1
|
Long M, Calude A, Burnette J. "This was never about a virus": Perceptions of Vaccination Hazards and Pandemic Risk in #Covid19NZ Tweets. THE JOURNAL OF MEDICAL HUMANITIES 2024:10.1007/s10912-024-09859-9. [PMID: 38985255 DOI: 10.1007/s10912-024-09859-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/24/2024] [Indexed: 07/11/2024]
Abstract
In this paper, we draw on qualitative methods from the medical humanities and quantitative approaches from corpus linguistics to assess the different mappings of pandemic risks by Twitter (X) users employing the #Covid19nz hashtag. We look specifically at their responses to government measures around vaccines between August and November 2021. Risk, we reveal, was a major discursive thread in tweets during this period, but within our tweets, it was the vaccine rather than the virus around which hazard perception and response were grouped. We find that the discursive stance of those opposed to the vaccine evoked entangled medical and political hazards, untrustworthy experts, obscure information, restrictions on sovereignty, threats to children, and uncertain future dangers, all of which positioned them within what Ulrich Beck termed the world risk society. We also found that these narratives of risk manifested in specific Twitter styles, which employed a consistently larger number of hashtags. The lack of conjunctions between the hashtags, we argue, encouraged a disordered reading of doubt and precaution, as the hashtags presented triggering phrases whose interconnections were hinted at rather than specified. By contrast, those who tweeted in support of government measures were rhetorically led by solutions rather than risks, with one exception: their perception of those who were vaccine opposed. We use scholarship on risk and precautionary logic to map out the contrasting positions in tweets addressing Aotearoa New Zealand's pandemic experience during the closing months of 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maebh Long
- English Programme, University of Waikato, Private Bag 3105, Hamilton, 3240, New Zealand.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bevan I, Bauld L, Street A. Who We Test For: Aligning Relational and Public Health Responsibilities in COVID-19 Testing in Scotland. Med Anthropol 2024; 43:277-294. [PMID: 38713821 PMCID: PMC11104742 DOI: 10.1080/01459740.2024.2349514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/09/2024]
Abstract
COVID-19 testing programs in the UK often called on people to test to "protect others." In this article we explore motivations to test and the relationships to "others" involved in an asymptomatic testing program at a Scottish university. We show that participants engaged with testing as a relational technology, through which they navigated multiple overlapping responsibilities to kin, colleagues, flatmates, strangers, and to more diffuse publics. We argue that the success of testing as a technique of governance depends not only on the production of disciplined selves, but also on the program's capacity to align interpersonal and public scales of responsibility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Imogen Bevan
- School of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Linda Bauld
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Alice Street
- School of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Radhuber IM, Haddad C, Kieslich K, Paul KT, Prainsack B, El-Sayed S, Schlogl L, Spahl W, Weiss E. Citizenship in times of crisis: biosocial state-citizen relations during COVID-19 in Austria. BIOSOCIETIES 2023; 19:1-26. [PMID: 37359140 PMCID: PMC10201040 DOI: 10.1057/s41292-023-00304-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/27/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023]
Abstract
Drawing upon 152 in-depth qualitative interviews with residents in Austria carried out in the first year of the pandemic, this article discusses how people's experiences with COVID-19 policies reflect and reshape state-citizen relations. Coinciding with a significant government crisis, the first year of COVID-19 in Austria saw pandemic measures justified with reference to a biological, often medical understanding of health that framed disease prevention in terms of transmission reduction, often with reference to metrics such as hospitalisation rates, etc. Instead of using this biomedical frame, our interviewees, however, drew attention to biopsychosocial dimensions of the crisis and problematised the entanglements between economy and health. We call this the emergence of a biosocial notion of citizenship that is attentive to psychological, social and economic dimensions of health. Insights into the biosocial nature of pandemic citizenship open a window of opportunity for addressing long-standing social injustices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Christian Haddad
- Department of Science and Technology Studies, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Center for Global Health Policy, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK
| | | | - Katharina T. Paul
- Department of Political Science, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Barbara Prainsack
- Department of Political Science, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Seliem El-Sayed
- Department of Political Science, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Lukas Schlogl
- Department of Political Science, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Wanda Spahl
- Department of Political Science, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Elias Weiss
- Department of Political Science, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Holroyd E, Long NJ, Appleton NS, Davies SG, Deckert A, Fehoko E, Laws M, Martin-Anatias N, Simpson N, Sterling R, Trnka S, Tunufa'i L. Community healthcare workers' experiences during and after COVID-19 lockdown: A qualitative study from Aotearoa New Zealand. HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE IN THE COMMUNITY 2022; 30:e2761-e2771. [PMID: 35088921 DOI: 10.1111/hsc.13720] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2021] [Revised: 11/19/2021] [Accepted: 12/23/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Shortly after the COVID-19 pandemic reached Aotearoa New Zealand, stringent lockdown measures lasting 7 weeks were introduced to manage community spread of the virus. This paper reports the findings of a qualitative study examining how lockdown measures impacted upon the lives of nurses, midwives and personal care assistants caring for community-based patients during this time. The study involved nationwide surveys and in-depth interviews with 15 registered nurses employed in community settings, two community midwives and five personal care assistants. During the lockdown, nurses, midwives and personal care assistants working in the community showed considerable courage in answering their 'call to duty' by taking on heightened care responsibilities and going 'the extra mile' to help others. They faced significant risks to personal and professional relationships when they were required to take on additional and complex responsibilities for community-based patients. Despite the hypervigilant monitoring of their personal protective equipment (PPE), the need to safeguard family and community members generated considerable stress and anxiety. Many also faced personal isolation and loneliness as a result of lockdown restrictions. Moreover, the negative impacts of experiences during lockdown often continued to be felt once restrictions had been lifted, inflecting life during periods in which community transmission of COVID-19 was not occurring. This article makes five core service delivery and policy recommendations for supporting community-based nurses, midwives and personal care assistants in respiratory disease pandemics: acknowledging the crucial role played by community-based carers and the associated stress and anxiety they endured by championing respect and compassion; demystifying the 'heroism' or 'self-sacrifice' projected onto care workers; the timely provision of adequate protective equipment; improving remuneration, with adequate provision for time off; and regular counselling, peer support groups and education on work-life balance delivered by support workers in recognition of stressors arising from these complex and isolated working conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleanor Holroyd
- School of Clinical Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Nicholas J Long
- Department of Anthropology, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| | | | - Sharyn Graham Davies
- School of Languages, Literatures, Cultures, and Linguistics, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- School of Social Sciences and Public Policy, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Antje Deckert
- School of Social Sciences and Public Policy, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Edmond Fehoko
- School of Māori Studies and Pacific Studies, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Megan Laws
- Department of Anthropology, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| | - Nelly Martin-Anatias
- School of Social Sciences and Public Policy, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Nikita Simpson
- Department of Anthropology, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| | | | - Susanna Trnka
- School of Social Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Laumua Tunufa'i
- School of Social Sciences and Public Policy, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Trnka S. States Reimagined: COVID-19, the Ordinary, and Extraordinary in Aotearoa/New Zealand. ANTHROPOLOGICAL FORUM 2022. [DOI: 10.1080/00664677.2022.2125366] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Susanna Trnka
- Anthropology Programme, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Addison C, Horan J. Elder Agency: How Older New Zealanders Played Their Part in Aotearoa New Zealand’s COVID-19 Response. ANTHROPOLOGICAL FORUM 2022. [DOI: 10.1080/00664677.2022.2103517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Courtney Addison
- Centre for Science in Society, Te Herenga Waka-Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Jane Horan
- Centre for Science in Society, Te Herenga Waka-Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Allen J, Uekusa S, Alpass FM. Longitudinal Cohort Study of Depression and Anxiety Among Older Informal Caregivers Following the Initial COVID-19 Pandemic Response in Aotearoa New Zealand. J Aging Health 2022; 34:653-665. [PMID: 35412393 PMCID: PMC9008474 DOI: 10.1177/08982643211052713] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/04/2022]
Abstract
Objectives To assess the impact of providing care and conditions of care on psychological wellbeing among older informal caregivers following the initial period of COVID-19 pandemic restrictions in Aotearoa New Zealand. Methods Data were from population-based cohorts of older adults participating in the 2020 Health, Work and Retirement longitudinal survey (n = 3839, 17.4% informal caregivers). Changes in symptoms of depression and anxiety over 2018–2020 surveys associated with sociodemographic factors, caregiving, cohabitation with the care recipient, assistance provided with activities of daily living, support in providing care, and opportunity cost of care were assessed. Results Increased depression, but not anxiety, was associated with providing informal care. Among caregivers, lower living standards and cohabitation were associated with increased depression. Lower living standards, unemployment, and lower help from friend/family networks were associated with increased anxiety. Discussion Economic hardship and social capital provide targets for supporting psychological wellbeing of older caregivers during periods of pandemic restrictions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanne Allen
- 6420Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand
| | - Shinya Uekusa
- 6420Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wardell S. To wish you well: the biopolitical subjectivities of medical crowdfunders during and after Aotearoa New Zealand's COVID-19 lockdown. BIOSOCIETIES 2021; 18:52-78. [PMID: 34567234 PMCID: PMC8456189 DOI: 10.1057/s41292-021-00251-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Crowdfunding platforms apply a marketized, competitive logic to healthcare, increasingly functioning as generative spaces in which worthy citizens and biopolitical subjects are produced. Using a lens of biopower, this article considers what sort of biopolitical subjectivities were produced in and through New Zealand crowdfunding campaigns during the 2020 COVID-19 lockdown. It focuses on a discursive and dialogical analysis of 59 online medical crowdfunding campaigns that were active during lockdown and chose to mention the pandemic. These pages pointed to interrelated biological, social and economic precarities, speaking to questions about how citizens navigate uneven needs during uncertain times. Findings showed that crowdfunders referred to the pandemic in order to narrate their own situation in culturally coherent ways and to establish context-specific relations of care. This included contextualising their needs through establishing shared crisis narratives that also made the infrastructural contexts of healthcare visible and performing relational labour in ways that aligned with nationally specific affective regimes. By highlighting their own vulnerability, crowdfunders strategically mobilised broader lockdown discourses of self-sacrifice on behalf of vulnerable people. In this way, New Zealand's lockdown produced subjectivities both drawing on wider neoliberal moral regimes and specific to the nuanced and emergent moral systems of pandemic citizenship.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan Wardell
- grid.29980.3a0000 0004 1936 7830Social Anthropology Programme, University of Otago, 2nd Floor Richardson Building, Leith St, Dunedin North, 9016 Otago New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Trotter S. Ways of Being Together During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Support Bubbles and the Legal Construction of Relationships. FRONTIERS IN SOCIOLOGY 2021; 6:730216. [PMID: 34540949 PMCID: PMC8447833 DOI: 10.3389/fsoc.2021.730216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2021] [Accepted: 07/16/2021] [Indexed: 05/17/2023]
Abstract
This article focuses on the concept of the support bubble. The concept was introduced in New Zealand in March 2020 in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic to denote a network of people with whom a person could have physical contact, and was later taken up in various forms elsewhere, particularly in the UK. The article focuses on the meaning that was attached to the concept and to the ways of being together that it encapsulated and stipulated. Where support bubbles were formalised as a matter of law, as in New Zealand and the UK, a particular form of relating was legally constructed and real relationships were affected through law. The article addresses the meaning and implications of the concept of the support bubble in this light. First, it considers the concept of the support bubble as a new legal form, which drew in, and built on, a range of relationships and then recast them in terms of a new legal form. Second, it analyses the central question posed by the concept as one of the meaning of being together in a support bubble, not only for those navigating and living with the concept in practice, but also as mediated in and through law. Third, it outlines how the concept of the support bubble represented a distinct legal development. It enabled those who were eligible to define for themselves, albeit within a specified framework, the meaning and nature of a relationship of support of this kind. It also supplied a space in which some kinds of relationships that had not necessarily attracted much previous legal attention-like friendships and dating relationships-came to find a degree of legal reflection and recognition.
Collapse
|