1
|
Cottrell D, Wright-Hughes A, Farrin A, Walwyn R, Mughal F, Truscott A, Diggins E, Irving D, Fonagy P, Ougrin D, Stahl D, Wright J. Reducing self-harm in adolescents: the RISA-IPD individual patient data meta-analysis and systematic review. Health Technol Assess 2024:1-42. [PMID: 39024118 DOI: 10.3310/gtnt6331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Self-harm is common in adolescents and a major public health concern. Evidence for effective interventions is lacking. An individual patient data meta-analysis has the potential to provide more reliable estimates of the effects of therapeutic interventions for self-harm than conventional meta-analyses, to explore which treatments are best suited to certain groups. Method A systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of therapeutic interventions to reduce repeat self-harm in adolescents who had a history of self-harm and presented to clinical services. Primary outcome was repetition of self-harm. The methods employed for searches, study screening and selection, and risk of bias assessment are described, with an overview of the outputs of the searching, selection and quality assessment processes. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidance is followed. Results We identified a total 39 eligible studies, from 10 countries, where we sought Individual Patient Data (IPD), of which the full sample of participants were eligible in 18 studies and a partial sample of participants were eligible in 21 studies. We obtained IPD from 26 studies of 3448 eligible participants. For our primary outcome, repetition of self-harm, only 6 studies were rated as low risk of bias with 10 rated as high risk (although 2 of these were for secondary outcomes only). Conclusions Obtaining individual patient data for meta-analyses is possible but very time-consuming, despite clear guidance from funding bodies that researchers should share their data appropriately. More attention needs to be paid to seeking appropriate consent from study participants for (pseudo) anonymised data-sharing and institutions need to collaborate on agreeing template data-sharing agreements. Researchers and funders need to consider issues of research design more carefully. Our next step is to analyse all the data we have collected to see if it will tell us more about how we might prevent repetition of self-harm in young people. Funding This article presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme as award number 17/117/11. A plain language summary of this research article is available on the NIHR Journals Library Website https://doi.org/10.3310/GTNT6331.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Cottrell
- Division of Psychological and Social Medicine, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Alex Wright-Hughes
- Complex Interventions Division, Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Amanda Farrin
- Complex Interventions Division, Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Rebecca Walwyn
- Complex Interventions Division, Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Faraz Mughal
- School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK
- NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Alex Truscott
- Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College, London, UK
| | - Emma Diggins
- Division of Psychological and Social Medicine, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Peter Fonagy
- Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College, London, UK
| | - Dennis Ougrin
- Youth Resilience Unit, WHO Collaborating Centre for Mental Health Services Development, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Daniel Stahl
- Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Judy Wright
- Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Erlangsen A, Khan M, Su W, Alateeq K, Charfi F, Madsen T, Qin P, Morthorst BR, Thomsen M, Malik A, Bandara P, Fleischmann A, Saeed K. Situation Analysis of Suicide and Self-Harm in the WHO Eastern Mediterranean Region. Arch Suicide Res 2024; 28:760-778. [PMID: 37837375 DOI: 10.1080/13811118.2023.2262532] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/16/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE An estimated 41,000 lives are lost to suicide each year in World Health Organization Eastern Mediterranean Region Office (WHO EMRO) countries. The objective of this study was to conduct a situation analysis for suicide and self-harm in the WHO EMRO region. METHODS Data on suicide were obtained from the WHO Global Health Estimates for the years 2000-2019. Information on risk groups efforts to prevent self-harm and suicide in the EMRO region were retrieved through scientific studies, grey literature, and public websites. RESULTS During 2000-2019, the age-standardized suicide rate was 6.7 per 100,000 inhabitants, albeit there are concerns regarding data quality. Self-harm and suicide remain criminal acts in more than half of the countries. Few countries have a national plan for prevention of suicide. Toxic agents, such as pesticides and black henna, are easily available and frequently used for suicide in some areas, as are firearms and self-immolation. Successful prevention measures include means restriction and psychosocial interventions after self-harm. CONCLUSION Many WHO EMRO countries remain underserved in terms of mental health care. Decriminalization of suicide and means restriction might be further promoted. Online-based tools for mental health literacy and psychosocial therapy are other options to explore.
Collapse
|
3
|
Steinberg R, Amini J, Sinyor M, Mitchell RHB, Schaffer A. Implementation of caring contacts using patient feedback to reduce suicide-related outcomes following psychiatric hospitalization. Suicide Life Threat Behav 2024. [PMID: 38934489 DOI: 10.1111/sltb.13108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2024] [Revised: 06/14/2024] [Accepted: 06/14/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Suicide risk is substantially elevated following discharge from a psychiatric hospitalization. Caring Contacts (CCs) are brief communications delivered post-discharge that can help to improve mental health outcomes. METHOD This three-phase, mixed-method quality-improvement study revised an existing CC intervention using iterative patient and community feedback. Inpatients (n = 2) and community members (n = 13) participated in focus groups to improve existing CC messages (phases 1 and 2). We piloted these messages among individuals with a suicide-related concern following discharge from an inpatient psychiatric hospitalization (n = 27), sending CCs on days 2 and 7 post-discharge (phase 3). Phase 3 participants completed mental health symptom measures at baseline and day 7, and provided feedback on these messages. RESULTS Phase 1 and 2 focus group participants indicated preferences for shorter, more visually appealing messages that featured personalized, recovery-focused content. Phase 3 participants demonstrated reductions in depressive symptoms at day-7 post-discharge (-6.4% mean score on Hopkins-Symptom-Checklist, -9.0% mean score on Entrapment-Scale). Most participants agreed that CC messages helped them feel more connected to the hospital and encouraged help-seeking behavior post-discharge. CONCLUSION This study supports the use of an iterative process, including patient feedback, to improve CC messages and provides further pilot evidence that CC can have beneficial effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosalie Steinberg
- Department of Psychiatry, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medical Psychiatry, St. John's Rehab, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jasmine Amini
- Department of Psychiatry, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mark Sinyor
- Department of Psychiatry, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rachel H B Mitchell
- Department of Psychiatry, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ayal Schaffer
- Department of Psychiatry, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hu FH, Xu J, Jia YJ, Ge MW, Zhang WQ, Tang W, Zhao DY, Hu SQ, Du W, Shen WQ, Xu H, Zhang WB, Chen HL. Non-pharmacological interventions for preventing suicide attempts: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Asian J Psychiatr 2024; 93:103913. [PMID: 38219553 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajp.2024.103913] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2023] [Revised: 12/30/2023] [Accepted: 01/03/2024] [Indexed: 01/16/2024]
Abstract
Suicide attempts can cause serious physical harm or death. It would be crucial to gain a better understanding of the comparative efficacy of non-pharmacological interventions. We aimed to identify which non-pharmacological interventions are more effective in preventing suicide attempts. PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE databases were searched systematically from their inception until 3 April 2023. To be eligible for inclusion, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) had to meet the following criteria: Participants were individuals who had suicidal ideation or a history of severe self-harm or attempted suicide. A network meta-analysis was performed using a random effects model to estimate the treatment effect of various non-pharmacological interventions. (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023411393). We obtained data from 54 studies involving 17,630 participants. Our primary analysis found that Cognitive therapy (CT) (OR=0.19, 95%CI =0.04-0.81), Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) (OR=0.37, 95%CI =0.13-0.97), Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) (OR=0.42, 95%CI =0.17-0.99), and Brief intervention and contact (BIC) (OR=0.65, 95%CI=0.44-0.94) were superior to TAU (within the longest available follow-up time) in preventing suicide attempts, while other intervention methods do not show significant advantages over TAU. Secondary analysis showed that the two intervention measures (CT and BIC) were effective when follow-up time did not exceed 6 months, but there was no effective intervention measure with longer follow-up times. CT, DBT, CBT, and BIC have a better effect in preventing suicide attempts than other non-pharmacological interventions. Additional research is necessary to validate which interventions, as well as which combinations of interventions, are the most effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fei-Hong Hu
- Medical School of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, PR China
| | - Jie Xu
- Medical School of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, PR China
| | - Yi-Jie Jia
- Medical School of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, PR China
| | - Meng-Wei Ge
- Medical School of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, PR China
| | - Wan-Qing Zhang
- Medical School of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, PR China
| | - Wen Tang
- Medical School of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, PR China
| | - Dan-Yan Zhao
- Medical School of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, PR China
| | - Shi-Qi Hu
- Medical School of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, PR China
| | - Wei Du
- Medical School of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, PR China
| | - Wang-Qin Shen
- Medical School of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, PR China
| | - Hong Xu
- Nantong Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nantong, Jiangsu, PR China
| | - Wei-Bing Zhang
- Nantong Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nantong, Jiangsu, PR China.
| | - Hong-Lin Chen
- School of Public Health, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, PR China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Jansen KJ, Shaw JL, Comtois KA, Elliott-Groves E, Slaney T, Avey JP, Nelson L. Culturally Adapting Caring Contacts for Suicide Prevention in Four Alaska Native and American Indian Communities. Arch Suicide Res 2023; 27:89-106. [PMID: 34492210 PMCID: PMC8898990 DOI: 10.1080/13811118.2021.1967820] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
AIM Despite substantial tribal, state, and federal effort, American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) suicide rates have changed little in the last 30 years, prompting attention to new and innovative approaches to this persistent health disparity. Suicide prevention interventions with demonstrated success in other populations may be useful in AI/AN communities. Caring Contacts is a suicide prevention intervention that has been adapted and shown to reduce suicide ideation, attempts, and deaths in other populations. CONCLUSION Overall, AI/AN study participants in four diverse AI/AN communities endorsed the use of Caring Contacts for suicide prevention in their communities. Intervention adaptations for use in these communities centered primarily on message frequency and timing as well as expanding access to Caring Contacts. The results of this study may be applicable to other populations that experience suicide-related health disparities. METHODS We used a community-based participatory research approach to gather qualitative data from community members, healthcare providers, and leaders in four AI/AN communities. These data were analyzed thematically and used to adapt Caring Contacts for use in a subsequent clinical trial with AI/AN people at high risk for suicide. RESULTS A total of 189 community members and other health system stakeholders in four tribal communities participated in focus groups and interviews. Caring Contacts was perceived in all communities to be acceptable. Feedback for intervention adaptations focused on the themes of trial eligibility criteria; instruments; message frequency, timing, and content; and cultural considerations.
Collapse
|
6
|
Caring Texts, a strength-based, suicide prevention trial in 5 native communities: Research design and methods. Contemp Clin Trials 2022; 123:106966. [PMID: 36252937 PMCID: PMC10395650 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106966] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2022] [Revised: 09/20/2022] [Accepted: 10/11/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite their intrinsic strengths and resilience, some American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) communities experience among the highest rates of suicide of any racial and ethnic group. Caring Contacts is one of the only interventions shown to reduce suicide in clinical trials, but it has not been tested in AI/AN settings. OBJECTIVE To compare the effectiveness of Enhanced Usual Care (control) to Enhanced Usual Care augmented with a culturally adapted version of Caring Contacts (intervention) for reducing suicidal ideation, suicide attempts, and suicide-related hospitalizations. METHODS We are implementing a single blind randomized controlled trial of Caring Contacts in five AI/AN communities across the country (South Dakota, Montana, Oklahoma, and Alaska). Eligible participants have to be (1) actively suicidal or have made a suicide attempt within the past year; (2) at least 18 years of age; (3) AI/AN; (4) able to speak and read English; (5) able to participate voluntarily; (6) willing to be contacted by text, email or postal mail; and (7) able to provide consent. Following consent and baseline assessment, participants are randomized to receive either Enhanced Usual Care alone, or Enhanced Usual Care with 12 months (25 messages) of culturally adapted Caring Contacts. Follow-up assessments are conducted at 12 and 18 months. CONCLUSIONS If effective, this study of Caring Contacts will inform programs to reduce suicide in the study communities as well as inform future research on Caring Contacts in other tribal settings. Modifications to continue the trial during the COVID-19 pandemic are discussed. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION NCT02825771.
Collapse
|
7
|
Doty B, Bass J, Ryan T, Zhang A, Wilcox H. Systematic review of suicide prevention studies with data on youth and young adults living in low-income and middle-income countries. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e055000. [PMID: 36691131 PMCID: PMC9453991 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055000] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2021] [Accepted: 08/17/2022] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This review aimed to provide a summary of peer-reviewed, published literature on suicide preventive interventions with data on youth and young adults in low-income and middle-income countries (LMIC). DESIGN A systematic review was conducted using electronic databases of PubMed/MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PsycINFO, Education Resources Information Center and The Campbell Collaboration databases for English-language articles published between 1 January 1990 and 15 February 2022. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Interventions of interest could include behavioural, community, clinical/medical or policy studies, or any combination of these, so long as the studies had at least one outcome of interest and at least one control group or control period. Outcomes included suicide ideation, suicide attempt and suicide. Interventions must have been conducted in an LMIC. Studies with individuals ages 0-25 in the sample were included. Articles describing data on individuals over age 25 could be included if individuals ages 0-25 were part of the sample. RESULTS A total of 44 eligible studies were identified, representing a broad range of universal, selective and indicated interventions. Most studies assessed interventions designed to address lethal means or mental health. Most studies were conducted in lower-middle-income or upper-middle-income countries, with the largest proportion in Asia. Assessment of outcomes across studies was heterogeneous and there were few large-scale investigations tailored specifically for youth. CONCLUSIONS Most of the published, peer-reviewed suicide intervention research from LMIC is concentrated in a few countries. While geographical coverage to date has been limited, strategies and samples in included studies were diverse, representing populations in clinical, educational and community settings. While current findings hold promise, this review identified a need for large-scale studies designed specifically for youth.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Doty
- Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Judith Bass
- Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Taylor Ryan
- Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Allen Zhang
- Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Holly Wilcox
- Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Schmeckenbecher J, Rattner K, Cramer RJ, Plener PL, Baran A, Kapusta ND. Effectiveness of distance-based suicide interventions: multi-level meta-analysis and systematic review. BJPsych Open 2022; 8:e140. [PMID: 35861112 PMCID: PMC9345623 DOI: 10.1192/bjo.2022.526] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of distance-based interventions (DBIs) to reduce suicidal ideation and behaviours are an increasingly relevant form of intervention. DBIs are more affordable, scalable and available than traditional face-to-face interventions, helping to narrow the gap between needed and provided care. AIMS To evaluate the overall effectiveness of DBIs against suicidal ideation and behaviours. METHOD We systematically searched Web of Science, Scopus and PubMed for all DBIs primarily aimed at reducing suicidal ideation and behaviours. Data were analysed with a robust variance estimation corrected, multi-level meta-analysis. RESULTS We found 38 studies, reporting 110 outcomes. Effectiveness in reducing suicidal ideation was low (standardised mean difference -0.174, 95% CI -0.238 to -0.110). DBIs were significantly less effective against suicidal behaviours than against suicidal ideation, although still effective (standardised mean difference -0.059, 95% CI -0.087 to -0.032). Human involvement had no significant effect on effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS Despite low effectiveness, DBIs might play a role in large-scale prevention efforts against suicidal ideation within a stepped care approach. Further, DBIs may be helpful in expanding mental health services in low- and middle-income countries with otherwise limited access to mental healthcare. Although the evidence for DBIs efficacy is well grounded, the technical and scientific evaluation of DBIs regarding their set up, functionality and components needs to be addressed in future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jim Schmeckenbecher
- Department of Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy, Medical University Vienna, Austria
| | - Katrin Rattner
- Clinic for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, kbo-Inn-Salzach-Klinikum, Freilassing, Germany
| | - Robert J Cramer
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, North Carolina, USA
| | - Paul L Plener
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Medical University Vienna, Austria; and Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Ulm, Germany
| | - Anna Baran
- Department of Medicine and Optometry, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Linnaeus University, Sweden; and Department of Psychiatry, Blekinge Hospital, Sweden
| | - Nestor D Kapusta
- Department of Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy, Medical University Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Reger MA, Lauver MG, Manchester C, Abraham TH, Landes SJ, Garrido MM, Griffin C, Woods JA, Strombotne KL, Hughes G. Development of the Veterans Crisis Line Caring Letters Suicide Prevention Intervention. Health Serv Res 2022; 57 Suppl 1:42-52. [DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.13985] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2021] [Revised: 02/22/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Mark A. Reger
- VA Puget Sound Health Care System Seattle WA USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences University of Washington Seattle WA USA
| | - Mary Grace Lauver
- Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Crisis Line Office of Mental Health and Suicide Prevention, VA Central Office Washington DC USA
| | | | - Traci H. Abraham
- Center for Mental Health Outcomes and Research Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System North Little Rock AR USA
- South Central Mental Illness Research Education and Clinical Center (MIRECC) Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System North Little Rock AR USA
| | - Sara J. Landes
- South Central Mental Illness Research Education and Clinical Center (MIRECC) Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System North Little Rock AR USA
- Behavioral Health QUERI Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System North Little Rock AR USA
- Department of Psychiatry University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Little Rock AR USA
| | - Melissa M. Garrido
- VA Boston Healthcare System Boston MA USA
- Boston University School of Public Health Boston MA USA
| | - Cameron Griffin
- Veterans Affairs (VA) Serious Mental Illness Treatment Resource and Evaluation Center Office of Mental Health and Suicide Prevention Ann Arbor Michigan USA
| | - Jack A. Woods
- Center for Mental Health Outcomes and Research Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System North Little Rock AR USA
| | - Kiersten L. Strombotne
- VA Boston Healthcare System Boston MA USA
- Boston University School of Public Health Boston MA USA
| | - Gregory Hughes
- Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Crisis Line Office of Mental Health and Suicide Prevention, VA Central Office Washington DC USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Hou X, Wang J, Guo J, Zhang X, Liu J, Qi L, Zhou L. Methods and efficacy of social support interventions in preventing suicide: a systematic review and meta-analysis. EVIDENCE-BASED MENTAL HEALTH 2021; 25:29-35. [PMID: 34911688 PMCID: PMC8788249 DOI: 10.1136/ebmental-2021-300318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2021] [Accepted: 11/25/2021] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
QUESTION Suicide is a global public and mental health problem. The effectiveness of social support interventions has not been widely demonstrated in the prevention of suicide. We aimed to describe the methods of social support interventions in preventing suicide and examine the efficacy of them. STUDY SELECTION AND ANALYSIS We searched literature databases and conducted clinical trials. The inclusion criteria for the summary of intervention methods were as follows: (1) studies aimed at preventing suicide through method(s) that directly provide social support; (2) use of one or more method(s) to directly provide social support. The additional inclusion criteria for meta-analysis on the efficacy of these interventions included: (1) suicide, suicide attempt or social support-related outcome was measured; (2) randomised controlled trial design and (3) using social support intervention as the main/only method. FINDINGS In total, 22 656 records and 185 clinical trials were identified. We reviewed 77 studies in terms of intervention methods, settings, support providers and support recipients. There was a total of 18 799 person-years among the ten studies measuring suicide. The number of suicides was significantly reduced in the intervention group (risk ratio (RR)=0.48, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.85). In 14 studies with a total of 14 469 person-years, there was no significant reduction of suicide attempts in the overall pooled RR of 0.88 (95% CI 0.73 to 1.07). CONCLUSIONS Social support interventions were recommended as a suicide prevention strategy for those with elevated suicide risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaofei Hou
- Department of Social Medicine and Health Management, Xiangya School of Public Health, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Jiali Wang
- Department of Social Medicine and Health Management, Xiangya School of Public Health, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Jing Guo
- Department of Social Medicine and Health Management, Xiangya School of Public Health, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Xinxu Zhang
- Department of Social Medicine and Health Management, Xiangya School of Public Health, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Jiahai Liu
- Department of Social Medicine and Health Management, Xiangya School of Public Health, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Linmao Qi
- School of Mental Health, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Liang Zhou
- Department of Social Psychiatry, The Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Liu H, Chen G, Li J, Hao C, Zhang B, Bai Y, Song L, Chen C, Xie H, Liu T, Caine ED, Hou F. Sequential multiple assignment randomised trial of a brief contact intervention for suicide risk management among discharged psychiatric patients: an implementation study protocol. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e054131. [PMID: 34836907 PMCID: PMC8628333 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The postdischarge suicide risk among psychiatric patients is significantly higher than it is among patients with other diseases and general population. The brief contact interventions (BCIs) are recommended to decrease suicide risk in areas with limited mental health service resources like China. This study aims to develop a postdischarge suicide intervention strategy based on BCIs and evaluate its implementability under the implementation outcome framework. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This study will invite psychiatric patients and family members, clinical and community mental health service providers as the community team to develop a postdischarge suicide intervention strategy. The study will recruit 312 patients with psychotic symptoms and 312 patients with major depressive disorder discharged from Shenzhen Kangning Hospital (SKH) in a Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomised Trial. Participants will be initially randomised into two intervention groups to receive BCIs monthly and weekly, and they will be rerandomised into three intervention groups to receive BCIs monthly, biweekly and weekly at 3 months after discharge according to the change of their suicide risk. Follow-ups are scheduled at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after discharge. With the intention-to-treat approach, generalised estimating equation and survival analysis will be applied. This study will also collect qualitative and quantitative information on implementation and service outcomes from the community team. ETHICS/DISSEMINATION This study has received ethical approval from the Ethics Committee Review Board of SKH. All participants will provide written informed consent prior to enrolment. The findings of the study will be disseminated through peer-reviewed scientific journals, conference presentations. A project report will be submitted to the National Natural Science Foundation of China as the concluding report of this funded project, and to the mental health authorities in the Shenzhen to refine and apply evidence-based and pragmatic interventions into health systems for postdischarge suicide prevention. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT04907669.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huiming Liu
- Department of Public Health, Shenzhen Kangning Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| | - Guanjie Chen
- Department of Public Health, Shenzhen Kangning Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| | - Jinghua Li
- Sun Yat-sen Global Health Institute, Sun Yat-Sen University School of Public Health, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Chun Hao
- Sun Yat-sen Global Health Institute, Sun Yat-Sen University School of Public Health, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Bin Zhang
- Department of Public Health, Shenzhen Kangning Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| | - Yuanhan Bai
- Department of Bipolar Disorders, Shenzhen Kangning Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| | - Liangchen Song
- Department of Public Health, Shenzhen Kangning Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| | - Chang Chen
- Department of Public Health, Shenzhen Kangning Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| | - Haiyan Xie
- Department of Public Health, Shenzhen Kangning Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| | - Tiebang Liu
- Department of Public Health, Shenzhen Kangning Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| | - Eric D Caine
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Fengsu Hou
- Department of Public Health, Shenzhen Kangning Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
- Sun Yat-sen Global Health Institute, Sun Yat-Sen University School of Public Health, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Aggarwal S, Patton G, Berk M, Patel V. Psychosocial interventions for self-harm in low-income and middle-income countries: systematic review and theory of change. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2021; 56:1729-1750. [PMID: 33394070 PMCID: PMC7611648 DOI: 10.1007/s00127-020-02005-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2020] [Accepted: 11/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To synthesise the evidence on effectiveness, acceptability and the delivery mechanisms of psychosocial interventions for self-harm in low and middle income countries and to develop a pathway of change specific for self-harm interventions. METHOD Studies reporting one or more patient or implementation outcomes of a psychosocial intervention targeting self-harm and conducted in low- and middle-income countries were included. Taxonomy of treatment components and a theory of change map was created using information from the studies. RESULTS We identified thirteen studies including nine randomised controlled trials (RCT), three non-RCTs, and a single experimental case design study. A single study using postcard contact and another using cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) reported a reduction in self-harm attempts. Suicidal ideations were significantly reduced with CBT, volitional help sheets and postcard contact in different studies. Suicide risk assessment, problem solving and self-validation were the most frequently used elements in interventions. Goal-setting was the technique used most commonly. Cultural adaptations of psychotherapies were used in two studies. High attrition rates in psychotherapy trials, limited benefit of the delivery of treatment by non-specialist providers, and variable benefit observed using phone contact as a means to deliver intervention were other important findings. CONCLUSION There were no strong positive findings to draw definitive conclusions. Limited availability and evidence for culturally adapted interventions in self-harm, lack of evaluation of task sharing using evidence based interventions as well as a dearth in evaluation and reporting of various intervention delivery models in low- and middle-income countries were major literature gaps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shilpa Aggarwal
- Public Health Foundation of India (Centre for Chronic Conditions), New Delhi, India. .,Faculty of Health, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
| | - George Patton
- Murdoch Children’s Research Institute (Centre for Adolescent Health), Victoria, Australia
| | - Michael Berk
- IMPACT-The Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation, School of Medicine, Barwon Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia,Department of Psychiatry, Orygen (Centre for Youth Mental Health), Florey Institute for Neuroscience and Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Vikram Patel
- Harvard T H Chan School of Public Health, Global Health and Social Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Witt KG, Hetrick SE, Rajaram G, Hazell P, Taylor Salisbury TL, Townsend E, Hawton K. Psychosocial interventions for self-harm in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021; 4:CD013668. [PMID: 33884617 PMCID: PMC8094743 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013668.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Self-harm (SH; intentional self-poisoning or self-injury regardless of degree of suicidal intent or other types of motivation) is a growing problem in most counties, often repeated, and associated with suicide. There has been a substantial increase in both the number of trials and therapeutic approaches of psychosocial interventions for SH in adults. This review therefore updates a previous Cochrane Review (last published in 2016) on the role of psychosocial interventions in the treatment of SH in adults. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of psychosocial interventions for self-harm (SH) compared to comparison types of care (e.g. treatment-as-usual, routine psychiatric care, enhanced usual care, active comparator) for adults (aged 18 years or older) who engage in SH. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Common Mental Disorders Specialised Register, the Cochrane Library (Central Register of Controlled Trials [CENTRAL] and Cochrane Database of Systematic reviews [CDSR]), together with MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, and PsycINFO (to 4 July 2020). SELECTION CRITERIA We included all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing interventions of specific psychosocial treatments versus treatment-as-usual (TAU), routine psychiatric care, enhanced usual care (EUC), active comparator, or a combination of these, in the treatment of adults with a recent (within six months of trial entry) episode of SH resulting in presentation to hospital or clinical services. The primary outcome was the occurrence of a repeated episode of SH over a maximum follow-up period of two years. Secondary outcomes included treatment adherence, depression, hopelessness, general functioning, social functioning, suicidal ideation, and suicide. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We independently selected trials, extracted data, and appraised trial quality. For binary outcomes, we calculated odds ratio (ORs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). For continuous outcomes, we calculated mean differences (MDs) or standardised mean differences (SMDs) and 95% CIs. The overall quality of evidence for the primary outcome (i.e. repetition of SH at post-intervention) was appraised for each intervention using the GRADE approach. MAIN RESULTS We included data from 76 trials with a total of 21,414 participants. Participants in these trials were predominately female (61.9%) with a mean age of 31.8 years (standard deviation [SD] 11.7 years). On the basis of data from four trials, individual cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT)-based psychotherapy may reduce repetition of SH as compared to TAU or another comparator by the end of the intervention (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.12 to 1.02; N = 238; k = 4; GRADE: low certainty evidence), although there was imprecision in the effect estimate. At longer follow-up time points (e.g., 6- and 12-months) there was some evidence that individual CBT-based psychotherapy may reduce SH repetition. Whilst there may be a slightly lower rate of SH repetition for dialectical behaviour therapy (DBT) (66.0%) as compared to TAU or alternative psychotherapy (68.2%), the evidence remains uncertain as to whether DBT reduces absolute repetition of SH by the post-intervention assessment. On the basis of data from a single trial, mentalisation-based therapy (MBT) reduces repetition of SH and frequency of SH by the post-intervention assessment (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.73; N = 134; k = 1; GRADE: high-certainty evidence). A group-based emotion-regulation psychotherapy may also reduce repetition of SH by the post-intervention assessment based on evidence from two trials by the same author group (OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.88; N = 83; k = 2; moderate-certainty evidence). There is probably little to no effect for different variants of DBT on absolute repetition of SH, including DBT group-based skills training, DBT individual skills training, or an experimental form of DBT in which participants were given significantly longer cognitive exposure to stressful events. The evidence remains uncertain as to whether provision of information and support, based on the Suicide Trends in At-Risk Territories (START) and the SUicide-PREvention Multisite Intervention Study on Suicidal behaviors (SUPRE-MISS) models, have any effect on repetition of SH by the post-intervention assessment. There was no evidence of a difference for psychodynamic psychotherapy, case management, general practitioner (GP) management, remote contact interventions, and other multimodal interventions, or a variety of brief emergency department-based interventions. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Overall, there were significant methodological limitations across the trials included in this review. Given the moderate or very low quality of the available evidence, there is only uncertain evidence regarding a number of psychosocial interventions for adults who engage in SH. Psychosocial therapy based on CBT approaches may result in fewer individuals repeating SH at longer follow-up time points, although no such effect was found at the post-intervention assessment and the quality of evidence, according to the GRADE criteria, was low. Given findings in single trials, or trials by the same author group, both MBT and group-based emotion regulation therapy should be further developed and evaluated in adults. DBT may also lead to a reduction in frequency of SH. Other interventions were mostly evaluated in single trials of moderate to very low quality such that the evidence relating to the use of these interventions is inconclusive at present.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katrina G Witt
- Orygen, Parkville, Melbourne, Australia
- Centre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Sarah E Hetrick
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Gowri Rajaram
- Orygen, Parkville, Melbourne, Australia
- Centre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Philip Hazell
- Speciality of Psychiatry, University of Sydney School of Medicine, Sydney, Australia
| | - Tatiana L Taylor Salisbury
- Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Ellen Townsend
- Self-Harm Research Group, School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Keith Hawton
- Centre for Suicide Research, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
da Silva APC, Henriques MR, Rothes IA, Zortea T, Santos JC, Cuijpers P. Effects of psychosocial interventions among people cared for in emergency departments after a suicide attempt: a systematic review protocol. Syst Rev 2021; 10:68. [PMID: 33766137 PMCID: PMC7992994 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-021-01609-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2020] [Accepted: 02/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The care of the emergency department (ED) for a person after a suicide attempt can act as a protector against future suicidal behavior. For this reason, it is essential that the ED ensure an assistance that involves effective interventions in preventing suicidal behaviors. Among suicidal behaviors, it is known that suicide attempt is one of the most lethal risk factors for consummated suicide. In addition, the risk for further attempts is greater in the period from the immediate post-discharge up to 12 months after the last attempt. This makes the ED a key link in the suicide prevention chain. The purpose of this review is to investigate the effects of psychosocial interventions on suicide prevention, when applied in the ED after a suicide attempt. METHODS This systematic review protocol was built and registered with the collaboration of a multidisciplinary scientific team. The review will include randomized clinical studies, quasi-experimental trials, and comparative observational studies, all conducted with people (11 years old or more) who have received a psychosocial suicide prevention intervention initiated in the ED after a suicide attempt. The research will be conducted across databases such as Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and DARE. The repetition of a suicide attempt and death by suicide as primary outcomes will be analyzed. The eligibility of the studies and data extraction will be carried out by matched and blind researchers. The risk of bias will be addressed using appropriate instruments. The analyses and synthesis of the results will be both qualitative and quantitative. DISCUSSION From a public health point of view, suicide is in itself a public health problem and requires appropriate interventions at different levels of care in order to be prevented. Taking into account that a high percentage of people who died by suicide sought the ED for suicide attempt in the year before their death, the ED is a clinical context with a privileged potential to implement these interventions. Presently, several clinical studies seek to validate interventions to be adopted regarding the prevention of suicidal behavior. Current evidence indicates that different interventions must be strategically combined to reduce suicide attempts and their mortality. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO registration number CRD42019131040.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Paula Coutinho da Silva
- Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Porto, Portugal FPCEUP/Center for Psychology at University of Porto CPUP, Rua Alfredo Allen, 4200-392 Porto, Portugal
- Department of Clinical Nursing, Health Sciences Center, Federal University of Paraíba, Cidade Universitária, João Pessoa/PB, CEP: 58051-900 Brazil
| | - Margarida Rangel Henriques
- Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Porto, Portugal FPCEUP/Center for Psychology at University of Porto CPUP, Rua Alfredo Allen, 4200-392 Porto, Portugal
| | - Inês Areal Rothes
- Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Porto, Portugal FPCEUP/Center for Psychology at University of Porto CPUP, Rua Alfredo Allen, 4200-392 Porto, Portugal
| | - Tiago Zortea
- Suicidal Behaviour Research Laboratory, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Academic Centre, Gartnavel Royal Hospital, 1055 Great Western Road, Glasgow, Scotland G12 0XH UK
| | - José Carlos Santos
- Nursing School of Coimbra, Avenida Bissaya Barreto s/n, 3004-011 Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Pim Cuijpers
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1105, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Malakouti SK, Nojomi M, Ghanbari B, Rasouli N, Khaleghparast S, Farahani IG. Aftercare and Suicide Reattempt Prevention in Tehran, Iran. CRISIS 2021; 43:18-27. [PMID: 33563037 DOI: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000754] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Background: A previous suicide attempt is one of the strongest risk factors for subsequent suicide. Effective care following a suicide attempt may reduce the risk of suicide reattempts. Aims: We aimed to investigate the effect of a brief educational intervention and contact program on suicide reattempts. Method: This study was performed as a randomized clinical trial (RCT) recruiting 305 individuals who had attempted suicide (brief intervention and contact = 153 individuals, BIC; treatment as usual = 152 individuals, TAU) who were referred to Baharlu Hospital in Tehran. The SUPRE-MISS questionnaire and a discharge follow-up questionnaire were used for data collection. Cox proportional hazard models and log-rank tests were used to assess the association of the variable with the event (reattempt). Kaplan-Meier curves were used to depict the time to the event of reattempt. Results: In the BIC group, 11% of the individuals had attempted suicide once, and 25% of the TAU group had attempted suicide once (12.4%), twice (9.3%), and three times (3.8%), respectively. The results of Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated the mean time of reattempt in the BIC (0.76) and TAU groups (0.25) as the fourth and second months of follow-up, respectively (log rank, χ2 = 12.48, p < .001). The hazard ratio for the TAU group was 2.57 (95% CI [1.4, 5.9]). Limitations: Loss to follow-up due to stigma is one of the serious problems of follow-up services. Conclusion: Implementing a brief educational intervention and contact program on suicide reattempts is feasible and effective in reducing the rate of reattempt; however, it should be accommodated within the mental health services of the county.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seyed Kazem Malakouti
- Mental Health Research Center, School of Behavioral Sciences and Mental Health (Tehran Institute of Psychiatry), Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Marzieh Nojomi
- Preventive Medicine and Public Health Research Center, Department of Community and Family Medicine, Psychosocial Health Research Institute, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Behrooz Ghanbari
- Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Nafee Rasouli
- Mental Health Research Center, School of Behavioral Sciences and Mental Health (Tehran Institute of Psychiatry), Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Shiva Khaleghparast
- Rajaie Cardiovascular, Medical and Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Abstract
The risk of suicide is significant during the transition of care; the highest in the first few weeks after discharge from a healthcare facility. This systematic review summarizes the evidence for interventions providing care during this high-risk period. In January 2019, PubMed and Scopus were systematically searched using the search terms: Suicide AND (Hospital OR Emergency department) AND Discharge. Articles relevant to interventions targeting suicidal behaviors during the transition of care were selected after the title and abstract screening followed by full-text screening. This review article included 40 articles; with a total patient population of 24,568. The interventions included telephone contacts, letters, green cards, postcards, structured visits, and community outreach programs. An improvement in the engagement of patients in outpatient services was observed but the evidence for suicidal behaviors was conflicting. The reviewed interventions were efficacious in linking patients to outpatient services, reducing feelings of social isolation and helping patients in navigating the available community resources. For patients with repetitive suicidal behaviors, psychosocial interventions such as dialectical behavioral therapy can be helpful. Patients should be followed by targeted interventions based on risk categorization of the patients by using evidence-based tools.
Collapse
|
17
|
Reger MA, Gebhardt HM, Lee JM, Ammerman BA, Tucker RP, Matarazzo BB, Wood AE, Ruskin DA. Veteran Preferences for the Caring Contacts Suicide Prevention Intervention. Suicide Life Threat Behav 2019; 49:1439-1451. [PMID: 30451311 DOI: 10.1111/sltb.12528] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2018] [Accepted: 10/12/2018] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The Caring Contacts intervention has been implemented with a variety of methodologies. The purpose of this study was to examine high-risk inpatient preferences for the Caring Contacts intervention. METHOD Veteran psychiatric inpatients (N = 154) completed an anonymous patient preferences survey to obtain feedback on Caring Contact methods such as message wording, preferred correspondent, frequency of contact, duration of the intervention, imagery, and mailing modality. RESULTS Eighty-five percent of veterans Agreed or Strongly Agreed that they would like to receive Caring Contacts from at least one of the correspondent options, with inpatient or outpatient mental health counselor, or primary care physician most preferred. Example messages based on prior studies were overwhelmingly rated as caring and helpful; 84% believed that Caring Contacts could help suicidal individuals. Letters or postcards sent through postal mail were preferred over e-mail or text messages. Participants most commonly thought Caring Contacts should be sent monthly for a period of a year. CONCLUSIONS The results of this study suggest that most high-risk veterans would perceive Caring Contacts as helpful and caring. The results provide several practical, helpful tips for programs seeking to establish a Caring Contacts program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark A Reger
- VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA.,Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Jacob M Lee
- VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Raymond P Tucker
- Department of Psychology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA
| | - Bridget B Matarazzo
- Rocky Mountain Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center (MIRECC) for Suicide Prevention, Denver, CO, USA.,Department of Psychiatry, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Amanda E Wood
- VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA.,Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - David A Ruskin
- VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA.,Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Sall J, Brenner L, Millikan Bell AM, Colston MJ. Assessment and Management of Patients at Risk for Suicide: Synopsis of the 2019 U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs and U.S. Department of Defense Clinical Practice Guidelines. Ann Intern Med 2019; 171:343-353. [PMID: 31450237 DOI: 10.7326/m19-0687] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
DESCRIPTION In May 2019, the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) approved an update to the 2013 joint clinical practice guideline for assessing and managing patients who are at risk for suicide. This guideline provides health care providers with a framework by which to screen for, evaluate, treat, and manage the individual needs and preferences of VA and DoD patients who may be at risk for suicide. METHODS In January 2018, the VA/DoD Evidence-Based Practice Work Group convened to develop a joint VA/DoD guideline including clinical stakeholders and conforming to the National Academy of Medicine's tenets for trustworthy clinical practice guidelines. The guideline panel drafted key questions, systematically searched and evaluated the literature through April 2018, created algorithms, and advanced 22 recommendations in accordance with the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) system. RECOMMENDATIONS This synopsis, which includes 3 clinical practice algorithms, summarizes the key recommendations of the guideline related to screening and evaluation, risk management and treatment, and other management methods. Risk management and treatment recommendations address both pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic approaches for patients with suicidal ideation and behavior. Other management methods address lethal means safety (such as restricting access to firearms, poisons, and medications and installing barriers to prevent jumping from lethal heights) and population health strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Sall
- Veterans Health Administration, Washington, DC, and Texas A&M University, Corpus Christi, Texas (J.S.)
| | - Lisa Brenner
- Rocky Mountain Mental Illness Research Education and Clinical Center, Denver, Colorado, and University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado (L.B.)
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Comtois KA, Kerbrat AH, DeCou CR, Atkins DC, Majeres JJ, Baker JC, Ries RK. Effect of Augmenting Standard Care for Military Personnel With Brief Caring Text Messages for Suicide Prevention: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Psychiatry 2019; 76:474-483. [PMID: 30758491 PMCID: PMC6495345 DOI: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.4530] [Citation(s) in RCA: 83] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Accessible and cost-effective interventions for suicidality are needed to address high rates of suicidal behavior among military service members. Caring Contacts are brief periodic messages that express unconditional care and concern and have been previously shown to prevent suicide deaths, attempts, ideation, and hospitalizations. OBJECTIVE To test the effectiveness of augmenting standard military health care with Caring Contacts delivered via text message to reduce suicidal thoughts and behaviors over 12 months. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This randomized clinical trial was conducted at 3 military installations in the southern and western United States. Soldiers and Marines identified as being at risk of suicide were recruited between April 2013 and September 2016. The final follow-up was in September 2017. INTERVENTIONS Both groups received standard care, and the Caring Contacts group also received consisted of 11 text messages delivered on day 1, at week 1, at months 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12, and on participants' birthdays. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Primary outcomes were current suicidal ideation and suicide risk incidents (hospitalization or medical evacuation). Secondary outcomes were worst-point suicidal ideation, emergency department visits, and suicide attempts. Suicidal ideation was measured by the Scale for Suicide Ideation, suicide risk incidents, and emergency department visits by the Treatment History Interview; attempted suicide was measured by the Suicide Attempt Self-Injury Count. RESULTS Among 658 randomized participants (329 randomizely assigned to each group), data were analyzed for 657 individuals (mean [SD] age, 25.2 [6.1] years; 539 men [82.0%]). All participants reported suicidal ideation at baseline, and 291 (44.3%) had previously attempted suicide. Of the 657 participants, 461 (70.2%) were assessed at 12 months. Primary outcomes were nonsignificant. There was no significant effect on likelihood or severity of current suicidal ideation or likelihood of a suicide risk incident; there was also no effect on emergency department visits. However, participants who received Caring Contacts (172 of 216 participants [79.6%]) had lower odds than those receiving standard care alone (179 of 204 participants [87.7%]) of experiencing any suicidal ideation between baseline and follow-up (odds ratio, 0.56 [95% CI, 0.33-0.95]; P = .03) and fewer had attempted suicide since baseline (21 of 233 [9.0%] in the group receiving Caring Contacts vs 34 of 228 [14.9%] in the standard-care group; odds ratio, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.29-0.92]; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This trial provides inconsistent results on the effectiveness of caring text messages between primary and secondary outcomes, but this inexpensive and scalable intervention offers promise for preventing suicide attempts and ideation in military personnel. Additional research is needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01829620.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine Anne Comtois
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Amanda H. Kerbrat
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Christopher R. DeCou
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - David C. Atkins
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
| | | | - Justin C. Baker
- Naval Medical Center Camp Lejeune, Camp Lejeune, North Carolina
| | - Richard K. Ries
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Inagaki M, Kawashima Y, Yonemoto N, Yamada M. Active contact and follow-up interventions to prevent repeat suicide attempts during high-risk periods among patients admitted to emergency departments for suicidal behavior: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Psychiatry 2019; 19:44. [PMID: 30683075 PMCID: PMC6347824 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-019-2017-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2017] [Accepted: 01/07/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is evidence that several intervention types, including psychotherapy, reduce repeat suicide attempts. However, these interventions are less applicable to the heterogeneous patients admitted to emergency departments (EDs). The risk of a repeat suicide attempt is especially high in the first 6 months after the initial attempt. Therefore, it is particularly important to develop effective ED interventions to prevent repeat suicide attempts during this 6-month period. METHODS We systematically reviewed randomized controlled trials of ED-initiated interventions for suicidal patients admitted to EDs using the databases MEDLINE, PsychoINFO, CINAHL, and EMBASE up to January 2015 in accordance with an a priori published protocol (PROSPERO: CRD42013005463). Interventions were categorized into four types, including active contact and follow-up interventions (intensive care plus outreach, brief interventions and contact, letter/postcard, telephone, and composite of letter/postcard and telephone), and a meta-analysis was conducted to determine pooled relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of a repeat suicide attempt within 6 months. RESULTS Of the 28 selected trials, 14 were active contact and follow-up interventions. Two of these trials (n = 984) reported results at 6 months (pooled RR = 0.48; 95% CI: 0.31 to 0.76). There were not enough trials of other interventions to perform meta-analysis. Some trials included in the meta-analysis were judged as showing risk of bias. CONCLUSION Active contact and follow-up interventions are recommended for suicidal patients admitted to an ED to prevent repeat suicide attempts during the highest-risk period of 6 months. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42013005463 (27 August 2013).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masatoshi Inagaki
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Shimane University, 89-1, Enya-cho, Izumo-shi, Shimane, 693-8501, Japan.
| | - Yoshitaka Kawashima
- 0000 0000 9832 2227grid.416859.7Department of Neuropsychopharmacology, National Institute of Mental Health, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, 4-1-1, Ogawahigashimachi, Kodaira, Tokyo, 187-8553 Japan
| | - Naohiro Yonemoto
- 0000 0004 0372 2033grid.258799.8Department of Biostatistics, Kyoto University School of Public Health, Yoshida Konoe-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8501 Japan
| | - Mitsuhiko Yamada
- 0000 0000 9832 2227grid.416859.7Department of Neuropsychopharmacology, National Institute of Mental Health, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, 4-1-1, Ogawahigashimachi, Kodaira, Tokyo, 187-8553 Japan
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Denchev P, Pearson JL, Allen MH, Claassen CA, Currier GW, Zatzick DF, Schoenbaum M. Modeling the Cost-Effectiveness of Interventions to Reduce Suicide Risk Among Hospital Emergency Department Patients. Psychiatr Serv 2018; 69:23-31. [PMID: 28945181 PMCID: PMC5750130 DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.201600351] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study estimated the expected cost-effectiveness and population impact of outpatient interventions to reduce suicide risk among patients presenting to general hospital emergency departments (EDs), compared with usual care. Several such interventions have been found efficacious, but none is yet widespread, and the cost-effectiveness of population-based implementation is unknown. METHODS Modeled cost-effectiveness analysis compared three ED-initiated suicide prevention interventions previously found to be efficacious-follow-up via postcards or caring letters, follow-up via telephone outreach, and suicide-focused cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT)-with usual care. Primary outcomes were treatment costs, suicides, and life-years saved, evaluated over the year after the index ED visit. RESULTS Compared with usual care, adding postcards improved outcomes and reduced costs. Adding telephone outreach and suicide-focused CBT, respectively, improved outcomes at a mean incremental cost of $4,300 and $18,800 per life-year saved, respectively. Monte Carlo simulation (1,000 repetitions) revealed the chance of incremental cost-effectiveness to be a certainty for all three interventions, assuming societal willingness to pay ≥$50,000 per life-year. These main findings were robust to various sensitivity analyses, including conservative assumptions about effect size and incremental costs. Population impact was limited by low sensitivity of detecting ED patients' suicide risk, and health care delivery inefficiencies. CONCLUSIONS The highly favorable cost-effectiveness found for each outpatient intervention provides a strong basis for widespread implementation of any or all of the interventions. The estimated population benefits of doing so would be enhanced by increasing the sensitivity of suicide risk detection among individuals presenting to general hospital EDs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Denchev
- At the time of this research, Dr. Denchev was with the Office of Science Policy, Planning and Communication, National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), Bethesda, Maryland. Dr. Pearson and Dr. Schoenbaum are with the Division of Services and Intervention Research, NIMH, Bethesda. Dr. Allen is with the Department of Psychiatry, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Aurora, and with Rocky Mountain Crisis Partners, Denver. Dr. Claassen is with the Department of Psychiatry, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth. Dr. Currier is with the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa. Dr. Zatzick is with the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington and Harborview Medical Center, Seattle
| | - Jane L Pearson
- At the time of this research, Dr. Denchev was with the Office of Science Policy, Planning and Communication, National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), Bethesda, Maryland. Dr. Pearson and Dr. Schoenbaum are with the Division of Services and Intervention Research, NIMH, Bethesda. Dr. Allen is with the Department of Psychiatry, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Aurora, and with Rocky Mountain Crisis Partners, Denver. Dr. Claassen is with the Department of Psychiatry, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth. Dr. Currier is with the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa. Dr. Zatzick is with the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington and Harborview Medical Center, Seattle
| | - Michael H Allen
- At the time of this research, Dr. Denchev was with the Office of Science Policy, Planning and Communication, National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), Bethesda, Maryland. Dr. Pearson and Dr. Schoenbaum are with the Division of Services and Intervention Research, NIMH, Bethesda. Dr. Allen is with the Department of Psychiatry, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Aurora, and with Rocky Mountain Crisis Partners, Denver. Dr. Claassen is with the Department of Psychiatry, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth. Dr. Currier is with the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa. Dr. Zatzick is with the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington and Harborview Medical Center, Seattle
| | - Cynthia A Claassen
- At the time of this research, Dr. Denchev was with the Office of Science Policy, Planning and Communication, National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), Bethesda, Maryland. Dr. Pearson and Dr. Schoenbaum are with the Division of Services and Intervention Research, NIMH, Bethesda. Dr. Allen is with the Department of Psychiatry, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Aurora, and with Rocky Mountain Crisis Partners, Denver. Dr. Claassen is with the Department of Psychiatry, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth. Dr. Currier is with the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa. Dr. Zatzick is with the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington and Harborview Medical Center, Seattle
| | - Glenn W Currier
- At the time of this research, Dr. Denchev was with the Office of Science Policy, Planning and Communication, National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), Bethesda, Maryland. Dr. Pearson and Dr. Schoenbaum are with the Division of Services and Intervention Research, NIMH, Bethesda. Dr. Allen is with the Department of Psychiatry, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Aurora, and with Rocky Mountain Crisis Partners, Denver. Dr. Claassen is with the Department of Psychiatry, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth. Dr. Currier is with the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa. Dr. Zatzick is with the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington and Harborview Medical Center, Seattle
| | - Douglas F Zatzick
- At the time of this research, Dr. Denchev was with the Office of Science Policy, Planning and Communication, National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), Bethesda, Maryland. Dr. Pearson and Dr. Schoenbaum are with the Division of Services and Intervention Research, NIMH, Bethesda. Dr. Allen is with the Department of Psychiatry, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Aurora, and with Rocky Mountain Crisis Partners, Denver. Dr. Claassen is with the Department of Psychiatry, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth. Dr. Currier is with the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa. Dr. Zatzick is with the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington and Harborview Medical Center, Seattle
| | - Michael Schoenbaum
- At the time of this research, Dr. Denchev was with the Office of Science Policy, Planning and Communication, National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), Bethesda, Maryland. Dr. Pearson and Dr. Schoenbaum are with the Division of Services and Intervention Research, NIMH, Bethesda. Dr. Allen is with the Department of Psychiatry, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Aurora, and with Rocky Mountain Crisis Partners, Denver. Dr. Claassen is with the Department of Psychiatry, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth. Dr. Currier is with the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa. Dr. Zatzick is with the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington and Harborview Medical Center, Seattle
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Falcone G, Nardella A, Lamis DA, Erbuto D, Girardi P, Pompili M. Taking care of suicidal patients with new technologies and reaching-out means in the post-discharge period. World J Psychiatry 2017; 7:163-176. [PMID: 29043154 PMCID: PMC5632601 DOI: 10.5498/wjp.v7.i3.163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2017] [Revised: 05/07/2017] [Accepted: 07/17/2017] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Suicide is a global public health problem with over one million people dying by suicide each year worldwide. Research efforts have focused on developing and testing novel suicide prevention strategies employing recent technological advances. In order to provide a review regarding the role of new technologies (e.g., postcards/letters, text messages, crisis cards, telephone contacts, online interventions) in suicide prevention, we searched PubMed, ScienceDirect, ResearchGate, and Crisis to identify all papers in English from 1977 to 2016. Our results indicated that brief contact interventions show promise in reducing the number of episodes of repeated self-harm and/or suicide attempts following discharge from the Emergency Department or psychiatric units. Innovative methods of contact (e.g., text messages) are easily implemented by clinicians and received by patients in the period of post discharge and have been shown to be beneficial. However, more research employing randomized clinical trials investigating the potential benefits of these novel suicide prevention methods is warranted. Future researchers should continue improving and testing new technologies in the prevention of suicide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulia Falcone
- Psychiatry Residency Training Program, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00189 Rome, Italy
| | - Adele Nardella
- Psychiatry Residency Training Program, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00189 Rome, Italy
| | - Dorian A Lamis
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30303, United States
| | - Denise Erbuto
- Department of Neurosciences, Mental Health and Sensory Organs, Suicide Prevention Center, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, 00189 Rome, Italy
| | - Paolo Girardi
- Department of Neurosciences, Mental Health and Sensory Organs, Suicide Prevention Center, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, 00189 Rome, Italy
| | - Maurizio Pompili
- Department of Neurosciences, Mental Health and Sensory Organs, Suicide Prevention Center, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, 00189 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Meerwijk EL, Parekh A, Oquendo MA, Allen IE, Franck LS, Lee KA. Direct versus indirect psychosocial and behavioural interventions to prevent suicide and suicide attempts: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Psychiatry 2016; 3:544-54. [PMID: 27017086 DOI: 10.1016/s2215-0366(16)00064-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 94] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2015] [Revised: 01/26/2016] [Accepted: 02/09/2016] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Psychosocial and behavioural interventions that address suicidal thoughts and behaviour during treatment (direct interventions) might be more effective in preventing suicide and suicide attempts than indirect interventions that address symptoms associated with suicidal behaviour only (eg, hopelessness, depression, anxiety, quality of life). To test this hypothesis, we did a systematic review and meta-analysis of psychosocial and behavioural interventions aimed at preventing suicide and suicide attempts. METHODS For this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched MEDLINE and PsycINFO from inception to Dec 25, 2015, for randomised controlled trials that reported suicides or suicide attempts as an outcome, irrespective of participants' diagnoses or the publication language. We excluded studies with pharmacological or device-based interventions, those that targeted communities or clinicians, primary prevention trials, and trials that reported events of non-suicidal self-injury as suicide attempts. Trials that had no suicides or suicide attempts in both groups were also excluded. Data were extracted by one investigator and independently verified by a second investigator. We used random-effects models of the odds ratio (OR) based on a pooled measure of suicides and the number of individuals who attempted suicide, immediately post-treatment and at longer-term follow-up. FINDINGS Of 2024 unique abstracts screened, 53 articles met eligibility criteria and reported on 44 studies; 31 studies provided post-treatment data with 6658 intervention group participants and 6711 control group participants at baseline, and 29 studies provided follow-up data. The post-treatment difference between direct interventions and indirect interventions did not reach statistical significance at the 0·05 level (OR 0·62 [95% CI 0·45-0·87] vs 0·93 [0·77-1·12], p=0·06) and represented a large effect size (Cohen's d=0·77). At longer-term follow-up, the difference was not significant (OR 0·65 [0·46-0·91] vs 0·82 [0·70-0·96], p=0·25) but still represented a medium effect size (Cohen's d=0·47). These effect sizes emphasise the clinical importance of direct interventions. Post-hoc subgroup and sensitivity analyses showed that our results are robust and unlikely to be notably affected by between-study heterogeneity or publication bias. INTERPRETATION Psychosocial and behavioural interventions that directly address suicidal thoughts and behaviour are effective immediately post-treatment and long term, whereas treatments indirectly addressing these components are only effective long term. Moreover, although the differences shown between direct and indirect strategies were non-significant, the difference in favour of direct interventions represented a large post-treatment improvement and medium improvement at longer-term follow-up. On the basis of these findings, clinicians working with patients at risk of suicide should address suicidal thoughts and behaviours with the patient directly. Although direct interventions are effective, they are not sufficient, and additional efforts are needed to further reduce death by suicide and suicide attempts. Continued patient contact might be necessary to retain long-term effectiveness. FUNDING National Institute of Nursing Research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esther L Meerwijk
- Department of Family Health Care Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| | - Amrita Parekh
- Public Health Foundation of India, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | | | - I Elaine Allen
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Linda S Franck
- Department of Family Health Care Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Kathryn A Lee
- Department of Family Health Care Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Hawton K, Witt KG, Taylor Salisbury TL, Arensman E, Gunnell D, Hazell P, Townsend E, van Heeringen K. Psychosocial interventions for self-harm in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; 2016:CD012189. [PMID: 27168519 PMCID: PMC8786273 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 98] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Self-harm (SH; intentional self-poisoning or self-injury) is common, often repeated, and associated with suicide. This is an update of a broader Cochrane review first published in 1998, previously updated in 1999, and now split into three separate reviews. This review focuses on psychosocial interventions in adults who engage in self-harm. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of specific psychosocial treatments versus treatment as usual, enhanced usual care or other forms of psychological therapy, in adults following SH. SEARCH METHODS The Cochrane Depression, Anxiety and Neurosis Group (CCDAN) trials coordinator searched the CCDAN Clinical Trials Register (to 29 April 2015). This register includes relevant randomised controlled trials (RCTs) from: the Cochrane Library (all years), MEDLINE (1950 to date), EMBASE (1974 to date), and PsycINFO (1967 to date). SELECTION CRITERIA We included RCTs comparing psychosocial treatments with treatment as usual (TAU), enhanced usual care (EUC) or alternative treatments in adults with a recent (within six months) episode of SH resulting in presentation to clinical services. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used Cochrane's standard methodological procedures. MAIN RESULTS We included 55 trials, with a total of 17,699 participants. Eighteen trials investigated cognitive-behavioural-based psychotherapy (CBT-based psychotherapy; comprising cognitive-behavioural, problem-solving therapy or both). Nine investigated interventions for multiple repetition of SH/probable personality disorder, comprising emotion-regulation group-based psychotherapy, mentalisation, and dialectical behaviour therapy (DBT). Four investigated case management, and 11 examined remote contact interventions (postcards, emergency cards, telephone contact). Most other interventions were evaluated in only single small trials of moderate to very low quality.There was a significant treatment effect for CBT-based psychotherapy compared to TAU at final follow-up in terms of fewer participants repeating SH (odds ratio (OR) 0.70, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.55 to 0.88; number of studies k = 17; N = 2665; GRADE: low quality evidence), but with no reduction in frequency of SH (mean difference (MD) -0.21, 95% CI -0.68 to 0.26; k = 6; N = 594; GRADE: low quality).For interventions typically delivered to individuals with a history of multiple episodes of SH/probable personality disorder, group-based emotion-regulation psychotherapy and mentalisation were associated with significantly reduced repetition when compared to TAU: group-based emotion-regulation psychotherapy (OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.88; k = 2; N = 83; GRADE: low quality), mentalisation (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.73; k = 1; N = 134; GRADE: moderate quality). Compared with TAU, dialectical behaviour therapy (DBT) showed a significant reduction in frequency of SH at final follow-up (MD -18.82, 95% CI -36.68 to -0.95; k = 3; N = 292; GRADE: low quality) but not in the proportion of individuals repeating SH (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.21 to 1.59, k = 3; N = 247; GRADE: low quality). Compared with an alternative form of psychological therapy, DBT-oriented therapy was also associated with a significant treatment effect for repetition of SH at final follow-up (OR 0.05, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.49; k = 1; N = 24; GRADE: low quality). However, neither DBT vs 'treatment by expert' (OR 1.18, 95% CI 0.35 to 3.95; k = 1; N = 97; GRADE: very low quality) nor prolonged exposure DBT vs standard exposure DBT (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.08 to 5.68; k = 1; N =18; GRADE: low quality) were associated with a significant reduction in repetition of SH.Case management was not associated with a significant reduction in repetition of SH at post intervention compared to either TAU or enhanced usual care (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.47 to 1.30; k = 4; N = 1608; GRADE: moderate quality). Continuity of care by the same therapist vs a different therapist was also not associated with a significant treatment effect for repetition (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.07 to 1.10; k = 1; N = 136; GRADE: very low quality). None of the following remote contact interventions were associated with fewer participants repeating SH compared with TAU: adherence enhancement (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.32 to 1.02; k = 1; N = 391; GRADE: low quality), mixed multimodal interventions (comprising psychological therapy and remote contact-based interventions) (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.43; k = 1 study; N = 684; GRADE: low quality), including a culturally adapted form of this intervention (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.44 to 1.55; k = 1; N = 167; GRADE: low quality), postcards (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.23; k = 4; N = 3277; GRADE: very low quality), emergency cards (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.31 to 2.14; k = 2; N = 1039; GRADE: low quality), general practitioner's letter (OR 1.15, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.44; k = 1; N = 1932; GRADE: moderate quality), telephone contact (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.32; k = 3; N = 840; GRADE: very low quality), and mobile telephone-based psychological therapy (OR not estimable due to zero cell counts; GRADE: low quality).None of the following mixed interventions were associated with reduced repetition of SH compared to either alternative forms of psychological therapy: interpersonal problem-solving skills training, behaviour therapy, home-based problem-solving therapy, long-term psychotherapy; or to TAU: provision of information and support, treatment for alcohol misuse, intensive inpatient and community treatment, general hospital admission, or intensive outpatient treatment.We had only limited evidence on whether the intervention had different effects in men and women. Data on adverse effects, other than planned outcomes relating to suicidal behaviour, were not reported. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS CBT-based psychological therapy can result in fewer individuals repeating SH; however, the quality of this evidence, assessed using GRADE criteria, ranged between moderate and low. Dialectical behaviour therapy for people with multiple episodes of SH/probable personality disorder may lead to a reduction in frequency of SH, but this finding is based on low quality evidence. Case management and remote contact interventions did not appear to have any benefits in terms of reducing repetition of SH. Other therapeutic approaches were mostly evaluated in single trials of moderate to very low quality such that the evidence relating to these interventions is inconclusive.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keith Hawton
- Centre for Suicide Research, University Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, UK, OX3 7JX
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|