Aminoglycosides against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae in the critically ill: the pitfalls of aminoglycoside susceptibility

Third-Generation Tetracyclines: Current Knowledge and Therapeutic Potential

Tetracyclines constitute a unique class of antibiotic agents, widely prescribed for both community and hospital infections due to their broad spectrum of activity. Acting by disrupting protein synthesis through tight binding to the 30S ribosomal subunit, their interference is typically reversible, rendering them bacteriostatic in action. Resistance to tetracyclines has primarily been associated with changes in pump efflux or ribosomal protection mechanisms. To address this challenge, tetracycline molecules have been chemically modified, resulting in the development of third-generation tetracyclines. These novel tetracyclines offer significant advantages in treating infections, whether used alone or in combination therapies, especially in hospital settings. Beyond their conventional antimicrobial properties, research has highlighted their potential non-antibiotic properties, including their impact on immunomodulation and malignancy. This review will focus on third-generation tetracyclines, namely tigecycline, eravacycline, and omadacycline. We will delve into their mechanisms of action and resistance, while also evaluating their pros and cons over time. Additionally, we will explore their therapeutic potential, analyzing their primary indications of prescription, potential future uses, and non-antibiotic features. This review aims to provide valuable insights into the clinical applications of third-generation tetracyclines, thereby enhancing understanding and guiding optimal clinical use.

Carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (CR-GNB) in ICUs: resistance genes, therapeutics, and prevention - a comprehensive review

Intensive care units (ICUs) are specialized environments dedicated to the management of critically ill patients, who are particularly susceptible to drug-resistant bacteria. Among these, carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (CR-GNB) pose a significant threat endangering the lives of ICU patients. Carbapenemase production is a key resistance mechanism in CR-GNB, with the transfer of resistance genes contributing to the extensive emergence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). CR-GNB infections are widespread in ICUs, highlighting an urgent need for prevention and control measures to reduce mortality rates associated with CR-GNB transmission or infection. This review provides an overview of key aspects surrounding CR-GNB within ICUs. We examine the mechanisms of bacterial drug resistance, the resistance genes that frequently occur with CR-GNB infections in ICU, and the therapeutic options against carbapenemase genotypes. Additionally, we highlight crucial preventive measures to impede the transmission and spread of CR-GNB within ICUs, along with reviewing the advances made in the field of clinical predictive modeling research, which hold excellent potential for practical application.

Population pharmacokinetics and humanized dosage regimens matching the peak, area, trough, and range of amikacin plasma concentrations in immune-competent murine bloodstream and lung infection models

Amikacin is an FDA-approved aminoglycoside antibiotic that is commonly used. However, validated dosage regimens that achieve clinically relevant exposure profiles in mice are lacking. We aimed to design and validate humanized dosage regimens for amikacin in immune-competent murine bloodstream and lung infection models of Acinetobacter baumannii. Plasma and lung epithelial lining fluid (ELF) concentrations after single subcutaneous doses of 1.37, 13.7, and 137 mg/kg of body weight were simultaneously modeled via population pharmacokinetics. Then, humanized amikacin dosage regimens in mice were designed and prospectively validated to match the peak, area, trough, and range of plasma concentration profiles in critically ill patients (clinical dose: 25-30 mg/kg of body weight). The pharmacokinetics of amikacin were linear, with a clearance of 9.93 mL/h in both infection models after a single dose. However, the volume of distribution differed between models, resulting in an elimination half-life of 48 min for the bloodstream and 36 min for the lung model. The drug exposure in ELF was 72.7% compared to that in plasma. After multiple q6h dosing, clearance decreased by ~80% from the first (7.35 mL/h) to the last two dosing intervals (~1.50 mL/h) in the bloodstream model. Likewise, clearance decreased by 41% from 7.44 to 4.39 mL/h in the lung model. The humanized dosage regimens were 117 mg/kg of body weight/day in mice [administered in four fractions 6 h apart (q6h): 61.9%, 18.6%, 11.3%, and 8.21% of total dose] for the bloodstream and 96.7 mg/kg of body weight/day (given q6h as 65.1%, 16.9%, 10.5%, and 7.41%) for the lung model. These validated humanized dosage regimens and population pharmacokinetic models support translational studies with clinically relevant amikacin exposure profiles.

Improved characterization of aminoglycoside penetration into human lung epithelial lining fluid via population pharmacokinetics

Aminoglycosides are important treatment options for serious lung infections, but modeling analyses to quantify their human lung epithelial lining fluid (ELF) penetration are lacking. We estimated the extent and rate of penetration for five aminoglycosides via population pharmacokinetics from eight published studies. The area under the curve in ELF vs plasma ranged from 50% to 100% and equilibration half-lives from 0.61 to 5.80 h, indicating extensive system hysteresis. Aminoglycoside ELF peak concentrations were blunted, but overall exposures were moderately high.

Comparative Investigation into the Roles of Imipenem:Cyclodextrin Complexation and Antibiotic Combination in Combatting Antimicrobial Resistance in Gram-Negative Bacteria

Extensively drug-resistant (XDR), multidrug-resistant (MDR) and pandrug-resistant (PDR) Gram-negative microorganisms (GNBs) are considered a significant global threat. β-lactam and aminoglycoside combinations and imipenem:cyclodextrin inclusion complexes were studied for the treatment of lethal GNBs. This is because of the broad empiric coverage of the two drugs and their possession of different spectra of activity. Two cyclodextrins (β- and hydroxy propyl β-cyclodextrins) were utilized for inclusion complex formation with imipenem using the physical and kneading methods. In silico investigation using the molecular docking and Fourier-infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) were employed to estimate binding constant and confirm complex formation, respectively. The in vitro effects of amikacin and imipenem combination in comparison to the effect of imipenem-β- and hydroxy propyl β-cyclodextrin (CD) complexes against Klebsiella spp. and Acinetobacter baumannii were studied. The isolated microorganisms' antimicrobial responsiveness to various antibiotics (19 antibiotics) was evaluated. It was found that piperacillin/tazobactam and gentamycin (resistance rates were 33.3% and 34%, respectively) were the most effective antimicrobials. The in vitro studies have been performed by the checkerboard technique and time-killing assay. The studied combination of amikacin and imipenem showed a substantial drop in bacterial count (p < 0.05). The in vitro studies demonstrated a synergism for the investigated combination. Conventional PCR was used in molecular studies to identify the resistance genes bla IMP and aac (6')-Ib. The blaIMP and aac (6')-Ib were recorded in 38.2% and 3.6% of the studied isolates, respectively. The in vitro studies showed synergistic effects among the tested antibiotics with FICIs of ≤0.5. Finally, the study compared the reduction in bacterial count between the tested antibiotic combinations and imipenem:CD physical and kneaded mixtures. Imipenem:CD inclusion complexes demonstrated a significant bacterial count reduction over the antibiotic combination. These results highlight the emerging role of CDs as safe biofunctional excipients in the combat against superbug bacterial resistance.

Molecular evaluation of aminoglycosides resistance and biofilm formation in Klebsiella pneumoniae clinical isolates: A cross-sectional study

Background and Aims

Resistance to antibiotics and the capability to develop biofilm as two main virulent determinants of Klebsiella pneumoniae have important role in infection persistence. The aim of the study was to evaluate the association between the prevalence of aminoglycoside resistance and virulence genes and biofilm formation capacity in K. pneumoniae strains isolated from hospitalized patients in South-West of Iran.

Methods

A total of 114 non-duplicate clinical isolates of K. pneumoniae collected from Ahvaz teaching hospitals. Identification of species was performed by biochemical tests and then confirmed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of rpoB gene. The susceptibility to antibiotics was determined by Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method. Biofilm formation was assessed by microtiter plate method. Finally, PCR was conducted to detect virulence gene determinants including fimbrial genes, aminoglycoside modifying enzymes- and 16S rRNA methylase (RMTase) genes.

Results

Totally, all collected strains were carbapenem resistant and showed multidrug- and extensively drug-resistance phenotype (75% and 25%, respectively). Seventy-one percent (n = 81) of isolates were non-susceptible to aminoglycosides. Among aminoglycoside antibiotics, K. pneumoniae isolates showed the highest and lowest resistance rates to tobramycin (71%) and the amikacin (25%), respectively. All biofilm producer strains were positive for the presence virulence determinants including ecpA, fimA, mrkD, and mrkA. Of 81 aminoglycosides non-susceptible isolates 33% were positive for the presence ant (2″)-Ia as the most prevalent gene followed by aac (3')-IIa and armA (27%), aac (6')-Ib (18%), and aph (3')-Ia (15%).

Conclusion

K. pneumoniae isolates showed the highest and the lowest aminoglycoside resistance rates to tobramycin and amikacin, respectively. Majority of isolates were biofilm producers and there was significant association between antibiotic resistance pattern and the strength of biofilm production. The ant(2″)-Ia, aac (3')-IIa, and armA genes in aminoglycoside-resistant isolates.

Lumbar Cistern Drainage and Gentamicin Intrathecal Injection in the Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella Pneumoniae Intracranial Infection After Intracerebral Hemorrhage craniotomy: A Case Report

Background

Intracranial infection is a common complication caused by craniotomy. In particular, patients in Intensive Care Units (ICU) are prone to intracranial infection with multiple drug-resistant bacteria. Due to the lack of sensitive antibiotics for the treatment of multiple drug-resistant bacteria, there are few literatures focusing on the treatment of intracranial infection, and patients often fail to receive unified and standardized treatment. Consequently, patients with Carbapenem-resistant bacteria intracranial infection report poor prognosis and high mortality. It is very important to discuss how to treat patients with intracranial infection caused by multidrug resistant bacteria.

Case Presentation

We reported a case of intracranial infection of Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae(CRKp) due to high flap tension, poor wound healing and CSF leakage caused by subcutaneous fluid accumulation after intracerebral hemorrhage craniotomy. Since the patient was exposed to intracranial infection resulted from subcutaneous fluid accumulation, we adopted the method of continuous drainage with subcutaneous tube. When subcutaneous effusion disappeared, the subcutaneous drainage tube was pull out, while patients exhibited high fever again, the waist big pool drainage catheter and continuous drainage were carried out. According to the result of Subcutaneous effusion and CSF culture indicated multiple drug resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae intracranial infection and drug susceptibility, The treatment of gentamicin intrathecal injection, intravenous use amikacin and oral Paediatric Compound Sulfamethoxazole Tablets was adopted, the condition of intracranial infection was eventually controlled, with the consciousness restored. This patient was characterized by intracranial infection with Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae(CRKp).

Conclusions

Subcutaneous effusion is a high-risk factor for poor wound healing and interventions are required to be conducted to promote healing as early as possible to contribute to decreasing the menace of CSF leakage. In this case, Continuous drainage and intrathecal injection of sensitive antibiotics serve as critical process to determine the best strategy for clinical treatment of intracranial infection.

Aminoglycoside or Polymyxin Monotherapy for Treating Complicated Urinary Tract Infections Caused by Extensively Drug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa: A Propensity Score-Adjusted and Matched Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

Extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) infections are difficult to treat. We aimed to compare aminoglycosides or polymyxin monotherapy versus other antibiotic regimens (carbapenems, aztreonam, ceftazidime, cefepime, ceftolozane-tazobactam, or ceftazidime-avibactam) in complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI) caused by XDR-PA.

METHODS

Study performed at a tertiary-care hospital from 2010 to 2019. All consecutive adult patients with XDR-PA urine cultures and diagnosed with cUTI were retrospectively reviewed. XDR phenotype was defined according to Magiorakos et al. A propensity score was used as a covariate in multivariate analyses and for matching. Primary outcome was early clinical failure and at end of treatment (EOT). Main secondary outcomes were 30- and 90-day mortality, microbiological clearance, and antibiotic-related side effects.

RESULTS

Of the 465 episodes screened, 101 were included, 48% were treated with aminoglycoside or colistin monotherapy. Most XDR-PA were susceptible to colistin (100%) and amikacin (43%). Patients treated with antibiotic regimens other than aminoglycosides or polymyxin monotherapy were more likely to have hematologic malignancy (p < 0.001), higher SOFA score (p = 0.048), and bacteremia (p = 0.003). In multivariate models adjusted by propensity score, aminoglycoside or colistin monotherapy was not associated with worse outcomes. After propensity score matching, 28 episodes in each treatment group were matched. Adjusted ORs (95% CI) for early clinical failure and at EOT with aminoglycosides or polymyxin monotherapy were 0.53 (0.18-1.58) and 1.29 (0.34-4.83), respectively. Aminoglycoside or colistin monotherapy was not associated with higher 30-day (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.17-5.08) or 90-day mortality (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.20-2.31), nor with absence of microbiological clearance (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.33-1.58). No statistically significant differences were found in terms of nephrotoxicity. Clostridioides difficile infection was observed only in the "other antibiotic regimens" group (n = 6, 11.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

Aminoglycosides or polymyxin monotherapy showed good efficacy and safety profile in treating cUTI caused by XDR-PA. These results may be useful for antibiotic stewardship activities.

Amikacin for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infections: clinical efficacy and toxicity

Infections by carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKp) are an increasing global threat with limited therapeutic options. Our objective was to evaluate clinical and microbiological outcomes of patients treated with amikacin for CRKp infections. We did a retrospective cohort of patients > 18 years old, with CRKp infections treated with amikacin in two tertiary care hospitals in Porto Alegre, Brazil. The impact of clinical factors, antibiotic treatment, and amikacin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) on patients' 30-day mortality was assessed. Microbiological clearance and nephrotoxicity (assessed by RIFLE score) were evaluated as secondary outcomes. A Cox regression analysis was done for mortality. We included 84 patients for analysis. Twenty-nine (34.5%) patients died in 30 days. Amikacin MIC values ranged from 0.125 to 8 μg/mL and did not influence on mortality, regardless of the prescribed dose of this antibiotic (P = 0.24). Bacterial clearance occurred in 17 (58.6%) of 29 patients who collected subsequent cultures. Two (16.6%) of the 12 persistently positive cultures changed the amikacin susceptibility profile from susceptible to intermediate. Twenty-nine (37.2%) patients developed acute kidney injury (AKI): risk 13, injury 11, and failure 5. Risk factors for AKI were higher baseline eGFR (P < 0.01) and combination therapy with colistin (P = 0.02). Comparing patients who received combination with colistin vs polymyxin B, AKI occurred in 60.0% vs 20.6%, respectively, P < 0.01. Fifteen of the 16 (16.6%) patients who developed renal injury or failure were receiving colistin. In conclusion, amikacin was an effective treatment for CRKp infections. Within susceptible range, amikacin MIC values did not influence on clinical outcomes. Combination therapy of amikacin and colistin was highly nephrotoxic and should be used with caution.

Characterization of Enterobacter cloacae and Citrobacter freundii species complex isolates with decreased susceptibility to cephalosporins from United States hospitals and activity of ceftazidime/avibactam and comparator agents

Objectives

To evaluate the antimicrobial susceptibility and resistance mechanisms to β-lactams among Enterobacter cloacae and Citrobacter freundii from United States medical centres.

Methods

2571 E. cloacae and 1008 C. freundii species complex isolates were consecutively collected from 77 medical centres and susceptibility tested by broth microdilution method. Isolates displaying MIC values ≥16 mg/L for ceftazidime or ≥2 mg/L for cefepime (n = 914) were tested for β-lactamase-encoding genes using whole genome sequencing.

Results

Overall susceptibility to ceftazidime and cefepime were 73.9% and 91.2% among E. cloacae and 74.2% and 93.5% among C. freundii, respectively. Sixty-three isolates harboured a carbapenemase gene, including 56 bla_KPC, 2 bla_NMC-A, and 5 metallo-β-lactamase genes. Among non-carbapenemase producers, 121 isolates had at least one ESBL-encoding gene, mainly bla_SHV (81) or bla_CTX-M (61), and 15 had a transferable AmpC gene, mainly bla_DHA-1 (8) or bla_FOX-5 (6). Carbapenemase, ESBL, or transferable AmpC-encoding genes were not identified among 718 of 914 (78.6%) isolates sequenced. The most active agents against isolates with a decreased susceptibility to ceftazidime and/or cefepime were ceftazidime/avibactam (MIC_50/90, 0.5/1 mg/L; 99.3% susceptible), amikacin (MIC_50/90, 1/4 mg/L; 99.5% susceptible), and meropenem (MIC_50/90, 0.06/0.5 mg/L; 92.9% susceptible). The isolates resistant to ceftazidime/avibactam were the five MBL producers and one E. cloacae isolate with a reduced expression of OmpF and overexpression of AcrAB-TolC.

Conclusions

Hyperproduction of chromosomal AmpC appears to be the most common mechanism of resistance to ceftazidime and/or cefepime in E. cloacae and C. freundii. Ceftazidime/avibactam remained highly active against most isolates showing decreased susceptibility to ceftazidime and/or cefepime.

Synergistic Antibacterial Effects of Meropenem in Combination with Aminoglycosides against Carbapenem-Resistant Escherichia coli Harboring blaNDM-1 and blaNDM-5

Infections due to carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli (CREC) are problematic due to limitation in treatment options. Combination therapies of existing antimicrobial agents have become a reliable strategy to control these infections. In this study, the synergistic effects of meropenem in combination with aminoglycosides were assessed by checkerboard and time-kill assays. Of the 35 isolates, 19 isolates (54.3%) were resistant to carbapenems (imipenem and meropenem) with the MIC ranges from 16 to 128 µg/mL. These isolates were resistant to almost all antibiotic classes. Molecular characteristics revealed co-harboring of carbapenemase (bla_NDM-1, bla_NDM-5 and bla_OXA-48) and extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBL) genes (bla_CTX-M, bla_SHV and bla_TEM). The checkerboard assay displayed synergistic effects of meropenem and several aminoglycosides against most CREC isolates. Time-kill assays further demonstrated strong synergistic effects of meropenem in combination with either amikacin, gentamicin, kanamycin, streptomycin, and tobramycin. The results suggested that meropenem in combination with aminoglycoside therapy might be an efficient optional treatment for infections cause by CREC.

Generating Genotype-Specific Aminoglycoside Combinations with Ceftazidime/Avibactam for KPC-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae

Antibiotic combinations, including ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ/AVI), are frequently employed to combat KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (KPC-Kp), though such combinations have not been rationally optimized. Clinical KPC-Kp isolates with common genes encoding aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes (AMEs), aac(6')-Ib' or aac(6')-Ib, were used in static time-kill assays (n = 4 isolates) and the hollow-fiber infection model (HFIM; n = 2 isolates) to evaluate the activity of gentamicin, amikacin, and CAZ/AVI alone and in combinations. A short course, one-time aminoglycoside dose was also evaluated. Gentamicin plus CAZ/AVI was then tested in a mouse pneumonia model. Synergy with CAZ/AVI was more common with amikacin for aac(6')-Ib'-containing KPC-Kp but more common with gentamicin for aac(6')-Ib-containing isolates in time-kill assays. In the HFIM, although the isolates were aminoglycoside-susceptible at baseline, aminoglycoside monotherapies displayed variable initial killing, followed by regrowth and resistance emergence. CAZ/AVI combined with amikacin or gentamicin resulted in undetectable counts 50 h sooner than CAZ/AVI monotherapy against KPC-Kp with aac(6')-Ib'. CAZ/AVI monotherapy failed to eradicate KPC-Kp with aac(6')-Ib and a combination with gentamicin led to undetectable counts 70 h sooner than with amikacin. A one-time aminoglycoside dose with CAZ/AVI provided similar killing to aminoglycosides dosed for 7 days. In the mouse pneumonia model (n = 1 isolate), gentamicin and CAZ/AVI achieved a 6.0-log₁₀ CFU/lung reduction at 24 h, which was significantly greater than either monotherapy (P < 0.005). Aminoglycosides in combination with CAZ/AVI were promising for KPC-Kp infections; this was true even for a one-time aminoglycoside dose. Selecting aminoglycosides based on AME genes or susceptibilities can improve the pharmacodynamic activity of the combination.

Optimizing aminoglycoside selection for KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae with the aminoglycoside-modifying enzyme (AME) gene aac(6')-Ib

OBJECTIVES

KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (KPC-Kp) isolates commonly co-harbour the aminoglycoside-modifying enzyme (AME) gene aac(6')-Ib, which encodes an AME that can confer resistance to some of the commercially available aminoglycosides. We sought to determine the influence of AAC(6')-Ib in KPC-Kp on the pharmacodynamic activity of aminoglycosides.

METHODS

Six KPC-Kp clinical isolates, three with and three without aac(6')-Ib, were analysed. Using these isolates, the bacterial killing of amikacin, gentamicin and tobramycin was assessed in static time-kill experiments. The pharmacodynamic activity of the aminoglycosides was then assessed in a dynamic one-compartment infection model over 72 h using simulated human pharmacokinetics of once-daily dosing with amikacin (15 mg/kg), gentamicin (5 mg/kg) and tobramycin (5 mg/kg).

RESULTS

At clinically relevant aminoglycoside concentrations in time-kill experiments and the dynamic one-compartment model, gentamicin was more active than amikacin or tobramycin against the isolates harbouring aac(6')-Ib. Amikacin, gentamicin and tobramycin all showed progressively reduced bacterial killing with exposure to repeated doses against most isolates in the dynamic one-compartment model. MIC values were generally not a good predictor of gentamicin pharmacodynamic activity against KPC-Kp, but were more reliable for amikacin and tobramycin.

CONCLUSIONS

Gentamicin may be preferred over amikacin or tobramycin for treatment of KPC-Kp infections. However, gentamicin MICs are not a consistent predictor of its pharmacodynamic activity and unexpected treatment failures are possible.

Amikacin for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infections: clinical efficacy and toxicity

Infections by carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKp) are an increasing global threat with limited therapeutic options. Our objective was to evaluate clinical and microbiological outcomes of patients treated with amikacin for CRKp infections. We did a retrospective cohort of patients > 18 years old, with CRKp infections treated with amikacin in two tertiary care hospitals in Porto Alegre, Brazil. The impact of clinical factors, antibiotic treatment, and amikacin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) on patients' 30-day mortality was assessed. Microbiological clearance and nephrotoxicity (assessed by RIFLE score) were evaluated as secondary outcomes. A Cox regression analysis was done for mortality. We included 84 patients for analysis. Twenty-nine (34.5%) patients died in 30 days. Amikacin MIC values ranged from 0.125 to 8 μg/mL and did not influence on mortality, regardless of the prescribed dose of this antibiotic (P = 0.24). Bacterial clearance occurred in 17 (58.6%) of 29 patients who collected subsequent cultures. Two (16.6%) of the 12 persistently positive cultures changed the amikacin susceptibility profile from susceptible to intermediate. Twenty-nine (37.2%) patients developed acute kidney injury (AKI): risk 13, injury 11, and failure 5. Risk factors for AKI were higher baseline eGFR (P < 0.01) and combination therapy with colistin (P = 0.02). Comparing patients who received combination with colistin vs polymyxin B, AKI occurred in 60.0% vs 20.6%, respectively, P < 0.01. Fifteen of the 16 (16.6%) patients who developed renal injury or failure were receiving colistin. In conclusion, amikacin was an effective treatment for CRKp infections. Within susceptible range, amikacin MIC values did not influence on clinical outcomes. Combination therapy of amikacin and colistin was highly nephrotoxic and should be used with caution.

The Synergistic Activity and Optimizing Doses of Tigecycline in Combination with Aminoglycosides against Clinical Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Isolates

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE), especially carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP), are among the largest pathogenic threats to humans. The available antibiotic treatment options for combating CRKP are limited. Colistin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CoRE) have also been reported worldwide, including in Thailand. Therefore, this study aimed (1) to determine minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) and synergistic activities of antibiotics of CRKP, and (2) to determine the probability target of attainment (PTA) and cumulative fraction of response (CFR) using pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) data. Clinical CRKP isolates were obtained from Phramongkutklao Hospital (June to November 2020). Broth microdilution and checkerboard techniques were used to determine the mono- and synergistic activities of antibiotics. Carbapenemase and mcr-1 genes were also identified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The optimal antibiotic regimens were evaluated using Monte Carlo simulations. Forty-nine CRKP isolates were collected, 40 of which were CoRKP strains. The MIC50 and MIC90 of tigecycline, amikacin, and gentamicin were 1 and 2 µg/mL, 4 and 16 µg/mL, and 0.25 and 4 µg/mL, respectively. None of any isolates expressed the mcr-1 gene, whereas bla_OXA-48 (53.1%) and bla_OXA-48 plus bla_NDM (42.9%) were detected. Synergistic activity was observed in 8.2% of isolates for tigecycline combined with amikacin or gentamicin. Additive activity was observed in 75.5% of isolates for tigecycline-amikacin and 69.4% for tigecycline-gentamicin, and no antagonism was observed. High-dose antibiotic regimens achieved the PTA target. The general recommended dose of combination regimens began with 200 mg tigecycline and 25 mg/kg amikacin, or 7 mg/kg gentamicin, followed by 100 mg tigecycline every 12 h and 15 mg/kg amikacin or 5 mg/kg gentamicin every 24 h. In conclusion, tigecycline plus aminoglycosides might be a potential regimen against CRKP and CoRKP. The appropriate combination regimen based on MIC-based dose adjustment can improve optimal antibiotic dosing. Further research via clinical studies will be necessary to confirm these results.

Combating Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria by Integrating a Novel Target Site Penetration and Receptor Binding Assay Platform Into Translational Modeling

Multidrug-resistant bacteria are causing a serious global health crisis. A dramatic decline in antibiotic discovery and development investment by pharmaceutical industry over the last decades has slowed the adoption of new technologies. It is imperative that we create new mechanistic insights based on latest technologies, and use translational strategies to optimize patient therapy. Although drug development has relied on minimal inhibitory concentration testing and established in vitro and mouse infection models, the limited understanding of outer membrane permeability in Gram-negative bacteria presents major challenges. Our team has developed a platform using the latest technologies to characterize target site penetration and receptor binding in intact bacteria that inform translational modeling and guide new discovery. Enhanced assays can quantify the outer membrane permeability of β-lactam antibiotics and β-lactamase inhibitors using multiplex liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. While β-lactam antibiotics are known to bind to multiple different penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs), their binding profiles are almost always studied in lysed bacteria. Novel assays for PBP binding in the periplasm of intact bacteria were developed and proteins identified via proteomics. To characterize bacterial morphology changes in response to PBP binding, high-throughput flow cytometry and time-lapse confocal microscopy with fluorescent probes provide unprecedented mechanistic insights. Moreover, novel assays to quantify cytosolic receptor binding and intracellular drug concentrations inform target site occupancy. These mechanistic data are integrated by quantitative and systems pharmacology modeling to maximize bacterial killing and minimize resistance in in vitro and mouse infection models. This translational approach holds promise to identify antibiotic combination dosing strategies for patients with serious infections.

Present and Future Perspectives on Therapeutic Options for Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacterales Infections

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) are included in the list of the most threatening antibiotic resistance microorganisms, being responsible for often insurmountable therapeutic issues, especially in hospitalized patients and immunocompromised individuals and patients in intensive care units. The enzymatic resistance to carbapenems is encoded by different β-lactamases belonging to A, B or D Ambler class. Besides compromising the activity of last-resort antibiotics, CRE have spread from the clinical to the environmental sectors, in all geographic regions. The purpose of this review is to present present and future perspectives on CRE-associated infections treatment.

Antibiotic strategies and clinical outcomes for patients with carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacterial bloodstream infection

Carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacterial bloodstream infection (CRGNB-BSI) has become a rapidly growing global threat with limited antibiotic options and significant mortality. The aim of this study was to explore the antibiotic strategies and clinical outcomes of patients with CRGNB-BSI in Western China. We retrospectively investigated the demographic, microbiological and clinical characteristics of 355 patients with CRGNB-BSI from 2012-2017. Treatment failure and 28-day in-hospital mortality rates were 49.3% (175/355) and 23.7% (84/355), respectively. The most frequently isolated micro-organism was Acinetobacter baumannii (58.6%; 208/355). Patients with treatment failure had higher procalcitonin and interleukin-6 levels (P < 0.05). High-dosage tigecycline therapy (200 mg loading dose followed by 100 mg every 12 h) was not superior to standard tigecycline dosing (P > 0.05). Multivariable analysis revealed that multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) (OR = 2.226, 95% CI 1.376-3.602; P = 0.001) and intensive care unit (ICU) admission (OR = 3.116, 95% CI 1.905-5.097; P = 0.000) were independent risk factors for treatment failure, whereas monotherapy (OR = 0.386, 95% CI 0.203-0.735; P = 0.004) had a protective effect. Survival analysis revealed that inappropriate therapy, MODS and ICU admission were associated with a higher 28-day in-hospital mortality rate (P < 0.001). Combination antimicrobial therapy was not superior to monotherapy (P = 0.387). This study demonstrates that appropriate therapy is significantly associated with lower treatment failure and 28-day in-hospital mortality rates. Tigecycline might not be a suitable option for CRGBN-BSI. Patients with MODS and admitted to the ICU had poor clinical outcomes.

Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis due to carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae: Etiology and antibiotic treatment

Carbapenem antibiotics were first introduced in the 1980s and have long been considered the most active agents for the treatment of multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria. Over the last decade, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) have emerged as organisms causing spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. Infections caused by CRE have shown a higher mortality rate than those caused by bacteria sensitive to carbapenem antibiotics. Current antibiotic guidelines for the treatment of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis are insufficient, and rapid de-escalation of empiric antibiotic treatment is not widely recognized. This review summarizes the molecular characteristics, epidemiology and possible treatment of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis caused by CRE.

Synergistic Effect and Mechanism of Plumbagin with Gentamicin Against Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae

Background

Aminoglycosides are one of a few susceptible antimicrobials available for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE). However, the altered pharmacokinetics and increasing drug resistance of aminoglycosides will make them hardly effective if used in monotherapy. The purpose of this study was to identify herbal compounds that potentiate the antibacterial effect of gentamicin against carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKp) with gentamicin resistance and explore the action mechanisms.

Methods

A collection of 280 Chinese herbal compounds was screened for synergistic effect with gentamicin against CRKp by broth microdilution method according to the standard of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Intracellular gentamicin was measured by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). The membrane potential was evaluated by BacLight^TM Bacterial Membrane Potential Kit. Plumbagin-induced metabolite changes of vital metabolic pathways were measured by an optimized untargeted metabolomics method based on gas chromatography-mass spectrometer (GC/MS). Intracellular nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH) was detected via EnzyChrom NAD/NADH assay kit.

Results

We identified plumbagin to remarkably potentiate the antimicrobial activity of gentamicin against the CRKp with gentamicin resistance. Plumbagin at 100 μM could bring the MIC of gentamicin from >16 μg/mL to ~4 μg/mL despite its minimal inhibitory effect on the CRKp. A similar synergistic effect with gentamicin was also observed in an antibiotics-susceptible strain of Klebsiella pneumoniae. Compared with gentamicin monotreatment, the combination group showed a higher intracellular concentration of gentamicin and increased membrane potential in CRKp. Metabolomics analysis indicated remarkable increases of malate and α-ketoglutarate in the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle in the CRKp upon plumbagin treatment. Further analysis revealed higher intracellular NADH concentration in plumbagin-treated CRKp, supporting increased proton-motive force (PMF) that facilitates aminoglycosides uptake.

Conclusion

Herbal compound plumbagin was identified to stimulate gentamicin uptake by CRKp via enhancing TCA efflux and PMF to achieve a synergistic antibacterial effect. Plumbagin may be used in combination with aminoglycosides for severe CRKp infection by potentiating their therapeutic efficacy and lowering dosage.

Unraveling the Gentamicin Drug Product Complexity Reveals Variation in Microbiological Activities and Nephrotoxicity

The gentamicin drug product is a complex mixture of numerous components, many of which have not individually undergone safety and efficacy assessments. This is in contrast to the majority of medicines that require rigorous characterizations of trace impurities and are dosed as single components. In gentamicin, four components, known as gentamicin congeners C1, C1a, C2, and C2a, comprise the majority of the mixture. A liquid chromatography-mass spectroscopy analysis revealed that the relative abundances of each gentamicin congener in commercial formulations can vary up to 1.9-fold depending on the commercial source of the gentamicin. To determine if the gentamicin used for antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) would be predictive of the microbiological activity of the product used to dose patients, the relative abundances of the four congeners contained on commercial AST disks were measured. It was found that the congener abundances on the commercial AST disks varied up to 4.1-fold. After purification of the four gentamicin congeners, similar potencies against bacterial strains lacking aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes (AMEs) were observed. However, the potency of the congeners against strains harboring a common AME differed up to 128-fold. Nephrotoxicity of the individual gentamicin congeners also differed significantly in cell-based and repeat-dose rat nephrotoxicity studies. Variations in the composition of commercial gentamicin products combined with toxicity differences between gentamicin congeners suggest that some gentamicin formulations may be more nephrotoxic. Our results also raise the concern that gentamicin susceptibility test results may not be predictive of patient outcomes and could lead to unexpected clinical treatment failures.

A rapid and accurate method for the detection of four aminoglycoside modifying enzyme drug resistance gene in clinical strains of Escherichia coli by a multiplex polymerase chain reaction

BACKGROUND

Antibiotics are highly effective drugs used in the treatment of infectious diseases. Aminoglycoside antibiotics are one of the most common antibiotics in the treatment of bacterial infections. However, the development of drug resistance against those medicines is becoming a serious concern.

AIM

This study aimed to develop an efficient, rapid, accurate, and sensitive detection method that is applicable for routine clinical use.

METHODS

Escherichia coli was used as a model organism to develop a rapid, accurate, and reliable multiplex polymerase chain reaction (M-PCR) for the detection of four aminoglycoside modifying enzyme (AME) resistance genes Aac(6')-Ib, Aac(3)-II, Ant(3″)-Ia, and Aph(3')-Ia. M-PCR was used to detect the distribution of AME resistance genes in 237 clinical strains of E. coli. The results were verified by simplex polymerase chain reaction (S-PCR).

RESULTS

Results of M-PCR and S-PCR showed that the detection rates of Aac(6')-Ib, Aac(3)-II, Ant(3″)-Ia, and Aph(3')-Ia were 32.7%, 59.2%, 23.5%, and 16.8%, respectively, in 237 clinical strains of E. coli. Compared with the traditional methods for detection and identification, the rapid and accurate M-PCR detection method was established to detect AME drug resistance genes. This technique can be used for the clinical detection as well as the surveillance and monitoring of the spread of those specific antibiotic resistance genes.

Novel Cassette Assay To Quantify the Outer Membrane Permeability of Five β-Lactams Simultaneously in Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae and Enterobacter cloacae

Poor penetration through the outer membrane (OM) of Gram-negative bacteria is a major barrier of antibiotic development. While β-lactam antibiotics are commonly used against Klebsiella pneumoniae and Enterobacter cloacae, there are limited data on OM permeability especially in K. pneumoniae Here, we developed a novel cassette assay, which can simultaneously quantify the OM permeability to five β-lactams in carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae and E. cloacae Both clinical isolates harbored a blaKPC-2 and several other β-lactamases. The OM permeability of each antibiotic was studied separately ("discrete assay") and simultaneously ("cassette assay") by determining the degradation of extracellular β-lactam concentrations via multiplex liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analyses. Our K. pneumoniae isolate was polymyxin resistant, whereas the E. cloacae was polymyxin susceptible. Imipenem penetrated the OM at least 7-fold faster than meropenem for both isolates. Imipenem penetrated E. cloacae at least 258-fold faster and K. pneumoniae 150-fold faster compared to aztreonam, cefepime, and ceftazidime. For our β-lactams, OM permeability was substantially higher in the E. cloacae compared to the K. pneumoniae isolate (except for aztreonam). This correlated with a higher OmpC porin production in E. cloacae, as determined by proteomics. The cassette and discrete assays showed comparable results, suggesting limited or no competition during influx through OM porins. This cassette assay allowed us, for the first time, to efficiently quantify the OM permeability of multiple β-lactams in carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae and E. cloacae Characterizing the OM permeability presents a critical contribution to combating the antimicrobial resistance crisis and enables us to rationally optimize the use of β-lactam antibiotics.IMPORTANCE Antimicrobial resistance is causing a global human health crisis and is affecting all antibiotic classes. While β-lactams have been commonly used against susceptible isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae and Enterobacter cloacae, carbapenem-resistant isolates are spreading worldwide and pose substantial clinical challenges. Rapid penetration of β-lactams leads to high drug concentrations at their periplasmic target sites, allowing β-lactams to more completely inactivate their target receptors. Despite this, there are limited tangible data on the permeability of β-lactams through the outer membranes of many Gram-negative pathogens. This study presents a novel, cassette assay, which can simultaneously characterize the permeability of five β-lactams in multidrug-resistant clinical isolates. We show that carbapenems, and especially imipenem, penetrate the outer membrane of K. pneumoniae and E. cloacae substantially faster than noncarbapenem β-lactams. The ability to efficiently characterize the outer membrane permeability is critical to optimize the use of β-lactams and combat carbapenem-resistant isolates.

Analysis of Resistance Gene Prevalence in Whole-Genome Sequenced Enterobacteriales from Brazil

Enterobacteriales is an order of bacteria responsible for community and hospital-acquired infections related to high rates of antimicrobial resistance and increased treatment costs, morbidity, and mortality globally. The aims of this study were to analyze the frequency of the resistance genes detected and distribution over the years and sources of isolation in sequenced Enterobacteriales strains isolated in Brazil and available at the Pathogen Detection website. The presence of resistance genes was analyzed in 1,507 whole-genome sequenced strains of 19 Enterobacteriales species. A total of 58.0% of the strains presented resistance genes to at least one antimicrobial class and 684 strains presented a multidrug-resistant (MDR) profile. Resistance genes to 14 classes of antimicrobials were detected. Aminoglycosides presented the most prevalent and diverse resistance genes, while the sulfonamide resistance gene, sul2, was the most prevalent among the strains studied. The presence of resistance genes from 14 different antimicrobial classes, the high levels of MDR strains, and the detection of genes related to clinical and veterinary-used drugs reinforce the necessity of more efficient control measures. Moreover, it warns for the necessity of the rational use of antimicrobials in veterinary and clinical situations in Brazil, since contaminated food may act as a vehicle for human infections.

Optimizing therapy in carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infections

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In the absence of randomized clinical trial data, questions remain regarding the optimal treatment of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) infections. CRE have historically been susceptible to polymyxins, tigecycline or aminoglycosides (mostly gentamicin), and these antibiotics have long been considered the drugs of choice for CRE infections, although varying rates of resistance to all have been reported. This review looks at data from clinical studies assessing the outcomes of CRE infections treated with different antibiotic regimens.

RECENT FINDINGS

The recently approved fixed-dose combination agent, ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI), is active against KPC and OXA-48-producing Enterobacteriaceae. The limited clinical data available on CAZ-AVI indicate that it is associated with survival benefits relative to other commonly used regimens, although development of resistance is a concern. New drugs active against CRE isolates (including the recently approved meropenem-vaborbactam) are in different stages of development.

SUMMARY

CAZ-AVI and meropenem-vaborbactam seem destined to become the backbone of target therapy for high-risk patients with severe infections caused by susceptible CRE strains. However, empirical therapy should be based on risk factors to be defined in the near future, whereas the necessity of combinations with CAZ-AVI requires further studies. Polymyxins are still important options for low-risk patients with susceptible CRE infections, but also for high-risk patients in regions where metallo-β-lactamase-producing CRE predominate because CAZ-AVI and meropenem-vaborbactam are both ineffective against these strains.

Association of blaNDM-1 with blaKPC-2 and aminoglycoside-modifying enzyme genes among Klebsiella pneumoniae, Proteus mirabilis and Serratia marcescens clinical isolates in Brazil

OBJECTIVES

Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales are frequently involved in healthcare-associated infections worldwide. The objectives of this study were to investigate (i) the frequency of the main genes encoding carbapenemases, 16S rRNA methylases and aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes (AMEs) as well as the mcr gene and (ii) the clonal relationship of enterobacteria isolates resistant to carbapenems and aminoglycosides from colonisation and infection in patients from hospitals in northeastern Brazil.

METHODS

Antimicrobial susceptibility was determined using an automated VITEK®2 system. Presence of carbapenemase, AME and 16S rRNA methylase genes as well as the mcr gene was determined by PCR and amplicon sequencing. Genetic variability was determined by ERIC-PCR.

RESULTS

A total of 35 isolates resistant to carbapenems and aminoglycosides were selected for this study. Klebsiella pneumoniae was most common (45.7%), followed by Proteus mirabilis (28.6%) and Serratia marcescens (25.7%). AME genes were found in 97.1% of isolates, most commonly aph(3')-VI and aac(6')-Ib. The bla_NDM-1 and bla_KPC-2 genes were detected in 25.7% and 88.6% of isolates, respectively; five isolates harboured these genes concomitantly. According to the literature, this is the first report of the association of bla_NDM-1 and bla_KPC-2 in P. mirabilis and S. marcescens in Brazil. The isolates showed a multiclonal profile by ERIC-PCR.

CONCLUSION

The emergence of bla_NDM-1 associated with bla_KPC-2 and AME genes in K. pneumoniae, P. mirabilis and S. marcescens isolates with a multiclonal profile is of concern as this limits therapeutic options. These results should alert medical authorities to establish rigorous detection methods to reduce the spread of these antimicrobial resistance genes.

Comparable Efficacy and Better Safety of Double β-Lactam Combination Therapy versus β‑Lactam plus Aminoglycoside in Gram-Negative Bacteria in Randomized, Controlled Trials

There is a great need for efficacious therapies against Gram-negative bacteria. Double β-lactam combination(s) (DBL) are relatively safe, and preclinical data are promising; however, their clinical role has not been well defined. We conducted a metaanalysis of the clinical and microbiological efficacy of DBL compared to β-lactam plus aminoglycoside combinations (BLAG). PubMed, Embase, ISI Web of Knowledge, and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register database were searched through July 2018. We included randomized controlled clinical trials that compared DBL with BLAG combinations. Clinical response was used as the primary outcome and microbiological response in Gram-negative bacteria as the secondary outcome; sensitivity analyses were performed for Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella spp., and Escherichia coli Heterogeneity and risk of bias were assessed. Safety results were classified by systems and organs. Thirteen studies evaluated 2,771 cases for clinical response and 665 cases for microbiological response in various Gram-negative species. DBL achieved slightly, but not significantly, better clinical response (risk ratio, 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.99 to 1.11) and microbiological response in Gram-negatives (risk ratio, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.99 to 1.25) compared with BLAG. Sensitivity analyses by pathogen showed the same trend. No significant heterogeneity across studies was found. DBL was significantly safer than BLAG regarding renal toxicity (6.6% versus 8.8%, P = 0.0338) and ototoxicity (0.7 versus 3.1%, P = 0.0137). Other adverse events were largely comparable. Overall, empirically designed DBL showed comparable clinical and microbiological responses across different Gram-negative species, and were significantly safer than BLAG. Therefore, DBL should be rationally optimized via the latest translational approaches, leveraging mechanistic insights and newer β-lactams for future evaluation in clinical trials.

The "Old" and the "New" Antibiotics for MDR Gram-Negative Pathogens: For Whom, When, and How

The recent expansion of multidrug resistant and pan-drug-resistant pathogens poses significant challenges in the treatment of healthcare associated infections. An important advancement, is a handful of recently launched new antibiotics targeting some of the current most problematic Gram-negative pathogens, namely carbapenem-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) and carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa (CRPA). Less options are available against carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) and strains producing metallo-beta lactamases (MBL). Ceftazidime-avibactam signaled a turning point in the treatment of KPC and partly OXA- type carbapenemases, whereas meropenem-vaborbactam was added as a potent combination against KPC-producers. Ceftolozane-tazobactam could be seen as an ideal beta-lactam backbone for the treatment of CRPA. Plazomicin, an aminoglycoside with better pharmacokinetics and less toxicity compared to other class members, will cover important proportions of multi-drug resistant pathogens. Eravacycline holds promise in the treatment of infections by CRAB, with a broad spectrum of activity similar to tigecycline, and improved pharmacokinetics. Novel drugs and combinations are not to be considered "panacea" for the ongoing crisis in the therapy of XDR Gram-negative bacteria and colistin will continue to be considered as a fundamental companion drug for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (particularly in areas where MBL predominate), for the treatment of CRPA (in many cases being the only in vitro active drug) as well as CRAB. Aminoglycosides are still important companion antibiotics. Finally, fosfomycin as part of combination treatment for CRE infections and P. aeruginosa, deserves a greater attention. Optimal conditions for monotherapy and the "when and how" of combination treatments integrating the novel agents will be discussed.

Generating Robust and Informative Nonclinical In Vitro and In Vivo Bacterial Infection Model Efficacy Data To Support Translation to Humans

In June 2017, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, part of the National Institutes of Health, organized a workshop entitled “Pharmacokinetics-Pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) for Development of Therapeutics against Bacterial Pathogens.” The aims were to discuss details of various PK/PD models and identify sound practices for deriving and utilizing PK/PD relationships to design optimal dosage regimens for patients. Workshop participants encompassed individuals from academia, industry, and government, including the United States Food and Drug Administration.

In June 2017, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, part of the National Institutes of Health, organized a workshop entitled “Pharmacokinetics-Pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) for Development of Therapeutics against Bacterial Pathogens.” The aims were to discuss details of various PK/PD models and identify sound practices for deriving and utilizing PK/PD relationships to design optimal dosage regimens for patients. Workshop participants encompassed individuals from academia, industry, and government, including the United States Food and Drug Administration. This and the accompanying review on clinical PK/PD summarize the workshop discussions and recommendations. Nonclinical PK/PD models play a critical role in designing human dosage regimens and are essential tools for drug development. These include in vitro and in vivo efficacy models that provide valuable and complementary information for dose selection and translation from the laboratory to human. It is crucial that studies be designed, conducted, and interpreted appropriately. For antibacterial PK/PD, extensive published data and expertise are available. These have been leveraged to develop recommendations, identify common pitfalls, and describe the applications, strengths, and limitations of various nonclinical infection models and translational approaches. Despite these robust tools and published guidance, characterizing nonclinical PK/PD relationships may not be straightforward, especially for a new drug or new class. Antimicrobial PK/PD is an evolving discipline that needs to adapt to future research and development needs. Open communication between academia, pharmaceutical industry, government, and regulatory bodies is essential to share perspectives and collectively solve future challenges.

Antimicrobial treatment challenges in the era of carbapenem resistance

Infections due to carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria are burdened by high mortality and represent an urgent threat to address. Clinicians are currently at a dawn of a new era in which antibiotic resistance in Gram-negative bacilli is being dealt with by the availability of the first new antibiotics in this field for many years. Although new antibiotics have shown promising results in clinical trials, there is still uncertainty over whether their use will improve clinical outcomes in real world practice. Some observational studies have reported a survival benefit in carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae bloodstream infections using combination therapy, often including "old" antibiotics such as colistin, aminoglycosides, tigecycline, and carbapenems. These regimens, however, are linked to increased risk of antimicrobial resistance, and their efficacy has yet to be compared to new antimicrobial options. While awaiting more definitive evidence, antibiotic stewards need clear direction on how to optimize the use of old and novel antibiotic options. Furthermore, carbapenem-sparing regimens should be carefully considered as a potential tool to reduce selective antimicrobial pressure.

Infections Caused by Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae: An Update on Therapeutic Options

Carbapenems are considered as last-resort antibiotics for the treatment of infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. With the increasing use of carbapenems in clinical practice, the emergence of carbapenem-resistant pathogens now poses a great threat to human health. Currently, antibiotic options for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) are very limited, with polymyxins, tigecycline, fosfomycin, and aminoglycosides as the mainstays of therapy. The need for new and effective anti-CRE therapies is urgent. Here, we describe the current understanding of issues related to CRE and review combination therapeutic strategies for CRE infections, including high-dose tigecycline, high-dose prolonged-infusion of carbapenem, and double carbapenem therapy. We also review the newly available antibiotics which have potential in the future treatment of CRE infections: ceftazidime/avibactam, which is active against KPC and OXA-48 producers; meropenem/vaborbactam, which is active against KPC producers; plazomicin, which is a next-generation aminoglycoside with in vitro activity against CRE; and eravacycline, which is a tetracycline class antibacterial with in vitro activity against CRE. Although direct evidence for CRE treatment is still lacking and the development of resistance is a concern, these new antibiotics provide additional therapeutic options for CRE infections. Finally, we review other potential anti-CRE antibiotics in development: imipenem/relebactam and cefiderocol. Currently, high-dose and combination strategies that may include the new β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors should be considered in severe CRE infections to maximize treatment success. In the future, when more treatment options are available, therapy for CRE infections should be individualized and based on molecular phenotypes of resistance, susceptibility profiles, disease severity, and patient characteristics. More high-quality studies are needed to guide effective treatment for infections caused by CRE.

Effect of increasing meropenem MIC on the killing activity of meropenem in combination with amikacin or polymyxin B against MBL- and KPC-producing Enterobacter cloacae

Carbapenem resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) are a growing threat worldwide. Infections caused by these organisms have exhibited high rates of mortality (50%) for which there is no standard of care and a dearth of clinical trials. Most in vitro data on CRE focus on Klebsiella pneumoniae, but it is known that effective therapy may depend on species or even strain. To address this, meropenem, amikacin, and polymyxin B alone and in combination were evaluated by time kill against four carbapenem-producing Enterobacter cloacae clinical isolates representing a range of meropenem nonsusceptibility (2-32 mg/L) and resistance mechanisms (KPC 2 and/or VIM 1). As meropenem minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) increased, bactericidal activity and synergy were maintained for 48 hours in isolates exposed to meropenem and amikacin, but synergy and bactericidal activity were not maintained in all isolates exposed to meropenem and polymyxin B.

Combination therapy with polymyxin B for carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infection

Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae (KPC-KP) bloodstream infections (BSIs) are related to high mortality rates, and combination therapy has been associated with lower mortality in patients treated mostly with colistin. There is a paucity of studies addressing polymyxin B (PMB) treatment for KPC-KP infections. This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with monomicrobial KPC-KP BSIs. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Antimicrobial therapy was defined as empirical (started within the first 48 h) or definitive (initiated after >48 h) and was evaluated as follows: monotherapy (only one in vitro active agent or combination therapy of one in vitro active agent plus one or more in vitro non-active agents); and combination therapy with two or more in vitro active agents. A total of 82 KPC-KP BSIs were included; 40 patients (48.8%) died in the first 30 days. Mortality of patients treated with the combination of two in vitro active antimicrobial agents, mostly PMB plus amikacin, was significantly lower (37.5%) compared with monotherapy (64.7%) (P= 0.01). Combination therapy [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 0.40, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.22-0.83; P = 0.01] was independently associated with lower 30-day survival when controlled for non-surgical admission (aHR = 2.33, 95% CI 1.14-4.80; P = 0.02) and use of vasoactive drugs (aHR = 7.37, 95% CI 3.01-18.02; P < 0.01). In conclusion, combination therapy with two in vitro active agents, mostly PMB plus amikacin, showed a survival benefit compared with other regimens.

KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream isolates from Brazilian hospitals: What (still) remains active?

OBJECTIVES

This study assessed susceptibility to polymyxin B (PMB) and alternative antimicrobials, with focus on aminoglycosides and tigecycline, according to different breakpoints in KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (KPC-Kp) bloodstream isolates from Brazilian hospitals.

METHODS

Bloodstream K. pneumoniae isolates non-susceptible to any of the three carbapenems (meropenem, imipenem or ertapenem) from four Brazilian tertiary-care hospitals were selected. Antimicrobial susceptibility was determined and interpreted according to distinct breakpoints. Twenty-nine PMB-resistant KPC-Kp isolates were selected for molecular typing.

RESULTS

A total of 158 KPC-Kp were analysed. MIC_50/90 values for PMB were 0.25/16mg/L; 40 isolates (25.3%) were resistant to PMB. MIC_50/90 values for meropenem were 32/≥256mg/L; no isolates were susceptible to meropenem according to CLSI, but 10 isolates were intermediate using EUCAST breakpoints (1, MIC=4mg/L; 9, MIC=8mg/L). MIC_50/90 values for tigecycline were 2/8mg/L; 53 (33.5%) and 94 (59.5%) isolates were susceptible according to EUCAST and FDA breakpoints, respectively. MIC_50/90 values were 32/≥64mg/L for amikacin and ≥16/≥16mg/L for gentamicin; 48 (30.4%), 28 (17.7%) and 16 (10.1%) were susceptible to amikacin according to CLSI, EUCAST and USCAST, respectively, but susceptibility rates to gentamicin were <7.0%. Eighteen distinct clonal profiles were identified among 29 PMB-resistant isolates by DNA macrorestriction. Most clones belonged to CC11.

CONCLUSION

Elevated rates of PMB-resistant KPC-Kp bloodstream infections were found in four Brazilian hospitals, mostly of polyclonal origin. Alternative antimicrobials with the highest in vitro activity were tigecycline and amikacin, although susceptibility rates significantly decreased using criteria with stricter breakpoints (e.g. EUCAST, USCAST).

The Epidemiology, Evolution, and Treatment of KPC-Producing Organisms

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to investigate the evolution and epidemiology of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing organisms and the current and future treatment options for infections caused by KPC-producing isolates.

RECENT FINDINGS

The emergence of resistance in Enterobacteriaceae producing carbapenemases globally has increased the challenges in treating infections caused by these organisms. One of the prominent mechanisms of resistance is the production of KPC enzymes. Infections caused by organisms producing KPCs have limited treatment options and are associated with poor clinical outcomes. The rapid rise of KPC-producing organisms necessitated the use of drugs with pharmacokinetic and toxicity limitations, including polymyxins, tigecycline, fosfomycin, and aminoglycosides. The availability of new beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations that are effective against KPC-producing organisms represent an advance in safety and efficacy. Several agents are currently being studied that have activity against KPC-producing organisms and appear to represent promising additions to our armamentarium. KPC-producing organisms cause infections with high morbidity and mortality. Limited treatment options are available, though new therapies have been developed. Pipeline agents are likely to have a place in therapy for the treatment of infections caused by KPC-producing isolates.

Treatment of Infections Caused by Extended-Spectrum-Beta-Lactamase-, AmpC-, and Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae

Therapy of invasive infections due to multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (MDR-E) is challenging, and some of the few active drugs are not available in many countries. For extended-spectrum β-lactamase and AmpC producers, carbapenems are the drugs of choice, but alternatives are needed because the rate of carbapenem resistance is rising. Potential active drugs include classic and newer β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor combinations, cephamycins, temocillin, aminoglycosides, tigecycline, fosfomycin, and, rarely, fluoroquinolones or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. These drugs might be considered in some specific situations. AmpC producers are resistant to cephamycins, but cefepime is an option. In the case of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE), only some "second-line" drugs, such as polymyxins, tigecycline, aminoglycosides, and fosfomycin, may be active; double carbapenems can also be considered in specific situations. Combination therapy is associated with better outcomes for high-risk patients, such as those in septic shock or with pneumonia. Ceftazidime-avibactam was recently approved and is active against KPC and OXA-48 producers; the available experience is scarce but promising, although development of resistance is a concern. New drugs active against some CPE isolates are in different stages of development, including meropenem-vaborbactam, imipenem-relebactam, plazomicin, cefiderocol, eravacycline, and aztreonam-avibactam. Overall, therapy of MDR-E infection must be individualized according to the susceptibility profile, type, and severity of infection and the features of the patient.

In vitro activity of minocycline combined with aminoglycosides against Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae

This study assessed the in vitro antibacterial activity of minocycline-aminoglycoside combination against Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing K. pneumoniae. Seventy non-duplicate clinical isolates of KPC-producing K. pneumoniae were collected from patients with bloodstream infections. The synergistic activity of minocycline-aminoglycoside combination was studied by the checkerboard method and time-kill assays in strains with different susceptibilities, and the mutant prevention concentration (MPC) and mutant selection window (MSW) of drugs alone and in combination were determined. The checkerboard method found this combination displayed synergistic and partial synergistic activity against aminoglycoside-susceptible isolates, but indifferent activity against aminoglycoside-resistant isolates. Time-kill assays further demonstrated strong synergistic and bactericidal effect of this combination existed against isolates which were susceptible to both drugs. But for resistant isolates, the time-kill assays showed no synergy. The MPCs of minocycline or aminoglycosides were 8- to 32-fold higher than the MICs, suggesting the MSWs of these drugs were quite wide. For the antibiotic combinations, the addition of 1×MIC concentration of amikacin or gentamicin could reduce the MPCs of minocycline by 4- to 16-fold. Generally, no mutants recovered in the plates containing 1×MIC concentration of minocycline and 2×MIC concentration of amikacin or gentamicin. In summary, these results suggest that minocycline-aminoglycoside combination can be an alternative for infections caused by KPC-producing K. pneumoniae because this combination displays strong synergistic and bactericidal activity in susceptible isolates, and can effectively prevent the emergence of resistant mutants. Further in vitro pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic studies and clinical trials should be performed to fully evaluate the efficacy of this drug combination.

Discrepant susceptibility to gentamicin despite amikacin resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae by VITEK 2 represents false susceptibility associated with the armA 16S rRNA methylase gene

Because we experienced gentamicin failure in Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteraemia that was susceptible to gentamicin despite amikacin resistance, as determined by VITEK 2, we evaluated the true susceptibility and mechanism of resistance. We screened 2818 K. pneumoniae isolates during a 1-year period at a university hospital and reviewed anti-microbial susceptibility reports using the VITEK 2 system. The minimum inhibitory concentration was substantiated by broth microdilution (BMD), and the presence of 16S rRNA methylase genes and aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes was also investigated. A total of 131 amikacin-resistant isolates from 19 patients were gentamicin non-resistant according to the VITEK 2 system. Among these, we were able to collect isolates from 12 patients (63.2 %), and a single isolate from each patient was tested. Eleven of the gentamicin non-resistant isolates (91.7 %) showed high-level resistance to both amikacin and gentamicin by BMD in association with the armA gene. Gentamicin is not an adequate treatment option for amikacin-resistant K. pneumoniae, even if VITEK 2 reports susceptibility.

Evaluation of automated systems for aminoglycosides and fluoroquinolones susceptibility testing for Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae

BACKGROUND

Automated systems (MicroScan WalkAway 96 Plus, Phoenix 100, and Vitek 2 Compact) are widely used in clinical laboratories nowadays. The aim of this study is to evaluate the performance of these three systems for susceptibility testing of aminoglycosides and fluoroquinolones against Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE).

METHODS

A total of 75 CRE isolates were used in this study. Quinolone resistance determinants (QRDs) (qnrA, qnrB, qnrC, qnrD, qnrS, aac(6')-Ib-cr, oqxAB and qepA) and aminoglycoside resistance determinants (ARDs) (aac(6')-Ib, armA, npmA, rmtA, rmtB, rmtC, rmtD and rmtE) of these CRE were screened by PCR. The MICs of aminoglycosides (gentamicin and amikacin) and fluoroquinolones (ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin) to CRE obtained with the automated systems were compared with the reference method (agar dilution method).

RESULTS

Totally, 97.3% (73/75) of CRE harbored QRDs. The qnr gene was the most common QRD determinant identified in 68 (96.7%), followed by aac (6')-Ib-cr in 56 (74.7%), oqxAB in 23 (30.7%), and qepA in 2 (2.7%), respectively. 22.7% (17/75) of CRE harbored ARD determinants. rmtA, rmtB and npmA were identified among these isolates in 6 (8.0%), 6 (8.0%) and 5 (6.7%), respectively. A total of 900 results were obtained in this study. Overall, the total error rate was 9.89%. Twenty-eight very major errors (3.11%), 22 major errors (2.44%) and 39 minor errors (4.33%) were identified against agar dilution method. The very major errors were almost evenly distributed between results for fluoroquinolones (2.89%) and aminoglycosides (3.33%), while the major errors and minor errors were more commonly found in the results of fluoroquinolones (3.11% and 6.44%, respectively) than aminoglycosides (1.78% and 2.22%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study shows that testing difficulties in susceptibility testing do exist in automated systems. We suggest clinical laboratories using automated systems should consider using a second, independent antimicrobial susceptibility testing method to validate aminoglycosides and fluoroquinolones susceptibility.