1
|
Ma H, Gottfredson NC, Kieu T, Rohde JA, Hall MG, Brewer NT, Noar SM. Examining the Longitudinal Relationship Between Perceived and Actual Message Effectiveness: A Randomized Trial. HEALTH COMMUNICATION 2024; 39:1510-1519. [PMID: 37316818 PMCID: PMC10719418 DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2023.2222459] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
We sought to examine the relationship between perceived message effectiveness (PME) and actual message effectiveness (AME) in a 3-week randomized trial of vaping prevention advertisements. Participants were US adolescents (n = 1,514) recruited in 2021. We randomly assigned them to view The Real Cost vaping prevention ads or control videos online. Participants viewed three videos at Visit 1, again at Visits 2 and 3, and completed a survey at each visit that assessed AME (susceptibility to vaping) and two types of PME - effects perceptions (potential for behavioral impact) and message perceptions (potential for message processing). At Visit 4, AME was measured. Compared to control, The Real Cost ads led to improved AME (lower susceptibility to vaping at Visit 4, p < .001). This was anticipated by The Real Cost ads eliciting higher PME ratings (higher effects and message perceptions at Visit 1, both p < .001). Furthermore, PME (both effects and message perceptions) at Visit 1 predicted susceptibility to vaping at Visits 1, 2, 3, and 4 (all p < .001). Finally, effects perceptions fully mediated the impact of The Real Cost ads on susceptibility to vaping (β = -.30; p < .001), while message perceptions only partially mediated the effect (β = -.04; p = .001). Our findings indicate a relationship between PME and AME, especially effects perceptions, and suggest that PME may be useful in message pre-testing to select messages with greater behavior change potential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haijing Ma
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, U.S
| | - Nisha C. Gottfredson
- Substance Use Prevention, Evaluation, and Research Program, Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle, NC, U.S
| | - Talia Kieu
- Department of Health Behavior, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC, U.S
| | - Jacob A. Rohde
- Hussman School of Journalism and Media, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, U.S
| | - Marissa G. Hall
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, U.S
- Department of Health Behavior, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC, U.S
- Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, U.S
| | - Noel T. Brewer
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, U.S
- Department of Health Behavior, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC, U.S
| | - Seth M. Noar
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, U.S
- Hussman School of Journalism and Media, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, U.S
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tao R, Wang X, Wang Y, Yao H, Wu S, Liu J, Yang S. Emotional Appeals and Norms: How Normative Perceptions Moderate the Persuasive Impacts of Discrete Emotional Appeals within Tobacco Pictorial Warnings in China. HEALTH COMMUNICATION 2023:1-16. [PMID: 37947022 DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2023.2277036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2023]
Abstract
Tobacco pictorial warnings could employ a variety of emotional appeals to enhance effectiveness; however, little research exists to guide the selection of discrete emotional appeals. Further, it remains unclear how contextual pro-smoking norms might influence the persuasive impacts of discrete emotional appeals within pictorial warnings, especially in China, where the overall smoking rate and social acceptance remain high. To fill these gaps, this study leveraged the largest set of pictorial warnings (K = 510) tested to date. Using a randomized large-K multiple-message design, we evaluated the impacts of disgust, fear, self-anger, contempt, shame, and hope appeals among Chinese adult male smokers (N = 2,306) on perceived message effectiveness (PME). Results showed that fear, self-anger, shame, and hope appeals significantly increased PME, while disgust and contempt appeals appeared less effective. Importantly, the PME of nearly all emotional appeals - except hope appeals - was weakened for Chinese adult male smokers with higher pro-smoking normative perceptions, highlighting the importance of considering local contextual influences when implementing pictorial warnings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ran Tao
- School of Journalism and Mass Communication, University of Wisconsin-Madison
| | - Xinyi Wang
- Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania
| | - Yidi Wang
- Department of Communication, University of California Santa Barbara
| | - Heyu Yao
- Center for Studies of Media Development, School of Journalism and Communication, Wuhan University
| | - Shiwen Wu
- Center for Studies of Media Development, School of Journalism and Communication, Wuhan University
| | - Jiaying Liu
- Department of Communication, University of California Santa Barbara
| | - Sijia Yang
- School of Journalism and Mass Communication, University of Wisconsin-Madison
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Johnson AC, Mercincavage M, Souprountchouk V, Deatley T, Mays D, Strasser AA. Assessing Attention to Tobacco Warnings With a Heatmapping Task. Am J Prev Med 2023; 65:809-817. [PMID: 37257762 PMCID: PMC10592484 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2023.05.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2023] [Revised: 05/24/2023] [Accepted: 05/24/2023] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Attention is a critical outcome to understanding the impacts of tobacco warning labels and is commonly measured using eye tracking. Self-report, online methods may be efficient, scalable alternatives to capture attention. This study assesses warning label attention on cigarette marketing using a heatmapping task. METHODS Young adults (n=1,608) aged 18-30 years and registered on Mechanical Turk with a WorkerID verified in the U.S. were included. Data were collected in 2021-2022 and analyzed in 2022. Tobacco advertisement exposure included a 2 × 3 between-subjects factorial design for varying contexts and warnings. Attention was operationalized with self-reported frequency and timing of warning selection. Outcomes include credibility, willingness to use the advertised cigarettes, and intentions to use cigarettes and low-nicotine cigarettes. RESULTS Early and more frequent attention to the warning was associated with higher credibility (frequent: β=0.28, 95% CI=0.11, 0.44; early: β=0.14, 95% CI=0.02, 0.25), lower willingness to use the advertised cigarettes (frequent: β= -1.78, 95% CI= -2.24, -1.32; early: β= -1.16, 95% CI= -1.49, -0.84), lower cigarette use intentions in the next week (frequent: β= -0.44, 95% CI= -0.64, -0.25; early: β= -0.21, 95% CI= -0.35, -0.08), and lower low-nicotine cigarette use intentions in the next week (frequent: β= -0.47, 95% CI= -0.66, -0.28; early: β= -0.25, 95% CI= -0.38, -0.12) than no attention at all. CONCLUSIONS Greater attention as measured by a heatmapping task was observed for pictorial warnings and associated with lower intentions to use tobacco. Heatmapping selection patterns were a suitable proxy for attention in this online sample.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea C Johnson
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science (TCORS), Annenberg School of Communication, University of Pennsylvania-Rutgers University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
| | - Melissa Mercincavage
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science (TCORS), Annenberg School of Communication, University of Pennsylvania-Rutgers University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Valentina Souprountchouk
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science (TCORS), Annenberg School of Communication, University of Pennsylvania-Rutgers University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Teresa Deatley
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science (TCORS), Annenberg School of Communication, University of Pennsylvania-Rutgers University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Darren Mays
- Center for Tobacco Research, Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio; Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Andrew A Strasser
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science (TCORS), Annenberg School of Communication, University of Pennsylvania-Rutgers University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kumari L, Sood M, Gupta S. Motivation to quit tobacco; Impact of different types of Anti-tobacco state-sponsored media propaganda messages. J Family Med Prim Care 2023; 12:708-716. [PMID: 37312770 PMCID: PMC10259574 DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1661_22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2022] [Revised: 12/08/2022] [Accepted: 01/13/2023] [Indexed: 06/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Antitobacco media messages can easily reach the mass and play a very positive and significant role in changing the motivational stages among recent quitters. Motivation is the key to changing human behaviour. Motivation can be intrinsic and extrinsic. To modify tobacco-related behaviour, one must have an inherent motivation to quit tobacco. However, the outside factors, for example, protobacco advertisements, antitobacco advertisements, peer pressure, celebrity influence, and family members' influence cannot be ignored. Method A total of 400 recent tobacco quitters were enrolled from four colleges via a multistage sampling method. Time series research design was used for data collection at three time periods 0, 1, and 3 months. Study participants were divided into four groups: 1) personal testimony group, 2) health warning group, 3) celebrity-influenced public service announcements, and 4) natural exposure group. Media messages containing antitobacco video clippings and pictures were delivered to the participants via phone thrice a week, as per the groups assigned. All four groups were assessed for the motivational stage via contemplation ladder at 0, 1, and 3 months of intervals. Results Antitobacco personal testimonial media messages are most effective in enhancing the motivation to quit tobacco, followed by the antitobacco health warning messages, which are also proven to be effective in maintaining high motivation levels to remain abstinent from smoking. However, public service announcements are ineffective in keeping the motivation to quit tobacco at higher smoking. Conclusion Overall, the antitobacco state-sponsored media messages, personal testimonials, and health warnings about tobacco products effectively maintain and enhance motivation to quit tobacco.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laxmi Kumari
- Chitkara School of Health Sciences, Chitkara University, Punjab, India
| | - Meenakshi Sood
- Chitkara College of Pharmacy, Chitkara University, Punjab, India
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kowitt SD, Mendel Sheldon J, Vereen RN, Kurtzman RT, Gottfredson NC, Hall MG, Brewer NT, Noar SM. The Impact of The Real Cost Vaping and Smoking Ads across Tobacco Products. Nicotine Tob Res 2023; 25:430-437. [PMID: 36006858 PMCID: PMC9910139 DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntac206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2021] [Revised: 07/07/2022] [Accepted: 08/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Little research has examined the spillover effects of tobacco communication campaigns, such as how anti-smoking ads affect vaping. AIMS AND METHODS Participants were a national sample of 623 U.S. adolescents (ages 13-17 years) from a probability-based panel. In a between-subjects experiment, we randomly assigned adolescents to view one of four videos online: (1) a smoking prevention video ad from the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) The Real Cost campaign, (2) a neutral control video about smoking, (3) a vaping prevention video ad from The Real Cost campaign, or (4) a neutral control video about vaping. We present effect sizes as Cohen's d, standardized mean differences, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS Exposure to The Real Cost vaping prevention ads led to more negative attitudes toward vaping compared with control (d = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.07, 0.53), while exposure to The Real Cost smoking prevention ads did not affect smoking-related outcomes compared with control (p-values > .05). Turning to spillover effects, exposure to The Real Cost smoking prevention ads led to less susceptibility to vaping (d = -0.34, 95% CI: -0.56, -0.12), more negative attitudes toward vaping (d = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.20, 0.65) and higher perceived likelihood of harm from vaping (d = 0.26, 95% CI: 0.04, 0.48), compared with control. Exposure to The Real Cost vaping prevention ads did not affect smoking-related outcomes compared with control (p-values > .05). CONCLUSIONS This experiment found evidence of beneficial spillover effects of smoking prevention ads on vaping outcomes and found no detrimental effects of vaping prevention ads on smoking outcomes. IMPLICATIONS Little research has examined the spillover effects of tobacco communication campaigns, such as how anti-smoking ads affect vaping. Using a national sample of 623 U.S. adolescents, we found beneficial evidence of spillover effects of smoking prevention ads on vaping outcomes, which is promising since it suggests that smoking prevention campaigns may have the additional benefit of reducing both smoking and vaping among adolescents. Additionally, we found that vaping prevention campaigns did not elicit unintended consequences on smoking-related outcomes, an important finding given concerns that vaping prevention campaigns could drive youth to increase or switch to using combustible cigarettes instead of vaping.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah D Kowitt
- Department of Family Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Jennifer Mendel Sheldon
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Rhyan N Vereen
- Hussman School of Journalism and Media, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Rachel T Kurtzman
- Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Nisha C Gottfredson
- Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Marissa G Hall
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Noel T Brewer
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Seth M Noar
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Hussman School of Journalism and Media, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Rubenstein D, Pacek LR, McClernon FJ. Multiple Tobacco Product Use Conceptual Framework: A 2021 Update on Evidence. Nicotine Tob Res 2022; 24:1208-1217. [PMID: 35137194 PMCID: PMC9278823 DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntac032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2021] [Revised: 01/04/2022] [Accepted: 01/31/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION One-third of adults in the United States who use tobacco regularly use two or more types of tobacco products. As the use of e-cigarettes and other noncombusted tobacco products increases-making multiple tobacco product (MTP) use increasingly common-it is essential to evaluate the complex factors that affect product use. AIMS AND METHODS In this update to our 2019 conceptual framework, we review and evaluate recent literature and expand the model to include ways in which MTP use may be affected by market factors such as the introduction of new products and socioenvironmental factors like marketing and advertising. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS MTP use patterns are complex, dynamic, and multiply determined by factors at the level of individuals, products, situations or contexts, and marketplace. Substitution, or using one product with the intent of decreasing use of another, and complementarity, or using multiple products for different reasons or purposes, explain patterns in MTP use. Moreover, substitution and complementarity may inform our understanding of how market changes targeted at one product, for instance, new product standards, bans, product pricing, and taxation, affect consumption of other tobacco products. New data from natural experiments and novel laboratory-based techniques add additional data and expand the framework. IMPLICATIONS A substantial proportion of people who use tobacco use more than one product. This review synthesizes and evaluates recent evidence on the diverse factors that affect MTP use in addition to expanding our framework. Our review is accompanied by suggested research questions that can guide future study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dana Rubenstein
- Corresponding Author: Dana Rubenstein, BA, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, 2608 Erwin Road, Suite 300, Durham, NC 27705, USA. Telephone: 919-668-3987; Fax: 919-681-1600; E-mail:
| | - Lauren R Pacek
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - F Joseph McClernon
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Harm Perceptions and Beliefs about Potential Modified Risk Tobacco Products. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 18:ijerph18020576. [PMID: 33445525 PMCID: PMC7827331 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18020576] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2020] [Revised: 12/31/2020] [Accepted: 01/05/2021] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
Under US law, tobacco products may be authorized to claim lower exposure to chemicals, or lower risk of health harms. We sought to examine the harm perceptions and beliefs about potential modified risk tobacco products (MRTPs). We recruited 864 adult current and former smokers in August 2019. Participants read a paragraph describing the potential for the FDA to authorize MRTPs and a brief description of MRTPs. The most endorsed beliefs for each product were that they contained nicotine and that they were risky. Believing that e-cigarettes can help smokers quit smoking, that they tasted good, and looked cool were associated with greater odds of intending to try e-cigarettes after controlling for demographic and use factors. For snus, the beliefs that the product was not addictive and tasted good were associated with increased odds of intending to try snus. The beliefs that heated tobacco would taste good and would be a good quit aid was associated with increased odds of intentions to try heated tobacco products. Understanding what the public believes about products currently or potentially authorized to be marketed as modified risk tobacco products can inform communication efforts.
Collapse
|