The dopamine D2 receptor can directly recruit and activate GRK2 without G protein activation

Neuromodulator regulation and emotions: insights from the crosstalk of cell signaling

The unraveling of the regulatory mechanisms that govern neuronal excitability is a major challenge for neuroscientists worldwide. Neurotransmitters play a critical role in maintaining the balance between excitatory and inhibitory activity in the brain. The balance controls cognitive functions and emotional responses. Glutamate and γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) are the primary excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmitters of the brain, respectively. Disruptions in the balance between excitatory and inhibitory transmission are implicated in several psychiatric disorders, including anxiety disorders, depression, and schizophrenia. Neuromodulators such as dopamine and acetylcholine control cognition and emotion by regulating the excitatory/inhibitory balance initiated by glutamate and GABA. Dopamine is closely associated with reward-related behaviors, while acetylcholine plays a role in aversive and attentional behaviors. Although the physiological roles of neuromodulators have been extensively studied neuroanatomically and electrophysiologically, few researchers have explored the interplay between neuronal excitability and cell signaling and the resulting impact on emotion regulation. This review provides an in-depth understanding of "cell signaling crosstalk" in the context of neuronal excitability and emotion regulation. It also anticipates that the next generation of neurochemical analyses, facilitated by integrated phosphorylation studies, will shed more light on this topic.

GPCR kinases differentially modulate biased signaling downstream of CXCR3 depending on their subcellular localization

Some G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) demonstrate biased signaling such that ligands of the same receptor exclusively or preferentially activate certain downstream signaling pathways over others. This phenomenon may result from ligand-specific receptor phosphorylation by GPCR kinases (GRKs). GPCR signaling can also exhibit location bias because GPCRs traffic to and signal from subcellular compartments in addition to the plasma membrane. Here, we investigated whether GRKs contributed to location bias in GPCR signaling. GRKs translocated to endosomes after stimulation of the chemokine receptor CXCR3 or other GPCRs in cultured cells. GRK2, GRK3, GRK5, and GRK6 showed distinct patterns of recruitment to the plasma membrane and to endosomes depending on the identity of the biased ligand used to activate CXCR3. Analysis of engineered forms of GRKs that localized to either the plasma membrane or endosomes demonstrated that biased CXCR3 ligands elicited different signaling profiles that depended on the subcellular location of the GRK. Each GRK exerted a distinct effect on the regulation of CXCR3 engagement of β-arrestin, internalization, and activation of the downstream effector kinase ERK. Our work highlights a role for GRKs in location-biased GPCR signaling and demonstrates the complex interactions between ligands, GRKs, and cellular location that contribute to biased signaling.

G Protein-Coupled Receptor Kinase 2 Selectively Enhances β-Arrestin Recruitment to the D2 Dopamine Receptor through Mechanisms That Are Independent of Receptor Phosphorylation

The D2 dopamine receptor (D2R) signals through both G proteins and β-arrestins to regulate important physiological processes, such as movement, reward circuitry, emotion, and cognition. β-arrestins are believed to interact with G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) at the phosphorylated C-terminal tail or intracellular loops. GPCR kinases (GRKs) are the primary drivers of GPCR phosphorylation, and for many receptors, receptor phosphorylation is indispensable for β-arrestin recruitment. However, GRK-mediated receptor phosphorylation is not required for β-arrestin recruitment to the D2R, and the role of GRKs in D2R-β-arrestin interactions remains largely unexplored. In this study, we used GRK knockout cells engineered using CRISPR-Cas9 technology to determine the extent to which β-arrestin recruitment to the D2R is GRK-dependent. Genetic elimination of all GRK expression decreased, but did not eliminate, agonist-stimulated β-arrestin recruitment to the D2R or its subsequent internalization. However, these processes were rescued upon the re-introduction of various GRK isoforms in the cells with GRK2/3 also enhancing dopamine potency. Further, treatment with compound 101, a pharmacological inhibitor of GRK2/3 isoforms, decreased β-arrestin recruitment and receptor internalization, highlighting the importance of this GRK subfamily for D2R-β-arrestin interactions. These results were recapitulated using a phosphorylation-deficient D2R mutant, emphasizing that GRKs can enhance β-arrestin recruitment and activation independently of receptor phosphorylation.

A β-Arrestin 2-Biased Dopamine Receptor Type 2 (DRD2) Agonist Is More Efficacious Than Cabergoline in Reducing Cell Proliferation in PRL-Secreting but Not in Non-Functioning Pituitary Tumor Cells

The molecular events underlying the variable effectiveness of dopamine receptor type 2 (DRD2) agonists in pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs) are not known. Besides the canonical pathway induced by DRD2 coupling with Gi proteins, the β-arrestin 2 pathway contributes to DRD2's antimitotic effects in PRL- and NF-PitNETs. A promising pharmacological strategy is the use of DRD2-biased agonists that selectively activate only one of these two pathways. The aim of the present study was to compare the effects of two biased DRD2 ligands, selectively activating the G protein (MLS1547) or β-arrestin 2 (UNC9994) pathway, with unbiased DRD2 agonist cabergoline in PRL- and NF-PitNET cells. In rat tumoral pituitary PRL-secreting MMQ cells, UNC9994 reduced cell proliferation with a greater efficacy compared to cabergoline (-40.2 ± 20.4% vs. -21 ± 10.9%, p < 0.05), whereas the G-protein-biased agonist induced only a slight reduction. β-arrestin 2 silencing, but not pertussis toxin treatment, reverted UNC9994 and cabergoline's antiproliferative effects. In a cabergoline-resistant PRL-PitNET primary culture, UNC9994 inhibited cell proliferation and PRL release. In contrast, in NF-PitNET primary cultures (n = 23), biased agonists did not show better antiproliferative effects than cabergoline. In conclusion, the preferential activation of the β-arrestin 2 pathway by UNC9994 improves DRD2-mediated antiproliferative effects in PRL-PitNETs, suggesting a new pharmacological approach for resistant or poorly responsive tumors.

Ubiquitination of GRK2 Is Required for the β-Arrestin-Biased Signaling Pathway of Dopamine D2 Receptors to Activate ERK Kinases

A class-A GPCR dopamine D2 receptor (D2R) plays a critical role in the proper functioning of neuronal circuits through the downstream activation of both G-protein- and β-arrestin-dependent signaling pathways. Understanding the signaling pathways downstream of D2R is critical for developing effective therapies with which to treat dopamine (DA)-related disorders such as Parkinson's disease and schizophrenia. Extensive studies have focused on the regulation of D2R-mediated extracellular-signal-regulated kinase (ERK) 1/2 signaling; however, the manner in which ERKs are activated upon the stimulation of a specific signaling pathway of D2R remains unclear. The present study conducted a variety of experimental techniques, including loss-of-function experiments, site-directed mutagenesis, and the determination of protein interactions, in order to investigate the mechanisms underlying β-arrestin-biased signaling-pathway-mediated ERK activation. We found that the stimulation of the D2R β-arrestin signaling pathway caused Mdm2, an E3 ubiquitin ligase, to move from the nucleus to the cytoplasm and interact with tyrosine phosphorylated G-protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 (GRK2), which was facilitated by Src, a non-receptor tyrosine kinase. This interaction led to the ubiquitination of GRK2, which then moved to the plasma membrane and interacted with activated D2R, followed by the phosphorylation of D2R as well as the mediation of ERK activation. In conclusion, Mdm2-mediated GRK2 ubiquitination, which is selectively triggered by the stimulation of the D2R β-arrestin signaling pathway, is necessary for GRK2 membrane translocation and its interaction with D2R, which in turn mediates downstream ERK signaling. This study is primarily novel and provides essential information with which to better understand the detailed mechanisms of D2R-dependent signaling.

Phosphorylation barcodes direct biased chemokine signaling at CXCR3

G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR)-biased agonism, selective activation of certain signaling pathways relative to others, is thought to be directed by differential GPCR phosphorylation "barcodes." At chemokine receptors, endogenous chemokines can act as "biased agonists", which may contribute to the limited success when pharmacologically targeting these receptors. Here, mass spectrometry-based global phosphoproteomics revealed that CXCR3 chemokines generate different phosphorylation barcodes associated with differential transducer activation. Chemokine stimulation resulted in distinct changes throughout the kinome in global phosphoproteomics studies. Mutation of CXCR3 phosphosites altered β-arrestin 2 conformation in cellular assays and was consistent with conformational changes observed in molecular dynamics simulations. T cells expressing phosphorylation-deficient CXCR3 mutants resulted in agonist- and receptor-specific chemotactic profiles. Our results demonstrate that CXCR3 chemokines are non-redundant and act as biased agonists through differential encoding of phosphorylation barcodes, leading to distinct physiological processes.

Phosphorylation barcodes direct biased chemokine signaling at CXCR3

G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) biased agonism, the activation of some signaling pathways over others, is thought to largely be due to differential receptor phosphorylation, or "phosphorylation barcodes." At chemokine receptors, ligands act as "biased agonists" with complex signaling profiles, which contributes to the limited success in pharmacologically targeting these receptors. Here, mass spectrometry-based global phosphoproteomics revealed that CXCR3 chemokines generate different phosphorylation barcodes associated with differential transducer activation. Chemokine stimulation resulted in distinct changes throughout the kinome in global phosphoproteomic studies. Mutation of CXCR3 phosphosites altered β-arrestin conformation in cellular assays and was confirmed by molecular dynamics simulations. T cells expressing phosphorylation-deficient CXCR3 mutants resulted in agonist- and receptor-specific chemotactic profiles. Our results demonstrate that CXCR3 chemokines are non-redundant and act as biased agonists through differential encoding of phosphorylation barcodes and lead to distinct physiological processes.

Dopamine-induced arrestin recruitment and desensitization of the dopamine D4 receptor is regulated by G protein-coupled receptor kinase-2

The dopamine D₄ receptor (D₄R) is expressed in the retina, prefrontal cortex, and autonomic nervous system and has been implicated in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), substance use disorders, and erectile dysfunction. D₄R has also been investigated as a target for antipsychotics due to its high affinity for clozapine. As opposed to the closely related dopamine D₂ receptor (D₂R), dopamine-induced arrestin recruitment and desensitization at the D₄R have not been studied in detail. Indeed, some earlier investigations could not detect arrestin recruitment and desensitization of this receptor upon its activation by agonist. Here, we used a novel nanoluciferase complementation assay to study dopamine-induced recruitment of β-arrestin2 (βarr2; also known as arrestin3) and G protein-coupled receptor kinase-2 (GRK2) to the D₄R in HEK293T cells. We also studied desensitization of D₄R-evoked G protein-coupled inward rectifier potassium (GIRK; also known as Kir3) current responses in Xenopus oocytes. Furthermore, the effect of coexpression of GRK2 on βarr2 recruitment and GIRK response desensitization was examined. The results suggest that coexpression of GRK2 enhanced the potency of dopamine to induce βarr2 recruitment to the D₄R and accelerated the rate of desensitization of D₄R-evoked GIRK responses. The present study reveals new details about the regulation of arrestin recruitment to the D₄R and thus increases our understanding of the signaling and desensitization of this receptor.

Phosphoproteomic mapping of CCR5 and ACKR2 signaling properties

ACKR2 is an atypical chemokine receptor which is structurally uncoupled from G proteins and is unable to activate signaling pathways used by conventional chemokine receptors to promote cell migration. Nonetheless, ACKR2 regulates inflammatory and immune responses by shaping chemokine gradients in tissues via scavenging inflammatory chemokines. To investigate the signaling pathways downstream to ACKR2, a quantitative SILAC-based phosphoproteomic analysis coupled with a systems biology approach with network analysis, was carried out on a HEK293 cell model expressing either ACKR2 or its conventional counterpart CCR5. The model was stimulated with the common agonist CCL3L1 for short (3 min) and long (30 min) durations. As expected, many of the identified proteins are known to participate in conventional signal transduction pathways and in the regulation of cytoskeleton dynamics. However, our analyses revealed unique phosphorylation and network signatures, suggesting roles for ACKR2 other than its scavenger activity. In conclusion, the mapping of phosphorylation events at a holistic level indicated that conventional and atypical chemokine receptors differ in signaling properties. This provides an unprecedented level of detail in chemokine receptor signaling and identifying potential targets for the regulation of ACKR2 and CCR5 function.

Location bias contributes to functionally selective responses of biased CXCR3 agonists

Some G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) ligands act as "biased agonists" that preferentially activate specific signaling transducers over others. Although GPCRs are primarily found at the plasma membrane, GPCRs can traffic to and signal from many subcellular compartments. Here, we determine that differential subcellular signaling contributes to the biased signaling generated by three endogenous ligands of the GPCR CXC chemokine receptor 3 (CXCR3). The signaling profile of CXCR3 changes as it traffics from the plasma membrane to endosomes in a ligand-specific manner. Endosomal signaling is critical for biased activation of G proteins, β-arrestins, and extracellular-signal-regulated kinase (ERK). In CD8 + T cells, the chemokines promote unique transcriptional responses predicted to regulate inflammatory pathways. In a mouse model of contact hypersensitivity, β-arrestin-biased CXCR3-mediated inflammation is dependent on receptor internalization. Our work demonstrates that differential subcellular signaling is critical to the overall biased response observed at CXCR3, which has important implications for drugs targeting chemokine receptors and other GPCRs.

BRET-Based Biosensors to Measure Agonist Efficacies in Histamine H1 Receptor-Mediated G Protein Activation, Signaling and Interactions with GRKs and β-Arrestins

The histamine H₁ receptor (H₁R) is a G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) and plays a key role in allergic reactions upon activation by histamine which is locally released from mast cells and basophils. Consequently, H₁R is a well-established therapeutic target for antihistamines that relieve allergy symptoms. H₁R signals via heterotrimeric G_q proteins and is phosphorylated by GPCR kinase (GRK) subtypes 2, 5, and 6, consequently facilitating the subsequent recruitment of β-arrestin1 and/or 2. Stimulation of a GPCR with structurally different agonists can result in preferential engagement of one or more of these intracellular signaling molecules. To evaluate this so-called biased agonism for H₁R, bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET)-based biosensors were applied to measure H₁R signaling through heterotrimeric G_q proteins, second messengers (inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate and Ca²⁺), and receptor-protein interactions (GRKs and β-arrestins) in response to histamine, 2-phenylhistamines, and histaprodifens in a similar cellular background. Although differences in efficacy were observed for these agonists between some functional readouts as compared to reference agonist histamine, subsequent data analysis using an operational model of agonism revealed only signaling bias of the agonist Br-phHA-HA in recruiting β-arrestin2 to H₁R over G_q biosensor activation.

G protein-coupled receptor kinase-2 confers isoform-specific calcium sensitivity to dopamine D2 receptor desensitization

The dopamine D₂ receptor (D₂ R) functions as an autoreceptor on dopaminergic cell bodies and terminals and as a postsynaptic receptor on a variety of neurons in the central nervous system. As a result of alternative splicing, the D₂ R is expressed as two isoforms: long (D_2L R) and short (D_2S R) differing by a stretch of 29 residues in the third intracellular loop, with D_2S R being the predominant presynaptic isoform. Recent reports described a Ca²⁺ sensitivity of the desensitization time course of potassium currents elicited via D_2S R, but not via D_2L R, when either isoform was selectively expressed in dopaminergic neurons. Here, we aimed to study the mechanism behind this subtype-specific Ca²⁺ sensitivity. Thus, we measured the desensitization of potassium channel responses evoked by D_2L R and D_2S R using two-electrode voltage clamp in Xenopus oocytes in the absence and presence of different amounts of β-arrestin2 and G protein-coupled receptor kinase-2 (GRK2), both of which are known to play important roles in D₂ R desensitization in native cells. We found that co-expression of both GRK2 and β-arrestin2 was necessary for reconstitution of the Ca²⁺ sensitivity of D_2S R desensitization, while D_2L R did not display Ca²⁺ sensitivity under these conditions. The effect of Ca²⁺ chelation by BAPTA-AM to slow the rate of D_2S R desensitization was mimicked by the GRK2 inhibitor, Cmpd101, and by the kinase-inactivating GRK2 mutation, K220R, but not by the PKC inhibitor, Gö6976, nor by the calmodulin antagonist, KN-93. Thus, Ca²⁺ -sensitive desensitization of D_2S R appears to be mediated via a GRK2 phosphorylation-dependent mechanism.

Acute Corticotropin-Releasing Factor Receptor Type 2 Agonism Results in Sustained Symptom Improvement in Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome

Background

Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) is a complex multi-symptom disease with widespread evidence of disrupted systems. The authors hypothesize that it is caused by the upregulation of the corticotropin-releasing factor receptor type 2 (CRFR2) in the raphé nuclei and limbic system, which impairs the ability to maintain homeostasis. The authors propose utilizing agonist-mediated receptor endocytosis to downregulate CRFR2.

Materials and Methods

This open-label trial tested the safety, tolerability and efficacy of an acute dose of CT38s (a short-lived, CRFR2-selective agonist, with no known off-target activity) in 14 ME/CFS patients. CT38s was subcutaneously-infused at one of four dose-levels (i.e., infusion rates of 0.01, 0.03, 0.06, and 0.20 μg/kg/h), for a maximum of 10.5 h. Effect was measured as the pre-/post-treatment change in the mean 28-day total daily symptom score (TDSS), which aggregated 13 individual patient-reported symptoms.

Results

ME/CFS patients were significantly more sensitive to the transient hemodynamic effects of CRFR2 stimulation than healthy subjects in a prior trial, supporting the hypothesized CRFR2 upregulation. Adverse events were generally mild, resolved without intervention, and difficult to distinguish from ME/CFS symptoms, supporting a CRFR2 role in the disease. The acute dose of CT38s was associated with an improvement in mean TDSS that was sustained (over at least 28 days post-treatment) and correlated with both total exposure and pre-treatment symptom severity. At an infusion rate of 0.03 μg/kg/h, mean TDSS improved by -7.5 ± 1.9 (or -25.7%, p = 0.009), with all monitored symptoms improving.

Conclusion

The trial supports the hypothesis that CRFR2 is upregulated in ME/CFS, and that acute CRFR2 agonism may be a viable treatment approach warranting further study.

Clinical Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT03613129.

Targeting G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) to G protein-coupled receptors

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) interact with three protein families following agonist binding: heterotrimeric G proteins, G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) and arrestins. GRK-mediated phosphorylation of GPCRs promotes arrestin binding to uncouple the receptor from G protein, a process called desensitization, and for many GPCRs, arrestin binding also promotes receptor endocytosis and intracellular signaling. Thus, GRKs play a central role in modulating GPCR signaling and localization. Here we review recent advances in this field which include additional insight into how GRKs target GPCRs and bias signaling, and the development of specific inhibitors to dissect GRK function in model systems.

Receptor-Arrestin Interactions: The GPCR Perspective

Arrestins are a small family of four proteins in most vertebrates that bind hundreds of different G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Arrestin binding to a GPCR has at least three functions: precluding further receptor coupling to G proteins, facilitating receptor internalization, and initiating distinct arrestin-mediated signaling. The molecular mechanism of arrestin–GPCR interactions has been extensively studied and discussed from the “arrestin perspective”, focusing on the roles of arrestin elements in receptor binding. Here, we discuss this phenomenon from the “receptor perspective”, focusing on the receptor elements involved in arrestin binding and emphasizing existing gaps in our knowledge that need to be filled. It is vitally important to understand the role of receptor elements in arrestin activation and how the interaction of each of these elements with arrestin contributes to the latter’s transition to the high-affinity binding state. A more precise knowledge of the molecular mechanisms of arrestin activation is needed to enable the construction of arrestin mutants with desired functional characteristics.

Noncanonical scaffolding of Gαi and β-arrestin by G protein-coupled receptors

Heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide-binding protein (G protein)-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are common drug targets and canonically couple to specific G_α protein subtypes and β-arrestin adaptor proteins. G protein-mediated signaling and β-arrestin-mediated signaling have been considered separable. We show here that GPCRs promote a direct interaction between G_αi protein subtype family members and β-arrestins regardless of their canonical G_α protein subtype coupling. G_αi:β-arrestin complexes bound extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK), and their disruption impaired both ERK activation and cell migration, which is consistent with β-arrestins requiring a functional interaction with G_αi for certain signaling events. These results introduce a GPCR signaling mechanism distinct from canonical G protein activation in which GPCRs cause the formation of G_αi:β-arrestin signaling complexes.

GRKs as Modulators of Neurotransmitter Receptors

Many receptors for neurotransmitters, such as dopamine, norepinephrine, acetylcholine, and neuropeptides, belong to the superfamily of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). A general model posits that GPCRs undergo two-step homologous desensitization: the active receptor is phosphorylated by kinases of the G protein-coupled receptor kinase (GRK) family, whereupon arrestin proteins specifically bind active phosphorylated receptors, shutting down G protein-mediated signaling, facilitating receptor internalization, and initiating distinct signaling pathways via arrestin-based scaffolding. Here, we review the mechanisms of GRK-dependent regulation of neurotransmitter receptors, focusing on the diverse modes of GRK-mediated phosphorylation of receptor subtypes. The immediate signaling consequences of GRK-mediated receptor phosphorylation, such as arrestin recruitment, desensitization, and internalization/resensitization, are equally diverse, depending not only on the receptor subtype but also on phosphorylation by GRKs of select receptor residues. We discuss the signaling outcome as well as the biological and behavioral consequences of the GRK-dependent phosphorylation of neurotransmitter receptors where known.

A Split Luciferase Complementation Assay for the Quantification of β-Arrestin2 Recruitment to Dopamine D2-Like Receptors

Investigations on functional selectivity of GPCR ligands have become increasingly important to identify compounds with a potentially more beneficial side effect profile. In order to discriminate between individual signaling pathways, the determination of β-arrestin2 recruitment, in addition to G-protein activation, is of great value. In this study, we established a sensitive split luciferase-based assay with the ability to quantify β-arrestin2 recruitment to D_2long and D₃ receptors and measure time-resolved β-arrestin2 recruitment to the D_2long receptor after agonist stimulation. We were able to characterize several standard (inverse) agonists as well as antagonists at the D_2longR and D₃R subtypes, whereas for the D_4.4R, no β-arrestin2 recruitment was detected, confirming previous reports. Extensive radioligand binding studies and comparisons with the respective wild-type receptors confirm that the attachment of the Emerald luciferase fragment to the receptors does not affect the integrity of the receptor proteins. Studies on the involvement of GRK2/3 and PKC on the β-arrestin recruitment to the D_2longR and D₃R, as well as at the D₁R using different kinase inhibitors, showed that the assay could also contribute to the elucidation of signaling mechanisms. Its broad applicability, which provides concentration-dependent and kinetic information on receptor/β-arrestin2 interactions, renders this homogeneous assay a valuable method for the identification of biased agonists.

β-Arrestin-Biased Allosteric Modulator of NTSR1 Selectively Attenuates Addictive Behaviors

Small molecule neurotensin receptor 1 (NTSR1) agonists have been pursued for more than 40 years as potential therapeutics for psychiatric disorders, including drug addiction. Clinical development of NTSR1 agonists has, however, been precluded by their severe side effects. NTSR1, a G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR), signals through the canonical activation of G proteins and engages β-arrestins to mediate distinct cellular signaling events. Here, we characterize the allosteric NTSR1 modulator SBI-553. This small molecule not only acts as a β-arrestin-biased agonist but also extends profound β-arrestin bias to the endogenous ligand by selectively antagonizing G protein signaling. SBI-553 shows efficacy in animal models of psychostimulant abuse, including cocaine self-administration, without the side effects characteristic of balanced NTSR1 agonism. These findings indicate that NTSR1 G protein and β-arrestin activation produce discrete and separable physiological effects, thus providing a strategy to develop safer GPCR-targeting therapeutics with more directed pharmacological action.

Differential Role of Serines and Threonines in Intracellular Loop 3 and C-Terminal Tail of the Histamine H4 Receptor in β-Arrestin and G Protein-Coupled Receptor Kinase Interaction, Internalization, and Signaling

The histamine H₄ receptor (H₄R) activates Gα_i-mediated signaling and recruits β-arrestin2 upon stimulation with histamine. β-Arrestins play a regulatory role in G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling by interacting with phosphorylated serine and threonine residues in the GPCR C-terminal tail and intracellular loop 3, resulting in receptor desensitization and internalization. Using bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET)-based biosensors, we show that G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRK) 2 and 3 are more quickly recruited to the H₄R than β-arrestin1 and 2 upon agonist stimulation, whereas receptor internalization dynamics toward early endosomes was slower. Alanine-substitution revealed that a serine cluster at the distal end of the H₄R C-terminal tail is essential for the recruitment of β-arrestin1/2, and consequently, receptor internalization and desensitization of G protein-driven extracellular-signal-regulated kinase (ERK)1/2 phosphorylation and label-free cellular impedance. In contrast, alanine substitution of serines and threonines in the intracellular loop 3 of the H₄R did not affect β-arrestin2 recruitment and receptor desensitization, but reduced β-arrestin1 recruitment and internalization. Hence, β-arrestin recruitment to H₄R requires the putative phosphorylated serine cluster in the H₄R C-terminal tail, whereas putative phosphosites in the intracellular loop 3 have different effects on β-arrestin1 versus β-arrestin2. Mutation of these putative phosphosites in either intracellular loop 3 or the C-terminal tail did not affect the histamine-induced recruitment of GRK2 and GRK3 but does change the interaction of H₄R with GRK5 and GRK6, respectively. Identification of H₄R interactions with these proteins is a first step in the understanding how this receptor might be dysregulated in pathophysiological conditions.

Carboxy-Terminal Phosphoregulation of the Long Splice Isoform of Free-Fatty Acid Receptor-4 Mediates β-Arrestin Recruitment and Signaling to ERK1/2

Free-fatty acid receptor-4 (FFA4), previously termed GPR120, is a G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) for medium and long-chained fatty acids, agonism of which can regulate a myriad of metabolic, sensory, inflammatory, and proliferatory signals. Two alternative splice isoforms of FFA4 exist that differ by the presence of an additional 16 amino acids in the longer (FFA4-L) transcript, which has been suggested to be an intrinsically β-arrestin-biased GPCR. Although the shorter isoform (FFA4-S) has been studied more extensively, very little is known about mechanisms of regulation or signaling of the longer isoform. Because β-arrestin recruitment is dependent on receptor phosphorylation, in the current study, we used the endogenous agonist docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) to examine the mechanisms of FFA4-L phosphorylation, as well as DHA-dependent β-arrestin recruitment and DHA-dependent extracellular-signal regulated kinase-1/2 (ERK1/2) signaling in human embryonic kidney 293 cells. Our results reveal differences in basal phosphorylation of the two FFA4 isoforms, and we show that DHA-mediated phosphorylation of FFA4-L is primarily regulated by G protein-coupled receptor kinase 6, whereas protein kinase-C can also contribute to agonist-induced and heterologous phosphorylation. Moreover, our data demonstrate that FFA4-L phosphorylation occurs on the distal C terminus and is directly responsible for recruitment and interactions with β-arrestin-2. Finally, using CRISPR/Cas9 genome-edited cells, our data reveal that unlike FFA4-S, the longer isoform is unable to facilitate phosphorylation of ERK1/2 in cells that are devoid of β-arrestin-1/2. Together, these results are the first to demonstrate phosphoregulation of FFA4-L as well as the effects of loss of phosphorylation sites on β-arrestin recruitment and ERK1/2 activation. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Free-fatty acid receptor-4 (FFA4) is a cell-surface G protein-coupled receptor for medium and long-chained fatty acids that can be expressed as distinct short (FFA4-S) or long (FFA4-L) isoforms. Although much is known about FFA4-S, the longer isoform remains virtually unstudied. Here, we reveal the mechanisms of docosahexaenoic acid-induced phosphorylation of FFA4-L and subsequent β-arrestin-2 recruitment and extracellular-signal regulated kinase-1/2 activity.

Dopamine D2 receptor modulates Wnt expression and control of cell proliferation

The Wnt/β-catenin pathway is one of the most conserved signaling pathways across species with essential roles in development, cell proliferation, and disease. Wnt signaling occurs at the protein level and via β-catenin-mediated transcription of target genes. However, little is known about the underlying mechanisms regulating the expression of the key Wnt ligand Wnt3a or the modulation of its activity. Here, we provide evidence that there is significant cross-talk between the dopamine D2 receptor (D2R) and Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathways. Our data suggest that D2R-dependent cross-talk modulates Wnt3a expression via an evolutionarily-conserved TCF/LEF site within the WNT3A promoter. Moreover, D2R signaling also modulates cell proliferation and modifies the pathology in a renal ischemia/reperfusion-injury disease model, via its effects on Wnt/β-catenin signaling. Together, our results suggest that D2R is a transcriptional modulator of Wnt/β-catenin signal transduction with broad implications for health and development of new therapeutics.

G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 (GRK2) as a multifunctional signaling hub

Accumulating evidence indicates that G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 (GRK2) is a versatile protein that acts as a signaling hub by modulating G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling and also via phosphorylation or scaffolding interactions with an extensive number of non-GPCR cellular partners. GRK2 multifunctionality arises from its multidomain structure and from complex mechanisms of regulation of its expression levels, activity, and localization within the cell, what allows the precise spatio-temporal shaping of GRK2 targets. A better understanding of the GRK2 interactome and its modulation mechanisms is helping to identify the GRK2-interacting proteins and its substrates involved in the participation of this kinase in different cellular processes and pathophysiological contexts.

The nature of efficacy at G protein-coupled receptors

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) participate in many pathophysiological processes as well as almost all aspects of normal physiology. They are present at the surface of all cell types making them amenable and attractive targets for pharmaceutical therapeutics. GPCRs possess complex pharmacology with the ability to be turned on to various extents, have their constitutive activity suppressed and even switch between signaling pathways to which they couple. Underlying this complex pharmacology is GPCR signaling efficacy, and differences in efficacy promoted by alternative ligands and in different tissues is of great interest to biology in general and also the pharmaceutical industry. In this review we hope to discuss what the molecular foundations of efficacy are and whether a new approach utilizing a rate-dependent model may provide new insights into this phenomenon.

GRK2 promotes growth of medulloblastoma cells and protects them from chemotherapy-induced apoptosis

G-protein coupled receptor kinase 2 (GRK2; ADRBK1, BARK1) is most known as a regulator of G-protein coupled receptors. However, GRK2 also has other functions. Medulloblastomas are the most common malignant brain cancers in children. GRK2 has not been implicated in medulloblastoma biology. Here we report that GRK2 knockdown slowed cell growth, diminished proliferation, and enhanced cisplatin- and etoposide-induced apoptosis in medulloblastoma cell lines UW228-2 and Daoy. Reciprocally, GRK2 overexpression attenuated apoptosis induced by these chemotherapy drugs. Cisplatin and etoposide increased phosphorylation of AKT (S473) and GRK2 knockdown mitigated this increase. Cisplatin and etoposide attenuated ERK phosphorylation, but GRK2 knockdown did not alter this effect. Wildtype GRK2 reversed the increase in cisplatin- and etoposide-induced apoptosis caused by GRK2 knockdown. GRK2-K220R (kinase dead) and GRK2-S670A (unphosphorylated, constitutively active) conferred protection from cisplatin that was similar to wildtype GRK2, suggesting that this protection may be mediated though a kinase-independent activity of GRK2. These data demonstrate that GRK2 contributes to proliferation and survival of these medulloblastoma cell lines and to their protection from cisplatin- and etoposide-induced apoptosis.

Spatial regulation of GPR64/ADGRG2 signaling by β-arrestins and GPCR kinases

Mechanisms of activation, signaling, and trafficking of adhesion G protein-coupled receptors (aGPCRs) have remained largely unknown. Several aGPCRs, including GPR56/ADGRG1 and GPR64/ADGRG2, show increased activity in the absence of their N-terminal fragment (NTF). This constitutive signaling is plausibly caused by the binding of extracellular N-terminal 15-25 amino acid-long tethered agonist to extracellular domains of the cognate aGPCRs. To test the role of NTF and tethered agonist in GPR64 signaling and endocytosis, we generated mutants that lack either NTF alone (ΔNTF) or NTF and tethered agonist (P622). We discover that unlike full-length GPR64, ΔNTF and P622 mutants interact with β-arrestin1 and β-arrestins2 and are constitutively internalized in steady states. However, only ΔNTF shows exaggerated basal activation of the Gα_s -cAMP-CRE signaling cascade. Neither ΔNTF nor P622 shows constitutive activation of the Gα₁₃ -SRE pathway, but both mutants respond to exogenously added agonistic peptide via CRE and SRE. GPCR kinases and dynamin mediate the constitutive internalization of ΔNTF and P622 to early endosomes, where ΔNTF constantly induces CRE. These data suggest that NTF not only shields the tethered agonist to prevent G protein signaling but also confers a conformation that inhibits the interaction with β-arrestins and the consequent endocytosis and sustained signaling from endosomes.

Upstream regulators of phosphoinositide 3-kinase and their role in diseases

Phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K), a crucial signaling molecule, is regulated by various upstream regulators. Traditionally, receptor tyrosine kinases and G protein-coupled receptor are regarded as its principle upstream regulators; however, recent reports have indicated that spleen tyrosine kinase, β-arrestin2, Janus kinase, and RAS can also perform this role. Dysregulation of PI3K is common in the progression of various diseases, including, but not limited to, tumors, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, rheumatoid arthritis, and acute myelogenous leukemia. The aim of this review is to provide a perspective on PI3K-related diseases examining both the classical and nonclassical upstream regulators of PI3K in detail.

Emerging roles of striatal dopamine D2 receptors in motivated behaviour: Implications for psychiatric disorders

Impaired motivation has been a long recognized negative symptom of schizophrenia, as well as a common feature of non-psychotic psychiatric disorders, responsible for a significant share of functional burden, and with limited treatment options. The striatum and dopamine signalling system play a central role in extracting motivationally relevant information from the environment, selecting which behavioural direction the animal should follow, and the vigour with which to engage it. Much of this function relies on striatal projection neurons, known as medium spiny neurons (MSNs) expressing dopamine D2 receptors (D2Rs), or D2-MSNs. However, determining the precise nature of D2-MSNs in regulating motivated behaviour in both healthy individuals and experimental manipulations of D2-MSN function has at times yielded a somewhat confusing picture since their activity has been linked to either enhancement or dampening of motivation in animal models. In this MiniReview, we describe the latest data from rodent studies that investigated how D2Rs exert their modulatory effect on motivated behaviour by regulating striatal indirect pathway neuronal activity. We will include a discussion about how functional selectivity of D2Rs towards G protein-dependent or β-arrestin-dependent signalling differentially affects motivated behaviour. Lastly, we will describe a recent preclinical attempt to improve motivation by exploiting serotonin receptor-mediated modulation of dopamine transmission in the striatum.

GPCR Signaling Regulation: The Role of GRKs and Arrestins

Every animal species expresses hundreds of different G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) that respond to a wide variety of external stimuli. GPCRs-driven signaling pathways are involved in pretty much every physiological function and in many pathologies. Therefore, GPCRs are targeted by about a third of clinically used drugs. The signaling of most GPCRs via G proteins is terminated by the phosphorylation of active receptor by specific kinases (GPCR kinases, or GRKs) and subsequent binding of arrestin proteins, that selectively recognize active phosphorylated receptors. In addition, GRKs and arrestins play a role in multiple signaling pathways in the cell, both GPCR-initiated and receptor-independent. Here we focus on the mechanisms of GRK- and arrestin-mediated regulation of GPCR signaling, which includes homologous desensitization and redirection of signaling to additional pathways by bound arrestins.

Angiotensin Analogs with Divergent Bias Stabilize Distinct Receptor Conformations

"Biased" G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) agonists preferentially activate pathways mediated by G proteins or β-arrestins. Here, we use double electron-electron resonance spectroscopy to probe the changes that ligands induce in the conformational distribution of the angiotensin II type I receptor. Monitoring distances between 10 pairs of nitroxide labels distributed across the intracellular regions enabled mapping of four underlying sets of conformations. Ligands from different functional classes have distinct, characteristic effects on the conformational heterogeneity of the receptor. Compared to angiotensin II, the endogenous agonist, agonists with enhanced Gq coupling more strongly stabilize an "open" conformation with an accessible transducer-binding site. β-arrestin-biased agonists deficient in Gq coupling do not stabilize this open conformation but instead favor two more occluded conformations. These data suggest a structural mechanism for biased ligand action at the angiotensin receptor that can be exploited to rationally design GPCR-targeting drugs with greater specificity of action.

Signaling transduction regulated by 5-hydroxytryptamine 1A receptor and orexin receptor 2 heterodimers

As G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), 5-hydroxytryptamine 1A receptor (5-HT1AR) and orexin receptor 2 (OX2R) regulate the levels of the cellular downstream molecules. The heterodimers of different GPCRs play important roles in various of neurological diseases. Moreover, 5-HT1AR and OX2R are involved in the pathogenesis of neurological diseases such as depression with deficiency of hippocampus plasticity. However, the direct interaction of the two receptors remains elusive. In the present study, we firstly demonstrated the heterodimer formation of 5-HT1AR and OX2R. Exchange protein directly activated by cAMP (Epac) cAMP bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) biosensor analysis revealed that the expression levels of cellular cAMP significantly increased in HEK293T cells transfected with the two receptors compared with the 5-HT1AR group. Additionally, the cellular level of calcium was upregulated robustly in HEK293T cells co-transfected with 5-HT1AR and OX2R group after agonist treatment. Furthermore, western blotting data showed that 5-HT1AR and OX2R heterodimer decreased the levels of phosphorylation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) and cAMP-response element-binding protein (CREB). These results not only unraveled the formation of 5-HT1AR and OX2R heterodimer but also suggested that the heterodimer affected the downstream signaling pathway, which will provide new insights into the function of the two receptors in the brain.

The Beta-Arrestin-Biased Dopamine D2 Receptor Ligand, UNC9994, Is a Partial Agonist at G-Protein-Mediated Potassium Channel Activation

BACKGROUND

Previous evidence suggests that UNC9994 is a beta-arrestin2-selective agonist at the dopamine D2 receptor, lacking ability both to activate and antagonize G protein-dependent signaling. However, this has only been reported by one laboratory using a single assay.

METHODS

We used G protein-coupled inward rectifier potassium channel activation in Xenopus oocytes to investigate UNC9994-induced modulation of G protein-dependent signaling at dopamine D2 receptor and dopamine D3 receptor.

RESULTS

At dopamine D2 receptor, UNC9994 induced G protein-coupled inward rectifier potassium channel currents that were 15% of the maximal response to dopamine, with an EC50 of 185 nM. At dopamine D3 receptor, the ligand elicited 89% of the maximal dopamine response with an EC50 of 62 nM. Pertussis toxin abolished G protein-coupled inward rectifier potassium channel activation. Furthermore, UNC9994 antagonized dopamine-induced G protein-coupled inward rectifier potassium channel activation at dopamine D2 receptor.

CONCLUSIONS

UNC9994 modulates G protein-coupled inward rectifier potassium channel channel activation via pertussis toxin-sensitive G proteins at dopamine D2 receptor and dopamine D3 receptor. These findings may have implications for the interpretation of data obtained with this ligand.

How to recruit a GRK

The dopamine D2 receptor recruits and activates the kinase GRK2 without the need for G protein activation.