Prevention of infection caused by Pneumocystis carinii in transplant recipients

Outcome of Pneumocystis pneumonia in transplant and non-transplant HIV-negative immunocompromised patients

BACKGROUND

Previous studies showed HIV-negative immunocompromised patients are susceptible to Pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP). However, the PCP outcome has not been compared among HIV-negative immunocompromised patients.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study at the University Health Network, we included all HIV-negative immunocompromised patients who fulfilled the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) PCP diagnosis criteria from December 2018 to December 2019. We compared the demographics, comorbidities, course of illness, and PCP outcome (28-day mortality and composite outcome [i.e., death or intensive care unit (ICU) admission]) between solid organ transplant (SOT) and non-SOT patients.

RESULTS

Of 160 non-HIV patients with PCP diagnoses, 118 patients fulfilled EORTC criteria (76 males [64.4%], median [range] age: 65.5 [21-87] years). PCP presentation in SOT recipients (n = 14) was more severe than non-SOT patients (n = 104): acute presentation (onset <7 days before admission: 11/14 [78.6%] vs. 51/104 [56%], p = .037), shortness of breath (100% vs. 75/104 [74.3%], p = .037), median [range] O2 saturation (88% [75%, 99%] vs. 92%[70%, 99%], p = .040), and supplemental O2 requirement (12/14 [85.7%] vs. 59/104 [56.7%], p = .044). The mortality [4/14, (28.6%) vs. 15/104 (14.4%), p = .176], ICU admission (10/14 [71.4%] vs. 18/104 [17.3%], p < .0001), and mechanical ventilation (8/14 [57.1%] vs. 18/104 [17.3%], p = .0007) in SOT patients was different from non-SOT patients. In multivariable analysis, SOT recipients were at greater risk of composite outcome than non-SOT patients (aOR [CI95%]: 12.25 [3.08-48.62], p < .001).

CONCLUSION

PCP presentation and outcomes in SOT recipients are more severe than in non-SOT patients. Further studies are required to explore the biological reasons for this difference.

Identification of predictive markers of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia in kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Kidney transplantation has emerged as the most effective treatment for patients with uremia. Advances in immunosuppressant medications have significantly reduced the risk of rejection. However, a notable increase in opportunistic infections, such as Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP), demands special attention in clinical practice. Our study aims to evaluate risk factors and identify predictive markers associated with PJP in kidney transplantation recipients.

METHODS

We conducted a case-control study (1:2 ratio) involving kidney transplant recipients with and without PJP, matched based on the same surgical date. The study was carried out at Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, China.

RESULTS

Ninety-three participants were enrolled at Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, comprising 31 with PJP and 62 without PJP. All patients tested negative for HIV. Our findings indicate that PJP patients exhibited lower levels of serum albumin (P = 0.001), reduced counts of total and CD3+ (P < 0.001), CD4+ (P = 0.001), and CD8+ T lymphocytes (P < 0.001), and a lower rate of prophylactic trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMZ) usage compared to non-PJP patients (P = 0.02). Conversely, urea levels in PJP patients were significantly higher than in non-PJP controls (P < 0.001). We developed a model combining CD8+ T cell count (< 241.11/μL, P < 0.001) and ALB levels (< 35.2 g/L, P = 0.003), which demonstrated excellent discriminatory power in distinguishing PJP from non-PJP cases, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0. 920 (95% CI, 0.856-0.989).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that a baseline CD8+ T cell count (< 241.11/μL) and serum ALB levels (< 35.2 g/L) offer robust predictive value for the occurrence of PJP infections in kidney transplant recipients.

Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia in a Liver Transplant Recipient With an Adverse Reaction to Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole Treated With a Sulfonamide Desensitization Protocol: Case Report

BACKGROUND

Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) is an opportunistic fungal infection that, in immunocompromised patients, can progress to respiratory failure and death. Since trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) chemoprophylaxis has become a standard management, the prognosis has improved. However, there are patients with a history of TMP/SMX intolerance who cannot receive chemoprophylaxis.

BACKGROUND

We report on a 53-year-old male liver recipient treated with a standard triple immunosuppressive regimen in whom TMP/SMX was waived because of a history of allergy manifested as a generalized rash with edema more than 30 years ago. At transplantation, the immunologic risk was assessed as low, and liver graft function was normal. In the third month after engraftment, he developed dyspnea at rest required constant passive oxygen therapy. Ceftriaxone, azithromycin, and clindamycin were implemented. Mycophenolate acid was stopped, and tacrolimus was reduced. High-resolution computed tomography revealed interstitial pneumonia. Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumoniae was diagnosed from bronchoalveolar lavage. Instead of TMP/SMX, pentamidine and caspofungin were also used for PJP, with no improvement. After 3 weeks, the patient deteriorated. Because of his life-threatening condition, TMP/SMX was introduced in the sulfonamide desensitization protocol, including hydrocortisone and clemastinum. Within 4 days, the patient stabilized with no signs of TMP/SMX intolerance. Pneumonia subsided within a month, and TMP/SMX was prescribed lifelong.

CONCLUSIONS

Prophylaxis for PJP with TMP/SMX still remains an important issue in transplant recipients. Adverse reaction to TMP/SMX in the past is not always a contraindication to reintroducing prophylaxis. The decision of prophylaxis avoidance should be analyzed carefully; in uncertain cases, a sulfonamide desensitization protocol should be considered.

Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole significantly reduces the risk of nocardiosis in solid organ transplant recipients: systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Whether trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) prophylaxis prevents nocardiosis in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients is controversial.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effect of TMP-SMX in the prevention of nocardiosis after SOT, its dose-response relationship, its effect on preventing disseminated nocardiosis, and the risk of TMP-SMX resistance in case of breakthrough infection.

METHODS

A systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Web of Science Core Collection, and Scopus up to 19 September 2023.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

(a) Risk of nocardiosis between SOT recipients with and without TMP-SMX prophylaxis, or (b) sufficient details to determine the rate of TMP-SMX resistance in breakthrough nocardiosis.

PARTICIPANTS

SOT recipients.

INTERVENTION

TMP-SMX prophylaxis versus no prophylaxis.

ASSESSMENT OF RISK OF BIAS

Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies-of Exposure (ROBINS-E) for comparative studies; dedicated tool for non-comparative studies.

METHODS OF DATA SYNTHESIS

For our primary outcome (i.e. to determine the effect of TMP-SMX on the risk of nocardiosis), a one-step mixed-effects regression model was used to estimate the association between the outcome and the exposure. Univariate and multivariable unconditional regression models were used to adjust for the potential confounding effects. Certainty of evidence was assessed using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

RESULTS

Individual data from three case-control studies were obtained (260 SOT recipients with nocardiosis and 519 uninfected controls). TMP-SMX prophylaxis was independently associated with a significantly decreased risk of nocardiosis (adjusted OR = 0.3, 95% CI 0.18-0.52, moderate certainty of evidence). Variables independently associated with an increased risk of nocardiosis were older age, current use of corticosteroids, high calcineurin inhibitor concentration, recent acute rejection, lower lymphocyte count, and heart transplant. Breakthrough infections (66/260, 25%) were generally susceptible to TMP-SMX (pooled proportion 98%, 95% CI 92-100).

CONCLUSIONS

In SOT recipients, TMP-SMX prophylaxis likely reduces the risk of nocardiosis. Resistance appears uncommon in case of breakthrough infection.

Antifungal prophylaxis and pre-emptive therapy: When and how?

The growing pool of critically ill or immunocompromised patients leads to a constant increase of life-threatening invasive infections by fungi such as Aspergillus spp., Candida spp. and Pneumocystis jirovecii. In response to this, prophylactic and pre-emptive antifungal treatment strategies have been developed and implemented for high-risk patient populations. The benefit by risk reduction needs to be carefully weighed against potential harm caused by prolonged exposure against antifungal agents. This includes adverse effects and development of resistance as well as costs for the healthcare system. In this review, we summarise evidence and discuss advantages and downsides of antifungal prophylaxis and pre-emptive treatment in the setting of malignancies such as acute leukaemia, haematopoietic stem cell transplantation, CAR-T cell therapy, and solid organ transplant. We also address preventive strategies in patients after abdominal surgery and with viral pneumonia as well as individuals with inherited immunodeficiencies. Notable progress has been made in haematology research, where strong recommendations regarding antifungal prophylaxis and pre-emptive treatment are backed by data from randomized controlled trials, whereas other critical areas still lack high-quality evidence. In these areas, paucity of definitive data translates into centre-specific strategies that are based on interpretation of available data, local expertise, and epidemiology. The development of novel immunomodulating anticancer drugs, high-end intensive care treatment and the development of new antifungals with new modes of action, adverse effects and routes of administration will have implications on future prophylactic and pre-emptive approaches.

First World Consensus Conference on pancreas transplantation: Part II - recommendations

The First World Consensus Conference on Pancreas Transplantation provided 49 jury deliberations regarding the impact of pancreas transplantation on the treatment of diabetic patients, and 110 experts' recommendations for the practice of pancreas transplantation. The main message from this consensus conference is that both simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPK) and pancreas transplantation alone can improve long-term patient survival, and all types of pancreas transplantation dramatically improve the quality of life of recipients. Pancreas transplantation may also improve the course of chronic complications of diabetes, depending on their severity. Therefore, the advantages of pancreas transplantation appear to clearly surpass potential disadvantages. Pancreas after kidney transplantation increases the risk of mortality only in the early period after transplantation, but is associated with improved life expectancy thereafter. Additionally, preemptive SPK, when compared to SPK performed in patients undergoing dialysis, appears to be associated with improved outcomes. Time on dialysis has negative prognostic implications in SPK recipients. Increased long-term survival, improvement in the course of diabetic complications, and amelioration of quality of life justify preferential allocation of kidney grafts to SPK recipients. Audience discussions and live voting are available online at the following URL address: http://mediaeventi.unipi.it/category/1st-world-consensus-conference-of-pancreas-transplantation/246.

Incidence of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia utilizing a polymerase chain reaction-based diagnosis in patients receiving bendamustine

BACKGROUND

Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) is a life-threatening infection occurring in patients receiving bendamustine. The poorly defined incidence, particularly when utilizing polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based diagnostic techniques, precipitates unclear prophylaxis recommendations. Our objective was to determine the cumulative incidence of PJP diagnosed by single copy target, non-nested PCR in patients receiving bendamustine.

METHODS

Patients were evaluated for PJP from initiation of bendamustine through 9 months after the last administration. The cumulative incidence of PJP was estimated using the Aalen-Johansen method. Cox proportional hazard models were used to demonstrate the strength of association between the independent variables and PJP risk.

RESULTS

This single-center, retrospective cohort included 486 adult patients receiving bendamustine from 1 January 2006 through 1 August 2019. Most patients received bendamustine-based combination therapy (n = 461, 94.9%), and 225 (46.3%) patients completed six cycles. Rituximab was the most common concurrent agent (n = 431, 88.7%). The cumulative incidence of PJP was 1.7% (95% CI 0.8%-3.3%, at maximum follow-up of 2.5 years), after the start of bendamustine (n = 8 PJP events overall). Prior stem cell transplant, prior chemotherapy within 1 year of bendamustine, and lack of concurrent chemotherapy were associated with the development of PJP in univariate analyses. Anti-Pneumocystis prophylaxis was not significantly associated with a reduction in PJP compared to no prophylaxis (HR 0.37, 95% CI (0.05, 3.04), p = 0.36).

CONCLUSIONS

Our incidence of PJP below 3.5%, the conventional threshold for prophylaxis implementation, indicates routine anti-Pneumocystis prophylaxis may not be necessary in this population. Factors indicating a high-risk population for targeted prophylaxis require further investigation.

A Comprehensive Evaluation of Risk Factors for Pneumocystis Jirovecii Pneumonia in Adult Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

There is no consensus guidance on when to reinitiate Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) prophylaxis in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients at increased risk. The 2019 American Society of Transplantation Infectious Diseases Community of Practice (AST IDCOP) guidelines suggested to continue or reinstitute PJP prophylaxis in those receiving intensified immunosuppression for graft rejection, CMV infection, higher dose of corticosteroids, or prolonged neutropenia.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted evaluating all literature from existence through April 22, 2020 using MEDLINE and EMBASE. (PROSPERO: CRD42019134204) RESULTS:: A total of 30 studies with 413 276 SOT recipients were included. The following factors were associated with PJP development: acute rejection (pooled odds ratio (pOR) = 2.35 (1.69, 3.26), study heterogeneity index (I)= 23.4%), cytomegalovirus (CMV)-related illnesses (pOR = 3.14 (2.30, 4.29), I=48%), absolute lymphocyte count < 500 cells/mm (pOR = 6.29[3.56, 11.13], I 0%), BK-related diseases (pOR = 2.59[1.22, 5.49], I 0%), HLA mismatch ≥ 3 (pOR = 1.83 [1.06, 3.17], I= 0%), rituximab use (pOR =3.03 (1.82, 5.04); I =0%) and polyclonal antibodies use for rejection (pOR = 3.92 [1.87, 8.19], I= 0%). On the other hand, sex, CMV mismatch, interleukin-2 inhibitors, corticosteroids for rejection, and plasmapheresis were not associated with developing PJP.

CONCLUSION

PJP prophylaxis should be considered in SOT recipients with lymphopenia, BK-related infections and rituximab exposure in addition to the previously mentioned risk factors in the AST IDCOP guidelines.

Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia in diffuse large B-cell Lymphoma treated with R-CHOP

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to estimate the incidence of and risk factors for Pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) infection in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients treated with rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (R-CHOP).

METHODS

The medical records of 739 DLBCL patients who received R-CHOP between May 2004 and January 2019 were retrospectively evaluated. Patients were divided into two groups: those who received primary PCP prophylaxis (prophylaxis group) and those who did not (control group). The incidence rate of PCP in each group was calculated, and risk factors for PCP were evaluated in the control group.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics were significantly different between the two groups. Compared to the 602 patients who did not receive prophylaxis, the prophylaxis group (n = 137) had poor prognostic factors of older age, high lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels, advanced Ann Arbour stage, and high International Prognostic Index (IPI) risk scores. None of the patients receiving PCP prophylaxis developed PCP, while the incidence of PCP in the control group was 8.1% (definite cases 5.5% and probable cases 2.7%). Out of the 49 patients who developed PCP, 10 patients (20.4%) were admitted to the intensive care unit, and the PCP-related death rate was 16.3% (8/49).

CONCLUSION

This study showed that PCP prophylaxis is highly effective against PCP infection and may help guide prevention of PCP during R-CHOP treatment in DLBCL patients.

Variability of Pneumocystis jirovecii prophylaxis use among pediatric solid organ transplant providers

Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) prophylaxis after pediatric solid organ transplant (SOT) is routinely recommended, but practice varies. Online survey was sent in 2018 to 707 members of the International Pediatric Transplant Association. A total of 105 responded, representing 47 institutions in 18 countries consisting of transplant physicians (66%), transplant surgeons (19%), nurse practitioners (6%), infectious disease physicians (5%), or pharmacists (4%). PJP prophylaxis was reported by 88%, while 12% did not routinely give prophylaxis. The majority not using PJP prophylaxis performed renal transplants (67%) citing low incidence of PJP (62%). Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole was first-line agent (95%). PJP prophylaxis for 4-6 months was the most frequent duration following kidney (48%, 27/56), liver (42%, 13/31), and heart (40%, 10/25) transplant. Abdominal multivisceral providers equally gave 10-12 months (47%) or lifelong (47%); most lung transplant providers gave lifelong prophylaxis (85%). Across all organs, 21% provided lifetime prophylaxis. After completion of prophylaxis, 32% do not restart for any reason; majority of the rest would restart for treatment of acute graft rejection. 83% reported no PJP cases in the prior 12 months; 14% reporting 1-5 infections. Only 3% reported a case of PJP infection on prophylaxis; none in SOT. PJP prophylaxis is routinely provided to pediatric SOT patients though practice and duration vary by center and organ type. Durations of 4-6 months were most common for renal, liver, and heart transplant recipients, while 10-12 months or lifelong prophylaxis were commonly reported for abdominal multivisceral recipients and most lung transplant recipients are given lifelong prophylaxis.

Disseminated toxoplasmosis associated with hemophagocytic syndrome after kidney transplantation: A case report and review

Disseminated toxoplasmosis is infrequent after kidney transplant transmission but life-threatening because of a lack of diagnostic suspicion as well as specific chemoprophylaxis recommendations. Solid organ transplantation has resulted in few cases of disseminated toxoplasmosis presenting with associated hemophagocytic syndrome. Herein, we report, within the context of a donor/receiver mismatch, a case of a toxoplasmosis associated with hemophagocytic syndrome in a kidney transplant recipient. Molecular and serological investigations confirmed Toxoplasma gondii transmission through the kidney graft.

Risk Factors for Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis and a Prophylactic Indication of Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Immunosuppressant medications (ISPs) increase the occurrence of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PCP) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. The prophylactic administration of trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) for PCP is effective but has serious adverse effects and so should be selectively used for patients at high risk. The aims of this study were to clarify the risk factors for PCP in RA patients and to establish the indications for administering TMP/SMX.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study analyzed data from 2640 patients (2010-2014) diagnosed as having RA who had not received a prophylactic administration of TMP/SMX. The risk factors for PCP were evaluated by comparing the clinical parameters between patients with PCP (PCP group, n = 19) and those without (non-PCP group, n = 2621).

RESULTS

The PCP group was older (70 vs. 64 years), received higher doses of prednisolone (6.2 vs. 2.4 mg/d) and methotrexate (7.7 vs. 5.2 mg/wk), and had a greater number of ISPs (1.3 vs. 0.8) (p < 0.05). We stratified the PCP risk using a scoring system based on odds ratios (ORs) calculated for these parameters (methotrexate ≥6 mg/wk OR = 4.5, 1 point; age ≥65 years, OR = 3.7, 1 point; ≥2 ISPs, OR = 3.7, 1 point; prednisolone ≥5 mg/d, OR = 12.4, 3 points). The incidence of PCP among patients scoring 0 to 2 points was 0.04%; 3 to 4 points, 2.3%; and 5 points or more, 5.8%.

CONCLUSIONS

The prophylactic administration of TMP/SMX for PCP is recommended for RA patients who score at least 5 points with our system.

Pneumocystis jiroveci in solid organ transplantation: Guidelines from the American Society of Transplantation Infectious Diseases Community of Practice

These updated guidelines from the Infectious Diseases Community of Practice of the American Society of Transplantation review the diagnosis, prevention, and management of Pneumocystis jiroveci fungal infection transplant recipients. Pneumonia (PJP) may develop via airborne transmission or reactivation of prior infection. Nosocomial clusters of infection have been described among transplant recipients. PJP should not occur during prophylaxis with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX). Without prophylaxis, PJP risk is greatest in the first 6 months after organ transplantation but may develop later. Risk factors include low lymphocyte counts, cytomegalovirus infection (CMV), hypogammaglobulinemia, treated graft rejection or corticosteroids, and advancing patient age (>65). Presentation typically includes fever, dyspnea with hypoxemia, and cough. Chest radiographic patterns generally reveal diffuse interstitial processes best seen by CT scans. Patients generally have PO₂  < 60 mm Hg, elevated serum lactic dehydrogenase (LDH), and elevated serum (1 → 3) β-d-glucan assay. Specific diagnosis uses respiratory specimens with direct immunofluorescent staining; invasive procedures may be required. Quantitative PCR is a useful adjunct to diagnosis. TMP-SMX is the drug of choice for therapy; drug allergy should be documented before resorting to alternative therapies. Adjunctive corticosteroids may be useful early. Routine PJP prophylaxis is recommended for at least 6-12 months post-transplant, preferably with TMP-SMX.

Infection in Kidney Transplant Recipients

In organ transplant recipients, impaired inflammatory responses suppress the clinical and radiologic findings of infection. The possible etiologies of infection are diverse, ranging from common bacterial and viral pathogens that affect the entire community to opportunistic pathogens that cause invasive disease only in immunocompromised hosts. Antimicrobial therapies required to treat established infection are often complex, with accompanying risks for drug toxicities and drug interactions with the immunosuppressive agents used to maintain graft function. Rapid and specific diagnosis is essential for successful therapy. The risk of serious infections in the organ transplant patient is largely determined by the interaction between two factors: the patient’s epidemiologic exposures and the patient’s net state of immunosuppression. The epidemiology of infection includes environmental exposures and nosocomial infections, organisms derived from donor tissues, and latent infections from the recipient activated with immunosuppression. The net state of immune suppression is a conceptual framework that measures those factors contributing to risk for infection: the dose, duration, and temporal sequence of immunosuppressive drugs; the presence of foreign bodies or injuries to mucocutaneous barriers; neutropenia; metabolic abnormalities including diabetes; devitalized tissues, hematomas, or effusions postsurgery; and infection with immunomodulating viruses. Multiple factors are present in each host. A timeline exists to aid in the development of a differential diagnosis for infection. The timeline for each patient is altered by changes in prophylaxis and immunosuppressive drugs. For common infections, new microbiologic assays, often nucleic acid based, are useful in the diagnosis and management of opportunistic infections.

Therapy and Management of Pneumocystis jirovecii Infection

The rates of Pneumocystis pneumonia (PcP) are increasing in the HIV-negative susceptible population. Guidance for the prophylaxis and treatment of PcP in HIV, haematology, and solid-organ transplant (SOT) recipients is available, although for many other populations (e.g., auto-immune disorders) there remains an urgent need for recommendations. The main drug for both prophylaxis and treatment of PcP is trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, but resistance to this therapy is emerging, placing further emphasis on the need to make a mycological diagnosis using molecular based methods. Outbreaks in SOT recipients, particularly renal transplants, are increasingly described, and likely caused by human-to-human spread, highlighting the need for efficient infection control policies and sensitive diagnostic assays. Widespread prophylaxis is the best measure to gain control of outbreak situations. This review will summarize diagnostic options, cover prophylactic and therapeutic management in the main at risk populations, while also covering aspects of managing resistant disease, outbreak situations, and paediatric PcP.

Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia in solid organ transplant recipients: a descriptive analysis for the Swiss Transplant Cohort

BACKGROUND

Descriptive data on Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTr) in the era of routine Pneumocystis-prophylaxis are lacking.

METHODS

All adult SOTr between 2008 and 2016 were included. PJP was diagnosed based on consensus guidelines. Early-onset PJP was defined as PJP within the first-year-post-transplant.

RESULTS

41/2842 SOTr (1.4%) developed PJP (incidence rate: 0.01/1000 person-days) at a mean of 493-days post-transplant: 21 (51.2%) early vs 20 (48.8%) late-onset PJP. 2465 (86.7%) SOTr received Pneumocystis-prophylaxis for a mean 316 days. PJP incidence was 0.001% and 0.003% (log-rank < 0.001) in SOTr with and without Pneumocystis-prophylaxis, respectively. PJP was an early event in 10/12 (83.3%) SOTr who did not receive Pneumocystis-prophylaxis and developed PJP, compared to those patients who received prophylaxis (11/29, 37.9%; P-value: 0.008). Among late-onset PJP patients, most cases (13/20, 65%) were observed during the 2nd year post-transplant. Age ≥65 years (OR: 2.4, P-value: 0.03) and CMV infection during the first 6 months post-SOT (OR: 2.5, P-value: 0.006) were significant PJP predictors, while Pneumocystis-prophylaxis was protective for PJP (OR: 0.3, P-value: 0.006) in the overall population. Most patients (35, 85.4%) were treated with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for a mean 20.6 days. 1-year mortality was 14.6%.

CONCLUSIONS

In the Pneumocystis-prophylaxis-era, PJP remains a rare post-transplant complication. Most cases occurred post-PJP-prophylaxis-discontinuation, particularly during the second-year-post-transplant. Additional research may help identify indications for Pneumocystis-prophylaxis prolongation.

Anti-infective chemoprophylaxis after solid-organ transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients are at high risk of opportunistic infections due to bacterial, viral, fungal, and parasitic pathogens. Anti-infective prophylaxis is a time-tested proven strategy for the prevention of these infections after SOT. Areas covered: The current recommendations for the prevention of surgical site infections, herpes simplex, cytomegalovirus, invasive fungal infections, and selected parasitic diseases are highlighted. Recent peer-reviewed publications on the prevention of infection after SOT were reviewed and their significance was discussed in the context of the current recommendations for preventing infectious complications. Expert commentary: The authors comment on the current approaches to infection prevention in transplant recipients, and discuss how these recommendations are implemented in their clinical practice. Notable findings published during the past year were highlighted, and their clinical significance was interpreted in the context of current recommendations. The evolution of diagnostic and immunologic assays was emphasized, with focus on their potential role in optimizing the current antimicrobial approaches to infection prevention after SOT.

Single-center outbreak of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia in heart transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) outbreaks are described in solid organ transplant recipients. Few reports suggest interhuman transmission with important infection control implications. We described a large PJP outbreak in heart transplant (HTx) recipients.

METHODS

Six cases of PJP occurred in HTx recipients within 10 months in our hospital. Demographics, clinical characteristics, treatment and outcomes were described. To identify contacts among individuals a review of all dates of out-patient visits and patient hospitalizations was performed. Cross exposure was also investigated using genotyping on PJ isolates.

RESULTS

At the time of PJP-related hospitalization, patients' mean age was 49 ± standard deviation 4 years, median time from HTx was 8 (25%-75% interquartile range [Q1-Q3] 5-12) months and none of the cases were on prophylaxis. At PJP-related admission, 5 patients had CMV reactivation, of whom 4 were on antiviral preemptive treatment. Median in-hospital stay was 30 (Q1-Q3, 28-48) days; and 2 cases required intensive care unit admission. All patients survived beyond 2 years. Transmission map analysis suggested interhuman transmission in all cases (presumed incubation period, median 90 [Q1-Q3, 64-91] days). Genotyping was performed in 4 cases, demonstrating the same PJ strain in 3 cases.

CONCLUSIONS

We described a large PJP cluster among HTx recipients, supporting the nosocomial acquisition of PJP through interhuman transmission. Based on this experience, extended prophylaxis for more than 6 months after HTx could be considered in specific settings. Further work is required to understand its optimal duration and timing based on individual risk factor profiles and to define standardized countermeasures to prevent and limit PJP outbreaks.

Overview of Infections in the Immunocompromised Host

Understanding the components of the immune system that contribute to host defense against infection is key to recognizing infections that are more likely to occur in an immunocompromised patient. In this review, we discuss the integrated system of physical barriers and of innate and adaptive immunity that contributes to host defense. Specific defects in the components of this system that predispose to particular infections are presented. This is followed by a review of primary immunodeficiency diseases and secondary immunodeficiencies, the latter of which develop because of a specific illness or condition or are treatment-related. The effects of treatment for neoplasia, autoimmune diseases, solid organ and stem cell transplants on host defenses are reviewed and associated with susceptibility to particular infections. In conclusion, an approach to laboratory screening for a suspected immunodeficiency is presented. Knowledge of which host defects predispose to specific infections allows clinicians to prevent, diagnose, and manage infections in their immunocompromised patients most effectively.

Infectious Complications and Vaccinations in the Posttransplant Population

Infections remain a major cause of mortality and morbidity after both kidney and liver transplantation, and internists increasingly play a major role in diagnosing and treating these infections. Because of immunosuppression, solid organ transplant recipients do not often demonstrate classic signs and symptoms of infection and have a broader variety of common and opportunistic infections, many of which are generally more difficult to diagnose and treat. Although these patients have many risk factors for infection, a major determinant is the time after transplant as it relates to levels of immunosuppression, healing, and hospital or environmental exposures.

Epidemiological Outbreaks of Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia Are Not Limited to Kidney Transplant Recipients: Genotyping Confirms Common Source of Transmission in a Liver Transplantation Unit

Over a 5-month period, four liver transplant patients at a single hospital were diagnosed with Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PCP). This unusually high incidence was investigated using molecular genotyping. Bronchoalveolar lavage fluids (BALF) obtained from the four liver recipients diagnosed with PCP were processed for multilocus sequence typing (MLST) at three loci (SOD, mt26s, and CYB). Twenty-four other BALF samples, which were positive for P. jirovecii and collected from 24 epidemiologically unrelated patients with clinical signs of PCP, were studied in parallel by use of the same method. Pneumocystis jirovecii isolates from the four liver recipients all had the same genotype, which was different from those of the isolates from all the epidemiologically unrelated individuals studied. These findings supported the hypothesis of a common source of contamination or even cross-transmission of a single P. jirovecii clone between the four liver recipients. Hospitalization mapping showed several possible encounters between these four patients, including outpatient consultations on one particular date when they all possibly met. This study demonstrates the value of molecular genotyping of P. jirovecii isolated from clinical samples for epidemiological investigation of PCP outbreaks. It is also the first description of a common source of exposure to a single P. jirovecii clone between liver transplant recipients and highlights the importance of prophylaxis in such a population.

The incidence, mortality and timing of Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia after hematopoietic cell transplantation: a CIBMTR analysis

Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia (PJP) is associated with high morbidity and mortality after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Little is known about PJP infections after HSCT because of the rarity of disease given routine prophylaxis. We report the results of a Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research study evaluating the incidence, timing, prophylaxis agents, risk factors and mortality of PJP after autologous (auto) and allogeneic (allo) HSCT. Between 1995 and 2005, 0.63% allo recipients and 0.28% auto recipients of first HSCT developed PJP. Cases occurred as early as 30 days to beyond a year after allo HSCT. A nested case cohort analysis with supplemental data (n=68 allo cases, n=111 allo controls) revealed that risk factors for PJP infection included lymphopenia and mismatch after HSCT. After allo or auto HSCT, overall survival was significantly poorer among cases vs controls (P=0.0004). After controlling for significant variables, the proportional hazards model revealed that PJP cases were 6.87 times more likely to die vs matched controls (P<0.0001). We conclude PJP infection is rare after HSCT but is associated with high mortality. Factors associated with GVHD and with poor immune reconstitution are among the risk factors for PJP and suggest that protracted prophylaxis for PJP in high-risk HSCT recipients may improve outcomes.

Approach to the Solid Organ Transplant Patient with Suspected Fungal Infection

In solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients, invasive fungal infections (IFIs) are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Detection of IFIs can be difficult because the signs and symptoms are similar to those of viral or bacterial infections, and diagnostic techniques have limited sensitivity and specificity. Clinicians must rely on knowledge of the patient's risk factors for fungal infection to make a diagnosis. The authors describe their approach to the SOT recipient with suspected fungal infection. The epidemiology of IFIs in the SOT population is reviewed, and a syndromic approach to suspected IFI in SOT recipients is described.

Management of Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia in Kidney Transplantation to Prevent Further Outbreak

The outbreak of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) among kidney transplant recipients is emerging worldwide. It is important to control nosocomial PJP infection. A delay in diagnosis and treatment increases the number of reservoir patients and the number of cases of respiratory failure and death. Owing to the large number of kidney transplant recipients compared to other types of organ transplantation, there are greater opportunities for them to share the same time and space. Although the use of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) as first choice in PJP prophylaxis is valuable for PJP that develops from infections by trophic forms, it cannot prevent or clear colonization, in which cysts are dominant. Colonization of P. jirovecii is cleared by macrophages. While recent immunosuppressive therapies have decreased the rate of rejection, over-suppressed macrophages caused by the higher levels of immunosuppression may decrease the eradication rate of colonization. Once a PJP cluster enters these populations, which are gathered in one place and uniformly undergoing immunosuppressive therapy for kidney transplantation, an outbreak can occur easily. Quick actions for PJP patients, other recipients, and medical staff of transplant centers are required. In future, lifelong prophylaxis may be required even in kidney transplant recipients.

Pneumocystis Pneumonia in Solid-Organ Transplant Recipients

Pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) is well known and described in AIDS patients. Due to the increasing use of cytotoxic and immunosuppressive therapies, the incidence of this infection has dramatically increased in the last years in patients with other predisposing immunodeficiencies and remains an important cause of morbidity and mortality in solid-organ transplant (SOT) recipients. PCP in HIV-negative patients, such as SOT patients, harbors some specificity compared to AIDS patients, which could change the medical management of these patients. This article summarizes the current knowledge on the epidemiology, risk factors, clinical manifestations, diagnoses, prevention, and treatment of Pneumocystis pneumonia in solid-organ transplant recipients, with a particular focus on the changes caused by the use of post-transplantation prophylaxis.

Study of peripheral blood natural killer cells, T-cell helper/T-cell suppressor ratio and intercurrent infection frequency in hepatitis C seropositive prevalent hemodialysis patients

Hemodialysis (HD) may adversely affect the immune system. It is established that intercurrent infection rate and severity may be increased in prevalent HD patients. Moreover, hepatitis C viral infection, a common infection in many HD centers, may further inhibit the immune system. To our knowledge, no previous study in the literature has attempted to investigate the possible effects of hepatitis C seropositivity on rate and severity of intercurrent infection in prevalent HD patients. The aim of this study was to assess the peripheral blood CD16-natural killer cells, CD4/CD8 ratio, as well as rate of intercurrent infection in hepatitis C seropositive prevalent HD patients as compared with hepatitis C seronegative prevalent HD patients. Twenty hepatitis C seropositive stable prevalent HD patients (group A), as well as another twenty hepatitis C seronegative stable prevalent HD patients (group B), were randomly selected from our HD unit and enrolled in the study. Both groups were similar in age, sex, body mass index, and duration of HD. Diabetics, smokers, and cases with advanced liver disease (Child classification stages B and C) were excluded from the study. A third group (group C) of 10 apparently healthy subjects (of similar age, sex, and body mass index), was also enrolled in the study. All subjects were investigated by complete blood count, routine chemistry, assessment of peripheral lymphocytes CD3,CD16, CD4, CD8, CD4/CD8 ratio by flow cytometer, as well assessment of intercurrent infection frequency retrospectively (since the start of HD therapy and seroconversion in HD patients, and prospectively for a period of six months. Although we detected statistically significant higher frequency of intercurrent infection in both HD groups compared with the healthy group, we did not detect significant differences between hepatitis C seropositive and seronegative groups regarding frequency or severity of intercurrent infection. Moreover, we did not detect significant differences among the three studied groups regarding levels of CD16, CD3, CD4, CD8, CD4/CD8 ratio in peripheral lymphocytes. It may be concluded that hepatitis C seropositive prevalent HD patients are not at increased risk of intercurrent infection as compared with hepatitis C seronegative prevalent HD patients, contrary to what is reported in hepatitis C seroconverted organ transplant candidates.

Incidence of Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia among groups at risk in HIV-negative patients

BACKGROUND

Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-negative immunocompromised patients is associated with high mortality rates. Although trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole provides a very effective prophylaxis, pneumocystosis still occurs and may even be emerging due to suboptimal characterization of patients most at risk, hence precluding targeted prophylaxis.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed all cases of documented pneumocystosis in HIV-negative patients admitted in our institution, a referral center in the area, from January 1990 to June 2010, and extracted data on their underlying condition(s). To estimate incidence rates within each condition, we estimated the number of patients followed-up in our area for each condition by measuring the number of patients admitted with the corresponding international classification diagnostic code, through the national hospital discharge database (Program of Medicalization of the Information System [PMSI]).

RESULTS

From 1990 to 2010, 293 cases of pneumocystosis were documented, of which 154 (52.6%) tested negative for HIV. The main underlying conditions were hematological malignancies (32.5%), solid tumors (18.2%), inflammatory diseases (14.9%), solid organ transplant (12.3%), and vasculitis (9.7%). Estimated incidence rates could be ranked in 3 categories: 1) high risk (incidence rates >45 cases per 100,000 patient-year): polyarteritis nodosa, granulomatosis with polyangiitis, polymyositis/dermatopolymyositis, acute leukemia, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, and non-Hodgkin lymphoma; 2) intermediate risk (25-45 cases per 100,000 patient-year): Waldenström macroglobulinemia, multiple myeloma, and central nervous system cancer; and 3) low risk (<25 cases per 100,000 patient-year): other solid tumors, inflammatory diseases, and Hodgkin lymphoma.

CONCLUSIONS

These estimates may be used as a guide to better target pneumocystosis prophylaxis in the groups most at risk.

The Prevalence of Pneumocystis jiroveci in Bronchoalveolar Lavage Specimens of Lung Transplant Recipients Examined by the Nested PCR

BACKGROUND

The use of immune suppressive drugs for organ transplant recipients predisposes them to opportunistic infections, especially by fungal agents. Pneumocystis jiroveci, as an opportunistic pathogen, endangers the patients' life in those with immune system disorders. Early detection of latent Pneumocystis infection in susceptible patients may help choose the optimal treatment for these patients.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to identify and determine the colonization of latent P. jiroveci infection among lung transplant recipients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted on lung transplant recipients. Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) specimens were collected from 32 patients undergoing bronchoscopy. The samples were aseptically homogenized by 10 mM dithiothreitol, and their DNA was extracted. The mtLSUrRNA gene of P. jiroveci was amplified using nested PCR in two stages. Nested PCR was performed using external primers of pAZ-102-E and pAZ102-H followed by using the PCR product of the first stage and internal primers of pAZ-102-E and pAZ102-L2.

RESULTS

The genome of P. jiroveci was revealed by a 346 bp PCR product in the initial amplification and a 120 bp product in the nested PCR. The results showed that seven BAL specimens (21.9%) from lung transplant recipients were positive for P. jiroveci.

CONCLUSIONS

In molecular epidemiology studies, nested PCR has higher sensitivity than PCR. Results of this study support the colonization of P. jiroveci in patients receiving lung transplantation. Patients who are carriers of P. jiroveci are at a higher risk of P. jiroveci pneumonia.

Clinical outcomes of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia in adult liver transplant recipients

PURPOSE

Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP) is an opportunistic infection associated with morbidity and mortality in solid-organ transplant recipients. We retrospectively assessed the characteristics and outcomes of liver transplant (OLT) recipients with PCP compared with those of patients with severe non-P carinii pneumonia (non-PCP) who required intensive care with mechanical ventilation.

METHODS

During the 2-year period between January 2008 and December 2009, 43 adult OLT recipients had severe pneumonia requiring mechanical ventilation; of these, 8 (19%) had PCP. During this period, routine antibiotic prophylaxis was administered for the first 6 months after OLT.

RESULTS

The median period from OLT to development of PCP was 9.5 months (range, 1-67); the 1-year incidence was 0.9%. The 6 and 6 to 12-month incidences of non-PCP were 4.2% and 0.3%, respectively, and those of PCP were 0.3% and 0.6%, respectively. Four of 8 patients (50%) in the PCP group had a recent history of a rejection episode. PCP was associated with a higher incidence of prior antirejection treatment. There were no significant differences between PCP and non-PCP groups in age, gender, preoperative Model for End-stage Liver Disease score, primary diagnosis, graft type, and total number of rejection episodes.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that the risk of PCP in OLT recipients is closely related to strong immunosuppressive treatment for acute cellular rejection episodes, suggesting the importance of PCP prophylaxis in these patients. Because most patients developed PCP at around 1 year, it may be advisable to prolong routine post-OLT PCP prophylaxis for 12 months, especially among patients receiving antirejection treatment.

Strategies for the prevention of infection after solid organ transplantation

Infection is a frequent complication of organ transplantation and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Preventative antimicrobial strategies are a key component of the care received by transplant patients. This review summarizes the evidence supporting anti-infective prophylaxis in this setting. Specific recommendations for the prevention of bacterial, fungal, viral and parasitic infection after transplant are made, with a focus on recent developments in the field of transplant infectious diseases.

Increased risk of pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia among patients with inflammatory bowel disease

OBJECTIVES

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) may be at increased risk for pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia (PCP). Our aims were (1) to determine the incidence and relative risk of PCP in IBD and (2) to describe medication exposures in patients with IBD with PCP.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study and a case series using administrative data from IMS Health Inc, LifeLink Health Plan Claims Database. In the cohort, patients with IBD were matched to 4 individuals with no IBD claims. PCP risk was evaluated by incidence rate ratio and adjusted Cox proportional hazards modeling. The demographics and medication histories of the 38 cases of PCP in patients with IBD were extracted.

RESULTS

The cohort included 50,932 patients with Crohn's disease, 56,403 patients with ulcerative colitis, and 1269 patients with unspecified IBD; matched to 434,416 individuals without IBD. The crude incidence of PCP was higher in the IBD cohort (10.6/100,000) than in the non-IBD cohort (3.0/100,000). In the adjusted analyses, PCP risk was higher in the IBD versus non-IBD cohort (hazard ratio, 2.96; 95% confidence interval, 1.75-4.29), with the greatest risk in Crohn's disease compared with non-IBD (hazard ratio, 4.01; 95% confidence interval, 1.88-8.56). In the IBD case series of PCP cases (n = 38), the median age was 49 (interquartile range, 43-57). A total of 20 individuals (53%) were on corticosteroids alone or in combination with other immunosuppression.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the overall incidence of PCP is low, patients with IBD are at increased risk. Patients with IBD with PCP are predominantly on corticosteroids alone or in combination before PCP diagnosis.

Parasitic infections in solid organ transplant recipients

Parasitic diseases are rare infections after a solid organ transplant (SOT). Toxoplasmosis, Trypanosoma cruzi, and visceral leishmanias are the 3 main opportunistic protozoal infections that have the potential to be lethal if not diagnosed early and treated appropriately after SOT. Strongyloides stercoralis is the one helminthic disease that is life-threatening after transplant. This review addresses modes of transmission, methods of diagnosis, and treatment of the most serious parasitic infections in SOT. The role of targeted pretransplant screening of the donor and recipient for parasitic diseases is also discussed.