1
|
Duenas-Lopez M, Morgan O, Marshall DC, Carney L, Caban-Martinez A, Huang M, Portelance L, Schnur J. Cuban American Perspectives on Sexual Dysfunction Following Pelvic Radiotherapy: A Qualitative Study. SEXUALITY AND DISABILITY 2023; 41:757-768. [PMID: 38948491 PMCID: PMC11213550 DOI: 10.1007/s11195-023-09812-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/24/2023] [Indexed: 07/02/2024]
Abstract
Participation in sexual medicine research may depend on a patient's willingness to speak openly about sex, sexual function, or other sensitive topics. These topics may be difficult or uncomfortable to talk about, and this discomfort may be further amplified when a patient comes from a cultural background that stigmatizes open conversation about sex and sexuality. We used qualitative analysis to better understand the intersection between cultural identity, the experience of sexual dysfunction as a side-effect of pelvic radiotherapy, and willingness to communicate about sexual dysfunction with healthcare providers, in Cuban American women in Miami, Florida. Doing so, we found four unique themes among Cuban American participants regarding the intersection of national identity, Hispanic identity, Catholic religion, and their experience of radiotherapy-related sexual dysfunction: Marianismo, Machismo, Familismo, and Espiritismo. These themes, a reflection of the cohort's shared identity, were found to have an effect on participant views of sexual health, romantic relationships, coping strategies, and relative comfort discussing problems with intercourse. These cultural values served as barriers to openly discussing sexual dysfunction with not just medical providers and research teams but also their partners, families, and friends. In order to encourage Cuban American participation in sexual medicine studies, future research should evaluate strategies to overcome these barriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Orly Morgan
- Department of Public Health Science, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
- University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1600 NW 10Th Ave #1140, Miami, FL 33136, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, United States
| | - Deborah C. Marshall
- Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Blavatnik Family Women’s Health Research Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lauren Carney
- Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Marilyn Huang
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, USA
| | - Lorraine Portelance
- University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1600 NW 10Th Ave #1140, Miami, FL 33136, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, United States
| | - Julie Schnur
- Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Morgan SE, Harrison TR, Wright KO, Jia X, Deal B, Malova K. The role of perceived expertise and trustworthiness in research study and clinical trial recruitment: Perspectives of clinical research coordinators and African American and Black Caribbean patients. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0275770. [PMID: 37342999 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275770] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2022] [Accepted: 04/11/2023] [Indexed: 06/23/2023] Open
Abstract
This study investigates the role of source credibility on minority participant recruitment, particularly African American and Black Caribbean patients. A total of nine focus groups (N = 48 participants) were conducted with both patient groups and clinical research coordinators (CRCs). Using the elaboration likelihood model as a guiding framework for analysis, this study found that the credibility of research coordinators (or other professionals who recruit for research studies and clinical trials) was instrumental in shaping attitudes of prospective participants. The perspectives of patients and CRCs aligned closely, with few exceptions. For both groups, professionalism and professional displays (clothing, institutional artifacts) enhanced perceived expertise, a core component of credibility. Trustworthiness, another important component of credibility, was fostered through homophily between recruiter and patient, expressions of goodwill and assuaging anxiety about CRCs' financial motivations for recruitment. Additionally, CRCs believed that credibility was supported when CRCs could emphasize transparency and truthfulness in communication. The importance of these findings for the development of empirically-based training programs to improve communication practices in recruitment contexts is discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan E Morgan
- Communication Studies Department, School of Communication, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, United States of America
| | - Tyler R Harrison
- Communication Studies Department, School of Communication, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, United States of America
| | - Kallia O Wright
- Communication Studies Department, School of Communication, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, United States of America
| | - Xiaofeng Jia
- School of Communication, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, United States of America
| | - Bonnie Deal
- School of Communication, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, United States of America
| | - Kate Malova
- Simon Business School, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Murong M, Giannopoulos E, Pirrie L, Giuliani ME, Fazelzad R, Bender J, Jones J, Papadakos J. The Experience of Informal Newcomer Cancer Caregivers with Limited Language Proficiency: A Scoping Review. J Immigr Minor Health 2023; 25:436-448. [PMID: 36538206 DOI: 10.1007/s10903-022-01442-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
This scoping review explored what is known about the experiences of informal cancer caregivers (CGs) who are newcomers with limited language proficiency. A literature search was performed in seven databases and the search yielded 11,289 articles. After duplicate removal and title and abstract screening, 216 articles underwent full text review and 57 articles and were synthesized. Most studies (n = 41, 72%) were qualitative and were published in North America (n = 35, 61%). Most CG participants were female (69%) and only 19 studies explicitly identified the CG country of origin. Of those that did, 26% originated from Asia, with most migrating from East Asia. Significant challenges were experienced by newcomer CGs and chief among these were related to communication challenges with HCPs that were exacerbated by a lack of availability of medical interpreters and the complexity of oncology health information. Efforts are needed to better integrate newcomer CGs into cancer care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mijia Murong
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Eleni Giannopoulos
- Cancer Health Literacy Research Centre, Cancer Education Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, 585 University Avenue, ELLICSR PMB B-130, Toronto, ON, M5G 2N2, Canada
| | - Lorraine Pirrie
- Institute for Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Meredith Elana Giuliani
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,Cancer Health Literacy Research Centre, Cancer Education Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, 585 University Avenue, ELLICSR PMB B-130, Toronto, ON, M5G 2N2, Canada.,The Institute for Education Research, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.,Department of Radiation of Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Rouhi Fazelzad
- Library and Information Services, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Jacqueline Bender
- Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Jennifer Jones
- Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Janet Papadakos
- Cancer Health Literacy Research Centre, Cancer Education Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, 585 University Avenue, ELLICSR PMB B-130, Toronto, ON, M5G 2N2, Canada. .,Institute for Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. .,The Institute for Education Research, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ridley-Merriweather KE, Head KJ, Younker SM, Evans MD, Moore CM, Lindsey DS, Wu CY, Wiehe SE. Identifying effective communication for recruitment of minority women to a breast cancer prevention study: A novel focus group approach. Contemp Clin Trials Commun 2022; 27:100910. [PMID: 35369402 PMCID: PMC8968002 DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2022.100910] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2020] [Revised: 02/21/2022] [Accepted: 03/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Ensuring that racial and ethnic minority women are involved in breast cancer research is important to address well-documented current disparities in cancer incidence, stages of diagnosis, and mortality rates. This study used a novel interactive focus group method to identify innovative communication strategies for recruiting women from two minority groups—Latinas and Asian Americans—into the Komen Tissue Bank, a specific breast cancer biobank clinical trial. Through activities that employed visual interactive tools to facilitate group discussion and self-reflection, the authors examined perspectives and motivations for Asian American women (N = 17) and Latinas (N = 14) toward donating their healthy breast tissue. Findings included three themes that, while common to both groups, were unique in how they were expressed: lack of knowledge concerning breast cancer risks and participation in clinical research, cultural influences in BC risk thinking, and how altruism relates to perceived personal connection to breast cancer. More significantly, this study illuminated the importance of using innovative methods to encourage deeper, more enlightened participation among underrepresented populations that may not arise in a traditional focus group format. The findings from this study will inform future health communication efforts to recruit women from these groups into clinical research projects like the Komen Tissue Bank.
Collapse
|
5
|
Simon CM, Wang K, Shinkunas LA, Stein DT, Meissner P, Smith M, Pentz R, Klein DW. Communicating With Diverse Patients About Participating in a Biobank: A Randomized Multisite Study Comparing Electronic and Face-to-Face Informed Consent Processes. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2022; 17:144-166. [PMID: 34410195 PMCID: PMC8712348 DOI: 10.1177/15562646211038819] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Some individuals' understanding of informed consent (IC) information may improve with electronic delivery, but others may benefit from face-to-face (F2F). This randomized, multisite study explores how individuals from diverse backgrounds understand electronic IC documents versus F2F, their confidence in understanding, and enrollment in research. A total of 501 patients at two U.S. biobanks with diverse populations participated. There were no overall differences between electronic and F2F understanding, but F2F predicted higher confidence in understanding and enrollment. Ethnicity and a higher educational level predicted higher understanding and confidence. Study findings suggest that electronic consent may lead to better understanding for non-Hispanic patients of higher socioeconomic status. F2F processes may lead to better understanding and higher enrollment of patients from Hispanic and lower socioeconomic levels. Researchers should carefully consider how they implement electronic IC processes and whether to maintain an F2F process to better address the needs and limitations of some populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kai Wang
- University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Rebecca Pentz
- School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Nolan TS, Bell AM, Chan YN, Leak Bryant A, Bissram JS, Hirschey R. Use of Video Education Interventions to Increase Racial and Ethnic Diversity in Cancer Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs 2021; 18:302-309. [PMID: 34561957 PMCID: PMC8483572 DOI: 10.1111/wvn.12539] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Less than 5% of eligible adult cancer survivors participate in cancer clinical trials. Survivors identifying as Black, Indigenous, and people of color (BIPOC) are less likely to participate in clinical trials compared to those identifying as non-Hispanic White. Common barriers to BIPOC participation are lack of knowledge, lack of access, and mistrust. These barriers are all factors in the disparities observed in BIPOC cancer-related morbidity and mortality. Clinical trials need adequate BIPOC representation to garner generalizable findings that can reduce or eliminate cancer disparities associated with the social construct of race. AIM This systematic review examined the use of video education interventions to impact BIPOC survivor participation in clinical trials. METHODS Web of Science, Embase, PubMed, Cochrane, PsycInfo, and CINAHL databases were queried for articles that described or tested video interventions aimed at increasing adult, BIPOC survivor clinical trial participation. Two authors independently screened articles for inclusion, appraised quality, and abstracted relevant data. All authors synthesized the data into themes through discussion and consensus. RESULTS The search yielded 2,512 articles. Seven selected articles described six distinct interventions. Although the six interventions reduced barriers to participation in clinical trials, their findings varied on Black and Hispanic survivors' readiness to enroll and participate in trials. Four themes emerged: (a) cultural sensitivity is needed in video development and delivery; (b) video content should be aimed to educate and change attitudes about clinical trials; (c) video interventions are feasible and acceptable; and (d) video interventions affect outcomes on intention or actual enrollment. LINKING EVIDENCE TO ACTION Video interventions are well-received by BIPOC survivors and may improve representation in clinical trials. Yet, video interventions are underutilized. More studies are needed to establish best practices for video interventions aimed at diversifying clinical trial participation as widening cancer disparities and rapidly changing cancer care continue to emerge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timiya S Nolan
- College of Nursing, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
- Comprehensive Cancer Center - The James, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Ana' M Bell
- College of Education and Human Ecology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Ya-Ning Chan
- School of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Ashley Leak Bryant
- School of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jennifer S Bissram
- Health Sciences Library, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Rachel Hirschey
- School of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Conley CC, Castro-Figueroa EM, Moreno L, Dutil J, García JD, Burgos C, Ricker C, Kim J, Graves KD, Ashing KT, Quinn GP, Soliman H, Vadaparampil ST. A pilot randomized trial of an educational intervention to increase genetic counseling and genetic testing among Latina breast cancer survivors. J Genet Couns 2021; 30:394-405. [PMID: 32936981 PMCID: PMC7960565 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2020] [Revised: 07/27/2020] [Accepted: 08/02/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Latinas are less likely to participate in genetic counseling (GC) and genetic testing (GT) than non-Hispanic Whites. A multisite, randomized pilot study tested a culturally targeted educational intervention to increase uptake of GC/GT among Latina breast cancer (BC) survivors (N = 52). Participants were recruited in Tampa, FL and Ponce, PR and randomized to: (a) fact sheet about BC survivorship (control) or (b) a culturally targeted educational booklet about GC/GT (intervention). Participants in the intervention condition were also offered no-cost telephone GC followed by free GT with mail-based saliva sample collection. Participants self-reported hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) knowledge and emotional distress at baseline and 1- and 3-month follow-ups. We used logistic regression to examine differences in GC/GT uptake by study arm (primary outcome) and repeated measures ANOVA to examine the effects of study arm and time on HBOC knowledge and emotional distress (secondary outcomes). Compared to the control arm, intervention participants were more likely to complete GC (ORIntervention = 13.92, 95% CI = 3.06-63.25, p < .01) and GT (ORIntervention = 12.93, 95% CI = 2.82-59.20, p < .01). Study site did not predict uptake of GC (p = .08) but Ponce participants were more likely to complete GT (ORPonce = 4.53, 95% CI = 1.04-19.72, p = .04). ANOVAs demonstrated an increase in HBOC knowledge over time across both groups (F(2,88) = 12.24, p < .01, ηp2 = 0.22). We also found a significant interaction of study arm and time, such that intervention participants demonstrated a greater and sustained (to the 3-month follow-up) increase in knowledge than control participants (F(2,88) = 3.66, p = .03, ηp2 = 0.08). No other main or interaction effects were significant (all p's> .15). Study findings demonstrate the potential of our culturally targeted print intervention. Lessons learned from this multisite pilot study for enhancing GC/GT in Latinas include the need to attend to both access to GC/GT and individual factors such as attitudes and knowledge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire C. Conley
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
- Georgetown Lombardi Cancer Center, Washington, DC
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Charité Ricker
- University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
McFarlane SJ, Morgan SE, Occa A, Peng W. An Evaluation of Clinical Trial Multimedia to Support Hispanic Cancer Patients' Informational and Decision-Making Needs. JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER EDUCATION 2021; 36:110-117. [PMID: 31444640 DOI: 10.1007/s13187-019-01606-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
The inclusion of diverse populations in clinical trial research is a social justice imperative. Creating the communicative tools that can support cancer patients across varied cultural backgrounds in processing complex clinical trial information, to achieve informed consent, has been a challenge. This study sought to evaluate specific clinical trial multimedia-a website, four animations, and a decision aid-to meet the decision-making and informational needs of Hispanic patients. The multimedia content was positively evaluated by Hispanic cancer patients. However, the discussions also yielded important steps for culturally adapting these tools to account for particular informational needs and cultural values that would be important to incorporate into these, and future, clinical trial multimedia interventions that target Hispanic populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Susan E Morgan
- School of Communication, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, USA
| | - Aurora Occa
- Department of Communication, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Wei Peng
- School of Communication, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Natale P, Saglimbene V, Ruospo M, Gonzalez AM, Strippoli GF, Scholes-Robertson N, Guha C, Craig JC, Teixeira-Pinto A, Snelling T, Tong A. Transparency, trust and minimizing burden to increase recruitment and retention in trials: a systematic review. J Clin Epidemiol 2021; 134:35-51. [PMID: 33515656 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.01.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2020] [Revised: 01/08/2021] [Accepted: 01/21/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe patient perspectives on recruitment and retention in clinical trials. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING Systematic review of qualitative studies that reported the perspective of adult patients with any health condition who accepted or declined to participate in clinical trials. RESULTS Sixty-three articles involving 1681 adult patients were included. Six themes were identified. Four themes reflected barriers: ambiguity of context and benefit - patients were unaware of the research question and felt pressured in making decisions; lacking awareness of opportunities - some believed health professionals obscured trials opportunities, or felt confused because of language barriers; wary of added burden - patients were without capacity because of sickness or competing priorities; and skepticism, fear and mistrust - patients feared loss of privacy, were suspicious of doctor's motivation, afraid of being a guinea pig, and disengaged from not knowing outcomes. Two themes captured facilitators: building confidence - patients hoped for better treatment, were supported from family members and trusted medical staff; and social gains and belonging to the community - altruism, a sense of belonging and peer encouragement motivated participation in trials. CONCLUSION Improving the visibility and transparency of trials, supporting informed decision making, minimizing burden, and ensuring confidence and trust may improve patient participation in trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrizia Natale
- Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, NSW, Australia; Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
| | - Valeria Saglimbene
- Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Marinella Ruospo
- Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Andrea Matus Gonzalez
- Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, NSW, Australia
| | - Giovanni Fm Strippoli
- Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Nicole Scholes-Robertson
- Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, NSW, Australia
| | - Chandana Guha
- Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, NSW, Australia
| | - Jonathan C Craig
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Armando Teixeira-Pinto
- Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, NSW, Australia
| | - Tom Snelling
- Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Allison Tong
- Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Rodríguez-Rabassa MS, Simmons VN, Vega A, Moreno D, Irizarry-Ramos J, Quinn GP. Perceptions of and Barriers to Lung Cancer Screening Among Physicians in Puerto Rico: A Qualitative Study. J Health Care Poor Underserved 2021; 31:973-991. [PMID: 33410819 DOI: 10.1353/hpu.2020.0072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT), an accepted U.S. screening tool for early lung cancer detection, is not widely-used in Puerto Rico. We investigated knowledge and attitudes about LDCT in focus groups of primary care physicians (PCP) and individuals at high risk for lung cancer (HRI) in Puerto Rico. Transcribed/translated audio-recorded discussions were analyzed with the constant comparison method. Both groups had limited knowledge about LDCT and concerns regarding insurance coverage. Most HRIs had never had a provider recommend LDCT and believed that having symptoms was necessary to obtain LDCT screening. Perceived barriers included fears about results and the procedure; a perceived benefit was having early detection and possibly being cured. Few PCPs had ever recommended LDCT to a patient, with those who had basing their decision on symptoms/smoking history but having challenges with insurance. More education on LDCT is needed among HRIs, and U.S. Preventive Services Task Force guidelines should be widely distributed to encourage physician recommendations.
Collapse
|
11
|
Langford AT, Hawley ST, Stableford S, Studts JL, Byrne MM. Development of a Plain Language Decision Support Tool for Cancer Clinical Trials: Blending Health Literacy, Academic Research, and Minority Patient Perspectives. JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER EDUCATION 2020; 35:454-461. [PMID: 30739270 PMCID: PMC9575516 DOI: 10.1007/s13187-019-1482-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
Abstract
Despite the promise of clinical trials for improving cancer care, less than 5% of all cancer patients participate. Racial/ethnic minorities continue to be underrepresented in cancer clinical trials (CCTs). To address this gap, we developed a plain language, web-based decision support tool (CHOICES DST) in English and Spanish to support decision-making about CCTs among Blacks and Hispanics. In phase 1 (information collection), we conducted qualitative interviews with 45 cancer patients, completed a thorough literature review, and reviewed results from a telephone survey of 1100 cancer patients. In phase 2 (content generation), we created the first iteration of the CHOICES DST. In phase 3 (usability testing), we gathered user experience and acceptability data from a small sample of cancer survivors (n = 9). The Knowledge, Empowerment, and Values Clarification (KEV) model of decision-making was developed based on data from phase 1. The KEV model and other phase 1 data allowed us to create the CHOICES DST platform. Usability testing of the CHOICES DST showed highly favorable responses from users, satisfaction with content, ease of navigation, and a desire to use the tool. Qualitative results identified addressable points that would benefit from content and navigation-related alterations. The final version of the CHOICES DST was well received and understood by Black and Hispanic participants, and adheres to the mandates for plain language communication. This research provides preliminary data that CHOICES DST holds promise for improving knowledge of CCTs and potentially improving informed decision-making about participation in trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aisha T Langford
- Department of Population Health, New York University School of Medicine, 227 East 30th Street, Room 645, New York, NY, 10016, USA.
| | - Sarah T Hawley
- Ann Arbor VA Center of Excellence in Health Services Research & Development, University of Michigan Departments of Internal Medicine and Health Management & Policy, 2800 Plymouth Road, NCRC Building 16, 4th Floor, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| | - Sue Stableford
- Health Literacy, Plain Language, & Clear Health Communication Consultant, Brunswick, ME, USA
| | - Jamie L Studts
- Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, 127 Medical Behavioral Science Building, Lexington, KY, 40536-0086, USA
| | - Margaret M Byrne
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, 4117 E Fowler St., Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hillyer GC, Beauchemin M, Hershman DL, Kelsen M, Brogan FL, Sandoval R, Schmitt KM, Reyes A, Terry MB, Lassman AB, Schwartz GK. Discordant attitudes and beliefs about cancer clinical trial participation between physicians, research staff, and cancer patients. Clin Trials 2020; 17:184-194. [PMID: 32009456 DOI: 10.1177/1740774520901514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS Essential to bringing innovative cancer treatments to patients is voluntary participation in clinical trials but approximately 8% of American cancer patients are enrolled onto a trial. We used a domain-oriented framework to assess barriers to cancer clinical trial enrollment. METHODS Physicians (MD, DO, fellows, residents) and research staff (physician assistants, nurse practitioners, staff and research nurses, clinical assistants, and program coordinators) involved in clinical research at a comprehensive cancer center completed an online survey in 2017; adult cancer patients not currently enrolled in a trial were interviewed in 2018. To inform the construct of our physician/staff and patient surveys and to assess barriers to clinical trial enrollment, we first conducted in-depth interviews among 14 key informants representing medical, hematologic, gynecologic, neurologic, radiation oncology, as well as members of the clinical research team (one clinical research coordinator, one research nurse practitioner). Perceived structural, provider- and patient-level barriers to clinical trial enrollment were assessed. Differences in perceptions, attitudes, and beliefs toward clinical trial enrollment between (1) physicians and staff, (2) patients by ethnicity, and (3) physicians/staff and patients were examined. RESULTS In total, 120 physicians/staff involved in clinical research (39.2% physicians, 60.8% staff; 48.0% overall response rate) and 150 cancer patients completed surveys. Nearly three-quarters of physician/staff respondents reported difficulty in keeping track of the eligibility criteria for open studies but was more often cited by physicians than staff (84.4% vs 64.3%, p = 0.02). Physicians more often reported lack of time to present clinical trial information than did staff(p < 0.001); 44.0% of staff versus 18.2% of physicians reported patient family interaction as a clinical trial enrollment barrier (p = 0.007). Hispanic patients more often stated they would join a trial, even if standard therapy was an option compared to non-Hispanic patients (47.7% vs 20.8%, p = 0.002). Comparing the beliefs and perceptions of physicians/staff to those of patients, patients more often reported negative beliefs about clinical trial enrollment (e.g. being in a trial does not help patients personally, 32.9% vs 1.8%, p < 0.001) but less often felt they had no other options when agreeing to join (38.1% vs 85.6%, p < 0.001), and less often refused clinical trial enrollment due to lack of understanding (9.1% vs 63.3%, p = 0.001) than reported by physicians/staff. CONCLUSION Our findings indicate a wide gap between physician/staff and patient attitudes and beliefs about clinical trial enrollment and highlight the importance of focusing future initiatives to raise awareness of this incongruency. Reconciling these differences will require tailored education to reduce implicit biases and dispel misperceptions. Strategies to improve the quality of patient-provider communication and address infrastructure and resource issues are also needed to improve patient enrollment onto cancer clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grace C Hillyer
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health of Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.,Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center of Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Melissa Beauchemin
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center of Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.,New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA.,Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, NY, USA
| | - Dawn L Hershman
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health of Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.,Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center of Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.,Division of Hematology/Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Moshe Kelsen
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center of Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Frances L Brogan
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center of Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rossy Sandoval
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center of Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Karen M Schmitt
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center of Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.,New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Andria Reyes
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center of Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mary Beth Terry
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health of Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.,Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center of Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Andrew B Lassman
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center of Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Neurology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Gary K Schwartz
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center of Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.,Division of Hematology/Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Skinner JS, Fair AM, Holman AS, Boyer AP, Wilkins CH. The Impact of an Educational Video on Clinical Trial Enrollment and Knowledge in Ethnic Minorities: A Randomized Control Trial. Front Public Health 2019; 7:104. [PMID: 31106188 PMCID: PMC6498183 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2019] [Accepted: 04/10/2019] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Innovative methods to increase awareness about clinical trials and address barriers associated with low participation among racial/ethnic minorities are desperately needed. African Americans comprise 5% of all clinical trial participants, and Hispanics make up 1%. Use of multimedia educational material has shown promise as an effective strategy to increase minority clinical trial enrollment. However, this approach has not been broadly implemented. We tested the effect of a video educational program on clinical trial knowledge and enrollment in a sample of oncology outpatients. Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted with 63 oncology patients without previous history of clinical trial participation. Participants were randomly assigned to the intervention, to watch a clinical trial educational video in the office, or to the control group which did not receive in-office education. The Clinical Trial Knowledge survey was administered before the intervention and 1 week after the intervention. Participation in clinical trials was assessed 1-year post study participation. Results for white participants and ethnic minorities were compared. Ethnicity was self-reported through the electronic health record and confirmed by self-reporting on questionnaire. Results: Sixty-three participants were recruited in this study. At 1-year follow-up, 3 participants enrolled in clinical trials in the study group which had received office-based video intervention and 2 participants enrolled in the control group (Z = 0.39, p = 0.69). These results were not statistically significant. Impact of the intervention by ethnicity could not be assessed due to low total clinical trial enrollment. The video intervention did not change knowledge, attitudes, or barriers as measured by the Clinical Trial Knowledge Survey. Minority participants did report significantly more negative beliefs and barriers to participation than white participants. Conclusions: Increasing awareness and knowledge about clinical trials in underrepresented communities is an important step to providing opportunities for participation. Future studies should focus on how to address the negative expectations of clinical trials and the greater information needs in minority populations. Tailored or personalized messaging may address negative perceptions of clinical trial participation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeannine S Skinner
- Interdisciplinary Gerontology Program, Department of Psychological Sciences, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC, United States
| | - Alecia M Fair
- Meharry-Vanderbilt Alliance, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - Alexis S Holman
- Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Sarah Cannon, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - Alaina P Boyer
- National Health Care for the Homeless Council, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - Consuelo H Wilkins
- Meharry-Vanderbilt Alliance, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States.,Department of Medicine, Meharry Medical College, Nashville, TN, United States
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Echeverri M, Anderson D, Nápoles AM, Haas JM, Johnson ME, Serrano FSA. Cancer Health Literacy and Willingness to Participate in Cancer Research and Donate Bio-Specimens. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2018; 15:ijerph15102091. [PMID: 30249985 PMCID: PMC6211072 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15102091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2018] [Revised: 09/20/2018] [Accepted: 09/21/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Although it has been well documented that poor health literacy is associated with limited participation in cancer clinical trials, studies assessing the relationships between cancer health literacy (CHL) and participation in research among diverse populations are lacking. In this study, we examined the relationship between CHL and willingness to participate in cancer research and/or donate bio-specimens (WPRDB) among African Americans, Latinos, and Whites. Participants completed the Cancer Health Literacy Test and the Multidimensional Cancer Literacy Questionnaire. Total-scale and subscale scores, frequencies, means, and distributions were computed. Analyses of variance, the Bonferroni procedure, and the Holm method were used to examine significant differences among groups. Cronbach’s alphas estimated scales’ internal consistency reliability. Significant interactions were found between race/ethnicity, gender, and CHL on WPRDB scales and subscale scores, even after education and age were taken into account. Our study confirms that CHL plays an important role that should be considered and researched further. The majority of participants were more willing to participate in non-invasive research studies (surveys, interviews, and training) or collection of bio-specimens (saliva, check cells, urine, and blood) and in studies led by their own healthcare providers, and local hospitals and universities. However, participants were less willing to participate in more-invasive studies requiring them to take medications, undergo medical procedures or donate skin/tissues. We conclude that addressing low levels of CHL and using community-based participatory approaches to address the lack of knowledge and trust about cancer research among diverse populations may increase not only their willingness to participate in research and donate bio-specimens, but may also have a positive effect on actual participation rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margarita Echeverri
- College of Pharmacy, Xavier University of Louisiana; New Orleans, LA 70125, USA.
| | - David Anderson
- Department of Mathematics, Xavier University of Louisiana; New Orleans, LA 70125, USA.
| | - Anna María Nápoles
- National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
| | | | - Marc E Johnson
- African American, Cancer Community Advisory Board, Kenner, LA 70063, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ramírez AS, Willis G, Rutten LF. Understanding Spanish-Language Response in a National Health Communication Survey: Implications for Health Communication Research. JOURNAL OF HEALTH COMMUNICATION 2017; 22:442-450. [PMID: 28414618 PMCID: PMC5553587 DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2017.1304470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
UNLABELLED Spanish-speaking Latinos account for 13% of the U.S. population yet are chronically under-represented in national surveys; additionally, the response quality suffers from low literacy rates and translation challenges. These are the same issues that health communicators face when understanding how best to communicate important health information to Latinos. The Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) offers a unique opportunity to understand the health communication landscape and information needs of the U.S. POPULATION We describe the challenges in recruiting Spanish-speaking HINTS respondents and strategies used to improve rates and quality of responses among Spanish-speaking Latinos. Cognitive interviewing techniques helped to better understand how Spanish-speaking Latinos were interpreting the survey questions, and the extent to which these interpretations matched English-speaking respondents' interpretations. Some Spanish-speaking respondents had difficulty with the questions because of a lack of access to health care. Additionally, Spanish-speaking respondents had a particularly hard time answering questions that were presented in a grid format. We describe the cognitive interview process, and consider the impact of format changes on Spanish-speaking people's responses and response quality. We discuss challenges that remain in understanding health information needs of non-English-speakers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Susana Ramírez
- a School of Social Sciences, Humanities, and Arts , University of California, Merced , Merced , California , USA
| | - Gordon Willis
- b Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences , National Cancer Institute , Bethesda , Maryland , USA
| | - Lila Finney Rutten
- c Cancer Prevention and Control Program , Mayo Clinic , Rochester , Minnesota , USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Underrepresentation of Hispanics and Other Minorities in Clinical Trials: Recruiters' Perspectives. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities 2017; 5:322-332. [PMID: 28452008 DOI: 10.1007/s40615-017-0373-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2017] [Revised: 04/08/2017] [Accepted: 04/11/2017] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Clinical trials and research studies often fail to recruit participants from the minorities, hampering the generalizability of results. In order to mitigate this problem, the present study investigated how race/ethnicity affects the process of recruiting people from racial and ethnic minority groups, by conducting 11 focus groups with professional recruiters. Several themes emerged, such as how to adapt to potential participants' language competency and literacy levels, the importance to engage in culturally appropriate verbal and non-verbal communication, and to establish a sense of homophily between recruiters and patients. In addition, recruiters pointed out possible solutions to accommodate socioeconomic concerns, to adapt to contextual factors-including immigration status-and ultimately to respond to potential participants' mistrust of medical research. These findings are discussed, and future recommendations are provided.
Collapse
|
17
|
Geana M, Erba J, Krebill H, Doolittle G, Madhusudhana S, Qasem A, Malomo N, Sharp D. Searching for cures: Inner-city and rural patients' awareness and perceptions of cancer clinical trials. Contemp Clin Trials Commun 2017; 5:72-79. [PMID: 29740623 PMCID: PMC5936702 DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2016.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2016] [Revised: 11/22/2016] [Accepted: 12/12/2016] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Fewer than 5% of cancer patients participate in clinical trials, making it challenging to test new therapies or interventions for cancer. Even within that small number, patients living in inner-city and rural areas are underrepresented in clinical trials. This study explores cancer patients' awareness and perceptions of cancer clinical trials, as well as their perceptions of patient-provider interactions related to discussing cancer clinical trials in order to improve accrual in cancer clinical trials. Interviews with 66 former and current in inner-city and rural cancer patients revealed a lack of awareness and understanding about clinical trials, as well as misconceptions about what clinical trials entail. Findings also revealed that commercials and television shows play a prominent role in forming inner-city and rural patients' attitudes and/or misconceptions about clinical trials. However, rural patients were more likely to hold unfavorable views about clinical trials than inner-city patients. Patient-provider discussions emerged as being crucial for increasing awareness of clinical trials among patients and recruiting them to trials. Findings from this study will inform communication strategies to enhance recruitment to cancer clinical trials by increasing awareness and countering misconceptions about clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mugur Geana
- William Allen White School of Journalism and Mass Communications, The University of Kansas, 1435 Jayhawk Blvd., Lawrence, KS 66045, USA
| | - Joseph Erba
- William Allen White School of Journalism and Mass Communications, The University of Kansas, 1435 Jayhawk Blvd., Lawrence, KS 66045, USA
| | - Hope Krebill
- Midwest Cancer Alliance, 4350 Shawnee Mission Parkway, Fairway, KS 66205, USA
| | - Gary Doolittle
- School of Medicine, The University of Kansas Cancer Center, 3901 Rainbow Blvd., Kansas City, KS 66160, USA
| | - Sheshadri Madhusudhana
- Richard and Annette Bloch Cancer Center, Truman Medical Centers, 2301 Holmes., Kansas City, MO 64108, USA
| | - Abdulraheem Qasem
- Richard and Annette Bloch Cancer Center, Truman Medical Centers, 2301 Holmes., Kansas City, MO 64108, USA
| | - Nikki Malomo
- Richard and Annette Bloch Cancer Center, Truman Medical Centers, 2301 Holmes., Kansas City, MO 64108, USA
| | - Denise Sharp
- Richard and Annette Bloch Cancer Center, Truman Medical Centers, 2301 Holmes., Kansas City, MO 64108, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Arevalo M, Heredia NI, Krasny S, Rangel ML, Gatus LA, McNeill LH, Fernandez ME. Mexican-American perspectives on participation in clinical trials: A qualitative study. Contemp Clin Trials Commun 2016; 4:52-57. [PMID: 27570845 PMCID: PMC4999069 DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2016.06.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Clinical trials are essential to advancing knowledge to reduce disease morbidity and mortality; however, ethnic and racial minorities remain under-represented in those studies. We explored knowledge and perceptions of clinical trials among Mexican-Americans in Texas. We conducted focus groups (N = 128) stratified by gender, language preference, and geographical location. This paper presents four emergent, primary themes: 1) knowledge and understanding of clinical trials, 2) fears and concerns about participating, 3) perceived benefits of participating, and 4) incentives to participate. Results suggest that lack of knowledge and understanding of clinical trials leads to misunderstanding about research, including fears and lack of trust. Participants indicated that fears related to perceived experimentation, harm, immigration status, and lack of clinical trial opportunities within their communities were barriers to participation. On the other hand, free healthcare access, helping family members in the future, and monetary incentives could facilitate participation. We also found differences across themes by language, gender, and place of residence. Findings from our study could inform the development of interventions to enhance recruitment of Mexican-American participants into clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariana Arevalo
- University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Public Health, 7000 Fannin Street, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Natalia I Heredia
- University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Public Health, 7000 Fannin Street, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Sarah Krasny
- University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Public Health, 7000 Fannin Street, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Maria L Rangel
- University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Public Health, 7000 Fannin Street, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Leticia A Gatus
- University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Public Health, 7000 Fannin Street, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Lorna H McNeill
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Health Disparities Research, 1400 Pressler St., Houston, TX 77030-3906, USA
| | - Maria E Fernandez
- University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Public Health, 7000 Fannin Street, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Pelto DJ, Sadler GR, Njoku O, Rodriguez MC, Villagra C, Malcarne VL, Riley NE, Behar AI, Jandorf L. Adaptation of a Cancer Clinical Trials Education Program for African American and Latina/o Community Members. HEALTH EDUCATION & BEHAVIOR 2015; 43:381-8. [PMID: 26493870 DOI: 10.1177/1090198115610555] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
The pilot study reported in this article culturally and linguistically adapted an educational intervention to promote cancer clinical trials (CCTs) participation among Latinas/os and African Americans. The single-session slide presentation with embedded videos, originally developed through a campus-community partnership in Southern California, was chosen for adaptation because it was perceived to fit the CORRECT model of innovation (credible, observable, relevant, relatively advantageous, easy to understand, compatible, and testable) and because of the potential to customize any components not identified as core, allowing them to be revised for cultural and linguistic alignment in New York City. Most of the 143 community participants (76.2%) were female; most (54.6%) were older than 59 years. More than half (78.3%) preferred to speak English or were bilingual in English and Spanish. A large proportion (41.3%) had not completed high school. Knowledge and perceived benefits and barriers regarding CCT showed small, though statistically significant, increases. There were no statistically significant group differences for changes in mean knowledge, perceived benefits, or perceived barriers when examined by ethnicity, education level, language, or other included sociodemographic variables. However, a small, but statistically significant difference in perceived barriers was observed when examined by country of origin, with the foreign born score worsening 0.08 points (SD = 0.47, p = .007) on the 5-point Likert-type scale administered posteducation compared to preeducation. Participants' open-ended comments demonstrated the acceptability of the topic and intervention. This adaptation resulted in an intervention with the potential to educate African American and Latina/o general community members in a new geographic region about the purpose, methods, and benefits of CCTs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Debra J Pelto
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Georgia Robins Sadler
- University of California San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA, USA University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA USA
| | - Ogo Njoku
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Lina Jandorf
- Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Muñoz-Antonia T, Ung D, Montiel-Ishino FA, Nelson A, Canales J, Quinn GP. African Americans' and Hispanics' information needs about cancer care. JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER EDUCATION 2015; 30:327-32. [PMID: 25189798 PMCID: PMC4594795 DOI: 10.1007/s13187-014-0721-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
Few studies have reported on African American and Hispanic (AA and H) populations' informational needs when seeking cancer care at an institution that offers clinical trials. Moffitt Cancer Center (MCC) sought to identify and examine the decision making process, the perceptions, and the preferred channels of communication about cancer care services for AA and H communities in order to develop a list of marketing recommendations. Five focus groups (N = 45) consisting of two AA and three H were conducted in four counties of the MCC catchment area in Tampa, FL. Participants were asked about their perceptions, knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs about cancer care and MCC. Focus groups were audio-recorded and verbatim transcripts were analyzed using content analysis. Similarities in responses were found between AA and H participants. Participants received general health and cancer information from media sources and word of mouth and preferred to hear patient testimonials. There were concerns about costs, insurance coverage, and the actual geographic location of the cancer center. In general, H participants were not opposed to participating in cancer clinical trials/research, whereas, AA participants were more hesitant. A majority of participants highly favored an institution that offered standard care and clinical trials. AA and H participants shared similar concerns and preferences in communication channels, but each group had specific informational needs. The perceptions and preferences of AA and H must be explored in order to successfully and efficiently increase cancer clinical trial participation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teresita Muñoz-Antonia
- Molecular Oncology Department, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, MRC 3044, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, 33612, FL, USA,
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Brooks SE, Carter RL, Plaxe SC, Basen-Engquist KM, Rodriguez M, Kauderer J, Walker JL, Myers TKN, Drake JG, Havrilesky LJ, Van Le L, Landrum LM, Brown CL. Patient and physician factors associated with participation in cervical and uterine cancer trials: an NRG/GOG247 study. Gynecol Oncol 2015; 138:101-8. [PMID: 25937529 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.04.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2015] [Accepted: 04/25/2015] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to identify patient and physician factors related to enrollment onto Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) trials. METHODS Prospective study of women with primary or recurrent cancer of the uterus or cervix treated at a GOG institution from July 2010 to January 2012. Logistic regression examined probability of availability, eligibility and enrollment in a GOG trial. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for significant (p<0.05) results reported. RESULTS Sixty institutions, 781 patients, and 150 physicians participated, 300/780 (38%) had a trial available, 290/300 had known participation status. Of these, 150 women enrolled (59.5%), 102 eligible did not enroll (35%), 38 (13%) were ineligible. Ethnicity and specialty of physician, practice type, data management availability, and patient age were significantly associated with trial availability. Patients with >4 comorbidities (OR 4.5; CI 1.7-11.8) had higher odds of trial ineligibility. Non-White patients (OR 7.9; CI 1.3-46.2) and patients of Black physicians had greater odds of enrolling (OR 56.5; CI 1.1-999.9) in a therapeutic trial. Significant patient therapeutic trial enrollment factors: belief trial may help (OR 76.9; CI 4.9->1000), concern about care if not on trial (OR12.1; CI 2.1-71.4), pressure to enroll (OR .27; CI 0.12-.64), caregiving without pay (OR 0.13; CI .02-.84). Significant physician beliefs were: patients would not do well on standard therapy (OR 3.6; CI 1.6-8.4), and trial would not be time consuming (OR 3.3; CI 1.3-8.1). CONCLUSIONS Trial availability, patient and physician beliefs were factors identified that if modified could improve enrollment in cancer cooperative group clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Randy L Carter
- University at Buffalo, NY, United States; NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, United States; Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY 14263, United States
| | - Steven C Plaxe
- Gynecologic Oncology, Rebecca and John Moores UCSD Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA 92093, United States
| | - Karen M Basen-Engquist
- Department of Behavioral Science, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, United States
| | - Michael Rodriguez
- Gynecologic Oncology, Northern Indiana Cancer Research Consortium, Memorial Hospital, Mishawaka, IN 46545, United States
| | - James Kauderer
- University at Buffalo, NY, United States; NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, United States; Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY 14263, United States
| | - Joan L Walker
- Gynecologic Oncology, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, United States
| | | | - Janet G Drake
- Gynecologic Oncology, Waukesha Memorial Hospital, Waukesha, WI 01199, United States
| | | | - Linda Van Le
- Gynecologic Oncology, University of Norton Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 26588, United States
| | - Lisa M Landrum
- Gynecologic Oncology, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, United States
| | - Carol L Brown
- Office of Diversity Programs in Clinical Care, Research and Training, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, United States
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Evaluating the linguistic appropriateness and cultural sensitivity of a self-report system for spanish-speaking patients with cancer. Nurs Res Pract 2014; 2014:702683. [PMID: 25045535 PMCID: PMC4089943 DOI: 10.1155/2014/702683] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2014] [Revised: 06/03/2014] [Accepted: 06/04/2014] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Spanish speakers in the United States encounter numerous communication barriers during cancer treatment. Communication-focused interventions may help Spanish speakers communicate better with healthcare providers and manage symptoms and quality of life issues (SQOL). For this study, we developed a Spanish version of the electronic self-report assessment for cancer (ESRA-C), a web-based program that helps people with cancer report, track, and manage cancer-related SQOL. Four methods were used to evaluate the Spanish version. Focus groups and cognitive interviews were conducted with 51 Spanish-speaking individuals to elicit feedback. Readability was assessed using the Fry readability formula. The cultural sensitivity assessment tool was applied by three bilingual, bicultural reviewers. Revisions were made to personalize the introduction using a patient story and photos and to simplify language. Focus group participants endorsed changes to the program in a second round of focus groups. Cultural sensitivity of the program was scored unacceptable ([Formula: see text]) for audiovisual material and acceptable ([Formula: see text]) for written material. Fry reading levels ranged from 4th to 10th grade. Findings from this study provide several next steps to refine ESRA-C for Spanish speakers with cancer.
Collapse
|
23
|
Wells KJ, McIntyre J, Gonzalez LE, Lee JH, Fisher KJ, Jacobsen PB, Meade C, Muñoz-Antonia T, Quinn GP. Feasibility trial of a Spanish-language multimedia educational intervention. Clin Trials 2013; 10:767-74. [PMID: 23935161 DOI: 10.1177/1740774513495984] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hispanic cancer patients are underrepresented in clinical trials; research suggests lack of knowledge and language barriers contribute to low accrual. Multimedia materials offer advantages to Hispanic populations because they have high acceptability, are easy to disseminate, and can be viewed with family. PURPOSE Hispanic cancer patients and caregivers participated in focus groups to aid in developing a Spanish-language multimedia intervention to educate Hispanic cancer patients about clinical trials. We explored the feasibility of delivering the intervention in medical oncology clinics. METHODS A total of 35 patients were randomized to either the multimedia intervention group (n = 18) or a control group (n = 17) who were asked to read the National Cancer Institute's Spanish-language clinical trials brochure. Self-reported data on knowledge about and attitudes toward clinical trials, self-efficacy for participating in a clinical trial, intention to participate in a clinical trial if asked, and receptivity to information about a clinical trial were collected at baseline and 10 days later. RESULTS Delivery of the multimedia presentation in oncology clinics was feasible. The intervention group had more knowledge about clinical trials at follow-up than the control group; scores for intention to participate in a clinical trial by participants in the intervention group increased from 3.8 to 4.0 of a possible 5, but declined in the control group from 4.5 to 4.1. No statistically significant difference was detected between groups in scores for attitudes or self-efficacy for making a decision to participate in a clinical trial. LIMITATIONS Our sample size was inadequate to identify differences between the informational methods. Although all patients were asked about their willingness to participate in a clinical trial, this decision was hypothetical. In addition, the study was conducted with a sample of Spanish-speaking Hispanic cancer patients at a comprehensive cancer center in Florida. Thus, the results may not generalize to other Hispanic populations. CONCLUSION In the pilot project, we demonstrated the feasibility of delivering multimedia information to patients in medical oncology clinics. Because delivery in a clinical setting was found to be feasible, a larger study should be conducted to evaluate the efficacy of the multimedia intervention with respect to promoting accrual of Hispanic patients to clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristen J Wells
- aDepartment of Psychology, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|