Examining occupational health and safety vulnerability among Canadian workers with disabilities

Exploring the working conditions of disabled employees: a scoping review

PURPOSE

Disabled people are often overlooked in considerations about work design, which contributes to their exclusion from the labor market. This issue also reflects within research, as the body of knowledge on the working conditions of disabled employees remains relatively limited.

METHODS

A scoping review was conducted to assess the research landscape concerning the working conditions of disabled employees. Five databases have been searched, focusing on relevant studies published between 2017 and 2022.

RESULTS

One hundred fourteen studies were included in the review. It was found that social aspects of work appeared within a substantial portion of the examined studies. Furthermore, it became evident that the interplay of accessibility and flexibility provides an important dynamic to make work design both inclusive and feasible.

CONCLUSION

The recurrent prominence of social aspects, accessibility, and flexibility across the studies shows common challenges and potentials within the work situation of disabled employees. This suggests avenues for future research and inclusive work design.

Growing disparity in the prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease between people with and without disabilities: a Korean nationwide serial cross-sectional study

Few studies have examined the association between disability and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We compared the trends in the annual COPD prevalence between people with and without disabilities, and examined the association between disability and COPD. We linked the National Health Information Database (2008-2017) with the National Disability Registration Database, which includes more than 2 million people with disabilities every year. In the 2017 dataset, people with disabilities had a higher prevalence of COPD than those without disabilities (30.6% vs. 12.5%, P < 0.001). The age-standardized prevalence rate of COPD among people without disabilities increased from 4.2 in 2008 to 10.9% in 2017 (change of 6.7%), whereas that among those with disabilities increased from 7.0 to 17.1% (change of 10.1%). In multivariate analysis, compared to people without disabilities, those with disabilities had a higher probability of having COPD (adjusted odds ratio, 1.42; 95% confidence interval 1.42-1.43). The results of subgroup analysis by disability characteristics suggested that disabilities due to failure of an organ, such as the kidney, lung, heart, or liver, and severe disabilities were particularly vulnerable to COPD. In conclusion, people with disabilities are more likely to have COPD compared to people without disabilities. Further longitudinal studies that examine cause-and-effect relationship between disability and COPD are needed to clarify this relationship and to further investigate any potential negative effects associated with the coexistence of these conditions.

The Participation of People with Disabilities in the Workplace Across the Employment Cycle: Employer Concerns and Research Evidence

Despite legislation on diversity in the workplace, people with disabilities still do not experience the same access to work opportunities as do their counterparts without disabilities. Many employers have been shown to harbor sincere yet ill-founded views about the work-related abilities of people with disabilities; these negative views are often a result of interrelated concerns that permeate the entire employment cycle. In this paper, we provide evidence-based responses to 11 specific concerns that employers have about people with disabilities, from pre-employment and entry experiences to the final dissolution of the employment relationship. At each stage of the employment cycle, we summarize and evaluate the relevant empirical evidence and provide recommendations for organizations committed to creating more effective, equitable, and inclusive workplaces for all individuals. We also suggest avenues for future research.