A plant pentatricopeptide repeat protein with a DYW-deaminase domain is sufficient for catalyzing C-to-U RNA editing in vitro

A Conserved Lysine in an Ion-Pair with a Catalytic Glutamate Is Critical for U-to-C RNA Editing but Restricts C-to-U RNA Editing

Plants make pyrimidine base substitutions in organellar mRNAs through the action of sequence-specific nuclear-encoded enzymes. Pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) proteins are essential for ensuring specificity, while the enzymatic DYW domain is often present at the C-terminus of a PPR protein and dependent on the variant possessing C-to-U and/or U-to-C RNA editing activities. Expression of exogenous DYW-KP variant enzymes in bacteria leads to the modification of RNAs suggestive of U-to-C base changes. The modified RNAs could only be purified from the interphase of an acidic guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform experiment. It was projected that in bacteria stable RNA-enzyme cross-links form from a lysyl attack. In this study, RNA editing was examined for dual U-to-C/C-to-U editing enzyme KP6 with conserved lysine residues substituted by alanine. A single lysine was found to be essential for U-to-C editing and, based on the crystal structures of DYW domains, would likely be present in the active site. Crystal structures also suggest that the lysine can potentially form an ion pair with the catalytic glutamate critical for C-to-U RNA editing. Mutation of lysine to alanine greatly stimulated the C-to-U RNA editing by KP6. A ∼319 Da adduct observed on DYW-KP proteins could not be detected on the U-to-C-deficient lysine to alanine point mutant enzymes. This work establishes the critical role for a single lysine in the DYW-KP domain specifically for U-to-C editing activity but also highlights a secondary role for the lysine in modulating C-to-U editing through the formation of an inhibitory ion pair with the catalytic glutamate.

Recent advances and biotechnological applications of RNA metabolism in plant chloroplasts and mitochondria

The chloroplast and mitochondrion are semi-autonomous organelles that play essential roles in cell function. These two organelles are embellished with prokaryotic remnants and contain many new features emerging from the co-evolution of organelles and the nucleus. A typical plant chloroplast or mitochondrion genome encodes less than 100 genes, and the regulation of these genes' expression is remarkably complex. The regulation of chloroplast and mitochondrion gene expression can be achieved at multiple levels during development and in response to environmental cues, in which, RNA metabolism, including: RNA transcription, processing, translation, and degradation, plays an important role. RNA metabolism in plant chloroplasts and mitochondria combines bacterial-like traits with novel features evolved in the host cell and is regulated by a large number of nucleus-encoded proteins. Among these, pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) proteins are deeply involved in multiple aspects of the RNA metabolism of organellar genes. Research over the past decades has revealed new insights into different RNA metabolic events in plant organelles, such as the composition of chloroplast and mitochondrion RNA editosomes. We summarize and discuss the most recent knowledge and biotechnological implications of various RNA metabolism processes in plant chloroplasts and mitochondria, with a focus on the nucleus-encoded factors supporting them, to gain a deeper understanding of the function and evolution of these two organelles in plant cells. Furthermore, a better understanding of the role of nucleus-encoded factors in chloroplast and mitochondrion RNA metabolism will motivate future studies on manipulating the plant gene expression machinery with engineered nucleus-encoded factors.

PCIS1, Encoded by a Pentatricopeptide Protein Co-expressed Gene, Is Required for Splicing of Three Mitochondrial nad Transcripts in Angiosperms

Group II introns are large catalytic RNAs, which reside mainly within genes encoding respiratory complex I (CI) subunits in angiosperms' mitochondria. Genetic and biochemical analyses led to the identification of many nuclear-encoded factors that facilitate the splicing of the degenerated organellar introns in plants. Here, we describe the analysis of the pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) co-expressed intron splicing-1 (PCIS1) factor, which was identified in silico by its co-expression pattern with many PPR proteins. PCIS1 is well conserved in land plants but has no sequence similarity with any known protein motifs. PCIS1 mutant lines are arrested in embryogenesis and can be maintained by the temporal expression of the gene under the embryo-specific ABI3 promoter. The pABI3::PCIS1 mutant plants display low germination and stunted growth phenotypes. RNA-sequencing and quantitative RT-PCR analyses of wild-type and mutant plants indicated that PCIS1 is a novel splicing cofactor that is pivotal for the maturation of several nad transcripts in Arabidopsis mitochondria. These phenotypes are tightly associated with respiratory CI defects and altered plant growth. Our data further emphasize the key roles of nuclear-encoded cofactors that regulate the maturation and expression of mitochondrial transcripts for the biogenesis of the oxidative phosphorylation system, and hence for plant physiology. The discovery of novel splicing factors other than typical RNA-binding proteins suggests further complexity of splicing mechanisms in plant mitochondria.

Screening clusters of charged residues in plants' mitochondrial proteins and biological significance

Protein function is dependent on charge interactions and charge biased regions, which are involved in a wide range of cellular and biochemical processes. We report the development of a new algorithm implemented in Python and its use to identify charge clusters CC (NegativeCC: NCC, PositiveCC: PCC and MixedCC: MCC) and compare their presence in mitochondrial proteins of plant groups. To characterize the resulting CC, statistical, structural and functional analyses were conducted. The screening of 105 399 protein sequences showed that 2.6 %, 0.48 % and 0.03 % of the proteins contain NCC, PCC and MCC, respectively. Mitochondrial proteins encoded by the nuclear genome of green algae have the biggest proportion of both PCC (1.6 %) and MCC (0.4 %) and mitochondrial proteins coded by the nuclear genome of other plants group have the highest portion of NCC (7.5 %). The mapping of the identified CC showed that they are mainly located in the terminal regions of the protein. Annotation showed that proteins with CC are classified as binding proteins, are included in the transmembrane transport processes, and are mainly located in the membrane. The CC scanning revealed the presence of 2373 and 784 sites and 192 and 149 motif profiles within NCC and PCC, respectively. The investigation of CC within pentatricopeptide repeat-containing proteins revealed that they are involved in correct and specific RNA editing. CC were proven to play a key role in providing insightful structural and functional information of complex protein assemblies which could be useful in biotechnological applications.

Crosslinking of base-modified RNAs by synthetic DYW-KP base editors implicates an enzymatic lysine as the nitrogen donor for U-to-C RNA editing

Sequence-specific cytidine to uridine (C-to-U) and adenosine to inosine editing tools can alter RNA and DNA sequences and utilize a hydrolytic deamination mechanism requiring an active site zinc ion and a glutamate residue. In plant organelles, DYW-PG domain containing enzymes catalyze C-to-U edits through the canonical deamination mechanism. Proteins developed from consensus sequences of the related DYW-KP domain family catalyze what initially appeared to be uridine to cytidine (U-to-C) edits leading to this investigation into the U-to-C editing mechanism. The synthetic DYW-KP enzyme KP6 was found sufficient for C-to-U editing activity stimulated by the addition of carboxylic acids in vitro. Despite addition of putative amine/amide donors, U-to-C editing by KP6 could not be observed in vitro. C-to-U editing was found not to be concomitant with U-to-C editing, discounting a pyrimidine transaminase mechanism. RNAs containing base modifications were highly enriched in interphase fractions consistent with covalent crosslinks to KP6, KP2, and KP3 proteins. Mass spectrometry of purified KP2 and KP6 proteins revealed secondary peaks with mass shifts of 319 Da. A U-to-C crosslinking mechanism was projected to explain the link between crosslinking, RNA base changes, and the ∼319 Da mass. In this model, an enzymatic lysine attacks C4 of uridine to form a Schiff base RNA-protein conjugate. Sequenced RT-PCR products from the fern Ceratopteris richardii indicate U-to-C base edits do not preserve proteinaceous crosslinks in planta. Hydrolysis of a protonated Schiff base conjugate releasing cytidine is hypothesized to explain the completed pathway in plants.

Learning from the Codon Table: Convergent Recoding Provides Novel Understanding on the Evolution of A-to-I RNA Editing

Adenosine-to-inosine (A-to-I) RNA editing recodes the genetic information. Apart from diversifying the proteome, another tempting advantage of RNA recoding is to correct deleterious DNA mutation and restore ancestral allele. Solid evidences for beneficial restorative editing are very rare in animals. By searching for "convergent recoding" under a phylogenetic context, we proposed this term for judging the potential restorative functions of particular editing site. For the well-known mammalian Gln>Arg (Q>R) recoding site, its ancestral state in vertebrate genomes was the pre-editing Gln, and all 470 available mammalian genomes strictly avoid other three equivalent ways to achieve Arg in protein. The absence of convergent recoding from His>Arg, or synonymous mutations on Gln codons, could be attributed to the strong maintenance on editing motif and structure, but the absence of direct A-to-G mutation is extremely unexpected. With similar ideas, we found cases of convergent recoding in Drosophila genus, reducing the possibility of their restorative function. In summary, we defined an interesting scenario of convergent recoding, the occurrence of which could be used as preliminary judgements for whether a recoding site has a sole restorative role. Our work provides novel insights to the natural selection and evolution of RNA editing.

Dissecting the molecular puzzle of the editosome core in Arabidopsis organelles

Over the last decade, the composition of the C-to-U RNA editing complex in embryophyte organelles has turned out to be much more complex than first expected. While PPR proteins were initially thought to act alone, significant evidences have clearly depicted a sophisticated mechanism with numerous protein-protein interaction involving PPR and non-PPR proteins. Moreover, the identification of specific functional partnership between PPRs also suggests that, in addition to the highly specific PPRs directly involved in the RNA target recognition, non-RNA-specific ones are required. Although some of them, such as DYW1 and DYW2, were shown to be the catalytic domains of the editing complex, the molecular function of others, such as NUWA, remains elusive. It was suggested that they might stabilize the complex by acting as a scaffold. We here performed functional complementation of the crr28-2 mutant with truncated CRR28 proteins mimicking PPR without the catalytic domain and show that they exhibit a specific dependency to one of the catalytic proteins DYW1 or DYW2. Moreover, we also characterized the role of the PPR NUWA in the editing reaction and show that it likely acts as a scaffolding factor. NUWA is no longer required for efficient editing of the CLB19 editing sites once this RNA specific PPR is fused to the DYW catalytic domain of its partner DYW2. Altogether, our results strongly support a flexible, evolutive and resilient editing complex in which RNA binding activity, editing activity and stabilization/scaffolding function can be provided by one or more PPRs.

Conquering new grounds: plant organellar C-to-U RNA editing factors can be functional in the plant cytosol

Plant mitochondrial and chloroplast transcripts are subject to numerous events of specific cytidine-to-uridine (C-to-U) RNA editing to correct genetic information. Key protein factors for this process are specific RNA-binding pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) proteins, which are encoded in the nucleus and post-translationally imported into the two endosymbiotic organelles. Despite hundreds of C-to-U editing sites in the plant organelles, no comparable editing has been found for nucleo-cytosolic mRNAs raising the question why plant RNA editing is restricted to chloroplasts and mitochondria. Here, we addressed this issue in the model moss Physcomitrium patens, where all PPR-type RNA editing factors comprise specific RNA-binding and cytidine deamination functionalities in single proteins. To explore whether organelle-type RNA editing can principally also take place in the plant cytosol, we expressed PPR56, PPR65 and PPR78, three editing factors recently shown to also function in a bacterial setup, together with cytosolic co-transcribed native targets in Physcomitrium. While we obtained unsatisfying results upon their constitutive expression, we found strong cytosolic RNA editing under hormone-inducible expression. Moreover, RNA-Seq analyses revealed varying numbers of up to more than 900 off-targets in other cytosolic transcripts. We conclude that PPR-mediated C-to-U RNA editing is not per se incompatible with the plant cytosol but that its limited target specificity has restricted its occurrence to the much less complex transcriptomes of mitochondria and chloroplast in the course of evolution.

Insights into U-to-C RNA editing from the lycophyte Phylloglossum drummondii

The lycophyte Phylloglossum drummondii is the sole inhabitant of its genus in the Huperzioideae group and one of a small minority of plants which perform uridine to cytidine RNA editing. We assembled the P. drummondii chloroplast and mitochondrial genomes and used RNA sequence data to build a comprehensive profile of organellar RNA editing events. In addition to many C-to-U editing events in both organelles, we found just four U-to-C editing events in the mitochondrial transcripts cob, nad1, nad5 and rpl2. These events are conserved in related lycophytes in the genera Huperzia and Phlegmariurus. De novo transcriptomes for three of these lycophytes were assembled to search for putative U-to-C RNA editing enzymes. Four putative U-to-C editing factors could be matched to the four mitochondrial U-to-C editing sites. Due to the unusually few numbers of U-to-C RNA editing sites, P. drummondii and related lycophytes are useful models for studying this poorly understood mechanism.

Applications of Synthetic Pentatricopeptide Repeat Proteins

RNA-binding proteins play integral roles in the regulation of essential processes in cells and as such are attractive targets for engineering to manipulate gene expression at the RNA level. Expression of transcripts in chloroplasts and mitochondria is heavily regulated by pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) proteins. The diverse roles of PPR proteins and their naturally modular architecture make them ideal candidates for engineering. Synthetic PPR proteins are showing great potential to become valuable tools for controlling the expression of plastid and mitochondrial transcripts. In this review, by 'synthetic', we mean both rationally modified natural PPR proteins and completely novel proteins designed using the principles learned from their natural counterparts. We focus on the many different applications of synthetic PPR proteins, covering both their use in basic research to learn more about protein-RNA interactions and their use to achieve specific outcomes in RNA processing and the control of gene expression. We describe the challenges associated with the design, construction and deployment of synthetic PPR proteins and provide perspectives on how they might be assembled and used in future biotechnology applications.

The Gating Domain of MEF28 Is Essential for Editing Two Contiguous Cytidines in nad2 mRNA in Arabidopsis thaliana

In plant organelles, each C-to-U RNA-editing site is specifically recognized by pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) proteins with E1-E2, E1-E2-E+ or E1-E2-DYW domain extensions at the C-terminus. The distance between the PPR domain-binding site and the RNA-editing site is usually fixed at four bases, increasing the specificity of target-site recognition in this system. We here report, in contrast to the general case, on MEF28, which edits two adjacent mitochondrial sites, nad2-89 and nad2-90. When the sDYW domain of MEF28 was replaced with one derived from MEF11 or CRR22, the ability to edit downstream sites was lost, suggesting that the DYW domain of MEF28 provides unique target flexibility for two continuous cytidines. By contrast, substitutions of the entire E1-E2-DYW domains by MEF19E1-E2, SLO2E1-E2-E+ or CRR22E1-E2-E+ target both nad2 sites. In these cases, access to the contiguous sites in the chimeric PPR proteins is likely to be provided by the trans-associated DYW1-like proteins via the replaced E1-E2 or E1-E2-E+ domains. Furthermore, we demonstrated that the gating domain of MEF28 plays an important role in specific target-site recognition of the DYW domain. This finding suggests that the DYW domain and its internal gating domain fine-tune the specificity of the target site, which is valuable information for designing specific synthetic RNA-editing tools based on plant RNA-editing factors.

Multiple factors interact in editing of PPR-E+-targeted sites in maize mitochondria and plastids

RNA cytidine-to-uridine editing is essential for plant organellar gene expression. Pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR)-E+ proteins have been proposed to bind to target sites and recruit the cytidine deaminase AtDYW2, facilitated by AtNUWA. Here we analyze the function of ZmNUWA, ZmDYW2A, and ZmDYW2B and their relationships with other editing factors in maize. The zmdyw2a and zmdyw2b single mutants are normal, but the zmdyw2a::zmdyw2b and zmnuwa mutants are severely arrested in seed development. ZmNUWA, ZmDYW2A, and ZmDYW2B are dual localized in mitochondria and plastids. Loss of ZmNUWA decreases the editing at 99 mitochondrial sites and 8 plastid sites. Surprisingly, loss of ZmDYW2A:ZmDYW2B affects almost the same set of sites targeted by PPR-E+ proteins. ZmNUWA interacts with ZmDYW2A and ZmDYW2B, suggesting that ZmNUWA recruits ZmDYW2A/2B in the editing of PPR-E+-targeted sites in maize. Further protein interaction analyses show that ZmNUWA and ZmDYW2A/2B interact with ZmMORF1, ZmMORF8, ZmMORF2, and ZmMORF9 and that ZmOZ1 interacts with ZmORRM1, ZmDYW2A, ZmDYW2B, ZmMORF8, and ZmMORF9. These results suggest that the maize mitochondrial PPR-E+ editosome contains PPR-E+, ZmDYW2A/2B, ZmNUWA, and ZmMORF1/8, whereas the plastid PPR-E+ editosome is composed of PPR-E+, ZmDYW2A/2B, ZmNUWA, ZmMORF2/8/9, ZmORRM1, and ZmOZ1.

Assembly and comparative analysis of the complete mitochondrial genome of white towel gourd (Luffa cylindrica)

Mitochondria play an important role in the energy production of plant cells through independent genetic systems. This study has aimed to assemble and annotate the functions of the mitochondrial (mt) genome of Luffa cylindrica. The mt genome of L. cylindrica contained two chromosomes with lengths of 380,879 bp and 67,982 bp, respectively. Seventy-seven genes including 39 protein-coding genes, 34 tRNA genes, 3 rRNA genes, and 1 pseudogene, were identified. About 90.63% of the codons ended with A or U bases, and 98.63% of monomers contained A/T, which contributed to the high A/T content (55.91%) of the complete mt genome. Six genes (ATP8, CCMFC, NAD4, RPL10, RPL5 and RPS4) showed positive selection. Phylogenetic analysis indicates that L. cylindrica is closely related to L. acutangula. The present results provide the mt genome of L. cylindrica, which may facilitate possible genetic variation, evolutionary, and molecular breeding studies of L. cylindrica.

The dicot homolog of maize PPR103 carries a C-terminal DYW domain and may have a role in C-to-U editing of some chloroplast RNA transcripts

In plants, cytidine-to-uridine (C-to-U) editing is a crucial step in processing mitochondria- and chloroplast-encoded transcripts. This editing requires nuclear-encoded proteins including members of the pentatricopeptide (PPR) family, especially PLS-type proteins carrying the DYW domain. IPI1/emb175/PPR103 is a nuclear gene encoding a PLS-type PPR protein essential for survival in Arabidopsis thaliana and maize. Arabidopsis IPI1 was identified as likely interacting with ISE2, a chloroplast-localized RNA helicase associated with C-to-U RNA editing in Arabidopsis and maize. Notably, while the Arabidopsis and Nicotiana IPI1 orthologs possess complete DYW motifs at their C-termini, the maize homolog, ZmPPR103, lacks this triplet of residues which are essential for editing. In this study we examined the function of IPI1 in chloroplast RNA processing in N. benthamiana to gain insight into the importance of the DYW domain to the function of the EMB175/PPR103/ IPI1 proteins. Structural predictions suggest that evolutionary loss of residues identified as critical for catalyzing C-to-U editing in other members of this class of proteins, were likely to lead to reduced or absent editing activity in the Nicotiana and Arabidopsis IPI1 orthologs. Virus-induced gene silencing of NbIPI1 led to defects in chloroplast ribosomal RNA processing and changes to stability of rpl16 transcripts, revealing conserved function with its maize ortholog. NbIPI1-silenced plants also had defective C-to-U RNA editing in several chloroplast transcripts, a contrast from the finding that maize PPR103 had no role in editing. The results indicate that in addition to its role in transcript stability, NbIPI1 may contribute to C-to-U editing in N. benthamiana chloroplasts.

RIP-Seq analysis of non-PPR chloroplast editing factors reveals broad RNA interactions and enrichment of less efficiently translated RNAs by OZ1 and ORRM1 complexes

C-to-U RNA editing in angiosperm chloroplasts requires a large suite of proteins bound together in the editosome. The editosome is comprised of PPR proteins, RIP/MORFs, OZ proteins, and ORRM proteins that physically interact in high molecular weight complexes. The specific functions of non-PPR editing factors in the editosome are unclear, however, specific subsets of editing sites are affected by absence of non-PPR editing factors. Unlike the PPR components of editosomes that have predictable nucleotide specificities, domains present in non-PPR editing factors make RNA associations difficult to predict. In this study, chloroplast extracts were isolated from juvenile maize seedlings. RNAs were immunoprecipitated using polyclonal antibodies targeting non-PPR editing factors RIP9, OZ1, and ORRM1. RNA libraries from duplicate experiments were compared. RIP9 was associated with most of the non-ribosomal RNA content of chloroplasts, consistent with a general binding function to PPR L-motifs and tethering of large ribonucleoprotein complexes. The breadth of RNA associations was greater than predicted and include mRNAs without predicted editing sites, tRNA sequences, and introns. OZ1 and ORRM1 were associated with a highly similar pool of RNAs that have a bias toward lower translational efficiency values in mature chloroplasts. Lower translational efficiency was also associated with the pool of edited RNAs compared to RNAs without editing sites. The unexpected breadth of interactions by non-PPR editing factors suggests the editosome is large, diverse, and associated with RNAs with lower relative translational efficiency in mature chloroplasts.

DEFECTIVE KERNEL 56 functions in mitochondrial RNA editing and maize seed development

Proper seed development is essential for achieving grain production, successful seed germination, and seedling establishment in maize (Zea mays). In the past few decades, pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) proteins have been proven to play an essential role in regulating the development of maize kernels through posttranscriptional RNA modification of mitochondrial genes. However, the underlying mechanisms remain largely unknown. Here, we characterized a mutant of DEFECTIVE KERNEL 56 (DEK56) with defective kernels that exhibited arrested development of both the embryo and endosperm. Accordingly, we isolated DEK56 through a map-based cloning strategy and found that it encoded an E subgroup PPR protein located in the mitochondria. Dysfunction of DEK56 resulted in altered cytidine (C)-to-uridine (U) editing efficiency at 48 editing sites across 21 mitochondrial transcripts. Notably, the editing efficiency of the maturase-related (matR)-1124 site was substantially reduced or abolished in the dek56 mutant. Furthermore, we found that the splicing efficiency of NADH dehydrogenase subunit 4 (nad4) Introns 1 and 3 was substantially reduced in dek56 kernels, which might be a consequence of the defective MatR function. Through a protein-protein interaction test, we hypothesized that DEK56 carries out its function by recruiting the PPR-DYW protein PPR motif, coiled-coil, and DYW domain-containing protein 1 (PCW1). This interaction is facilitated by Multiple Organellar RNA Editing Factors (ZmMORFs) and Glutamine-Rich Protein 23 (ZmGRP23). Based on these findings, we developed a working model of PPR-mediated mitochondrial processing that plays an essential role in the development of maize kernels. The present study will further broaden our understanding of PPR-mediated seed development and provide a theoretical basis for maize improvement.

Conservation of the moss RNA editing factor PPR78 despite the loss of its known cytidine-to-uridine editing sites is explained by a hidden extra target

Cytidine (C)-to-uridine (U) RNA editing in plant organelles relies on specific RNA-binding pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) proteins. In the moss Physcomitrium patens, all such RNA editing factors feature a C-terminal DYW domain that acts as the cytidine deaminase for C-to-U conversion. PPR78 of Physcomitrium targets 2 mitochondrial editing sites, cox1eU755SL and rps14eU137SL. Remarkably, the latter is edited to highly variable degrees in different mosses. Here, we aimed to unravel the coevolution of PPR78 and its 2 target sites in mosses. Heterologous complementation in a Physcomitrium knockout line revealed that the variable editing of rps14eU137SL depends on the PPR arrays of different PPR78 orthologues but not their C-terminal domains. Intriguingly, PPR78 has remained conserved despite the simultaneous loss of editing at both known targets among Hypnales (feather mosses), suggesting it serves an additional function. Using a recently established RNA editing assay in Escherichia coli, we confirmed site-specific RNA editing by PPR78 in the bacterium and identified 4 additional off-targets in the bacterial transcriptome. Based on conservation profiles, we predicted ccmFNeU1465RC as a candidate editing target of PPR78 in moss mitochondrial transcriptomes. We confirmed editing at this site in several mosses and verified that PPR78 targets ccmFNeU1465RC in the bacterial editing system, explaining the conservation and functional adaptation of PPR78 during moss evolution.

DYW cytidine deaminase domains have a long-range impact on RNA recognition by the PPR array of chimeric plant C-to-U RNA editing factors and strongly affect target selection

The protein factors for the specific C-to-U RNA editing events in plant mitochondria and chloroplasts possess unique arrays of RNA-binding pentatricopeptide repeats (PPRs) linked to carboxy-terminal cytidine deaminase DYW domains via the extension motifs E1 and E2. The E1 and E2 motifs have distant similarities to tetratricopeptide repeats known to mediate protein-protein interactions but their precise function is unclear. Here, we investigate the tolerance of PPR56 and PPR65, two functionally characterized RNA editing factors of the moss Physcomitrium patens, for the creation of chimeras by variably replacing their C-terminal protein regions. Making use of a heterologous RNA editing assay system in Escherichia coli we find that heterologous DYW domains can strongly restrict or widen the spectrum of off-targets in the bacterial transcriptome for PPR56. Surprisingly, our data suggest that these changes are not only caused by the preference of a given heterologous DYW domain for the immediate sequence environment of the cytidine to be edited but also by a long-range impact on the nucleotide selectivity of the upstream PPRs.

Chloroplast gene expression: Recent advances and perspectives

Chloroplasts evolved from an ancient cyanobacterial endosymbiont more than 1.5 billion years ago. During subsequent coevolution with the nuclear genome, the chloroplast genome has remained independent, albeit strongly reduced, with its own transcriptional machinery and distinct features, such as chloroplast-specific innovations in gene expression and complicated post-transcriptional processing. Light activates the expression of chloroplast genes via mechanisms that optimize photosynthesis, minimize photodamage, and prioritize energy investments. Over the past few years, studies have moved from describing phases of chloroplast gene expression to exploring the underlying mechanisms. In this review, we focus on recent advances and emerging principles that govern chloroplast gene expression in land plants. We discuss engineering of pentatricopeptide repeat proteins and its biotechnological effects on chloroplast RNA research; new techniques for characterizing the molecular mechanisms of chloroplast gene expression; and important aspects of chloroplast gene expression for improving crop yield and stress tolerance. We also discuss biological and mechanistic questions that remain to be answered in the future.

The DYW domain of RARE1 plays an indispensable role in regulating accD-C794 RNA editing in Arabidopsis thaliana

The Arabidopsis pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) proteins, required for accD RNA editing 1 (RARE1) and early chloroplast biogenesis 2 (AtECB2), each contain a DYW domain deemed essential for cytosine deamination at the accD-C794 RNA editing site in chloroplasts. Complementation assays using the rare1 mutant investigate the correlation between these PPRs and their respective DYW domain functions in RNA editing of accD-C794. The results demonstrate that the coding sequence of AtECB2 cannot replace that of RARE1. Moreover, rare1 mutants complemented with DYW-deleted RARE1 failed to recover the RNA editing of accD-C794 even in the presence of the highly similar DYW domain of the AtECB2 protein. These findings indicate that RARE1 and AtECB2 possess divergent roles in RNA editing, with specificity for accD-C794 directly attributable to DYW domain within RARE1. Structural modeling data suggest this functioning pertains to a local α-helical motif that residues slightly N-terminal to the consensus glutamate and CXXCH motif in the DYW domain for cytidine deamination during C-to-U editing by RARE1 that is absent within AtECB2.

Beyond a PPR-RNA recognition code: Many aspects matter for the multi-targeting properties of RNA editing factor PPR56

The mitochondrial C-to-U RNA editing factor PPR56 of the moss Physcomitrium patens is an RNA-binding pentatricopeptide repeat protein equipped with a terminal DYW-type cytidine deaminase domain. Transferred into Escherichia coli, PPR56 works faithfully on its two native RNA editing targets, nad3eU230SL and nad4eU272SL, and also converts cytidines into uridines at over 100 off-targets in the bacterial transcriptome. Accordingly, PPR56 is attractive for detailed mechanistic studies in the heterologous bacterial setup, allowing for scoring differential RNA editing activities of many target and protein variants in reasonable time. Here, we report (i) on the effects of numerous individual and combined PPR56 protein and target modifications, (ii) on the spectrum of off-target C-to-U editing in the bacterial background transcriptome for PPR56 and two variants engineered for target re-direction and (iii) on combinations of targets in tandem or separately at the 5'- and 3'-ends of large mRNAs. The latter experimentation finds enhancement of RNA editing at weak targets in many cases, including cox3eU290SF as a new candidate mitogenome target. We conclude that C-to-U RNA editing can be much enhanced by transcript features also outside the region ultimately targeted by PPRs of a plant editing factor, possibly facilitated by its enrichment or scanning along transcripts.

A ribonuclease activity linked to DYW1 in vitro is inhibited by RIP/MORF proteins

Organellar C-to-U RNA editing in plants occurs in complexes composed of various classes of nuclear-encoded proteins. DYW-deaminases are zinc metalloenzymes that catalyze hydrolytic deamination required for C-to-U modification editing. Solved crystal structures for DYW-deaminase domains display all structural features consistent with a canonical cytidine deamination mechanism. However, some recombinant DYW-deaminases from plants have been associated with ribonuclease activity in vitro. Direct ribonuclease activity by an editing factor is confounding since it is not required for deamination of cytosine, theoretically would be inimical for mRNA editing, and does not have a clear physiological function in vivo. His-tagged recombinant DYW1 from Arabidopsis thaliana (rAtDYW1) was expressed and purified using immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC). Fluorescently labeled RNA oligonucleotides were incubated with recombinant AtDYW1 under different conditions. Percent relative cleavage of RNA probes was recorded at multiple time points from triplicate reactions. The effects of treatment with zinc chelators EDTA and 1, 10-phenanthroline were examined for rAtDYW1. Recombinant His-tagged RNA editing factors AtRIP2, ZmRIP9, AtRIP9, AtOZ1, AtCRR4, and AtORRM1 were expressed in E. coli and purified. Ribonuclease activity was assayed for rAtDYW1 in the presence of different editing factors. Lastly, the effects on nuclease activity in the presence of nucleotides and modified nucleosides were investigated. RNA cleavage observed in this study was linked to the recombinant editing factor rAtDYW1 in vitro. The cleavage reaction is sensitive to high concentrations of zinc chelators, indicating a role for zinc ions for activity. The addition of equal molar concentrations of recombinant RIP/MORF proteins reduced cleavage activity associated with rAtDYW1. However, addition of equal molar concentrations of purified recombinant editing complex proteins AtCRR4, AtORRM1, and AtOZ1 did not strongly inhibit ribonuclease activity on RNAs lacking an AtCRR4 cis-element. Though AtCRR4 inhibited AtDYW1 activity for oligonucleotides with a cognate cis-element. The observation that editing factors limit ribonuclease activity of rAtDYW1 in vitro, suggests that nuclease activities are limited to RNAs in absence of native editing complex partners. Purified rAtDYW1 was associated with the hydrolysis of RNA in vitro, and activity was specifically inhibited by RNA editing factors.

Plant organellar RNA maturation

Plant organellar RNA metabolism is run by a multitude of nucleus-encoded RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) that control RNA stability, processing, and degradation. In chloroplasts and mitochondria, these post-transcriptional processes are vital for the production of a small number of essential components of the photosynthetic and respiratory machinery-and consequently for organellar biogenesis and plant survival. Many organellar RBPs have been functionally assigned to individual steps in RNA maturation, often specific to selected transcripts. While the catalog of factors identified is ever-growing, our knowledge of how they achieve their functions mechanistically is far from complete. This review summarizes the current knowledge of plant organellar RNA metabolism taking an RBP-centric approach and focusing on mechanistic aspects of RBP functions and the kinetics of the processes they are involved in.

Structural insight into the activation of an Arabidopsis organellar C-to-U RNA editing enzyme by active site complementation

RNA-binding pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) proteins catalyze hundreds of cytidine to uridine RNA editing events in plant organelles; these editing events are essential for proper gene expression. More than half of the PPR-type RNA editing factors, however, lack the DYW cytidine deaminase domain. Genetic analyses have suggested that their cytidine deaminase activity arises by association with a family of DYW1-like proteins that contain an N-terminally truncated DYW domain, but their molecular mechanism has been unclear. Here, we report the crystal structure of the Arabidopsis thaliana DYW1 deaminase domain at 1.8 Å resolution. DYW1 has a cytidine deaminase fold lacking the PG box. The internal insertion within the deaminase fold shows an α-helical fold instead of the β-finger reported for the gating domain of the A. thaliana ORGANELLE TRANSCRIPT PROCESSING 86. The substrate-binding pocket is incompletely formed and appears to be complemented in the complex by the E2 domain and the PG box of the interacting PPR protein. In vivo RNA editing assays corroborate the activation model for DYW1 deaminase. Our study demonstrates the common activation mechanism of the DYW1-like proteins by molecular complementation of the DYW domain and reconstitution of the substrate-binding pocket.

The dicot homolog of maize PPR103 carries a C-terminal DYW domain and is required for C-to-U editing of chloroplast RNA transcripts

In plants, cytidine-to-uridine (C-to-U) editing is a crucial step in processing mitochondria and chloroplast-encoded transcripts. This editing requires nuclear-encoded proteins including members of the pentatricopeptide (PPR) family, especially PLS-type proteins carrying the DYW domain. IPI1/emb175/PPR103 is a nuclear gene encoding a PLS-type PPR protein essential for survival in Arabidopsis thaliana and maize. Arabidopsis IPI1 was identified as likely interacting with ISE2, a chloroplast-localized RNA helicase associated with C-to-U RNA editing in Arabidopsis and maize. Notably, while the Arabidopsis and Nicotiana IPI1 homologs possess complete DYW motifs at their C-termini, the maize homolog, ZmPPR103, lacks this triplet of residues which are essential for editing. We examined the function of ISE2 and IPI1 in chloroplast RNA processing in N. benthamiana. A combination of deep sequencing and Sanger sequencing revealed C-to-U editing at 41 sites in 18 transcripts, with 34 sites conserved in the closely related N. tabacum. Virus induced gene silencing of NbISE2 or NbIPI1 led to defective C-to-U revealed that they have overlapping roles at editing a site in the rpoB transcript but have distinct roles in editing other transcripts. This finding contrasts with maize ppr103 mutants that showed no defects in editing. The results indicate that NbISE2 and NbIPI1 are important for C-to-U editing in N. benthamiana chloroplasts, and they may function in a complex to edit specific sites while having antagonistic effects on editing others. That NbIPI1, carrying a DYW domain, is involved in organelle C-to-U RNA editing supports previous work showing that this domain catalyzes RNA editing.

Maize PPR-E proteins mediate RNA C-to-U editing in mitochondria by recruiting the trans deaminase PCW1

RNA C-to-U editing in organelles is essential for plant growth and development; however, the underlying mechanism is not fully understood. Here, we report that pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR)-E subclass proteins carry out RNA C-to-U editing by recruiting the trans deaminase PPR motifs, coiled-coil, and DYW domain-containing protein 1 (PCW1) in maize (Zea mays) mitochondria. Loss-of-function of bZIP and coiled-coil domain-containing PPR 1 (bCCP1) or PCW1 arrests seed development in maize. bCCP1 encodes a bZIP and coiled-coil domain-containing PPR protein, and PCW1 encodes an atypical PPR-DYW protein. bCCP1 is required for editing at 66 sites in mitochondria and PCW1 is required for editing at 102 sites, including the 66 sites that require bCCP1. The PCW1-mediated editing sites are exclusively associated with PPR-E proteins. bCCP1 interacts with PCW1 and the PPR-E protein Empty pericarp7 (EMP7). Two multiple organellar RNA editing factor (MORF) proteins, ZmMORF1 and ZmMORF8, interact with PCW1, EMP7, and bCCP1. ZmMORF8 enhanced the EMP7-PCW1 interaction in a yeast three-hybrid assay. C-to-U editing at the ccmFN-1553 site in maize required EMP7, bCCP1, and PCW1. These results suggest that PPR-E proteins function in RNA editing by recruiting the trans deaminase PCW1 and bCCP1, and MORF1/8 assist this recruitment through protein-protein interactions.

A Bibliometric Study for Plant RNA Editing Research: Trends and Future Challenges

RNA editing is a post-transcriptional process that introduces changes in RNA sequences encoded by nuclear, mitochondrial, or plastid genomes. To understand the research progress of plant RNA editing, we comprehensively analyze the articles on plant RNA editing from 2001 to 2022 through bibliometric methods. Nucleic Acids Research, Plant Journal and Plant cell are the journals that deserve attention with their high production, total local citation scores (TLCS), and h-indexes. The USA, China, and Germany are the top three countries with highly productive publications. Ulm University, Cornell University, and Chinese Acad Sci are excellent cooperative institutions with a high level of influence in the field, and KNOOP V and TAKENAKA M are good partnership. Plant RNA editing researches concentrate on the subject categories of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Plant Sciences, Genetics & Heredity, etc. Plant mitochondria, genome editing and messenger-RNA may be the research hotspots in the future. The main plant RNA editing research tools are JACUSA, SPRINT, and REDO, and the main databases are REDIdb, PED, and dbRES. At present, the research streams are (1) RNA editing sites; (2) Pentapeptide repeat protein (PPR) involved in RNA editing; (3) RNA editing factors. Overall, this article summarizes the research overview of plant RNA editing until 2022 and provides theoretical implications for its possible future directions.

Emergence of Novel RNA-Editing Sites by Changes in the Binding Affinity of a Conserved PPR Protein

RNA editing converts cytidines to uridines in plant organellar transcripts. Editing typically restores codons for conserved amino acids. During evolution, specific C-to-U editing sites can be lost from some plant lineages by genomic C-to-T mutations. By contrast, the emergence of novel editing sites is less well documented. Editing sites are recognized by pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) proteins with high specificity. RNA recognition by PPR proteins is partially predictable, but prediction is often inadequate for PPRs involved in RNA editing. Here we have characterized evolution and recognition of a recently gained editing site. We demonstrate that changes in the RNA recognition motifs that are not explainable with the current PPR code allow an ancient PPR protein, QED1, to uniquely target the ndhB-291 site in Brassicaceae. When expressed in tobacco, the Arabidopsis QED1 edits 33 high-confident off-target sites in chloroplasts and mitochondria causing a spectrum of mutant phenotypes. By manipulating the relative expression levels of QED1 and ndhB-291, we show that the target specificity of the PPR protein depends on the RNA:protein ratio. Finally, our data suggest that the low expression levels of PPR proteins are necessary to ensure the specificity of editing site selection and prevent deleterious off-target editing.

GRP23 plays a core role in E-type editosomes via interacting with MORFs and atypical PPR-DYWs in Arabidopsis mitochondria

Identifying the PPR-E+-NUWA-DYW2 editosome improves our understanding of the C-to-U RNA editing in plant organelles. However, the mechanism of RNA editing remains to be elucidated. Here, we report that GLUTAMINE-RICH PROTEIN23 (GRP23), a previously identified nuclear transcription regulator, plays an essential role in mitochondrial RNA editing through interacting with MORF (multiple organellar RNA-editing factor) proteins and atypical DYW-type pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) proteins. GRP23 is targeted to mitochondria, plastids, and nuclei. Analysis of the grp23 mutants rescued by embryo-specific complementation shows decreased editing efficiency at 352 sites in mitochondria and 6 sites in plastids, with a predominant specificity for sites edited by the PPR-E and PPR-DYW proteins. GRP23 interacts with atypical PPR-DYW proteins (MEF8, MEF8S, DYW2, and DYW4) and MORF proteins (MORF1 and MORF8), whereas the four PPR-DYWs interact with the two MORFs. These interactions may increase the stability of the GRP23-MORF-atypical PPR-DYW complex. Furthermore, analysis of mef8^N△64aamef8s double mutants shows that MEF8/MEF8S are required for the editing of the PPR-E protein-targeted sites in mitochondria. GRP23 could enhance the interaction between PPR-E and MEF8/MEF8S and form a homodimer or heterodimer with NUWA. Genetic complementation analysis shows that the C-terminal domains of GRP23 and NUWA possess a similar function, probably in the interaction with the MORFs. NUWA also interacts with atypical PPR-DYWs in yeast. Both GRP23 and NUWA interact with the atypical PPR-DYWs, suggesting that the PPR-E proteins recruit MEF8/MEF8S, whereas the PPR-E+ proteins specifically recruit DYW2 as the trans deaminase, and then GRP23, NUWA, and MORFs facilitate and/or stabilize the E or E+-type editosome formation.

A Comprehensive Evolutionary Study of Chloroplast RNA Editing in Gymnosperms: A Novel Type of G-to-A RNA Editing Is Common in Gymnosperms

Although more than 9100 plant plastomes have been sequenced, RNA editing sites of the whole plastome have been experimentally verified in only approximately 21 species, which seriously hampers the comprehensive evolutionary study of chloroplast RNA editing. We investigated the evolutionary pattern of chloroplast RNA editing sites in 19 species from all 13 families of gymnosperms based on a combination of genomic and transcriptomic data. We found that the chloroplast C-to-U RNA editing sites of gymnosperms shared many common characteristics with those of other land plants, but also exhibited many unique characteristics. In contrast to that noted in angiosperms, the density of RNA editing sites in ndh genes was not the highest in the sampled gymnosperms, and both loss and gain events at editing sites occurred frequently during the evolution of gymnosperms. In addition, GC content and plastomic size were positively correlated with the number of chloroplast RNA editing sites in gymnosperms, suggesting that the increase in GC content could provide more materials for RNA editing and facilitate the evolution of RNA editing in land plants or vice versa. Interestingly, novel G-to-A RNA editing events were commonly found in all sampled gymnosperm species, and G-to-A RNA editing exhibits many different characteristics from C-to-U RNA editing in gymnosperms. This study revealed a comprehensive evolutionary scenario for chloroplast RNA editing sites in gymnosperms, and reported that a novel type of G-to-A RNA editing is prevalent in gymnosperms.

U-to-C RNA editing by synthetic PPR-DYW proteins in bacteria and human culture cells

Programmable RNA editing offers significant therapeutic potential for a wide range of genetic diseases. Currently, several deaminase enzymes, including ADAR and APOBEC, can perform programmable adenosine-to-inosine or cytidine-to-uridine RNA correction. However, enzymes to perform guanosine-to-adenosine and uridine-to-cytidine (U-to-C) editing are still lacking to complete the set of transition reactions. It is believed that the DYW:KP proteins, specific to seedless plants, catalyze the U-to-C reactions in mitochondria and chloroplasts. In this study, we designed seven DYW:KP domains based on consensus sequences and fused them to a designer RNA-binding pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) domain. We show that three of these PPR-DYW:KP proteins edit targeted uridine to cytidine in bacteria and human cells. In addition, we show that these proteins have a 5′ but not apparent 3′ preference for neighboring nucleotides. Our results establish the DYW:KP aminase domain as a potential candidate for the development of a U-to-C editing tool in human cells.

DYW:KP domains, designed on proteins found in the mitochondria and chloroplasts of seedless plants, are fused to a designer RNA-binding pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) domain to edit targeted uridine to cytidine in bacteria and human cells.

Plant mitochondrial RNA editing factors can perform targeted C-to-U editing of nuclear transcripts in human cells

RNA editing processes are strikingly different in animals and plants. Up to thousands of specific cytidines are converted into uridines in plant chloroplasts and mitochondria whereas up to millions of adenosines are converted into inosines in animal nucleo-cytosolic RNAs. It is unknown whether these two different RNA editing machineries are mutually incompatible. RNA-binding pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) proteins are the key factors of plant organelle cytidine-to-uridine RNA editing. The complete absence of PPR mediated editing of cytosolic RNAs might be due to a yet unknown barrier that prevents its activity in the cytosol. Here, we transferred two plant mitochondrial PPR-type editing factors into human cell lines to explore whether they could operate in the nucleo-cytosolic environment. PPR56 and PPR65 not only faithfully edited their native, co-transcribed targets but also different sets of off-targets in the human background transcriptome. More than 900 of such off-targets with editing efficiencies up to 91%, largely explained by known PPR-RNA binding properties, were identified for PPR56. Engineering two crucial amino acid positions in its PPR array led to predictable shifts in target recognition. We conclude that plant PPR editing factors can operate in the entirely different genetic environment of the human nucleo-cytosol and can be intentionally re-engineered towards new targets.

An Overview of Pentatricopeptide Repeat (PPR) Proteins in the Moss Physcomitrium patens and Their Role in Organellar Gene Expression

Pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) proteins are one type of helical repeat protein that are widespread in eukaryotes. In particular, there are several hundred PPR members in flowering plants. The majority of PPR proteins are localized in the plastids and mitochondria, where they play a crucial role in various aspects of RNA metabolism at the post-transcriptional and translational steps during gene expression. Among the early land plants, the moss Physcomitrium (formerly Physcomitrella) patens has at least 107 PPR protein-encoding genes, but most of their functions remain unclear. To elucidate the functions of PPR proteins, a reverse-genetics approach has been applied to P. patens. To date, the molecular functions of 22 PPR proteins were identified as essential factors required for either mRNA processing and stabilization, RNA splicing, or RNA editing. This review examines the P. patens PPR gene family and their current functional characterization. Similarities and a diversity of functions of PPR proteins between P. patens and flowering plants and their roles in the post-transcriptional regulation of organellar gene expression are discussed.

DYW deaminase domain has a distinct preference for neighboring nucleotides of the target RNA editing sites

C-to-U RNA editing sites in plant organelles show a strong bias for neighboring nucleotides. The nucleotide upstream of the target cytidine is typically C or U, whereas A and G are less common and rare, respectively. In pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR)-type RNA editing factors, the PPR domain specifically binds to the 5' sequence of target cytidines, whereas the DYW domain catalyzes the C-to-U deamination. We comprehensively analyzed the effects of neighboring nucleotides of the target cytidines using an Escherichia coli orthogonal system. Physcomitrium PPR56 efficiently edited target cytidines when the nucleotide upstream was U or C, whereas it barely edited when the position was G or the nucleotide downstream was C. This preference pattern, which corresponds well with the observed nucleotide bias for neighboring nucleotides in plant organelles, was altered when the DYW domain of OTP86 or DYW1 was adopted. The PPR56 chimeric proteins edited the target sites even when the -1 position was G. Our results suggest that the DYW domain possesses a distinct preference for the neighboring nucleotides of the target sites, thus contributing to target selection in addition to the existing selection determined by the PPR domain.

EMP80 mediates the C-to-U editing of nad7 and atp4 and interacts with ZmDYW2 in maize mitochondria

RNA C-to-U editing is important to the expression and function of organellar genes in plants. Although several families of proteins have been identified to participate in this process, the underlying mechanism is not fully understood. Here we report the function of EMP80 in the C-to-U editing at the nad7-769 and atp4-118 sites, and the potential recruitment of ZmDYW2 as a trans deaminase in maize (Zea mays) mitochondria. Loss of EMP80 function arrests embryogenesis and endosperm development in maize. EMP80 is a PPR-E+ protein localised to mitochondria. An absence of EMP80 abolishes the C-to-U RNA editing at nad7-769 and atp4-118 sites, resulting in a cysteine-to-arginine (Cys→Arg) change in Nad7 and Atp4 in the emp80 mutant. The amino acid change consequently reduces the assembly of complexes I and V, leading to an accumulation of the F₁ subcomplex of complex V. EMP80 was found to interact with atypical DYW-type PPR protein ZmDYW2, which interacts with ZmNUWA. Co-expression of ZmNUWA enhances the interaction between EMP80 and ZmDYW2, suggesting that EMP80 potentially recruits ZmDYW2 as a trans deaminase through protein-protein interaction, and ZmNUWA may function as an enhancer of this interaction.

DEK48 Is Required for RNA Editing at Multiple Mitochondrial Sites and Seed Development in Maize

In flowering plants, C-to-U RNA editing can be critical to normal functions of mitochondrion-encoded proteins. Mitochondrial C-to-U RNA editing is facilitated by many factors from diverse protein families, of which the pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) proteins play an important role. Owing to their large number and frequent embryo lethality in mutants, functions of many PPRs remain unknown. In this study, we characterized a mitochondrion-localized DYW-type PPR protein, DEK48, functioning in the C-to-U RNA editing at multiple mitochondrial transcripts in maize. Null mutation of Dek48 severely arrests embryo and endosperm development, causing a defective kernel (dek) phenotype, named dek48. DEK48 loss of function abolishes the C-to-U editing at nad3-185, -215, and nad4-376, -977 sites and decreases the editing at 11 other sites, resulting in the alteration of the corresponding amino acids. Consequently, the absence of editing caused reduced assembly and activity of complex I in dek48. Interestingly, we identified a point mutation in dek48-3 causing a deletion of the Tryptophan (W) residue in the DYW motif that abolishes the editing function. In sum, this study reveals the function of DEK48 in the C-to-U editing in mitochondrial transcripts and seed development in maize, and it demonstrates a critical role of the W residue in the DYW triplet motif of DEK48 for the C-to-U editing function in vivo.

Cofactor-independent RNA editing by a synthetic S-type PPR protein

Pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) proteins are RNA-binding proteins that are attractive tools for RNA processing in synthetic biology applications given their modular structure and ease of design. Several distinct types of motifs have been described from natural PPR proteins, but almost all work so far with synthetic PPR proteins has focused on the most widespread P-type motifs. We have investigated synthetic PPR proteins based on tandem repeats of the more compact S-type PPR motif found in plant organellar RNA editing factors and particularly prevalent in the lycophyte Selaginella. With the aid of a novel plate-based screening method, we show that synthetic S-type PPR proteins are easy to design and bind with high affinity and specificity and are functional in a wide range of pH, salt and temperature conditions. We find that they outperform a synthetic P-type PPR scaffold in many situations. We designed an S-type editing factor to edit an RNA target in E. coli and demonstrate that it edits effectively without requiring any additional cofactors to be added to the system. These qualities make S-type PPR scaffolds ideal for developing new RNA processing tools.

The RanBP2 zinc finger domains of chloroplast RNA editing factor OZ1 are required for protein-protein interactions and conversion of C to U

In the chloroplast, organelle zinc finger 1 (OZ1) is a RanBP2-type zinc finger (Znf) protein required for many RNA editing events, a process by which specific cytosines are enzymatically converted to uracils as a correction mechanism for missense mutations in the organelle genomes. RNA editing is carried out by a large multi-protein complex called the 'editosome' that contains members of the pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) protein family, the RNA editing factor interacting protein (also known as MORF) family and the organelle RNA-recognition motif (ORRM) family, in addition to OZ1. OZ1 is an 82-kDa protein with distinct domains, including a pair of Znf domains and a unique C-terminal region. To elucidate the functions of these domains, we have generated truncations of OZ1 for use in protein-protein interaction assays that identified the C-terminal region of OZ1, as well as the Znf domains as the primary interactors with PPR proteins, which are factors required for site-specificity and enzymatic editing. Expression of these OZ1 truncations in vivo showed that the Znf domains were required to restore chloroplast RNA editing in oz1 knockout plants. Mutation of key structural residues in the Znf domains showed that they are necessary for editing and required for interaction with ORRM1, a general editing factor with an RNA-binding domain. These functional characterizations of the Znfs and novel C-terminal domain contribute to our understanding of the model for the chloroplast plant editosome.

DYW domain structures imply an unusual regulation principle in plant organellar RNA editing catalysis

RNA editosomes selectively deaminate cytidines to uridines in plant organellar transcripts–mostly to restore protein functionality and consequently facilitate mitochondrial and chloroplast function. The RNA editosomal pentatricopeptide repeat proteins serve target RNA recognition, whereas the intensively studied DYW domain elicits catalysis. Here we present structures and functional data of a DYW domain in an inactive ground state and activated. DYW domains harbour a cytidine deaminase fold and a C-terminal DYW motif, with catalytic and structural zinc atoms, respectively. A conserved gating domain within the deaminase fold regulates the active site sterically and mechanistically in a process that we termed gated zinc shutter. Based on the structures, an autoinhibited ground state and its activation are cross-validated by RNA editing assays and differential scanning fluorimetry. We anticipate that, in vivo, the framework of an active plant RNA editosome triggers the release of DYW autoinhibition to ensure a controlled and coordinated cytidine deamination playing a key role in mitochondrial and chloroplast homeostasis.

Functions of PPR Proteins in Plant Growth and Development

Pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) proteins form a large protein family in land plants, with hundreds of different members in angiosperms. In the last decade, a number of studies have shown that PPR proteins are sequence-specific RNA-binding proteins involved in multiple aspects of plant organellar RNA processing, and perform numerous functions in plants throughout their life cycle. Recently, computational and structural studies have provided new insights into the working mechanisms of PPR proteins in RNA recognition and cytidine deamination. In this review, we summarized the research progress on the functions of PPR proteins in plant growth and development, with a particular focus on their effects on cytoplasmic male sterility, stress responses, and seed development. We also documented the molecular mechanisms of PPR proteins in mediating RNA processing in plant mitochondria and chloroplasts.

Quantification of Mitochondrial RNA Editing Efficiency Using Sanger Sequencing Data

C-to-U RNA editing in mitochondria and plastids is widespread in almost all terrestrial plants, where it mainly changes codons to encode conserved amino acids in organelle mRNAs. In flowering plants, the number of RNA editing sites reaches 400-600 in mitochondria and about 40 in plastids, respectively. To date, more than 100 factors involved in RNA editing have been identified. Since target cytidines of each factor are often distributed across multiple transcripts, comprehensive monitoring of all RNA editing sites is necessary for their characterization. Comparing the signals of C and T in the Sanger sequencing chromatogram of RT-PCR products is the most frequently employed method for quantification of RNA editing efficiency, although several methods based on next-generation sequencing have been developed. I here describe a quick and easy method for quantification of RNA editing efficiency at several hundred sites using the Sanger sequencing chromatogram data.

PPR-DYW Protein EMP17 Is Required for Mitochondrial RNA Editing, Complex III Biogenesis, and Seed Development in Maize

The conversion of cytidines to uridines (C-to-U) at specific sites in mitochondrial and plastid transcripts is a post-transcriptional processing event that is important to the expression of organellar genes. Pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) proteins are involved in this process. In this study, we report the function of a previously uncharacterized PPR-DYW protein, Empty pericarp17 (EMP17), in the C-to-U editing and kernel development in maize. EMP17 is targeted to mitochondria. The loss-function of EMP17 arrests maize kernel development, abolishes the editing at ccmF _C -799 and nad2-677 sites, and reduces the editing at ccmF _C -906 and -966 sites. The absence of editing causes amino acid residue changes in CcmF_C-267 (Ser to Pro) and Nad2-226 (Phe to Ser), respectively. As CcmF_C functions in cytochrome c (Cytc) maturation, the amount of Cytc and Cytc ₁ protein is drastically reduced in emp17, suggesting that the CcmF_C-267 (Ser to Pro) change impairs the CcmF_C function. As a result, the assembly of complex III is strikingly decreased in emp17. In contrast, the assembly of complex I appears less affected, suggesting that the Nad2-226 (Phe to Ser) change may have less impact on Nad2 function. Together, these results indicate that EMP17 is required for the C-to-U editing at several sites in mitochondrial transcripts, complex III biogenesis, and seed development in maize.

The Chloroplast Epitranscriptome: Factors, Sites, Regulation, and Detection Methods

Modifications in nucleic acids are present in all three domains of life. More than 170 distinct chemical modifications have been reported in cellular RNAs to date. Collectively termed as epitranscriptome, these RNA modifications are often dynamic and involve distinct regulatory proteins that install, remove, and interpret these marks in a site-specific manner. Covalent nucleotide modifications-such as methylations at diverse positions in the bases, polyuridylation, and pseudouridylation and many others impact various events in the lifecycle of an RNA such as folding, localization, processing, stability, ribosome assembly, and translational processes and are thus crucial regulators of the RNA metabolism. In plants, the nuclear/cytoplasmic epitranscriptome plays important roles in a wide range of biological processes, such as organ development, viral infection, and physiological means. Notably, recent transcriptome-wide analyses have also revealed novel dynamic modifications not only in plant nuclear/cytoplasmic RNAs related to photosynthesis but especially in chloroplast mRNAs, suggesting important and hitherto undefined regulatory steps in plastid functions and gene expression. Here we report on the latest findings of known plastid RNA modifications and highlight their relevance for the post-transcriptional regulation of chloroplast gene expression and their role in controlling plant development, stress reactions, and acclimation processes.

ZmPPR26, a DYW-type pentatricopeptide repeat protein, is required for C-to-U RNA editing at atpA-1148 in maize chloroplasts

Pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) proteins are involved in the C-to-U RNA editing of organellar transcripts. The maize genome contains over 600 PPR proteins and few have been found to function in the C-to-U RNA editing in chloroplasts. Here, we report the function of ZmPPR26 in the C-to-U RNA editing and chloroplast biogenesis in maize. ZmPPR26 encodes a DYW-type PPR protein targeted to chloroplasts. The zmppr26 mutant exhibits albino seedling-lethal phenotype. Loss of function of ZmPPR26 abolishes the editing at atpA-1148 site, and decreases the editing at ndhF-62, rpl20-308, rpl2-2, rpoC2-2774, petB-668, rps8-182, and ndhA-50 sites. Overexpression of ZmPPR26 in zmppr26 restores the editing efficiency and rescues the albino seedling-lethal phenotype. Abolished editing at atpA-1148 causes a Leu to Ser change at AtpA-383 that leads to a reduction in the abundance of chloroplast ATP synthase in zmppr26. The accumulation of photosynthetic complexes are also markedly reduced in zmppr26, providing an explanation for the albino seedling-lethal phenotype. These results indicate that ZmPPR26 is required for the editing at atpA-1148 and is important for editing at the other seven sites in maize chloroplasts. The editing at atpA-1148 is critical for AtpA function, assembly of ATP synthase complex, and chloroplast biogenesis in maize.

A synthetic RNA editing factor edits its target site in chloroplasts and bacteria

Members of the pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) protein family act as specificity factors in C-to-U RNA editing. The expansion of the PPR superfamily in plants provides the sequence variation required for design of consensus-based RNA-binding proteins. We used this approach to design a synthetic RNA editing factor to target one of the sites in the Arabidopsis chloroplast transcriptome recognised by the natural editing factor CHLOROPLAST BIOGENESIS 19 (CLB19). We show that our synthetic editing factor specifically recognises the target sequence in in vitro binding assays. The designed factor is equally specific for the target rpoA site when expressed in chloroplasts and in the bacterium E. coli. This study serves as a successful pilot into the design and application of programmable RNA editing factors based on plant PPR proteins.

Advancing organelle genome transformation and editing for crop improvement

Plant cells contain three organelles that harbor DNA: the nucleus, plastids, and mitochondria. Plastid transformation has emerged as an attractive platform for the generation of transgenic plants, also referred to as transplastomic plants. Plastid genomes have been genetically engineered to improve crop yield, nutritional quality, and resistance to abiotic and biotic stresses, as well as for recombinant protein production. Despite many promising proof-of-concept applications, transplastomic plants have not been commercialized to date. Sequence-specific nuclease technologies are widely used to precisely modify nuclear genomes, but these tools have not been applied to edit organelle genomes because the efficient homologous recombination system in plastids facilitates plastid genome editing. Unlike plastid transformation, successful genetic transformation of higher plant mitochondrial genome transformation was tested in several research group, but not successful to date. However, stepwise progress has been made in modifying mitochondrial genes and their transcripts, thus enabling the study of their functions. Here, we provide an overview of advances in organelle transformation and genome editing for crop improvement, and we discuss the bottlenecks and future development of these technologies.

The Pentatricopeptide Repeat Protein MEF100 Is Required for the Editing of Four Mitochondrial Editing Sites in Arabidopsis

In Arabidopsis thaliana there are more than 600 C-to-U RNA editing events in the mitochondria and at least 44 in the chloroplasts. Pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) proteins provide the specificity for these reactions. They recognize RNA sequences in a partially predictable fashion via key amino acids at the fifth and last position in each PPR motif that bind to individual ribonucleotides. A combined approach of RNA-Seq, mutant complementation, electrophoresis of mitochondrial protein complexes and Western blotting allowed us to show that MEF100, a PPR protein identified in a genetic screen for mutants resistant to an inhibitor of γ -glutamylcysteine synthetase, is required for the editing of nad1-493, nad4-403, nad7-698 and ccmFN2-356 sites in Arabidopsis mitochondria. The absence of editing in mef100 leads to a decrease in mitochondrial Complex I activity, which probably explains the physiological phenotype. Some plants have lost the requirement for MEF100 at one or more of these sites through mutations in the mitochondrial genome. We show that loss of the requirement for MEF100 editing leads to divergence in the MEF100 binding site.

An interbacterial DNA deaminase toxin directly mutagenizes surviving target populations

When bacterial cells come in contact, antagonism mediated by the delivery of toxins frequently ensues. The potential for such encounters to have long-term beneficial consequences in recipient cells has not been investigated. Here, we examined the effects of intoxication by DddA, a cytosine deaminase delivered via the type VI secretion system (T6SS) of Burkholderia cenocepacia. Despite its killing potential, we observed that several bacterial species resist DddA and instead accumulate mutations. These mutations can lead to the acquisition of antibiotic resistance, indicating that even in the absence of killing, interbacterial antagonism can have profound consequences on target populations. Investigation of additional toxins from the deaminase superfamily revealed that mutagenic activity is a common feature of these proteins, including a representative we show targets single-stranded DNA and displays a markedly divergent structure. Our findings suggest that a surprising consequence of antagonistic interactions between bacteria could be the promotion of adaptation via the action of directly mutagenic toxins.

The PPR-SMR Protein ATP4 Is Required for Editing the Chloroplast rps8 mRNA in Rice and Maize

Chloroplast gene expression involves the participation of hundreds of pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) RNA binding proteins, and proteins in the PLS subfamily typically specify sites of RNA editing, whereas those in the P-subfamily typically stabilize RNA, activate translation, or promote intron splicing. Several P-type PPR proteins include a small MutS-related (SMR) domain, but the biochemical contribution of the SMR domain remains enigmatic. Here, we describe a rice (Oryza sativa) mutant, osatp4, lacking the ortholog of ATP4, a PPR-SMR protein in maize (Zea mays). osatp4 mutants were chlorotic and had a plastid-ribosome deficiency when grown in the cold. Like maize ATP4, OsATP4 was required for the accumulation of dicistronic rpl16-rpl14 transcripts. Surprisingly, OsATP4 was also required for the editing of a specific nucleotide in the ribosomal protein S8 transcripts, rps8, and this function was conserved in maize. By contrast, rps8 RNA was edited normally in the maize PROTON gradient regulation3 mutant, pgr3, which also lacks rpl16-rpl14 transcripts, indicating that the editing defect in atp4 mutants is not a secondary effect of altered rpl16-rpl14 RNA metabolism. Expression of the edited rps8 isoform in transgenic osatp4 mutants complemented the cold-sensitive phenotype, indicating that a rps8 expression defect accounts for the cold-sensitivity. We suggest that ATP4 stimulates rps8 editing by facilitating access of a previously characterized PLS-type RNA editing factor to its cognate cis-element upstream of the edited nucleotide.

Maize pentatricopeptide repeat protein DEK53 is required for mitochondrial RNA editing at multiple sites and seed development

Pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) proteins were identified as site-specific recognition factors for RNA editing in plant mitochondria and plastids. In this study, we characterized maize (Zea mays) kernel mutant defective kernel 53 (dek53), which has an embryo lethal and collapsed endosperm phenotype. Dek53 encodes an E-subgroup PPR protein, which possesses a short PLS repeat region of only seven repeats. Subcellular localization analysis indicated that DEK53 is localized in the mitochondrion. Strand- and transcript-specific RNA-seq analysis showed that the dek53 mutation affected C-to-U RNA editing at more than 60 mitochondrial C targets. Biochemical analysis of mitochondrial protein complexes revealed a significant reduction in the assembly of mitochondrial complex III in dek53. Transmission electron microscopic examination showed severe morphological defects of mitochondria in dek53 endosperm cells. In addition, yeast two-hybrid and luciferase complementation imaging assays indicated that DEK53 can interact with the mitochondrion-targeted non-PPR RNA editing factor ZmMORF1, suggesting that DEK53 might be a functional component of the organellar RNA editosome.