Maspin expression in myoepithelial tumors of the breast

Prognostic value of Maspin protein level in patients with triple negative breast cancer

The search for prognostic markers in breast cancer has bumped into a typical feature of these tumors, intra and intertumoral heterogeneity. Changes in the expression profile, localization of these proteins or shedding to the surrounding stroma can be useful in the search for new markers. In this context, classification by molecular subtypes can bring perspectives for both diagnosis and screening for appropriate treatments. However, the Triple Negative (TN) subtype, which is already the one with the worst prognosis, lacks appropriate and consistent molecular markers. In this work, we analyzed 346 human breast cancer samples in tissue microarrays (TMA) from cases diagnosed with invasive breast carcinoma to assess the expression and localization pattern of Maspin and their correlation with clinical parameters. To complement our findings, we also used TCGA data to analyze the mRNA levels of these respective genes. Our data suggests that the TN subtype demonstrates a higher level of cytoplasmic Maspin compared to the other subtypes. Maspin transcript levels follow the same trend. However, TN patients with lower Maspin expression tend to have worse overall survival and free-survival metastasis rates. Finally, we used Maspin expression data to verify possible relationships with the clinicopathological information of our cohort. Our univariate analyses indicate that Maspin is related to the expression of estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR). Furthermore, Maspin expression levels also showed correlation with Scarff-Bloom-Richardson (SBR) parameter, and stromal Maspin showed a relationship with lymph node involvement. Our data is not consistently robust enough to categorize Maspin as a prognostic marker. However, it does indicate a change in the expression profile within the TN subtype.

Tumour suppression by targeted intravenous non-viral CRISPRa using dendritic polymers

This article demonstrates a fully synthetic strategy enabling CRISPR-mediated activation of tumour suppressor genes in vivo to reduce tumour burden.

Aberrant gene expression is a hallmark of cancer. Although transcription is traditionally considered ‘undruggable’, the development of CRISPR-associated protein 9 (Cas9) systems offers enormous potential to rectify cancer-associated transcriptional abnormalities in malignant cells. However delivery of this technology presents a critical challenge to overcome in order to realize clinical translation for cancer therapy. In this article we demonstrate for the first time, a fully synthetic strategy to enable CRISPR-mediated activation (CRISPRa) of tumour suppressor genes in vivo using a targeted intravenous approach. We show this via highly efficient transcriptional activation of two model tumour suppressor genes, Mammary Serine Protease Inhibitor (MASPIN, SERPINB5) and cysteine-rich 61/connective tissue growth factor/nephroblastoma-overexpressed 6 (CCN6, WISP3), in a mouse model of breast cancer. In particular, we demonstrate that targeted intravenous delivery of can be achieved using a novel nanoscale dendritic macromolecular delivery agent, with negligible toxicity and long lasting therapeutic effects, outlining a targeted effective formulation with potential to treat aggressive malignancies.

The Opportunity of Precision Medicine for Breast Cancer With Context-Sensitive Tumor Suppressor Maspin

To improve the precision of molecular diagnosis and to develop and guide targeted therapies of breast cancer, it is essential to determine the mechanisms that underlie the specific tumor phenotypes. To this end, the application of a snapshot of gene expression profile for breast cancer diagnosis and prognosis is fundamentally challenged since the tissue-based data are derived from heterogonous cell types and are not likely to reflect the dynamics of context-dependent tumor progression and drug sensitivity. The intricate network of epithelial differentiation program can be concertedly controlled by tumor suppressor maspin, a homologue of clade B serine protease inhibitors (serpin), through its multifaceted molecular interactions in multiple subcellular localizations. Unlike most other serpins that are expressed in multiple cell types, maspin is epithelial specific and has distinct roles in luminal and myoepithelial cells. Endogenously expressed maspin has been found in the nucleus and cytoplasm, and detected on the surface of cell membrane. It is also secreted free and as an exosomal cargo protein. Research in the field has led to the identification of the maspin targets and maspin-associated molecules, as well as the structural determinants of its suppressive functions. The current review discusses the possibility for maspin to serve as a cell type-specific and context-sensitive marker to improve the precision of breast cancer diagnosis and prognosis. These advancements further suggest a new window of opportunity for designing novel maspin-based chemotherapeutic agents with improved anti-cancer potency. J. Cell. Biochem. 118: 1639-1647, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Pathophysiology of myoepithelial cells in salivary glands

Myoepithelial cells (MECs) are considered to be a key participant in most salivary gland diseases, particularly tumors. MECs structurally resemble both epithelial cells and smooth muscles. Diagnostic dilemmas caused are due to inadequacy of characterizing the wide spectrum of morphologic and immunologic features which are different for both normal and neoplastic MECs. This article discusses the development, functions and structure of both normal and neoplastic MECs, their staining properties and differences in the morphologic and immunophenotypic properties of the MEC in detail. It also describes the role of MEC in pathogenesis and morphogenesis of various nonneoplastic and neoplastic salivary gland lesions and thereby are responsible for the myriad histopathology of salivary gland tumors.

K5/K14-positive cells contribute to salivary gland-like breast tumors with myoepithelial differentiation

Salivary gland-like tumors of the breast show a great variety of architectural patterns and cellular differentiations such as glandular, myoepithelial, squamous, and even mesenchymal phenotypes. However, currently little is known about the evolution and cellular differentiation of these tumors. For that reason, we performed an in situ triple immunofluorescence lineage/differentiation tracing (isTILT) and qRT-PCR study of basal (K5/K14), glandular (K7/K8/18), and epidermal-specific squamous (K10) keratins, p63, and smooth muscle actin (SMA; myoepithelial marker) with the aim to construct and trace different cell lineages and define their cellular hierarchy in tumors with myoepithelial differentiation. isTILT analysis of a series of 28 breast, salivary, and lacrimal gland tumors, including pleomorphic adenomas (n=8), epithelial-myoepithelial tumors (n=9), and adenoid cystic carcinomas (n=11) revealed that all tumor types contained K5/K14-positive progenitor cells in varying frequencies from a few percent up to 15%. These K5/K14-positive tumor cells were found to differentiate to glandular- (K8/18-positive) and myoepithelial-lineage (SMA-positive)-specific cells and were also shown to generate various heterologeous cell differentiations such as squamous and mesenchymal progenies. p63 was co-expressed with K5/K14 in basal-like progenitor cells, myoepithelial, and squamous cells but not in glandular cells. Our results show that the corresponding counterpart tumors of breast and salivary/lacrimal glands have identical cellular compositions. Taken together, our isTILT and RNA-expression data indicate that look-alike tumors of the breast represent a special subgroup of basal-type tumors with benign or usually low malignant potential.

Maspin: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic implications

Maspin, a non-inhibitory member of the serine protease inhibitor superfamily, has been characterized as a tumor suppressor gene in multiple cancer types. Among the established anti-tumor effects of Maspin are the inhibition of cancer cell invasion, attachment to extracellular matrices, increased sensitivity to apoptosis, and inhibition of angiogenesis. However, while significant experimental data support the role of Maspin as a tumor suppressor, clinical data regarding the prognostic implications of Maspin expression have led to conflicting results. This highlights the need for a better understanding of the context dependencies of Maspin in normal biology and how these are perturbed in the context of cancer. In this review, we outline the regulation and roles of Maspin in normal and developmental biology while discussing novel evidence and emerging theories related to its functions in cancer. We provide insight into the immense therapeutic potential of Maspin and the challenges related to its successful clinical translation.

Combined Epithelial-Myoepithelial Lesions of the Breast

Epithelial-myoepithelial proliferations of the breast are a heterogeneous poorly defined group of lesions characterized morphologically by dual differentiation into ductal (luminal) and myoepithelial cells. They include neoplastic and non-neoplastic entities that have overlapping morphologic features that may give rise to diagnostic difficulty. Many of these entities are low grade or of uncertain malignant potential but the biology of some of these rare lesions remains to be elucidated. This article discusses the differential diagnosis of epithelial-myoepithelial lesions of the breast and highlights the morphologic features of some of these entities.

Maspin and MCM2 immunoprofiling in salivary gland carcinomas

BACKGROUND

The pathogenesis of salivary gland carcinomas is very complex and prognostic markers are difficult to find in these carcinomas of which the different subtypes have varying malignant potential. The study was conducted to examine the cellular distribution of maspin and MCM2 in salivary gland carcinomas and their value to predict lymph node metastasis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty three paraffin blocks of different lesions (15 muco-epidermoid carcinoma, 14 adenoid cystic carcinoma, 3 epi-myoepithelial carcinoma, 5 salivary duct carcinoma, 5 malignant pleomorphic adenoma, 6 polymorphous low grade adenocarcinoma and 5 acinic cell carcinoma) were prepared for immunohistochemical staining with maspin and MCM2 antibodies. ANOVA and Pearson correlation tests were used for the statistical analysis of the results.

RESULTS

All salivary gland carcinomas express maspin and MCM2 with variable cellular localization. There was a significant difference in the expression of each antibody between mucoepidermoid carcinoma, adenoid cystic carcinoma and polymorphous low grade adenocarcinoma. No association was found between examined markers and lymph node metastasis.

CONCLUSIONS

Salivary gland carcinomas express maspin and MCM2 with variable levels and cellular localization, consisting important markers of biological behavior in these tumors. The level of MCM2 expression can be used in the differential diagnosis of adenoid cystic carcinoma and polymorphous low grade adenocarcinoma. Further study with large sample size is recommended to assess their value in prediction of lymph node metastasis.

Best practices in diagnostic immunohistochemistry: myoepithelial markers in breast pathology

CONTEXT

Numerous immunohistochemical stains have been shown to exhibit exclusive or preferential positivity in breast myoepithelial cells relative to their luminal/epithelial counterparts. These myoepithelial markers provide invaluable assistance in accurately classifying breast proliferations, especially in core biopsies. Although numerous myoepithelial markers are available, they differ in their sensitivity, specificity, and ease of interpretation, which may be attributed, to a large extent, to the variable immunoreactivity of these markers in stromal cells including myofibroblasts, vessels, luminal/epithelial cells, and tumor cells.

OBJECTIVE

To review commonly used myoepithelial markers in breast pathology and a selection of diagnostic scenarios where they may be useful.

DATA SOURCES

The information outlined in this review article is based on our experiences with routine cases and a review of English-language articles published between 1987 and 2008.

CONCLUSIONS

To demonstrate the presence or absence of myoepithelial cells, a panel-based approach of 2 or more markers is recommended. Markers that most effectively combine sensitivity, specificity, and ease of interpretation include smooth muscle myosin heavy chains, calponin, p75, p63, P-cadherin, basal cytokeratins, maspin, and CD10. These markers, however, display varying cross-reactivity patterns and variably reduced expression in the myoepithelial cells bordering in situ carcinomas. The choice of a myoepithelial marker should be dependent on a combination of factors, including published evidence on its diagnostic utility, its availability, performance characteristics that have been achieved in a given laboratory, and the specific diagnostic scenario. When its use is deemed necessary, immunohistochemistry for myoepithelial cells in breast pathology is most effective when conceptualized as supplemental, rather than central to routine morphologic interpretation.

Inmunohistochemical profile of solid cell nest of thyroid gland

It is widely held that solid cell nests (SCN) of the thyroid are ultimobranchial body remnants. SCNs are composed of main cells and C cells. It has been suggested that main cells might be pluripotent cells contributing to the histogenesis of C cells and follicular cells, as well as to the formation of certain thyroid tumors. The present study sought to analyze the immunohistochemical profile of SCN and to investigate the potential stem cell role of SCN main cells. Tissue sections from ten cases of nodular hyperplasia (non-tumor goiter) with SCNs were retrieved from the files of the Hospital Infanta Luisa (Seville, Spain). Parathormone (PTH), calcitonin (CT), thyroglobulin (TG), thyroid transcription factor (TTF-1), galectin 3 (GAL3), cytokeratin 19 (CK 19), p63, bcl-2, OCT4, and SALL4 expression were evaluated by immunohistochemistry. Patient clinical data were collected, and tissue sections were stained with hematoxylin-eosin for histological examination. Most cells stained negative for PTH, CT, TG, and TTF-1. Some cells staining positive for TTF-1 and CT required discussion. However, bcl-2, p63, GAL3, and CK 19 protein expression was detected in main cells. OCT4 protein expression was detected in only two cases, and SALL4 expression in none. Positive staining for bcl-2 and p63, and negative staining for PTH, CT, and TG in SCN main cells are both consistent with the widely accepted minimalist definition of stem cells, thus supporting the hypothesis that they may play a stem cell role in the thyroid gland, although further research will be required into stem cell markers. Furthermore, p63 and GAL-3 staining provides a much more sensitive means of detecting SCNs than staining for carcinoembryonic antigen, calcitonin, or other markers; this may help to distinguish SCNs from their mimics.

Adenomyoepithelioma of the breast: a review stressing its propensity for malignant transformation

This review describes the classification, clinical presentation, pathological features and clinical behaviour of adenomyoepithelioma (AME) of the breast. It is based on an extensive review of the literature and study of a collection of cases built up over a 17-year period at the British Columbia Cancer Agency. The diversity of the morphology encountered in both benign and malignant AME is described. The behaviour of malignant AME seems to be related to the grade of the malignant component.

Maspin protein expression correlates with tumor progression in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer

Maspin is a 42-kDa protein that belongs to the family of serine protease inhibitors. It is involved in various physiological processes. In cancer tissue, Maspin was found to influence angiogenesis, tumor growth, metastasis and the prognosis of tumor patients. This study was performed to analyze the involvement of Maspin in transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder as well as its prognostic impact in a large patient cohort. Specimens from 162 non-muscle invasive bladder cancer patients (pTa, 91; pT1, 71) treated by transurethral resection with a minimum 3-year follow-up (median 58.5 months) were included in the present investigation. Tissue microarrays were constructed, and the specimens were immunohistochemically stained for Maspin protein expression. Each tissue specimen was assessed on a staining scale ranging from 0 (no staining) to 300 (strong staining) and correlated with various clinicopathological parameters. Maspin protein expression predicted progression with a sensitivity of 95% and a specificity of 70% (p<0.001). In predicting recurrence, Maspin staining showed 52% sensitivity and 67% specificity (p<0.05). Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed, and a low Maspin protein expression was correlated with a higher incidence of tumor progression (p<0.0001). However, expression levels of Maspin protein did not distinguish between pTa and pT1 specimens. Multivariate analyses indicated Maspin expression as an independent factor for predicting progression (p<0.0001) and recurrence (p<0.05). The present results suggest that the Maspin protein expression is an independent prognostic indicator for predicting recurrence and progression to muscle invasive disease. This study further emphasizes a possible clinical role of this novel tumor suppressor gene in transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder.

Triple negative breast carcinomas: similarities and differences with basal like carcinomas

The cDNA microarrays allows the classification of breast cancers into 6 groups: luminal A, luminal B, luminal C, normal breast-like, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive, and basal-like. This latter is characterized by the expression of basal cytokeratins (CKs), and frequent negativity for hormone receptors and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2. There is a marked parallelism between triple negative breast carcinomas and basal-like carcinoma, but these are not equivalent terms. Estimated concordance is around 80%. CK5 seems to be the best marker for the identification of these tumors. Other good markers to identify these tumors are CK14, CK17, and epidermal growth factor receptor. A subset of triple negative breast carcinomas has myoepithelial differentiation, with positivities for smooth muscle actin, p63, S-100, and CD10 among others. Recent studies suggest that basal like carcinomas are originated from mammary stem cells.

Triple-Negative Breast Carcinoma

Triple-negative breast carcinomas (TNBCs) comprise approximately 15% to 20% of breast cancers. Accurate assessment of tumor estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status is an essential part of classifying tumors into this group. As a group, these tumors are associated with poor clinical outcomes and have been shown to exhibit an increased propensity for hematogenous metastasis to the brain and lungs. Many TNBCs, particularly ductal, not otherwise specified (NOS), and metaplastic carcinomas, show an overlapping characteristic gene expression pattern when evaluated by cDNA microarrays. This group has been termed basal-like because of the similarity with normal breast basal/myoepithelial cells including basal cytokeratin expression and lack of hormone receptor and HER2 expression. The array data have been used to develop multiple immunohistochemical surrogates to identify basal-like tumors in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues, most employing basal cytokeratins and epidermal growth factor receptor. Currently, there is no international consensus on biomarkers used to identify tumors as basal-like, and the routine use of the term basal-like in surgical pathology reports is premature. Tumor morphologic features associated with triple-negative status include Nottingham grade 3 with high mitotic rate, pushing border of invasion, geographic tumor necrosis, solid/sheet-like growth pattern, lymphocytic infiltrate, and large central acellular zone. Most breast cancers arising in patients who have a germ-line BRCA1 mutation show similar histologic features and a triple-negative phenotype. Not all TNBCs are associated with an unfavorable prognosis, drawing attention to the heterogeneity of this tumor group and the continued need to link tumor morphology and grade with triple-negative status. This article focuses on histopathology, molecular characterization, carcinogenesis, clinical behavior, and treatment of these tumors.

Triple negative breast carcinoma and the basal phenotype: from expression profiling to clinical practice

Triple negative breast carcinomas (TNBCs) are a group of primary breast tumors with aggressive clinical behavior. Most TNBCs possess a basal phenotype (BP) and show varying degrees of basal cytokeratin and myoepithelial marker expression. The importance of recognizing these tumors came to light largely as the result of gene expression profiling studies that categorized breast cancer into 3 major groups. Two of these groups are defined by their respective expression of estrogen receptor and HER2. TNBCs represent a third group and are defined by negativity for hormone receptors and HER2. TNBCs currently lack effective targeted therapies and are frequently resistant to standard chemotherapeutic regimens. These tumors tend to occur in premenopausal women and members of specific ethnic groups and a subset are associated with heritable BRCA1 mutations. For patients with sporadic TNBCs and BP tumors, BRCA1 dysfunction seems to play a major role in the development and progression of disease. The pathologist's role in the diagnosis and characterization of TNBCs and BP tumors is currently being defined as we are acquiring knowledge of the biologic and genetic underpinnings that drive this heterogeneous group of diseases. This review will provide a historical prospective on TNBCs and tumors that express basal cytokeratins and myoepithelial makers. Additionally, we will discuss the molecular biologic, genetic and pathologic aspects of these tumors. Guidelines will be provided on how to best approach the diagnosis of these cases and on what input pathologists should provide clinicians to help develop optimal therapeutic and preventative strategies against this aggressive group of breast cancers.

Malignant adenomyoepithelioma of the breast with matrix production may be compatible with one variant form of matrix-producing carcinoma: A case report

We examined a 77-year-old woman who suffered from a left breast tumor. She had undergone right mastectomy for invasive ductal carcinoma at 68 years of age, and rectal resection for mucinous carcinoma at the age of 74 years. The left breast tumor measured 3.8 x 2.5 x 1.6 cm. Neoplastic cells consisted of atypical epithelial and myoepithelial cells. The former cells were polygonal and large. They were located in the periphery of the tumor, arranged in a ductal pattern, and expressed cytokeratins, S-100 protein, maspin, and MIC2. The latter cells were composed of dark cells which proliferated in a periductal pattern, and stellate cells which were located in the center of the tumor. They invaded the chondromyxoid tissues, and proliferated in a lace-like pattern. Atypical myoepithelial cells expressed vimentin, S-100 protein, maspin, and MIC2. We conclude that malignant adenomyoepithelioma of the breast with matrix production might be compatible with a variant form of matrix-producing carcinoma.

Caveolin 1 is overexpressed and amplified in a subset of basal-like and metaplastic breast carcinomas: a morphologic, ultrastructural, immunohistochemical, and in situ hybridization analysis

PURPOSE

The distribution and significance of caveolin 1 (CAV1) expression in different breast cell types and role in breast carcinogenesis remain poorly understood. Both tumor-suppressive and oncogenic roles have been proposed for this protein. The aims of this study were to characterize the distribution of CAV1 in normal breast, benign breast lesions, breast cancer precursors, and metaplastic breast carcinomas; to assess the prognostic significance of CAV1 expression in invasive breast carcinomas; and to define whether CAV1 gene amplification is the underlying genetic mechanism driving CAV1 overexpression in breast carcinomas.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

CAV1 distribution in frozen and paraffin-embedded whole tissue sections of normal breast was evaluated using immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence, and immunoelectron microscopy. CAV1 expression was immunohistochemically analyzed in benign lesions, breast cancer precursors, and metaplastic breast carcinomas and in a cohort of 245 invasive breast carcinomas from patients treated with surgery followed by anthracycline-based chemotherapy. In 25 cases, CAV1 gene amplification was assessed by chromogenic in situ hybridization.

RESULTS

In normal breast, CAV1 was expressed in myoepithelial cells, endothelial cells, and a subset of fibroblasts. Luminal epithelial cells showed negligible staining. CAV1 was expressed in 90% of 39 metaplastic breast carcinomas and in 9.4% of 245 invasive breast cancers. In the later cohort, CAV1 expression was significantly associated with 'basal-like' immunophenotype and with shorter disease-free and overall survival on univariate analysis. CAV1 gene amplification was found in 13% of cases with strong CAV1 expression.

CONCLUSIONS

The concurrent CAV1 amplification and overexpression call into question its tumor-suppressive effects in basal-like breast carcinomas.

Metaplastic breast carcinomas are basal-like tumours

AIMS

Recently, an immunohistochemical panel comprising antibodies against HER2, oestrogen receptor (ER), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and cytokeratin (CK) 5/6 was reported to identify basal-like breast carcinomas, as defined by cDNA microarrays. Our aim was to analyse a series of metaplastic breast carcinomas (MBCs) using this panel plus two other basal markers (CK14 and p63) and progesterone receptor (PR), to define how frequently MBCs show a basal-like immunophenotype.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Sixty-five cases were retrieved from the pathology archives of the authors' institutions and reviewed by three of the authors. Immunohistochemistry with antibodies for HER2, ER, EGFR, CK5/6, CK14 and p63 was performed according to standard methods. All but six cases (91%) showed the typical immunoprofile of basal-like tumours (ER- and HER2-, EGFR+ and/or CK5/6+). When CK14 and p63 were added to the panel, two additional cases could be classified as basal-like. The majority of MBCs lacked PR, except 4/19 (21%) carcinomas with squamous metaplasia.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrate that MBCs show a basal-like phenotype, regardless of the type of metaplastic elements. Moreover, as these neoplasms frequently overexpress EGFR (57%), patients with MBC may benefit from treatment with anti-EGFR drugs.

Maspin expression in carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma

AIMS

To investigate the presence and distribution of the protein maspin in carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma (CXPA).

METHODS

Maspin expression was studied by means of immunohistochemistry in 16 cases of CXPA, using the labelled polymer method.

RESULTS

According to the extent of invasion, the tumours were subdivided into: intracapsular (five cases), minimally invasive (four cases), and invasive (seven cases). Twelve patients had carcinoma with only epithelial differentiation, whereas four had a malignant myoepithelial component. Non-luminal cells in the duct-like structures of the remnant pleomorphic adenoma were strongly positive for maspin, whereas only a few luminal cells were immunopositive. A few positive cells were seen in the frequent hypocellular and hyalinised areas. Maspin was abundantly expressed, mainly in non-luminal cells, in transitional areas of CXPA with only epithelial differentiation. In frankly carcinomatous areas there was a gradual decrease in maspin expression. Almost all cells were maspin positive in CXPA with a myoepithelial component. When present, luminal cells were in general negative for maspin.

CONCLUSIONS

When only epithelial cells undergo malignant transformation, maspin expression is gradually lost. In cases with a myoepithelial component, maspin expression is high, and this might be related to the tumour suppressor activity attributed to this cell.

Distribution and significance of nerve growth factor receptor (NGFR/p75NTR) in normal, benign and malignant breast tissue

Nerve growth factor receptor (NGFR) is a transmembrane glycoprotein without intrinsic tyrosine kinase activity, whose expression is not restricted to neural cells. NGFR is reported to act as a tumour suppressor, negatively regulating cell growth and proliferation. NGFR expression was immunohistochemically analysed in normal breast tissue and in 140 benign, biphasic and preinvasive breast lesions, in 22 tumours with myoepithelial differentiation and in two cohorts of breast cancer patients: a series of 245 invasive breast carcinomas studied with tissue microarrays and 37 high-grade invasive ductal carcinomas with basal-like immunophenotype. NGFR consistently displayed membrane reactivity in myoepithelial cells arranged as a continuous layer around normal ducts and lobular units, intralobular fibroblasts, vascular adventitia and nerve bundles. Myoepithelial cells of benign proliferations and pre-invasive lesions were consistently positive for NGFR. Scattered NGFR-positive cells were observed in solid areas of six out of nine cases of hyperplasia of usual type, whereas in flat atypia, lobular carcinoma in situ and virtually all cases of ductal carcinoma in situ (97.5%), NGFR was restricted to the myoepithelial layer. Positivity for NGFR was observed in 11 out of 245 (4.5%) breast carcinomas, nine out of 20 (45%) metaplastic breast carcinomas and 14 out of 37 (38%) basal-like breast carcinomas. NGFR expression in invasive tumours significantly correlated with that of cytokeratins 5/6 (P<0.05), 14 (P<0.0001) and 17 (P<0.0005) and EGFR (P<0.0001) and displayed an inverse correlation with oestrogen and progesterone receptors (both, P<0.0001). NGFR showed a statistically significant association with longer disease-free (P<0.05) and overall survival (P<0.01) in the cohort of patients with basal-like carcinomas. This study demonstrates the usefulness of NGFR as a new adjunct marker to identify myoepithelial cells in preinvasive lesions and myoepithelial differentiation in breast carcinomas. Furthermore, provisional data in a small number of basal-like breast carcinomas suggest that NGFR may identify a subgroup of basal-like breast carcinomas with good prognosis.

Expression of maspin in mammary gland tumors of the dog

Maspin is a serine protease inhibitor that inhibits tumor invasion and metastasis in human breast cancer and is consistently expressed by mammary myoepithelial cells (MECs). To analyze the value of maspin as a marker of the MEC layer of the normal and tumoral canine mammary gland, the immunohistochemical expression of maspin was studied in formalin-fixed tissues from 55 benign and malignant tumors (40 tumors also contained the surrounding normal mammary gland) using a commercially available monoclonal antibody. Periacinar and periductal MECs of all 40 normal mammary glands were stained by the anti-human maspin monoclonal antibody, and immunoreactivity was observed in the nucleus and cytoplasm of these cells. In addition, maspin was found in 53 (98%) of the tumors studied, reacting with the MECs in 100% of benign tumors and 93% of malignant tumors and to the epithelial cells of 16% of benign and 73% of malignant tumors. In the MEC compartment, immunoreactivity was observed in the cytoplasm of hypertrophic MECs, fusiform MECs, stellate MECs, rounded (myoepithelial) cells, and chondroblasts. In the epithelial cell compartment, immunoreactivity was observed in the cytoplasm of cells with and without squamous differentiation. Stromal myofibroblasts were unreactive. Maspin appears to be a very sensitive marker of the normal and neoplastic myoepithelium that, contrary to smooth muscle differentiation markers, does not stain stromal myofibroblasts. In addition, a subset of neoplastic epithelial cells reacted with the maspin antibody. The relationship between maspin expression in different cellular compartments of canine mammary carcinomas and the biologic aggressiveness of the disease remains to be elucidated.

Metaplastic breast carcinomas: are they of myoepithelial differentiation?: immunohistochemical profile of the sarcomatoid subtype using novel myoepithelial markers

We investigated 20 spindle cell (sarcomatoid) metaplastic carcinomas (MCs) without squamous differentiation. In addition, five high-grade phyllodes tumors were assessed for comparison. Our immunohistochemical antibody panel included pan-cytokeratin (CK), low molecular weight CK (CK8/18), four basal cell type CKs (34betaE12, CK5/6, CK14, and CK17), vimentin antibodies, as well as antibodies to established (SMA, CD10, p63, S-100, maspin, calponin, GFAP, SM-myosin), and novel (CD29, 14-3-3sigma) myoepithelial markers. Sixteen of the 20 tumors (80%) expressed at least two markers of the combination CD10/p63/SMA. S-100 detected 1 case negative for CD10/p63/SMA and 3 cases that only expressed one marker of this combination. While 18 MCs (90%) were positive for CD29, 14-3-3sigma (11 cases) and maspin (9 cases) were observed in 55% and 45%, respectively. Antibodies to pan-CK and the basal cell type CKs were strongly reactive in 12 tumors (60%), but in 6 cases (30%) positivity for these markers was weak and only focal; 2 MCs showed no positivity for CK. The stromal component of all phyllodes tumors was positive for vimentin, whereas all other investigated markers were absent except for focal p63 and CD10 expression in 1 case each. Our findings convincingly show a myoepithelial immunophenotype in sarcomatoid MCs, which is demonstrated by the presence of basal cell type CKs and the combination of the established myoepithelial markers CD10, p63, SMA, and S-100. We conclude that tumors with weak or even absent CK expression should only be diagnosed as primary sarcomas of the breast after exclusion of a myoepithelial immunophenotype. CD29 and 14-3-3sigma represent valuable novel myoepithelial markers in these diagnostically difficult cases.

The high resolution crystal structure of the human tumor suppressor maspin reveals a novel conformational switch in the G-helix

Maspin is a serpin that acts as a tumor suppressor in a range of human cancers, including tumors of the breast and lung. Maspin is crucial for development, because homozygous loss of the gene is lethal; however, the precise physiological role of the molecule is unclear. To gain insight into the function of human maspin, we have determined its crystal structure in two similar, but non-isomorphous crystal forms, to 2.1- and 2.8-A resolution, respectively. The structure reveals that maspin adopts the native serpin fold in which the reactive center loop is expelled fully from the A beta-sheet, makes minimal contacts with the core of the molecule, and exhibits a high degree of flexibility. A buried salt bridge unique to maspin orthologues causes an unusual bulge in the region around the D and E alpha-helices, an area of the molecule demonstrated in other serpins to be important for cofactor recognition. Strikingly, the structural data reveal that maspin is able to undergo conformational change in and around the G alpha-helix, switching between an open and a closed form. This change dictates the electrostatic character of a putative cofactor binding surface and highlights this region as a likely determinant of maspin function. The high resolution crystal structure of maspin provides a detailed molecular framework to elucidate the mechanism of function of this important tumor suppressor.

The significance of focal myoepithelial cell layer disruptions in human breast tumor invasion: a paradigm shift from the "protease-centered" hypothesis

Human breast epithelium and the stroma are separated by a layer of myoepithelial (ME) cells and basement membrane, whose disruption is a prerequisite for tumor invasion. The dissolution of the basement membrane is traditionally attributed primarily to an over-production of proteolytic enzymes by the tumor or the surrounding stromal cells. The results from matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor clinical trials, however, suggest that this "protease-centered" hypothesis is inadequate to completely reflect the molecular mechanisms of tumor invasion. The causes and signs of ME cell layer disruption are currently under-explored. Our studies revealed that a subset of pre- and micro-invasive tumors contained focal disruptions in the ME cell layers. These disruptions were associated with immunohistochemical and genetic alterations in the overlying tumor cells, including the loss of estrogen receptor expression, a higher frequency of loss of heterozygosity, and a higher expression of cell cycle, angiogenesis, and invasion-related genes. Focal ME layer disruptions were also associated with a higher rate of epithelial proliferation and leukocyte infiltration. We propose the novel hypothesis that a localized death of ME cells and immunoreactions that accompany an external environmental insult or internal genetic alterations are triggering factors for ME layer disruptions, basement membrane degradation, and subsequent tumor progression and invasion.

[P63 protein in the diagnosis of breast tubular carcinoma]

AIMS

To study and compare the expression of p63 protein and smooth muscle actin in breast tubular carcinoma (TC) and its main differential diagnoses, radial scar (RS)/complex sclerosing lesion (CSL).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Immunohistochemistry techniques were used to search for p63 protein and smooth muscle actin antibodies in 10 patients with TC and fifteen with RS/CSL.

RESULTS

Myoepythelial cells were diffusely positive for both actin and p63 protein with a cytoplasmic (actin) or nuclear (p63) pattern in all patients with RS/CSL. Inversely, all TC were negative for p63. Actin antibodies failed to label myoepithelial cells in TC, but both vessels and stromal myoblasts were actin-positive, creating difficult interpretation situations. By contrast, p63 was consistently negative in these structures.

CONCLUSION

For the differential diagnosis between TG and CR/LSC, smooth muscle actin and p63 protein demonstrate equivalent sensitivity for the detection of myoepithelial cells. However, the nuclear pattern of p63 labeling gives a "cleaner" stain. In addition, p63 enables distinction between myoepithelial cells and myofibroblasts/vascular smooth muscle cells, offering increased specificity.

Defining the role of myoepithelium in salivary gland neoplasia

Neoplastic myoepithelium is considered to be the key cellular participant in morphogenetic processes responsible for the variable histologic appearances of many salivary gland tumors. Nevertheless, controversy still exists concerning its participation in some types of salivary gland neoplasms. This has been largely due to the difficulty in fully characterizing the wide spectrum of morphologic and immunophenotypic expressions of neoplastic myoepithelium compared with the normal counterpart. However, in recent years, our understanding regarding the phenotypic, immunophenotypic, ultrastructural, and biochemical properties of myoepithelium has advanced. Here we discuss the role of neoplastic myoepithelium in the scope of salivary gland neoplasia and present this information from a practical diagnostic standpoint.

Aberrant Expression of the Maspin Gene Associated with Epigenetic Modification in Melanoma Cells

Maspin, a mammary serine protease inhibitor, was originally reported to be a tumor suppressor gene in breast and prostate cancers. The expression pattern of the maspin gene differs among cancer types and normal tissue however, and its significance as a tumor suppressor has been questioned. In this study, maspin expression and/or allele-specific methylation status were investigated in five melanoma cell lines and a normal human epidermal melanocyte (NHEM) cell line, and 80 surgically resected tumors (40 melanomas and 40 melanocytic nevi). One (HMV-I) of five melanoma cell lines overexpressed maspin protein whereas the remaining four melanoma cell lines and NHEM did not. The 19 CpG sites of the maspin promoter region were extensively hypomethylated in HMV-I, a maspin-positive cell line, and those of the remaining four melanoma and NHEM cell lines were hypermethylated. Furthermore, maspin-negative cell lines exhibited activation after treatment with 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine, a DNA demethylating agent. Immunoreactivity for maspin was negative in normal skin melanocytes and 40 melanocytic nevi, but five (12.5%) of 40 melanomas were positive. The methylation status judged by the methylation-specific PCR method was inversely correlated with maspin protein expression in vitro and in vivo. These results suggest that maspin expression in normal skin melanocytes and melanocytic nevi may be repressed in a cell-type-specific manner, whereas maspin is expressed aberrantly in a subset of melanoma cells by epigenetic modification. Further investigations are required to determine the significance of aberrant maspin expression.

Salivary gland-like tumours of the breast: surgical and molecular pathology

Breast glands and salivary glands are tubulo-acinar exocrine glands that can manifest as tumours with similar morphological features, but that differ in incidence and clinical behaviour depending on whether they are primary in breast or salivary glands. Salivary gland-like tumours of the breast are of two types: tumours with myoepithelial differentiation and those devoid of myoepithelial differentiation. The first and more numerous group comprises a spectrum of lesions ranging from "bona fide" benign (such as benign myoepithelioma and pleomorphic adenoma), to low grade malignant (such as adenoid cystic carcinoma, low grade adenosquamous carcinoma, and adenomyoepithelioma), to high grade malignant lesions (malignant myoepithelioma). The second group comprises lesions that have only recently been recognised, such as acinic cell carcinoma, oncocytic carcinoma of the breast, and the rare mucoepidermoid carcinoma.

Distribution of p63, a novel myoepithelial marker, in fine-needle aspiration biopsies of the breast: an analysis of 82 samples

BACKGROUND

The presence of myoepithelial cells (MECs) in fine-needle aspiration biopsies (FNAB) of the breast constitute an important criterion used to diagnose benign breast lesions. However, MECs sometimes have a distorted cytomorphology, and most of the previously evaluated myoepithelial markers do not have satisfactory sensitivity and specificity. p63, a recently characterized p53 homolog, is a nuclear transcription factor that is expressed in basal cells of multilayered epithelia and myoepithelial cells of the breast. The authors analyzed the immunocytochemical distribution of p63 in a series of 82 breast FNABs (30 benign lesions and 52 malignant breast lesions).

METHODS

Eighty-two archival, Papanicolaou-stained smears of breast lesions were retrieved from the files of the authors' institutions. Immunocytochemistry was performed according to the streptavidin-biotin-peroxidase complex technique using the antibody 4A4 (against all p63 isoforms). Two pathologists evaluated the distribution of p63 positive cells. Only nuclear reactivity was considered specific.

RESULTS

In benign lesions, p63 decorated the nuclei of MECs in all samples. p63 also stained naked nuclei in fibroadenomas. In malignant lesions, p63 was positive in MECs overlying malignant cell clusters in all 8 samples of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), in 9 of 16 samples of pure invasive carcinomas (IC), and in 16 of 20 samples that contained both DCIS and IC. In 18 samples (36%), a variable population of p63 positive, malignant cells was observed. p63 failed to decorate stromal, neural, adipocytic, and smooth muscle cells in all samples.

CONCLUSIONS

p63 is a reliable nuclear marker of MECs in breast aspirates. Regardless of the fact that variable proportions of p63 positive, malignant cells were observed in 36% of breast carcinoma aspirates, p63 may be a useful adjunct antibody to confirm the presence of MECs in FNABs of benign breast lesions.

Hyaline cell-rich chondroid syringoma: case report and review of the literature

Hyaline cell-rich chondroid syringoma (HCRCS) is a rare benign cutaneous neoplasm composed of cells with eosinophilic hyaline cytoplasm and plasmacytoid features, the origin of which remains elusive. To the best of our knowledge, only eight cases of this entity have been reported so far, and none of them was submitted to a large panel of myoepithelial markers. We report on a case of a previously healthy 29-year-old male patient who presented with a slowly enlarging flesh-colored nodule on the palmar aspect of the tenar region of his left hand, measuring 2 cm in maximum diameter. The nodule was "shelled-out" and submitted to light microscopy, immunohistochemistry, and ultrastructural examination. Histopathologic analysis disclosed a lobulated neoplasm composed of hyaline cells with plasmacytoid features showing ovoid nuclei, with occasional invaginations, finely granular chromatin, and discrete nucleoli; the cytoplasm was deeply eosinophilic with occasional dot-shaped paranuclear hyaline inclusions. On immunohistochemical evaluation, hyaline cells were strongly and diffusely positive for S-100 protein, vimentin, pan (CAM 5.2) and high molecular weight (34betaE12) cytokeratins; these cells were focally positive for GFAP, maspin, neuron-specific enolase, and cytokeratin 14. Alpha-smooth muscle actin, epithelial membrane antigen, carcinoembryonic antigen, collagen IV, Gp100 (HMB-45), and p63 were negative in neoplastic hyaline cells. Ultrastructural analysis disclosed cells with ovoid nuclei showing occasional invaginations and nuclear pockets; the cytoplasm was rich in meshworks of non-bundling intermediate filaments and a variable amount of rough endoplasmic reticulum cisternae. Based on our findings and those previously reported, hyaline cells of HCRCS might posses an aberrant myoepithelial differentiation. Most importantly, pathologists need to be aware of the histologic and immunohistochemical features of HCRCS to avoid a misdiagnosis of highly malignant neoplams, such as malignant melanoma and extra-skeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma.

P63 expression in papillary and anaplastic carcinomas of the thyroid gland: lack of an oncogenetic role in tumorigenesis and progression

P53 is considered one of the most important tumor suppressor genes and is mutated in up to 50% of all neoplasms. Well-differentiated thyroid carcinomas (WDTCs) only infrequently harbor p53 mutations. In contrast, these genetic alterations have been described in approximately 85% of anaplastic thyroid carcinomas and are considered a fundamental event in the malignant progression of WDTCs. However, alternative mechanisms to overcome p53 tumor suppressing properties in WDTCs and anaplastic carcinomas (ACs) have not been clarified to date. p63, a p53-homologue, has been recently characterized. In contrast to p53, p63 gene encodes six isoforms, three with transactivating and three with dominant negative (deltaN-p63) activities on p53 reporter genes. We hypothesized that overexpression of deltaN-p63 isoforms might constitute an alternative mechanism to overcome p53 tumor suppressing properties in WDTCs and ACs lacking p53 alterations. We semiquantitatively evaluated p53 and p63 immunoexpression in 12 papillary carcinomas (PC) and 11 anaplastic carcinomas. Only nuclear expression was considered specific. All PCs lacked p53 expression; at variance, nine ACs showed p53 immunoreactivity (+: 1 case; ++: 6 cases; +++: 2 cases). In PCs, p63 expression was restricted to scattered neoplastic cells juxtaposed to the basement membrane of papillary projections and to foci of squamous metaplasia. In ACs, p63 expression was observed in three cases, one of which lacked concurrent p53 immunoexpression. Our results do not support the hypothesis that p63 might constitute an alternative mechanism to overcome p53 tumor suppressing properties in thyroid neoplasms.

Novel and classic myoepithelial/stem cell markers in metaplastic carcinomas of the breast

Metaplastic carcinomas of the breast (MCBs) are unusual neoplasms characterized by an admixture of glandular epithelial components, which frequently exhibit features of squamous differentiation, and mesenchymal malignant components. Regardless of the presence of myoepithelial features in MCB, no consensus concerning their putative histogenesis has yet been achieved. Recently, novel putative myoepithelial markers have been developed, including p63, maspin, and P-cadherin. We assessed the expression of these myoepithelial markers in MCBs and compared their expression with classic myoepithelial markers. Immunohistochemistry using the streptavidin-biotin-peroxidase complex technique with antibodies raised against p63, maspin, P-cadherin, actin (clones CGA7, 1A4 and HHF35), cytokeratin 14 (Ck14), and vimentin was performed on 16 MCBs (7 matrix-producing MCBs, 6 adenosquamous MCBs, and 3 MCBs with heterologous elements). In healthy breast lobules and ducts adjacent to the tumors, myoepithelial cells showed distinctive and consistent immunoreactivity for p63, maspin, P-cadherin, actin, S-100 protein, and Ck14. Matrix-producing MCBs were positive for maspin in all cases, for p63 in 4 of 7 cases, and for P-cadherin in 4 of 7 cases. Adenosquamous MCB showed immunoreactivity for p63, maspin, and P-cadherin in 5 of 6 cases. All novel myoepithelial markers and Ck14 decorated squamous cell islands. MCBs with heterologous elements were positive for p63 in 1 case, for maspin in all 3 cases, and for P-cadherin in 2 cases. All cases showed at least one of the novel myoepithelial markers. Eleven of 16 cases were positive for actin. Eleven of 14 cases reacted with Ck14, and all cases that stained for S-100 protein (9 of 9) and vimentin (13 of 13) were also positive. Based on our findings, the balance of probabilities favors that MCBs may have a basal or myoepithelial cell histogenesis and differentiation.

A subset of morphologically distinct mammary myoepithelial cells lacks corresponding immunophenotypic markers

INTRODUCTION

Immunostaining for smooth muscle actin (SMA) is commonly used to elucidate mammary myoepithelial (ME) cells, whose presence or absence is a reliable criterion for differentiating in situ and invasive carcinomas. However, some morphologically distinct ME cells fail to stain for SMA. This study intended to assess whether these SMA-negative cells also lack the expression of other ME cell markers.

METHODS

Hematoxylin/eosin and SMA immunostained sections from 175 breast cancer patients were examined. Three cases were found to harbor ducts that showed morphologically distinct ME cell layers, but showed no SMA immunostaining in at least one-third of the layer or the entire layer. Eight additional consecutive sections from each case were stained for SMA, using a black chromogen, and each was then re-stained for one of eight additional markers supposed to exclusively or preferentially stain ME cells, using a red chromogen. SMA-negative ME cells were re-examined for the expression of other markers.

RESULTS

SMA-negative ME cells in two cases also failed to display immunoreactivity for other markers, including calponin, CD10, smooth muscle myosin heavy chain, protease inhibitor 5 (maspin), Wilms' tumor-1, and cytokeratins 5, 14, and 17 (CK5, CK14, and CK17). However, in one case SMA-negative ME cells displayed immunoreactivities for maspin, CK5, CK14, and CK17. The distribution of these ME cells is independent of ductal size, length, and architecture.

CONCLUSIONS

A subset of morphologically identifiable ME cells lack the expression of nine corresponding immunophenotypic markers, suggesting that ME cells might also be subject to different normal and pathological alterations.

p63 expression in solid cell nests of the thyroid: further evidence for a stem cell origin

Solid cell nests of the thyroid are embryonic remnants of endodermal origin that may be difficult to distinguish from squamous metaplasia, metastatic squamous carcinoma, papillary microcarcinoma, medullary carcinoma, and C-cell hyperplasia. These embryonic structures are composed of main cells and C-cells; cystic structures and mixed follicles are sometimes observed intermingled with solid cell nests. Recently, p63, a p53 homologue that is consistently expressed in basal/stem cells of stratified epithelia and plays a major role in triggering the differentiation of some specific cell lineages, has been characterized. We evaluated the immunohistochemical expression of p63, cytokeratins (CAM 5.2, AE1/AE3, 34betaE12, 7, and 20), carcinoembryonic antigen, thyroid transcription factor 1 (TTF-1), thyroglobulin, and calcitonin using the streptavidin-biotin-peroxidase complex technique in 6 bona fide solid cell nests. We observed that main cells of solid cell nests are strongly decorated by p63, while C-cells and all other thyroid structures were consistently negative. Moreover, main cells expressed carcinoembryonic antigen and all cytokeratins but cytokeratin 20 and lacked TTF-1, thyroglobulin and calcitonin. In contrast to this, C-cells of solid cell nests were immunoreactive for calcitonin, CAM 5.2, AE1/AE3, and cytokeratin 7; focal immunoreactivity for TTF-1 was also observed in some C-cells. We conclude that main cells of the solid cell nests display a basal/stem cell phenotype (p63 and basal cytokeratin positivity), whereas C-cells show features of parafollicular differentiation. We conclude, furthermore, that p63 antibodies may help in distinguishing solid cell nests from their mimics.

Expression and regulation of tumor suppressor gene maspin in breast cancer

Maspin (mammary serpin) is an inhibitor of serine proteases with tumor suppressor activity in breast cancer. Maspin was originally identified by subtractive hybridization in normal breast epithelial cells, but its expression decreased during tumor progression. The loss of maspin gene expression with increasing malignancy is by transcriptional regulation. Maspin is known to be involved in invasion and metastasis, interact with the p53 tumor suppressor pathway, and act as an inhibitor of angiogenesis. The immunohistochemical analysis and reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction of maspin in normal human breast tissue and breast carcinoma indicated a stepwise reduction of maspin expression during the progression from ductal carcinoma in situ to invasive carcinoma to lymph node metastasis. The lack of maspin expression in breast cancer seems to be associated with a short disease-free survival and supports maspin's function as an indicator for tumor aggressiveness and metastatic potential. New studies on the gene regulation of maspin provide evidence for promising potential of possible re-expression of maspin in tumor cells. The function of maspin as a tumor suppressor gene involved in tumor invasion, metastasis, and angiogenesis may not be limited to breast cancer.

p63 expression in normal skin and usual cutaneous carcinomas

BACKGROUND

p63 is a p53 homologue that is mapped to chromosome 3q27. This gene encodes six different isoforms, which have either transactivating or dominant negative effects on p53-reporter genes. It has been described that in contrast to p53, p63 seems not to be associated with tumor predisposition, as neither p63 knockout mouse models nor germline p63 mutations are related to an increased risk of tumorigenesis. It has been demonstrated that p63 is a reliable keratinocyte stem cell marker and that it is involved in the maintenance of the stem cell population. Scant data on p63 expression in normal skin, basal cell carcinomas (BCCs), keratoacanthomas and squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) have been reported. We herein evaluated p63 expression in 16 BCCs, one keratoacanthoma and 13 SCCs.

METHODS

Immunohistochemistry according to the streptavidin-biotin-peroxidase technique, using the antibody 4A4 raised against all p63 isoforms, was performed. p63 expression was evaluated in epidermal cells and skin appendages. Semi-quantitative evaluation (-, +, ++, +++) of p63 expression in BCCs, keratoacanthoma and SCCs was carried out. Only nuclear expression was considered as specific.

RESULTS

p63 was expressed in the nuclei of epidermal basal and suprabasal cells, in the cells of the germinative hair matrix and the external root sheath of hair follicles, in the basal cells of the sebaceous gland and in the myoepithelial/basal cells of the sweat glands. All terminally differentiated cells were negative for p63. All BCCs showed ++ to +++ immunoreactivity. At variance, keratoacanthomas and grade I and II SCCs showed variable p63 reactivity in a basal layer-like distribution, whereas undifferentiated cells of grade III SCCs showed ++ to +++ positivity. A grade IV spindle SCC showed + immunoreactivity. The SCCs in situ showed remarkable expression of p63 in all cell layers. Terminally differentiated squamous cells were either negative or showed only focal immunoreactivity in the carcinomas.

CONCLUSIONS

p63 is consistently expressed in the basal cells of epidermis and cutaneous appendages, including the basal/myoepithelial cells of sweat glands. Based on our findings, the balance of probabilities favors that p63 might play a role in the pattern of differentiation and in the oncogenesis of usual carcinomas of the skin.

Maspin is a tumour suppressor that inhibits breast cancer tumour metastasis in vivo

Maspin is a member of the serpin family of serine proteases and functions as a tumour suppressor. A study using a new syngeneic mouse model for breast cancer suggests that maspin can inhibit metastasis in vivo.