ST2 in heart failure with preserved and reduced ejection fraction

Plasma soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1, placental growth factor, and vascular endothelial growth factor system gene variants as predictors of survival in heart failure

AIMS

Soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 (sFlt-1) and placental growth factor (PlGF), components of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) system, play key roles in angiogenesis. Reports of elevated plasma levels of sFlt-1 and PlGF in coronary heart disease and heart failure (HF) led us to investigate their utility, and VEGF system gene single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), as prognostic biomarkers in HF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

ELISA assays for sFlt-1, PlGF and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) were performed on baseline plasma samples from the PEOPLE cohort (n = 890), a study of outcomes among patients after an episode of acute decompensated HF. Eight SNPs potentially associated with sFlt-1 or PlGF levels were genotyped. sFlt-1 and PlGF were assayed in 201 subjects from the Canterbury Healthy Volunteers Study (CHVS) matched to PEOPLE participants. All-cause death was the major endpoint for clinical outcome considered. In PEOPLE participants, mean plasma levels for both sFlt-1 (125 ± 2.01 pg/ml) and PlGF (17.5 ± 0.21 pg/ml) were higher (both p < 0.044) than in the CHVS cohort (81.2 ± 1.31 pg/ml and 15.5 ± 0.32 pg/ml, respectively). sFlt-1 was higher in HF with reduced ejection fraction compared to HF with preserved ejection fraction (p = 0.005). The PGF gene SNP rs2268616 was univariately associated with death (p = 0.016), and was also associated with PlGF levels, as was rs2268614 genotype. Cox proportional hazards modelling (n = 695, 246 deaths) showed plasma sFlt-1, but not PlGF, predicted survival (hazard ratio 6.44, 95% confidence interval 2.57-16.1; p < 0.001) in PEOPLE, independent of age, NT-proBNP, ischaemic aetiology, diabetic status and beta-blocker therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Plasma sFlt-1 concentrations have potential as an independent predictor of survival and may be complementary to established prognostic biomarkers in HF.

Association of NT-proBNP and sST2 with Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction and Oxidative Stress in Patients with Stable Dilated Cardiomyopathy

The aim of this study was to analyze the relationship between levels of sST2, NT-proBNP and oxidative stress markers in patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) due to non-ischemic cardiomyopathy. A total of 88 patients with HFrEF were divided into four groups based on left ventricular ejection fraction (≤25% and >25%) and NYHA functional class (group 1-LVEF > 25% and NYHA class I or II; group 2-LVEF > 25% and NYHA class III or IV; group III-LVEF ≤ 25% and NYHA class I or II; group IV-LVEF ≤ 25% and NYHA class III or IV). In 39 (44.32%) patients LVEF was reduced below 25%, and 22 of them (56.41%) were in NYHA functional class III/IV. Of the 49 (55.68%) patients with LVEF ≥ 25%, only 18.37% were in NYHA functional class III/IV (p < 0.001). Patients with LVEF ≥ 25% had lower levels of NT-proBNP, total oxidant status (TOS), total antioxidant capacity (TAC), and oxidative stress index (OSI). The levels of NT-proBNP but not sST-2 correlated positively with NYHA functional class (p < 0.001) and negatively with LVEF (p < 0.001). The levels of sST-2 were associated with increased TAC (p = 0.009) and uric acid (p = 0.040). These findings indicate that only NT-proBNP was related to the severity of heart failure, whereas sST2 correlated with total antioxidant capacity. Therefore, in stable patients with HFrEF due to dilated cardiomyopathy, sST2 may be an additional biomarker reflecting the redox status, but not the severity of heart failure.

Soluble ST2 in Heart Failure: A Clinical Role beyond B-Type Natriuretic Peptide

Soluble (s)ST2 has been proposed as a useful biomarker for heart failure (HF) patient management. Myocardial damage or mechanical stress stimulate sST2 release. ST2 competes with a membrane bound receptor (ST2 ligand, or ST2L) for interleukin-33 (IL-33) binding, inhibiting the effects induced by the ST2L/IL-33 interaction so that excessive sST2 may contribute to myocardial fibrosis and ventricular remodeling. Compared to natriuretic peptides (NPs), sST2 concentration is not substantially affected by age, sex, body mass index, kidney function, atrial fibrillation, anemia, or HF etiology, and has low intra-individual variation. Its prognostic role as an independent marker is well reported in the literature. However, there is a gap on its use in combination with NPs, currently the only biomarkers recommended by European and American guidelines for HF management. Reflecting the activation of two distinct biological systems, a benefit from the use of sST2 and NP in combination is advocated. The aim of this review is to report the current scientific knowledge on sST2 in the acute and chronic HF settings with a particular attention to its additive role to natriuretic peptides (NPs).

Interleukin-33/sST2: Dynamic assessment in patients with acute coronary syndrome

PURPOSE

Interleukin (IL)-33 and its soluble receptor ST2 (sST2) play a crucial role in the immune response. sST2 has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration as a prognostic biomarker of mortality in chronic heart failure patients, however, the role of IL-33 and sST2 in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease remains unclear. The aim of this study was to measure serum level of IL-33 and sST2 of patients at the onset of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and 3 months after primary percutaneous revascularization.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty patients were divided into ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) group, non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and unstable angina (UA) group. IL-33 and sST2 level were measured with ELISA. Additionally, IL-33 expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), was evaluated.

RESULTS

All ACS patients had a significantly lower level of sST2 3 months after ACS as compared to the baseline (p ​< ​0.039). The STEMI patients had higher serum levels of IL-33 at the moment of ACS as compared to 3 months after the event, with an average decrease of 17.87 ​pg/ml (p ​< ​0.007). Conversely, sST2 serum levels were still high after 3 months following an ACS in STEMI patients. ROC curve demonstrated that increased IL-33 serum level could be STEMI predictor.

CONCLUSIONS

The assessment of the baseline and dynamics of changes in IL-33 and sST2 concentrations in patients with ACS may be important for the diagnostic process and may help in understanding of how the immune mechanisms work at the moment of an ACS event.

Postmortem biochemical analysis of soluble ST2 in the pericardial fluid of patients with sudden cardiac death caused by ischemic heart disease: a pilot study

Soluble growth stimulation expressed gene 2 protein (sST2) is a myocardial protein induced by biomechanical stress. sST2 is widely present in the serum of patients with heart failure and is recommended as an important indicator to predict adverse outcomes in these patients. However, no postmortem biochemical analysis of sST2 in forensic practice has been reported. The present pilot study aimed to investigate the expression of sST2 in the pericardial fluid of patients with sudden cardiac death (SCD) caused by ischemic heart disease (IHD). In addition, to explore the relationship of sST2 with CK-MB, cTnT, and NT-proBNP, which have been proven to be auxiliary biomarkers for the diagnosis of SCD, we analyzed CK-MB, cTnT, NT-proBNP, and sST2 levels in twenty-one pericardial fluid samples from the Center of Forensic Investigation, China Medical University, with a Roche cobas e 411 electrochemiluminescence automatic immunoassay system and ST2/IL-33R Valukine™ enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit. The levels of sST2 in the pericardial fluid of patients with SCD caused by IHD were significantly increased (P < 0.01) and positively correlated with CK-MB and NT-proBNP (P < 0.0001). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis indicated that the combined measurement of sST2 and NT-proBNP has a higher diagnostic value for SCD caused by IHD than the measurement of either indicator alone. This study preliminarily demonstrated that sST2 in the pericardial fluid was significantly increased in patients with SCD caused by IHD and might be used as a novel auxiliary biomarker for postmortem diagnosis of SCD in forensic practice.

Could Endothelin-1 Be a Promising Neurohormonal Biomarker in Acute Heart Failure?

Acute heart failure (AHF) is a life-threatening condition with high morbidity and mortality. Even though this pathology has been extensively researched, there are still challenges in establishing an accurate and early diagnosis, determining the long- and short-term prognosis and choosing a targeted therapeutic strategy. The use of reliable biomarkers to support clinical judgment has been shown to improve the management of AHF patients. Despite a large pool of interesting candidate biomarkers, endothelin-1 (ET-1) appears to be involved in multiple aspects of AHF pathogenesis that include neurohormonal activation, cardiac remodeling, endothelial dysfunction, inflammation, atherosclerosis and alteration of the renal function. Since its discovery, numerous studies have shown that the level of ET-1 is associated with the severity of symptoms and cardiac dysfunction in this pathology. The purpose of this paper is to review the existing information on ET-1 and answer the question of whether this neurohormone could be a promising biomarker in AHF.

Advances in congestive heart failure biomarkers

Congestive heart failure (CHF) is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the elderly worldwide. Although many biomarkers associated with in heart failure, these are generally prognostic and identify patients with moderate and severe disease. Unfortunately, the role of biomarkers in decision making for early and advanced heart failure remains largely unexplored. Previous studies suggest the natriuretic peptides have the potential to improve the diagnosis of heart failure, but they still have significant limitations related to cut-off values. Although some promising cardiac biomarkers have emerged, comprehensive data from large cohort studies is lacking. The utility of multiple biomarkers that reflect various pathophysiologic pathways are increasingly being explored in heart failure risk stratification and to diagnose disease conditions promptly and accurately. MicroRNAs serve as mediators and/or regulators of renin-angiotensin-induced cardiac remodeling by directly targeting enzymes, receptors and signaling molecules. The role of miRNA in HF diagnosis is a promising area of research and further exploration may offer both diagnostic and prognostic applications and phenotype-specific targets. In this review, we provide insight into the classification of different biochemical and molecular markers associated with CHF, examine clinical usefulness in CHF and highlight the most clinically relevant.

Detection of soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 and N-terminal B-type natriuretic peptide in a rat model of aortic regurgitation: differential responses to omecamtiv mecarbil

OBJECTIVES

Both N-terminal fragment of B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and soluble isoform of ST2 (sST2) have been identified as biomarkers of heart failure. We evaluated the plasma levels of NT-proBNP and sST2 in a rat model of severe aortic valve regurgitation (AR) and correlated these findings with echocardiographic measurements. We also examined the impact of omecamtiv mecarbil (OM) on these parameters.

METHODS

The plasma levels of NT-proBNP and sST2 were measured in 18 rats both before and 2 months after surgical induction of AR, and at these same time points, in six rats assigned to a sham-procedure control group. Plasma biomarkers were then measured again after infusion of OM or placebo in rats with AR (n=8 and 10, respectively) and OM alone in the sham control rats (n=6). Echocardiographic measurements were collected before and 2 months after induction of AR.

RESULTS

Our results revealed increased levels of plasma NT-proBNP (219 ± 34 pg/mL vs. 429 ± 374 pg/mL; p<0.001) in rats with AR at day 7 after infusion of placebo, whereas plasma levels of sST2 were higher in this cohort after infusion of either OM or placebo. We identified a significant positive correlation between plasma sST2 with posterior wall thickness in diastole (r=0.34, p<0.05) and total body weight (r=0.45, p<0.01) in rats with surgically induced AR.

CONCLUSIONS

Because sST2 increased markedly, whereas NT-proBNP remained unchanged, when OM was administered, we hypothesize that sST2 has a distinct capability to detect deleterious effects of passive muscle tension, not reliably assessed by NT-proBNP, in the setting of AR.

Kravchenko A, Budnevsky AV, Ovsyannikov ES. Functional Status And Cytokine Profile Assessment In Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease And Chronic Heart Failure

Objective — to evaluate the effect of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) on the level of cytokines and the functional status of patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) with different categories of left ventricular ejection fraction. Methods — The study included 240 patients 40–70 years of age with CHF. All patients were divided into four groups: 69 CHF patients with preserved ejection fraction (CHFpEF), 91 CHF patients with reduced ejection fraction (CHFrEF), 36 COPD patients with CHFpEF and 44 COPD patients with CHFrEF. All participants underwent echocardiography, six-minute walk test (6MWT), the results of which were compared with the predicted six-minute walk distance: 6МWD (i). Additionally, we assessed the levels of NT-terminal fragment of pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (ST2) in patient blood samples. Results — Patients with CHFpEF had higher levels of hs-CRP and proinflammatory cytokines as compared with patients with CHFrEF. The levels of NT-proBNP were higher in patients with COPD and CHF, compared with patients with CHF alone. A negative effect of COPD on the functional status of CHF patients with different EF values was established by the lower 6MWT values and 6MWD/6MWD ratio (i). An increase in the level of suppression of tumorigenicity 2 soluble forms (sST2) was noted in patients with COPD and CHF as compared with the isolated course of cardiac pathology patients. Conclusion — We established that unfavorable effect of COPD on patients with CHF was caused by disadvantageous values of NT-proBNP, ST2, 6MWT, and 6MWD/6MWD (i) ratio.

Diagnostic and prognostic value of serum soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a growing public health burden, with mortality and rehospitalization rates comparable to HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The evidence for the clinical usefulness of soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (sST2) in HFpEF is contradictory. Therefore, we conducted the following systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the diagnostic and prognostic value of serum sST2 in HFpEF.

Methods

PubMed and Scopus were searched exhaustively from their inception until March 15, 2022. In diagnostic analysis, we compared the diagnostic value of serum sST2 in HFpEF to NT pro-BNP. We separately pooled the unadjusted and multivariate-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) in prognostic analysis.

Results

A total of 16 publications from 2008 to 2021 were examined. The results of this analysis were as follow: Firstly, compared with NT pro-BNP, sST2 obtains poor diagnostic performance in independently identifying HFpEF from healthy controls, hypertensive patients, and HFrEF patient. Nevertheless, it may provide incremental value to other biomarkers for diagnosing HFpEF and deserves further investigation. Secondly, log sST2 was independently associated with adverse endpoints on multivariable analysis after adjusting for variables such as age, sex, race, and NYHA class. Per log unit rise in sST2, there was a 2.76-fold increased risk of all-cause death [HR:2.76; 95% CI (1.24, 6.16); p = 0.516, I² = 0%; P = 0.013] and a 6.52-fold increased risk in the composite endpoint of all-cause death and HF hospitalization [HR:6.52; 95% CI (2.34, 18.19); p = 0.985, I² = 0%; P = 0.000]. Finally, the optimal threshold levels of serum sST2 need further determined.

Conclusions

Higher sST2 was strongly linked to an increased risk of adverse outcomes in HFpEE. Especially, log sST2 independently predicted all-cause death and the composite endpoint of all-cause death and HF hospitalization. However, prospective and multicenter studies with large-sample and extended follow-up periods are required to validate our results due to limitations in our research.

Biomarkers of HFpEF: Natriuretic Peptides, High-Sensitivity Troponins and Beyond

Heart failure (HF) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a complex syndrome, often participated by several cardiac and extracardiac conditions, including chronic kidney disease, pulmonary disease, anaemia and advanced age. Circulating biomarkers reflecting pathophysiological pathways involved in HFpEF development and progression may assist clinicians in early diagnosis and management of this condition. Natriuretic peptides (NPs) are cardioprotective hormones released by cardiomyocytes in response to pressure or volume overload and in response to activation of neuro-endocrine-immune system. The relevance of B-type NP (BNP) and N-terminal pro-B-type NP (NT-proBNP) for diagnosis and risk stratification has been extensively demonstrated, and these biomarkers are emerging tools for population screening and as guides to the start of treatment in subclinical HF. On the contrary, conflicting evidence exists on the value of NPs to guide HF therapy. Among the other biomarkers, high-sensitivity troponins and soluble suppression of tumorigenesis-2 are the most promising biomarkers for risk stratification, predicting outcome independently from NPs. In this review, some novel biomarkers are being tested in such clinical scenario, more tightly linked to specific pathophysiological processes of cardiac damage.

A Real Pandora's Box in Pandemic Times: A Narrative Review on the Acute Cardiac Injury Due to COVID-19

The intricate relationship between severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and the cardiovascular system is an extensively studied pandemic topic, as there is an ever-increasing amount of evidence that reports a high prevalence of acute cardiac injury in the context of viral infection. In patients with Coronavirus disease 2019, COVID-19, a significant increase in serum levels of cardiac troponin or other various biomarkers was observed, suggesting acute cardiac injury, thus predicting both a severe course of the disease and a poor outcome. Pathogenesis of acute cardiac injury is not yet completely elucidated, though several mechanisms are allegedly involved, such as a direct cardiomyocyte injury, oxygen supply-demand inequity caused by hypoxia, several active myocardial depressant factors during sepsis, and endothelial dysfunction due to the hyperinflammatory status. Moreover, the increased levels of plasma cytokines and catecholamines and a significantly enhanced prothrombotic environment may lead to the destabilization and rupture of atheroma plaques, subsequently triggering an acute coronary syndrome. In the present review, we focus on describing the epidemiology, pathogenesis, and role of biomarkers in the diagnosis and prognosis of patients with acute cardiac injury in the setting of the COVID-19 pandemic. We also explore some novel therapeutic strategies involving immunomodulatory therapy, as well as their role in preventing a severe form of the disease, with both the short-term outcome and the long-term cardiovascular sequelae being equally important in patients with SARS-CoV-2 induced acute cardiac injury.

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: key stumbling blocks for experimental drugs in clinical trials

INTRODUCTION

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a disease process with a high prevalence. Accounting for more than 50% of all heart failure cases, it carries a significant mortality. So far, there has been a lack of therapeutic options that truly show improvement in morbidity and mortality. Certain novel therapies have shown a decrease in heart failure hospitalizations, however, this beneficial effect was more pronounced for heart failure patients with mildly reduced ejection fraction (EF).

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes the pathophysiology of the disease to help elucidate the differences between heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), and HFpEF, which could explain why therapies are successful in one (rather than the other). At the focus of this review are non-standardized nomenclature across major trials, the challenges of finding a therapeutic agent for such a heterogeneous population, and identification of specific phenotypes that have different outcomes and could be a target for future therapies.

EXPERT OPINION

Lack of standardized diagnostic criteria, associated with population heterogeneity, might explain why trials have failed to improve outcomes for patients with HFpEF. Standardizing phenotypes and recapitulating these phenotypes in animal models, as well as understanding the mechanisms of the disease at the molecular level could be the first steps in identifying promising therapeutic options.

Correlation of serum ST2 levels with severity of diastolic dysfunction on echocardiography and findings on Cardiac MRI in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Objective

The aim of the present study was to find a correlation of serum Suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (ST2) levels with severity of diastolic dysfunction on echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) patients.

Methods

Fifty patients aged ≥18 years fulfilling diagnostic criteria for HFpEF were included. ST2 levels, 2D echocardiography and CMRI were performed. Left ventricular ejection fraction, E/A, Septal E/E’, left atrial volume index (LAVI), tricuspid regurgitation (TR), assessment of diastolic dysfunction, T1 mapping in milliseconds and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) in percentage were noted. The primary outcome measure was to study correlation of ST2 levels with severity of diastolic dysfunction, whereas the secondary outcome measures were to study correlation of ST2 levels with native T1 mapping and LGE on CMRI.

Results

ST2 levels showed statistically significant and positive correlation with E/E’ (r = 0.837), peak TR velocity (r = 0.373), LAVI (r = 0.74), E/A (r = 0.420), and T1 values in milliseconds (r = 0.619). There was no statistically significant correlation between ST2 level and LGE in % (r = 0.145). The median ST2 levels in patients with E/E’ > 14 and E/E’ ≤ 14 were 110.8 and 36.1 respectively (p-value < 0.05). The mean ST2 levels were significantly higher in patients who had diastolic dysfunction grade III (126.4) and New York Heart Association class IV (133.3).

Conclusions

Evaluation of ST2 adds important information to support the diagnosis of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in patients with HFpEF.

A Preclinical Rat Model of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction With Multiple Comorbidities

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a common complex clinical syndrome for which there are currently few evidence-based therapies. As patients with HFpEF very often present with comorbidities comprising the metabolic syndrome, we hypothesized, that metabolic syndrome could lead over time to the development of diastolic dysfunction and HFpEF. Obesity-prone rats were exposed to high-fat diet and compared to obesity-resistant rats fed with standard chow. Phenotyping of metabolic syndrome, associated with echocardiographic and cardiac hemodynamic measurements, was performed after 4 and 12 months. Blood and myocardial tissue sampling were performed for pathobiological evaluation. High-fat diet in obesity-prone rats elicited metabolic syndrome, characterized by increased body and abdominal fat weights, glucose intolerance and hyperlipidemia, as well as increased left ventricular (LV) systolic pressure (after 12 months). This was associated with LV diastolic dysfunction (assessed by increased LV end-diastolic pressure) and pulmonary hypertension (assessed by increased right ventricular systolic pressure). Echocardiography revealed significant concentric LV hypertrophy, while LV ejection fraction was preserved. LV remodeling was associated with cardiomyocyte hypertrophy, as well as myocardial and perivascular fibrosis. Circulating levels of soluble ST2 (the interleukin-1 receptor-like) markedly increased in rats with HFpEF, while plasma NT-proBNP levels decreased. RNA-sequencing analysis identified clusters of genes implicated in fatty acid metabolism and calcium-dependent contraction as upregulated pathways in the myocardium of rats with HFpEF. High-fat diet during 12 months in obesity-prone rats led to the development of a relevant preclinical model of HFpEF with multiple comorbidities, suitable for investigating novel therapeutic interventions.

Galectin-3 and sST2: associations to the echocardiographic markers of the myocardial mechanics in systemic sclerosis - a pilot study

BACKGROUND

Progressive cardiac fibrosis is the central aspect of the myocardial involvement in systemic sclerosis (SSc). We hypothesized that circulating biomarkers of the cardiac fibrosis may be useful in the early diagnosis of the cardiac manifestation in this disease. Thus, we investigated the potential correlations between the levels of galectin-3, soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 (sST2) and the echocardiographic markers of the myocardial mechanics in SSc patients.

METHODS

Forty patients (57.3 ± 13.7 years, 36 female) were investigated. In addition to the conventional echocardiography, tissue Doppler and speckle tracking-derived strain techniques were used to assess the function of both ventricles and atria. To estimate the correlations between galectin-3 and sST2 levels and the echocardiographic variables, partial correlation method was used with age as correcting factor.

RESULTS

In age adjusted analysis galectin-3 level showed significant correlation with left ventricular global longitudinal strain (r = 0.460, p = 0.005); grade of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (r = 0.394, p = 0.013); septal e' (r = - 0.369, p = 0.021); septal E/e' (r = 0.380, p = 0.017) and with the grade of mitral regurgitation (r = 0.323, p = 0.048). No significant correlation was found between sST2 levels and the echocardiographic variables.

CONCLUSIONS

Galectin-3 levels, but not sST2 levels show significant correlation with the parameters of the left ventricular systolic and diastolic function. Galectin-3 may be a useful biomarker for the screening and early diagnosis of SSc patients with cardiac involvement.

Heart failure with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: prognostic value of biomarkers

Aim      To study the role of soluble ST2 (sST2), N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), and С-reactive protein (CRP) in patients with chronic heart failure and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (CHF with pLVEF) and syndrome of obstructive sleep apnea (SOSA) in stratification of the risk for development of cardiovascular complications (CVC) during one month of a prospective observation.Material and methods  The study included 71 men with SOSA with an apnea/hypopnea index (AHI) &gt;15 per hour, abdominal obesity, and arterial hypertension. Polysomnographic study and echocardiography according to a standard protocol with additional evaluation of left ventricular myocardial fractional changes and work index were performed for all patients at baseline and after 12 months of observation. Serum concentrations of sST2 , NT-proBNP, and CRP were measured at baseline by enzyme-linked immunoassay (ELISA).Results The ROC analysis showed that the cutoff point characterizing the development of CVC were sST2 concentrations ≥29.67 ng/l (area under the curve, AUC, 0.773, sensitivity 65.71 %, specificity 86.11 %; p&lt;0.0001) while concentrations of NT-proBNP (AUC 0.619; p=0.081) and CRP (AUC 0.511; р=0.869) were not prognostic markers for the risk of CVC. According to data of the ROC analysis, all patients were divided into 2 groups based on the sST2 cutoff point: group 1 included 29 patients with ST2 ≥29.67 ng/l and group 2 included 42 patients with ST2 &lt;29.67 ng/l. The Kaplan-Meyer analysis showed that the incidence of CVC was higher in group 1 than in group 2 (79.3 and 28.6 %, respectively, p&lt;0.001). The regression analysis showed that adding values of AHI and left ventricular myocardial mass index (LVMMI) to sST2 in the model increased the analysis predictive significance.Conclusion      Measuring sST2 concentration may be used as a noninvasive marker for assessment of the risk of CVC development in patients with CHF with pLVEF and SOSA within 12 months of observation. Adding AHI and LVMMI values to the model increases the predictive significance of the analysis.

Soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 as outcome predictor after cardiopulmonary resuscitation: an observational prospective study

Prognostication after cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is complex. Novel biomarkers like soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (sST2) may provide an objective approach. A total of 106 post-CPR patients were included in this single-center observational prospective study. Serum sST2 levels were obtained 24 h after admission. Individuals were assigned to two groups: patients below and above the overall cohort’s median sST2 concentration. Primary outcome was a combined endpoint at 6 months (death or Cerebral Performance Category > 2); secondary endpoint 30-day mortality. A uni- and multivariate logistic regression analysis were conducted. Elevated sST2-levels were associated with an increased risk for the primary outcome (OR 1.011, 95% CI 1.004–1.019, p = 0.004), yet no patients with poor neurological outcome were observed at 6 months. The optimal empirical cut-off for sST2 was 46.15 ng/ml (sensitivity 81%, specificity 53%, AUC 0.69). Levels above the median (> 53.42 ng/ml) were associated with higher odds for both endpoints (death or CPC > 2 after 6 months: 21% vs. 49%, OR 3.59, 95% CI 1.53–8.45, p = 0.003; death after 30 days: 17% vs. 43.3%, OR 3.75, 95% CI 1.52–9.21, p = 0.003). A positive correlation of serum sST2 after CPR with mortality at 30 days and 6 months after cardiac arrest could be demonstrated.

A Novel Paradigm Based on ST2 and Its Contribution towards a Multimarker Approach in the Diagnosis and Prognosis of Heart Failure: A Prospective Study during the Pandemic Storm

Background: Acute heart failure (HF) represents an increasingly common and challenging presentation in the emergency room, also inducing a great socio-economic burden. Extensive research was conducted toward finding an ideal biomarker of acute HF, both in terms of sensitivity and specificity, but today practicians’ interest has shifted towards a more realistic multimarker approach. Natriuretic peptides (NPs) currently represent the gold standard for diagnosing HF in routine clinical practice, but novel molecules, such as sST2, emerge as potentially useful biomarkers, providing additional diagnostic and prognostic value. Methods: We conducted a prospective, single-center study that included 120 patients with acute HF and 53 controls with chronic HF. Of these, 13 patients (eight with acute HF, five from the control group) associated the coronavirus-19 disease (COVID-19). The diagnosis of HF was confirmed by a complete clinical, biological and echocardiographic approach. Results: The serum levels of all studied biomarkers (sST2, NT-proBNP, cardiac troponin) were significantly higher in the group with acute HF. By area under the curve (AUC) analysis, we noticed that NT-proBNP (AUC: 0.976) still had the best diagnostic performance, closely followed by sST2 (AUC: 0.889). However, sST2 was a significantly better predictor of fatal events, showing positive correlations for both in-hospital and at 1-month mortality rates. Moreover, sST2 was also associated with other markers of poor prognosis, such as the use of inotropes or high lactate levels, but not with left ventricle ejection fraction, age, body mass index or mean arterial pressure. sST2 levels were higher in patients with a positive history of COVID-19 as compared with non-COVID-19 patients, but the differences were statistically significant only within the control group. Bivariate regression showed a positive and linear relationship between NT-proBNP and sST2 (r(120) = 0.20, p < 0.002). Conclusions: we consider that sST2 has certain qualities worth integrating in a future multimarker test kit alongside traditional biomarkers, as it provides similar diagnostic value as NT-proBNP, but is emerging as a more valuable prognostic factor, with a better predictive value of fatal events in patients with acute HF.

Could a Multi-Marker and Machine Learning Approach Help Stratify Patients with Heart Failure?

Half of the patients with heart failure (HF) have preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). To date, there are no specific markers to distinguish this subgroup. The main objective of this work was to stratify HF patients using current biochemical markers coupled with clinical data. The cohort study included HFpEF (n = 24) and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) (n = 34) patients as usually considered in clinical practice based on cardiac imaging (EF ≥ 50% for HFpEF; EF < 50% for HFrEF). Routine blood tests consisted of measuring biomarkers of renal and heart functions, inflammation, and iron metabolism. A multi-test approach and analysis of peripheral blood samples aimed to establish a computerized Machine Learning strategy to provide a blood signature to distinguish HFpEF and HFrEF. Based on logistic regression, demographic characteristics and clinical biomarkers showed no statistical significance to differentiate the HFpEF and HFrEF patient subgroups. Hence a multivariate factorial discriminant analysis, performed blindly using the data set, allowed us to stratify the two HF groups. Consequently, a Machine Learning (ML) strategy was developed using the same variables in a genetic algorithm approach. ML provided very encouraging explorative results when considering the small size of the samples applied. The accuracy and the sensitivity were high for both validation and test groups (69% and 100%, 64% and 75%, respectively). Sensitivity was 100% for the validation and 75% for the test group, whereas specificity was 44% and 55% for the validation and test groups because of the small number of samples. Lastly, the precision was acceptable, with 58% in the validation and 60% in the test group. Combining biochemical and clinical markers is an excellent entry to develop a computer classification tool to diagnose HFpEF. This translational approach is a springboard for improving new personalized treatment methods and identifying “high-yield” populations for clinical trials.

Diagnostic Value of sST2 in Cardiovascular Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Biomarkers such as B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), N-terminal pro-BNP (NT-proBNP), cardiac troponin (cTn), and CK-MB contribute significantly to the diagnosis of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Recent studies have demonstrated that suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (ST2) is associated with CVD, but a meta-analysis of ST2 levels in different CVDs has yet to be conducted. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate soluble ST2 (sST2) levels in patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD), myocardial infarction (MI), and heart failure (HF). A total of 1,425 studies were searched across four databases, of which 16 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale (NOS) values of all 16 studies were ≥7. The meta-analysis results indicated that the sST2 level was not correlated with IHD (standard mean difference [SMD] = 0.58, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] = 0.00 to 1.16, p = 0.05) or MI (weighted mean difference [WMD] = 0.17, 95% CI = -0.22 to 0.55, p = 0.40) but was significantly associated with HF (WMD = 0.21, 95% CI = 0.04 to 0.38, p = 0.02; I ² = 99%, p < 0.00001). sST2 levels did not differ significantly between patients with IHD or MI and healthy individuals; however, we believe that ST2 could be used as an auxiliary diagnostic biomarker of HF.

The Novel Perspectives Opened by ST2 in the Pandemic: A Review of Its Role in the Diagnosis and Prognosis of Patients with Heart Failure and COVID-19

The increasing incidence of coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) and its polymorphic clinical manifestations due to local and systemic inflammation represent a high burden for many public health systems. Multiple evidence revealed the interdependence between the presence of cardiovascular comorbidities and a severe course of COVID-19, with heart failure (HF) being incriminated as an independent predictor of mortality. Suppression of tumorigenicity-2 ST2 has emerged as one of the most promising biomarkers in assessing the evolution and prognosis of patients with HF. The uniqueness of ST2 is determined by its structural particularities. Its transmembrane isoform exerts cardioprotective effects, while the soluble isoform (sST2), which is detectable in serum, is associated with myocardial fibrosis and poor outcome in patients with HF. Some recent data also suggested the potential role of sST2 as a marker of inflammation, while other studies highlighted it as a valuable prognostic factor in patients with COVID-19. In this review, we summarized the pathways by which sST2 is related to myocardial injury and its connection to the severity of inflammation in patients with COVID-19. Also, we reviewed possible perspectives of using it as a dual cardio-inflammatory biomarker, for both early diagnosis, risk stratification and prognosis assessment of patients with concomitant HF and COVID-19.

Multimarker approach including CRP, sST2 and GDF-15 for prognostic stratification in stable heart failure

Aims

Inflammation and cardiac remodelling are common and synergistic pathways in heart failure (HF). Emerging biomarkers such as soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (sST2) and growth differentiation factor‐15 (GDF‐15), which are linked to inflammation and fibrosis process, have been proposed as prognosis factors. However, their potential additive values remain poorly investigated.

Methods and results

Here, we aimed at evaluating inflammatory and remodelling biomarkers to predict both short‐term and long‐term mortality in a population with chronic HF in comparison with other classical clinical or biological markers (i.e. N terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide, hs‐cTnT, C‐reactive protein) alone or using meta‐analysis global group in chronic HF risk score in a cohort of 182 patients followed during 80 months (interquartile range: 12.3–90.0). Proportional hazard assumption does not hold for sST2 and C‐reactive protein, and follow‐up was split into short term (less than 1 year), midterm (between 1 and 5 years), and long term (after 5 years). In univariate analysis, C‐reactive protein and sST2 were predictive of short‐term mortality but not of middle term and long term whereas GDF‐15 was predictive of short and mid‐term but not of long‐term mortality. In a multivariate model after adjustment for meta‐analysis global group in chronic HF score including the three markers, only sST2 was predictive of short‐term mortality (P = 0.0225), and only GDF‐15 was predictive of middle term mortality (P = 0.0375). None of the markers was predictive of long‐term mortality.

Conclusions

Our results demonstrate that both sST2 and GDF‐15 significantly improve the prognosis evaluation of HF patients and suggest that the value of GDF‐15 is more sustained overtime and could predict middle term events.

Prevention of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF): reexamining microRNA-21 inhibition in the era of oligonucleotide-based therapeutics

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) accounts for 50% of cases of heart failure, which is the most common cause of hospitalization in US patients over the age of 65. HFpEF pathogenesis is increasingly believed to be due to pathological hypertrophy and fibrosis of the myocardium that may be a result of systemic inflammation from comorbid conditions such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, anemia, chronic kidney disease and others. It is believed that oxidative stress triggers a process of pathological hypertrophy and fibrosis in cardiac endothelial cells, which leads to increased left ventricle filling pressures and, eventually, symptoms of heart failure. Numerous recent major clinical trials that have examined various therapies aimed at improving mortality in HFpEF have emerged empty-handed and thus the search for effective management strategies continues. Over the last several years, there have been many new developments in the field of antisense oligonucleotide-based therapeutics, which involves using noncoding nucleic acid particles such as microRNA and small interfering RNA to repress the expression of specific messenger RNA. In this article, we review the concept of using oligonucleotide-based therapeutics to prevent or treat HFpEF by targeting a specific microRNA that has been implicated in the pathogenesis of myocardial fibrosis and hypertrophy, microRNA-21 (miR-21). We review the various evidence that implicates miR-21 in the process of myocardial fibrosis and discuss recent attempts to use antimiR-21 compounds to prevent fibrosis. We also discuss proposed methods for screening patients at high risk for HFpEF for diastolic dysfunction in order to determine which patients.

Characterizing heart failure with preserved and reduced ejection fraction: An imaging and plasma biomarker approach

Introduction

The pathophysiology of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains incompletely defined. We aimed to characterize HFpEF compared to heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and asymptomatic hypertensive or non-hypertensive controls.

Materials and methods

Prospective, observational study of 234 subjects (HFpEF n = 140; HFrEF n = 46, controls n = 48, age 73±8, males 49%) who underwent echocardiography, cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR), plasma biomarker analysis (panel of 22) and 6-minute walk testing (6MWT). The primary end-point was the composite of all-cause mortality and/or HF hospitalization.

Results

Compared to controls both HF groups had lower exercise capacity, lower left ventricular (LV) EF, higher LV filling pressures (E/E’, B-type natriuretic peptide [BNP], left atrial [LA] volumes), more right ventricular (RV) systolic dysfunction, more focal and diffuse fibrosis and higher levels of all plasma markers. LV remodeling (mass/volume) was different between HFpEF (concentric, 0.68±0.16) and HFrEF (eccentric, 0.47±0.15); p<0.0001. Compared to controls, HFpEF was characterized by (mild) reductions in LVEF, more myocardial fibrosis, LA remodeling/dysfunction and RV dysfunction. HFrEF patients had lower LVEF, increased LV volumes, greater burden of focal and diffuse fibrosis, more RV remodeling, lower LAEF and higher LA volumes compared to HFpEF. Inflammatory/fibrotic/renal dysfunction plasma markers were similarly elevated in both HF groups but markers of cardiomyocyte stretch/damage (BNP, pro-BNP, N-terminal pro-atrial natriuretic peptide and troponin-I) were higher in HFrEF compared to HFpEF; p<0.0001. Focal fibrosis was associated with galectin3, GDF-15, MMP-3, MMP-7, MMP-8, BNP, pro-BNP and NTproANP; p<0.05. Diffuse fibrosis was associated with GDF-15, Tenascin-C, MMP-2, MMP-3, MMP-7, BNP, proBNP and NTproANP; p<0.05. Composite event rates (median 1446 days follow-up) did not differ between HFpEF and HFrEF (Log-Rank p = 0.784).

Conclusions

HFpEF is a distinct pathophysiological entity compared to age- and sex-matched HFrEF and controls. HFpEF and HFrEF are associated with similar adverse outcomes. Inflammation is common in both HF phenotypes but cardiomyocyte stretch/stress is greater in HFrEF.

Expression of the Novel Cardiac Biomarkers sST2, GDF-15, suPAR, and H-FABP in HFpEF Patients Compared to ICM, DCM, and Controls

Background: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains an ongoing therapeutic and diagnostic challenge to date. In this study we aimed for an analysis of the diagnostic potential of four novel cardiovascular biomarkers, GDF-15, H-FABP, sST2, and suPAR in HFpEF patients compared to controls as well as ICM, and DCM. Methods: In total, we included 252 stable outpatients and controls (77 DCM, 62 ICM, 18 HFpEF, and 95 controls) in the present study. All patients were in a non-decompensated state and on a stable treatment regimen. Serum samples were obtained and analyzed for GDF-15 (inflammation, remodeling), H-FABP (ischemia and subclinical ischemia), sST2 (inflammation, remodeling) and suPAR (inflammation, remodeling) by means of ELISA. Results: A significant elevation of GDF-15 was found for all heart failure entities compared to controls (p < 0.005). Similarly, H-FABP evidenced a significant elevation in all heart failure entities compared to the control group (p < 0.0001). Levels of sST2 were significantly elevated in ICM and DCM patients compared to the control group and HFpEF patients (p < 0.0001). Regarding suPAR, a significant elevation in ICM and DCM patients compared to the control group (p < 0.0001) and HFpEF patients (p < 0.01) was observed. An AUC analysis identified H-FABP (0.792, 95% CI 0.713–0.870) and GDF-15 (0.787, 95% CI 0.696–0.878) as paramount diagnostic biomarkers for HFpEF patients. Conclusion: Based on their differences in secretion patterns, novel cardiovascular biomarkers might represent a promising diagnostic tool for HFpEF in the future.

Suppression of Tumourigenicity 2 in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

Heart failure (HF), with steadily increasing incidence rates and mortality in an ageing population, represents a major challenge. Evidence suggests that more than half of all patients with a diagnosis of HF suffer from HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Emerging novel biomarkers to improve and potentially guide the treatment of HFpEF are the subject of discussion. One of these biomarkers is suppression of tumourigenicity 2 (ST2), a member of the interleukin (IL)-1 receptor family, binding to IL-33. Its two main isoforms – soluble ST2 (sST2) and transmembrane ST2 (ST2L) – show opposite effects in cardiovascular diseases. While the ST2L/IL-33 interaction is considered as being cardioprotective, sST2 antagonises this beneficial effect by competing for binding to IL-33. Recent studies show that elevated levels of sST2 are associated with increased mortality in HF with reduced ejection fraction. Nevertheless, the significance of sST2 in HFpEF remains uncertain. This article aims to give an overview of the current evidence on sST2 in HFpEF with an emphasis on prognostic value, clinical association and interaction with HF treatment. The authors conclude that sST2 is a promising biomarker in HFpEF. However, further research is needed to fully understand underlying mechanisms and ultimately assess its full value.

A MULTI-MARKER MODEL FOR PREDICTING DECOMPENSATED HEART FAILURE IN PATIENTS WITH PRIOR ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION

The aim of the study was to assess the prognostic value of determining the plasma concentration of NT-proBNP and ST2 in the patients with decompensated HF and prior acute myocardial infarction and their combination in this category of patients. Materials and methods. There were examined 120 patients with acute myocardial infarction and stage II A-B decompensated chronic HF according to the classification proposed by Vasylenko V. Kh. and Strazhesko M.D., NYHA functional class (FC) III-IV. The patients with Q-QS wave MI (60 individuals) and non Q MI (60 individuals) were divided into 4 groups depending on the treatment methods. Study groups were homogenous by age, gender, disease severity, duration of the post-infarction period, clinical signs of decompensation, which served as a basis for inclusion of the patients in the study. All the patients underwent the six-minute walk test in a quiet 30-50-m long hospital corridor in the morning. N-terminal pro-B-type brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and ST-2 were analyzed in all patients. Results. Promising biomarkers of HF decompensation in the post-infarction period were studied. In the patients with prior Q-QS MI and decompensated HF, NT-proBNP level was (950.38±3.15) pmol/l (p<0.05); in the patients with prior MI without signs of decompensated HF, it was (580.15±3.03) pmol/l (p˂0.05); in apparently healthy individuals, the level of NT-proBNP was found to be (111.20±3.47) pmol/l. ST2 level was (14.80±1.61) ng/ml, (36.00±1.43) ng/ml and (49.22±1.40) ng/ml in the patients of Group 1, Group 2 and Group 3, respectively (p˂0.05). Similar changes were found in patients with decompensated HF in postinfarction period after non Q MI. Conclusions. The increase in plasma concentration of sST2 is associated with the activation of both neurohumoral and fibrous pathways and can help in detecting the patients with decompensated HF in the post-infarction period and predicting the risk of its development. Our results confirmed the results of other multiple studies reporting ST2 in combination with NT-proBNP to be valuable tools for prognosing the development of decompensated HF in the patients with prior MI. ST2, alongside with NT-proBNP, is a promising biomarker to be included in the diagnostic panel for detecting acute HF and can provide additional information on risk stratification for such patients during hospitalization and at the time of discharge from the hospital.

Cardiac Biomarkers in Advanced Heart Failure: How Can They Impact Our Pre-transplant or Pre-LVAD Decision-making

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Decision-making in advanced heart failure (HF) is a complex process that involves careful consideration of competing tradeoffs of risks and benefits in regard to heart transplantation (HT) or left ventricular assist device (LVAD) placement. The purpose of this review is to discuss how biomarkers may affect decision-making for HT or LVAD implantation.

RECENT FINDINGS

N-Terminal probrain natriuretic peptide, soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2, galectin-3, copeptin, and troponin T levels are associated with HF survival and can help identify the appropriate timing for advanced HF therapies. Patients at risk of right ventricular failure after LVAD implantation can be identified with preimplant biomarkers of extracellular matrix turnover, neurohormonal activation, and inflammation. There is limited data on the adoption of biomarker measurement for decision-making in the allocation of advanced HF therapies. Nonetheless, biomarkers can improve risk stratification and prognostication thereby optimizing patient selection for HT and LVAD implantation.

sST2 as a value-added biomarker in heart failure

Soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 (sST2) is a biomarker widely investigated during the last few years. Its role has become clear in pathological conditions such as fibrosis and inflammation. From translational research to laboratory medicine, considerable efforts have been made to elucidate the features of sST2 biomarker and to consider its contribution to HF management. In this review, we summarized the results from recent works concerning sST2, and particularly we focused on the interest of sST2 in conditions for which classical biomarkers value interpretation is misleading. Indeed, despite other HF biomarkers, sST2 was proved to be independent from common comorbidities such as renal dysfunction and hypertension. Thus, sST2 showed promise for a combined strategy with natriuretic peptides, mainly for specific categories of patients. Particular attention was paid to findings on sST2 in HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), a form of HF for which reliable and specific biomarkers are awaited. Finally, a place is reserved to sST2 kinetics from basal to follow up values in order to improve clinical decision making and to customize patient treatments.

Biomarkers of Inflammation in Left Ventricular Diastolic Dysfunction

Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) is an important precursor to many different cardiovascular diseases. Diastolic abnormalities have been studied extensively in the past decade, and it has been confirmed that one of the mechanisms leading to heart failure is a chronic, low-grade inflammatory reaction. The triggers are classical cardiovascular risk factors, grouped under the name of metabolic syndrome (MetS), or other systemic diseases that have an inflammatory substrate such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The triggers could induce myocardial apoptosis and reduce ventricular wall compliance through the release of cytokines by multiple pathways such as (1) immune reaction, (2) prolonged cell hypoxemia, or (3) excessive activation of neuroendocrine and autonomic nerve function disorder. The systemic proinflammatory state causes coronary microvascular endothelial inflammation which reduces nitric oxide bioavailability, cyclic guanosine monophosphate content, and protein kinase G (PKG) activity in adjacent cardiomyocytes favoring hypertrophy development and increases resting tension. So far, it has been found that inflammatory cytokines associated with the heart failure mechanism include TNF-α, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-2, TGF-β, and IFN-γ. Some of them could be used as diagnosis biomarkers. The present review aims at discussing the inflammatory mechanisms behind diastolic dysfunction and their triggering conditions, cytokines, and possible future inflammatory biomarkers useful for diagnosis.