Fludarabine, busulfan, and low-dose TBI conditioning versus cyclophosphamide and TBI in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Limited Sampling Strategies for Estimating Busulfan Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve: Based on Peak and Trough Concentrations in Saliva

Therapeutic drug monitoring for busulfan is currently performed by multiple plasma sampling. Saliva is considered a noninvasive therapeutic drug monitoring matrix. This study aimed to investigate intravenous busulfan pharmacokinetics (PK) in plasma and saliva, and establish a limited sampling strategy (LSS) for predicting the area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity in plasma (AUC0-∞,p) by using saliva samples. Therefore, the PK of busulfan was studied in 37 Chinese patients. Pearson correlation analysis was used to evaluate the correlation between the AUC of busulfan in plasma and saliva. LSS models were established by the multiple linear regression analysis. The prediction error, the mean prediction error, and the root mean square error were used to evaluate the predictive accuracy. The agreement between the predicted and observed AUC0-∞ in saliva was investigated by the intraclass correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman analysis. The accuracy and robustness of the models were evaluated by using the bootstrap procedure. The result of PK analysis 62.2% of patients (23/37) was within the target range of AUC0-∞,p . A good correlation between saliva and plasma busulfan AUC0-∞ was observed (r = 0.63, p < .01). The bias and precision of the models 7 and 13 were less than 15%. The intraclass correlation coefficient exceeded 0.9, and the limits of agreement were within ±15%. The 2-point LSS model in saliva is a convenient and desirable approach to predict the AUC0-∞ of 4 times daily intravenous busulfan in plasma, which can be used to design personalized dosing for busulfan.

Saliva as a noninvasive sampling matrix for therapeutic drug monitoring of intravenous busulfan in Chinese patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A prospective population pharmacokinetic and simulation study

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of busulfan (BU) is currently performed by plasma sampling in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Saliva samples are considered a noninvasive TDM matrix. Currently, no salivary population pharmacokinetics (PopPKs) model for BU available. This study aimed to develop a PopPK model that can describe the relationship between plasma and saliva kinetics in patients receiving intravenous BU. The performance of the model in predicting the area under the concentration-time curve at steady state (AUCss ) based on saliva samples is evaluated. Sixty-six patients with HSCT were recruited and administered 0.8 mg/kg BU intravenously. A PopPK model for saliva and plasma was developed using the nonlinear mixed effects model. Bayesian maximum a posteriori (MAP) optimization was used to estimate the model's predictive performance. Plasma and saliva PKs were adequately described with a one-compartment model and a scaled central compartment. Body surface area correlated positively with both clearance and apparent volume of distribution (Vd), whereas alkaline phosphatase correlated negatively with Vd. Simulations demonstrated that the percentage root mean squared prediction error and lower and upper limits of agreements reduced to 10.02% and -16.96% to 22.86% based on five saliva samples. Saliva can be used as an alternative matrix to plasma in TDM of BU. The AUCss can be predicted from saliva concentration by Bayesian MAP optimization, which can be used to design personalized dosing for BU.

Thiotepa, busulfan and fludarabine conditioning-regimen is a promising approach for older adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated with allogeneic stem cell transplantation

For acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients, total body irradiation (TBI)- based conditioning regimens are the first choice specially in young population. However, several studies have shown an equivalence in clinical outcomes with thiotepa-based conditioning regimen. We performed a retrospective study to evaluate the outcome of adult ALL patients who received allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT) with a thiotepa-busulfan-fludarabine (TBF) myeloablative conditioning regimen with reduced toxicity. Fifty-five patients received a TBF regimen. The median age of the patients was 51 years (range, 17 to 72.4). Most patients had a diagnosis of B-ALL (93%) with 7% having T-ALL. Two - and 5-year overall survival was 73.2% and 64%, respectively. At 2 years, leukemia-free survival and GVHD-free, relapse-free survival were 59.5% and 57.6%, and at 5 years, 53.4% and 51.8%, respectively. The 5-year non-relapse mortality was 15%. The day 180 cumulative incidence (CI) of grade II-IV acute GVHD and grade III-IV acute GVHD were 38.2% and 5.5%, respectively. At 2 years, the CI of chronic GVHD and extensive chronic GVHD was 16.9% and 1.9%, respectively. Our study results do suggest that using TBF as the conditioning regimen in adult ALL patients is a promising option with acceptable toxicity.

Two Different Transplant Preconditioning Regimens Combined with Irradiation and Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Childhood Leukemia: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective

To observe the therapeutic effect and the incidence of adverse reactions of total body irradiation plus cyclophosphamide (TBI/CY) and busulfan plus cyclophosphamide (BU/CY) in the treatment of pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Methods

By searching the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Knowledge, Embase, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), and screening randomized controlled trials (RCTs), quality evaluation and data extraction were performed for the included literature, and meta-analysis was performed for RCTs included at using Review Manager 5.2 software.

Results

A total of 10160 patients were enrolled in 15 RCTs, including 5211 patients in the TBI/CY group and 4949 patients in the BU/CY group. Meta-analysis showed that there was a statistical difference in transplant failure rate (OR = 1.56, 95% CI (1.23, 1.97), P = 0.0002, I 2 = 56%, Z = 3.69), transplant mortality (OR = 1.45, 95% CI (1.24, 1.68), P < 0.00001, I 2 = 76%, Z = 4.80), transplantation long-term disease-free survival rate (OR = 1.52, 95% CI (1.09, 2.12), P = 0.01, I 2 = 0%, Z = 2.50), and transplantation adverse reactions (OR = 1.28, 95% CI (1.08, 1.52), P = 0.004, I 2 = 0%, Z = 2.85).

Conclusion

Meta-analysis showed that TBI/CY combined pretreatment regimen was more effective than BU/CY regimen alone in the treatment of pediatric hematologic transplantation, with a lower incidence of adverse reactions and significant long-term survival efficacy.

Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia in the Youngest: Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and Beyond

The ALL SCTped 2012 FORUM (For Omitting Radiation Under Majority age) trial compared outcomes for children ≥4 years of age transplanted for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) who were randomised to myeloablation with a total body irradiation (TBI)-based or chemotherapy-based conditioning regimen. The TBI-based preparation was associated with a lower rate of relapse compared with chemoconditioning. Nevertheless, the age considered suitable for TBI was progressively raised over time to spare the most fragile youngest patients from irradiation-related complications. The best approach to use for children <4 years of age remains unclear. Children diagnosed with ALL in their first year of life, defined as infants, have a remarkably poorer prognosis compared with older children. This is largely explained by the biology of their ALL, with infants often carrying a KMT2A gene rearrangement, as well as by their fragility. In contrast, the clinical presentations and biological features of ALL in children >1 year but <4 years often resemble those presented by older children. In this review, we explore the state of the art regarding haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in children <4 years, the preparative regimens available, and new developments in the field that may influence treatment decisions.

Busulfan-containing conditioning regimens in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A Taiwan observational study

Background

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo‐HSCT) is the ultimate cure for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).

Aim

This study was performed to compare the outcomes of ALL patients receiving busulfan (Bu) with cyclophosphamide (Cy)‐based or total body irradiation (TBI)‐based regimen in a Chinese population.

Methods

We enrolled 224 adult patients with ALL who received allo‐HSCT at National Taiwan University Hospital between 1997 and 2016.

Results

The median age at transplantation was 33 years. Before allo‐HSCT, 75.9% of patients attained first or late complete remission. A total of 141 patients (62.9%) received Bu/Cy‐based conditioning, either myeloablative (MA) or reduced‐intensity stem cell transplantation (RIST), and 83 patients received a TBI‐based regimen (MA‐TBI). Patients receiving the MA‐Bu regimen had longer relapse‐free survival (RFS) than those receiving the MA‐TBI regimen (median, 24.1 vs. 6.7 months, p = .044). There was no difference in overall survival (OS, MA‐Bu vs. MA‐TBI vs. RIST‐Bu: 39.4 vs. 28.2 vs. 13.1 months, p = .276), treatment‐related mortality (TRM), or incidences of grade 3–4 acute graft‐versus‐host disease (GvHD). Among patients receiving identical GvHD prophylactic regimens, there was no difference between MA‐Bu and MA‐TBI groups regarding the incidence of grade 3–4 acute GvHD, grade 2–4, and all‐grade chronic GvHD. In subgroup analysis, patients receiving oral busulfan had comparable RFS and OS to the intravenous busulfan group (p = .436 and p = .236, respectively), but a higher TRM (25% vs. 9.8%, p = .016). In the multivariable analysis, disease status before allo‐HSCT was the only risk factor impacting RFS and OS.

Conclusion

In summary, patients receiving Bu/Cy‐based or TBI‐based regimens as conditioning had similar results in terms of OS, TRM, and acute GvHD, whereas the use of myeloablative Bu/Cy resulted in a better RFS. A Bu‐based regimen could be an alternative conditioning choice for patients who are ineligible to receive TBI. Prospective and randomized controlled trials are warranted to validate the long‐term outcomes.

Inferior outcomes with reduced intensity conditioning followed by allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in fit individuals with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a Canadian single-center study and a comparison to registry data

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) can offer cure to some patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). It remains unclear how conditioning intensity affects transplant outcomes in ALL. In this retrospective study, we compared outcomes between 27 patients <60 who received reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) at Princess Margaret Hospital Cancer Center (PMCC) and 226 Cell Therapy Transplant Canada (CTTC) age-matched controls who received myeloablative conditioning (MAC) between 2007 and 2018. Compared to CTTC patients, PMCC patients had an inferior 2-y OS: 0.29 (95% CI: 0.11-0.49) vs 0.63 (0.56-0.70), HR = 2.10 (1.23-3.55), p = 0.006, higher TRM: 0.41 (0.22-0.60) vs 0.24 (0.18-0.30), HR = 2.00 (1.05-3.81), p = 0.04 and a trend toward increased risk of relapse: 0.36 (0.17-0.56) versus 0.17 (0.12-0.22), HR = 1.72 (0.82-3.62), p = 0.15. In multivariate analysis, RIC and the use of T-cell depletion (TCD) were associated with inferior OS. In ALL patients <60, the use of RIC with TCD is associated with inferior allogeneic HCT outcomes.

Adding melphalan to fludarabine and a myeloablative dose of busulfan improved survival after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in a propensity score-matched cohort of hematological malignancies

Fludarabine and a myeloablative dose of busulfan (Flu/Bu4) can improve prognosis after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) with melphalan (Mel). We investigated the prognostic impact of adding Mel to Flu/Bu4 by comparing between Flu/Bu4/Mel and Flu/Bu4 groups. This study included 846 propensity score (PS)-matched patients who received either Flu/Bu4/Mel (n = 423) or Flu/Bu4 (n = 423) from 2394 patients enrolled in a multicenter prospective registry, from January 2010 to December 2016. The primary endpoint (5-year overall survival [OS]), and the prognostic impact of adding Mel was evaluated using Cox regression analysis. The study population median age was 58 (interquartile 50-64) years and 61.0% were male. Patient characteristics were well-balanced between groups. Five-year OS was 34.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 27.3-41.1%) and 30.1% (24.8-35.6%) in the Flu/Bu4/Mel and Flu/Bu4 groups, respectively (log-rank P = 0.019). The adjusted hazard ratio of adding Mel was 0.77 (95% CI: 0.62-0.96) (P = 0.022) for the 5-year OS, and this attributed to a lower incidence of 5-year relapse (0.71, 0.56-0.90, P = 0.005) and relapse associated mortality (0.73, 0.57-0.95, P = 0.018). There was no statistical difference in 5-year non-relapse mortality between groups (log-rank P = 0.855). Flu/Bu4/Mel was associated with better 5-year OS compared to Flu/Bu4 in a PS-matched cohort after allogeneic HSCT.

Reduced-Intensity Conditioning with Busulfan and Fludarabine for Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

PURPOSE

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) with optimal conditioning has helped better long-term survival in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). This study investigated the efficacy and safety of reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) with busulfan and fludarabine in adult ALL patients unfit for myeloablation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Records of 78 patients who underwent HSCT with RIC consisting of 3.2 mg/kg/day of busulfan for 2 or 3 days and 30 mg/m²/day of fludarabine for 5 or 6 days were analyzed.

RESULTS

The median age at diagnosis was 49 years. Over a median follow-up of 22 months, 2-year estimates of relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival were 57.4% and 68.7%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed a trend of improved RFS in patients with chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) (hazard ratio, 0.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.26-1.08; p=0.080). The cumulative incidences of relapse and non-relapse mortality were 42.9% and 19.6%, respectively and one case of central nervous system relapse was noted. No hepatic veno-occlusive disease was reported. Grade II-IV acute GVHD and any grade chronic GVHD occurred in 21.1% and 41.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

RIC with busulfan and fludarabine is an effective and safe conditioning regimen for adult ALL patients unfit for myeloablation.