Invasion of fat justifies assignment of stage pT3a in prostatic adenocarcinoma

Incidence and Pitfalls of Adipose Tissue Encountered in Prostatic Transurethral Resections and Related Specimens

While the presence of adipose tissue and its involvement by prostatic cancer (extraprostatic extension) is well-recognized in prostate biopsies, adipose tissue in transurethral resections of the prostate (TURP) is largely unexplored. Herein, 200 consecutive TURPs and related specimens were reviewed, including a separate 3-year analysis of specimens containing prostatic cancer, with the following data collected: presence of fat, presence of cancer within fat, and quantity of fat. For specimens with both fat and prostatic cancer, specimen weight and tumor volume were recorded. Within the 200 consecutive TURPs and related specimens, adipose tissue was identified in 20%; 55% had 2.5 mm of adipose tissue; the number of fragments with adipose tissue ranged from 1 to 14. No correlation between specimen weight and measured extent of adipose tissue or number of fragments with adipose tissue was identified. Of all the specimens with prostatic cancer, 15/56 (27%) involved adipose tissue, with two specimens with large cancer volume (>90%) demonstrating extensive involvement of adipose tissue. Adipose tissue is frequently present within TURP and related specimens with variability in extent. The etiology behind encountering adipose tissue is uncertain, and it could represent resection into peri-prostatic fat, intraprostatic fat, or bladder neck fat sampling. Although encountering adipose tissue involved by cancer in TURP and related specimens may imply extraprostatic extension (pT3a), further studies are needed to corroborate these findings as well as to determine if these should be included in reported synoptics.

Obesity and prostate cancer - microenvironmental roles of adipose tissue

Obesity is known to have important roles in driving prostate cancer aggressiveness and increased mortality. Multiple mechanisms have been postulated for these clinical observations, including effects of diet and lifestyle, systemic changes in energy balance and hormonal regulation and activation of signalling by growth factors and cytokines and other components of the immune system. Over the past decade, research on obesity has shifted towards investigating the role of peri-prostatic white adipose tissue as an important source of locally produced factors that stimulate prostate cancer progression. Cells that comprise white adipose tissue, the adipocytes and their progenitor adipose stromal cells (ASCs), which proliferate to accommodate white adipose tissue expansion in obesity, have been identified as important drivers of obesity-associated cancer progression. Accumulating evidence suggests that adipocytes are a source of lipids that are used by adjacent prostate cancer cells. However, results of preclinical studies indicate that ASCs promote tumour growth by remodelling extracellular matrix and supporting neovascularization, contributing to the recruitment of immunosuppressive cells, and inducing epithelial-mesenchymal transition through paracrine signalling. Because epithelial-mesenchymal transition is associated with cancer chemotherapy resistance and metastasis, ASCs are considered to be potential targets of therapies that could be developed to suppress cancer aggressiveness in patients with obesity.

White adipose tissue-derived factors and prostate cancer progression: mechanisms and targets for interventions

Obesity represents an important risk factor for prostate cancer, driving more aggressive disease, chemoresistance, and increased mortality. White adipose tissue (WAT) overgrowth in obesity is central to the mechanisms that lead to these clinical observations. Adipose stromal cells (ASCs), the progenitors to mature adipocytes and other cell types in WAT, play a vital role in driving PCa aggressiveness. ASCs produce numerous factors, especially chemokines, including the chemokine CXCL12, which is involved in driving EMT and chemoresistance in PCa. A greater understanding of the impact of WAT in obesity-induced progression of PCa and the underlying mechanisms has begun to provide opportunities for developing interventional strategies for preventing or offsetting these critical events. These include weight loss regimens, therapeutic targeting of ASCs, use of calorie restriction mimetic compounds, and combinations of compounds as well as specific receptor targeting strategies.

Leptin in Tumor Microenvironment

Leptin is a hormone that plays a major role as mediator of long-term regulation of energy balance, suppressing food intake, and stimulating weight loss. More recently, important physiological roles other than controlling appetite and energy expenditure have been suggested for leptin, including neuroendocrine, reparative, reproductive, and immune functions. These emerging peripheral roles let hypothesize that leptin can modulate also cancer progression. Indeed, many studies have demonstrated that elevated chronic serum concentrations of leptin, frequently seen in obese subjects, represent a stimulatory signal for tumor growth. Current knowledge indicates that also different non-tumoral cells resident in tumor microenvironment may respond to leptin creating a favorable soil for cancer cells. In addition, leptin is produced also within the tumor microenvironment creating the possibility for paracrine and autocrine action. In this review, we describe the main mechanisms that regulate peripheral leptin availability and how leptin can shape tumor microenvironment.

Digital versus light microscopy assessment of extraprostatic extension in radical prostatectomy samples

Focal or non-focal/extensive extraprostatic extension of prostate carcinoma is an important pathologic prognostic parameter to be reported after radical prostatectomy. Currently, there is no agreement on how to measure and what are the best cutoff points to be used in practice. We hypothesized that digital microscopy would potentially provide more objective measurements of extraprostatic extension, thus better defining its clinical significance. To further our knowledge on digital prostate pathology, we evaluated the status of extraprostatic extension in 107 consecutive laparoscopic radical prostatectomy samples, using digital and conventional light microscopy. Mean linear and radial measurements of extraprostatic extension by digital microscopy significantly correlated to pT status (p = 0.022 and p = 0.050, respectively) but only radial measurements correlated to biochemical recurrence (p = 0.042) and grade groups (p = 0.022). None of the measurements, whether conventional or digital, were associated with lymph node status. Receiving operating characteristic analysis showed a potential cutoff point to assess linear measurements by conventional (< vs. > 24.21 mm) or digital microscopy (< vs. > 15 mm) or by radial measurement (< vs. > 1.6 mm). Finally, we observed an association between the number of paraffin blocks bearing EPE with pT (p = 0.041) status (digital microscopy), and linear measurements by conventional (p = 0.044) or digital microscopy (p = 0.045) with lymph node status. Reporting EPE measurements by digital microscopy, both linear and radial, and the number of paraffin blocks with EPE, might provide additional prognostic features after radical prostatectomy.

Should reporting of peri-neural invasion and extra prostatic extension be mandatory in prostate cancer biopsies? correlation with outcome in biopsy cases treated conservatively

The identification of perineural invasion (PNI) and extraprostatic extension (ECE) in prostate cancer (PC) biopsies is time consuming and can be difficult. Although this is required information in many datasets, there is little evidence on their effect on outcome in patients treated conservatively. Cases of PC were identified from three cancer registries in the UK from men with clinically localized prostate cancer diagnosed by needle biopsy from 1990-2003. The endpoint was prostate cancer death (DOD). Patients treated radically within 6 months, those with objective evidence of metastases or who had prior hormone therapy were excluded. Follow-up was through cancer registries up until 2012. Deaths were divided into those from PC and those from other causes, according to WHO criteria. 988 biopsy cases (6522 biopsy cores) were centrally reviewed by three uropathologists and assigned a Gleason score and Grade Group (GG). The presence of both PNI and ECE was recorded. Of 988 patients, PNI was present in 288 (DOD = 75) and ECE in 23 (DOD = 5). On univariable analysis PNI was highly significantly associated with DOD (hazard ratio [HR] 2.28, 95% CI: 1.68, 3.1, log-rank test p-value = 4.8 × 10-8), but ECE was not (log-rank test p-value = 0.334). On multivariable analysis with GG, serum PSA (per 10%), clinical stage and extent of disease (per 10%), PNI lost significance (HR 1.16, 95% CI: 0.83, 1.63, likelihood ratio test p-value = 0.371). The utility of routinely examining prostate biopsies for ECE and PNI is doubtful as it is not independently associated with higher grade, stage or prognosis.

Prostate cancer reporting and staging: needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens

Prostatic adenocarcinoma remains the most common cancer affecting men. A substantial majority of patients have the diagnosis made on thin needle biopsies, most often in the absence of a palpable abnormality. Treatment choices ranging from surveillance to radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy are largely driven by the pathologic findings in the biopsy specimen. The first part of this review focuses on important morphologic parameters in needle biopsy specimens that are not covered in the accompanying articles. This includes tumor quantification as well as other parameters such a extraprostatic extension, seminal vesicle invasion, perineural invasion, and lymphovascular invasion. For those men who undergo radical prostatectomy, pathologic stage and other parameters are critical in prognostication and in determining the appropriateness of adjuvant therapy. Staging parameters, including extraprostatic extension, seminal vesicle invasion, and lymph node status are discussed here. Surgical margin status is also an important parameter and definitions and reporting of this feature are detailed. Throughout the article the current reporting guidelines published by the College of American Pathologists and the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting are highlighted.

Contribution of Adipose Tissue to Development of Cancer

Solid tumor growth and metastasis require the interaction of tumor cells with the surrounding tissue, leading to a view of tumors as tissue-level phenomena rather than exclusively cell-intrinsic anomalies. Due to the ubiquitous nature of adipose tissue, many types of solid tumors grow in proximate or direct contact with adipocytes and adipose-associated stromal and vascular components, such as fibroblasts and other connective tissue cells, stem and progenitor cells, endothelial cells, innate and adaptive immune cells, and extracellular signaling and matrix components. Excess adiposity in obesity both increases risk of cancer development and negatively influences prognosis in several cancer types, in part due to interaction with adipose tissue cell populations. Herein, we review the cellular and noncellular constituents of the adipose "organ," and discuss the mechanisms by which these varied microenvironmental components contribute to tumor development, with special emphasis on obesity. Due to the prevalence of breast and prostate cancers in the United States, their close anatomical proximity to adipose tissue depots, and their complex epidemiologic associations with obesity, we particularly highlight research addressing the contribution of adipose tissue to the initiation and progression of these cancer types. Obesity dramatically modifies the adipose tissue microenvironment in numerous ways, including induction of fibrosis and angiogenesis, increased stem cell abundance, and expansion of proinflammatory immune cells. As many of these changes also resemble shifts observed within the tumor microenvironment, proximity to adipose tissue may present a hospitable environment to developing tumors, providing a critical link between adiposity and tumorigenesis. © 2018 American Physiological Society. Compr Physiol 8:237-282, 2018.

Local adipocyte cancer cell paracrine loop: can "sick fat" be more detrimental?

This review article focuses on the emerging role of tumor resident adipocytes. It provides in vitro and in vivo evidence that they are essential for cancer development/progression. In addition to systemic effects, their tumor-promoting impact is dependent on local functions, notably via a complex adipocyte cancer cell paracrine loop (ACCPL). Indeed, this event leads to dramatic phenotypic and/or functional modifications of both cell types as well as of the extracellular matrix. Adipocytes undergo delipidation leading to adipocytes/cancer-associated adipocytes/cancer-associated fibroblasts de-differentiation processes. In turn, cancer cell aggressiveness is exacerbated through increased proliferation, migration, and invasion properties. This is accompanied by intense tissue remodeling, conducting to the occurrence of the tumor stroma. The molecular pathways involved in ACCPL remain largely unknown. Nevertheless, several clues are starting to emerge. Moreover, obesity is currently a sign of increased risk and poor prognosis in human carcinomas. How adiposopathy might impact tumors and specifically the ACCPL is still under investigation. However, available experimental, epidemiological, and clinical data allow to draw some directions. Interestingly, there are numerous similarities between the ACCPL-induced and obesity-related molecular alterations. It might, therefore, be hypothesized that obesity provides a "constitutively active" local permissive environment for cancer cells. Improving our knowledge about ACCPL in both lean and obese patients remains a challenging task. Indeed, deciphering the cellular and molecular mechanisms behind ACCPL might provide new targets for improving diagnosis/prognosis and the design of innovative therapeutic strategies, and even, in case of obesity, for preventing cancer.

Variation in reporting of cancer extent and benign histology in prostate biopsies among European pathologists

It is not known how uropathologists currently report histopathological features of prostate biopsies such as core length, tumor extent, perineural invasion, and non-tumor-associated features such as inflammation and hyperplasia in needle biopsies. A web-based survey was distributed among 661 members of the European Network of Uropathology. Complete replies were received from 266 pathologists in 22 European countries. Total core lengths were reported by 64 %. The numbers of cores positive for cancer was given by 79 %. Linear cancer extent was reported by 81 %, most often given in millimeters for each core (53 %) followed by the estimation of percentage of cancer in each core (40 %). A gap of benign tissue between separate cancer foci in a single core would always be subtracted by 48 % and by 63 % if cancer foci were minute and widely separated. Perineural invasion was reported by 97 %. Fat invasion by tumor was interpreted as extraprostatic extension by 81 %. Chronic and active/acute inflammation was always reported by 32 and 56 % but only if pronounced by 54 and 39 %, respectively. While most (79 %) would never diagnose benign prostatic hyperplasia on needle biopsy, 21 % would attempt to make this diagnosis. Reporting practices for prostate biopsies are variable among European pathologists. The great variation in some methodologies used suggests a need for further international consensus, in order for retrospective data to be comparable between different institutions.

International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Handling and Staging of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens. Working group 3: extraprostatic extension, lymphovascular invasion and locally advanced disease

The International Society of Urological Pathology Consensus Conference on Handling and Staging of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens in Boston made recommendations regarding the standardization of pathology reporting of radical prostatectomy specimens. Issues relating to extraprostatic extension (pT3a disease), bladder neck invasion, lymphovascular invasion and the definition of pT4 were coordinated by working group 3. It was agreed that prostate cancer can be categorized as pT3a in the absence of adipose tissue involvement when cancer bulges beyond the contour of the gland or beyond the condensed smooth muscle of the prostate at posterior and posterolateral sites. Extraprostatic extension can also be identified anteriorly. It was agreed that the location of extraprostatic extension should be reported. Although there was consensus that the amount of extraprostatic extension should be quantitated, there was no agreement as to which method of quantitation should be employed. There was overwhelming consensus that microscopic urinary bladder neck invasion by carcinoma should be reported as stage pT3a and that lymphovascular invasion by carcinoma should be reported. It is recommended that these elements are considered in the development of practice guidelines and in the daily practice of urological surgical pathology.

Intraprostatic adipose tissue: a study of 427 whole mount radical prostatectomy specimens

Prostatic adenocarcinoma is the most frequently diagnosed cancer in American men. Tumor Gleason grade and stage provide extremely valuable prognostic information and play an important role in therapeutic decision making and patient counseling. A biopsy or radical prostatectomy specimen revealing carcinoma extending into extraprostatic tissue permits a T3 classification. This is most easily recognized, particularly in a needle biopsy, when tumor is seen to invade the adipose tissue. The existence of intraprostatic adipose tissue is somewhat controversial. To investigate this, formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded whole-mount radical prostatectomy specimens from 427 patients with adenocarcinoma were evaluated for intraprostatic adipose tissue. It was defined as any collection of adipocytes amid or internal to the most peripheral glands. The amount, anatomic location, and relationship to normal structures were also recorded. Intraprostatic adipose tissue was identified in 17 (3.98%) of cases. It consisted of small microscopic foci composed of 5 to 20 adipocytes. In 13 cases, the fat was intimately associated with benign glands. In another 2 cases, it was associated with small nerves, and in 2 cases was random with no specific localization. Intraprostatic adipose tissue was located in the peripheral zone in 15 cases and in the central zone in 2. Intraprostatic adipose tissue, although uncommon, does exist. Therefore, caution must be exercised in diagnosing extraprostatic extension based only upon identification of fat invasion, especially in a needle biopsy. The small size of foci of adipose tissue and its admixture with benign glands are useful morphologic clues in distinguishing it from extraprostatic fat.

Interobserver variability between expert urologic pathologists for extraprostatic extension and surgical margin status in radical prostatectomy specimens

Accurate Gleason score, pathologic stage, and surgical margin (SM) information is critical for the planning of post-radical prostatectomy management in patients with prostate cancer. Although interobserver variability for Gleason score among urologic pathologists has been well documented, such data for pathologic stage and SM assessment are limited. We report the first study to address interobserver variability in a group of expert pathologists concerning extraprostatic soft tissue (EPE) and SM interpretation for radical prostatectomy specimens. A panel of 3 urologic pathologists selected 6 groups of 10 slides designated as being positive, negative, or equivocal for either EPE or SM based on unanimous agreement. Twelve expert urologic pathologists, who were blinded to the panel diagnoses, reviewed 40x whole-slide scans and provided diagnoses for EPE and SM on each slide. On the basis of panel diagnoses, as the gold standard, specificity, sensitivity, and accuracy values were high for both EPE (87.5%, 95.0%, and 91.2%) and SM (97.5%, 83.3%, and 90.4%). Overall kappa values for all 60 slides were 0.74 for SM and 0.63 for EPE. The kappa values were higher for slides with definitive gold standard EPE (kappa=0.81) and SM (kappa=0.73) diagnoses when compared with the EPE (kappa=0.29) and SM (kappa=0.62) equivocal slides. This difference was markedly pronounced for EPE. Urologic pathologists show good to excellent agreement when evaluating EPE and SM. Interobserver variability for EPE and SM interpretation was principally related to the lack of a clearly definable prostatic capsule and crush/thermal artifact along the edge of the gland, respectively.

The relationship between the extent of surgical margin positivity and prostate specific antigen recurrence in radical prostatectomy specimens

The presence of positive surgical margins is a negative prognostic indicator in patients undergoing prostatectomy for prostate cancer; whether the extent of the positive margins affects the clinical outcome with regards to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) recurrence remains uncertain. We evaluated the linear extent of margin positivity as a prognostic indicator in a series of radical prostatectomy specimens. One hundred seventy-four consecutive margin-positive prostatectomy specimens were evaluated. The linear extent of margin positivity was measured with an ocular micrometer and ranged from 0.05 to 75.0 mm (mean, 8.94; median, 5.0). The linear extent of margin positivity was associated with tumor volume (P = .03) but was not associated with patients' age at surgery, preoperative PSA level, prostate weight, pathologic stage, Gleason score, extraprostatic extension, seminal vesicle invasion, perineural invasion, high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, or PSA recurrence. In the full model multiple Cox regression, significant predictors for PSA recurrence were Gleason score (P = .001) and preoperative PSA (P = .01); extent of margin positivity was not predictive of PSA recurrence (hazard ratio, 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 0.98-1.02; P = .97) nor was tumor volume a significant factor when adjusted for other covariates (P = .27). Preoperative PSA, tumor stage, and Gleason score remained significant prognostic factors in evaluating the likelihood of PSA recurrence in patients with positive surgical margins; the extent of margin positivity, however, is not a prognostic factor for PSA recurrence and should, therefore, not necessarily be included in the final report for radical prostatectomy specimens.

Positive-block ratio in radical prostatectomy specimens is an independent predictor of prostate-specific antigen recurrence

Tumor volume has been considered an important variable in determining the probability of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) recurrence in prostatic adenocarcinoma. There have been many studies that have tried to determine an appropriate method of calculating tumor volume, but no single methodology has been agreed upon. We tested the hypothesis that the ratio of tumor positive tissue blocks to the total number of blocks submitted (positive-block ratio) can be used as an independent prognostic indicator for PSA recurrence. We analyzed 504 patients who underwent total radical retropubic prostatectomy between 1990 and 1998. None of the patients had preoperative radiation or androgen-deprivation therapy. Clinical records were reviewed. The mean positive-block ratio was 0.44 (median, 0.43; range, 0.05 to 1.0). The positive block-ratio was significantly associated with Gleason score, pathologic stage, surgical margin status, extraprostatic extension, seminal vesical invasion, lymph node metastasis, perineural invasion, and preoperative serum PSA level (all P<0.001). Using a multivariate Cox regression model, controlling for pathologic stage, Gleason score, lymph node metastasis, and surgical margin status, positive-block ratio was an independent predictor of PSA recurrence (hazard ratio, 2.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-4.83; P=0.03). Five-year PSA recurrence-free survival was 67% for those patients with positive-block ratio <or=0.43, as compared with 42% those with positive-block ratio >0.43 (P<0.001). Positive-block ratio is an independent predictor of PSA recurrence and this simple method of tumor measurement seems to be promising for quantifying tumor volume if our findings are validated by subsequent reports.