Serotonin syndrome after concomitant treatment with linezolid and citalopram

Approaches to Reduce Use and Duration of Anti-MRSA Agents for Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs: A Review of Recent Literature

Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) have the potential to effectively deescalate unnecessary methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) coverage. This review summarizes literature published from 2014 through 2021 describing contemporary ASP methods and their resulting effectiveness at reducing anti-MRSA agent use (ie vancomycin, linezolid, daptomycin, ceftaroline, and clindamycin). This review of the literature examined the following strategies, which had reports of success in either decreasing the use or duration of anti-MRSA agents: prospective review and feedback, antibiotic timeouts, health system or department protocol changes, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and rapid testing of patient samples. Most of the current literature continue to support most ASP interventions including antibiotic timeouts, pathways, and molecular testing including MRSA nasal PCRs and rapid diagnostic testing can be successful at reducing unnecessary anti-MRSA use.

Linezolid-associated serotonin toxicity: a systematic review

PURPOSE

This systematic review aims to evaluate the existing evidence associating linezolid to serotonin toxicity when used as monotherapy or when co-administered with other serotonergic agents.

METHODS

A systematic literature search using PubMed (till March 2023), IDWeek meetings (2003-2023), the European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Annual Meetings (2001-2023), and the American College of Clinical Pharmacy (1999-2023) identified studies and abstracts related to linezolid and serotonin toxicity.

RESULTS

A total of 84 studies were included. The data collected in retrospective/observational studies compared the incidence of serotonin toxicity with linezolid monotherapy at 0.0050% and linezolid combination therapy at 0.0134%. All cases which discontinued linezolid and serotonergic agent/s at signs and symptoms of toxicity found symptom resolution; 75% of cases reported serotonin toxicity resolution within 24-48 h after discontinuation.

CONCLUSION

Linezolid therapy when optimal should not be deferred due to the risk of serotonin syndrome. The data collected reveals a low prevalence of serotonin toxicity in both linezolid monotherapy and linezolid concurrent with other serotonergic agents.

Fatal serotonin syndrome: a systematic review of 56 cases in the literature

INTRODUCTION

Serotonin syndrome (SS) is a drug-induced potentially life-threatening clinical condition. There is a paucity of data on the risk factors, clinical course, and complications associated with fatal SS.

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the epidemiological profile, clinical features, and risk factors associated with fatal SS through a systematic review.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of MEDLINE and Google Scholar for case reports, case series, or cohort studies of fatal SS.

RESULTS

Initial database search identified 2326 articles of which 46 (56 patients) were included in the final analysis. The mean age was 42.3 years (range 18-87 years) with female predominance (57%). North America and Europe constitute 80% of the reported fatal SS. The symptoms evolved very rapidly, within 24 h after the administration of serotonergic drugs in 59% of the cases. Fever (61%) was the most common symptom, followed by seizure (36%) and tremors (30%). The mean temperature in the reported cases (25 patients) was 41.6 ± 1.3 °C (range 38.3-43.5 °C). SS was reported to occur with the maintenance dosage of serotonergic agents, after initiation of the drug for the first time, and addition of the drugs for the development of another unrelated illness. Creatine kinase (CK) activities were elevated (>3 times of the upper limit of normal) in eighteen patients, and it was very high (>25,000 IU/L) in four patients. Presence of high grade fever, seizures, and high CK activities may be associated with severe SS. Nine patients (16%) received 5-HT2A antagonists as a therapy. About 50% of patients died within 24 h of the onset of symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

While fatal SS is rare, frequently observed features include hyperthermia, seizures, and high CK activities. Cyproheptadine use appears infrequent for these patients.

Linezolid-induced serotonin syndrome

Linezolid is an oxazolidinone antibiotic, which is a weak, reversible, nonselective monoamine oxidase A and B inhibitor; is known to increase serotonin levels, and has been implicated in the development of serotonin syndrome (SS). There is limited literature on the development of SS with linezolid, when used alone. In this report, we present the case of a 70-year-old female who developed features of SS while being treated with linezolid 600 mg twice daily for pneumonia. The SS in her case was managed with stoppage of linezolid, administration of cyproheptadine, and supportive measures.

Serotonin Syndrome and the Anaesthetist

Serotonin syndrome results from excessive activation of serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine; 5-HT) receptors in the nervous system, on the surface of platelets, and on the vascular endothelium. The clinical manifestations are a triad of altered conscious state, autonomic dysfunction, and neuromuscular excitability. Clinical diagnostic criteria remain poorly defined and unvalidated, and there are no available investigations to confirm the diagnosis. The syndrome is caused by the administration of one or more drugs possessing serotonergic activity. Severe forms of the syndrome usually result from overdose, but can be induced by monotherapy. The exact incidence of serotonin syndrome remains unknown, but is likely to be increasing due to increased prescription of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor anti-depressants and tramadol, as well as recreational use of amphetamine-like substances. Serotonin syndrome may complicate the administration of drugs frequently used in anaesthetic practice, including pethidine and tramadol. Although the majority of cases improve with symptomatic and supportive care, severe cases need intensive care and frequently require mechanical ventilation. Neuromuscular excitability is likely to be the cause of rhabdomyolysis seen in severe cases and should be treated with benzodiazepines and muscle relaxants. Supportive therapies are required to treat hyperthermia and autonomic dysfunction. Cyproheptadine is the most commonly administered serotonergic antagonist, but is unavailable in parenteral form.

The risk factors of linezolid-induced lactic acidosis: A case report and review

BACKGROUND

In recent years, linezolid is increasingly used in multidrug-resistant bacteria therapy. At the same time, linezolid-induced lactic acidosis has been continually reported as a serious side effect. Notably, to our knowledge, there are limited available literatures that evaluate risk factors for linezolid-induced lactic acidosis, and there is no highly reliable study on the relationship between linezolid-induced lactic acidosis and age or gender. However, clinicians need relevant information to advice on the use of linezolid. Therefore, we report on a case of life-threatening lactic acidosis after 3 doses of linezolid exposure and evaluate the risk factors of linezolid-induced lactic acidosis.

METHODS

Cases of linezolid-induced lactic acidosis reported in PubMed were searched. Several characteristics and data of case numbers and deaths were extracted for analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 35 articles including 47 cases were included in this study. Twelve patients (25.5%) died due to linezolid-induced lactic acidosis. At the cut-offs of 7, 14, and 28 days, the mortalities were 27.3%, 20%, and 27.3%. No statistically significant difference was observed according to age and gender. However, the proportion (27.7% and 29.8%) and mortality (30.8% and 35.7%) of male patients were much higher than females in both ≥65 and <65 years old groups (proportion: 15.2% and 23.9%; mortality: 14.3% and 18.2%).

CONCLUSION

The mortality of linezolid-induced lactic acidosis was relatively high. The duration of linezolid use and age might not be risk factors. Gender (specifically, male) might be related to the mortality of linezolid-induced lactic acidosis.

Linezolid-induced lactic acidosis: the thin line between bacterial and mitochondrial ribosomes

INTRODUCTION

Linezolid inhibits bacterial growth by targeting bacterial ribosomes and by interfering with bacterial protein synthesis. Lactic acidosis is a rare, but potentially lethal, side effect of linezolid. Areas covered: The pathogenesis of linezolid-induced lactic acidosis is reviewed with special emphasis on aspects relevant to the recognition, prevention and treatment of the syndrome. Expert opinion: Linezolid-induced lactic acidosis reflects the untoward interaction between the drug and mitochondrial ribosomes. The inhibition of mitochondrial protein synthesis diminishes the respiratory chain enzyme content and thus limits aerobic energy production. As a result, anaerobic glycolysis and lactate generation accelerate independently from tissue hypoxia. In the absence of any confirmatory test, linezolid-induced lactic acidosis should be suspected only after exclusion of other, more common, causes of lactic acidosis such as hypoxemia, anemia or low cardiac output. Normal-to-high whole-body oxygen delivery, high venous oxygen saturation and lack of response to interventions that effectively increase tissue oxygen provision all suggest a primary defect in oxygen use at the mitochondrial level. During prolonged therapy with linezolid, blood drug and lactate levels should be regularly monitored. The current standard-of-care treatment of linezolid-induced lactic acidosis consists of drug withdrawal to reverse mitochondrial intoxication and intercurrent life support.

Therapy of Multidrug-Resistant and Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis

The global epidemic of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains resistant to at least isoniazid and rifampin was recently reported as larger than previously estimated, with at least 580,000 new cases reported in 2015. Extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (XDR-TB), MDR-TB with additional resistance to a second-line fluoroquinolone and injectable, continues to account for nearly 10% of MDR cases globally. Cases in India, China, and the Russian Federation account for >45% of the cases of MDR-TB. Molecular testing helps identify MDR more quickly, and treatment options have expanded across the globe. Despite this, only 20% are in treatment, and treatment is challenging due to the toxicity of medications and the long duration. In 2016 the World Health Organization updated guidelines for the treatment of MDR-TB. A new short-course regimen is an option for those who qualify. Five effective drugs, including pyrazinamide (PZA) when possible, are recommended during the initial treatment phase and four drugs thereafter. Revised drug classifications include the use of linezolid and clofazimine as key second-line drugs and the option to use bedaquiline and delamanid to complete a five-drug regimen when needed due to poor medication tolerance or extensive resistance. Despite multiple drugs and long-duration treatment regimens, the outcomes for MDR and especially XDR-TB are much worse than for drug-susceptible disease. Better management of toxicity, prevention of transmission, and identification and appropriate management of infected contacts are important challenges for the future.

Linezolid-Associated Serotonin Syndrome After Concomitant Treatment With Citalopram and Mirtazepine in a Critically Ill Bone Marrow Transplant Recipient

Linezolid was initially discovered as an antidepressant because of its effect on blocking intracellular metabolism of serotonin, norepinephrine, and other biogenic amines. As time passed, it was realized that linezolid possessed antibacterial activity, and linezolid has been developed and marketed as such. In medicine we are quick to categorize drugs into specific classes as a mechanism to recall indication and use. By classifying linezolid as an antibacterial, it is common to forget about its antidepressant roots. A case report involving linezolid with citalopram and mirtazepine in the precipitation of serotonin syndrome in a critically ill bone marrow transplant patient is described in this article.

Drug-Induced Metabolic Acidosis

Metabolic acidosis could emerge from diseases disrupting acid-base equilibrium or from drugs that induce similar derangements. Occurrences are usually accompanied by comorbid conditions of drug-induced metabolic acidosis, and clinical outcomes may range from mild to fatal. It is imperative that clinicians not only are fully aware of the list of drugs that may lead to metabolic acidosis but also understand the underlying pathogenic mechanisms. In this review, we categorized drug-induced metabolic acidosis in terms of pathophysiological mechanisms, as well as individual drugs’ characteristics.

Role of linezolid in the treatment of complicated skin and soft tissue infections

Staphylococcus aureus is the most common cause of complicated skin and soft tissue infections (cSSTIs). Antibiotic choices for these infections continue to evolve. History has seen penicillin progress to antistaphylococcal penicillins and cephalosporins, but these drugs are now giving way to drugs that are effective against methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). While vancomycin has been the gold standard to treat MRSA infections, newer therapeutic options have been developed over the last 5 years. These include quinupristin-dalfopristin, daptomycin, tigecycline and linezolid, which is the focus for this review. Linezolid is efficacious in the treatment of cSSTIs (including diabetic foot infections) caused by Gram-positive organisms (including MRSA), with a well-defined safety profile and straightforward dosing. It is also approved for nosocomial pneumonia, community-acquired pneumonia and uncomplicated skin and skin structure infections. Linezolid has an oral and parenteral formulation, which are equivalent. The oral formulation has the potential to offer economic benefits as compared with other therapies. Currently, there are only a few new antibiotics in development with MRSA activity. The proper use of all antibiotics, including these newer agents, is increasingly important if we are to slow the evolution of microbial resistance.

A review of linezolid: the first oxazolidinone antibiotic

Resistance of Gram-positive bacterial pathogens, such as Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecium, to existing antibiotics continues to increase, and new antibiotics with activity against these pathogens are in demand. Linezolid (Zyvox, Pharmacia and Upjohn) is the first agent of a new class of antibiotics called the oxazolidinones. Linezolid possesses excellent microbial activity against a wide variety of Gram-positive pathogens including those resistant to methicillin and vancomycin (Vancocin, Eli Lilly). Linezolid is available for intravenous and oral administration and possesses excellent bioavailability. It exhibits good penetration into pulmonary, as well as skin and related structure tissues, and does not require dosage adjustment in hepatic or renal dysfunction. Linezolid is generally well-tolerated, with the predominant adverse effect manifesting as a duration dependent, reversible thrombocytopenia. Linezolid possesses monoamine oxidase inhibitor activity and caution is warranted with coadministration of adrenergic or seritonergic medications. Clinical trials conducted with linezolid in skin and structure infections, lower respiratory tract infections and vancomycin-resistant enterococcal infections demonstrate that linezolid is an effective therapy. Recent data suggest that linezolid may be superior to vancomycin for the treatment of infections caused by methicillin-resistant S. aureus. Linezolid is an excellent and promising new antibiotic for the treatment of resistant Gram-positive pathogens.

Comparative evaluation of serotonin toxicity among veterans affairs patients receiving linezolid and vancomycin

Despite the theoretical risk of serotonin toxicity (ST) with linezolid, "real-world" clinical evaluations of the risk of ST in patients receiving linezolid have been limited to case reports and noncomparator studies. An observational, matched-cohort study was conducted to evaluate the risk of ST among hospitalized patients who received linezolid or vancomycin at the Upstate New York Veterans Affairs Healthcare Network (Veterans Integrated Service Network 2 [VISN-2]). Matching criteria included VISN-2 hospital, hospital ward, prior hospital length of stay, age, and baseline platelet counts. The patients' electronic medical records were evaluated for symptoms consistent with ST and the Hunter serotonin toxicity criteria (HSTC) using an intensive, natural word search algorithm. The study included 251 matched pairs. Demographics and comorbidities were similar between groups. Over half of the study population received at least one concurrent medication with serotonergic activity. Receipt of agents with serotonergic activity was more pronounced in the vancomycin group, and the higher frequency was due to concomitant antihistamine and antiemetic use. Antidepressant use, including selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), was similar between groups. No patients in either group were found to meet the criteria using the word search algorithm for ST. Fewer linezolid patients than vancomycin patients met the HSTC overall (3.2% versus 8.8%) and when stratified by receipt of a concurrent serotonergic agent (4.3% versus 12.4%). Of the patients meeting the HSTC, most had past or present comorbidities that may have contributed to or overlapped the HSTC. This study of hospitalized patients revealed comparably low frequencies of adverse events potentially related to ST among patients who received linezolid or vancomycin.

A review of the interplay between tuberculosis and mental health

AIMS

Tuberculosis and mental illness share common risk factors including homelessness, HIV positive serology, alcohol/substance abuse and migrant status leading to frequent comorbidity. We sought to generate a comprehensive literature review that examines the complex relationship between tuberculosis and mental illness.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted in MedLine, Ovid and Psychinfo, with further examination of the references of these articles. In total 316 articles were identified. It was not possible to conduct a formal meta-analysis due to the absence of randomised controlled data.

RESULTS

Rates of mental illness of up to 70% have been identified in tuberculosis patients. Medications used in the treatment of common mental illnesses, such as depression, may have significant interactions with anti-tuberculosis agents, especially isoniazid and increasingly linezolid. Many medications used in the treatment of tuberculosis can have significant adverse psychiatric effects and some medications such as rifampicin may reduce the effective doses of anti-psychotics y their enzyme induction actions. Treatment with agents such as cycloserine has been associated with depression, and there have been reported cases of psychosis with most anti-tuberculous agents. Mental illness and substance abuse may also affect compliance with treatment, with attendant public health concerns.

CONCLUSIONS

As a result of the common co-morbidity of mental illness and tuberculosis, it is probable that physicians will encounter previously undiagnosed mental illness among patients with tuberculosis. Similarly, psychiatrists are likely to meet tuberculosis among their patients. It is important that both psychiatrists and physicians are aware of the potential for interactions between the drugs used to treat tuberculosis and psychiatric conditions.

Serotonergic and Adrenergic Drug Interactions Associated with Linezolid: A Critical Review and Practical Management Approach

OBJECTIVE

To describe the evidence for serotonergic and adrenergic drug interactions with linezolid and discuss clinical management strategies.

DATA SOURCES

A literature search of PubMed (1947–November 2012), MEDLINE (1946–November 2012), EMBASE (1974–November 2012), and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1970–November 2012) was conducted using the terms linezolid, drug interaction, serotonin syndrome, serotonin toxicity, sympathomimetic, serotonergic agents, and adrenergic agents. Citations of retrieved articles were also reviewed.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

English-language articles describing coadministration of serotonergic or adrenergic agents with linezolid to humans were included. Studies published only in abstract form were excluded.

DATA SYNTHESIS

One prospective study, 6 retrospective studies, and 24 case reports were identified describing a serotonergic or adrenergic drug interaction. Incidence of serotonin syndrome in patients on linezolid and serotonergic agents ranged between 0.24% and 4%. Serotonergic agents determined to have probable (according to the Horn Drug Interaction Probability Scale) linezolid interactions in case reports included meperidine, citalopram, escitalopram, fluoxetine, paroxetine, sertraline, duloxetine, and venlafaxine. Serotonergic agent dose and duration of coadministration with linezolid did not appear to influence the occurrence of serotonin syndrome. Adrenergic medication coadministration was associated with a possible drug interaction as determined by the Horn Drug Interaction Probability Scale but did not appear to result in clinically significant drug interactions with linezolid.

CONCLUSIONS

Linezolid-associated serotonergic drug interactions occur more commonly than adrenergic interactions. Serotonergic interactions considered probable according to the Horn Drug Interaction Probability Scale do not appear to correlate with drug dosage; time of onset ranges from <1 to 20 days, and effect resolves in <1 to 5 days after discontinuation of offending agents. If coadministration of linezolid and a serotonergic agent cannot be avoided, clinicians should be aware of the symptoms and management of serotonergic toxicity; close monitoring is recommended and additional serotonergic agents should not be used. While adrenergic drug interactions with linezolid are less common in clinical practice, monitoring for signs of hypertension remains important.

Clinical relevance of linezolid-associated serotonin toxicity

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate and review the literature surrounding serotonin toxicity in patients receiving linezolid and determine the clinical relevance of this reaction.

DATA SOURCES

Literature was accessed via MEDLINE/PubMed and Google Scholar (both through February 2013) using the search terms linezolid, serotonin syndrome, serotonin toxicity, and adverse reaction.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Relevant case reports, retrospective studies, surveys, and review articles were included. Bibliographies of all relevant articles were reviewed for additional sources.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Linezolid exhibits mild, nonselective inhibition of monoamine oxidase and has been associated with serotonin toxicity when used in combination with other serotonergic agents. Based on published reports, the incidence of linezolid-associated serotonin toxicity is between 0.54% and 18.2%. Our review identified 32 documented cases, including 3 fatalities. Most cases occurred in patients concurrently receiving selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Receipt of multiple agents with serotonergic activity seems to increase the risk of serotonin toxicity. Both onset and resolution of symptoms varied from hours to days.

CONCLUSIONS

Current Food and Drug Administration recommendations to avoid the use of linezolid in patients receiving select serotonergic agents highlight the need to carefully balance the risk/benefit ratio in this situation. Although linezolid has been available for 12 years, reports of serotonin toxicity with this agent are uncommon. While clinicians should be aware of this potentially severe interaction and closely monitor patients who are receiving linezolid in combination with serotonergic agents, our findings show that linezolid is not contraindicated in this situation.

Linezolid is associated with serotonin syndrome in a patient receiving amitriptyline, and fentanyl: a case report and review of the literature

We report a unique case of an adverse interaction between the oxazolidinone antibiotic linezolid, the tricyclic antidepressant amitriptyline and the opioid analgesic fentanyl in a 68-year-old woman with advanced ischemic peripheral arterial disease and sepsis, under empirical antibiotic treatment. We also summarize the current relevant literature as identified via PubMed, EMBASE, and PsycINFO as well as reference sections of selected articles.

Linezolid interaction with serotonin reuptake inhibitors: report of two cases and incidence assessment

BACKGROUND

Prompted by the advent of potentially life-threatening neuromuscular symptoms following initiation of linezolid therapy in two patients receiving treatment with a serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressant, an evaluation was conducted to determine the incidence and characteristics of symptomatic serotonin toxicity among hospitalized patients receiving combined treatment with these medications.

METHODS

Patients admitted between January 1, 2006 and August 30, 2008 who received linezolid concurrently with citalopram or escitalopram were identified and their medical records were examined. Patients were judged to have serotonin toxicity if their records contained documentation of clinical evidence adequate to fulfill requisites of the Hunter Serotonin Toxicity Criteria. Severity of serotonin-related symptoms was graded according to previously established criteria.

RESULTS

During the period of observation, 24 patients received concurrent treatment with linezolid and citalopram or escitalopram. Of these, one patient (4%) treated with citalopram met evidentiary requirements for diagnosis of serotonin toxicity. The severity of symptoms in this patient was graded as mild. No evidence of serious harm related to a possible drug interaction was identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Severe symptoms associated with serotonin toxicity were shown to be uncommon in patients receiving linezolid and selected serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Nonetheless, serious interaction-related toxicity has been observed at our institution and reported in detail by others. Accordingly, concurrent use of these medications is categorized as contraindicated. Alternative antimicrobial therapy should be instituted in most cases. If no suitable alternative is available, recipient patients should be hospitalized for expectant observation and rigorous monitoring.

Tolerability of prolonged linezolid therapy in bone and joint infection: protective effect of rifampicin on the occurrence of anaemia?

BACKGROUND

Linezolid therapy has shown high rates of clinical success in patients with osteomyelitis and prosthetic joint infections caused by Gram-positive cocci. Recent studies have demonstrated that linezolid/rifampicin combination therapy prevents the emergence of rifampicin-resistant mutations in vitro. However, linezolid/rifampicin combination-related haematological and neurological toxicities have not been evaluated.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the tolerability of prolonged linezolid/rifampicin combination therapy compared with other linezolid-containing regimens in patients with bone and joint infections.

METHODS

We reviewed the medical records of 94 patients who had received linezolid for >4 weeks after bone and joint infections. Anaemia was defined as a ≥2 g/dL reduction in haemoglobin, leucopenia as a total leucocyte count <4 × 10(9)/L, and thrombocytopenia as a reduction in platelet count to <75% of baseline.

RESULTS

Anaemia was less frequent among patients on linezolid/rifampicin combination therapy than among patients on linezolid alone or in combination with other drugs (9.3%, 44% and 52%, respectively; P<0.01). In multivariate analysis, age and treatment group were independently associated with anaemia. Thrombocytopenia was reported in 44% of patients on linezolid/rifampicin combination therapy, in 48% of patients on linezolid alone and in 57.7% of patients on other linezolid-containing regimens. Age was the only variable associated with thrombocytopenia (P=0.019) in univariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Linezolid/rifampicin combination therapy was associated with a significantly reduced incidence of anaemia among patients with bone and joint infections, but it did not have an effect on thrombocytopenia and peripheral neuropathy rates. Linezolid/rifampicin combination therapy was not associated with poor clinical outcomes.

Lactic acidosis: recognition, kinetics, and associated prognosis

Lactic acidosis is a common condition encountered by critical care providers. Elevated lactate and decreased lactate clearance are important for prognostication. Not all lactate in the intensive care unit is due to tissue hypoxia or ischemia and other sources should be evaluated. Lactate, in and of itself, is unlikely to be harmful and is a preferred fuel for many cells. Treatment of lactic acidosis continues to be aimed the underlying source.

Linezolid: a review of safety and tolerability

Linezolid has demonstrated activity against antibiotic-susceptible and antibiotic-resistant aerobic Gram-positive cocci. The availability of intravenous and oral formulations, with near 100% bioavailability of the latter, is hoped to facilitate the management of multiply drug-resistant Gram-positive infections. Linezolid was approved for clinical use in the United States in April 2000 and has subsequently been approved in other countries for the management of community-acquired and nosocomial pneumonia, complicated and uncomplicated skin and soft-tissue infections, and infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant enterococci, including cases with concurrent bacteremia. Additional studies have demonstrated potential use in febrile cancer patients with neutropenia, and case reports have documented some efficacy in the management of infective endocarditis, tuberculosis, nocardiosis, and in anaerobic infections. Given the potential for significantly increased use of linezolid, a thorough review and update of its tolerability and safety profile is warranted.

Linezolid use associated with lactic acidosis

Linezolid is a new synthetic antibiotic with a broad spectrum of activity against virtually all important Gram-positive infections. Lactic acidosis is a well known side-effect of metformin and nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors. We report a case in which lactic acidosis developed as an adverse effect of linezolid treatment.

Serotonin toxicity as a consequence of linezolid use in revision hip arthroplasty

Linezolid is the first in a new group of antibiotics called oxazolidinones. As a potent antimicrobial, it has activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus, penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae, and macrolide-resistant streptococci. There are several documented case reports of serotonin toxicity when used with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. The symptoms of serotonin syndrome are alteration of mental state, autonomic dysfunction, and neuromuscular disorders. This article presents a case of an interaction of the serotonin reuptake inhibitor venlafaxine and linezolid and the possible diagnostic problems that can occur. A 58-year-old woman presented with signs of systemic infection. Her medical history included bladder resection for transitional cell carcinoma, bilateral total hip arthroplasty (THA), and depression, for which she was on venlafaxine. Serological and imaging investigations revealed MRSA infection of the bilateral THA. The patient was started on vancomycin and rifampicin intravenously. As intravenous access was becoming problematic and long-term antibiotics were needed, treatment was changed to oral linezolid and oral rifampicin. Four days after the commencement of linezolid, the patient was acutely disorientated with generalized cerebellar signs and no autonomic dysfunction. A computed tomography scan of the head and lumbar puncture revealed no abnormal findings. A diagnosis of serotonin toxicity was made. The patient recovered when linezolid and venlafaxine were discontinued and supportive measures were provided. Linezolid is a popular choice of antibiotic, especially for the treatment of orthopedic-related MRSA infections. Patients who commonly require linezolid as an antimicrobial are those with complex infections where other antibiotic treatment has failed. It is therefore important to be vigilant with linezolid use. Physicians should be aware of the nonspecific presentation of serotonin symptoms and the treatment.

Linezolid for the treatment of drug-resistant infections

Multidrug-resistant pathogens have become increasingly common in contemporary healthcare. Specific to Gram-positive pathogens, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is of particular concern, as it has been associated with increased hospital length of stay, higher healthcare expenditures and poorer outcomes. To date, linezolid is the first and only oxazolidinone approved by the US FDA for the treatment of infections caused by Gram-positive pathogens, including MRSA. This article will serve as a comprehensive review of linezolid, including an overview of the current market and its in vitro activity, with an in-depth review of its pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile. Emphasis will be placed on clinical data for the drug, both on- and off-label. The article will conclude with a brief overview of linezolid's pharmacoeconomic implications and safety profile, followed by a commentary and 5-year prospective analysis remarking on the future of the antimicrobial field as it relates to MRSA.

Serotonergic antidepressants and linezolid: a retrospective chart review and presentation of cases

OBJECTIVE

To report the results from a retrospective chart review looking at the combination of linezolid and serotonergic antidepressants and to report two cases of serotonin syndrome which were identified at our hospital.

CASE SUMMARY

During the retrospective chart review one case of serotonin syndrome was identified. A 65-year-old female was receiving escitalopram for the treatment of depression prior to admission. Linezolid therapy was initiated on admission and two days later the patient had a tonic-clonic seizure. Escitalopram was discontinued and the patient did not have any further seizure activity. In a second case, a 37-year-old male was receiving citalopram during hospitalization and was started on concomitant linezolid. The patient had myoclonus and was observed to be tremulous throughout therapy with linezolid. Ten days after discontinuation of linezolid the patient continued to have symptoms until the withdrawal of citalopram. The Naranjo probability scale scores the first case as possibly related and the second case as probably related to the combination.

DISCUSSION

It has been well documented in the literature that the combination of linezolid and serotonergic antidepressants may cause serotonin syndrome. In this retrospective chart review only one patient of 53 (1.8%) had symptoms highly suggestive of serotonin syndrome. A second patient continued to have symptoms of serotonin syndrome even after withdrawal of linezolid.

CONCLUSIONS

This retrospective review and subsequent case reports confirm the rare, but serious, potential of serotonin syndrome associated with the combination of linezolid and serotonergic antidepressants.

Life-threatening serotonin toxicity due to a citalopram-fluconazole drug interaction: case reports and discussion

OBJECTIVE

To discuss two cases of life-threatening serotonin toxicity due to a drug interaction between citalopram and fluconazole and to review the pertinent literature.

METHODS

A Medline search without date limitation was conducted using the terms serotonin syndrome, serotonin toxicity, fluconazole and citalopram.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Fluconazole inhibits CYP2C19. Citalopram is a substrate for 2C19 and inhibition of its metabolism may result in serotonin toxicity. Serotonin toxicity in oncology patients may not present with the classic constellation of signs typically described in the literature. Delirium may be the only presenting feature. Current level of evidence for treatment of serotonin toxicity is level 4 or 5 (case series and expert opinion). Nevertheless, there is a strong theoretical basis for treating serotonin toxicity in medical patients with a 5H(2A) blocker such as cyproheptadine.

CONCLUSIONS

Consultation-liaison psychiatrists and oncologists should be aware of this preventable and underrecognized interaction. Citalopram should be stopped or substituted prior to the concurrent administration of fluconazole, and in the event of toxicity, treatment with cyproheptadine has a favorable risk-benefit ratio despite a lack of randomized controlled data to support its use.

Linezolid-associated peripheral and optic neuropathy, lactic acidosis, and serotonin syndrome

Linezolid is an oxazolidinone antibacterial agent indicated for serious gram-positive infections. Only minor adverse effects were seen in phase III trials. However, more serious adverse effects were reported after commercial release, including cases of lactic acidosis, peripheral and optic neuropathy, and serotonin syndrome. Peripheral and optic neuropathy was usually seen after several months of linezolid therapy (median 5 mo), lactic acidosis after several weeks (median 6 wks), and serotonin syndrome after several days (median 4 days). Death occurred in two of seven reported cases of lactic acidosis, and three of 15 reported cases of serotonin syndrome. Improvement or complete recovery occurred in all cases of optic neuropathy, whereas complete recovery failed to occur in any patient with peripheral neuropathy. Linezolid should be discontinued immediately in patients experiencing these adverse effects. Patients receiving linezolid for more than 28 days should be monitored for signs of peripheral and optic neuropathy.

New antimicrobial agents as therapy for resistant gram-positive cocci

Vancomycin- and methicillin-resistant gram-positive cocci have emerged as an increasingly problematic cause of hospital-acquired infections. We conducted a literature review of newer antibiotics with activity against vancomycin-resistant and methicillin-resistant gram-positive cocci. Quinupristin/dalfopristin, linezolid, daptomycin, and tigecycline have in vitro activity for methicillin-resistant staphylococci and are superior to vancomycin for vancomycin-resistant isolates. Dalbavancin, telavancin, and oritavancin are new glycopeptides that have superior pharmacodynamic properties compared to vancomycin. We review the antibacterial spectrum, clinical indications and contraindications, pharmacologic properties, and adverse events associated with each of these agents. Daptomycin has rapid bactericidal activity for Staphylococcus aureus and is approved for use in bacteremia and right-sided endocarditis. Linezolid is comparable to vancomycin in patients with methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) pneumonia and has pharmacoeconomic advantages given its oral formulation. Quinupristin/dalfopristin is the drug of choice for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium infections but has no activity against Enterococcus faecalis. Tigecycline has activity against both enterococcus species and MRSA; it is also active against Enterobacteriaceae and anaerobes which allows for use in intra-abdominal and diabetic foot infections. A review of numerous in vitro and animal model studies shows that interaction between these newer agents and other antistaphylococcal agents for S. aureus are usually indifferent (additive).

Lactic Acidosis after Treatment with Linezolid

Linezolid is currently indicated to treat vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium infections, nosocomial pneumonia caused by Staphylococcus aureus or Streptococcus pneumoniae, complicated and uncomplicated skin and skin structure infections, and community-acquired pneumonia. We report a case of linezolid-induced lactic acidosis during treatment of vancomycin-resistant enterococcal bacteremia after mitral valve replacement and permanent pacemaker implantation. We also review the current literature describing other cases of linezolid-associated hyperlactatemia.

Serotonin syndrome associated with the use of escitalopram

Escitalopram is the newest selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) available for use in the United States. It has been approved for the treatment of major depression and generalized anxiety disorder. It is the S-enantiomer of the SSRI citalopram and is highly serotonin specific as it has minimal effect on the reuptake of dopamine or norepinephrine. It is also a well-tolerated medication, with a side-effect profile comparable to the other SSRIs. While a number of side effects have been seen during escitalopram therapy, such as insomnia, nausea, and increased sweating, there are no reported cases of serotonin syndrome associated with escitalopram therapy to date. We present the case of a 24-year-old woman who developed serotonin syndrome after an increase in her escitalopram to 30 mg/day. We will review the diagnostic criteria of serotonin syndrome and the clinical scenarios in which serotonin syndrome can develop. We will also discuss the proposed treatments and role that polypharmacology may play in the development of this clinical entity.

Risk of serotonin syndrome with concomitant administration of linezolid and serotonin agonists

Linezolid, an antimicrobial used to treat resistant gram-positive bacteria, can inhibit monoamine oxidase, an enzyme that metabolizes serotonin and other biogenic amines. Inhibition of this enzyme can predispose patients who are concomitantly taking serotonin agonists to serotonin syndrome. Because of the potential of linezolid to inhibit monoamine oxidase, premarketing studies were conducted with drugs such as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. No cases of serotonin syndrome were recorded. After linezolid was released to the United States market, several case reports of serotonin syndrome emerged. A literature search revealed 13 cases of serotonin syndrome occurring with the concomitant use of linezolid and drugs possessing serotonergic properties. To direct clinical management of this potential drug interaction, we reviewed reports of serotonin syndrome to determine relevant drug interactions with linezolid and serotonergic drugs and to characterize similarities and differences in the reported cases. Clinicians should obtain complete drug histories to identify patients at risk, strictly monitor drug therapy including concomitant drugs, and receive education about this potential drug interaction and the symptoms of serotonin syndrome.

Role of linezolid in the treatment of orthopedic infections

Gram-positive organisms, particularly staphylococci and streptococci, are responsible for the majority of bone and joint infections. The rising incidence of antimicrobial resistance among Staphylococcus aureus, coagulase-negative staphylococci and enterococci means that novel antibiotics with unique mechanisms of antimicrobial activity are needed, especially in orthopedic infections. Linezolid is the first of the oxazolidinones, a new class of antibacterial agents particularly effective against Gram-positive infections including methicillin- and vancomycin-resistant strains. With an excellent oral bioavailability and acceptable safety profile, linezolid offers a valuable alternative to more traditional therapies, such as glycopeptides. No large randomized trials have been published on its use in patients with orthopedic infections, but early results are encouraging. Reported adverse events, especially bone marrow suppression and optic neuropathy seen with prolonged administration, mean that treatment of such patients must be undertaken with careful follow-up of laboratory tests. Until now, little resistance has been reported.

[Clinically significant toxicity and tolerance of the main antibiotics used in lower respiratory tract infections]

The purpose of this article was not to review all reported adverse reactions of antibiotics used in the treatment of lower respiratory tract infections but rather to focus either on those which might have an impact on observance, efficacy, and resistance, or on rare but life-threatening adverse effects such as torsade de pointe. The latter are mostly predictable and prescribers should adhere to precautions and contraindications. For new antibiotics, the number of patients enrolled in phase I to III clinical trials is far to small to detect such rare adverse effects and large post registration tolerance surveys are mandatory. ss-lactams are well tolerated. The risk of anaphylactic reaction is magnified by patient reports and can be reduced by skin testing. Macrolides are well tolerated as well. The risk of cardiac toxicity should be reduced by assessing individual susceptibility and avoiding drug interactions. The tolerance to telithromycin, a new ketolide, is similar to that of macrolides. Serious toxic reactions such as convulsions, tendon rupture, torsade de pointe, and hypoglycemia are associated with the use of fluoroquinolones. Most of these adverse reactions can be often circumvented by avoiding exposure patients at risk. Quinupristin/dalfopristin can induce arthralgia and myalgia and the major adverse effects of linezolid are IMAO like reactions, reversible myelosuppression, and peripheral neuropathy. Most of the adverse antibiotic reactions are reported when precautions of use in susceptible patients are not taken into account. When they are, the safety/risk ratio is good.