A Low Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index is Associated with Aggressive Pathologic Characteristics and Poor Survival after Nephrectomy in Clear Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

Prognostic value of the geriatric nutritional risk index in patients with non-metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of the geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) in patients with non-metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) who underwent nephrectomy.

METHODS

Patients with non-metastatic ccRCC who underwent nephrectomy between 2013 and 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. The GNRI was calculated within one week before surgery. The optimal cut-off value of GNRI was determined using X-tile software, and the patients were divided into a low GNRI group and a high GNRI group. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare the overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) between the two groups. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were used to determine prognostic factors. In addition, propensity score matching (PSM) was performed with a matching ratio of 1:3 to minimize the influence of confounding factors. Variables entered into the PSM model were as follows: sex, age, history of hypertension, history of diabetes, smoking history, BMI, tumor sidedness, pT stage, Fuhrman grade, surgical method, surgical approach, and tumor size.

RESULTS

A total of 645 patients were included in the final analysis, with a median follow-up period of 37 months (range: 1-112 months). The optimal cut-off value of GNRI was 98, based on which patients were divided into two groups: a low GNRI group (≤ 98) and a high GNRI group (> 98). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that OS (P < 0.001), CSS (P < 0.001) and RFS (P < 0.001) in the low GNRI group were significantly worse than those in the high GNRI group. Univariate and multivariate Cox analysis showed that GNRI was an independent prognostic factor of OS, CSS and RFS. Even after PSM, OS (P < 0.05), CSS (P < 0.05) and RFS (P < 0.05) in the low GNRI group were still worse than those in the high GNRI group. In addition, we observed that a low GNRI was associated with poor clinical outcomes in elderly subgroup (> 65) and young subgroup (≤ 65), as well as in patients with early (pT1-T2) and low-grade (Fuhrman I-II) ccRCC.

CONCLUSION

As a simple and practical tool for nutrition screening, the preoperative GNRI can be used as an independent prognostic indicator for postoperative patients with non-metastatic ccRCC. However, larger prospective studies are necessary to validate these findings.

The prognostic utility of preoperative geriatric nutritional risk index on survival outcomes of locally advanced oral cancer

PURPOSE

This retrospective cohort study was to assess the prognostic value of preoperative geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) on survival outcomes for patients with locally advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma (LAOSCC).

METHODS

Patients with LAOSCC receiving upfront radical surgery at a single institute from January 2007 to February 2017 were enrolled. The primary outcomes in the study were 5-year overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates, and a nomogram based on GNRI and other clinical-pathological factors was established for individualized OS prediction.

RESULTS

There were 343 patients enrolled in this study. The optimal cut-off value of GNRI was observed to be 97.8. Patients in the high-GNRI group (GNRI ≥97.8) had statistically significantly better outcomes in 5-year OS (74.7% vs. 57.2%, p = 0.001) and CSS (82.2% vs. 68.9%, p = 0.005) when compared with the low-GNRI group (GNRI <97.8). In Cox models, low GNRI remained an independent negative prognosticator of OS (HR: 1.6; 95% CI: 1.124-2.277; p = 0.009) and CSS (HR: 1.907; 95% CI: 1.219-2.984; p = 0.005). The c-index of the proposed nomogram, incorporating assorted clinicopathological factors and GNRI, had a statistically significant increase compared with the predictive nomogram constructed by the TNM staging system alone (0.692 vs. 0.637, p < 0.001)."

CONCLUSION

Preoperative GNRI is an independent prognostic factor of OS and CSS in patients with LAOSCC. A multivariate nomogram that includes GNRI may better help us to accurately estimate individual survival outcomes.

Development and Validation of Nomograms Based on Nutritional Risk Index for Predicting Extracapsular Extension and Seminal Vesicle Invasion in Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy

Background

The aim of the study was to investigate the predictive value of the nutritional risk index (NRI) for extracapsular extension (ECE) and seminal vesicle invasion (SVI) in prostate cancer (PCa) patients undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP), and further develop and validate predictive nomograms for ECE and SVI based on the NRI.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 734 PCa patients who underwent RP between 2010 and 2020 in the Department of Urology at Peking University Third Hospital. The enrolled patients were randomly divided into a primary cohort (n = 489) and a validation cohort (n = 245) in a 2:1 manner. The baseline NRI of patients was calculated using serum albumin level and body mass index, and a malnutrition status was defined as NRI ≤ 98. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify predictors for ECE and SVI. Nomograms for predicting ECE and SVI were established based on the results of the multivariate logistic regression analysis. The performance of the nomograms was estimated using Harrell's concordance index (C-index), the area under curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and the calibration curves.

Results

In the primary cohort, 70 (14.3%) patients with NRI ≤ 98 were classified as malnutrition, while the remaining 419 (85.7%) patients with NRI > 98 were considered to have normal nutrition. The nomograms for predicting ECE and SVI shared common factors including NRI, percentage of positive biopsy cores (PPC) and biopsy Gleason score, while prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels and PSA density (PSAD) were only incorporated in ECE nomogram. The C-indexes of the nomograms for predicting ECE and SVI were 0.785 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.745 - 0.826) and 0.852 (95% CI: 0.806 - 0.898), respectively. The calibration curves demonstrated excellent agreement between the predictions by the nomograms and the actual observations. The results remained reproducible when the nomograms were applied to the validation cohort.

Conclusions

The NRI is significantly associated with ECE and SVI in PCa patients. The nomogram established based on the NRI in our study can provide individualized risk estimation for ECE and SVI in PCa patients, and may be valuable for clinicians in making well-informed decisions regarding treatment strategies and patient management.

Geriatric nutritional risk index as a predictor of prognosis in hematologic malignancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

Recent studies have reported inconsistent results regarding the association between geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) and clinical outcomes in patients with hematologic malignancies (HMs). We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of low GNRI on the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with HMs.

Research Methods and Procedures

We conducted the research via PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases to identify trials. Exploring the association between GNRI and prognosis in patients with HMs. A meta-analysis of OS and PFS was performed. Quality In Prognostic Studies instrument and Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment Scale were used to assess the quality of included trials.

Results

Fourteen studies enrolling 3,524 patients with HMs were included. Low GNRI was associated with shorter OS (Hazard ratio (HR) = 1.77; 95% CI = 1.44-2.18, p < 0.01) and PFS (HR = 1.63; 95% CI = 1.17-2.27, p < 0.01) in patients with HMs. In the subgroup analysis, GNRI was not significantly associated with prognosis in Chinese patients with HMs (OS, HR =1.33; 95% CI = 0.89-1.98, p = 0.16; PFS, HR = 1.70; 95% CI = 0.72-4.01, p = 0.23). For the subgroup with a GNRI cutoff value less than 98, there was no significant difference in PFS (HR = 1.34; 95% CI = 0.98-1.83, p = 0.06).

Conclusion

Low GNRI negatively impacted on the prognosis in patients with HMs. Prospective studies to identify the best cut-off value for GNRI are required.

Association between geriatric nutritional risk index and 28 days mortality in elderly patients with sepsis: a retrospective cohort study

Background

There is a significant controversy surrounding the impact of the geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) on mortality among elderly septic patients. This retrospective cohort study aimed to investigate the association between GNRI at admission and 28 days mortality in elderly septic patients.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed data collected from the MIMIC IV database between 2009 and 2019, which included 2,834 septic patients aged 65 years and above. The exposure variable was the GNRI, determined according to albumin levels, height, and weight. The primary outcome was 28 days mortality. We employed multivariable Cox regression analyses and Kaplan-Meier survival curves to examine the association between GNRI and 28 days mortality. We used restricted cubic splines to determine if there was a non-linear relationship between 28 days mortality and GNRI in elderly patients with sepsis and to examine the presence of a threshold saturation effect. In addition, interaction tests were conducted to identify subgroups that exhibited significant differences.

Results

A total of 2,834 elderly patients with sepsis participated in the study. Following adjustment, multivariable Cox regression analyses demonstrated that the GNRI was related to 28 days mortality (HR = 0.97, p < 0.001, 95% CI: 0.97-0.98). An L-shaped connection between GNRI and 28 days mortality was discovered via restricted cubic spline analysis, with an inflection point of 98.1. On the left side of the inflection point, GNRI levels were significantly negatively linked with 28 days mortality (HR = 0.967, 95% CI: 0.959-0.974; p < 0.001), and on the right side, there was no significant correlation (HR = 1.043, 95% CI: 0.984-1.106; p = 0.1549).

Conclusion

In this analysis of data from a large cohort of elderly septic patients, GNRI scores on admission were correlated with a 28 days risk of death from sepsis in the elderly suggesting that GNRI scores could serve as a valuable indicator for evaluating mortality rates among elderly septic patients in the intensive care unit (ICU).

Geriatric nutritional risk index as a prognostic marker for patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma receiving radical nephroureterectomy

To investigate the prognostic value of the geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) in patients with upper tract urothelial cell carcinoma (UTUC) receiving radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). Between January 2001 and December 2015, we enrolled 488 patients with UTUC underwent RNU in Taichung Veterans General Hospital. GNRI before radical surgery was calculated based on serum albumin level and body mass index. The malnutritional status was defined as GNRI < 92.0. Using Kaplan-Meier analyses and Cox proportional hazards models to analyze the risk factors on disease-free survival (DFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS). 386 patients were categorized as normal nutritional status (GNRI ≥ 92) and 102 patients as malnutritional status (GNRI < 92). We used the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for determined the association between GNRI and OS, with area under the curve (AUC) being 0.69. The 5-year survival rate of DFS, CSS and OS were 48.6%, 80.5% and 80.5% in the normal nutritional group and 28.0%, 53.2% and 40% in the malnutritional group. Using the multivariate analysis, malnutritional status was found as an independent risk factor for OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.94, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.70-5.74), together with age (HR = 1.04, 95% CI 1.02-1.06), surgical margin positive (HR = 1.78, 95% CI 1.13-2.82), pathological T3 (HR = 2.54, 95% CI 1.53-4.21), pathological T4 (HR = 6.75, 95% CI 3.17-14.37) and lymphovascular invasion (HR = 1.81, 95% CI 1.16-2.81). We also found GNRI index as independent risk factor in DFS (HR = 1.90, 95% CI 1.42-2.54) and CSS (HR = 5.42, 95% CI 3.24-9.06). Preoperative malnutritional status with low GNRI is an independent marker in predicting DFS, CSS and OS in UTUC patients underwent RNU.

Impact of Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index After Initial Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: a Retrospective Cohort Study with the Hiroshima Surgical Study Group of Clinical Oncology (HiSCO)

INTRODUCTION

The importance of a nutrition scoring system, including the geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI), was reported as an objective tool widely used to assess nutritional status in patients with inflammatory disease, chronic heart failure, and chronic liver disease. However, studies on the relationship between GNRI and the prognosis in patients who have undergone initial hepatectomy have been limited. Thus, we conducted a multi-institutional cohort study to clarify the relationship between GNRI and long-term outcomes for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients after such a procedure.

METHODS

Data from 1,494 patients who underwent initial hepatectomy for HCC between 2009 and 2018 was retrospectively collected from a multi-institutional database. The patients were divided into two groups according to GNRI grade (cutoff: 92), and their clinicopathological characteristics and long-term results were compared.

RESULTS

Of the 1,494 patients, the low-risk group (≥ 92; N = 1,270) was defined as having a normal nutritional status. Meanwhile, low GNRI (< 92; N = 224) were divided into malnutrition as the high-risk group. Multivariate analysis identified seven prognostic factors of poor overall survival (higher tumor markers; α-fetoprotein (AFP) and des-γ-carboxy protein [DCP], higher ICG-R15 levels, larger tumor size, multiple tumors, vascular invasion, and lower GNRI and eight prognostic factors of high recurrence (HCV antibody positive, higher ICG-R15 levels, higher tumor markers such as AFP and DCP, greater bleeding, multiple tumors, vascular invasion, and lower GNRI).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with HCC, preoperative GNRI predicts poorer overall survival and high recurrence.

Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index as a Predictor of Prognosis in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated with Nivolumab

BACKGROUND

The Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) has been reported as a screening tool to assess the nutrition-related risk with mortality in older patients and those with the various diseases. However, the prognostic value of GNRI in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients receiving nivolumab therapy remains unclear.

METHODS

Fifty-six consecutive patients with mRCC receiving nivolumab between September 2013 and August 2020 at our institution were retrospectively analyzed. The survival outcomes and prognostic factors associated with overall survival (OS) were statistically analyzed.

RESULTS

Thirteen and forty-three patients were classified with low (GNRI < 92) and high (GNRI ≥ 92) GNRI, respectively. Patients with low GNRI demonstrated significantly shorter OS (P = 0.0002) than those with high GNRI. In multivariate analysis, GNRI at the time of nivolumab (P = 0.008) was extracted as the predictor for OS in addition to Karnofsky performance status (KPS) (P = 0.016). Integration of the GNRI into the International Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer Database Consortium (IMDC) risk classification improved the c-index from 0.761 to 0.833 (combination of GNRI with IMDC risk classification) and to 0.778 (substitution of GNRI with KPS in IMDC risk classification).

CONCLUSIONS

GNRI was a significant prognostic biomarker in mRCC patients receiving nivolumab.

Comparison of the Prognostic Value of Inflammatory and Nutritional Indices in Nonmetastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

Several markers that reflect inflammation and nutritional status have been associated with oncological outcomes in many tumors. This study aimed to describe the impact of pretreatment inflammatory and nutritional indices on the oncological outcomes in nonmetastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). A total of 213 Japanese patients with nonmetastatic RCC at Kanazawa University Hospital between October 2007 and December 2018 were included. The inflammatory and nutritional indices, including neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio (CAR), prognostic nutritional index (PNI), and geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI), were retrospectively analyzed. The optimal cutoffs for NLR, PLR, CAR, PNI, and GNRI were 2.18, 153.7, 0.025, 48.4, and 98, respectively. According to Kaplan-Meier curves, elevated NLR, PLR, CAR, and GNRI correlated with increased metastasis, while NLR and PNI correlated with worse overall survival (OS). In multivariate analysis, high CAR was an independent poor risk factor for metastasis (hazard ratio (HR), 3.08; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.24-7.67; p = 0.016). Furthermore, high NLR showed an independent prognostic factor for worse OS (HR, 3.96; 95% CI, 1.01-15.59; p = 0.049). The pretreatment inflammatory and nutritional indices such as NLR and CAR might be promising prognostic factors for nonmetastatic RCC.

Prognostic impact of geriatric nutritional risk index on patients with urological cancers: A meta-analysis

Background

Despite previous research examining the predictive value of the geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) in individuals with urological cancers (UCs), results have been conflicting. This study aimed to comprehensively explore the potential link between GNRI and the prognosis of UCs using a meta-analysis.

Methods

The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases were systematically and exhaustively searched. We estimated the prognostic importance of the GNRI in patients with UCs by calculating the pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) on survival outcomes. Publication bias was identified using Egger's test and Begg's funnel plot.

Results

Eight trials with 6,792 patients were included in our meta-analysis. Patients with UCs who had a lower GNRI before treatment had a higher risk of experiencing worse overall survival (HR = 2.62, 95% CI = 1.69-4.09, p < 0.001), recurrence-free survival/progression-free survival (HR = 1.77, 95% CI = 1.51-2.08, p < 0.001), and cancer-specific survival (HR = 2.32, 95% CI = 1.28-4.20, p = 0.006). Moreover, the subgroup analysis did not change the predictive significance of the GNRI in individuals with UCs. Neither Egger's nor Begg's test indicated substantial bias in this analysis.

Conclusion

As a result of our meta-analysis, we found that a low GNRI strongly predicts poor prognosis for patients with UCs. A lower pretreatment GNRI indicates poor survival outcomes in UCs.

Association of geriatric nutritional risk index with all-cause hospital mortality among elderly patients in intensive care unit

Background

Malnutrition is associated with poor outcomes for geriatric patients in intensive care unit (ICU). It is important to identify patients at risk of malnutrition and provide individual nutrition support. The assessment of malnutrition risk is not easy for these patients due to their cognitive impairment. Geriatric nutrition risk index (GNRI) is a simple and objective scoring tool to evaluate the risk of malnutrition in elderly patients. In this study, we aimed to see whether GNRI score was appropriate to predict clinical outcomes among geriatric patients in the setting of ICU.

Materials and methods

Elderly patients with age ≥ 65 years were extracted from Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) database. Categories based on GNRI were classified as major risk (GNRI <82), moderate risk (GNRI 82 to <92), low risk (GNRI 92 to ≤98), and no risk (GNRI >98). The primary outcome was all-cause hospital mortality. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models and restricted cubic spline were used to investigate associations of GNRI with hospital mortality, respectively. A two-piecewise linear regression model was applied to examine the inflection point of GNRI on hospital mortality. To reduce selection bias, propensity score matching (PSM) was used in a 1:1 ratio.

Results

A total of 3,696 geriatric patients were finally included with median age 75 (69, 81) years. The prevalence of major risk was 28.6%. In the fully adjusted model, GNRI categories featured a negative trend with hospital mortality (p for trend = 0.037). Restricted cubic spline analysis demonstrated an L-shaped relationship between GNRI and hospital mortality before and after matching. The inflection point was 78.7. At the left side of inflection point, GNRI levels were significantly negatively associated with hospital mortality (HR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.94-0.98; p < 0.001) and featured no significant relations at the right side. Multiple linear regression also showed that GNRI was negatively associated with length of stay in hospital.

Conclusion

The major risk of malnutrition defined by GNRI was able to predict poor prognosis for geriatric patients admitted to ICU.

Geriatric nutritional risk index as a prognostic factor in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma following transarterial chemoembolization: A retrospective study

The geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) has been shown to be associated with the prognosis of cancer patients except for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients after transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). Our aim is to examine the association between the GNRI and long-term prognosis in patients with HCC who underwent TACE. Patients with HCC who underwent TACE were enrolled. The relationship between the patient characteristics and GNRI were compared, and the independent prognostic factors were investigated. Nomogram performance was assessed via the concordance index (C-index) and calibration plots. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was performed to evaluate the net benefit of the nomogram. A total of 235 patients met the inclusion criteria. Compared with the parameters of the high GNRI group, low GNRI was significantly associated with hypertension, ascites, body mass index, tumor size, anemia, Child-Turcotte-Pugh class. The univariate analysis demonstrated that overall survival (OS) was inferior when GNRI < 98, tumor size ≥ 5cm, vascular invasion, alpha-fetoprotein level ≥ 400, Barcelona clinical liver cancer stage B to C and TACE times < 3. The multivariate analysis revealed that GNRI < 98, tumor size ≥ 5cm, tumor number ≥ 2, alpha-fetoprotein level ≥ 400 and TACE times < 3 were independent predictors of a poor OS. In the validation step, OS was shown to be well calibrated (C-index = 0.724), and a satisfactory clinical utility was proven by DCA. Low GNRI score was associated with a shorter OS in patients undergoing TACE.

Prognostic value of the geriatric nutritional index in colorectal cancer patients undergoing surgical intervention: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

We reviewed the literature to assess the prognostic ability of the geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) for patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) undergoing curative surgery.

METHODS

The online databases of PubMed, CENTRAL, ScienceDirect, Embase, and Google Scholar were searched for articles reporting the relationship between GNRI and outcomes in CRC patients. English language studies were searched up to 28th April 2022.

RESULTS

Ten studies with 3802 patients were included. Meta-analysis indicated that patients with low GNRI had significantly poor overall survival (HR: 2.41 95% CI: 1.72, 3.41 I2 = 68%) and disease-free survival (HR: 1.92 95% CI: 1.47, 2.49 I2 = 49%) as compared to those with high GNRI. The meta-analysis also indicated a significantly higher risk of complications with low GNRI as compared to high GNRI (HR: 1.98 95% CI: 1.40, 2.82 I2 = 0%). The results did not change on subgroup analysis based on study location, age group, GNRI cut-off, and sample size.

CONCLUSION

Current evidence indicates that GNRI can be a valuable prognostic indicator for CRC patients undergoing surgical intervention. Patients with low GNRI have poor overall and disease-free survival and a higher incidence of complications. Clinicians could use this simple indicator to stratify patients and formulate personalized treatment plans.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier (CRD42022328374).

Prognostic impact of preoperative Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index in oral squamous cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the prognostic impact of preoperative Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) values in older adults undergoing radical surgery for oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC).

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 61 patients ≥ 65 years old with OSCC (43 men, 18 women; age: 72.1±5.4 years) who underwent radical surgery between 2013 and 2020. Factors influencing overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were examined.

RESULTS

Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis indicated that the optimal GNRI value for classifying patients into low-GNRI (<93.7; OS: n=19 [31.1%], DFS: n=42 [68.9%]) and high-GNRI groups (≥93.7; OS, n=19 [31.1%]; DFS, n=42 [68.9%]) was 93.7. OS and DFS rates were significantly lower in the low-GNRI group than in the high-GNRI group. Univariate analysis indicated that alcohol use, preoperative serum C-reactive protein level, lymphatic invasion, postoperative treatment, and GNRI were significantly correlated with OS, while lymphatic invasion, postoperative treatment, and GNRI were significantly correlated with DFS. In multivariate analysis, only GNRI was significantly correlated with OS. DFS and postoperative treatment were independent predictors of DFS.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative GNRI may be a significant prognostic factor in older adults with OSCC. GNRI assessment and nutritional intervention may improve prognosis in patients at high nutritional risk.

Preoperative nutritional evaluation of prostate cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

Background and objective

Prostate cancer (PCa) is one of the most common malignant tumors in men. Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) is an objective index for evaluating nutritional status of elderly people over 65 years old. The aim of the current study was to explore the correlation and predictive value between GNRI and postoperative recovery and complications in PCa patients undergoing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP).

Methods

Taking 98 as the GNRI boundary value, 96 PCa patients (aged≥65 y) undergoing LRP in the Department of Urology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College from January 2018 to December 2020 were grouped into malnutrition group (MNg, 34 patients, 35.4%) and normal nutrition group (NNg, 62 patients, 64.6%). Basic information, laboratory examination indexes, operation conditions, postoperative complications and postoperative recovery indexes of patients were recorded and retrospectively analyzed. Clavien-Dindo Classification System (CDCS) was used to assess postoperative complications. T-test was used to analyze differences between the two groups. ROC curve was generated to determine the predictive value of GNRI for postoperative complications.

Results

Percentage of complications was significantly higher in MNg group compared with that in NNg group (P < 0.01). The average grade based on CDCS was significantly lower in NNg group compared with that in MNg group (P < 0.01). Body weight, Body Mass Index (BMI), preoperative hemoglobin value (HGB), serum albumin (ALB) values of MNg and NNg were significantly positively correlated with GNRI (P<0.01). Incidence and severity of postoperative complications of MNg patients were significantly higher compared with those of NNg patients (P<0.05). Average hospitalization cost of MNg patients was higher in MNg patients compared with that of NNg patients (P<0.05). Duration of post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), duration of antibiotic use and duration of indwelling drainage tube were longer in MNg patients compared with those in NNg patients (P<0.05). Furthermore, volume of indwelling drainage tube was higher in MNg patients compared with that in NNg patients (P<0.05).

Conclusion

GNRI is an effective and reliable tool for evaluation of preoperative nutritional status of prostate cancer patients. The findings showed that GNRI is correlated with postoperative recovery and complications, and is an effective predictive marker.

Nutritional Risk Index Predicts Survival in Patients With Breast Cancer Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

Nutritional risk index (NRI) is an index based on ideal body weight that aims to present body weight and serum albumin levels. It has been utilized to discriminate patients at risk of postoperative complications and predict the postoperative outcome of major surgeries. However, this index remains limited for breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). The research explores the clinical and prognostic significance of NRI in breast cancer patients. This study included 785 breast cancer patients (477 cases received NACT and 308 cases did not) were enrolled in this retrospective study. The optimal NRI cutoff value was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, then reclassified as low NRI group (<112) and high NRI group (≥112). The results demonstrated that NRI independently predicted survival on disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) by univariate and multivariate Cox regression survival analyses [P = 0.019, hazard ratio (HR): 1.521, 95% CI: 1.071–2.161 and P = 0.004, HR: 1.415, 95% CI: 1.119–1.789; and P = 0.026, HR:1.500, 95% CI: 1.051–2.143 and P < 0.001, HR: 1.547, 95% CI: 1.221–1.959]. According to the optimal cutoff value of NRI, the high NRI value patients had longer mean DFS and OS time in contrast to those with low NRI value patients (63.47 vs. 40.50 months; 71.50 vs. 56.39 months). Furthermore, the results demonstrated that the high NRI score patients had significantly longer mean DFS and OS time than those with low NRI score patients in early-stage breast cancer (χ² = 9.0510, P = 0.0026 and χ² = 9.2140, P = 0.0024) and advanced breast cancer (χ² = 6.2500, P = 0.0124 and χ² = 5.8880, P = 0.0152). The mean DFS and OS values in patients with high NRI scores were significantly longer in contrast to those with low NRI scores in different molecular subtypes. The common toxicities after NACT were hematologic and gastrointestinal reactions, and the NRI had no statistically significant effects on toxicities, except in nausea (χ² = 9.2413, P = 0.0024), mouth ulcers (χ² = 4.8133, P = 0.0282), anemia (χ² = 8.5441, P = 0.0140), and leukopenia (χ² = 11.0951, P = 0.0039). NRI serves as a minimally invasive, easily accessible and convenient prognostic tool for evaluating breast cancer prognoses and treatment efficacy, and may help doctors in terms of selecting measures of greater efficiency or appropriateness to better treat breast cancer.

Impact of frailty on perioperative and oncologic outcomes in patients undergoing surgery or ablation for renal cancer: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Frailty has been recognized as a major risk factor for adverse perioperative and oncological outcomes in patients with genitourinary malignancies. Yet, the evidence supporting such an association in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is still sparse. Herein we provide an updated comprehensive overview of the impact of frailty on perioperative and oncologic outcomes in patients undergoing surgery or ablation for RCC.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A systematic review of the English-language literature was conducted using the MEDLINE (Via PubMed), Web of Science and the Cochrane Library databases according to the principles highlighted by the EAU Guidelines Office and the PRISMA statement recommendations. The review protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021242516). The overall quality of evidence was assessed according to GRADE recommendations.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Overall, 18 studies were included in the qualitative analysis. Most of these were retrospective single-centre series including patients undergoing surgery for non-metastatic RCC. The overall quality of evidence was low. A variety of measures were used for frailty assessment, including the Canadian Study of Health and Aging Frailty Index, the five-item frailty index, the Modified Rockwood's Clinical Frailty Scale Score, the Hopkins Frailty score, the Groningen Frailty Index, and the Geriatric nutritional risk index. Sarcopenia was defined based on the Lumbar skeletal muscle mass at cross-sectional imaging, the skeletal muscle index, the total psoas area, or the psoas muscle index. Overall, available studies point to frailty and sarcopenia as potential independent risk factors for worse perioperative and oncological outcomes after surgery or ablation for different RCC stages. Increased patient's frailty was indeed associated with higher risk of perioperative complications, healthcare resources utilization, readmission rates and longer hospitalization periods, as well as potentially lower cancer specific or overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Frailty has been consistently associated with worse outcomes after surgery for RCC, reinforcing the value of preoperative frailty assessment in carefully selected patients. Given the low quality of the available evidence (especially in the setting of tumour ablation), prospective studies are needed to standardize frailty assessments and to identify patients who are expected to benefit most from preoperative geriatric evaluation, aiming to optimize decision-making and postoperative outcomes in patients with RCC.

Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index Predicts Adverse Outcomes in Human Malignancy: A Meta-Analysis

Background

Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) has been widely used to assess the nutritional status in a variety of human pathological conditions, but the prognostic value of the GNRI in malignancies has not been evinced.

Methods

Relevant studies updated on Jul 27, 2019, were retrieved in available databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane library, Chinese CNKI, and Chinese Wan-fang. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were extracted and pooled by using STATA 14.

Results

A total of 15 studies involving 8,046 subjects were included in this meta-analysis. Meta-analysis results evinced that low GNRI was associated with poor OS (HR = 1.95, 95% CI: 1.49-2.56, p ≤ 0.001), poor CSS (HR = 1.81, 95% CI: 1.49-2.19, p ≤ 0.001), poor DFS (HR = 1.67, 95% CI: 1.28-2.17, p ≤ 0.001), and poor PFS (HR = 1.68, 95% CI: 1.28-2.21, p ≤ 0.001), and the correlation of GNRI with OS was not changed when stratified by possible confounding factors, suggesting that malignancy patients with low GNRI would suffer from reduced survival rate and increased recurrence rate. Moreover, low GNRI was also associated with postoperative complications in malignancies.

Conclusions

In summary, GNRI is associated poor prognosis in human malignancies, and GNRI should be used as a predictive indicator of adverse outcomes during malignancy treatment.