1
|
Mugu VK, Carr BM, Olson MC, Schupbach JC, Eguia FA, Schmitz JJ, Khandelwal A. Increasing Adherence to Societal Recommendations in Radiology Reporting: A Feasibility Study Using Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Guidelines for Incidentally Detected Gallbladder Polyps. Ultrasound Q 2025; 41:e00699. [PMID: 39690147 DOI: 10.1097/ruq.0000000000000699] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2024]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Incidental findings in diagnostic imaging are common, but follow-up recommendations often lack consistency. The Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound (SRU) issued guidelines in 2021 for managing incidentally detected gallbladder polyps, aiming to balance follow-up with avoiding overtreatment. There is variable adherence to these guidelines in radiology reports, however, which makes it difficult for the clinician to pursue appropriate follow-up for the patient. The purpose of this project is to test the feasibility of a Large Language Model (LLM)-based tool to incorporate SRU guidelines into radiology reports. Additionally, we propose a framework for closely integrating societal follow-up recommendations into radiology reports, using this tool as an example.Following institutional review board approval, we retrospectively reviewed gallbladder ultrasound examinations performed on adult ED patients in 2022. Data on patient demographics and radiology report content were collected. Using the 2021 SRU guidelines, we developed an interactive tool employing a retriever-augmented generator (RAG) and prompt engineering. A board-certified radiologist tested the accuracy, whereas a board-certified emergency medicine physician assessed the clarity and consistency of the recommendations.The interactive tool, GB-PRL, outperformed leading closed-source and open-source LLMs, achieving 100% accuracy in risk categorization and follow-up recommendations on hypothetical user queries (P < 0.001). The tool also showed superior accuracy compared to radiology reports on retrospective data (P = 0.04). Although GB-PRL demonstrated greater clarity and consistency, the improvement from the radiology reports was not statistically significant (P = 0.22). Further work is needed for prospective testing of GB-PRL before integrating it into clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Brendan M Carr
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chai JL, Baranov E, Licaros AR, Frates MC. Sonographic Characteristics of ≥7 mm Gallbladder Polyps: A Retrospective Analysis. JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE : OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE 2025; 44:57-66. [PMID: 39282690 DOI: 10.1002/jum.16578] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2024] [Revised: 08/21/2024] [Accepted: 09/02/2024] [Indexed: 12/12/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To describe the sonographic characteristics of gallbladder polyps measuring ≥7 mm focusing on echogenicity, correlate with surgical pathology when available, and assess stability in size over time. METHODS This retrospective study used a natural language processing application to screen ultrasound (US) reports between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2020, that contained the words "gallbladder polyp" or "polyps." Reports were reviewed to identify polyps ≥7 mm. The most hyperechoic components of the polyps were compared to the adjacent inner wall of the gallbladder and categorized as more echogenic, isoechoic, and less echogenic. Other sonographic characteristics such as heterogeneity, sessile configuration, vascularity, multiplicity, presence of gallstones, and wall thickening were recorded. Surgical pathology reports were reviewed when available. Polyps in nonsurgical patients with ≥48-month US follow-up and ≤1 mm/year growth rate were characterized as benign. Clinical outcomes were followed until December 31, 2023. RESULTS Review of 4897 reports yielded 550 reports in 450 patients with polyps ≥7 mm. Surgical pathology reports were available in 22.0% (99/450) of patients; 96 (97%) had non-neoplastic etiologies and 3 (3.0%) neoplastic. There were no malignancies. All of the neoplastic polyps and 56.1% (87/155) of non-neoplastic polyps had components more echogenic than the adjacent inner wall. There were no deaths related to the polyps. CONCLUSIONS The vast majority of gallbladder polyps are benign. In our large series of gallbladder polyps, we found that increased echogenicity is a nonspecific feature, found in slightly more than half of benign but also in all neoplastic polyps. Our findings support current Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound consensus guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessie L Chai
- Division of Abdominal Imaging and Intervention, Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Esther Baranov
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Andro Reginald Licaros
- Division of Thoracic Imaging, Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Mary C Frates
- Division of Abdominal Imaging and Intervention, Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lee KC, Kim JK, Kim DK. Comparison of the Size Measurement of Gallbladder Polyps by Three Different Radiologists in Abdominal Ultrasonography. Tomography 2024; 10:1031-1041. [PMID: 39058049 PMCID: PMC11281002 DOI: 10.3390/tomography10070077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2024] [Revised: 06/25/2024] [Accepted: 06/26/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is little information regarding the size measurement differences in gallbladder (GB) polyps performed by different radiologists on abdominal ultrasonography (US). AIM To reveal the differences in GB polyp size measurements performed by different radiologists on abdominal US. METHODS From June to September 2022, the maximum diameter of 228 GB polyps was measured twice on abdominal US by one of three radiologists (a third-year radiology resident [reader A], a radiologist with 7 years of experience in abdominal US [reader B], and an abdominal radiologist with 8 years of experience in abdominal US [reader C]). Intra-reader agreements for polyp size measurements were assessed by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). A Bland-Altman plot was used to visualize the differences between the first and second size measurements in each reader. RESULTS Reader A, reader B, and reader C evaluated 65, 77, and 86 polyps, respectively. The mean size of measured 228 GB polyps was 5.0 ± 1.9 mm. Except for the case where reader A showed moderate intra-reader agreement (0.726) for polyps with size ≤ 5 mm, all readers showed an overall high intra-reader reliability (reader A, ICC = 0.859; reader B, ICC = 0.947, reader C, ICC = 0.948), indicative of good and excellent intra-reader agreements. The 95% limit of agreement of reader A, B, and C was 1.9 mm of the mean in all three readers. CONCLUSIONS GB polyp size measurement on abdominal US showed good or excellent intra-reader agreements. However, size changes of approximately less than 1.9 mm should be interpreted carefully because these may be within the measurement error.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyu-Chong Lee
- Department of Radiology, Armed Forces Capital Hospital, Seongnam 13574, Republic of Korea; (K.-C.L.); (J.-K.K.)
- Department of Radiology, Korea University Anam Hospital, 73 Geryeodae-ro, Seongbuk-Gu, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea
| | - Jin-Kyem Kim
- Department of Radiology, Armed Forces Capital Hospital, Seongnam 13574, Republic of Korea; (K.-C.L.); (J.-K.K.)
| | - Dong-Kyu Kim
- Department of Radiology, Armed Forces Capital Hospital, Seongnam 13574, Republic of Korea; (K.-C.L.); (J.-K.K.)
- Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-Ro, Seodaemun-Gu, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Vo-Phamhi JM, Tiyarattanachai T, Matuszczak M, Shen L, Kim S, Kamaya A. Follow-up imaging and surgical costs associated with different guidelines for management of incidentally detected gallbladder polyps. Acad Radiol 2024:S1076-6332(24)00337-4. [PMID: 38862347 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2024.05.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2024] [Revised: 05/13/2024] [Accepted: 05/18/2024] [Indexed: 06/13/2024]
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES To compare follow-up imaging and surgical cost implications of the Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound (SRU) guidelines, 2017 and 2022 European (EUR) guidelines, 2020 Canadian Association of Radiologists (CAR) recommendations, and 2013 American College of Radiology (ACR) White Paper for managing incidentally detected gallbladder polyps. MATERIALS AND METHODS 253 consecutive patients with gallbladder polyps identified on ultrasound were independently reviewed by three radiologists for polyp size and morphology. Electronic medical records were reviewed for patient demographics, cholecystectomy (if performed) pathological findings, or any subsequent diagnosis of gallbladder cancer. For each patient, the following were calculated for each of the 5 guidelines studied: 1) number of recommended follow-up ultrasounds based on initial presentation, 2) number of surgical consultations recommended based on initial presentation, 3) number of surgical consultations recommended based on growth, and 4) associated imaging and surgical costs. Interrater agreement was calculated. RESULTS The SRU 2022 guidelines suggested significantly fewer follow-up ultrasounds and surgical consultations, leading to a cost reduction of 96.5 % and 96.7 % compared to European 2022 and 2017, respectively; 86.5 % compared to CAR; and 86.2 % compared to ACR guidelines. With SRU Recommendations, the majority of gallbladder polyps would be classified as extremely low risk (68.4 %), 30.8 % low risk, and 0.8 % indeterminate risk. In our cohort, a single case of gallbladder cancer was identified (26 mm) which would be recommended for surgical consult by all guidelines. CONCLUSION The SRU 2022 guidelines can lead to significant savings for patients, health systems, and society, while reducing unnecessary medical interventions for managing incidentally detected gallbladder polyps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenny M Vo-Phamhi
- Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians & Surgeons, 630 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032.
| | - Thodsawit Tiyarattanachai
- Department of Radiology and Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University School of Medicine, 1265 Welch Road, Stanford, CA 94305.
| | - Martin Matuszczak
- Stanford Hospital and Clinics, 300 Pasteur Dr H1307, Stanford, CA 94305.
| | - Luyao Shen
- Stanford Hospital and Clinics, 300 Pasteur Dr H1307, Stanford, CA 94305.
| | - Solomon Kim
- Integrated Imaging Consultants, LLC, 4440 West 95th Street, Department of Radiology, Oak Lawn, IL 60453.
| | - Aya Kamaya
- Stanford Hospital and Clinics, 300 Pasteur Dr H1307, Stanford, CA 94305.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Anderson MA, Mercaldo S, Cao J, Mroueh N, Furtado FS, Cochran RL, Chung R, Goiffon RJ, Sertic M, Pierce TT, Kilcoyne A, Mojtahed A, Shenoy-Bhangle AS, Catalano OA, Kambadakone A. Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Consensus Conference Recommendations for Incidental Gallbladder Polyp Management: Interreader Agreement Among 10 Radiologists. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2024; 222:e2330720. [PMID: 38353447 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.23.30720] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/29/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND. The 2022 Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound (SRU) consensus conference recommendations for small gallbladder polyps support management that is less aggressive than earlier approaches and may help standardize evaluation of polyps by radiologists. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of the present study was to assess the interreader agreement of radiologists in applying SRU recommendations for management of incidental gallbladder polyps on ultrasound. METHODS. This retrospective study included 105 patients (75 women and 30 men; median age, 51 years) with a gallbladder polyp on ultrasound (without features highly suspicious for invasive or malignant tumor) who underwent cholecystectomy between January 1, 2003, and January 1, 2021. Ten abdominal radiologists independently reviewed ultrasound examinations and, using the SRU recommendations, assessed one polyp per patient to assign risk category (extremely low risk, low risk, or indeterminate risk) and make a possible recommendation for surgical consultation. Five radiologists were considered less experienced (< 5 years of experience), and five were considered more experienced (≥ 5 years of experience). Interreader agreement was evaluated. Polyps were classified pathologically as nonneoplastic or neoplastic. RESULTS. For risk category assignments, interreader agreement was substantial among all readers (k = 0.710), less-experienced readers (k = 0.705), and more-experienced readers (k = 0.692). For surgical consultation recommendations, inter-reader agreement was substantial among all readers (k = 0.795) and more-experienced readers (k = 0.740) and was almost perfect among less-experienced readers (k = 0.811). Of 10 readers, a median of 5.0 (IQR, 2.0-8.0), 4.0 (IQR, 2.0-7.0), and 0.0 (IQR, 0.0-0.0) readers classified polyps as extremely low risk, low risk, and indeterminate risk, respectively. Across readers, the percentage of polyps classified as extremely low risk ranged from 32% to 72%; as low risk, from 24% to 65%; and as indeterminate risk, from 0% to 8%. Of 10 readers, a median of zero change to 0 (IQR, 0.0-1.0) readers recommended surgical consultation; the percentage of polyps receiving a recommendation for surgical consultation ranged from 4% to 22%. Of a total of 105 polyps, 102 were nonneo-plastic and three were neoplastic (all benign). Based on readers' most common assessments for nonneoplastic polyps, the risk category was extremely low risk for 53 polyps, low risk for 48 polyps, and indeterminate risk for one polyp; surgical consultation was recommended for 16 polyps. CONCLUSION. Ten abdominal radiologists showed substantial agreement for polyp risk categorizations and surgical consultation recommendations, although areas of reader variability were identified. CLINICAL IMPACT. The findings support the overall reproducibility of the SRU recommendations, while indicating opportunity for improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark A Anderson
- Department of Radiology, Abdominal Imaging Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St, White Bldg, Rm 270, Boston, MA 02114
| | - Sarah Mercaldo
- Department of Radiology, Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Jinjin Cao
- Department of Radiology, Abdominal Imaging Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St, White Bldg, Rm 270, Boston, MA 02114
| | - Nayla Mroueh
- Department of Radiology, Abdominal Imaging Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St, White Bldg, Rm 270, Boston, MA 02114
| | - Felipe S Furtado
- Department of Radiology, Abdominal Imaging Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St, White Bldg, Rm 270, Boston, MA 02114
| | - Rory L Cochran
- Department of Radiology, Abdominal Imaging Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St, White Bldg, Rm 270, Boston, MA 02114
| | - Ryan Chung
- Department of Radiology, Abdominal Imaging Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St, White Bldg, Rm 270, Boston, MA 02114
| | - Reece J Goiffon
- Department of Radiology, Abdominal Imaging Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St, White Bldg, Rm 270, Boston, MA 02114
| | - Madeleine Sertic
- Department of Radiology, Abdominal Imaging Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St, White Bldg, Rm 270, Boston, MA 02114
| | - Theodore T Pierce
- Department of Radiology, Abdominal Imaging Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St, White Bldg, Rm 270, Boston, MA 02114
| | - Aoife Kilcoyne
- Department of Radiology, Abdominal Imaging Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St, White Bldg, Rm 270, Boston, MA 02114
| | - Amirkasra Mojtahed
- Department of Radiology, Abdominal Imaging Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St, White Bldg, Rm 270, Boston, MA 02114
| | - Anuradha S Shenoy-Bhangle
- Department of Radiology, Abdominal Imaging Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St, White Bldg, Rm 270, Boston, MA 02114
| | - Onofrio A Catalano
- Department of Radiology, Abdominal Imaging Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St, White Bldg, Rm 270, Boston, MA 02114
| | - Avinash Kambadakone
- Department of Radiology, Abdominal Imaging Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St, White Bldg, Rm 270, Boston, MA 02114
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Li Q, Dou M, Liu H, Jia P, Wang X, Geng X, Zhang Y, Yang R, Li J, Yang W, Yao C, Zhang X, Lei D, Yang C, Hao Q, Liu Y, Guo Z, Geng Z, Zhang D. Prediction of neoplastic gallbladder polyps in patients with different age level based on preoperative ultrasound: a multi-center retrospective real-world study. BMC Gastroenterol 2024; 24:146. [PMID: 38689244 PMCID: PMC11059696 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-024-03240-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2023] [Accepted: 04/24/2024] [Indexed: 05/02/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The prevalence of neoplastic polyps in gallbladder polyps (GPs) increases sharply with age and is associated with gallbladder carcinoma (GBC). This study aims to predict neoplastic polyps and provide appropriate treatment strategies based on preoperative ultrasound features in patients with different age level. METHODS According to the age classification of WHO, 1523 patients with GPs who underwent cholecystectomy from January 2015 to December 2019 at 11 tertiary hospitals in China were divided into young adults group (n=622), middle-aged group (n=665) and elderly group (n=236). Linear scoring models were established based on independent risk variables screened by the Logistic regression model in different age groups. The area under ROC (AUC) to evaluate the predictive ability of linear scoring models, long- and short- diameter of GPs. RESULTS Independent risk factors for neoplastic polyps included the number of polyps, polyp size (long diameter), and fundus in the young adults and elderly groups, while the number of polyps, polyp size (long diameter), and polyp size (short diameter) in the middle-aged groups. In different age groups, the AUCs of its linear scoring model were higher than the AUCs of the long- and short- diameter of GPs for differentiating neoplastic and non-neoplastic polyps (all P<0.05), and Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit test showed that the prediction accuracy of the linear scoring models was higher than the long- and short- diameter of GPs (all P>0.05). CONCLUSION The linear scoring models of the young adults, middle-aged and elderly groups can effectively distinguish neoplastic polyps from non-neoplastic polyps based on preoperative ultrasound features.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qi Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710061, China
| | - Minghui Dou
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710061, China
| | - Hengchao Liu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710061, China
| | - Pengbo Jia
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First People's Hospital of Xianyang City, Xianyang, Shaanxi, 712000, China
| | - Xintuan Wang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First People's Hospital of Xianyang City, Xianyang, Shaanxi, 712000, China
| | - Xilin Geng
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710068, China
| | - Yu Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710068, China
| | - Rui Yang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Central Hospital of Hanzhong City, Hanzhong, Shaanxi, 723000, China
| | - Junhui Li
- Department of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710004, China
| | - Wenbin Yang
- Department of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710004, China
| | - Chunhe Yao
- Department of General Surgery, Xianyang Hospital of Yan'an University, Xianyang, Shaanxi, 712000, China
| | - Xiaodi Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, 215 Hospital of Shaanxi Nuclear Industry, Xianyang, Shaanxi, 712000, China
| | - Da Lei
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Central Hospital of Baoji City, Baoji, Shaanxi, 721000, China
| | - Chenglin Yang
- Department of General Surgery, Central Hospital of Ankang City, Ankang, Shaanxi, 725000, China
| | - Qiwei Hao
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Hospital of Yulin City, Yulin, Shaanxi, 719000, China
| | - Yimin Liu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, People's Hospital of Baoji City, Baoji, Shaanxi, 721000, China
| | - Zhihua Guo
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, People's Hospital of Baoji City, Baoji, Shaanxi, 721000, China
| | - Zhimin Geng
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710061, China.
| | - Dong Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710061, China.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Qin Z, Ding J, Fu Y, Zhou H, Wang Y, Jing X. Preliminary study on diagnosis of gallbladder neoplastic polyps based on contrast-enhanced ultrasound and grey scale ultrasound radiomics. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1370010. [PMID: 38720810 PMCID: PMC11076697 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1370010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2024] [Accepted: 04/02/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective Neoplastic gallbladder polyps (GPs), including adenomas and adenocarcinomas, are considered absolute indications for surgery; however, the distinction of neoplastic from non-neoplastic GPs on imaging is often challenging. This study thereby aimed to develop a CEUS radiomics nomogram, and evaluate the role of a combined grey-scale ultrasound and CEUS model for the prediction and diagnosis of neoplastic GPs. Methods Patients with GPs of ≥ 1 cm who underwent CEUS between January 2017 and May 2022 were retrospectively enrolled. Grey-scale ultrasound and arterial phase CEUS images of the largest section of the GPs were used for radiomics feature extraction. Features with good reproducibility in terms of intraclass correlation coefficient were selected. Grey-scale ultrasound and CEUS Rad-score models were first constructed using the Mann-Whitney U and LASSO regression test, and were subsequently included in the multivariable logistic regression analysis as independent factors for construction of the combined model. Results A total of 229 patients were included in our study. Among them, 118 cholesterol polyps, 68 adenomas, 33 adenocarcinomas, 6 adenomyomatoses, and 4 inflammatory polyps were recorded. A total of 851 features were extracted from each patient. Following screening, 21 and 15 features were retained in the grey-scale and CEUS models, respectively. The combined model demonstrated AUCs of 0.88 (95% CI: 0.83 - 0.93) and 0.84 (95% CI: 0.74 - 0.93) in the training and testing set, respectively. When applied to the whole dataset, the combined model detected 111 of the 128 non-neoplastic GPs, decreasing the resection rate of non-neoplastic GPs to 13.3%. Conclusion Our proposed combined model based on grey-scale ultrasound and CEUS radiomics features carries the potential as a non-invasive, radiation-free, and reproducible tool for the prediction and identification of neoplastic GPs. Our model may not only guide the treatment selection for GPs, but may also reduce the surgical burden of such patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhengyi Qin
- Department of Ultrasound, Tianjin Third Central Hospital, Tianjin, China
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Extracorporeal Life Support for Critical Diseases, Tianjin, China
- Artificial Cell Engineering Technology Research Center, Tianjin, China
- Tianjin Institute of Hepatobiliary Disease, Tianjin Third Central Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Jianmin Ding
- Department of Ultrasound, Tianjin Third Central Hospital, Tianjin, China
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Extracorporeal Life Support for Critical Diseases, Tianjin, China
- Artificial Cell Engineering Technology Research Center, Tianjin, China
- Tianjin Institute of Hepatobiliary Disease, Tianjin Third Central Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Yaling Fu
- Department of Ultrasound, Tianjin Third Central Hospital, Tianjin, China
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Extracorporeal Life Support for Critical Diseases, Tianjin, China
- Artificial Cell Engineering Technology Research Center, Tianjin, China
- Tianjin Institute of Hepatobiliary Disease, Tianjin Third Central Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Hongyu Zhou
- Department of Ultrasound, Tianjin Third Central Hospital, Tianjin, China
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Extracorporeal Life Support for Critical Diseases, Tianjin, China
- Artificial Cell Engineering Technology Research Center, Tianjin, China
- Tianjin Institute of Hepatobiliary Disease, Tianjin Third Central Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Yandong Wang
- Department of Ultrasound, Tianjin Third Central Hospital, Tianjin, China
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Extracorporeal Life Support for Critical Diseases, Tianjin, China
- Artificial Cell Engineering Technology Research Center, Tianjin, China
- Tianjin Institute of Hepatobiliary Disease, Tianjin Third Central Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Xiang Jing
- Department of Ultrasound, Tianjin Third Central Hospital, Tianjin, China
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Extracorporeal Life Support for Critical Diseases, Tianjin, China
- Artificial Cell Engineering Technology Research Center, Tianjin, China
- Tianjin Institute of Hepatobiliary Disease, Tianjin Third Central Hospital, Tianjin, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Seguin CL, Davidi B, Peters MLB, Eckel A, Harisinghani MG, Goiffon RJ, Knudsen AB, Pandharipande PV. Ultrasound Surveillance of Small, Incidentally Detected Gallbladder Polyps: Projected Benefits by Sex, Age, and Comorbidity Level. J Am Coll Radiol 2023; 20:1031-1041. [PMID: 37406750 PMCID: PMC10777737 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2023.05.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2022] [Revised: 04/03/2023] [Accepted: 05/06/2023] [Indexed: 07/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Incidentally detected gallbladder polyps are commonly encountered when performing upper abdominal ultrasound. Our purpose was to estimate the life expectancy (LE) benefit of ultrasound-based gallbladder surveillance in patients with small (6-7 to <10 mm), incidentally detected gallbladder polyps, accounting for patient sex, age, and comorbidity level. METHODS We developed a decision-analytic Markov model to evaluate hypothetical cohorts of women and men with small gallbladder polyps, with varying age (66-80 years) and comorbidity level (none, mild, moderate, severe). Drawing from current evidence, in the base case, we assumed no increased risk of gallbladder cancer in patients with small gallbladder polyps. To estimate maximal possible LE gains from surveillance, we assumed perfect cancer control consequent to 5 years of surveillance. We varied key assumptions including cancer risk and test performance characteristics in sensitivity analysis. RESULTS Projected LE gains from surveillance were <3 days across most cohorts and scenarios evaluated. For 66- and 80-year-olds with no comorbidities, LE gains were 1.46 and 1.45 days, respectively, for women, and 0.67 and 0.75 days for men. With 10 years of surveillance, LE gains increased to 2.94 days for 66-year-old women with no comorbidities (men: 1.35 days). If we assumed a 10% increase in gallbladder cancer risk among individuals with polyps, LE gains increased slightly to 1.60 days for 66-year-old women with no comorbidities (men: 0.74 days). Results were sensitive to test performance and surgical mortality. DISCUSSION Even under unrealistic, optimistic assumptions of cancer control, ultrasound surveillance of incidentally detected small gallbladder polyps provided limited benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia L Seguin
- Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Barak Davidi
- Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Mary Linton B Peters
- Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Andrew Eckel
- Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Mukesh G Harisinghani
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Director of Abdominal MRI, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Reece J Goiffon
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Amy B Knudsen
- Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Pari V Pandharipande
- Chair of Radiology, Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio; and Chief of Radiology Services for the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center Health System, Columbus, Ohio.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Yıldırım HÇ, Kavgaci G, Chalabiyev E, Dizdar O. Advances in the Early Detection of Hepatobiliary Cancers. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3880. [PMID: 37568696 PMCID: PMC10416925 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15153880] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2023] [Revised: 07/23/2023] [Accepted: 07/28/2023] [Indexed: 08/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular cancer (HCC) and biliary tract cancers (BTCs) have poor survival rates and a low likelihood of a cure, especially in advanced-stage disease. Early diagnosis is crucial and can significantly improve survival rates through curative treatment approaches. Current guidelines recommend abdominal ultrasonography (USG) and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) monitoring for HCC screening in high-risk groups, and abdominal USG, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) monitoring for biliary tract cancer. However, despite this screening strategy, many high-risk individuals still develop advanced-stage HCC and BTC. Blood-based biomarkers are being developed for use in HCC or BTC high-risk groups. Studies on AFP, AFP-L3, des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin, glypican-3 (GPC3), osteopontin (OPN), midkine (MK), neopterin, squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCCA), Mac-2-binding protein (M2BP), cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP), and interleukin-6 biomarkers for HCC screening have shown promising results when evaluated individually or in combination. In the case of BTCs, the potential applications of circulating tumor DNA, circulating microRNA, and circulating tumor cells in diagnosis are also promising. These biomarkers have shown potential in detecting BTCs in early stages, which can significantly improve patient outcomes. Additionally, these biomarkers hold promise for monitoring disease progression and evaluating response to therapy in BTC patients. However, further research is necessary to fully understand the clinical utility of these biomarkers in the diagnosis and management of HCC and BTCs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Omer Dizdar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, 06230 Ankara, Turkey; (H.Ç.Y.); (G.K.); (E.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Riddell ZC, Corallo C, Albazaz R, Foley KG. Gallbladder polyps and adenomyomatosis. Br J Radiol 2023; 96:20220115. [PMID: 35731858 PMCID: PMC9975534 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20220115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Incidental findings are commonly detected during examination of the gallbladder. Differentiating benign from malignant lesions is critical because of the poor prognosis associated with gallbladder malignancy. Therefore, it is important that radiologists and sonographers are aware of common incidental gallbladder findings, which undoubtedly will continue to increase with growing medical imaging use. Ultrasound is the primary imaging modality used to examine the gallbladder and biliary tree, but contrast-enhanced ultrasound and MRI are increasingly used. This review article focuses on two common incidental findings in the gallbladder; adenomyomatosis and gallbladder polyps. The imaging features of these conditions will be reviewed and compared between radiological modalities, and the pathology, epidemiology, natural history, and management will be discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zena C Riddell
- National Imaging Academy of Wales (NIAW), Bridgend, United Kingdom
| | - Carmelo Corallo
- Department of Radiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds, England
| | - Raneem Albazaz
- Department of Radiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds, England
| | - Kieran G Foley
- Division of Cancer & Genetics, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Wales, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Jenssen C, Lorentzen T, Dietrich CF, Lee JY, Chaubal N, Choi BI, Rosenberg J, Gutt C, Nolsøe CP. Incidental Findings of Gallbladder and Bile Ducts-Management Strategies: General Aspects, Gallbladder Polyps and Gallbladder Wall Thickening-A World Federation of Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (WFUMB) Position Paper. ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE & BIOLOGY 2022; 48:2355-2378. [PMID: 36058799 DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2022.06.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2021] [Revised: 06/02/2022] [Accepted: 06/20/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
The World Federation of Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (WFUMB) is addressing the issue of incidental findings with a series of position papers to give advice on characterization and management. The biliary system (gallbladder and biliary tree) is the third most frequent site for incidental findings. This first part of the position paper on incidental findings of the biliary system is related to general aspects, gallbladder polyps and other incidental findings of the gallbladder wall. Available evidence on prevalence, diagnostic work-up, malignancy risk, follow-up and treatment is summarized with a special focus on ultrasound techniques. Multiparametric ultrasound features of gallbladder polyps and other incidentally detected gallbladder wall pathologies are described, and their inclusion in assessment of malignancy risk and decision- making on further management is suggested.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Jenssen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Krankenhaus Märkisch Oderland GmbH, Strausberg/Wriezen, Germany; Brandenburg Institute for Clinical Ultrasound (BICUS) at Medical University Brandenburg "Theodor Fontane", Neuruppin, Germany
| | - Torben Lorentzen
- Ultrasound Section, Division of Surgery, Department of Gastroenterology, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Christoph F Dietrich
- Department Allgemeine Innere Medizin (DAIM), Kliniken Hirslanden Beau Site, Salem und Permancence, Bern, Switzerland.
| | - Jae Young Lee
- Department of Radiology, Medical Research Center, Seoul National University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Nitin Chaubal
- Thane Ultrasound Centre, Jaslok Hospital and Research Centre, Mumbai, India
| | - Buyng Ihn Choi
- Department of Radiology, Medical Research Center, Seoul National University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jacob Rosenberg
- Department of Surgery, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Carsten Gutt
- Department of Surgery, Klinikum Memmingen, Memmingen, Germany
| | - Christian P Nolsøe
- Center for Surgical Ultrasound, Department of Surgery, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark; Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation (CAMES), University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Han JW, Choi YH, Lee IS, Choi HJ, Hong TH, You YK. Gallbladder polyps growth rate is an independent risk factor for neoplastic polyps. United European Gastroenterol J 2022; 10:651-656. [PMID: 36087036 PMCID: PMC9486499 DOI: 10.1002/ueg2.12274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2022] [Accepted: 06/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The size of gallbladder (GB) polyps is a representative risk factor for neoplastic polyps. However, whether growth rate during follow‐up is associated with neoplastic polyps remains unclear. Methods From 2009 to 2019, a cohort of patients with GB polyps who underwent cholecystectomy was enrolled. We included only patients who underwent at least two abdominal ultrasonography procedures at least 6 months apart prior to cholecystectomy. Performance and optimal cutoff value of polyp growth rate for predicting neoplastic polyps were estimated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. In addition to growth rate, several other variables considered suitable for predicting neoplastic polyps were also investigated. A nomogram was created to predict neoplastic polyps. Results A total of 239 patients with neoplastic polyps (n = 27, 11.3%) and non‐neoplastic polyps (n = 212, 88.7%) were included. The median follow‐up period was 28.5 months. The area under the ROC curve (AUROC) of polyp growth rate for neoplastic polyps was 0.66 (95% confidence interval, 0.59–0.72). The growth rate cutoff value for prediction of neoplastic polyps was 3 mm/year (sensitivity, 37.0%; specificity, 86.3%). Multivariate analysis identified several factors predicting neoplastic polyps: polyp size ≥10 mm (odds ratio [OR], 3.74, p = 0.041), solitary polyp (OR, 3.92, p = 0.004), and polyp growth rate ≥ 3 mm/year (OR, 2.75, p = 0.031). The AUROC of the nomogram using these three significant factors in multivariate analysis was 0.71. Conclusion GB polyps with a growth rate of over 3 mm per year on ultrasonography during follow‐up should be considered a risk factor for neoplastic polyps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ji Won Han
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Young Hoon Choi
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - In Seok Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ho Joong Choi
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Tae Ho Hong
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Young Kyoung You
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kamaya A, Fung C, Szpakowski JL, Fetzer DT, Walsh AJ, Alimi Y, Bingham DB, Corwin MT, Dahiya N, Gabriel H, Park WG, Porembka MR, Rodgers SK, Tublin ME, Yuan X, Zhang Y, Middleton WD. Management of Incidentally Detected Gallbladder Polyps: Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Consensus Conference Recommendations. Radiology 2022; 305:277-289. [PMID: 35787200 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.213079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Gallbladder polyps (also known as polypoid lesions of the gallbladder) are a common incidental finding. The vast majority of gallbladder polyps smaller than 10 mm are not true neoplastic polyps but are benign cholesterol polyps with no inherent risk of malignancy. In addition, recent studies have shown that the overall risk of gallbladder cancer is not increased in patients with small gallbladder polyps, calling into question the rationale for frequent and prolonged follow-up of these common lesions. In 2021, a Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound, or SRU, consensus conference was convened to provide recommendations for the management of incidentally detected gallbladder polyps at US. See also the editorial by Sidhu and Rafailidis in this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aya Kamaya
- From the Departments of Radiology (A.K.), Pathology (D.B.B.), Medicine (W.G.P.), and Ultrasound (X.Y.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford Hospital and Clinics, 300 Pasteur Dr, H1307, Stanford, CA 94305; Department of Radiology, University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada (C.F., A.J.W.); Department of Gastroenterology, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, Calif (J.L.S.); Departments of Radiology (D.T.F.) and Surgical Oncology (M.R.P.), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex; Department of Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC (Y.A.); Department of Radiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, Calif (M.T.C.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Scottsdale, Phoenix, Ariz (N.D.); Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (H.G.); Department of Radiology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Cherry Hill, NJ (S.K.R.); Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pa (M.E.T.); Joint Pathology Center, Silver Spring, Md (Y.Z.); and Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (W.D.M.)
| | - Christopher Fung
- From the Departments of Radiology (A.K.), Pathology (D.B.B.), Medicine (W.G.P.), and Ultrasound (X.Y.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford Hospital and Clinics, 300 Pasteur Dr, H1307, Stanford, CA 94305; Department of Radiology, University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada (C.F., A.J.W.); Department of Gastroenterology, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, Calif (J.L.S.); Departments of Radiology (D.T.F.) and Surgical Oncology (M.R.P.), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex; Department of Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC (Y.A.); Department of Radiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, Calif (M.T.C.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Scottsdale, Phoenix, Ariz (N.D.); Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (H.G.); Department of Radiology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Cherry Hill, NJ (S.K.R.); Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pa (M.E.T.); Joint Pathology Center, Silver Spring, Md (Y.Z.); and Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (W.D.M.)
| | - Jean-Luc Szpakowski
- From the Departments of Radiology (A.K.), Pathology (D.B.B.), Medicine (W.G.P.), and Ultrasound (X.Y.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford Hospital and Clinics, 300 Pasteur Dr, H1307, Stanford, CA 94305; Department of Radiology, University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada (C.F., A.J.W.); Department of Gastroenterology, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, Calif (J.L.S.); Departments of Radiology (D.T.F.) and Surgical Oncology (M.R.P.), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex; Department of Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC (Y.A.); Department of Radiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, Calif (M.T.C.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Scottsdale, Phoenix, Ariz (N.D.); Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (H.G.); Department of Radiology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Cherry Hill, NJ (S.K.R.); Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pa (M.E.T.); Joint Pathology Center, Silver Spring, Md (Y.Z.); and Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (W.D.M.)
| | - David T Fetzer
- From the Departments of Radiology (A.K.), Pathology (D.B.B.), Medicine (W.G.P.), and Ultrasound (X.Y.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford Hospital and Clinics, 300 Pasteur Dr, H1307, Stanford, CA 94305; Department of Radiology, University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada (C.F., A.J.W.); Department of Gastroenterology, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, Calif (J.L.S.); Departments of Radiology (D.T.F.) and Surgical Oncology (M.R.P.), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex; Department of Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC (Y.A.); Department of Radiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, Calif (M.T.C.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Scottsdale, Phoenix, Ariz (N.D.); Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (H.G.); Department of Radiology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Cherry Hill, NJ (S.K.R.); Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pa (M.E.T.); Joint Pathology Center, Silver Spring, Md (Y.Z.); and Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (W.D.M.)
| | - Andrew J Walsh
- From the Departments of Radiology (A.K.), Pathology (D.B.B.), Medicine (W.G.P.), and Ultrasound (X.Y.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford Hospital and Clinics, 300 Pasteur Dr, H1307, Stanford, CA 94305; Department of Radiology, University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada (C.F., A.J.W.); Department of Gastroenterology, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, Calif (J.L.S.); Departments of Radiology (D.T.F.) and Surgical Oncology (M.R.P.), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex; Department of Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC (Y.A.); Department of Radiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, Calif (M.T.C.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Scottsdale, Phoenix, Ariz (N.D.); Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (H.G.); Department of Radiology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Cherry Hill, NJ (S.K.R.); Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pa (M.E.T.); Joint Pathology Center, Silver Spring, Md (Y.Z.); and Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (W.D.M.)
| | - Yewande Alimi
- From the Departments of Radiology (A.K.), Pathology (D.B.B.), Medicine (W.G.P.), and Ultrasound (X.Y.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford Hospital and Clinics, 300 Pasteur Dr, H1307, Stanford, CA 94305; Department of Radiology, University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada (C.F., A.J.W.); Department of Gastroenterology, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, Calif (J.L.S.); Departments of Radiology (D.T.F.) and Surgical Oncology (M.R.P.), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex; Department of Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC (Y.A.); Department of Radiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, Calif (M.T.C.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Scottsdale, Phoenix, Ariz (N.D.); Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (H.G.); Department of Radiology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Cherry Hill, NJ (S.K.R.); Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pa (M.E.T.); Joint Pathology Center, Silver Spring, Md (Y.Z.); and Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (W.D.M.)
| | - David B Bingham
- From the Departments of Radiology (A.K.), Pathology (D.B.B.), Medicine (W.G.P.), and Ultrasound (X.Y.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford Hospital and Clinics, 300 Pasteur Dr, H1307, Stanford, CA 94305; Department of Radiology, University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada (C.F., A.J.W.); Department of Gastroenterology, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, Calif (J.L.S.); Departments of Radiology (D.T.F.) and Surgical Oncology (M.R.P.), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex; Department of Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC (Y.A.); Department of Radiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, Calif (M.T.C.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Scottsdale, Phoenix, Ariz (N.D.); Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (H.G.); Department of Radiology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Cherry Hill, NJ (S.K.R.); Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pa (M.E.T.); Joint Pathology Center, Silver Spring, Md (Y.Z.); and Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (W.D.M.)
| | - Michael T Corwin
- From the Departments of Radiology (A.K.), Pathology (D.B.B.), Medicine (W.G.P.), and Ultrasound (X.Y.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford Hospital and Clinics, 300 Pasteur Dr, H1307, Stanford, CA 94305; Department of Radiology, University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada (C.F., A.J.W.); Department of Gastroenterology, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, Calif (J.L.S.); Departments of Radiology (D.T.F.) and Surgical Oncology (M.R.P.), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex; Department of Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC (Y.A.); Department of Radiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, Calif (M.T.C.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Scottsdale, Phoenix, Ariz (N.D.); Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (H.G.); Department of Radiology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Cherry Hill, NJ (S.K.R.); Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pa (M.E.T.); Joint Pathology Center, Silver Spring, Md (Y.Z.); and Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (W.D.M.)
| | - Nirvikar Dahiya
- From the Departments of Radiology (A.K.), Pathology (D.B.B.), Medicine (W.G.P.), and Ultrasound (X.Y.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford Hospital and Clinics, 300 Pasteur Dr, H1307, Stanford, CA 94305; Department of Radiology, University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada (C.F., A.J.W.); Department of Gastroenterology, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, Calif (J.L.S.); Departments of Radiology (D.T.F.) and Surgical Oncology (M.R.P.), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex; Department of Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC (Y.A.); Department of Radiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, Calif (M.T.C.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Scottsdale, Phoenix, Ariz (N.D.); Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (H.G.); Department of Radiology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Cherry Hill, NJ (S.K.R.); Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pa (M.E.T.); Joint Pathology Center, Silver Spring, Md (Y.Z.); and Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (W.D.M.)
| | - Helena Gabriel
- From the Departments of Radiology (A.K.), Pathology (D.B.B.), Medicine (W.G.P.), and Ultrasound (X.Y.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford Hospital and Clinics, 300 Pasteur Dr, H1307, Stanford, CA 94305; Department of Radiology, University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada (C.F., A.J.W.); Department of Gastroenterology, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, Calif (J.L.S.); Departments of Radiology (D.T.F.) and Surgical Oncology (M.R.P.), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex; Department of Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC (Y.A.); Department of Radiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, Calif (M.T.C.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Scottsdale, Phoenix, Ariz (N.D.); Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (H.G.); Department of Radiology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Cherry Hill, NJ (S.K.R.); Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pa (M.E.T.); Joint Pathology Center, Silver Spring, Md (Y.Z.); and Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (W.D.M.)
| | - Walter G Park
- From the Departments of Radiology (A.K.), Pathology (D.B.B.), Medicine (W.G.P.), and Ultrasound (X.Y.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford Hospital and Clinics, 300 Pasteur Dr, H1307, Stanford, CA 94305; Department of Radiology, University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada (C.F., A.J.W.); Department of Gastroenterology, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, Calif (J.L.S.); Departments of Radiology (D.T.F.) and Surgical Oncology (M.R.P.), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex; Department of Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC (Y.A.); Department of Radiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, Calif (M.T.C.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Scottsdale, Phoenix, Ariz (N.D.); Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (H.G.); Department of Radiology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Cherry Hill, NJ (S.K.R.); Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pa (M.E.T.); Joint Pathology Center, Silver Spring, Md (Y.Z.); and Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (W.D.M.)
| | - Matthew R Porembka
- From the Departments of Radiology (A.K.), Pathology (D.B.B.), Medicine (W.G.P.), and Ultrasound (X.Y.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford Hospital and Clinics, 300 Pasteur Dr, H1307, Stanford, CA 94305; Department of Radiology, University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada (C.F., A.J.W.); Department of Gastroenterology, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, Calif (J.L.S.); Departments of Radiology (D.T.F.) and Surgical Oncology (M.R.P.), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex; Department of Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC (Y.A.); Department of Radiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, Calif (M.T.C.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Scottsdale, Phoenix, Ariz (N.D.); Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (H.G.); Department of Radiology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Cherry Hill, NJ (S.K.R.); Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pa (M.E.T.); Joint Pathology Center, Silver Spring, Md (Y.Z.); and Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (W.D.M.)
| | - Shuchi K Rodgers
- From the Departments of Radiology (A.K.), Pathology (D.B.B.), Medicine (W.G.P.), and Ultrasound (X.Y.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford Hospital and Clinics, 300 Pasteur Dr, H1307, Stanford, CA 94305; Department of Radiology, University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada (C.F., A.J.W.); Department of Gastroenterology, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, Calif (J.L.S.); Departments of Radiology (D.T.F.) and Surgical Oncology (M.R.P.), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex; Department of Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC (Y.A.); Department of Radiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, Calif (M.T.C.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Scottsdale, Phoenix, Ariz (N.D.); Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (H.G.); Department of Radiology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Cherry Hill, NJ (S.K.R.); Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pa (M.E.T.); Joint Pathology Center, Silver Spring, Md (Y.Z.); and Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (W.D.M.)
| | - Mitchell E Tublin
- From the Departments of Radiology (A.K.), Pathology (D.B.B.), Medicine (W.G.P.), and Ultrasound (X.Y.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford Hospital and Clinics, 300 Pasteur Dr, H1307, Stanford, CA 94305; Department of Radiology, University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada (C.F., A.J.W.); Department of Gastroenterology, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, Calif (J.L.S.); Departments of Radiology (D.T.F.) and Surgical Oncology (M.R.P.), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex; Department of Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC (Y.A.); Department of Radiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, Calif (M.T.C.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Scottsdale, Phoenix, Ariz (N.D.); Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (H.G.); Department of Radiology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Cherry Hill, NJ (S.K.R.); Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pa (M.E.T.); Joint Pathology Center, Silver Spring, Md (Y.Z.); and Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (W.D.M.)
| | - Xin Yuan
- From the Departments of Radiology (A.K.), Pathology (D.B.B.), Medicine (W.G.P.), and Ultrasound (X.Y.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford Hospital and Clinics, 300 Pasteur Dr, H1307, Stanford, CA 94305; Department of Radiology, University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada (C.F., A.J.W.); Department of Gastroenterology, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, Calif (J.L.S.); Departments of Radiology (D.T.F.) and Surgical Oncology (M.R.P.), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex; Department of Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC (Y.A.); Department of Radiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, Calif (M.T.C.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Scottsdale, Phoenix, Ariz (N.D.); Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (H.G.); Department of Radiology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Cherry Hill, NJ (S.K.R.); Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pa (M.E.T.); Joint Pathology Center, Silver Spring, Md (Y.Z.); and Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (W.D.M.)
| | - Yang Zhang
- From the Departments of Radiology (A.K.), Pathology (D.B.B.), Medicine (W.G.P.), and Ultrasound (X.Y.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford Hospital and Clinics, 300 Pasteur Dr, H1307, Stanford, CA 94305; Department of Radiology, University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada (C.F., A.J.W.); Department of Gastroenterology, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, Calif (J.L.S.); Departments of Radiology (D.T.F.) and Surgical Oncology (M.R.P.), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex; Department of Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC (Y.A.); Department of Radiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, Calif (M.T.C.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Scottsdale, Phoenix, Ariz (N.D.); Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (H.G.); Department of Radiology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Cherry Hill, NJ (S.K.R.); Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pa (M.E.T.); Joint Pathology Center, Silver Spring, Md (Y.Z.); and Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (W.D.M.)
| | - William D Middleton
- From the Departments of Radiology (A.K.), Pathology (D.B.B.), Medicine (W.G.P.), and Ultrasound (X.Y.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford Hospital and Clinics, 300 Pasteur Dr, H1307, Stanford, CA 94305; Department of Radiology, University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada (C.F., A.J.W.); Department of Gastroenterology, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, Calif (J.L.S.); Departments of Radiology (D.T.F.) and Surgical Oncology (M.R.P.), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex; Department of Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC (Y.A.); Department of Radiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, Calif (M.T.C.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Scottsdale, Phoenix, Ariz (N.D.); Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (H.G.); Department of Radiology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Cherry Hill, NJ (S.K.R.); Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pa (M.E.T.); Joint Pathology Center, Silver Spring, Md (Y.Z.); and Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (W.D.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Aziz H, Hewitt DB, Pawlik TM. Critical Analysis of the Updated Guidelines for Management of Gallbladder Polyps. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:3363-3365. [PMID: 35419760 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-11701-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2022] [Accepted: 03/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - D Brock Hewitt
- The Ohio State Wexner Medical Center, James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Timothy M Pawlik
- Department of Surgery, The Urban Meyer III and Shelley Meyer Chair for Cancer Research, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Surgery, Oncology, Health Services Management and Policy, Columbus, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Longitudinal Ultrasound Assessment of Changes in Size and Number of Incidentally Detected Gallbladder Polyps. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2022; 218:472-483. [PMID: 34549608 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.21.26614] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND. Previous European multisociety guidelines recommend routine follow-up imaging of gallbladder polyps (including polyps < 6 mm in patients without risk factors) and cholecystectomy for polyp size changes of 2 mm or more. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to assess longitudinal changes in the number and size of gallbladder polyps on serial ultrasound examinations. METHODS. This retrospective study included patients who underwent at least one ultrasound examination between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2020 (as part of a hepatocellular carcinoma screening and surveillance program) that showed a gallbladder polyp. Number of polyps and size of largest polyp were recorded based primarily on review of examination reports. Longitudinal changes on serial examinations were summarized. Pathologic findings from cholecystectomy were reviewed. RESULTS. Among 9683 patients, 759 (8%) had at least one ultrasound examination showing a polyp. Of these, 434 patients (248 men, 186 women; mean age, 50.6 years) had multiple examinations (range, 2-19 examinations; mean, 4.8 examinations per patient; mean interval between first and last examinations, 3.6 ± 3.1 [SD] years; maximum interval, 11.0 years). Among these 434 patients, 257 had one polyp, 40 had two polyps, and 137 had more than two polyps. Polyp size was 6 mm or less in 368 patients, 7-9 mm in 52 patients, and 10 mm or more in 14 patients. Number of polyps increased in 9% of patients, decreased in 14%, both increased and decreased on serial examinations in 22%, and showed no change in 55%. Polyp size increased in 10% of patients, decreased in 16%, both increased and decreased on serial examinations in 18%, and showed no change in 56%. In 9% of patients, gallbladder polyps were not detected on follow-up imaging; in 6% of patients, gallbladder polyps were not detected on a follow-up examination but were then detected on later studies. No gallbladder carcinoma was identified in 19 patients who underwent cholecystectomy. CONCLUSION. Gallbladder polyps fluctuate in size, number, and visibility over serial examinations. Using a 2-mm threshold for growth, 10% increased in size. No carcinoma was identified. CLINICAL IMPACT. European multisociety guidelines that propose surveillance of essentially all polyps and a 2-mm size change as the basis for cholecystectomy are likely too conservative for clinical application.
Collapse
|
16
|
Kwon OS, Kim YK. Are there modifiable risk factors affecting the prevalence of gallbladder polyps or those 5 mm or larger? A retrospective cross-sectional study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2021; 100:e27115. [PMID: 34477153 PMCID: PMC8415951 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000027115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2021] [Accepted: 08/14/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Gallbladder polyps (GBPs), especially GBPs ≥5 mm in diameter, are clinically important because they can progress to gallbladder cancer. The known modifiable risk factors for GBP are obesity, metabolic syndrome, and dyslipidemia; however, there is limited evidence regarding specific modifiable risk factors for GBPs ≥5 mm in diameter. Therefore, this study is aimed to investigate the existence of modifiable risk factors affecting the prevalence of GBPs and GBPs ≥5 mm in diameter in a Korean population.A total of 10,119 subjects who visited a single health-screening center at Jeju National University Hospital between January 2009 and December 2019 was included in this study. Binary logistic analyses were performed to identify risk factors affecting the prevalence of GBPs and GBPs ≥5 mm in diameter.The overall prevalence of GBPs and GBPs ≥5 mm in diameter were 9.0% and 4.1%, respectively. Multivariable analysis identified male gender as an independent risk factor affecting the prevalence of GBPs. Moreover, multivariable analysis revealed age and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels as independent risk factors for GBPs ≥5 mm in diameter.This study showed that gender was a risk factor affecting the prevalence of GBPs and that age and high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol levels were risk factors for the presence of GBPs ≥5 mm in diameter. High-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels could be a modifiable risk factor affecting the prevalence of large-diameter GBPs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oh-Sung Kwon
- Department of Medical Information, Jeju National University Hospital, Jeju-si, Jeju Special Self-Governing Province, Republic of Korea
| | - Young-Kyu Kim
- Department of Surgery, Jeju National University School of Medicine, Aran 13gil 15 (Ara-1Dong) Jeju-si, Jeju Special Self-Governing Province, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Gallbladder Polyp Classification in Ultrasound Images Using an Ensemble Convolutional Neural Network Model. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10163585. [PMID: 34441881 PMCID: PMC8396835 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10163585] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2021] [Revised: 07/20/2021] [Accepted: 08/10/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Differential diagnosis of true gallbladder polyps remains a challenging task. This study aimed to differentiate true polyps in ultrasound images using deep learning, especially gallbladder polyps less than 20 mm in size, where clinical distinction is necessary. A total of 501 patients with gallbladder polyp pathology confirmed through cholecystectomy were enrolled from two tertiary hospitals. Abdominal ultrasound images of gallbladder polyps from these patients were analyzed using an ensemble model combining three convolutional neural network (CNN) models and a 5-fold cross-validation. True polyp diagnosis with the ensemble model that learned only using ultrasonography images achieved an area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.8960 and accuracy of 83.63%. After adding patient age and polyp size information, the diagnostic performance of the ensemble model improved, with a high specificity of 88.35%, AUC of 0.9082, and accuracy of 87.61%, outperforming the individual CNN models constituting the ensemble model. In the subgroup analysis, the ensemble model showed the best performance with AUC of 0.9131 for polyps larger than 10 mm. Our proposed ensemble model that combines three CNN models classifies gallbladder polyps of less than 20 mm in ultrasonography images with high accuracy and can be useful for avoiding unnecessary cholecystectomy with high specificity.
Collapse
|
18
|
Current update on gallbladder carcinoma. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2021; 46:2474-2489. [PMID: 33386907 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-020-02871-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2020] [Revised: 11/12/2020] [Accepted: 11/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Gallbladder (GB) carcinoma is a relatively rare malignancy and is associated with poor prognosis. Numerous risk factors have been associated with the development of GB carcinoma. GB carcinomas may present as mass lesions replacing the GB, focal or diffuse thickening of the GB wall, and intraluminal mass in the GB. Various benign conditions can mimic GB carcinoma. This article reviews the epidemiology, pathology, clinical findings, imaging features, and management of GB carcinomas.
Collapse
|
19
|
Wennmacker SZ, de Savornin Lohman EAJ, de Reuver PR, Drenth JPH, van der Post RS, Nagtegaal ID, Hermans JJ, van Laarhoven CJHM. Imaging based flowchart for gallbladder polyp evaluation. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci 2021; 52:68-78. [PMID: 33422451 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmir.2020.12.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2020] [Revised: 12/17/2020] [Accepted: 12/17/2020] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Preoperative differentiation between neoplastic and nonneoplastic gallbladder polyps, and the subsequent indication for cholecystectomy remains a clinical dilemma. The current 1 cm size threshold for neoplasia is unspecific. The aim of this study was to improve diagnostic work-up for gallbladder polyps using sonographic and MRI characteristics of neoplastic and nonneoplastic polyps. METHODS A prospective, exploratory study including patients undergoing cholecystectomy for gallbladder polyp(s) was conducted. Patients underwent targeted transabdominal ultrasound (TAUS) and MRI. Outcomes were sensitivity and specificity for polyp diagnosis, and the radiological characteristics of neoplastic and nonneoplastic polyp types. Histopathology after cholecystectomy was used as reference standard. RESULTS Histopathology demonstrated gallbladder polyps in 20/27 patients (74%): 14 cholesterol polyps, three adenomyomatosis, two adenomas and one gastric heterotopia. Sensitivity of polyp identification were 72% (routine TAUS) and 86% (targeted TAUS and MRI). Both adenomas were identified as neoplastic on targeted TAUS and MRI. Sonographic presentation as multiple, pedunculated polyps, either heterogeneous or with hyperechoic foci, or as single polyps containing cysts were limited to nonneoplastic polyps. On MRI hyperintense polyps on T1-weighted image were cholesterol polyps. An adenoma with high-grade dysplasia showed foci of decreased ADC values. We propose a checklist for polyp evaluation by targeted TAUS and a flowchart for radiological work-up of gallbladder polyps. CONCLUSIONS The presented checklist and flowchart could aid diagnostic work-up for gallbladder polyps compared to current routine ultrasound, by elimination of nonneoplastic polyps and ultimately improve treatment decision for patients with gallbladder polyps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Z Wennmacker
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, the Netherlands.
| | | | - Philip R de Reuver
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, the Netherlands
| | - Joost P H Drenth
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Centre, the Netherlands
| | | | - Iris D Nagtegaal
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Centre, the Netherlands
| | - John J Hermans
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Kim KH. Gallbladder polyps: evolving approach to the diagnosis and management. Yeungnam Univ J Med 2020; 38:1-9. [PMID: 33045805 PMCID: PMC7787897 DOI: 10.12701/yujm.2020.00213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2020] [Accepted: 04/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Gallbladder (GB) polyp is a mucosal projection into the GB lumen. With increasing health awareness, GB polyps are frequently found using ultrasonography during health screening. The prevalence of GB polyps ranges between 1.3% and 9.5%. Most patients are asymptomatic and have benign characteristics. Of the nonneoplastic polyps, cholesterol polyps are most common, accounting for 60%-70% of lesions. However, a few polyps have malignant potential. Currently, the guidelines recommend laparoscopic cholecystectomy for polyps larger than 1 cm in diameter due to their malignan potential. The treatment algorithm can be influenced by the size, shape, and numbers of polyps, old age (>50 years), the presence of primary sclerosing cholangitis, and gallstones. This review summarizes the commonly recognized concepts on GB polyps from diagnosis to an algorithm of treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kook Hyun Kim
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Zhang J, Zhang Y, Chen Y, Chen W, Xu H, Sun W. Helicobacter pylori is not a contributing factor in gallbladder polyps or gallstones: a case-control matching study of Chinese individuals. J Int Med Res 2020; 48:300060520959220. [PMID: 33045881 PMCID: PMC7557694 DOI: 10.1177/0300060520959220] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2020] [Accepted: 08/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the relationship between Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection and gallstones or gallbladder polyps. METHODS This retrospective analysis included 27,881 individuals who underwent health examinations that included a H. pylori test and an abdominal ultrasound scan. Patients were divided into four groups: gallbladder polyp (P group), gallstone (S group), gallstone and gallbladder polyp (SP group), and no gallbladder disease (N group). Case-control matching was used to select the participants in the control group. RESULTS The mean ages of participants in the P, S, and SP groups were all significantly higher than the mean age of participants in the N group. The proportions of participants with each type of body mass index significantly differed between the N and P groups, and between the N and S groups. In total 45.7% of participants exhibited H. pylori infection. After case-control matching, the proportion of participants with H. pylori infection did not significantly differ according to the presence or absence of gallbladder polyps. Similar results were observed regarding gallstones, as well as gallstones and gallbladder polyps. CONCLUSION H. pylori infection might not be related to gallbladder polyps or gallstones.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinshun Zhang
- Health Management Center, Taizhou Hospital, Linhai, China
| | - Ying Zhang
- School of Foreign Languages, Taizhou University, Linhai,
China
| | - Yahong Chen
- Health Management Center, Taizhou Hospital, Linhai, China
| | - Weiling Chen
- Health Management Center, Taizhou Hospital, Linhai, China
| | - Hongfang Xu
- Health Management Center, Taizhou Hospital, Linhai, China
| | - Wei Sun
- Health Management Center, Taizhou Hospital, Linhai, China
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Jeong Y, Kim JH, Chae HD, Park SJ, Bae JS, Joo I, Han JK. Deep learning-based decision support system for the diagnosis of neoplastic gallbladder polyps on ultrasonography: Preliminary results. Sci Rep 2020; 10:7700. [PMID: 32382062 PMCID: PMC7205977 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-64205-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2019] [Accepted: 04/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Ultrasonography (US) has been considered image of choice for gallbladder (GB) polyp, however, it had limitations in differentiating between nonneoplastic polyps and neoplastic polyps. We developed and investigated the usefulness of a deep learning-based decision support system (DL-DSS) for the differential diagnosis of GB polyps on US. We retrospectively collected 535 patients, and they were divided into the development dataset (n = 437) and test dataset (n = 98). The binary classification convolutional neural network model was developed by transfer learning. Using the test dataset, three radiologists with different experience levels retrospectively graded the possibility of a neoplastic polyp using a 5-point confidence scale. The reviewers were requested to re-evaluate their grades using the DL-DSS assistant. The areas under the curve (AUCs) of three reviewers were 0.94, 0.78, and 0.87. The DL-DSS alone showed an AUC of 0.92. With the DL-DSS assistant, the AUCs of the reviewer’s improved to 0.95, 0.91, and 0.91. Also, the specificity of the reviewers was improved (65.1–85.7 to 71.4–93.7). The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) improved from 0.87 to 0.93. In conclusion, DL-DSS could be used as an assistant tool to decrease the gap between reviewers and to reduce the false positive rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Younbeom Jeong
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Korea
| | - Jung Hoon Kim
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Korea. .,Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 103 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Korea. .,Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, 103 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.
| | - Hee-Dong Chae
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Korea. .,Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 103 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Korea.
| | - Sae-Jin Park
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Korea.,Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 103 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Korea
| | - Jae Seok Bae
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Korea.,Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 103 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Korea
| | - Ijin Joo
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Korea.,Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 103 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Korea
| | - Joon Koo Han
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Korea.,Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 103 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Korea.,Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, 103 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Szpakowski JL, Tucker LY. Outcomes of Gallbladder Polyps and Their Association With Gallbladder Cancer in a 20-Year Cohort. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3:e205143. [PMID: 32421183 PMCID: PMC7235691 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.5143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Gallbladder polyps (GP) are found in more than 4% of adult abdominal ultrasonographs. Their growth pattern and association with gallbladder cancer (GBC) are poorly defined. OBJECTIVE To determine the growth pattern of GPs and their association with GBC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This cohort study included 622 227 adult members (ie, aged 18 years or older) of Kaiser Permanente Northern California, an integrated health care delivery system, enrolled between January 1, 1995, and December 31, 2014. The GBC cohort comprised a total of 365 adults with GBC and prior ultrasonography, and the GP cohort comprised 35 970 adults with GPs present on ultrasonography. Data analysis was performed from March 2016 to November 2019. EXPOSURES Gallbladder polyps (quantitative size, <6 mm, 6 to <10 mm, and ≥10 mm or qualitative size [ie, tiny, small, moderate, and large]). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES For the GBC cohort, proportion of patients with GBC with polyps identified on preceding ultrasonograph. For the GP cohort, rates of GBC among those with polyps according to size and rate of GP growth of at least 2 mm over time. RESULTS The GBC cohort comprised 365 individuals (267 [73.1%] women; 173 [47.4%] white patients; median [interquartile range] age, 71 [61-79] years). After excluding 14 patients who did not have evaluation of polyp size, the final GP cohort comprised 35 856 adults, with 18 645 (52.0%) women, a median (interquartile range) age 50 (40-60) years, and 15 573 (43.3%) white patients. Gallbladder polyps were found in 22 patients (6.0%) in the GBC cohort and in 35 870 of 622 227 adults (5.8%) who underwent abdominal ultrasonography. Of these, 19 (0.053%) were diagnosed with GBC, similar to those without GP (316 of 586 357 [0.054%]). The unadjusted GBC rate per 100 000 person-years was 11.3 (95% CI, 6.2-16.3) overall and increased with polyp size, from 1.3 (95% CI, 0-4.0) with initial size of less than 6 mm (n = 17 531) to 128.2 (95% CI, 39.4-217.0) with initial size of 10 mm or larger (n = 2055). In those observed for at least 1 year, the rate was 3.6 (95% CI, 0.7-6.5) per 100 000 person-years. In 6359 patients with evaluable follow-up, unadjusted cumulative probabilities of polyp growth of at least 2 mm at 10 years were 66.2% (95% CI, 62.3%-70.0%) in polyps initially less than 6 mm and 52.9% (95% CI, 47.1%-59.0%) in polyps initially 6 mm to less than 10 mm. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this study, GBC rates were low and similar among patients with and without GPs. Growth of 2 mm or more appeared to be part of GP natural history. The results call into question the strategy of proactively following GP to detect GBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lue-Yen Tucker
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, California
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Thomas E, Gargano T, Libri M, Ruggeri G, Salfi N, Mazzoni E, Lima M. Gallbladder polyps in association with metachromatic leukodystrophy. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY CASE REPORTS 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.epsc.2019.101354] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022] Open
|
25
|
Pickering O, Pucher PH, Toale C, Hand F, Anand E, Cassidy S, McEntee G, Toh SKC. Prevalence and Sonographic Detection of Gallbladder Polyps in a Western European Population. J Surg Res 2020; 250:226-231. [PMID: 32106001 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2019] [Revised: 12/31/2019] [Accepted: 01/19/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gallbladder cancer is rare but associated with significant morbidity and mortality necessitating the early identification of premalignant and malignant lesions to improve overall prognosis. Despite limited evidence regarding the effectiveness of transabdominal ultrasound (US) in the detection of gallbladder polyps, it plays a key role in current European guidelines. The aim of this study was to investigate gallbladder polyp prevalence in a western European population and assess the diagnostic accuracy of transabdominal US. METHODS Data from patients who underwent cholecystectomy for US detected gallbladder polypoid lesions at four hospitals in Ireland and the United Kingdom between 2010 and 2018 were retrospectively collected. Patient demographics, ultrasonographic, and histopathologic findings were analyzed. RESULTS A total of 134 patients underwent cholecystectomy for US-detected gallbladder polyps. After histopathologic examination, pseudopolyps were found in 75 (56%) specimens with dysplastic or malignant polyps seen in only six (4.5%) specimens. Mean size for neoplastic polyps was 33 mm. The positive predictive value for US in detecting neoplastic polyps in this study was 4.5%, which is significantly lower than the 10%-15% reported previously. CONCLUSIONS Although the prevalence of neoplastic polyps in this study is higher than in the previous literature, the distribution of pseudopolyps and true polyps is as expected. With all malignant polyps being >10 mm in diameter, these findings support the current size thresholds stated in European guidelines. The poor diagnostic accuracy of US demonstrated may have led to significant number of patients undergoing unnecessary surgical intervention, further supporting the argument for improved strategies for the investigation of gallbladder polyps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver Pickering
- Department of General Surgery, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, Hampshire, United Kingdom.
| | - Philip H Pucher
- Department of General Surgery, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, Hampshire, United Kingdom
| | - Conor Toale
- Department of General Surgery, The Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Fiona Hand
- Department of General Surgery, The Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Easan Anand
- Department of General Surgery, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, Hampshire, United Kingdom
| | - Sheena Cassidy
- Department of General Surgery, The Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Gerry McEntee
- Department of General Surgery, The Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Simon K C Toh
- Department of General Surgery, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, Hampshire, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Lee W. Diagnostic and Therapeutic Algorithm: Polypoid Lesions of the Gallbladder. DISEASES OF THE GALLBLADDER 2020:255-268. [DOI: 10.1007/978-981-15-6010-1_26] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2025]
|
27
|
Okaniwa S. Role of conventional ultrasonography in the diagnosis of gallbladder polypoid lesions. J Med Ultrason (2001) 2019; 48:149-157. [DOI: 10.1007/s10396-019-00989-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2019] [Accepted: 11/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
28
|
|
29
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Unlike adults, gallbladder polyps (GPs) are rare in childhood. The aim of this study was to evaluate patients with a GP diagnosis. METHODS Patients who were diagnosed with GP via ultrasonography from October 2012 to October 2017 were retrospectively evaluated in terms of sociodemographic characteristics and laboratory findings. RESULTS The study included 19 patients diagnosed with GP and followed up in our department. The patients comprised 14 (73.6%) girls with a mean age of 13.9 ± 4.1 years and a mean follow-up period of 10.2 ± 5.4 months (range, 3-26 months). The most common presenting symptom of the patients (n = 15, 78.9%) for ultrasonography was abdominal pain without biliary symptoms. Location of the polyps was in the corpus in 55% of patients, and either in the fundus (20%) or the neck of the gallbladder (25%). The average diameter of the polyps was 4.5 ± 1.6 mm (range, 2-9 mm). Multiple polyps were observed in 3 patients. No significant change in the number or size of polyps was noted at the end of the follow-up periods. Cholecystectomy was applied to 1 patient who had >5 polyps with a rapid increase in size, and the pathology report was hamartomatous polyp. There was no remarkable change in the clinical or laboratory findings of other patients during the follow-up period. CONCLUSION In this study, GPs could be seen in young children as young as 16 months of age and ultrasonography is sufficient for follow-up in stable and asymptomatic patients.
Collapse
|
30
|
Patel K, Dajani K, Vickramarajah S, Huguet E. Five year experience of gallbladder polyp surveillance and cost effective analysis against new European consensus guidelines. HPB (Oxford) 2019; 21:636-642. [PMID: 30416065 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2018.10.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2018] [Revised: 07/26/2018] [Accepted: 10/14/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gallbladder polyp (GBP) surveillance seeks to identify early neoplasms, but practice varies amongst surgical units. Recent European consensus guidelines have recommended an evidence-based GBP surveillance strategy. In a tertiary centre Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary unit we examine GBP surveillance, malignant yield, and assess cost-effectiveness of the new European consensus guidelines. METHODS Respective data were collected from all patients with ultrasonography-detected GBPs between January 2008 and January 2013. RESULTS 558 patients had GBPs detected on ultrasonography. Following initial ultrasonography, 304 (54.5%) had further ultrasonography surveillance of which 168 were in a formal GBP surveillance programme. Pre-malignant/malignant pathology yield was 1.97% with an annual detection rate of 12.0 cases per 1000 GBPs surveyed. Cost-effectiveness analysis of European consensus guidelines calculated annual savings of £209 163 per 1000 GBPs surveyed. Compliance with these guidelines would result in an additional 12.5% of patients under surveillance requiring cholecystectomy. CONCLUSION GBP surveillance uptake was suboptimal at 32.8%. The incidence of pre-malignant/malignant lesions in GBPs emphasises the importance of surveillance for early detection and management with a view to avoiding the poor outcomes associated with more advanced gallbladder cancer. Adherence to the new European consensus guidelines would be clinically cost-effective with significant potential savings demonstrated in this study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krashna Patel
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom.
| | - Khaled Dajani
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Saranya Vickramarajah
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Emmanuel Huguet
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Abdullah AAN, Rangaraj A, Rashid M, Puw-Jones R, Rasheed A. Gallbladder polypoid lesions are inaccurately reported and undermanaged: a retrospective study of the management of gallbladder polypoid lesions detected at ultrasound in symptomatic patients during a 36-month period. Clin Radiol 2019; 74:489.e17-489.e23. [PMID: 30910171 DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2019.02.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2018] [Accepted: 02/06/2019] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
AIM To investigate whether gallbladder polypoid lesions (GPL) are accurately reported and managed by radiologists, sonographers, general practitioners (GPs) and surgeons. MATERIALS AND METHODS Consecutive abdominal ultrasound examinations indicating GPL in symptomatic patients performed during 2011-2013 were captured and analysed. The study comprised 244 patients who satisfied the inclusion criteria. RESULTS Of the ultrasound reports retrieved, 238/244 reports (98%) erroneously described the polypoid lesions as polyps. One hundred and thirty-two of the 244 (54%) reports recommended follow-up, 5/244 (2%) recommended no follow-up, 35/244 (14%) deemed the findings insignificant, and 72/244 (30%) did not comment. Regarding GP referral, 57/184 (31%) patients were correctly referred to general surgeons, 20/184 (11%) to gastroenterologists, and 107/184 (58%) were not referred to secondary care. Forty-three of the 244 patients (18%) underwent cholecystectomy. Regarding subsequent biliary presentations, 63/244 patients (26%) presented at a later date with biliary symptoms; 13/63 (21%) of these eventually had cholecystectomies with 2/13 (15%) experiencing potentially life-threatening pancreatitis episodes. Regarding the surgical approach, differences were observed in the way individual surgeons managed polypoid lesions, with some veering towards cholecystectomy, others towards follow-up ultrasound, and some towards discharge. CONCLUSION GPL tend to be misreported by radiologists and sonographers, unappreciated by GPs, and variably managed by surgeons. These factors delay definitive therapy and seem to contribute to future biliary presentations. A fresh educational approach is required to raise awareness among radiologists, sonographers, and GPs regarding the clinical relevance and possible representations of GPL, and a uniform strategy is needed for managing GPL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A A N Abdullah
- Gwent Centre for Digestive Diseases, Royal Gwent Hospital, Newport, NP20 2UB, UK.
| | - A Rangaraj
- Department of Radiology, Royal Gwent Hospital, Newport, NP20 2UB, UK
| | - M Rashid
- Department of Histopathology, Royal Gwent Hospital, Newport, NP20 2UB, UK
| | - R Puw-Jones
- Department of Histopathology, Royal Gwent Hospital, Newport, NP20 2UB, UK
| | - A Rasheed
- Gwent Centre for Digestive Diseases, Royal Gwent Hospital, Newport, NP20 2UB, UK
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Heitz L, Kratzer W, Gräter T, Schmidberger J. Gallbladder polyps - a follow-up study after 11 years. BMC Gastroenterol 2019; 19:42. [PMID: 30885181 PMCID: PMC6423886 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-019-0959-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2018] [Accepted: 03/07/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The aim of our study was to investigate the prevalence and natural long-term progression of gallbladder polyps in a random sample of the general population. Methods Four hundred and thirteen subjects (190 women, 223 men; aged 29–75 years) were studied first in 2002 and again eleven years later in 2013. All subjects were interviewed using a standardised questionnaire, anthropometric data were recorded, and an abdominal ultrasound scan was carried out. Results The prevalence of gallbladder polyps was 6.1% (115/1880) in the 2002 study and 12.1% (50/413) in the 2013 follow-up study. After eleven years, 36 subjects (8.7%, 36/413) had developed new polyps, thirteen subjects (48.1%, 13/27) no longer had gallbladder polyps, and 14 subjects (51.9%, 14/27) still had polyps. The number of polyps had increased in six of these subjects (43%, 6/14), decreased in a further six (43%, 6/14), and remained unchanged in two (14%, 2/14). The mean polyp size was 4.7 mm (± 2.2 mm, range 2–20 mm) in 2002 and 4.0 mm (± 1.9 mm, range 0.5–11 mm) at follow-up. A decrease in polyp size was noted in seven (50%) of the 14 subjects, an increase in size in five subjects (35.7%), and no change in two subjects (14.3%). The shape of the polyps had changed from pedunculated to sessile in two subjects (14.3%, 2/14) and from sessile to pedunculated in one subject (7.1%, 1/14). Conclusions In long-term follow-up, the prevalence of gallbladder polyps increased, with new lesions developing in 8.7% of the population. Polyps persisted in 51.9% of the subjects who had them in the original study and disappeared in the other 48.1%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda Heitz
- Centre for Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine I, Ulm University Hospital, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Kratzer
- Centre for Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine I, Ulm University Hospital, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Germany.
| | - Tilmann Gräter
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Germany
| | - Julian Schmidberger
- Centre for Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine I, Ulm University Hospital, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Gallbladder polyps (GBPs) are generally harmless, but the planning of diagnosis and treatment of the GBP is of clinical importance due to the high mortality risk of delays in the diagnosis of gallbladder carcinomas that show polypoid development. MATERIALS AND METHODS GBPs are usually incidentally detected during ultrasonographic (USG) examinations of the abdomen. The risk of carcinoma development from polypoid lesions in the literature is reported as 0-27%. There is no consensus about the management of the GBPs. Herein, we reviewed the contemporary data to update our knowledge about diagnosis and treatment of gallbladder polyps. RESULTS Polyps can be identified in five different groups, primarily as neoplastic and non-neoplastic. Cholesterol polyps account for 60% of all cases. The most common (25%) benign polypoid lesions after cholesterol polyps are adenomyomas. CONCLUSION Ultrasonography and endoscopic ultrasonography seems to be the most important tool in differential diagnosis and treatment. Ultrasonography should be repeated in every 3-12 months in cases that are thought to be risky. Nowadays, the most common treatment approach is to perform cholecystectomy in patients with polyps larger than 10 mm in diameter. Radical cholecystectomy and/or segmental liver resections should be planned in cases of malignancy. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE Dilek ON, Karsu S, et al. Diagnosis and Treatment of Gallbladder Polyps: Current Perspectives. Euroasian J Hepatogastroenterol 2019;9(1):40-48.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Osman Nuri Dilek
- Department of Surgery, Izmir Katip Çelebi University School of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Sebnem Karasu
- Department of Radiology, Izmir Katip Çelebi University School of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Fatma Hüsniye Dilek
- Department of Pathology, Izmir Katip Çelebi University School of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Torabi Sagvand B, Edwards K, Shen B. Frequency, Risk Factors, and Outcome of Gallbladder Polyps in Patients With Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis: A Case-Control Study. Hepatol Commun 2018; 2:1440-1445. [PMID: 30556033 PMCID: PMC6287476 DOI: 10.1002/hep4.1276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2018] [Accepted: 10/12/2018] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
The prevalence polyps (GBPs) in the general population has been estimated to be approximately 5%, with up to 10% of these being dysplastic or malignant. Previous studies have suggested that patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) have increased frequency of GBPs. However, data on the prevalence, risk factors, and outcome of GBPs in these patients are sparse. This case‐control study investigates the frequency, risk factors, and outcome of GBPs in patients with PSC. In this study, 363 patients with an established diagnosis of PSC based on magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP), endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), or liver biopsy were identified. Patients with at least one abdominal imaging and no history of cholecystectomy before the first available abdominal imaging were included. The presence of GBPs was confirmed by abdominal computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or ultrasound. Patients with GBPs were compared to those without GBPs. Furthermore, patients with malignant/premalignant polyps were compared to those with benign polyps. The frequency of GBPs in patients with PSC was 10.6%. There was no significant difference in the frequency of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) between the two groups. Of the 16 with GBPs who underwent cholecystectomy, 10 had malignant/premalignant lesions, of whom 6 had adenocarcinoma, and 4 had high‐grade dysplasia. Of the 6 patients with adenocarcinoma, 4 had lesions >10 mm, 1 had a lesion as small as 4 mm, and 1 had a 7‐mm lesion. Conclusion: GBPs may be frequently seen in patients with PSC. These lesions seem to occur independent of IBD. In patients with PSC, even small GBPs appear to have a risk of malignancy. These findings suggest that patients with PSC and GBPs may benefit from cholecystectomy, regardless of the size of the polyp.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Katelyn Edwards
- Department of Internal Medicine Cleveland Clinic Cleveland OH
| | - Bo Shen
- Department of Gastroenterology/Hepatology/Nutrition Cleveland Clinic Cleveland OH
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Abstract
The finding of gallbladder polyps on imaging studies prompts further workup. Imaging results are often discordant with final pathology. The goal of this study is to compare polypoid lesions of the gallbladder found on preoperative ultrasound (US) with final pathologic diagnosis after cholecystectomy to help guide clinical decision-making. A retrospective study was conducted identifying adult patients who were diagnosed with polyps via US and who underwent cholecystectomy from 2008 through 2015. Imaging data, final pathology, and demographics were manually reviewed. A total of 2290 cholecystectomy patients had US-based polyps. Of these, 1661 patients (73%) did not have polyps on final pathology; primarily, stones or sludge were identified. Adenomyosis was diagnosed in 61 patients (2.7%). A total of 556 patients (24.2%) had pathologic polypoid lesions with the following breakdown: 463 (20.2%) cholesterol polyps, 43 other benign polyps (1.8%), 40 adenomas (1.7%), and 10 adenocarcinomas (0.4%). All patients with adenocarcinoma were older than 40 years and 91 per cent had US findings of polyps >10 mm. Ultrasound alone is an unreliable method of detecting real gallbladder polyps. This large database study found a very low risk of cancer. Size on US and patient age should be considered in the selection of appropriate surgical candidates with sonographic “polyps.”
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yiping Li
- Department of Surgery, Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Talar Tejirian
- Department of Surgery, Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - J. Craig Collins
- Department of Surgery, Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Wennmacker SZ, Lamberts MP, Di Martino M, Drenth JPH, Gurusamy KS, van Laarhoven CJHM. Transabdominal ultrasound and endoscopic ultrasound for diagnosis of gallbladder polyps. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018; 8:CD012233. [PMID: 30109701 PMCID: PMC6513652 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012233.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Approximately 0.6% to 4% of cholecystectomies are performed because of gallbladder polyps. The decision to perform cholecystectomy is based on presence of gallbladder polyp(s) on transabdominal ultrasound (TAUS) or endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), or both. These polyps are currently considered for surgery if they grow more than 1 cm. However, non-neoplastic polyps (pseudo polyps) do not need surgery, even when they are larger than 1 cm. True polyps are neoplastic, either benign (adenomas) or (pre)malignant (dysplastic polyps/carcinomas). True polyps need surgery, especially if they are premalignant or malignant. There has been no systematic review and meta-analysis on the accuracy of TAUS and EUS in the diagnosis of gallbladder polyps, true gallbladder polyps, and (pre)malignant polyps. OBJECTIVES To summarise and compare the accuracy of transabdominal ultrasound (TAUS) and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) for the detection of gallbladder polyps, for differentiating between true and pseudo gallbladder polyps, and for differentiating between dysplastic polyps/carcinomas and adenomas/pseudo polyps of the gallbladder in adults. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, Science Citation Index Expanded, and trial registrations (last date of search 09 July 2018). We had no restrictions regarding language, publication status, or prospective or retrospective nature of the studies. SELECTION CRITERIA Studies reporting on the diagnostic accuracy data (true positive, false positive, false negative and true negative) of the index test (TAUS or EUS or both) for detection of gallbladder polyps, differentiation between true and pseudo polyps, or differentiation between dysplastic polyps/carcinomas and adenomas/pseudo polyps. We only accepted histopathology after cholecystectomy as the reference standard, except for studies on diagnosis of gallbladder polyp. For the latter studies, we also accepted repeated imaging up to six months by TAUS or EUS as the reference standard. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two authors independently screened abstracts, selected studies for inclusion, and collected data from each study. The quality of the studies was evaluated using the QUADAS-2 tool. The bivariate random-effects model was used to obtain summary estimates of sensitivity and specificity, to compare diagnostic performance of the index tests, and to assess heterogeneity. MAIN RESULTS A total of 16 studies were included. All studies reported on TAUS and EUS as separate tests and not as a combination of tests. All studies were at high or unclear risk of bias, ten studies had high applicability concerns in participant selection (because of inappropriate participant exclusions) or reference standards (because of lack of follow-up for non-operated polyps), and three studies had unclear applicability concerns in participant selection (because of high prevalence of gallbladder polyps) or index tests (because of lack of details on ultrasound equipment and performance). A meta-analysis directly comparing results of TAUS and EUS in the same population could not be performed because only limited studies executed both tests in the same participants. Therefore, the results below were obtained only from indirect test comparisons. There was significant heterogeneity amongst all comparisons (target conditions) on TAUS and amongst studies on EUS for differentiating true and pseudo polyps.Detection of gallbladder polyps: Six studies (16,260 participants) used TAUS. We found no studies on EUS. The summary sensitivity and specificity of TAUS for the detection of gallbladder polyps was 0.84 (95% CI 0.59 to 0.95) and 0.96 (95% CI 0.92 to 0.98), respectively. In a cohort of 1000 people, with a 6.4% prevalence of gallbladder polyps, this would result in 37 overdiagnosed and seven missed gallbladder polyps.Differentiation between true polyp and pseudo gallbladder polyp: Six studies (1078 participants) used TAUS; the summary sensitivity was 0.68 (95% CI 0.44 to 0.85) and the summary specificity was 0.79 (95% CI 0.57 to 0.91). Three studies (209 participants) used EUS; the summary sensitivity was 0.85 (95% CI 0.46 to 0.97) and the summary specificity was 0.90 (95% CI 0.78 to 0.96). In a cohort of 1000 participants with gallbladder polyps, with 10% having true polyps, this would result in 189 overdiagnosed and 32 missed true polyps by TAUS, and 90 overdiagnosed and 15 missed true polyps by EUS. There was no evidence of a difference between the diagnostic accuracy of TAUS and EUS (relative sensitivity 1.06, P = 0.70, relative specificity 1.15, P = 0.12).Differentiation between dysplastic polyps/carcinomas and adenomas/pseudo polyps of the gallbladder: Four studies (1,009 participants) used TAUS; the summary sensitivity was 0.79 (95% CI 0.62 to 0.90) and the summary specificity was 0.89 (95% CI 0.68 to 0.97). Three studies (351 participants) used EUS; the summary sensitivity was 0.86 (95% CI 0.76 to 0.92) and the summary specificity was 0.92 (95% CI 0.85 to 0.95). In a cohort of 1000 participants with gallbladder polyps, with 5% having a dysplastic polyp/carcinoma, this would result in 105 overdiagnosed and 11 missed dysplastic polyps/carcinomas by TAUS and 76 overdiagnosed and seven missed dysplastic polyps/carcinomas by EUS. There was no evidence of a difference between the diagnostic accuracy of TAUS and EUS (log likelihood test P = 0.74). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Although TAUS seems quite good at discriminating between gallbladder polyps and no polyps, it is less accurate in detecting whether the polyp is a true or pseudo polyp and dysplastic polyp/carcinoma or adenoma/pseudo polyp. In practice, this would lead to both unnecessary surgeries for pseudo polyps and missed cases of true polyps, dysplastic polyps, and carcinomas. There was insufficient evidence that EUS is better compared to TAUS in differentiating between true and pseudo polyps and between dysplastic polyps/carcinomas and adenomas/pseudo polyps. The conclusions are based on heterogeneous studies with unclear criteria for diagnosis of the target conditions and studies at high or unclear risk of bias. Therefore, results should be interpreted with caution. Further studies of high methodological quality, with clearly stated criteria for diagnosis of gallbladder polyps, true polyps, and dysplastic polyps/carcinomas are needed to accurately determine diagnostic accuracy of EUS and TAUS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Z Wennmacker
- Radboud University Medical Center NijmegenDepartment of SurgeryPO Box 9101internal code 618NijmegenNetherlands6500 HB
| | - Mark P Lamberts
- Radboud University Medical Center NijmegenDepartment of Gastroenterology and HepatologyP.O. Box 9101, code 455NijmegenNetherlands
| | | | - Joost PH Drenth
- Radboud University Medical Center NijmegenDepartment of Gastroenterology and HepatologyP.O. Box 9101, code 455NijmegenNetherlands
| | - Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy
- Royal Free Campus, UCL Medical SchoolDepartment of SurgeryRoyal Free HospitalRowland Hill StreetLondonUKNW3 2PF
| | - Cornelis JHM van Laarhoven
- Radboud University Medical Center NijmegenDepartment of SurgeryPO Box 9101internal code 618NijmegenNetherlands6500 HB
| | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
De Armas RE, Rosenberg JM, Fenves AZ. Cholesterolosis as a cause of acute pancreatitis. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) 2018; 31:324-325. [DOI: 10.1080/08998280.2018.1460128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2018] [Revised: 03/01/2018] [Accepted: 03/08/2018] [Indexed: 10/16/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jacob M. Rosenberg
- Department of Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Andrew Z. Fenves
- Department of Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Abstract
GOAL To provide the statistical predictive model for neoplastic potential of gallbladder polyp (GBP). BACKGROUND Many studies have attempted to define the risk factors for neoplastic potential of GBP. It remains difficult to precisely adapt the reported risk factors for the decision of surgery. Estimating the probability for neoplastic potential of GBP using a combination of several risk factors before surgical resection would be useful in patient consultation. STUDY We collected data of patients confirmed as GBP through cholecystectomy at Samsung Medical Center between January 1997 and March 2015. Those with a definite evidence for malignancy, such as adjacent organ invasion, metastasis on preoperative imaging studies, polyp >15 mm, and absence of proper preoperative ultrasonographic imaging were excluded. A total of 1976 patients were enrolled. To make and validate the predictive model, we divided the cohort into the modeling group (n=979) and validation group (n=997). Clinical information, ultrasonographic findings, and blood tests were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS Clinical factors of older age, single lesion, sessile shape, and polyp size showed statistical significance for neoplastic potential of GBP in the modeling group. A predictive model for neoplastic potential of GBP was constructed utilizing the statistical outcome of the modeling group. Statistical validation was performed with the validation group to determine the optimal clinical sensitivity and specificity of the predictive model. Optimal cut-off value for neoplastic probability was 7.4%. CONCLUSIONS The predictive model for neoplastic potential of GBP may support clinical decisions before cholecystectomy.
Collapse
|
39
|
Kim SY, Cho JH, Kim EJ, Chung DH, Kim KK, Park YH, Kim YS. The efficacy of real-time colour Doppler flow imaging on endoscopic ultrasonography for differential diagnosis between neoplastic and non-neoplastic gallbladder polyps. Eur Radiol 2017; 28:1994-2002. [PMID: 29218621 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-017-5175-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2017] [Revised: 10/23/2017] [Accepted: 11/06/2017] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We evaluated the usefulness of real-time colour Doppler flow (CDF) endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) for differentiating neoplastic gallbladder (GB) polyps from non-neoplastic polyps. METHODS Between August 2014 and December 2016, a total of 233 patients with GB polyps who underwent real-time CDF-EUS were consecutively enrolled in this prospective study. CDF imaging was subjectively categorized for each patient as: strong CDF pattern, weak CDF pattern and no CDF pattern. RESULTS Of the 233 patients, 115 underwent surgical resection. Of these, there were 90 cases of non-neoplastic GB polyps and 23 cases of neoplastic GB polyps. In a multivariate analysis, a strong CDF pattern was the most significant predictive factor for neoplastic polyps; sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy were 52.2 %, 79.4 %, 38.7 %, 86.9 % and 73.9 %, respectively. Solitary polyp and polyp size were associated with an increased risk of neoplasm. CONCLUSIONS The presence of a strong CDF pattern as well as solitary and larger polyps on EUS may be predictive of neoplastic GB polyps. As real-time CDF-EUS poses no danger to the patient and requires no additional equipment, it is likely to become a supplemental tool for the differential diagnosis of GB polyps. KEY POINTS • Differential diagnosis between neoplastic polyps and non-neoplastic polyps of GB is limited. • The use of real-time CDF-EUS was convenient, with high agreement between operators. • The real-time CDF-EUS is helpful in differential diagnosis of GB polyps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Su Young Kim
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gachon University, Gil Medical Center, 21, Namdong-daero 774beon-gil, Namdong-gu, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Jae Hee Cho
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gachon University, Gil Medical Center, 21, Namdong-daero 774beon-gil, Namdong-gu, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
| | - Eui Joo Kim
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gachon University, Gil Medical Center, 21, Namdong-daero 774beon-gil, Namdong-gu, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Dong Hae Chung
- Department of Pathology, Gachon University, Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Kun Kuk Kim
- Department of Surgery, Gachon University, Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Yeon Ho Park
- Department of Surgery, Gachon University, Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Yeon Suk Kim
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gachon University, Gil Medical Center, 21, Namdong-daero 774beon-gil, Namdong-gu, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Choi TW, Kim JH, Park SJ, Ahn SJ, Joo I, Han JK. Risk stratification of gallbladder polyps larger than 10 mm using high-resolution ultrasonography and texture analysis. Eur Radiol 2017; 28:196-205. [PMID: 28687913 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-017-4954-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2017] [Revised: 05/23/2017] [Accepted: 06/20/2017] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess important features for risk stratification of gallbladder (GB) polyps >10 mm using high-resolution ultrasonography (HRUS) and texture analysis. METHODS We included 136 patients with GB polyps (>10 mm) who underwent both HRUS and cholecystectomy (non-neoplastic, n = 58; adenomatous, n = 32; and carcinoma, n = 46). Two radiologists retrospectively assessed HRUS findings and texture analysis. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify significant predictors for neoplastic polyps and carcinomas. RESULTS Single polyp (OR, 3.680-3.856) and larger size (OR, 1.450-1.477) were independently associated with neoplastic polyps (p < 0.05). In a single or polyp >14 mm, sensitivity for differentiating neoplastic from non-neoplastic polyps was 92.3%. To differentiate carcinoma from adenoma, sessile shape (OR, 9.485-41.257), larger size (OR, 1.267-1.303), higher skewness (OR, 6.382) and lower grey-level co-occurrence matrices (GLCM) contrast (OR, 0.963) were significant predictors (p < 0.05). In a polyp >22 mm or sessile, sensitivity for differentiating carcinomas from adenomas was 93.5-95.7%. If a polyp demonstrated at least one HRUS finding and at least one texture feature, the specificity for diagnosing carcinoma was increased to 90.6-93.8%. CONCLUSION In a GB polyp >10 mm, single and diameter >14 mm were useful for predicting neoplastic polyps. In neoplastic polyps, sessile shape, diameter >22 mm, higher skewness and lower GLCM contrast were useful for predicting carcinoma. KEY POINTS • Risk of neoplastic polyp is low in <14 mm and multiple polyps • A sessile polyp or >22 mm has increased risk for GB carcinomas • Higher skewness and lower GLCM contrast are predictors of GB carcinoma • HRUS is useful for risk stratification of GB polyps >1 cm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tae Won Choi
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehangno, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 110-744, Republic of Korea
| | - Jung Hoon Kim
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehangno, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 110-744, Republic of Korea.
- Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| | - Sang Joon Park
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehangno, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 110-744, Republic of Korea
| | - Su Joa Ahn
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehangno, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 110-744, Republic of Korea
| | - Ijin Joo
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehangno, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 110-744, Republic of Korea
| | - Joon Koo Han
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehangno, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 110-744, Republic of Korea
- Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Polypoid lesions of the gallbladder: analysis of 1204 patients with long-term follow-up. Surg Endosc 2016; 31:2776-2782. [PMID: 28039652 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-016-5286-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2016] [Accepted: 10/05/2016] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Polypoid lesions of the gallbladder (PLG) are common, and most are benign. Few lesions are found to be malignant, but are not preoperatively distinguished as such using common imaging modalities. Therefore, we compared characteristics of benign and malignant PLGs in depth. METHODS We enrolled 1204 consecutive patients diagnosed with PLG at Taipei Veterans General Hospital between January 2004 and December 2013. Patients underwent either surgery or regular follow-up with various imaging modalities for at least 24 months. The mean follow-up duration was 72 ± 32 months. RESULTS Of 1204 patients, 194 underwent surgical treatment and 1010, regular follow-up. In addition, 73 % patients were asymptomatic. The mean PLG size was 6.9 ± 7.7 (range 0.8-129) mm; the PLGs of 337 patients (28 %) grew during their follow-up periods. The majority of PLGs (90.4 %) were single lesions, and 10.5 % of patients had associated gallstones. The PLGs of 20.1 % of surgical patients were malignant. Malignant PLGs were found in 32.4 % of patients ≥50 years old and in 4.7 % of those <50 years old (p < 0.001). Right quadrant abdominal pain, epigastric pain, and body weight loss were the three most common symptoms associated with malignancy. Malignant PLGs were significantly larger than benign lesions (means: 27.5 ± 18.4 mm vs. 12.3 ± 12.3 mm, respectively, p < 0.001). Notably, the size of 5 % of malignant PLGs was 3-5 mm, and that of 8 % was 5-10 mm. The negative predictive value for gallbladder malignancy was 92.8 % based on a size ≥10 mm and 100 % based on a size ≥3 mm. CONCLUSIONS Our study reassesses the PLG size that warrants more aggressive intervention. Cholecystectomy remains mandatory for PLGs > 10 mm, but should also be considered a definitive diagnostic and treatment modality for PLGs with diameters of 3-10 mm.
Collapse
|
42
|
Clark TJ, Coats G. Adherence to ACR Incidental Finding Guidelines. J Am Coll Radiol 2016; 13:1530-1533. [PMID: 27319370 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2016.05.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2016] [Revised: 04/30/2016] [Accepted: 05/09/2016] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
|
43
|
Lee H, Kim K, Park I, Cho H, Gwak G, Yang K, Bae BN, Kim HJ, Kim YD. Preoperative predictive factors for gallbladder cholesterol polyp diagnosed after laparoscopic cholecystectomy for polypoid lesions of gallbladder. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2016; 20:180-186. [PMID: 28261697 PMCID: PMC5325147 DOI: 10.14701/ahbps.2016.20.4.180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2016] [Revised: 10/18/2016] [Accepted: 10/20/2016] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUNDS/AIMS We investigated patients' clinical and radiological data to determine preoperative factors that predict cholesterol gallbladder (GB) polyps of large size, which can be helpful for decision on further diagnostic tools. METHODS In this study, we retrospectively analyzed 126 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy for GB polyps >10 mm diagnosed preoperatively by abdominal ultrasonography between February 2002 and February 2016 in Department of Surgery, Sanggye Paik Hospital. Patients were divided into non-cholesterol polyps group and cholesterol polyps group, based on the postoperative pathologic diagnosis. Clinical and radiological data, such as gender, age, body weight, height, body mass index (BMI), laboratory findings, size, number and shape of the polypoid lesions, and presence of the concurrent GB stone were compared between the two groups. RESULTS Of the 126 cases, 73 had cholesterol polyps (57.9%) and 53 cases were non-cholesterol polyps (42.1%). The younger age (<48.5 years), size of polyp <13.25 mm and multiple polyps were independent predictive variables for cholesterol polyps, with odd ratios (OR) of 2.352 (p=0.045), 5.429 (p<0.001) and 0.472 (p<0.001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS Age, size and polyp number were used to predict cholesterol GB polyp among polypoid lesions of the gallbladder >10 mm. For cases in which these factors are not applicable, it is strongly recommended to evaluate further diagnostic tools, such as computed tomography, endoscopic ultrasonography and tumor markers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyojin Lee
- Department of Surgery, Sanggye Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kihwan Kim
- Department of Surgery, Sanggye Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Inseok Park
- Department of Surgery, Sanggye Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyunjin Cho
- Department of Surgery, Sanggye Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Geumhee Gwak
- Department of Surgery, Sanggye Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Keunho Yang
- Department of Surgery, Sanggye Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Byung-Noe Bae
- Department of Surgery, Sanggye Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hong-Ju Kim
- Department of Surgery, Sanggye Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Young Duk Kim
- Department of Surgery, Sanggye Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Li C, Mikus C, Ahmed A, Hu G, Xiong K, Zhang Y, Sui X. A cross-sectional study of cardiorespiratory fitness and gallbladder disease. Ann Epidemiol 2016; 27:269-273.e3. [PMID: 27955793 DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2016.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2016] [Revised: 11/10/2016] [Accepted: 11/11/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine the association of different levels of cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF), an objective indicator of habitual physical activity, with gallbladder disease. METHODS In the Aerobics Center Longitudinal Study (ACLS) database, 41,528 men and 13,206 women aged 20-90 years, with body mass index of 18.5 or more and without history of cardiovascular disease and cancer, received a preventive examination at the Cooper Clinic in Dallas, Texas, between 1970 and 2003. CRF was quantified as maximal metabolic equivalents and classified as low, moderate, and high based on traditional ACLS cut points. Gallbladder disease was defined as physician-diagnosed gallbladder disease. RESULTS When compared with low CRF, adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for gallbladder disease for those with moderate and high CRF were 0.74 (0.55-0.99) and 0.59 (0.42-0.82), respectively when adjusted for all the potential confounders. Each one metabolic equivalent increment of CRF was associated with 10% lower odds of gallbladder disease in all participants (P for trend <.001), 13% lower in women (P for trend <.001), and 8% lower in men (P for trend = .08). The association was consistent across age, history of diabetes mellitus, and physical inactivity subgroups. CONCLUSIONS CRF is inversely related to the prevalence of gallbladder disease among relatively healthy men and women in the ACLS cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Changqing Li
- Department of Exercise Science, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia
| | - Catherine Mikus
- Sarah W. Stedman Nutrition and Metabolism Center, Duke Molecular Physiology Institute, Durham, NC
| | - Ali Ahmed
- Center for Health and Aging, VA Medical Center and Department of Medicine, George Washington University, Washington, DC
| | - Gang Hu
- Chronic Disease Epidemiology Laboratory, Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, LA
| | - Kaiyu Xiong
- Teaching and Experimental Center, Beijing Sport University, Beijing, China
| | - Yimin Zhang
- Teaching and Experimental Center, Beijing Sport University, Beijing, China
| | - Xuemei Sui
- Department of Exercise Science, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Choi YS, Do JH, Seo SW, Lee SE, Oh HC, Min YJ, Kang H. Prevalence and Risk Factors of Gallbladder Polypoid Lesions in a Healthy Population. Yonsei Med J 2016; 57:1370-5. [PMID: 27593864 PMCID: PMC5011268 DOI: 10.3349/ymj.2016.57.6.1370] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2015] [Revised: 04/01/2016] [Accepted: 04/04/2016] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine the prevalence of and investigate the risk factors for gallbladder (GB) polypoid lesions in a healthy population. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 23827 subjects who underwent abdominal ultrasonography in conjunction with health screening examinations were retrospectively analyzed. The prevalence of risk factors for GB polypoid lesions were evaluated. In addition, risk factors according to the number of polypoid lesions and the presence of stones with polypoid lesions were investigated. To analyze these risk factors, a control group was established with a 1:2 ratio matched for age and sex. RESULTS The prevalence of GB polypoid lesions was identified as 9.96%. On multivariate analysis, chronic hepatitis B infection (CHB) and the presence of metabolic syndrome (MS) were risk factors for GB polypoid lesions. CHB and MS were also significant independent risk factors for multiple GB polypoid lesions when compared with solitary GB polypoid lesions. In addition, gastric Helicobacter pylori infection and MS were significant risk factors for GB polypoid lesions with stones when compared with GB polypoid lesions without stones. CONCLUSION The prevalence of GB polypoid lesions in a healthy Korean population was 9.96%. Patients with CHB and MS need to be carefully examined for such lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoo Shin Choi
- Department of Surgery, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae Hyuk Do
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| | - Suk Won Seo
- Department of Surgery, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seung Eun Lee
- Department of Surgery, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyoung Chul Oh
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yun Joo Min
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyun Kang
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Abstract
RATIONALE Cholesterol polyps are rare in the common bile duct and difficult to diagnose. PATIENT CONCERNS The small polypoid lesions often go undetected when using routine imaging methods, such as ultrasonography. DIAGNOSES We treated a patient with cholesterol polyps in the common bile duct. After failing to detect choleliths using ultrasonography, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography revealed mild dilation of the common bile duct. Choledochoscopy was performed during laparoscopic cholecystectomy, which revealed yellowish-white polyps circumferentially distributed across the luminal surface of the distal common bile duct. Histological examination of biopsy specimens indicated cholesterol polyps with characteristic foamy cells. INTERVENTIONS The patient was treated with ursodeoxycholic acid, and the number of polyps was found to have been reduced at the 6-week follow-up based on T-tube choledochoscopic examination. OUTCOMES Recovery was unremarkable, and the ursodeoxycholic acid treatment was discontinued at the 6-month follow-up. LESSONS SUBSECTIONS Our findings suggest that this rare condition can be treated pharmacologically to avoid potential postsurgical complications following resection of the distal common bile duct.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Jian-ping Zeng
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, Tsinghua University Medical Center, Beijing, China
- Correspondence: Jian-ping Zeng, No. 168 Litang Road, Changping District, Beijing, China (e-mail: )
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Shabanzadeh DM, Sørensen LT, Jørgensen T. Determinants for gallstone formation - a new data cohort study and a systematic review with meta-analysis. Scand J Gastroenterol 2016; 51:1239-48. [PMID: 27232657 DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2016.1182583] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Only few determinants of gallstone formation have been identified in cohort studies. The aim was to identify further determinants for gallstones in a Danish cohort and to perform a meta-analysis of results from existing cohorts. MATERIAL AND METHODS Data from a cohort study was used. Gallstone incidence was assessed through repeated ultrasound examinations. Body mass index (BMI), blood pressure, self-rated health, lifestyle variables, blood lipids, and use of female sex hormones were measured at the baseline examination. Statistical analyses included logistic regression. Based on a prospective protocol, a systematic review of the literature was performed identifying all articles dealing with determinants of incident gallstones. Meta-analyses of comparable determinants were performed through fixed effect models. RESULTS Participants with no gallstones at baseline and with at least one re-examination were followed-up completely (mean 11.6 years, N = 2848). The overall cumulative incidence of gallstones was 0.60% per year. Independent positive determinants for incident gallstones were age, female sex, non-high density lipoprotein (non-HDL) cholesterol, and gallbladder polyps. In addition, BMI was positively associated in men. The systematic review additionally identified associations for comorbidities, parity, and dietary factors. Meta-analysis confirmed the significant associations for incident gallstones and age, female sex, BMI, and non-HDL cholesterol. No significant associations were found for blood pressure, smoking, alcohol consumption, HDL cholesterol, or triglycerides in meta-analyses. CONCLUSIONS Age, female sex, BMI, non-HDL cholesterol, and polyps are independent determinants for gallstone formation. Incident gallstones and the metabolic syndrome share common risk factors. More studies are needed for further exploration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Mønsted Shabanzadeh
- a Digestive Disease Center , Bispebjerg University Hospital , Copenhagen , Denmark ;,b Research Centre for Prevention and Health , Centre for Health , Capital Region , Denmark
| | - Lars Tue Sørensen
- a Digestive Disease Center , Bispebjerg University Hospital , Copenhagen , Denmark ;,c Institute for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences , University of Copenhagen , Copenhagen , Denmark
| | - Torben Jørgensen
- b Research Centre for Prevention and Health , Centre for Health , Capital Region , Denmark ;,d Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences , University of Copenhagen , Copenhagen , Denmark ;,e The Faculty of Medicine , Aalborg University , Aalborg , Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Lee JK, Hahn SJ, Kang HW, Jung JG, Choi HS, Lee JH, Han IW, Jung JH, Kwon JH. Visceral Obesity Is Associated with Gallbladder Polyps. Gut Liver 2016; 10:133-9. [PMID: 26260756 PMCID: PMC4694745 DOI: 10.5009/gnl14506] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background/Aims Gallbladder polyps (GBP) are a common clinical finding and may possess malignant potential. We conducted this study to determine whether visceral obesity is a risk factor for GBP. Methods We retrospectively reviewed records of subjects who received both ultrasonography and computed tomography with measurements of the areas of visceral adipose tissue and total adipose tissue (TAT) on the same day as health checkups. Results Ninety-three of 1,615 subjects (5.8%) had GBP and were compared with 186 age- and sex-matched controls. VAT (odds ratio [OR], 2.941; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.325 to 6.529; p=0.008 for the highest quartile vs the lowest quartile) and TAT (OR, 3.568; 95% CI, 1.625 to 7.833; p=0.002 for the highest quartile vs the lowest quartile) were independent risk factors together with hypertension (OR, 2.512; 95% CI, 1.381 to 4.569; p=0.003), diabetes mellitus (OR, 2.942; 95% CI, 1.061 to 8.158; p=0.038), hepatitis B virus positivity (OR, 3.548; 95% CI, 1.295 to 9.716; p=0.014), and a higher level of total cholesterol (OR, 2.232; 95% CI, 1.043 to 4.778; p=0.039 for <200 mg/dL vs ≥240 mg/dL). Body mass index and waist circumference were not meaningful variables. Conclusions Visceral obesity measured by VAT and TAT was associated with GBP irrespective of body mass index or waist circumference.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Kyu Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Dongguk University College of Medicine, Goyang, Korea
| | - Suk Jae Hahn
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Dongguk University College of Medicine, Goyang, Korea
| | - Hyoun Woo Kang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Dongguk University College of Medicine, Goyang, Korea
| | - Jae Gu Jung
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Dongguk University College of Medicine, Goyang, Korea
| | - Han Seok Choi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Dongguk University College of Medicine, Goyang, Korea
| | - Jin Ho Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Dongguk University College of Medicine, Goyang, Korea
| | - In Woong Han
- Department of Surgery, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Dongguk University College of Medicine, Goyang, Korea
| | - Jin-Hee Jung
- Department of Radiology, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Dongguk University College of Medicine, Goyang, Korea
| | - Jae Hyun Kwon
- Department of Radiology, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Dongguk University College of Medicine, Goyang, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Elmasry M, Lindop D, Dunne DF, Malik H, Poston GJ, Fenwick SW. The risk of malignancy in ultrasound detected gallbladder polyps: A systematic review. Int J Surg 2016; 33 Pt A:28-35. [PMID: 27465099 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.07.061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2016] [Revised: 07/11/2016] [Accepted: 07/19/2016] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
|
50
|
EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of gallstones. J Hepatol 2016; 65:146-181. [PMID: 27085810 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2016.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 287] [Impact Index Per Article: 31.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2016] [Accepted: 03/09/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|