1
|
Jang S, Lee J, Kim SH, Han S, Shin SG, Lee S, Kang I, Jo WS, Jeong S, Oh SJ, Lee CG. Radiation dose estimation with multiple artificial neural networks in dicentric chromosome assay. Int J Radiat Biol 2024; 100:865-874. [PMID: 38687685 DOI: 10.1080/09553002.2024.2338531] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2024] [Accepted: 03/26/2024] [Indexed: 05/02/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The dicentric chromosome assay (DCA), often referred to as the 'gold standard' in radiation dose estimation, exhibits significant challenges as a consequence of its labor-intensive nature and dependency on expert knowledge. Existing automated technologies face limitations in accurately identifying dicentric chromosomes (DCs), resulting in decreased precision for radiation dose estimation. Furthermore, in the process of identifying DCs through automatic or semi-automatic methods, the resulting distribution could demonstrate under-dispersion or over-dispersion, which results in significant deviations from the Poisson distribution. In response to these issues, we developed an algorithm that employs deep learning to automatically identify chromosomes and perform fully automatic and accurate estimation of diverse radiation doses, adhering to a Poisson distribution. MATERIALS AND METHODS The dataset utilized for the dose estimation algorithm was generated from 30 healthy donors, with samples created across seven doses, ranging from 0 to 4 Gy. The procedure encompasses several steps: extracting images for dose estimation, counting chromosomes, and detecting DC and fragments. To accomplish these tasks, we utilize a diverse array of artificial neural networks (ANNs). The identification of DCs was accomplished using a detection mechanism that integrates both deep learning-based object detection and classification methods. Based on these detection results, dose-response curves were constructed. A dose estimation was carried out by combining a regression-based ANN with the Monte-Carlo method. RESULTS In the process of extracting images for dose analysis and identifying DCs, an under-dispersion tendency was observed. To rectify the discrepancy, classification ANN was employed to identify the results of DC detection. This approach led to satisfaction of Poisson distribution criteria by 32 out of the initial pool of 35 data points. In the subsequent stage, dose-response curves were constructed using data from 25 donors. Data provided by the remaining five donors served in performing dose estimations, which were subsequently calibrated by incorporating a regression-based ANN. Of the 23 points, 22 fell within their respective confidence intervals at p < .05 (95%), except for those associated with doses at levels below 0.5 Gy, where accurate calculation was obstructed by numerical issues. The accuracy of dose estimation has been improved for all radiation levels, with the exception of 1 Gy. CONCLUSIONS This study successfully demonstrates a high-precision dose estimation method across a general range up to 4 Gy through fully automated detection of DCs, adhering strictly to Poisson distribution. Incorporating multiple ANNs confirms the ability to perform fully automated radiation dose estimation. This approach is particularly advantageous in scenarios such as large-scale radiological incidents, improving operational efficiency and speeding up procedures while maintaining consistency in assessments. Moreover, it reduces potential human error and enhances the reliability of results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seungsoo Jang
- Department of Advanced Nuclear Engineering, POSTECH, Pohang, Korea
| | - Janghee Lee
- Department of Advanced Nuclear Engineering, POSTECH, Pohang, Korea
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Wol Soon Jo
- Research Center, Dongnam Institute of Radiological and Medical Science, Busan, Korea
| | - Sookyung Jeong
- Research Center, Dongnam Institute of Radiological and Medical Science, Busan, Korea
| | - Su Jung Oh
- Research Center, Dongnam Institute of Radiological and Medical Science, Busan, Korea
| | - Chang Geun Lee
- Research Center, Dongnam Institute of Radiological and Medical Science, Busan, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wilkins RC, Beaton-Green LA. Development of high-throughput systems for biodosimetry. RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY 2023; 199:1477-1484. [PMID: 37721060 PMCID: PMC10720693 DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncad060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2022] [Revised: 01/24/2023] [Accepted: 02/08/2023] [Indexed: 09/19/2023]
Abstract
Biomarkers for ionising radiation exposure have great utility in scenarios where there has been a potential exposure and physical dosimetry is missing or in dispute, such as for occupational and accidental exposures. Biomarkers that respond as a function of dose are particularly useful as biodosemeters to determine the dose of radiation to which an individual has been exposed. These dose measurements can also be used in medical scenarios to track doses from medical exposures and even have the potential to identify an individual's response to radiation exposure that could help tailor treatments. The measurement of biomarkers of exposure in medicine and for accidents, where a larger number of samples would be required, is limited by the throughput of analysis (i.e. the number of samples that could be processed and analysed), particularly for microscope-based methods, which tend to be labour-intensive. Rapid analysis in an emergency scenario, such as a large-scale accident, would provide dose estimates to medical practitioners, allowing timely administration of the appropriate medical countermeasures to help mitigate the effects of radiation exposure. In order to improve sample throughput for biomarker analysis, much effort has been devoted to automating the process from sample preparation through automated image analysis. This paper will focus mainly on biological endpoints traditionally analysed by microscopy, specifically dicentric chromosomes, micronuclei and gamma-H2AX. These endpoints provide examples where sample throughput has been improved through automated image acquisition, analysis of images acquired by microscopy, as well as methods that have been developed for analysis using imaging flow cytometry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruth C Wilkins
- Consumer and Clinical Radiation Protection Bureau, Health Canada, Ottawa K1A 1C1, Canada
| | - Lindsay A Beaton-Green
- Consumer and Clinical Radiation Protection Bureau, Health Canada, Ottawa K1A 1C1, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Port M, Barquinero JF, Endesfelder D, Moquet J, Oestreicher U, Terzoudi G, Trompier F, Vral A, Abe Y, Ainsbury L, Alkebsi L, Amundson S, Badie C, Baeyens A, Balajee A, Balázs K, Barnard S, Bassinet C, Beaton-Green L, Beinke C, Bobyk L, Brochard P, Brzoska K, Bucher M, Ciesielski B, Cuceu C, Discher M, D,Oca M, Domínguez I, Doucha-Senf S, Dumitrescu A, Duy P, Finot F, Garty G, Ghandhi S, Gregoire E, Goh V, Güçlü I, Hadjiiska L, Hargitai R, Hristova R, Ishii K, Kis E, Juniewicz M, Kriehuber R, Lacombe J, Lee Y, Lopez Riego M, Lumniczky K, Mai T, Maltar-Strmečki N, Marrale M, Martinez J, Marciniak A, Maznyk N, McKeever S, Meher P, Milanova M, Miura T, Gil OM, Montoro A, Domene MM, Mrozik A, Nakayama R, O’Brien G, Oskamp D, Ostheim P, Pajic J, Pastor N, Patrono C, Pujol-Canadell M, Rodriguez MP, Repin M, Romanyukha A, Rößler U, Sabatier L, Sakai A, Scherthan H, Schüle S, Seong K, Sevriukova O, Sholom S, Sommer S, Suto Y, Sypko T, Szatmári T, Takahashi-Sugai M, Takebayashi K, Testa A, Testard I, Tichy A, Triantopoulou S, Tsuyama N, Unverricht-Yeboah M, Valente M, Van Hoey O, Wilkins R, Wojcik A, Wojewodzka M, Younghyun L, Zafiropoulos D, Abend M. RENEB Inter-Laboratory Comparison 2021: Inter-Assay Comparison of Eight Dosimetry Assays. Radiat Res 2023; 199:535-555. [PMID: 37310880 PMCID: PMC10508307 DOI: 10.1667/rade-22-00207.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2022] [Accepted: 01/10/2023] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Tools for radiation exposure reconstruction are required to support the medical management of radiation victims in radiological or nuclear incidents. Different biological and physical dosimetry assays can be used for various exposure scenarios to estimate the dose of ionizing radiation a person has absorbed. Regular validation of the techniques through inter-laboratory comparisons (ILC) is essential to guarantee high quality results. In the current RENEB inter-laboratory comparison, the performance quality of established cytogenetic assays [dicentric chromosome assay (DCA), cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay (CBMN), stable chromosomal translocation assay (FISH) and premature chromosome condensation assay (PCC)] was tested in comparison to molecular biological assays [gamma-H2AX foci (gH2AX), gene expression (GE)] and physical dosimetry-based assays [electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR), optically or thermally stimulated luminescence (LUM)]. Three blinded coded samples (e.g., blood, enamel or mobiles) were exposed to 0, 1.2 or 3.5 Gy X-ray reference doses (240 kVp, 1 Gy/min). These doses roughly correspond to clinically relevant groups of unexposed to low exposed (0-1 Gy), moderately exposed (1-2 Gy, no severe acute health effects expected) and highly exposed individuals (>2 Gy, requiring early intensive medical care). In the frame of the current RENEB inter-laboratory comparison, samples were sent to 86 specialized teams in 46 organizations from 27 nations for dose estimation and identification of three clinically relevant groups. The time for sending early crude reports and more precise reports was documented for each laboratory and assay where possible. The quality of dose estimates was analyzed with three different levels of granularity, 1. by calculating the frequency of correctly reported clinically relevant dose categories, 2. by determining the number of dose estimates within the uncertainty intervals recommended for triage dosimetry (±0.5 Gy or ±1.0 Gy for doses <2.5 Gy or >2.5 Gy), and 3. by calculating the absolute difference (AD) of estimated doses relative to the reference doses. In total, 554 dose estimates were submitted within the 6-week period given before the exercise was closed. For samples processed with the highest priority, earliest dose estimates/categories were reported within 5-10 h of receipt for GE, gH2AX, LUM, EPR, 2-3 days for DCA, CBMN and within 6-7 days for the FISH assay. For the unirradiated control sample, the categorization in the correct clinically relevant group (0-1 Gy) as well as the allocation to the triage uncertainty interval was, with the exception of a few outliers, successfully performed for all assays. For the 3.5 Gy sample the percentage of correct classifications to the clinically relevant group (≥2 Gy) was between 89-100% for all assays, with the exception of gH2AX. For the 1.2 Gy sample, an exact allocation to the clinically relevant group was more difficult and 0-50% or 0-48% of the estimates were wrongly classified into the lowest or highest dose categories, respectively. For the irradiated samples, the correct allocation to the triage uncertainty intervals varied considerably between assays for the 1.2 Gy (29-76%) and 3.5 Gy (17-100%) samples. While a systematic shift towards higher doses was observed for the cytogenetic-based assays, extreme outliers exceeding the reference doses 2-6 fold were observed for EPR, FISH and GE assays. These outliers were related to a particular material examined (tooth enamel for EPR assay, reported as kerma in enamel, but when converted into the proper quantity, i.e. to kerma in air, expected dose estimates could be recalculated in most cases), the level of experience of the teams (FISH) and methodological uncertainties (GE). This was the first RENEB ILC where everything, from blood sampling to irradiation and shipment of the samples, was organized and realized at the same institution, for several biological and physical retrospective dosimetry assays. Almost all assays appeared comparably applicable for the identification of unexposed and highly exposed individuals and the allocation of medical relevant groups, with the latter requiring medical support for the acute radiation scenario simulated in this exercise. However, extreme outliers or a systematic shift of dose estimates have been observed for some assays. Possible reasons will be discussed in the assay specific papers of this special issue. In summary, this ILC clearly demonstrates the need to conduct regular exercises to identify research needs, but also to identify technical problems and to optimize the design of future ILCs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M. Port
- Bundeswehr Institute of Radiobiology, Munich, Germany
| | | | | | - J. Moquet
- UK Health Security Agency, Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards Division, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom
| | | | - G. Terzoudi
- National Centre for Scientific Research “Demokritos”, Health Physics, Radiobiology & Cytogenetics Laboratory, Agia Paraskevi, Greece
| | - F. Trompier
- Institut de Radioprotection et de Surete Nucleaire, Fontenay aux Roses, France
| | - A. Vral
- Ghent University, Radiobiology Research Unit, Gent, Belgium
| | - Y. Abe
- Department of Radiation Biology and Protection, Nagasaki University, Japan
| | - L. Ainsbury
- UK Health Security Agency and Office for Health Improvement and Disparities, Cytogenetics and Pathology Group, Oxfordshire, England
| | - L Alkebsi
- Department of Radiation Measurement and Dose Assessment, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| | - S.A. Amundson
- Columbia University, Irving Medical Center, Center for Radiological Research, New York, New York
| | - C. Badie
- UK Health Security Agency, Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards Division, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom
| | - A. Baeyens
- Ghent University, Radiobiology Research Unit, Gent, Belgium
| | - A.S. Balajee
- Cytogenetic Biodosimetry Laboratory, Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Oak Ridge, Tennessee
| | - K. Balázs
- Radiation Medicine Unit, Department of Radiobiology and Radiohygiene, National Public Health Centre, Budapest, Hungary
| | - S. Barnard
- UK Health Security Agency, Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards Division, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom
| | - C. Bassinet
- Institut de Radioprotection et de Surete Nucleaire, Fontenay aux Roses, France
| | | | - C. Beinke
- Bundeswehr Institute of Radiobiology, Munich, Germany
| | - L. Bobyk
- Institut de Recherche Biomédicale des Armées (IRBA), Bretigny Sur Orge, France
| | | | - K. Brzoska
- Institute of Nuclear Chemistry and Technology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - M. Bucher
- Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz, Oberschleißheim, Germany
| | - B. Ciesielski
- Medical University of Gdansk, Department of Physics and Biophysics, Gdansk, Poland
| | - C. Cuceu
- Genevolution, Porcheville, France
| | - M. Discher
- Paris-Lodron-University of Salzburg, Department of Environment and Biodiversity, 5020 Salzburg, Austria
| | - M.C. D,Oca
- Università Degli Studi di Palermo, Dipartimento di Fisica e Chimica “Emilio Segrè,” Palermo, Italy
| | - I. Domínguez
- Universidad de Sevilla, Departamento de Biología Celular, Sevilla, Spain
| | | | - A. Dumitrescu
- National Institute of Public Health, Radiation Hygiene Laboratory, Bucharest, Romania
| | - P.N. Duy
- Dalat Nuclear Research Institute, Radiation Technlogy & Biotechnology Center, Dalat City, Vietnam
| | - F. Finot
- Genevolution, Porcheville, France
| | - G. Garty
- Columbia University, Irving Medical Center, Center for Radiological Research, New York, New York
| | - S.A. Ghandhi
- Columbia University, Irving Medical Center, Center for Radiological Research, New York, New York
| | - E. Gregoire
- Institut de Radioprotection et de Surete Nucleaire, Fontenay aux Roses, France
| | - V.S.T. Goh
- Department of Radiobiology, Singapore Nuclear Research and Safety Initiative (SNRSI), National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - I. Güçlü
- TENMAK, Nuclear Energy Research Institute, Technology Development and Nuclear Research Department, Türkey
| | - L. Hadjiiska
- National Centre of Radiobiology and Radiation Protection, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - R. Hargitai
- Radiation Medicine Unit, Department of Radiobiology and Radiohygiene, National Public Health Centre, Budapest, Hungary
| | - R. Hristova
- National Centre of Radiobiology and Radiation Protection, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - K. Ishii
- Department of Radiation Measurement and Dose Assessment, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| | - E. Kis
- Radiation Medicine Unit, Department of Radiobiology and Radiohygiene, National Public Health Centre, Budapest, Hungary
| | - M. Juniewicz
- Medical University of Gdansk, Department of Physics and Biophysics, Gdansk, Poland
| | - R. Kriehuber
- Department of Safety and Radiation Protection, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany
| | - J. Lacombe
- University of Arizona, Center for Applied Nanobioscience & Medicine, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Y. Lee
- Laboratory of Biological Dosimetry, Korea Institute of Radiological & Medical Sciences, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | | | - K. Lumniczky
- Radiation Medicine Unit, Department of Radiobiology and Radiohygiene, National Public Health Centre, Budapest, Hungary
| | - T.T. Mai
- Dalat Nuclear Research Institute, Radiation Technlogy & Biotechnology Center, Dalat City, Vietnam
| | - N. Maltar-Strmečki
- Ruðer Boškovic Institute, Division of Physical Chemistry, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - M. Marrale
- Università Degli Studi di Palermo, Dipartimento di Fisica e Chimica “Emilio Segrè,” Palermo, Italy
| | - J.S. Martinez
- Institut de Radioprotection et de Surete Nucleaire, Fontenay aux Roses, France
| | - A. Marciniak
- Medical University of Gdansk, Department of Physics and Biophysics, Gdansk, Poland
| | - N. Maznyk
- Radiation Cytogenetics Laboratory, S.P. Grigoriev Institute for Medical Radiology and Oncology of Ukrainian National Academy of Medical Science, Kharkiv, Ukraine
| | - S.W.S. McKeever
- Radiation Dosimetry Laboratory, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma
| | | | - M. Milanova
- University of Defense, Faculty of Military Health Sciences, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic
| | - T. Miura
- Institute of Radiation Emergency Medicine, Hirosaki University, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - O. Monteiro Gil
- Instituto Superior Técnico/ Campus Tecnológico e Nuclear, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - A. Montoro
- Servicio de Protección Radiológica. Laboratorio de Dosimetría Biológica, Valencia, Spain
| | - M. Moreno Domene
- Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Laboratorio de dosimetría biológica, Madrid, Spain
| | - A. Mrozik
- Institute of Nuclear Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Krakow, Poland
| | - R. Nakayama
- Institute of Radiation Emergency Medicine, Hirosaki University, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - G. O’Brien
- UK Health Security Agency, Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards Division, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom
| | - D. Oskamp
- Department of Safety and Radiation Protection, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany
| | - P. Ostheim
- Bundeswehr Institute of Radiobiology, Munich, Germany
| | - J. Pajic
- Serbian Institute of Occupational Health, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - N. Pastor
- Universidad de Sevilla, Departamento de Biología Celular, Sevilla, Spain
| | - C. Patrono
- Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development, Rome, Italy
| | | | - M.J. Prieto Rodriguez
- Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Laboratorio de dosimetría biológica, Madrid, Spain
| | - M. Repin
- Columbia University, Irving Medical Center, Center for Radiological Research, New York, New York
| | | | - U. Rößler
- Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz, Oberschleißheim, Germany
| | | | - A. Sakai
- Department of Radiation Life Sciences, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima, Japan
| | - H. Scherthan
- Bundeswehr Institute of Radiobiology, Munich, Germany
| | - S. Schüle
- Bundeswehr Institute of Radiobiology, Munich, Germany
| | - K.M. Seong
- Laboratory of Biological Dosimetry, Korea Institute of Radiological & Medical Sciences, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | | | - S. Sholom
- Radiation Dosimetry Laboratory, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma
| | - S. Sommer
- Institute of Nuclear Chemistry and Technology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Y. Suto
- Department of Radiation Measurement and Dose Assessment, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| | - T. Sypko
- Radiation Cytogenetics Laboratory, S.P. Grigoriev Institute for Medical Radiology and Oncology of Ukrainian National Academy of Medical Science, Kharkiv, Ukraine
| | - T. Szatmári
- Radiation Medicine Unit, Department of Radiobiology and Radiohygiene, National Public Health Centre, Budapest, Hungary
| | - M. Takahashi-Sugai
- Department of Radiation Life Sciences, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima, Japan
| | - K. Takebayashi
- Institute of Radiation Emergency Medicine, Hirosaki University, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - A. Testa
- Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development, Rome, Italy
| | - I. Testard
- CEA-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette Cedex, France
| | - A. Tichy
- University of Defense, Faculty of Military Health Sciences, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic
| | - S. Triantopoulou
- National Centre for Scientific Research “Demokritos”, Health Physics, Radiobiology & Cytogenetics Laboratory, Agia Paraskevi, Greece
| | - N. Tsuyama
- Department of Radiation Life Sciences, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima, Japan
| | - M. Unverricht-Yeboah
- Department of Safety and Radiation Protection, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany
| | - M. Valente
- CEA-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette Cedex, France
| | - O. Van Hoey
- Belgian Nuclear Research Center SCK CEN, Mol, Belgium
| | | | - A. Wojcik
- Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - M. Wojewodzka
- Institute of Nuclear Chemistry and Technology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Lee Younghyun
- Laboratory of Biological Dosimetry, Korea Institute of Radiological & Medical Sciences, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - D. Zafiropoulos
- Laboratori Nazionali di Legnaro - Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Legnaro, Italy
| | - M. Abend
- Bundeswehr Institute of Radiobiology, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tuner H. EPR dosimetric properties of different mineral eyeglass lenses. Radiat Phys Chem Oxf Engl 1993 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2023.110764] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
|
5
|
Vellichirammal NN, Sethi S, Pandey S, Singh J, Wise SY, Carpenter AD, Fatanmi OO, Guda C, Singh VK. Lung transcriptome of nonhuman primates exposed to total- and partial-body irradiation. MOLECULAR THERAPY. NUCLEIC ACIDS 2022; 29:584-598. [PMID: 36090752 PMCID: PMC9418744 DOI: 10.1016/j.omtn.2022.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2022] [Accepted: 08/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
The focus of radiation biodosimetry has changed recently, and a paradigm shift for using molecular technologies of omic platforms in addition to cytogenetic techniques has been observed. In our study, we have used a nonhuman primate model to investigate the impact of a supralethal dose of 12 Gy radiation on alterations in the lung transcriptome. We used 6 healthy and 32 irradiated animal samples to delineate radiation-induced changes. We also used a medical countermeasure, γ-tocotrienol (GT3), to observe any changes. We demonstrate significant radiation-induced changes in the lung transcriptome for total-body irradiation (TBI) and partial-body irradiation (PBI). However, no major influence of GT3 on radiation was noted in either comparison. Several common signaling pathways, including PI3K/AKT, GADD45, and p53, were upregulated in both exposures. TBI activated DNA-damage-related pathways in the lungs, whereas PTEN signaling was activated after PBI. Our study highlights the various transcriptional profiles associated with γ- and X-ray exposures, and the associated pathways include LXR/RXR activation in TBI, whereas pulmonary wound-healing and pulmonary fibrosis signaling was repressed in PBI. Our study provides important insights into the molecular pathways associated with irradiation that can be further investigated for biomarker discovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sahil Sethi
- Department of Genetics, Cell Biology and Anatomy, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198, USA
| | - Sanjit Pandey
- Department of Genetics, Cell Biology and Anatomy, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198, USA
| | - Jatinder Singh
- Division of Radioprotectants, Department of Pharmacology and Molecular Therapeutics, F. Edward Hébert School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA
- Armed Forces Radiobiology Research Institute, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Stephen Y. Wise
- Division of Radioprotectants, Department of Pharmacology and Molecular Therapeutics, F. Edward Hébert School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA
- Armed Forces Radiobiology Research Institute, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Alana D. Carpenter
- Division of Radioprotectants, Department of Pharmacology and Molecular Therapeutics, F. Edward Hébert School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA
- Armed Forces Radiobiology Research Institute, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Oluseyi O. Fatanmi
- Division of Radioprotectants, Department of Pharmacology and Molecular Therapeutics, F. Edward Hébert School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA
- Armed Forces Radiobiology Research Institute, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Chittibabu Guda
- Department of Genetics, Cell Biology and Anatomy, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198, USA
| | - Vijay K. Singh
- Division of Radioprotectants, Department of Pharmacology and Molecular Therapeutics, F. Edward Hébert School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA
- Armed Forces Radiobiology Research Institute, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Obrador E, Salvador-Palmer R, Villaescusa JI, Gallego E, Pellicer B, Estrela JM, Montoro A. Nuclear and Radiological Emergencies: Biological Effects, Countermeasures and Biodosimetry. Antioxidants (Basel) 2022; 11:1098. [PMID: 35739995 PMCID: PMC9219873 DOI: 10.3390/antiox11061098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2022] [Revised: 05/26/2022] [Accepted: 05/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Atomic and radiological crises can be caused by accidents, military activities, terrorist assaults involving atomic installations, the explosion of nuclear devices, or the utilization of concealed radiation exposure devices. Direct damage is caused when radiation interacts directly with cellular components. Indirect effects are mainly caused by the generation of reactive oxygen species due to radiolysis of water molecules. Acute and persistent oxidative stress associates to radiation-induced biological damages. Biological impacts of atomic radiation exposure can be deterministic (in a period range a posteriori of the event and because of destructive tissue/organ harm) or stochastic (irregular, for example cell mutation related pathologies and heritable infections). Potential countermeasures according to a specific scenario require considering basic issues, e.g., the type of radiation, people directly affected and first responders, range of doses received and whether the exposure or contamination has affected the total body or is partial. This review focuses on available medical countermeasures (radioprotectors, radiomitigators, radionuclide scavengers), biodosimetry (biological and biophysical techniques that can be quantitatively correlated with the magnitude of the radiation dose received), and strategies to implement the response to an accidental radiation exposure. In the case of large-scale atomic or radiological events, the most ideal choice for triage, dose assessment and victim classification, is the utilization of global biodosimetry networks, in combination with the automation of strategies based on modular platforms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Obrador
- Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine and Odontology, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain; (R.S.-P.); (B.P.); (J.M.E.)
| | - Rosario Salvador-Palmer
- Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine and Odontology, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain; (R.S.-P.); (B.P.); (J.M.E.)
| | - Juan I. Villaescusa
- Service of Radiological Protection, Clinical Area of Medical Image, La Fe University Hospital, 46026 Valencia, Spain; (J.I.V.); (A.M.)
- Biomedical Imaging Research Group GIBI230, Health Research Institute (IISLaFe), La Fe University Hospital, 46026 Valencia, Spain
| | - Eduardo Gallego
- Energy Engineering Department, School of Industrial Engineering, Polytechnic University of Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain;
| | - Blanca Pellicer
- Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine and Odontology, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain; (R.S.-P.); (B.P.); (J.M.E.)
| | - José M. Estrela
- Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine and Odontology, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain; (R.S.-P.); (B.P.); (J.M.E.)
| | - Alegría Montoro
- Service of Radiological Protection, Clinical Area of Medical Image, La Fe University Hospital, 46026 Valencia, Spain; (J.I.V.); (A.M.)
- Biomedical Imaging Research Group GIBI230, Health Research Institute (IISLaFe), La Fe University Hospital, 46026 Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Marciniak A, Ciesielski B, Juniewicz M. EPR dosimetry in glass: a review. RADIATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL BIOPHYSICS 2022; 61:179-203. [PMID: 35306595 DOI: 10.1007/s00411-022-00970-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2021] [Accepted: 02/26/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR) spectroscopy enables detection of paramagnetic centers generated in solids by ionising radiation. In the last years, the ubiquity of glass in personal utility items increased significance of fortuities retrospective dosimetry based on EPR in glass parts of mobile phones and watches. Despite of fading of the signals and their susceptibility to light, it enables dosimetry at medical triage level of 1-2 Gy. In this article information relevant for assessment of applicability and planning of the EPR dosimetry is presented-particularly at dose levels typical for radiation accidents. Reported data on fading of the radiation-induced spectral components are presented and compared. Effects of light on background spectra and on the dosimetric signals are also presented. It is concluded that when properly accounting for the fading and for the obscuring effects of light, the EPR dosimetry in glasses from mobile phones and watches can be used in dose assessment after radiation accidents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Agnieszka Marciniak
- Department of Physics and Biophysics, Medical University of Gdańsk, Dębinki 1, 80-211, Gdańsk, Poland
| | - Bartłomiej Ciesielski
- Department of Physics and Biophysics, Medical University of Gdańsk, Dębinki 1, 80-211, Gdańsk, Poland.
| | - Małgorzata Juniewicz
- Department of Physics and Biophysics, Medical University of Gdańsk, Dębinki 1, 80-211, Gdańsk, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Yang Y, Wang G, Li X, Iradukunda Y, Liu F, Li Z, Gao H, Shi G. Preparation of Electrospun Active Molecules Membrane Application to Atmospheric Free Radicals. MEMBRANES 2022; 12:membranes12050480. [PMID: 35629806 PMCID: PMC9143268 DOI: 10.3390/membranes12050480] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2022] [Revised: 04/27/2022] [Accepted: 04/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022]
Abstract
Atmospheric reactive oxygen species (ROS) play a key role in the process of air pollution and oxidative damage to organisms. The analysis of ROS was carried out by the capture-derivative method. Therefore, it is necessary to prepare an effective molecular membrane to trap and detect ROS. Electrospinning membranes were prepared by combining the electrospinning technique with chrysin, baicalein, scutellarin, genistein, quercetin, and baicalin. By comparing the structures of the membranes before and after the reaction, the fluorescence enhancement characteristics of the reactive molecular membranes and the atmospheric radicals were studied. The ability of the active molecular membranes to trap atmospheric radicals was also studied. It was found that the genistein active molecular membrane had good trapping ability in four environments. The fluorescence enhancement rates in ROS, OH radical and O3 simulated environments were 39.32%, 7.99% and 11.92%, respectively. The fluorescence enhancement rate in atmospheric environment was 16.16%. Indeed, the sites where the atmospheric radicals react with the active molecular membranes are discussed. It is found that it is mainly related to the 5,7 phenolic hydroxyl of ring A, catechol structure and the coexistence structure of 4′ phenolic hydroxyl of ring B and 7 phenolic hydroxyl of ring A. Therefore, the genistein molecular membrane has shown great potential in its trapping ability and it is also environmentally friendly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yang Yang
- School of Petrochemical Engineering, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou 730050, China; (Y.Y.); (X.L.); (F.L.); (Z.L.); (H.G.); (G.S.)
| | - Guoying Wang
- School of Petrochemical Engineering, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou 730050, China; (Y.Y.); (X.L.); (F.L.); (Z.L.); (H.G.); (G.S.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Xin Li
- School of Petrochemical Engineering, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou 730050, China; (Y.Y.); (X.L.); (F.L.); (Z.L.); (H.G.); (G.S.)
| | - Yves Iradukunda
- Lanzhou Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China;
| | - Fengshuo Liu
- School of Petrochemical Engineering, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou 730050, China; (Y.Y.); (X.L.); (F.L.); (Z.L.); (H.G.); (G.S.)
| | - Zhiqian Li
- School of Petrochemical Engineering, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou 730050, China; (Y.Y.); (X.L.); (F.L.); (Z.L.); (H.G.); (G.S.)
| | - Hongli Gao
- School of Petrochemical Engineering, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou 730050, China; (Y.Y.); (X.L.); (F.L.); (Z.L.); (H.G.); (G.S.)
| | - Gaofeng Shi
- School of Petrochemical Engineering, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou 730050, China; (Y.Y.); (X.L.); (F.L.); (Z.L.); (H.G.); (G.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Evans AC, Setzkorn T, Edmondson DA, Segelke H, Wilson PF, Matthay KK, Granger MM, Marachelian A, Haas-Kogan DA, DuBois SG, Coleman MA. Peripheral Blood Transcript Signatures after Internal 131I-mIBG Therapy in Relapsed and Refractory Neuroblastoma Patients Identifies Early and Late Biomarkers of Internal 131I Exposures. Radiat Res 2022; 197:101-112. [PMID: 34673986 PMCID: PMC8870530 DOI: 10.1667/rade-20-00173.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2020] [Accepted: 09/23/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
131I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (131I-mIBG) is a targeted radiation therapy developed for the treatment of advanced neuroblastoma. We have previously shown that this patient cohort can be used to predict absorbed dose associated with early 131I exposure, 72 h after treatment. We now expand these studies to identify gene expression differences associated with 131I-mIBG exposure 15 days after treatment. Total RNA from peripheral blood lymphocytes was isolated from 288 whole blood samples representing 59 relapsed or refractory neuroblastoma patients before and after 131I-mIBG treatment. We found that several transcripts predictive of early exposure returned to baseline levels by day 15, however, selected transcripts did not return to baseline. At 72 h, all 17 selected pathway-specific transcripts were differentially expressed. Transcripts CDKN1A (P < 0.000001), FDXR (P < 0.000001), DDB2 (P < 0.000001), and BBC3 (P < 0.000001) showed the highest up-regulation at 72 h after 131I-mIBG exposure, with mean log2 fold changes of 2.55, 2.93, 1.86 and 1.85, respectively. At day 15 after 131I-mIBG, 11 of the 17 selected transcripts were differentially expressed, with XPC, STAT5B, PRKDC, MDM2, POLH, IGF1R, and SGK1 displaying significant up-regulation at 72 h and significant down-regulation at day 15. Interestingly, transcripts FDXR (P = 0.01), DDB2 (P = 0.03), BCL2 (P = 0.003), and SESN1 (P < 0.0003) maintained differential expression 15 days after 131I-mIBG treatment. These results suggest that transcript levels for DNA repair, apoptosis, and ionizing radiation-induced cellular stress are still changing by 15 days after 131I-mIBG treatment. Our studies showcase the use of biodosimetry gene expression panels as predictive biomarkers following early (72 h) and late (15 days) internal 131I exposure. Our findings also demonstrate the utility of our transcript panel to differentiate exposed from non-exposed individuals up to 15 days after exposure from internal 131I.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela C. Evans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California
| | - Tim Setzkorn
- Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Germany
| | | | - Haley Segelke
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California
| | - Paul F. Wilson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California
| | - Katherine K. Matthay
- Department of Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco California
| | | | - Araz Marachelian
- Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Daphne A. Haas-Kogan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Steven G. DuBois
- Dana-Farber/Boston Children’s Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Matthew A. Coleman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Entine F, Garnier G, Dondey M, Rizzi Y, Gobert A, Bassinet C, Papin S, Pennacino I, Cazoulat A, Amabile JC, Huet C. SEED: An Operational Numerical Tool for Dosimetric Reconstruction in Case of External Radiological Overexposure. HEALTH PHYSICS 2022; 122:271-290. [PMID: 34995220 DOI: 10.1097/hp.0000000000001483] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT In the event of a radiological accident involving external exposure of one or more victims and potential high doses, it is essential to know the dose distribution within the body in order to sort the victims according to the severity of the irradiation and then to take them to the most suitable medical facilities. However, there are currently few techniques that can be rapidly deployed on field and capable of characterizing an irradiation. Therefore, a numerical simulation tool has been designed. It can be implemented by a doctor/physicist pairing, projected within a limited time as close as possible to the irradiation accident and emergency response teams. Called SEED (Simulation of External Exposures & Dosimetry), this tool (dedicated to dose reconstruction in case of external exposure) allows a rapid modeling of the irradiation scene and a visual exchange with the victims and witnesses of the event. The user can navigate in three dimensions in the accident scene thanks to a graphical user interface including a "first person" camera. To validate the performance of the SEED tool, two dosimetric benchmarking exercises were performed. The first consisted in comparing the dose value provided by SEED to that given by a reference calculation code: MCNPX. The purpose of the second validation was to perform an experiment irradiating a physical dummy equipped with dosimeters and to reconstruct this irradiation using SEED. These two validation protocols have shown satisfactory results with mean difference less than 2% and 12% for the first and second exercises, respectively. They confirm that this new tool is able to provide useful information to medical teams in charge of dosimetric triage in case of a major external exposure event.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - G Garnier
- French Defense Radiation Protection Service (SPRA), 1 bis rue du lieutenant Raoul Batany - CS500 - 92141 CLAMART Cedex, France
| | - M Dondey
- French Defense Radiation Protection Service (SPRA), 1 bis rue du lieutenant Raoul Batany - CS500 - 92141 CLAMART Cedex, France
| | - Y Rizzi
- Institute for Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety (IRSN), 31 avenue de la Division Leclerc - 92260 FONTENAY-AUX-ROSES, France
| | - A Gobert
- Institute for Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety (IRSN), 31 avenue de la Division Leclerc - 92260 FONTENAY-AUX-ROSES, France
| | - C Bassinet
- Institute for Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety (IRSN), 31 avenue de la Division Leclerc - 92260 FONTENAY-AUX-ROSES, France
| | - S Papin
- French Defense Radiation Protection Service (SPRA), 1 bis rue du lieutenant Raoul Batany - CS500 - 92141 CLAMART Cedex, France
| | - I Pennacino
- French Defense Radiation Protection Service (SPRA), 1 bis rue du lieutenant Raoul Batany - CS500 - 92141 CLAMART Cedex, France
| | - A Cazoulat
- French Defense Radiation Protection Service (SPRA), 1 bis rue du lieutenant Raoul Batany - CS500 - 92141 CLAMART Cedex, France
| | - J C Amabile
- Armed Forces Medical Service Head quarters (DCSSA), 60 boulevard du général Martial Valin - CS 21 623 - 75509 PARIS Cedex 15, France
| | - C Huet
- Institute for Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety (IRSN), 31 avenue de la Division Leclerc - 92260 FONTENAY-AUX-ROSES, France
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
ESR dosimetric properties of gamma irradiated different origin eyeglass samples. Appl Radiat Isot 2021; 178:109987. [PMID: 34688023 DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2021.109987] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2021] [Revised: 09/23/2021] [Accepted: 10/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
In the present research, mineral and organic origin eyeglasses (CR-39) were examined with respect to their potential application in the dosimetry of ionizing radiation by using electron spin resonance (ESR) technique. Before irradiation, organic and mineral origin eyeglasses did not exhibit any ESR signal. But they do produce radiation-induced ESR spectra after gamma irradiation. The variations of the radiation-induced resonance signals of organic and mineral origin eyeglasses with microwave power and modulation amplitude were investigated and the optimum spectrometer operating conditions were determined. The dose-response curves of the organic and mineral origin eyeglasses exposed to gamma radiations were found to be described well by a linear and single exponential saturation functions in the dose ranges of 0.1-10 and 0.05-10 kGy, respectively. For mineral eyeglasses this behavior was linear at lower doses (0.05-1 kGy). Despite the observed fading with time in the signal intensity, measurable ESR signals were obtained even 54 days after irradiation for organic origin eyeglass, while the corresponding value for the mineral eyeglass was 154 days. The study also showed that the thermal stability of the radiation-induced ESR signal of mineral eyeglass sample was higher than the signal of organic origin eyeglass.
Collapse
|
12
|
Kim H, Discher M, Kim MC, Woda C, Lee J. Thermally assisted optically stimulated luminescence protocol of mobile phone substrate glasses for accident dosimetry. RADIAT MEAS 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2021.106625] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
13
|
Endesfelder D, Oestreicher U, Kulka U, Ainsbury EA, Moquet J, Barnard S, Gregoire E, Martinez JS, Trompier F, Ristic Y, Woda C, Waldner L, Beinke C, Vral A, Barquinero JF, Hernandez A, Sommer S, Lumniczky K, Hargitai R, Montoro A, Milic M, Monteiro Gil O, Valente M, Bobyk L, Sevriukova O, Sabatier L, Prieto MJ, Moreno Domene M, Testa A, Patrono C, Terzoudi G, Triantopoulou S, Histova R, Wojcik A. RENEB/EURADOS field exercise 2019: robust dose estimation under outdoor conditions based on the dicentric chromosome assay. Int J Radiat Biol 2021; 97:1181-1198. [PMID: 34138666 DOI: 10.1080/09553002.2021.1941380] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2021] [Revised: 05/19/2021] [Accepted: 06/02/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Biological and/or physical assays for retrospective dosimetry are valuable tools to recover the exposure situation and to aid medical decision making. To further validate and improve such biological and physical assays, in 2019, EURADOS Working Group 10 and RENEB performed a field exercise in Lund, Sweden, to simulate various real-life exposure scenarios. MATERIALS AND METHODS For the dicentric chromosome assay (DCA), blood tubes were located at anthropomorphic phantoms positioned in different geometries and were irradiated with a 1.36 TBq 192Ir-source. For each exposure condition, dose estimates were provided by at least one laboratory and for four conditions by 17 participating RENEB laboratories. Three radio-photoluminescence glass dosimeters were placed at each tube to assess reference doses. RESULTS The DCA results were homogeneous between participants and matched well with the reference doses (≥95% of estimates within ±0.5 Gy of the reference). For samples close to the source systematic underestimation could be corrected by accounting for exposure time. Heterogeneity within and between tubes was detected for reference doses as well as for DCA doses estimates. CONCLUSIONS The participants were able to successfully estimate the doses and to provide important information on the exposure scenarios under conditions closely resembling a real-life situation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Ulrike Kulka
- Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz, BfS, Oberschleissheim, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Eric Gregoire
- Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | - Juan S Martinez
- Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | - François Trompier
- Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | - Yoann Ristic
- Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | - Clemens Woda
- Helmholtz Zentrum München, Institute of Radiation Medicine, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Lovisa Waldner
- Department of Translational Medicine, Medical Radiation Physics, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | | | - Anne Vral
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiteit Gent, Gent, Belgium
| | - Joan-Francesc Barquinero
- Department of Animal Biology, Plant Biology and Ecology, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain
| | - Alfredo Hernandez
- Department of Animal Biology, Plant Biology and Ecology, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain
- Independent Researcher, London, UK
| | | | - Katalin Lumniczky
- Department of Radiobiology and Radiohygiene, Unit of Radiation Medicine, National Public Health Centre, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Rita Hargitai
- Department of Radiobiology and Radiohygiene, Unit of Radiation Medicine, National Public Health Centre, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Alegría Montoro
- Laboratorio de Dosimetría Biológica, Servicio de Protección Radiológica Hospital, Universitario Politécnico la Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Mirta Milic
- Institute for Medical Research and Occupational Health Mutagenesis Unit, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Octávia Monteiro Gil
- Centro de Ciências e Tecnologias Nucleares, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Marco Valente
- Department of Radiation Biological, Armed Forces Biomedical Research Institute, Brétigny-sur-Orge, France
| | - Laure Bobyk
- Department of Radiation Biological, Armed Forces Biomedical Research Institute, Brétigny-sur-Orge, France
| | - Olga Sevriukova
- Department of Expertise and Exposure Monitoring, Radiation Protection Centre, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Laure Sabatier
- PROCyTOX, Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique et aux Energies Alternatives, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
- Graduate School Life Science and Health, Université Paris, Saclay, France
| | - María Jesús Prieto
- Laboratorio de Dosimetría Biológica, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Mercedes Moreno Domene
- Laboratorio de Dosimetría Biológica, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Antonella Testa
- Agenzia Nazionale per le Nuove Tecnologie, L'energia e lo Sviluppo Economico Sostenibile, Rome, Italy
| | - Clarice Patrono
- Agenzia Nazionale per le Nuove Tecnologie, L'energia e lo Sviluppo Economico Sostenibile, Rome, Italy
| | - Georgia Terzoudi
- Health Physics, Radiobiology and Cytogenetics Laboratory, National Centre for Scientific Research 'Demokritos', Athens, Greece
| | - Sotiria Triantopoulou
- Health Physics, Radiobiology and Cytogenetics Laboratory, National Centre for Scientific Research 'Demokritos', Athens, Greece
| | - Rositsa Histova
- Department of Radiobiology, National Centre of Radiobiology and Radiation Protection, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Andrzej Wojcik
- Department of Molecular Biosciences, The Wenner-Gren Institute, Stockholm University, Sweden
- Institute of Biology, Jan Kochanowski University, Kielce, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Waldner L, Bernhardsson C, Woda C, Trompier F, Van Hoey O, Kulka U, Oestreicher U, Bassinet C, Rääf C, Discher M, Endesfelder D, Eakins JS, Gregoire E, Wojcik A, Ristic Y, Kim H, Lee J, Yu H, Kim MC, Abend M, Ainsbury E. The 2019-2020 EURADOS WG10 and RENEB Field Test of Retrospective Dosimetry Methods in a Small-Scale Incident Involving Ionizing Radiation. Radiat Res 2021; 195:253-264. [PMID: 33347576 DOI: 10.1667/rade-20-00243.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2020] [Accepted: 11/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
With the use of ionizing radiation comes the risk of accidents and malevolent misuse. When unplanned exposures occur, there are several methods which can be used to retrospectively reconstruct individual radiation exposures; biological methods include analysis of aberrations and damage of chromosomes and DNA, while physical methods rely on luminescence (TL/OSL) or EPR signals. To ensure the quality and dependability of these methods, they should be evaluated under realistic exposure conditions. In 2019, EURADOS Working Group 10 and RENEB organized a field test with the purpose of evaluating retrospective dosimetry methods as carried out in potential real-life exposure scenarios. A 1.36 TBq 192Ir source was used to irradiate anthropomorphic phantoms in different geometries at doses of several Gy in an outdoor open-air geometry. Materials intended for accident dosimetry (including mobile phones and blood) were placed on the phantoms together with reference dosimeters (LiF, NaCl, glass). The objective was to estimate radiation exposures received by individuals as measured using blood and fortuitous materials, and to evaluate these methods by comparing the estimated doses to reference measurements and Monte Carlo simulations. Herein we describe the overall planning, goals, execution and preliminary outcomes of the 2019 field test. Such field tests are essential for the development of new and existing methods. The outputs from this field test include useful experience in terms of planning and execution of future exercises, with respect to time management, radiation protection, and reference dosimetry to be considered to obtain relevant data for analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Waldner
- Lund University, Department of Translational Medicine, Medical Radiation Physics, Malmö, Sweden
| | - C Bernhardsson
- Lund University, Department of Translational Medicine, Medical Radiation Physics, Malmö, Sweden
| | - C Woda
- Helmholtz Zentrum München, Institute of Radiation Medicine, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - F Trompier
- Lund University, Department of Translational Medicine, Medical Radiation Physics, Malmö, Sweden
| | - O Van Hoey
- Institute for Environment, Health and Safety, Belgian Nuclear Research Center (SCK•CEN), Belgium
| | - U Kulka
- Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz, BfS, Department of Radiation Protection and Health, Oberschleissheim, Germany
| | - U Oestreicher
- Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz, BfS, Department of Radiation Protection and Health, Oberschleissheim, Germany
| | - C Bassinet
- Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | - C Rääf
- Lund University, Department of Translational Medicine, Medical Radiation Physics, Malmö, Sweden
| | - M Discher
- Paris-Lodron-University of Salzburg, Department of Geography and Geology, Salzburg, Austria
| | - D Endesfelder
- Lund University, Department of Translational Medicine, Medical Radiation Physics, Malmö, Sweden
| | - J S Eakins
- Public Health England, CRCE, Chilton, Didcot, Oxon, United Kingdom
| | - E Gregoire
- Lund University, Department of Translational Medicine, Medical Radiation Physics, Malmö, Sweden
| | - A Wojcik
- Stockholm University, Department of Molecular Biosciences, The Wenner-Gren Institute, Sweden and Institute of Biology, Jan Kochanowski University, Kielce, Poland
| | - Y Ristic
- Lund University, Department of Translational Medicine, Medical Radiation Physics, Malmö, Sweden
| | - H Kim
- Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, Division of Radiation Safety Management, Daejeon, South Korea
| | - J Lee
- Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, Division of Radiation Safety Management, Daejeon, South Korea
| | - H Yu
- Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety, Department of Radiological Emergency Preparedness, Daejeon, South Korea
| | - M C Kim
- Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, Division of Radiation Safety Management, Daejeon, South Korea
| | - M Abend
- Bundeswehr Institute of Radiobiology, Munich, Germany
| | - E Ainsbury
- Public Health England, CRCE, Chilton, Didcot, Oxon, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
McKeever SWS, Sholom S, Chandler JR. DEVELOPMENTS IN THE USE OF THERMOLUMINESCENCE AND OPTICALLY STIMULATED LUMINESCENCE FROM MOBILE PHONES IN EMERGENCY DOSIMETRY. RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY 2020; 192:205-235. [PMID: 33406531 DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncaa208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2020] [Revised: 10/15/2020] [Accepted: 11/23/2020] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Proposed physical dosimetry methods for emergency dosimetry in radiological, mass-casualty incidents include both thermoluminescence (TL) and optically stimulated luminescence (OSL). Potential materials that could feasibly be used for TL and OSL dosimetry include clothing, shoes and personal accessories. However, the most popular target of study has been personal electronics, especially different components from smartphones. Smartphones have been a focus because they are widely available and, in principle, may be viewed as surrogates for commercial TL or OSL dosimeters. The components of smartphones that have been studied include surface mount devices (such as resistors, capacitors and inductors) and glass materials, including front protective glass, display glass and (with more modern devices) back protective glass. This paper reviews the most recent developments in the use of TL and OSL with these materials and guides the way to future, and urgently needed, research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S W S McKeever
- Radiation Dosimetry Group, Department of Physics, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74074, USA
| | - S Sholom
- Radiation Dosimetry Group, Department of Physics, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74074, USA
| | - J R Chandler
- Department of Nuclear Engineering, University of Tennessee, TN 87996, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kortmiš MV, Maltar-Strmečki N. DOSE RECONSTRUCTION FROM ESR SIGNAL OF GAMMA-IRRADIATED SODA-LIME GLASS FOR TRIAGE APPLICATION. RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY 2019; 186:88-93. [PMID: 30649472 DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncy290] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2018] [Revised: 12/11/2018] [Accepted: 12/15/2018] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
In this work, we report some preliminary results regarding the analysis of electron spin resonance (ESR) response of soda-lime samples used for retrospective dosimetry. Six different soda-lime glass batches were evaluated after irradiation. We compared several dose reconstruction techniques: saturation method, subtraction method and g-effective, geff, approach. The differences were observed and discussed. ESR signal responses of soda-lime glass samples to different radiation doses for the triage application were investigated. Results confirmed that geff approach has potential for the identification and dosimetry of irradiated soda-lime glass samples using either additive dose method or only calibration curve.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maja Vojnić Kortmiš
- Department of Occupational Safety and Health, Fire and Radiation Protection, Ruđer Bošković Institute, Bijenička cesta 54, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Nadica Maltar-Strmečki
- Division of Physical Chemistry, Ruđer Bošković Institute, Bijenička cesta 54, Zagreb, Croatia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Juniewicz M, Ciesielski B, Marciniak A, Prawdzik-Dampc A. Time evolution of radiation-induced EPR signals in different types of mobile phone screen glasses. RADIATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL BIOPHYSICS 2019; 58:493-500. [PMID: 31263953 PMCID: PMC6768913 DOI: 10.1007/s00411-019-00805-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2019] [Accepted: 06/19/2019] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
In this study, samples of smart phone touch screen glass sheets and tempered glass screen protectors were examined with respect to their potential application in the dosimetry of ionizing radiation. The glass samples were obtained from various phones with different types of glass. Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectra of the radiation-induced signals (RIS) are presented and their dose dependence within a dose range of 0-20 Gy. Despite the observed fading with time of the dosimetric components of the signal, the remaining RIS turned out to be strong enough for a reliable dosimetry even 18 month after irradiation. The study also shows that crushing of the glass sheets and water treatment of the samples have no effect on the background and dosimetric EPR signals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Małgorzata Juniewicz
- Department of Physics and Biophysics, Medical University of Gdańsk, Dębinki 1, 80-211, Gdańsk, Poland.
| | - Bartłomiej Ciesielski
- Department of Physics and Biophysics, Medical University of Gdańsk, Dębinki 1, 80-211, Gdańsk, Poland
| | - Agnieszka Marciniak
- Department of Physics and Biophysics, Medical University of Gdańsk, Dębinki 1, 80-211, Gdańsk, Poland
| | - Anita Prawdzik-Dampc
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Medical University of Gdańsk, Dębinki 7, 80-952, Gdańsk, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Eakins JS, Ainsbury EA. Quantities for assessing high doses to the body: a short review of the current status. JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION : OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION 2018; 38:731-742. [PMID: 29692365 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6498/aabffe] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
Tissue reactions are the most clinically significant consequences of high-dose exposures to ionizing radiation. However, there is currently no universally recognized or recommended dose quantity that can be used to assess generalized risks to individuals following whole body exposures in the high-dose range. This is particularly problematic in emergency response situations, for example, following external exposures of large numbers of individuals: in attempts to relate the triage dosemeter absorbed dose to the risk to the individual, such that a 'dose' may subsequently be reported to medical professionals, it is necessary to first agree on the quantity to be reported. The current paper presents a brief review of the likely scenarios and emergency dosimetry techniques that require such a quantity, before examining the biological constraints and requirements that might underpin any future definition. The aim of this work is to outline the arguments for developing a commonly agreed dose quantity for reporting high-dose radiation exposures.
Collapse
|
19
|
Eakins JS, Ainsbury EA. Quantities for assessing high photon doses to the body: a calculational approach. JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION : OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION 2018; 38:743-762. [PMID: 29692366 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6498/aabffc] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
Tissue reactions are the most clinically significant consequences of high-dose exposures to ionising radiation. However, currently there is no universally recognized dose quantity that can be used to assess and report generalised risks to individuals following whole body exposures in the high-dose range. In this work, a number of potential dose quantities are presented and discussed, with mathematical modelling techniques employed to compare them and explore when their differences are most or least manifest. The results are interpreted to propose the average (D GRB) of the absorbed doses to the stomach, small intestine, red bone marrow, and brain as the optimum quantity for informing assessments of risk. A second, maximally conservative dose quantity (D Max) is also suggested, which places limits on any under-estimates resulting from the adoption of D GRB. The primary aim of this work is to spark debate, with further work required to refine the final choice of quantity or quantities most appropriate for the full range of different potential exposure scenarios.
Collapse
|
20
|
Ainsbury EA, Samaga D, Della Monaca S, Marrale M, Bassinet C, Burbidge CI, Correcher V, Discher M, Eakins J, Fattibene P, Güçlü I, Higueras M, Lund E, Maltar-Strmecki N, McKeever S, Rääf CL, Sholom S, Veronese I, Wieser A, Woda C, Trompier F. UNCERTAINTY ON RADIATION DOSES ESTIMATED BY BIOLOGICAL AND RETROSPECTIVE PHYSICAL METHODS. RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY 2018; 178:382-404. [PMID: 28981844 DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncx125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2017] [Accepted: 08/09/2017] [Indexed: 05/16/2023]
Abstract
Biological and physical retrospective dosimetry are recognised as key techniques to provide individual estimates of dose following unplanned exposures to ionising radiation. Whilst there has been a relatively large amount of recent development in the biological and physical procedures, development of statistical analysis techniques has failed to keep pace. The aim of this paper is to review the current state of the art in uncertainty analysis techniques across the 'EURADOS Working Group 10-Retrospective dosimetry' members, to give concrete examples of implementation of the techniques recommended in the international standards, and to further promote the use of Monte Carlo techniques to support characterisation of uncertainties. It is concluded that sufficient techniques are available and in use by most laboratories for acute, whole body exposures to highly penetrating radiation, but further work will be required to ensure that statistical analysis is always wholly sufficient for the more complex exposure scenarios.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth A Ainsbury
- Public Health England, Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards, Chilton, Didcot, Oxford OX11 ORQ, UK
| | - Daniel Samaga
- Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz, Ingolstaedter Landstr. 1, 85764 Oberschleissheim, Germany
| | - Sara Della Monaca
- Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Viale Regina Elena 299, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Maurizio Marrale
- Department of Physics and Chemistry and Advanced Technologies Network Center, University of Palermo, Viale delle Scienze Edificio 18, 90128 Palermo, Italy
| | - Celine Bassinet
- Institut de radioprotection et de sûreté nucléaire, BP 17 - 92262 Fontenay-aux-Roses Cedex 31, Avenue de la Division Leclerc 92260 Fontenay-aux-Roses, Paris, France
| | - Christopher I Burbidge
- Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Radiological Protection, 3 Clonskeagh Square, Clonskeagh Road, Dublin 14, Ireland
| | - Virgilio Correcher
- Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas, Centro de la Moncloa, Complutense, 40, 28040 Madrid, Spain
| | - Michael Discher
- University of Salzburg, Department of Geography and Geology, Hellbrunnerstraße 34, 5020 Salzburg, Austria
| | - Jon Eakins
- Public Health England, Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards, Chilton, Didcot, Oxford OX11 ORQ, UK
| | - Paola Fattibene
- Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Viale Regina Elena 299, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Inci Güçlü
- Turkish Atomic Energy Authority, Mustafa Kemal Mahallesi, Dumlupinar Bulvari, No: 192, 06510, Çankaya - Ankara, Turkey
| | - Manuel Higueras
- Basque Center for Applied Mathematics, Alameda de Mazarredo 14, E-48009 Bilbao, Basque Country, Spain
| | - Eva Lund
- Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, SE-581 85 Linköping, Sweden
| | - Nadica Maltar-Strmecki
- Ruder Boškovic Institute, Division of Physical Chemistry, Laboratory for Magnetic Resonances, Bijenicka cesta 54,10000 Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Stephen McKeever
- Oklahoma State University, 145 Physical Sciences, Campus, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA
| | - Christopher L Rääf
- Medicinsk strålningsfysik, Institutionen för Translationell Medicin, Lunds universitet, Skånes universitetssjukhus SUS, SE-205 02 Malmö, Sweden
| | - Sergey Sholom
- Oklahoma State University, 145 Physical Sciences, Campus, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA
| | - Ivan Veronese
- Università degli Studi di Milano, Department of Physics and National Institute of Nuclear Physics, Section of Milan, Via Celoria 16, 20133 - Milano, Italy
| | - Albrecht Wieser
- Helmholtz Zentrum München, Deutsches Forschungszentrum für Gesundheit und Umwelt, Institute of Radiation Protection, Ingolstädter Landstraße 1, D-85764 Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Clemens Woda
- Helmholtz Zentrum München, Deutsches Forschungszentrum für Gesundheit und Umwelt, Institute of Radiation Protection, Ingolstädter Landstraße 1, D-85764 Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Francois Trompier
- Institut de radioprotection et de sûreté nucléaire, BP 17 - 92262 Fontenay-aux-Roses Cedex 31, Avenue de la Division Leclerc 92260 Fontenay-aux-Roses, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Wojcik A, Oestreicher U, Barrios L, Vral A, Terzoudi G, Ainsbury E, Rothkamm K, Trompier F, Kulka U. The RENEB operational basis: complement of established biodosimetric assays. Int J Radiat Biol 2016; 93:15-19. [DOI: 10.1080/09553002.2016.1235296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Andrzej Wojcik
- Department of Molecular Biosciences, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden and Jan Kochanowski University, Institute for Biology, Kielce, Poland
| | - Ursula Oestreicher
- Bundesamt fuer Strahlenschutz, Department Radiation Protection and Health, Neuherberg, Germany
| | | | - Anne Vral
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiteit Gent, Gent, Belgium
| | - Georgia Terzoudi
- National Center for Scientific Research “Demokritos”, Athens, Greece
| | | | - Kai Rothkamm
- Public Health England, CRCE, Chilton, Didcot, Oxon, UK
- University Medical Center Hamburg, Laboratory of Radiation Biology, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Francois Trompier
- Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | - Ulrike Kulka
- Bundesamt fuer Strahlenschutz, Department Radiation Protection and Health, Neuherberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Kulka U, Abend M, Ainsbury E, Badie C, Barquinero JF, Barrios L, Beinke C, Bortolin E, Cucu A, De Amicis A, Domínguez I, Fattibene P, Frøvig, AM, Gregoire E, Guogyte K, Hadjidekova V, Jaworska A, Kriehuber R, Lindholm C, Lloyd D, Lumniczky K, Lyng F, Meschini R, Mörtl S, Della Monaca S, Monteiro Gil O, Montoro A, Moquet J, Moreno M, Oestreicher U, Palitti F, Pantelias G, Patrono C, Piqueret-Stephan L, Port M, Prieto MJ, Quintens R, Ricoul M, Romm H, Roy L, Sáfrány G, Sabatier L, Sebastià N, Sommer S, Terzoudi G, Testa A, Thierens H, Turai I, Trompier F, Valente M, Vaz P, Voisin P, Vral A, Woda C, Zafiropoulos D, Wojcik A. RENEB – Running the European Network of biological dosimetry and physical retrospective dosimetry. Int J Radiat Biol 2016; 93:2-14. [DOI: 10.1080/09553002.2016.1230239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Ulrike Kulka
- Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz, Department Radiation Protection and Health, Oberschleissheim, Germany
| | - Michael Abend
- Bundeswehr Institute of Radiobiology affiliated to the University of Ulm, Munich, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | - Christina Beinke
- Bundeswehr Institute of Radiobiology affiliated to the University of Ulm, Munich, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Eric Gregoire
- Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | - David Lloyd
- affiliated to Public Health England, CRCE, Chilton, Didcot, Oxon, UK
| | - Katalin Lumniczky
- National Public Health Centre – National Research Directorate for Radiobiology and Radiohygiene, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Fiona Lyng
- Dublin Institute of Technology, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - Simone Mörtl
- HelmholtzZentrum München, Oberschleissheim, Germany
| | | | - Octávia Monteiro Gil
- Centro de Ciências e Tecnologias Nucleares, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Bobadela-LRS, Portugal
| | - Alegria Montoro
- Hospital Universitario y Politécnico la Fe de la Comunidad Valenciana, Valencia, Spain
| | - Jayne Moquet
- Public Health England, CRCE, Chilton, Didcot, Oxon, UK
| | - Mercedes Moreno
- Servicio Madrileño de Salud – Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ursula Oestreicher
- Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz, Department Radiation Protection and Health, Oberschleissheim, Germany
| | | | | | - Clarice Patrono
- Agenzia Nazionale per le Nuove Tecnologie, ĹEnergia e lo Sviluppo Economico Sostenibile, Rome, Italy
| | - Laure Piqueret-Stephan
- PROCyTOX, Commissariat à l’Energie Atomique et aux Energies Alternatives, Fontenay-aux-Roses, and Université Paris-Saclay, Paris, France
| | - Matthias Port
- Bundeswehr Institute of Radiobiology affiliated to the University of Ulm, Munich, Germany
| | - María Jesus Prieto
- Servicio Madrileño de Salud – Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Michelle Ricoul
- PROCyTOX, Commissariat à l’Energie Atomique et aux Energies Alternatives, Fontenay-aux-Roses, and Université Paris-Saclay, Paris, France
| | - Horst Romm
- Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz, Department Radiation Protection and Health, Oberschleissheim, Germany
| | - Laurence Roy
- Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | - Géza Sáfrány
- National Public Health Centre – National Research Directorate for Radiobiology and Radiohygiene, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Laure Sabatier
- PROCyTOX, Commissariat à l’Energie Atomique et aux Energies Alternatives, Fontenay-aux-Roses, and Université Paris-Saclay, Paris, France
| | - Natividad Sebastià
- Hospital Universitario y Politécnico la Fe de la Comunidad Valenciana, Valencia, Spain
| | | | - Georgia Terzoudi
- National Centre for Scientific Research Demokritos, Athens, Greece
| | - Antonella Testa
- Agenzia Nazionale per le Nuove Tecnologie, ĹEnergia e lo Sviluppo Economico Sostenibile, Rome, Italy
| | - Hubert Thierens
- Universiteit Gent, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Gent, Belgium
| | - Istvan Turai
- affiliated to National Public Health Centre – National Research Directorate for Radiobiology and Radiohygiene, Budapest, Hungary
| | - François Trompier
- Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | | | - Pedro Vaz
- Centro de Ciências e Tecnologias Nucleares, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Bobadela-LRS, Portugal
| | - Philippe Voisin
- affiliated to Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | - Anne Vral
- Universiteit Gent, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Gent, Belgium
| | - Clemens Woda
- HelmholtzZentrum München, Oberschleissheim, Germany
| | | | - Andrzej Wojcik
- Stockholm University, Centre for Radiation Protection Research, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Brzozowska B, Ainsbury E, Baert A, Beaton-Green L, Barrios L, Barquinero JF, Bassinet C, Beinke C, Benedek A, Beukes P, Bortolin E, Buraczewska I, Burbidge C, De Amicis A, De Angelis C, Della Monaca S, Depuydt J, De Sanctis S, Dobos K, Domene MM, Domínguez I, Facco E, Fattibene P, Frenzel M, Monteiro Gil O, Gonon G, Gregoire E, Gruel G, Hadjidekova V, Hatzi VI, Hristova R, Jaworska A, Kis E, Kowalska M, Kulka U, Lista F, Lumniczky K, Martínez-López W, Meschini R, Moertl S, Moquet J, Noditi M, Oestreicher U, Orta Vázquez ML, Palma V, Pantelias G, Montoro Pastor A, Patrono C, Piqueret-Stephan L, Quattrini MC, Regalbuto E, Ricoul M, Roch-Lefevre S, Roy L, Sabatier L, Sarchiapone L, Sebastià N, Sommer S, Sun M, Suto Y, Terzoudi G, Trompier F, Vral A, Wilkins R, Zafiropoulos D, Wieser A, Woda C, Wojcik A. RENEB accident simulation exercise. Int J Radiat Biol 2016; 93:75-80. [PMID: 27559844 DOI: 10.1080/09553002.2016.1206230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The RENEB accident exercise was carried out in order to train the RENEB participants in coordinating and managing potentially large data sets that would be generated in case of a major radiological event. MATERIALS AND METHODS Each participant was offered the possibility to activate the network by sending an alerting email about a simulated radiation emergency. The same participant had to collect, compile and report capacity, triage categorization and exposure scenario results obtained from all other participants. The exercise was performed over 27 weeks and involved the network consisting of 28 institutes: 21 RENEB members, four candidates and three non-RENEB partners. RESULTS The duration of a single exercise never exceeded 10 days, while the response from the assisting laboratories never came later than within half a day. During each week of the exercise, around 4500 samples were reported by all service laboratories (SL) to be examined and 54 scenarios were coherently estimated by all laboratories (the standard deviation from the mean of all SL answers for a given scenario category and a set of data was not larger than 3 patient codes). CONCLUSIONS Each participant received training in both the role of a reference laboratory (activating the network) and of a service laboratory (responding to an activation request). The procedures in the case of radiological event were successfully established and tested.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beata Brzozowska
- a Stockholm University , Centre for Radiation Protection Research, Department of Molecular Biosciences, The Wenner-Gren Institute , Stockholm , Sweden.,b University of Warsaw , Faculty of Physics, Department of Biomedical Physics , Warsaw , Poland
| | | | - Annelot Baert
- d Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences , Ghent University , Ghent , Belgium
| | | | | | | | - Celine Bassinet
- g Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire , France
| | - Christina Beinke
- h Bundeswehr Institut für Radiobiologie in Verbindung mit der Universtität Ulm , Munich , Germany
| | - Anett Benedek
- i National Public Health Centre - National Research Directorate for Radiobiology & Radiohygiene , Budapest , Hungary
| | - Philip Beukes
- j NRF iThemba LABS - Laboratory for Accelerator Based Sciences , Cape Town , South Africa
| | | | | | - Christopher Burbidge
- m Centro de Ciências e Tecnologias Nucleares , Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa , Bobadela-LRS , Portugal
| | | | | | | | - Julie Depuydt
- d Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences , Ghent University , Ghent , Belgium
| | | | - Katalin Dobos
- i National Public Health Centre - National Research Directorate for Radiobiology & Radiohygiene , Budapest , Hungary
| | - Mercedes Moreno Domene
- o Laboratorio de Dosimetría Biológica, Servicio de Oncología Radioterápica , Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón , Madrid , Spain
| | | | - Eva Facco
- q Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare , Italy
| | | | - Monika Frenzel
- r PROCyTOX, Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique et aux Energies Alternatives , Fontenay-aux-Roses, and Université Paris-Saclay , France
| | - Octávia Monteiro Gil
- m Centro de Ciências e Tecnologias Nucleares , Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa , Bobadela-LRS , Portugal
| | - Géraldine Gonon
- g Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire , France
| | - Eric Gregoire
- g Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire , France
| | - Gaëtan Gruel
- g Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire , France
| | | | - Vasiliki I Hatzi
- t National Centre for Scientific Research Demokritos , Athens , Greece
| | - Rositsa Hristova
- s National Centre for Radiobiology and Radiation Protection , Bulgaria
| | | | - Enikő Kis
- i National Public Health Centre - National Research Directorate for Radiobiology & Radiohygiene , Budapest , Hungary
| | - Maria Kowalska
- v Central Laboratory for Radiological Protection , Warsaw , Poland
| | - Ulrike Kulka
- w Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz , Oberschleissheim , Germany
| | - Florigio Lista
- n Army Medical and Veterinary Research Center , Rome , Italy
| | - Katalin Lumniczky
- i National Public Health Centre - National Research Directorate for Radiobiology & Radiohygiene , Budapest , Hungary
| | | | | | - Simone Moertl
- z Helmholtz Zentrum München , Oberschleissheim , Germany
| | - Jayne Moquet
- c Public Health England , Chilton , United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | - Valentina Palma
- ab Agenzia Nazionale per le Nuove Tecnologie, l'Energia e lo Sviluppo Economico Sostenibile , Italy
| | - Gabriel Pantelias
- t National Centre for Scientific Research Demokritos , Athens , Greece
| | | | - Clarice Patrono
- ab Agenzia Nazionale per le Nuove Tecnologie, l'Energia e lo Sviluppo Economico Sostenibile , Italy
| | - Laure Piqueret-Stephan
- r PROCyTOX, Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique et aux Energies Alternatives , Fontenay-aux-Roses, and Université Paris-Saclay , France
| | | | - Elisa Regalbuto
- n Army Medical and Veterinary Research Center , Rome , Italy
| | - Michelle Ricoul
- r PROCyTOX, Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique et aux Energies Alternatives , Fontenay-aux-Roses, and Université Paris-Saclay , France
| | | | - Laurence Roy
- g Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire , France
| | - Laure Sabatier
- r PROCyTOX, Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique et aux Energies Alternatives , Fontenay-aux-Roses, and Université Paris-Saclay , France
| | | | | | - Sylwester Sommer
- l Institute of Nuclear Chemistry and Technology , Warsaw , Poland
| | - Mingzhu Sun
- c Public Health England , Chilton , United Kingdom
| | - Yumiko Suto
- ad National Institute of Radiological Sciences , Chiba , Japan
| | - Georgia Terzoudi
- t National Centre for Scientific Research Demokritos , Athens , Greece
| | | | - Anne Vral
- d Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences , Ghent University , Ghent , Belgium
| | | | | | | | - Clemens Woda
- z Helmholtz Zentrum München , Oberschleissheim , Germany
| | - Andrzej Wojcik
- a Stockholm University , Centre for Radiation Protection Research, Department of Molecular Biosciences, The Wenner-Gren Institute , Stockholm , Sweden.,ae Jan Kochanowski University , Kielce , Poland
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Gregoire E, Ainsbury L, Barrios L, Bassinet C, Fattibene P, Kulka U, Oestreicher U, Pantelias G, Terzoudi G, Trompier F, Voisin P, Vral A, Wojcik A, Roy L. The harmonization process to set up and maintain an operational biological and physical retrospective dosimetry network: QA QM applied to the RENEB network. Int J Radiat Biol 2016; 93:81-86. [DOI: 10.1080/09553002.2016.1206232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Gregoire
- Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire, Fontenay-Aux-Roses, France
| | - Liz Ainsbury
- Public Health England, CRCE, Chilton, Didcot, Oxon, UK
| | | | - Céline Bassinet
- Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire, Fontenay-Aux-Roses, France
| | | | - Ulrike Kulka
- Bundesamt fuer Strahlenschutz, Department Radiation Protection and Health, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Ursula Oestreicher
- Bundesamt fuer Strahlenschutz, Department Radiation Protection and Health, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Gabriel Pantelias
- National Centre for Scientific Research ‘Demokritos’, Athens, Greece
| | - Georgia Terzoudi
- National Centre for Scientific Research ‘Demokritos’, Athens, Greece
| | - Francois Trompier
- Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire, Fontenay-Aux-Roses, France
| | - Philippe Voisin
- Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire, Fontenay-Aux-Roses, France
| | - Anne Vral
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | | | - Laurence Roy
- Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire, Fontenay-Aux-Roses, France
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Ainsbury E, Badie C, Barnard S, Manning G, Moquet J, Abend M, Antunes AC, Barrios L, Bassinet C, Beinke C, Bortolin E, Bossin L, Bricknell C, Brzoska K, Buraczewska I, Castaño CH, Čemusová Z, Christiansson M, Cordero SM, Cosler G, Monaca SD, Desangles F, Discher M, Dominguez I, Doucha-Senf S, Eakins J, Fattibene P, Filippi S, Frenzel M, Georgieva D, Gregoire E, Guogyte K, Hadjidekova V, Hadjiiska L, Hristova R, Karakosta M, Kis E, Kriehuber R, Lee J, Lloyd D, Lumniczky K, Lyng F, Macaeva E, Majewski M, Vanda Martins S, McKeever SW, Meade A, Medipally D, Meschini R, M’kacher R, Gil OM, Montero A, Moreno M, Noditi M, Oestreicher U, Oskamp D, Palitti F, Palma V, Pantelias G, Pateux J, Patrono C, Pepe G, Port M, Prieto MJ, Quattrini MC, Quintens R, Ricoul M, Roy L, Sabatier L, Sebastià N, Sholom S, Sommer S, Staynova A, Strunz S, Terzoudi G, Testa A, Trompier F, Valente M, Hoey OV, Veronese I, Wojcik A, Woda C. Integration of new biological and physical retrospective dosimetry methods into EU emergency response plans – joint RENEB and EURADOS inter-laboratory comparisons. Int J Radiat Biol 2016; 93:99-109. [DOI: 10.1080/09553002.2016.1206233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth Ainsbury
- Public Health England Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards (PHE), Chilton, UK
| | - Christophe Badie
- Public Health England Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards (PHE), Chilton, UK
| | - Stephen Barnard
- Public Health England Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards (PHE), Chilton, UK
| | - Grainne Manning
- Public Health England Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards (PHE), Chilton, UK
| | - Jayne Moquet
- Public Health England Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards (PHE), Chilton, UK
| | - Michael Abend
- Bundeswehr Institute of Radiobiology (BIR), Munich, Germany
| | - Ana Catarina Antunes
- Centro de Ciências e Tecnologias Nucleares, Instituto Superior Técnico (IST/ITN), Universidade de Lisboa, Bobadela-LRS, Portugal
| | | | - Celine Bassinet
- Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), Paris, France
| | - Christina Beinke
- Bundeswehr Institute of Radiobiology affiliated to the University of Ulm (UULM), Munich, Germany
| | | | - Lily Bossin
- Public Health England Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards (PHE), Chilton, UK
- Durham University (DUR), Durham, UK
| | - Clare Bricknell
- Public Health England Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards (PHE), Chilton, UK
| | - Kamil Brzoska
- Institute of Nuclear Chemistry and Technology (INCT), Warsaw, Poland
| | - Iwona Buraczewska
- Institute of Nuclear Chemistry and Technology (INCT), Warsaw, Poland
| | | | - Zina Čemusová
- Státní ústav radiační ochrany (SÚRO), Prague, Czech Republic
| | | | | | - Guillaume Cosler
- Institut de Recherche Biomédicale des Armées (IRBA), Paris, France
| | | | | | - Michael Discher
- Salzburg University Department of Geography and Geology, Salzburg, Austria
| | | | | | - Jon Eakins
- Public Health England Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards (PHE), Chilton, UK
| | | | | | - Monika Frenzel
- PROCyTOX, Commissariat à l’Energie Atomique et aux Energies Alternatives, Université Paris-Saclay (CEA), Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | - Dimka Georgieva
- National Center of Radiobiology and Radiation Protection (NCRRP), Bulgaria
| | - Eric Gregoire
- Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), Paris, France
| | | | | | | | - Rositsa Hristova
- National Center of Radiobiology and Radiation Protection (NCRRP), Bulgaria
| | - Maria Karakosta
- Laboratory of Health Physics, Radiobiology & Cytogenetics Institute of Nuclear & Radiological Sciences & Technology, Energy & Safety National Center for Scientific Research “Demokritos” (NCSRD), Greece
| | - Enikő Kis
- National Public Health Centre – National Research Institute for Radiobiology and Radiohygiene (NRIRR), Hungary
| | - Ralf Kriehuber
- Radiation Biology Unit Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH (FzJ), Jülich, Germany
| | - Jungil Lee
- Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute (KAERI), Daejeon, South Korea
| | - David Lloyd
- Public Health England Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards (PHE), Chilton, UK
| | - Katalin Lumniczky
- National Public Health Centre – National Research Institute for Radiobiology and Radiohygiene (NRIRR), Hungary
| | - Fiona Lyng
- Dublin Institute of Technology (DIT), Dublin, Ireland
| | - Ellina Macaeva
- Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (SCK-CEN), Mol, Belgium
- Ghent University (GU), Ghent, Belgium
| | | | - S. Vanda Martins
- Centro de Ciências e Tecnologias Nucleares, Instituto Superior Técnico (IST/ITN), Universidade de Lisboa, Bobadela-LRS, Portugal
| | | | - Aidan Meade
- Dublin Institute of Technology (DIT), Dublin, Ireland
| | | | | | - Radhia M’kacher
- PROCyTOX, Commissariat à l’Energie Atomique et aux Energies Alternatives, Université Paris-Saclay (CEA), Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | - Octávia Monteiro Gil
- Centro de Ciências e Tecnologias Nucleares, Instituto Superior Técnico (IST/ITN), Universidade de Lisboa, Bobadela-LRS, Portugal
| | - Alegria Montero
- Radiation Protection Service, IIS La Fe, Health Research Institute (LAFE), Spain
| | - Mercedes Moreno
- Laboratorio de Dosimetría Biológica, Servicio de Oncología Radioterápica, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón (SERMAS), Spain
| | | | - Ursula Oestreicher
- Bundesamt fuer Strahlenschutz (BfS), Department Radiation Protection and Health, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Dominik Oskamp
- Radiation Biology Unit Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH (FzJ), Jülich, Germany
| | | | - Valentina Palma
- Laboratory of Biosafety and Risk Assessment Division of Health Protection Technologies (ENEA) Casaccia Research Center, Italy
| | - Gabriel Pantelias
- Laboratory of Health Physics, Radiobiology & Cytogenetics Institute of Nuclear & Radiological Sciences & Technology, Energy & Safety National Center for Scientific Research “Demokritos” (NCSRD), Greece
| | - Jerome Pateux
- Institut de Recherche Biomédicale des Armées (IRBA), Paris, France
| | - Clarice Patrono
- Laboratory of Biosafety and Risk Assessment Division of Health Protection Technologies (ENEA) Casaccia Research Center, Italy
| | - Gaetano Pepe
- Università degli Studi della Tuscia (UNITUS), Italy
| | - Matthias Port
- Bundeswehr Institute of Radiobiology (BIR), Munich, Germany
| | - María Jesús Prieto
- Laboratorio de Dosimetría Biológica, Servicio de Oncología Radioterápica, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón (SERMAS), Spain
| | | | - Roel Quintens
- Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (SCK-CEN), Mol, Belgium
| | - Michelle Ricoul
- PROCyTOX, Commissariat à l’Energie Atomique et aux Energies Alternatives, Université Paris-Saclay (CEA), Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | - Laurence Roy
- Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), Paris, France
| | - Laure Sabatier
- PROCyTOX, Commissariat à l’Energie Atomique et aux Energies Alternatives, Université Paris-Saclay (CEA), Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | - Natividad Sebastià
- Radiation Protection Service, IIS La Fe, Health Research Institute (LAFE), Spain
| | | | - Sylwester Sommer
- Institute of Nuclear Chemistry and Technology (INCT), Warsaw, Poland
| | - Albena Staynova
- National Center of Radiobiology and Radiation Protection (NCRRP), Bulgaria
| | - Sonja Strunz
- Leibniz Institute for Farm Animal Biology (FBN), Dummerstorf, Germany
| | - Georgia Terzoudi
- Laboratory of Health Physics, Radiobiology & Cytogenetics Institute of Nuclear & Radiological Sciences & Technology, Energy & Safety National Center for Scientific Research “Demokritos” (NCSRD), Greece
| | - Antonella Testa
- Laboratory of Biosafety and Risk Assessment Division of Health Protection Technologies (ENEA) Casaccia Research Center, Italy
| | - Francois Trompier
- Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), Paris, France
| | - Marco Valente
- Institut de Recherche Biomédicale des Armées (IRBA), Paris, France
| | | | - Ivan Veronese
- Università degli Studi di Milano (UNIMI), Milano, Italy
| | | | - Clemens Woda
- Helmholtz Zentrum München (HMGU), Neuherberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|