Relevancy of positive trends in mortality and functional recovery after surgical treatment of acute subdural hematomas. Our 10-year experience

Outcome and survival of surgically treated acute subdural hematomas and postcraniotomy hematomas - A retrospective cohort study

Background

The morbidity and mortality of acute subdural hematoma (aSDH) remains high. Several factors have been reported to affect the outcome and survival of these patients. In this study, we explored factors potentially associated with the outcome and survival of surgically treated acute subdural hematoma (aSDH), including postcraniotomy hematomas (PCHs).

Methods

This retrospective cohort study was conducted in a single tertiary university hospital between 2008 and 2012 and all aSDH patients that underwent surgical intervention were included. A total of 132 cases were identified for collection of demographics, clinical, laboratory, and imaging data. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed to assess factors associated with three-month Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) and survival at one- and five-year.

Results

In this study, PCH (n = 14, 10.6%) was not associated with a worse outcome according to the 3- month GOS (p = 0.37) or one (p = 0.34) and five-year (p = 0.37) survival. The multivariable analysis showed that the volume of initial hematoma (p = 0.009) and Abbreviated Injury Scale score (p = 0.016) were independent predictors of the three-month GOS. Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score (p < 0.001 and p = 0.037) and age (p = 0.048 and p = 0.003) were predictors for one and five-year survival, while use of antiplatelet drug (p = 0.030), neuroworsening (p = 0.005) and smoking (p = 0.026) were significant factors impacting one year survival. In addition, blood alcohol level on admission was a predictor for five-year survival (p = 0.025).

Conclusions

These elucidations underscore that, although PCHs are pertinent, a comprehensive appreciation of multifarious variables is indispensable in aSDH prognosis. These findings are observational, not causal. Expanded research endeavors are advocated to corroborate these insights.

Prognostic Factors of Mortality and Functional Outcome for Acute Subdural Hematoma: A Review Article

Acute subdural hematoma (ASDH) is the most frequent intracranial traumatic lesion requiring surgery in high-income countries. To date, uncertainty remains regarding the odds of mortality or functional outcome of patients with ASDH, regardless of whether they are operated on. This review aims to shed light on the clinical and radiologic factors associated with ASDH outcome. A scoping review was conducted on Medline database from inception to 2023. This review yielded 41 patient series. In the general population, specific clinical (admission Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS], abnormal pupil exam, time to surgery, decompressive craniectomy, raised postoperative intracranial pressure) and radiologic (ASDH thickness, midline shift, thickness/midline shift ratio, uncal herniation, and brain density difference) factors were associated with mortality (grade III). Other clinical (admission GCS, decompressive craniectomy) and radiologic (ASDH volume, thickness/midline shift ratio, uncal herniation, loss of basal cisterns, petechiae, and brain density difference) factors were associated with functional outcome (grade III). In the elderly, only postoperative GCS and midline shift on brain computed tomography were associated with mortality (grade III). Comorbidities, abnormal pupil examination, postoperative GCS, intensive care unit hospitalization, and midline shift were associated with functional outcome (grade III). Based on these factors, the SHE (Subdural Hematoma in the Elderly) and the RASH (Richmond Acute Subdural Hematoma) scores could be used in daily clinical practice. This review has underlined a few supplementary factors of prognostic interest in patients with ASDH, and highlighted two predictive scores that could be used in clinical practice to guide and assist clinicians in surgical indication.

Traumatic Epidural and Subdural Hematoma: Epidemiology, Outcome, and Dating

Epidural hematomas (EDHs) and subdural hematomas (SDHs), or so-called extra-axial bleedings, are common clinical entities after a traumatic brain injury (TBI). A forensic pathologist often analyzes cases of traumatic EDHs or SDHs due to road accidents, suicides, homicides, assaults, domestic or on-the-job accidents, and even in a medical responsibility scenario. The aim of this review is to give an overview of the published data in the medical literature, useful to forensic pathologists. We mainly focused on the data from the last 15 years, and considered the most updated protocols and diagnostic-therapeutic tools. This study reviews the epidemiology, outcome, and dating of extra-axial hematomas in the adult population; studies on the controversial interdural hematoma are also included.

[Surgical techniques for severe brain injury : With special emphasis on polytrauma]

CLINICAL ISSUE

In Austria approximately 2000 people suffer from severe brain injury per year. Brain trauma is the most common cause of death under the age of 45 years. In polytrauma patients the treatment and management of severe brain injury is particularly challenging because the life-threatening injuries of other organ systems significantly influence the timing of surgery and the outcome. The sequence of the necessary surgery is an interdisciplinary decision already made in the emergency room. The evacuation of space-occupying intracranial hemorrhage can be of secondary importance.

STANDARD TREATMENT

The standard approach for acute subdural hematoma is a craniotomy using a large question mark-shaped incision (trauma flap) and decompression. In acute epidural hematoma and impression fractures the localization of the lesion determines the surgical approach and evacuation. A variety of access procedures are available. Frontobasal injuries are extremely rarely an indication for an emergency operation for life-threatening injuries. Decompressive craniotomy is performed as for craniotomy for acute subdural hematoma by the standard trauma flap.

DIAGNOSTIC WORK-UP

Emergency room computed tomography provides fast and accurate information about the localization and extent of brain injury.

PERFORMANCE

The mortality of acute subdural hematoma ranges between 50-90% despite an adequate evacuation. Outcome of epidural hematoma has a much better prognosis (10% mortality). The results of decompressive craniectomy versus conservative treatment for moderate disability and good recovery are quite similar according to the randomized evaluation of surgery with craniectomy for uncontrolled elevation of intracranial pressure (RESCUE-ICP) study.

PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATION

Interdisciplinary cooperation and communication and well-trained trauma surgeons with experience in brain trauma are key factors in the treatment of severe brain injury in polytrauma patients.

Prognosis of Acute Subdural Hematoma in the Elderly: A Systematic Review

Acute subdural hematoma (aSDH) is among the most common injury types encountered by neurosurgeons, and carries a poor prognosis, particularly in the elderly. As the incidence of aSDH in the elderly population rises, identifying those patients who may benefit from operative intervention is crucial. This systematic review aimed to identify data on prognostic factors or indices, such as the modified frailty index, that may help predict outcome, and hence guide management. A comprehensive search of online databases was conducted by two independent authors, and data on prognostic factors and outcomes were extracted. The quality of the evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria. Of 769 studies identified in the initial search, 7 satisfied inclusion and exclusion criteria. Mortality and morbidity varied considerably among studies. Initial Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) of 3-8 was the most consistently reported negative prognostic feature. Several studies evaluated the impact of medical comorbidities and premorbid frailty, but were limited by small sample size. A previous history of pneumonia was shown to increase the risk of Glasgow Outcome Score (GOS) 1-3 (odds ratio [OR] 6.4 [95% CI 1.6-25.2], p = 0.04) in a single study, which also reported a greater increase in GOS at 3 months in those with fewer than five comorbidities (56% vs. 19%, p < 0.01). There are limited data describing prognostic factors or the use of frailty indices within the specific group of elderly patients with aSDH. Prospective research is needed to evaluate the utility of accurate and validated assessments of frailty to enhance the neurosurgeon's ability to appropriately manage this complex and expanding patient group.

Geriatric Traumatic Brain Injury: Epidemiology, Outcomes, Knowledge Gaps, and Future Directions

This review of the literature on traumatic brain injury (TBI) in older adults focuses on incident TBI sustained in older adulthood ("geriatric TBI") rather than on the separate, but related, topic of older adults with a history of earlier-life TBI. We describe the epidemiology of geriatric TBI, the impact of comorbidities and pre-injury function on TBI risk and outcomes, diagnostic testing, management issues, outcomes, and critical directions for future research. The highest incidence of TBI-related emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and deaths occur in older adults. Higher morbidity and mortality rates among older versus younger individuals with TBI may contribute to an assumption of futility about aggressive management of geriatric TBI. However, many older adults with TBI respond well to aggressive management and rehabilitation, suggesting that chronological age and TBI severity alone are inadequate prognostic markers. Yet there are few geriatric-specific TBI guidelines to assist with complex management decisions, and TBI prognostic models do not perform optimally in this population. Major barriers in management of geriatric TBI include under-representation of older adults in TBI research, lack of systematic measurement of pre-injury health that may be a better predictor of outcome and response to treatment than age and TBI severity alone, and lack of geriatric-specific TBI common data elements (CDEs). This review highlights the urgent need to develop more age-inclusive TBI research protocols, geriatric TBI CDEs, geriatric TBI prognostic models, and evidence-based geriatric TBI consensus management guidelines aimed at improving short- and long-term outcomes for the large and growing geriatric TBI population.