The implementation of a physical activity counseling program in rehabilitation care: findings from the ReSpAct study

Professionals' knowledge, skills and confidence on using the best practices for spinal cord injury physical activity counseling in Canada and the Netherlands

CONTEXT

To improve physical activity (PA) participation in people with spinal cord injury (SCI), an international panel co-created theory- and evidence-based best practices for SCI PA counseling. This study aimed to identify and compare Canadian and Dutch counselors' knowledge, skills, and confidence in using these best practices.

METHODS

An online survey was conducted in Canada and the Netherlands. Respondents were included if they worked or volunteered as exercise/lifestyle counselor, recreation therapist, physiotherapist, occupational therapist, or peer mentor and were planning to provide counseling in the next 12 months. Chi-square tests, t-tests and linear regression analyses were used to compare groups.

RESULTS

Canadian (n = 45) and Dutch respondents (n = 41) had different expertise, with the majority of Canadians working as therapeutic recreation therapist and the majority of Dutch respondents working as PA/lifestyle counselor. In both countries, respondents scored relatively high on their knowledge, skills, and confidence in using the best practices on how to have a conversation and what to discuss during a conversation. Dutch respondents scored slightly higher in their confidence for using best practices about building rapport, motivational interviewing, and tailoring the support (p = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The generally high counseling skills reported by Canadian and Dutch respondents may be due to the history of SCI-specific PA promotion projects conducted in both countries. These survey findings were used to inform the development of evidence-based training modules on SCI PA counseling. This study may inspire cross-country collaboration and exchange to optimize the organization and delivery of PA counseling services for adults with SCI.

Underreporting of implementation strategies and barriers in physical activity interventions for young people at risk of problematic substance use: a brief report

BACKGROUND

Several studies have assessed whether physical activity interventions can reduce substance use in young people at risk of problematic substance use. This report identifies and describes the reporting of implementation characteristics within published studies of physical activity interventions for young people at risk of problematic substance use and provides recommendations for future reporting.

METHODS

Reported implementation strategies (including intervention manualization), barriers, implementation fidelity, and personnel acceptance were extracted from studies of physical activity interventions for young people aged 12-25 years at risk of problematic substance use that were included in a previous systematic review of intervention efficacy.

RESULTS

Implementation strategies were reported in less than half of the included studies (42.9%), implementation barriers in only 10.7% of studies, intervention fidelity in 21.4%, and personnel acceptance in a single study (3.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

Results indicate insufficient reporting of implementation strategies, barriers, fidelity, and personnel acceptance. Consideration of implementation characteristics is essential for implementing physical activity interventions in practice. Inadequate or limited reporting of these characteristics may contribute to delayed uptake and adoption of evidence-based interventions in clinical practice. Recommendations to improve the reporting of implementation information include integrating standards for reporting implementation characteristics into existing reporting guidelines, developing an international taxonomy of implementation strategies, and upskilling intervention researchers in the fundamentals of implementation science.

Understanding How Newly Implemented Rehabilitation Best Practices Are Sustained: A Realist Review

OBJECTIVE

We conducted a realist review to understand how (mechanism) and in what circumstances (context) evidence-based practices are sustained in rehabilitation (outcome).

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, Embase, reference lists, and targeted websites.

STUDY SELECTION

Two independent reviewers calibrated study selection; then 1 reviewer screened all titles and abstracts, while the second reviewer screened a random 20%. We repeated this process for full texts. We included 115 documents representing 61 implementation projects (8.9% of identified documents). Included documents described implementation projects in which physical therapists, occupational therapists, and/or speech-language pathologists were the target users of an evidence-based practice.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two reviewers repeated the independent process described in study selection to extract basic study and sustainability characteristics as well as context, mechanism, outcome, and strategy text.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Using basic numerical analyses, we found that only 54% of evidence-based practices in rehabilitation are sustained. Furthermore, while authors who reported sustainability planning sustained the practice 94% of the time, sustainability planning in rehabilitation is rare (only reported 26% of the time). Extracted text was synthesized using the realist technique of inductive and deductive retroduction in which context, mechanism, outcome, and strategy text are combined into narrative explanations of how sustainability works. To inform these explanations, we applied normalization process theory and the theory of planned behavior. Collectively, the 52 identified narratives provide evidence for 3 patterns: (1) implementation and sustainability phases are interconnected, (2) continued use of the evidence-based practice can be interpreted as the ultimate sustainability outcome, and (3) intermediate sustainability outcomes (ie, fit/alignment, financial support, benefits, expertise) can become contextual features influencing other sustainability outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation teams can use the narrative explanations generated in this review to optimize sustainability planning. This can sustain practice changes and improve quality of care and patient outcomes. Future research should seek to iteratively refine the proposed narrative explanations.

Physical Activity and Public Health among People with Disabilities: Research Gaps and Recommendations

Physical activity has become an integral component of public health systems modeling the public health core functions of assessment, policy development, and assurance. However, people with disabilities have often not been included in public health efforts to assess, develop policies, or evaluate the impact of physical activity interventions to promote health and prevent disease among people with disabilities. Addressing the core function of assessment, current physical activity epidemiology, and surveillance among people with disabilities across the globe highlights the paucity of surveillance systems that include physical activity estimates among people with disabilities. The status of valid and reliable physical activity measures among people with condition-specific disabilities is explored, including self-report measures along with wearable devices, and deficiencies in measurement of physical activity. The core functions of policy development and assurance are described in the context of community-based intervention strategies to promote physical activity among people with disabilities. The identification of research gaps in health behavior change, policy, and environmental approaches to promoting physical activity among people with disabilities is explored, along with recommendations based on the principles of inclusive and engaged research partnerships between investigators and the members of the disability community.

Physical activity behaviour up to 1 year post-rehabilitation among adults with physical disabilities and/or chronic diseases: results of the prospective cohort study ReSpAct

BACKGROUND

Little is known of physical activity behaviour among adults with a disability and/or chronic disease during and up to 1 year post-rehabilitation. We aimed to explore (1) dose characteristics of physical activity behaviour among adults with physical disabilities and/or chronic diseases during that period, and (2) the effects of personal characteristics and diagnosis on the development of physical activity over time.

METHODS

Adults with physical disabilities and/or chronic diseases (N=1256), enrolled in the Rehabilitation, Sports and Active lifestyle study, were followed with questionnaires: 3-6 weeks before (T0) and 14 (T1), 33 (T2) and 52 (T3) weeks after discharge from rehabilitation. Physical activity was assessed with the adapted version of the Short Questionnaire to ASsess Health enhancing physical activity. Dose characteristics of physical activity were descriptively analysed. Multilevel regression models were performed to assess physical activity over time and the effect of personal and diagnosis characteristics on physical activity over time.

RESULTS

Median total physical activity ranged from 1545 (IQR: 853-2453) at T0 to 1710 (IQR: 960-2730) at T3 min/week. Household (495-600 min/week) and light-intensity (900-998 min/week) activities accrued the most minutes. Analyses showed a significant increase in total physical activity moderate-intensity to vigorous-intensity physical activity and work/commuting physical activity for all time points (T1-T3) compared with baseline (T0). Diagnosis, age, sex and body mass index had a significant effect on baseline total physical activity.

CONCLUSION

Physical activity is highly diverse among adults with physical disabilities and/or chronic diseases. Understanding this diversity in physical activity can help improve physical activity promotion activities.

Identifying Factors That Influence Physical Activity Promotion in Outpatient Physical Therapist Practice Using the Theoretical Domains Framework

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Physical activity (PA) promotion is not routine practice for physical therapists. Understanding the PA promotion beliefs of physical therapists may offer targets for behavior change interventions to improve PA promotion. The purpose of this study was to explore outpatient US physical therapists' beliefs about PA promotion and determine which Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) domains can inform implementation efforts.

METHODS

We used a descriptive qualitative research design. A TDF-based interview guide was developed to identify beliefs about PA promotion. Twenty-six outpatient US physical therapists (13 regular PA promoters and 13 irregular PA promoters) completed semistructured interviews. Directed content analysis identified specific beliefs by grouping similar belief statements. Specific beliefs were mapped to TDF domains.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Five TDF domains were identified as likely relevant to changing physical therapists' PA promotion behaviors. Key beliefs within those domains included conflicting comments about PA guidelines being evidence based, a lack of confidence to promote PA due to perceived deficits in communication skills, and time constraints as key barriers. Beliefs about improving PA promotion included incorporating screening for baseline PA and continuing education targeting confidence and communication.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified key beliefs that influence outpatient US physical therapists' PA promotion. These beliefs identify targets for behavior change interventions to improve PA promotion rates among outpatient US physical therapists including incorporating baseline screening for PA and the development of continuing education training programs.