Anti-CD4 mediates clonal anergy during transplantation tolerance induction

Identification of HLA-DR4-restricted immunogenic peptide derived from xenogenic porcine major histocompatibility complex class I molecule

Indirect recognition of xenoantigens has been implicated as the major mechanism underlying xenospecific CD4+ T-cell activation in chronic rejection. We identified swine leukocyte antigen (SLA)-derived immunogenic peptides that are presented in the context of human HLA-DR4 molecules. The SLA class I-derived peptides that bind HLA-DRB1*0401, a representative of the DR4 supertype, were predicted using a computer-assisted algorithm. The candidate peptides were synthesized, and their binding capacities to HLA-DRB1*0401 were compared in a competitive ELISA using biotinylated hemagglutinin reporter peptides [HA(307-319)]. Peptide-11 (LRSWTAADTAAQISK) was determined to exhibit the most potent binding capacity to HLA-DRB1*0401 in vitro and thus selected for in vivo immunization. Immunization of HLA-DRB1*0401-transgenic mice with peptide-11 elicited potent CD4+ Th1 responses. Peptide-11 shares homology to α2 domains of three SLA-1 alleles, six SLA-2 alleles, and 14 SLA-3 alleles. Thus, this study has important implications not only for the identification of an immunogenic indirect epitope shared by diverse SLA class I alleles, but also for the development of epitope-specific immunoregulation strategies.

Sustained suppression by Foxp3+ regulatory T cells is vital for infectious transplantation tolerance

A new genetic mouse model demonstrates the necessity of Foxp3⁺ T reg cells for infectious tolerance.

A paradigm shift in immunology has been the recent discovery of regulatory T cells (T reg cells), of which CD4⁺Foxp3⁺ cells are proven as essential to self-tolerance. Using transgenic B6.Foxp3^hCD2 mice to isolate and ablate Foxp3⁺ T reg cells with an anti-hCD2 antibody, we show for the first time that CD4⁺Foxp3⁺ cells are crucial for infectious tolerance induced by nonablative anti–T cell antibodies. In tolerant animals, Foxp3⁺ T reg cells are constantly required to suppress effector T cells still capable of causing tissue damage. Tolerated tissue contains T cells that are capable of rejecting it, but are prevented from doing so by therapeutically induced Foxp3⁺ T reg cells. Finally, Foxp3⁺ cells have been confirmed as the critical missing link through which infectious tolerance operates in vivo. Peripherally induced Foxp3⁺ cells sustain tolerance by converting naive T cells into the next generation of Foxp3⁺ cells. Empowering Foxp3⁺ regulatory T cells in vivo offers a tractable route to avoid and correct tissue immunopathology.

Alloreactive (CD4-Independent) CD8+ T cells jeopardize long-term survival of intrahepatic islet allografts

Despite success of early islet allograft engraftment and survival in humans, late islet allograft loss has emerged as an important clinical problem. CD8+ T cells that are independent of CD4+ T cell help can damage allograft tissues and are resistant to conventional immunosuppressive therapies. Previous work demonstrates that islet allografts do not primarily initiate rejection by the (CD4-independent) CD8-dependent pathway. This study was performed to determine if activation of alloreactive CD4-independent, CD8+ T cells, by exogenous stimuli, can precipitate late loss of islet allografts. Recipients were induced to accept intrahepatic islet allografts (islet 'acceptors') by short-term immunotherapy with donor-specific transfusion (DST) and anti-CD154 mAb. Following the establishment of stable long-term islet allograft function for 60-90 days, recipients were challenged with donor-matched hepatocellular allografts, which are known to activate (CD4-independent) CD8+ T cells. Allogeneic islets engrafted long-term were vulnerable to damage when challenged locally with donor-matched hepatocytes. Islet allograft loss was due to allospecific immune damage, which was CD8- but not CD4-dependent. Selection of specific immunotherapy to suppress both CD4- and CD8-dependent immune pathways at the time of transplant protects islet allografts from both early and late immune damage.

CD4+ T cells are sufficient to elicit allograft rejection and major histocompatibility complex class I molecule is required to induce recurrent autoimmune diabetes after pancreas transplantation in mice

BACKGROUND

We characterized the role of T cell subsets and major histocompatibility complex molecules in allograft rejection and recurrence of autoimmune diabetes.

METHODS

Adoptive cell transfer and vascularized segmental pancreas transplantation were performed in mice.

RESULTS

In an alloimmune response model, transfer of nondiabetic CD4, but not CD8 T cells, elicited pancreas allograft rejection in streptozotocin (STZ)-induced diabetic NOD/scid mice. Pancreas allografts were acutely rejected in STZ-induced diabetic NOD/beta2m mice (confirmed the absence of major histocompatibility complex [MHC] class I and CD8 T cells) and permanently accepted in NOD/CIIT mice (confirmed the absence of MHC class II and CD4 T cells). The results suggest that rejection of pancreas allograft is CD4-dependent and MHC class I-independent. In the autoimmune diabetes model, whole spleen cells obtained from diabetic NOD mice induced autoimmune diabetes in NOD/scid and NOD/CIIT mice, but the onset of diabetes was delayed in NOD/beta2m mice. However, the purified diabetic T cells failed to elicit autoimmune diabetes in NOD/beta2m mice. NOD/scid and NOD/CIIT pancreas grafts were acutely destroyed whereas four of six NOD/beta2m pancreas grafts were permanently accepted in autoimmune diabetic NOD mice.

CONCLUSION

CD4 T cells are sufficient for the induction of allograft rejection, and MHC class I molecule is required to induce recurrent autoimmune diabetes after pancreas transplantation in mice.

Biological and Biomaterial Approaches for Improved Islet Transplantation

Islet transplantation may be used to treat type I diabetes. Despite tremendous progress in islet isolation, culture, and preservation, the clinical use of this modality of treatment is limited due to post-transplantation challenges to the islets such as the failure to revascularize and immune destruction of the islet graft. In addition, the need for lifelong strong immunosuppressing agents restricts the use of this option to a limited subset of patients, which is further restricted by the unmet need for large numbers of islets. Inadequate islet supply issues are being addressed by regeneration therapy and xenotransplantation. Various strategies are being tried to prevent beta-cell death, including immunoisolation using semipermeable biocompatible polymeric capsules and induction of immune tolerance. Genetic modification of islets promises to complement all these strategies toward the success of islet transplantation. Furthermore, synergistic application of more than one strategy is required for improving the success of islet transplantation. This review will critically address various insights developed in each individual strategy and for multipronged approaches, which will be helpful in achieving better outcomes.

Tolerance and the "Holy Grail" of transplantation

Advances in transplantation biology have greatly improved patient outcomes following transplant surgery. However, generalized immunosuppression remains the Achilles heel of modern transplantation surgery with its associated infectious and neoplastic morbidities. Tolerance remains the ultimate goal for the entire field. Although recent advances in transplant immunology suggest that tolerance may be achievable in the near future, the complex and redundant nature of the human immune system may not allow us to circumvent such a basic function as the recognition of nonself. In this paper, advances in transplant immunology are reviewed and their potential relevance to achieving the "Holy Grail" of transplantation are discussed.

Ex vivo and systemic transfer of adenovirus-mediated CTLA4Ig gene combined with a short course of FK506 therapy prolongs islet graft survival

Adenovirus-mediated CTLA4Ig gene transfer has been reported to enhance graft survival in several rodent transplantation models. In this study, we investigated the efficacy of ex vivo and systemic transfer of the CTLA4Ig gene by adenoviral vectors in pancreatic islet allo-transplantation. Islet grafts from BN rats were transplanted to chemically induced diabetic LEW rats. First, ex vivo CTLA4Ig gene transfer into isolated islets was performed prior to transplantation. Survival of transduced grafts under the kidney capsule was slightly prolonged (8.6+/-1.3 days) compared with survival of untransduced grafts (6.7+/-1.2 days); when combined with a short course of FK506, graft survival was further extended (32.6+/-10.7 days vs. 13.7+/-1.0 days with FK506 alone). Secondly, systemic gene transfer was accomplished by intravenous administration immediately after the transplantation procedure. In these animals, islet grafts under the kidney capsule survived longer (15.2+/-3.3 days) than in controls (6.7+/-1.2 days), and when FK506 was administered perioperatively, all the islet grafts survived for more than 100 days. In systemically transduced recipients, the survival of islet grafts transplanted into the liver was not significantly different from that of the grafts placed under the kidney capsule. In order to examine organ-specific immunogenicity, heterotopic BN cardiac grafts were transplanted to LEW rats intra-abdominally, with the virus transferred systemically as in the islet model. In contrast to the islet grafts, all the cardiac grafts were accepted for longer than 100 days, even without FK506 therapy. Finally, the LEW recipients with long-surviving islet or cardiac grafts were re-transplanted with islet grafts from the same donor strain (BN) on day 100. The second islet grafts survived longer than 100 days in half of the cardiac recipients, but consistently failed in the islet recipients. We conclude that in this transplant model, CTLA4Ig gene transfer and FK506 treatment synergistically improved islet graft survival, systemic transfer of the gene was more effective than ex vivo transfer to the islets, and donor-specific tolerance could not be achieved for islet transplantation but was achieved for cardiac transplantation.

The balance between donor T cell anergy and suppression versus lethal graft-versus-host disease is determined by host conditioning

Graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) remains the most life-threatening complication following the transfer of allogeneic bone marrow into immunocompromised hosts. Transferred alloreactive T cells respond in a complex manner. While massive T cell expansion is observed upon entry into an allogeneic environment, anergy, apoptosis, and repertoire selection are also observed. The study presented here shows that alloreactive T cell expansion and differentiation vs anergy and suppression are dramatically influenced by host conditioning. Using alloreactive CD4(+) and CD8(+) TCR transgenic (Tg) T cells, a novel GVHD model is presented that allows for the visualization of how alloreactive T cells behave when host conditioning is manipulated. Following the transfer of alloreactive CD4(+) and CD8(+) TCR Tg T cells into sublethally irradiated hosts, both Tg T cells populations expand, develop effector function, and cause GVHD. In contrast, when Tg T cells are transferred in non-irradiated hosts, expansion is observed, but there is no development of effector function or disease. Assessment of CD4(+) Tg T cell function following transfer into non-irradiated hosts reveals that these CD4(+) Tg cells are profoundly anergic and have acquired a regulatory function, as manifested in their ability to suppress the expansion of naive TCR Tg T cells in vitro and in vivo as well as the development of GVHD. These findings underscore the decisive effect of the inflammatory environment created by irradiation in determining the ultimate fate and function of alloreactive T cells in vivo

Ligation of human CD4 interferes with antigen-induced activation of primary T cells

The CD4 molecule functions to enhance T cell activation when it is co-aggregated with the T cell receptor for antigen (TCR) by MHC class II antigenic peptide complexes. However, independent ligation of CD4 has been shown to negatively effect signaling through the TCR in vitro. The interaction between the HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein gp120 and CD4 is a central event in the pathogenesis of AIDS and may contribute to immune deficiency via both direct and indirect mechanisms, including lytic infection of T cells and induction of CD4 signaling events resulting in apoptosis and anergy. Analysis of the consequences of interactions between CD4 and gp120 have yielded contradictory results presumably because most of these studies have focused on T cell clones of questionable relevance to the in vivo target of the virus. Here, we analyzed the effects of CD4 ligation on freshly isolated cells of human CD4 transgenic mice, and show that huCD4 preligation, in the absence of human CXCR4, has an inhibitory effect on both early and late T cell activation events. CD4 signaling negatively regulates the response to antigen, as well as to anti-TCR mAb. In addition, we show here that this negative signal requires the cytoplasmic tail of CD4. These results suggest that in HIV infected patients the interaction of gp120 with CD4 induces unresponsiveness of CD4+ T cells to subsequent activation by antigen.

Role for thymic and splenic regulatory CD4+ T cells induced by donor dendritic cells in allograft tolerance by LF15-0195 treatment

A 20-day treatment with LF15-0195, a deoxyspergualine analogue, induced allograft tolerance in a fully MHC-mismatched heart allograft model in the rat. Long-term allografts displayed minimal cell infiltration with no signs of chronic rejection. CD4+ spleen T cells from tolerant LF15-0195-treated recipients were able to suppress in vitro proliferation of allogeneic CD4+ T cells and to transfer tolerance to second syngeneic recipients, demonstrating dominant suppression by regulatory cells. A significant increase in the percentage of CD4+CD25+ T cells was observed in the thymus and spleen from tolerant LF15-0195-treated recipient. In vitro direct stimulation with donor APCs demonstrated that CD4+ regulatory T cells proliferated weakly and expressed low levels of IFN-gamma, IL-10, and IL-2. CD4+CD25+ cell depletion increased IL-2 production by CD4+CD25- thymic cells, but not splenic cells. Moreover, tolerance was transferable with splenic and thymic CD4+CD25+ cells, but also in 50% of cases with splenic CD4+CD25- cells, demonstrating that CD25 can be a marker for regulatory cells in the thymus, but not in the periphery. In addition, we presented evidences that donor APCs were required to induce tolerance and to expand regulatory CD4+ T cells. This study demonstrates that LF15-0195 treatment induces donor APCs to expand powerful regulatory CD4+CD25+/- T cells present in both the central and peripheral compartments.

Tolerance and pancreatic islet transplantation

Islet transplantation holds renewed promise as a cure for type I diabetes mellitus. Results of recent clinical trials have shown remarkable success, and have reignited universal optimism for this procedure. In spite of this success, the need for life-long immunosuppression of the recipient still limits islet transplantation to patients with poorly controlled diabetes or to those requiring kidney transplantation. It is obvious that the achievement of immunological tolerance would broaden the indication for islet transplantation to a much larger cohort of patients with type I diabetes mellitus, most likely preventing long-term complications and contributing to a much improved quality of life. Increased understanding of the basic mechanisms of tolerance induction has resulted in the implementation of numerous experimental approaches to achieve long-term survival of islet grafts in the absence of chronic immunosuppression. In this brief review we will attempt to summarize the current status of research and knowledge.

Oral exposure to alloantigen generates intragraft CD8+ regulatory cells

We have previously reported that oral administration of allogeneic rat spleen cells before kidney allotransplantation significantly prolongs graft survival. This prolongation was alloantigen specific and was associated with a decrease in graft-infiltrating cells (GIC) and an increase in transcription of IL-4 mRNA in the GIC. In this study increased splenic mixed lymphocyte responses from animals orally exposed to alloantigen before kidney transplantation suggested that the kidney allograft prolongation was not due to a masking of allorecognition, but to an immunomodulation of the immune response. We have assessed GIC T cell subsets on day 5 post-transplant and found decreased numbers of CD4(+) T cells in fed animals compared with controls, but there was no change in CD8(+) T cell numbers. The CD8(+) GIC from fed animals transcribed substantial levels of perforin, granzyme, and Fas ligand mRNA, indicating the presence of active CTL. Direct CTL assays showed that the GIC from fed recipients exhibited higher allo-CTL activity than GIC from control unfed recipients. In addition, the CD8(+) GIC exhibited high levels of IL-4 mRNA, suggesting Tc2-type regulatory cells. Prolonged graft survival in the face of active CTL and Tc2 cells suggests the presence of a CD8(+) regulatory cell population in the allograft. To confirm this, cell transfer experiments were performed. Prolongation of graft survival was transferred from rats orally exposed to alloantigen to naive animals by transfer of CD8(+) GIC. This is the first report that oral exposure to alloantigen prolongs kidney allograft survival by the generation of intragraft CD8(+) regulatory cells.

IL-10 is required for regulatory T cells to mediate tolerance to alloantigens in vivo

We present evidence that donor-reactive CD4(+) T cells present in mice tolerant to donor alloantigens are phenotypically and functionally heterogeneous. CD4(+) T cells contained within the CD45RB(high) fraction remained capable of mediating graft rejection when transferred to donor alloantigen-grafted T cell-depleted mice. In contrast, the CD45RB(low) CD4(+) and CD25(+)CD4(+) populations failed to induce rejection, but rather, were able to inhibit rejection initiated by naive CD45RB(high) CD4(+) T cells. Analysis of the mechanism of immunoregulation transferred by CD45RB(low) CD4(+) T cells in vivo revealed that it was donor Ag specific and could be inhibited by neutralizing Abs reactive with IL-10, but not IL-4. CD45RB(low) CD4(+) T cells from tolerant mice were also immune suppressive in vitro, as coculture of these cells with naive CD45RB(high) CD4(+) T cells inhibited proliferation and Th1 cytokine production in response to donor alloantigens presented via the indirect pathway. These results demonstrate that alloantigen-specific regulatory T cells contained within the CD45RB(low) CD4(+) T cell population are responsible for the maintenance of tolerance to donor alloantigens in vivo and require IL-10 for functional activity.

Different costimulation signals used by CD4(+) and CD8(+) cells that independently initiate rejection of allogenic hepatocytes in mice

The current study evaluated the role of CD40/CD40 ligand (CD40L) and CD28/B7 costimulation signals during alloimmune responses independently mediated by CD4(+) or CD8(+) T cells. Allogeneic hepatocytes were transplanted into CD8 or CD4 knock out (KO) mice under cover of costimulatory blockade. Rejection of FVB/N (H-2(q)) hepatocytes occurred by day 10 posttransplant in untreated CD8 or CD4 KO (H-2(b)) mice. Treatment of CD8 or CD4 KO mice with anti-CD40L monoclonal antibody (mAb; MR1) resulted in significant prolongation of hepatocyte survival indicating that CD40/CD40L interactions were critical in both CD4(+) and CD8(+) T-cell initiated hepatocyte rejection. Anti-CD40L mAb also prolonged hepatocyte survival in B-cell KO (H-2(b)) mice, indicating that the efficacy of CD40/CD40L blockade in preventing hepatocyte rejection was B-cell (and antibody) independent. In contrast, treatment with CTLA4 fusion protein (CTLA4Ig), prolonged hepatocyte survival in CD8 KO but not CD4 KO mice, showing that CD28/B7 interactions were important in CD4(+) but not CD8(+) T-cell initiated hepatocyte rejection. Under selected circumstances, such as in CD40 KO mice, both CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells mediate hepatocyte rejection in the absence of CD40/CD40L costimulation and without a significant contribution from CD28/B7 costimulation signals. These results highlight the disparate roles of CD40/CD40L and CD28/B7 costimulation signals in CD4(+) versus CD8(+) T-cell mediated immune responses to allogeneic hepatocytes. The CD4(+) T-cell independent, CD40L-sensitive, CD28/B7-independent pathway of CD8(+) T-cell activation in response to transplantation antigens is novel.

Indirect recognition of porcine swine leukocyte Ag class I molecules expressed on islets by human CD4+ T lymphocytes

Xenotransplantation of porcine islets is considered a viable alternative treatment for type 1 diabetes mellitus. Therefore, we characterized human PBL responding to porcine islets both in vitro by coculture and in vivo using SCID mice reconstituted with human PBLs (HuPBL-SCID) and transplanted with porcine islets. T cell lines generated in vitro and graft-infiltrating T cells obtained from HuPBL-SCID mice were CD4+-proliferated specifically to porcine islets cultured with autologous APC. This proliferation was abrogated by an anti-human class II Ab. These T cell lines also proliferated to purified swine leukocyte Ag (SLA) class I molecules in the presence of self-APC, indicating that the primary xenoantigens recognized are peptides derived from SLA. This CD4+ T cell line lysed porcine islets but not splenocytes. CD4+ T cell clones with Th0, Th1, and Th2 cytokine profiles were isolated. The Th0 and Th1 clones lysed porcine islets, whereas the Th2 clone that secreted a large amount of IL-4 was not lytic. These results demonstrate that human T cells responding to porcine islets are primarily CD4+ and recognize porcine xenoantigens by the indirect Ag pathway presentation. These activated T cells produce cytokines that lyse islets. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the major porcine xenoantigens recognized are SLA class I molecules.

Anti-CD4 induced rat heart tolerance: no presence of primed T cells and regulatory mechanisms for cytotoxic T cells

Treatment with anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody (mAb) (OX38) induces heart, but not skin graft tolerance in WF (RT1u) to Lewis (RT1l) rat strain combinations. We examined differences in cellular responses between heart-bearing and skin-rejected hosts that were both treated with anti-CD4 mAb. In the tolerant LEW rats bearing WF heart transplants, the secondary WF heart but not skin grafts were accepted. On the other hand, in anti-CD4 treated WF skin-rejected hosts, both secondary WF heart and skin grafts were rapidly rejected. Spleen cells from anti-CD4 treated WF skin-rejected LEW rats but not from WF heart-bearing LEW rats received the same treatment generated CTL after in vitro stimulation with paraformaldehyde (PFA) treated donor WF stimulator spleen cells. Adoptive transfer of spleen cells from WF skin-rejected LEW rats with or without anti-CD4 therapy into the tolerant LEW rats at the secondary WF heart transplantation blocked the secondary heart graft acceptance. However, transfer of spleen cells from WF heart-rejected rats without immunosuppression failed to block acceptance of the secondary heart graft. Our results indicated the lack of primed T cells and presence of regulatory mechanisms for tissue specific T cells in anti-CD4 treated heart bearing hosts.

Prolonged cardiac allograft survival in rats systemically injected adenoviral vectors containing CTLA4Ig-gene

BACKGROUND

CTLA4Ig, a soluble recombinant fusion protein that contains the extracellular domain of the CTLA4 and Fc portion of IgG1, strongly adheres to the B7 molecule to block CD28-mediated costimulatory signals and inhibits in vitro and in vivo immune responses. In vivo gene transfer using adenovirus vector achieves a high transfection rate into organ cells that usually contain adenoviral receptors. In this study, we investigated expression levels of the transfected gene and the survival times of the allografts in cardiac recipients systemically administered adenoviral vectors containing CTLA4Ig.

METHODS

Hearts from DA rats (RT-1a) were transplanted into a cervical location in LEW recipients (RT1(1)). The adenoviral vectors containing CTLA4Ig was injected via a recipient vein immediately after grafting.

RESULTS

The serum level of CTLA4Ig reached to maximum at 51-93 microg/ml 3 to 7 days after gene-transfection and declined after 14 days, although detectable levels were observed up to 49 days. The median survival time of the allografts in the gene-transfected group were significantly prolonged (27 days) in compared to the control group (6 days). In addition, down-regulation of IL-2 and IFN-gamma mRNAs and persistence of IL-4 and IL-10 transcripts were observed in the graft infiltrating cells.

CONCLUSION

The adenovirous-mediated CTLA4Ig gene transfer into a recipient liver by systemic administration resulted in remarkable prolongation of cardiac allograft survival. Its action mechanisms may be mediated by inhibition of CD28-associated signal transduction, reduction of Th1-type cytokine production, and continuous expression of Th2-type cytokines in the activating lymphocytes.

Implication of soluble and membrane HLA class I and serum IL-10 in liver graft acceptance

Membrane HLA class-I expression (mHLA-I), soluble HLA class-I antigens (sHLA-I) and interleukin (IL)-10 are different factors implicated in the special acceptance of liver allograft. In this study, pre- and post-operative levels of mHLA-I in peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL) and serum sHLA-I were analyzed in 86 liver transplants, immunosuppressed with Cyclosporine-A, methylprednisolone and azathioprine, and classified into acute-rejection (AR, n = 28) and non-acute-rejection (NAR, n = 58) groups. Serum IL-10 was studied in 47 recipients (AR-group, n = 16 and NAR-group, n = 31). Pre-transplant values of mHLA-I and sHLA-I showed a bimodal distribution (high/low) in NAR-recipients, but in AR-patients were mainly included in the low expression/secretion zone (mHLA-I, p < 0.02 and sHLA-I, p < 0.05). Consequently, average pre-transplant mHLA-I (868 +/- 109 versus 998 +/- 123, p < 0.05) and sHLA-I (1.3 +/- 0.4 versus 2.02 +/- 0.7 microg/ml, p < 0.01) was lower in the AR- than in the NAR-group. After transplant both parameters decreased in the NAR-group, but increased in AR-recipients previous to and on rejection diagnosis day. Additionally, serum IL-10 levels were significantly higher (p < 0.01) in the NAR than in the AR-group during the first 24 h post-transplant. In conclusion, low pre-transplant mHLA-I and sHLA-I levels pre-dispose liver recipients to acute rejection, whereas early post-transplant increases of serum IL-10 appear to be related to a good liver allograft acceptance.

Tolerance to Antigen-Presenting Cell-Depleted Islet Allografts Is CD4 T Cell Dependent

Pretreatment of pancreatic islets in 95% oxygen culture depletes graft-associated APCs and leads to indefinite allograft acceptance in immunocompetent recipients. As such, the APC-depleted allograft represents a model of peripheral alloantigen presentation in the absence of donor-derived costimulation. Over time, a state of donor-specific tolerance develops in which recipients are resistant to donor APC-induced graft rejection. Thus, persistence of the graft is sufficient to induce tolerance independent of other immune interventions. Donor-specific tolerance could be adoptively transferred to immune-deficient SCID recipient mice transplanted with fresh immunogenic islet allografts, indicating that the original recipient was not simply “ignorant” of donor antigens. Interestingly, despite the fact that the original islet allograft presented only MHC class I alloantigens, CD8+ T cells obtained from tolerant animals readily collaborated with naive CD4+ T cells to reject donor-type islet grafts. Conversely, tolerant CD4+ T cells failed to collaborate effectively with naive CD8+ T cells for the rejection of donor-type grafts. In conclusion, the MHC class I+, II− islet allograft paradoxically leads to a change in the donor-reactive CD4 T cell subset and not in the CD8 subset. We hypothesize that the tolerant state is not due to direct class I alloantigen presentation to CD8 T cells but, rather, occurs via the indirect pathway of donor Ag presentation to CD4 T cells in the context of host MHC class II molecules.

Induction of immunologic tolerance for transplantation

In the second half of the 20th century, the transplantation of replacement organs and tissues to cure disease has become a clinical reality. Success has been achieved as a direct result of progress in understanding the cellular and molecular biology of the immune system. This understanding has led to the development of immunosuppressive pharmaceuticals that are part of nearly every transplantation procedure. All such drugs are toxic to some degree, however, and their chronic use, mandatory in transplantation, predisposes the patient to the development of infection and cancer. In addition, many of them may have deleterious long-term effects on the function of grafts. New immunosuppressive agents are constantly under development, but organ transplantation remains a therapy that requires patients to choose between the risks of their primary illness and its treatment on the one hand, and the risks of life-long systemic immunosuppression on the other. Alternatives to immunosuppression include modulation of donor grafts to reduce immunogenicity, removal of passenger leukocytes, transplantation into immunologically privileged sites like the testis or thymus, encapsulation of tissue, and the induction of a state of immunologic tolerance. It is the last of these alternatives that has, perhaps, the most promise and most generic applicability as a future therapy. Recent reports documenting long-term graft survival in the absence of immunosuppression suggest that tolerance-based therapies may soon become a clinical reality. Of particular interest to our laboratory are transplantation strategies that focus on the induction of donor-specific T-cell unresponsiveness. The basic biology, protocols, experimental outcomes, and clinical implications of tolerance-based transplantation are the focus of this review.

Dominant regulation: a common mechanism of monoclonal antibody induced tolerance?

Transplantation tolerance can be induced by a range of agents that block T cell/antigen-presenting cell (APC) interactions known to be important for initiation of the adaptive immune response. Tolerance so induced has been shown to have a regulatory phenotype dependent on CD4+ cells. This was first observed with nonlytic anti-CD4 antibodies, and was recently demonstrated following other therapeutic approaches. Dominant tolerance also plays a role in natural regulation of the immune response, functioning to prevent autoaggressive cells mediating self-destruction. The mechanism by which dominant tolerance is established and maintained remains unclear, and the reported characteristics of regulatory cells in different experimental models vary widely. Here we review the evidence for potential mechanisms involved and propose that there is a common pathway by which dominant tolerance is mediated.

Anti-CD4 Monoclonal Antibody-Induced Tolerance to MHC-Incompatible Cardiac Allografts Maintained by CD4+ Suppressor T Cells That Are Not Dependent upon IL-4

Anti-CD4 mAb-induced tolerance to transplanted tissues has been proposed as due to down-regulation of Th1 cells by preferential induction of Th2 cytokines, especially IL-4. This study examined the role of CD4+ cells and cytokines in tolerance to fully allogeneic PVG strain heterotopic cardiac allografts induced in naive DA rats by treatment with MRC Ox38, a nondepleting anti-CD4 mAb. All grafts survived &gt;100 days but had a minor mononuclear cell infiltrate that increased mRNA for the Th1 cytokines IL-2, IFN-γ, and TNF-β, but not for Th2 cytokines IL-4 and IL-6 or the cytolytic molecules perforin and granzyme A. These hosts accepted PVG skin grafts but rejected third-party grafts, which were not blocked by anti-IL-4 mAb. Cells from these tolerant hosts proliferated in MLC and produced IL-2, IFN-γ, and IL-4 at levels equivalent to naive cells. Unfractionated and CD4+ T cells, but not CD8+ T cells, transferred specific tolerance to irradiated heart grafted hosts and inhibited reconstitution of rejection by cotransferred naive cells. This transfer of tolerance was associated with normal induction of IL-2 and delayed induction of IFN-γ, but not with increased IL-4 or IL-10 mRNA. Transfer of tolerance was also not inhibited by anti-IL-4 mAb. This study demonstrated that tolerance induced by a nondepleting anti-CD4 mAb is maintained by a CD4+ suppressor T cell that is not associated with preferential induction of Th2 cytokines or the need for IL-4; nor is it associated with an inability to induce Th1 cytokines or anergy.

Anti-CD4 therapy in combined heart-kidney, heart-liver, and heart-small bowel allotransplants in high-responder rats

BACKGROUND

In these experiments, we studied the role of anti-CD4 (Ox38) monoclonal antibody in the induction of allograft unresponsiveness in high-responder Lewis rats in the single liver, kidney, small bowel, and heart versus the combined heart-kidney, heart-liver, and heart-small bowel transplantation models.

METHODS

ACI heart, kidney, liver, and small bowel allografts were transplanted into untreated and anti-CD4 treated Lewis rats. In selected animals bearing long-surviving ACI liver or kidney allografts for over 3 months, donor-matched second heart or third-party (Brown Norway) heart allografts were transplanted. Simultaneously, heart-liver, heart-kidney, and heart-small bowel transplants were performed on the day of operation. Rejected allografts were verified by autopsy and pathology.

RESULTS

ACI liver allografts were permanently accepted by Lewis recipients treated with either regular-dose (5 mg/kg for 4 days) or low-dose (5 mg/kg for 2 days) of anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody. Pretransplant anti-CD4 therapy (5 mg/kg for 4 days but not 5 mg/kg for 2 days) resulted in a long-term survival of kidney allografts (mean survival time [MST] > 100.0 days, n=5). Pretransplant anti-CD4 treatment (5 mg/kg for 4 days) could not induce tolerance when single ACI hearts were transplanted; however, long-term survival of ACI heart allografts could be induced when heart transplants were combined with liver (n=7) or kidney (n=8) transplants. The survival of both ACI heart allografts (MST=25.0 days, n=4) and small bowel allografts (MST=28.0 days, n=4) was also prolonged when simultaneous heart and small bowel transplantation was performed in anti-CD4-treated recipients. The second ACI heart allograft was permanently accepted by tolerant Lewis recipients of ACI liver or kidney allografts induced by anti-CD4 treatment, and third-party heart grafts were acutely rejected without affecting survival of the primary allografts.

CONCLUSION

Our current results show that: (1) there is a vigorous rejection of heart > or = small bowel > kidney > liver in high-responder Lewis rats after pretransplant anti-CD4 therapy; and (2) simultaneous or metachronous combined liver-heart and kidney-heart transplants may protect heart allografts from rejection.

How do monoclonal antibodies induce tolerance? A role for infectious tolerance?

One of the major goals in therapeutic immunosuppression has been to achieve long-term benefit from short-term therapy. The discovery in the mild-1980s that CD4 antibodies can induce immunological tolerance without depleting CD4+ T cells has reawakened interest in the use of nondepleting monoclonal antibodies for reprogramming the immune system in autoimmunity and in transplantation. Since that time, antibodies to CD11a, CD4OL, CD25, CD3, and CTLA4-Ig have all been shown capable of facilitating tolerance. In order to apply to principle of reprogramming in the clinic, we have sought to understand the mechanisms that are involved in its induction and its maintenance. In a number of allogeneic transplant models (heart, skin, bone marrow) anti-CD4 (+/- CD8) antibodies can be shown to block the rejection process while selectively promoting the development of CD4+ regulatory T cells responsible for a dominant tolerance that is reflected in findings of linked suppression and infectious tolerance. In these models, T cells that have never been exposed to CD4 antibodies become tolerant to grafted antigens by experiencing antigen in the microenvironment of regulatory T cells. Dominant tolerance is not the only mechanism that can be facilitated by CD4 Mab therapy. If allogeneic marrow is given at high cell doses under the umbrella of CD4 and CD8 antibodies, then tolerance can be achieved through clonal deletion. The mechanism by which regulatory CD4+ T cell suppress is not yet defined but could be active or passive. We have proposed the "civil service model" to explain how tolerant T cells might interfere with the responses of competent T cells in such a way as to render them tolerant.

Prolongation of cardiac graft survival with anti-CD4Ig plus hCTLA4Ig in primates

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to determine whether the use of combined immunotherapy with a brief course of humanized anti-CD4Ig and hCTLA4Ig would prolong heterotopic cardiac allograft survival in primates (rhesus monkeys). This model was based on work in "high responder" rats where a brief course of depletive anti-CD4mAb plus hCTLA4Ig was successful in inducing transplantation tolerance.

METHODS

Heterotopic cardiac transplants were performed in rhesus recipients. Donor/recipient pairs between groups were confirmed to be reactive prior to transplantation by MLR matching. Humanized anti-CD4Ig, a recently developed anti-CD4mAb, was given at a dose of 20 mg/kg i.v. on days -3, -2, -1, and 0. hCTLA4Ig was administered at 6 mg/kg/dose i.v. on days 0 and 2 for the first recipient and days 0, 2, 4, and 6 for the second recipient. No further immunosuppression was administered. The treated (n = 2) or untreated (n = 5) recipients were followed for graft function by daily palpitation.

RESULTS

Treatment with anti-CD4Ig plus hCTLA4Ig resulted in a significant prolongation of heart graft survival (42 days for the first recipient and 52 days for the second recipient) compared to untreated recipients (7 days x 4, 11 days x 1). FACS analysis demonstrated CD4 depletion of anti-CD4 treated animals to <2% on posttransplant day 1. The CD4+ T cells gradually repopulated to 50-70% pretransplant levels just prior to rejection. No adverse responses (fever, tachypnea, tachycardia, infections) were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

These are the first results demonstrating that a brief course of combined specific induction immunotherapy with humanized anti-CD4Ig plus hCTLA4Ig, in the absence of adjuvant posttransplant immunosuppression, was well tolerated and resulted in marked prolongation of cardiac allograft survival in primates.

Induction of tolerance with nondepleting anti-CD4 monoclonal antibodies is associated with down-regulation of TH2 cytokines

BACKGROUND

Induction of tolerance with anti-CD4 has mainly focused on monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) that deplete CD4+ T cells. In this study, the mechanisms by which nondepleting anti-CD4 mAbs induce tolerance in the Dark Agouti to PVG rat heart graft model were examined.

METHODS

Five anti-CD4 mAbs were tested. Immunohistology and cytokine mRNA profiles were analyzed within grafts. Effects of combining anti-CD4 therapy with alloantibody (alloAb), interleukin (IL)-4, and anti-IL-4 mAb were also examined.

RESULTS

All mAbs tested induced indefinite graft survival (>150 days), with blocking of alloAb production. Exogenous alloAb did not restore rejection. Similar T cell receptor alphabeta+, CD8+, IL-2 receptor+ T cell, macrophage, and natural killer cell infiltration and comparable MHC II and intercellular adhesion molecule-1 levels were seen in rejecting and tolerant grafts. mRNA for IL-2, interferon-gamma, lymphotoxin, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, transforming growth factor-beta, cytolysin, and granzyme-A/B was comparable, although inducible nitric oxide synthase was slightly reduced in tolerant grafts. IL-4 and IL-5 were significantly reduced in tolerant grafts, although IL-6, IL-10, and IL-13 levels were similar; this was consistent with partial T helper (Th)2 response inhibition, which was also manifested by inhibited alloAb. The combination of alloAb, IL-4, or anti-IL-4 mAb with anti-CD4 did not prevent tolerance induction.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that anti-CD4 mAb therapy did not inhibit activation and infiltration of Th1 and CD8+ effector T cells. Preferential induction of Th2 responses, especially IL-4, was not essential for the induction of tolerance. Our studies also found no evidence to support induction of anergy or transforming growth factor-beta as mechanisms of tolerance induction. These results question whether IL-4 is required for induction of transplantation tolerance.

Effect of anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody combined with human CTLA4Ig on the survival of hamster liver and heart xenografts in Lewis rats

We investigated the effects of pretransplant anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody (mAb) combined with human (h) CTLA4Ig on the survival of hamster heart and liver xenografts. Pretransplant anti-CD4 mAb (5 mg/kg x 4 days) or hCTLA4Ig (0.5 mg/rat on days 1, 3, and 5 after transplantation) treatment alone prolonged the survival of hamster liver xenografts in Lewis rats (mean survival time [MST]=10.5 days, n=6, and MST=9.0 days, n=5, respectively, compared with untreated Lewis recipients of hamster liver grafts, MST=6.0 days, n=6). The same regimen could not prevent hamster heart xenorejection. Pretransplant anti-CD4 mAb (5 mg/kg x 4 days) combined with hCTLA4Ig (0.5 mg/rat x 4) treatments increased survival of hamster liver xenograft fourfold (MST=24.2 days, n=5). The current results also show that IgG in the sera from Lewis recipients of hamster liver grafts treated with anti-CD4 mAb and hCTLA4Ig was threefold reduced at 6 days after transplantation compared with untreated Lewis rats. These results suggest a synergistic effect of anti-CD4 mAb combined with hCTLA4Ig in a liver xenograft transplantation model.

Prolonged murine cardiac allograft acceptance: characteristics of persistent active alloimmunity after treatment with gallium nitrate versus anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody

We have treated DBA/2-->C57BL/6 murine cardiac allograft recipients with anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody or with gallium nitrate to promote long-term (>60 days) allograft survival. Within this period, all grafts developed histologic evidence of ongoing vascular and parenchymal tissue remodeling, including interstitial fibrosis and neointimal hyperplasia, which are characteristic of chronic allograft rejection. To evaluate residual alloimmunity associated with the pharmacologic avoidance of acute graft rejection and the development of chronic tissue remodeling, we subjected these graft recipients to a battery of histologic and immunologic tests. Similar test results were obtained for graft recipients treated with either of the two immunosuppressive agents. All long-surviving allografts displayed histologic evidence of ongoing microvascular endothelial activation and interstitial leukocytic infiltration. Reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction analyses demonstrated intragraft expression of mRNAs for interleukin (IL)-1, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, tumor necrosis factor, interferon-gamma, and transforming growth factor-beta. All recipients had limiting dilution analysis-detectable, graft-reactive cytolytic T lymphocytes and helper T lymphocytes in their spleens and grafts, and all produced high titers of graft-reactive alloantibodies. In general, these observations indicate that (1) a similar immune status is achieved in long-surviving allografts and their recipients when either anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody or gallium nitrate was used for antirejection therapy, (2) this immune status is characterized by continuous, long-term inflammatory and immune processes that are qualitatively similar to those observed during acute allograft rejection, and (3) no specific immune responses developed selectively in long-term graft recipients to account for the avoidance of acute graft rejection or the development of chronic tissue remodeling in the graft.

Modulatory effects of human donor bone marrow cells on allogeneic cellular immune responses

BACKGROUND

In order to evaluate whether immunoregulatory mechanisms are brought about by human donor bone marrow cell infusions accompanying organ transplantation, we established in vitro culture systems analogous to the transplant model.

METHODS

Cell-mediated lympholysis (CML) and mixed lymphocyte culture (MLC) responses of peripheral blood lymphocytes or spleen cells stimulated with irradiated cadaver donor spleen cells in the presence of specific donor vertebral-body bone marrow cell (DBMC) modulators were tested.

RESULTS

When compared with spleen cells as modulator controls, DBMC inhibited both the proliferative and cytotoxic responses in a dose-dependent manner. Use of unirradiated and T cell-depleted DBMC was required for detection of the inhibitory activity. Furthermore, DBMC had to be added within the first 2 days after the initiation of the cultures for the down-regulation of CML (MLC) to occur. The down-regulation of MLC responses could not be shown to be antigen (donor) specific. Physical separation of DBMC from the responder-stimulator cells using the transwell system abrogated modulation of the CML (and MLC) reactions, suggesting the requirement of cell-cell contact for modulatory effect. The inhibitory activity by DBMC could not be overcome by addition of up to 200 U/ml of exogenous recombinant interleukin 2 to the cultures. However, it could be abrogated by restimulation with donor spleen cells, indicating that donor reactive cells were not deleted by DBMC in short-term cultures.

CONCLUSIONS

These results showed a regulatory role for DBMC in cellular immune responses against donor cell alloantigens, supporting the rationale for DBMC for facilitating clinical allograft acceptance.

Induction of donor specific transplantation tolerance to cardiac allografts following treatment with nondepleting (RIB 5/2) or depleting (OX-38) anti-CD4 mAb plus intrathymic or intravenous donor alloantigen

The nondepleting monoclonal antirat CD4 antibody, RIB 5/2, has been shown to modulate, but not eliminate, the CD4+ T cells and to prolong survival of rat skin, renal, or cardiac allografts when serially administered after transplantation. In the present study, we compared the efficacy of recipient pretreatment with a single dose of nondepleting RIB 5/2 or depleting OX-38 anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody plus donor alloantigen given intravenously or intrathymically 21 days before transplantation on the survival of completely MHC-mismatched rat cardiac allografts. Intraperitoneal injection of a single dose (20 mg/kg) of RIB 5/2 resulted in a decrease in CD4 surface molecule expression on peripheral CD4+ T cells without cell elimination as shown by FACS analysis. The nonspecific effect of a single dose of RIB 5/2 mAb had resolved by 21 days after treatment as evidenced by the almost complete recovery of normal surface CD4 molecule expression. Cardiac allografts transplanted immediately or 21 days after a single dose of RIB 5/2 alone were uniformly acutely rejected. On the other hand, recipients treated with depleting anti-CD4 OX-38 (20 mg/kg) acutely rejected cardiac allografts transplanted 21 days later, but indefinitely accepted all grafts transplanted on the same day. In contrast, combined treatment with i.v. donor splenocytes (25 x 10(6)) plus nondepleting RIB 5/2, but not with depleting anti-CD4 mAb, OX-38, resulted in survival for more than 100 days in 75% of recipients of donor specific, but not third party, cardiac allografts transplanted 21 days later. Irradiation (3000 rads) of the i.v. donor splenocytes combined with RIB 5/2 abrogated their tolerizing effect. When donor antigen was given intrathymically, both RIB 5/2 and OX-38 resulted in indefinite tolerance to cardiac allografts transplanted 21 days later. The failure of exogenous administration of high dose (180,000 IU/injection) rIL-2 for 10 days to reverse the unresponsiveness of i.v. SC plus RIB 5/2 pretreatment suggests that this tolerant state is not due to a deficiency of IL-2. In vitro studies showed marked inhibition of MLC responsiveness and cytolytic T cell activity in tolerant recipients that cannot be reversed by the addition of IL-2. Thus, pretransplant intravenous donor alloantigen combined with a dose of nondepleting anti-CD4 mAb, RIB 5/2, which alone has no significant effect, induced donor specific cardiac allograft tolerance.

The efficiency of CD4 recruitment to ligand-engaged TCR controls the agonist/partial agonist properties of peptide-MHC molecule ligands

One hypothesis seeking to explain the signaling and biological properties of T cell receptor for antigen (TCR) partial agonists and antagonists is the coreceptor density/kinetic model, which proposes that the pharmacologic behavior of a TCR ligand is largely determined by the relative rates of (a) dissociation ofligand from an engaged TCR and (b) recruitment oflck-linked coreceptors to this ligand-engaged receptor. Using several approaches to prevent or reduce the association of CD4 with occupied TCR, we demonstrate that consistent with this hypothesis, the biological and biochemical consequence of limiting this interaction is to convert typical agonists into partial agonist stimuli. Thus, adding anti-CD4 antibody to T cells recognizing a wild-type peptide-MHC class II ligand leads to disproportionate inhibition of interleukin-2 (IL-2) relative to IL-3 production, the same pattern seen using a TCR partial agonist/antagonist. In addition, T cells exposed to wild-type ligand in the presence of anti-CD4 antibodies show a pattern of TCR signaling resembling that seen using partial agonists, with predominant accumulation of the p21 tyrosine-phosphorylated form of TCR-zeta, reduced tyrosine phosphorylation of CD3epsilon, and no detectable phosphorylation of ZAP-70. Similar results are obtained when the wild-type ligand is presented by mutant class II MHC molecules unable to bind CD4. Likewise, antibody coligation of CD3 and CD4 results in an agonist-like phosphorylation pattern, whereas bivalent engagement of CD3 alone gives a partial agonist-like pattern. Finally, in accord with data showing that partial agonists often induce T cell anergy, CD4 blockade during antigen exposure renders cloned T cells unable to produce IL-2 upon restimulation. These results demonstrate that the biochemical and functional responses to variant TCR ligands with partial agonist properties can be largely reproduced by inhibiting recruitment of CD4 to a TCR binding a wild-type ligand, consistent with the idea that the relative rates of TCR-ligand disengagement and of association of engaged TCR with CD4 may play a key role in determining the pharmacologic properties of peptide-MHC molecule ligands. Beyond this insight into signaling through the TCR, these results have implications for models of thymocyte selection and the use of anti-coreceptor antibodies in vivo for the establishment ofimmunological tolerance.

Long-term survival of solid organ allografts by brief anti-lymphocyte function-associated antigen-1 monoclonal antibody monotherapy

Strategies targeting lymphocyte function-associated antigen-1 (LFA-1, CD11a/CD18) and intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) have previously been shown to produce long-term survival of solid organ allografts in animals only when both CD11a and ICAM-1 are targeted for a brief (6-7 days) time or when extended (14 weeks) treatment with anti-CD11a monoclonal antibody (mAb) is administered. We show that recipient pretreatment followed by a brief (13 days) treatment course with high-dose anti-CD11a mAb alone produces long-term survival of cardiac allografts in the rigorous, nonprimarily vascularized heart allograft model in mice. This treatment regimen induces specific unresponsiveness in our model. In recipients bearing long-term beating cardiac grafts after treatment with anti-CD11a mAb, there still exists a high frequency of potentially antigen-reactive T cells in isolated peripheral blood lymphocyte fractions. Therefore, clonal deletion does not appear to explain the induction of specific unresponsiveness by treatment with anti-CD11a mAb in this model. These findings support the further investigation of the use of high-dose anti-LFA-1 mAb monotherapy in the pre- and early postoperative period to promote solid organ allograft survival.

The graft-versus-leukemia effect of post-transplant donor leukocyte infusion

Tumor relapse remains a major obstacle to the success of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) as a treatment for leukemia. Due to limited treatment options, the outlook for most patients that relapse following allogeneic BMT has been poor. The infusion of normal immunocompetent leukocytes from the original marrow donor has become a promising new option for treating/preventing leukemia relapse in allogeneic BMT recipients. This form of treatment has often been referred to as donor leukocyte infusion (DLI) therapy. Our laboratory is using murine models of allogeneic BMT to address important unresolved issues regarding DLI therapy in an effort to make the treatment more effective. These include identification of the antileukemic effector cells, augmentation of the antileukemic effect, and understanding why graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD) is less severe than anticipated. This article reviews our work in murine models of DLI and introduces our current working hypotheses concerning DLI therapy.

Liver allograft rejection in rats depleted of CD8+ cells

The mechanism(s) of rejection or tolerance induction is a competitive, complex process that presumably involves interactions between multiple subpopulations of T lymphocytes. We investigated the roles of CD8+ cytolytic and CD4+ helper T cells in rat strains that tolerate liver allografts and that differ at both the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) (RT1) and minor histocompatibility genes. Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) with arterial reconstruction was performed with Brown Norway (BN) (RT1n) donors and Lewis (RT1(1)) recipients, some of which were untreated, others treated with anti-CD8 antibody, and still others treated with anti-CD4 antibody. Liver graft rejection was monitored for 28 days on the basis of two criteria: (1) serum levels of AST enzyme at 3-day intervals and (2) liver biopsies at weekly intervals and at the time of sacrifice at the end of the study period. In the untreated control group, an elevation of AST was found to peak at day 6 after grafting, and it remained elevated until day 28 (AST 542 +/- 72 U/l). Histologically, signs of severe rejection were first observed on day 9; these changed to moderate rejection about day 21 and to mild rejection by day 28, when the animals were sacrificed. Recipients pre-treated with anti-CD8 demonstrated a significant elevation of AST within 6 days that, unlike in the control recipients, continued to rise sharply through the observation period (AST 1127 +/- 181 U/l, P = 0.009 vs control group). Liver biopsies showed mild rejection at day 9 and moderate rejection at days 21 through 28. Recipients pretreated with anti-CD4 showed a time course of enzyme elevation and severity of rejection that was not significantly different from that observed in the control group. However, anti-CD4 treatment resulted in only 75% depletion of CD4+ cells in peripheral blood as compared to complete elimination of CD8+ cells following anti-CD8 treatment. Functional studies of spleen and liver-infiltrating lymphocytes obtained after 28 days showed low proliferative response in mixed lymphocyte culture with both BN and PVG stimulator spleen and lymph node cells. These results suggest that in this donor/recipient combination, removal of CD8+ cells increases the severity of rejection as demonstrated by a progressive rise in AST and histology. Moreover, OLT in this combination results in a profound, nonspecific inhibition of proliferative T-cell responses to MHC alloantigens.

alpha/beta-T cell receptor-directed therapy in rat allograft recipients. Long-term survival of cardiac allografts after pretreatment with R73 mAb is associated with upregulation of Th2-type cytokines

Rejection of vascularized allografts still poses the major problem in organ transplantation. Therefore, transplant rejection of cardiac allografts was investigated in a rat model (BN-to-LEW) under alpha/beta-TCR (R73) mAb-targeted therapy. Two protocols were studied: posttransplant ("immunosuppressive") and pretransplant conditioning therapy. In posttransplant therapy over a wide dose range, R73 mAb only marginally improved cardiac allograft survival (7.8 +/- 0.8 days vs. 12.5 +/- 0.8 days at 0.1 mg/kg for 7 days). In contrast, conditioning treatment with low-dose (0.1 mg/kg) anti-alpha/beta-TCR mAb given 3 to 7 days prior to organ transplantation was highly effective and resulted in 50% permanent acceptance of cardiac allografts. R73 mAb-treated rats were monitored with respect to peripheral lymphocyte populations and intragraft cytokine levels. A temporary, incomplete reduction (CD5+ cells) and partial modulation (alpha/beta-TCR/CD5 double+ cells) in the peripheral blood was observed. In contrast to untreated controls, intragraft production of IL-2 and IFN-gamma at the mRNA and protein level was abolished in both post- and pretreated recipients. Interestingly, pretransplant mAb application was associated with augmented in situ elaboration of the Th2-type cytokines, IL-4 and IL-10, together with up-regulated TGF-beta and PGE. Increased expression of IL-4 and IL-10 continued to be observed in long-term surviving allografts. In conclusion, the mechanism of conditioning therapy with alpha/beta-TCR mAb prior to alloantigen exposure appears to be a switch from Th1 to Th2 response allowing long-term acceptance of allogeneic grafts.

Balancing immunity and tolerance: deleting and tuning lymphocyte repertoires

Immunological self-tolerance is ensured by eliminating or inhibiting self-reactive lymphocyte clones, creating physical or functional holes in the B- and T-lymphocyte antigen receptor repertoires. The nature and size of these gaps in our immune defenses must be balanced against the necessity of mounting rapid immune responses to an everchanging array of foreign pathogens. To achieve this balance, only a fraction of particularly hazardous self-reactive clones appears to be physically eliminated from the repertoire in a manner that fully prevents their recruitment into an antimicrobial immune response. Many self-reactive cells are retained with a variety of conditional and potentially flexible restraints: (i) their ability to be triggered by antigen is diminished by mechanisms that tune down signaling by their antigen receptors, (ii) their ability to carry out inflammatory effector functions can be inhibited, and (iii) their capacity to migrate and persist is constrained. This balance between tolerance and immunity can be shifted, altering susceptibility to autoimmune disease and to infection by genetic or environmental differences either in the way antigens are presented, in the tuning molecules that adjust triggering set points for lymphocyte responses to antigen, or in the effector molecules that eliminate, retain, or expand particular clones.

Treatment of severe cutaneous lupus erythematosus with a chimeric CD4 monoclonal antibody, cM-T412

BACKGROUND

Monoclonal CD4 antibodies are among the most potent immunomodulatory agents in various experimental models of autoimmune disease, including murine lupus erythematosus.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the toxicity and therapeutic efficacy of a chimeric monoclonal CD4 antibody, cM-T412, in patients with cutaneous lupus erythematosus (LE).

METHODS

Five patients with severe cutaneous LE lesions received intravenously a total of 275, 400, or 475 mg of cM-T412 in single doses of 20 to 50 mg during a period of 5 to 8 weeks.

RESULTS

CD4 antibody treatment induced a long-lasting decrease in disease activity. It resulted in healing of LE skin lesions, a reconstituted responsiveness to conventional treatment, or both. Despite a substantial depletion of circulating CD4+ T lymphocytes, no clinical signs of immunosuppression were noted.

CONCLUSION

Monoclonal CD4 antibodies should be considered as a novel treatment for the management of severe cutaneous LE.

Mechanisms of peripheral tolerance and suppression induced by monoclonal antibodies to CD4 and CD8

Over the last five years it has become increasingly clear that the peripheral immune system can maintain tolerance to both self and non-self antigens through a variety of mechanisms. Although clonal deletion may play an important part in limiting rapidly expanding responses, there are many examples where antigen reactive T cells remain. It has been proposed that tolerance is maintained in this situation either by the induction of anergy or by ongoing suppression. The phenomenon known as immune deviation, where non-inflammatory Th2 responses could suppress Th1 and positively reinforce themselves provided an attractive explanation for infectious tolerance, where tolerant T cells could guide further naive T cells also to tolerance. However, experiments to test this hypothesis in the models of CD4 and CD8 antibody-induced tolerance have given conflicting data, with no clear evidence of Th2 responses in tolerant mice. In this paper we review recent data that IL-4 plays a role in suppression, but that the source of IL-4 may not be the tolerant/suppressor T cell. We also discuss how infectious tolerance can operate on third party antigens if they are linked on the same antigen presenting cell and how CD4+ T cells can suppress CD8+ T-cell responses. Finally, we suggest a model of infectious anergy that is compatible with the available data.

Pancreatic islet allograft immunity and tolerance: the two-signal hypothesis revisited

The principle assumption of this discussion is that costimulation (CoS) forms the primary stimulus that compels T cells to mount a response to their specific antigen. However, this response can be either positive or negative, depending on the developmental stage of the T cell and the microenvironment in which the antigen and CoS are received. Thus, both immunity and tolerance may represent different outcomes of a two-signal process. We would emphasize that CoS is a functional term and not a strict molecular definition. While many molecular interactions have been described as providing CoS activity, notably those involving the B-7 family of cell surface molecules, it is not yet clear what combination(s) of non-antigen-specific signals may fulfil this function. This point is important because many studies have achieved tolerance through strategies designed to inhibit specific CoS molecules. However, it may be that differential signaling through distinct CoS molecules, rather than a global inhibition of CoS per se, plays a role in the generation of active tolerance in such studies (Bluestone 1995). A corollary of this notion is that antigen (signal 1) delivery to T cells is a null event and so is not an inherently paralysing signal. Of course, if signal 1 is not itself a tolerogenic signal, then other mechanisms are necessary to explain many empirical observations of tolerance to allogeneic or self antigens. This is best illustrated by those forms of functional tolerance to either alloantigens or self antigens that do not appear to be the result of clonal deletion/inactivation. It would be relatively simple to invoke a model of tolerance whereby the relevant tissue-destructive cell is eliminated or inactivated; such a model would preclude the necessity to suggest active regulatory mechanisms of tolerance. However, in several model systems, including our own observations concerning tolerance induction to APC-depleted islet allografts, tissue-destructive T cells can persist in recipients tolerant to allogeneic or self antigens. Furthermore, there are key examples in which tolerance demonstrates a dominant phenotype; that is, tolerant cells can regulate the activity of naive, non-tolerant cells. This latter observation points to the function of an active, regulatory form of tolerance. As such, we would emphasize that tolerance should not be defined as unresponsiveness since the tolerant state is the consequence of very active immune reactions.

Tissue-specific effects of anti-CD4 therapy in induction of allograft unresponsiveness in high and low responder rats

In these experiments, we studied the role of anti-CD4 (Ox38) monoclonal antibody in the prevention of heart and/or kidney allograft rejection in low (ACI) and high (Lewis) responder rats. In low responder ACI rats, donor-specific tolerance for heart and kidney allografts (individually or in combination) was achieved by pretransplant anti-CD4 therapy. In high responder Lewis rats, anti-CD4 therapy alone (or combined with anti-CD8 (Ox8), thymectomy or total lymphoid irradiation) did not prevent first-set rejection of heart allografts. This difference was correlated with a more profound and longer lasting CD4+ cell depletion in the low responder strain. Anti-CD4 treatment, however, produced tolerance of kidney transplants in high responder rats. Additionally, anti-CD4 treatment induced tolerance to heart (as well as kidney) allografts in Lewis recipients of combined kidney and heart allografts from ACI. The effects of anti-CD4 treatment thus depend upon the recipient responder status as well as the organs transplanted and the order of transplantation.