1
|
Bukten A, Virtanen S, Hesse M, Thylstrup B, Kvamme TL, Seid AK, Chang Z, Skjærvø I, Tverborgvik T, Stavseth MR. The prevalence of substance use disorders among people in Norwegian, Danish and Swedish prisons: A multi-national cohort study, 2010-19. Addiction 2024; 119:1264-1275. [PMID: 38529890 DOI: 10.1111/add.16477] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2023] [Accepted: 02/18/2024] [Indexed: 03/27/2024]
Abstract
AIMS We estimated the prevalence of substance use disorders (SUDs) in the Norwegian, Danish and Swedish prison populations and compared the prevalence of SUDs in the national prison populations with country-specific general population prevalence rates. DESIGN A multi-national cohort study using data from the National Prison Registries linked to the National Patient Registries in Norway, Denmark and Sweden. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS We used data from the PriSUD-Nordic study, including national prison populations aged 19 years and older in Norway (2010-19), Denmark (2010-18) and Sweden (2010-13). A total of 119 507 Individuals (108 971 men and 10 536 women) contributing to 191 549 incarcerations were included in the study (Norway: 45432 men; 5429 women, Denmark: 42 162 men; 3370 women, Sweden: 21 377 men; 1737 women). MEASUREMENT We calculated a study prevalence and prevalence at entry to prison for all types of SUDs before imprisonment each consecutive year of observation in each prison population. We also extracted country-specific 1-year prevalence rates from the Global Burden of Diseases database to calculate comparative national prevalence ratios. FINDINGS The study prevalence of any SUD was approximately 40% [Norway: 44.0%, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 43.6-44.5%; Denmark: 39.9%, CI = 39.5-40.4%; Sweden: 39.1%, CI = 38.4-39.7%] in all three countries. Women had a significantly higher study prevalence of any SUD compared with men (Norway: 55.8 versus 42.6%, P < 0.001; Denmark 43.1 versus 39.7%, P = 0.004; Sweden: 51.7 versus 38.0%, P < 0.001). Prevalence estimates were higher for SUDs among people in prison than in the general population. We observed an increasing proportion of people with SUDs entering prison in Norway (P = 0.003), while the proportion was more stable in Denmark and Sweden. CONCLUSIONS Substance use disorders (SUDs) appear to be highly prevalent among the Scandinavian prison populations compared with the general population, especially among women. In Norway, there was a relative increase in SUDs from 2010 to 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Bukten
- Norwegian Centre for Addiction Research, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital, Norway
| | - Suvi Virtanen
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Morten Hesse
- Centre for Alcohol and Drug Research, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Birgitte Thylstrup
- Centre for Alcohol and Drug Research, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Abdu Kedir Seid
- Centre for Alcohol and Drug Research, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Zheng Chang
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ingeborg Skjærvø
- Norwegian Centre for Addiction Research, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital, Norway
| | - Torill Tverborgvik
- Norwegian Centre for Addiction Research, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Marianne R Stavseth
- Norwegian Centre for Addiction Research, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bukten A, Virtanen S, Hesse M, Chang Z, Kvamme TL, Thylstrup B, Tverborgvik T, Skjærvø I, Stavseth MR. The prevalence and comorbidity of mental health and substance use disorders in Scandinavian prisons 2010-2019: a multi-national register study. BMC Psychiatry 2024; 24:95. [PMID: 38317111 PMCID: PMC10840271 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-024-05540-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2023] [Accepted: 01/19/2024] [Indexed: 02/07/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mental health disorders are common among people in prison, but their prevalence in the Scandinavian prison population remain unclear. In this multinational register study, we examined the prevalence of mental health disorders and the comorbidity of substance use disorders (SUDs) with other mental health disorders in this population. Further, we investigated how the prevalence of mental disorders at prison entry had changed in Norway, Denmark, and Sweden over the study period. METHODS The three study cohorts included all individuals, aged 19 or older, whom had been imprisoned in Norway (2010-2019), Denmark (2011-2018), and Sweden (2010-2013). Mental disorders were defined as ICD-10 diagnoses (F-codes) registered in the national patient registers. The study prevalence was estimated based on recorded diagnoses during the entire study follow-up period in each respective country. The one-year prevalence of mental disorders was estimated for each calendar year for individuals entering prison during that year. RESULTS The Scandinavian prison cohorts included 119 507 individuals released 191 549 times during the study period. Across all three countries a high proportion of both women (61.3%-74.4%) and men (49.6%-57.9%) had at least one mental health disorder during the observation period. The most prevalent disorders were SUDs (39.1%-44.0%), depressive disorder (8.1%-17.5%), and stress related disorder (8.8%-17.1%). Women (31.8%-41.1%) had higher levels of mental health and substance use comorbidities compared to men (20.8%-27.6%). The one-year prevalence of any mental health disorder increased over time with a 33% relative increase in Norway, 8% in Denmark, and 10% in Sweden. The proportion of individuals entering prison with a comorbid SUD and other mental disorder had also increased. CONCLUSIONS While the incarceration rate has been decreasing during the past decade in the Scandinavian countries, an increasing proportion of people entering prison have a diagnosed mental health disorder. Our results suggest that prisons should provide adequate treatment and scale up services to accommodate the increasing proportion of people with complex health needs among incarcerated people.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Bukten
- Norwegian Centre for Addiction Research, University of Oslo, Kirkeveien 166, Oslo, N-0407, Norway.
- Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Suvi Virtanen
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Morten Hesse
- Center for Alcohol and Drug Research, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Zheng Chang
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Birgitte Thylstrup
- Center for Alcohol and Drug Research, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Torill Tverborgvik
- Norwegian Centre for Addiction Research, University of Oslo, Kirkeveien 166, Oslo, N-0407, Norway
| | - Ingeborg Skjærvø
- Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Marianne R Stavseth
- Norwegian Centre for Addiction Research, University of Oslo, Kirkeveien 166, Oslo, N-0407, Norway
- Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bukten A, Skjærvø I, Stavseth MR. Exploring mental health comorbidities and opioid agonist treatment coverage among people in prison: A national cohort study 2010-2019. Drug Alcohol Depend 2023; 250:110896. [PMID: 37515826 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2023.110896] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2023] [Revised: 06/28/2023] [Accepted: 07/06/2023] [Indexed: 07/31/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Despite a high prevalence of opioid use disorder (OUD) among people in prison, there is little knowledge of how many receive the recommended opioid agonist treatment (OAT) and what characterizes those who receive OAT and those who do not when it comes to mental health comorbidities. We aimed to describe people with OUD in Norwegian prisons over a ten-year period and their OAT status, and to investigate comorbidity of mental health disorders stratified by gender. METHODS Data from the PriSUD study, including all people (≥19 years old) imprisoned in Norway between 2010 and 2019, linked to national patient registry data, including ICD-10 codes. We calculated the prevalence (1-year and 10-year) of OUD and OAT, and mental health comorbidity stratified on OAT-status and gender. RESULTS Among the cohort (n=51,148), 7 282 (14.2%) were diagnosed with OUD during the period of observation. Of those, 4 689 (64.4%) received OAT. People with OUD had high levels of comorbidity, including other drug use disorders (92.4% OAT, 90.3% non-OAT), alcohol use disorder (32.1% OAT, 44.4% non-OAT) and any other mental health disorders (61.6% OAT, 68.2% non-OAT). The proportion receiving OAT among people with OUD increased markedly during the ten years of observation; from 35.7% in 2010-70.9% in 2019. CONCLUSION People with OUD, both receiving OAT and not, had substantially more mental health comorbidities than the non-OUD population. Understanding how the prison population changes over time especially in terms of mental health needs related to OUD, is important for correctional health service planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Bukten
- Norwegian Centre for Addiction Research, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital, Norway.
| | - I Skjærvø
- Norwegian Centre for Addiction Research, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital, Norway; Norwegian Centre for Violence and Traumatic Stress Studies, Oslo, Norway
| | - M R Stavseth
- Norwegian Centre for Addiction Research, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Törölä M, Rautanen M. Prisoners with reduced criminal responsibility stand out based on their rates of hospitalisation during their sentences. Int J Prison Health 2023; ahead-of-print:641-652. [PMID: 37480197 PMCID: PMC10845016 DOI: 10.1108/ijph-05-2022-0032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2022] [Revised: 03/22/2023] [Accepted: 07/09/2023] [Indexed: 07/23/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Globally, health problems are very common among prisoners. A mental state examination aims to help in recognising psychiatric problems among offenders and the possible association of these psychiatric issues with their committed crime. The legal-medical term "reduced criminal responsibility" refers to a weakened sense of reality and the ability to control one's behaviour because of compromised mental health and without an evaluated need for forensic psychiatric hospitalisation. However, little is known about the actual need for the health care of prisoners with reduced criminal responsibility (PRCR). The purpose of this study was to explore treatment-related visits to prison by PRCR in Finland. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH The research data comprise information on PRCR's treatment-related visits and that of a matched control group (n = 222). Descriptive cross-tabulation with X²- and nonparametric Mann-Whitney U-tests and Cox regression analyses are applied. FINDINGS The results show that almost every PRCR had at least one treatment-related visit during their sentences. Visits to a psychiatric hospital for prisoners, to the prison hospital and especially to a civil hospital are more common among PRCR. The need for treatment appears significantly earlier in their sentences. ORIGINALITY/VALUE These findings demonstrate the PRCR's greater need for access to health services and the need for further development between the Health Care Services for Prisoners, Prison and Probation Service of Finland and public health and social services in Finland. More exploration of the medical reasons and locational distribution of the vast amount of civil hospitalisation is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miisa Törölä
- UEF Law School, University of Eastern
Finland, Joensuu, Finland
| | - Mika Rautanen
- Health Care Services for Prisoners, Finnish Institute
for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Svendsen VG, Stavseth MR, Skardhamar T, Bukten A. Psychiatric morbidity among women in Norwegian prisons, 2010-2019: a register-based study. BMC Psychiatry 2023; 23:390. [PMID: 37268924 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-023-04886-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2023] [Accepted: 05/18/2023] [Indexed: 06/04/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Research suggests that women in prison have more mental health problems than men and are prone to suffer from more severe psychiatric disorders. This study utilizes national registry data to describe demographic and psychiatric gender differences in Norwegian prisons, and to investigate comorbid psychiatric disorders and time trends in psychiatric morbidity among women. METHODS Longitudinal data from the Norwegian Prison Release Study linked with the Norwegian Patient Registry and data from Statistics Norway provided information on health care utilization, socioeconomic status, and history of psychiatric disorders among all individuals (nwomen = 5,429; nmen = 45,432) who were incarcerated in a Norwegian prison between 2010 and 2019. RESULTS Women were more likely than men to have a history of any psychiatric disorder (75% vs. 59%). Substance use disorders and dual disorders were highly prevalent in both genders, yet highest among women (56 and 38% respectively, versus 43 and 24% among men). From 2010 to 2019, we found a considerable increase in the 12-month prevalence of most diagnostic categories among women entering prison. CONCLUSION Psychiatric and dual disorders are highly prevalent in Norwegian prisons, and especially among women. The proportion of women entering prison with a recent history of mental health problems has increased rapidly over the last decade. Women's prison institutions need to adjust health and social services, and awareness about substance use and other psychiatric disorders in order to meet the increasing proportion of women facing these challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vegard G Svendsen
- Norwegian Centre for Addiction Research, SERAF, University of Oslo, Building 45, Kirkeveien 166, Oslo, 0450, Norway.
| | - Marianne Riksheim Stavseth
- Norwegian Centre for Addiction Research, SERAF, University of Oslo, Building 45, Kirkeveien 166, Oslo, 0450, Norway
- Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Torbjørn Skardhamar
- Department of Sociology and Human Geography, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Anne Bukten
- Norwegian Centre for Addiction Research, SERAF, University of Oslo, Building 45, Kirkeveien 166, Oslo, 0450, Norway
- Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Browne CC, Korobanova D, Yee N, Spencer SJ, Ma T, Butler T, Dean K. The prevalence of self-reported mental illness among those imprisoned in New South Wales across three health surveys, from 2001 to 2015. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2023; 57:550-561. [PMID: 35694738 DOI: 10.1177/00048674221104411] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The prevalence of mental illness among those in prison is much higher than in the community; however, very few studies have examined whether rates have changed over time, in line with increasing self-reported rates in the community. METHODS This study compares the prevalence of self-reported mental illness, self-harm and suicidal thoughts/behaviours, and drug and alcohol use across three waves (2001, 2009 and 2015) of health surveys involving men and women in New South Wales prisons and compared these rates with published community-level findings. RESULTS The prevalence of those reporting any mental health diagnosis increased significantly across the three surveys, even after adjustment for socio-demographic and criminal justice variables that also changed over time. Individuals surveyed in 2015 were more likely to report a mental health diagnosis than those surveyed in 2001 (adjusted odds ratio = 2.66, 95% confidence interval = [2.16, 3.27]). The prevalence of self-harm and suicidal thoughts and behaviours remained stable across the three surveys, while self-reported regular drug use decreased over the period. Women experienced a far greater burden of mental illness than men across all three surveys and experienced more growth in the prevalence of most psychiatric disorders. CONCLUSION These findings have important implications for public and prison health systems given the poor social, health and criminal justice outcomes of those imprisoned with mental illness, both in custody and post-release.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christie C Browne
- Discipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Justice Health and Forensic Mental Health Network, Matraville, NSW, Australia
| | - Daria Korobanova
- Discipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Justice Health and Forensic Mental Health Network, Matraville, NSW, Australia
- Western Sydney Local Health District, North Parramatta, NSW, Australia
| | - Natalia Yee
- Discipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Justice Health and Forensic Mental Health Network, Matraville, NSW, Australia
| | - Sarah-Jane Spencer
- Discipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Justice Health and Forensic Mental Health Network, Matraville, NSW, Australia
| | - Trevor Ma
- Discipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Justice Health and Forensic Mental Health Network, Matraville, NSW, Australia
| | - Tony Butler
- School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- National Health and Medical Research Council, Centre of Research Excellence in Offender Health, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Kimberlie Dean
- Discipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Justice Health and Forensic Mental Health Network, Matraville, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Smeekens MV, Sappelli F, de Vries MG, Bulten BH. Dutch Forensic Flexible Assertive Community Treatment: Operating on the Interface Between General Mental Health Care and Forensic Psychiatric Care. Front Psychol 2021; 12:708722. [PMID: 34630215 PMCID: PMC8492920 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.708722] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2021] [Accepted: 08/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
In the Netherlands, Forensic Flexible Assertive Community Treatment (ForFACT) is used as a specialized form of outpatient intensive treatment. This outreaching type of treatment is aimed at patients with severe and long lasting psychiatric problems that are at risk of engaging in criminal behavior. In addition, these patients often suffer from addiction and experience problems in different areas of their life (e.g., financial debt, unemployment, or lack of daytime activities). The aim of this exploratory study was to gain more insight into the characteristics of the ForFACT patient population. More knowledge about these patients may enhance the effectiveness of ForFACT and therefore (further) reduce the risk of recidivism. Data on 132 ForFACT patients were gathered by studying electronic patient records, criminal records, and by conducting semi-structured interviews with practitioners and patients. Additionally, as part of a cognitive screening, two screening instruments were conducted to gain insight into intelligence and possible mild cognitive impairments. This article gives a broad description of the ForFACT patient population, including demographic data and context variables, diagnostics, recidivism risk and offense history, and aspects related to care. Furthermore, several recommendations are given to further improve ForFACT. Based on the results it can be concluded that the ForFACT patient population shows a high degree of diversity in complex care needs and responsivity issues. Therefore, this article highlights the necessity for ForFACT to collaborate with other mental health institutions, as well as probation officers, and forensic or criminal justice institutions. Moreover, it is important to continually check the inclusion and exclusion criteria when admitting patients to ForFACT, and to examine whether ForFACT is still the most adequate care for patients or if they need to be referred. In addition, the results emphasize the importance of cognitive screening for forensic outpatients. Finally, this study zooms in on the interface between forensic psychiatric care and general mental health care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marjam V Smeekens
- Department Assessment, Research and Professional Development, Pompefoundation, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Fedde Sappelli
- Department Assessment, Research and Professional Development, Pompefoundation, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Meike G de Vries
- Department Assessment, Research and Professional Development, Pompefoundation, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Berend H Bulten
- Department Assessment, Research and Professional Development, Pompefoundation, Nijmegen, Netherlands.,Faculty of Social Sciences, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Seppänen A, Joelsson P, Ahlgren-Rimpiläinen A, Repo-Tiihonen E. Forensic psychiatry in Finland: an overview of past, present and future. Int J Ment Health Syst 2020; 14:29. [PMID: 32322299 PMCID: PMC7164302 DOI: 10.1186/s13033-020-00362-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2019] [Accepted: 04/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite a recent contrary trend, Finland has been for decades one of the most violent countries in Western Europe. Also, Finland has had one of the highest number of psychiatric beds per capita in Europe, although this, too, has seen a sharp decline. Against this background, among other national idiosyncrasies, Finland has developed its forensic psychiatric services. Here, we describe the legal, organizational and clinical structure of these services, and outline the historical and current issues that have shaped them. Finally, we consider future challenges facing the Finnish forensic service system, as part of wider European and global trends.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allan Seppänen
- 1Psychoses and Forensic Psychiatry, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.,2Vanha Vaasa Hospital, Vaasa, Finland
| | - Petteri Joelsson
- 3National Institute for Health and Welfare, Forensic Psychiatry, Helsinki, Finland
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Grecco GG, Andrew Chambers R. The Penrose Effect and its acceleration by the war on drugs: a crisis of untranslated neuroscience and untreated addiction and mental illness. Transl Psychiatry 2019; 9:320. [PMID: 31780638 PMCID: PMC6882902 DOI: 10.1038/s41398-019-0661-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2019] [Revised: 11/05/2019] [Accepted: 11/07/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
In 1939, British psychiatrist Lionel Penrose described an inverse relationship between mental health treatment infrastructure and criminal incarcerations. This relationship, later termed the 'Penrose Effect', has proven remarkably predictive of modern trends which have manifested as reciprocal components, referred to as 'deinstitutionalization' and 'mass incarceration'. In this review, we consider how a third dynamic-the criminalization of addiction via the 'War on Drugs', although unanticipated by Penrose, has likely amplified the Penrose Effect over the last 30 years, with devastating social, economic, and healthcare consequences. We discuss how synergy been the Penrose Effect and the War on Drugs has been mediated by, and reflects, a fundamental neurobiological connection between the brain diseases of mental illness and addiction. This neuroscience of dual diagnosis, also not anticipated by Penrose, is still not being adequately translated into improving clinical training, practice, or research, to treat patients across the mental illness-addictions comorbidity spectrum. This failure in translation, and the ongoing fragmentation and collapse of behavioral healthcare, has worsened the epidemic of untreated mental illness and addictions, while driving unsustainable government investment into mass incarceration and high-cost medical care that profits too exclusively on injuries and multi-organ diseases resulting from untreated addictions. Reversing the fragmentation and decline of behavioral healthcare with decisive action to co-integrate mental health and addiction training, care, and research-may be key to ending criminalization of mental illness and addiction, and refocusing the healthcare system on keeping the population healthy at the lowest possible cost.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory G Grecco
- Medical Scientist Training Program, Indiana University of School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
- Stark Neurosciences Research Institute, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - R Andrew Chambers
- Department of Psychiatry, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
- Laboratory for Translational Neuroscience of Dual Diagnosis & Development, IU Neuroscience Research Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Houser KA, Vîlcică ER, Saum CA, Hiller ML. Mental Health Risk Factors and Parole Decisions: Does Inmate Mental Health Status Affect Who Gets Released. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2019; 16:E2950. [PMID: 31426341 PMCID: PMC6720969 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16162950] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2019] [Revised: 08/09/2019] [Accepted: 08/13/2019] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
Parole decision-the decision to release an incarcerated individual from prison conditionally-is one of the most critical decisions across justice systems around the world. The decision carries with it significant consequences: for the freedom of the individual awaiting release (the parolee); for the safety of the community in which they will return; and for the correctional system overall, especially its organizational capacity. The current study attempts to add to the parole decision-making literature by specifically analyzing the role that mental health factors may play in explaining parole decisions. Research to date is inconclusive on whether or not mental illness is a risk factor for criminal behavior; despite this, individuals with mental health problems generally fare worse on risk assessment tools employed in justice decisions. The study relies on a 1000+ representative sample of parole-eligible individuals in Pennsylvania, United States. To increase reliability, the analyses test for several mental health factors based on information from different sources (i.e., self-reported mental health history; risk assessment tool employed by the Parole Board; and risk assessment tool employed by the Department of Corrections). To address validity concerns, the study controls for other potential correlates of parole decisions. Although the multivariate models explained a considerable amount of variance in parole decisions, the inclusion of mental health variables added relatively little to model fit. The results provide insights into an understudied area of justice decision making, suggesting that despite the stigmatization of mental illness among criminal justice populations, parole board members in Pennsylvania, United States, appear to follow official guidelines rather than to consider more subjective notions that poor mental health should negate parole release.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimberly A Houser
- Department of Law and Justice Studies, Rowan University, Glassboro, NJ 08028, USA.
| | - E Rely Vîlcică
- Department of Criminal Justice, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA
| | - Christine A Saum
- Department of Law and Justice Studies, Rowan University, Glassboro, NJ 08028, USA
| | - Matthew L Hiller
- Department of Criminal Justice, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
The prevalence of mental disorders in Taiwanese prisons: a nationwide population-based study. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2019; 54:379-386. [PMID: 30310945 DOI: 10.1007/s00127-018-1614-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2017] [Accepted: 10/08/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE In Taiwan, few studies explored the morbidity of mental disorders among prisoners. The purpose of this study is conducted to estimate the prevalence of mental disorders in Taiwanese prisoners. METHODS Based on Nationwide population-based databank, 82,650 prisons were studied for mental disorders. Mental disorders were assessed with the International Classification of Diseases 9th revision Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM). RESULT The prevalence of mental disorders among prisoners was estimated 11.31%. Female prisons exhibited a higher prevalence than males (17.82% vs. 10.56%, p < 0.01). Among all cases that were diagnosed with the contents of mental disorder, anxiety, dissociative and somatoform disorders was the most frequent disease (total: 49.48%, female: 59.42%, male: 47.55%) followed by special symptoms or syndromes (total: 38.24%, female: 33.20%, male: 39.22%), drug dependence (total: 15.41%, female: 9.22%, male: 16.61%), episodic mood disorders (total: 13.56%, female: 26.15%, male: 11.12%), nondependent abuse of drugs (total: 11.23%, female: 2.77%, male: 12.87%) and depressive disorder (total: 11.23%, female: 11.66%, male: 11.14%). CONCLUSION A substantial proportion of prisoners reported having mental disorders. The results suggests the necessity of comprehensive assessment and more treatment programs that offer alternatives to incarceration of mental health for the criminal justice system in Taiwan.
Collapse
|
12
|
Askola R, Soininen P, Seppänen A. Offense-Related Issues in Forensic Psychiatric Treatment: A Thematic Analysis. Front Psychiatry 2019; 10:925. [PMID: 31998150 PMCID: PMC6961555 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00925] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2019] [Accepted: 11/21/2019] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Characteristics unique to forensic psychiatric treatment include coming to terms with the offenses committed, the long duration of treatment and the assessment of the risk of repeat offending. This study describes the views of both patients and staff on the significance of the patient's offense as a part of forensic psychiatric rehabilitation. Eight forensic psychiatric patients and eight forensic psychiatric nurses from two forensic psychiatric hospitals in Finland participated in this study. Data were gathered by means of thematic interview and analyzed by means of thematic analysis. The findings suggest that patients and professionals alike concur that ascertaining the factors with a bearing on the offense, and working through the offense and the factors leading up to it, constitute an essential aspect of forensic treatment. This, in turn, has a bearing on the planning and administration of a treatment plan consisting of both medical and psychosocial support and interventions intended to enable patients to live independent, fulfilling lives, thus reducing the likelihood of reoffending. The findings of this study can be used as part of the development of international, standardized treatment models for clinical forensic psychiatric practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riitta Askola
- Division of Mood Disorders, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.,Department of Nursing Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Päivi Soininen
- Psychoses and Forensic Psychiatry, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Allan Seppänen
- Psychoses and Forensic Psychiatry, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.,Vanha Vaasa Hospital, Vaasa, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Seppänen A, Törmänen I, Shaw C, Kennedy H. Modern forensic psychiatric hospital design: clinical, legal and structural aspects. Int J Ment Health Syst 2018; 12:58. [PMID: 30377440 PMCID: PMC6195744 DOI: 10.1186/s13033-018-0238-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2018] [Accepted: 10/11/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Forensic psychiatric care must be provided within the least restrictive setting possible, whilst simultaneously maintaining appropriate levels of security. This presents particular challenges for the design of forensic psychiatric hospitals, which are required to provide both a therapeutic and a safe material environment, often for extended periods of treatment and rehabilitation. By taking into consideration variable trends in psychiatric service provision and myriad clinical, legal and ethical issues, interdisciplinary forensic facility design teams are at the very forefront in implementing the latest developments in medical architecture. Also, although there are significant differences in how forensic psychiatric services are organized around the world, the underlying clinical challenges and increasingly research-based treatment principles are similar worldwide; it is therefore becoming less acceptable to operate and develop national forensic services without reference to international standards. Accordingly, we here review the literature on what features of forensic psychiatric facilities best serve the needs of those patients who need to rely on them, and we present a systematic and widely applicable approach to the complex and costly challenge of modern forensic psychiatric hospital design.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allan Seppänen
- Department of Psychoses and Forensic Psychiatry, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
- Vanha Vaasa Hospital, Vaasa, Finland
| | - Iida Törmänen
- Department of Psychoses and Forensic Psychiatry, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
- Department of ICT Psychiatry and Psychosocial Treatments, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | | | - Harry Kennedy
- Department of Psychiatry, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland
- National Forensic Mental Health Service, Central Mental Hospital, Dundrum, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Putkonen H, Taylor PJ. Making sense of mental health service changes. Nord J Psychiatry 2018; 72:82-83. [PMID: 29113575 DOI: 10.1080/08039488.2017.1398275] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Hanna Putkonen
- a National Institute for Health and Welfare, University of Turku , Turku , Finland
| | - Pamela J Taylor
- b Division of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences , School of Medicine, Cardiff University , Cardiff , UK
| |
Collapse
|