Spatial approximation between two residues in the mid-region of secretin and the amino terminus of its receptor. Incorporation of seven sets of such constraints into a three-dimensional model of the agonist-bound secretin receptor

Effects of GW002, a novel recombinant human glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analog fusion protein, on CHO recombinant cells and BKS-db mice

AIMS

GLP-1-based strategies have many advantages in treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), but native GLP-1 has a short half-life in the circulation, which limits its clinical application. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of GW002, a novel recombinant GLP-1 analog fusion protein produced by linking the human GLP-1 analog C-terminus to the N-terminus of human serum albumin via a linker, in vitro and in BKS-db mice.

METHODS

To determine whether GW002 can activate the GLP-1 receptor in cells, the level of luciferase expression was evaluated in vitro. In vivo, body weight, food intake, non-fasting and fasting blood glucose, oral glucose tolerance test, blood glucose and insulin levels, liver histology, liver function parameters and antibody levels in BKS-db mice were investigated to evaluate the effects of GW002. Albiglutide was chosen as a positive comparator.

RESULTS

Cyclic adenosine monophosphate levels were increased in a dose-dependent manner in cells. In vivo studies demonstrated that GW002 lowers non-fasting and fasting blood glucose levels and improves glucose tolerance and insulin secretion in BKS-db mice. The degree of hepatic steatosis and hepatic biochemical indexes was also decreased. In this study, the mice body weight was not reduced significantly.

CONCLUSIONS

The above results showed that the efficacy of GW002 in BKS-db mice displayed a significant hypoglycemic effect, which indicated that GW002 might be a potential candidate for the treatment of T2DM.

Structure-Activity Relationship Studies of N- and C-Terminally Modified Secretin Analogs for the Human Secretin Receptor

The pleiotropic role of human secretin (hSCT) validates its potential use as a therapeutic agent. Nevertheless, the structure of secretin in complex with its receptor is necessary to develop a suitable therapeutic agent. Therefore, in an effort to design a three-dimensional virtual homology model and identify a peptide agonist and/or antagonist for the human secretin receptor (hSR), the significance of the primary sequence of secretin peptides in allosteric binding and activation was elucidated using virtual docking, FRET competitive binding and assessment of the cAMP response. Secretin analogs containing various N- or C-terminal modifications were prepared based on previous findings of the role of these domains in receptor binding and activation. These analogs exhibited very low or no binding affinity in a virtual model, and were found to neither exhibit in vitro binding nor agonistic or antagonistic properties. A parallel analysis of the analogs in the virtual model and in vitro studies revealed instability of these peptide analogs to bind and activate the receptor.

A new GLP-1 analogue with prolonged glucose-lowering activity in vivo via backbone-based modification at the N-terminus

Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) is an endogenous insulinotropic hormone with wonderful glucose-lowering activity. However, its clinical use in type II diabetes is limited due to its rapid degradation at the N-terminus by dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP-IV). Among the N-terminal modifications of GLP-1, backbone-based modification was rarely reported. Herein, we employed two backbone-based strategies to modify the N-terminus of tGLP-1. Firstly, the amide N-methylated analogues 2-6 were designed and synthesized to make a full screening of the N-terminal amide bonds, and the loss of GLP-1 receptor (GLP-1R) activation indicated the importance of amide H-bonds. Secondly, with retaining the N-terminal amide H-bonds, the β-peptide replacement strategy was used and analogues 7-13 were synthesized. By two rounds of screening, analogue 10 was identified. Analogue 10 greatly improved the DPP-IV resistance with maintaining good GLP-1R activation in vitro, and showed approximately a 4-fold prolonged blood glucose-lowering activity in vivo in comparison with tGLP-1. This modification strategy will benefit the development of GLP-1-based anti-diabetic drugs.

Ligand binding pocket formed by evolutionarily conserved residues in the glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor core domain

Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) plays a pivotal role in glucose homeostasis through its receptor GLP1R. Due to its multiple beneficial effects, GLP-1 has gained great attention for treatment of type 2 diabetes and obesity. However, little is known about the molecular mechanism underlying the interaction of GLP-1 with the heptahelical core domain of GLP1R conferring high affinity ligand binding and ligand-induced receptor activation. Here, using chimeric and point-mutated GLP1R, we determined that the evolutionarily conserved amino acid residue Arg(380) flanked by hydrophobic Leu(379) and Phe(381) in extracellular loop 3 (ECL3) may have an interaction with Asp(9) and Gly(4) of the GLP-1 peptide. The molecular modeling study showed that Ile(196) at transmembrane helix 2, Met(233) at ECL1, and Asn(302) at ECL2 of GLP1R have contacts with His(1) and Thr(7) of GLP-1. This study may shed light on the mechanism underlying high affinity interaction between the ligand and the binding pocket that is formed by these conserved residues in the GLP1R core domain.

Fish genomes provide novel insights into the evolution of vertebrate secretin receptors and their ligand

The secretin receptor (SCTR) is a member of Class 2 subfamily B1 GPCRs and part of the PAC1/VPAC receptor subfamily. This receptor has long been known in mammals but has only recently been identified in other vertebrates including teleosts, from which it was previously considered to be absent. The ligand for SCTR in mammals is secretin (SCT), an important gastrointestinal peptide, which in teleosts has not yet been isolated, or the gene identified. This study revises the evolutionary model previously proposed for the secretin-GPCRs in metazoan by analysing in detail the fishes, the most successful of the extant vertebrates. All the Actinopterygii genomes analysed and the Chondrichthyes and Sarcopterygii fish possess a SCTR gene that shares conserved sequence, structure and synteny with the tetrapod homologue. Phylogenetic clustering and gene environment comparisons revealed that fish and tetrapod SCTR shared a common origin and diverged early from the PAC1/VPAC subfamily group. In teleosts SCTR duplicated as a result of the fish specific whole genome duplication but in all the teleost genomes analysed, with the exception of tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus), one of the duplicates was lost. The function of SCTR in teleosts is unknown but quantitative PCR revealed that in both sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) and tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus) transcript abundance is high in the gastrointestinal tract suggesting it may intervene in similar processes to those in mammals. In contrast, no gene encoding the ligand SCT was identified in the ray-finned fishes (Actinopterygii) although it was present in the coelacanth (lobe finned fish, Sarcopterygii) and in the elephant shark (holocephalian). The genes in linkage with SCT in tetrapods and coelacanth were also identified in ray-finned fishes supporting the idea that it was lost from their genome. At present SCTR remains an orphan receptor in ray-finned fishes and it will be of interest in the future to establish why SCT was lost and which ligand substitutes for it so that full characterization of the receptor can occur.

Structural and functional insights into the juxtamembranous amino-terminal tail and extracellular loop regions of class B GPCRs

Class B guanine nucleotide-binding protein GPCRs share heptahelical topology and signalling via coupling with heterotrimeric G proteins typical of the entire superfamily of GPCRs. However, they also exhibit substantial structural differences from the more extensively studied class A GPCRs. Even their helical bundle region, most conserved across the superfamily, is predicted to differ from that of class A GPCRs. Much is now known about the conserved structure of the amino-terminal domain of class B GPCRs, coming from isolated NMR and crystal structures, but the orientation of that domain relative to the helical bundle is unknown, and even less is understood about the conformations of the juxtamembranous amino-terminal tail or of the extracellular loops linking the transmembrane segments. We now review what is known about the structure and function of these regions of class B GPCRs. This comes from indirect analysis of structure-function relationships elucidated by mutagenesis and/or ligand modification and from the more direct analysis of spatial approximation coming from photoaffinity labelling and cysteine trapping studies. Also reviewed are the limited studies of structure of some of these regions. No dominant theme was recognized for the structures or functional roles of distinct regions of these juxtamembranous portions of the class B GPCRs. Therefore, it is likely that a variety of molecular strategies can be engaged for docking of agonist ligands and for initiation of conformational changes in these receptors that would be expected to converge to a common molecular mechanism for activation of intracellular signalling cascades.

Insights into the impact of phenolic residue incorporation at each position along secretin for receptor binding and biological activity

Understanding of the structural importance of each position along a peptide ligand can provide important insights into the molecular basis for its receptor binding and biological activity. This has typically been evaluated using serial replacement of each natural residue with an alanine. In the current report, we have further complemented alanine scanning data with the serial replacement of each residue within secretin-27, the natural ligand for the prototypic class B G protein-coupled secretin receptor, using a photolabile phenolic residue. This not only provided the opportunity to probe spatial approximations between positions along a docked ligand with its receptor, but also provided structure-activity insights when compared with tolerance for alanine replacement of the same residues. The pattern of sensitivity to phenolic residue replacement was periodic within the carboxyl-terminal region of this peptide ligand, corresponding with alanine replacements in that region. This was supportive of the alpha-helical conformation of the peptide in that region and its docking within a groove in the receptor amino-terminal domain. In contrast, the pattern of sensitivity to phenolic residue replacement was almost continuous in the amino-terminal region of this peptide ligand, again similar to alanine replacements, however, there were key positions in which either the phenolic residue or alanine was differentially preferred. This provided insights into the receptor environment of the portion of this ligand most critical for its biological activity. As the structure of the intact receptor is elucidated, these data will provide a guide for ligand docking to the core domain and to help clarify the molecular basis of receptor activation.

Ligand binding and activation of the secretin receptor, a prototypic family B G protein-coupled receptor

The secretin receptor is a prototypic member of family B G protein-coupled receptors that binds and responds to a linear 27-residue peptide natural ligand. The carboxyl-terminal region of this peptide assumes a helical conformation that occupies the peptide-binding cleft within the structurally complex disulphide-bonded amino-terminal domain of this receptor. The amino terminus of secretin is directed toward the core helical bundle domain of this receptor that seems to be structurally distinct from the analogous region of family A G protein-coupled receptors. This amino-terminal region of secretin is critical for its biological activity, to stimulate Gs coupling and the agonist-induced cAMP response. While the natural peptide ligand is known to span the two key receptor domains, with multiple residue-residue approximation constraints well established, the orientation of the receptor amino terminus relative to the receptor core helical bundle domain is still unclear. Fluorescence studies have established that the mid-region and carboxyl-terminal end of secretin are protected by the receptor peptide-binding cleft and the amino terminus of secretin is most exposed to the aqueous milieu as it is directed toward the receptor core, with the mid-region of the peptide becoming more exposed upon receptor activation. Like other family B peptide hormone receptors, the secretin receptor is constitutively present in a structurally specific homo-dimeric complex built around the lipid-exposed face of transmembrane segment four. This complex is important for facilitating G protein association and achieving the high affinity state of this receptor.

Structural and molecular conservation of glucagon-like Peptide-1 and its receptor confers selective ligand-receptor interaction

Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) is a major player in the regulation of glucose homeostasis. It acts on pancreatic beta cells to stimulate insulin secretion and on the brain to inhibit appetite. Thus, it may be a promising therapeutic agent for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus and obesity. Despite the physiological and clinical importance of GLP-1, molecular interaction with the GLP-1 receptor (GLP1R) is not well understood. Particularly, the specific amino acid residues within the transmembrane helices and extracellular loops of the receptor that may confer ligand-induced receptor activation have been poorly investigated. Amino acid sequence comparisons of GLP-1 and GLP1R with their orthologs and paralogs in vertebrates, combined with biochemical approaches, are useful to determine which amino acid residues in the peptide and the receptor confer selective ligand-receptor interaction. This article reviews how the molecular evolution of GLP-1 and GLP1R contributes to the selective interaction between this ligand-receptor pair, providing critical clues for the development of potent agonists for the treatment of diabetes mellitus and obesity.

Evolutionarily conserved residues at glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor core confer ligand-induced receptor activation

Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) play important roles in insulin secretion through their receptors, GLP1R and GIPR. Although GLP-1 and GIP are attractive candidates for treatment of type 2 diabetes and obesity, little is known regarding the molecular interaction of these peptides with the heptahelical core domain of their receptors. These core domains are important not only for specific ligand binding but also for ligand-induced receptor activation. Here, using chimeric and point-mutated GLP1R/GIPR, we determined that evolutionarily conserved amino acid residues such as Ile(196) at transmembrane helix 2, Leu(232) and Met(233) at extracellular loop 1, and Asn(302) at extracellular loop 2 of GLP1R are responsible for interaction with ligand and receptor activation. Application of chimeric GLP-1/GIP peptides together with molecular modeling suggests that His(1) of GLP-1 interacts with Asn(302) of GLP1R and that Thr(7) of GLP-1 has close contact with a binding pocket formed by Ile(196), Leu(232), and Met(233) of GLP1R. This study may provide critical clues for the development of peptide and/or nonpeptide agonists acting at GLP1R.

Molecular basis of secretin docking to its intact receptor using multiple photolabile probes distributed throughout the pharmacophore

The molecular basis of ligand binding and activation of family B G protein-coupled receptors is not yet clear due to the lack of insight into the structure of intact receptors. Although NMR and crystal structures of amino-terminal domains of several family members support consistency in general structural motifs that include a peptide-binding cleft, there are variations in the details of docking of the carboxyl terminus of peptide ligands within this cleft, and there is no information about siting of the amino terminus of these peptides. There are also no empirical data to orient the receptor amino terminus relative to the core helical bundle domain. Here, we prepared a series of five new probes, incorporating photolabile moieties into positions 2, 15, 20, 24, and 25 of full agonist secretin analogues. Each bound specifically to the receptor and covalently labeled single distinct receptor residues. Peptide mapping of labeled wild-type and mutant receptors identified that the position 15, 20, and 25 probes labeled residues within the distal amino terminus of the receptor, whereas the position 24 probe labeled the amino terminus adjacent to TM1. Of note, the position 2 probe labeled a residue within the first extracellular loop of the receptor, a region not previously labeled, providing an important new constraint for docking the amino-terminal region of secretin to its receptor core. These additional experimentally derived constraints help to refine our understanding of the structure of the secretin-intact receptor complex and provide new insights into understanding the molecular mechanism for activation of family B G protein-coupled receptors.

NMR structure of the first extracellular domain of corticotropin-releasing factor receptor 1 (ECD1-CRF-R1) complexed with a high affinity agonist

The corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) peptide hormone family members coordinate endocrine, behavioral, autonomic, and metabolic responses to stress and play important roles within the cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, and central nervous systems, among others. The actions of the peptides are mediated by activation of two G-protein-coupled receptors of the B1 family, CRF receptors 1 and 2 (CRF-R1 and CRF-R2α,β). The recently reported three-dimensional structures of the first extracellular domain (ECD1) of both CRF-R1 and CRF-R2β (Pioszak, A. A., Parker, N. R., Suino-Powell, K., and Xu, H. E. (2008) J. Biol. Chem. 283, 32900-32912; Grace, C. R., Perrin, M. H., Gulyas, J., Digruccio, M. R., Cantle, J. P., Rivier, J. E., Vale, W. W., and Riek, R. (2007) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104, 4858-4863) complexed with peptide antagonists provided a starting point in understanding the binding between CRF ligands and receptors at a molecular level. We now report the three-dimensional NMR structure of the ECD1 of human CRF-R1 complexed with a high affinity agonist, α-helical cyclic CRF. In the structure of the complex, the C-terminal residues (23-41) of α-helical cyclic CRF bind to the ECD1 of CRF-R1 in a helical conformation mainly along the hydrophobic face of the peptide in a manner similar to that of the antagonists in their corresponding ECD1 complex structures. Unique to this study is the observation that complex formation between an agonist and the ECD1-CRF-R1 promotes the helical conformation of the N terminus of the former, important for receptor activation (Gulyas, J., Rivier, C., Perrin, M., Koerber, S. C., Sutton, S., Corrigan, A., Lahrichi, S. L., Craig, A. G., Vale, W., and Rivier, J. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 92, 10575-10579).

Effects of pH and temperature on photoaffinity labeling of Family B G protein-coupled receptors

The efficiency of covalent labeling of a receptor by a photolabile analogue of its natural ligand is dependent on the spatial approximation of the probe and its target. Systematic application of intrinsic photoaffinity labeling to the secretin receptor, a prototypic Family B G protein-coupled receptor, demonstrated reduced efficiency of labeling for amino-terminal and mid-region sites of labeling relative to carboxyl-terminal sites. Reduction of pH from 7.4 to 5.5 and reduction of temperature from 25 degrees C to 4 degrees C improved the efficiency of covalent labeling of the receptor with these probes. This correlated with sites of labeling at the interface between the receptor amino terminus and the receptor core, a region containing histidine residues that have their ionization affected in this pH range. Application to the calcitonin receptor, another Family B G protein-coupled receptor, yielded analogous results. These results support the consistent mode of docking peptide ligands to this group of receptors.

Spatial approximation between secretin residue five and the third extracellular loop of its receptor provides new insight into the molecular basis of natural agonist binding

The amino terminus of class II G protein-coupled receptors plays an important role in ligand binding and receptor activation. Understanding of the conformation of the amino-terminal domain of these receptors has been substantially advanced with the solution of nuclear magnetic resonance and crystal structures of this region of receptors for corticotrophin-releasing factor, pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide, and gastric inhibitory polypeptide. However, the orientation of the amino terminus relative to the receptor core and how the receptor gets activated upon ligand binding remain unclear. In this work, we have used photoaffinity labeling to identify a critical spatial approximation between residue five of secretin and a residue within the proposed third extracellular loop of the secretin receptor. This was achieved by purification, deglycosylation, cyanogen bromide cleavage, and sequencing of labeled wild-type and mutant secretin receptors. This constraint has been used to refine our evolving molecular model of secretin docked at the intact receptor, which for the first time includes refined helical bundle and loop regions and reflects a peptide-binding groove within the receptor amino terminus that directs the amino terminus of the peptide toward the receptor body. This model is fully consistent with the endogenous agonist mechanism for class II G protein-coupled receptor activation, where ligand binding promotes the interaction of a portion of the receptor amino terminus with the receptor body to activate it.

Structural diversity of G protein-coupled receptors and significance for drug discovery

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are the largest family of membrane-bound receptors and also the targets of many drugs. Understanding of the functional significance of the wide structural diversity of GPCRs has been aided considerably in recent years by the sequencing of the human genome and by structural studies, and has important implications for the future therapeutic potential of targeting this receptor family. This article aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the five main human GPCR families--Rhodopsin, Secretin, Adhesion, Glutamate and Frizzled/Taste2--with a focus on gene repertoire, general ligand preference, common and unique structural features, and the potential for future drug discovery.

Mapping ligand-receptor interfaces: approaching the resolution limit of benzophenone-based photoaffinity scanning

Photoaffinity crosslinking has yielded important insights in the study of G protein-coupled receptors and the mode of ligand binding. The most widely used photolabile moiety is p-benzoylphenylalanine largely because of its reportedly high site specificity, reduced reactivity to water and light, photokinetics, and ease of incorporation into peptide ligands during synthesis. However, in the course of our studies directed at characterizing the binding of parathyroid hormone to its cognate G protein-coupled receptor, we find that inherent properties of p-benzoylphenylalanine, such as its size and conformational flexibility, limit the resulting resolution of the ligand-receptor structure. Here, we examine and define these limits.

Crystal structure of the ligand-bound glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor extracellular domain

The glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) belongs to Family B1 of the seven-transmembrane G protein-coupled receptors, and its natural agonist ligand is the peptide hormone glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1). GLP-1 is involved in glucose homeostasis, and activation of GLP-1R in the plasma membrane of pancreatic beta-cells potentiates glucose-dependent insulin secretion. The N-terminal extracellular domain (nGLP-1R) is an important ligand binding domain that binds GLP-1 and the homologous peptide Exendin-4 with differential affinity. Exendin-4 has a C-terminal extension of nine amino acid residues known as the "Trp cage", which is absent in GLP-1. The Trp cage was believed to interact with nGLP-1R and thereby explain the superior affinity of Exendin-4. However, the molecular details that govern ligand binding and specificity of nGLP-1R remain undefined. Here we report the crystal structure of human nGLP-1R in complex with the antagonist Exendin-4(9-39) solved by the multiwavelength anomalous dispersion method to 2.2A resolution. The structure reveals that Exendin-4(9-39) is an amphipathic alpha-helix forming both hydrophobic and hydrophilic interactions with nGLP-1R. The Trp cage of Exendin-4 is not involved in binding to nGLP-1R. The hydrophobic binding site of nGLP-1R is defined by discontinuous segments including primarily a well defined alpha-helix in the N terminus of nGLP-1R and a loop between two antiparallel beta-strands. The structure provides for the first time detailed molecular insight into ligand binding of the human GLP-1 receptor, an established target for treatment of type 2 diabetes.

Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer Analysis of Secretin Docking to Its Receptor

Full structural characterization of G protein-coupled receptors has been limited to rhodopsin, with its uniquely stable structure and ability to be crystallized. For other members of this important superfamily, direct structural insights have been limited to NMR structures of soluble domains. Two members of the Class II family have recently had the structures of their isolated amino-terminal regions solved by NMR, yet it remains unclear how that domain is aligned with the heptahelical transmembrane bundle domain of those receptors. Indeed, three distinct orientations have been suggested for different members of this family. In the current work, we have utilized fluorescence resonance energy transfer to establish the distances between four residues distributed throughout fully biologically active, high affinity analogues of secretin and distinct residues in each of four extracellular regions of the intact secretin receptor. These 16 distance constraints were utilized along with nine photoaffinity labeling spatial approximation constraints to study the three proposed orientations of the peptide-binding amino terminus and helical bundle domains of this receptor. In the best model, the carboxyl terminus of secretin was found to bind in a groove above the beta-hairpin region of the receptor amino terminus, with its amino-terminal end adjacent to the third extracellular loop and top of transmembrane segment VI. This refined model of the intact receptor was also fully consistent with the spatial approximation of the Trp(48)-Asp(49)-Asn(50) endogenous agonist segment with the third extracellular loop region that it has been shown to photolabel. This provides strong evidence for the orientation of peptide-binding and signaling domains of a prototypic Class II G protein-coupled receptor.

Structural basis of natural ligand binding and activation of the Class II G-protein-coupled secretin receptor

The secretin receptor is prototypic of Class II GPCRs (G-protein-coupled receptors), based on its structural and functional characteristics and those of its natural agonist ligand. Secretin represents a linear 27-residue peptide with diffuse pharmacophoric domain. The secretin receptor includes the typical signature sequences for this receptor family within its predicted transmembrane segments and the highly conserved six cysteine residues contributing to three intradomain disulfide bonds within its long N-terminus. This domain is critical for secretin binding based on receptor mutagenesis and photoaffinity labelling studies. Full agonist analogues of secretin incorporating a photolabile moiety at various positions throughout the pharmacophore covalently label residues within this region, while only N-terminal probes have labelled the core helical bundle domain. Combining insights coming from receptor structural studies, peptide structure-activity relationship considerations, photoaffinity labelling, and application of fluorescence techniques has resulted in the development of a working model of the secretin-receptor complex. This supports the initial docking of the peptide agonist within a cleft in the receptor N-terminus, providing the opportunity for an endogenous sequence within that domain to interact with the core of the receptor. This interaction is believed to be key in the molecular basis of conformational change associated with activation of this receptor. The site of action of this endogenous agonist could also provide a possible target for small molecule agonists to act.

Transmembrane segment IV contributes a functionally important interface for oligomerization of the Class II G protein-coupled secretin receptor

Oligomerization of the Class II G protein-coupled secretin receptor has been reported, but the molecular basis for this and its functional significance have not been determined. In the current work, we have examined the possible contribution of each of the transmembrane (TM) segments of this receptor to its homo-oligomerization, using the method of competitive disruption screening for inhibition of receptor bioluminescence resonance energy transfer signal. TM IV was the only segment that was found to disrupt receptor bioluminescence resonance energy transfer. Evaluation of predicted interhelical and lipid-exposed faces of this TM segment demonstrated that its lipid-exposed face represented the determinant for oligomerization. This was further confirmed by mutagenesis of the intact secretin receptor. Morphological FRET was utilized to demonstrate that secretin receptor oligomerization occurred at the cell surface and that this oligomerization was disrupted by mutating Gly(243) and Ile(247), key residues within the lipid-exposed face of TM IV. Although disruption of the receptor oligomerization interface had no effect on secretin binding parameters, it reduced the ability of secretin to stimulate intracellular cAMP. This supports a clear functional effect of oligomerization of this receptor. Such an effect might be particularly relevant to clinical situations in which this receptor is overexpressed, such as in certain neoplasms.

Understanding interactions of gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) with its G-protein coupled receptor through NMR and molecular modeling

Gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP, or glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide) is a 42-amino acid incretin hormone moderating glucose-induced insulin secretion. Antidiabetic therapy based on GIP holds great promise because of the fact that its insulinotropic action is highly dependent on the level of glucose, overcoming the sideeffects of hypoglycemia associated with the current therapy of Type 2 diabetes. The truncated peptide, GIP(1-30)NH2, has the same activity as the full length native peptide. We have studied the structure of GIP(1-30)NH2 and built a model of its G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR). The structure of GIP(1-30)NH2 in DMSO-d6 and H2O has been studied using 2D NMR (total correlation spectroscopy (TOCSY), nuclear overhauser effect spectroscopy (NOESY), double quantum filtered-COSY (DQF-COSY), 13C-heteronuclear single quantum correlation (HSQC) experiments, and its conformation built by MD simulations with the NMR data as constraints. The peptide in DMSO-d6 exhibits an alpha-helix between residues Ile12 and Lys30 with a discontinuity at residues Gln19 and Gln20. In H2O, the alpha-helix starts at Ile7, breaks off at Gln19, and then continues right through to Lys30. GIP(1-30)NH2 has all the structural features of peptides belonging to family B1 GPCRs, which are characterized by a coil at the N-terminal and a long C-terminal alpha-helix with or without a break. A model of the seven transmembrane (TM) helices of the GIP receptor (GIPR) has been built on the principles of comparative protein modeling, using the crystal structure of bovine rhodopsin as a template. The N-terminal domain of GIPR has been constructed from the NMR structure of the N-terminal of corticoptropin releasing factor receptor (CRFR), a family B1 GCPR. The intra and extra cellular loops and the C-terminal have been modeled from fragments retrieved from the PDB. On the basis of the experimental data available for some members of family B1 GPCRs, four pairs of constraints between GIP(1-30)NH2 and its receptor were used in the FTDOCK program, to build the complete model of the GIP(1-30)NH2:GIPR complex. The model can rationalize the various experimental observations including the potency of the truncated GIP peptide. This work is the first complete model at the atomic level of GIP(1-30)NH2 and of the complex with its GPCR.

Mapping the architecture of secretin receptors with intramolecular fluorescence resonance energy transfer using acousto-optic tunable filter-based spectral imaging

The molecular structure and agonist-induced conformational changes of class II G protein-coupled receptors are poorly understood. In this work, we developed and characterized a series of dual cyan fluorescent protein (CFP)-tagged and yellow fluorescent protein (YFP)-tagged secretin receptor constructs for use in various functional and fluorescence analyses of receptor structural variants. CFP insertions within the first or second intracellular loop domains of this receptor were tolerated poorly or partially, respectively, in receptors tagged with a carboxyl-terminal yellow fluorescent protein that itself had no effect on secretin binding or cAMP production. A similar CFP insertion into the third intracellular loop resulted in a plasma membrane-localized receptor that bound secretin and signaled normally. This fully active third-loop variant exhibited a significant decrease in fluorescence resonance energy transfer signals that were recorded with an acousto-optic tunable filter microscope after exposure to secretin agonist but not to a receptor antagonist. These data demonstrate changes in the relative positions of intracellular structures that support a model for secretin receptor activation.

Molecular Approximations between Residues 21 and 23 of Secretin and Its Receptor: Development of a Model for Peptide Docking with the Amino Terminus of the Secretin Receptor

The structurally unique amino-terminal domain of class II G protein-coupled receptors is critically important for ligand binding and receptor activation. Understanding the precise role it plays requires detailed insights into the molecular basis of its ligand interactions and the conformation of the ligand-receptor complex. In this work, we used two high-affinity, full-agonist, secretin-like photolabile probes having sites for covalent attachment in positions 21 and 23 and used sequential proteolysis and sequencing of the labeled region of the receptor to identify two new spatial approximation constraints. The position 21 probe labeled receptor residue Arg(15), whereas the position 23 probe labeled receptor residue Arg(21). A homology model of the amino-terminal domain of the secretin receptor was developed using the NMR structure of the analogous domain of the corticotropin-releasing factor receptor. This was attached to a homology model of the secretin receptor transmembrane bundle, with the two domains oriented relative to each other based on continuity of the peptide backbone and by imposing a distance restraint recently identified between the amino-terminal WDN sequence and the region of the helical bundle above transmembrane segment six. Secretin was docked to this model using seven sets of spatial approximation constraints identified in previous photoaffinity labeling studies. This model was found to fully accommodate all existing constraints, as well as the two new approximations identified in this work.

Differential Spatial Approximation between Secretin and Its Receptor Residues in Active and Inactive Conformations Demonstrated by Photoaffinity Labeling

Understanding of the conformational changes in G protein-coupled receptors associated with activation and inactivation is of great interest. We previously used photoaffinity labeling to elucidate spatial approximations between photolabile residues situated throughout the pharmacophore of secretin agonist probes and this receptor. The aim of the current work was to develop analogous photolabile secretin antagonist probes and to explore their spatial approximations. The most potent secretin antagonist reported is a pseudopeptide ([ψ4, 5]secretin) in which the peptide bond between residues 4 and 5 was replaced by a ψ(CH2-NH) peptide bond isostere. We have developed a series of [ψ4, 5]secretin analogs incorporating photolabile benzoyl phenylalanine residues in positions 6, 22, and 26. Each bound to the secretin receptor saturably and specifically, with affinity similar to their parental peptide. At concentrations with no measurable agonist activity, each probe covalently labeled the secretin receptor. Peptide mapping using proteolytic cleavage, immunoprecipitation, and radiochemical sequencing identified that each of these three probes labeled the amino terminus of the secretin receptor. Whereas the position 22 probe labeled the same residue as its analogous agonist probe and the position 6 probe labeled a residue within two residues of that labeled by its analogous agonist probe, the position 26 probe labeled a site 16 residues away from that labeled by its analogous agonist probe. Thus, whereas structurally related agonist and antagonist probes dock in the same general region of this receptor, conformational differences in active and inactive states result in substantial differences in spatial approximation at the carboxyl-terminal end of secretin analogs.

Possible endogenous agonist mechanism for the activation of secretin family G protein-coupled receptors

The class B family of G protein-coupled receptors contains several potentially important drug targets, yet our understanding of the molecular basis of ligand binding and receptor activation remains incomplete. Although a key role is recognized for the cysteine-rich, disulfide-bonded amino-terminal domain of these receptors, detailed insights into ligand docking and resultant conformational changes are not clear. We postulate that binding natural ligands to this domain results in a conformational change that exposes an endogenous ligand which interacts with the body of the receptor to activate it. In this work, we examined whether a synthetic peptide corresponding to a candidate region between the first and third conserved cysteines could act as an agonist. Indeed, this peptide was a weakly potent but fully efficacious agonist, stimulating a concentration-dependent cAMP response in secretin receptor-bearing cells. This effect was maintained as the peptide length was reduced from 30 to 5, and ultimately, three residues focused on the conserved residue Asp49. The agonist potency was enhanced by cyclization through a diaminopropionic acid linker and by amino-terminal fatty acid acylation. Both ends of the cyclic peptide were shown to interact with the top of transmembrane segment 6 of the receptor, using probes with a photolabile benzoyl-phenylalanine on each end. Analogous observations were also made for two other members of this family, the vasoactive intestinal polypeptide type 1 and calcitonin receptors. These data may provide a unique molecular mechanism and novel leads for the development of small-molecule agonists acting at potential drug targets within this physiologically important receptor family.

Use of probes with fluorescence indicator distributed throughout the pharmacophore to examine the peptide agonist-binding environment of the family B G protein-coupled secretin receptor

Fluorescence techniques can provide insight into the environment of fluorescence indicators situated at distinct sites within a ligand as it is bound to its receptor. Here, we have developed a series of analogues of the 27-amino acid hormone, secretin, that incorporate a fluorescent Alexa Fluor 488 into the amino terminus, the carboxyl terminus, and positions 13 and 22. Each probe bound with high affinity and was biologically active, stimulating full cAMP responses in receptor-bearing Chinese hamster ovary-SecR cells. Treatment with 10 mum guanosine 5'-(beta,gamma-imido)triphosphate (GppNHp) shifted the agonist-bound receptor into a G protein-uncoupled low affinity state. Fluorescence spectra for the probes in solution and bound to the receptor demonstrated maximal emission at 521 nm after excitation at 481 nm. Collisional quenching of fluorescence with potassium iodide revealed that Alexa at the amino terminus of secretin was more accessible than at the other three positions within the probes. Of note, quenching constants for each probe were higher when bound in the active state than in the G protein-uncoupled, low affinity state of the receptor, with the most marked changes occurring for the two midregion probes. Anisotropy values and fluorescence lifetimes confirmed this, with higher anisotropy and longer lifetimes observed for position 13 and 22 probes bound to the receptor in its uncoupled state than in its active state. These observations suggest that the amino terminus of secretin as docked to the receptor is most exposed to the hydrophilic aqueous milieu, and that the major changes in conformation and exposure to the medium occur in the midregion of secretin. Photoaffinity labeling studies have demonstrated approximation of each of these ligand residues with distinct receptor residues. Combining the fluorescence data with photoaffinity labeling data provides insights into the conformation and dynamics of a natural peptide ligand docked to a Family B G protein-coupled receptor.

Functional characterization and purification of the secretin receptor expressed in baculovirus-infected insect cells

Structural insights into Class II G protein-coupled receptors have been limited by the absence of a plentiful and highly enrichable source such as rhodopsin in the Class I family. With structural differences predicted to exist between these families, and with the key importance of an intact, disulfide-bonded amino-terminal domain for the Class II receptors, an overproduction and purification scheme is critically important. In this work, we have established and characterized a baculoviral expression and purification system for the secretin receptor. Hemagglutinin epitope-tagged wild-type rat secretin receptor construct was expressed using the recombinant baculovirus/Sf9 insect cell-based system, achieving a level of expression substantially higher than that previously achieved in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO-SecR) cells. Receptor expressed in Sf9 cells had similar affinity for secretin (Ki=1.4+/-0.2 nM) and similar potency to stimulate intracellular cAMP in response to this hormone (EC50=194+/-45 pM) as did wild-type receptor expressed in CHO cells. Receptors from Sf9 cells were also affinity labeled saturably and specifically by a photolabile secretin analogue. The receptors were purified to homogeneity by solubilization with sodium deoxycholate, selective ammonium sulfate precipitation, gel filtration and immunoaffinity purification. This expression system should facilitate the structural characterization of this receptor and its important amino-terminal domain.

Insights into the structure and molecular basis of ligand docking to the G protein-coupled secretin receptor using charge-modified amino-terminal agonist probes

The amino terminus and third loop regions of class B G protein-coupled receptors play critical roles in ligand docking and action. For the prototypic secretin receptor, the hormone amino terminus is spatially approximated with receptor region high in transmembrane segment 6 (TM6), whereas residues ranging from position 6 through 26 label the amino terminus. Here, we focus on the role of charge of the secretin amino terminus, using a series of full-agonist, acetylated probes. Sites of covalent labeling were examined using sequential purification, chemical and enzymatic cleavage, and Edman degradation. High-affinity amino-terminally-blocked probes labeled the distal amino-terminal tail, rather than TM6, while adding a basic residue, again labeled TM6. These data suggest that the secretin amino terminus docks between the amino terminus and TM6 of the receptor, with this region of secretin likely interacting with an acidic residue within the receptor TM6 and the third extracellular loop. To explore this, candidate acidic residues were mutated to Ala (E341A, D342A, E345A, E351A). The E351A mutant markedly interfered with binding, biological activity, and internalization, whereas all others bound secretin and signaled and internalized normally. This supports the possibility that there is a charge-charge interaction between this residue and the amino terminus of secretin that is critical to its normal docking.

Paired cysteine mutagenesis to establish the pattern of disulfide bonds in the functional intact secretin receptor

The amino-terminal domain of class B G protein-coupled receptors contains six conserved cysteine residues involved in structurally and functionally critical disulfide bonds. The mapping of these bonds has been unclear, with one pattern based on biochemical and NMR structural characterizations of refolded, nonglycosylated amino-terminal fragments, and another pattern derived from functional characterizations of intact receptors having paired cysteine mutations. In the present study, we determined the disulfide bonding pattern of the prototypic class B secretin receptor by applying the same paired cysteine mutagenesis approach and confirming the predicted bonding pattern with proteolytic cleavage of intact functional receptor. As expected, systematic mutation to serine of the six conserved cysteine residues within this region of the secretin receptor singly and in pairs resulted in loss of function of most constructs. Notable exceptions were single mutations of the 4th and 6th cysteine residues and paired mutations involving the 1st and 3rd, 2nd and 5th, and 4th and 6th conserved cysteines, with secretin eliciting statistically significant cAMP responses above basal levels of activation for each of these constructs. Immunofluorescence microscopy confirmed similar levels of plasma membrane expression for each of the mutated receptors. Furthermore, cyanogen bromide cleaved a series of wild type and mutant secretin receptors, yielding patterns that agreed with our paired cysteine mutagenesis results. In conclusion, these data suggest the same pattern of disulfide bonding as that predicted previously by NMR and thus support a consistent pattern of amino-terminal disulfide bonds in class B G protein-coupled receptors.

Molecular approximation between a residue in the amino-terminal region of calcitonin and the third extracellular loop of the class B G protein-coupled calcitonin receptor

The calcitonin receptor is a member of the class B family of G protein-coupled receptors, which contains numerous potentially important drug targets. Delineation of themes for agonist binding and activation of these receptors will facilitate the rational design of receptor-active drugs. We reported previously that a photolabile residue within the carboxyl-terminal half (residue 26) and mid-region (residue 16) of calcitonin covalently label the extracellular amino-terminal domain of this receptor (Dong, M., Pinon, D. I., Cox, R. F., and Miller, L. J. (2004) J. Biol. Chem. 279, 1167-1175). Chimeric receptor studies support the importance of this region and suggest important contributions of extracellular loop domains. To examine whether other parts of the ligand may contact those loops, we developed another probe that has its photolabile site of labeling within the amino-terminal half in position 8 of the ligand. This probe was a full agonist (EC(50) = 563 +/- 67 pm), stimulating cAMP accumulation in receptor-bearing human embryonic kidney 293 cells in a concentration-dependent manner. It bound specifically and saturably (K(i) = 14.3 +/- 1.9 nm) and was able to efficiently label the calcitonin receptor. By purification, specific cleavage, and sequencing of labeled wild-type and mutant calcitonin receptors, the site of attachment was identified as residue Leu(368) within the third extracellular loop of the receptor, a domain distinct from that labeled by previous probes. These data are consistent with a common ligand binding mechanism for receptors in this important family.

Spatial approximation between the amino terminus of a peptide agonist and the top of the sixth transmembrane segment of the secretin receptor

Distinct spatial approximations between residues within the secretin pharmacophore and its receptor can provide important constraints for modeling this agonist-receptor complex. We previously used a series of probes incorporating photolabile residues into positions 6, 12, 13, 14, 18, 22, and 26 of the 27-residue peptide and demonstrated that each covalently labeled a site within the receptor amino terminus. Although supporting a critical role of this domain for ligand binding, it does not explain the molecular mechanism of receptor activation. Here, we developed probes having photolabile residues at the amino terminus of secretin to explore possible approximations with a different receptor domain. The first probe incorporated a photolabile p-benzoyl-l-phenylalanine into the position of His(1) of rat secretin ([Bpa(1),Tyr(10)]secretin-27). Because His(1) is critical for function, we also positioned a photolabile Bpa as an amino-terminal extension, in positions -1 (rat [Bpa(-1),Tyr(10)]secretin-27) and -2 (rat [Bpa(-2),Gly(-1),Tyr(10)]secretin-27). Each analog was shown to be a full agonist, stimulating cAMP accumulation in receptor-bearing Chinese hamster ovary-SecR cells in a concentration-dependent manner, with the position -2 probe being most potent. They bound specifically and saturably, although the position 1 analog had lowest affinity, and all were able to label the receptor efficiently. Sequential specific cleavage, purification, and sequencing demonstrated that the sites of covalent attachment for each probe were high within the sixth transmembrane segment. This suggests that secretin binding may exert tension between the receptor amino terminus and the transmembrane domain to elicit a conformational change effecting receptor activation.

Importance of the amino terminus in secretin family G protein-coupled receptors. Intrinsic photoaffinity labeling establishes initial docking constraints for the calcitonin receptor

The calcitonin receptor is a member of the class B family of G protein-coupled receptors, closely related to secretin and parathyroid hormone receptors. Although mechanisms of ligand binding have been directly explored for those receptors, current knowledge of the molecular basis of calcitonin binding to its receptor is based only on receptor mutagenesis. In this work we have utilized the more direct approach of photoaffinity labeling to explore spatial approximations between distinct residues within calcitonin and its receptor. For this we have developed two human calcitonin analogues incorporating a photolabile p-benzoyl-l-phenylalanine residue in the mid-region and carboxyl-terminal half of the peptide in positions 16 and 26, respectively. Both probes specifically bound to the human calcitonin receptor with high affinity and were potent stimulants of cAMP accumulation in calcitonin receptor-bearing human embryonic kidney 293 cells. They covalently labeled the calcitonin receptor in a saturable and specific manner. Further purification, deglycosylation, specific chemical and enzymatic cleavage, and sequencing of labeled wild type and mutant calcitonin receptors identified the sites of labeling for the position 16 and 26 probes as receptor residues Phe137 and Thr30, respectively. Both were within the extracellular amino terminus of the calcitonin receptor, with the former adjacent to the first transmembrane segment and the latter within the distal amino-terminal tail of the receptor. These data are consistent with affinity labeling of other members of the class B G protein-coupled receptors using analogous probes and may suggest a common ligand binding mechanism for this family.