1
|
MacNeil M, Hirslund E, Baiocco-Romano L, Kuspinar A, Stolee P. A scoping review of the use of intelligent assistive technologies in rehabilitation practice with older adults. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2024; 19:1817-1848. [PMID: 37498115 DOI: 10.1080/17483107.2023.2239277] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2022] [Revised: 05/30/2023] [Accepted: 07/17/2023] [Indexed: 07/28/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE There is growing interest in intelligent assistive technologies (IATs) in the rehabilitation and support of older adults, however, the factors contributing to or preventing their use in practice are not well understood. This study aimed to develop an overview of current knowledge on barriers and facilitators to the use of smart technologies in rehabilitative practice with older adults. MATERIALS AND METHODS We undertook a scoping review following guidelines proposed by Arksey and O'Malley (2005) and Levac et al. (2010). A computerised literature search was conducted using the Scopus and Ovid databases, yielding 7995 citations. Of these, 94 studies met inclusion criteria. Analysis of extracted data identified themes which were explored in semi-structured interviews with a purposefully selected sample of seven clinical rehabilitation practitioners (three physical therapists, two occupational therapists, and two speech-language pathologists). RESULTS Barriers and facilitators to using these technologies were associated with accessibility, reported effectiveness, usability, patient-centred considerations, and staff considerations. CONCLUSIONS Collaborative efforts of policy-makers, researchers, manufacturers, rehabilitation professionals, and older persons are needed to improve the design of technologies, develop appropriate funding and reimbursement strategies, and minimise barriers to their appropriate use to support independence and quality of life. Any strategies to improve upon barriers to prescribing smart technologies for older people should leverage the expertise of rehabilitation professionals operating at the interface between older people; their health/mobility; their families; and technology-based solutions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maggie MacNeil
- School of Nursing, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Emily Hirslund
- School of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada
| | | | - Ayse Kuspinar
- School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Paul Stolee
- School of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zheng J, Gresham M, Phillipson L, Hall D, Jeon YH, Brodaty H, Low LF. Exploring the usability, user experience and usefulness of a supportive website for people with dementia and carers. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2024; 19:1369-1381. [PMID: 37086036 DOI: 10.1080/17483107.2023.2180546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2022] [Accepted: 02/08/2023] [Indexed: 04/23/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study explores the usability, usefulness and user experience of the Forward with Dementia website for people with dementia and family carers, and identifies strategies to improve web design for this population. METHODS The website was iteratively user-tested by 12 participants (five people with dementia, seven carers) using the Zoom platform. Data collection involved observations, semi-structured interviews and questionnaires. Integrative mixed-method data analysis was used, informed by inductive thematic qualitative analysis. RESULTS Users of Version 1 of the website experienced web functionality, navigation and legibility issues. Strategies for desirable web design were identified as simplifying functions, streamlining navigation and decluttering page layouts. Implementation of strategies produced improvements in usability, user experience and usefulness in Version 2, with mean System Usability Scale scores improving from 15 to 84, and mean task completion improving from 55% to 89%. The user journey for people with dementia and carers overlapped, but each group had their own unique needs in the context of web design. CONCLUSIONS The interplay between a website's content, functionality, navigation and legibility can profoundly influence user perceptions of a website. Dementia-related websites play an important role in informing audiences of management strategies, service availability and planning for the progression of dementia. Findings of this study may assist in guiding future web development targeting this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacky Zheng
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Meredith Gresham
- Discipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Centre for Healthy Brain Ageing, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Lyn Phillipson
- School of Health and Society, Faculty of the Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
| | - Danika Hall
- Discipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Centre for Healthy Brain Ageing, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Yun-Hee Jeon
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Henry Brodaty
- Discipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Centre for Healthy Brain Ageing, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Lee-Fay Low
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Blanchette V, Maranda-Pelletier S, Bilodeau G, Giguere A. Factors influencing the engagement of older adults with neurocognitive disorders in the design of decision aids: A qualitative descriptive study. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2024; 119:108061. [PMID: 38035412 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.108061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2023] [Revised: 10/23/2023] [Accepted: 11/08/2023] [Indexed: 12/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify factors influencing the engagement of older adults with neurocognitive disorders (NCDs) in the design of decision aids (DAs). METHODS We conducted a qualitative descriptive study using semi-structured interviews with 23 older adults with NCDs who were accompanied by 27 caregivers. This is a secondary analysis of a published study to identify the features of DAs designed for this population and their caregivers. RESULTS Several behaviours and attitudes of caregivers and researchers hindered the older adults' engagement in the DA design process. Specific communication strategies can be employed to support their engagement and overcome the communication challenges inherent to this population, such as memory, attention, hearing, or visual impairments. Adopting the appropriate attitude, taking the time, and providing guidance to the older person can help them focus on the topic, while developing trust between participants is a facilitator to obtain their feedback. CONCLUSION Findings from this project could serve to inform the communication and co-design of DAs with older people with NCDs and their caregivers. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Caregivers and researchers have key roles to play in facilitating communication with older persons with NCDs so they are empowered to help in co-designing DAs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Virginie Blanchette
- VITAM - Research Centre on Sustainable Health, Quebec City, Canada; Department of Human Kinetic and Podiatric Medicine, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, Canada
| | - Sarah Maranda-Pelletier
- University Laval, Quebec City, Canada; School of Psychology, University Laval, Quebec City, Canada
| | | | - Anik Giguere
- VITAM - Research Centre on Sustainable Health, Quebec City, Canada; Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tsertsidis A, Kolkowska E, Rapado I. Consumer direction in the field of digital technologies and people with dementia: a literature review. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2023; 18:1364-1376. [PMID: 34927508 DOI: 10.1080/17483107.2021.2008529] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2021] [Accepted: 11/12/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Digital technologies have a great potential to improve the quality of life of people with dementia. However, this group is usually not involved in their development and dissemination. A consumer-directed role in the delivery of digital technologies could allow this group to regain autonomy and certain independence. This article aims to conceptualise the components of the Consumer Direction theory in the context of digital technologies and people with dementia. METHOD A literature review was conducted. We searched for studies within the aforementioned context in five relevant databases, covering the years 2012-2020. Identified studies were screened and assessed for inclusion. The data were categorised using two-stage qualitative content analysis. RESULTS Forty articles were included. The results provide definitions of the four components of the Consumer Direction theory in the context of this study. Namely, what it means for people with dementia to be (1) in control of technology use, (2) offered a variety of technological options, (3) informed and supported regarding the use and training of digital technologies, and (4) actively participating in systems design. These can lead to the empowerment of people with dementia. CONCLUSION The four theoretical components of the Consumer Direction theory are conceptualised differently in the context of this study. By providing new definitions, this paper contributes to research and practice. We expect the definitions to be deployed by researchers, practitioners, and policymakers for the creation of a more consumer-directed delivery of digital technologies to people with dementia.Implications for rehabilitationDigital technologies have a great potential to improve the quality of life of people with dementia.A consumer-directed role in the delivery of digital technologies could empower people with dementia and give them the opportunity to take control over the offered services as well as maintain a degree of independence.The Consumer Direction theory and its components should be conceptualised differently in the context of digital technologies and people with dementia than in previous contexts that used the theory.The new definitions can be utilised by researchers, practitioners and policymakers for the creation of a more consumer-directed delivery of digital technologies to people with dementia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ella Kolkowska
- Department of Informatics, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Irene Rapado
- Department of Philosophy, Linguistics and Theory of Science, Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Roberts JR, Jones CH, Windle G. Knowledge Is Power: Utilizing Human-Centered Design Principles with People Living with Dementia to Co-Design a Resource and Share Knowledge with Peers. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2023; 20:6937. [PMID: 37887675 PMCID: PMC10606225 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20206937] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Revised: 10/11/2023] [Accepted: 10/12/2023] [Indexed: 10/28/2023]
Abstract
This paper describes the process used by a group of people living with young-onset dementia to inform the development and delivery of a post-diagnosis peer guide. It draws on the four stages of human-centered design and applies them in a new context of supporting resilience for people following a diagnosis of dementia. (1) Discover: The group discussed in-depth their perspectives on what it takes to be resilient while living with dementia and how this can be maintained. (2) Define: The group decided to collate practical information and knowledge based on their personal experiences into a booklet to support the resilience of others following a diagnosis of dementia. (3) Develop: The booklet was designed and developed together with input from other people living with dementia, facilitated by the authors. (4) Deliver: The group guided the professional production of the booklet 'Knowledge is Power'. Over 8000 copies have been distributed to memory clinics, post-diagnostic support organizations and people living with dementia across Wales. A bilingual English-Scottish Gaelic adaptation and an adaptation for people in England have since been developed. The success of 'Knowledge is Power' highlights the importance of working alongside people with dementia to share knowledge and support their resilience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Rhiannon Roberts
- DSDC Wales Research Centre, School of Health Sciences, Bangor University, Ardudwy, Normal Site, Bangor LL57 2PZ, UK; (C.H.J.); (G.W.)
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Warran K, Greenwood F, Ashworth R, Robertson M, Brown P. Challenges in co-produced dementia research: A critical perspective and discussion to inform future directions. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2023; 38:e5998. [PMID: 37671685 DOI: 10.1002/gps.5998] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/07/2023]
Abstract
Key points
There is a move towards meaningful collaboration of people living with dementia in the research process, but these processes are rarely critiqued, with more critical reflection needed.
Current academic structures, frameworks, and funding processes limit meaningful collaboration, particularly in relation to academic language and hierarchies of evidence.
There is a need for an environment that can enable the collaboration that is at the heart of a co‐produced ethos, but creating such an environment of reciprocity in dementia research requires extensive time, resources and emotional support.
It is important to embrace the tensions of the contexts we, as researchers, work within and continue to strive towards learning and growth, and fairer and more equitable ways of working in co‐produced dementia research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katey Warran
- Edinburgh Centre for Research on the Experience of Dementia, School of Health in Social Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Frankie Greenwood
- Edinburgh Centre for Research on the Experience of Dementia, School of Health in Social Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Rosalie Ashworth
- Neuroprogressive and Dementia Network, NHS Tayside, Dundee, Scotland
| | - Martin Robertson
- ECREDibles, Edinburgh Centre for Research on the Experience of Dementia, School of Health in Social Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Paula Brown
- ECREDibles, Edinburgh Centre for Research on the Experience of Dementia, School of Health in Social Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Mannheim I, Wouters EJM, Köttl H, van Boekel LC, Brankaert R, van Zaalen Y. Ageism in the Discourse and Practice of Designing Digital Technology for Older Persons: A Scoping Review. THE GERONTOLOGIST 2023; 63:1188-1200. [PMID: 36130318 PMCID: PMC10448991 DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnac144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Involving older persons in the design process of digital technology (DT) promotes the development of technologies that are appealing, beneficial, and used. However, negative discourse on aging and ageism are potential underlying factors that could influence which and how DTs are designed and how older persons are involved in the design process. This scoping review investigates the explicit and implicit manifestations of ageism in the design process of DT. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Seven databases were screened for studies reporting on the design of DT with older persons between January 2015 and January 2020. Data regarding study and DT characteristics, discourse about older persons, and their involvement in the design process were extracted, coded, and analyzed using critical discourse analysis. RESULTS Sixty articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. Various forms of exclusion of older persons from the design process were identified, such as no or low involvement, upper-age limits, and sample biases toward relatively "active," healthy and "tech-savvy" older persons. Critical discourse analysis revealed the use of outdated language, stereotypical categorizations, and/or design decisions based on ageism in 71.7% of the studies. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS A discrepancy was found between an "ideal" discourse regarding the involvement of older persons throughout the design process and actual practice. Manifestations of ageism, errors, and biases of designing DT with older persons are discussed. This article calls for more authentic inclusion of older persons and higher awareness toward the implications of ageism in the design process of DT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ittay Mannheim
- School of Allied Health Professions, Fontys University of Applied Science, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
- Tranzo, School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, Tilburg, the Netherlands
| | - Eveline J M Wouters
- School of Allied Health Professions, Fontys University of Applied Science, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
- Tranzo, School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, Tilburg, the Netherlands
| | - Hanna Köttl
- Louis and Gabi Weisfeld School of Social Work, Faculty of Social Sciences, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel
- Department of Health Sciences, IMC University of Applied Sciences Krems, Krems an der Donau, Austria
| | - Leonieke C van Boekel
- Tranzo, School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, Tilburg, the Netherlands
| | - Rens Brankaert
- School of Allied Health Professions, Fontys University of Applied Science, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
- Expertise Centre Dementia and Technology, University of Technology Eindhoven, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Yvonne van Zaalen
- School of Allied Health Professions, Fontys University of Applied Science, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Alhasani R, George N, Radman D, Auger C, Ahmed S. Methodologies for Evaluating the Usability of Rehabilitation Technologies Aimed at Supporting Shared Decision-Making: Scoping Review. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol 2023; 10:e41359. [PMID: 37581911 PMCID: PMC10466154 DOI: 10.2196/41359] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2022] [Revised: 02/27/2023] [Accepted: 03/31/2023] [Indexed: 04/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The field of rehabilitation has seen a recent rise in technologies to support shared decision-making (SDM). Usability testing during the design process of SDM technologies is needed to optimize adoption and realize potential benefits. There is variability in how usability is defined and measured. Given the complexity of usability, a thorough examination of the methodologies used to measure usability to develop the SDM technologies used in rehabilitation care is needed. OBJECTIVE This scoping review aims to answer the following research questions: which methods and measures have been used to produce knowledge about the usability of rehabilitation technologies aimed at supporting SDM at the different phases of development and implementation? Which parameters of usability have been measured and reported? METHODS This review followed the Arksey and O'Malley framework. An electronic search was performed in the Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and PsycINFO databases from January 2005 up to November 2020. In total, 2 independent reviewers screened all retrieved titles, abstracts, and full texts according to the inclusion criteria and extracted the data. The International Organization for Standardization framework was used to define the scope of usability (effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction). The characteristics of the studies were outlined in a descriptive summary. Findings were categorized based on usability parameters, technology interventions, and measures of usability. RESULTS A total of 38 articles were included. The most common SDM technologies were web-based aids (15/33, 46%). The usability of SDM technologies was assessed during development, preimplementation, or implementation, using 14 different methods. The most frequent methods were questionnaires (24/38, 63%) and semistructured interviews (16/38, 42%). Satisfaction (27/38, 71%) was the most common usability parameter mapped to types of SDM technologies and usability evaluation methods. User-centered design (9/15, 60%) was the most frequently used technology design framework. CONCLUSIONS The results from this scoping review highlight the importance and the complexity of usability evaluation. Although various methods and measures were shown to be used to evaluate the usability of technologies to support SDM in rehabilitation, very few evaluations used in the included studies were found to adequately span the selected usability domains. This review identified gaps in usability evaluation, as most studies (24/38, 63%) relied solely on questionnaires rather than multiple methods, and most questionnaires simply focused on the usability parameter of satisfaction. The consideration of end users (such as patients and clinicians) is of particular importance for the development of technologies to support SDM, as the process of SDM itself aims to improve patient-centered care and integrate both patient and clinician voices into their rehabilitation care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rehab Alhasani
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Nicole George
- School of Physical and Occupation Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Dennis Radman
- School of Physical and Occupation Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Claudine Auger
- Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Institut Universitaire sur la Réadaptation en Déficience Physique de Montréal, Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
- School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Sara Ahmed
- School of Physical and Occupation Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Constance Lethbridge Rehabilitation Center, Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Centre-Ouest-de-l'Île-de-Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
- McGill University Health Center Research Institute, Centre for Health Outcomes Research, Montreal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ghaderi G, Milley P, Lysaght R, Cobigo V. Including people with intellectual and other cognitive disabilities in research and evaluation teams: A scoping review of the empirical knowledge base. JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES : JOID 2023:17446295231189912. [PMID: 37463247 DOI: 10.1177/17446295231189912] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/20/2023]
Abstract
We conducted a rapid scoping review of empirical studies to identify how persons with intellectual and other cognitive disabilities have been engaged as active members of research and evaluation teams. We conducted a literature search using a systematic method that accessed peer reviewed studies in relevant library databases and all major evaluation journals. The search resulted in 6,624 potential articles, of which 32 met the inclusion criteria for this study. The findings address three categories of interest: 1) methodological underpinnings and practical justifications for using inclusive approaches, 2) different inclusion processes, and 3) reflections by researchers with and without intellectual and other cognitive disabilities. Findings provide conceptual and practical insights for researchers and evaluators when designing inclusive methods involving persons with intellectual and other cognitive disabilities. Gaps in inclusive research and evaluation are discussed and suggestions for future research are proposed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Golnaz Ghaderi
- Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Peter Milley
- Faculty of Education, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Rosemary Lysaght
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Virginie Cobigo
- Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Mannheim I, Weiss D, van Zaalen Y, Wouters EJM. An "ultimate partnership": Older persons' perspectives on age-stereotypes and intergenerational interaction in co-designing digital technologies. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2023; 113:105050. [PMID: 37120917 DOI: 10.1016/j.archger.2023.105050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2022] [Revised: 04/16/2023] [Accepted: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 05/02/2023]
Abstract
AIM There is often a gap between the ideal of involving older persons iteratively throughout the design process of digital technology, and actual practice. Until now, the lens of ageism has not been applied to address this gap. The goals of this study were: to voice the perspectives and experiences of older persons who participated in co-designing regarding the design process; their perceived role in co-designing and intergenerational interaction with the designers; and apparent manifestations of ageism that potentially influence the design of digital technology. METHODS Twenty-one older persons participated in three focus groups. Five themes were identified using thematic analysis which combined a critical ageism 'lens' deductive approach and an inductive approach. RESULTS Ageism was experienced by participants in their daily lives and interactions with the designers during the design process. Negative images of ageing were pointed out as a potential influencing factor on design decisions. Nevertheless, positive experiences of inclusive design pointed out the importance of "partnership" in the design process. Participants defined the "ultimate partnership" in co-designing as processes in which they were involved from the beginning, iteratively, in a participatory approach. Such processes were perceived as leading to successful design outcomes, which they would like to use, and reduced intergenerational tension. CONCLUSIONS This study highlights the potential role of ageism as a detrimental factor in how digital technologies are designed. Viewing older persons as partners in co-designing and aspiring to more inclusive design processes may promote designing technologies that are needed, wanted and used.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ittay Mannheim
- School of Allied Health Professions, Fontys University of Applied Science, Dominee Theodor Fliednerstraat 2 Gebouw TF, 5631 BN Eindhoven, Netherlands; Tranzo, School of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Tilburg University, Professor Cobbenhagenlaan 125, 5037 DB Tilburg, the Netherlands.
| | - Dana Weiss
- Myers-JDC-Brookdale institute, JDC Hill PO Box 3886 Jerusalem 91037, Israel
| | - Yvonne van Zaalen
- School of Allied Health Professions, Fontys University of Applied Science, Dominee Theodor Fliednerstraat 2 Gebouw TF, 5631 BN Eindhoven, Netherlands; The Hague University of Allied Sciences, Johanna Westerdijkplein 75, 2521 EN, the Hague, the Netherlands
| | - Eveline J M Wouters
- School of Allied Health Professions, Fontys University of Applied Science, Dominee Theodor Fliednerstraat 2 Gebouw TF, 5631 BN Eindhoven, Netherlands; Tranzo, School of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Tilburg University, Professor Cobbenhagenlaan 125, 5037 DB Tilburg, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kowe A, Panjaitan H, Klein OA, Boccardi M, Roes M, Teupen S, Teipel S. The impact of participatory dementia research on researchers: A systematic review. DEMENTIA 2022; 21:1012-1031. [DOI: 10.1177/14713012211067020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Participatory approaches are increasingly required and used in research. In this review, we examined the impact (benefits and disadvantages) of participatory dementia research on researchers as potential key actors to sustainably implement the participatory approach. Our aim was to provide information on how the participatory process could be improved. We conducted a systematic literature review covering the Cochrane Library, PsycNet, PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar. The inclusion criteria for publications were as follows: research (1) involving people with dementia as co-researchers, (2) including a description or discussion of the impact of participatory research for researchers, (3) published between 2000 and 2020, and (4) in English. We performed a quality assessment of the included publications. Our final review included nine publications; three categorized as high quality, five as medium quality, and one as low quality. Four of the publications categorized as high or medium quality implemented participation at the level of partnership, and two publications implemented participation at the level of delegated power. The beneficial impact of participatory dementia research on researchers consisted of an increased understanding of people with dementia that widened researchers’ theoretical knowledge and perspectives and increased their competence in working with people with dementia. Disadvantages comprised the required additional effort and time as well as the difficulty of establishing a balanced relationship between researchers and co-researchers. Disadvantages may result from the lack of a definition and structure of participatory research and a lack of training on both sides. More well-designed and transparent methods of evaluating participatory research projects are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonia Kowe
- Department “Ageing of Individuals and Society”, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Hentry Panjaitan
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Site Rostock/Greifswald, Rostock, Germany
| | - Olga A Klein
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Site Rostock/Greifswald, Rostock, Germany
| | - Marina Boccardi
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Site Rostock/Greifswald, Rostock, Germany
| | - Martina Roes
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Site Witten,Witten, Germany
| | - Sonja Teupen
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Site Witten,Witten, Germany
| | - Stefan Teipel
- Rostock University Medical Center and German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Site Rostock/Greifswald, Rostock, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Cowdell F, Dyson J, Sykes M, Dam R, Pendleton R. How and how well have older people been engaged in healthcare intervention design, development or delivery using co-methodologies: A scoping review with narrative summary. HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE IN THE COMMUNITY 2022; 30:776-798. [PMID: 33103313 DOI: 10.1111/hsc.13199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2020] [Revised: 08/17/2020] [Accepted: 09/22/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Co-methodological working is gaining increasing traction in healthcare, but studies with older people have been slower to develop. Our aim was to investigate how and how well older people have been engaged in healthcare intervention design, development or delivery using co-methodologies. We conducted a systematic search of four electronic databases to identify international literature published between 2009 and November 2019. We included peer-reviewed empirical research of any design. Three authors screened papers. Our review is reported in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute manual for scoping reviews, we have referred to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses statement. We data extracted to a bespoke spreadsheet and used the Co:Create Co-production Matrix to guide quality appraisal. Included studies (n = 48) were diverse in nature of interventions, co-methodologies and reporting. We offer a narrative summary of included papers. Establishing how older people were engaged in co-methodological work was largely straightforward. How well this was done was more challenging, however we have identified gems of good practice and offered directions for future practice. The Co:Create Co-Production Matrix was the best fit for evaluating papers, however it is not intended as a measure per se. In essence we argue that notions of 'best' and 'scores' are an oxymoron in co-methodological working, what is important that: (a) researchers embrace these methods, (b) incremental change is the way forward, (c) researchers need to do what is right for people and purpose and (d) have time to consider and articulate why they are choosing this approach and how best this can be achieved for their particular situation. Future evaluation of participant's experience of the process would enable others to learn about what works for who and in what circumstances.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fiona Cowdell
- Faculty of Health, Education and Life Sciences, Birmingham City University, Birmingham, UK
| | - Judith Dyson
- School of Health Sciences, City University, London, UK
| | - Michael Sykes
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Rinita Dam
- Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Haak M, Ivanoff S, Barenfeld E, Berge I, Lood Q. Research as an essentiality beyond one's own competence: an interview study on frail older people's view of research. RESEARCH INVOLVEMENT AND ENGAGEMENT 2021; 7:91. [PMID: 34952649 PMCID: PMC8705152 DOI: 10.1186/s40900-021-00333-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2021] [Accepted: 12/09/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is an increased interest to make the voices of frail older people heard in research by actively involving them in research processes. Involving frail older people in research could, however, be perceived as challenging by researchers. To actively involve frail older people in research processes in a meaningful way, the knowledge about their own views on what research is must be widened and deepened. METHODS Individual interviews were conducted with 17 frail older men and women with former experience of participation in research studies. Qualitative data were analysed using content analysis. RESULTS Frail older people's views on what research means are described through the main category; An essentiality beyond one's own competence, which describes research as a complex process that is important for society but difficult to understand. This is described in the sub-categories; A driving force for societal development, A benefit when based on lived experience, A source of knowledge difficult to access and understand, and A respected job filled with responsibilities. CONCLUSION Different views on research from the perspective of frail older people show that research is viewed as a complex yet important phenomenon to frail older people. Research was also seen as a natural part in society. Research was viewed as difficult to access and understand. Thus, researchers must train themselves to communicate research findings to the public in an understandable way. To create common understandings through information and education, researchers might be better placed to involve frail older people in a meaningful way and thereby also have the possibility to develop good working practice and relationships with those involved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Haak
- Research Platform for Collaboration for Health, Faculty of Health Science, Kristianstad University, Kristianstad, Sweden.
- Department of Health and Rehabilitation, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, Centre for Ageing and Health - AgeCap, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
| | - Synneve Ivanoff
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, Centre for Ageing and Health - AgeCap, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Emmelie Barenfeld
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Centre for Person-Centred Care (GPCC), University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Centre for Ageing and Health - AgeCap, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Occupational Therapy and Physiotherapy, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Isak Berge
- Department of Health and Rehabilitation, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, Centre for Ageing and Health - AgeCap, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Qarin Lood
- Department of Health and Rehabilitation, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, Centre for Ageing and Health - AgeCap, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health Sciences, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Gilfoyle M, Krul J, Oremus M. Developing practice standards for engaging people living with dementia in product design, testing, and commercialization - a case study. Assist Technol 2021; 35:127-135. [PMID: 34383606 DOI: 10.1080/10400435.2021.1968069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
Abstract
AbstractTo successfully create assistive technologies for persons with dementia, product developers must understand the capacity of people with dementia to use these technologies. Capacity assessment is typically done through user experience research. However, the published literature is bereft of guidelines to conduct optimal user experience research in samples of persons with dementia.We recruited persons with dementia from community-based organizations and private partners to participate in user experience research for an assistive technology platform. After a testing session, we used semi-structured interviews to ask participants about their involvement in the user experience process. We employed an inductive thematic approach to analyze the interview transcripts and draft guidelines to meaningfully engage persons with dementia in user experience research in the future.Ten participants with mild to moderate dementia (6 females, 4 males) participated in the study. Nine participants had previous experience with mobile devices. Thematic analysis yielded three overarching themes: 1) the techniques, approaches and attributes of the interviewer; 2) participants' views on being part of the user experience research process; and 3) specific items to optimize the research process. Resulting guidelines were divided into recommendations for the interviewer specifically, and for the broader research process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meghan Gilfoyle
- School of Medicine, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | | | - Mark Oremus
- School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Glassner A. Fighting Stigma by Engaging Persons Living with Dementia in Research. Issues Ment Health Nurs 2021; 42:604-607. [PMID: 33048623 DOI: 10.1080/01612840.2020.1825572] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Ashlie Glassner
- School of Nursing, University of Texas Health Science Center in San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Jones A, Morgan-Jones P, Busse M, Shepherd V, Wood F. Conducting focus groups in neurodegenerative disease populations: ethical and methodological considerations. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e041869. [PMID: 33441358 PMCID: PMC7812104 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041869] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Involvement of vulnerable populations in research is critical to inform the generalisability of evidence-based medicine to all groups of the population. OBJECTIVE In this communication, we reflect on our previous research, and that of other authors, to identify and explore key ethical and methodological considerations. DISCUSSION Focus groups are a widely implemented qualitative methodology, but their use, particularly in vulnerable neurodegenerative disease populations, is not straightforward. Although the risk of harm is generally low in focus group research, neurodegenerative disease populations are particularly vulnerable to issues relating to comprehension and their capacity to consent. Physical and cognitive impairments may also affect social interactions among participants and therefore impact data collection and analyses. CONCLUSION We offer a number of ethical and methodological recommendations to facilitate the processes of recruitment and data collection when conducting focus groups with neurodegenerative disease populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Monica Busse
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | | | - Fiona Wood
- Division of Population Medicine and PRIME Centre Wales, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Carroll S, Kobayashi K, Cervantes MN, Freeman S, Saini M, Tracey S. Supporting Healthy Aging through the Scale-Up, Spread, and Sustainability of Assistive Technology Implementation: A Rapid Realist Review of Participatory Co-Design for Assistive Technology with Older Adults. Gerontol Geriatr Med 2021; 7:23337214211023269. [PMID: 34179298 PMCID: PMC8202255 DOI: 10.1177/23337214211023269] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2021] [Revised: 05/04/2021] [Accepted: 05/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: To identify the key mechanisms, contexts, and outcomes that drive the successful participatory co-design of assistive technologies. Method: A rapid realist review was conducted using a systematic search strategy. After screening, a final set of 28 articles were included. Articles were analyzed for evidence relevant to our initial program theory (IPT), and context-mechanism-outcome configurations were developed, resulting in a revised program theory. Results: All 28 articles included were highly relevant to the IPT, and had sufficient detail regarding the process of participatory co-design. The findings of this review highlight several key context-mechanism-outcome configurations as potential patterns in the data under the two dimensions of the evolving program theory: knowledge integration and the ethico-political dimension. Discussion: This review revealed the key mechanisms of mutual awareness, mutual learning, trust, and reciprocity that need to be taken into account in AT development and assessment. We concluded that participatory co-design requires a restructuring of power relations between end-users and those traditionally in control of technology design. These findings inform the development and assessment of AT for older adults and help guide policy/decision-makers to move forward with the now urgent agenda for scale-up and spread, initiated by the burning platform of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Shannon Freeman
- University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, Canada
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Rai HK, Cavalcanti Barroso A, Yates L, Schneider J, Orrell M. Involvement of People With Dementia in the Development of Technology-Based Interventions: Narrative Synthesis Review and Best Practice Guidelines. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22:e17531. [PMID: 33270034 PMCID: PMC7746489 DOI: 10.2196/17531] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2019] [Accepted: 02/26/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Technology can be helpful in supporting people with dementia in their daily lives. However, people with dementia are often not fully involved in the development process of new technology. This lack of involvement of people with dementia in developing technology-based interventions can lead to the implementation of faulty and less suitable technology. Objective This systematic review aims to evaluate current approaches and create best practice guidelines for involving people with dementia in developing technology-based interventions. Methods A systematic search was conducted in January 2019 in the following databases: EMBASE (Excerpta Medica database), PsycINFO, MEDLINE (Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online), CINAHL (Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), and Web of Science. The search strategy included search terms in 3 categories: dementia, technology, and involvement in development. Narrative synthesis wove the evidence together in a structured approach. Results A total of 21 studies met the inclusion criteria. Most studies involved people with dementia in a single phase, such as development (n=10), feasibility and piloting (n=7), or evaluation (n=1). Only 3 studies described involvement in multiple phases. Frequently used methods for assessing involvement included focus groups, interviews, observations, and user tests. Conclusions Most studies concluded that it was both necessary and feasible to involve people with dementia, which can be optimized by having the right prerequisites in place, ensuring that technology meets standards of reliability and stability, and providing a positive research experience for participants. Best practice guidelines for the involvement of people with dementia in developing technology-based interventions are described.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harleen Kaur Rai
- Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Aline Cavalcanti Barroso
- Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.,School of Sociology and Social Policy, Law and Social Sciences Building, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Lauren Yates
- Department of Clinical, Education and Health Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Justine Schneider
- School of Sociology and Social Policy, Law and Social Sciences Building, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Martin Orrell
- Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Suijkerbuijk S, Nap HH, Cornelisse L, IJsselsteijn WA, de Kort YAW, Minkman MMN. Active Involvement of People with Dementia: A Systematic Review of Studies Developing Supportive Technologies. J Alzheimers Dis 2020; 69:1041-1065. [PMID: 31156158 PMCID: PMC6597993 DOI: 10.3233/jad-190050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Although there are promising benefits of supportive technology in dementia care, use of these technologies is still limited. It is challenging for researchers and developers in this field to actively involve people with dementia in development. This review updates and builds on existing knowledge by including a contemporary and relevant perspective. This perspective was gained by including search words and search databases from the field of Human Computer Interaction (HCI) and Design, as these fields were expected to supply novel insights in the complex task of actively involving people with dementia in developing supportive technologies. A total of 49 out of 3456 studies were included which describe the development of a great variety of technologies. Often people with dementia were involved in the generative or evaluative phase of the development. Interviews and observations were most commonly used methods. In seven articles the people with dementia were co-designers. This literature review reflects that people with dementia can influence the development of technology in regards to content, design, and even the initial idea, although the impact on how they experience their own involvement remains largely unknown. There is a lack of specific knowledge on appropriate methods and materials for active involvement of people with dementia in supportive technology development, even when including articles from the field of HCI and Design. Future research is needed to further appreciate and improve the desired role of people with dementia in meaningful technology development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra Suijkerbuijk
- Vilans, Centre of expertise Long-term care, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Human Technology Interaction, University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Henk Herman Nap
- Vilans, Centre of expertise Long-term care, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Human Technology Interaction, University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Lotte Cornelisse
- Vilans, Centre of expertise Long-term care, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Yvonne A W de Kort
- Human Technology Interaction, University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Mirella M N Minkman
- Vilans, Centre of expertise Long-term care, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Tilburg University, TIAS School for Business and Society, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Bogza LM, Patry-Lebeau C, Farmanova E, Witteman HO, Elliott J, Stolee P, Hudon C, Giguere AMC. User-Centered Design and Evaluation of a Web-Based Decision Aid for Older Adults Living With Mild Cognitive Impairment and Their Health Care Providers: Mixed Methods Study. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22:e17406. [PMID: 32442151 PMCID: PMC7468645 DOI: 10.2196/17406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2019] [Revised: 04/07/2020] [Accepted: 04/15/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is often considered a transitional state between normal and pathologic (eg, dementia) cognitive aging. Although its prognosis varies largely, the diagnosis carries the risk of causing uncertainty and overtreatment of older adults with MCI who may never progress to dementia. Decision aids help people become better informed and more involved in decision making by providing evidence-based information about options and possible outcomes and by assisting them in clarifying their personal values in relation to the decision to be made. Objective This study aimed to incorporate features that best support values clarification and adjust the level of detail of a web-based decision aid for individuals with MCI. Methods We conducted a rapid review to identify options to maintain or improve cognitive functions in individuals with MCI. The evidence was structured into a novel web-based decision aid designed in collaboration with digital specialists and graphic designers. Qualitative and user-centered evaluations were used to draw on users’ knowledge, clarify values, and inform potential adoption in routine clinical practice. We invited clinicians, older adults with MCI, and their caregivers to evaluate the decision aid in 6 consecutive rounds, with new participants in each round. Quantitative data were collected using the Values Clarity and Informed subscales of the Decisional Conflict Scale, the System Usability Scale, the Ottawa Acceptability questionnaire, and a 5-point satisfaction rating scale. We verified their comprehension using a teach-back method and recorded usability issues. We recorded the audio and computer screen during the session. An inductive thematic qualitative analysis approach was used to identify and describe the issues that arose. After each round, an expert panel met to prioritize and find solutions to mitigate the issues. An integrated analysis was conducted to confirm our choices. Results A total of 7 clinicians (social workers, nurses, family physicians, psychologists) and 12 older (≥60 years) community-dwelling individuals with MCI, half of them women, with education levels going from none to university diploma, were recruited and completed testing. The thematic analysis revealed 3 major issues. First, the user should be guided through the decision-making process by tailoring the presentation of options to users’ priorities using the values clarification exercise. Second, its content should be simple, but not simplistic, notably by using information layering, plain language, and pictograms. Third, the interface should be intuitive and user friendly, utilize pop-up windows and information tips, avoid drop-down menus, and limit the need to scroll down. The quantitative assessments corroborated the qualitative findings. Conclusions This project resulted in a promising web-based decision aid that can support decision making for MCI intervention, based on the personal values and preferences of the users. Further ongoing research will allow its implementation to be tested in clinical settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura-Mihaela Bogza
- Laval University Research Centre on Community-Based Primary Health Care, Quebec, QC, Canada.,Quebec Centre for Excellence on Aging, Québec, QC, Canada.,Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Laval University, Québec, QC, Canada
| | - Cassandra Patry-Lebeau
- Quebec Centre for Excellence on Aging, Québec, QC, Canada.,Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Laval University, Québec, QC, Canada
| | - Elina Farmanova
- Quebec Centre for Excellence on Aging, Québec, QC, Canada.,Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Laval University, Québec, QC, Canada.,Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Holly O Witteman
- Laval University Research Centre on Community-Based Primary Health Care, Quebec, QC, Canada.,Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Laval University, Québec, QC, Canada
| | - Jacobi Elliott
- School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
| | - Paul Stolee
- School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
| | - Carol Hudon
- School of Psychology, Laval University, Québec, QC, Canada
| | - Anik M C Giguere
- Laval University Research Centre on Community-Based Primary Health Care, Quebec, QC, Canada.,Quebec Centre for Excellence on Aging, Québec, QC, Canada.,Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Laval University, Québec, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Smith L, Argentina V. The Usability of Physical Activity and Cognitive Training Applications in People With Mild Cognitive Impairment. Res Gerontol Nurs 2019; 13:64-72. [PMID: 31584688 DOI: 10.3928/19404921-20190930-04] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2019] [Accepted: 08/23/2019] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
The aim of the current study is to identify key issues with utility, effectiveness, and appeal of specific electronic applications (apps) for people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to guide the design and development of a mobile app, which integrates physical activity and cognitive activities. Sixteen participants age ≥65 were recruited from three assisted living facilities in Alabama. Participants were observed playing a physical activity app and cognitive training app via a tablet on two separate occasions. Most participants agreed that Sworkit®, Elevate®, and 7-Minute Workout® were easy to use and fun, less frustrating, and they would recommend them to a friend. Most participants had questions regarding clarification about how to play the games. All (100%) participants smiled and appeared happy when playing the physical activity games, whereas only 35% smiled during the cognitive training games. The current study was instrumental in revealing that people with MCI can use technology and provide feedback regarding use of that technology. Individuals with impaired cognition should be recruited for participation in research for the knowledge they can provide researchers. [Research in Gerontological Nursing, 13(2), 64-72.].
Collapse
|
22
|
Co-designing with people with dementia: A scoping review of involving people with dementia in design research. Maturitas 2019; 127:55-63. [DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2019.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2019] [Revised: 03/26/2019] [Accepted: 06/04/2019] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
23
|
Bilodeau G, Witteman H, Légaré F, Lafontaine-Bruneau J, Voyer P, Kröger E, Tremblay MC, Giguere AMC. Reducing complexity of patient decision aids for community-based older adults with dementia and their caregivers: multiple case study of Decision Boxes. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e027727. [PMID: 31072861 PMCID: PMC6528048 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027727] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2018] [Revised: 02/19/2019] [Accepted: 03/14/2019] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To identify patient decision aids' features to limit their complexity for older adults with dementia and their family caregivers. DESIGN Mixed method, multiple case study within a user-centred design (UCD) approach. SETTING Community-based healthcare in the province of Quebec in Canada. PARTICIPANTS 23 older persons (aged 65+ years) with dementia and their 27 family caregivers. RESULTS During three UCD evaluation-modification rounds, participants identified strengths and weaknesses of the patient decision aids' content and visual design that influenced their complexity. Weaknesses of content included a lack of understanding of the decision aids' purpose and target audience, missing information, irrelevant content and issues with terminology and sentence structure. Weaknesses of visual design included critics about the decision aids' general layout (density, length, navigation) and their lack of pictures. In response, the design team implemented a series of practical features and design strategies, comprising: a clear expression of the patient decision aids' purpose through simple text, picture and personal stories; systematic and frequent use of pictograms illustrating key points and helping structure patient decision aids' general layout; a glossary; removal of scientific references from the main document; personal stories to clarify more difficult concepts; a contact section to facilitate implementation of the selected option; GRADE ratings to convey the quality of the evidence; a values clarification exercise formatted as a checklist and presented at the beginning of the document to streamline navigation; involvement of a panel of patient/caregiver partners to guide expression of patient priorities; editing of the text to a sixth grade reading level; UCD process to optimise comprehensiveness and relevance of content and training of patients/caregivers in shared decision-making. CONCLUSIONS The revised template for patient decision aids is designed to meet the needs of adults living with dementia and their caregivers better, which may translate into fewer evaluation-modification rounds.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriel Bilodeau
- Laval University Research Centre on Primary Care and Services, Centre integre universitaire de sante et de services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Holly Witteman
- Laval University, Family and Emergency Medicine, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - France Légaré
- Knowledge Transfer and Health Technology Assessment Research Group, Research Center of Centre hospitalier universitaire de Québec (CRCHUQ), Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
- Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Universite Laval Faculte de medecine, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | | | - Philippe Voyer
- Faculte des Sciences Infirmieres de l'Universite Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Edeltraut Kröger
- Laval University Research Center on Primary Care and Services, Centre integre universitaire de sante et de services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Marie-Claude Tremblay
- Laval University Research Centre on Primary Care and Services, Centre integre universitaire de sante et de services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
- Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Universite Laval Faculte de medecine, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Anik M C Giguere
- Laval University Research Centre on Primary Care and Services, Centre integre universitaire de sante et de services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
- Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Evaluation of Person-Centredness in Rehabilitation for People Living with Dementia Is Needed: A Review of the Literature. J Aging Res 2019; 2019:8510792. [PMID: 31192013 PMCID: PMC6525915 DOI: 10.1155/2019/8510792] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2018] [Revised: 03/14/2019] [Accepted: 03/24/2019] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background With an expected increase in the prevalence of dementia, change in care policies and healthcare systems worldwide is needed. Rehabilitation is increasingly recognised as contributing to dementia care. Rehabilitation subscribes to person-centredness, and thus, evaluations of person-centredness in rehabilitation for people living with dementia are relevant in order for healthcare professionals to know how best to practice person-centredness. Aim The aim of this study was to identify methods of evaluating person-centeredness in rehabilitation for people living with dementia. Materials and Methods Review of the literature using the search terms dementia, person-centredness, and rehabilitation or occupational therapy. Databases searched included: CINAHL, PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, OTseeker, and SveMed+. The study included peer-reviewed articles from year 2000 to 2018 in Danish, English, Norwegian, or Swedish. Results Only one academic article met the inclusion criteria. In that article, person-centred practice was evaluated using observation and interview as well as analytical frameworks from person-centred care and occupational therapy. Conclusion Evaluations of person-centred practice in rehabilitation for people living with dementia in peer-reviewed literature are lacking. Evaluations are needed to identify effective strategies to pursue and uphold person-centred care. Given the dearth of research on evaluations of person-centredness in rehabilitation, this article included research in person-centred dementia care in the discussion, which potentially can inspire practice and research of rehabilitation for people living with dementia. To understand the complex nature of person-centredness, a variety of research methodologies of qualitative and quantitative characters are recommended for evaluations.
Collapse
|
25
|
Giguere AMC, Lawani MA, Fortier-Brochu É, Carmichael PH, Légaré F, Kröger E, Witteman HO, Voyer P, Caron D, Rodríguez C. Tailoring and evaluating an intervention to improve shared decision-making among seniors with dementia, their caregivers, and healthcare providers: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2018; 19:332. [PMID: 29941020 PMCID: PMC6019313 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-018-2697-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2016] [Accepted: 05/17/2018] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The increasing prevalence of Alzheimer’s disease and other forms of dementia raises new challenges to ensure that healthcare decisions are informed by research evidence and reflect what is important for seniors and their caregivers. Therefore, we aim to evaluate a tailored intervention to help healthcare providers empower seniors and their caregivers in making health-related decisions. Methods In two phases, we will: (1) design and tailor the intervention; and (2) implement and evaluate it. We will use theory and user-centered design to tailor an intervention comprising a distance professional training program on shared decision-making and five shared decision-making tools dealing with difficult decisions often faced by seniors with dementia and their caregivers. Each tool will be designed in two versions, one for clinicians and one for patients. We will recruit 49 clinicians and 27 senior/caregiver to participate in three cycles of design-evaluation-feedback of each intervention components. Besides think-aloud and interview approaches, users will also complete questionnaires based on the Theory of Planned Behavior to identify the factors most likely to influence their adoption of shared decision-making after exposure to the intervention. We will then modify the intervention by adding/enhancing behavior-change techniques targeting these factors. We will evaluate the effectiveness of this tailored intervention before/after implementation, in a two-armed, clustered randomized trial. We will enroll a convenience sample of six primary care clinics (unit of randomization) in the province of Quebec and recruit the clinicians who practice there (mostly family physicians, nurses, and social workers). These clinics will then be randomized to immediate exposure to the intervention or delayed exposure. Overall, we will recruit 180 seniors with dementia, their caregivers, and their healthcare providers. We will evaluate the impact of the intervention on patient involvement in the decision-making process, decisional comfort, patient and caregiver personal empowerment in relation to their own healthcare, patient quality of life, caregiver burden, and decisional regret. Discussion The intervention will empower patients and their caregivers in their healthcare, by fostering their participation as partners during the decision-making process and by ensuring they make informed decisions congruent with their values and priorities. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.org, NCT02956694. Registered on 31 October 2016. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-018-2697-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anik M C Giguere
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Laval University, Pavillon Ferdinand-Vandry, room 2881-C, 1050 avenue de la Médecine, Quebec, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada. .,Quebec Centre for Excellence on Aging, St-Sacrement Hospital, Room L2-21, 1050, chemin Sainte-Foy, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada. .,Laval University Research Centre on Primary Care and Services, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada. .,Research Axis of Population Health and Practice-Changing Research Group, CHU de Quebec Research Centre, Quebec city, QC, Canada.
| | - Moulikatou Adouni Lawani
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Laval University, Pavillon Ferdinand-Vandry, room 2881-C, 1050 avenue de la Médecine, Quebec, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada.,Quebec Centre for Excellence on Aging, St-Sacrement Hospital, Room L2-21, 1050, chemin Sainte-Foy, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.,Laval University Research Centre on Primary Care and Services, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Émilie Fortier-Brochu
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Laval University, Pavillon Ferdinand-Vandry, room 2881-C, 1050 avenue de la Médecine, Quebec, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada.,Quebec Centre for Excellence on Aging, St-Sacrement Hospital, Room L2-21, 1050, chemin Sainte-Foy, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.,Laval University Research Centre on Primary Care and Services, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Pierre-Hugues Carmichael
- Quebec Centre for Excellence on Aging, St-Sacrement Hospital, Room L2-21, 1050, chemin Sainte-Foy, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - France Légaré
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Laval University, Pavillon Ferdinand-Vandry, room 2881-C, 1050 avenue de la Médecine, Quebec, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada.,Faculty of Nursing Sciences, Laval University, Pavillon Ferdinand-Vandry, room 2881-C, 1050, avenue de la Médecine, Quebec, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada
| | - Edeltraut Kröger
- Quebec Centre for Excellence on Aging, St-Sacrement Hospital, Room L2-21, 1050, chemin Sainte-Foy, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.,Research Axis of Population Health and Practice-Changing Research Group, CHU de Quebec Research Centre, Quebec city, QC, Canada.,Faculty of Pharmacy, Laval University, St-Sacrement Hospital, Room L2-30, 1050, Chemin Sainte-Foy, Québec, QC, G1S 4L8, Canada
| | - Holly O Witteman
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Laval University, Pavillon Ferdinand-Vandry, room 2881-C, 1050 avenue de la Médecine, Quebec, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada.,Quebec Centre for Excellence on Aging, St-Sacrement Hospital, Room L2-21, 1050, chemin Sainte-Foy, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.,Research Axis of Population Health and Practice-Changing Research Group, CHU de Quebec Research Centre, Quebec city, QC, Canada
| | - Philippe Voyer
- Quebec Centre for Excellence on Aging, St-Sacrement Hospital, Room L2-21, 1050, chemin Sainte-Foy, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.,Faculty of Nursing Sciences, Laval University, Pavillon Ferdinand-Vandry, room 2881-C, 1050, avenue de la Médecine, Quebec, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada
| | - Danielle Caron
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Laval University, Pavillon Ferdinand-Vandry, room 2881-C, 1050 avenue de la Médecine, Quebec, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada
| | - Charo Rodríguez
- Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, 5858 chemin de la Cote-des-Neiges, 3rd floor, Suite 300, Room 328, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|