Human factors studies of a prefilled syringe with stable liquid glucagon in a simulated severe hypoglycemia rescue situation

DCRM 2.0: Multispecialty practice recommendations for the management of diabetes, cardiorenal, and metabolic diseases

The spectrum of cardiorenal and metabolic diseases comprises many disorders, including obesity, type 2 diabetes (T2D), chronic kidney disease (CKD), atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), heart failure (HF), dyslipidemias, hypertension, and associated comorbidities such as pulmonary diseases and metabolism dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease and metabolism dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASLD and MASH, respectively, formerly known as nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis [NAFLD and NASH]). Because cardiorenal and metabolic diseases share pathophysiologic pathways, two or more are often present in the same individual. Findings from recent outcome trials have demonstrated benefits of various treatments across a range of conditions, suggesting a need for practice recommendations that will guide clinicians to better manage complex conditions involving diabetes, cardiorenal, and/or metabolic (DCRM) diseases. To meet this need, we formed an international volunteer task force comprising leading cardiologists, nephrologists, endocrinologists, and primary care physicians to develop the DCRM 2.0 Practice Recommendations, an updated and expanded revision of a previously published multispecialty consensus on the comprehensive management of persons living with DCRM. The recommendations are presented as 22 separate graphics covering the essentials of management to improve general health, control cardiorenal risk factors, and manage cardiorenal and metabolic comorbidities, leading to improved patient outcomes.

Glucagon: Delivery advancements for hypoglycemia management

As the 100th anniversary of glucagon's discovery approaches, we reflect on the remarkable journey of understanding its pivotal role in glucose regulation. Advancements in glucagon delivery systems for managing hypoglycemia are unfolding with promise, albeit accompanied by formulation and implementation challenges. Recent developments include non-injectable methods like BAQSIMI® (Nasal glucagon) offers a user-friendly option, but stability, bioavailability, and rapid onset remain formulation hurdles. Closed-loop systems, combining glucagon with insulin, aim to automate glucose control, demanding stable and precise formulations compatible with complex algorithms. However, achieving co-delivery harmony and effective dual-hormone responses poses substantial challenges. Ogluo® and Gvoke HypoPen® are auto-injector pens, a ready-to-use solution that can rapidly control hypoglycemia and eliminate the need for mixing powder and liquid. GlucaGen® Hypokit® and Glucagon Emergency Kits are traditional deliveries that possess complexity during administration and are still widely used in clinical practice. In addition to this advancement, we have covered the recent patents and clinical trials of glucagon delivery. The synergy of patent innovation and clinical validation offers a glimpse into the transformative potential of glucagon delivery yet underscores the intricate path toward widespread adoption and improved diabetes care. Finally, this review will help the formulation scientist, clinicians, healthcare providers, and patient to manage hypoglycemia using glucagon.

Management of Individuals With Diabetes at High Risk for Hypoglycemia: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline

CONTEXT

Hypoglycemia in people with diabetes is common, especially in those taking medications such as insulin and sulfonylureas (SU) that place them at higher risk. Hypoglycemia is associated with distress in those with diabetes and their families, medication nonadherence, and disruption of life and work, and it leads to costly emergency department visits and hospitalizations, morbidity, and mortality.

OBJECTIVE

To review and update the diabetes-specific parts of the 2009 Evaluation and Management of Adult Hypoglycemic Disorders: Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline and to address developing issues surrounding hypoglycemia in both adults and children living with diabetes. The overriding objectives are to reduce and prevent hypoglycemia.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary panel of clinician experts, together with a patient representative, and methodologists with expertise in evidence synthesis and guideline development, identified and prioritized 10 clinical questions related to hypoglycemia in people living with diabetes. Systematic reviews were conducted to address all the questions. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology was used to assess the certainty of evidence and make recommendations.

RESULTS

The panel agreed on 10 questions specific to hypoglycemia risk and prevention in people with diabetes for which 10 recommendations were made. The guideline includes conditional recommendations for use of real-time continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and algorithm-driven insulin pumps in people with type 1 diabetes (T1D), use of CGM for outpatients with type 2 diabetes at high risk for hypoglycemia, use of long-acting and rapid-acting insulin analogs, and initiation of and continuation of CGM for select inpatient populations at high risk for hypoglycemia. Strong recommendations were made for structured diabetes education programs for those at high risk for hypoglycemia, use of glucagon preparations that do not require reconstitution vs those that do for managing severe outpatient hypoglycemia for adults and children, use of real-time CGM for individuals with T1D receiving multiple daily injections, and the use of inpatient glycemic management programs leveraging electronic health record data to reduce the risk of hypoglycemia.

CONCLUSION

The recommendations are based on the consideration of critical outcomes as well as implementation factors such as feasibility and values and preferences of people with diabetes. These recommendations can be used to inform clinical practice and health care system improvement for this important complication for people living with diabetes.

Pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of a ready-to-use, room temperature, liquid stable glucagon administered via an autoinjector pen to youth with type 1 diabetes

BACKGROUND

Prompt and reliable management of hypoglycemia in youth with diabetes is important to prevent serious medical complications.

OBJECTIVES

To determine efficacy, pharmacodynamics (PD), pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and tolerability of a ready-to-use, liquid stable glucagon formulation administered subcutaneously via an autoinjector pen to youth with type 1 diabetes (T1D).

METHODS

After plasma glucose concentration was < 80 mg/dL (< 4.4 mmol/L) after insulin, participants aged 2 to < 12 years with T1D were administered 0.5 mg of glucagon; participants aged 12 to < 18 years instead received 1 mg of glucagon. Then, adolescents were challenged with 0.5 mg after a 7- to 28-day washout period. Primary endpoint was mean plasma glucose concentration at 30 min after glucagon.

RESULTS

Plasma glucose concentrations significantly (p < 0.001) increased from baseline to 30 min after glucagon, with mean change in plasma glucose concentration between baseline and 30 min for each age cohort as follows: 2 to < 6 years (n = 7; 81.4 mg/dL [4.5 mmol/L]); 6 to < 12 years (13; 84.2 mg/dL [4.7 mmol/L]); 12 to < 18 years (11; dose, 1 mg; 54.0 mg/dL [3.0 mmol/L]); and 12 to < 18 years (11; 0.5 mg; 52.4 mg/dL [2.9 mmol/L]). Among age cohorts, no clinically relevant differences were observed for PD and PK parameters. Common adverse events were nausea, vomiting, and hypoglycemia.

CONCLUSION

Age-appropriate dosing of this glucagon formulation was effective at 30 min in reversing plasma glucose concentrations from < 80 mg/dL in youth with T1D.

Emergency Glucagon: a Focused Review of Psychosocial Experiences of Rescue Drugs for Type 1 Diabetes

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this paper is to describe rescue glucagon types, safety, efficacy, and preferences, as well as to review articles regarding emergency glucagon usage, severe hypoglycemia, and the emotions of both phenomena. We conducted a review of current literature on glucagon usage and the emotional impact of severe hypoglycemia on people with diabetes (PwD) and the caregivers of people with type 1 diabetes (T1D).

RECENT FINDINGS

Minimal research exists pertaining to glucagon and severe hypoglycemic experiences in PwD, which is troubling considering the severity of risks and possible side effects. Recent articles described negative emotions such as fear, anxiety, stress, helplessness, shame, embarrassment, loneliness, frustration, hopefulness, and uncertainty surrounding glucagon usage. There is scarce research regarding PwD's emotions surrounding severe hypoglycemia and rescue glucagon use. Additional research is needed to investigate the emotions and feelings people with T1D and their caregivers' experience pertaining to severe hypoglycemia and emergency glucagon use.

A Comparative Study of Dasiglucagon Ready-to-Use Autoinjector and Glucagon Emergency Kit During Rescue from Simulated Severe Hypoglycemia

Background: Severe hypoglycemic episodes are life-threatening events demanding rapid administration of glucagon by a caregiver or bystander. The glucagon analog dasiglucagon is stable in aqueous formulation and therefore suitable for delivery in a ready-to-use autoinjector, potentially increasing speed and ease of use compared with standard glucagon emergency kits (GEKs). Methods: In an open label, randomized, crossover, comparative device handling study, trained caregivers and untrained bystanders administered the dasiglucagon autoinjector or Eli Lilly GEK to manikins in a simulated emergency hypoglycemia situation. Results: In total, 54 participants were randomized (18 patient-caregiver pairs and 18 bystanders). Overall, 94% of trained caregivers were able to administer the dasiglucagon autoinjector successfully within 15 min, compared with 56% for the GEK (P < 0.05). A greater proportion of trained caregivers and untrained bystanders successfully prepared and administered the dasiglucagon autoinjector within 2 min compared with the GEK (P < 0.005 and P < 0.05, respectively). Time to successful completion was also significantly faster with the dasiglucagon autoinjector than with the GEK (P < 0.005 for both groups). Most study participants preferred the dasiglucagon autoinjector over the GEK (94%, P < 0.001) and rated it as easier (90%, P < 0.001) and less stressful to use (94%, P < 0.001) than the GEK. Conclusion: Dasiglucagon autoinjector was more rapidly and reliably administered, and users reported greater ease of use and usage satisfaction than with the GEK. Thus, dasiglucagon autoinjector has the potential to improve speed and ease of treatment in severe hypoglycemic events, providing a better usage experience for rescuing individuals and enabling faster recovery for patients.

Dasiglucagon demonstrates reduced costs in the treatment of severe hypoglycemia in a budget impact model

BACKGROUND: Approximately 7.3 million people with type 1 or type 2 diabetes (T1D/T2D) are treated with insulin, placing them at higher risk of severe hypoglycemia (SH). SH requires assistance of another individual and often necessitates the prompt administration of intravenous glucose, injectable glucagon, or both. Untreated, SH can progress to unconsciousness, seizures, coma, or death. Before 2018, all glucagon rescue treatments required reconstitution. The complexity of reconstitution is often a barrier to successful administration during a severe hypoglycemic event. Studies suggest successful administration of glucagon emergency kits range from 6%-56% of the time. Second-generation glucagon treatments and glucagon analogs do not require reconstitution and have caregiver administration success rates ranging from 94%-100%. Dasiglucagon is a glucagon analog administered via autoinjector or prefilled syringe and has been shown to result in rapid hypoglycemia recovery. Moreover, the autoinjector can be administered successfully 94% of the time by trained caregivers. Previous evaluation of costs in budget impact models (BIMs) demonstrated the potential for second-generation glucagon treatments to reduce the cost of SH events (SHEs). The current model expands on those findings with a treatment pathway and accompanying assumptions reflecting important aspects of real-world SHE treatment. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the economic impact of dasiglucagon compared with available glucagon treatments for SHE management, considering direct cost of treatment and health care resource utilization. METHODS: A 1-year BIM with a hypothetical US commercial health plan of 1 million lives was developed with a target population of individuals with diabetes at risk of SHE. The treatment pathway model included initial and secondary treatment attempts, treatment administration success and failure, plasma glucose (PG) recovery within 15 minutes, emergency medical services, emergency department (ED) visits, and hospitalizations. A 1-way sensitivity analysis was conducted to assess the sensitivity of the model to changes in parameter values. RESULTS: In a 1 million-covered lives population, it was estimated that 12,006 SHEs would occur annually. The higher rate of initial treatment success and PG recovery within 15 minutes associated with dasiglucagon treatment resulted in lower total health care costs. Total SHE treatment costs with dasiglucagon were estimated at $13.4 million, compared with $16.7 million for injectable native glucagon, $20.7 million for nasal glucagon, $35.3 million for reconstituted glucagon, and $43.8 million for untreated individuals. Compared with untreated people, the number needed to treat (NNT) with dasiglucagon was 6 individuals to avoid 1 hospitalization. NNT for this same comparison was 59 for injectable native glucagon and 27 for nasal glucagon. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of SH with dasiglucagon decreased total direct medical costs by reducing health care resource utilization (emergency calls, emergency transports, ED visits, and hospitalizations) and accompanying costs associated with the treatment of SH. DISCLOSURES: This research was funded by Zealand Pharma. Bromley, Hinahara, and Goss are employed by Boston Healthcare Associates, Inc., which received funding from Zealand Pharma for development of the health economic model and the manuscript. Kendall and Hammer are employed by Zealand Pharma. Weinzimer has received consulting fees from Zealand Pharma.

DCRM Multispecialty Practice Recommendations for the management of diabetes, cardiorenal, and metabolic diseases

Type 2 diabetes (T2D), chronic kidney disease (CKD), atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), and heart failure (HF)-along with their associated risk factors-have overlapping etiologies, and two or more of these conditions frequently occur in the same patient. Many recent cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOTs) have demonstrated the benefits of agents originally developed to control T2D, ASCVD, or CKD risk factors, and these agents have transcended their primary indications to confer benefits across a range of conditions. This evolution in CVOT evidence calls for practice recommendations that are not constrained by a single discipline to help clinicians manage patients with complex conditions involving diabetes, cardiorenal, and/or metabolic (DCRM) diseases. The ultimate goal for these recommendations is to be comprehensive yet succinct and easy to follow by the nonexpert-whether a specialist or a primary care clinician. To meet this need, we formed a volunteer task force comprising leading cardiologists, nephrologists, endocrinologists, and primary care physicians to develop the DCRM Practice Recommendations, a multispecialty consensus on the comprehensive management of the patient with complicated metabolic disease. The task force recommendations are based on strong evidence and incorporate practical guidance that is clinically relevant and simple to implement, with the aim of improving outcomes in patients with DCRM. The recommendations are presented as 18 separate graphics covering lifestyle therapy, patient self-management education, technology for DCRM management, prediabetes, cognitive dysfunction, vaccinations, clinical tests, lipids, hypertension, anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy, antihyperglycemic therapy, hypoglycemia, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), ASCVD, HF, CKD, and comorbid HF and CKD, as well as a graphical summary of medications used for DCRM.

Comparison of a ready-to-use liquid glucagon injection administered by autoinjector to glucagon emergency kit for the symptomatic relief of severe hypoglycemia: two randomized crossover non-inferiority studies

INTRODUCTION

To prevent medical sequelae of severe hypoglycemic emergencies, prompt and reliable rescue intervention is critically important. A ready-to-use, liquid stable glucagon, administered subcutaneously by glucagon autoinjector (GAI), Gvoke HypoPen (glucagon injection; Xeris Pharmaceuticals), was evaluated for rescue treatment of severe hypoglycemia.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Two phase III, randomized, controlled, blinded, non-inferiority crossover studies were conducted in 161 adults with type 1 diabetes to compare 1 mg doses of GAI versus glucagon emergency kit (GEK) for treating insulin-induced severe hypoglycemia. Efficacy was evaluated as either a return of plasma glucose to >70 mg/dL (3.9 mmol/L) or increase ≥20 mg/dL (1.1 mmol/L) from a baseline glucose of <50 mg/dL (2.9 mmol/L), within 30 min of dosing.

RESULTS

For successful plasma glucose recovery within 30 min, treatment with GAI was non-inferior to GEK. Treatment with GAI was non-inferior to GEK for a plasma glucose >70 mg/dL (3.9 mmol/L) or neuroglycopenic symptom relief within 30 min. From administration of glucagon, the mean time to achieve plasma glucose >70 mg/dL (3.9 mmol/L) or increase ≥20 mg/dL (1.1 mmol/L) was 13.8±5.6 min for GAI and 10.0±3.6 min for GEK. This mean time does not account for the significantly shorter (p<0.0001) drug preparation and administration time for GAI (27.3±19.7 s) versus GEK (97.2±45.1 s). The incidence of treatment emergent adverse events was comparable in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

A ready-to-use GAI was non-inferior to GEK, with a similar tolerability profile. GAI is an effective, safe, and well-tolerated rescue treatment for severe hypoglycemia and is a viable alternative to GEK.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS

NCT02656069 and NCT03439072.

New Fast Acting Glucagon for Recovery from Hypoglycemia, a Life-Threatening Situation: Nasal Powder and Injected Stable Solutions

The goal of diabetes care is to achieve and maintain good glycemic control over time, so as to prevent or delay the development of micro- and macrovascular complications in type 1 (T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D). However, numerous barriers hinder the achievement of this goal, first of all the frequent episodes of hypoglycemia typical in patients treated with insulin as T1D patients, or sulphonylureas as T2D patients. The prevention strategy and treatment of hypoglycemia are important for the well-being of patients with diabetes. Hypoglycemia is strongly associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease in diabetic patients, due probably to the release of inflammatory markers and prothrombotic effects triggered by hypoglycemia. Treatment of hypoglycemia is traditionally based on administration of carbohydrates or of glucagon via intramuscular (IM) or subcutaneous injection (SC). The injection of traditional glucagon is cumbersome, such that glucagon is an under-utilized drug. In 1983, it was shown for the first time that intranasal (IN) glucagon increases blood glucose levels in healthy volunteers, and in 1989-1992 that IN glucagon is similar to IM glucagon in resolving hypoglycemia in normal volunteers and in patients with diabetes, both adults and children. IN glucagon was developed in 2010 and continued in 2015; in 2019 IN glucagon obtained approval in the US, Canada, and Europe for severe hypoglycemia in children and adults. In the 2010s, two ready-to-use injectable formulations, a stable non-aqueous glucagon solution and the glucagon analog dasiglucagon, were developed, showing an efficacy similar to traditional glucagon, and approved in the US in 2020 and in 2021, respectively, for severe hypoglycemia in adults and in children. Fast-acting glucagon (nasal administration and injected solutions) appears to represent a major breakthrough in the treatment of severe hypoglycemia in insulin-treated patients with diabetes, both adults and children. It is anticipated that the availability of fast-acting glucagon will expand the use of glucagon, improve overall metabolic control, and prevent hypoglycemia-related complications, in particular cardiovascular complications and cognitive impairment.

An Evaluation of Glucagon Injection Anxiety and Its Association with the Fear of Hypoglycemia among the Parents of Children with Type 1 Diabetes

OBJECTIVE

Hypoglycemia is a common acute complication of type 1 diabetes (T1D), which may cause seizure, loss of consciousness, and temporary motor or sensory impairment. Glucagon administration is an effective way of treating severe hypoglycemia, especially in a free-living setting. Nonetheless, families have difficulties in managing severe hypoglycemia due to their anxiety and challenges with current glucagon administration techniques. The aim of the current study was to explore the associations between parental fear of hypoglycemia (FoH) and their general anxiety level, and in particular, their attitudes towards and thoughts on glucagon administration.

METHODS

Parents of children with T1D completed questionnaires assessing background and clinical information, FoH, generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) and parental anxiety for glucagon administration (PAGA).

RESULTS

Sixty-eight parents participated. Positive correlations were found between parental GAD-7 score and both FoH and the number of night-time blood glucose measurements and there was a negative correlation with the child’s age. Parents mean self-evaluation score of their competence in glucagon administration was 6 (standard deviation±2.9) on a scale of 0 to 10. Unsurprisingly, this score was negatively correlated with the PAGA scores. There was no significant difference between children using continuous glucose monitoring system and self-monitoring of blood glucose in terms of parental FoH, anxiety and misconceptions about glucagon administration.

CONCLUSION

The results showed that parents of children with T1D had anxiety and fear connected with hypoglycemia and glucagon administration. Structured and practical training should be implemented to increase parents’ self-confidence including annual refresher training for home glucagon administration.

Glucagon: Its evolving role in the management of hypoglycemia

More than 10% of the United States population has diabetes, characterized by hyperglycemia. Insulin and other agents used to treat diabetes predispose people to hypoglycemia, which can be life threatening. Glucagon is an emergency medication that can save lives by quickly raising glucose in people who are unconscious or unable to consume glucose due to severe hypoglycemia. Although glucagon has been commercially available since 1960, earlier formulations required reconstitution of a dry powder with diluent immediately prior to injection, due to lack of long-term stability once reconstituted. Glucagon has been underutilized due to the lack of confidence or ability to administer in emergency situations. More recently, new formulations including a nasal powder glucagon and liquid-stable glucagon have become available. This article discusses the evidence surrounding new glucagon formulations compared with the original glucagon emergency kit including ease of use, efficacy, and safety with a focus on important patient counseling points and relevant clinical information on hypoglycemia.

Glucagon delivery - An overview of current and future devices

Glucagon is crucial in the treatment of Type 1 diabetes mellitus due to the prevalence of hypoglycemia in patients with this disorder. Hypoglycemia can be life-threatening, leading to loss of consciousness, and requiring emergency glucagon to reverse the effects. Emergency kits are difficult to use, requiring reconstitution of glucagon, which itself is not stable for lengthy periods. Approaches have aimed to improve stability which has allowed for use in pens or pumps. Glucagon can now also be delivered intranasally. This review discusses the history of glucagon, its current delivery methods as well as some modern approaches being introduced.

A ready-to-use liquid glucagon for treatment of severe hypoglycemia demonstrates reduced healthcare payer costs in a budget impact model

Research aim: To model the annual value of a novel ready-to-use, room-temperature stable liquid glucagon rescue pen and prefilled syringe (GRP, G-PFS; Xeris Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) for treatment of severe hypoglycemia events (SHE) versus current lyophilized powder glucagon emergency kits (GEK). GRP is a prefilled auto-injector designed to promptly administer concentrated liquid glucagon in a simple two-step process. G-PFS is a stable liquid formulation of glucagon in a prefilled syringe. In simulated emergencies, GRP and G-PFS demonstrated high functional efficacy, where 99% of users successfully administered a full-dose of drug. Studies with currently available injectable GEK suggest very low success rates (6-31%). The high functional efficacy of GRP and G-PFS significantly reduces user errors and may reduce utilization across emergency medical services (EMS), emergency departments (ED), and inpatient and outpatient costs for SHE.Methods: To estimate the economic impact of GRP and G-PFS, we developed a one-year budget impact model from a US commercial health plan perspective. Cost offsets from successful glucagon administration incorporated EMS, ED, inpatient, and outpatient utilization. Diabetes prevalence and event probabilities were estimated from publicly-available sources and clinical expert opinion. Costs (US$) were obtained from the 2018 Medicare Fee Schedules and adjusted to represent commercial payer costs.Results: GRP and G-PFS led to fewer EMS, ED, inpatient, and outpatient costs compared to GEK and no kit, resulting in total per-patient SHE costs of $2,564, $3,606, and $3,849, respectively. Costs for 1 million covered lives were 8.2 million following the introduction of GRP and G-PFS compared to almost 9 million before GRP and G-PFS.Limitations: The model is limited by reliance on assumptions based on expert opinion for key variables, primarily the probability of: (1) ambulance calls, (2) ambulance transport to the ED, and (3) non-ambulance transport to the ED.Conclusions: A budget impact model suggests GRP and G-PFS can lead to significant annual cost savings for US commercial payers.