Challenges and opportunities for the future of monoclonal antibody development: Improving safety assessment and reducing animal use

The emergence of cell-based protein arrays to test for polyspecific off-target binding of antibody therapeutics

Specificity profiling is a requirement for monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and antibody-directed biotherapeutics such as CAR-T cells prior to initiating human trials. However, traditional approaches to assess the specificity of mAbs, primarily tissue cross-reactivity studies, have been unreliable, leading to off-target binding going undetected. Here, we review the emergence of cell-based protein arrays as an alternative and improved assessment of mAb specificity. Cell-based protein arrays assess binding across the full human membrane proteome, ~6,000 membrane proteins each individually expressed in their native structural configuration within live or unfixed cells. Our own profiling indicates a surprisingly high off-target rate across the industry, with 33% of lead candidates displaying off-target binding. Moreover, about 20% of therapeutic mAbs in clinical development and currently on the market display off-target binding. Case studies and off-target rates at different phases of biotherapeutic drug approval suggest that off-target binding is likely a major cause of adverse events and drug attrition.

CSL-Tox: an open-source analytical framework for the comparison of short-term and long-term toxicity end points and assessing the need of chronic studies in drug development

In-vivo toxicity assessment is an important step prior to clinical development and is still the main source of data for overall risk assessment of a new molecular entity (NCE). All in-vivo studies are performed according to regulatory requirements and many efforts have been exerted to minimize these studies in accordance with the (Replacement, Reduction and Refinement) 3Rs principle. Many aspects of in-vivo toxicology packages can be optimized to reduce animal use, including the number of studies performed as well as study durations, which is the main focus of this analysis. We performed a statistical comparison of adverse findings observed in 116 short-term versus 78 long-term in-house or in-house sponsored Contract Research Organizations (CRO) studies, in order to explore the possibility of using only short-term studies as a prediction tool for the longer-term effects. All the data analyzed in this study was manually extracted from the toxicology reports (in PDF formats) to construct the dataset. Annotation of treatment related findings was one of the challenges faced during this work. A specific focus was therefore put on the summary and conclusion sections of the reports since they contain expert assessments on whether the findings were considered adverse or were attributed to other reasons. Our analysis showed a general good concordance between short-term and long-term toxicity findings for large molecules and the majority of small molecules. Less concordance was seen for certain body organs, which can be named as "target organ systems' findings". While this work supports the minimization of long-term studies, a larger-scale effort would be needed to provide more evidence. We therefore present the steps performed in this study as an open-source R workflow for the Comparison of Short-term and Long-term Toxicity studies (CSL-Tox). The dataset used in the work is provided to allow researchers to reproduce such analysis, re-evaluate the statistical tools used and promote large-scale application of this study. Important aspects of animal research reproducibility are highlighted in this work, specifically, the necessity of a reproducible adverse effects reporting system and utilization of the controlled terminologies in-vivo toxicology reports and finally the importance of open-source analytical workflows that can be assessed by other scientists in the field of preclinical toxicology.

Breaking barriers in antibody discovery: harnessing divergent species for accessing difficult and conserved drug targets

To exploit highly conserved and difficult drug targets, including multipass membrane proteins, monoclonal antibody discovery efforts increasingly rely on the advantages offered by divergent species such as rabbits, camelids, and chickens. Here, we provide an overview of antibody discovery technologies, analyze gaps in therapeutic antibodies that stem from the historic use of mice, and examine opportunities to exploit previously inaccessible targets through discovery now possible in alternate species. We summarize the clinical development of antibodies raised from divergent species, discussing how these animals enable robust immune responses against highly conserved binding sites and yield antibodies capable of penetrating functional pockets via long HCDR3 regions. We also discuss the value of pan-reactive molecules often produced by these hosts, and how these antibodies can be tested in accessible animal models, offering a faster path to clinical development.

Exploring the Definition of "Similar Toxicities": Case Studies Illustrating Industry and Regulatory Interpretation of ICH S6(R1) for Long-Term Toxicity Studies in One or Two Species

ICH S6 (R1) states that safety evaluation of biotherapeutics should normally include 2 relevant species when available (i.e., a rodent and non-rodent species in which the test material is pharmacologically active), at least for short-term toxicology studies (generally supporting Phase I trials). For subsequent long-term toxicology studies (e.g., chronic studies up to 6 months dosing duration), there are options to reduce to only one species when justified, including when the mechanism of action of the biologic is well-understood or the toxicity findings in the short-term studies are "similar" in both the rodent and non-rodent species. Across the industry, around 25 to 33% of biologics assess multiple species within short-term toxicity studies but it is often unclear how different companies and regulators are applying the ICH S6 (R1) principles of "similar toxicity profiles" to progress with either 1 or 2 species in the long-term studies, in particular whether the absence of toxicities is considered within this definition. Sponsors may potentially continue to use 2 species to avoid regulatory risk and potential delays in development timelines, representing missed opportunities for reducing animal use, particularly of non-human primates, during drug development.This article summarizes presentations from a symposium at the 41st Annual meeting of the American College of Toxicology (ACT) in November 2020, in which industry case studies and regulatory perspectives addressed considerations and decisions for using 1 or 2 species for long-term toxicity studies, highlighting any common themes or experience that could be applicable for use in future decision-making.

Effects of Monovalent Salt on Protein-Protein Interactions of Dilute and Concentrated Monoclonal Antibody Formulations

In this study, we used sodium chloride (NaCl) to extensively modulate non-specific protein-protein interactions (PPI) of a humanized anti-streptavidin monoclonal antibody class 2 molecule (ASA-IgG2). The changes in PPI with varying NaCl (C_NaCl) and monoclonal antibody (mAb) concentration (C_mAb) were assessed using the diffusion interaction parameter k_D and second virial coefficient B₂₂ measured from solutions with low to moderate C_mAb. The effective structure factor S(q)_eff measured from concentrated mAb solutions using small-angle X-ray and neutron scattering (SAXS/SANS) was also used to characterize the PPI. Our results found that the nature of net PPI changed not only with C_NaCl, but also with increasing C_mAb. As a result, parameters measured from dilute and concentrated mAb samples could lead to different predictions on the stability of mAb formulations. We also compared experimentally determined viscosity results with those predicted from interaction parameters, including k_D and S(q)_eff. The lack of a clear correlation between interaction parameters and measured viscosity values indicates that the relationship between viscosity and PPI is concentration-dependent. Collectively, the behavior of flexible mAb molecules in concentrated solutions may not be correctly predicted using models where proteins are considered to be uniform colloid particles defined by parameters derived from low C_mAb.

Targeted cancer treatment and fertility: effect of immunotherapy and small molecule inhibitors on female reproduction

Targeted cancer therapy is rapidly evolving the landscape of personalized health care. Novel approaches to selectively impeding tumour growth carry significant potential to improve survival outcomes, particularly for reproductive-aged patients harbouring treatment refractory disease. Current agents fall within two classes: immunotherapy and small molecule inhibitors. These are collectively divided into the following subclasses: monoclonal antibodies; immunomodulators; adoptive cell therapy; treatment vaccines; kinase inhibitors; proteasome inhibitors; metalloproteinase and heat shock protein inhibitors; and promoters of apoptosis. The short- and long-term effects of these treatments on the female reproductive system are not well understood. As a result, clinicians are rendered unable to appropriately counsel women on downstream effects to their fertility. Data-driven consensus recommendations are desperately needed. This review aims to characterize the effect of targeted cancer therapy on the female hypothalamic-pituitary-ovary axis, direct ovarian function and conception.

Degenerative disease-on-a-chip: Developing microfluidic models for rapid availability of newer therapies

BACKGROUND

Understanding the pathophysiology of degenerative diseases pertaining to nervous system, ocular region, bone/cartilage and muscle are still being comprehended, thus delaying the availability of targeted therapies.

PURPOSE AND SCOPE

Newer micro-physiological systems (organ-on-chip technology) involves development of more sophisticated devices, modelling a range of in vitro human tissues and an array of models for diseased conditions. These models expand opportunities for high throughput screening (HTS) of drugs and are likely to be rapid and cost-effective, thus reducing extensive usage of animal models.

CONCLUSION

Through this review article, we aim to present an overview of the degenerative disease models that are presently being developed using microfluidic platforms with the aim of mimicking in vivo tissue physiology and micro-architecture. The manuscript provides an overview of the degenerative disease models and their potential for testing and screening of possible biotherapeutic molecules and drugs. It highlights the perspective of the regulatory bodies with respect to the established-on chip models and thereby enhancing its translational potential. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Off-target binding of an anti-amyloid beta monoclonal antibody to platelet factor 4 causes acute and chronic toxicity in cynomolgus monkeys

ABT-736 is a humanized monoclonal antibody generated to target a specific conformation of the amyloid-beta (Aβ) protein oligomer. Development of ABT-736 for Alzheimer's disease was discontinued due to severe adverse effects (AEs) observed in cynomolgus monkey toxicity studies. The acute nature of AEs observed only at the highest doses suggested potential binding of ABT-736 to an abundant plasma protein. Follow-up investigations indicated polyspecificity of ABT-736, including unintended high-affinity binding to monkey and human plasma protein platelet factor 4 (PF-4), known to be involved in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) in humans. The chronic AEs observed at the lower doses after repeat administration in monkeys were consistent with HIT pathology. Screening for a backup antibody revealed that ABT-736 possessed additional unintended binding characteristics to other, unknown factors. A subsequently implemented screening funnel focused on nonspecific binding led to the identification of h4D10, a high-affinity Aβ oligomer binding antibody that did not bind PF-4 or other unintended targets and had no AEs in vivo. This strengthened the hypothesis that ABT-736 toxicity was not Aβ target-related, but instead was the consequence of polyspecificity including PF-4 binding, which likely mediated the acute and chronic AEs and the HIT-like pathology. In conclusion, thorough screening of antibody candidates for nonspecific interactions with unrelated molecules at early stages of discovery can eliminate candidates with polyspecificity and reduce potential for toxicity caused by off-target binding.

Opportunities for use of one species for longer-term toxicology testing during drug development: A cross-industry evaluation

An international expert working group representing 37 organisations (pharmaceutical/biotechnology companies, contract research organisations, academic institutions and regulatory bodies) collaborated in a data sharing exercise to evaluate the utility of two species within regulatory general toxicology studies. Anonymised data on 172 drug candidates (92 small molecules, 46 monoclonal antibodies, 15 recombinant proteins, 13 synthetic peptides and 6 antibody-drug conjugates) were submitted by 18 organisations. The use of one or two species across molecule types, the frequency for reduction to a single species within the package of general toxicology studies, and a comparison of target organ toxicities identified in each species in both short and longer-term studies were determined. Reduction to a single species for longer-term toxicity studies, as used for the development of biologicals (ICHS6(R1) guideline) was only applied for 8/133 drug candidates, but might have been possible for more, regardless of drug modality, as similar target organ toxicity profiles were identified in the short-term studies. However, definition and harmonisation around the criteria for similarity of toxicity profiles is needed to enable wider consideration of these principles. Analysis of a more robust dataset would be required to provide clear, evidence-based recommendations for expansion of these principles to small molecules or other modalities where two species toxicity testing is currently recommended.

From Laboratory to Patient: The Evolving Path to Become a Medicine

Gene editing and other laboratory developments promise to revolutionize treatment of many diseases that currently have no cure. The process to become a medicine is long and complex and requires many years. Regulation of medicines (permission to market a product and monitoring of its performance) is evolving to adapt to emerging new approaches in development. Current issues and new ideas needed to navigate the difficult waters from laboratory to patient are discussed here: novel approaches for narrow evidence base, earlier discussions of evidence with regulators, earlier planning for post-authorization requirements and better patient access.

Monoclonal Antibodies in Dermatooncology-State of the Art and Future Perspectives

Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting specific proteins are currently the most popular form of immunotherapy used in the treatment of cancer and other non-malignant diseases. Since the first approval of anti-CD20 mAb rituximab in 1997 for the treatment of B-cell malignancies, the market is continuously booming and the clinically used mAbs have undergone a remarkable evolution. Novel molecular targets are constantly emerging and the development of genetic engineering have facilitated the introduction of modified mAbs with improved safety and increased capabilities to activate the effector mechanisms of the immune system. Next to their remarkable success in hematooncology, mAbs have also an already established role in the treatment of solid malignancies. The recent development of mAbs targeting the immune checkpoints has opened new avenues for the use of this form of immunotherapy, also in the immune-rich milieu of the skin. In this review we aim at presenting a comprehensive view of mAbs' application in the modern treatment of skin cancer. We present the characteristics and efficacy of mAbs currently used in dermatooncology and summarize the recent clinical trials in the field. We discuss the side effects and strategies for their managing.

Integration of Consortia Recommendations for Justification of Animal Use Within Current and Future Drug Development Paradigms

The pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries continually review the requirements for, and relevance of, safety assessment strategies. Various industry consortia are currently discussing and reviewing data on a range of topics with respect to regulatory toxicology programs. These consortia are charged with critical evaluation of data and the identification of opportunities to promote best practice and to introduce improved approaches to safety assessment. Such improvements may include enhanced predictivity, more efficient ways of working, and opportunities for promoting and implementing the 3Rs (replacement, refinement, or reduction). As each consortium is considering a distinct question, individual outputs and recommendations could be perceived to be conflicting. However, a common theme embraced by the consortia represented here is exploration of the most appropriate use of animals for the safety assessment of new medicinal products. This short review summarizes presentations and discussions from a symposium describing the work of four industry consortia and considers whether their recommendations can be aligned into realistic approaches to improve future toxicology testing strategies, highlighting justification for the appropriate use of different animal species and opportunities for reductions in animal use without compromising patient safety.

Are mimotope vaccines a good alternative to monoclonal antibodies?

Utilizing immunotherapy as a potential therapeutic approach to boost the body's immune system for the fight against various diseases such as cancers, autoimmune diseases and also infections, is increasing day by day. Monoclonal antibodies, as effective therapeutic agents are used in cancer targeted therapies. However, these biologics have some disadvantages such as high costs and side effects. Therefore, emerging alternative immunotherapy strategies with high efficiency and low costs seems necessary. Mimotope vaccines, as epitope-mimicking structures, have shown to be effective therapeutic options, but are they really a good alternative to monoclonal antibodies, or are they just effective adjuvants?

Third generation antibody discovery methods: in silico rational design

Owing to their outstanding performances in molecular recognition, antibodies are extensively used in research and applications in molecular biology, biotechnology and medicine. Recent advances in experimental and computational methods are making it possible to complement well-established in vivo (first generation) and in vitro (second generation) methods of antibody discovery with novel in silico (third generation) approaches. Here we describe the principles of computational antibody design and review the state of the art in this field. We then present Modular, a method that implements the rational design of antibodies in a modular manner, and describe the opportunities offered by this approach.

Biotherapeutics: Challenges and Opportunities for Predictive Toxicology of Monoclonal Antibodies

Biotherapeutics are a rapidly growing portion of the total pharmaceutical market accounting for almost one-half of recent new drug approvals. A major portion of these approvals each year are monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). During development, non-clinical pharmacology and toxicology testing of mAbs differs from that done with chemical entities since these biotherapeutics are derived from a biological source and therefore the animal models must share the same epitopes (targets) as humans to elicit a pharmacological response. Mechanisms of toxicity of mAbs are both pharmacological and non-pharmacological in nature; however, standard in silico predictive toxicological methods used in research and development of chemical entities currently do not apply to these biotherapeutics. Challenges and potential opportunities exist for new methodologies to provide a more predictive program to assess and monitor potential adverse drug reactions of mAbs for specific patients before and during clinical trials and after market approval.

An approved in vitro approach to preclinical safety and efficacy evaluation of engineered T cell receptor anti-CD3 bispecific (ImmTAC) molecules

Robust preclinical testing is essential to predict clinical safety and efficacy and provide data to determine safe dose for first-in-man studies. There are a growing number of examples where the preclinical development of drugs failed to adequately predict clinical adverse events in part due to their assessment with inappropriate preclinical models. Preclinical investigations of T cell receptor (TCR)-based immunotherapies prove particularly challenging as these biologics are human-specific and thus the conventional testing in animal models is inadequate. As these molecules harness the full force of the immune system, and demonstrate tremendous potency, we set out to design a preclinical package that would ensure adequate evaluation of these therapeutics. Immune Mobilising Monoclonal TCR Against Cancer (ImmTAC) molecules are bi-specific biologics formed of an affinity-enhanced TCR fused to an anti-CD3 effector function. ImmTAC molecules are designed to activate human T lymphocytes and target peptides within the context of a human leukocyte antigen (HLA), thus require an intact human immune system and peptidome for suitable preclinical screening. Here we draw upon the preclinical testing of four ImmTAC molecules, including IMCgp100, the first ImmTAC molecule to reach the clinic, to present our comprehensive, informative and robust approach to in vitro preclinical efficacy and safety screening. This package comprises a broad range of cellular and molecular assays using human tissues and cultured cells to test efficacy, safety and specificity, and hence predict human responses in clinical trials. We propose that this entirely in vitro package offers a potential model to be applied to screening other TCR-based biologics.

Reviewing the Utility of Two Species in General Toxicology Related to Drug Development

As part of the safety assessment of new drugs, the use of two species (a rodent and a nonrodent) for regulatory toxicology studies is the typical approach taken for small molecules. For biologics, species selection is dictated by pharmacological relevance, and single species toxicology packages (typically using the nonhuman primate) are common. The UK National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement, and Reduction of Animals in Research and the Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry are collaborating on a project to review the utility of two species in regulatory toxicology studies, with the aim to explore whether there are wider circumstances when data from a single species could be sufficient to enable safe progression in humans. An international working group consisting of 37 representatives from pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, contract research organizations, academia, and regulatory bodies is coordinating a large-scale data sharing exercise to examine the potential for changes in current practice to reduce the number of species used for nonclinical safety testing at different stages of development. The challenge will be to determine whether two species toxicology adds significant value or whether in some instances data from a single species are sufficient (across a broader range of molecules than is currently the case) without compromising human safety.

Big Data in Drug Discovery

Interpretation of Big Data in the drug discovery community should enhance project timelines and reduce clinical attrition through improved early decision making. The issues we encounter start with the sheer volume of data and how we first ingest it before building an infrastructure to house it to make use of the data in an efficient and productive way. There are many problems associated with the data itself including general reproducibility, but often, it is the context surrounding an experiment that is critical to success. Help, in the form of artificial intelligence (AI), is required to understand and translate the context. On the back of natural language processing pipelines, AI is also used to prospectively generate new hypotheses by linking data together. We explain Big Data from the context of biology, chemistry and clinical trials, showcasing some of the impressive public domain sources and initiatives now available for interrogation.

Structural Basis of Enhanced Crystallizability Induced by a Molecular Chaperone for Antibody Antigen-Binding Fragments

Monoclonal antibodies constitute one of the largest groups of drugs to treat cancers and immune disorders, and are guiding the design of vaccines against infectious diseases. Fragments antigen-binding (Fabs) have been preferred over monoclonal antibodies for the structural characterization of antibody-antigen complexes due to their relatively low flexibility. Nonetheless, Fabs often remain challenging to crystallize because of the surface characteristics of complementary determining regions and the residual flexibility in the hinge region between the variable and constant domains. Here, we used a variable heavy-chain (V_HH) domain specific for the human kappa light chain to assist in the structure determination of three therapeutic Fabs that were recalcitrant to crystallization on their own. We show that this ligand alters the surface properties of the antibody-ligand complex and lowers its aggregation temperature to favor crystallization. The V_HH crystallization chaperone also restricts the flexible hinge of Fabs to a narrow range of angles, and so independently of the variable region. Our findings contribute a valuable approach to antibody structure determination and provide biophysical insight into the principles that govern the crystallization of macromolecules.