When to begin highly active antiretroviral therapy? Evidence supporting initiation of therapy at CD4+ lymphocyte counts <350 cells/microL

Impact of initiation of combination antiretroviral therapy according to the WHO recommendations on the survival of HIV-positive patients in Taiwan

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Early initiation of antiretroviral therapy (ART) reduces the risks for serious infections and mortality. We aimed to assess the outcomes of initiating ART among HIV-positive Taiwanese according to the CD4 cut-off values by the WHO recommendations.

METHODS

We reviewed medical records of patients with newly diagnosed HIV infection between 2004 and 2015 and 3 groups of patients were defined according to the timing of ART initiation based on CD4 count recommended by WHO: Group 1 between 2004 and 2009; Group 2 between 2010 and 2012; and Group 3 between 2013 and 2015. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. All patients were followed until 2 years after the last patient was included in each group.

RESULTS

Of 2022 patients included, the mortality rate was 18.28, 14.01, and 9.10 deaths per 1000 person-years of follow-up (PYFU) in Groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. In multivariable Cox regression analysis, factors associated with mortality were age (per 1-year increase, adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 1.06; 95% CI, 1.05-1.08), presence of AIDS-defining disease at HIV diagnosis (AHR, 4.81; 95% CI, 2.99-7.74), solid-organ malignancy (AHR, 3.10; 95% CI, 1.86-5.18), and initiation of ART (AHR, 0.09; 95% CI, 0.05-0.16). By competing risk regression model for non-AIDS-related death, the AHR for Group 3 versus Group 1 was 0.27 (95% CI, 0.09-0.80).

CONCLUSIONS

While continued efforts are needed to improve early diagnosis and linkage to care, initiation of cART improved survival among HIV-positive patients in Taiwan according to the increasing CD4 cut-off values that were recommended by the WHO.

A systematic review and cost-effectiveness analyses of the new World Health Organization guidelines for the treatment of HIV-positive adults in India

Background

The World Health Organization (WHO) in 2013 has revised its guidelines on antiretroviral therapy (ART) treatment for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive adults and further updated it in 2016. Based on the WHO recommendations, in May 2017, National AIDS Control Organisation, India recommended initiation of ART treatment for all people living with HIV, regardless of CD4 count, clinical stage, age, or population. This systematic review aims to assess the clinical effectiveness and cost implication of the new guidelines for India.

Methods

A systematic and comprehensive literature search on PubMed, OvidSP, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar was carried out. Studies reporting either acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) or mortality or both as outcome variables were selected. A meta-analysis of the available studies was carried out. The risk ratio was calculated to assess the reduction in AIDS or mortality or both. Cost-effectiveness analysis using health technology principles evaluating the lives saved in terms of incremental cost-effectiveness ratio and cost per quality-adjusted life years gained was carried out.

Results

Nine eligible studies were included for the meta-analysis. For India, the pooled relative risk of AIDS or mortality or both being 0.84 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76-0.92) and 0.78 (95% CI, 0.68-0.89) for ART initiation at CD4 count of ≤350 vs CD4 count of ≤500 and at CD4 count of ≤500 vs CD4 count > 500 cells/mm³, respectively. The incremental cost for per additional life saved is US$ 2592 and US$ 2357 for ART initiation at ≤500 and > 500 CD4 count, respectively.

Conclusion

The adoption of the new WHO guidelines is beneficial with substantial reduction in AIDS or mortality or both. This study suggests that adopting new WHO guidelines is cost-effective for India.

Pretransplant CD4 Count Influences Immune Reconstitution and Risk of Infectious Complications in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected Kidney Allograft Recipients

In current practice, human immunodeficiency virus-infected (HIV(+) ) candidates with CD4 >200 cells/mm(3) are eligible for kidney transplantation; however, the optimal pretransplant CD4 count above this threshold remains to be defined. We evaluated clinical outcomes in patients with baseline CD4 >350 and <350 cells/mm(3) among 38 anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG)-treated HIV-negative to HIV(+) kidney transplants performed at our center between 2006 and 2013. Median follow-up was 2.6 years. Rates of acute rejection and patient and graft survival were not different between groups. Occurrence of severe CD4 lymphopenia (<200 cells/mm(3) ), however, was more common among patients with a baseline CD4 count 200-349 cells/mm(3) compared with those transplanted at higher counts (75% vs. 30% at 4 weeks [p = 0.04] and 71% vs. 5% at 52 weeks [p = 0.001], respectively, after transplant). After adjusting for age, baseline CD4 count of 200-349 cells/mm(3) was an independent predictor of severe CD4 lymphopenia at 4 weeks (relative risk [RR] 2.6; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.3-5.1) and 52 weeks (RR 14.3; 95% CI 2-100.4) after transplant. Patients with CD4 <200 cells/mm(3) at 4 weeks had higher probability of serious infections during first 6 months after transplant (19% vs. 50%; log-rank p = 0.05). These findings suggest that ATG must be used with caution in HIV(+) kidney allograft recipients with a pretransplant CD4 count <350 cells/mm(3) .

Tryptophan depletion in context of the inflammatory and general nutritional status of a low-income South African HIV-infected population

BACKGROUND

The essential amino acid tryptophan cannot be synthesised in the body and must be acquired through dietary intake. Oxidation of tryptophan, due to immune induction of the enzyme indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO), is considered to be the main cause of tryptophan depletion in HIV infection and AIDS. We examined plasma tryptophan levels in a low-income sub-Saharan HIV-infected population and compared it to that of developed countries. Tryptophan levels were further examined in context of the general nutritional and inflammatory status.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study included 105 HIV-positive patients recruited from the Kalafong Hospital in Pretoria, South Africa, and 60 HIV-negative controls.

RESULTS

Patient tryptophan levels were in general markedly lower than those reported for developed countries. In contrast to reports from developed countries that showed tryptophan levels on average to be 18.8 % lower than their control values, tryptophan levels in our study were 44.1 % lower than our controls (24.4 ± 4.1 vs. 43.6 ± 11.9 μmol/l; p < 0.001). Tryptophan levels correlated with both CD4 counts (r = 0.341; p = 0.004) and with pro-inflammatory activity as indicated by neopterin levels (r = -0.399; p = 0.0001). Nutritional indicators such as albumin and haemoglobin correlated positively with tryptophan and negatively with the pro-inflammatory indicators neopterin, interleukin 6 and C-reactive protein. The most probable causes of the lower tryptophan levels seen in our population are food insecurity and higher levels of inflammatory activity.

CONCLUSIONS

We contend that inflammation-induced tryptophan depletion forms part of a much wider effect of pro-inflammatory activity on the nutritional profile of HIV-infected patients.

CD4+ T cell counts in initiation of antiretroviral therapy in HIV infected asymptomatic individuals; controversies and inconsistencies

The primary goal when devising strategies to define the start of therapy in HIV infected individuals is to avoid HIV disease progression and toxicity from antiretroviral therapy (ART). Intermediate goals includes, avoiding resistance by suppressing HIV replication, reducing transmission, limiting spread and diversity of HIV within the body and protecting the immune system from harm. The question of how early or late to start ART and achieve both primary and intermediate goals has dominated HIV research. The distinction between early and late treatment of HIV infection is currently a matter of CD4+ T cells count, a marker of immune status, rather than on viral load, a marker of virus replication. Discussions about respective benefits of early or delayed therapy, as well as the best CD4+ T cell threshold during the course of HIV infection at which ART is initiated remains inconclusive. Guidelines issued by various agencies, provide different initiation recommendations. This can be confusing for clinicians and policy-makers when determining the best time to initiate therapy. Optimizing ART initiation strategies are clearly complex and must be balanced between individual and broader public health needs. This review assesses available data that contributes to the debate on optimal time to initiate therapy in HIV-infected asymptomatic individuals. We also review reports on CD4+ T cell threshold to guide initiation of ART and finally discuss arguments for and against early or late initiation of ART.

Treatment outcomes and their determinants in HIV patients on Anti-retroviral Treatment Program in selected health facilities of Kembata and Hadiya zones, Southern Nations, Nationalities and Peoples Region, Ethiopia

Background

Ethiopia has been providing free Antiretroviral Treatment (ART) since 2005 for HIV/AIDS patients. ART improves survival time and quality of life of HIV patients but ART treatment outcomes might be affected by several factors. However, factors affecting treatment outcomes are poorly understood in Ethiopia. Hence, this study assesses treatment outcomes and its determinants for HIV patients on ART in selected health facilities of Kembata and Hadiya zones.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 730 adult HIV/AIDS patients who enrolled antiretroviral therapy from 2007 to 2011 in four selected health facilities of Kembata and Hadiya zones of Southern Ethiopia. Study subjects were sampled from the health facilities based on population proportion to size. Data was abstracted using data extraction format from medical records. Kaplan-Meier survival function was used to estimate survival probability. Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to identify factors associated with time to death.

Result

Median age of patients was 32.4 years with Inter Quartile Range (IQR) [15, 65]. The female to male ratio of the study participants’ was 1.4:1. Median CD4 count significantly increased during the last four consecutive years of follow up. A total of 92 (12.6 %) patients died, 106(14.5 %) were lost to follow-up, and 109(15 %) were transferred out. Sixty three (68 %) deaths occurred in the first 6 months of treatment. The median survival time was 25 months with IQR [9, 43]. After adjustment for confounders, WHO clinical stage IV [HR 2.42; 95 % CI, 1.19, 5.86], baseline CD4 lymphocyte counts of 201 cell/mm³ and 350 cell/mm³ [HR 0.20; 95 % CI; 0.09−0.43], poor regimen adherence [HR 2.70 95 % CI: 1.4096, 5.20], baseline hemoglobin level of 10gm/dl and above [HR 0.23; 95 % CI: 0.14, 0.37] and baseline functional status of bedridden [HR 3.40; 95 % CI: 1.61, 7.21] were associated with five year survival of HIV patients on ART.

Conclusion

All people living with HIV/AIDS should initiate ART as early as possible. Initiation of ART at the early stages of the disease, before deterioration of the functional status of the patients and before the reduction of CD4 counts and hemoglobin levels with an intensified health education on adherence to ART regimen is recommended.

A Comparative Systematic Review of the Optimal CD4 Cell Count Threshold for HIV Treatment Initiation

HIV infection is no longer characterized by high morbidity, rapid progression to AIDS, and death as when the infection was first identified. While anti-retroviral drugs have improved the outcome of AIDS patients, clinical research on the appropriate time to initiate therapy continues to evolve. Optimal therapy initiation would maximize the benefits of these drugs, while minimizing side effects and drug resistance. Recent 2013 WHO guidelines changed HIV therapy initiation from 350 cells/μL to 500 cells/μL. This systematic review provides an evidence-based comparison of starting treatment at >500 cells/μL with starting treatment at the range between 350 cells/μL and 500 cells/μL. An 11% increase in risk was detected from initiation therapy at the 350–500 cells/μL range (0.37 [0.26, 0.53]), when compared with starting treatment before 500 cells/μL (0.33 [0.22, 0.48]). Most individual study comparisons showed a benefit for starting treatment at 500 cells/μL in comparison with starting at the 350–500 cells/μL range with risks ranging from 19% to 300%, though a number of comparisons were not statistically significant. Overall, the study provides evidence based support for initiating anti retroviral therapy at cell counts >500 cells/μL wherever possible to prevent AIDS mortality and morbidity.

Early postseroconversion CD4 cell counts independently predict CD4 cell count recovery in HIV-1-postive subjects receiving antiretroviral therapy

BACKGROUND

The relationship between CD4 T-cell counts determined soon after seroconversion with HIV-1 (baseline CD4), nadir CD4, and CD4 levels attained during highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) is unknown.

METHODS

Longitudinal, including baseline (at or soon after HIV diagnosis), intermediate (nadir), and distal (post-HAART) CD4 T-cell counts were assessed in 1085 seroconverting subjects who achieved viral load suppression from a large well-characterized cohort. The association of baseline with post-HAART CD4 T-cell count was determined after adjustment for other relevant covariates.

RESULTS

A higher baseline CD4 T-cell count predicted a greater post-HAART CD4 T-cell count, independent of the nadir and other explanatory variables. Together, baseline and nadir strongly predicted the post-HAART CD4 count such that a high baseline and lower nadir were associated with a maximal immune recovery after HAART. Likelihood of recovery of the baseline count after HAART was significantly higher when the nadir/baseline count ratio was consistently ≥ 0.6.

CONCLUSIONS

Among viral load suppressing seroconverters, the absolute CD4 T-cell count attained post-HAART is highly dependent on both baseline and nadir CD4 T-cell counts. These associations further support the early diagnosis and initiation of HAART among HIV-infected persons.

Validation of World Health Organisation HIV/AIDS clinical staging in predicting initiation of antiretroviral therapy and clinical predictors of low CD4 cell count in Uganda

Introduction

The WHO clinical guidelines for HIV/AIDS are widely used in resource limited settings to represent the gold standard of CD4 counts for antiviral therapy initiation. The utility of the WHO-defined stage 1 and 2 clinical factors used in WHO HIV/AIDS clinical staging in predicting low CD4 cell count has not been established in Uganda. Although the WHO staging has shown low sensitivity for predicting CD4<200cells/mm³, it has not been evaluated at for CD4 cut-offs of <250cells/mm³ or <350 cells/mm³.

Objective

To validate the World Health Organisation HIV/AIDS clinical staging in predicting initiation of antiretroviral therapy in a low-resource setting and to determine the clinical predictors of low CD4 cell count in Uganda.

Results

Data was collected on 395 participants from the Joint Clinical Research Centre, of whom 242 (61.3%) were classified as in stages 1 and 2 and 262 (68%) were females. Participants had a mean age of 36.8 years (SD 8.5). We found a significant inverse correlation between the CD4 lymphocyte count and WHO clinical stages. The sensitivity the WHO clinical staging at CD4 cell count of 250 cells/mm³ and 350cells/mm³ was 53.5% and 49.1% respectively. Angular cheilitis, papular pruritic eruptions and recurrent upper respiratory tract infections were found to be significant predictors of low CD4 cell count among participants in WHO stage 1 and 2.

Conclusion

The WHO HIV/AIDS clinical staging guidelines have a low sensitivity and about half of the participants in stages 1 and 2 would be eligible for ART initiation if they had been tested for CD4 count. Angular cheilitis and papular pruritic eruptions and recurrent upper respiratory tract infections may be used, in addition to the WHO staging, to improve sensitivity in the interim, as access to CD4 machines increases in Uganda.

Impact of earlier HAART initiation on the immune status and clinical course of treated patients on the basis of cohort data of the German Competence Network for HIV/AIDS

PURPOSE

Hitherto, studies on highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) initiation have shown partly inconsistent results. Our study investigated the clinical course and course of immune status after HAART initiation at CD4-cell-count/μl of treated patients between 250 and 349 (group 1), compared to 350-449 (group 2), on the basis of the cohort of the Competence Network for HIV/AIDS (KompNet cohort).

METHODS

Patients had to be HAART-naïve. Medication had to start at the earliest in 1996, being at least triple combination therapy. The primary endpoints of death, first AIDS-defining illness and first drop of CD4-cell-count/μl below 200 were evaluated as censored event times between the initiation of HAART (t (0)) and the date of the first event/date of last observation. Probabilities of event-free intervals since t (0) were calculated by Kaplan-Meier estimation, compared by logrank tests. The results were adjusted for confounders using Cox regression. Additionally, incidences were estimated.

RESULTS

A total of 822 patients met the inclusion criteria (group 1: 526, group 2: 296), covering 4,133 patient years (py) overall. In group 1, 0.64 death cases/100 py were found, with the corresponding vale being 0.17 in group 2. In group 1, 1.38 AIDS-defining events/100 py occurred, whereas it was 0.78 in group 2. In group 1, 2.64 events of first drop of CD4-cell-count/μl below 200 occurred per 100 py, compared to 0.77 in group 2. Kaplan-Meier estimations showed borderline significant differences regarding death (p = 0.063), no differences regarding first AIDS-defining illness (p = 0.148) and distinct differences regarding the first drop of CD4-cell-count/μl below 200 (p = 0.0004).

CONCLUSIONS

The results gave a strong hint for a therapy initiation at higher CD4-cell-count/μl regarding the outcome of death in treated patients. A distinct benefit was shown regarding the first decline of CD4-cell-count/μl below 200.

Initiating patients on antiretroviral therapy at CD4 cell counts above 200 cells/microl is associated with improved treatment outcomes in South Africa

OBJECTIVES

To compare treatment outcomes by starting CD4 cell counts using data from the Comprehensive International Program of Research on AIDS-South Africa trial.

DESIGN

An observational cohort study.

METHODS

Patients presenting to primary care clinics with CD4 cell counts below 350 cells/microl were randomized to either doctor or nurse-managed HIV care and followed for at least 2 years after antiretroviral therapy (ART) initiation. Clinical and laboratory outcomes were compared by baseline CD4 cell counts.

RESULTS

Eight hundred and twelve patients were followed for a median of 27.5 months and 36% initiated ART with a CD4 cell count above 200 cells/microl. Although 10% of patients failed virologically, the risk was nearly double among those with a CD4 cell count of 200 cells/microl or less vs. above 200 cells/microl (12.2 vs. 6.8%). Twenty-one deaths occurred, with a five-fold increased risk for the low CD4 cell count group (3.7 vs. 0.7%). After adjustment, those with a CD4 cell count of 200 cells/microl had twice the risk of death/virologic failure [hazard ratio 1.9; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.1-3.3] and twice the risk of incident tuberculosis (hazard ratio 1.90; 95% CI, 0.89-4.04) as those above 200 cells/microl. Those with either a CD4 cell count of 200 cells/microl or less (hazard ratio 2.1; 95% CI, 1.2-3.8) or a WHO IV condition (hazard ratio 2.9; 95% CI, 0.93-8.8) alone had a two-to-three-fold increased risk of death/virologic failure vs. those with neither, but those with both conditions had a four-fold increased risk (hazard ratio 3.9; 95% CI, 1.9-8.1). We observed some decreased loss to follow-up among those initiating ART at less than 200 cells/microl (hazard ratio 0.79; 95% CI, 0.50-1.25).

CONCLUSION

Patients initiating ART with higher CD4 cell counts had reduced mortality, tuberculosis and less virologic failure than those initiated at lower CD4 cell counts. Our data support increasing CD4 cell count eligibility criteria for ART initiation.

Outcomes of highly active antiretroviral therapy in the context of universal access to healthcare: the U.S. Military HIV Natural History Study

Background

To examine the outcomes of highly-active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) for individuals with free access to healthcare, we evaluated 2327 patients in a cohort study composed of military personnel and beneficiaries with HIV infection who initiated HAART from 1996 to the end of 2007.

Methods

Outcomes analyzed were virologic suppression (VS) and failure (VF), CD4 count changes, AIDS and death. VF was defined as never suppressing or having at least one rebound event. Multivariate (MV) analyses stratified by the HAART initiation year (before or after 2000) were performed to identify risk factors associated with these outcomes.

Results

Among patients who started HAART after 2000, 81% had VS at 1 year (N = 1,759), 85% at 5 years (N = 1,061), and 82% at 8 years (N = 735). Five years post-HAART, the median CD4 increase was 247 cells/ml and 34% experienced VF. AIDS and mortality rates at 5 years were 2% and 0.3%, respectively. In a MV model adjusted for known risk factors associated with treatment response, being on active duty (versus retired) at HAART initiation was associated with a decreased risk of AIDS (HR = 0.6, 95% CI 0.4-1.0) and mortality (0.6, 0.3-0.9), an increased probability of CD4 increase ≥ 50% (1.2, 1.0-1.4), but was not significant for VF.

Conclusions

In this observational cohort, VS rates approach those described in clinical trials. Initiating HAART on active duty was associated with even better outcomes. These findings support the notion that free access to healthcare likely improves the response to HAART thereby reducing HIV-related morbidity and mortality.

When to start antiretroviral therapy

The question of when to start combination antiretroviral therapy for treatment-naïve patients has always been controversial. This is particularly true in the current era, with major guidelines recommending very different treatment strategies. Despite a lack of clarity regarding the optimal time to begin therapy, there has been a recent shift toward earlier initiation. This more aggressive approach is driven by several observations. First, effective viral suppression with therapy can prevent non-AIDS-related morbidity and mortality. Second, therapy can prevent irreversible harm to the human immune system. Third, therapy may prevent transmission of HIV to others, and thus have a potential public health benefit. For patients who are motivated and willing to initiate early treatment, the collective benefits of early therapy may outweigh the well-documented risks of antiretroviral medications.

Early antiretroviral therapy: the role of cohorts

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review the data that contribute to the debate on the optimal time to initiate highly active antiretroviral therapy in HIV-infected individuals, with a focus on the information that is available from cohort studies.

RECENT FINDINGS

The findings from cohort studies generally support initiation of highly active antiretroviral therapy at CD4 cell counts more than 350 cells/microl. In particular, the findings that death rates among treated HIV-infected individuals are higher than those in the general population, and that the risks of AIDS and serious non-AIDS events are higher in those with lower CD4 cell counts (even when the count remains >350 cells/microl), suggest that earlier initiation of highly active antiretroviral therapy may prevent some excess morbidity and mortality. However, given the lack of adjustment for lead-time bias in many analyses, the potential for residual confounding and the possible incomplete ascertainment of relevant outcomes in cohorts, it cannot be concluded that the benefits of highly active antiretroviral therapy when started at higher CD4 cell counts will outweigh the possible detrimental effects.

SUMMARY

Whereas the data from cohort studies currently support initiation of highly active antiretroviral therapy at CD4 cell counts more than 350 cells/microl, there is an urgent need for data from randomized trials to inform this decision.

Effect of early versus deferred antiretroviral therapy for HIV on survival

BACKGROUND

The optimal time for the initiation of antiretroviral therapy for asymptomatic patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection is uncertain.

METHODS

We conducted two parallel analyses involving a total of 17,517 asymptomatic patients with HIV infection in the United States and Canada who received medical care during the period from 1996 through 2005. None of the patients had undergone previous antiretroviral therapy. In each group, we stratified the patients according to the CD4+ count (351 to 500 cells per cubic millimeter or >500 cells per cubic millimeter) at the initiation of antiretroviral therapy. In each group, we compared the relative risk of death for patients who initiated therapy when the CD4+ count was above each of the two thresholds of interest (early-therapy group) with that of patients who deferred therapy until the CD4+ count fell below these thresholds (deferred-therapy group).

RESULTS

In the first analysis, which involved 8362 patients, 2084 (25%) initiated therapy at a CD4+ count of 351 to 500 cells per cubic millimeter, and 6278 (75%) deferred therapy. After adjustment for calendar year, cohort of patients, and demographic and clinical characteristics, among patients in the deferred-therapy group there was an increase in the risk of death of 69%, as compared with that in the early-therapy group (relative risk in the deferred-therapy group, 1.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.26 to 2.26; P<0.001). In the second analysis involving 9155 patients, 2220 (24%) initiated therapy at a CD4+ count of more than 500 cells per cubic millimeter and 6935 (76%) deferred therapy. Among patients in the deferred-therapy group, there was an increase in the risk of death of 94% (relative risk, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.37 to 2.79; P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The early initiation of antiretroviral therapy before the CD4+ count fell below two prespecified thresholds significantly improved survival, as compared with deferred therapy.

Should HIV therapy be started at a CD4 cell count above 350 cells/microl in asymptomatic HIV-1-infected patients?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim is to review the available data that contribute to the debate on the optimal time to initiate highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) in HIV-infected individuals with a CD4 cell count more than 350 cells/microl.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although few randomized data exist that can contribute to this debate, a number of findings from observational studies generally support earlier initiation of HAART. In particular, the findings that death rates remain higher in HIV-infected individuals than in uninfected individuals, even when successfully treated, and that both AIDS and several serious non-AIDS events are more common in those with a lower CD4 cell count (even when this count is above 350 cells/microl), suggest that earlier initiation of HAART may prevent much of the excess morbidity and mortality that remains in this patient group.

SUMMARY

Currently, the data would generally support initiation of HAART in patients with CD4 cell counts more than 350 cells/microl. However, given the strong potential for confounding in observational studies and the lack of adjustment for lead-time bias in many analyses, it is not possible to rule out possible long-term detrimental effects of earlier use of HAART until the results from fully powered randomized trials that directly address this issue become available.

Determinants of HIV progression and assessment of the optimal time to initiate highly active antiretroviral therapy: PISCIS Cohort (Spain)

OBJECTIVE

We analyze the factors related to progression to AIDS or death in HIV-infected patients from the Proyecto para la Informatización del Seguimiento Clínico epidemiológico de los pacientes con Infección por VIH/SIDA (PISCIS) Cohort and we assess the optimal time to initiate highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) taking lead time into account.

METHODS

We selected naive patients who were AIDS-free and initiated HAART after January 1998. Statistical analyses were performed using Cox proportional hazards models. Lead time was defined as the time it took the deferred group with an early disease stage to reach the later stage. The analysis accounting for lead time was performed using multiple imputation methods based on estimates from the pre-HAART period as described elsewhere.

RESULTS

Multivariate analysis on 2035 patients (median follow-up = 34.3 months) showed significantly higher hazard ratios (HRs) for a CD4 count <200 cells/microL (HR = 3.79, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.18 to 6.57), HIV-1 RNA level >100,000 copies/mL (HR = 1.84, 95% CI: 1.26 to 2.69), and hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfection (HR = 2.40, 95% CI: 1.65 to 3.49), whereas a lower risk was found for those who started HAART between January 2001 and June 2004 (HR = 0.55, 95% CI: 0.30 to 0.90). When lead time and unseen events were included, we found a higher risk of progression to AIDS among patients who deferred treatment when the CD4 count reached <200 cells/microL (HR = 2.97, 95% CI: 1.91 to 4.63) and 200 to 350 cells/microL (HR = 1.85, 95% CI: 1.03 to 3.33) compared with those who started treatment with CD4 counts from 200 to 350 cells/microL and >350 cells/microL, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Advanced HIV disease, HCV coinfection, and early HAART period were determinants of AIDS progression or death. Lead-time analysis in asymptomatic HIV-infected patients suggests that the best time to start HAART is before the CD4 count falls to lower than 350 cells/microL.

WHO HIV clinical staging or CD4 cell counts for antiretroviral therapy eligibility assessment? An evaluation in rural Rakai district, Uganda

The ability of WHO clinical staging to predict CD4 cell counts of 200 cells/microl or less was evaluated among 1221 patients screened for antiretroviral therapy (ART). Sensitivity was 51% and specificity was 88%. The positive predictive value was 64% and the negative predictive value was 81%. Clinical criteria missed half the patients with CD4 cell counts of 200 cells/microl or less, highlighting the importance of CD4 cell measurements for the scale-up of ART provision in resource-limited settings.

[Recommendations from the GESIDA/Spanish AIDS Plan regarding antiretroviral treatment in adults with human immunodeficiency virus infection (update January 2007)]

OBJECTIVE

This consensus document is an update of antiretroviral therapy (ART) recommendations for adult patients infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1).

METHODS

To formulate these recommendations, a panel composed of members of the Grupo de Estudio de Sida (GESIDA; AIDS Study Group) and the Plan Nacional sobre el Sida (PNS; Spanish AIDS Plan) reviewed the advances in the current understanding of the pathophysiology of HIV, the safety and efficacy findings from clinical trials, and the results from cohort and pharmacokinetic studies published in biomedical journals or presented at scientific meetings over the last years. Three levels of evidence were defined according to the source of the data: randomized studies (level A), cohort or case-control studies (level B), and expert opinion (level C). The decision to recommend, consider or not recommend ART was established in each situation.

RESULTS

Currently, the treatment of choice for chronic HIV infection is the combination of three drugs of two different classes, including 2 nucleosides or nucleotide analogs (NRTI) plus 1 non-nucleoside (NNRTI) or 1 boosted protease inhibitor (PI/r). Initiation of ART is recommended in patients with symptomatic HIV infection. In asymptomatic patients, initiation of ART is recommended on the basis of CD4+ lymphocyte counts and plasma viral load, as follows: 1) therapy should be started in patients with CD4+ counts of < 200 cells/microl; 2) therapy should be started in most patients with CD4+ counts of 200-350 cells/microl, although it can be delayed when CD41 count persists at around 350 cells/microL and viral load is low, and 3) initiation of therapy can be delayed in patients with CD4+ counts of > 350 cells/microL. The initial objective of ART is to achieve an undetectable viral load. Adherence to therapy plays an essential role in maintaining the antiviral response. Therapeutic options are limited with the development of cross resistance and ART failure. Genotype studies are useful in these cases. More information regarding the studies analyzed and the panel recommendations for adherence, toxicity, treatment during pregnancy, patients with hepatitis B or C virus co-infection, and post-exposure prophylaxis can be accessed at www.gesida.seimc.org.

CONCLUSIONS

CD4+ lymphocyte count is the most important reference factor for initiating ART in asymptomatic patients. The large number of available drugs, the increased sensitivity of tests to monitor viral load, and the ability to determine viral resistance is leading to a more individualized approach to therapy.

Establishing CD4 thresholds for highly active antiretroviral therapy initiation in a cohort of HIV-infected adult Chinese in Hong Kong

Studies on the use and outcome of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) in HIV-infected Chinese have been scarce. We evaluated risk of progression to (1) nonaccidental death and (2) new AIDS-defining illness (ADI) or death in 223, 89.9% of 248 HIV-1-infected adult Chinese patients who were first initiated on HAART between 1997 and 2002, and followed through 2003. The study subjects were mostly male (88.3%), aged between 30-49 years (43.9%), and acquired HIV via sexual contact (95.7%). After a median follow-up of 38.6 months, 13 nonaccidental deaths were observed. Overall, 25 patients developed new ADI or died. Using Kaplan-Meier analyses, there was no survival difference of starting HAART at various CD4 strata but a higher risk of progression to new ADI/death in patients with pretreatment CD4 count less than 100 cells per microliter (p = 0.01). On Cox proportional hazards multivariate regression analyses, pretreatment CD4 counts of less than 100 cells per microliter and less than 150 cells per microliter but not higher levels were the cutoffs for increased progression to death (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 4.90, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.08-22.22) and new ADI/death (adjusted HR = 14.44, 95% CI: 1.95-106.89), respectively. Age 50 years or greater was the only other independent predictor of mortality and new ADI/death after HAART. Further studies are indicated to validate and discern implications of these preliminary findings of a lower CD4 threshold for antiretroviral therapy in a small Chinese HIV cohort.

Longitudinal trends in antiretroviral use in a cohort of men and women in Ontario, Canada

Initial studies have shown impaired access to antiretrovirals and slower adoption of new therapies by women. It is unclear if similar treatment delays still occur, especially in those with a publicly funded health care system in Ontario, Canada. The objectives of this study were (1) to evaluate longitudinal patterns of antiretroviral use in patients with HIV in Ontario and (2) to determine if gender differences exist in access to and uptake of antiretroviral drugs over time. A retrospective medical chart review was undertaken. One hundred four HIV-positive patients were recruited from nine hospital-based HIV outpatient clinics throughout Ontario. From time of study enrollment in 1999-2001 to the first clinic visit (8.1 +/- 3.2 years; range, 2.3-16.8 years), CD4+ T-cell counts, date of and agents used in initial antiretroviral regimen, and first HAART regimen were evaluated by gender. Kaplan-Meier plots were used to evaluate time to drug initiation from known HIV diagnosis. Serial cross sections of numbers and types of antiretroviral drugs prescribed in March, June, September, and December 1988 to 2001 were also compared as was number of regimens used. There were few differences between men and women in antiretroviral use; both initiated therapy within 2.2 +/- 2.3 years of HIV diagnosis at an average CD4 counts of 300.3 +/- 150.1 cells per microliter. Antiretroviral treatment regimens changed over time, with limited variation by gender. In the period immediately surrounding the first highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) recommendations by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services in July 1997, significantly more antiretroviral drugs were prescribed for men than women. Antiretroviral prescribing in patients attending hospital- based HIV outpatient programs in Ontario is consistent with antiretroviral treatment guidelines over time, without substantial differences in antiretroviral access and use by gender.

Comparing costs and effectiveness of different starting points for highly active antiretroviral therapy in HIV-positive patients. Evidence from the ICONA cohort

We evaluated the costs and effectiveness of starting highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) at different points during the course of HIV infection, defined on the basis of CD4 T-lymphocytes counts. The study considered 3,250 HAART-naive patients of the Italian Cohort Naive Antiretrovirals (ICONA), enrolled and followed between 1997 and 2002. In correspondence to the thresholds of 500, 350, and 200 CD4 cells/mm(3), we selected immediate and deferred groups accounting for lead-time bias. The effects of immediate vs. deferred treatment on AIDS-free survival and direct health costs were estimated stratifying on the propensity score of immediate HAART initiation. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and the cost-effectiveness acceptability curve were also obtained. Although immediate HAART initiation did not affect incidence AIDS and death at high CD4 levels, starting HAART with 200-349 CD4 cells/mm(3) rather than deferring it below 200 CD4 cells/mm(3), proved to be cost-effective.

Immunologic function and virologic suppression among children with perinatally acquired HIV Infection on highly active antiretroviral therapy

BACKGROUND

The goal of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) has been to stabilize and reconstitute immune function and suppress viral replication to the greatest degree possible. Suppression of HIV viral replication has been associated with improved long-term and short-term prognosis. Limited data are available on the level of virologic suppression and immune function of pediatric patients followed in clinical settings in the HAART era.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to assess the level of virologic suppression and immune function in a cohort of children with perinatally acquired HIV infection followed at dedicated HIV specialty care sites.

RESEARCH DESIGN

This study comprised a cohort study of HIV-infected children and adolescents.

SUBJECTS

Study subjects consisted of 263 HIV-positive children (<or=17 years old), on HAART, with at least one outpatient visit and CD4 test recorded in 2001 seen at 4 U.S. HIV primary pediatrics and specialty care sites (2 eastern, 1 southern, and 1 western).

MEASURES

Measures consisted of all plasma HIV-1 RNA levels <or=400 during calendar year 2001.

RESULTS

Two hundred sixty-three patients received HIV-related treatment during 2001, with a mean age of 8.5 years. Sixty-eight percent were black, 54% were females, and the majority (85%) was insured by Medicaid. A total of 28.6% had a class C AIDS diagnosis. A total of 23.5% and 34% of patients maintained viral suppression at <50 copies per milliliter (cpm), or <400 cpm, respectively, for the calendar year; 32.5% and 38.8%, respectively, fulfilled the criteria if one "blip" to <5000 cpm was allowed. Forty-eight percent maintained all viral loads <5000 cpm, and 74.9% overall had HIV-1 RNAs <or=15,000 cpm. Eighty-seven percent of patients had CD4% >25; only 4.2% had CD4 <15%. Overall, 12.5% of patients had either CD4% <15 or severely decreased absolute CD4 counts (adjusted for age). A total of 4.6% of patients had HIV-1 RNAs >100,000 cpm and severe immunosuppression. Patients who were less likely to achieve virologic suppression to <400 cpm included those with CD4 count <200 cells/mm(3) (odds ratio [OR], 0.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.007-0.46), those with AIDS (OR, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.28-0.94), and those with moderate (OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.22-0.79), or severe immunologic suppression (OR, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.046-0.43) based on CD4%.

CONCLUSION

In this multisite, pediatric cohort, the rate of near-complete virologic suppression (<50 or <400 cpm) was low. However, the majority of patients have near-normal CD4 counts and viral loads <15,000 cpm. Follow up will be critical to assess the implications of ongoing low-level viral replication with near-normal CD4 values.

SIV-specific T lymphocyte responses in PBMC and lymphoid tissues of SIV-infected pigtailed macaques during suppressive combination antiretroviral therapy

There is currently no SIV macaque model in which the effects of combination antiretroviral therapy on tissue immune responses and latent reservoirs have been measured. This study was performed to define the impact of combination therapy on the specificity and distribution of the T lymphocyte response in multiple tissue compartments. Pigtailed macaques (Macaca nemestrina) were infected with SIV/17E-Fr and treated with combination antiretroviral therapy consisting of 9-R-(2-phosphonomethoxypropyl)adenine (PMPA) and beta-2',3'-dideoxy-3'-thia-5-fluorocytidine (FTC). The SIV-specific T lymphocyte response was measured in peripheral blood, spleen and several lymph nodes at necropsy by IFN-gamma Elispot analysis. Two animals (one treated, one untreated) had high acute peak viremia, which was associated with lower SIV-specific T lymphocyte responses in the peripheral blood and lymphoid tissues. In the treated animal, viremia was controlled to low or undetectable for the study duration, and virus-specific responses remained low. The untreated animal remained viremic throughout the study and developed clinical symptoms of AIDS. In contrast, the two animals that had lower acute peak viremia (one treated, one untreated) had more robust T lymphocyte responses, and controlled viral replication. Virus-specific responses were detected in the treated animal despite 6 months of suppressive therapy. These data suggest that in this model, in the context of acute peak viremia and weak T cell responses, combination therapy may be essential to control virus replication and disease progression. Conversely, in the setting of low initial viremia and robust T lymphocyte responses, treatment does not have a detrimental effect on the immune response.

The effect of baseline CD4 cell count and HIV-1 viral load on the efficacy and safety of nevirapine or efavirenz-based first-line HAART

BACKGROUND

A substantial number of patients start their first-line antiretroviral therapy at an advanced stage of an HIV-1 infection. Potential differences between specific drug regimens in antiviral efficacy and safety in these patients are of major importance.

METHODS

A post-hoc analysis within the randomized controlled 2NN trial comparing efficacy between regimes containing nevirapine (NVP), efavirenz (EFV), or both, in addition to stavudine and lamivudine.

PRIMARY OUTCOME

risk of virologic failure in different strata of baseline CD4 T-lymphocyte counts and plasma HIV-1 RNA concentrations (pVL). Virologic failure: never reaching a pVL < 400 copies/ml, or a rebound to two consecutive values > 400 copies/ml.

RESULTS

The risk of virologic failure was increased at very low CD4 counts (< 25 x 10(6) cells/l) compared to CD4 counts > 200 x 10(6) cells/l [hazard ratio (HR), 1.28; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.93-1.77]. The same was seen for a pVL > or = 100,000 copies/ml compared to a lower pVL (HR, 1.20; CI, 0.96-1.50). There were no statistically significant differences between NVP and EFV in risk of virologic failure within any of the CD4 or pVL strata, although EFV performed slightly better in the low CD4 stratum. The incidence of rash in the NVP group was significantly higher in female patients with higher CD4 cell counts, while adverse events in the EFV group were not associated with CD4 cell count.

CONCLUSIONS

Initial antiretroviral therapy including NVP or EFV is effective in patients with an advanced HIV-1 infection. A high baseline CD4 cell count is associated with the occurrence of rash in female patients using NVP.

The case for earlier treatment of HIV infection

Current US guidelines advise that antiretroviral therapy for asymptomatic HIV patients should definitely be started for those who have CD4(+) cell counts of >200 cells/ microL, but antiretroviral therapy is often not started at CD4(+) cell counts much above that level. Guidelines advocating later therapy for HIV infection have been based mainly on sparse and limited cross-sectional data and have been predicated on avoiding drug-related toxicity and viral drug resistance. However, emerging data about factors that contribute to survival and the availability of newer, less toxic drugs are eroding this position. Earlier initiation of antiretroviral therapy--namely, for patients with CD4(+) cell counts of >350 cells/ microL--may, in fact, be associated with lower mortality, better immune improvement, and less drug-related toxicity. These findings coincide with the introduction of antiretroviral drugs that have become more effective and less difficult to take. Earlier initiation of therapy may also reduce HIV transmission, an important public health consideration, and may be beneficial in terms of overall therapeutic cost-effectiveness. Given these accumulating data, we believe reconsideration of the "when-to-start" question is timely and justified.

It Is Safe to Stop Antiretroviral Therapy in Patients With Preantiretroviral CD4 Cell Counts >250 cells/??L

OBJECTIVE

To study clinical, immunologic, and virologic outcomes in patients who stop antiretroviral therapy (ART) with relatively preserved CD4 cell counts.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Patients with a documented CD4 cell count >250 cells/microL who stopped ART for any reason for at least 5 weeks were studied. Relevant clinical and laboratory data were collected using a standardized data collection form.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Patients were monitored for outcomes including Centers for Disease Control (CDC) category B or C events, time to restarting ART, and time to reaching a CD4 cell count of < or = 250 cells/microL.

RESULTS

A total of 107 patients were included. The median time on ART was 45 months and median number of antiretroviral medications was 4. The median pre-ART CD4 cell count and HIV viral load were 463 cells/microL and 4.35 log copies/mL, respectively. The median CD4 cell at time of ART stop was 739 cell/microL. The slope of the CD4 decrease was 65 cells/mo in the first 2 months, which was greater than the subsequent decline of 8 cells/mo thereafter (P < 0.01). Similarly the median viral load increase was 2.54 log copies/mL in the first 2 months after stopping and was unchanged after that point. Two patients experienced the retroviral rebound syndrome after ART cessation but no CDC category B or C events were observed during 10 months of follow-up. The median time from stopping ART to reaching the combined endpoint of CD4 <250 or restarting ART was 8.9 months. In multivariate analysis, pre-ART CD4 cell count >250 was protective of reaching the combined endpoint (odds ratio = 0.156, P = 0.03). Other predictors of reaching the combined endpoint in multivariate analysis were older age and number of prior ART agents. Patients who restarted ART had a favorable virologic and immunologic response.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with relatively high CD4 cell counts prior to starting ART did well after stopping ART. Pre-ART CD4 cell count can be used to predict outcomes after ART cessation.

Delayed progression to death and to AIDS in a Hong Kong cohort of patients with advanced HIV type 1 disease during the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy

BACKGROUND

The magnitude of the impact of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) since its introduction in non-Western countries is not entirely clear. We studied disease progression among adult patients with advanced human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection in the pre-HAART (i.e., 1996 and earlier) and HAART eras in Hong Kong.

METHODS

The cohort of patients seen at the Integrated Treatment Center (Hong Kong) from 1984 through mid-2003 was retrospectively examined with respect to 3 clinical end points: death after the diagnosis of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), progression to AIDS after achieving a CD4 cell count of <200 cells/microL, and death after achieving a CD4 cell count of <200 cells/microL.

RESULTS

A total of 581 patients with advanced HIV-1 disease had AIDS and/or a CD4 cell count of <200 cells/microL. The incidences of death after AIDS (52.3% vs. 13.6%), AIDS progression after a CD4 cell count of <200 cells/microL (47.7% vs. 20.9%), and death after a CD4 cell count of <200 cells/microL (38.8% vs. 7.0%) were significantly higher among patients in the pre-HAART era than among those in the HAART era (P<.001 for all). On the basis of life-table analysis, the probabilities of death after AIDS (P<.0001), AIDS after a CD4 cell count of <200 cells/microL (P=.0063), and death after a CD4 cell count of <200 cells/microL (P<.0001) diminished in the HAART era, compared with the pre-HAART era. Median survival after AIDS increased from 29.8 months during the pre-HAART era to >70 months during the HAART era (P<.001). Compared with patients in the pre-HAART era, adjusted hazard ratios of clinical events were 0.15 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.08-0.26) for death after AIDS, 0.38 (95% CI, 0.24-0.60) for AIDS after a CD4 cell count of <200 cells/microL, and 0.25 (95% CI, 0.15-0.40) for death after a CD4 cell count of <200 cells/microL for patients in the HAART era. CONCLUSIONS. The clinical outcome of patients with advanced HIV-1 disease in Hong Kong significantly improved during the HAART era. Our findings of extended durations of survival and AIDS-free status may be relevant to the expected health impacts associated with increased access to HAART in non-Western countries.