1
|
Patrick EE, Fleeting CR, Patel DR, Casauay JT, Patel A, Shepherd H, Wong JK. Modeling the volume of tissue activated in deep brain stimulation and its clinical influence: a review. Front Hum Neurosci 2024; 18:1333183. [PMID: 38660012 PMCID: PMC11039793 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1333183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2023] [Accepted: 03/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a neuromodulatory therapy that has been FDA approved for the treatment of various disorders, including but not limited to, movement disorders (e.g., Parkinson's disease and essential tremor), epilepsy, and obsessive-compulsive disorder. Computational methods for estimating the volume of tissue activated (VTA), coupled with brain imaging techniques, form the basis of models that are being generated from retrospective clinical studies for predicting DBS patient outcomes. For instance, VTA models are used to generate target-and network-based probabilistic stimulation maps that play a crucial role in predicting DBS treatment outcomes. This review defines the methods for calculation of tissue activation (or modulation) including ones that use heuristic and clinically derived estimates and more computationally involved ones that rely on finite-element methods and biophysical axon models. We define model parameters and provide a comparison of commercial, open-source, and academic simulation platforms available for integrated neuroimaging and neural activation prediction. In addition, we review clinical studies that use these modeling methods as a function of disease. By describing the tissue-activation modeling methods and highlighting their application in clinical studies, we provide the neural engineering and clinical neuromodulation communities with perspectives that may influence the adoption of modeling methods for future DBS studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin E. Patrick
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Chance R. Fleeting
- College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Drashti R. Patel
- College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Jed T. Casauay
- College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Aashay Patel
- College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Hunter Shepherd
- College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Joshua K. Wong
- Department of Neurology, Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ng PR, Bush A, Vissani M, McIntyre CC, Richardson RM. Biophysical Principles and Computational Modeling of Deep Brain Stimulation. Neuromodulation 2024; 27:422-439. [PMID: 37204360 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurom.2023.04.471] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2022] [Revised: 04/02/2023] [Accepted: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has revolutionized the treatment of neurological disorders, yet the mechanisms of DBS are still under investigation. Computational models are important in silico tools for elucidating these underlying principles and potentially for personalizing DBS therapy to individual patients. The basic principles underlying neurostimulation computational models, however, are not well known in the clinical neuromodulation community. OBJECTIVE In this study, we present a tutorial on the derivation of computational models of DBS and outline the biophysical contributions of electrodes, stimulation parameters, and tissue substrates to the effects of DBS. RESULTS Given that many aspects of DBS are difficult to characterize experimentally, computational models have played an important role in understanding how material, size, shape, and contact segmentation influence device biocompatibility, energy efficiency, the spatial spread of the electric field, and the specificity of neural activation. Neural activation is dictated by stimulation parameters including frequency, current vs voltage control, amplitude, pulse width, polarity configurations, and waveform. These parameters also affect the potential for tissue damage, energy efficiency, the spatial spread of the electric field, and the specificity of neural activation. Activation of the neural substrate also is influenced by the encapsulation layer surrounding the electrode, the conductivity of the surrounding tissue, and the size and orientation of white matter fibers. These properties modulate the effects of the electric field and determine the ultimate therapeutic response. CONCLUSION This article describes biophysical principles that are useful for understanding the mechanisms of neurostimulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Alan Bush
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Matteo Vissani
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Cameron C McIntyre
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Robert Mark Richardson
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Campbell BA, Favi Bocca L, Tiefenbach J, Hogue O, Nagel SJ, Rammo R, Escobar Sanabria D, Machado AG, Baker KB. Myogenic and cortical evoked potentials vary as a function of stimulus pulse geometry delivered in the subthalamic nucleus of Parkinson's disease patients. Front Neurol 2023; 14:1216916. [PMID: 37693765 PMCID: PMC10484227 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1216916] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2023] [Accepted: 08/10/2023] [Indexed: 09/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction The therapeutic efficacy of deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) for Parkinson's disease (PD) may be limited for some patients by the presence of stimulation-related side effects. Such effects are most often attributed to electrical current spread beyond the target region. Prior computational modeling studies have suggested that changing the degree of asymmetry of the individual phases of the biphasic, stimulus pulse may allow for more selective activation of neural elements in the target region. To the extent that different neural elements contribute to the therapeutic vs. side-effect inducing effects of DBS, such improved selectivity may provide a new parameter for optimizing DBS to increase the therapeutic window. Methods We investigated the effect of six different pulse geometries on cortical and myogenic evoked potentials in eight patients with PD whose leads were temporarily externalized following STN DBS implant surgery. DBS-cortical evoked potentials were quantified using peak to peak measurements and wavelets and myogenic potentials were quantified using RMS. Results We found that the slope of the recruitment curves differed significantly as a function of pulse geometry for both the cortical- and myogenic responses. Notably, this effect was observed most frequently when stimulation was delivered using a monopolar, as opposed to a bipolar, configuration. Discussion Manipulating pulse geometry results in differential physiological effects at both the cortical and neuromuscular level. Exploiting these differences may help to expand DBS' therapeutic window and support the potential for incorporating pulse geometry as an additional parameter for optimizing therapeutic benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brett A. Campbell
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States
- Department of Neurosciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Leonardo Favi Bocca
- Center for Neurological Restoration, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Jakov Tiefenbach
- Department of Neurosciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Olivia Hogue
- Center for Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Sean J. Nagel
- Center for Neurological Restoration, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
- Department of Neurosurgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Richard Rammo
- Center for Neurological Restoration, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
- Department of Neurosurgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - David Escobar Sanabria
- Center for Neurological Restoration, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Andre G. Machado
- Department of Neurosciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
- Center for Neurological Restoration, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
- Department of Neurosurgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Kenneth B. Baker
- Department of Neurosciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
- Center for Neurological Restoration, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Aberra AS, Lopez A, Grill WM, Peterchev AV. Rapid estimation of cortical neuron activation thresholds by transcranial magnetic stimulation using convolutional neural networks. Neuroimage 2023; 275:120184. [PMID: 37230204 PMCID: PMC10281353 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2023] [Revised: 04/13/2023] [Accepted: 05/22/2023] [Indexed: 05/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) can modulate neural activity by evoking action potentials in cortical neurons. TMS neural activation can be predicted by coupling subject-specific head models of the TMS-induced electric field (E-field) to populations of biophysically realistic neuron models; however, the significant computational cost associated with these models limits their utility and eventual translation to clinically relevant applications. OBJECTIVE To develop computationally efficient estimators of the activation thresholds of multi-compartmental cortical neuron models in response to TMS-induced E-field distributions. METHODS Multi-scale models combining anatomically accurate finite element method (FEM) simulations of the TMS E-field with layer-specific representations of cortical neurons were used to generate a large dataset of activation thresholds. 3D convolutional neural networks (CNNs) were trained on these data to predict thresholds of model neurons given their local E-field distribution. The CNN estimator was compared to an approach using the uniform E-field approximation to estimate thresholds in the non-uniform TMS-induced E-field. RESULTS The 3D CNNs estimated thresholds with mean absolute percent error (MAPE) on the test dataset below 2.5% and strong correlation between the CNN predicted and actual thresholds for all cell types (R2 > 0.96). The CNNs estimated thresholds with a 2-4 orders of magnitude reduction in the computational cost of the multi-compartmental neuron models. The CNNs were also trained to predict the median threshold of populations of neurons, speeding up computation further. CONCLUSION 3D CNNs can estimate rapidly and accurately the TMS activation thresholds of biophysically realistic neuron models using sparse samples of the local E-field, enabling simulating responses of large neuron populations or parameter space exploration on a personal computer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aman S Aberra
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering, Duke University, NC, USA
| | - Adrian Lopez
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, School of Engineering, Duke University, NC, USA; Department of Mathematics, College of Arts and Sciences, Duke University, NC, USA
| | - Warren M Grill
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering, Duke University, NC, USA; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, School of Engineering, Duke University, NC, USA; Department of Neurobiology, School of Medicine, Duke University, NC, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Duke University, NC, USA
| | - Angel V Peterchev
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering, Duke University, NC, USA; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, School of Engineering, Duke University, NC, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Duke University, NC, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, Duke University, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Elmalem MS, Moody H, Ruffle JK, de Schotten MT, Haggard P, Diehl B, Nachev P, Jha A. A framework for focal and connectomic mapping of transiently disrupted brain function. Commun Biol 2023; 6:430. [PMID: 37076578 PMCID: PMC10115870 DOI: 10.1038/s42003-023-04787-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2022] [Accepted: 03/30/2023] [Indexed: 04/21/2023] Open
Abstract
The distributed nature of the neural substrate, and the difficulty of establishing necessity from correlative data, combine to render the mapping of brain function a far harder task than it seems. Methods capable of combining connective anatomical information with focal disruption of function are needed to disambiguate local from global neural dependence, and critical from merely coincidental activity. Here we present a comprehensive framework for focal and connective spatial inference based on sparse disruptive data, and demonstrate its application in the context of transient direct electrical stimulation of the human medial frontal wall during the pre-surgical evaluation of patients with focal epilepsy. Our framework formalizes voxel-wise mass-univariate inference on sparsely sampled data within the statistical parametric mapping framework, encompassing the analysis of distributed maps defined by any criterion of connectivity. Applied to the medial frontal wall, this transient dysconnectome approach reveals marked discrepancies between local and distributed associations of major categories of motor and sensory behaviour, revealing differentiation by remote connectivity to which purely local analysis is blind. Our framework enables disruptive mapping of the human brain based on sparsely sampled data with minimal spatial assumptions, good statistical efficiency, flexible model formulation, and explicit comparison of local and distributed effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael S Elmalem
- UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK.
- National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK.
- Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.
| | - Hanna Moody
- UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | - James K Ruffle
- UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK
- National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
| | - Michel Thiebaut de Schotten
- Groupe d'Imagerie Neurofonctionnelle, Institut des Maladies Neurodégénérative, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
- Brain Connectivity and Behaviour Laboratory, Sorbonne Universities, Paris, France
| | | | - Beate Diehl
- UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK
- National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
| | - Parashkev Nachev
- UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK.
- National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK.
| | - Ashwani Jha
- UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK.
- National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Madadi Asl M, Valizadeh A, Tass PA. Decoupling of interacting neuronal populations by time-shifted stimulation through spike-timing-dependent plasticity. PLoS Comput Biol 2023; 19:e1010853. [PMID: 36724144 PMCID: PMC9891531 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010853] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2022] [Accepted: 01/05/2023] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
The synaptic organization of the brain is constantly modified by activity-dependent synaptic plasticity. In several neurological disorders, abnormal neuronal activity and pathological synaptic connectivity may significantly impair normal brain function. Reorganization of neuronal circuits by therapeutic stimulation has the potential to restore normal brain dynamics. Increasing evidence suggests that the temporal stimulation pattern crucially determines the long-lasting therapeutic effects of stimulation. Here, we tested whether a specific pattern of brain stimulation can enable the suppression of pathologically strong inter-population synaptic connectivity through spike-timing-dependent plasticity (STDP). More specifically, we tested how introducing a time shift between stimuli delivered to two interacting populations of neurons can effectively decouple them. To that end, we first used a tractable model, i.e., two bidirectionally coupled leaky integrate-and-fire (LIF) neurons, to theoretically analyze the optimal range of stimulation frequency and time shift for decoupling. We then extended our results to two reciprocally connected neuronal populations (modules) where inter-population delayed connections were modified by STDP. As predicted by the theoretical results, appropriately time-shifted stimulation causes a decoupling of the two-module system through STDP, i.e., by unlearning pathologically strong synaptic interactions between the two populations. Based on the overall topology of the connections, the decoupling of the two modules, in turn, causes a desynchronization of the populations that outlasts the cessation of stimulation. Decoupling effects of the time-shifted stimulation can be realized by time-shifted burst stimulation as well as time-shifted continuous simulation. Our results provide insight into the further optimization of a variety of multichannel stimulation protocols aiming at a therapeutic reshaping of diseased brain networks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mojtaba Madadi Asl
- School of Biological Sciences, Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences (IPM), Tehran, Iran
- Pasargad Institute for Advanced Innovative Solutions (PIAIS), Tehran, Iran
| | - Alireza Valizadeh
- Pasargad Institute for Advanced Innovative Solutions (PIAIS), Tehran, Iran
- Department of Physics, Institute for Advanced Studies in Basic Sciences (IASBS), Zanjan, Iran
| | - Peter A. Tass
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Golabek J, Schiefer M, Wong JK, Saxena S, Patrick E. Artificial neural network-based rapid predictor of biological nerve fiber activation for DBS applications. J Neural Eng 2023; 20. [PMID: 36599158 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/acb016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2022] [Accepted: 01/04/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
Objective.Computational models are powerful tools that can enable the optimization of deep brain stimulation (DBS). To enhance the clinical practicality of these models, their computational expense and required technical expertise must be minimized. An important aspect of DBS models is the prediction of neural activation in response to electrical stimulation. Existing rapid predictors of activation simplify implementation and reduce prediction runtime, but at the expense of accuracy. We sought to address this issue by leveraging the speed and generalization abilities of artificial neural networks (ANNs) to create a novel predictor of neural fiber activation in response to DBS.Approach.We developed six variations of an ANN-based predictor to predict the response of individual, myelinated axons to extracellular electrical stimulation. ANNs were trained using datasets generated from a finite-element model of an implanted DBS system together with multi-compartment cable models of axons. We evaluated the ANN-based predictors using three white matter pathways derived from group-averaged connectome data within a patient-specific tissue conductivity field, comparing both predicted stimulus activation thresholds and pathway recruitment across a clinically relevant range of stimulus amplitudes and pulse widths.Main results.The top-performing ANN could predict the thresholds of axons with a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.037 V, and pathway recruitment with an MAE of 0.079%, across all parameters. The ANNs reduced the time required to predict the thresholds of 288 axons by four to five orders of magnitude when compared to multi-compartment cable models.Significance.We demonstrated that ANNs can be fast, accurate, and robust predictors of neural activation in response to DBS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin Golabek
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America
| | - Matthew Schiefer
- Malcom Randall Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Gainesville, FL, United States of America
| | - Joshua K Wong
- Department of Neurology, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America
| | - Shreya Saxena
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America
| | - Erin Patrick
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
White Matter Microstructure Associated with the Antidepressant Effects of Deep Brain Stimulation in Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Review of Diffusion Tensor Imaging Studies. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:ijms232315379. [PMID: 36499706 PMCID: PMC9738114 DOI: 10.3390/ijms232315379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2022] [Revised: 11/23/2022] [Accepted: 12/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) is a severe disorder characterized by high relapse rates and decreased quality of life. An effective strategy in the management of TRD is deep brain stimulation (DBS), a technique consisting of the implantation of electrodes that receive a stimulation via a pacemaker-like stimulator into specific brain areas, detected through neuroimaging investigations, which include the subgenual cingulate cortex (sgCC), basal ganglia, and forebrain bundles. In this context, to improve our understanding of the mechanism underlying the antidepressant effects of DBS in TRD, we collected the results of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) studies exploring how WM microstructure is associated with the therapeutic effects of DBS in TRD. A search on PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus identified 11 investigations assessing WM microstructure in responders and non-responders to DBS. Altered WM microstructure, particularly in the sgCC, medial forebrain bundle, cingulum bundle, forceps minor, and uncinate fasciculus, was associated with the antidepressant effect of DBS in TRD. Overall, the results show that DBS targeting selective brain regions, including the sgCC, forebrain bundle, cingulum bundle, rectus gyrus, anterior limb of the internal capsule, forceps minor, and uncinate fasciculus, seem to be effective for the treatment of TRD.
Collapse
|
9
|
Skoven CS, Tomasevic L, Kvitsiani D, Pakkenberg B, Dyrby TB, Siebner HR. Dose-response relationship between the variables of unilateral optogenetic stimulation and transcallosal evoked responses in rat motor cortex. Front Neurosci 2022; 16:968839. [PMID: 36213739 PMCID: PMC9539969 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.968839] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2022] [Accepted: 08/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Efficient interhemispheric integration of neural activity between left and right primary motor cortex (M1) is critical for inter-limb motor control. We employed optogenetic stimulation to establish a framework for probing transcallosal M1–M1 interactions in rats. We performed optogenetic stimulation of excitatory neurons in right M1 of male Sprague-Dawley rats. We recorded the transcallosal evoked potential in contralateral left M1 via chronically implanted electrodes. Recordings were performed under anesthesia combination of dexmedetomidine and a low concentration of isoflurane. We systematically varied the stimulation intensity and duration to characterize the relationship between stimulation parameters in right M1 and the characteristics of the evoked intracortical potentials in left M1. Optogenetic stimulation of right M1 consistently evoked a transcallosal response in left M1 with a consistent negative peak (N1) that sometimes was preceded by a smaller positive peak (P1). Higher stimulation intensity or longer stimulation duration gradually increased N1 amplitude and reduced N1 variability across trials. A combination of stimulation intensities of 5–10 mW with stimulus durations of 1–10 ms were generally sufficient to elicit a robust transcallosal response in most animal, with our optic fiber setup. Optogenetically stimulated excitatory neurons in M1 can reliably evoke a transcallosal response in anesthetized rats. Characterizing the relationship between “stimulation dose” and “response magnitude” (i.e., the gain function) of transcallosal M1-to-M1 excitatory connections can be used to optimize the variables of optogenetic stimulation and ensure stimulation efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Stald Skoven
- Danish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Centre for Functional and Diagnostic Imaging and Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Center for Functional Integrative Neuroscience, Aarhus University (AU), Aarhus, Denmark
- *Correspondence: Christian Stald Skoven,
| | - Leo Tomasevic
- Danish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Centre for Functional and Diagnostic Imaging and Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Duda Kvitsiani
- Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Danish Research Institute of Translational Neuroscience, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Bente Pakkenberg
- Research Laboratory for Stereology and Neuroscience, Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Tim Bjørn Dyrby
- Danish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Centre for Functional and Diagnostic Imaging and Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark
| | - Hartwig Roman Siebner
- Danish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Centre for Functional and Diagnostic Imaging and Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Hartwig Roman Siebner,
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Smith EE, Choi KS, Veerakumar A, Obatusin M, Howell B, Smith AH, Tiruvadi V, Crowell AL, Riva-Posse P, Alagapan S, Rozell CJ, Mayberg HS, Waters AC. Time-frequency signatures evoked by single-pulse deep brain stimulation to the subcallosal cingulate. Front Hum Neurosci 2022; 16:939258. [PMID: 36061500 PMCID: PMC9433578 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.939258] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2022] [Accepted: 07/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Precision targeting of specific white matter bundles that traverse the subcallosal cingulate (SCC) has been linked to efficacy of deep brain stimulation (DBS) for treatment resistant depression (TRD). Methods to confirm optimal target engagement in this heterogenous region are now critical to establish an objective treatment protocol. As yet unexamined are the time-frequency features of the SCC evoked potential (SCC-EP), including spectral power and phase-clustering. We examined these spectral features—evoked power and phase clustering—in a sample of TRD patients (n = 8) with implanted SCC stimulators. Electroencephalogram (EEG) was recorded during wakeful rest. Location of electrical stimulation in the SCC target region was the experimental manipulation. EEG was analyzed at the surface level with an average reference for a cluster of frontal sensors and at a time window identified by prior study (50–150 ms). Morlet wavelets generated indices of evoked power and inter-trial phase clustering. Enhanced phase clustering at theta frequency (4–7 Hz) was observed in every subject and was significantly correlated with SCC-EP magnitude, but only during left SCC stimulation. Stimulation to dorsal SCC evinced stronger phase clustering than ventral SCC. There was a weak correlation between phase clustering and white matter density. An increase in evoked delta power (2–4 Hz) was also coincident with SCC-EP, but was less consistent across participants. DBS evoked time-frequency features index mm-scale changes to the location of stimulation in the SCC target region and correlate with structural characteristics implicated in treatment optimization. Results also imply a shared generative mechanism (inter-trial phase clustering) between evoked potentials evinced by electrical stimulation and evoked potentials evinced by auditory/visual stimuli and behavioral tasks. Understanding how current injection impacts downstream cortical activity is essential to building new technologies that adapt treatment parameters to individual differences in neurophysiology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ki Sueng Choi
- Departments of Psychiatry, Neuroscience, Neurology, Neurosurgery and Radiology, Nash Family Center for Advanced Circuit Therapeutics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Ashan Veerakumar
- Department of Psychiatry, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, ON, Canada
| | - Mosadoluwa Obatusin
- Departments of Psychiatry, Neuroscience, Neurology, Neurosurgery and Radiology, Nash Family Center for Advanced Circuit Therapeutics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Bryan Howell
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Andrew H. Smith
- Departments of Psychiatry, Neuroscience, Neurology, Neurosurgery and Radiology, Nash Family Center for Advanced Circuit Therapeutics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Vineet Tiruvadi
- Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Tech and Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Andrea L. Crowell
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Patricio Riva-Posse
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Sankaraleengam Alagapan
- School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Christopher J. Rozell
- School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Helen S. Mayberg
- Departments of Psychiatry, Neuroscience, Neurology, Neurosurgery and Radiology, Nash Family Center for Advanced Circuit Therapeutics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Allison C. Waters
- Departments of Psychiatry, Neuroscience, Neurology, Neurosurgery and Radiology, Nash Family Center for Advanced Circuit Therapeutics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
- *Correspondence: Allison C. Waters,
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Shapira G, Marcus-Kalish M, Amsalem O, Van Geit W, Segev I, Steinberg DM. Statistical Emulation of Neural Simulators: Application to Neocortical L2/3 Large Basket Cells. Front Big Data 2022; 5:789962. [PMID: 35402905 PMCID: PMC8992430 DOI: 10.3389/fdata.2022.789962] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2021] [Accepted: 01/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Many scientific systems are studied using computer codes that simulate the phenomena of interest. Computer simulation enables scientists to study a broad range of possible conditions, generating large quantities of data at a faster rate than the laboratory. Computer models are widespread in neuroscience, where they are used to mimic brain function at different levels. These models offer a variety of new possibilities for the neuroscientist, but also numerous challenges, such as: where to sample the input space for the simulator, how to make sense of the data that is generated, and how to estimate unknown parameters in the model. Statistical emulation can be a valuable complement to simulator-based research. Emulators are able to mimic the simulator, often with a much smaller computational burden and they are especially valuable for parameter estimation, which may require many simulator evaluations. This work compares different statistical models that address these challenges, and applies them to simulations of neocortical L2/3 large basket cells, created and run with the NEURON simulator in the context of the European Human Brain Project. The novelty of our approach is the use of fast empirical emulators, which have the ability to accelerate the optimization process for the simulator and to identify which inputs (in this case, different membrane ion channels) are most influential in affecting simulated features. These contributions are complementary, as knowledge of the important features can further improve the optimization process. Subsequent research, conducted after the process is completed, will gain efficiency by focusing on these inputs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gilad Shapira
- Department of Statistics and Operations Research, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Mira Marcus-Kalish
- Department of Statistics and Operations Research, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Oren Amsalem
- Division of Endocrinology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Werner Van Geit
- Blue Brain Project, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Campus Biotech, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Idan Segev
- The Edmond and Lily Safra Center for Brain Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - David M. Steinberg
- Department of Statistics and Operations Research, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
- *Correspondence: David M. Steinberg
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Widge AS, Zhang F, Gosai A, Papadimitrou G, Wilson-Braun P, Tsintou M, Palanivelu S, Noecker AM, McIntyre CC, O’Donnell L, McLaughlin NCR, Greenberg BD, Makris N, Dougherty DD, Rathi Y. Patient-specific connectomic models correlate with, but do not reliably predict, outcomes in deep brain stimulation for obsessive-compulsive disorder. Neuropsychopharmacology 2022; 47:965-972. [PMID: 34621015 PMCID: PMC8882183 DOI: 10.1038/s41386-021-01199-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2021] [Revised: 08/11/2021] [Accepted: 09/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the ventral internal capsule/ventral striatum (VCVS) is an emerging treatment for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Recently, multiple studies using normative connectomes have correlated DBS outcomes to stimulation of specific white matter tracts. Those studies did not test whether these correlations are clinically predictive, and did not apply cross-validation approaches that are necessary for biomarker development. Further, they did not account for the possibility of systematic differences between DBS patients and the non-diagnosed controls used in normative connectomes. To address these gaps, we performed patient-specific diffusion imaging in 8 patients who underwent VCVS DBS for OCD. We delineated tracts connecting thalamus and subthalamic nucleus (STN) to prefrontal cortex via VCVS. We then calculated which tracts were likely activated by individual patients' DBS settings. We fit multiple statistical models to predict both OCD and depression outcomes from tract activation. We further attempted to predict hypomania, a VCVS DBS complication. We assessed all models' performance on held-out test sets. With this best-practices approach, no model predicted OCD response, depression response, or hypomania above chance. Coefficient inspection partly supported prior reports, in that capture of tracts projecting to cingulate cortex was associated with both YBOCS and MADRS response. In contrast to prior reports, however, tracts connected to STN were not reliably correlated with response. Thus, patient-specific imaging and a guideline-adherent analysis were unable to identify a tractographic target with sufficient effect size to drive clinical decision-making or predict individual outcomes. These findings suggest caution in interpreting the results of normative connectome studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alik S. Widge
- grid.17635.360000000419368657Department of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN USA
| | - Fan Zhang
- grid.62560.370000 0004 0378 8294Department of Radiology, Brigham and Womens Hospital, Boston, MA USA
| | - Aishwarya Gosai
- grid.32224.350000 0004 0386 9924Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA USA
| | - George Papadimitrou
- grid.32224.350000 0004 0386 9924Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA USA
| | - Peter Wilson-Braun
- grid.32224.350000 0004 0386 9924Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA USA
| | - Magdalini Tsintou
- grid.32224.350000 0004 0386 9924Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA USA
| | - Senthil Palanivelu
- grid.32224.350000 0004 0386 9924Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA USA
| | - Angela M. Noecker
- grid.67105.350000 0001 2164 3847Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH USA
| | - Cameron C. McIntyre
- grid.67105.350000 0001 2164 3847Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH USA
| | - Lauren O’Donnell
- grid.62560.370000 0004 0378 8294Department of Radiology, Brigham and Womens Hospital, Boston, MA USA
| | - Nicole C. R. McLaughlin
- grid.40263.330000 0004 1936 9094Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI USA ,grid.273271.20000 0000 8593 9332Butler Hospital, Providence, RI USA
| | - Benjamin D. Greenberg
- grid.40263.330000 0004 1936 9094Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI USA ,grid.273271.20000 0000 8593 9332Butler Hospital, Providence, RI USA ,Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology, VA Providence Healthcare System, Providence, RI USA
| | - Nikolaos Makris
- grid.32224.350000 0004 0386 9924Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA USA
| | - Darin D. Dougherty
- grid.32224.350000 0004 0386 9924Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA USA
| | - Yogesh Rathi
- grid.62560.370000 0004 0378 8294Department of Radiology, Brigham and Womens Hospital, Boston, MA USA ,grid.32224.350000 0004 0386 9924Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Beylergil SB, Murray J, Noecker AM, Gupta P, Kilbane C, McIntyre CC, Ghasia FF, Shaikh AG. Temporal Patterns of Spontaneous Fixational Eye Movements: The Influence of Basal Ganglia. J Neuroophthalmol 2022; 42:45-55. [PMID: 34812763 DOI: 10.1097/wno.0000000000001452] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Spontaneity is a unique feature of the nervous system. One of the fundamentally critical and recognized forms of spontaneous motor activity is witnessed in the visuomotor system. Microsaccades, the miniature spontaneous eye movements, are critical for the visual perception. We hypothesized that microsaccades follow specific temporal patterns that are modulated by the basal ganglia output. METHODS We used high-resolution video-oculography to capture microsaccades in 48 subjects (31 healthy and 17 with Parkinson's disease) when subjects were asked to hold their gaze on a straight-ahead target projected on white background. We analyzed spontaneous discharge patterns of microsaccades. RESULTS The first analysis considering coefficient of variation in intersaccadic interval distribution demonstrated that microsaccades in Parkinson's disease are more dispersed than the control group. The second analysis scrutinized microsaccades' temporal variability and revealed 3 distinct occurrence patterns: regular rhythmic, clustered, and randomly occurring following a Poisson-like process. The regular pattern was relatively more common in Parkinson's disease. Subthalamic DBS modulated this temporal pattern. The amount of change in the temporal variability depended on the DBS-induced volume of tissue activation and its overlap with the subthalamic nucleus. The third analysis determined the autocorrelations of microsaccades within 2-second time windows. We found that Parkinson's disease altered local temporal organization in microsaccade generation, and DBS had a modulatory effect. CONCLUSION The microsaccades occur in 3 temporal patterns. The basal ganglia are one of the modulators of the microsaccade spontaneity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sinem Balta Beylergil
- Department of Biomedical Engineering (SBB, AMN, PG, CCM, AGS), Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio; National VA Parkinson Consortium Center (PG, AGS), Neurology Service, Daroff-Dell'Osso Ocular Motility and Vestibular Laboratory, Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio; Cole Eye Institute (JM), Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio; Department of Neurology (CK, AGS), Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio; and Movement Disorders Center (CK, AGS), Neurological Institute, University Hospitals, Cleveland, Ohio
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Tiruvadi V, Choi KS, Gross RE, Butera R, Jirsa V, Mayberg H. Dynamic Oscillations Evoked by Subcallosal Cingulate Deep Brain Stimulation. Front Neurosci 2022; 16:768355. [PMID: 35281513 PMCID: PMC8905359 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.768355] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2021] [Accepted: 01/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of subcallosal cingulate white matter (SCCwm) alleviates symptoms of depression, but its mechanistic effects on brain dynamics remain unclear. In this study we used novel intracranial recordings (LFP) in n = 6 depressed patients stimulated with DBS around the SCCwm target, observing a novel dynamic oscillation (DOs). We confirm that DOs in the LFP are of neural origin and consistently evoked within certain patients. We then characterize the frequency and dynamics of DOs, observing significant variability in DO behavior across patients. Under the hypothesis that LFP-DOs reflect network engagement, we characterize the white matter tracts associated with LFP-DO observations and report a preliminary observation of DO-like activity measured in a single patient's electroencephalography (dEEG). These results support further study of DOs as an objective signal for mechanistic study and connectomics guided DBS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vineet Tiruvadi
- Emory School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Tech and Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
- School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Georgia Tech, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Ki Sueng Choi
- Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Robert E. Gross
- Emory School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Tech and Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Robert Butera
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Tech and Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
- School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Georgia Tech, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Viktor Jirsa
- Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France
| | - Helen Mayberg
- Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Gibson WS, Rusheen AE, Oh Y, In MH, Gorny KR, Felmlee JP, Klassen BT, Jung SJ, Min HK, Lee KH, Jo HJ. Symptom-specific differential motor network modulation by deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease. J Neurosurg 2021; 135:1771-1779. [PMID: 33990083 PMCID: PMC10193504 DOI: 10.3171/2020.10.jns202277] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2020] [Accepted: 10/06/2020] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) is an established neurosurgical treatment for the motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD). While often highly effective, DBS does not always yield optimal therapeutic outcomes, and stimulation-induced adverse effects, including paresthesia, muscle contractions, and nausea/lightheadedness, commonly occur and can limit the efficacy of stimulation. Currently, objective metrics do not exist for monitoring neural changes associated with stimulation-induced therapeutic and adverse effects. METHODS In the present study, the authors combined intraoperative functional MRI (fMRI) with STN DBS in 20 patients with PD to test the hypothesis that stimulation-induced blood oxygen level-dependent signals contained predictive information concerning the therapeutic and adverse effects of stimulation. RESULTS As expected, DBS resulted in blood oxygen level-dependent activation in myriad motor regions, including the primary motor cortex, caudate, putamen, thalamus, midbrain, and cerebellum. Across the patients, DBS-induced improvements in contralateral Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale tremor subscores correlated with activation of thalamic, brainstem, and cerebellar regions. In addition, improvements in rigidity and bradykinesia subscores correlated with activation of the primary motor cortex. Finally, activation of specific sensorimotor-related subregions correlated with the presence of DBS-induced adverse effects, including paresthesia and nausea (cerebellar cortex, sensorimotor cortex) and unwanted muscle contractions (caudate and putamen). CONCLUSIONS These results suggest that DBS-induced activation patterns revealed by fMRI contain predictive information with respect to the therapeutic and adverse effects of DBS. The use of fMRI in combination with DBS therefore may hold translational potential to guide and improve clinical stimulator optimization in patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William S. Gibson
- Departments of Neurologic Surgery
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois; and
| | - Aaron E. Rusheen
- Departments of Neurologic Surgery
- Medical Scientist Training Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Yoonbae Oh
- Departments of Neurologic Surgery
- Biomedical Engineering
| | | | | | | | | | - Sung Jun Jung
- Department of Physiology, College of Medicine, Hanyang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | | | | | - Hang Joon Jo
- Departments of Neurologic Surgery
- Radiology, and
- Neurology, and
- Department of Physiology, College of Medicine, Hanyang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
de Roquemaurel A, Wirth T, Vijiaratnam N, Ferreira F, Zrinzo L, Akram H, Foltynie T, Limousin P. Stimulation Sweet Spot in Subthalamic Deep Brain Stimulation - Myth or Reality? A Critical Review of Literature. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 2021; 99:425-442. [PMID: 34120117 DOI: 10.1159/000516098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2020] [Accepted: 03/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION While deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) has been extensively used for more than 20 years in Parkinson's disease (PD), the optimal area of stimulation to relieve motor symptoms remains elusive. OBJECTIVE We aimed at localizing the sweet spot within the subthalamic region by performing a systematic review of the literature. METHOD PubMed database was searched for published studies exploring optimal stimulation location for STN DBS in PD, published between 2000 and 2019. A standardized assessment procedure based on methodological features was applied to select high-quality publications. Studies conducted more than 3 months after the DBS procedure, employing lateralized scores and/or stimulation condition, and reporting the volume of tissue activated or the position of the stimulating contact within the subthalamic region were considered in the final analysis. RESULTS Out of 439 references, 24 were finally retained, including 21 studies based on contact location and 3 studies based on volume of tissue activated (VTA). Most studies (all VTA-based studies and 13 of the 21 contact-based studies) suggest the superior-lateral STN and the adjacent white matter as the optimal sites for stimulation. Remaining contact-based studies were either inconclusive (5/21), favoured the caudal zona incerta (1/21), or suggested a better outcome of STN stimulation than adjacent white matter stimulation (2/21). CONCLUSION Using a standardized methodological approach, our review supports the presence of a sweet spot located within the supero-lateral STN and extending to the adjacent white matter.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexis de Roquemaurel
- Unit of Functional Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology and the National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, United Kingdom
| | - Thomas Wirth
- Unit of Functional Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology and the National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, United Kingdom.,Neurology department, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France.,INSERM-U964/CNRS-UMR7104/University of Strasbourg, Illkirch-Graffenstaden, France
| | - Nirosen Vijiaratnam
- Unit of Functional Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology and the National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, United Kingdom
| | - Francisca Ferreira
- Unit of Functional Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology and the National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ludvic Zrinzo
- Unit of Functional Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology and the National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, United Kingdom
| | - Harith Akram
- Unit of Functional Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology and the National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, United Kingdom
| | - Thomas Foltynie
- Unit of Functional Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology and the National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, United Kingdom
| | - Patricia Limousin
- Unit of Functional Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology and the National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Vedam-Mai V, Deisseroth K, Giordano J, Lazaro-Munoz G, Chiong W, Suthana N, Langevin JP, Gill J, Goodman W, Provenza NR, Halpern CH, Shivacharan RS, Cunningham TN, Sheth SA, Pouratian N, Scangos KW, Mayberg HS, Horn A, Johnson KA, Butson CR, Gilron R, de Hemptinne C, Wilt R, Yaroshinsky M, Little S, Starr P, Worrell G, Shirvalkar P, Chang E, Volkmann J, Muthuraman M, Groppa S, Kühn AA, Li L, Johnson M, Otto KJ, Raike R, Goetz S, Wu C, Silburn P, Cheeran B, Pathak YJ, Malekmohammadi M, Gunduz A, Wong JK, Cernera S, Wagle Shukla A, Ramirez-Zamora A, Deeb W, Patterson A, Foote KD, Okun MS. Proceedings of the Eighth Annual Deep Brain Stimulation Think Tank: Advances in Optogenetics, Ethical Issues Affecting DBS Research, Neuromodulatory Approaches for Depression, Adaptive Neurostimulation, and Emerging DBS Technologies. Front Hum Neurosci 2021; 15:644593. [PMID: 33953663 PMCID: PMC8092047 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.644593] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2020] [Accepted: 03/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
We estimate that 208,000 deep brain stimulation (DBS) devices have been implanted to address neurological and neuropsychiatric disorders worldwide. DBS Think Tank presenters pooled data and determined that DBS expanded in its scope and has been applied to multiple brain disorders in an effort to modulate neural circuitry. The DBS Think Tank was founded in 2012 providing a space where clinicians, engineers, researchers from industry and academia discuss current and emerging DBS technologies and logistical and ethical issues facing the field. The emphasis is on cutting edge research and collaboration aimed to advance the DBS field. The Eighth Annual DBS Think Tank was held virtually on September 1 and 2, 2020 (Zoom Video Communications) due to restrictions related to the COVID-19 pandemic. The meeting focused on advances in: (1) optogenetics as a tool for comprehending neurobiology of diseases and on optogenetically-inspired DBS, (2) cutting edge of emerging DBS technologies, (3) ethical issues affecting DBS research and access to care, (4) neuromodulatory approaches for depression, (5) advancing novel hardware, software and imaging methodologies, (6) use of neurophysiological signals in adaptive neurostimulation, and (7) use of more advanced technologies to improve DBS clinical outcomes. There were 178 attendees who participated in a DBS Think Tank survey, which revealed the expansion of DBS into several indications such as obesity, post-traumatic stress disorder, addiction and Alzheimer’s disease. This proceedings summarizes the advances discussed at the Eighth Annual DBS Think Tank.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vinata Vedam-Mai
- Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases and the Program for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Karl Deisseroth
- Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.,Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - James Giordano
- Department of Neurology and Neuroethics Studies Program, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Gabriel Lazaro-Munoz
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Winston Chiong
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, Memory and Aging Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Nanthia Suthana
- Department of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine and Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.,Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.,Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.,Department of Bioengineering, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Jean-Philippe Langevin
- Department of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine and Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.,Neurosurgery Service, Department of Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Jay Gill
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Wayne Goodman
- Menninger Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Nicole R Provenza
- School of Engineering, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States
| | - Casey H Halpern
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Rajat S Shivacharan
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Tricia N Cunningham
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Sameer A Sheth
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Nader Pouratian
- Department of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine and Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Katherine W Scangos
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Helen S Mayberg
- Department of Neurology and Department of Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Andreas Horn
- Movement Disorders & Neuromodulation Unit, Department for Neurology, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Kara A Johnson
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.,Scientific Computing and Imaging Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| | - Christopher R Butson
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.,Scientific Computing and Imaging Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| | - Ro'ee Gilron
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Kavli Institute for Fundamental Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Coralie de Hemptinne
- Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases and the Program for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.,Department of Neurological Surgery, Kavli Institute for Fundamental Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Robert Wilt
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Kavli Institute for Fundamental Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Maria Yaroshinsky
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Kavli Institute for Fundamental Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Simon Little
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Kavli Institute for Fundamental Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Philip Starr
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Kavli Institute for Fundamental Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Greg Worrell
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Prasad Shirvalkar
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Kavli Institute for Fundamental Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.,Department of Anesthesiology (Pain Management) and Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Edward Chang
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Kavli Institute for Fundamental Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Jens Volkmann
- Neurologischen Klinik Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Muthuraman Muthuraman
- Section of Movement Disorders and Neurostimulation, Biomedical Statistics and Multimodal Signal Processing Unit, Department of Neurology, Focus Program Translational Neuroscience, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Sergiu Groppa
- Section of Movement Disorders and Neurostimulation, Biomedical Statistics and Multimodal Signal Processing Unit, Department of Neurology, Focus Program Translational Neuroscience, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Andrea A Kühn
- Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Luming Li
- National Engineering Laboratory for Neuromodulation, School of Aerospace Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Matthew Johnson
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | - Kevin J Otto
- J. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Robert Raike
- Restorative Therapies Group Implantables, Research and Core Technology, Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | - Steve Goetz
- Restorative Therapies Group Implantables, Research and Core Technology, Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | - Chengyuan Wu
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Peter Silburn
- Asia Pacific Centre for Neuromodulation, Queensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Binith Cheeran
- Neuromodulation Division, Abbott, Plano, TX, United States
| | - Yagna J Pathak
- Neuromodulation Division, Abbott, Plano, TX, United States
| | | | - Aysegul Gunduz
- Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases and the Program for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.,J. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Joshua K Wong
- Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases and the Program for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Stephanie Cernera
- Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases and the Program for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.,J. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Aparna Wagle Shukla
- Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases and the Program for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Adolfo Ramirez-Zamora
- Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases and the Program for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Wissam Deeb
- Department of Neurology, University of Massachusetts, Worchester, MA, United States
| | - Addie Patterson
- Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases and the Program for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Kelly D Foote
- Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases and the Program for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Michael S Okun
- Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases and the Program for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Howell B, Isbaine F, Willie JT, Opri E, Gross RE, De Hemptinne C, Starr PA, McIntyre CC, Miocinovic S. Image-based biophysical modeling predicts cortical potentials evoked with subthalamic deep brain stimulation. Brain Stimul 2021; 14:549-563. [PMID: 33757931 DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2021.03.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2020] [Revised: 02/19/2021] [Accepted: 03/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Subthalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective surgical treatment for Parkinson's disease and continues to advance technologically with an enormous parameter space. As such, in-silico DBS modeling systems have become common tools for research and development, but their underlying methods have yet to be standardized and validated. OBJECTIVE Evaluate the accuracy of patient-specific estimates of neural pathway activations in the subthalamic region against intracranial, cortical evoked potential (EP) recordings. METHODS Pathway activations were modeled in eleven patients using the latest advances in connectomic modeling of subthalamic DBS, focusing on the hyperdirect pathway (HDP) and corticospinal/bulbar tract (CSBT) for their relevance in human research studies. Correlations between pathway activations and respective EP amplitudes were quantified. RESULTS Good model performance required accurate lead localization and image fusions, as well as appropriate selection of fiber diameter in the biophysical model. While optimal model parameters varied across patients, good performance could be achieved using a global set of parameters that explained 60% and 73% of electrophysiologic activations of CSBT and HDP, respectively. Moreover, restricted models fit to only EP amplitudes of eight standard (monopolar and bipolar) electrode configurations were able to extrapolate variation in EP amplitudes across other directional electrode configurations and stimulation parameters, with no significant reduction in model performance across the cohort. CONCLUSIONS Our findings demonstrate that connectomic models of DBS with sufficient anatomical and electrical details can predict recruitment dynamics of white matter. These results will help to define connectomic modeling standards for preoperative surgical targeting and postoperative patient programming applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bryan Howell
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, USA
| | | | - Jon T Willie
- Department of Neurosurgery, Emory University, USA
| | - Enrico Opri
- Department of Neurology, Emory University, USA
| | | | | | - Philip A Starr
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, USA
| | - Cameron C McIntyre
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Coblentz A, Elias GJB, Boutet A, Germann J, Algarni M, Oliveira LM, Neudorfer C, Widjaja E, Ibrahim GM, Kalia SK, Jain M, Lozano AM, Fasano A. Mapping efficacious deep brain stimulation for pediatric dystonia. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2021; 27:346-356. [PMID: 33385998 DOI: 10.3171/2020.7.peds20322] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2020] [Accepted: 07/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to report the authors' experience with deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the internal globus pallidus (GPi) as a treatment for pediatric dystonia, and to elucidate substrates underlying clinical outcome using state-of-the-art neuroimaging techniques. METHODS A retrospective analysis was conducted in 11 pediatric patients (6 girls and 5 boys, mean age 12 ± 4 years) with medically refractory dystonia who underwent GPi-DBS implantation between June 2009 and September 2017. Using pre- and postoperative MRI, volumes of tissue activated were modeled and weighted by clinical outcome to identify brain regions associated with clinical outcome. Functional and structural networks associated with clinical benefits were also determined using large-scale normative data sets. RESULTS A total of 21 implanted leads were analyzed in 11 patients. The average follow-up duration was 19 ± 20 months (median 5 months). Using a 7-point clinical rating scale, 10 patients showed response to treatment, as defined by scores < 3. The mean improvement in the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale motor score was 40% ± 23%. The probabilistic map of efficacy showed that the voxel cluster most associated with clinical improvement was located at the posterior aspect of the GPi, comparatively posterior and superior to the coordinates of the classic GPi target. Strong functional and structural connectivity was evident between the probabilistic map and areas such as the precentral and postcentral gyri, parietooccipital cortex, and brainstem. CONCLUSIONS This study reported on a series of pediatric patients with dystonia in whom GPi-DBS resulted in variable clinical benefit and described a clinically favorable stimulation site for this cohort, as well as its structural and functional connectivity. This information could be valuable for improving surgical planning, simplifying programming, and further informing disease pathophysiology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ailish Coblentz
- 1Department of Diagnostic Imaging, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto
| | | | - Alexandre Boutet
- 2University Health Network, Toronto
- 3Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto
| | | | - Musleh Algarni
- 4Edmond J. Safra Program in Parkinson's Disease, Morton and Gloria Shulman Movement Disorders Clinic, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Division of Neurology, University of Toronto
| | - Lais M Oliveira
- 4Edmond J. Safra Program in Parkinson's Disease, Morton and Gloria Shulman Movement Disorders Clinic, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Division of Neurology, University of Toronto
| | | | - Elysa Widjaja
- 1Department of Diagnostic Imaging, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto
| | - George M Ibrahim
- 5Department of Neurosurgery, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto
| | - Suneil K Kalia
- 3Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto
- 7Krembil Brain Institute, Toronto; and
- 8Center for Advancing Neurotechnological Innovation to Application (CRANIA), Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mehr Jain
- 6Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa
| | | | - Alfonso Fasano
- 4Edmond J. Safra Program in Parkinson's Disease, Morton and Gloria Shulman Movement Disorders Clinic, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Division of Neurology, University of Toronto
- 7Krembil Brain Institute, Toronto; and
- 8Center for Advancing Neurotechnological Innovation to Application (CRANIA), Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Sui Y, Tian Y, Ko WKD, Wang Z, Jia F, Horn A, De Ridder D, Choi KS, Bari AA, Wang S, Hamani C, Baker KB, Machado AG, Aziz TZ, Fonoff ET, Kühn AA, Bergman H, Sanger T, Liu H, Haber SN, Li L. Deep Brain Stimulation Initiative: Toward Innovative Technology, New Disease Indications, and Approaches to Current and Future Clinical Challenges in Neuromodulation Therapy. Front Neurol 2021; 11:597451. [PMID: 33584498 PMCID: PMC7876228 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2020.597451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2020] [Accepted: 11/23/2020] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is one of the most important clinical therapies for neurological disorders. DBS also has great potential to become a great tool for clinical neuroscience research. Recently, the National Engineering Laboratory for Neuromodulation at Tsinghua University held an international Deep Brain Stimulation Initiative workshop to discuss the cutting-edge technological achievements and clinical applications of DBS. We specifically addressed new clinical approaches and challenges in DBS for movement disorders (Parkinson's disease and dystonia), clinical application toward neurorehabilitation for stroke, and the progress and challenges toward DBS for neuropsychiatric disorders. This review highlighted key developments in (1) neuroimaging, with advancements in 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging DBS compatibility for exploration of brain network mechanisms; (2) novel DBS recording capabilities for uncovering disease pathophysiology; and (3) overcoming global healthcare burdens with online-based DBS programming technology for connecting patient communities. The successful event marks a milestone for global collaborative opportunities in clinical development of neuromodulation to treat major neurological disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yanan Sui
- National Engineering Laboratory for Neuromodulation, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Ye Tian
- National Engineering Laboratory for Neuromodulation, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Wai Kin Daniel Ko
- National Engineering Laboratory for Neuromodulation, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Zhiyan Wang
- National Engineering Laboratory for Neuromodulation, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Fumin Jia
- National Engineering Laboratory for Neuromodulation, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Andreas Horn
- Charité, Department of Neurology, Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Unit, University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Dirk De Ridder
- Section of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Ki Sueng Choi
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Science, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.,Department of Radiology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States.,Department of Neurosurgery, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States
| | - Ausaf A Bari
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Shouyan Wang
- Institute of Science and Technology for Brain-Inspired Intelligence, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Clement Hamani
- Harquail Centre for Neuromodulation, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Kenneth B Baker
- Department of Neurosciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States.,Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Andre G Machado
- Department of Neurosciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States.,Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Tipu Z Aziz
- Department of Neurosurgery, John Radcliffe Hospital, Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Erich Talamoni Fonoff
- Department of Neurology, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil.,Hospital Sírio-Libanês and Hospital Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Andrea A Kühn
- Charité, Department of Neurology, Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Unit, University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Hagai Bergman
- Department of Medical Neurobiology (Physiology), Institute of Medical Research-Israel-Canada (IMRIC), Faculty of Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel.,The Edmond and Lily Safra Center for Brain Research (ELSC), The Hebrew University and Department of Neurosurgery, Hadassah Medical Center, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Terence Sanger
- University of Southern California, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Hesheng Liu
- Department of Neuroscience, College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Suzanne N Haber
- Department of Pharmacology and Physiology, University of Rochester School of Medicine & Dentistry, Rochester, NY, United States.,McLean Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Belmont, MA, United States
| | - Luming Li
- National Engineering Laboratory for Neuromodulation, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Schaper FLWVJ, Plantinga BR, Colon AJ, Wagner GL, Boon P, Blom N, Gommer ED, Hoogland G, Ackermans L, Rouhl RPW, Temel Y. Deep Brain Stimulation in Epilepsy: A Role for Modulation of the Mammillothalamic Tract in Seizure Control? Neurosurgery 2021; 87:602-610. [PMID: 32421806 PMCID: PMC8210468 DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyaa141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2019] [Accepted: 02/16/2020] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Deep brain stimulation of the anterior nucleus of the thalamus (ANT-DBS) can improve seizure control for patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). Yet, one cannot overlook the high discrepancy in efficacy among patients, possibly resulting from differences in stimulation site. OBJECTIVE To test the hypothesis that stimulation at the junction of the ANT and mammillothalamic tract (ANT-MTT junction) increases seizure control. METHODS The relationship between seizure control and the location of the active contacts to the ANT-MTT junction was investigated in 20 patients treated with ANT-DBS for DRE. Coordinates and Euclidean distance of the active contacts relative to the ANT-MTT junction were calculated and related to seizure control. Stimulation sites were mapped by modelling the volume of tissue activation (VTA) and generating stimulation heat maps. RESULTS After 1 yr of stimulation, patients had a median 46% reduction in total seizure frequency, 50% were responders, and 20% of patients were seizure-free. The Euclidean distance of the active contacts to the ANT-MTT junction correlates to change in seizure frequency (r2 = 0.24, P = .01) and is ∼30% smaller (P = .015) in responders than in non-responders. VTA models and stimulation heat maps indicate a hot-spot at the ANT-MTT junction for responders, whereas non-responders had no evident hot-spot. CONCLUSION Stimulation at the ANT-MTT junction correlates to increased seizure control. Our findings suggest a relationship between the stimulation site and therapy response in ANT-DBS for epilepsy with a potential role for the MTT. DBS directed at white matter merits further exploration for the treatment of epilepsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frédéric L W V J Schaper
- Department of Neurology, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Neurosurgery, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), Maastricht, The Netherlands.,School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNS), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Birgit R Plantinga
- Department of Neurosurgery, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), Maastricht, The Netherlands.,School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNS), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Albert J Colon
- Academic Center for Epileptology Kempenhaeghe/ Maastricht University Medical Center, Heeze, The Netherlands.,Academic Center for Epileptology Kempenhaeghe/ Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - G Louis Wagner
- Academic Center for Epileptology Kempenhaeghe/ Maastricht University Medical Center, Heeze, The Netherlands.,Academic Center for Epileptology Kempenhaeghe/ Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Paul Boon
- Academic Center for Epileptology Kempenhaeghe/ Maastricht University Medical Center, Heeze, The Netherlands.,Academic Center for Epileptology Kempenhaeghe/ Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Neurology, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Nadia Blom
- Department of Neurosurgery, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), Maastricht, The Netherlands.,School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNS), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Erik D Gommer
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Govert Hoogland
- Department of Neurosurgery, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), Maastricht, The Netherlands.,School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNS), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Academic Center for Epileptology Kempenhaeghe/ Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Linda Ackermans
- Department of Neurosurgery, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Rob P W Rouhl
- Department of Neurology, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), Maastricht, The Netherlands.,School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNS), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Academic Center for Epileptology Kempenhaeghe/ Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Yasin Temel
- Department of Neurosurgery, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), Maastricht, The Netherlands.,School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNS), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Noecker AM, Frankemolle-Gilbert AM, Howell B, Petersen MV, Beylergil SB, Shaikh AG, McIntyre CC. StimVision v2: Examples and Applications in Subthalamic Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease. Neuromodulation 2021; 24:248-258. [PMID: 33389779 DOI: 10.1111/ner.13350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2020] [Revised: 11/16/2020] [Accepted: 12/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Subthalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established therapy for Parkinson's disease. Connectomic DBS modeling is a burgeoning subfield of research aimed at characterizing the axonal connections activated by DBS. This article describes our approach and methods for evolving the StimVision software platform to meet the technical demands of connectomic DBS modeling in the subthalamic region. MATERIALS AND METHODS StimVision v2 was developed with Visualization Toolkit (VTK) libraries and integrates four major components: 1) medical image visualization, 2) axonal pathway visualization, 3) electrode positioning, and 4) stimulation calculation. RESULTS StimVision v2 implemented two key technological advances for connectomic DBS analyses in the subthalamic region. First was the application of anatomical axonal pathway models to patient-specific DBS models. Second was the application of a novel driving-force method to estimate the response of those axonal pathways to DBS. Example simulations with directional DBS electrodes and clinically defined therapeutic DBS settings are presented to demonstrate the general outputs of StimVision v2 models. CONCLUSIONS StimVision v2 provides the opportunity to evaluate patient-specific axonal pathway activation from subthalamic DBS using anatomically detailed pathway models and electrically detailed electric field distributions with interactive adjustment of the DBS electrode position and stimulation parameter settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela M Noecker
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | - Bryan Howell
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Mikkel V Petersen
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Sinem Balta Beylergil
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Aasef G Shaikh
- Department of Neurology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Cameron C McIntyre
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.,Department of Neurology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Subramaniam S, Blake DT, Constantinidis C. Cholinergic Deep Brain Stimulation for Memory and Cognitive Disorders. J Alzheimers Dis 2021; 83:491-503. [PMID: 34334401 PMCID: PMC8543284 DOI: 10.3233/jad-210425] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Memory and cognitive impairment as sequelae of neurodegeneration in Alzheimer's disease and age-related dementia are major health issues with increasing social and economic burden. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has emerged as a potential treatment to slow or halt progression of the disease state. The selection of stimulation target is critical, and structures that have been targeted for memory and cognitive enhancement include the Papez circuit, structures projecting to the frontal lobe such as the ventral internal capsule, and the cholinergic forebrain. Recent human clinical and animal model results imply that DBS of the nucleus basalis of Meynert can induce a therapeutic modulation of neuronal activity. Benefits include enhanced activity across the cortical mantle, and potential for amelioration of neuropathological mechanisms associated with Alzheimer's disease. The choice of stimulation parameters is also critical. High-frequency, continuous stimulation is used for movement disorders as a way of inhibiting their output; however, no overexcitation has been hypothesized in Alzheimer's disease and lower stimulation frequency or intermittent patterns of stimulation (periods of stimulation interleaved with periods of no stimulation) are likely to be more effective for stimulation of the cholinergic forebrain. Efficacy and long-term tolerance in human patients remain open questions, though the cumulative experience gained by DBS for movement disorders provides assurance for the safety of the procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saravanan Subramaniam
- Department of Neurobiology & Anatomy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - David T. Blake
- Brain and Behavior Discovery Institute, Department of Neurology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA
| | - Christos Constantinidis
- Department of Neurobiology & Anatomy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
- Neuroscience Program, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Parastarfeizabadi M, Sillitoe RV, Kouzani AZ. Multi-disease Deep Brain Stimulation. IEEE ACCESS : PRACTICAL INNOVATIONS, OPEN SOLUTIONS 2020; 8:216933-216947. [PMID: 33381359 PMCID: PMC7771650 DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.3041942] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Current closed-loop deep brain stimulation (DBS) devices can generally tackle one disorder. This paper presents the design and evaluation of a multi-disease closed-loop DBS device that can sense multiple brain biomarkers, detect a disorder, and adaptively deliver electrical stimulation pulses based on the disease state. The device consists of: (i) a neural sensor, (ii) a controller involving a feature extractor, a disease classifier, and a control strategy, and (iii) neural stimulator. The neural sensor records and processes local field potentials and spikes from within the brain using two low-frequency and high-frequency channels. The feature extractor digitally processes the output of the neural sensor, and extracts five potential biomarkers: alpha, beta, slow gamma, high-frequency oscillations, and spikes. The disease classifier identifies the type of the neurological disorder through an analysis of the biomarkers' amplitude features. The control strategy considers the disease state and supplies the stimulation settings to the neural stimulator. Both the disease classifier and control strategy are based on fuzzy algorithms. The neural stimulator generates electrical stimulation pulses according to the control commands, and delivers them to the target area of the brain. The device can generate current stimulation pulses with specific amplitude, frequency, and duration. The fabricated device has the maximum radius of 15 mm. Its total weight including the circuit board, battery and battery holder is 5.1 g. The performance of the integrated device has been evaluated through six bench and in-vitro experiments. The experimental results are presented, analyzed, and discussed. Six bench and in-vitro experiments were conducted using sinusoidal, normal pre-recorded, and diseased neural signals representing normal, epilepsy, depression and PD conditions. The results obtained through these tests indicate the successful neural sensing, classification, control, and neural stimulating performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Roy V. Sillitoe
- Department of Pathology and Immunology, Department of Neuroscience, Jan and Dan Duncan Neurological Research Institute, and Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Children’s Hospital, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Abbas Z. Kouzani
- School of Engineering, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3216, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Baniasadi M, Proverbio D, Gonçalves J, Hertel F, Husch A. FastField: An open-source toolbox for efficient approximation of deep brain stimulation electric fields. Neuroimage 2020; 223:117330. [DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2020] [Revised: 05/26/2020] [Accepted: 08/25/2020] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
|
26
|
Krauss JK, Lipsman N, Aziz T, Boutet A, Brown P, Chang JW, Davidson B, Grill WM, Hariz MI, Horn A, Schulder M, Mammis A, Tass PA, Volkmann J, Lozano AM. Technology of deep brain stimulation: current status and future directions. Nat Rev Neurol 2020; 17:75-87. [PMID: 33244188 DOI: 10.1038/s41582-020-00426-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 292] [Impact Index Per Article: 73.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/08/2020] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a neurosurgical procedure that allows targeted circuit-based neuromodulation. DBS is a standard of care in Parkinson disease, essential tremor and dystonia, and is also under active investigation for other conditions linked to pathological circuitry, including major depressive disorder and Alzheimer disease. Modern DBS systems, borrowed from the cardiac field, consist of an intracranial electrode, an extension wire and a pulse generator, and have evolved slowly over the past two decades. Advances in engineering and imaging along with an improved understanding of brain disorders are poised to reshape how DBS is viewed and delivered to patients. Breakthroughs in electrode and battery designs, stimulation paradigms, closed-loop and on-demand stimulation, and sensing technologies are expected to enhance the efficacy and tolerability of DBS. In this Review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the technical development of DBS, from its origins to its future. Understanding the evolution of DBS technology helps put the currently available systems in perspective and allows us to predict the next major technological advances and hurdles in the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joachim K Krauss
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Nir Lipsman
- Department of Neurosurgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Tipu Aziz
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Alexandre Boutet
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Peter Brown
- Medical Research Council Brain Network Dynamics Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Jin Woo Chang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Benjamin Davidson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Warren M Grill
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Marwan I Hariz
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Umea, Umea, Sweden
| | - Andreas Horn
- Department of Neurology, Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Section, Charité Medicine University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Michael Schulder
- Department of Neurosurgery, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, New York, NY, USA
| | - Antonios Mammis
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA
| | - Peter A Tass
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Jens Volkmann
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.,Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Andres M Lozano
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Vachez YM, Creed MC. Deep Brain Stimulation of the Subthalamic Nucleus Modulates Reward-Related Behavior: A Systematic Review. Front Hum Neurosci 2020; 14:578564. [PMID: 33328933 PMCID: PMC7714911 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.578564] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2020] [Accepted: 10/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN-DBS) is an effective treatment for the motor symptoms of movement disorders including Parkinson's Disease (PD). Despite its therapeutic benefits, STN-DBS has been associated with adverse effects on mood and cognition. Specifically, apathy, which is defined as a loss of motivation, has been reported to emerge or to worsen following STN-DBS. However, it is often challenging to disentangle the effects of STN-DBS per se from concurrent reduction of dopamine replacement therapy, from underlying PD pathology or from disease progression. To this end, pre-clinical models allow for the dissociation of each of these factors, and to establish neural substrates underlying the emergence of motivational symptoms following STN-DBS. Here, we performed a systematic analysis of rodent studies assessing the effects of STN-DBS on reward seeking, reward motivation and reward consumption across a variety of behavioral paradigms. We find that STN-DBS decreases reward seeking in the majority of experiments, and we outline how design of the behavioral task and DBS parameters can influence experimental outcomes. While an early hypothesis posited that DBS acts as a "functional lesion," an analysis of lesions and inhibition of the STN revealed no consistent pattern on reward-related behavior. Thus, we discuss alternative mechanisms that could contribute to the amotivational effects of STN-DBS. We also argue that optogenetic-assisted circuit dissection could yield important insight into the effects of the STN on motivated behavior in health and disease. Understanding the mechanisms underlying the effects of STN-DBS on motivated behavior-will be critical for optimizing the clinical application of STN-DBS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yvan M Vachez
- Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University Pain Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Meaghan C Creed
- Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University Pain Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States.,Departments of Psychiatry, Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Davidson B, Lipsman N, Meng Y, Rabin JS, Giacobbe P, Hamani C. The Use of Tractography-Based Targeting in Deep Brain Stimulation for Psychiatric Indications. Front Hum Neurosci 2020; 14:588423. [PMID: 33304258 PMCID: PMC7701283 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.588423] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2020] [Accepted: 10/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) has been investigated as a treatment option for patients with refractory psychiatric illness. Over the past two decades, neuroimaging developments have helped to advance the field, particularly the use of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and tractographic reconstruction of white-matter pathways. In this article, we review translational considerations and how DTI and tractography have been used to improve targeting during DBS surgery for depression, obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Davidson
- Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Harquail Centre for Neuromodulation, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Division of Neurosurgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Nir Lipsman
- Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Harquail Centre for Neuromodulation, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Division of Neurosurgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ying Meng
- Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Harquail Centre for Neuromodulation, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Division of Neurosurgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jennifer S. Rabin
- Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Harquail Centre for Neuromodulation, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Peter Giacobbe
- Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Harquail Centre for Neuromodulation, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Clement Hamani
- Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Harquail Centre for Neuromodulation, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Division of Neurosurgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Lo Vercio L, Amador K, Bannister JJ, Crites S, Gutierrez A, MacDonald ME, Moore J, Mouches P, Rajasheka D, Schimert S, Subbanna N, Tuladhar A, Wang N, Wilms M, Winder A, Forkert ND. Supervised machine learning tools: a tutorial for clinicians. J Neural Eng 2020; 17. [PMID: 33036008 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/abbff2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2020] [Accepted: 10/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
In an increasingly data-driven world, artificial intelligence is expected to be a key tool for converting big data into tangible benefits and the healthcare domain is no exception to this. Machine learning aims to identify complex patterns in multi-dimensional data and use these uncovered patterns to classify new unseen cases or make data-driven predictions. In recent years, deep neural networks have shown to be capable of producing results that considerably exceed those of conventional machine learning methods for various classification and regression tasks. In this paper, we provide an accessible tutorial of the most important supervised machine learning concepts and methods, including deep learning, which are potentially the most relevant for the medical domain. We aim to take some of the mystery out of machine learning and depict how machine learning models can be useful for medical applications. Finally, this tutorial provides a few practical suggestions for how to properly design a machine learning model for a generic medical problem.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Jasmine Moore
- Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, CANADA
| | | | | | | | | | - Anup Tuladhar
- Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, CANADA
| | - Nanjia Wang
- Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, CANADA
| | - Matthias Wilms
- Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, CANADA
| | - Anthony Winder
- Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, CANADA
| | - Nils Daniel Forkert
- Radiology, University of Calgary, 3330 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 1N4, CANADA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Slopsema JP, Canna A, Uchenik M, Lehto LJ, Krieg J, Wilmerding L, Koski DM, Kobayashi N, Dao J, Blumenfeld M, Filip P, Min HK, Mangia S, Johnson MD, Michaeli S. Orientation-selective and directional deep brain stimulation in swine assessed by functional MRI at 3T. Neuroimage 2020; 224:117357. [PMID: 32916285 PMCID: PMC7783780 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2019] [Revised: 08/27/2020] [Accepted: 09/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Functional MRI (fMRI) has become an important tool for probing network-level effects of deep brain stimulation (DBS). Previous DBS-fMRI studies have shown that electrical stimulation of the ventrolateral (VL) thalamus can modulate sensorimotor cortices in a frequency and amplitude dependent manner. Here, we investigated, using a swine animal model, how the direction and orientation of the electric field, induced by VL-thalamus DBS, affects activity in the sensorimotor cortex. Adult swine underwent implantation of a novel 16-electrode (4 rows × 4 columns) directional DBS lead in the VL thalamus. A within-subject design was used to compare fMRI responses for (1) directional stimulation consisting of monopolar stimulation in four radial directions around the DBS lead, and (2) orientation-selective stimulation where an electric field dipole was rotated 0°−360° around a quadrangle of electrodes. Functional responses were quantified in the premotor, primary motor, and somatosensory cortices. High frequency electrical stimulation through leads implanted in the VL thalamus induced directional tuning in cortical response patterns to varying degrees depending on DBS lead position. Orientation-selective stimulation showed maximal functional response when the electric field was oriented approximately parallel to the DBS lead, which is consistent with known axonal orientations of the cortico-thalamocortical pathway. These results demonstrate that directional and orientation-selective stimulation paradigms in the VL thalamus can tune network-level modulation patterns in the sensorimotor cortex, which may have translational utility in improving functional outcomes of DBS therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Antonietta Canna
- Department of Radiology, Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota
| | | | - Lauri J Lehto
- Department of Radiology, Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota
| | - Jordan Krieg
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota
| | | | - Dee M Koski
- Department of Radiology, Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota
| | - Naoharu Kobayashi
- Department of Radiology, Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota
| | - Joan Dao
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota
| | | | - Pavel Filip
- Department of Radiology, Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota; Department of Neurology, Charles University, First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | | | - Silvia Mangia
- Department of Radiology, Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota
| | - Matthew D Johnson
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota; Institute for Translational Neuroscience, University of Minnesota
| | - Shalom Michaeli
- Department of Radiology, Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Bower KL, McIntyre CC. Deep brain stimulation of terminating axons. Brain Stimul 2020; 13:1863-1870. [PMID: 32919091 DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2020.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2020] [Revised: 08/05/2020] [Accepted: 09/01/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic region is an established treatment for the motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease. Several types of neural elements reside in the subthalamic region, including subthalamic nucleus (STN) neurons, fibers of passage, and terminating afferents. Recent studies suggest that direct activation of a specific population of subthalamic afferents, known as the hyperdirect pathway, may be responsible for some of the therapeutic effects of subthalamic DBS. OBJECTIVE The goal of this study was to quantify how axon termination affects neural excitability from DBS. We evaluated how adjusting different stimulation parameters influenced the relative excitability of terminating axons (TAs) compared to fibers of passage (FOPs). METHODS We used finite element electric field models of DBS, coupled to multi-compartment cable models of axons, to calculate activation thresholds for populations of TAs and FOPs. These generalized models were used to evaluate the response to anodic vs. cathodic stimulation, with short vs. long stimulus pulses. RESULTS Terminating axons generally exhibited lower thresholds than fibers of passage across all tested parameters. Short pulse widths accentuated the relative excitability of TAs over FOPs. CONCLUSION(S) Our computational results demonstrate a hyperexcitability of terminating axons to DBS that is robust to variation in the stimulation parameters, as well as the axon model parameters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelsey L Bower
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Cameron C McIntyre
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Treu S, Strange B, Oxenford S, Neumann WJ, Kühn A, Li N, Horn A. Deep brain stimulation: Imaging on a group level. Neuroimage 2020; 219:117018. [PMID: 32505698 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2020] [Revised: 05/07/2020] [Accepted: 06/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) is an established treatment option for movement disorders and is under investigation for treatment in a growing number of other brain diseases. It has been shown that exact electrode placement crucially affects the efficacy of DBS and this should be considered when investigating novel indications or DBS targets. To measure clinical improvement as a function of electrode placement, neuroscientific methodology and specialized software tools are needed. Such tools should have the goal to make electrode placement comparable across patients and DBS centers, and include statistical analysis options to validate and define optimal targets. Moreover, to allow for comparability across different centers, these need to be performed within an algorithmically and anatomically standardized and openly available group space. With the publication of Lead-DBS software in 2014, an open-source tool was introduced that allowed for precise electrode reconstructions based on pre- and postoperative neuroimaging data. Here, we introduce Lead Group, implemented within the Lead-DBS environment and specifically designed to meet aforementioned demands. In the present article, we showcase the various processing streams of Lead Group in a retrospective cohort of 51 patients suffering from Parkinson's disease, who were implanted with DBS electrodes to the subthalamic nucleus (STN). Specifically, we demonstrate various ways to visualize placement of all electrodes in the group and map clinical improvement values to subcortical space. We do so by using active coordinates and volumes of tissue activated, showing converging evidence of an optimal DBS target in the dorsolateral STN. Second, we relate DBS outcome to the impact of each electrode on local structures by measuring overlap of stimulation volumes with the STN. Finally, we explore the software functions for connectomic mapping, which may be used to relate DBS outcomes to connectivity estimates with remote brain areas. The manuscript is accompanied by a walkthrough tutorial which allows users to reproduce all main results presented here. All data and code needed to reproduce results are openly available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Svenja Treu
- Laboratory for Clinical Neuroscience, Centre for Biomedical Technology, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Spain; Movement Disorders & Neuromodulation Unit, Department for Neurology, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Germany.
| | - Bryan Strange
- Laboratory for Clinical Neuroscience, Centre for Biomedical Technology, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Spain
| | - Simon Oxenford
- Movement Disorders & Neuromodulation Unit, Department for Neurology, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Germany
| | - Wolf-Julian Neumann
- Movement Disorders & Neuromodulation Unit, Department for Neurology, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Germany
| | - Andrea Kühn
- Movement Disorders & Neuromodulation Unit, Department for Neurology, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Germany; Berlin School of Mind and Brain, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Exzellenzcluster NeuroCure, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ningfei Li
- Movement Disorders & Neuromodulation Unit, Department for Neurology, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Germany
| | - Andreas Horn
- Movement Disorders & Neuromodulation Unit, Department for Neurology, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Telkes I, Sabourin S, Durphy J, Adam O, Sukul V, Raviv N, Staudt MD, Pilitsis JG. Functional Use of Directional Local Field Potentials in the Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation. Front Hum Neurosci 2020; 14:145. [PMID: 32410972 PMCID: PMC7198898 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2019] [Accepted: 03/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Directional deep brain stimulation (DBS) technology aims to address the limitations, such as stimulation-induced side effects, by delivering selective, focal modulation via segmented contacts. However, DBS programming becomes more complex and time-consuming for clinical feasibility. Local field potentials (LFPs) might serve a functional role in guiding clinical programming. Objective In this pilot study, we investigated the spectral dynamics of directional LFPs in subthalamic nucleus (STN) and their relationship to motor symptoms of Parkinson’s disease (PD). Methods We recorded intraoperative STN-LFPs from 8-contact leads (Infinity-6172, Abbott Laboratories, Illinois, United States) in 8 PD patients at rest. Directional LFPs were referenced to their common average and time-frequency analysis was computed using a modified Welch periodogram method. The beta band (13–35 Hz) features were extracted and their correlation to preoperative UPDRS-III scores were assessed. Results Normalized beta power (13–20 Hz) and normalized peak power (13–35 Hz) were found to be higher in anterior direction despite lack of statistical significance (p > 0.05). Results of the Spearman correlation analysis demonstrated positive trends with bradykinesia/rigidity in dorsoanterior direction (r = 0.659, p = 0.087) and with axial scores in the dorsomedial direction (r = 0.812, p = 0.072). Conclusion Given that testing all possible combinations of contact pairs and stimulation parameters is not feasible in a single clinic visit, spatio-spectral LFP dynamics obtained from intraoperative recordings might be used as an initial marker to select optimal contact(s).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilknur Telkes
- Department of Neuroscience and Experimental Therapeutics, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY, United States
| | - Shelby Sabourin
- Department of Neuroscience and Experimental Therapeutics, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY, United States
| | - Jennifer Durphy
- Department of Neurology, Albany Medical Center, Albany, NY, United States
| | - Octavian Adam
- Department of Neurology, Albany Medical Center, Albany, NY, United States
| | - Vishad Sukul
- Department of Neurosurgery, Albany Medical Center, Albany, NY, United States
| | - Nataly Raviv
- Department of Neurosurgery, Albany Medical Center, Albany, NY, United States
| | - Michael D Staudt
- Department of Neurosurgery, Albany Medical Center, Albany, NY, United States
| | - Julie G Pilitsis
- Department of Neuroscience and Experimental Therapeutics, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY, United States.,Department of Neurosurgery, Albany Medical Center, Albany, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Vachez Y, Carcenac C, Magnard R, Kerkerian‐Le Goff L, Salin P, Savasta M, Carnicella S, Boulet S. Subthalamic Nucleus Stimulation Impairs Motivation: Implication for Apathy in Parkinson's Disease. Mov Disord 2020; 35:616-628. [DOI: 10.1002/mds.27953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2019] [Revised: 11/13/2019] [Accepted: 11/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Yvan Vachez
- Inserm U1216 Grenoble France
- Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble Institut des Neurosciences, GIN Grenoble France
| | - Carole Carcenac
- Inserm U1216 Grenoble France
- Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble Institut des Neurosciences, GIN Grenoble France
| | - Robin Magnard
- Inserm U1216 Grenoble France
- Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble Institut des Neurosciences, GIN Grenoble France
| | | | | | - Marc Savasta
- Inserm U1216 Grenoble France
- Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble Institut des Neurosciences, GIN Grenoble France
| | - Sebastien Carnicella
- Inserm U1216 Grenoble France
- Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble Institut des Neurosciences, GIN Grenoble France
| | - Sabrina Boulet
- Inserm U1216 Grenoble France
- Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble Institut des Neurosciences, GIN Grenoble France
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Ramasubbu R, Clark DL, Golding S, Dobson KS, Mackie A, Haffenden A, Kiss ZH. Long versus short pulse width subcallosal cingulate stimulation for treatment-resistant depression: a randomised, double-blind, crossover trial. Lancet Psychiatry 2020; 7:29-40. [PMID: 31860455 DOI: 10.1016/s2215-0366(19)30415-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2019] [Revised: 10/03/2019] [Accepted: 10/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stimulation adjustment is required to optimise outcomes of deep brain stimulation (DBS) for treatment-resistant depression, but controlled data for ideal stimulation parameters are poor or insufficient. We aimed to establish the efficacy and safety of short pulse width (SPW) and long pulse width (LPW) subcallosal cingulate DBS in depression. METHODS We did a double-blind, randomised, crossover trial in an academic hospital in Calgary, AB, Canada. Patients had DSM IV-defined major depressive disorder and bipolar depression (20-70 years old, both sexes) and did not respond to treatment for more than 1 year, with a score of 20 or more on the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) at recruitment. Patients underwent bilateral DBS implantation into the subcallosal cingulate white matter using diffusion tensor imaging tractography. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 without stratification using a computerised list generator to receive either SPW (90 μs) or LPW (210-450 μs) stimulation for 6 months. Patients and the clinician assessing outcomes were masked to the stimulation group. Keeping frequency constant (130 Hz), either pulse width or voltage was increased monthly, based on response using the HDRS. Patients who did not respond to treatment (<50% reduction in HDRS from baseline) at 6 months crossed over to the opposite stimulation for another 6 months. All patients received individualised cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) for 12 weeks. The primary outcome was change in HDRS at 6 months and 12 months using intention-to-treat analysis. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01983904. FINDINGS Between Dec 5, 2013, and Sept 30, 2016, of 225 patients screened for eligibility, 23 patients were selected for DBS surgery. After one patient withdrew, 22 (mean age 46·4 years, SEM 3·1; 10 [45%] female, 12 [55%] male) were randomly assigned, ten (45%) to LPW stimulation and 12 (55%) to SPW stimulation. Patients were followed up at 6 months and 12 months. There was a significant reduction in HDRS scores (p<0·0001) with no difference between SPW and LPW groups (p=0·54) in the randomisation phase at 6 months. Crossover groups did not show a significant decrease in HDRS within groups (p=0·15) and between groups (p=0·21) from 6-12 months. Adverse events were equal between groups. Worsening anxiety and depression were the most common psychological adverse events. One patient in the SPW group died by suicide. INTERPRETATION Both LPW and SPW stimulation of subcallosal cingulate white matter tracts carried similar risks and were equally effective in reducing depressive symptoms, suggesting a role for both pulse width and amplitude titration in optimising clinical outcomes in patients with treatment-resistant depression. FUNDING Alberta Innovates Health Solutions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rajamannar Ramasubbu
- Departments of Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, Mathison Centre for Mental Health Research & Education, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada; Foothills Hospital, Calgary, AB, Canada.
| | - Darren L Clark
- Departments of Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, Mathison Centre for Mental Health Research & Education, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Sandra Golding
- Departments of Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, Mathison Centre for Mental Health Research & Education, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Keith S Dobson
- Department of Psychology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | | | | | - Zelma Ht Kiss
- Departments of Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, Mathison Centre for Mental Health Research & Education, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada; Foothills Hospital, Calgary, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Ma BB, Fields MC, Knowlton RC, Chang EF, Szaflarski JP, Marcuse LV, Rao VR. Responsive neurostimulation for regional neocortical epilepsy. Epilepsia 2019; 61:96-106. [PMID: 31828780 DOI: 10.1111/epi.16409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2019] [Revised: 11/19/2019] [Accepted: 11/19/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Surgical resection of seizure-producing brain tissue is a gold standard treatment for drug-resistant focal epilepsy. However, several patient-specific factors can preclude resective surgery, including a spatially extensive ("regional") seizure-onset zone (SOZ). For such patients, responsive neurostimulation (RNS) represents a potential treatment, but its efficacy has not been investigated in this population. METHODS We performed a multicenter retrospective cohort study of patients (N = 30) with drug-resistant focal epilepsy and a regional neocortical SOZ delineated by intracranial monitoring who were treated with the RNS System for at least 6 months. RNS System leads were placed at least 1-cm apart over the SOZ, and most patients were treated with a lead-to-lead stimulation pathway. Five patients underwent partial resection of the SOZ concurrent with RNS System implantation. We assessed change in seizure frequency relative to preimplant baseline and evaluated correlation between clinical outcome and stimulation parameters. RESULTS Median follow-up duration was 21.5 months (range 6-52). Median reduction in clinical seizure frequency was 75.5% (interquartile range [IQR] 40%-93.9%). There was no significant difference in outcome between patients treated with and without concurrent partial resection. Most patients were treated with low charge densities (1-2.5 µC/cm2 ), but charge density, interlead distance, and duration of treatment were not significantly correlated with outcome. SIGNIFICANCE RNS is a feasible and effective treatment in patients with drug-resistant regional neocortical seizures. Prospective studies in larger cohorts are necessary to determine optimal lead configuration and stimulation parameters, although our results suggest that lead-to-lead stimulation and low charge density may be effective in some patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brandy B Ma
- Department of Neurology and Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Madeline C Fields
- Department of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Robert C Knowlton
- Department of Neurology and Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Edward F Chang
- Department of Neurological Surgery and Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jerzy P Szaflarski
- Department of Neurology and the UAB Epilepsy Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AB, USA
| | - Lara V Marcuse
- Department of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Vikram R Rao
- Department of Neurology and Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Karimi F, Attarpour A, Amirfattahi R, Nezhad AZ. Computational analysis of non-invasive deep brain stimulation based on interfering electric fields. Phys Med Biol 2019; 64:235010. [PMID: 31661678 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab5229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
Neuromodulation modalities are used as effective treatments for some brain disorders. Non-invasive deep brain stimulation (NDBS) via temporally interfering electric fields has emerged recently as a non-invasive strategy for electrically stimulating deep regions in the brain. The objective of this study is to provide insight into the fundamental mechanisms of this strategy and assess the potential uses of this method through computational analysis. Analytical and numerical methods are used to compute the electric potential and field distributions generated during NDBS in homogeneous and inhomogeneous models of the brain. The computational results are used for specifying the activated area in the brain (macroscopic approach), and quantifying its relationships to the stimulation parameters. Two automatic algorithms, using artificial neural network (ANN), are developed for the homogeneous model with two and four electrode pairs to estimate stimulation parameters. Additionally, the extracellular potentials are coupled to the compartmental axon cable model to determine the responses of the neurons to the modulated electric field in two developed models and to evaluate the precise activated area location (microscopic approach). Our results show that although the shape of the activated area was different in macroscopic and microscopic approaches, it located only at depth. Our optimization algorithms showed significant accuracy in estimating stimulation parameters. Moreover, it demonstrated that the more the electrode pairs, the more controllable the activated area. Finally, compartmental axon cable modeling results verified that neurons can demodulate and follow the electric field modulation envelope amplitude (MEA) in our models. The results of this study help develop the NDBS method and eliminate some limitations associated with the nonautomated optimization algorithm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fariba Karimi
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan 8415683111, Iran. These authors have contributed equally to this work as first authors
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Duffley G, Anderson DN, Vorwerk J, Dorval AD, Butson CR. Evaluation of methodologies for computing the deep brain stimulation volume of tissue activated. J Neural Eng 2019; 16:066024. [PMID: 31426036 PMCID: PMC7187771 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ab3c95] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Objective. Computational models are a popular tool for predicting the effects of deep brain stimulation (DBS) on neural tissue. One commonly used model, the volume of tissue activated (VTA), is computed using multiple methodologies. We quantified differences in the VTAs generated by five methodologies: the traditional axon model method, the electric field norm, and three activating function based approaches—the activating function at each grid point in the tangential direction (AF-Tan) or in the maximally activating direction (AF-3D), and the maximum activating function along the entire length of a tangential fiber (AF-Max). Approach. We computed the VTA using each method across multiple stimulation settings. The resulting volumes were compared for similarity, and the methodologies were analyzed for their differences in behavior. Main results. Activation threshold values for both the electric field norm and the activating function varied with regards to electrode configuration, pulse width, and frequency. All methods produced highly similar volumes for monopolar stimulation. For bipolar electrode configurations, only the maximum activating function along the tangential axon method, AF-Max, produced similar volumes to those produced by the axon model method. Further analysis revealed that both of these methods are biased by their exclusive use of tangential fiber orientations. In contrast, the activating function in the maximally activating direction method, AF-3D, produces a VTA that is free of axon orientation and projection bias. Significance. Simulating tangentially oriented axons, the standard approach of computing the VTA, is too computationally expensive for widespread implementation and yields results biased by the assumption of tangential fiber orientation. In this work, we show that a computationally efficient method based on the activating function, AF-Max, reliably reproduces the VTAs generated by direct axon modeling. Further, we propose another method, AF-3D as a potentially superior model for representing generic neural tissue activation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gordon Duffley
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America. Scientific Computing & Imaging (SCI) Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Anderson DN, Osting B, Vorwerk J, Dorval AD, Butson CR. Optimized programming algorithm for cylindrical and directional deep brain stimulation electrodes. J Neural Eng 2019; 15:026005. [PMID: 29235446 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/aaa14b] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a growing treatment option for movement and psychiatric disorders. As DBS technology moves toward directional leads with increased numbers of smaller electrode contacts, trial-and-error methods of manual DBS programming are becoming too time-consuming for clinical feasibility. We propose an algorithm to automate DBS programming in near real-time for a wide range of DBS lead designs. APPROACH Magnetic resonance imaging and diffusion tensor imaging are used to build finite element models that include anisotropic conductivity. The algorithm maximizes activation of target tissue and utilizes the Hessian matrix of the electric potential to approximate activation of neurons in all directions. We demonstrate our algorithm's ability in an example programming case that targets the subthalamic nucleus (STN) for the treatment of Parkinson's disease for three lead designs: the Medtronic 3389 (four cylindrical contacts), the direct STNAcute (two cylindrical contacts, six directional contacts), and the Medtronic-Sapiens lead (40 directional contacts). MAIN RESULTS The optimization algorithm returns patient-specific contact configurations in near real-time-less than 10 s for even the most complex leads. When the lead was placed centrally in the target STN, the directional leads were able to activate over 50% of the region, whereas the Medtronic 3389 could activate only 40%. When the lead was placed 2 mm lateral to the target, the directional leads performed as well as they did in the central position, but the Medtronic 3389 activated only 2.9% of the STN. SIGNIFICANCE This DBS programming algorithm can be applied to cylindrical electrodes as well as novel directional leads that are too complex with modern technology to be manually programmed. This algorithm may reduce clinical programming time and encourage the use of directional leads, since they activate a larger volume of the target area than cylindrical electrodes in central and off-target lead placements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daria Nesterovich Anderson
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America. Scientific Computing & Imaging (SCI) Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Dembek TA, Roediger J, Horn A, Reker P, Oehrn C, Dafsari HS, Li N, Kühn AA, Fink GR, Visser‐Vandewalle V, Barbe MT, Timmermann L. Probabilistic sweet spots predict motor outcome for deep brain stimulation in Parkinson disease. Ann Neurol 2019; 86:527-538. [DOI: 10.1002/ana.25567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 78] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2018] [Revised: 07/07/2019] [Accepted: 07/28/2019] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Till A. Dembek
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of Cologne Cologne Germany
- Department of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of Cologne Cologne Germany
| | - Jan Roediger
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of Cologne Cologne Germany
| | - Andreas Horn
- Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Unit, Department for NeurologyCharité–University Medicine Berlin Berlin Germany
| | - Paul Reker
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of Cologne Cologne Germany
| | - Carina Oehrn
- Cognitive Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and MedicineJülich Research Center Jülich Germany
| | - Haidar S. Dafsari
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of Cologne Cologne Germany
| | - Ningfei Li
- Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Unit, Department for NeurologyCharité–University Medicine Berlin Berlin Germany
| | - Andrea A. Kühn
- Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Unit, Department for NeurologyCharité–University Medicine Berlin Berlin Germany
| | - Gereon R. Fink
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of Cologne Cologne Germany
- Cognitive Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and MedicineJülich Research Center Jülich Germany
| | - Veerle Visser‐Vandewalle
- Department of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of Cologne Cologne Germany
| | - Michael T. Barbe
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of Cologne Cologne Germany
| | - Lars Timmermann
- Department of NeurologyUniversity Hospital of Marburg and Gießen Marburg Germany
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Howell B, Gunalan K, McIntyre CC. A Driving-Force Predictor for Estimating Pathway Activation in Patient-Specific Models of Deep Brain Stimulation. Neuromodulation 2019; 22:403-415. [PMID: 30775834 PMCID: PMC6579680 DOI: 10.1111/ner.12929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2018] [Revised: 11/30/2018] [Accepted: 12/20/2018] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Detailed biophysical modeling of deep brain stimulation (DBS) provides a theoretical approach to quantify the cellular response to the applied electric field. However, the most accurate models for performing such analyses, patient-specific field-cable (FC) pathway-activation models (PAMs), are so technically demanding to implement that their use in clinical research is greatly limited. Predictive algorithms can simplify PAM calculations, but they generally fail to reproduce the output of FC models when evaluated over a wide range of clinically relevant stimulation parameters. Therefore, we set out to develop a novel driving-force (DF) predictive algorithm (DF-Howell), customized to the study of DBS, which can better match FC results. METHODS We developed the DF-Howell algorithm and compared its predictions to FC PAM results, as well as to the DF-Peterson algorithm, which is currently the most accurate and generalizable DF-based method. Comparison of the various methods was quantified within the context of subthalamic DBS using activation thresholds of axons representing the internal capsule, hyperdirect pathway, and cerebellothalamic tract for various combinations of fiber diameters, stimulus pulse widths, and electrode configurations. RESULTS The DF-Howell predictor estimated activation of the three axonal pathways with less than a 6.2% mean error with respect to the FC PAM for all 21 cases tested. In 15 of the 21 cases, DF-Howell outperformed DF-Peterson in estimating pathway activation, reducing mean-errors up to 22.5%. CONCLUSIONS DF-Howell represents an accurate predictor for estimating axonal pathway activation in patient-specific DBS models, but errors still exist relative to FC PAM calculations. Nonetheless, the tractability of DF algorithms helps to reduce the technical barriers for performing accurate biophysical modeling in clinical DBS research studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bryan Howell
- Case Western Reserve University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Emory University, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Kabilar Gunalan
- Case Western Reserve University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Cameron C. McIntyre
- Case Western Reserve University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Neuroimaging Technological Advancements for Targeting in Functional Neurosurgery. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 2019; 19:42. [DOI: 10.1007/s11910-019-0961-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
|
43
|
Riva-Posse P, Inman CS, Choi KS, Crowell AL, Gross RE, Hamann S, Mayberg HS. Autonomic arousal elicited by subcallosal cingulate stimulation is explained by white matter connectivity. Brain Stimul 2019; 12:743-751. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2019.01.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2018] [Revised: 12/11/2018] [Accepted: 01/22/2019] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
|
44
|
Hell F, Palleis C, Mehrkens JH, Koeglsperger T, Bötzel K. Deep Brain Stimulation Programming 2.0: Future Perspectives for Target Identification and Adaptive Closed Loop Stimulation. Front Neurol 2019; 10:314. [PMID: 31001196 PMCID: PMC6456744 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00314] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2018] [Accepted: 03/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation has developed into an established treatment for movement disorders and is being actively investigated for numerous other neurological as well as psychiatric disorders. An accurate electrode placement in the target area and the effective programming of DBS devices are considered the most important factors for the individual outcome. Recent research in humans highlights the relevance of widespread networks connected to specific DBS targets. Improving the targeting of anatomical and functional networks involved in the generation of pathological neural activity will improve the clinical DBS effect and limit side-effects. Here, we offer a comprehensive overview over the latest research on target structures and targeting strategies in DBS. In addition, we provide a detailed synopsis of novel technologies that will support DBS programming and parameter selection in the future, with a particular focus on closed-loop stimulation and associated biofeedback signals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Franz Hell
- Department of Neurology, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany
- Graduate School of Systemic Neurosciences, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany
| | - Carla Palleis
- Department of Neurology, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany
- Department of Translational Neurodegeneration, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Munich, Germany
| | - Jan H. Mehrkens
- Department of Neurosurgery, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany
| | - Thomas Koeglsperger
- Department of Neurology, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany
- Department of Translational Neurodegeneration, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Munich, Germany
| | - Kai Bötzel
- Department of Neurology, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Tucker HR, Mahoney E, Chhetri A, Unger K, Mamone G, Kim G, Audil A, Moolick B, Molho ES, Pilitsis JG, Shin DS. Deep brain stimulation of the ventroanterior and ventrolateral thalamus improves motor function in a rat model of Parkinson's disease. Exp Neurol 2019; 317:155-167. [PMID: 30890329 DOI: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2019.03.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2019] [Revised: 02/26/2019] [Accepted: 03/14/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disease with affected individuals exhibiting motor symptoms of bradykinesia, muscle rigidity, tremor, postural instability and gait dysfunction. The current gold standard treatment is pharmacotherapy with levodopa, but long-term use is associated with motor response fluctuations and can cause abnormal movements called dyskinesias. An alternative treatment option is deep brain stimulation (DBS) with the two FDA-approved brain targets for PD situated in the basal ganglia; specifically, in the subthalamic nucleus (STN) and globus pallidus pars interna (GPi). Both improve quality of life and motor scores by ~50-70% in well-selected patients but can also elicit adverse effects on cognition and other non-motor symptoms. Therefore, identifying a novel DBS target that is efficacious for patients not optimally responsive to current DBS targets with fewer side-effects has clear clinical merit. Here, we investigate whether the ventroanterior (VA) and ventrolateral (VL) motor nuclei of the thalamus can serve as novel and effective DBS targets for PD. In the limb-use asymmetry test (LAT), hemiparkinsonian rats showcased left forelimb akinesia and touched only 6.5 ± 1.3% with that paw. However, these animals touched equally with both forepaws with DBS at 10 Hz, 100 μsec pulse width and 100 uA cathodic stimulation in the VA (n = 7), VL (n = 8) or at the interface between the two thalamic nuclei which we refer to as the VA|VL (n = 12). With whole-cell patch-clamp recordings, we noted that VA|VL stimulation in vitro increased the number of induced action potentials in proximal neurons in both areas albeit VL neurons transitioned from bursting to non-bursting action potentials (APs) with large excitatory postsynaptic potentials time-locked to stimulation. In contrast, VA neurons were excited with VA|VL electrical stimulation but with little change in spiking phenotype. Overall, our findings show that DBS in the VA, VL or VA|VL improved motor function in a rat model of PD; plausibly via increased excitation of residing neurons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heidi R Tucker
- Department of Neuroscience & Experimental Therapeutics, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY, United States of America
| | - Emily Mahoney
- Department of Neuroscience & Experimental Therapeutics, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY, United States of America
| | - Ashok Chhetri
- Department of Neuroscience & Experimental Therapeutics, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY, United States of America
| | - Kristen Unger
- Department of Neuroscience & Experimental Therapeutics, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY, United States of America
| | - Gianna Mamone
- Department of Neuroscience & Experimental Therapeutics, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY, United States of America
| | - Gabrielle Kim
- Department of Neuroscience & Experimental Therapeutics, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY, United States of America
| | - Aliyah Audil
- Department of Neuroscience & Experimental Therapeutics, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY, United States of America
| | - Benjamin Moolick
- Department of Neuroscience & Experimental Therapeutics, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY, United States of America
| | - Eric S Molho
- Department of Neurology, Albany Medical Center, Albany, NY, United States of America
| | - Julie G Pilitsis
- Department of Neuroscience & Experimental Therapeutics, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY, United States of America; Department of Neurosurgery, Albany Medical Center, Albany, NY, United States of America
| | - Damian S Shin
- Department of Neuroscience & Experimental Therapeutics, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY, United States of America; Department of Neurology, Albany Medical Center, Albany, NY, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Bijanki KR, Manns JR, Inman CS, Choi KS, Harati S, Pedersen NP, Drane DL, Waters AC, Fasano RE, Mayberg HS, Willie JT. Cingulum stimulation enhances positive affect and anxiolysis to facilitate awake craniotomy. J Clin Invest 2019; 129:1152-1166. [PMID: 30589643 DOI: 10.1172/jci120110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2018] [Accepted: 12/18/2018] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Awake neurosurgery requires patients to converse and respond to visual or verbal prompts to identify and protect brain tissue supporting essential functions such as language, primary sensory modalities, and motor function. These procedures can be poorly tolerated because of patient anxiety, yet acute anxiolytic medications typically cause sedation and impair cortical function. METHODS In this study, direct electrical stimulation of the left dorsal anterior cingulum bundle was discovered to reliably evoke positive affect and anxiolysis without sedation in a patient with epilepsy undergoing research testing during standard inpatient intracranial electrode monitoring. These effects were quantified using subjective and objective behavioral measures, and stimulation was found to evoke robust changes in local and distant neural activity. RESULTS The index patient ultimately required an awake craniotomy procedure to confirm safe resection margins in the treatment of her epilepsy. During the procedure, cingulum bundle stimulation enhanced positive affect and reduced the patient's anxiety to the point that intravenous anesthetic/anxiolytic medications were discontinued and cognitive testing was completed. Behavioral responses were subsequently replicated in 2 patients with anatomically similar electrode placements localized to an approximately 1-cm span along the anterior dorsal cingulum bundle above genu of the corpus callosum. CONCLUSIONS The current study demonstrates a robust anxiolytic response to cingulum bundle stimulation in 3 patients with epilepsy. TRIAL REGISTRATION The current study was not affiliated with any formal clinical trial. FUNDING This project was supported by the American Foundation for Suicide Prevention and the NIH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly R Bijanki
- Department of Neurosurgery, and.,Department of Psychiatry, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Joseph R Manns
- Department of Psychology, Emory University College of Arts and Sciences, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | | | - Ki Sueng Choi
- Department of Psychiatry, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | | | - Nigel P Pedersen
- Department of Neurology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Daniel L Drane
- Department of Neurology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Allison C Waters
- Department of Psychiatry, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Rebecca E Fasano
- Department of Neurology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Helen S Mayberg
- Department of Psychiatry, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.,Department of Neurology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Jon T Willie
- Department of Neurosurgery, and.,Department of Neurology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Cubo R, Astrom M, Medvedev A. Optimization-Based Contact Fault Alleviation in Deep Brain Stimulation Leads. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2019; 26:69-76. [PMID: 29324404 DOI: 10.1109/tnsre.2017.2769707] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a neurosurgical treatment in, e.g., Parkinson's Disease. Electrical stimulation in DBS is delivered to a certain target through electrodes implanted into the brain. Recent developments aiming at better stimulation target coverage and lesser side effects have led to an increase in the number of contacts in a DBS lead as well as higher hardware complexity. This paper proposes an optimization-based approach to alleviation of the fault impact on the resulting therapeutical effect in field steering DBS. Faulty contacts could be an issue given recent trends of increasing number of contacts in DBS leads. Hence, a fault detection/alleviation scheme, such as the one proposed in this paper, is necessary ensure resilience in the chronic stimulation. Two alternatives are considered and compared with the stimulation prior to the fault: one using higher amplitudes on the remaining contacts and another with alleviating contacts in the neighborhood of the faulty one. Satisfactory compensation for a faulty contact can be achieved in both ways. However, to designate alleviating contacts, a model-based optimization procedure is necessary. Results suggest that stimulating with more contacts yields configurations that are more robust to contact faults, though with reduced selectivity.
Collapse
|
48
|
Avecillas-Chasin JM, Alonso-Frech F, Nombela C, Villanueva C, Barcia JA. Stimulation of the Tractography-Defined Subthalamic Nucleus Regions Correlates With Clinical Outcomes. Neurosurgery 2019; 85:E294-E303. [DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyy633] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2018] [Accepted: 12/27/2018] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Although deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the dorsolateral subthalamic nucleus (STN) is a well-established surgical treatment for patients with Parkinson disease (PD), there is still controversy about the relationship between the functional segregation of the STN and clinical outcomes.
OBJECTIVE
To correlate motor and neuropsychological (NPS) outcomes with the overlap between the volume of activated tissue (VAT) and the tractography-defined regions within the STN.
METHODS
Retrospective study evaluating 13 patients with PD treated with STN-DBS. With the aid of tractography, the STN was segmented into 4 regions: smaSTN (supplementary motor area STN), m1STN (primary motor area STN), mSTN (the sum of the m1STN and the smaSTN segments), and nmSTN (non-motor STN). We computed the overlap coefficients between these STN regions and the patient-specific VAT. The VAT outside of the STN was also calculated. These coefficients were then correlated with motor (Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale, UPDRS III) and NPS outcomes.
RESULTS
Stimulation of the mSTN segment was significantly correlated with UPDRS III and bradykinesia improvement. Stimulation of the smaSTN segment, but not the m1STN one, had a positive correlation with bradykinesia improvement. Stimulation of the nmSTN segment was negatively correlated with the improvement in rigidity. Stimulation outside of the STN was correlated with some beneficial NPS effects.
CONCLUSION
Stimulation of the tractography-defined motor STN, mainly the smaSTN segment, is positively correlated with motor outcomes, whereas stimulation of the nmSTN is correlated with poor motor outcomes. Further validation of these results might help individualize and optimize targets prior to STN-DBS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Fernando Alonso-Frech
- Department of Neurology, Institute of Neurosciences, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Cristina Nombela
- Department of Neurosurgery, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria San Carlos, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Clara Villanueva
- Department of Neurology, Institute of Neurosciences, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Juan A Barcia
- Department of Neurosurgery, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria San Carlos, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Horn A, Li N, Dembek TA, Kappel A, Boulay C, Ewert S, Tietze A, Husch A, Perera T, Neumann WJ, Reisert M, Si H, Oostenveld R, Rorden C, Yeh FC, Fang Q, Herrington TM, Vorwerk J, Kühn AA. Lead-DBS v2: Towards a comprehensive pipeline for deep brain stimulation imaging. Neuroimage 2019; 184:293-316. [PMID: 30179717 PMCID: PMC6286150 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.08.068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 445] [Impact Index Per Article: 89.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2018] [Revised: 08/13/2018] [Accepted: 08/28/2018] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a highly efficacious treatment option for movement disorders and a growing number of other indications are investigated in clinical trials. To ensure optimal treatment outcome, exact electrode placement is required. Moreover, to analyze the relationship between electrode location and clinical results, a precise reconstruction of electrode placement is required, posing specific challenges to the field of neuroimaging. Since 2014 the open source toolbox Lead-DBS is available, which aims at facilitating this process. The tool has since become a popular platform for DBS imaging. With support of a broad community of researchers worldwide, methods have been continuously updated and complemented by new tools for tasks such as multispectral nonlinear registration, structural/functional connectivity analyses, brain shift correction, reconstruction of microelectrode recordings and orientation detection of segmented DBS leads. The rapid development and emergence of these methods in DBS data analysis require us to revisit and revise the pipelines introduced in the original methods publication. Here we demonstrate the updated DBS and connectome pipelines of Lead-DBS using a single patient example with state-of-the-art high-field imaging as well as a retrospective cohort of patients scanned in a typical clinical setting at 1.5T. Imaging data of the 3T example patient is co-registered using five algorithms and nonlinearly warped into template space using ten approaches for comparative purposes. After reconstruction of DBS electrodes (which is possible using three methods and a specific refinement tool), the volume of tissue activated is calculated for two DBS settings using four distinct models and various parameters. Finally, four whole-brain tractography algorithms are applied to the patient's preoperative diffusion MRI data and structural as well as functional connectivity between the stimulation volume and other brain areas are estimated using a total of eight approaches and datasets. In addition, we demonstrate impact of selected preprocessing strategies on the retrospective sample of 51 PD patients. We compare the amount of variance in clinical improvement that can be explained by the computer model depending on the preprocessing method of choice. This work represents a multi-institutional collaborative effort to develop a comprehensive, open source pipeline for DBS imaging and connectomics, which has already empowered several studies, and may facilitate a variety of future studies in the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Horn
- Movement Disorders & Neuromodulation Unit, Department for Neurology, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Germany.
| | - Ningfei Li
- Movement Disorders & Neuromodulation Unit, Department for Neurology, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Germany
| | - Till A Dembek
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Cologne, Germany
| | - Ari Kappel
- Wayne State University, Department of Neurosurgery, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | | | - Siobhan Ewert
- Movement Disorders & Neuromodulation Unit, Department for Neurology, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Germany
| | - Anna Tietze
- Institute of Neuroradiology, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Germany
| | - Andreas Husch
- University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine, Interventional Neuroscience Group, Belvaux, Luxembourg
| | - Thushara Perera
- Bionics Institute, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Medical Bionics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Wolf-Julian Neumann
- Movement Disorders & Neuromodulation Unit, Department for Neurology, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Germany; Institute of Neuroradiology, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Germany
| | - Marco Reisert
- Medical Physics, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, University Freiburg, Germany
| | - Hang Si
- Numerical Mathematics and Scientific Computing, Weierstrass Institute for Applied Analysis and Stochastics (WIAS), Germany
| | - Robert Oostenveld
- Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, NL, Netherlands; NatMEG, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, SE, Sweden
| | - Christopher Rorden
- McCausland Center for Brain Imaging, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA
| | - Fang-Cheng Yeh
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh PA, USA
| | - Qianqian Fang
- Department of Bioengineering, Northeastern University, Boston, USA
| | - Todd M Herrington
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Johannes Vorwerk
- Scientific Computing & Imaging (SCI) Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA
| | - Andrea A Kühn
- Movement Disorders & Neuromodulation Unit, Department for Neurology, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Degeneffe A, Kuijf ML, Ackermans L, Temel Y, Kubben PL. Comparing deep brain stimulation in the ventral intermediate nucleus versus the posterior subthalamic area in essential tremor patients. Surg Neurol Int 2018; 9:244. [PMID: 30603229 PMCID: PMC6293600 DOI: 10.4103/sni.sni_234_18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2018] [Accepted: 09/27/2018] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The ventral intermediate nucleus (VIM) is the most commonly used target for deep brain stimulation (DBS) in patients with essential tremor (ET). Recent evidence suggests that the posterior subthalamic area (PSA) might be a better target for tremor reduction. We compared the outcome of VIM DBS with PSA DBS in our cohort of patients. Methods: Overall, 19 ET patients with bilateral DBS were included in this retrospective study, with a total of 38 electrodes (12 located in the VIM, 12 in the PSA, and 14 in an intermediate area). The outcome was measured using the essential tremor rating scale (ETRS), the glass scale and the quality of life in essential tremor questionnaire (QUEST). Results: Unilateral tremor-scores with items 5–6 (tremor of the upper extremity), 8–9 (tremor of the lower extremity), and 11-14 (hand function) from the ETRS showed a 63% tremor reduction in the VIM group, 47% tremor reduction in the PSA group, and 67% tremor reduction in the intermediate group after a mean follow-up of 1.6 years. After a mean follow-up of 5.8 years, there was a tremor reduction of 50%, 34%, and 45%, respectively. In our series, side effects such as dysarthria (75%), ataxia and disequilibrium (40%), and paraesthesia (15%) were assessed. Conclusions: All aforementioned anatomical target areas are effective in reducing tremor, although no superior reduction was found with PSA stimulation. Because of intraindividual differences between left and right hemisphere regarding the stimulated anatomical target, no conclusions can be drawn regarding differences in side effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aurélie Degeneffe
- Department of Neurosurgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Mark L Kuijf
- Department of Neurology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Linda Ackermans
- Department of Neurosurgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Yasin Temel
- Department of Neurosurgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Pieter L Kubben
- Department of Neurosurgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|