Predictors of dropout among adolescents with borderline personality disorder attending mentalization-based group treatment

Patient characteristics of completion and dropout of mentalization-based treatment for adolescents with conduct disorder

Introduction

Conduct disorder (CD) is a severe mental disorder in youth. Yet, providing psychological interventions for adolescents with CD is challenging. This patient group is often characterized by risk factors for therapy dropout such as, e.g., CD symptoms and being in middle adolescence. On the other hand, little is known about characteristics of adolescents with CD who complete treatment. To gain more insight into what might become a successful therapy with adolescents with CD, this study explores baseline characteristics and drop-out occurrence in patients with CD referred to mentalization-based treatment for adolescents with CD (MBT-CD). More specifically, this study aims at identifying clusters of adolescent patients based on age, CD symptom severity and personality pathology at the beginning of treatment which may have come along with a higher or lower dropout occurrence.

Methods

Following implications of an elbow plot, a 3-means cluster-analysis was conducted on self-report baseline data of N = 32 adolescents with CD (n = 11 dropouts, n = 21 completers) who participated in a feasibility study on MBT-CD. Additionally, in an exploratory stepwise logistic regression, variables were explored as potential predictors of dropout.

Results

Cluster 1 consisted of n = 14 adolescents, of whom n = 8 (57%) dropped out. Cluster 2 consisted of n = 5 adolescents of whom 1 (20%) dropped out. Cluster 3 consisted of N = 13 adolescents, of whom only n = 2 (15%) dropped out. Cluster 2 showed descriptively the highest CD symptom severity. While adolescents in Clusters 1 and 3 showed in part similarities in CD symptom severity, personality pathology was descriptively markedly higher in Cluster 1. In the stepwise logistic regression, only intimacy personality pathology was identified as potential predictor for dropout.

Discussion

This study's exploratory findings point to different types of adolescents with CD coming along with different chances for therapists to conduct a (successful) psychotherapy. Herein, low personality functioning in the intimacy domain, rather than CD symptoms as aggressiveness, may play a crucial role. While findings are limited by the small sample size, they may be able to shed increasing light on conducting (successful) psychotherapy with a scarcely researched patient group.

Validation of the Capacity for the Psychotherapy Process Scale for Use in Adolescent Patients

Although pre-treatment assessments of the capacity for the psychotherapy process can aid in identifying patients experiencing great difficulties in therapy and in tailoring therapies for individual patients, limited information exists for adolescents. To address this gap, this study followed the World Health Organization's age standards for adolescents (younger adolescents aged 10-14 years; older adolescents aged 15-19 years), examined the psychometric properties of the Capacity for Psychotherapy Process Scale (CFPPS; mainly used for adult patients) in these two groups of adolescents, and compared their capacities for the psychotherapy process. The participants were 434 younger adolescent (mean age = 13.00 ± 1.08 years; 70.0% female) and 883 older adolescent outpatients (mean age = 16.68 ± 1.29 years; 62.3% female) at the department of psychiatry of the hospital in Guangzhou, China. The results of exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses validated the 5-factor model (motivation, belief, self-revelation, persistence, and insight) in both groups. The scale also demonstrated good internal consistency. Furthermore, the CFPPS exhibited small or no associations with pre-treatment sleep problems, depression symptoms, or anxiety symptoms but was a significant predictor of working alliance and psychological benefit in therapy. The capacity for the psychotherapy process among younger adolescents was lower than that among older adolescents. The CFPPS appears to be a reliable and validated instrument for measuring the capacity for the psychotherapy process among adolescent outpatients in China. Therapists should provide therapy tailored to the Chinese adolescents' capacity. Future studies are needed to examine the predictive utility of the CFPPS for the whole sessions of the psychotherapy.

Mentalization based treatment for a broad range of personality disorders: a naturalistic study

BACKGROUND

Several studies have observed that mentalization-based treatment (MBT) is an effective treatment for borderline personality disorder (BPD), but its effectiveness for other personality disorders (PDs) has hardly been examined. Additionally, the evidence supporting the claim that MBT improves mentalizing capacity is scarce. The present study examined whether (i) patients with a broad range of PDs enrolled in an MBT program would improve on several outcome measures (ii) mentalizing capacity would improve over time; (iii) patients with BPD would improve more than those with non-borderline PDs.

METHOD

Personality disorders, psychiatric symptoms, social functioning, maladaptive personality functioning and mentalizing capacity were measured in a group of individuals with various PDs (n = 46) that received MBT. Assessments were made at baseline and after 6, 12, and 18 months of treatment. The severity of psychiatric symptoms, measured using the Outcome Questionnaire 45, was the primary outcome variable.

RESULTS

Overall, enrollment in the MBT program was associated with a decrease in psychiatric symptoms and an improvement of personality functioning, social functioning for a mixed group of PDs (all p's ≤ .01). Bigger effect sizes were observed for BPD patients (n = 25) than for patients with non-BPD (n = 21), but the difference failed to reach statistical significance (p = 0.06). A primary analysis showed that the decrease in psychiatric symptoms was significant in BPD patients (p = 0.01), not in non-BPD (p = 0.19) patients. However, a sufficiently powered secondary analysis with imputed data showed that non-BPD patients reported a significant decrease in psychiatric symptoms too (p = 0.01). Mentalizing capacity of the whole group improved over time (d = .68 on the Toronto Alexithymia Scale and 1.46 on the Social Cognition and Object Relations System).

DISCUSSION

These results suggest that MBT coincides with symptomatic and functional improvement across a broad range of PDs and shows that MBT is associated with improvements in mentalizing capacity. As the study is not experimental in design, we cannot make causal claims.

CONCLUSION

Mentalization-based treatment may be an effective treatment for patients with a broad range of PDs.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study design was approved by the Leiden University Ethical Committee.

Patient-related factors associated with patient retention and non-completion in psychosocial treatment of borderline personality disorder: A systematic review

The potential efficacy of psychosocial interventions in the treatment of borderline personality disorder (BPD) is impacted by significant treatment non-completion (TNC), with meta-analytic studies reporting rates of attrition of between 25% and 28%. Increasing patient retention could facilitate outcomes and improve resource utilization, given limited healthcare services. A systematic search of PsycINFO, CINAHL, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and Web of Science Core Collection identified 33 articles that met the criteria for inclusion. Although substantial heterogeneity in terms of methodology and quality of analysis limited conclusions that could be drawn in the narrative review, a few consistent patterns of findings were elucidated, such as Cluster B personality disorder comorbidities and lower therapeutic alliance were associated with TNC. Interestingly, the severity of BPD symptoms was not a predictor of TNC. These findings are discussed in terms of their potential theoretical contribution to TNC. Clinically, there may be value in applying mindfulness and motivational interviewing strategies early on in treatment for individuals who present uncertainty about engaging in treatment. Further research to develop this empirical landscape includes focusing on high-powered replications, examining burgeoning lines of research, and investigating dynamic predictors of TNC.

Mentalization-based treatment for adolescents with conduct disorder (MBT-CD): a feasibility study

Conduct disorder (CD) is a common psychiatric disorder in youth characterized by persisting norm-violating or aggressive behavior. Considering high individual and societal burden, feasible and effective psychotherapeutic treatment is desirable. Yet, treatments and research in this patient group are scarce. This study investigates the feasibility of mentalization-based treatment for adolescents with CD (MBT-CD) in terms of acceptability of MBT-CD and scientific assessments by participants as well as necessary organizational resources to conduct a consecutive randomized controlled trial (RCT). Recruitment, adherence and treatment session numbers were descriptively analyzed. Treatment evaluation interviews were qualitatively analyzed. A subset of sessions of therapists without prior MBT experience was rated for MBT adherence. Quantitative data were used to plan a consecutive RCT. Pre to post treatment changes in diagnosis and self-reported aggression, mentalizing and personality functioning were preliminarily analyzed. N = 45 adolescents with CD were recruited. 43% dropped out. Acceptance of scientific assessments was somewhat lower than therapy adherence (questionnaires filled out by ~ 80% of adolescents in treatment), and low at follow-up (25% of treatment completers). Mean session number was 30.3. Most treatment completers were satisfied with MBT-CD. Referrals mainly came from child and youth services and psychiatry. Nine of 16 sessions rated for MBT adherence were adherent. A priori sample size estimation for a prospective RCT with a drop-out rate of 43% yielded a sample of N = 158 to detect an effect f = .15 with 80% power in a repeated measures ANOVA. Pre-post analyses revealed diagnostic improvement in 68%. Of self-reported data, empathy pathology improved. Findings provide a sound basis for a consecutive feasibility and pilot RCT. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, registration number NCT02988453, November 30, 2016, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02988453.

Drop-out and ineffective treatment in youth with severe and enduring mental health problems: a systematic review

Youth with severe and enduring mental health problems (SEMHP) tend to drop out of treatment or insufficiently profit from treatment in child and adolescent psychiatry (CAP). Knowledge about factors related to treatment failure in this group is scarce. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review was to thematically explore factors associated with dropout and ineffective treatment among youth with SEMHP. After including 36 studies, a descriptive thematic analysis was conducted. Themes were divided into three main categories: client, treatment, and organizational factors. The strongest evidence was found for the association between treatment failure and the following subthemes: type of treatment, engagement, transparency and communication, goodness of fit and, perspective of practitioner. However, most other themes showed limited evidence and little research has been done on organizational factors. To prevent treatment failure, attention should be paid to a good match between youth and both the treatment and the practitioner. Practitioners need to be aware of their own perceptions of youth's perspectives, and transparent communication with youth contributes to regaining their trust.

Adapting Short-Term Mentalization-Based Therapy to ICD-11 Personality Disorder in Adolescents

Following the introduction of the 11th revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11), adolescents can now be diagnosed with a personality disorder based on severity ranging from mild to moderate to severe. This dimensional model has potential implications for treatment, as it allows clinicians and researchers to search for effective treatments targeting adolescents at different severity levels rather than offering all patients the same treatment. In this conceptual paper, we propose that the short-term mentalization-based therapy (MBT) program, originally developed to treat adults with borderline personality disorder (BPD), has potential clinical advantages for adolescents with ICD-11 personality disorder at the mild to moderate severity level. The short-term MBT program is a 5-month structured treatment approach including individual therapy, combined psychotherapy with the individual therapist also being one of the group therapists, and closed-group therapy to enhance cohesion and a feeling of security. The purpose of this paper is to make a case for the use of this format, as opposed to the traditional long-term MBT format, for adolescents with BPD. Future research should include large-scale randomized clinical trials powered to assess patient-important outcomes.

Prädiktion von Behandlungsabbrüchen bei Adoleszenten mit Borderline-Persönlichkeitsstörung

Zusammenfassung: Theoretischer Hintergrund: Die Borderline-Persönlichkeitsstöurng (BPS) kann bereits in der Adoleszenz zuverlässig diagnostiziert und wirksam behandelt werden. Eine möglichst frühe Behandlung der BPS durch störungsspezifische Therapien (z. B. Dialektisch-Behaviorale Therapie), erscheint ist sinnvoll, weil hierdurch selbstschädigende Verhaltensweisen und chronische Verläufe mit häufigen suizidalen Krisen verhindert und die langfristige psychosoziale Entwicklung verbessert werden kann. Mehrere Therapiestudien zur Wirksamkeit der Behandlung in der Adoleszenz zeigten sehr hohe Abbruchraten (bis zu 75 %), bisher sind allerdings nur wenig konsistente Ergebnisse zur Prädiktion von Therapieabbrüchen vorhanden. Fragestellung: Das Hauptziel der vorliegenden Studie war daher im Rahmen einer Beobachtungsstudie a) die Abbruchrate in der Realversorgung und b) die möglichen Prädiktoren (klinische und demographische Variablen) des Abbruchs einer stationären Behandlung mit DBT für Adoleszente an N = 172 Patient_innen im Alter von 15 – 18 Jahren zu untersuchen. Methode: In einer logistischen Regression wurden 18 Prädiktoren (u. a. Alter, Anzahl der Diagnosen, Schwere der Symptomatik) in SPSS untersucht, die im Rahmen einer drei monatigen stationären Behandlung in der Routineversorgung erhoben wurden. Ergebnisse: Lediglich ein jüngeres Alter der Patient_innen war statistisch signifikant mit einem erhöhten Risiko für einen Therapieabbruch assoziiert. Keine statistisch bedeutsamen Zusammenhänge mit einem Therapieabbruch fanden sich hingegen für die untersuchten psychiatrischen Komorbiditäten (bspw. für das Vorliegen einer Essstörung), für die Schwere der BPS-spezifischen Psychopathologie und für BPS-typische problematische Verhaltensweisen (bspw. selbstschädigendes Verhalten oder Hochrisikoverhalten). Diskussion und Schlussfolgerung: Unsere Untersuchung ergibt keinen Anhalt dafür, dass bei stark ausgeprägter Symptombelastung eine erhöhte Gefahr für einen Abbruch einer Behandlung mit DBT besteht. Sollte das Ergebnis einer erhöhten Abbruchrate bei jüngeren Jugendlichen in weiteren Studien repliziert werden, wären systematische Untersuchungen zu Variablen notwendig, die bei jüngeren Jugendlichen eine besondere Bedeutung besitzen und mit einem Therapieabbruch in Zusammenhang stehen könnten (bspw. die Beziehung zu wichtigen Bezugspersonen). Hieraus ließen sich ggf. gezielte Therapiemodifikationen ableiten, die Therapieabbrüchen entgegenwirken.

Die Borderline-Persönlichkeitsstörung im Jugendalter

Zusammenfassung: Die Borderline-Persönlichkeitsstörung (BPS) ist eine schwere psychische Erkrankung, die durch hohe Morbidität und Mortalität gekennzeichnet ist sowie mit einem niedrigen psychosozialen Funktionsniveau einhergeht. Die BPS zeigt sich oft mit Beginn der frühen Adoleszenz (ab dem 12. Lebensjahr). Neben repetitiver Selbstverletzung und Suizidalität bestehen häufig sowohl Symptome internalisierender (Depression und Angst) als auch externalisierender Störungen (Hyperaktivität und Substanzkonsum). Daher kommt einer differentialdiagnostischen Abklärung und der Diagnosestellung mit dem Ziel der Frühintervention im klinischen Alltag eine besondere Rolle zu. Die Psychotherapie stellt bei der BPS eine äußerst wirksame Behandlungsmethode dar, Belege für die Wirksamkeit von pharmakologischen Intervention fehlen. Der Schlüssel zu einer Verbesserung der Versorgung für Jugendliche mit BPS liegt in einer Generierung von Wissen zu Vorläufersymptomen sowie einer evidenzbasierten, stadienspezifischen Behandlung (frühe Behandlung bereits subklinischer BPS mit Behandlungsintensität abgestuft nach dem Schweregrad). Dieser Übersichtsartikel beleuchtet den aktuellen Stand der Forschung und gibt Empfehlungen für die therapeutische Arbeit in der klinischen Praxis.

Improving treatment outcomes for adolescents with borderline personality disorder through a socioecological approach

BACKGROUND

There is a dearth of studies evaluating treatment efficacy for adolescents diagnosed with borderline personality disorder. The few available randomized controlled trials that have been conducted show modest results and treatments appear to have equivalent effects. The current paper draws on (a) the lessons learnt from the last 50 years of psychotherapy research in general and (b) recent advances in mentalization-based understanding of why treatment works, which together point to the importance of following a socioecological approach in the treatment of personality problems in adolescence - a developmental period that insists on a treatment approach that goes beyond the therapist-client dyad.

CASE PRESENTATION

Here, we describe such an approach, and offer a clinical case example with a young 16-year old girl diagnosed with borderline personality disorder, to illustrate what a shift toward a more socioecological approach would entail.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical impact of the socioecological approach and the potential benefits as illustrated in the current case illustration, offers a framework that justifies and allows for the expansion of service delivery for youth with borderline personality disorder beyond dyadic therapist-client work.

Mentalizing in Adolescents With and Without Prominent Borderline Features: Validation of the Reflective Functioning Questionnaire for Youths (RFQY) and an Investigation of the Factor Structure of Hypo- and Hypermentalizing

The Reflective Functioning Questionnaire for Youths (RFQY) is a self-report measure of reflective functioning (RF) also referred to as mentalizing. Lower levels of RF are characteristic of a wide range of mental disorders and are especially relevant in the assessment of personality pathology. The goal of the current study is to examine the psychometric properties of a Danish translation of the RFQY and to corroborate previous research on the measure's ability to differentiate between adolescents with and without borderline personality disorder (BPD) features. 889 adolescents were administered the RFQY and divided into three subsamples: a community sample (n = 644), a clinical non-personality disorder sample (n = 64), and a BPD sample (n = 181). Construct validity was examined through bivariate correlations between RFQY and a dimensional assessment of borderline personality features. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) supported the utility of the RFQY to discriminate between adolescents with and without BPD features. Moreover, a two-factor structure based on previous research of the adult version of the RFQ was examined. A series of exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses yielded a two-factor structure corroborating previous research. Implications for prevention, assessment, and treatment are discussed along with methodological limitations and suggestions for future research.

Introduction to Mentalization-Based Approaches for Parents, Children, Youths, and Families

Family members mentalize when they try to understand each other's behavior on the basis of intentional mental states. This article aims to introduce and briefly describe how the concept of mentalization can provide a useful framework for clinicians to understand psychopathology of children, youths, and families. The authors further outline how mentalization-based techniques and interventions can be applied to build epistemic trust and to reestablish mentalizing in families by presenting clinical vignettes of initial sessions from various clinical settings in the United Kingdom and Germany. The article concludes with a brief summary about the current evidence for mentalization-based interventions with children, adolescents, and families and provides an outlook for future clinical and research work.

Mentalization-based treatment for adolescents with conduct disorder (MBT-CD): protocol of a feasibility and pilot study

BACKGROUND

Conduct disorder (CD) is a complex mental disorder characterized by severe rule-breaking and aggressive behavior. While studies have shown that several therapeutic interventions are effective in treating CD symptoms, researchers call for treatments based on etiological knowledge and potential patho-mechanisms. Mentalization-based treatment (MBT) may represent such a treatment approach: Studies have shown that individuals with CD show mentalizing deficits and that mentalizing might represent a protective factor against the development of the disorder. As MBT focuses on the understanding of social behavior in terms of mental states, fostering mentalizing might help CD individuals to (re)gain an adaptive way of coping with negative emotions especially in social interactions and thus reduce aggressive behavior. For this purpose, MBT was adapted for adolescents with CD (MBT-CD). This is a protocol of a feasibility and pilot study to inform the planning of a prospective RCT. The primary aim is to estimate the feasibility of an RCT based on the acceptability of the intervention and the scientific assessments by CD individuals and their families indicated by quantitative and qualitative data, as well as based on necessary organizational resources to conduct an RCT. The secondary aim is to investigate the course of symptom severity and mentalizing skills.

METHODS

The bi-center study is carried out in two outpatient settings associated with university hospitals (Heidelberg and Mainz) in Germany. Adolescents aged between 11 and 18 years with a CD or oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) diagnosis are included. Participants receive MBT-CD for 6 to 12 months. The primary outcome of the feasibility study (e.g., recruitment and adherence rates) will be descriptively analyzed. Multilevel modeling will be used to investigate secondary outcome data.

DISCUSSION

Fostering the capacity to mentalize social interactions triggering non-mentalized, aggressive behavior might help CD individuals to behave more adaptively. The feasibility trial is essential for gathering information on how to properly conduct MBT-CD including appropriate scientific assessments in this patient group, in order to subsequently investigate the effectiveness of MBT-CD in an RCT.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT02988453 . November 30, 2016 SOURCES OF MONETARY SUPPORT: Dietmar Hopp Stiftung, Heidehof Stiftung RECRUITMENT STATUS: Recruitment complete and intervention complete, follow-up assessments ongoing (Heidelberg). Recruitment and assessments ongoing (Mainz). PRIMARY SPONSOR, PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR, AND LEAD INVESTIGATOR IN HEIDELBERG: Svenja Taubner is responsible for the design and conduct of MBT-CD intervention and feasibility and pilot study, preparation of protocol and revisions, and publication of study results.

SECONDARY SPONSOR AND LEAD INVESTIGATOR IN MAINZ

Esther Sobanski is responsible for the recruitment and data collection in the collaborating center Mainz RECRUITMENT COUNTRY: Germany HEALTH CONDITION STUDIED: Conduct disorder, oppositional defiant disorder INTERVENTION: Mentalization-based treatment for conduct disorder (MBT-CD): MBT-CD is an adaptation of MBT for Borderline Personality Disorder. This manualized psychodynamic psychotherapy focuses on increasing mentalizing, i.e., the ability to understand behavior in terms of mental states, in patients. MBT-CD includes weekly individual sessions with the patient and monthly family sessions.

KEY INCLUSION AND EXCLUSION CRITERIA

Included are adolescent individuals with a diagnosis of conduct disorder or oppositional defiant disorder aged between 11 and 18 years.

STUDY TYPE

Feasibility and pilot study (single-group) DATE OF FIRST ENROLLMENT: 19.01.2017 STUDY STATUS: The trial is currently in the follow-up assessment phase in Heidelberg and in the recruitment and treatment phase in Mainz.

PRIMARY OUTCOMES

Acceptability of MBT-CD intervention (as indicated by recruitment rates, completion rates, drop-out rates, treatment duration, oral evaluation), acceptability of scientific assessments (as indicated by adherence, missing data, oral evaluation), and necessary organizational resources (scientific personnel, recruitment networks, MBT-CD training and supervision) to estimate feasibility of an RCT SECONDARY OUTCOMES: Adolescents' symptom severity and mentalizing ability PROTOCOL VERSION: 20.08.2020, version 1.0.