Using pharmacokinetics to optimize antiretroviral drug-drug interactions in the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus infection

Algae-mediated processes for the treatment of antiretroviral drugs in wastewater: Prospects and challenges

The prevalence of pharmaceuticals (PCs), especially antiretroviral (ARV) drugs in various aquatic ecosystems has been expansively reported, wherein wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) are identified as the primary point source. Consequently, the occurrence, ecotoxicity and treatment of ARV drugs in WWTPs have drawn much attention in recent years. Numerous studies have shown that the widely employed activated sludge-based WWTPs are incapable of removing ARV drugs efficiently from wastewater. Recently, algae-based wastewater treatment processes have shown promising results in PCs removal from wastewater, either completely or partially, through different processes such as biosorption, bioaccumulation, and intra-/inter-cellular degradation. Algal species have also shown to tolerate high concentrations of ARV drugs than the reported concentrations in the environmental matrices. In this review, emphasis has been given on discussing the current status of the occurrence of ARV drugs in the aquatic environment and WWTPs. Besides, the current trends and future perspectives of PCs removal by algae are critically reviewed and discussed. The potential pathways and mechanisms of ARV drugs removal by algae have also been discussed.

Nanotechnology-based antiviral therapeutics

The host immune system is highly compromised in case of viral infections and relapses are very common. The capacity of the virus to destroy the host cell by liberating its own DNA or RNA and replicating inside the host cell poses challenges in the development of antiviral therapeutics. In recent years, many new technologies have been explored for diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of viral infections. Nanotechnology has emerged as one of the most promising technologies on account of its ability to deal with viral diseases in an effective manner, addressing the limitations of traditional antiviral medicines. It has not only helped us to overcome problems related to solubility and toxicity of drugs, but also imparted unique properties to drugs, which in turn has increased their potency and selectivity toward viral cells against the host cells. The initial part of the paper focuses on some important proteins of influenza, Ebola, HIV, herpes, Zika, dengue, and corona virus and those of the host cells important for their entry and replication into the host cells. This is followed by different types of nanomaterials which have served as delivery vehicles for the antiviral drugs. It includes various lipid-based, polymer-based, lipid-polymer hybrid-based, carbon-based, inorganic metal-based, surface-modified, and stimuli-sensitive nanomaterials and their application in antiviral therapeutics. The authors also highlight newer promising treatment approaches like nanotraps, nanorobots, nanobubbles, nanofibers, nanodiamonds, nanovaccines, and mathematical modeling for the future. The paper has been updated with the recent developments in nanotechnology-based approaches in view of the ongoing pandemic of COVID-19.Graphical abstract.

Human respiratory viral infections: Current status and future prospects of nanotechnology-based approaches for prophylaxis and treatment

Respiratory viral infections are major cause of highly mortal pandemics. They are impacting socioeconomic development and healthcare system globally. These emerging deadly respiratory viruses develop newer survival strategies to live inside host cells and tricking the immune system of host. Currently, medical facilities, therapies and research -development teams of every country kneel down before novel corona virus (SARS-CoV-2) which claimed ~2,828,629 lives till date. Thus, there is urgent requirement of novel treatment strategies to combat against these emerging respiratory viral infections. Nanocarriers come under the umbrella of nanotechnology and offer numerous benefits compared to traditional dosage forms. Further, unique physicochemical properties (size, shape and surface charge) of nanocarriers provide additional advantage for targeted delivery. This review discusses in detail about the respiratory viruses, their transmission mode and cell invasion pathways, survival strategies, available therapies, and nanocarriers for the delivery of therapeutics. Further, the role of nanocarriers in the development of treatment therapy against SARS-CoV-2 is also overviewed.

Management of Antiretroviral Therapy with Boosted Protease Inhibitors-Darunavir/Ritonavir or Darunavir/Cobicistat

A major challenge in the management of antiretroviral therapy (ART) is to improve the patient's adherence, reducing the burden caused by the high number of drugs that compose the treatment regimens for human immunodeficiency virus positive (HIV+) patients. Selection of the most appropriate treatment regimen is responsible for therapeutic success and aims to reduce viremia, increase the immune system response capacity, and reduce the incidence rate and intensity of adverse reactions. In general, protease inhibitor (PI) is one of the pillars of regimens, and darunavir (DRV), in particular, is frequently recommended, along with low doses of enzyme inhibitors as cobicistat (COBI) or ritonavir (RTV), by the international guidelines. The potential of clinically significant drug interactions in patients taking COBI or RTV is high due to the potent inhibitory effect on cytochrome CYP 450, which attracts significant changes in the pharmacokinetics of PIs. Regardless of the patient or type of virus, the combined regimens of DRV/COBI or DRV/RTV are available to clinicians, proving their effectiveness, with a major impact on HIV mortality/morbidity. This study presents current information on the pharmacokinetics, pharmacology, drug interactions, and adverse reactions of DRV; it not only compares the bioavailability, pharmacokinetic parameters, immunological and virological responses, but also the efficacy, advantages, and therapeutic disadvantages of DRV/COBI or DRV/RTV combinations.

Pharmaceutical Approaches to HIV Treatment and Prevention

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection continues to pose a major infectious disease threat worldwide. It is characterized by the depletion of CD4+ T cells, persistent immune activation, and increased susceptibility to secondary infections. Advances in the development of antiretroviral drugs and combination antiretroviral therapy have resulted in a remarkable reduction in HIV-associated morbidity and mortality. Antiretroviral therapy (ART) leads to effective suppression of HIV replication with partial recovery of host immune system and has successfully transformed HIV infection from a fatal disease to a chronic condition. Additionally, antiretroviral drugs have shown promise for prevention in HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis and treatment as prevention. However, ART is unable to cure HIV. Other limitations include drug-drug interactions, drug resistance, cytotoxic side effects, cost, and adherence. Alternative treatment options are being investigated to overcome these challenges including discovery of new molecules with increased anti-viral activity and development of easily administrable drug formulations. In light of the difficulties associated with current HIV treatment measures, and in the continuing absence of a cure, the prevention of new infections has also arisen as a prominent goal among efforts to curtail the worldwide HIV pandemic. In this review, the authors summarize currently available anti-HIV drugs and their combinations for treatment, new molecules under clinical development and prevention methods, and discuss drug delivery formats as well as associated challenges and alternative approaches for the future.

Drug-Drug Interactions and HIV Therapy: What Should Pharmacists Know?

Drug-interaction issues continue to present a major dilemma for the clinician caring for complex patients such as those infected with HIV. The inherent possibility of a drug interaction is magnified by the multitude of drugs being administered in highly-active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). In addition, other classes of medications are used to alleviate side effects, reduce toxicities associated with HAART, or treat concomitant diseases. The modification of one drug by another substance or drug-drug interaction is the main focus of this article. Drug-drug interactions may result in toxicity, treatment failure, or loss of effectiveness and can significantly affect a patient’s clinical outcome. An understanding of the fundamental mechanisms of HIV drug-drug interactions may allow for the early detection or avoidance of troublesome regimens and prudent management if they develop. Although HIV drug interactions are usually thought of as detrimental, resulting in a loss of therapeutic effect or toxicity, some drug interactions such as ritonavir boosted protease inhibitor–based antiretroviral treatments are beneficial and are commonly used in clinical practice. Therefore, pharmacists need to understand drug interaction mechanisms, remember key drug interactions, and vigilantly monitor patients for potential complications.

Recent Progress in the Development of HIV-1 Protease Inhibitors for the Treatment of HIV/AIDS

HIV-1 protease inhibitors continue to play an important role in the treatment of HIV/AIDS, transforming this deadly ailment into a more manageable chronic infection. Over the years, intensive research has led to a variety of approved protease inhibitors for the treatment of HIV/AIDS. In this review, we outline current drug design and medicinal chemistry efforts toward the development of next-generation protease inhibitors beyond the currently approved drugs.

Targeting strategies for delivery of anti-HIV drugs

Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) infection remains a significant cause of mortality globally. Though antiretroviral therapy has significantly reduced AIDS-related morbidity and mortality, there are several drawbacks in the current therapy, including toxicity, drug–drug interactions, development of drug resistance, necessity for long-term drug therapy, poor bio-availability and lack of access to tissues and reservoirs. To circumvent these problems, recent anti-HIV therapeutic research has focused on improving drug delivery systems through drug delivery targeted specifically to host cells infected with HIV or could potentially get infected with HIV. In this regard, several surface molecules of both viral and host cell origin have been described in recent years, that would enable targeted drug delivery in HIV infection. In the present review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the need for novel drug delivery systems, and the successes and challenges in the identification of novel viral and host-cell molecules for the targeted drug delivery of anti-HIV drugs. Such targeted anti-retroviral drug delivery approaches could pave the way for effective treatment and eradication of HIV from the body.

Structure-activity relationships of diamine inhibitors of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A as novel pharmacoenhancers. Part II: P2/P3 region and discovery of cobicistat (GS-9350)

The HIV protease inhibitor (PI) ritonavir (RTV) has been widely used as a pharmacoenhancer for other PIs, which are substrates of cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A). However the potent anti-HIV activity of ritonavir may limit its use as a pharmacoenhancer with other classes of anti-HIV agents. Ritonavir is also associated with limitations such as poor physicochemical properties. To address these issues a series of compounds with replacements at the P2 and/or P3 region was designed and evaluated as novel CYP3A inhibitors. Through these efforts, a potent and selective inhibitor of CYP3A, GS-9350 (cobicistat) with improved physiochemical properties was discovered.

Structure-activity relationships of diamine inhibitors of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A as novel pharmacoenhancers, part I: core region

Ritonavir (RTV), an HIV-1 protease inhibitor (PI), is also a potent mechanism-based inhibitor of human cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) and has been widely prescribed as a pharmacoenhancer. As a boosting agent for marketed PIs, it reduces pill burden, and improves compliance. Removal of the hydroxyl group from RTV reduces, but does not eliminate HIV PI activity and does not affect CYP3A inhibition. Herein we report the discovery of a novel series of CYP3A inhibitors that are devoid of antiviral activity. The synthesis and evaluation of analogs with extensive modifications of the 1,4-diamine core along with the structure activity relationships with respect to anti-HIV activity, CYP3A inhibitory activity, selectivity against other CYP enzymes and the human pregnane X receptor (PXR) will be discussed.

HIV-positive nigerian adults harbor significantly higher serum lumefantrine levels than HIV-negative individuals seven days after treatment for Plasmodium falciparum infection

Management of coinfection with malaria and HIV is a major challenge to public health in developing countries, and yet potential drug-drug interactions between antimalarial and antiviral regimens have not been adequately investigated in people with both infections. Each of the constituent components of artemether-lumefantrine, the first-line regimen for malaria treatment in Nigeria, and nevirapine, a major component of highly active antiretroviral therapy, are drugs metabolized by the cytochrome P450 3A4 isoenzyme system, which is also known to be induced by nevirapine. We examined potential interactions between lumefantrine and nevirapine in 68 HIV-positive adults, all of whom were diagnosed with asymptomatic Plasmodium falciparum infections by microscopy. Post hoc PCR analysis confirmed the presence of P. falciparum in only a minority of participants. Day 7 capillary blood levels of lumefantrine were significantly higher in HIV-positive participants than in 99 HIV-negative controls (P = 0.0011). Associations between day 7 levels of lumefantrine and risk of persistent parasitemia could not be evaluated due to inadequate power. Further investigations of the impact of nevirapine on in vivo malaria treatment outcomes in HIV-infected patients are thus needed.

Identification of potential drug-drug interactions between antiretroviral drugs from prescriptions in the private health-care sector in South Africa

The aim of this study was to identify potential drug-drug interactions (DDIs) between antiretroviral drugs (ARVs) and to determine whether prescribed daily doses (PDDs) from prescriptions can be used in the evaluation of these interactions. A quantitative, retrospective drug utilization study was performed on 49,995 and 81,096 ARV prescriptions from a South African pharmacy benefit management company, which were prescribed to 7664 and 10,162 HIV patients for 2005 and 2006, respectively. Potential DDIs identified across different age groups were 778 for 2005 and 1155 for 2006; the majority occurred in patients aged 19 to ≤45 years. The potential DDIs identified between ARVs were all interacting at clinical significance level 2 according to guidelines indicated by Tatro. These results demonstrate that potential DDIs were identified between ARVs mostly in three ARV combinations: Kaletra(®) (lopinavir/ritonavir) and efavirenz, lopinavir/ritonavir and nevirapine and combinations of indinavir and ritonavir. There is a need for more education on the prescribing protocols for ARVs in the treatment of HIV-infected patients in the private health-care sector in South Africa.

Cobicistat (GS-9350): A Potent and Selective Inhibitor of Human CYP3A as a Novel Pharmacoenhancer

Cobicistat (3, GS-9350) is a newly discovered, potent, and selective inhibitor of human cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) enzymes. In contrast to ritonavir, 3 is devoid of anti-HIV activity and is thus more suitable for use in boosting anti-HIV drugs without risking selection of potential drug-resistant HIV variants. Compound 3 shows reduced liability for drug interactions and may have potential improvements in tolerability over ritonavir. In addition, 3 has high aqueous solubility and can be readily coformulated with other agents.

[Interactions with antiretroviral drugs]

Drug-drug interactions are frequently encountered in the therapy of HIV-infected patients, since the highly active antiretroviral therapy always contains several drugs. Drugs against opportunistic infections and concomitant diseases are added frequently. All protease inhibitors are inhibitors of CYP3A, which is important in the metabolism of approximately 50% of all drugs, e.g. simvastatin, atorvastatin, sildenafil, and clarithromycin. Among the protease inhibitors, ritonavir is the strongest inhibitor of CYP3A activity. This inhibition is also used to enhance ("boost") the bioavailability of other protease inhibitors. The nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTI) efavirenz and nevirapine lead to an increase in CYP3A activity during long-term treatment. To prevent interactions, doses of CYP3A substrates have to be adapted in the beginning and at the end of CYP3A activity-modifying treatments. Interactions can also be a result of modifications in the activities of glucuronosyltransferases and of transport proteins. Ritonavir is an inhibitor of P-glycoprotein, which leads to increased expositions towards many antineoplastic drugs.

Drug-drug interaction study of ketoconazole and ritonavir-boosted saquinavir

Saquinavir, a potent human immunodeficiency virus protease inhibitor, is extensively metabolized by CYP3A4. Saquinavir is coadministered with ritonavir, a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor, to boost its exposure. Ketoconazole is a potent CYP3A inhibitor. The objectives of this study were to investigate the effect of ketoconazole on the pharmacokinetics of saquinavir/ritonavir and vice versa using the approved dosage regimens of saquinavir/ritonavir at 1,000/100 mg twice daily and ketoconazole at 200 mg once daily. This was an open-label, randomized two-arm, one-sequence, two-period crossover study in healthy subjects. In study arm 1, 20 subjects received saquinavir/ritonavir treatment alone for 14 days, followed in combination with ketoconazole treatment for 14 days. In arm 2, 12 subjects received ketoconazole treatment for 6 days, followed in combination with saquinavir/ritonavir treatment for 14 days. The pharmacokinetics were assessed on the last day of each treatment (days 14 and 28 in arm 1 and days 6 and 20 in arm 2). The exposures C(max) and the area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 12 h (AUC(0-12)) of saquinavir and ritonavir with or without ketoconazole were not substantially altered after 2 weeks of concomitant dosing with ketoconazole. The C(max) and AUC(0-12) of ketoconazole, dosed at 200 mg once daily, were increased by 45% (90% confidence interval = 32 to 59%) and 168% (90% confidence interval = 146 to 193%), respectively, after 2 weeks of concomitant dosing with ritonavir-boosted saquinavir (1,000 mg of saquinavir/100 mg of ritonavir given twice daily). The greater exposure to ketoconazole when given in combination with saquinavir/ritonavir was not associated with unacceptable safety or tolerability. No dose adjustment for saquinavir/ritonavir (1,000/100 mg twice daily) is required when coadministered with 200 mg of ketoconazole once daily, and high doses of ketoconazole (>200 mg/day) are not recommended.

Induction of P-glycoprotein expression and activity by ritonavir in bovine brain microvessel endothelial cells

Extended treatment with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) protease inhibitors (HPIs) is standard in HIV/AIDS therapy. While these drugs have helped decrease the overall incidence of AIDS defining illnesses, the relative prevalence of HIV/AIDS dementia has increased. HPIs may cause induction of blood-brain barrier (BBB) drug transporters (P-glycoprotein; P-gp) and thereby limit entry of HPIs into brain tissue, increasing the probability that the brain could become an HIV sanctuary site. Using bovine brain microvessel endothelial cells (BMEC) as an in-vitro model of the BBB, the potential for the HIV protease inhibitor ritonavir to cause induction of P-gp activity and expression was examined. BMEC were isolated from fresh cow brain by enzymatic digest and density centrifugation. Primary culture BMEC were co-incubated with ritonavir or vehicle control for 120 h. Quantitative drug accumulation of rhodamine 123 (Rh123) and fluorescence microscopy were used as measures of P-gp activity. P-gp expression was assessed using quantitative Western blotting. Ritonavir decreased Rh123 cell accumulation and increased P-gp immunoreactive protein in a concentration-dependent manner. Fluorescent microscopy mirrored Rh123 quantitative studies. In BMEC pretreated with 30 microM ritonavir, Rh123 accumulation was decreased 40% and immunoreactive P-gp protein increased 2-fold. Collectively, a strong correlation between decreased Rh123 BMEC accumulation and increased P-gp immunoreactive protein was observed (Spearman r2 = 0.77, P < 0.0001). Thus extended exposure of BMEC to ritonavir caused a concentration-dependent increase in P-gp activity and expression. Similar findings may occur at the clinical level with prolonged HIV protease inhibitor use, giving insight into the central nervous system as an HIV sanctuary site and eventual development of HIV dementia.

Current status of antiretroviral therapy

At present, there are 22 FDA-approved antiretroviral agents, which are categorised into four classes of drugs. Several others are in various stages of basic and clinical development. The authors of this paper review the general characteristics of each class of antiretrovirals, as well as individual investigational agents that are in advanced clinical development. A brief synopsis of US and WHO antiretroviral treatment guidelines is also provided.

Limited sampling strategy for the estimation of systemic exposure to the protease inhibitor nelfinavir

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of antiretroviral drugs has been proposed as a means of optimizing response to highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) in HIV infection because suboptimal exposure to these agents may lead to the development of resistant viral strains and subsequent therapeutic failure. The area under the curve (AUC), though considered to make the best estimate of total drug exposure, requires repeated blood sampling. The authors investigated the predictability of individual nelfinavir (NFV) concentrations at different time points for the AUC and tried to find the best sampling time for the abbreviated AUC to predict NFV total body exposure. A total of 99 NFV AUC0-12h values were measured in 99 patients receiving a 1250-mg oral dose twice a day. Venous blood samples were collected at baseline (predose, 0) and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, and 12 hours postdose. A stepwise forward-selection, multiple-regression technique was chosen to assess the relative importance of single and combination concentration time points to predict the AUC calculated from the entire pharmacokinetic profile. Data were split into a development set and a validation set. The development set contained 49 randomly selected HIV patients. Of these, 22 HIV patients were coinfected with HCV, 7 with and 15 without cirrhosis. One-point predictors provided the lowest prediction precision, but predictive performance improved after the first 2 hours postdose. Plasma concentrations at 0 and 4 hours after the oral dose were most predictive if 2 variables were used in the regression equation. The AUC could be estimated from data for these 2 samples by using the following equation: AUC0-12 = 3.0 + 2.7 (C0) + 6.4 (C4), r = 92. The predictive performance of 2-point predictors at 0 and 4 hours (C0 + C4) was validated by comparing their ability to predict the full AUC in a validation set representative of HIV/HCV patients (n = 28) and HIV/HCV patients, with (n = 8) and without (n = 14) cirrhosis. The results showed a mean bias ranging from +2.7% in HIV/HCV patients to -6.0% in HCV coinfection with cirrhosis. The authors conclude that this result is clinically significant. The limited sampling strategy (LSS) described could be used in clinical practice for the easy assessment of the total exposure to NFV in HIV/HCV patients, both with and without cirrhosis.

Application and impact of population pharmacokinetics in the assessment of antiretroviral pharmacotherapy

Population pharmacokinetics has been an important technique used to explore and define relevant sources of variation in drug exposure and response in patient populations. This has been especially true in the area of antiretroviral therapy where the assurance of adequate and sustained drug exposure of multiple agents is highly correlated with therapeutic success. Population pharmacokinetic analyses across the four drug classes and 20 US FDA-approved products used to treat HIV have been published to date. The published reports were predominantly based on actual clinical trials conducted in HIV-infected patients with one or more agents administered. Modelling and simulation approaches have been used in the evaluation of antiretroviral agent outcomes incorporating problematic design and analysis factors such as sparse plasma sampling, data imbalance and censored data. Additional benefits of population modelling approaches applied to the investigation of antiretroviral agents include the ability to assess dosing compliance, understanding and quantifying drug-drug interactions in order to select dosing regimens and the screening of new drug candidates. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic models have been used to characterise the relationship between drug exposure and virological and immunological response, and to predict clinical outcome. These models offer the best opportunity for individualising and optimising patient therapy, particularly when adjusted for adherence/compliance. The impact of population pharmacokinetics in the area of antiretroviral therapy can be directly assessed by its role in the validation of surrogate markers such as viral RNA load, therapeutic drug monitoring and the management of individual patient outcomes via exposure-toxicity relationships. Each of these population pharmacokinetic outcomes has contributed to the current regulatory environment, specifically in the area of accelerated approval of new antiretroviral agents.

The pharmacokinetics of HIV protease inhibitor combinations

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The clinical use of double-boosted protease inhibitor regimens has evolved recently. This strategy offers a number of unique benefits, including pharmacokinetic enhancement of two different protease inhibitors with low dose ritonavir. We review the pharmacologic rationale for the double-boosted protease inhibitor combinations and the complex drug-drug interactions that occur among different protease inhibitors when co-administered.

RECENT FINDINGS

The discovery and widespread clinical use of low dose ritonavir as a pharmacoenhancer of other protease inhibitors has significantly improved the management of HIV infection treatment. This has subsequently led to the development of double-boosted protease inhibitor regimens which have been shown to be effective in heavily pre-treated patients, in whom it is crucial to maintain drug concentrations sufficient to suppress viruses with multiple resistance mutations. Interesting pharmacokinetic data have been recently produced showing the complexity of the interactions among three protease inhibitors. As the outcome of these multidrug interactions may be difficult to predict, formal pharmacokinetic studies have been fundamental to determine which protease inhibitors are best to administer in combination.

SUMMARY

This review summarizes the current literature regarding the pharmacokinetics of double-boosted protease inhibitor regimens and general considerations regarding their usage in the treatment of HIV-infected patients.

Simultaneous determination of six HIV protease inhibitors (amprenavir, indinavir, lopinavir, nelfinavir, ritonavir and saquinavir), the active metabolite of nelfinavir (M8) and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (efavirenz) in human plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography

We report the development of a simple, economical and reliable chromatographic method for the simultaneous determination of six HIV protease inhibitors (PIs; amprenavir, indinavir, lopinavir, nelfinavir, ritonavir and saquinavir), the active metabolite of nelfinavir (M8) and the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI; efavirenz) in human plasma. After extraction from plasma with an ethyl acetate-acetonitrile mixture, the analytes were separated on a phenyl column with a gradient of acetonitrile and phosphate solutions, and detected at three ultraviolet wavelengths. Calibration curves were linear over the range 0.025-15 microg/mL for saquinavir and 0.05-15 microg/mL for the other analytes. The accuracies ranged from -6.9% to +7.6%, and the intra-assay and inter-assay precisions were <9.2 and <11.8%, respectively. Our method, covering most of the PIs and NNRTIs currently used, facilitates ready therapeutic drug monitoring in hospital laboratories.

Therapeutic drug monitoring for patients with HIV infection: Children's National Medical Center, Washington DC experience

This paper provides a brief overview of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in patients with HIV infection. The manuscipt not only focuses on an update on TDM in HIV infection but also provides the latest information on tandem mass spectrometric methods for antiretroviral drug quantification. Also discussed are the preliminary new and original data on free antiretroviral drug measurement in both plasma and saliva.

Pharmacokinetics of Once-Daily Saquinavir/Ritonavir in HIV-Infected Subjects: Comparison with the Standard Twice-Daily Regimen

Objective

To evaluate the steady-state pharmacokinetics and safety of two once-daily saquinavir/ritonavir (SQV/RTV) regimens, 1600/100 and 2000/100 mg, in HIV-positive patients.

Methods

Eighteen HIV-infected adults treated with the standard twice-daily SQV/RTV 1000/100 mg regimen were enrolled in this open-label, two-phase, crossover pharmacokinetic study. The steady-state pharmacokinetics of SQV administered with 100 mg RTV were investigated following once-daily doses of 1600 mg or 2000 mg or a twice-daily dose of 1000 mg. Plasma drug concentrations were determined by high performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry and pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using a non-compartmental model.

Results

Compared with SQV 1000 mg twice daily, the Cmax of SQV following a 1600 mg and 2000 mg dose increased in a dose-proportional manner [geometric mean (95% CI) 1915 (1656–2850) ng/ml for 1000 mg, 2782 (2249–4330) ng/ml for 1600 mg and 4179 (3429–6105) ng/ml for 2000 mg doses, respectively]. SQV Ctrough values were 539 (453–1011), 106 (76–223) and 231 (75–822) ng/ml, respectively. A SQV Ctrough value greater than 100 ng/ml was achieved in all subjects on the twice-daily regimen, in 9/18 (50%) subjects on the 1600/100 mg once-daily regimen, and in 14/17 (82%) subjects on the 2000/100 mg once-daily regimen. The once-daily regimens were well tolerated, with mild-to-moderate gastrointestinal symptoms being the only events reported by a small number of patients.

Conclusion

This is the first study to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of once-daily SQV/RTV 2000/100 mg in HIV-infected subjects. Our findings suggest that this regimen may be an alternative to twice-daily 1000/100 mg doses and should be further evaluated in efficacy studies. The data indicate that most patients (14/17) on once-daily 2000/100 mg achieve trough concentrations above target values (determined for HIV wild-type) for efficacy of SQV with the use of just 100 mg RTV/day and with good tolerability.

Drug interactions among the antiretrovirals

There are 20 antiretroviral agents approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), four of which were approved in 2003. With 20 antiretrovirals FDA-approved, interactions occur when the medications alter the toxicity profile or efficacy of the other medication. In order to maintain clinical relevance, only the most significant interactions published within the past 12 months are highlighted in this article. Interactions discussed involve atazanavir, fosamprenavir, lopinavir/ritonavir, tenofovir, proton pump inhibitors, H(2)-blockers, clarithromycin, and vardenafil. Important interaction-management strategies also are discussed. The field of HIV pharmacology is constantly advancing, as are the drug interaction data. To screen, manage, dose adjust, and counsel, the physician and other health care professionals are highly advised and encouraged to consult with an infectious disease clinical pharmacist when managing patients receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy.

THEINTEGRATION OFPHARMACOKINETICS ANDPHARMACODYNAMICS: Understanding Dose-Response

Pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) studies have proven to be powerful and instructive tools, particularly in elucidating important aspects of human pharmacology. Nevertheless, they remain imperfect tools in that they only allow researchers to indirectly extrapolate, through computational modeling, the dynamic processes of drug action. Furthermore, neither tool alone provides a complete nor necessarily relevant picture of drug action. This review explores the utility and applications of PK and PD in the study of drugs, provides examples of lessons learned from their application to studies of human pharmacology, points out some of their limitations, and advances the thesis that these tools ideally should be employed together in an integrated approach. As we continue to apply these tools across the continuum of age and disease, they provide a powerful means to enhance our understanding of drug action, drug interactions, and intrinsic host factors that influence pharmacologic response.

Protein binding in antiretroviral therapies

There is marked variability in the extent to which the three classes of antiretroviral (ARV) drugs bind to plasma proteins (<5 to >99%). Protease inhibitors (PIs), with the exception of indinavir, are more than 90% protein bound, mainly to alpha1-acid glycoprotein (AAG). Efavirenz, a nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI), is more than 99% bound, mainly to albumin. Nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) are not highly protein bound. The pharmacological activity of ARV drugs is dependent on unbound drug entering cells that harbor the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). There has been concern that changes in protein binding could impact on antiviral activity and management. However, for PIs and NNRTIs, and for many drugs given orally, altered plasma binding would not be expected to influence the average exposure to unbound (active) drug after chronic oral dosing. Nevertheless, there will be a change in the relationship between total and unbound concentrations that will be important if, as part of therapeutic drug monitoring, the total rather than the unbound drug is measured. Measuring drug concentrations that are needed to inhibit different HIV strains (wild type and drug resistant) in vitro could also cause confusion because most methods employ bovine serum in the assay medium, and unbound concentrations are not directly measured. Estimating unbound drug concentrations in human plasma and in incubation media can be highly method dependent and thus may affect the calculated IC50 (the concentration of drug that results in 50% inhibition of viral replication). Because inhibitory quotients (IQs = C(trough)/IC50) are becoming part of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) analyses of clinical trial data, the strengths and weaknesses of the methods used for the determination of unbound drug concentration in plasma and in vitro systems--ultracentrifugation, ultrafiltration, and equilibrium dialysis--need to be understood. Consensus on standard procedures must be reached. In June 2002, a panel of experts assembled by the Forum for Collaborative HIV Research met in Washington, DC, to review the basic principles of protein binding of ARV drugs, and to discuss the impact that changes in plasma protein binding may have on the PKs and activity of ARV drugs as well as on therapeutic drug monitoring. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss the following topics: (1) basic principles of protein binding and how changes in binding can impact on drug PKs and drug exposure in vivo, (2) variability in plasma protein binding among patients taking ARV drugs, (3) the impact of HIV infection and concomitant diseases on the extent of plasma protein binding, (4) the likelihood of clinically relevant drug interactions at the level of plasma protein binding, (5) the evidence that measuring unbound concentrations of ARV drugs in the plasma of patients gives more meaningful information than total drug concentration and, therefore, should be considered in routine therapeutic drug monitoring of ARV agents, (6) optimal method(s) for measuring the unbound concentration of drugs in vitro (for IC50 determination) and in vivo, and (7) future studies that need to be considered to fully understand the importance of plasma protein binding in therapeutic drug monitoring. This report summarizes the topics discussed at this meeting. It guides the reader through the discussions that allowed the panel to formulate a series of statements regarding the significance of plasma protein binding of ARV drugs when studied in vitro and in vivo. The roundtable participants also identified research priorities that are important for understanding the sources of inter- and intraindividual variability in protein binding in patients. These include obtaining data on unbound as well as on total concentrations in PK studies; looking at variants of AAG and whether they differ in binding affinity; and emphasizing the importance of developing a standard procedure for drug susceptibility assays used to determine IC50 values.

A Controlled Phase Ii Trial Assessing Three Doses of Enfuvirtide (T-20) in Combination with Abacavir, Amprenavir, Ritonavir and Efavirenz in Non-Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor-Naive HIV-Infected Adults

Enfuvirtide is a novel antiretroviral that blocks HIV-1 cell fusion and viral entry. This Phase II, controlled, open-label, randomized, multicentre dose-ranging trial explored the safety, antiviral activity and pharmacoki-netics of enfuvirtide, administered by subcutaneous (SC) injection, in 71 HIV-1-infected, protease inhibitor-experienced, non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-naive adults for 48 weeks.

Study participants were randomized to receive enfuvirtide at a deliverable dose of 45, 67.5 or 90 mg twice daily; the 45 mg twice daily dose required 2 injections/day, while the higher doses required 4 injections/day. A background oral antiretroviral (ARV) regimen of abacavir (300 mg twice daily), amprenavir (1200 mg twice daily), ritonavir (200 mg twice daily) and efavirenz (600 mg once daily) was provided with enfuvirtide. A control group received the background ARV regimen alone. All potential participants underwent an HIV genotype at screen to ensure a homogenous population and to exclude patients with evidence of genotypic resistance to NNRTIs.

Overall, the tolerability of the combination of abacavir, amprenavir, ritonavir, efavirenz and enfuvirtide was generally comparable to control through 48 weeks. No enfuvirtide dose-dependent adverse events (AEs) were observed across treatment groups. Injection site reactions (ISRs) occurred at least once in 68.5% of the enfuvirtide-treated population, and most ISRs were mild to moderate in severity, with no apparent dose relationship. Excluding ISRs, the most common treatment-emergent AEs were nausea, diarrhoea, dizziness and fatigue; with no clinically significant differences in the incidence of AEs observed between the control and enfuvirtide groups. Each treatment group benefited from ARV therapy, with a trend of increasing antiviral and immunological activity associated with increasing enfuvirtide dose. At 48 weeks, the median HIV-1 RNA change from baseline for the ITT population was –2.24 log10 copies/ml for the combined enfuvirtide groups compared with –1.87 log10 copies/ml for the control group. In addition, 54.9% of patients in the enfuvirtide group achieved HIV-1 RNA ≤400 copies/ml versus 36.8% of patients in the control group.

These results indicate that enfuvirtide has a favourable safety profile and is a promising new antiviral agent for HIV-infected patients who have been on previously failing ARV regimens.

Brief report: efficacy and treatment-limiting toxicity with the concurrent use of lopinavir/ritonavir and a third protease inhibitor in treatment-experienced HIV-infected patients

To investigate the efficacy and tolerability of using lopinavir/ritonavir concurrently with a third protease inhibitor (PI), the authors reviewed the medical records of 47 HIV-infected patients treated with antiretroviral regimens containing lopinavir/ritonavir and amprenavir, saquinavir, indinavir, or nelfinavir. The baseline mean HIV RNA level was 4.6 log(10) copies/mL, and the median CD4 cell count was 123/mm3. By week 40, one patient (2%) was lost to follow-up, and 21 (44%) discontinued their lopinavir/ritonavir plus a third PI regimens: 4 (8%) due to virologic failure as determined by the clinician; 13 (28%) due to toxicity; and 4 (8%) due to social reasons. By intent-to-treat analysis, 12 (26%) of 47 patients had an HIV RNA level of less than 400 copies/mL at 40 weeks. By multivariate analysis, factors associated with virologic response were no prior lopinavir exposure (p =.03) and no prior exposure to nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors among patients taking a nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (p =.05). Some HIV-infected patients concurrently treated with lopinavir/ritonavir and a third PI have viral suppression; many eventually discontinue therapy because of toxicity or virologic failure.

The safety, plasma pharmacokinetics, and antiviral activity of subcutaneous enfuvirtide (T-20), a peptide inhibitor of gp41-mediated virus fusion, in HIV-infected adults

Enfuvirtide (T-20) is a novel antiretroviral agent that blocks HIV-1 cell fusion. A 28-day randomized dose-comparison study was conducted to determine the safety, pharmacokinetics, and antiviral activity of enfuvirtide in 78 HIV-infected adults, most with extensive treatment experience. Patients received enfuvirtide, added to a failing regimen, either by continuous subcutaneous infusion (CSI: 12.5, 25, 50 or 100 mg/day) or by subcutaneous (SC) injection (50 or 100 mg twice daily). Dose-related decreases in viral load were observed, with a maximum mean reduction from baseline of 1.6 log(10) copies/ml (p< 0.001) seen in the 100 mg bid SC group. Most responses diminished by 28 days. Plasma pharmacokinetics and antiviral responses were more consistent for SC injection than for CSI because of technical difficulties experienced with CSI. Injection site reactions were common but generally mild. These results indicate that enfuvirtide is a promising new therapeutic agent for HIV-infected patients, including those with prior antiretroviral treatment.

Practical psychopharmacology in HIV-1 and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome

HIV-1 infection poses a challenge for psychiatrists of the medically ill. Many factors concerning the care of HIV-1-infected patients need to be considered when prescribing psychotropics. These include careful diagnosis, taking into account medical disorders associated with HIV-1 that can present with psychiatric symptoms, as well as medications that HIV-1 patients may be taking that can cause a variety of neuropsychiatric side effects. Another important issue is the potential for drug-illness interactions. In general, HIV-1 patients seem to be more sensitive to the development of adverse drug reactions than do non-HIV-1 patients, especially as the illness progresses. It is also important to be cognizant of the complex multidrug regimens that many HIV-1 patients are on to avoid known drug-drug interactions and be on the alert for other potential interactions when using psychotropic medications.

High-performance liquid chromatography of HIV protease inhibitors in human biological matrices

Methods for HPLC analysis of protease inhibitors (PIs) in human biological matrices were reviewed. Assays have been developed for analysis of single PIs or for simultaneous measurement of multiple PIs in plasma-serum, saliva, cerebrospinal fluid and semen. Liquid-liquid extraction was most often applied for sample pretreatment, but solid-phase extraction and protein precipitation were used as well. Reversed-phase or ion-pair chromatography have been used to separate PIs. Detection of PIs should be sensitive enough for quantitation of plasma concentrations below trough levels of single PIs, or below proposed therapeutic thresholds for PIs. The large majority of assays employs UV detection. As the potential for interferences is large, the selectivity of every method should be evaluated properly. The available high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) methods have been applied in clinical pharmacokinetic studies and for therapeutic drug monitoring of PIs. Participation in an interlaboratory quality control program is recommended for every laboratory engaged in the bioanalysis of PIs.