1
|
van Erning FN, van den Heuvel TBM, Sijtsma FPC, Boerma D, Brandt-Kerkhof ARM, Bremers AJ, van Duyn EB, van Grevenstein HMU, Hemmer PHJ, Kok NFM, Madsen E, de Reuver PR, Wiezer RJ, Witkamp AJ, Nienhuijs SW, Poelmann FB, Tuynman JB, Been LB, Rovers KP, de Hingh IHJT. An observational cohort of patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases or pseudomyxoma peritonei treated with CRS-HIPEC: Development and first results of the Dutch CRS-HIPEC quality registry. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2024; 50:108568. [PMID: 39241538 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108568] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2024] [Revised: 07/08/2024] [Accepted: 07/25/2024] [Indexed: 09/09/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To improve care for patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases (CRC-PM) or pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP), the Dutch CRS-HIPEC quality registry was initiated in 2019. The aims are to describe the development and content of this registry and to give insight into the data collected during the first years. MATERIALS AND METHODS The registry is an observational cohort in the Netherlands. All patients with CRC-PM or PMP who intend to undergo cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) from 6 hospitals are included. Clinical data and outcomes (including hospital variation) were analyzed. RESULTS In 2019-2022, 889 patients were included in the CRS-HIPEC quality registry: 749 (84 %) with CRC-PM and 140 (16 %) with PMP. Peritoneal metastases were diagnosed synchronously in 51 % of CRC-PM patients and in 94 % of PMP patients. In patients undergoing complete CRS, the median peritoneal cancer index was 8 (IQR 4-13) for CRC-PM and 15 (IQR 6-26) for PMP. Complete cytoreduction was achieved in 639 CRC-PM patients (97 %) and 108 PMP patients (82 %). HIPEC was mainly performed with mitomycin C (CRC-PM: 94 %, PMP: 92 %). Major postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥3) occurred in 148 CRC-PM patients (22 %) and 30 PMP patients (23 %) with 90-day mortality rates of 2 %. In CRC-PM, differences between hospitals were observed regarding proportions of diagnostic laparoscopies/laparotomies, (neo)adjuvant treatment, ostomy formations and re-admissions. CONCLUSION The CRS-HIPEC quality registry provides insight into the outcomes of CRS-HIPEC and enables clinical auditing and observational cohort studies aiming to improve treatment outcomes for patients with CRC-PM and PMP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felice N van Erning
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
| | - Teun B M van den Heuvel
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Femke P C Sijtsma
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Djamila Boerma
- Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | | | - André J Bremers
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Eino B van Duyn
- Department of Surgery, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | | | - Patrick H J Hemmer
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Niels F M Kok
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Eva Madsen
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Philip R de Reuver
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - René J Wiezer
- Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - Arjan J Witkamp
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Simon W Nienhuijs
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Floris B Poelmann
- Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - Jurriaan B Tuynman
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Lucas B Been
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Koen P Rovers
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Ignace H J T de Hingh
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, the Netherlands; GROW - School for Oncology and Development Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sedighim S, Khan A, Li AY, Tajik F, Radhakrishnan VK, Eng O, Turaga K, Senthil M. Adoption of cytoreductive surgery in the management of peritoneal malignancies-Global trends. J Surg Oncol 2023; 128:1021-1031. [PMID: 37818906 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27448] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2023] [Accepted: 09/08/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023]
Abstract
Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) has now been accepted as an integral component in the management of gastrointestinal and gynecological cancers with peritoneal metastases. Since the adoption of CRS is influenced by access to advanced medical facilities, trained multidisciplinary teams, and funding, there is wide variability in incorporation of CRS into routine clinical practice between high- versus low- and middle-income countries. This review highlights the global trends in the adoption of CRS for peritoneal malignancies with a specific focus on the establishment of CRS programs and barriers to incorporate CRS into routine clinical care in low- and middle-income countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shaina Sedighim
- Department of Surgery, University of California, Irvine, California, USA
| | - Aaqil Khan
- Department of Surgery, University of California, Irvine, California, USA
- School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, California, USA
| | - Amy Y Li
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of California Irvine Medical Center, Orange, California, USA
| | - Fatemeh Tajik
- Department of Surgery, University of California, Irvine, California, USA
| | | | - Oliver Eng
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of California Irvine Medical Center, Orange, California, USA
| | - Kiran Turaga
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Maheswari Senthil
- Department of Surgery, University of California, Irvine, California, USA
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of California Irvine Medical Center, Orange, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Marano L, Marrelli D, Sammartino P, Biacchi D, Graziosi L, Marino E, Coccolini F, Fugazzola P, Valle M, Federici O, Baratti D, Deraco M, Di Giorgio A, Macrì A, Pasqual EM, Framarini M, Vaira M, Roviello F. Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Gastric Cancer with Synchronous Peritoneal Metastases: Multicenter Study of 'Italian Peritoneal Surface Malignancies Oncoteam-S.I.C.O.'. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 28:9060-9070. [PMID: 34057569 PMCID: PMC8590997 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10157-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2021] [Accepted: 04/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Background The development of multimodality treatment, including cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), has led to promising results in selected patients with peritoneal disease of gastric origin. The aim of this study was to investigate the short- and long-term outcomes of CRS/HIPEC in the treatment of synchronous peritoneal metastasis in gastric cancer. Methods The Italian Peritoneal Surface Malignancies Oncoteam—S.I.C.O. retrospective registry included patients with synchronous peritoneal malignancy from gastric cancer submitted to gastrectomy with CRS and HIPEC between 2005 and 2018 from 11 high-volume, specialized centers. Results A total of 91 patients with a median age of 58 years (range 26–75) were enrolled. The median overall survival (OS) time for the whole group of patients was 20.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 11.8–28.5] and the median recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 7.3 months (95% CI 4–10.6). The completeness of cytoreduction score (CCS) of 0 and Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) score of ≤ 6 groups showed a significantly better long-term survival (median OS 40.7 and 44.3 months, respectively) compared with the incomplete resected groups (median OS 10.7 months, p = 0.003) and PCI score of > 6 group (median OS 13.4 months, p = 0.005). A significant difference was observed in the survival rate according to neoadjuvant treatment (untreated patients: 10.7 months, 95% CI 5.1–16.2; treated patients: 35.3 months, 95% CI 2.8–67.8; p = 0.022). Conclusions In referral centers, CRS and HIPEC after neoadjuvant treatment significantly improved survival in selected patients. Patients with a PCI score ≤ 6, complete cytoreduction, negative nodal involvements, and negative cytology had encouraging results, showing a clinically meaningful survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luigi Marano
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, Unit of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
| | - Daniele Marrelli
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, Unit of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Paolo Sammartino
- Cytoreductive Surgery and HIPEC Unit, Department of Surgery "Pietro Valdoni", Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Daniele Biacchi
- Cytoreductive Surgery and HIPEC Unit, Department of Surgery "Pietro Valdoni", Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Luigina Graziosi
- General and Emergency Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Elisabetta Marino
- General and Emergency Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Federico Coccolini
- General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery Department, Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy.,General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery Department, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Paola Fugazzola
- General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery Department, Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy
| | - Mario Valle
- Department of Digestive Surgery, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Orietta Federici
- Department of Digestive Surgery, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Dario Baratti
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori di Milano, Peritoneal Surface Malignancies Unit, Milan, Italy
| | - Marcello Deraco
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori di Milano, Peritoneal Surface Malignancies Unit, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Di Giorgio
- Surgical Unit of Peritoneum and Retroperitoneum, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio Macrì
- Peritoneal Surface Malignancy and Soft Tissue Sarcoma Program, Messina University Medical School Hospital, Messina, Italy
| | - Enrico Maria Pasqual
- Department of Medical Area, University of Udine, Santa Maria della Misericordia University Hospital Udine, Udine, Italy
| | | | - Marco Vaira
- Candiolo Cancer Institute, Unit of Surgical Oncology, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy
| | - Franco Roviello
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, Unit of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Marano L, Marrelli D, Roviello F. ASO Author Reflections: Gastric Cancer with Synchronous Peritoneal Disease-A Clinically Meaningful Survival After CRS and HIPEC in Selected Patients from Italian Peritoneal Surface Malignancies Oncoteam Network. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 28:9071-9072. [PMID: 34018086 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10206-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2021] [Accepted: 05/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Luigi Marano
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, Unit of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
| | - Daniele Marrelli
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, Unit of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Franco Roviello
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, Unit of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Centralization and Oncologic Training Reduce Postoperative Morbidity and Failure-to-rescue Rates After Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Peritoneal Surface Malignancies: Study on a 10-year National French Practice. Ann Surg 2020; 272:847-854. [PMID: 32833761 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000004326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Evaluate at a national level the postoperative mortality (POM), major morbidity (MM) and failure-to-rescue (FTR) after cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) across time and according to hospital-volume. BACKGROUND CRS/HIPEC is an effective therapeutic strategy commonly used to treat peritoneal surface malignancies. However, this aggressive approach has the reputation to be associated with a high POM and MM. METHODS All patients treated with CRS/HIPEC between 2009 and 2018 in France were identified through a national medical database. Patients and perioperative outcomes were analyzed. A cut-off value of the annual CRS/HIPEC caseload affecting the 90-day POM was calculated using the Chi-squared Automatic Interaction Detector method. A multivariable logistic model was used to identify factors mediating 90-day POM. RESULTS A total of 7476 CRS/HIPEC were analyzed. Median age was 59 years with a mean Elixhauser comorbidity index of 3.1, both increasing over time (P < 0.001). Ninety-day POM was 2.6%. MM occurred in 44.2% with a FTR rate of 5.1%. The threshold of CRS/HIPEC number per center per year above which the 90-day POM was significantly reduced was 45 (3.2% vs 1.9%, P = 0.01). High-volume centers had more extended surgery (P < 0.001) with increased MM (55.8% vs 40.4%, P < 0.001) but lower FTR (3.1% vs 6.3%, P = 0.001). After multivariate analysis, independent factors associated with 90-day POM were: age >70 years (P = 0.002), Elixhauser comorbidity index ≥8 (P = 0.006), lower gastro-intestinal origin, (P < 0.010), MM (P < 0.001), and <45 procedures/yr (P = 0.002). CONCLUSION In France, CRS/HIPEC is a safe procedure with an acceptable 90-day POM that could even be improved through centralization in high-volume centers.
Collapse
|
6
|
Martin D, Grass F, Deo SVS, Ashwin KR, Maheshwari A, Hübner M, Somashekhar SP. Current Opinion on Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Treatment: a Survey of the Indian Society of Peritoneal Surface Malignancies (ISPSM). J Gastrointest Cancer 2020; 52:1061-1066. [PMID: 33073299 PMCID: PMC8376720 DOI: 10.1007/s12029-020-00538-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) are increasingly treated with multidisciplinary combined approaches. The study aim was to assess current practice and perceptions of treatment modalities of PC. Methods Indian Society of Peritoneal Surface Malignancies (ISPSM) members were invited to complete an online survey. Current practice and perceptions of treatment modalities were assessed through 19 closed questions. Scores were assessed using a Likert scale (0: not important, 5: very important). Treatment modality satisfaction was assessed using a semantic scale (frustrated: 0, perfectly happy: 10). Participants were sent 3 reminders at 4-week intervals. Results Fifty-seven out of 182 members completed the survey (31%). Forty percent of participants had an experience of at least 10 years, and 75% stated treating less than 20 PC patients per year. Main treatment goals for patients with PC were cure (5/5) and symptom relief (4/5). Participant’s satisfaction with treatment modalities for ovarian, colorectal, and gastric PC were 6/10, 5/10, and 2/10, respectively. Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for ovarian (57%) and colorectal (44%) origins were considered to be useful. Clinical usefulness of chemotherapy for gastric PC was rated to be low (17%). Conclusions Current treatment modalities fall short to satisfy the needs (cure, symptom relief) of patients with PC. Alternative systemic and intraperitoneal treatment modalities should be assessed. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s12029-020-00538-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Martin
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland.
| | - F Grass
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - S V S Deo
- Department of Surgical Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - K R Ashwin
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Manipal Hospital, Bangalore, India
| | - A Maheshwari
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Tata Memorial Cancer Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - M Hübner
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - S P Somashekhar
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Manipal Hospital, Bangalore, India
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ravn S, Christiansen CF, Hagemann-Madsen RH, Verwaal VJ, Iversen LH. The Validity of Registered Synchronous Peritoneal Metastases from Colorectal Cancer in the Danish Medical Registries. Clin Epidemiol 2020; 12:333-343. [PMID: 32273772 PMCID: PMC7108706 DOI: 10.2147/clep.s238193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2019] [Accepted: 02/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Treatment options for peritoneal metastases (PM) from colorectal cancer (CRC) have increased, their efficiency should be monitored. For this purpose, register-based data on PM can be used, if valid. Purpose We aimed to evaluate the completeness and positive predictive value (PPV) of synchronous peritoneal metastases (S-PM) registered among CRC patients in the Danish National Patient Register (DNPR) and/or the Danish National Pathology Register (the DNPatR) using the Danish Colorectal Cancer Group database (DCCG) as a reference. Patients and Methods We identified Danish patients with newly diagnosed primary CRC in the DCCG during 2014–2015. S-PM were routinely registered in the DCCG. We excluded patients with non-CRC cancers and identified S-PM using all three registries. We estimated the completeness and the PPV of registered S-PM in the DNPR, the DNPatR and the DNPR and/or the DNPatR (DNPR/DNPatR) in combination using the DCCG as the reference. We stratified by age, gender, WHO performance status, tumour location and distant metastases to liver and/or lungs. Results We identified 9142 patients with CRC in DCCG. In DCCG, 366 patients were registered with S-PM, among whom 213 in DCCG only, whereas 153 in DCCG and in at least one of DNPR and/or DNPatR. In DNPR/DNPatR, S-PM was registered with a completeness of 42% [95% CI: 37–47] and a PPV of 60% [95% CI: 54–66]. In the DNPR only, the completeness was 32% [95% CI: 27–37] and the PPV 57% [95% CI: 50–64]. The completeness in the DNPatR was 19% [95% CI: 15–23] and the PPV was 76% [95% CI: 68–85]. In the DNPR/DNPatR patients aged <60 years (57% [95% CI: 46–69]), patients with WHO performance status 0 (46% [95% CI: 37–54]) and patients with no distant metastases (58% [95% CI: 50–65]) were registered with a higher completeness. Conclusion Our algorithm demonstrates that the DNPR/DNPatR captures less than half of CRC patients with S-PM. Potential candidates for curative treatment options are registered with a higher completeness. Clinicians should be encouraged to register the presence of S-PM to increase the validity of register-based S-PM data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sissel Ravn
- Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | | | - Victor J Verwaal
- Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Lene H Iversen
- Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Danish Colorectal Cancer Group (DCCG), Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Peritoneal metastasis in gastric cancer: results from the German database. Gastric Cancer 2020; 23:11-22. [PMID: 31228044 DOI: 10.1007/s10120-019-00978-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2018] [Accepted: 06/05/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with peritoneal metastases of gastric cancer have a poor prognosis with a median survival of 7 months. A benefit of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) could be shown in several selected patient cohorts but remains controversial. The aim of this study was, to reflect the results of a national German HIPEC registry initiated by the German Society of General and Visceral Surgery (DGAV). METHODS The DGAV HIPEC registry StuDoQ|Peritoneum documents patients with peritoneal malignancy contributed from 52 hospitals. All consecutive documented patients from 2011 until 2016 (n = 3078) were treated with CRS and HIPEC and were analysed. A total of 315 (10%) suffered from gastric cancer and were analysed. RESULTS A complete data set of 235 patients was available for this study, including 113 male (48.1%) and 122 female (51.9%) patients with a median age of 53.4 years (SD ± 11.9). The median PCI was 8.0 (range 1-30). A complete cytoreduction was achieved in 121 patients (71.6%). Postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grades 3-4) occurred in 40 patients (17%). The median overall survival (OS) time was 13 months. The 5-year survival rate was 6%. According to the PCI from 0-6 (n = 74); 7-15 (n = 70) and 16-39 (n = 24) the median OS differs significantly (18 months vs. 12 months vs. 5 months; p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS CRS and HIPEC in selected patients with gastric cancer and peritoneal spread can improve survival when they are treated in centers. An accurate staging and patient selection are of major importance to achieve long-term survival.
Collapse
|
9
|
Piso P, Nedelcut SD, Rau B, Königsrainer A, Glockzin G, Ströhlein MA, Hörbelt R, Pelz J. Morbidity and Mortality Following Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy: Data from the DGAV StuDoQ Registry with 2149 Consecutive Patients. Ann Surg Oncol 2018; 26:148-154. [PMID: 30456672 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-018-6992-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2018] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) are performed for well-selected patients with peritoneal surface malignancies. This combined treatment is potentially associated with an increased rate of complications. OBJECTIVE The aim of this paper was to analyze the morbidity and mortality of CRS and HIPEC in the German national registry. METHODS We present a retrospective analysis of 2149 consecutive patients from 52 hospitals. The data were prospectively documented in the DGAV StuDoQ Registry between February 2011 and December 2016. RESULTS Almost two-thirds of all patients had a colorectal malignancy; therefore, the most frequently performed resections were colectomies (54%) and rectal resections (30%). Only 36.2% of all patients had no anastomosis, and fewer than 20% of all patients were older than 70 years of age (16.4%). Enteric fistula and anastomotic leaks occurred in 10.5% of all cases. The reoperation rate was 14.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 11.51-18.1). Major grade 3 and 4 complications (Clavien-Dindo classification) occurred in 19.3% of all patients, half of which were due to surgical complications. The overall 30-day postoperative hospital mortality was 2.3% (95% CI 1.02-3.85). Multivariate analysis showed an increased risk for morbidity associated with pancreatic resections (odds ratio [OR] 2.4), rectal resection (OR 1.5), or at least one anastomosis (OR 1.35), and mortality with reoperation (OR 8.7) or age > 70 years (OR 3.35). CONCLUSIONS CRS and HIPEC are associated with acceptable morbidity and low mortality. These results show that CRS and HIPEC can be safely performed nationwide when close mentoring by experienced centers is provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pompiliu Piso
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Hospital Barmherzige Brüder, Regensburg, Germany.
| | - Sebastian D Nedelcut
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Hospital Barmherzige Brüder, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Beate Rau
- Department of Surgery, Campus Virchow-Klinikum and Charité Campus Mitte, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Alfred Königsrainer
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Eberhard-Karls University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Gabriel Glockzin
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.,Department of Surgery, Städtisches Klinikum München GmbH, Klinikum Bogenhausen, München, Germany
| | - Michael A Ströhlein
- Department of Abdominal, Vascular and Transplant Surgery, Köln-Merheim Medical Center, Witten/Herdecke University, Köln, Germany
| | - Rüdiger Hörbelt
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Giessen-Marburg, Giessen, Germany
| | - Jörg Pelz
- Department of General, Visceral, Vascular and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bhatt A, Mehta SS, Zaveri S, Rajan F, Ray M, Sethna K, Katdare N, Patel MD, Kammar P, Prabhu R, Sinukumar S, Mishra S, Rangarajan B, Rangole A, Damodaran D, Penumadu P, Ganesh M, Peedicayil A, Raj H, Seshadri R. Treading the beaten path with old and new obstacles: a report from the Indian HIPEC registry. Int J Hyperthermia 2018; 35:361-369. [PMID: 30300029 DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2018.1503345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Indian HIPEC registry is a self-funded registry instituted by a group of Indian surgeons for patients with peritoneal metastases (PM) undergoing surgical treatment. This work was performed to • Evaluate outcomes of cytoreductive surgery ± HIPEC in patients enrolled in the registry. • Identify operational problems. METHODS A retrospective analysis of patients enrolled in the registry from March 2016 to September 2017 was performed. An online survey was performed to study the surgeons' attitudes and existing practices pertaining to the registry and identify operational problems. RESULTS During the study period, 332 patients were enrolled in 8 participating centres. The common indication was ovarian cancer for three centres and pseudomyxoma peritonei for three others. The median PCI ranged from 3 to 23. A CC-0/1 resection was obtained in 94.7%. There was no significant difference in the morbidity (p = .25) and mortality (p = .19) rates between different centres. There was a high rate of failure-to-rescue (19.3%) patients with complications and the survival in patients with colorectal PM was inferior. A lack of dedicated personnel for data collection and entry was the main reason for only 10/43 surgeons contributing data. The other problem was the lack of complete electronic medical record systems at all centres. CONCLUSIONS These results validate existing practices and identify country-specific problems that need to be addressed. Despite operational problems, the registry is an invaluable tool for audit and research. It shows the feasibility of fruitful collaboration between surgeons in the absence of any regulatory body or funding for the project.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aditi Bhatt
- a Department of Surgical Oncology , Fortis Hospital , Bangalore , India
| | - Sanket S Mehta
- b Department of Peritoneal surface oncology , Saifee Hospital , Mumbai , India
| | - Shabber Zaveri
- c Department of Surgical Oncology , Manipal Hospital , Bangalore , India
| | - Firoz Rajan
- d Department of Surgical Oncology , Kovai Medical Center , Coimbatore , India
| | - Mukurdipi Ray
- e Department of Surgical Oncology , All India Institute of Medical Sciences , New Delhi , India
| | - Kayomarz Sethna
- f Department of Surgery , Lokmanya Tilak Municipal medical college and general hospital , Mumbai , India
| | - Ninad Katdare
- g Department of Surgical Oncology , SL Raheja hospital , Mumbai , India
| | - Mahesh D Patel
- h Department of Surgical Oncology , Zydus Hospital , Ahmedabad , India
| | - Praveen Kammar
- i Department of Surgical Oncology , Global hospitals , Hyderabad , India
| | - Robin Prabhu
- a Department of Surgical Oncology , Fortis Hospital , Bangalore , India
| | - Snita Sinukumar
- j Department of Surgical oncology , Jehangir Hospital , Pune , India
| | - Suniti Mishra
- k Department of Pathology , Fortis Hospital , Bangalore , India
| | - Bharath Rangarajan
- l Department of Medical oncology , Kovai Medical center , Coimbatore , India
| | - Ashvin Rangole
- m Department of Surgical oncology , CHL, CBCC cancer center , Indore , India
| | - Dileep Damodaran
- n Department of Surgical oncology , MVR cancer center and research Institute , Calicut , India
| | - Prasanth Penumadu
- o Department of Surgical oncology , Jawarharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER) , Puducherry , India
| | - Mandakulutur Ganesh
- p Department of Surgical Oncology , Vaidehi Institute of Medical sciences , Bangalore , India
| | - Abraham Peedicayil
- q Department of Gynecologic Oncology , Christian Medical College , Vellore , India
| | - Hemant Raj
- r Department of Surgical Oncology , Cancer Institute (WIA) , Chennai , India
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Nowacki M, Zegarski W. The scientific report from the first pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) procedures performed in the eastern part of Central Europe. J Int Med Res 2018; 46:3748-3758. [PMID: 29916281 PMCID: PMC6135997 DOI: 10.1177/0300060518778637] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2018] [Accepted: 05/02/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To perform a single-centre, detailed analysis of the preparations for the introduction of the first pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) programme in the eastern part of Central Europe. Methods The study analysed the 14-month preparation period prior to the performance of the first PIPAC procedure with respect to: (i) general preparations; (ii) patient referral and qualification; (iii) the first PIPAC procedure; (iv) the 2 weeks following PIPAC programme establishment; and (v) general problematic issues that arose. Results The length of time needed to prepare our institution for the first PIPAC procedure was extremely long compared with other European Union PIPAC centres: 14 months versus a standard 3-6 months of preparation. The longest amount of time (12 months) was required to prepare the required paperwork. Conclusions A new PIPAC programme was successfully established in the eastern part of Central Europe. The length of time to implement this method was significantly longer because of lengthy bureaucratic processes. These current findings should help new centres, especially in this part of Europe, to establish a PIPAC programme more quickly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maciej Nowacki
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Ludwik Rydygier’s
Collegium Medicum, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Bydgoszcz,
Poland
| | - Wojciech Zegarski
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Ludwik Rydygier’s
Collegium Medicum, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Bydgoszcz,
Poland
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
The current practice of cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC for colorectal peritoneal metastases: Results of a worldwide web-based survey of the Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International (PSOGI). Eur J Surg Oncol 2018; 44:1942-1948. [PMID: 30075978 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 95] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2018] [Revised: 06/28/2018] [Accepted: 07/08/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND At present, selected patients with resectable colorectal peritoneal metastases (CRC-PM) are increasingly treated with a combination therapy of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). The aim of this study was to investigate the current worldwide practice. METHODS HIPEC experts from 19 countries were invited through the Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International (PSOGI) to complete an online survey concerning their personal expertise and current hospital and countrywide practice. RESULTS It is estimated that currently more than 3800 patients with CRC-PM (synchronous and metachronous) are annually treated with CRS and HIPEC in 430 centers. Integration of CRS and HIPEC in national guidelines varies, resulting in large treatment disparities between countries. Amongst the experts, there was general agreement on issues related to indication, surgical technique and follow up but less on systemic chemotherapy or proactive strategies. CONCLUSION This international survey demonstrates that CRS and HIPEC is now performed on a large scale for CRC-PM patients. Variation in treatment may result in heterogeneity in surgical and oncological outcomes, emphasising the necessity to reach consensus on several issues of this comprehensive procedure. Future initiatives directed at achieving an international consensus statement are needed.
Collapse
|