1
|
Jack S, Andritsch E, Joaquim A, Kreissl M, Locati L, Netea-Maier R, Reverter J, Elisei R. Current landscape and support for practical initiation of oncological prehabilitation translatable to thyroid cancer: A position paper. Heliyon 2024; 10:e30723. [PMID: 38813200 PMCID: PMC11133508 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30723] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2023] [Revised: 05/02/2024] [Accepted: 05/02/2024] [Indexed: 05/31/2024] Open
Abstract
Despite a growing body of evidence for the effectiveness of prehabilitation, the uptake of prehabilitation in Europe remains low. Contributing factors range from limited awareness and understanding of prehabilitation to a lack of supporting infrastructure and reimbursement challenges. In this position paper, the authors propose a new comprehensive definition of prehabilitation and identify differentiated thyroid cancer as a type of cancer particularly well-suited for prehabilitation. To support clinicians with the implementation of prehabilitation programs in their clinics, the authors discuss the following practical solutions: a) find the most appropriate prehabilitation program for each patient; b) raise awareness among peers; c) develop evidence to demonstrate the effectiveness of prehabilitation; d) expand the interdisciplinary team; e) expand your network and make use of existing assets; f) utilize learnings from the COVID-19 pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S. Jack
- Clinical Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, University Road, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK
| | - E. Andritsch
- Clinical Department of Oncology, University Medical Centre of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerpl. 2, 8036, Graz, Austria
| | - A. Joaquim
- ONCOMOVE®, Associação de Investigação de Cuidados de Suporte em Oncologia (AICSO), 4410-406, Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal
| | - M.C. Kreissl
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Magdeburg, Otto von Guericke University, Universitatsplätz 2, 39106, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - L. Locati
- Department of Internal Medicine and Therapeutics, University of Pavia, S. da Nuova, 65, 27100, Pavia, PV, Italy
- Medical Oncology Unit, IRCCS ICS, Maugeri, Via Salvatore Maugeri, 10, 27100 Pavia PV, Italy
| | - R.T. Netea-Maier
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 28, 6525, GA, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - J.L. Reverter
- Endocrinology and Nutrition Department, Germans Trias i Pujol University Hospital, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Placa Civica, 08193, Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain
| | - R. Elisei
- Endocrine Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Lungarno Antonio Pacinotti, 43, 56126, Pisa, PI, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lovey J, Molnar A, Banky B. Long-term nutrition in patients candidate to neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatments. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2024; 50:106850. [PMID: 36841694 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2022] [Accepted: 02/14/2023] [Indexed: 02/19/2023]
Abstract
To improve outcomes, to decrease the rate of local recurrence and development of distant metastases neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies are employed in cancer patients in forms of radiation, chemo-, endocrine-, targeted-, and immunotherapy or their combination. Nutrition therapy plays important role in all phases of the cancer journey. From neoadjuvant therapy to prehabilitation, early postoperative nutrition, and long-term nutrition care during the adjuvant phase and survivorship determines the survival and quality of life of cancer patients. During the neoadjuvant phase patients may be in poor nutritional condition which can be aggravated by the applied oncological treatment. Beside this apparent threat this period also gives an excellent opportunity to maintain or even improve the nutritional status of the patients by nutrition therapy. After surgery the burdening effects of the operation may jeopardize the execution of adjuvant therapy. After early postoperative feeding a long-term nutrition strategy should be developed for cancer patients in order to avoid nutritional deterioration during the usually lengthy postoperative therapy. In this narrative review we discuss how preoperative nutritional status and medical nutrition therapy influence the results of surgery and after the operation what is the available evidence about nutritional status and outcome and the potentials to influence them by nutrition therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jozsef Lovey
- National Tumorbiology Laboratory, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary; Chair of Oncology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
| | - Andrea Molnar
- Scientific Committee, National Association of Hungarian Dietitians, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Balazs Banky
- Department of Surgery, Transplantation and Gastroenterology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Harris E, Marignol L. Prehabilitation for Patients with Cancer Undergoing Radiation Therapy: a Scoping Review. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2024; 36:254-264. [PMID: 38350785 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2024.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2023] [Revised: 01/18/2024] [Accepted: 02/06/2024] [Indexed: 02/15/2024]
Abstract
AIMS Prehabilitation is a process of identifying and assessing factors that could compromise the physical and psychological health of patients undergoing cancer treatment and implementing an intervention to combat such concerns. The use of prehabilitation in cancer surgery has yielded positive outcomes in rectal, lung and abdominal cancers. Prehabilitation strategies have potential to improve the management of patients receiving radiation therapy or chemoradiation. The aim of the present study was to map the evidence of the assessment and evaluation of prehabilitation for radiation therapy patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS A database search using EMBASE and PubMed was conducted. The PRISMA guidelines were adhered to. Keywords included prehabilitation, radiation therapy/radiotherapy, chemoradiotherapy/chemoradiation, intervention and exercise. Types of prehabilitation strategy, their purposes and impact, according to cancer site, were analysed. RESULTS Prehabilitation is most commonly evaluated in head and neck cancer, whereby unimodal, physical interventions manage dysphagia. Prehabilitation for lung cancer demonstrated its ability to widen treatment options for patients. Physical prehabilitation is administered to combat adverse effects of neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy in patients with rectal cancer. CONCLUSION Prehabilitation is adaptive and tailored to specific patient and site needs; thus it is applied across a wide range of cancer sites. More interventions by which radiation therapy is the definitive treatment modality and larger sample sizes within these studies are warranted to increase prehabilitation utilisation for patients undergoing radiation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Harris
- Applied Radiation Therapy Trinity (ARTT), Discipline of Radiation Therapy, School of Medicine, Trinity St. James's Cancer Institute, Trinity College Dublin, University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - L Marignol
- Applied Radiation Therapy Trinity (ARTT), Discipline of Radiation Therapy, School of Medicine, Trinity St. James's Cancer Institute, Trinity College Dublin, University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yang L, Alice A, Friedenreich CM. Physical activity for cancer prehabilitation: A scoping review. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2024; 196:104319. [PMID: 38460927 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2023] [Revised: 02/27/2024] [Accepted: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 03/11/2024] Open
Abstract
This scoping review aims to synthesize the current landscape of physical activity in cancer prehabilitation and identify knowledge gaps. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS and WEB OF SCIENCE for exercise interventions and observational studies that measured exercise or physical activity before cancer treatment from inception to January 20, 2023. Fifty-one articles from 44 unique studies were reviewed, including 32 intervention and 12 observational studies. Surgery is the only treatment modality that has been investigated. Included studies used heterogeneous exercise interventions and measures for physical activity. Colorectal and other gastrointestinal, lung, and urologic cancers are the most studied cancer types. Exercise intervention in cancer prehabilitation is highly feasible. The evidence for improved fitness, functional, psychosocial, and clinical outcomes is promising yet limited. Although research has increased recently, prehabilitation exercise remains a relatively under-investigated area in oncology. We have provided research directions towards an ideal cancer prehabilitation design in the real-world setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lin Yang
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Research, Cancer Care Alberta, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Canada; Departments of Oncology and Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
| | - Azam Alice
- Adapted Physical Activity and Health, University Rennes 2, Rennes, France
| | - Christine M Friedenreich
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Research, Cancer Care Alberta, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Canada; Departments of Oncology and Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Driessens H, Wijma AG, Buis CI, Nijkamp MW, Nieuwenhuijs-Moeke GJ, Klaase JM. Prehabilitation: tertiary prevention matters. Br J Surg 2024; 111:znae028. [PMID: 38436470 PMCID: PMC10910596 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znae028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2023] [Revised: 10/24/2023] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Heleen Driessens
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Allard G Wijma
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Carlijn I Buis
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten W Nijkamp
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Joost M Klaase
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bates A, West MA, Jack S, Grocott MPW. Preparing for and Not Waiting for Surgery. Curr Oncol 2024; 31:629-648. [PMID: 38392040 PMCID: PMC10887937 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31020046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2023] [Revised: 01/22/2024] [Accepted: 01/22/2024] [Indexed: 02/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Cancer surgery is an essential treatment strategy but can disrupt patients' physical and psychological health. With worldwide demand for surgery expected to increase, this review aims to raise awareness of this global public health concern, present a stepwise framework for preoperative risk evaluation, and propose the adoption of personalised prehabilitation to mitigate risk. Perioperative medicine is a growing speciality that aims to improve clinical outcome by preparing patients for the stress associated with surgery. Preparation should begin at contemplation of surgery, with universal screening for established risk factors, physical fitness, nutritional status, psychological health, and, where applicable, frailty and cognitive function. Patients at risk should undergo a formal assessment with a qualified healthcare professional which informs meaningful shared decision-making discussion and personalised prehabilitation prescription incorporating, where indicated, exercise, nutrition, psychological support, 'surgery schools', and referral to existing local services. The foundational principles of prehabilitation can be adapted to local context, culture, and population. Clinical services should be co-designed with all stakeholders, including patient representatives, and require careful mapping of patient pathways and use of multi-disciplinary professional input. Future research should optimise prehabilitation interventions, adopting standardised outcome measures and robust health economic evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Bates
- Perioperative and Critical Care Medicine Theme, NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton/University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK; (A.B.); (M.A.W.)
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Malcolm A. West
- Perioperative and Critical Care Medicine Theme, NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton/University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK; (A.B.); (M.A.W.)
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Sandy Jack
- Perioperative and Critical Care Medicine Theme, NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton/University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK; (A.B.); (M.A.W.)
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Michael P. W. Grocott
- Perioperative and Critical Care Medicine Theme, NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton/University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK; (A.B.); (M.A.W.)
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gartrell R, Qiao J, Kiss N, Faragher I, Chan S, Baird PN, Yeung JM. Can sarcopenia predict survival in locally advanced rectal cancer patients? ANZ J Surg 2023; 93:2166-2171. [PMID: 37209307 DOI: 10.1111/ans.18512] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2023] [Revised: 04/20/2023] [Accepted: 05/02/2023] [Indexed: 05/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is mounting evidence that suggests sarcopenia can be used to predict survival outcomes in patients with colon cancer. However, the effect on locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is less clear. We sought to determine the association between sarcopenia on Overall Survival and Recurrence-free Survival (OS and RFS) in patients with LARC undergoing multimodal treatment. METHODS A retrospective study was undertaken of all pre-treatment stage 2-3 rectal cancer patients who underwent neo-adjuvant treatment and surgery with curative intent between January 2010 and September 2016 at Western Health. Sarcopenia was measured on pre-treatment staging scans at the third lumbar vertebrae and defined using cohort-derived, sex-specific thresholds. Primary outcomes were OS and RFS. RESULTS A total of 132 patients with LARC were analysed. Sarcopenia: Hazard ratio (HR) 3.71; 95% CI, 1.28-10.75, P = 0.016 was independently associated with worse Overall Survival following multivariate analysis. There was no significant relationship between sarcopenia and RFS: Time ratio (TR) 1.67; 95% CI 0.52-5.34, P = 0.386. CONCLUSION Sarcopenia was found to be an independent risk factor for worse overall survival, but not recurrence free survival, in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer undergoing neo-adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy and surgery with curative intent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Gartrell
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Western Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Surgery (Western Precinct), University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jing Qiao
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Western Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Nicole Kiss
- Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Allied Health Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ian Faragher
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Western Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Steven Chan
- Department of Surgery (Western Precinct), University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Paul N Baird
- Department of Surgery (Western Precinct), University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Surgery, Ophthalmology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Justin M Yeung
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Western Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Surgery (Western Precinct), University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Paladini A, Rawal N, Coca Martinez M, Trifa M, Montero A, Pergolizzi J, Pasqualucci A, Narvaez Tamayo MA, Varrassi G, De Leon Casasola O. Advances in the Management of Acute Postsurgical Pain: A Review. Cureus 2023; 15:e42974. [PMID: 37671225 PMCID: PMC10475855 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.42974] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2023] [Accepted: 08/04/2023] [Indexed: 09/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Despite the millions of surgeries performed every year around the world, postoperative pain remains prevalent and is often addressed with inadequate or suboptimal treatments. Chronic postsurgical pain is surprisingly prevalent, and its rate varies with the type of surgery, as well as with certain patient characteristics. Thus, better clinical training is needed as well as patient education. As pain can be caused by more than one mechanism, multimodal or balanced postsurgical analgesia is appropriate. Pharmacological agents such as opioid and nonopioid pain relievers, as well as adjuvants and nonpharmacologic approaches, can be combined to provide better and opioid-sparing pain relief. Many specialty societies have guidelines for postoperative pain management that emphasize multimodal postoperative analgesia. These guidelines are particularly helpful when dealing with special populations such as pregnant patients or infants and children. Pediatric pain control, in particular, can be challenging as patients may be unable to communicate their pain levels. A variety of validated assessment tools are available for diagnosis. Related to therapy, most guidelines agree on the fact that codeine should be used with extreme caution in pediatric patients as some may be "rapid metabolizers" and its use may be life-threatening. Prehabilitation is a preoperative approach that prepares patients in advance of elective surgery with conditioning exercises and other interventions to optimize their health. Prehabilitation may have aerobic, strength-training, nutritional, and counseling components. Logistical considerations and degree of patient adherence represent barriers to effective prehabilitation programs. Notwithstanding all this, acute postoperative pain represents a clinical challenge that has not yet been well addressed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonella Paladini
- Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences (MESVA), University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, ITA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
The global volume of surgery is increasing. Adverse outcomes after surgery have resource implications and long-term impact on quality of life and consequently represent a significant and underappreciated public health issue. Standardization of outcome reporting is essential for evidence synthesis, risk stratification, perioperative care planning, and to inform shared decision-making. The association between short- and long-term outcomes, which persists when corrected for base-line risk, has significant implications for patients and providers and warrants further investigation. Candidate mechanisms include sustained inflammation and reduced physician activity, which may, in the future, be mitigated by targeted interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Alexander Harvie
- From the Department of Anaesthesia & Perioperative Care and General Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Denny Zelda Hope Levett
- From the Department of Anaesthesia & Perioperative Care and General Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Patrick William Grocott
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton/University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Christodoulidis G, Halliday LJ, Samara A, Bhuva N, Park WHE, Moorthy K. Personalized Prehabilitation Improves Tolerance to Chemotherapy in Patients with Oesophageal Cancer. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:1538-1545. [PMID: 36826079 PMCID: PMC9955115 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30020118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2022] [Revised: 12/04/2022] [Accepted: 01/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prehabilitation programmes aim to optimise patients before and after cancer treatment including surgery. Previous studies in surgical patients demonstrate that prehabilitation improves pre-operative fitness and overcomes the negative impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on fitness. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of prehabilitation on the tolerance of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with oesophageal cancer. METHODS Patients with oesophageal or gastroesophageal junction (GOJ) cancer from two oncology centres were retrospectively included in the present comparative cohort study; one provided a multimodal prehabilitation programme and one did not offer any prehabilitation. Tolerance of chemotherapy, defined as completion of the full chemotherapy regime as per protocol, was compared between the two groups. RESULTS In terms of participants, 92 patients were included in this study, 47 patients in the prehabilitation cohort and 45 in the control cohort. Compared with the control group, the prehabilitation group demonstrated an improved rate of chemotherapy completion (p = 0.029). In multivariate analysis, participation in prehabilitation was significantly associated with an improved rate of chemotherapy completion. CONCLUSION The findings of this exploratory study suggest that prehabilitation is associated with better tolerance for chemotherapy. Further research is needed to establish the long-term impact of prehabilitation on oncological outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Laura J. Halliday
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London W2 1NS, UK
| | - Athina Samara
- General Surgery Department, University Hospital of Larisa, 41110 Larisa, Greece
| | - Neel Bhuva
- Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, East and North Hertfordshire NHS Trust, Northwood HA6 2RN, UK
| | | | - Krishna Moorthy
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London W2 1NS, UK
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London W2 1NS, UK
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +44-203-312-1427; Fax: +44-0203-312-1810
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Salamon G, Dougherty D, Whiting L, Crawford GB, Stein B, Kotasek D. Effects of a prescribed, supervised exercise programme on tumour disease progression in oncology patients undergoing anti-cancer therapy: a retrospective observational cohort study. Intern Med J 2023; 53:104-111. [PMID: 33347696 PMCID: PMC10078728 DOI: 10.1111/imj.15170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2020] [Revised: 12/11/2020] [Accepted: 12/16/2020] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Exercise promotes numerous advantages in both health and disease, and is increasingly being acknowledged to improve overall survival in cancer patients. Preclinical studies indicate a direct effect on tumour behaviour, but human data on the effect of exercise on tumour progression are lacking. AIMS To capture preliminary clinical data regarding the impact of a prescribed, supervised exercise programme on cancer disease progression. METHODS Retrospective cohort study of 137 matched pairs of patients. All patients referred to LIFT Cancer Care Services (LIFT) supervised exercise programme between 2018 and 2019 were matched with non-LIFT patients from the oncology practice database. Disease progression via staging computed tomography scans ± tumour markers was compared for each match. Secondary outcomes were changes in neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and death. Results were analysed by logistical regression and adjusted for potential confounders. RESULTS Patients from the LIFT group had a 66% (OR = 0.34, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.61) decreased odds of disease progression and 76% (OR = 0.24, 95% CI 0.12-0.47) decreased odds of death compared with the non-LIFT group. No effect on the number of LIFT sessions on disease progression was demonstrated. The LIFT group had a mean final NLR reading 3.48 (-5.89 to -1.09) lower than the non-LIFT group. CONCLUSION Supervised exercise programmes have the potential to significantly improve outcomes in cancer patients due to an effect on tumour progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgia Salamon
- Southern Adelaide Palliative Services, Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | | | - Lauren Whiting
- LIFT Cancer Care Services, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Gregory B Crawford
- Northern Adelaide Palliative Service, Northern Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.,Discipline of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Brian Stein
- Adelaide Cancer Centre, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.,Discipline of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Dusan Kotasek
- Adelaide Cancer Centre, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.,Discipline of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Denehy L, Edbrooke L. The Role of Exercise Before Cancer Treatment. Semin Oncol Nurs 2022; 38:151330. [PMID: 36008200 DOI: 10.1016/j.soncn.2022.151330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We aim to describe on the role of exercise in preparation for cancer treatments (prehabilitation) that include surgery and neoadjuvant or nonsurgical approaches. We discuss the evidence for the role of exercise and provide guidelines to exercise prescription and examples of the structure of prehabilitation exercise programs. DATA SOURCE We use peer-reviewed articles obtained through PubMed searches with search terms: exercise, oncology, cancer surgery, exercise physiology, respiratory exercises, prehabilitation, and behavior change. CONCLUSION The emergence of prehabilitation in preparing patients for cancer care has followed a rapidly upward trajectory over the past 20 years. Exercise prehabilitation remains the cornerstone of management, particularly in patients attending for major surgery. Multimodal approaches to supporting patients before cancer treatment are now well accepted and include screening and individualized treatments of functional, nutritional, and psychological impairments. Respiratory training before surgery and the addition of behavior change strategies to improve adherence to interventions and promote improved longer-term outcomes are now included in many prehabilitation programs. For exercise to be an effective treatment in improving fitness and strength, supervised aerobic and resistance exercises at moderate intensity are recommended. There remains debate regarding the use of higher-intensity exercise, the appropriate outcome to measure efficacy, and the mechanisms driving the efficacy of exercise. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE We provide background evidence and knowledge pertaining to the role and provision of exercise prehabilitation. Understanding screening, risk factors, and potential efficacy assists in knowing who to refer for prehabilitation and what the programs include. This enables more effective com munication with patients attending for cancer treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda Denehy
- Department of Physiotherapy, Melbourne School of Health Sciences; Faculty of Medicine Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - Lara Edbrooke
- Department of Physiotherapy, Melbourne School of Health Sciences; Faculty of Medicine Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Renouf T, Bates A, Davis JF, Jack S. Prehabilitation. An Interdisciplinary Patient-Centric Conceptual Framework. Semin Oncol Nurs 2022; 38:151329. [PMID: 35965141 DOI: 10.1016/j.soncn.2022.151329] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To review the recent literature around patient-centric prehabilitation in oncology patients and propose a conceptual framework to inform development of interdisciplinary prehabilitation services leading to focused, individualized prehabilitation interventions. DATA SOURCES A review of recent peer-reviewed literature, national guidance, and government strategy on prehabilitation in oncology patients. CONCLUSION Patient- centric prehabilitation is key to improving patient's experiences of cancer throughout the cancer journey while improving population health and reducing financial costs. Successful personalized prehabilitation interventions are comprised of an interplay between individual interdisciplinary roles, as illustrated in the conceptual framework. The role of the nurse underpins this whole process in patient screening, assessment, implementation of the intervention, and patient reassessment, ensuring care is dynamic and tailored to patient need. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE The review has discussed the key role that nurses play in the process but warrants more research in the area. The conceptual framework provides a basis to develop interdisciplinary prehabilitation services underpinned by the nurse's role. The review advocates the use of educational interventions to equip all health professionals with prehabilitation knowledge to enable interdisciplinary prehabilitation services to be developed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tessa Renouf
- The Royal Marsden School, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Andrew Bates
- Clinical Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK; NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
| | - June F Davis
- Macmillan Cancer Support, London, UK; Allied Health Solutions, Hadlow, Kent, UK
| | - Sandy Jack
- Clinical Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK; NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK; Department of Perioperative Medicine, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Domínguez Tristancho JL. Organ preservation in rectal cancer, the desire of a new paradigm. Cir Esp 2022; 100:389-391. [PMID: 35525484 DOI: 10.1016/j.cireng.2021.07.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2021] [Accepted: 07/31/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- José Luis Domínguez Tristancho
- Unidad de Coloproctología y Terapia Celular, Servicio de Cirugía General y del Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Universitario Fundación, Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Impact of Age on Multimodality Treatment and Survival in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Patients. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14112741. [PMID: 35681721 PMCID: PMC9179565 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14112741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2022] [Revised: 05/29/2022] [Accepted: 05/30/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Optimal treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer is neoadjuvant (chemo)radiation followed by radical surgery. This is challenging in the aging population because of frequently concomitant comorbidity. We analyzed whether age below and above 70 years is associated with differences in treatment strategy and outcome in this population-based study. Methods: Data between 2008 and 2016 were extracted from the Netherlands Cancer Registry with follow-up until 2021. Differences in therapy, referral and outcome were analyzed using χ2 tests, multivariable logistic regression and relative survival analysis. Results: In total, 6524 locally advanced rectal cancer patients were included. A greater proportion of patients <70 years underwent resection compared to older patients (89% vs. 71%). Patients ≥70 years were more likely treated with neoadjuvant radiotherapy (OR 3.4, 95% CI 2.61−4.52), than with chemoradiation (OR 0.3, 95% CI 0.23−0.37) and less often referred to higher volume hospitals for resection (OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.51−0.87). Five-year relative survival after resection following neoadjuvant therapy was comparable and higher for both patients <70 years and ≥70 years (82% and 77%) than after resection only. Resection only was associated with worse survival in the elderly compared to younger patients (56% vs. 75%). Conclusion: Elderly patients with locally advanced rectal cancer received less intensive treatment and were less often referred to higher volume hospitals for surgery. Relative survival was good and comparable after optimal treatment in both age groups. Effort is necessary to improve guideline adherence, and multimodal strategies should be tailored to age, comorbidity and performance status.
Collapse
|
16
|
The Role of Prehabilitation in Modern Esophagogastric Cancer Surgery: A Comprehensive Review. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14092096. [PMID: 35565226 PMCID: PMC9102916 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14092096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2022] [Accepted: 04/20/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Surgery is the only potentially curative treatment option for esophagogastric cancer. Although esophagectomy/gastrectomy remains associated with major surgical trauma and significant morbidity. Prehabilitation has emerged as a novel strategy to improve postoperative outcomes by preparing patients for a surgery-associated physiological challenge. We discuss current knowledge and the results of studies on the role of prehabilitation in esophagogastric cancer surgery. Abstract Esophagogastric cancer is among the most common malignancies worldwide. Surgery with or without neoadjuvant therapy is the only potentially curative treatment option. Although esophagogastric resections remain associated with major surgical trauma and significant postoperative morbidity. Prehabilitation has emerged as a novel strategy to improve clinical outcomes by optimizing physical and psychological status before major surgery through exercise and nutritional and psychological interventions. Current prehabilitation programs may be unimodal, including only one intervention, or multimodal, combining the benefits of different types of interventions. However, it still is an investigational treatment option mostly limited to clinical trials. In this comprehensive review, we summarize the current evidence for the role of prehabilitation in modern esophagogastric cancer surgery. The available studies are very heterogeneous in design, type of interventions, and measured outcomes. Yet, all of them confirm at least some positive effects of prehabilitation in terms of improved physical performance, nutritional status, quality of life, or even reduced postoperative morbidity. However, the optimal interventions for prehabilitation remain unclear; thus, they cannot be standardized and widely adopted. Future studies on multimodal prehabilitation are necessary to develop optimal programs for patients with esophagogastric cancer.
Collapse
|
17
|
Shovel L, Morkane C. Prehabilitation for Vascular Surgery Patients: Challenges and Opportunities. Can J Cardiol 2022; 38:645-653. [PMID: 35240251 DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2022.02.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2021] [Revised: 01/24/2022] [Accepted: 02/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Global demand for major surgery is rising as a consequence of a growing, ageing population and clinically applicable approaches to perioperative risk reduction have never been needed more. Prehabilitation aims to optimise aerobic capacity and address modifiable risk factors prior to surgery to improve postoperative outcomes. Given the inherently high-risk nature of vascular surgery and the frequently high-acuity, frail, vascular surgical population, the potential to introduce an intervention into the surgical pathway that may reduce postoperative complications cannot be overlooked. The aim of this article is to examine the current evidence base for prehabilitation in patients awaiting vascular surgery, and to summarise the potential benefits, pitfalls, and practicalities of this emerging perioperative intervention. There is a paucity of high-quality research specifically aimed at prehabilitation for patients undergoing vascular surgery, both peripheral and aortic, making it difficult to draw definitive conclusions upon which to base a change in practice. Currently, evidence is taken from small, often single-centre heterogenous studies that vary significantly from each other, meaning that the optimal exercise regimen for patients awaiting vascular surgery has yet to be defined. Establishing the impact of prehabilitation on outcomes for vascular patients is important as the effectiveness of preoperative exercise training is likely to vary between surgical interventions and patient populations. However, extrapolation from other cohorts is possible and indeed forms the basis of many current prehabilitation programmes. Given the success of prehabilitation in other surgical groups, it has potential to become an important future research target for patients awaiting vascular surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louisa Shovel
- Royal Free Perioperative Research, Department of Anaesthesia, Royal Free Hospital, Pond Street, London, UK, NW3 2QG.
| | - Clare Morkane
- Royal Free Perioperative Research, Department of Anaesthesia, Royal Free Hospital, Pond Street, London, UK, NW3 2QG
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Orange ST, Jordan AR, Odell A, Kavanagh O, Hicks KM, Eaglen T, Todryk S, Saxton JM. Acute aerobic exercise-conditioned serum reduces colon cancer cell proliferation through IL-6-induced regulation of DNA damage in vitro. Int J Cancer 2022; 151:265-274. [PMID: 35213038 PMCID: PMC9314683 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.33982] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2021] [Revised: 01/26/2022] [Accepted: 02/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
Epidemiological evidence shows that regular physical activity is associated with reduced risk of primary and recurrent colon cancer. However, the underlying mechanisms of action are poorly understood. We evaluated the effects of stimulating a human colon cancer cell line (LoVo) with human serum collected before and after an acute exercise bout vs non-exercise control serum on cancer cell proliferation. We also measured exercise-induced changes in serum cytokines and intracellular protein expression to explore potential biological mechanisms. Blood samples were collected from 16 men with lifestyle risk factors for colon cancer (age ≥ 50 years; body mass index ≥25 kg/m2 ; physically inactive) before and immediately after an acute bout of moderate-intensity aerobic interval exercise (6 x 5 min intervals at 60% heart rate reserve) and a non-exercise control condition. Stimulating LoVo cells with serum obtained immediately after exercise reduced cancer cell proliferation compared with control (-5.7%; P = 0.002). This was accompanied by a decrease in LoVo cell γ-H2AX expression (-24.6%; P = 0.029), indicating a reduction in DNA damage. Acute exercise also increased serum IL-6 (24.6%, P = 0.002). Furthermore, stimulating LoVo cells with recombinant IL-6 reduced γ-H2AX expression (β = -22.7%; P < 0.001) and cell proliferation (β = -5.3%; P < 0.001) in a linear dose-dependent manner, mimicking the effect of exercise. These findings suggest that the systemic responses to acute aerobic exercise inhibit colon cancer cell proliferation in vitro, and this may be driven by IL-6-induced regulation of DNA damage and repair. This mechanism of action may partly underlie epidemiological associations linking regular physical activity with reduced colon cancer risk. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel T Orange
- School of Biomedical, Nutritional and Sport Sciences, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.,Newcastle University Centre for Cancer, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Alistair R Jordan
- School of Science, Technology and Health, York St John University, York, UK
| | - Adam Odell
- School of Science, Technology and Health, York St John University, York, UK
| | - Owen Kavanagh
- School of Science, Technology and Health, York St John University, York, UK
| | - Kirsty M Hicks
- Department of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Northumberland Building, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Tristan Eaglen
- Department of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Northumberland Building, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Stephen Todryk
- Department of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Ellison Building, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - John M Saxton
- Department of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Northumberland Building, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.,Department of Sport, Health and Exercise Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Hull, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Hannan E, Kelly ME, Fahy MR, Winter DC. Prehabilitation in rectal surgery: a narrative review. Int J Colorectal Dis 2022; 37:293-299. [PMID: 35006332 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-021-04092-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/29/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
AIM Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACRT) can make decompensated patients more vulnerable prior to rectal surgery. Prehabilitation is an intervention which enhances functional capacity to withstand the stress of surgery. The aim of this review was to evaluate the impact of prehabilitation for patients undergoing rectal surgery on physical fitness and clinical outcomes and to establish feasibility of prehabilitation. METHODS An analysis of the literature was conducted of PubMed, the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE and ScienceDirect. Articles were initially included based on their title and abstracts reviewed. Full-text copies of those selected were obtained for confirmation of inclusion. RESULTS Eight studies were included. Heterogenicity was observed in the structure of exercise programmes. Improvements in physical fitness were observed in six studies. One study demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in quality of life. The prehabilitation programmes were shown to be feasible, with high completion rates. No adverse events were reported. There was limited data regarding the impact of prehabilitation on postoperative outcomes. CONCLUSION Current evidence on prehabilitation in rectal surgery has considerable heterogenicity in both structure of programmes and outcome measures. Standardisation is required for future evaluation of the impact on outcomes. A trimodal approach of exercise, nutritional and psychological interventions has been employed in similar programmes, and should be used in rectal surgery. The intervention should be tailored to the patient and environment. This review highlights the benefits, safety and feasibility of prehabilitation and provides a platform for consensus-building for international trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Hannan
- Department of Surgery, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin 4, Ireland.
| | - M E Kelly
- Department of Surgery, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin 4, Ireland
| | - M R Fahy
- Department of Surgery, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin 4, Ireland
| | - D C Winter
- Department of Surgery, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin 4, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Crozier A, Watson PM, Graves LEF, George K, Naylor L, Green DJ, Rosenberg M, Jones H. Clinical exercise provision in the UK: comparison of staff job titles, roles and qualifications across five specialised exercise services. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med 2022; 8:e001152. [PMID: 35136656 PMCID: PMC8788312 DOI: 10.1136/bmjsem-2021-001152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives In the UK, the National Health Service long-term plan advocates exercise as a key component of clinical services, but there is no clearly defined workforce to deliver the plan. We aimed to provide an overview of current UK clinical exercise services, focusing on exercise staff job titles, roles and qualifications across cardiovascular, respiratory, stroke, falls and cancer services. Methods Clinical exercise services were identified electronically between May 2020 and September 2020 using publicly available information from clinical commissioning groups, national health boards and published audit data. Data relating to staff job titles, roles, qualifications and exercise delivery were collected via electronic records and telephone/email contact with service providers. Results Data were obtained for 731 of 890 eligible clinical services (216 cardiac, 162 respiratory, 129 stroke, 117 falls, 107 cancer). Cardiac rehabilitation services provided both clinical (phase III) and community (phase IV) exercise interventions delivered by physiotherapists, exercise physiologists (exercise specific BSc/MSc) and exercise instructors (vocationally qualified with or without BSc/MSc). Respiratory, stroke and falls services provided a clinical exercise intervention only, mostly delivered by physiotherapists and occupational therapists. Cancer services provided a community exercise service only, delivered by vocationally qualified exercise instructors. Job titles of ‘exercise physiologists’ (n=115) bore little alignment to their qualifications, with a large heterogeneity across services. Conclusion In the UK, clinical exercise services job titles, roles and qualifications were inconsistent. Regulation of exercise job titles and roles is required to remove the current disparities in this area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony Crozier
- Sport & Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK
| | - Paula Mary Watson
- Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK
| | - Lee E F Graves
- Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK
| | - Keith George
- RISES, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK
| | - Louise Naylor
- School of Sport Science, Exercise and Health, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Daniel J Green
- School of Sport Science, Exercise and Health, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Michael Rosenberg
- Sport Science, Exercise and Health, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Helen Jones
- Sport & Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Watson A, Wilkinson TMA, Freeman A. Evidence Around the Impact of Pulmonary Rehabilitation and Exercise on Redox Status in COPD: A Systematic Review. Front Sports Act Living 2021; 3:782590. [PMID: 34901852 PMCID: PMC8664411 DOI: 10.3389/fspor.2021.782590] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2021] [Accepted: 10/26/2021] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Oxidative stress is increasingly recognized as a significant factor in the pathogenesis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Pulmonary rehabilitation, a major component of which is prescribed exercise, is essential in COPD care. Regular exercise has been proposed to increase antioxidant defenses and overall enhance the ability of the body to counteract oxidative stress. However, the mechanisms through which it improves COPD outcomes remain unclear. Objectives: We aimed to appraise the current evidence around the impact of pulmonary rehabilitation on redox status, compared with other exercise interventions, to gain an understanding of optimal exercise interventions to modify this pathophysiological mechanism. Methods: We performed a systematic review through searching CENTRAL, MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Results were independently reviewed and relevant studies were selected by two independent assessors. Studies were assessed by two independent people using the modified RoB 2 tool and discrepancies were resolved through discussion. Results: We identified 1,710 records and 1,117 records after duplicate removal. Six studies were included in the final analysis. The evidence available was low quality and four studies had high risk of bias and two studies had unclear risk of bias. Studies were small (15–56 participants); only two included details of randomization and patient cohorts were of varying ages and poorly described. Differences in smoking status and previous exercise levels, which are known to impact redox status, were not well documented. Studies were not standardized and used different exercise doses and measured different outcomes. One study reported lower malondialdehyde levels, a marker of lipid peroxidation, after pulmonary rehabilitation, compared with control. However, one study saw no difference following whole-body vibration training and another study showed higher malondialdehyde levels following supervised modified arm swing exercise compared with control. Conclusion: Understanding the impact of exercise on oxidative stress in COPD could lead to tailored exercise programs and modification of pathological mechanisms. However, we identify a lack of high-quality evidence to determine this. Larger, standardized, and high quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are essential, which use carefully clinically characterized and controlled cohorts to determine the relative impact of different exercise interventions on redox status to guide COPD management. We propose an idealized RCT design, which could be used to try and meet this need.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alastair Watson
- Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.,National Institute for Health Research Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom.,College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Tom M A Wilkinson
- Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.,National Institute for Health Research Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Anna Freeman
- Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.,National Institute for Health Research Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Physical activity levels after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: one-year follow-up. BMC Public Health 2021; 21:2270. [PMID: 34903207 PMCID: PMC8667409 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-12311-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2021] [Accepted: 11/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Overall survival rates after rectal cancer have increased. Therefore, functional outcomes rightly deserve more interest. The aims of this study were to assess progression in total, sports, occupational and household physical activity levels of rectal cancer survivors, from preoperatively to 12 months after surgery/stoma closure and to explore predictive factors. Methods Multi-center prospective study with 125 patients who underwent low anterior resection for rectal cancer. The Flemish Physical Activity Computerized Questionnaire was completed concerning all physical activity levels at baseline (past preoperative year) and at 1, 4, 6 and 12 months after surgery/stoma closure. At these timepoints, questionnaires (LARS−/ COREFO-questionnaire) regarding bowel symptoms were also filled out. Results were analyzed using linear mixed models for repeated measures. Results Total physical activity levels up to 12 months remained significantly lower than preoperative. Occupational and sports physical activity levels remained significantly lower until 6 and 4 months postoperative, respectively. Predictive factors for decreased physical activity levels at a specific timepoint were: younger age and no stoma (total physical activity, 1 month), low/mid rectal tumor, no stoma, non-employed status (total, 4 months), higher COREFO-scores (occupational, 4 months) and non-employed status (total, 12 months). At all timepoints, lower COREFO-scores were associated with higher total physical activity levels; male gender and lower educational levels with higher occupational levels; younger age, normal BMI, employed status and adjuvant therapy with higher sports levels; and female gender, lower educational level and unemployed status with higher household levels. Conclusions One year after rectal cancer treatment, total physical activity levels were still not recovered. Rectal cancer patients, especially those at risk for decreased physical activity levels and with major bowel complaints, should be identified and guided to increase their activities. Trial registration This trial has been registered at Netherlands Trial Register (NTR6383, 23/01/2017).
Collapse
|
23
|
Freeman A, Cellura D, Minnion M, Fernandez BO, Spalluto CM, Levett D, Bates A, Wallis T, Watson A, Jack S, Staples KJ, Grocott MPW, Feelisch M, Wilkinson TMA. Exercise Training Induces a Shift in Extracellular Redox Status with Alterations in the Pulmonary and Systemic Redox Landscape in Asthma. Antioxidants (Basel) 2021; 10:antiox10121926. [PMID: 34943027 PMCID: PMC8750917 DOI: 10.3390/antiox10121926] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2021] [Revised: 11/24/2021] [Accepted: 11/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Redox dysregulation and oxidative stress have been implicated in asthma pathogenesis. Exercise interventions improve symptoms and reduce inflammation in asthma patients, but the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. We hypothesized that a personalised exercise intervention would improve asthma control by reducing lung inflammation through modulation of local and systemic reactive species interactions, thereby increasing antioxidant capacity. We combined deep redox metabolomic profiling with clinical assessment in an exploratory cohort of six female patients with symptomatic asthma and studied their responses to a metabolically targeted exercise intervention over 12 weeks. Plasma antioxidant capacity and circulating nitrite levels increased following the intervention (p = 0.028) and lowered the ratio of reduced to oxidised glutathione (p = 0.029); this was accompanied by improvements in physical fitness (p = 0.046), symptoms scores (p = 0.020), quality of life (p = 0.046), lung function (p = 0.028), airway hyperreactivity (p = 0.043), and eosinophilic inflammation (p = 0.007). Increased physical fitness correlated with improved plasma antioxidant capacity (p = 0.019), peak oxygen uptake and nitrite changes (p = 0.005), the latter also associated with reductions in peripheral blood eosinophil counts (p = 0.038). Thus, increases in “redox resilience” may underpin the clinical benefits of exercise in asthma. An improved understanding of exercise-induced alterations in redox regulation offers opportunities for greater treatment personalisation and identification of new treatment targets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Freeman
- Clinical and Experimental Sciences and Southampton Centre for Biomedical Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK; (D.C.); (M.M.); (B.O.F.); (C.M.S.); (D.L.); (A.B.); (T.W.); (A.W.); (S.J.); (K.J.S.); (M.P.W.G.); (M.F.); (T.M.A.W.)
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Tremona Road, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
- Correspondence:
| | - Doriana Cellura
- Clinical and Experimental Sciences and Southampton Centre for Biomedical Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK; (D.C.); (M.M.); (B.O.F.); (C.M.S.); (D.L.); (A.B.); (T.W.); (A.W.); (S.J.); (K.J.S.); (M.P.W.G.); (M.F.); (T.M.A.W.)
| | - Magdalena Minnion
- Clinical and Experimental Sciences and Southampton Centre for Biomedical Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK; (D.C.); (M.M.); (B.O.F.); (C.M.S.); (D.L.); (A.B.); (T.W.); (A.W.); (S.J.); (K.J.S.); (M.P.W.G.); (M.F.); (T.M.A.W.)
| | - Bernadette O. Fernandez
- Clinical and Experimental Sciences and Southampton Centre for Biomedical Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK; (D.C.); (M.M.); (B.O.F.); (C.M.S.); (D.L.); (A.B.); (T.W.); (A.W.); (S.J.); (K.J.S.); (M.P.W.G.); (M.F.); (T.M.A.W.)
| | - Cosma Mirella Spalluto
- Clinical and Experimental Sciences and Southampton Centre for Biomedical Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK; (D.C.); (M.M.); (B.O.F.); (C.M.S.); (D.L.); (A.B.); (T.W.); (A.W.); (S.J.); (K.J.S.); (M.P.W.G.); (M.F.); (T.M.A.W.)
| | - Denny Levett
- Clinical and Experimental Sciences and Southampton Centre for Biomedical Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK; (D.C.); (M.M.); (B.O.F.); (C.M.S.); (D.L.); (A.B.); (T.W.); (A.W.); (S.J.); (K.J.S.); (M.P.W.G.); (M.F.); (T.M.A.W.)
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Tremona Road, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Andrew Bates
- Clinical and Experimental Sciences and Southampton Centre for Biomedical Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK; (D.C.); (M.M.); (B.O.F.); (C.M.S.); (D.L.); (A.B.); (T.W.); (A.W.); (S.J.); (K.J.S.); (M.P.W.G.); (M.F.); (T.M.A.W.)
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Tremona Road, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Timothy Wallis
- Clinical and Experimental Sciences and Southampton Centre for Biomedical Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK; (D.C.); (M.M.); (B.O.F.); (C.M.S.); (D.L.); (A.B.); (T.W.); (A.W.); (S.J.); (K.J.S.); (M.P.W.G.); (M.F.); (T.M.A.W.)
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Tremona Road, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Alastair Watson
- Clinical and Experimental Sciences and Southampton Centre for Biomedical Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK; (D.C.); (M.M.); (B.O.F.); (C.M.S.); (D.L.); (A.B.); (T.W.); (A.W.); (S.J.); (K.J.S.); (M.P.W.G.); (M.F.); (T.M.A.W.)
| | - Sandy Jack
- Clinical and Experimental Sciences and Southampton Centre for Biomedical Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK; (D.C.); (M.M.); (B.O.F.); (C.M.S.); (D.L.); (A.B.); (T.W.); (A.W.); (S.J.); (K.J.S.); (M.P.W.G.); (M.F.); (T.M.A.W.)
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Tremona Road, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Karl J. Staples
- Clinical and Experimental Sciences and Southampton Centre for Biomedical Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK; (D.C.); (M.M.); (B.O.F.); (C.M.S.); (D.L.); (A.B.); (T.W.); (A.W.); (S.J.); (K.J.S.); (M.P.W.G.); (M.F.); (T.M.A.W.)
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Tremona Road, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Michael P. W. Grocott
- Clinical and Experimental Sciences and Southampton Centre for Biomedical Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK; (D.C.); (M.M.); (B.O.F.); (C.M.S.); (D.L.); (A.B.); (T.W.); (A.W.); (S.J.); (K.J.S.); (M.P.W.G.); (M.F.); (T.M.A.W.)
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Tremona Road, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Martin Feelisch
- Clinical and Experimental Sciences and Southampton Centre for Biomedical Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK; (D.C.); (M.M.); (B.O.F.); (C.M.S.); (D.L.); (A.B.); (T.W.); (A.W.); (S.J.); (K.J.S.); (M.P.W.G.); (M.F.); (T.M.A.W.)
| | - Tom M. A. Wilkinson
- Clinical and Experimental Sciences and Southampton Centre for Biomedical Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK; (D.C.); (M.M.); (B.O.F.); (C.M.S.); (D.L.); (A.B.); (T.W.); (A.W.); (S.J.); (K.J.S.); (M.P.W.G.); (M.F.); (T.M.A.W.)
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Tremona Road, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
West MA, Jack S, Grocott MPW. Prehabilitation before surgery: Is it for all patients? Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2021; 35:507-516. [PMID: 34801213 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpa.2021.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2021] [Accepted: 01/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the role of prehabilitation interventions in adult patients before elective major surgery. RECENT FINDINGS Exercise training before elective adult major surgery is feasible and safe. Efficacy has been determined but the clinical effectiveness remains uncertain. Early data suggest a reduction in morbidity, length of stay, and an improvement in the quality of life. Nutritional and psychological interventions are less well evaluated, and when they are, it is often in combination with exercise interventions as part of multimodal prehabilitation. SUMMARY Studies evaluating multimodal prehabilitation interventions before elective major surgery in adults are producing encouraging early results, but definitive clinical effectiveness is currently very limited. Future research should focus on refining interventions, exploring mechanisms, establishing minimum dosage, interrogating interactions between therapies, and urgent implementation of large-scale clinical effectiveness studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Malcolm A West
- School of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK; University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK; NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Southampton, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, UK; Anaesthesia, Perioperative and Critical Care Research Group, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust/University of Southampton, Southampton, UK; Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Sandy Jack
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK; NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Southampton, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, UK; Anaesthesia, Perioperative and Critical Care Research Group, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust/University of Southampton, Southampton, UK; Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Michael P W Grocott
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK; NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Southampton, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, UK; Anaesthesia, Perioperative and Critical Care Research Group, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust/University of Southampton, Southampton, UK; Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
SupPoRtive Exercise Programmes for Accelerating REcovery after major ABdominal Cancer surgery trial (PREPARE-ABC): Pilot phase of a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Colorectal Dis 2021; 23:3008-3022. [PMID: 34355484 DOI: 10.1111/codi.15856] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2021] [Revised: 07/08/2021] [Accepted: 07/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
AIM PREPARE-ABC is a pragmatic multicentre randomised controlled trial including an internal pilot designed to assess the clinical and cost-effectiveness of pre- and postoperative exercise in relation to short- and longer-term postoperative recovery outcomes in colorectal cancer patients undergoing surgical resection. Here, we report on internal pilot phase data for the first 200 patients randomised to the trial, which included prespecified stop-go criteria used to inform the decision to progress to the fully powered trial by the funder. METHODS Eligible and consenting patients are randomly assigned (1:1:1) to hospital-supervised exercise, home-supported exercise or treatment as usual (TAU). Randomisation is concealed but clinical teams providing treatment and participants are unmasked. Primary outcomes are 30-day morbidity (Clavien-Dindo) and 12-month health-related quality of life (Medical Outcomes Study Health Questionnaire). Here, we present findings from the prespecified pilot phase which assessed feasibility of site set up, recruitment, adherence and acceptability of trial processes to patients and site staff. RESULTS Between 9 November 2016 and 18 May 2018, 18 sites were set up, with 200 patients randomised to either hospital-supervised exercise (68), home-supported exercise (69) or treatment as usual (TAU) (63). Across the groups, 19 patients did not proceed to surgery or withdrew and 52% experienced a complication. Over half of the participants (57%) in the hospital-supervised group attended ≥6 preoperative sessions and 50% attended ≥5 monthly postoperative exercise "booster sessions". In the home-supported group, 70% patients engaged with ≥2 telephone support sessions in the preoperative phase and 80% engaged in ≥5 monthly telephone support "booster sessions". Adverse events were reported by 22 patients and three patients reported a serious adverse event. The majority of complications were Clavien-Dindo grades 1-2; however, 16 patients experienced one or more Clavien-Dindo grade 3-4 complication(s). CONCLUSIONS Results of the internal pilot phase confirm the feasibility of site set-up and patient recruitment, representativeness of the sample population and adequate adherence to hospital-supervised and home-supported exercise. On the basis of these positive results, progression to the fully-powered trial was authorised by the funder.
Collapse
|
26
|
Murdoch J, Varley A, McCulloch J, Jones M, Thomas LB, Clark A, Stirling S, Turner D, Swart AM, Dresser K, Howard G, Saxton J, Hernon J. Implementing supportive exercise interventions in the colorectal cancer care pathway: a process evaluation of the PREPARE-ABC randomised controlled trial. BMC Cancer 2021; 21:1137. [PMID: 34688257 PMCID: PMC8542291 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-08880-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2021] [Accepted: 10/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background A colorectal resection is standard treatment for patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). However, the procedure results in significant post-operative mortality and reduced quality of life. Maximising pre-operative cardiopulmonary fitness could improve post-surgical outcomes. PREPARE-ABC is a multi-centre, three-armed, randomised controlled trial investigating the effects of exercise interventions, with motivational support on short and longer-term recovery outcomes in CRC patients undergoing major lower-gastrointestinal surgery. The trial included an internal pilot phase with parallel process evaluation. The aim of the process evaluation was to optimise intervention implementation for the main trial. Methods Mixed methods process evaluation conducted in 14 UK hospitals between November 2016 and March 2018. Data included a site profile questionnaire and telephone scoping interview with hospital staff, 34 qualitative observations of standard care and 14 observations of intervention delivery, 13 semi-structured interviews with healthcare professionals (HCPs) and 28 semi-structured interviews with patients. Data analysis focused on describing intervention delivery within each arm, assessing fidelity, acceptability and how variation in delivery was linked to contextual characteristics. Results Standard care exercise advice was typically limited to maintaining current activity levels, and with lead-in time to surgery affecting whether any exercise advice was provided. Variation in HCP capacity affected the ability of colorectal units to deploy staff to deliver the intervention. Patients’ exercise history and motivation prior to surgery influenced HCP perceptions and delivery of the motivational components. Observations indicated a high level of fidelity to delivery of the exercise interventions. All but one of the 28 interviewed patients reported increasing exercise levels as a result of receiving the intervention, with most finding them motivational and greatly valuing the enhanced level of social support (versus standard care) provided by staff. Conclusion Hospital-supervised and home-based exercise interventions were highly acceptable for most patients undergoing surgery for CRC. Delivery of pre- and post-operative exercise within the CRC care pathway is feasible but systematic planning of capacity and resources is required to optimise implementation. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-021-08880-8.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jamie Murdoch
- Department of Population Health Sciences, King's College London, London, SE1 9NH, UK.
| | - Anna Varley
- School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK
| | - Jane McCulloch
- School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK
| | - Megan Jones
- Norwich Clinical Trials Unit, Norwich Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Laura B Thomas
- School of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Tom Reilly Building, Byrom Street, Liverpool, L3 3AF, UK
| | - Allan Clark
- Norwich Clinical Trials Unit, Norwich Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Susan Stirling
- Norwich Clinical Trials Unit, Norwich Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - David Turner
- Norwich Clinical Trials Unit, Norwich Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Ann Marie Swart
- Norwich Clinical Trials Unit, Norwich Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Kerry Dresser
- Norwich Clinical Trials Unit, Norwich Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Gregory Howard
- Norwich Clinical Trials Unit, Norwich Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - John Saxton
- Department of Sport, Health and Exercise Science, University of Hull, Hull, HU6 7RX, UK
| | - James Hernon
- Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Colney Lane, Norwich, NR4 7UY, UK
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Jones H, George KP, Scott A, Buckley JP, Watson PM, Oxborough DL, Thijssen DH, Graves LEF, Whyte GP, McGregor G, Naylor LH, Rosenberg M, Askew CD, Green DJ. Charter to establish clinical exercise physiology as a recognised allied health profession in the UK: a call to action. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med 2021; 7:e001158. [PMID: 34631147 PMCID: PMC8458347 DOI: 10.1136/bmjsem-2021-001158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The UK population is growing, ageing and becoming increasingly inactive and unfit. Personalised and targeted exercise interventions are beneficial for ageing and the management of chronic and complex conditions. Increasing the uptake of effective exercise and physical activity (PA) interventions is vital to support a healthier society and decrease healthcare costs. Current strategies for exercise and PA at a population level mostly involve self-directed exercise pathways, delivered largely via the fitness industry. Even for those who opt-in and manage to achieve the current recommendations regarding minimum PA, this generic ‘one-size-fits-all’ approach often fails to demonstrate meaningful physiological and health benefits. Personalised exercise prescription and appropriate exercise testing, monitoring and progression of interventions for individuals with chronic disease should be provided by appropriately trained and recognised exercise healthcare professionals, educated in the cognate disciplines of exercise science (eg, physiology, biomechanics, motor control, psychology). This workforce has operated for >20 years in the Australian public and private healthcare systems. Accredited exercise physiologists (AEPs) are recognised allied health professionals, with demonstrable health and economic benefits. AEPs have knowledge of the risks and benefits of distinct forms of exercise, skills in the personalised prescription and optimal delivery of exercise, and competencies to support sustained PA behavioural change, based on the established scientific evidence. In this charter, we propose a road map for the training, accreditation and promotion of a clinical exercise physiology profession in the UK.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen Jones
- Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK
| | - Keith P George
- Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK
| | - Andrew Scott
- School of Sport, Health and Exercise Science, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK
| | - John P Buckley
- Centre for Active Living, University Centre Shrewsbury, University of Chester, Shrewsbury, UK
| | - Paula M Watson
- Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK
| | - David L Oxborough
- Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK
| | - Dick H Thijssen
- Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.,Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Radboud, The Netherlands
| | - Lee E F Graves
- Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK
| | - Greg P Whyte
- Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK
| | - Gordon McGregor
- University of Coventry, Coventry, UK.,University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK
| | - Louise H Naylor
- School of Human Sciences (Exercise and Sport Sciences), The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Michael Rosenberg
- School of Human Sciences (Exercise and Sport Sciences), The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Christopher D Askew
- School of Health and Behavioural Sciences, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sunshine Coast, Queensland, Australia.,Sunshine Coast Health Institute, Sunshine Coast Hospital and Health Service, Sunshine Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Daniel J Green
- School of Human Sciences (Exercise and Sport Sciences), The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
SupPoRtive Exercise Programmes for Accelerating REcovery after major ABdominal Cancer surgery trial (PREPARE-ABC): Study protocol for a multicentre randomized controlled trial. Colorectal Dis 2021; 23:2750-2760. [PMID: 34245094 DOI: 10.1111/codi.15805] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2021] [Revised: 04/13/2021] [Accepted: 04/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Exercise programmes can increase cardiopulmonary reserve and functional capacity prior to surgery and can improve clinical, functional and survival outcomes after a colorectal cancer diagnosis. However, the impact of pre- and postoperative exercise on postoperative recovery outcomes and longer-term health-related quality of life are unknown; thus, there is a need for high-quality randomized controlled trials. METHOD SupPoRtive Exercise Programmes for Accelerating REcovery after major Abdominal Cancer surgery (PREPARE-ABC) is a three-arm multicentre randomized controlled trial with internal pilot. The primary objective is to assess the effects of pre- and postoperative exercise on surgical outcomes and longer-term health-related quality of life in cancer patients undergoing colorectal resection. The aim of PREPARE-ABC is to randomize 1146 patients at the individual level (1:1:1) to hospital-supervised exercise, home-supported exercise or treatment as usual. The primary outcomes are short-term (30-day) morbidity, assessed using the Clavien-Dindo classification, and longer-term health-related quality of life, assessed using the Medical Outcomes Study Health Questionnaire (36-item Short-Form Survey [SF-36]). Secondary outcomes include cardiopulmonary fitness, physical activity behaviour change, psychological health status and cost-effectiveness. A process evaluation of intervention delivery and usual care also will be undertaken. DISCUSSION This is the first UK-based definitive randomized controlled trial to investigate the effects of pre- and postoperative exercise on short-term postoperative health outcomes and longer-term health-related quality of life in colorectal cancer patients. The trial will yield robust clinical and cost-effectiveness data to underpin clinical guidance on how exercise programmes should be implemented in the routine management of patients undergoing major colorectal cancer surgery.
Collapse
|
29
|
Domínguez Tristancho JL. Organ preservation in rectal cancer, the desire of a new paradigm. Cir Esp 2021; 100:S0009-739X(21)00261-X. [PMID: 34544563 DOI: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2021.07.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2021] [Revised: 07/28/2021] [Accepted: 07/31/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- José Luis Domínguez Tristancho
- Unidad de Coloproctología y Terapia Celular, Servicio de Cirugía General y del Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, España.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Fawcett WJ, Klein AA. Anaesthesia and peri-operative medicine over the next 25 years. Anaesthesia 2021; 76:1416-1420. [PMID: 34333762 DOI: 10.1111/anae.15552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- W J Fawcett
- Department of Anaesthesia, Royal Surrey County NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, UK
| | - A A Klein
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Royal Papworth Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Thomsen SN, Mørup ST, Mau-Sørensen M, Sillesen M, Lahart I, Christensen JF. Perioperative exercise training for patients with gastrointestinal cancer undergoing surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 2021; 47:3028-3039. [PMID: 34294466 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2021] [Revised: 06/16/2021] [Accepted: 07/10/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Exercise training is emerging as a supportive treatment strategy in surgical oncology, but its effects remain uncertain in patients with gastrointestinal cancer. The primary objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the effects of perioperative exercise training on gastrointestinal cancer-specific mortality, recurrence, and surgical outcomes (postoperative complications, hospitalization, surgical stress) in patients with gastrointestinal cancer. Randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials evaluating the effects of perioperative exercise training versus control in patients with GI cancer were eligible. MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, CINAHL, PEDro, and SPORTDiscus were systematically searched on June 20, 2020. Data were synthesized using random-effects meta-analyses. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool 2, and the certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE. Study selection, data extraction, risk of bias, and GRADE assessments were performed independently by two authors. Ten randomized controlled trials comprising 448 participants with gastrointestinal cancer were eligible. Meta-analyses indicated no statistical effects of exercise on postoperative complications (risk ratio: 1.11, 95% CI: 0.84; 1.47), readmissions (risk ratio: 2.76; 95% CI: 0.00, 9394.76), or postoperative length of stay (difference in means: -0.47, 95% CI: -17.2; 16.2 days). None of the eligible studies assessed gastrointestinal cancer-specific mortality or recurrence. Overall risk of bias was high or of some concerns in all studies, and the certainty of evidence was very low. The effects of perioperative exercise on cancer-specific and surgical outcomes are unknown in patients with gastrointestinal cancer due to lack of studies and very low certainty of evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Nørskov Thomsen
- Centre for Physical Activity Research, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - Stine Truel Mørup
- Centre for Physical Activity Research, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Morten Mau-Sørensen
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Martin Sillesen
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology and Transplantation, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; Center for Surgical Translational and Artificial Intelligence Research (CSTAR), Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ian Lahart
- Faculty of Health, Education, and Wellbeing, Institute of Human Sciences, University of Wolverhampton, Walsall Campus, Walsall, WS1 3BD, UK
| | - Jesper Frank Christensen
- Centre for Physical Activity Research, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Objective assessment of metabolism and guidance of ICU rehabilitation with cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Curr Opin Crit Care 2021; 27:390-398. [PMID: 33973897 DOI: 10.1097/mcc.0000000000000843] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Addressing the reduced quality of life that affects ICU survivors is the most pressing challenge in critical care medicine. In order to meet this challenge, we must translate lessons learnt from assessing and training athletes to the clinical population, utilizing measurable and targeted parameters obtained during cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET). RECENT FINDINGS Critical illness survivors demonstrate a persistent reduction in their physical and metabolic function. This manifests in reduced aerobic exercise capacity and metabolic inflexibility. CPET-guided targeted metabolic conditioning has proved beneficial in several clinical populations, including those undergoing high-risk surgery, and could be successfully applied to the rehabilitation of ICU survivors. SUMMARY CPET shows great promise in the guidance of rehabilitation in functionally limited ICU survivors. Parallels in the physiological response to exercise in athletes and clinical populations with the stress and consequences of critical illness must be investigated and ultimately applied to the burgeoning population of ICU survivors in order to treat the consequences of survival from critical illness.
Collapse
|
33
|
Parke SC, Ng A, Martone P, Gerber LH, Zucker DS, Engle J, Gupta E, Power K, Sokolof J, Shapar S, Bagay L, Becker BE, Langelier DM. Translating 2019 ACSM Cancer Exercise Recommendations for a Physiatric Practice: Derived Recommendations from an International Expert Panel. PM R 2021; 14:996-1009. [PMID: 34213826 DOI: 10.1002/pmrj.12664] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2020] [Revised: 04/27/2021] [Accepted: 06/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
In 2018, the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) reconvened an international, multi-disciplinary group of professionals to review pertinent published literature on exercise for people with cancer. The 2018 roundtable resulted in the publication of three articles in 2019. The three articles serve as an important update to the original ACSM Roundtable on Cancer, which convened in 2010. Although the focus of the three 2019 articles is on exercise, which is only one part of comprehensive cancer rehabilitation, the evidence presented in the 2019 ACSM articles has direct implications for physiatrists and other rehabilitation professionals who care for people with cancer. As such, the narrative review presented here has two primary objectives. First, we summarize the evidence within the three ACSM articles and interpret it within a familiar rehabilitation framework, namely the Dietz model of Cancer Rehabilitation, in order to facilitate implementation broadly within rehabilitation practice. Second, via expert consensus, we have tabulated relevant exercise recommendations for specific cancer populations at different points in the cancer care continuum and translated them into text, tables, and figures for ease of reference. Notably, the authors of this article are members of the Cancer Rehabilitation Physician Consortium (CRPC), a group of physicians who subspecialize in cancer rehabilitation medicine (CRM).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara C Parke
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Amy Ng
- Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation and Integrative Medicine, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Patrick Martone
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, MedStar National Rehabilitation Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Lynn H Gerber
- Medicine Service Line, Inova Health System, Falls Church, Virginia, USA
| | - David S Zucker
- Swedish Cancer Medicine Services, Swedish Cancer Institute Swedish Health Services, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Jessica Engle
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Ekta Gupta
- Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation and Integrative Medicine, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Katherine Power
- MedStar National Rehabilitation Network, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Jonas Sokolof
- Department of Rehabilitation, NYU-Langone Health and Rusk Rehabilitation, New York, New York, USA
| | - Sam Shapar
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Leslie Bagay
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.,HMH JFK Johnson Rehabilitation Institute, Edison, New Jersey, USA.,Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine, Nutley, New Jersey, USA
| | - Bruce E Becker
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - David Michael Langelier
- Cancer Rehabilitation and Survivorship, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Lambert JE, Hayes LD, Keegan TJ, Subar DA, Gaffney CJ. The Impact of Prehabilitation on Patient Outcomes in Hepatobiliary, Colorectal, and Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Surgery: A PRISMA-Accordant Meta-analysis. Ann Surg 2021; 274:70-77. [PMID: 33201129 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000004527] [Citation(s) in RCA: 74] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the impact of prehabilitation on hospital length of stay, functional capacity, complications, and mortality after surgery in patients with hepatobiliary, colorectal, and upper gastrointestinal cancer. BACKGROUND "Prehabilitation" encompasses exercise, nutrition, and psychosocial interventions to optimize health before surgery. The benefits of prehabilitation are ill-defined. METHODS Medline, Embase and Cochrane Databases were searched systematically for the terms "prehabilitation AND exercise," "perioperative care AND cancer surgery," and "colorectal AND hepatobiliary AND hepatopancreatobiliary AND esophagogastric AND recovery AND outcomes." Primary outcomes analyzed were hospital length of stay, functional capacity, significant postoperative complications (Clavien Dindo ≥ III), and mortality. A meta-analysis was conducted on the effect of all-modality prehabilitation for patients with colorectal, hepatopancreatobiliary and upper gastrointestinal cancer surgery using the raw mean difference, risk difference, and a random-effects model. RESULTS Three hundred and seventy seven original titles were identified. Fifteen studies (randomized controlled trials; n = 9 and uncontrolled trials; n = 6) were included in the meta-analysis. Prehabilitation reduced hospital length of stay by 1.78 days versus standard care (95% CI: -3.36, -0.20, P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in functional capacity with prehabilitation determined using the 6-minute walk test (P = 0.816) and no significant reduction in postoperative complications (P = 0.378) or mortality rates (P = 0.114). CONCLUSIONS Prehabilitation was associated with reduced hospital length of stay but had no effect on functional capacity, postoperative complications, or mortality rates. Thus, prehabilitation should be recommended to accelerate recovery from cancer surgery, demonstrated by reduced hospital length of stay.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joel E Lambert
- Lancaster Medical School, Health Innovation One, Sir John Fisher Drive, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4AT, United Kingdom
- East Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Blackburn BB2 3HH, United Kingdom
| | - Lawrence D Hayes
- School of Life and Health Sciences, University of West of Scotland, Blantyre G72 0LH, United Kingdom
| | - Thomas J Keegan
- Lancaster Medical School, Health Innovation One, Sir John Fisher Drive, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4AT, United Kingdom
| | - Daren A Subar
- East Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Blackburn BB2 3HH, United Kingdom
| | - Christopher J Gaffney
- Lancaster Medical School, Health Innovation One, Sir John Fisher Drive, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4AT, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Morielli AR, Usmani N, Boulé NG, Severin D, Tankel K, Joseph K, Nijjar T, Fairchild A, Courneya KS. Feasibility, Safety, and Preliminary Efficacy of Exercise During and After Neoadjuvant Rectal Cancer Treatment: A Phase II Randomized Controlled Trial. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2021; 20:216-226. [PMID: 34158253 DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2021.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2020] [Revised: 05/06/2021] [Accepted: 05/13/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neoadjuvant chemoradiation (NACRT) improves outcomes for patients with rectal cancer; however, there are dose-limiting toxicities and only a 15% to 27% pathologic complete response (pCR) rate. Exercise may help manage toxicities and improve treatment response, but feasibility and early efficacy have not been established. EXERT was a phase II trial designed to establish the feasibility and safety of exercise and provide the first evidence of efficacy. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with rectal cancer scheduled to receive NACRT were randomly assigned to usual care (n = 18) or exercise (n = 18) involving supervised exercise during NACRT and unsupervised exercise after NACRT. The primary outcome was cardiorespiratory fitness (VO2 peak). Clinical outcomes included treatment toxicities, treatment completion, and treatment response. RESULTS Median attendance at supervised exercise sessions during NACRT was 82%, and median self-reported exercise after NACRT was 90 min/wk. From baseline to post-NACRT, VO2 peak increased by 0.4 mL·kg-1·min-1 in the exercise group and decreased by 0.8 mL·kg-1·min-1 in the usual care group (P = .47). There were no significant differences between groups for grade 3/4 toxicities or treatment completion. Of 18 patients in the exercise group, 10 (56%) achieved pCR/near pCR compared with 3 of 17 (18%) in the usual care group (P = .020). CONCLUSION Exercise during and after NACRT is feasible for many patients with rectal cancer and may improve pCR despite limited fitness improvements. Larger trials are warranted to confirm if exercise is an effective intervention for improving treatment outcomes in this clinical setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andria R Morielli
- Faculty of Kinesiology, Sport, and Recreation, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Nawaid Usmani
- Department of Oncology, University of Alberta and Division of Radiation Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Normand G Boulé
- Faculty of Kinesiology, Sport, and Recreation, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Diane Severin
- Department of Oncology, University of Alberta and Division of Radiation Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Keith Tankel
- Department of Oncology, University of Alberta and Division of Radiation Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Kurian Joseph
- Department of Oncology, University of Alberta and Division of Radiation Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Tirath Nijjar
- Department of Oncology, University of Alberta and Division of Radiation Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Alysa Fairchild
- Department of Oncology, University of Alberta and Division of Radiation Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Kerry S Courneya
- Faculty of Kinesiology, Sport, and Recreation, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Molenaar CJL, Janssen L, van der Peet DL, Winter DC, Roumen RMH, Slooter GD. Conflicting Guidelines: A Systematic Review on the Proper Interval for Colorectal Cancer Treatment. World J Surg 2021; 45:2235-2250. [PMID: 33813632 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-021-06075-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Timely treatment for colorectal cancer (CRC) is a quality indicator in oncological care. However, patients with CRC might benefit more from preoperative optimization rather than rapid treatment initiation. The objectives of this study are (1) to determine the definition of the CRC treatment interval, (2) to study international recommendations regarding this interval and (3) to study whether length of the interval is associated with outcome. METHODS We performed a systematic search of the literature in June 2020 through MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane databases, complemented with a web search and a survey among colorectal surgeons worldwide. Full-text papers including subjects with CRC and a description of the treatment interval were included. RESULTS Definition of the treatment interval varies widely in published studies, especially due to different starting points of the interval. Date of diagnosis is often used as start of the interval, determined with date of pathological confirmation. The end of the interval is rather consistently determined with date of initiation of any primary treatment. Recommendations on the timeline of the treatment interval range between and within countries from two weeks between decision to treat and surgery, to treatment within seven weeks after pathological diagnosis. Finally, there is no decisive evidence that a longer treatment interval is associated with worse outcome. CONCLUSIONS The interval from diagnosis to treatment for CRC treatment could be used for prehabilitation to benefit patient recovery. It may be that this strategy is more beneficial than urgently proceeding with treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte J L Molenaar
- Department of Surgery, Máxima MC, De Run 4600, P.O. Box 7777, 5504 DB, Veldhoven, The Netherlands.
| | - Loes Janssen
- Department of Surgery, Máxima MC, De Run 4600, P.O. Box 7777, 5504 DB, Veldhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Donald L van der Peet
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Desmond C Winter
- Department of Surgery, St Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin, D04T6F4, Ireland
| | - Rudi M H Roumen
- Department of Surgery, Máxima MC, De Run 4600, P.O. Box 7777, 5504 DB, Veldhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Gerrit D Slooter
- Department of Surgery, Máxima MC, De Run 4600, P.O. Box 7777, 5504 DB, Veldhoven, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Halliday LJ, Doganay E, Wynter-Blyth VA, Hanna GB, Moorthy K. The Impact of Prehabilitation on Post-operative Outcomes in Oesophageal Cancer Surgery: a Propensity Score Matched Comparison. J Gastrointest Surg 2021; 25:2733-2741. [PMID: 33269459 PMCID: PMC8602132 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-020-04881-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2020] [Accepted: 11/10/2020] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients undergoing oesophageal cancer surgery are often frail with a high risk of post-operative complications. Prehabilitation has been shown to reduce post-operative complications in specific patient populations but evidence in oesophageal cancer patients is inconclusive. METHODS Between January 2016 and April 2019, all patients with resectable oesophageal cancer who underwent curative treatment at a specialist tertiary centre participated in a personalised, home-based, multimodal prehabilitation programme. Post-operative complications and hospital stay in this group were compared to a control sample. Propensity score matching was used to control for differences in baseline characteristics. RESULTS Seventy-two patients who completed prehabilitation and 39 control patients were studied; following propensity score matching, there were 38 subjects in each group. In comparison to matched controls, patients in the prehabilitation group had a lower incidence of post-operative pneumonia (prehabilitation = 26%; control = 66%; p = 0.001) and a shorter length of stay (prehabilitation = median 10 days, IQR 8-17 days; control = median 13 days, IQR 11-20 days; p = 0.018). On multivariate regression analysis, participation in prehabilitation was associated with a 77% lower incidence of post-operative pneumonia (OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.55 p = 0.001). There was no significant difference in the incidence of overall complications or severe complications. CONCLUSION Prehabilitation was associated with a lower incidence of post-operative pneumonia and shorter hospital length of stay following oesophagectomy. This model of home based, personalised, and supervised prehabilitation is effective and relevant to centralised cancer services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura J. Halliday
- grid.7445.20000 0001 2113 8111Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Emre Doganay
- grid.7445.20000 0001 2113 8111Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Venetia A. Wynter-Blyth
- grid.417895.60000 0001 0693 2181Oesophago-gastric cancer surgery unit, St Mary’s Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - George B. Hanna
- grid.7445.20000 0001 2113 8111Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Krishna Moorthy
- grid.7445.20000 0001 2113 8111Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Bundred JR, Kamarajah SK, Hammond JS, Wilson CH, Prentis J, Pandanaboyana S. Prehabilitation prior to surgery for pancreatic cancer: A systematic review. Pancreatology 2020; 20:1243-1250. [PMID: 32826168 DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2020.07.411] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2020] [Revised: 07/20/2020] [Accepted: 07/27/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Prehabilitation aims to improve fitness and outcomes of patients undergoing major surgery. This systematic review aimed to appraise current available evidence regarding the role of prehabilitation in patients undergoing oncological pancreatic resection. METHODS A systematic literature search of PUBMED, MEDLINE, EMBASE databases identified articles describing prehabilitation programmes before pancreatic resection for malignancy. Data collected included timing of prehabilitation, programme type, duration, adherence and post-operative outcome reporting. RESULTS Six studies, including 193 patients were included in the final analysis. Three studies included patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy followed by resection and 3 studies included patients undergoing upfront resection. Time from diagnosis to surgery ranged between 2 and 22 weeks across all studies. Two studies reported a professionally supervised exercise programme, and four described unsupervised programmes. Exercise programmes varied from 5 days to 6 months in duration. Adherence to exercise programmes was better with supervised programmes (99% reaching weekly activity goal vs 85%) and patients not undergoing neoadjuvant therapy (90% reaching weekly activity goal vs 82%). All studies reported improvement in muscle mass or markers of muscle function following prehabilitation. Two studies reported the impact of Prehabilitation on postoperative outcomes and Prehabilitation was associated with lower delayed gastric emptying and a shorter hospital stay with no impact on other postoperative outcomes. CONCLUSION Early evidence demonstrates that Prehabilitation programmes may improve postoperative outcomes following pancreatic surgery. However current Prehabilitaton programmes for patients undergoing pancreatic resection report diverse exercise regimens with no consensus regarding timing or length of Prehabilitation, warranting a need for standardisation of Prehabilitation programmes in pancreatic surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James R Bundred
- College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Leeds, UK
| | - Sivesh K Kamarajah
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle, UK; Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK
| | - John S Hammond
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle, UK
| | - Colin H Wilson
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle, UK
| | - James Prentis
- Department of Perioperative and Critical Care Medicine, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle, UK
| | - Sanjay Pandanaboyana
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle, UK; Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Abstract
Prehabilitation aims at enhancing patient’s preoperative functional capacity to better withstand the stress of surgery and recovery.
Collapse
|
40
|
A simplified (modified) Duke Activity Status Index (M-DASI) to characterise functional capacity: a secondary analysis of the Measurement of Exercise Tolerance before Surgery (METS) study. Br J Anaesth 2020; 126:181-190. [PMID: 32690247 DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.06.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2020] [Revised: 04/13/2020] [Accepted: 06/05/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Accurate assessment of functional capacity, a predictor of postoperative morbidity and mortality, is essential to improving surgical planning and outcomes. We assessed if all 12 items of the Duke Activity Status Index (DASI) were equally important in reflecting exercise capacity. METHODS In this secondary cross-sectional analysis of the international, multicentre Measurement of Exercise Tolerance before Surgery (METS) study, we assessed cardiopulmonary exercise testing and DASI data from 1455 participants. Multivariable regression analyses were used to revise the DASI model in predicting an anaerobic threshold (AT) >11 ml kg-1 min-1 and peak oxygen consumption (VO2 peak) >16 ml kg-1 min-1, cut-points that represent a reduced risk of postoperative complications. RESULTS Five questions were identified to have dominance in predicting AT>11 ml kg-1 min-1 and VO2 peak>16 ml.kg-1min-1. These items were included in the M-DASI-5Q and retained utility in predicting AT>11 ml.kg-1.min-1 (area under the receiver-operating-characteristic [AUROC]-AT: M-DASI-5Q=0.67 vs original 12-question DASI=0.66) and VO2 peak (AUROC-VO2 peak: M-DASI-5Q 0.73 vs original 12-question DASI 0.71). Conversely, in a sensitivity analysis we removed one potentially sensitive question related to the ability to have sexual relations, and the ability of the remaining four questions (M-DASI-4Q) to predict an adequate functional threshold remained no worse than the original 12-question DASI model. Adding a dynamic component to the M-DASI-4Q by assessing the chronotropic response to exercise improved its ability to discriminate between those with VO2 peak>16 ml.kg-1.min-1 and VO2 peak<16 ml.kg-1.min-1. CONCLUSIONS The M-DASI provides a simple screening tool for further preoperative evaluation, including with cardiopulmonary exercise testing, to guide perioperative management.
Collapse
|
41
|
Lee K, Zhou J, Norris MK, Chow C, Dieli-Conwright CM. Prehabilitative Exercise for the Enhancement of Physical, Psychosocial, and Biological Outcomes Among Patients Diagnosed with Cancer. Curr Oncol Rep 2020; 22:71. [PMID: 32537699 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-020-00932-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This review summarizes the effects of prehabilitative exercise interventions on the physical, psychosocial, and biological outcomes among patients with cancer. Current gaps and future directions in prehabilitative exercise research will be addressed. RECENT FINDINGS Prehabilitative exercise mitigates the detrimental impact of cancer surgery on physical fitness, noted by increases in maximal oxygen consumption and 6-min walk distance. Beneficial effects on psychosocial and biological outcomes remain inconclusive. Aerobic exercise interventions were often prescribed and included low-, moderate-, or high-intensity exercise. Resistance exercise interventions were often performed in conjunction with aerobic exercise. Prehabilitative exercise elicits robust improvements in physical fitness; however, effect on psychosocial and biological outcomes remains inconclusive. Exercise prescription parameters varied greatly by frequency, intensity, time, and type across multiple cancer diagnoses. Future investigations are needed to systematically dose exercise for a wider variety of outcome measures, with an overall goal to set forth pre-operative exercise guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyuwan Lee
- Department of Population Sciences, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, 91010, USA
| | - Judy Zhou
- Division of Biokinesiology and Physical Therapy, Ostrow School of Dentistry, University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, CA, 90089, USA
| | - Mary K Norris
- Division of Populations Sciences, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, 375 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Christina Chow
- Division of Biokinesiology and Physical Therapy, Ostrow School of Dentistry, University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, CA, 90089, USA
| | - Christina M Dieli-Conwright
- Division of Populations Sciences, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, 375 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
|
43
|
Santa Mina D, Au D, Papadopoulos E, O'Neill M, Diniz C, Dolan L, Lipton J, Chang E, Jones JM. Aerobic capacity attainment and reasons for cardiopulmonary exercise test termination in people with cancer: a descriptive, retrospective analysis from a single laboratory. Support Care Cancer 2020; 28:4285-4294. [PMID: 31900621 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-019-05094-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2019] [Accepted: 09/20/2019] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Aerobic exercise prescriptions in clinical populations commonly involve target intensities based on cardiopulmonary exercise tests (CPET). CPETs are often discontinued prior to a patient achieving true maximum oxygen consumption (VO2 max) which can adversely affect exercise dose and efficacy monitoring; however, reasons for early discontinuation are poorly reported. Accordingly, we explored the CPET termination reasons in persons with cancer participating in exercise intervention studies. METHODS This study comprised of an exploratory, descriptive analysis of retrospective CPET data (VO2 and anaerobic threshold) and termination reasons in a convenience sample of people with cancer participating in exercise intervention studies in a single laboratory. CPETs were standardized using the modified Bruce treadmill protocol with expired gas collection and analysis using a metabolic cart. VO2 max was considered "met" when participants demonstrated (a) oxygen consumption plateau or (b) two of the following criteria: rating of perceived exertion ≥ 9/10, respiratory exchange ratio ≥ 1.15, and/or heart rate of 95% of age-predicted maximum. The frequency and distribution of reasons for test termination relative to the number of CPET exposures for the participants were reported. RESULTS Forty-four participants engaged in exercise studies between February 2016 and March 2018 provided data for the analysis. Participants completed up to three CPETs during this period (total of 78 CPETs in the current analysis). Eighty-six percent of all CPETs were terminated prior to achieving VO2 max verification criteria and no tests resulted in an oxygen consumption plateau. For those that did not demonstrate achievement of VO2 max verification criteria, reasons for discontinuation were distributed as follows: equipment discomfort-49%, volitional peak-36%, and physical discomfort-14.9%. For those who met VO2 max criteria, volitional peak was the most common reason for test termination (45.5%), followed by physical discomfort (36.4%), and equipment discomfort (18.2%). CONCLUSIONS In our sample of cancer survivors, VO2 max criteria were infrequently met with equipment discomfort being a primary reason for participant-driven test termination. Protocol and equipment considerations are necessary for interpretation and application of CPET findings in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Santa Mina
- Faculty of Kinesiology and Physical Education, University of Toronto, 55 Harbord St, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 2 W6, Canada.,University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Darren Au
- Faculty of Kinesiology and Physical Education, University of Toronto, 55 Harbord St, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 2 W6, Canada. .,University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Efthymios Papadopoulos
- Faculty of Kinesiology and Physical Education, University of Toronto, 55 Harbord St, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 2 W6, Canada.,University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Meagan O'Neill
- University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Camilla Diniz
- Faculty of Kinesiology and Physical Education, University of Toronto, 55 Harbord St, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 2 W6, Canada
| | - Lianne Dolan
- University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jeffrey Lipton
- University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Eugene Chang
- University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jennifer M Jones
- University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
|
45
|
Dalton SO, Johansen C. European cancer rehabilitation and survivorship, 2018: one of a kind. Acta Oncol 2019; 58:519-521. [PMID: 31035842 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2019.1606937] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Susanne Oksbjerg Dalton
- Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Oncology and Palliative Care, Zealand University Hospital, Naestved, Denmark
| | - Christoffer Johansen
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Unit of Survivorship Research, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|