A Retrospective Multicenter Evaluation of Clozapine Use in Pediatric Patients Admitted for Acute Psychiatric Hospitalization

Clozapine-associated pericarditis and pancreatitis in children and adolescents: A systematic literature review and pharmacovigilance study using the VigiBase database

BACKGROUND

The literature has paid very little attention to pericarditis, pericardial effusion and pancreatitis during clozapine treatment in children and adolescents.

METHODS

Cases of clozapine-associated pericarditis and pancreatitis in children were studied using searches in: 1) PubMed (June 16, 2023), and 2) the World Health Organization's pharmacovigilance database (June 1, 2022), VigiBase. VigiBase uses a logarithmic measure of disproportionality called the information component (IC).

RESULTS

The PubMed search yielded 3 clozapine-associated pericarditis cases, 1 pancreatitis case and 1 with both. VigiBase provided a significant clozapine-associated pericarditis IC = 3.6 with an IC025 = 2.9 (only 3 cases were expected while 22 were observed). VigiBase provided a significant clozapine-associated pancreatitis IC = 2.2 with an IC025 = 1.4 (only 3 cases were expected while 16 were observed). In VigiBase clozapine-associated pericarditis and pericardial effusion in youth looked similar and on a continuum with myocarditis, as myocarditis, pericarditis and pancreatitis appeared to occur mainly during clozapine titration. Combining PubMed and VigiBase we identified: 1) 29 cases of at least possible clozapine-associated pericarditis/pericardial effusion (6 probable and 23 possible) including 7 cases with and 22 without myocarditis, and 2) 17 cases of clozapine-associated pancreatitis (1 definite and 16 possible). Two of the pancreatitis cases occurred during overdoses. No fatal outcomes were found in any clozapine-associated pericarditis and pancreatitis cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the lack of attention in the literature to clozapine-associated pericarditis and pancreatitis, results demonstrate that they can happen in youth, particularly during titration. Pericarditis and pancreatitis appear to be forms of clozapine-associated inflammation during dose titration.

Evaluation of major adverse events of clozapine based on accordance to an international titration guideline

Introduction

Clozapine is the only antipsychotic approved for treatment-resistant schizophrenia, but without appropriate monitoring, it can be associated with potentially fatal outcomes. An International Adult Clozapine Titration Guideline categorizes patients into normal or slow metabolizers. Categorization provides clozapine titration schedules and recommends regular c-reactive protein (CRP) and clozapine concentration monitoring to reduce the risk of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). The impact of the guideline on clozapine ADRs has not been evaluated.

Methods

A retrospective chart review assessed clozapine titrations, laboratory monitoring, ADRs, and discontinuations for clozapine-naive adult inpatients at a single center from January 1, 2013, to June 1, 2022. Each patient's cumulative weekly clozapine dosage was compared with their guideline recommended dosage to create a percent accordance. Linear logistic regression evaluated the relationship between titration speed and the presence of an ADR, while descriptive statistics analyzed laboratory monitoring.

Results

Forty-three patients were included, with the majority being White males with schizophrenia. An inverse relationship existed between the last inpatient week clozapine dose percent accordance and the probability of an ADR. Nonobese patients were less likely than obese patients to experience an ADR (odds ratio = 0.17; 95% CI, 0.03-0.99). CRP and clozapine concentration monitoring was suboptimal.

Discussion

Based on our small retrospective review of primarily White males, more aggressive clozapine titrations did not increase ADRs. Future studies with more diverse samples are needed and should focus on specific ADRs, which may have increased occurrence with rapid titrations. Obese patients were at higher risk of ADRs, correlating with the guideline-recommended slower titrations for these patients.

A Systematic Review of Clozapine Concentration-Dose Ratio from Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Studies in Children and Adolescents Treated with Clozapine for Mental Disorders

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic drug monitoring of clozapine in children and adolescents has received insufficient attention. Calculation of concentration-to-dose (C/D) ratios from trough steady-state concentrations estimate drug clearance.

METHODS

A systematic electronic literature search was conducted in 3 article databases from inception until January 10, 2023, and articles reporting clozapine concentrations in children and adolescents were retrieved. The pharmacokinetic quality of the studies was assessed, and clozapine C/D ratios were calculated using the sample mean clozapine dose and concentration.

RESULTS

Of the 37 articles of potential interest, only 7 reported clozapine trough and steady-state concentrations. After excluding case reports and a study confounded by fluvoxamine, 4 studies on psychosis from Europe and the United States were included. The clozapine C/D ratios were similar to published adult values and ranged from 0.82 to 1.24 with a weighted mean of 1.08 ng/mL per mg/d. The weighted means were 334 mg/d for the dose and 380 ng/mL for the concentration. The stratified analysis of the weighted mean clozapine C/D ratios from 2 studies showed lower values in 52 male (1.05 ng/mL per mg/d) than in 46 female (1.46 ng/mL per mg/d) children and adolescents, with values similar to those reported for European adult nonsmokers. Two female adolescents had high clozapine C/D ratios (2.54 ng/mL per mg/d), an Asian American patient with borderline obesity and a patient with intellectual disability with low dosage (mean = 102 mg/d) and concentration (mean = 55 ng/mL).

CONCLUSIONS

Reports on clozapine therapeutic drug monitoring in children and adolescents are limited in number and quality. Future studies should focus on basic pharmacokinetic issues, such as stratification by sex, smoking, and relevant comedications with inductive or inhibitory properties.

CLEAR - clozapine in early psychosis: study protocol for a multi-centre, randomised controlled trial of clozapine vs other antipsychotics for young people with treatment resistant schizophrenia in real world settings

BACKGROUND

Clozapine is an antipsychotic drug with unique efficacy, and it is the only recommended treatment for treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS: failure to respond to at least two different antipsychotics). However, clozapine is also associated with a range of adverse effects which restrict its use, including blood dyscrasias, for which haematological monitoring is required. As treatment resistance is recognised earlier in the illness, the question of whether clozapine should be prescribed in children and young people is increasingly important. However, most research to date has been in older, chronic patients, and evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of clozapine in people under age 25 is lacking. The CLEAR (CLozapine in EARly psychosis) trial will assess whether clozapine is more effective than treatment as usual (TAU), at the level of clinical symptoms, patient rated outcomes, quality of life and cost-effectiveness in people below 25 years of age. Additionally, a nested biomarker study will investigate the mechanisms of action of clozapine compared to TAU.

METHODS AND DESIGN

This is the protocol of a multi-centre, open label, blind-rated, randomised controlled effectiveness trial of clozapine vs TAU (any other oral antipsychotic monotherapy licenced in the British National Formulary) for 12 weeks in 260 children and young people with TRS (12-24 years old).

AIM AND OBJECTIVES

The primary outcome is the change in blind-rated Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale scores at 12 weeks from baseline. Secondary outcomes include blind-rated Clinical Global Impression, patient-rated outcomes, quality of life, adverse effects, and treatment adherence. Patients will be followed up for 12 months and will be invited to give consent for longer term follow-up using clinical records and potential re-contact for further research. For mechanism of action, change in brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) biomarkers and peripheral inflammatory markers will be measured over 12 weeks.

DISCUSSION

The CLEAR trial will contribute knowledge on clozapine effectiveness, safety and cost-effectiveness compared to standard antipsychotics in young people with TRS, and the results may guide future clinical treatment recommendation for early psychosis.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN Number: 37176025, IRAS Number: 1004947.

TRIAL STATUS

In set-up. Protocol version 4.0 01/08/23. Current up to date protocol available here: https://fundingawards.nihr.ac.uk/award/NIHR131175# /.

Electroconvulsive therapy or clozapine for adolescents with treatment-resistant schizophrenia: an explorative analysis on symptom dimensions

OBJECTIVE

This study sought to compare pre-intervention patient characteristics and post-intervention outcomes in a naturalistic sample of adolescent inpatients with treatment-resistant psychotic symptoms who received either electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) or clozapine.

METHODS

Data of adolescents with schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder receiving ECT or clozapine were retrospectively collected from two tertiary-care psychiatry-teaching university hospitals. Subscale scores of the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale (PANSS) factors were calculated according to the five-factor solution. Baseline demographics, illness characteristics, and post-intervention outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between patients receiving ECT (n = 13) and clozapine (n = 66) in terms of age, sex, and the duration of hospital stay. The ECT group more commonly had higher overall illness and aggression severity. Smoking was less frequent in the clozapine group. Baseline resistance/excitement symptom severity was significantly higher in the ECT group, while positive, negative, affect, disorganisation, and total symptom scores were not. Both interventions provided a significant reduction in PANSS scores with large effect sizes.

CONCLUSION

Both ECT and clozapine yielded high effectiveness rates in adolescents with treatment-resistant schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder. Youth receiving ECT were generally more activated than those who received clozapine.

Psychopharmacological Treatment Algorithms of Manic/Mixed and Depressed Episodes in Pediatric Bipolar Disorder

Introduction: Pediatric bipolar disorder (PBD) is a severe psychiatric illness diagnosed before the age of 18, which is associated with extreme shifts in mood characterized by manic and depressive episodes. In 2005, AACAP published algorithms to guide pharmacological treatment of manic/mixed episodes associated with PBD. At that time, lithium was the only Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved treatment for pediatric bipolar manic/mixed episodes. The goal of this article is to review evidence that has emerged since the AACAP algorithm in 2005. Methods: Literature searches were conducted through PubMed and limited to studies published between 2005 and 2021, using keywords that focused on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for available psychopharmacological medications. In addition, the authors conducted in-depth searches for articles providing evidence for agents included in the 2005 AACAP algorithm. Results: Since the publication of the AACAP algorithm in 2005, multiple RCTs have been conducted in PBD, leading to FDA approval of five medications (aripiprazole, asenapine, olanzapine, quetiapine, and risperidone) for the treatment of manic/mixed episodes and two medications (lurasidone and olanzapine-fluoxetine combination) for the treatment of depressed episodes. Divalproex sodium and oxcarbazepine were studied in pediatric RCTs and failed to separate from placebo. Conclusions: We offer an update to the 2005 AACAP algorithms for the treatment of pediatric bipolar mixed/manic episodes and added an evidence-based algorithm for the treatment of depression in PBD. In addition to treatment algorithms, we review current evidence for efficacy of agents proposed in the AACAP algorithm and provide tables summarizing medication side effects and efficacy.

Clozapine-induced myocarditis in children and adolescents: a pharmacovigilance study using VigiBase and a systematic literature review

INTRODUCTION

Clozapine-induced myocarditis in children (age ≤18 yo) was studied from a PubMed search (18 July 2022) (9 cases) and from the World Health Organization's pharmacovigilance database, called Vigibase, of adverse drug reaction (ADR) reports (72 non-duplicated cases). VigiBase uses a logarithmic measure of disproportionality called the information component (IC). A logistic regression model of presence/absence (40/32) of seriousness in VigiBase was developed.

AREAS COVERED

VigiBase provided a significant myocarditis IC = 4.2 with an IC₀₂₅ = 3.8; only 4 clozapine-induced myocarditis cases were expected, while 72 were observed. The PubMed search identified 9 cases, while VigiBase identified 72 cases (of which 67 did not overlap with published cases). These 76 combined cases included 35 doubtful (most with missing information on the day of diagnosis), 19 possible and 22 probable, according to the ADR scale. After adjusting for confounders, quetiapine increased the risk of seriousness with an odds ratio (OR) of 17.6 (95% confidence interval CI, 1.56 to 198.6), while Australian origin decreased it with an OR = 0.13 (CI, 0.04 to 0.47).

EXPERT OPINION

These 41 cases of at least possible clozapine-induced myocarditis indicated that this ADR can definitively occur in children, particularly in the first 30 days of up-titration. Children's and adult cases appeared similar.

Clozapine for Management of Childhood and Adolescent-Onset Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Schizophrenia at a young age deserves investigation because of the greater severity and burden of illness on individuals and health care than its adult onset. For this study, we included both childhood-onset schizophrenia and early-onset schizophrenia. We used the common term "childhood and adolescent-onset schizophrenia (CAOS)" for either type. This systematic review provides an overview of the clinical use, efficacy, and safety of clozapine treatment in managing CAOS. Methods: We conducted a systematic literature search in PubMed, Embase, and PsycINFO databases. We searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), open-label studies (OLSs), review articles, meta-analytic and observational studies. Our literature search resulted in 1242 search results. After the title, abstract, and full article review, 18 studies qualified (double-blind RCTs n = 4; OLS n = 4; observational studies n = 7; case reports n = 3). Results: Clozapine use in CAOS was generally well tolerated and not associated with any fatalities. Clozapine use in the short term (6 weeks) and long term (2-9 years) was superior in efficacy than other antipsychotics in CAOS management. Improvement in overall symptoms was maintained during long-term follow-up over the years in OLSs. Clozapine appeared to have a favorable clinical response and shorter hospital stays. Sedation and hypersalivation were commonly reported (90%), constipation was next in frequency (13%-50%). Neutropenia was seen in 6%-15% of cases and agranulocytosis (<0.1%). Although weight gain was common (up to 64%), followed by metabolic changes (8%-22%), treatment-onset diabetes was less frequent (<6%). Akathisia, tachycardia, and blood pressure changes were less commonly seen. Conclusions: Limited studies indicate that clozapine is a safe and efficacious option for CAOS management. We need large-scale and well-designed long-term RCTs for the use of clozapine in the management of CAOS.

Retrospective Review of Clozapine Use in Children and Adolescents

OBJECTIVE

Literature describing use of clozapine by children and adolescents is limited. The primary study objective was to assess the patterns of clozapine use in an inpatient child and adolescent population.

METHODS

A retrospective review of child and adolescent inpatients receiving clozapine at a Canadian children's hospital from January 2000 through December 2014 was conducted. Interdisciplinary comprehensive data collection was conducted by experienced clinicians. Baseline population characteristics and psychiatric illness risk factors were captured. Illness symptoms and severity were assessed retrospectively using validated measures including the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) and Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) scales. Estimated clozapine dosing requirements for each patient to achieve a serum level associated with response was calculated. Clozapine-related adverse events were captured.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight inpatients (64% female) receiving clozapine during the study period were identified. Mean age at clozapine initiation was 15.8 years. Twenty-three patients (82%) were taking clozapine at discharge, and of these, 22 patients (96%) experienced at least minimal improvement in BPRS and CGAS scores. Patients took a mean of 33.1 days from clozapine start to reach their maximum clozapine dosage, a mean maximum of 57% of their estimated clozapine dose requirement. Mean length of stay following clozapine initiation was 60.7 days. We observed a high rate of benign hematological adverse events, but no episodes of severe neutropenia. The majority of patients were of ethnicity associated with high risk for metabolic adverse events.

CONCLUSION

Most hospitalized, treatment-refractory children requiring clozapine clinically improve despite experiencing high, but largely manageable, adverse event rates.

Clozapine: An Updated Overview of Pharmacogenetic Biomarkers, Risks, and Safety-Particularities in the Context of COVID-19

BACKGROUND

clozapine (CLZ) use is precarious due to its neurological, cardiovascular, and hematological side effects; however, it is the gold standard in therapy-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) in adults and is underused.

OBJECTIVE

to examine the most recent CLZ data on (a) side effects concerning (b) recent pharmacological mechanisms, (c) therapy benefits, and (d) the particularities of the COVID-19 pandemic.

DATA SOURCES

a search was performed in two databases (PubMed and Web of Science) using the specific keywords "clozapine" and "schizophrenia", "side effects", "agranulocytosis", "TRS", or "bipolar affective disorder (BAF)" for the last ten years.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

clinical trials on adults with acute symptoms of schizophrenia or related disorders.

RESULTS

we selected 37 studies, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and clinical case series (CCS), centered on six main topics in the search area: (a) CLZ in schizophrenia, (b) CLZ in bipolar disorder, (c) side effects during the clozapine therapy, (d) CLZ in pregnancy, (e) CLZ in early-onset schizophrenia, and (f) CLZ therapy and COVID-19 infection.

LIMITATIONS

we considered RCTs and CCS from two databases, limited to the search topics. Conclusions and implications of key findings: (a) clozapine doses should be personalized for each patient based on pharmacogenetics testing when available; the genetic vulnerability postulates predictors of adverse reactions' severity; patients with a lower genetic risk could have less frequent hematological monitoring; (b) a CLZ-associated risk of pulmonary embolism imposes prophylactic measures for venous thromboembolism; (c) convulsive episodes are not an indication for stopping treatment; the plasma concentration of clozapine is a better side effect predictor than the dosage; (d) COVID-19 infection may enhance clozapine toxicity, generating an increased risk of pneumonia. Therapy must be continued with the proper monitoring of the white blood count, and the clozapine dose decreased by half until three days after the fever breaks; psychiatrists and healthcare providers must act together.

Safety and Tolerability of Antipsychotic Drugs in Pediatric Patients: Data From a 1-Year Naturalistic Study

Background: Antipsychotic drugs (APs) are increasingly used to treat a variety of psychiatric disorders in children and adolescents. However, their safety and tolerability profiles, when used in a developmental age context, show different characteristics from the ones observed in adult patients. Treatment with APs in pediatric patients is often long-term. However, the tolerability data regarding these patients mostly derive from short-term studies. Methods: Starting from April 2017, for a 1-year period, patients between 4 and 18 years of age followed by five units of developmental age neuropsychiatry, who initiated a treatment with at least an AP (ATC class N05A) were included into the study. Patient-related data have been collected at baseline and regularly thereafter, as allowed by the clinical routine. Changes to continuous variables over time have been analyzed using a linear mixed model in subsamples of our population treated with risperidone or aripiprazole. Results: During the observation period, 158 patients were initially enrolled, but only 116 completed 12 months of therapy with an AP. Risperidone was the most used AP (n = 52) followed by aripiprazole (n = 44) and olanzapine (n = 7). For both the aripiprazole and risperidone groups, the mean body mass index (BMI) (P < 0.001 for both groups) and heart rate (P = 0.026 for aripiprazole group and P < 0.001 for the risperidone one) values significantly increased over time. The mean prolactin concentration value significantly increased over time only in the risperidone group (P = 0.04). Eighty-six patients experienced at least one adverse drug reaction (ADR), accounting for a total of 238 specific reactions, with the most frequent being weight gain (n = 34), increased serum prolactin levels (n = 21), hyperphagia (n = 20), and hypercholesterolemia (n = 14). Among these, only 24 ADRs were classifiable as serious. Conclusions: The results of this study confirm that risperidone and aripiprazole are relatively well-tolerated therapeutic options for the treatment of a variety of psychiatric disorders in pediatric patients. However, in findings such as statistically significant increments of BMI and heart rate mean values, the variations over time in prolactin levels observed with risperidone and the differences between the two drugs remark the necessity of systematic monitoring.