Efficacy and safety of biologics and small molecules for psoriasis in pediatric and geriatric populations. Part I: focus on pediatric patients

Infection and infestation-related adverse events of biologics in psoriasis: insights from the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS)

OBJECTIVE

The study aims to thoroughly assess the adverse events related to infections and infestations associated with biological agents used for psoriasis using the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.

METHODS

We analyzed FAERS data from the first quarter of 2004 to the fourth quarter of 2023. The study included TNF-α inhibitors (etanercept, infliximab, adalimumab), IL-12/23 inhibitors (ustekinumab), IL-23p19 inhibitors (guselkumab), and IL-17 inhibitors (secukinumab, ixekizumab). We used disproportionality analysis and Bayesian methods to quantify the related adverse event (AE) signals.

RESULTS

Most AEs related to infections and infestations are already listed on the drug packaging labels. Notably, TNF-α inhibitors are associated with a significantly higher incidence of tuberculosis-related diseases compared to other biological agents. In contrast, IL-17 inhibitors show a greater variety and number of fungal infection-related AEs than their counterparts. Furthermore, our study has identified new potential AEs that require the attention of clinicians.

CONCLUSION

In clinical practice, it is advisable to monitor the risks of infections and infestations in patients receiving biological agents for psoriasis to enable early detection and intervention. Our findings highlight the need for further epidemiological investigations to establish causality and guide clinical practice in managing these risks effectively.

Secukinumab in the Treatment of Psoriasis: A Narrative Review on Early Treatment and Real-World Evidence

Psoriasis is a chronic, immune-mediated, inflammatory skin disease, associated with multiple comorbidities and psychological and psychiatric disorders. The quality of life of patients with this disease is severely compromised, especially in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Secukinumab, a fully humanized monoclonal antibody, was the first anti-interleukin (IL)-17 biologic approved for treating psoriasis. Secukinumab demonstrated long-lasting efficacy and a good safety profile in individuals with plaque psoriasis, and it is associated with an improvement in health-related quality of life. While there is evidence that early treatment with systemic therapy can affect disease progression and improve long-term outcomes in other autoimmune diseases, evidence is limited in psoriasis, especially in real-world settings. This review provides an overview of studies describing the effectiveness of secukinumab in the treatment of psoriasis summarizing the literature and focusing on real-world evidence and early intervention.

Injection site reactions resulting from the use of biological therapy in the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis

INTRODUCTION

Biological medications have significantly improved the prognosis of psoriasis patients. All biological drugs (except infliximab) for psoriasis require subcutaneous (SC) administration. Adverse events of biologic drug treatment include injection site reactions. ISRs are a local phenomenon characterized by swelling, erythema, pruritus, and pain around the injection site.

AREAS COVERED

We conducted a review to analyze the differences between the ISRs of various biologics approved for psoriasis. Specifically, the review focused on anti-TNF-α, anti-IL12/23, anti-IL-17, and anti-IL-23 drugs.

EXPERT OPINION

Etanercept and adalimumab have reported ISR rates of 37% and 20%, respectively, with erythema, pruritus, pain, and irritation being the most common. Citrate free (CF) solution and thinner needles have reduced ISR associated with adalimumab. Ustekinumab showed a low risk of ISR. Regarding secukinumab and ixekizumab, pain was found to be the most common ISR. The introduction of CF ixekizumab formulation has shown promise in reducing ISRs associated with ixekizumab. The risk of ISR appears insignificant with bimekizumab, brodalumab, and anti-IL23 drugs, with ISR rates ranging from less than 1% to 7.1%. The choice of biologic agent should consider ISR risk. Education on injection techniques and the use of single-dose autoinjectors/pens can mitigate ISR risk.

Efficacy and safety of deucravacitinib for the management of psoriasis: a drug safety evaluation

INTRODUCTION

Nowadays, despite the wide availability of biological drugs and apremilast for psoriasis management, there is always a need for new therapies to customize the therapeutic approach on the basis of the patient's clinical features and comorbidities, especially in order to achieve a prolonged therapeutic response. Thus, new treatment strategies are required to offer patients a personalized approach. In this scenario, major knowledge on psoriasis pathogenesis led to the development of deucravacitinib, an orally administered selective TYK2 inhibitor.

AREAS COVERED

The aim of this manuscript is to review the current literature on the effectiveness and safety of deucravacitinib in psoriasis to offer readers a wide perspective. The current English literature was analyzed using the PubMed, Google Scholar, Embase, Cochrane Skin, and clinicaltrials.gov databases, selecting the most relevant manuscripts.

EXPERT OPINION

Deucravacitinib appears to be an innovative weapon for the management of moderate to severe psoriasis. Despite its efficacy and safety profiles have been revealed by RCTs, real-life data are still scant. Certainly, deucravacitinib broadens the range of therapeutic alternatives for psoriasis patients, thus enhancing the holistic and personalized approaches required for the treatment of this disease.

Novel pharmacotherapies and breakthroughs in psoriasis treatment: 2024 and beyond

INTRODUCTION

The use of the current available therapies for psoriasis management may sometimes be limited by reduced patients' compliance, safety issues for patients' comorbidities, primary lack of efficacy, loss of effectiveness, development of side effects. In this context, several clinical trials investigating the use of both topical and systemic therapies are ongoing, and other new drugs will be approved soon.

AREAS COVERED

The aim of this manuscript is to review current literature and to provide an overview of the current and future trends in psoriasis treatment. A comprehensive review of the English-language medical literature was performed using Pubmed and clinicaltrials.gov databases.

EXPERT OPINION

Although several therapies are currently available for psoriasis' treatment, unmet needs still exist for patients with moderate and severe psoriasis and hence expanding the therapeutic armamentarium is desirable for a more personalized approach. The ongoing development of innovative therapies could provide effective and safe therapies in the future enhancing the therapeutic management of moderate-severe unresponsive psoriasis.

Management of Psoriasis Patients with Serious Infectious Diseases

The management of patients affected by moderate-to-severe psoriasis may be challenging, in particular in patients with serious infectious diseases [tuberculosis (TB), hepatitis B and C, HIV, COVID-19]. Indeed, these infections should be ruled out before starting and during systemic treatment for psoriasis. Currently, four conventional systemic drugs (methotrexate, dimethyl fumarate, acitretin, cyclosporine), four classes of biologics (anti-tumour necrosis factor alpha, anti-interleukin (IL)12/23, anti-IL-17s, and anti-IL-23], and two oral small molecules (apremilast, deucravacitinib) have been licensed for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Each of these drugs is characterized by a unique safety profile which should be considered before starting therapy. Indeed, some comorbidities or risk factors may limit their use. In this context, the aim of this manuscript was to evaluate the management of patients affected by moderate-to-severe psoriasis with serious infectious diseases.

The Role of Interleukin 23/17 Axis in Psoriasis Management: A Comprehensive Review of Clinical Trials

Psoriasis pathogenesis is influenced by genetic factors and characterized by a complex interplay between genetic predisposition and various environmental triggers. These triggers set off metabolic processes involving inflammation, cell signaling, immune response dysregulation, and antigen presentation. Several types of innate and adaptive immune cells are involved in psoriasis. Among the cytokine cascade which leads to psoriasis development, the interleukin (IL)-23/Th17 axis, especially IL-17 production, emerges as crucial. Recognizing the pivotal role of this axis has facilitated the development of selective and effective biological drugs, such as anti-IL17 and anti-IL23 monoclonal antibodies. These drugs aim to achieve the complete or near-complete disappearance of psoriatic lesions, as indicated by PASI100 and PASI90 responses, respectively. In this context, the aim of our review was to delve into the functioning of the IL-23/Th17 axis, its dysregulation in psoriasis pathogenesis, and the therapeutic potential of its inhibition. Currently, 4 anti-IL17 (secukinumab, ixekizumab, bimekizumab and brodalumab) and 3 anti-IL23 (guselkumab, risankizumab and tildrakizumab) have been approved. All these drugs showed high levels of effectiveness in both clinical trials and real-life experiences, with an excellent profile in terms of safety. Certainly, furthers studies will allow for better characterization of biologics' profile, in order to administer the right drug for the right patients at the right moment.

Biological Therapy for Psoriasis in Cancer Patients: An 8-Year Retrospective Real-Life Study

Background: It is now recognized that psoriasis plays a key role in the development of several comorbidities, such as cardiovascular disease, and metabolic syndrome. Some authors have hypothesized that patients with psoriasis may have an increased risk of developing certain types of cancer. The efficacy and safety of biologic drugs are well-documented in clinical trials and in real-life studies. However, there is limited evidence on the safety of the use of biologic treatments in cancer patients with psoriasis, and the use of this therapeutic class in patients with a pre-existing or concomitant malignancy is still debated. Methods: We have conducted a retrospective observational study of a group of oncology patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis treated with biologic therapy at the Dermatology Clinic of the University of Naples Federico II, during the period from 2016 to 2024. We included 20 adult patients; in 15 of them the diagnosis of neoplasm preceded the start of treatment biologic, while four of these patients had been diagnosed with cancer during the course of therapy biologics. Results: The most represented neoplasms in our population were breast carcinoma, prostate carcinoma, thyroid carcinoma, and chronic lymphatic leukemia. Anti-IL17 drugs were the most frequently prescribed (47.7%), followed by anti-IL23p19 (36.8%), anti-IL-12/23 (10.5%) and anti-TNF alpha (5.26%). All patients showed improvement of psoriasis after starting the therapy. Conclusions: Our experience supports the effectiveness and safety of biological therapy for psoriasis in patients with a history of cancer or recent onset neoplasia.

Case report: Successful treatment with biologics in a pediatric patient with a severe inflammatory skin disease and novel CARD14 mutation

CARD14 (caspase activation and recruitment domain) mutations have been associated with psoriasis vulgaris, psoriatic arthritis, generalized and palmoplantar pustular psoriasis, pityriasis rubra pilaris, and atopic dermatitis. We present a pediatric patient with a novel CARD14: c.394A > T/- (Ile123Phe) mutation, diagnosed with CARD14-associated papulosquamous eruption (CAPE), who was successfully treated with biological treatment.

Speed and Cumulative Responses According to Body Regions in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis Treated with Ixekizumab (Interleukin-17A Antagonist) versus Guselkumab (Interleukin-23p19 Inhibitor)

INTRODUCTION

When assessing the effect of a therapy for psoriasis (PsO), it is important to consider speed of response and cumulative response. However, responses among biologics may differ by body regions. This post hoc analysis compares speed of response and cumulative response for ixekizumab (IXE), an interleukin-17A antagonist, and guselkumab (GUS), an interleukin-23p19 inhibitor, in different body regions of patients with moderate-to-severe plaque PsO participating in the IXORA-R study, up to week 24.

METHODS

The IXORA-R design has been previously described. Patients received the respective on-label dosing of IXE or GUS. The median time to first Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 50, 75, 90, and 100 response (50%, 75%, 90%, and 100% improvement from baseline, respectively) and the cumulative days with clear skin for PASI 50, 75, 90, and 100 responses were assessed in four body regions: head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities.

RESULTS

A total of 1027 patients were enrolled and received IXE (N = 520) or GUS (N = 507). Median time to first PASI 50, 75, 90, and 100 response was shortest in the head region, followed by the remaining body regions in both IXE and GUS cohorts. In each body region, IXE was significantly faster than GUS (p < 0.001) in achieving PASI 50, 75, 90, and 100. Through 24 weeks, the number of days with clear skin for PASI 90 and 100 was greater in the head region, followed by trunk, upper extremities, and lastly lower extremities in both IXE and GUS cohorts. In each body region, through 24 weeks, patients on IXE experienced a significantly higher number of days with clear skin for PASI 50, 75, 90, and 100 than patients on GUS (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

As compared to GUS, IXE provided a faster skin clearance and more days with clear skin in all body regions of patients with moderate-to-severe plaque PsO through 24 weeks.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

https://www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov/ : NCT03573323 (IXORA-R).

Efficacy of tyrosine-kinase-2 and phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitors for scalp psoriasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Psoriasis of the scalp is challenging to manage. The only approved oral tyrosine kinase 2 and phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitors for psoriasis are deucravacitinib and apremilast. The aim of this study was to explore their efficacy for scalp psoriasis utilizing data from randomized controlled trials.

METHODS

We searched Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov up to August 4, 2023. To determine risk of bias, the revised Risk of Bias assessment tool 2.0 was used. Inverse variance random effects meta-analyses were executed. Heterogeneity was assessed utilizing Q and I2 statistics. Pre-determined outcomes included the proportion of participants with cleared scalp skin (Scalp Physician's Global Assessment [ScPGA] of 0/1), mean change in Psoriasis Scalp Severity Index (PSSI), and mean improvement in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI).

RESULTS

Ten RCTs fulfilled inclusion criteria. Both apremilast (RR = 2.41, 95% CI = 2.08-2.79, Tau2 = 0, I2 = 0) and deucravacitinib (RR = 3.86, 95% CI = 3.02-4.94, Tau2 = 0, I2 = 0) were more effective in inducing ScPGA of 0/1 at 16 weeks compared to placebo. Furthermore, deucravacitinib was more effective than apremilast (RR = 1.70, 95% CI = 1.44-2.00, Tau2 = 0, I2 = 0). An analysis could not be executed for the rest of the outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Apremilast and deucravacitinib are effective for scalp psoriasis. Deucravacitinib may be more efficient in clearing the scalp.

An observational study on treatment regimens and effectiveness for psoriasis in real-world settings among 407 patients in Southeast China

Introduction

While new targeted therapies have advanced psoriasis treatment, real-world data on comparative effectiveness is lacking. This study analyzed treatment regimens and response in an observational cohort, examining potential disparities between clinical trials and routine practice.

Methods

Data from the Psoriasis Standardized Diagnosis and Treatment Center registry were analyzed. Patients with ≥1 follow-up were included. Treatment response was assessed using PASI 50/90 criteria. Factors associated with response were analyzed.

Results

407 patients were included (46 first-time diagnosed, 361 previously diagnosed). A higher proportion of first-time diagnosed patients achieved treatment response than previously diagnosed (76.1% vs. 62.6%). Multivariable analysis identified factors associated with reduced response in previously treated patients.

Conclusion

This real-world study found lower treatment response rates compared to clinical trials, especially in previously treated patients. Disparities highlight remaining unmet needs for psoriasis management. Combination and rotational strategies may improve outcomes in patients unresponsive to available therapies. Ongoing research on novel targets and pathways is warranted to address treatment gaps.

Secukinumab in Hidradenitis Suppurativa Patients Who Failed Adalimumab: A 52-Week Real-Life Study

Background

The treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) has always been a real challenge for dermatologists; to date, adalimumab the only biologic drug approved for HS is adalimumab, an anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α drug, the approval of this drug dates to 2015, data provided by real life show an effectiveness rate of about 60% percent. Recently (31 October 2023) FDA approves secukinumab for moderate-severe HS. The treatment and management of HS is very challenging as available treatments are very limited and show very variable outcomes.

Methods

We conducted a prospective monocentric study designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of secukinumab treatment in HS patients in a real-life setting.

Results

The initial cohort of patients recruited included 21 HS patients including 12 females and 9 males. About 57.1% of patients achieved the primary endpoint and recorded significant decrease in all the severity assessment scales (IHS4, DLQI and VAS pain scale) at week 16 and 52, when HiSCR reached 71.4%.

Conclusion

The results of our study highlight that treatment with secukinumab in patients with severe HS who failed adalimumab may be a safe and effective therapeutic weapon.

Pityriasis Rosea and Pityriasis Rosea-Like Eruption Following COVID-19 Vaccination: A Narrative Review

COVID-19 pandemic completely changed every aspect of human life. Several measures were adopted to limit the spreading of the infection. Among these, vaccination was the main one. Globally, vaccination campaign was a success, showing to be efficient in controlling and preventing the SARS-Cov2 infection, reducing the risk of disease progression, hospitalization, and mortality. However, with the increasing number of vaccines administered, several cutaneous reactions were described, making dermatologists key players in their recognition and treatment. Among these, also viral reactivations have been described. In particular, cases of Pityriasis Rosea (PR) and PR-like reactivations have been collected. An early diagnosis is mandatory to avoid mistreatments. In this context, we conducted a review of the current literature investigating cases of PR following COVID-19 vaccination with the aim of understanding the possible pathogenetic mechanisms and causal correlation as well as to investigate the risk of this cutaneous eruption, to offer clinicians a wide perspective on the linkage between PR and COVID-19 vaccines.

Pediatric Psoriasis with or without Arthritis: Does It Make a Difference?

BACKGROUND

Psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis can present simultaneously or separately in children and may pose a diagnostic challenge.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the dermatological manifestations in pediatric psoriatic patients with and without arthritis.

METHODS

A retrospective case-control study of psoriatic patients ≤ 18 years old at Sheba Medical Center was conducted between 2011 and 2021. Patients with psoriatic arthritis versus psoriasis-only were compared according to body surface area (BSA) involvement, cutaneous distribution, severity of skin disease, response to treatment and related side effects.

RESULTS

The study cohort included 29 psoriatic arthritis and 64 psoriasis-only patients matched by age and sex. The psoriasis-only group had a significantly higher mean BSA (19.7%, SD ± 18.7) than the psoriatic arthritis group (6.1%, SD ± 11.4), (p = 0.029). The skin distribution differed with the psoriasis group showing more involvement of the extremities, scalp, trunk, and genitals. Both groups primarily experienced partial responses to methotrexate, whereas the psoriasis group mainly saw complete responses to biologics. Adverse events were rare, with a higher incidence in the psoriasis group.

CONCLUSION

This retrospective study highlights the differences in cutaneous disease characteristics, severity, and treatment response in pediatric patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis, providing valuable insights for diagnosis and disease course in the pediatric population.

A Case of Erythrodermic Psoriasis Successfully Treated with Risankizumab

Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory cutaneous disease, affecting up to 3% of the worldwide population. Several clinical phenotypes can be distinguished. Among these, erythrodermic psoriasis (EP) is a rare and severe variant (less than 3% of cases), characterized by severe generalized erythema and scaling affecting at least 90% of the body surface area. EP is often a life-threatening condition, since several systemic symptoms (tachycardia, fever, fatigue, lymphadenopathy, dehydration, serum electrolyte disturbances) can be associated. Thus, a prompt and appropriate treatment is mandatory. Unfortunately, EP treatment is challenging. Indeed, the reduced prevalence of EP makes clinical trials feasibility difficult, leading to the absence of established guidelines. So, the treatment of EP is often derived from moderate-to-severe psoriasis management which relies on the use of conventional systemic drugs (cyclosporine, dimethyl fumarate, methotrexate, retinoids) and biologic agents. However, conventional systemic drugs are often contraindicated for patients' comorbidities, or their use is characterized by reduced efficacy and various adverse events (AEs). The recent development of biologic drugs, which showed excellent results in terms of effectiveness and safety in plaque psoriasis, made these drugs an ideal weapon in EP management, despite their use in EP is still off-label. Among these, risankizumab, a humanized immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody targeting the p19 subunit of the IL23, is one of the latest biologics approved for the management of moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Herein, we reported the first case of a caucasian patient affected by EP successfully treated with risankizumab, reaching PASI100 response after 16 weeks of treatment, without experiencing AEs.

Efficacy of Avène Hydrotherapy on Chronic Pruritus in Patients with Plaque Psoriasis

INTRODUCTION

Pruritus is a prevalent symptom, described as one of the most bothersome of psoriasis. Specific itch management remains a challenge, for which hydrotherapy could be used as adjunct care to medical treatment. Therefore, we assessed the immediate and longer-term benefit of 3 weeks of Avène thermal spring water hydrotherapy on chronic pruritus in patients in addition to their usual psoriasis and/or pruritus management.

METHODS

Twenty-six patients suffering from chronic pruritus due to psoriasis were evaluated before and after 3 weeks of hydrotherapy with a 3 and 6 month follow-up. A control group (18 patients) did not undergo hydrotherapy and continued to follow their usual skin management. Pruritus was assessed according to the numeric rating scale (NRS, pruritus intensity), the visual dynamic pruritus score (vDPS, change in pruritus intensity), and the 5-D itch scale (pruritus characteristics). Psoriasis severity was measured using the psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) score. The "itchy quality of life" (ItchQoL) scale was used to assess quality-of-life (QoL) impact related to itch. Pruritus and psoriasis gene and protein biomarkers were measured in lesional and nonlesional skin.

RESULTS

Pruritus measurements (NRS, vDPS, and 5-D itch scale) indicated an immediate and long-lasting positive effect of hydrotherapy compared with control patients. The psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) was decreased by 40.0% by hydrotherapy, which was sustained over 6 months. The ItchQoL also improved directly after hydrotherapy, which was still much improved even 6 months later. Analysis of gene and/or protein biomarkers revealed a significant decrease of inflammation biomarkers (IL-8, IL-1α, IL-1RA, and RANTES), of psoriasis biomarkers (PI3, S100A7, and IL-17), and of pruritus biomarkers (IL-31, TRPV1, and CGRP1).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings demonstrated an immediate and long-lasting improvement of pruritus in patients with psoriasis who underwent Avène thermal spring water hydrotherapy, indicating that this would be a good complementary therapy in the management of this disease.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT03023254.

Casual association between childhood body mass index and risk of psoriasis: A Mendelian randomization study

BACKGROUND

Observational studies have suggested that childhood body mass index (BMI) is associated with the risk of psoriasis. However, their causal relationship remains unclear. In this investigation, we aimed to determine whether an association exists between childhood BMI and psoriasis.

METHODS

Using summary statistics for childhood BMI of European descent from publicly available GWAS meta-analyses (n = 39 620), we conducted Mendelian randomization (MR) research using the inverse variance weighting (IVW), weighted median, and MR-Egger regression techniques. The outcome was a genome-wide association studies (GWAS) for the self-reported non-cancer disease classification psoriasis in the UK Biobank population (total n = 337 159; case = 3871; control = 333 288).

RESULTS

We selected instrumental variables from 16 single-molecule polymorphisms that attained genome-wide significance in GWAS on childhood BMI. Using the IVW method, our findings supported a causal relationship between childhood BMI and psoriasis (beta = 0.003, standard error [SE] = 0.001, p = 0.006). Using MR-Egger regression analysis, we evaluated the potential for directional pleiotropy to bias our results (intercept = 0.00039, p-value = 0.247) and found no causal relationship between childhood BMI and psoriasis (beta = -0.002, SE = 0.004, p = 0.625). The weighted median method, however, provided proof of a causal relationship (beta = 0.003, SE = 0.001, p = 0.029). Cochran's Q test and the funnel plot revealed little proof of heterogeneity or asymmetry, indicating the lack of directional pleiotropy.

CONCLUSION

According to the findings of the MR analysis, an increased childhood BMI may be linked to a higher likelihood of psoriasis.

Case report: Area of focus of management of severe pityriasis rubra pilaris by dose optimization of adalimumab biosimilar in combination with acitretin and montelukast

Pityriasis rubra pilaris (PRP) is a rare inflammatory skin disorder characterized by hyperkeratotic follicular papules, orange-red scaling plaques with islands of sparing and palmoplantar keratoderma. While spontaneous resolution occurs in some cases, treatment can be challenging for others. The use of biologics in PRP management has gained attention in recent studies, although their high costs and potential side effects present limitations. We present a case of a 71-year-old patient with treatment-resistant PRP who showed significant improvement through optimized adalimumab treatment. Considering the emerging role of phospholipase A2 in PRP pathogenesis, montelukast was added, further enhancing the therapeutic response. By maintaining montelukast and prolonging the adalimumab interval to 3 and 4 weeks, effective dose optimization was achieved without PRP relapse. This case report highlights the potential for adalimumab dose optimization by shortening the initial treatment interval for increased effectiveness and lengthening the interval during the maintenance phase to conserve medication doses. Montelukast appears to assist in sustaining clinical outcomes during interval prolongation, necessitating further investigation through additional studies.

Skin-Related Sexual Life Questionnaire (SRSLQ): Creation and Validation of the Questionnaire

Background and Objectives: The assessment of sexual dysfunction among psoriatic patients still remains a great diagnostic difficulty due to its subjective and embarrassing character. Various questionnaires have been used to assess sexual dysfunctions associated with skin conditions; however, none of them have been approved as a gold standard. The aim of our study was to create and validate the Skin-Related Sexual Life Questionnaire (SRSLQ) for the assessment of possible sexual dysfunction and related psychological burdens in patients with skin diseases. Materials and Methods: A total of 109 patients, including 45 women and 64 men (1:1.4) suffering from psoriasis and aged between 18 and 73 years (mean 48.0 ± 13.4 years), were included in the study. All subjects completed the 11-item SRSLQ and the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). In addition, all men were asked to fulfil the five-item version of the International Index of Erectile Dysfunction (IIEF-5) at the time of examination and 7 days after enrollment. The disease severity was assessed via the PASI scale. Results: The statistical analysis of internal consistency of SRSLQ showed very good integrity, with a Cronbach α coefficient of 0.94. The reproducibility level assessed with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) amounted to 0.96. A significant correlation between the total score of the 11-item SRSDQ and the DLQI (r = 0.39; p < 0.001) was found, confirming congruent validity. Conclusions: The validated 11-item Skin-Related Sexual Life Questionnaire can be successfully implemented in daily clinical practice as well as in clinical research.

Herpes Zoster and COVID-19 Vaccination: A Narrative Review

COVID-19 was a worldwide emergency, leading to a global health crisis, which completely revolutionized every aspect of human life. Several strategies were adopted to limit the spreading of the infection such as testing and contact tracing, quarantine and isolation, use of face mask, social distancing, lockdowns, travel restrictions, etc. Of these, vaccines were the most important measures to reduce the transmission of the virus and the severity of the infection, in order to overcome the pandemic. Fortunately, vaccination campaign was a success, showing to be efficient in controlling and preventing the COVID-19, reducing the risk of disease progression, hospitalization, and mortality. Monitoring and addressing vaccine-related adverse events have been essential for maintaining public confidence. Indeed, with the increasing number of vaccines administered, various cutaneous reactions have been reported, making dermatologists key players in their recognition and treatment. Particularly, several cutaneous diseases and cutaneous findings have been reported. Of note, also viral reactivations have been described following COVID-19 vaccination. Among these, varicella zoster virus (VZV) reactivation has been collected. Globally, an early diagnosis and an accurate treatment of herpes zoster (HZ) is mandatory to reduce possible complications. In this context, we conducted a review of the current literature investigating cases HZ following COVID-19 vaccination with the aim of understanding the possible causal correlation and underlying pathogenetic mechanisms to offer clinicians a wide perspective on VZV reactivation and COVID-19 vaccines.

An Observational Study of 147 Psoriasis Patients: Overweightness and Obesity as a Significant Clinical Factors Correlated with Psoriasis

Background and Objectives: Psoriasis is a common, chronic, and immune-mediated inflammatory skin disease recognized to lead to a wide range of comorbid disorders, mainly obesity. The study aimed to evaluate the problem of overweightness and obesity among psoriasis patients in the context of their prevalence and influence on the disease course. Materials and Methods: The study group encompassed 147 adult patients with plaque psoriasis. Results: The prevalences of overweightness (39.46%) and obesity (37.41%) demonstrated in the study showed the strong predisposition of psoriatic patients for abnormal body mass. The vast majority (77%) of subjects with psoriatic arthritis were overweight or obese. The results of the correlation analysis revealed the significant impacts of overweightness and obesity, as defined by the BMI index, on modifying the severity of psoriasis (as assessed by the PASI with a correlation coefficient of R = 0.23, p = 0.016; and BSA values with a correlation coefficient of R = 0.21, p = 0.023), particularly in contrast to patients with a normal body mass. Conclusions: Overweightness and obesity constitute a major health burden among psoriatic patients, influencing the disease course and severity. Enhanced understanding of the phenomenon may directly translate into improving disease management and overall patient care.

Management Strategies for Pediatric Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis: Spotlight on Biologics

Although psoriasis onset has been reported at any ages, in up to one-third of cases, it begins during childhood, with an estimated prevalence of about 2% in pediatric population. The management of moderate-to-severe forms of childhood psoriasis may represent a challenge for dermatologists, especially for parents' concerns about the need of systemic treatments. However, a prompt safe and effective treatment is mandatory in these patients, due to the significative impact that psoriasis may have on their quality of life, with well-known consequences on psychological health of both patients and caregivers. Due to the relatively frequent parents' refusal of systemic treatments, probably due to the fear of eventual adverse events, difficulties of oral or injective route, the management of moderate-to-severe forms still represents a challenge. Herein, we report a narrative review, aiming to resume the systemic treatments for pediatric psoriasis, focusing on the use of biologics and small molecules in the pediatric ages. The most widely used therapeutic strategies today for the pediatric population with moderate-severe psoriasis are traditional systemic therapies, while more innovative drugs such as biologics and small molecules now represent a somewhat unexplored but certainly promising field for unresponsive patients.

JAK Inhibitors in Psoriatic Disease

Psoriasis is now considered to be the cutaneous phenotype of a systemic inflammatory condition, recognized under the term Psoriatic Disease (PsD). PsD has several extracutaneous manifestations, such as inflammatory articular and entheseal involvement, leading to psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and the less frequent intestinal and ocular manifestations with colitis/inflammatory bowel disease and uveitis, respectively. There have also been several reports of an increased frequency of comorbidities such as hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, obesity, metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular manifestations during the course of PsD. The link between psoriasis and related comorbidities is considered a long-term disease sequela, often characterized by an unhealthy lifestyle and a consequence of systemic inflammation; hence, psoriasis requires adequate and prompt treatment, with the aim of controlling not only cutaneous manifestations but also extracutaneous manifestations and systemic inflammation. Pharmacological strategies for PsD have significantly increased over recent years. Recently, the targeted synthetic DMARDs, Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, tofacitinib and upadacitinib, were added to the therapeutic armamentarium for treating PsA, and deucravacitinib for psoriasis. These oral agents act directly on inflammatory mechanisms underlining the disease, as antagonists of the intracellular JAK signal pathway and, by STAT phosphorylation, inhibit gene proinflammatory cytokine transcription. JAK inhibitors represent a recent additional treatment strategy for PsD management and, among these, tofacitinib and upadacitinib have recently been approved for PsA, and deucravacitinib for psoriasis. In this review we describe ongoing and recent phase II and III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy and safety of investigational JAK inhibitors in psoriasis and PsA.

The efficacy and safety of tyrosine kinase 2 inhibitor deucravacitinib in the treatment of plaque psoriasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background

Orally effective therapeutics for plaque psoriasis with improved response rates, lower toxicity and costs are needed in clinical practices. This study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of the recently approved TYK2 inhibitor deucravacitinib in adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis through meta-analysis.

Methods

A systematic search was performed for eligible studies using electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Clinical Trials, the EU Clinical Trials Register, and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy and safety of deucravacitinib vs. placebo or active comparators in adult patients with plaque psoriasis were included. The effectiveness of deucravacitinib was evaluated using a 75% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 75) from baseline and the proportion of patients achieving the static Physician's Global Assessment (sPGA) response. The secondary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving PASI 90, PASI 100, ssPGA 0/1, and Dermatology Life Quality Index 0/1 (DLQI). The incidence of adverse events (AEs), serious AEs (SAEs), and AE-related treatment discontinuation were statistically analyzed to determine the safety of deucravacitinib.

Results

The systematic review and meta-analysis included five RCTs involving 2,198 patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Results showed that deucravacitinib was superior to placebo as well as active comparator apremilast in multiple key endpoints, including PASI 75, sPGA 0/1, PASI 90, PASI 100, DLQI 0/1 at week 16. Moreover, a durable response was seen in the two 52-week studies. Safety assessment showed that deucravacitinib was generally well tolerated, and the incidence of AEs, SAEs, and AE-related treatment discontinuation was low and balanced across groups.

Conclusion

Deucravacitinib demonstrated superior efficacy to apremilast in adult patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis with an acceptable safety profile and has the potential to be used as the first-line oral therapy for plaque psoriasis.

Effectiveness of Brodalumab in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis Located in Difficult-to-Treat Areas

Background

Recent knowledge of psoriasis pathogenesis has led to the development of selective drugs. Among these, brodalumab is a monoclonal antibody targeting the interleukin (IL)-17A receptor approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Biologics may be considered in patients with milder diseases in case of active psoriatic arthritis, severe impact on patient's quality of life, and involvement of sensitive and difficult-to-treat areas. These skin locations commonly require systemic drugs. Recently, psoriasis severity monitoring has also changed. Indeed, the clinical evaluation by means of specific efficacy scores was combined with serological evaluation by means of the assay of specific inflammatory biomarkers.

Methods

An observational study enrolled patients affected by moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis involving difficult-to-treat areas, undergoing treatment with brodalumab to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of brodalumab in patients with psoriasis affecting difficult-to-treat areas (scalp and palmoplantar regions). Secondary outcomes were the assessment of the development of serum markers of inflammation during the treatment period as well as the evaluation of the dermoscopic features of the affected sites to quantify disease activity and response to treatment.

Results

Twenty-five patients were included in the study. A statistically significant reduction from baseline in PASI, PSSI, ppPASI and DLQI values as early as week 24 was observed, with further improvement up to week 52. Plasma levels of MMP-3, VEGF-A, and hs-PCR decreased during treatment from week 0 to week 52.

Conclusion

Our real-life experience suggests brodalumab as a valuable option for the management of psoriasis located in difficult-to-treat areas. Moreover, our study highlights that the use of brodalumab reduces the plasmatic levels of inflammatory biomarkers (MMP-3, VEGF-A and hs-PCR), showing how the drug modulates the skin inflammatory response by reducing systemic inflammation.

Rehmannioside A Inhibits TRAF6/MAPK Pathway and Improves Psoriasis by Interfering with the Interaction of HaCaT Cells with IL-17A

Objective

As a common chronic inflammatory skin disease, psoriasis seriously affects the physical health and psychological well-being of patients. Various clinical treatments for psoriasis have their own drawbacks, so it is important to find effective and safe drugs. Rehmannioside A (ReA) has anti-inflammatory properties and is the main active ingredient in Fuzhengzhiyanghefuzhiyang decoction (FZHFZY), an herbal compound for the treatment of psoriasis. But no studies have been conducted to determine whether ReA alone can treat psoriasis. Therefore, this study was designed to investigate the effect of ReA in the treatment of psoriasis and its potential mechanism of action.

Methods

HaCaT cells were treated with ReA and IL-17A alone for 24 h and 48 h, and the most effective concentrations of ReA and interleukin (IL)-17A were found at 25 μg/mL and 100 ng/mL, respectively. A psoriasis cell model was constructed by stimulating HaCaT cells with IL-17A, followed by intervention with ReA. Cell viability and cell cycle distribution were measured by MTT assay and flow cytometry. The expression levels of keratin family members and chemokines were detected by real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR), the levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and key proteins of TRAF6/MAPK signaling pathway by Western blot.

Results

ReA weaken cell viability, down-regulate the expression of keratin family members (KRT6 and KRT17), restore cell cycle distribution to normal distribution, inhibit the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-6, IL-8 and IL-1β) and lower the expression of chemokines (S100A7, S100A9 and CXCL2) by interfering with the interaction between HaCaT cells and IL-17A. Thus, it exerts an anti-psoriatic effect by reducing the inflammatory response and inhibiting abnormal proliferation of HaCaT cells. Mechanistically, ReA inhibited the TRAF6/MAPK signaling pathway activated by IL-17A stimulation in HaCaT cells.

Conclusion

ReA has in vitro anti-psoriatic effects and may be a new therapeutic agent for psoriasis.

Guselkumab, Risankizumab, and Tildrakizumab in the Management of Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Review of Existing Trials and Real-Life Data

The treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) has always been a real challenge for dermatologists; to date, the only biologic drugs approved for HS are adalimumab, an anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α drug, authorized in 2015, and secukinumab, recently licensed. The management of this condition is challenging as the available treatments show variable results, and the course of the condition is often chronic-recurrent; therefore, it will be necessary for the future to identify new therapeutic targets for HS. In recent years, studies have focused on the development towards new therapeutic targets. The purpose of our review was to perform a comprehensive literature review of real-life data on anti-IL23 (guselkumab, tildrakizumab, and risankizumab) in HS to summarize the existing evidence on the efficacy and safety of these drugs. We selected 64 articles, among which 32 had the characteristics that we were looking for in our review. To date, the positive data expressed in real-life experiences contrast with the three existing Phase 2 studies conducted so far, where it seems that these drugs may be useful only for a subgroup of patients with HS whose features need to be elucidated. Data from Phase 3 studies and other real-life experiences, perhaps more detailed and with higher numbers, will certainly be needed to fully understand the efficacy and safety of this class of drugs.

Biologics for the Management of Erythrodermic Psoriasis: An Updated Review

Erythrodermic psoriasis (EP) is a severe and rare variant of psoriasis (less than 3% of cases), characterized by generalized scaling and erythema affecting more than 90% of body surface area. Several systemic symptoms can be present in patients with EP such as lymphadenopathy, arthralgia, fever, fatigue, dehydration, serum electrolyte disturbances, and tachycardia making this condition a possible life-threatening disease, particularly if appropriate treatments are not performed. In this scenario, effective and safe therapies are required. Unfortunately, the rarity of EP makes head-to-head Phase III trials challenging, leading to the lack of established guidelines for its management. Globally, conventional systemic drugs such as cyclosporine, methotrexate, and retinoids often have contraindications linked to patients' comorbidities and have not shown a high profile of efficacy and safety. Recently, the development of biologic drugs including anti-tumor necrosis factor-α and anti-interleukin 12-23, 23, and 17 has revealed favorable results for the management of plaque psoriasis, making them also a possible therapeutic option for EP disease. However, their use in EP is still off-label. The aim of our study was to review current literature on the use of biologic drugs for the treatment of EPs in order to offer a wide perspective on their possible application in EP management.

Nail Psoriasis: An Updated Review of Currently Available Systemic Treatments

Background

Nail psoriasis (NP) has a prevalence that ranges from 10 to 82% among patients with psoriasis (PsO) and is one of the most common difficult to treat site of psoriasis. We performed a thorough review of the literature, exploring evidence regarding all available NP systemic treatments, describing also in detail NP dedicated clinical trials.

Methods

A literature search was conducted in PubMed and Embase prior to February 2023 using a combination of the terms "nail" AND "psoriasis" AND "systemic therapy" AND/OR "systemic treatment". A total of 47 original studies and case reports were reviewed in this article.

Results

Systemic therapies should be considered when the disorder involves more than 3 nails, has extensive skin and joint involvement, and has a significant impact on QoL, due to their best long-term efficacy. In detail, conventional and biologic systemic drugs demonstrated efficacy in recent trials, including acitretin, methotrexate, cyclosporine, apremilast, adalimumab, infliximab, etanercept, certolizumab, golimumab, ustekinumab, secukinumab, ixekizumab, brodalumab, bimekizumab, guselkumab, risankizumab and tildrakizumab.

Conclusion

Several therapies have demonstrated efficacy and safety in the treatment of NP; however, the choice of treatment depends not only on the severity of the nail involvement, but also on whether PsA is present, the patient's comorbidities other than PsA, previous treatment history, and the patient's drug preferences.

Efficacy of biologic agents for palmoplantar psoriasis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Palmoplantar psoriasis (PP) represents a localized type of disease. While controversy over its' classification exists, a hyperkeratotic type, a pustular type and palmoplantar pustulosis (PPP) have been recognized. PP management is regularly supported by biologic agents. Our study aimed to review and synthesize available data regarding the efficacy of approved biologics for PP and PPP.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A literature search was conducted in PubMed, CENTRAL, Scopus, and ClinicalTrilas.gov. Utilizing random-effects inverse-variance frequentist network meta-analyses (NMAs), we ranked interventions. The proportion of participants with cleared skin was the primary outcome. Fifty and 75% improvement in palmoplantar psoriasis area severity index (PPASI) were also explored (PPASI50, PPASI75).

RESULTS

In total, 15 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) exploring the efficacy of on-label adalimumab, bimekizumab, etanercept, guselkumab, infliximab, ixekizumab, secukinumab, and ustekinumab were included. Data for PP were synthesized. Every biologic agent examined, except from infliximab, outperformed placebo. On-label secukinumab exhibited the highest probability of inducing complete resolution. Ixekizumab and infliximab ranked best on inducing PPASI50 and PPASI75. Our review supports that guselkumab is effective for PPP.

CONCLUSIONS

Secukinumab, ixekizumab and infliximab are effective for PP. Research is warranted to produce evidence about the efficacy of biologics in PP and PPP.

Efficacy and safety of spesolimab for the management of generalized pustular psoriasis: a drug safety evaluation

INTRODUCTION

Generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) is a rare form of psoriasis (less of 1% of cases). Currently, GPP is recognized as a clinical entity, distinguished from plaque psoriasis. However, there are not guidelines for GPP management and treatments are often derived from plaque psoriasis. Therefore, conventional systemic drugs are usually used as first-line treatment options, and biologics are still used off label. Recently, spesolimab, an anti-IL36 receptor humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody, has been specifically approved for GPP disease, revolutionizing treatment scenario.

AREAS COVERED

The aim of this review is to investigate current literature on the use of spesolimab for GPP management to underline its potential role in GPP and offer a current clinical perspective. Literature research using the Google Scholar, Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Skin, and clinicaltrials.gov databases was performed, selecting the most relevant manuscripts.

EXPERT OPINION

Spesolimab is efficacious and has a consistent and favorable safety profile in patients presenting with a GPP flare. However, despite excellent results in terms of safety and efficacy have been reported by both clinical trials and very limited real-life experiences, long-term data, especially in flare-up prevention, are scant. Thus, while the available data are encouraging, further research is warranted to understand the efficacy, safety, and long-term outcomes associated with spesolimab treatment in GPP.

Use of Biological Therapies for the Management of Pustular Psoriasis: A New Era?

Generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) is a severe and rare form of psoriasis, being a potentially life-threatening condition, characterized by recurring episodes or flares of widespread cutaneous erythema with macroscopic sterile pustules. An irregular innate immune response is linked to GPP, which is considered an auto-inflammatory disorder, while innate and adaptive immunopathogenic responses are involved in psoriasis pathogenesis. In consequence, different cytokine cascades have been suggested to be mainly involved in the pathogenesis of each different psoriasis form, with the interleukin (IL)23/IL17 axis implied in plaque psoriasis, and the IL36 pathway in the GPP. As regards GPP treatment, conventional systemic drugs available for plaque psoriasis are usually used as the first-line treatment option. However, contraindications and adverse events often limit the use of these therapies. In this scenario, biologic drugs may represent a promising treatment option. To date, even if 12 different biologics have been approved for plaque psoriasis, none of these is approved for GPP where they are employed off-label. Recently, spesolimab, an anti-IL36 receptor monoclonal antibody, has been recently approved for GPP. The purpose of this article is to assess the current literature about the use of biological therapies for the treatment of GPP to establish the basis for a shared GPP management algorithm.

The Impact of COVID-19 Vaccination on Inflammatory Skin Disorders and Other Cutaneous Diseases: A Review of the Published Literature

Background: Four vaccines have been authorized by the European Medicines Agency (EMA): viral vector-based vaccines (AstraZeneca; AZD1222 and Johnson & Johnson; Ad26.COV2. and 2 mRNA-based vaccines (Pfizer/BioNTech; BNT162b2 and Moderna; mRNA-1273). Adverse events (AEs) related to vaccination have been described in the literature. The main aim of the dermatological practice was to avoid the diffusion of COVID-19, allowing the continuity of care for patients. Objective: The aim of this review article is to investigate current literature regarding cutaneous reactions following COVID-19 vaccination, mainly inflammatory dermatological diseases. Materials and methods: Investigated manuscripts included metanalyses, reviews, letters to the editor, real-life studies, case series, and reports. Results: We selected a total of 234 articles involving more than 550 patients. We have divided the results section into various sub-sections to ensure greater understanding for readers. Conclusions: Clinicians should keep in mind the possibility of new onsets or the worsening of several dermatoses following vaccination in order to promptly recognize and treat these AEs. Certainly, vaccination should not be discouraged.

Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Risankizumab for Moderate to Severe Psoriasis: A 2-Year Real-Life Retrospective Study

Risankizumab is a humanized IgG monoclonal antibody inhibitor of IL23 and has been recently approved by the EMA and the FDA for the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis in adults who are candidates for systemic therapy. Its efficacy and safety have been reported by clinical trials and real-life studies. However, even if long-term data from trials have already been reported (up to 172 weeks), data on long-term real-life experiences are still limited. The aim of our study was to investigate the long-term (2 years) efficacy and safety of risankizumab for psoriasis management in a real-life setting. A monocentric retrospective study was performed, enrolling 168 patients affected by moderate to severe psoriasis who were undergoing treatment with risankizumab. Psoriasis severity and safety outcomes were evaluated at each follow-up visit (week 16, week 28, week 52, week 88, week 104). A statistically significant reduction of psoriasis severity scores was reported from week 16 and was maintained up to week 104. Moreover, interesting results in terms of safety have been collected, without any serious adverse events registered. Our long-term real-life monocentric retrospective study confirmed the efficacy and safety of risankizumab up to 104 weeks of treatment. However, further studies are required to confirm our results and to increase available data to establish the best evidence-based biologic selection algorithm.

Acrodermatitis Continua of Hallopeau Successfully Treated with Ustekinumab: A Case Report and Literature Review

Acrodermatitis continua of Hallopeau (ACH) is a rare variant of pustular psoriasis that presents as a sterile pustular eruption of the periungual and subungual regions. It affects the skin and nail bed and can lead to distal phalangeal destruction as the disease progresses. ACH is an incurable disease that requires long-term maintenance therapy to prevent any complications. Because ACH is a variant of pustular psoriasis, it is commonly treated with anti-psoriatic therapies. Unfortunately, it is resistant to many available anti-psoriatic therapies, and there are no clinical guidelines for it; the treatment is therefore highly challenging. Current treatment strategies are mostly based on a few case reports and case series. In this study, we present a case of ACH in a 24-year-old man with a long history of severe skin lesions and overt onychodystrophy, successfully treated with Ustekinumab. In this patient, we observed rapid improvement in skin lesions and symptoms. Ustekinumab can considerably improve other symptoms besides plaque psoriasis. The treatment and excellent outcomes of Ustekinumab may provide clinical benefits to more patients and serve as a reference for other dermatologists.

Bimekizumab treatment in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: a drug safety evaluation

INTRODUCTION

Biological treatments deeply changed the management of moderate-to-severe forms of psoriasis. Among the available biological therapies, interleukin (IL)-17 inhibitors, secukinumab, ixekizumab, brodalumab, and bimekizumab represent one of the most rapid and effective biologic classes available for psoriasis. Bimekizumab, the latest available IL-17 inhibitor, is a humanized monoclonal immunoglobulin (Ig)G1 antibody that acts by neutralizing both IL-17A and IL-17F, showing a unique mechanism of action differing from ixekizumab and secukinumab (selective IL17A inhibitor), as well as brodalumab (antagonist of IL17 receptor).

AREAS COVERED

This review aims to evaluate the safety profile of bimekizumab in the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.

EXPERT OPINION

The efficacy and safety of bimekizumab have been reported by several phase II and III clinical trials, even in a longer-term period. Moreover, clinical trials also showed bimekizumab to have significantly higher efficacy compared to other biological classes, including anti-TNF, anti-IL-12/23, and even to another IL-17 inhibitor, secukinumab. Although numerous biologics are currently available for psoriasis, some patients may result resistant to other treatments and/or experience psoriatic flares during or after treatment withdrawal. In this scenario, bimekizumab may represent an additional valuable alternative for patients with moderate-to-severe forms of psoriasis.

Effectiveness and Safety of Deucravacitinib for the Management of Psoriasis: A Review of the Current Literature

Psoriasis management may be challenging, particularly for moderate-to-severe forms of the disease. Indeed, conventional systemic treatments are often avoided for contraindications or the risk of adverse events as well as phototherapy is often limited by logistic concerns. Despite the development of biological drugs and small molecules revolutionized the treatment options showing promising results in terms of safety and effectiveness, some limitations remain. Thus, there is still a need for new therapies that are always welcome in order to tailor the treatment to the patient and to have a higher level of performance, especially in order to maintain long-term effectiveness. In this scenario, deucravacitinib, an oral small molecule which selectively inhibits Tyrosine Kinase 2, may represent a promising weapon in psoriasis management. The aim of our manuscript is to review the current knowledge on the efficacy and safety of deucravacitinib for the management of psoriasis.

Safety of current systemic therapies for nail psoriasis

INTRODUCTION

A discussion of safety of systemic treatments for nail psoriasis is lacking, particularly in reference to approval of new therapies assessed for nail outcomes. A review of safety profiles for agents commonly utilized for treatment of nail psoriasis is warranted to help inform treatment choices. The PubMed database was searched on 5 April 20235 April 2023, with articles discussing safety of nail psoriasis systemic therapies identified and reviewed.

AREAS COVERED

Systemic treatments for nail psoriasis include biologic therapies (tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors, interleukin-17 inhibitors, interleukin-23 inhibitors, interleukin-12/23 inhibitors), small molecule inhibitors (apremilast, tofacitinib), and oral systemic immunomodulators (methotrexate, cyclosporine, acitretin), each with unique safety profiles and considerations. Herein, we discuss adverse events, contraindications, drug-drug interactions, screening/monitoring guidelines, as well as utilization for special populations, including pregnant, older, and pediatric patients.

EXPERT OPINION

The advent of targeted therapies, including biologic treatments and small molecule inhibitors, has revolutionized outcomes for nail psoriasis patients, but warrant review and monitoring for potential adverse events. Oral systemic immunomodulators have demonstrated moderate efficacy for nail psoriasis treatment, but are notable for frequent contraindications and drug-drug interactions. Further study of these agents and their use in special populations is needed to elucidate safety profiles for long-term use.

Safety and Efficacy of Covid-19 Vaccination in Patients Undergoing Biological Treatments for Psoriasis

The introduction of biologic drugs revolutionized the treatment of psoriasis, shifting treatment goals to higher treatment outcomes and less frequent safety issues. The outbreak of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) represented a worldwide challenge, strongly affecting lifestyle, global economy, and overall health. Among the strategies adopted to contain the spreading of the infection, vaccination is the main one. In this context, the introduction of COVID-19 vaccines raised several doubts about their effectiveness and safety in patients undergoing therapy with biological for psoriasis. Even if molecular and cellular mechanisms by which COVID-19 vaccines lead to psoriasis development have not yet been fully elucidated, vaccination itself can trigger the release of interleukin (IL)-6, interferon (IFN) and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) α by T-helper (Th)1/Th17 cells. All these cytokines are involved in psoriasis pathogenesis. Thus, the aim of this manuscript is to review current literature on the safety and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination in psoriasis patients undergoing treatment with biologics, in order to clarify any concerns.