Efficacy of debridement, antibiotic therapy and implant retention within three months during postoperative instrumented spine infections

Prevention and Management of Posterior Wound Complications Following Oncologic Spine Surgery: Narrative Review of Available Evidence and Proposed Clinical Decision-Making Algorithm

STUDY DESIGN

Narrative Review.

OBJECTIVE

Contextualized by a narrative review of recent literature, we propose a wound complication prevention and management algorithm for spinal oncology patients. We highlight available strategies and motivate future research to identify optimal and individualized wound management for this population.

METHODS

We conducted a search of recent studies (2010-2022) using relevant keywords to identify primary literature in support of current strategies for wound complication prevention and management following spine tumor surgery. When primary literature specific to spine tumor cases was not available, data were extrapolated from studies of other spine surgery populations. Results were compiled into a proposed clinical algorithm to guide practice considering available evidence.

RESULTS

Based on available literature, we recommend individualized stratification of patients according to identifiable risk factors for wound complication and propose several interventions which might be employed preventatively, including intrawound antibiotic administration, negative pressure wound therapy, and primary flap closure of the surgical wound. Of these, the available evidence, weighing possible risks vs benefits, most strongly favors primary flap closure of surgical wounds, particularly for patients with multiple risk factors. A secondary algorithm to guide management of wound complications is also proposed.

CONCLUSIONS

Wound complications such as SSI and dehiscence remain a significant source of morbidity following spine tumor surgery. Triaging patients on an individualized basis according to risk factors for complication may aid in selecting appropriate prophylactic strategies to prevent these complications. Future research in this area is still needed to strengthen recommendations.

State-of-the-Art Review: Diagnosis and Management of Spinal Implant Infections

Spinal implant infections are a serious complications of instrumented spinal fusion surgeries, carrying high morbidity and complex management challenges. Early postoperative infections may manifest with wound-healing issues, back pain, and fevers. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the preferred imaging modality, but can be limited by metal artifacts. For cases with stable implants, surgical debridement with implant retention combined with at least 12 weeks of antibiotics is currently considered appropriate treatment. Staphylococcal infections are ideally treated with biofilm-active antibiotics. Suppressive antibiotic therapy can be considered when surgical debridement has been delayed or is incomplete, and for those who are poor surgical candidates for another surgery. Chronic infections may present insidiously with implant failure or pseudarthrosis; implant removal or revision is generally pursued. As current guidance is heavily based on the periprosthetic joint infection literature and low-level studies on spinal implant infections, further research on optimizing diagnostic and treatment approaches is needed.

Microbiological Profile of Instrumented Spinal Infections: 10-Year Study at a French Spine Center

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to compare the microbiological characteristics and treatment of early and late surgical site infections (SSIs) in instrumented spinal surgery.

METHODS

Those patients admitted for SSIs in a single center between January 2010 and December 2022 were included. The subjects were divided into early (eSSIs) and late (lSSIs) SSIs, and demographic, microbiological, treatment, and follow-up data were collected.

RESULTS

Instrumented spinal surgery was performed in 2136 patients. Ninety-six cases of infections were identified (prevalence = 4.5%), with 47.9% eSSIs and 52.1% lSSIs. In 58.7% of the cases, the eSSIs were monomicrobial: Staphylococcus aureus (37%) and Enterobacterales (33.3%) were the main bacteria involved. In 66% of the cases, the lSSIs, were monomicrobial: Cutibacterium acnes (30.3%) and staphylococci were predominant. Enterobacterales were isolated in more than 70% of the polymicrobial samples in both the eSSIs and lSSIs. The treatment of the eSSIs mostly consisted of lavage-debridement surgery associated with antibiotic treatment, while the treatment of the lSSIs combined hardware removal or replacement and long-duration antibiotic treatment. A negative outcome was observed in 17.1% of the eSSIs and 5.7% of the lSSIs. Enterobacterales were associated with negative outcomes of eSSIs.

CONCLUSIONS

Enterobacterales were found in most of the polymicrobial infections regardless of the time of infection onset. Further large studies should be conducted to precisely determine the management and prevention regarding the increasing Gram-negative bacteria SSIs.

Is Aggressive Surgery Always Necessary for Suspected Early-Onset Surgical Site Infection after Lumbar Surgery? A 10-Year Retrospective Analysis

OBJECTIVE

Surgical site infection (SSI) after spinal surgery is still a persistent worldwide health concern as it is a worrying and devastating complication. The number of samples in previous studies is limited and the role of conservative antibiotic therapy has not been established. This study aims to evaluate the clinical efficacy and feasibility of empirical antibiotic treatment for suspected early-onset deep spinal SSI.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study to identify all cases with suspected early-onset deep SSI after lumbar instrumented surgery between January 2009 and December 2018. We evaluated the potential risks for antibiotic treatment, examined the antibiotic treatment failure rate, and applied logistic regression analysis to assess the risk factors for empirical antibiotic treatment failure.

RESULTS

Over the past 10 years, 45 patients matched the inclusion criteria. The success rate of antibiotic treatment was 62.2% (28/45). Of the 17 patients who failed antibiotic treatment, 16 were cured after a debridement intervention and the remaining one required removal of the internal fixation before recovery. On univariate analysis, risk factors for antibiotic treatment failure included age, increasing or persisting back pain, wound dehiscence, localized swelling, and time to SSI (cut-off: 10 days). Multivariate analysis revealed that infection occurring 10 days after primary surgery and wound dehiscence were independent risk factors for antibiotic treatment failure.

CONCLUSION

Appropriate antibiotic treatment is an alternative strategy for suspected early-onset deep SSI after lumbar instrumented surgery. Antibiotic treatment for suspected SSI occurring within 10 days after primary surgery may improve the success rate of antibiotic intervention. Patients with wound dehiscence have a significantly higher likelihood of requiring surgical intervention.

[Translated article] Descriptive study of spinal instrumentation-related infections in a tertiary hospital

INTRODUCTION

Spinal instrumentation-related infections (SIRI) are one of the main causes of post-surgical complication and comorbidity. Our objective was to describe the clinical and microbiological characteristics, treatment and prognosis of these infections.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study in our institution (2011-2018) including adult patients undergoing spinal instrumentation who met the diagnostic criteria for confirmed infection. Superficial surgical wound and deep intraoperative samples were processed for microbiological culture. The medical and orthopaedic team was always the same.

RESULTS

Forty-one cases were diagnosed of which 39 patients (95.1%) presented early infection (<3 months after initial surgery) with symptoms in the first two weeks, mean CRP at diagnosis was 133mg/dl and 23% associated bacteremia. The remaining two patients (4.8%) were chronic infections (symptoms >3 months after surgery). The treatment of choice in early infections was the Debridement, Antibiotics and Implant Retention (DAIR) strategy without removal of the bone graft, which successfully resolved 84.2% of the infections. The main aetiology was gram-positive (Staphylococcus aureus: 31.7%), followed by gram-negative and polymicrobial flora. Antibiotics were optimised according to cultures with a mean duration of 12 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

In early infections, early diagnosis and DAIR strategy (with bone graft retention) demonstrated a healing rate higher than 80%.

Descriptive study of spinal instrumentation-related infections in a tertiary hospital

INTRODUCTION

Spinal instrumentation-related infections (SIRI) are one of the main causes of post-surgical complication and comorbidity. Our objective was to describe the clinical and microbiological characteristics, treatment and prognosis of these infections.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study in our institution (2011-2018) including adult patients undergoing spinal instrumentation who met the diagnostic criteria for confirmed infection. Superficial surgical wound and deep intraoperative samples were processed for microbiological culture. The medical and orthopaedic team was always the same.

RESULTS

Forty-one cases were diagnosed of which 39 patients (95.1%) presented early infection (<3 months after initial surgery) with symptoms in the first two weeks, mean CRP at diagnosis was 133mg/dl and 23% associated bacteremia. The remaining two patients (4.8%) were chronic infections (symptoms >3 months after surgery). The treatment of choice in early infections was the Debridement, Antibiotics and Implant Retention (DAIR) strategy without removal of the bone graft, which successfully resolved 84.2% of the infections. The main etiology was gram-positive (Staphylococcus aureus: 31.7%), followed by gram-negative and polymicrobial flora. Antibiotics were optimized according to cultures with a mean duration of 12 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

In early infections, early diagnosis and DAIR strategy (with bone graft retention) demonstrated a healing rate higher than 80%.

Surgical Site Infection After Primary Spinal Fusion Surgery for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: An Analysis of Risk Factors From a Nationwide Insurance Database

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to quantify the incidence and factors associated with surgical site infection (SSI) in pediatric patients undergoing spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Infection is a morbid complication after spinal fusion. The incidence of SSI after pediatric spinal fusion is likely underestimated; the use of a national database allows for a comprehensive assessment of this rare outcome.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The PearlDiver Database was used to identify AIS patients who underwent primary instrumented spinal fusion between 2010 and 2019 and relevant patient records were queried to identify infections within 7, 30, and 90 postoperative days. Patients with nonidiopathic scoliosis were excluded. Logistic regression was used to evaluate risk factors associated with postoperative infection.

RESULTS

Out of 9801 patients who underwent primary fusion for AIS, 44 patients (0.4%) developed an infection within 7 postoperative days. The 30 days and 90 days incidences were 1.9% and 2.7%, respectively. Within 90 days, 154 (57.7%) of the patients with infection had undergone reoperation, of whom 72 underwent multiple reoperations. Obesity and male sex ( P < 0.05) were significantly associated with postoperative infection. The length of fusion was not a significant factor in the development of SSI ( P > 0.05). Eleven patients underwent an operation requiring hardware removal within 90 days. There were no significant factors associated with those undergoing hardware removal compared with those undergoing surgical debridement.

CONCLUSIONS

The study identified a 2.7% 90 days incidence of SSI after posterior spinal fusion for AIS, with 57.7% of all infections requiring a return to the operating room. Preoperative patient-related characteristics associated with increased risk of postoperative SSI were male sex and obesity. The current study can be used to provide preoperative counseling regarding the risk of this postoperative complication.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

2022 SPILF - Clinical Practice guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of disco-vertebral infection in adults

These guidelines are an update of those made in 2007 at the request of the French Society of Infectious Diseases (SPILF, Société de Pathologie Infectieuse de Langue Française). They are intended for use by all healthcare professionals caring for patients with disco-vertebral infection (DVI) on spine, whether native or instrumented. They include evidence and opinion-based recommendations for the diagnosis and management of patients with DVI. ESR, PCT and scintigraphy, antibiotic therapy without microorganism identification (except for emergency situations), therapy longer than 6 weeks if the DVI is not complicated, contraindication for spinal osteosynthesis in a septic context, and prolonged dorsal decubitus are no longer to be done in DVI management. MRI study must include exploration of the entire spine with at least 2 orthogonal planes for the affected level(s). Several disco-vertebral samples must be performed if blood cultures are negative. Short, adapted treatment and directly oral antibiotherapy or early switch from intravenous to oral antibiotherapy are recommended. Consultation of a spine specialist should be requested to evaluate spinal stability. Early lifting of patients is recommended.

Changes of the microbiological spectrum and antibiotic resistance pattern in postoperative spinal implant infections with multiple culture-positive revision surgeries

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

In severe cases of postoperative spinal implant infections (PSII) multiple revision surgeries may be needed. Little is known if changes in the microbiological spectrum and antibiotic resistance pattern occur between revision surgeries.

PURPOSE

Analysis of the microbiological spectrum and antibiotic resistance pattern in patients with multiple revision surgeries for the treatment of PSII STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective database analysis.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Between 01/2011 and 12/2018, 103 patients underwent 248 revision surgeries for the treatment of PSII. Twenty patients (19.4%) who underwent multiple revision surgeries for PSII were included in this study.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Microbiological spectrum, antibiotic resistance pattern.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained single center spine infection database was performed with a minimum follow-up of 3 years. Overall, 20 patients (six male/14 female) underwent 82 revisions for PSII (median 3; range 2-12). There were 55 of 82 (67.1%) procedures with a positive microbiological result. Microbiological analysis was performed on tissue and implant sonication fluid. Changes in microbial spectrum and antibiotic resistance pattern between surgeries were evaluated using Chi-Square and Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

In total, 74 microorganisms (83.3% gram-positive; 10.8% gram-negative) were identified. The most common microorganisms were Staphylococcus epidermidis (18.9%) and Cutibacterium acnes (18.9%). All S. epidermidis identified were methicillin-resistant (MRSE). Overall, there were 15 of 55 (27.3%) polymicrobial infections. The microbiological spectrum changed in 57.1% (20/35) between the revision stages over the entire PSII period. In 42.9% (15/35) the microorganism persisted between the revision surgeries stages. Overall, changes of the antibiotic resistance pattern were seen in 17.4% (8/46) of the detected microorganisms, comparing index revision and all subsequent re-revisions. Moreover, higher resistance rates were found for moxifloxacin and for ciprofloxacin at first re-revision surgery compared with index PSII revision. Resistances against vancomycin increased from 4.5% (1/23) at index PSII revision to 7.7% (2/26) at first re-revision surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Changes of the microbiological spectrum and the resistance pattern can occur in patients with severe PSII who require multiple revision surgeries. It is important to consider these findings in the antimicrobial treatment of PSII. The microbiological analysis of intraoperative tissue samples should be performed at every revision procedure for PSII.

Surgical Site Infection Management following Spinal Instrumentation Surgery: Implant Removal vs. Implant Retention: an Updated Systematical Review

Background

The number of lumbar spine surgery increased in recent years. Spinal instrumentation surgery was an integral component in the treatment of spinal pathologies, which can cause surgical site infection (SSI). Surgical site infections (SSIs) are the leading cause of mortality and morbidity after spinal instrumentation surgery. The management of SSI was implant retention and removal is still unclear.

Objective

The objective of this literature is to systematically review the implant removal and retention method for SSI management after spinal instrumentation surgery.

Methods

We searched in PubMed and ScienceDirect for cohort and randomized control trial studies in English, published between 2002 and 2022, which had data on patients with spinal instrumentation surgery. The underlying disease, comorbidities, common bacteria, type of infection, the onset of infection, implant removal, and retention percentage and recommendation were analyzed. Bias analysis using Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment.

Results

We included 15 studies with a total sample were 2.584 with an average of age 15 to 66 years old. The most common organism detected were S. Aureus, MRSA, and S. Epidermis. The most common surgical procedure indications were degenerative followed by scoliosis. Implant removal and retention rate were 0-100% and 0-90,32% respectively. Implant removal is more frequently used in patients after spinal instrumentation surgery than the implant retention method.

Conclusion

Implant retention can be performed in case of SSI is < 3 months after surgery. Implant removal is recommended if the incidence of SSI is > 3 months. Empirical antibiotics therapy is necessary to reduce the possibility of implant removal after debridement. Further studies on the effect of implant removal and retention in patients on infection recurrence, pain, and quality of life of patients are needed.

Medicosurgical management of deep wound infections after thoracolumbar instrumentation: risk factors of poor outcomes

BACKGROUND

Surgical site infection (SSI) after thoracolumbar osteosynthesis is a common complication. Its management relies on surgical revision and antibiotic therapy, but treatment failure is not uncommon. The aim of our study was to assess the frequency of SSI management failure and its risk factors.

METHODS

A retrospective study of patients hospitalized from 2011 to 2019 at the University Hospital of Caen was carried out. The infection rate and the time to onset of failure were assessed over a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Treatment failure was defined as the occurrence of a new intervention in the spine in the year following the end of antibiotic therapy, the establishment of long-term suppressive antibiotic therapy, or death from any cause within 1 year of the end of antibiotic therapy. We compared the treatment failure group with the treatment success group to determine risk factors for treatment failure.

RESULTS

A total of 2881 patients underwent surgery during the study period, and 92 developed an SSI, corresponding to an SSI rate of 3.19%. Thirty-six percent of the patients with an SSI presented treatment failure. The median time to failure was 31 days. On multivariate analysis, diabetes mellitus was identified as a risk factor for treatment failure, whereas prolonged postoperative drainage for 4 to 5 days was a protective factor.

CONCLUSIONS

The number of failures was significant, and failure occurred mainly during the early phase. To decrease the risk of treatment failure, prolonged duration of postoperative drainage seems to be helpful. Additionally, as diabetes is a risk factor for treatment failure, good control of glycemia in these patients might impact their outcomes.

Involvement of L5-S1 level as an independent risk factor for adverse outcomes after surgical treatment of lumbar pyogenic spondylitis: A multivariate analysis

PURPOSE

To identify the independent risk factors for adverse outcomes and determine the effect of L5-S1 involvement on the outcome of surgical treatment of lumbar pyogenic spondylitis (PS).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed for all consecutive patients who underwent surgery for lumbar PS between November 2004 and June 2020 at a single institution. The patients were divided into two groups based on the outcomes: good and adverse (treatment failure, relapse, or death). Treatment failure was defined as persistent or worsening pain with C-reactive protein (CRP) reduction less than 25% from preoperative measurement or requiring additional debridement. Relapse was defined as the reappearance of symptoms and signs with an elevated white blood cell count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and CRP after the first period of treatment. Binary logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the independent risk factors for adverse outcomes.

RESULTS

Twenty-four (21.2%) of the 113 patients were classified as having adverse outcomes: treatment failure, relapse, and death occurred in 15, 7, and 2 patients, respectively. The involvement of L5-S1 (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 6.561, P = 0.004), Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection (aOR = 6.870, P = 0.008), polymicrobial infection (aOR = 12.210, P = 0.022), and Charlson comorbidity index (CCI; P = 0.005) were identified as significant risk factors for adverse outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Involvement of L5-S1, MRSA, polymicrobial infection, and CCI were identified as independent risk factors for adverse outcomes after surgical treatment of lumbar PS. Because L5-S1 is anatomically demanding to access anteriorly, judicious access and thorough debridement are recommended in patients requiring anterior debridement of L5-S1.

Infections after spine instrumentation: effectiveness of short antibiotic treatment in a large multicentre cohort

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Available information about infection after spine instrumentation (IASI) and its management are scarce. We aimed to analyse DAIR (debridement, antibiotics and implant retention) prognosis and evaluate effectiveness of short antibiotic courses on early forms.

METHODS

Multicentre retrospective study of patients with IASI managed surgically (January 2010-December 2016). Risk factors for failure were analysed by multivariate Cox regression and differences between short and long antibiotic treatment were evaluated with a propensity score-matched analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 411 IASI cases, 300 (73%) presented in the first month after surgery, 48 in the second month, 22 in the third and 41 thereafter. Infections within the first 2 months (early cases) occurred mainly to older patients, with local inflammatory signs and predominance of Enterobacteriaceae, unlike those in the later periods. When managed with DAIR, prognosis of early cases was better than later ones (failure rate 10.4% versus 26.1%, respectively; P = 0.02). Risk factors for DAIR failure in early cases were female sex, Charlson Score, large fusions (>6 levels) and polymicrobial infections (adjusted HRs of 2.4, 1.3, 2.6 and 2.26, respectively). Propensity score matching proved shorter courses of antibiotics (4-6 weeks) as effective as longer courses (failure rates 11.4% and 10.5%, respectively; P = 0.870).

CONCLUSIONS

IASIs within the first 2 months could be managed effectively with DAIR and shorter antibiotic courses. Clinicians should be cautious when faced with patients with comorbidities, large fusions and/or polymicrobial infections.

A retrospective study of antibacterial iodine-coated implants for postoperative infection

Postoperative infection is one of the most serious complications in orthopedic surgery. We have developed and use iodine-coated implants to prevent and treat postoperative infection in compromised hosts. This study evaluated outcomes using iodine-coated implants for postoperative infections.We treated 72 postoperative infected patients using iodine-coated implants. Of these, 38 were males and 34 were females, with a mean age of 59.3 years. The mean follow-up period was 5.6 years. The patients included 23 with an infection following total knee arthroplasty, 20 following total hip arthroplasty, 11 following osteosynthesis, 11 following spine surgery, 6 following tumor excision, and 1 following osteotomy. Of these, 37 underwent single-stage surgery and 35 underwent staged revision surgery. We performed staged surgery in any case with active infection. The survival of iodine-coated implants was determined using Kaplan-Meier analysis. White blood cell (WBC) and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were measured pre- and postoperatively. To evaluate the systemic effects of iodine, serum thyroid hormone levels were examined.Five patients underwent re-revision surgery. In 3 patients, periprosthetic infection recurred at an average of 18 months after surgery. The reinfection rate was 4.2%. These patients recovered following reimplantation of iodine-coated prostheses. No patients required amputation. The survival rate of iodine-coated implants was 91%. There were no signs of infection at the latest follow-up. The median WBC level was nearly in the normal range, and CRP levels returned to normal within 4 weeks after surgery. No abnormalities of thyroid gland function were detected.Iodine-coated titanium implants can be very effective in the treatment of postoperative infections. An iodine coating can be safely applied to infected regions.

Risk factors for Cutibacterium acnes spinal implant-associated infection: a case-case-control study

OBJECTIVES

The aim was to determine the characteristics of patients who developed Cutibacterium acnes spinal implant-associated infection (SIAI) and the associated risk factors.

METHODS

We conducted two parallel case-control studies comparing 59 patients with SIAI caused by C. acnes (cases 1) and 93 patients with SIAI caused by other microorganisms (cases 2) diagnosed during 2010-2015 with 302 controls who underwent spinal instrumentation without subsequent infection.

RESULTS

Late-onset infections (median time to diagnosis, 843 days versus 23 days; p < 0.001) were more common in cases 1 than in cases 2. However, 20/59 (34%) of cases 1 occurred within the first 3 months after the index surgery. In addition, cases 1 were less likely to have fever (27%, 16/59 versus 58%, 54/93; p 0.001) or wound inflammation (39%, 23/59 versus 72%, 67/93; p < 0.001). Moreover, 24/59 (40%) of cases 1 presented with polymicrobial infections, and staphylococcal pathogens accounted for 22/24 (92%) of the co-infections. By comparing and contrasting the two multivariate risk models (cases 1 versus controls and cases 2 versus controls), the following factors associated with C. acnes SIAI development were identified: age <54 years (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 2.43, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.09-5.58, p 0.03), a body mass index <22 kg/m² (aOR 2.47, 95% CI 1.17-5.29, p 0.02), and thoracic instrumentation (aOR 16.1, 95% CI 7.57-37.0, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Future therapeutic and prophylactic studies on C. acnes SIAI should focus on young, thin patients who undergo spinal instrumentation procedures involving the thoracic spine.

Comparison of pyogenic postoperative and native vertebral osteomyelitis

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Postoperative vertebral osteomyelitis (PVO) after spinal surgery is a clinical challenge. However, there is a paucity of evidence regarding the most likely etiologic organisms to guide the choice of empirical antibiotic therapy, and previous reports of treatment outcomes for PVO are scarce.

PURPOSE

To compare the microbiology, clinical characteristics, and outcomes of pyogenic PVO with native vertebral osteomyelitis (NVO).

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective comparative study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Patients with microbiologically proven vertebral osteomyelitis from three university-affiliated hospitals in South Korea between January 2005 and December 2015 with follow-up of at least 12 months after completion of antibiotics or until the patient was transferred. Patients who had a spine operation in the same location within 1 year of diagnosis, and all patients with remnant implants at the time of the vertebral osteomyelitis diagnosis, were defined as having PVO. The remainder of the patients was considered to have NVO. Spinal operations included discectomy, laminectomy, arthrodesis, and instrumentation for stabilization of the spine.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Overall mortality, neurologic outcomes, treatment failure, and relapse of infection.

METHODS

Demographic data, comorbidities, presenting symptoms, microbiological data, radiographic characteristics, laboratory data (including white blood cell counts, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and C-reactive protein), surgical treatment, and neurologic outcomes for each patient were reviewed from electronic medical records and analyzed. Mortality rate, treatment failure, and relapse of infection were calculated for the two groups. Factors associated with treatment outcome were evaluated using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

The study evaluated 104 patients with PVO and 441 patients with NVO. In PVO, the most common isolate was Staphylococcus aureus (34%, n=35), followed by coagulase-negative staphylococci (31%, n=32). In NVO, the most common isolates were S. aureus (47%, n=206) and streptococci (21%, n=94). Of the staphylococci, the proportion of methicillin-resistant strains was significantly higher in PVO than that in NVO (75% vs. 39%, p<.001). The proportion of patients with gram-negative bacilli was 14% in PVO and 20% in NVO. Pre-existing or synchronous nonspinal infection was observed more frequently in NVO than in PVO (33% vs. 13%, p<.001). Although the duration of antibiotic use was similar in both groups, surgery for infection control was performed more frequently in PVO. The mortality rate was similar in both groups. However, the treatment failure and relapse rates at 12 months were higher in the PVO group (23% vs. 13%, p=.009; 14% vs. 7%, p=.028, respectively). Methicillin-resistant S.aureus was significantly associated with treatment failure or relapse via logistic regression (odds ratio 3.01, 95% confidence interval [1.71-5.32], p<.001; odds ratio 2.78, 95% confidence interval [1.40-5.49], p=.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Coverage of methicillin-resistant staphylococci should be considered when prescribing empirical antibiotics for PVO. Although surgery was performed more often in PVO than NVO, the treatment failure and relapse rates at 12 months were higher in PVO.

Factors Associated with Deep Surgical Site Infection Following Spinal Surgery: A Pilot Study

Introduction

Surgical site infection (SSI) is the most common healthcare-related infection in surgical patients. Patients who have undergone spinal surgeries and have contracted postoperative SSI face increased morbidity and mortality, which invariably leads to additional burden on the healthcare system and higher costs. The risk factors for the increase in SSI in patients who have undergone spinal surgery have been investigated in numerous studies but no studies have been performed in Malaysia. The aim of this pilot study is to determine the incidence and factors associated with deep SSIs in patients that have undergone spinal surgeries.

Methods

This retrospective study includes all patients who underwent spinal surgeries at Tengku Ampuan Afzan Hospital, Kuantan, from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2017. Patients with an active spinal infection, polytrauma, and open fractures were excluded from this study. Patient characteristics and laboratory investigations were extracted to determine the risk factors for deep SSI events. Associations between SSI and risk factors were analyzed with SPSS V21.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY).

Results

The univariate analysis indicated that fracture dislocation at the thoraco-lumbar junction (p=0.008) and a history of preoperative blood product transfusion (p=0.003) were associated with deep SSI. Other factors such as age (p=0.162), gender (p=0.262), body mass index (p=0.215), smoking status (0.272), number of vertebrae involved in the surgery (p=0.837), spinal cord involvement (p=0.259), postoperative hemoglobin reduction (p=0.816), and preoperative white blood cell count (p=0.278) were not associated with deep SSI.

Conclusions

This pilot study highlights the factors associated with deep SSI in spinal surgeries. A larger study is needed to further confirm these findings.

Acute spinal implant infection treated with debridement: does extended antibiotic treatment improve the prognosis?

The study aims to determine whether 8 weeks of antibiotics is non-inferior to 12 weeks in patients with acute deep spinal implant infection (SII). In the retrospective study of all SII cases (2009-2016), patients aged ≥ 15 years with microbiologically confirmed SII treated with debridement and implant retention were included. Whenever possible, tailored antibiotic treatment was used: rifampin/linezolid in gram-positive and quinolones in gram-negative infection. Patients were divided into short treatment course (8 weeks, ST group) and extended treatment (12 weeks, ET group). Primary outcome measure was percentage of cures at 1-year follow-up. One-hundred-twenty-four patients considered, 48 excluded based on the above criteria, leaving 76 patients, 28 ST and 48 ET. There were no differences in patient age, comorbidities, underlying pathologies, infection location, or surgery characteristics between groups. Surgery-to-debridement time was similar (18.5-day ST vs. 19-day ET; P = 0.96). Sixteen SII cases (21.1%) occurred with bloodstream infection. Pathogens found were Enterobacteriaceae (35, 46.1%), Staphylococcus aureus (29, 38.2%), coagulase-negative staphylococci (12, 15.8%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (12, 15.8%), and Enterococcus faecalis (7, 9.2%). Twenty seven (35.5%) had polymicrobial infection. E. faecalis was more frequent in the ST group (7, 25% vs. 0; P < 0.001), and P. aeruginosa in ET (1, 3.6% vs. 11, 22.9%; P = 0.05). Five patients died of causes unrelated to SII. At 1-year follow-up, cure rates (21/26 ST, 80.8% vs. 39/45 ET, 86.7%; P = 0.52) and recurrences (2/26, 7.7% vs. 2/45, 4.4%; P = 0.62) were similar. Eight-week antimicrobial courses were not inferior to 12 weeks in patients with acute deep SII treated with prompt debridement, proper wound healing, and optimized antibiotics.

Added value of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography for the diagnosis of post-operative instrumented spine infection

PURPOSE

Post-operative instrumented spine infection (PISI) is an infrequent complication. Diagnosis of spinal implant infection can be difficult, especially in case of chronic infection.

METHODS

This retrospective study attempts to evaluate the diagnostic performance of [¹⁸F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in PISI. Imagings were performed between April 2010 and June 2018 among patients referred for suspected chronic spinal implant infection. PET/CT were performed more than 12 weeks after surgery. PET/CT images were re-interpreted independently by two nuclear medicine physicians without knowledge of the patient's conditions. PET/CT data were analyzed both visually and semi-quantitatively (SUV_max). MRI results were collected from medical records. The final diagnosis of infection was based on bacteriological cultures or a twelve-month follow-up.

RESULTS

Forty-nine PET/CT were performed in 44 patients (22 women, median age 65.0 years). Twenty-two patients had a diagnosis of infection during follow-up. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) for PET/CT were 86.4%, 81.5%, 79.2%, and 88.0%. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were 66.7%, 75.0%, 66.0%, 75.0% respectively for MRI and 50.0%, 92.6%, 84.6% and 69.4% for serum C-reactive protein (CRP). Although these values were higher for PET/CT than for MRI or CRP, the differences were not statistically significant. In this setting, false positives with PET/CT can be observed in case of previous spine infection or adjacent segments disc disease. False negatives can result of extensive instrumented arthrodesis or infection with low virulence bacteria.

CONCLUSION

PET/CT is useful for the diagnosis of PISI. These results should be evaluated in further prospective study.

Relevance of Modified Debridement-Irrigation, Antibiotic Therapy and Implant Retention Protocol for the Management of Surgical Site Infections: A Series of 1694 Instrumented Spinal Surgery

Introduction: Management of surgical site infections (SSI) after instrumented spinal surgery remains controversial. The debridement-irrigation, antibiotic therapy and implant retention protocol (DAIR protocol) is safe and effective to treat deep SSI occurring within the 3 months after instrumented spinal surgery. Methods: This retrospective study describes the outcomes of patients treated over a period of 42 months for deep SSI after instrumented spinal surgery according to a modified DAIR protocol. Results: Among 1694 instrumented surgical procedures, deep SSI occurred in 46 patients (2.7%): 41 patients (89%) experienced early SSI (< 1 month), 3 (7%) delayed SSI (from 1 to 3 months), and 2 (4%) late SSI (> 3months). A total of 37 patients had a minimum 1 year of follow-up; among these the modified DAIR protocol was effective in 28 patients (76%) and failed (need for new surgery for persistent signs of SSI beyond 7 days) in 9 patients (24%). Early second-look surgery (≤ 7days) for iterative debridement was performed in 3 patients, who were included in the cured group. Among the 9 patients in whom the modified DAIR protocol failed, none had early second-look surgery; 3 (33%) recovered and were cured at 1 year follow-up, and 6 (66%) relapsed. Overall, among patients with SSI and a minimum 1 year follow-up, the modified DAIR protocol led to healing in 31/37 (84%) patients. Conclusions: The present study supports the effectiveness of a modified DAIR protocol in deep SSI occurring within the 3 months after instrumented spinal surgery. An early second-look surgery for iterative debridement could increase the success rate of this treatment.

Prognosis of deep infection in spinal surgery using implants, treated by retention, removal of bone graft and lengthy antibiotherapy

OBJECTIVE

Surgical site infections (SSIs) are complications that predispose to a high risk of unfavourable surgical outcomes. The aim of this study was to assess the SSI rate in this type of patients and their prognosis with similar treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective case series of 799 patients above 18 years old with spinal instrumentation surgery, between January 2010 and December 2014 in the traumatology and orthopaedic surgery department of our institution. All patients with SSIs were treated by debridement, graft replacement, retention of the instrumentation and lengthy courses of antimicrobial therapy. The patients were followed up for a period of 12 months.

RESULTS

Of all the patients with arthrodesis, 32 (4%) had spinal SSIs. Three patients were lost to follow-up. The final sample analyzed comprised 29 cases, with a median age of 54.9 years (IQR, 45.7-67 years) and a Charlson comorbidity index of 2.0 (IQR; 0-3). A microbiological diagnosis was obtained in 75.8% of the cases. Of these, the ISSs were monomicrobial in 68.2% and polymicrobial in 31.8%. Once treatment had been completed, 96% were cured without sequelae, and the rate of recurrence and reoperation was 4%.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment based on debridement, retention of the instrumentation, graft replacement and lengthy courses of antimicrobial therapy seems a very effective strategy in the treatment of patients with deep surgical site infection in spine surgery.