Molecular therapy with recombinant p53 adenovirus in an androgen-independent, metastatic human prostate cancer model

Considering the potential for gene-based therapy in prostate cancer

Therapeutic gene manipulation has been at the forefront of popular scientific discussion and basic and clinical research for decades. Basic and clinical research applications of CRISPR-Cas9-based technologies and ongoing clinical trials in this area have demonstrated the potential of genome editing to cure human disease. Evaluation of research and clinical trials in gene therapy reveals a concentration of activity in prostate cancer research and practice. Multiple aspects of prostate cancer care - including anatomical considerations that enable direct tumour injections and sampling, the availability of preclinical immune-competent models and the delineation of tumour-related antigens that might provide targets for an induced immune system - make gene therapy an appealing treatment option for this common malignancy. Vaccine-based therapies that induce an immune response and new technologies exploiting CRISPR-Cas9-assisted approaches, including chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapies, are very promising and are currently under investigation both in the laboratory and in the clinic. Although laboratory and preclinical advances have, thus far, not led to oncologically relevant outcomes in the clinic, future studies offer great promise for gene therapy to become established in prostate cancer care.

Combination of cabazitaxel and p53 gene therapy abolishes prostate carcinoma tumor growth

For patients with metastatic prostate cancer, the 5-year survival rate of 31% points to a need for novel therapies and improvement of existing modalities. We propose that p53 gene therapy and chemotherapy, when combined, will provide superior tumor cell killing for the treatment of prostate carcinoma. To this end, we have developed the AdRGD-PGp53 vector which offers autoregulated expression of p53, resulting in enhanced tumor cell killing in vitro and in vivo. Here, we combined AdRGD-PGp53 along with the chemotherapy drugs used in the clinical treatment of prostate carcinoma, mitoxantrone, docetaxel, or cabazitaxel. Our results indicate that all drugs increase phosphorylation of p53, leading to improved induction of p53 targets. In vitro experiments reveal that AdRGD-PGp53 sensitizes prostate cancer cells to each of the drugs tested, conferring increased levels of cell death. In a xenograft mouse model of in situ gene therapy, AdRGD-PGp53 treatment, when combined with cabazitaxel, drastically reduced tumor progression and increased survival rates to 100%. Strikingly, we used a sub-therapeutic dose of cabazitaxel thus avoiding leukopenia, yet still showed potent anti-tumor effects when combined with AdRGD-PGp53 in this mouse model. The AdRGD-PGp53 approach warrants further development for its application in gene therapy of prostate carcinoma.

Improving adenoviral vectors and strategies for prostate cancer gene therapy

Gene therapy has been evaluated for the treatment of prostate cancer and includes the application of adenoviral vectors encoding a suicide gene or oncolytic adenoviruses that may be armed with a functional transgene. In parallel, versions of adenoviral vector expressing the p53 gene (Ad-p53) have been tested as treatments for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and non-small cell lung cancer. Although Ad-p53 gene therapy has yielded some interesting results when applied to prostate cancer, it has not been widely explored, perhaps due to current limitations of the approach. To achieve better functionality, improvements in the gene transfer system and the therapeutic regimen may be required. We have developed adenoviral vectors whose transgene expression is controlled by a p53-responsive promoter, which creates a positive feedback mechanism when used to drive the expression of p53. Together with improvements that permit efficient transduction, this new approach was more effective than the use of traditional versions of Ad-p53 in killing prostate cancer cell lines and inhibiting tumor progression. Even so, gene therapy is not expected to replace traditional chemotherapy but should complement the standard of care. In fact, chemotherapy has been shown to assist in viral transduction and transgene expression. The cooperation between gene therapy and chemotherapy is expected to effectively kill tumor cells while permitting the use of reduced chemotherapy drug concentrations and, thus, lowering side effects. Therefore, the combination of gene therapy and chemotherapy may prove essential for the success of both approaches.

Induction of Oxidants Distinguishes Susceptibility of Prostate Carcinoma Cell Lines to p53 Gene Transfer Mediated by an Improved Adenoviral Vector

Previously, the authors developed an adenoviral vector, Ad-PG, where transgene expression is regulated by a p53-responsive promoter. When used to transfer the p53 cDNA, a positive feedback mechanism is established. In the present study, a critical comparison is performed between Ad-PGp53 and AdRGD-PGp53, where the RGD motif was incorporated in the adenoviral fiber protein. AdRGD-PGp53 provided superior transgene expression levels and resulted in the killing of prostate carcinoma cell lines DU145 and PC3. In vitro, this effect was associated with increased production of cytoplasmic and mitochondrial oxidants, DNA damage as revealed by detection of phosphorylated H2AX, as well as cell death consistent with apoptosis. Differential gene expression of key mediators of reactive oxygen species pathways was also observed. Specifically, it was noted that induction of known p53-target genes Sestrin2 and PIG3, as well as a novel target, NOX1, occurred in PC3 cells only when transduced with the improved vector, AdRGD-PGp53. The participation of NOX1 was confirmed upon its inhibition using a specific peptide, resulting in reduced cell death. In situ gene therapy also resulted in significantly improved inhibition of tumor progression consistent with oxidant-induced DNA damage only when treated with the novel AdRGD-PGp53 vector. The study shows that the improved adenovirus overcomes limitations associated with other p53-expressing vectors and induces oxidant-mediating killing, thus supporting its further development for cancer gene therapy.

Autoregulated expression of p53 from an adenoviral vector confers superior tumor inhibition in a model of prostate carcinoma gene therapy

Alternative treatments for cancer using gene therapy approaches have shown promising results and some have even reached the marketplace. Even so, additional improvements are needed, such as employing a strategically chosen promoter to drive expression of the transgene in the target cell. Previously, we described viral vectors where high-level transgene expression was achieved using a p53-responsive promoter. Here we present an adenoviral vector (AdPGp53) where p53 is employed to regulate its own expression and which outperforms a traditional vector when tested in a model of gene therapy for prostate cancer. The functionality of AdPGp53 and AdCMVp53 were compared in human prostate carcinoma cell lines. AdPGp53 conferred greatly enhanced levels of p53 protein and induction of the p53 target gene, p21, as well as superior cell killing by a mechanism consistent with apoptosis. DU145 cells were susceptible to induction of death with AdPGp53, yet PC3 cells were quite resistant. Though AdCMVp53 was shown to be reliable, extremely high-level expression of p53 offered by AdPGp53 was necessary for tumor suppressor activity in PC3 and DU145. In situ gene therapy experiments revealed tumor inhibition and increased overall survival in response to AdPGp53, but not AdCMVp53. Upon histologic examination, only AdPGp53 treatment was correlated with the detection of both p53 and TUNEL-positive cells. This study points to the importance of improved vector performance for gene therapy of prostate cancer.

Rh2 or its aglycone aPPD in combination with docetaxel for treatment of prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Docetaxel is one of the few chemotherapeutic drugs that are considered highly effective when used to treat prostate cancer patients that have relapsed and/or metastatic disease, it is therefore reasonable to expect further improvements in treatment outcomes when it is combined with other therapeutic agents active in prostate cancer. This study assesses the combination of well tolerated and orally bioavailable formulations of ginsenoside Rh2 or its aglycone aPPD with docetaxel.

METHODS

The in vitro activity of Rh2, aPPD, and docetaxel was determined in four prostate cancer cell lines: PC-3, LNCaP, DU145, and C4-2. Combinations of Rh2 or aPPD with docetaxel were assessed using the constant ratio combination design. Combination Indices (CI) and Dose Reduction Indices (DRI) were subsequently estimated using Calcusyn. In vivo efficacy studies and Immunohistochemical analyses (PC-3 model) were also evaluated.

RESULTS

In PC-3, DU145 and C4-2 prostate cancer cells combinations of Rh2 or aPPD with docetaxel were predominantly additive or synergistic. Combinations of Rh2 + docetaxel and aPPD + docetaxel caused established PC-3 tumors to regress from their initial size by 15% and 27%, respectively. Tumor cell proliferation rate (measured by Ki-67 positive cells) was significantly lower for combinations of Rh2 + docetaxel and aPPD + docetaxel, compared to animals treated with docetaxel alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Rh2 and aPPD can be combined with docetaxel to yield additive or synergistic activity in vitro and in vivo. Pending further assessment of toxicity and pharmacodynamic behavior, this study supports testing of combinations of ginsenoside Rh2 or its aglycone aPPD with docetaxel in a clinical setting.

Viral-based gene delivery and regulated gene expression for targeted cancer therapy

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

Cancer is both a major health concern and a care-cost issue in the US and the rest of the world. It is estimated that there will be a total of 1,479,350 new cancer cases and 562,340 cancer deaths in 2009 within the US alone. One of the major obstacles in cancer therapy is the ability to target specifically cancer cells. Most existing chemotherapies and other routine therapies (such as radiation therapy and hormonal manipulation) use indiscriminate approaches in which both cancer cells and non-cancerous surrounding cells are treated equally by the toxic treatment. As a result, either the cancer cell escapes the toxic dosage necessary for cell death and consequently resumes replication, or an adequate lethal dose that kills the cancer cell also causes the cancer patient to perish. Owing to this dilemma, cancer- or organ/tissue-specific targeting is greatly desired for effective cancer treatment and the reduction of side effect cytotoxicity within the patient.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

In this review, the strategies of targeted cancer therapy are discussed, with an emphasis on viral-based gene delivery and regulated gene expression.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

Numerous approaches and updates in this field are presented for several common cancer types.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

A summary of existing challenges and future directions is also included.

Conditionally replicating adenovirus therapy utilizing bone sialoprotein promoter (Ad-BSP-E1a) in an in vivo study of treating androgen-independent intraosseous prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Adenoviral based gene therapy has been used in clinical trials in control of advanced prostate cancer. In this study, a promising conditionally replicating adenovirus (CRAd) driven by a tissue specific bone sialoprotein promoter in controlling prostate cancer both in vitro and in vivo is demonstrated.

METHODS

C4-2B, an androgen-independent prostate cancer cell line, was treated with PBS, Ad-BSP-TK, or the Ad-BSP-E1a in vitro, and in subcutaneous and intraosseous xenographs. Cell proliferation, PSA level in condition medium, tumor volume, and/or serum PSA were followed.

RESULTS

The growth of C4-2B and the PSA production was dramatically suppressed by Ad-BSP-E1a at very low dosage (0.3 MOI) compared with PBS and Ad-BSP-TK treatment in vitro. In the subcutaneous model, the tumor volume was significantly lower statistically in the Ad-BSP-E1a treated group than the Ad-BSP-TK control group (P = 0.02). In the intraosseous model, the mice treated in the Ad-BSP-E1a treatment group demonstrated a significant lower PSA compared to that in the control group (P < 0.01) at week 8 and week 16 post-treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The CRAd Ad-BSP-E1a revealed potential in treating prostate cancer in this model system. Using viral or none-viral mediated gene therapy to treat prostate carcinoma continues to be a potential avenue to treat afflicted men with prostate cancer.

Transcriptionally regulated, prostate-targeted gene therapy for prostate cancer

Prostate cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer and the second leading cause of cancer deaths in American males today. Novel and effective treatment such as gene therapy is greatly desired. The early viral based gene therapy uses tissue-nonspecific promoters, which causes unintended toxicity to other normal tissues. In this chapter, we will review the transcriptionally regulated gene therapy strategy for prostate cancer treatment. We will describe the development of transcriptionally regulated prostate cancer gene therapy in the following areas: (1) Comparison of different routes for best viral delivery to the prostate; (2) Study of transcriptionally regulated, prostate-targeted viral vectors: specificity and activity of the transgene under several different prostate-specific promoters were compared in vitro and in vivo; (3) Selection of therapeutic transgenes and strategies for prostate cancer gene therapy (4) Oncolytic virotherapy for prostate cancer. In addition, the current challenges and future directions in this field are also discussed.

Cytotoxicity of adenoviruses expressing the wild-type p53 gene to esophageal carcinoma cells is linked with the CAR expression level and indirectly with the endogenous p53 status

We examined cytotoxic effects of adenoviruses (Ad) expressing the p53 gene (Ad-p53) in nine human esophageal carcinoma cell lines with respect to the Ad receptor expression and the endogenous p53 gene status. Ad-p53-mediated cytotoxicity was related with an expression level of the coxsackievirus adenovirus receptor (CAR) but not with that of CD51, both of which are type 5 Ad receptors. Contrary to earlier studies, we found that the cytotoxicity was greater in tumor cells with the wild-type p53 gene than in those with mutated p53. The cytotoxic activity of Ad defective of E1B55kDa molecules (Ad-delE1B55), however, was not linked with the CAR expression level or the endogenous p53 status. We noticed that the tumor cells with the wild-type p53 gene showed greater CAR expression levels, although transduction with Ad-p53 did not upregulate the CAR expression in the mutated cells. We also examined the Ad-53-mediated cytotoxicity in two kinds of paired fibroblasts, parent and immortalized with loss of the p53 functions, and showed that the CAR expression level was more influential than the endogenous p53 status in the cytotoxicity. These data suggest that CAR expression level is a better predictive marker than endogenous p53 status for Ad-p53-mediated cytotoxicity in esophageal carcinoma.

Effects of antisense RNA targeting of ODC and AdoMetDC on the synthesis of polyamine synthesis and cell growth in prostate cancer cells using a prostatic androgen-dependent promoter in adenovirus

PURPOSE

This study was designed to investigate the use of a prostatic androgen-dependent promoter to mediate antisense targeting of ornithine decarboxylase (ODC) and S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase (AdoMetDC) and its effects on the synthesis of polyamine. We also examined the potential of this construct for prostate cancer therapy.

METHODS

pADxsi-PSES-AdoMetDC-ODC-PolyA AV was constructed and used to infect various cancer cell lines, including LNCaP, HT-29, H1299, HepG2. The effects of pADxsi-PSES-AdoMetDC-ODC-PolyA AV on the expression of ODC and AdoMetDC, in addition to the cell cycle, apoptosis and p21 levels, were analyzed through Western blotting and cytometry. A Matrigel invasion assay was used to analyze the effects of the recombinant virus on tumor cell invasion. The effect on polyamine content was also determined, and the relationship between inhibition of cellular ODC and AdoMetDC and decreases in polyamine were also investigated using a polyamine recovery assay.

RESULTS

Treatment with pADxsi-PSES-AdoMetDC-ODC-PolyA at an MOI of 90 significantly inhibited the proliferation of LNCaP cells, which could not be recovered through the addition of exogenous putrescine. The expression of ODC and AdoMetDC was also reduced, as was the polyamine content. The G1 phase of LNCaP cells was delayed, but no increase in apoptosis was detected. The down-regulation of ODC and AdoMetDC led to increased p21 expression.

CONCLUSIONS

The pADxsi-PSES-AdoMetDC-ODC-PolyA AV specifically inhibited the expression of ODC and AdoMetDC and the synthesis of polyamine, while it induced p21 expression, resulting in cell growth arrest in the G1 phase in prostate cancer cells but not in other cells.

Agents used for chemoprevention of prostate cancer may influence PSA secretion independently of cell growth in the LNCaP model of human prostate cancer progression

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the inhibitory growth effects of different potential chemopreventive agents in vitro and to determine their influence on PSA mRNA and protein expression with an established screening platform.

METHODS

LNCaP and C4-2 cells were incubated with genistein, seleno-L-methionine, lycopene, DL-alpha-tocopherol, and trans-beta-carotene at three different concentrations and cell growth was determined by the MTT assay. PSA mRNA expression was assessed by quantitative real-time RT-PCR and secreted PSA protein levels were quantified by the microparticle enzyme immunoassay.

RESULTS

Genistein, seleno-l-methionine and lycopene inhibited LNCaP cell growth, and the proliferation of C4-2 cells was suppressed by seleno-L-methionine and lycopene. PSA mRNA expression was downregulated by genistein in LNCaP but not C4-2 cells. No other compound tested altered PSA mRNA expression. PSA protein expression was downregulated by genistein, seleno-L-methionine, DL-alpha-tocopherol in LNCaP cells. In C4-2 cells only genistein significantly reduced the secretion of PSA protein.

CONCLUSIONS

In the LNCaP progression model PSA expression depends on the compound, its concentration and on the hormonal dependence of the cell line used and does not necessarily reflect cell growth or death. Before potential substances are evaluated in clinical trials using PSA as a surrogate end point marker, their effect on PSA mRNA and protein expression has to be considered to correctly assess treatment response by PSA.

2-Deoxyglucose combined with wild-type p53 overexpression enhances cytotoxicity in human prostate cancer cells via oxidative stress

Overexpression of the tumor suppressor gene, wild-type p53 (wtp53), using adenoviral vectors (Adp53) has been suggested to kill cancer cells by hydroperoxide-mediated oxidative stress [1,2] and nutrient distress induced by the glucose analog, 2-deoxyglucose (2DG), has been suggested to enhance tumor cell killing by agents that induce oxidative stress via disrupting hydroperoxide metabolism [3,4]. In the current study clonogenic cell killing of PC-3 and DU-145 human prostate cancer cells (lacking functional p53) mediated by 4 h exposure to 50 plaque forming units (pfus)/cell of Adp53 (that caused the enforced overexpression of wtp53) was significantly enhanced by treatment with 2DG. Accumulation of glutathione disulfide was found to be significantly greater in both cell lines treated with 2DG+Adp53 and both cell lines treated with 2DG+Adp53 showed a approximately 2-fold increases in dihydroethidine (DHE) and 5-(and-6)-carboxy-2',7'-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (CDCFH(2)) oxidation, indicative of increased steady-state levels of O(2)(.-) and hydroperoxides, respectively. Finally, overexpression of catalase or glutathione peroxidase using adenoviral vectors partially, but significantly, protected DU-145 cells from the toxicity induced by 2DG+Adp53 treatment. These results show that treatment of human prostate cancer cells with the combination of 2DG (a nutrient stress) and overexpression of the tumor suppressor gene, wtp53, enhances clonogenic cell killing by a mechanism that involves oxidative stress as well as allowing for the speculation that inhibitors of glucose and hydroperoxide metabolism can be used in combination with Adp53 gene therapy to enhance therapeutic responses.

Terapia génica en el cáncer de próstata. ¿Es posible una vacuna?

BACKGROUND

New approaches for prostate cancer are needed due to limitations of current therapies for the treatment in advanced stages of the disease. In fact, there is no effective treatment for these patients. Development in molecular biology research on prostate cancer has improved the knowledge of common alterations encoded in DNA sequence, which may be useful as targets for prostate cancer approach. In this review we give an overview of current gene therapy concepts, the most common gene alterations in prostate cancer and the gene therapy treatment strategies.

Future innovations in treating advanced prostate cancer

Many novel techniques for the treatment of prostate cancer are being aggressively investigated because prostate cancer is prevalent in the population and the current treatments for advanced prostate cancer are woefully inadequate. Although the current treatment options prolong life, most patients will eventually experience local recurrence or develop advanced disease. A greater understanding of the molecular events underlying cancer has enabled investigators to explore gene therapy approaches that are targeted against these molecular events. This article discusses antiangiogenic therapy, immune based therapy, and gene therapy. Any of these experimental modalities could be developed to replace hormone ablation therapy which causes unpleasant side effects, decreases the quality of life of the patient, and only temporarily controls the disease.

Gene therapy for prostate cancer: current strategies and new cell-based approaches

Prostate cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in adult males in the Western world. It accounts for one in ten cancer cases and is the second leading cause of cancer death in men, after lung cancer. A number of curative treatments are available for patients with localized prostate cancer such as radical prostatectomy, radiotherapy, or brachytherapy. However, a proportion of these men will develop progressive disease, and some will present de novo with advanced and metastatic prostate cancer, which is amenable to palliation only with androgen-withdrawal therapy. Most of these patients will eventually develop hormone refractory disease which is incurable, and for whom gene therapy, if feasible may develop as an alternative treatment option. In this review we discuss the gene therapy vectors and strategies that are currently in use, new cell-based approaches, discuss their advantages and disadvantages, and review the potential or proven pre-clinical and clinical efficacy in prostate cancer models/patients.

Antitumor effect of antisense ODC adenovirus on human prostate cancer cells

Ornithine decarboxylase (ODC), the first enzyme of polyamine biosynthesis, was found to increase in cancer cells, especially prostate cancers. Some chemotherapeutic agents aimed to decrease ODC expression showed inhibitory effects on cancer cells. In this study, we examined the effect of adenoviral-transduced antisense ODC on prostate cancer cells. An adenovirus carrying antisense ODC (rAd-ODC/Ex3as) was infected to prostate cancer cells PC-3 and LNCap. Expression of ODC and concentration of polyamines in cells were determined by Western blotting and HPLC. MTT (3-(4,5-methylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl-tetrazolium bromide) assay was used to analyze the effect on cell growth. Cell cycle was evaluated by FCM and cellular invasion by Matrigel invasion assay. A nude mouse xenograft model was used to examine tumorigenicity. Expression of ODC in PC-3 and LNCap cells were reduced to 45 and 59%, and three polyamines were also decreased by the rAd-ODC/Ex3as treatment. Consequently, cell growth was substantially inhibited and cell cycle arrested at G1 phase. Matrigel invasion assay showed relatively low invasion. Marked suppression of tumor formation was observed in the xenograft model. This study suggests that rAd-ODC/Ex3as has the antitumor effect on the human prostate cancer cells.

Gene delivery and gene therapy of prostate cancer

Surgery, radiation or hormonal therapy are not adequate to control prostate cancer. Clearly, other novel treatment approaches, such as gene therapy, for advanced/recurrent disease are desperately needed to achieve long-term local control and particularly to develop effective systemic therapy for metastatic prostate cancer. In the last decade, significant progress in gene therapy for the treatment of localised prostate cancer has been demonstrated. A broad range of different gene therapy approaches, including cytolytic, immunological and corrective gene therapy, have been successfully applied for prostate cancer treatment in animal models, with translation into early clinical trials. In addition, a wide variety of viral and nonbiological gene delivery systems are available for basic and clinical research. Gene therapy approaches that have been developed for the treatment of prostate cancer are summarised.

Targeting Prostate Cancer with Conditionally Replicative Adenovirus Using PSMA Enhancer

Prostate cancer is the second most commonly diagnosed cancer in men and accounts for significant mortality and morbidity in the United States. Initially androgen-dependent, prostate cancer ultimately becomes androgen-independent, which makes the disease extremely difficult to cure. In this study, we examined the use of conditionally replication-competent adenovirus for the treatment of hormone-independent prostate cancer. We utilized PSME, an enhancer element for prostate-specific PSMA expression, to control viral E1A protein expression and achieve exclusive virus replication in prostate. Western blotting confirmed that PSME mediated high E1A protein expression in PSMA-positive, androgen-independent prostate cancer cells (C4-2 and CWR22rv), but was much less active in PSMA-negative cancer cells (PC-3 and A549). Consistent with E1A protein expression, the recombinant adenovirus Ad5-PSME-E1a replicated in C4-2 and CWR22rv almost as efficiently as wild type with low levels of androgen, but its replication was significantly attenuated in PSMA-negative cells. In the in vitro killing assay, Ad5-PSME-E1a lysed all C4-2 and CWR22rv cells 5 days after infection, with minimal effect on PSMA-negative cells. In addition, injections of 1.7 x 10(8) plaque-forming units in a CWR22rv xenograft model in nude mice induced significant tumor growth delay, with a substantial necrotic area. These studies suggest that PSME-driven replication-competent adenovirus may be a new therapeutic modality for prostate cancer patients after hormone ablation therapy.

Is gene therapy the answer for prostate cancer?

Prostate cancer is the third most common cancer, accounting for one in 10 cancer diagnoses in men worldwide during 2000. Despite this high burden of morbidity, there is a lack of curative treatments for locally advanced and metastatic disease. Good anatomical accessibility of the prostate combined with substantial molecular understanding of the disease makes prostate cancer an attractive target for gene therapy. Considerable progress has been made in the development of suitable gene transfer vectors and prostate-targeting strategies. Therapeutic approaches being explored fall into two broad categories: corrective and cytoreductive/cytolytic. There are currently 63 prostate cancer gene therapy clinical trials based on these approaches registered in the United States and United Kingdom. Although significant hurdles remain to be overcome, early clinical trial results are encouraging, suggesting that gene therapy may become an important treatment option for prostate cancer.

HOXB13 homeodomain protein suppresses the growth of prostate cancer cells by the negative regulation of T-cell factor 4

In prostate gland, HOXB13 is highly expressed from the embryonic stages to adulthood. However, the function of HOXB13 in normal cell growth and tumorigenesis is not yet known. We investigated the role of HOXB13 and mechanism by which it functions in HOXB13-negative cells. Expression of HOXB13 was forced in HOXB13-negative PC3 prostate cancer cells using a liposome-mediated gene transfer approach. Compared with the control clones, HOXB13-expressing PC3 cells exhibited significant inhibition of in vitro and in vivo cell growth with G1 cell cycle arrest mediated by the suppression of cyclin D1 expression. Because cyclin D1 is mainly regulated by beta-catenin/T-cell factor (TCF), TCF-4 response element was used in a reporter gene transcription assay, demonstrating that HOXB13 significantly inhibits TCF-4-mediated transcriptional activity in both prostate and nonprostate cells. This inhibition occurred in a dose-responsive manner and was specific to TCF-4 response element. Western blot analysis demonstrated that HOXB13 down-regulates the expression of TCF-4 and its responsive genes, c-myc and cyclin D1. HOXB13 also suppressed the activity of natural c-myc promoter. This study suggests that HOXB13, a transcription factor, functions as a cell growth suppressor by negatively regulating the expression of TCF-4, which eventually provides negative signals for cell proliferation. This observation will provide valuable insight into the molecular basis of prostate tumorigenesis.

A modified p53 enhances apoptosis in sarcoma cell lines mediated by doxorubicin

Mdm2 is frequently overexpressed in sarcoma cells and may contribute to drug resistance by increasing p53 degradation. We investigated the induction of apoptosis in sarcoma cells via adenovirus-mediated gene transfer of wild-type p53 and two modified p53 genes, p53 14/19 and p53 22/23, whose protein products are resistant to Mdm2-mediated degradation. We found that adenovirus-wt p53 (Ad-wt p53) induces significant apoptosis in HT1080 fibrosarcoma cells expressing low levels of Mdm2, but fails to induce apoptosis in SJSA osteosarcoma cells expressing high levels of Mdm2. In contrast, Ad-p53 14/19 induces significant apoptosis in both cell lines. Interestingly, Ad-p53 22/23, a vector encoding a transcription-defective p53 mutant, causes limited apoptosis in both cell lines. We demonstrate that doxorubicin induces phosphorylation of both wt p53 and p53 14/19 protein at multiple sites. We tested the efficacy of doxorubicin and cisplatin with either Ad-wt p53, Ad-p53 22/23 or Ad-p53 14/19. SJSA cells, although harbouring endogenous wt p53, did not undergo significant apoptosis following doxorubicin or cisplatin exposure alone or combined with Ad-wt p53. In contrast, doxorubicin or cisplatin plus Ad-p53 14/19 induced significant apoptosis. Gene transfer of p53 14/19 in combination with the administration of doxorubicin or cisplatin is a potential therapeutic approach for cancers expressing high levels of Mdm2.

Evidence that transfer of functional p53 protein results in increased apoptosis in prostate cancer

PURPOSE

INGN 201 (Ad-p53) is a replication-defective adenoviral vector that encodes a wild-type p53 gene driven by the cytomegalovirus promoter. INGN 201 has been shown to have antitumoral activity against human prostate cancer cell lines. This study was undertaken to determine the safety of INGN 201 in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer, to assess transgene expression, and to evaluate antitumoral activity.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Our study included patients with clinical stage T3, T1c-T2a with Gleason score 8-10 disease, or T2a-T2b with Gleason score 7 disease and a prostate-specific antigen level >10 ng/ml. INGN 201 was administered by intraprostatic injection under ultrasonographic guidance. One course of INGN 201 was defined as three separate INGN 201 administrations 2 weeks apart. Biopsies at baseline and 24 h after the first administration were assessed for p53 protein by immunohistochemical staining and for apoptosis by terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated nick end labeling assay.

RESULTS

A total of 38 courses of INGN 201 gene therapy were administered to 30 patients, of whom 26 underwent radical prostatectomy. There were no grade 3 or 4 adverse events related to INGN 201 administration. Of the 11 patients with negative baseline immunostaining for p53 protein, 10 had positive p53 immunostaining after the first administration of INGN 201, and 8 had an increase in apoptotic cells by terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated nick end labeling staining. All 26 of the patients who underwent radical prostatectomy had significant residual viable prostate cancer, and 12 have experienced biochemical failure (median follow-up, 42 months).

CONCLUSION

Intraprostatic INGN 201 gene therapy is safe and can reliably result in p53 protein production and apoptosis.

Bcl-2 and Bcl-x(L) differentially protect human prostate cancer cells from induction of apoptosis by melanoma differentiation associated gene-7, mda-7/IL-24

Subtraction hybridization identified melanoma differentiation associated gene-7, mda-7, in the context of terminally differentiated human melanoma cells. Based on its structure, cytokine-like properties and proposed mode of action, mda-7 has now been classified as IL-24. When expressed by means of a replication-incompetent adenovirus, Ad.mda-7 induces apoptosis in a broad range of cancer cells, without inducing harmful effects in normal fibroblast or epithelial cells. These unique properties of mda-7/IL-24 suggest that this gene will prove beneficial for cancer gene therapy. We now demonstrate that Ad.mda-7 decreases viability by induction of apoptosis in hormone-responsive (LNCaP) and hormone-independent (DU-145 and PC-3) human prostate carcinomas, without altering growth or survival in early-passage normal human prostate epithelial cells (HuPEC). Ad.mda-7 causes G(2)/M arrest and apoptosis in LNCaP (p53-wildtype), DU-145 (p53 mutant, Bax-negative) and PC-3 (p53-negative) prostate carcinomas, but not in HuPEC. Apoptosis induction correlated with changes in the ratio of pro- to antiapoptotic Bcl-2 protein family members. A potential functional role for changes in bcl-2 family gene expression in Ad.mda-7-induced apoptosis was suggested by the finding that forced overexpression of bcl-x(L) or bcl-2 differentially diminished the apoptotic effect of Ad.mda-7 in prostate carcinomas. These results confirm that induction of apoptosis by the mda-7/IL-24 gene in prostate cancer cells is Bax- and p53-independent and is mediated by mitochondrial pathways involving bcl-2 family gene members. The mda-7/IL-24 gene represents a new class of cancer-specific apoptosis-inducing genes with obvious potential for the targeted gene-based therapy of human prostate cancer.

Elevated levels of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in prostate cancer cells expressing mutant p53 is associated with tumor metastasis

The underlying basis for rising levels of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in prostate cancer is not fully understood, but attention has turned to the possibility that loss of normal p53 function might be directly involved. We have investigated the relationship between p53 function and PSA expression using in vitro and in vivo approaches. Three prostate cancer-derived p53 mutants (F134L, M237L, R273H) were introduced into LNCaP prostate cancer cells and stable transfectants established. Expression of mutant p53 was demonstrated by Western blot analysis, inactivation of wtp53 function, and a loss of p53-dependent responses to DNA damage induced by UV-irradiation and cisplatin. Levels of PSA mRNA and secreted protein were determined by RT-PCR and Western blotting, respectively. Serine protease activity was assessed using an esterase assay. In vivo effects of mutant p53 expression were examined after orthotopic implantation into prostates of nude mice. Expression of all p53 mutants was associated with elevated PSA mRNA and secreted PSA protein. In a representative line, mutant p53 was also associated with increased PSA protease-like activity compared with a control line expressing wildtype p53. Overall PSA levels, and PSA levels in serum from mice bearing tumors derived from cells expressing mutant p53, were increased compared with levels in mice bearing tumors derived from control cells. In addition, the tumors derived from cells with mutant p53 had increased vascularization and induced lymph node metastases. These data provide in vitro and in vivo support for the notion that p53 mutations directly contribute to increased levels of serum PSA, and are associated with more aggressive tumors.

Antitumor efficacy of FK228, a novel histone deacetylase inhibitor, depends on the effect on expression of angiogenesis factors

It has been recently demonstrated that histone deacetylase inhibitors inhibit angiogenesis, but their mechanism of action has not been characterized well. In this study, we examined the in vitro and in vivo effects of FK228 [(E)-(1S,4S,10S,21R)-7-[(Z)-ethylidene]-4,21-diisopropyl-2-oxa-12,13-dithia-5,8,20,23-tetraazabicyclo-[8,7,6]-tricos-16-ene-3,6,9,19,22-pentanone; FR901228, depsipeptide], an HDAC inhibitor, on the expression of angiogenesis factors in FK228-sensitive PC-3 prostate and FK228-resistant ACHN renal cancer cells. FK228 suppressed the expression of VEGF mRNA in PC-3 cells, but not in ACHN cells. FK228 also suppressed the expression of basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) mRNA in both PC-3 and ACHN cells. Under conditions of hypoxia, FK228 suppressed the expression of VEGF mRNA without modulating the expression of hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha mRNA in PC-3 cells. FK228 induced the highest acetylation of histone H3 and H4 in the P2 region of the VEGF promoter, which includes the hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha binding site that plays an important role in regulating the expression of VEGF gene. Moreover, FK228 reduced the amount of VEGF and bFGF protein, and their mRNA levels in PC-3 xenograft implanted in nude mice, but did not reduce them in ACHN xenograft.

IN CONCLUSION

(i) FK228 showed a suppressive effect on the expression of angiogenesis factors, such as VEGF and bFGF, in PC-3 xenograft but not in ACHN xenograft, which suggests that the effect on the expression of angiogenesis factors is important for the antitumor efficacy of FK228; (ii) FK228 caused histone acetylation of the VEGF promoter regions, which may contribute to the suppression of VEGF gene expression.

Modulation of DNA damage-induced apoptosis by cell adhesion is independently mediated by p53 and c-Abl

Conventional cancer therapies are based on preferential killing of tumor cells by DNA damage. Previous work showed that, for certain cell types, loss of integrin-mediated adhesion decreased the apoptotic response to DNA damage because of decreased p53 levels after detachment from the extracellular matrix. Integrin ligation restored p53 and sensitivity to DNA damage. In this study, we show that c-Abl mediates a second pathway by which adhesion to extracellular matrix regulates cell killing by chemotherapeutic agents 5-arabinofuranosylcytosine, cisplatin, and camptothecin. Activation of c-Abl tyrosine kinase by DNA damage requires cell adhesion. Abl-dependent stabilization of p73, a p53-related proapoptotic transcription factor, is also adhesion-dependent. Sensitivity to the Abl inhibitor STI571 suggests differential utilization of the p53 and c-Abl/p73 pathways by different tumor cell lines. These data suggest that killing of p53-negative tumor cells by chemotherapy would be enhanced by integrin ligation to activate the alternative c-Abl/p73 pathway.

The growth inhibitory effect of p21 adenovirus on androgen-dependent and -independent human prostate cancer cells

OBJECTIVE

To assess the potential of p21 as a gene therapy treatment for prostate cancer, by introducing p21 into both androgen-dependent (AD) and -independent (AI) human prostate cancer cell lines via a recombinant adenoviral vector, Ad5CMV-p21, carrying human p21 cDNA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The LNCaP, DU145 and PC-3 human prostate cancer cell lines were cultured and infected with Ad5CMV-p21. Cell growth, cell-cycle progression and tumorigenicity were then assessed by thymidine incorporation into cellular DNA, and cell number, flow cytometry, and tumour growth after inoculating the cells into nude mice.

RESULTS

Growth was inhibited in Ad5CMV-p21 viral-infected AD and AI prostate cancer cells. The effects were dose-dependent, regardless of the androgen status of the cell lines. Flow cytometric analysis showed that Ad5CMV-p21 arrested cell-cycle progression at G1/S with no appreciable effect on the levels of apoptotic cells. The tumorigenicity of cancer cells infected with Ad5CMV-p21 was greatly reduced in athymic mice.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that Ad5CMV-p21 may be a new therapeutic agent for human prostate cancer gene therapy.

Endogenous p21WAF1/CIP1 status predicts the response of human tumor cells to wild-type p53 and p21WAF1/CIP1 overexpression

Expression of exogenous wild-type (wt) p53 protein can suppress the growth and/or induce apoptosis in different tumor cells. The effect of exogenous p21(WAF1/CIP1) expression is more controversial: while it can induce apoptosis in some cells, it can protect against p53-mediated apoptosis in others. We used adenoviral vectors to introduce p53 and p21(WAF1/CIP1) genes into human tumor cell lines with different p53 and/or p21(WAF1/CIP1) status. The cell growth inhibition and the induction of apoptosis were measured. Overexpression of wt p53 induced more efficient growth inhibition and apoptosis in SW 620 (mutant p53) and HeLa (inactivated p53 protein) than in MCF-7 (wt p53) and CaCo-2 cell line, which was the most resistant to p53 overexpression despite the p53 mutation. Unlike HeLa and SW 620 cells, the basal p21 protein level was readily detected in CaCo-2 and MCF-7 cells. Overexpression of p21(WAF1/CIP1) gene induced somewhat less pronounced growth inhibition of all cell lines tested, but it also induced apoptosis in HeLa and SW 620 cells. These results suggest that the basal, but not the inducible, levels of p21(WAF1/CIP1) protein in tumor cells could protect from p53-mediated apoptosis. On the other hand, overexpression of p21(WAF1/CIP1) gene itself can induce apoptosis in cells with no basal p21(WAF1/CIP1) protein level. Possible mechanisms of the differential response to these genes are discussed.

Prostate cancer gene therapy

Numerous gene therapy trials in the United States and throughout the world using various strategies are in progress for the treatment of locally advanced and metastatic prostate cancer. Although vector technology advances at a rapid pace, progress in elucidating the molecular pathways critical for the development and progression of prostate cancer has been slower and more deliberate. Thus far, prostate gene therapy appears to be safe and well tolerated. Through these early clinical trials, the safety and efficacy of gene therapy alone or in combination with more conventional therapy as a basis for the treatment of prostate cancer will ultimately be determined.

Gene therapy for prostate cancer delivered by ovine adenovirus and mediated by purine nucleoside phosphorylase and fludarabine in mouse models

A gene-directed enzyme pro-drug therapy (GDEPT) based on purine nucleoside phosphorylase (PNP), that converts the prodrug, fludarabine to 2-fluoroadenine, has been described, but studies are limited compared with other GDEPTs. We investigated the in vitro and in vivo efficacies of PNP-GDEPT for treating androgen-independent (AI) prostate cancer. The PNP gene controlled by Rous sarcoma virus (RSV) constitutive promoter was delivered using a recombinant ovine adenovirus vector (OAdV220) that uses a different receptor from human adenovirus type 5. In vitro, OAdV220 provided increased transgene expression over a comparable human Ad5 vector in infected AI, murine RM1 prostate cancer cells. Subsequent in vivo testing was therefore confined to OAdV220. Transduction of RM1 cells with OAdV220 before implantation in immunocompetent mice dramatically inhibited subcutaneous (s.c.) tumor growth when fludarabine phosphate was administered systemically and increased mouse survival in a dose-dependent manner. In tumor-bearing C57BL/6 mice, a single intratumoral injection of OAdV220 produced detectable PNP activity for at least 6 days and with prodrug, retarded the growth of aggressive RM1 s.c. tumors by 35% at day 14. There was a consistent trend to reduction of pre-established intraprostatic RM1 tumors. A similar regimen induced significant therapeutic efficacy in human PC3 xenografts. Thus, ovine adenovirus-mediated GDEPT using the PNP system was effective in vivo against AI prostate cancers, the aggressive murine RM1, and the human PC3 lines. Methods that improve viral dissemination and stimulate the immune system in vivo may further improve efficacy.

p53 and PTEN/MMAC1/TEP1 gene therapy of human prostate PC-3 carcinoma xenograft, using transferrin-facilitated lipofection gene delivery strategy

We previously reported that supplementation of a cationic liposome with transferrin (Tf) greatly enhanced lipofection efficiency (P.-W. Cheng, Hum. Gene Ther. 1996;7:275-282). In this study, we examined the efficacy of p53 and PTEN tumor suppressor gene therapy in a mouse xenograft model of human prostate PC-3 carcinoma cells, using a vector consisting of dimyristoyloxypropyl-3-dimethylhydroxyethyl ammonium bromide (DMRIE)-cholesterol (DC) and Tf. When the volume of the tumors grown subcutaneously in athymic nude mice reached 50-60 mm(3), three intratumoral injections of the following four formulations were performed during week 1 and then during week 3: (1) saline, (2) DC + Tf + pCMVlacZ, (3) DC + Tf + pCMVPTEN, and (4) DC + Tf + pCMVp53 (standard formulation). There was no significant difference in tumor volume and survival between group 1 and group 2 animals. As compared with group 1 controls, group 3 animals had slower tumor growth during the first 3 weeks but thereafter their tumor growth rate was similar to that of the controls. By day 2 posttreatment, group 4 animals had significantly lower tumor volume relative to initial tumor volume as well as controls at the comparable time point. Also, animals treated with p53 survived longer. Treatment with DC, Tf, pCMVp53, DC + pCMVp53, or Tf + pCMVp53 had no effect on tumor volume or survival. Expression of p53 protein and apoptosis were detected in tumors treated with the standard formulation, thus associating p53 protein expression and apoptosis with efficacy. However, p53 protein was expressed in only a fraction of the tumor cells, suggesting a role for bystander effects in the efficacy of p53 gene therapy. We conclude that intratumoral gene delivery by a nonviral vector consisting of a cationic liposome and Tf can achieve efficacious p53 gene therapy of prostate cancer.

Gene therapy for bladder cancer using adenoviral vector

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Bladder cancer is common. Current treatment for patients with superficial bladder cancer involves transurethral resection followed by adjuvant bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) administration. Adjuvant BCG has been reported to be effective in 38% to 68% of patients; however, more than 30% of patients do not respond. Because p53 mutations are common among superficial bladder cancers, we tested the feasibility of using p53 as a gene therapy agent for targeting superficial tumors, which are easily accessible using an intravesical approach.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Wild-type p53 was transduced into various human and murine bladder cancer cell lines (HTB9, KU-1, and MBT-2) using a recombinant adenoviral vector (Ad5CMV-p53) in vitro. Also, subcutaneous tumors were established and then treated with intratumoral injection of Ad5CMV-p53 or control viruses.

RESULTS

In vitro assays revealed significant growth suppression of target cells by Ad5CMV-p53 in comparison with those receiving the control Ad5-CMV-PA vector or untreated control cells. In vivo studies using subcutaneous bladder tumor models established in syngeneic mice demonstrated that the rate of tumor growth and volume was reduced to a greater extent by 14 days of intratumoral injection of Ad5CMV-p53 rather than Ad5CMV-PA. Furthermore, the survival of host animals bearing tumors that were infected with Ad5CMV-p53 was significantly longer than that of the control group treated with Ad5CMV-PA (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that Ad5CMV-p53 is effective in suppressing bladder cancer growth and improving host survival.

Transrectal gene therapy of the prostate in the canine model

Direct transrectal delivery of therapeutic genes utilizing adenoviral vectors for advanced prostate cancer may offer effective treatment at the molecular level. Large animal models to assess feasibility and the intraprostatic and systemic dissemination patterns of these vectors have not been reported. For these studies, a replication-deficient (E1(-)/E3(-)) recombinant adenovirus (AdRSVlacZ) expressing bacterial beta-galactosidase (beta-gal) was delivered under transrectal ultrasound guidance. Two prostate biopsies, followed by concurrent injection of 4.8 x 10(9) pfu of the adenoviral vector divided into either 1 or 2 mL of diluent, were performed (n=4). Swabs of the rectum, sputum, and urine were collected and after 72 hours, the animals were sacrificed. Specimens were assayed for the presence of virus and beta-gal activity. Rectal swabs were transiently positive, whereas urine and sputum samples showed no detectable vector throughout the experiment. Beta-gal activity was observed at the prostate injection sites with detectable activity noted up to 7.5 mm away from the injection site. Systemic dissemination was observed regardless of the injected volume. In conclusion, transrectal prostate biopsy with concurrent prostate injection is a feasible method to deliver therapeutic adenoviral vectors for the treatment of prostate cancer; however, systemic distribution and temporary rectal shedding of virus should be anticipated.

Additional gene therapy with Ad5CMV-p53 enhanced the efficacy of radiotherapy in human prostate cancer cells

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of combination therapy of ionizing radiation (IR) and adenoviral p53 gene therapy and to evaluate its molecular mechanisms.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Two human prostate cancer cell lines, DU145 and PC-3 cells, containing different types of p53 gene mutations, were investigated. The recombinant adenovirus vector containing the wild-type p53 gene (Ad5CMV-p53) was used for this study. Cells were irradiated (in 0, 2, 4, and 6 Gy, 300 cGy/min) and after 12 h of irradiation, the cells were infected with various doses of Ad5CMV-p53 (0-40 multiplicity of infection [MOI]). Cytotoxicity was determined by clonogenic assay. The molecular mechanisms were evaluated by quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), apoptotic cell detection, and cell cycle analysis.

RESULTS

The cell growth inhibition in DU145 (p53-mutated) cells by IR was strongly enhanced by additional Ad5CMV-p53 infection in a viral dose-dependent manner. In DU145 cells, IR alone induced minimal p53 mRNA expression. However, IR combined with Ad5CMV-p53 infection stimulated significant increase in p53 mRNA expression supplemented with Bax and p21 mRNA expressions. In PC-3 (p53-null), IR induced Bax and p21 mRNA expression, while the combination effects were observed in p53, Bax, and p21 mRNA expression. Apoptotic cell deaths were rarely observed after IR alone (DU145: 3%, PC-3: 5%). However, after combination therapy, the proportion of apoptotic cells greatly increased (sevenfold in DU145 cells, and twice in PC-3 cells). G1 cell cycle arrest was observed after Ad5CMV-p53 infection and the combination in both cell lines.

CONCLUSION

In this study, we demonstrated that the combination of IR and Ad5CMV-p53 gene therapy resulted in remarkable synergistic effects in human prostate cancer cells. This combination therapy could be one of the optimal treatment strategies for radioresistant prostate cancer.

p53 represses androgen-induced transactivation of prostate-specific antigen by disrupting hAR amino- to carboxyl-terminal interaction

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is highly overexpressed in prostate cancer. One important regulator of PSA expression is the androgen receptor (AR), the nuclear receptor that mediates the biological actions of androgens. AR is able to up-regulate PSA expression by directly binding and activating the promoter of this gene. We provide evidence here that that this AR activity is repressed by the tumor suppressor protein p53. p53 appears to exert its inhibition of human AR (hAR) by disrupting its amino- to carboxyl-terminal (N-to-C) interaction, which is thought to be responsible for the homodimerization of this receptor. Consistent with this, p53 is also able to block hAR DNA binding in vitro. Our previous data have shown that c-Jun can mediate hAR transactivation, and this appears to result from a positive effect on hAR N-to-C interaction and DNA binding. Interestingly, c-Jun is able to relieve the negative effects of p53 on hAR transactivation, N-to-C interaction, and DNA binding, demonstrating antagonistic activities of these two proteins. Importantly, a p53 mutation found in metastatic prostate cancer severely disrupts the p53 negative activity on hAR, suggesting that the inability of p53 mutants to down-regulate hAR is, in part, responsible for the metastatic phenotype.

Drug-resistant human bladder-cancer cells are more sensitive to adenovirus-mediated wild-type p53 gene therapy compared to drug-sensitive cells

We investigated the therapeutic potential and molecular mechanism of adenovirus-mediated wt p53 gene therapy for drug-resistant human bladder cancers. KK47, a human bladder-cancer cell line, along with the drug-resistant sublines KK47/DDP10, KK47/DDP20 (cisplatin-resistant) and KK47/ADM (doxorubicin-resistant) were used for the experiments. All 4 KK47 cell lines had genetically normal p53 genes. Using an in vitro cytotoxicity assay, the drug-resistant cell lines were more sensitive to Ad-CMV-p53 cell killing than the KK47 parental cell line. Ad-CMV-p53 induced higher levels of p53 protein and mRNA in the drug-resistant cell lines than in the parental cell line and, consequently, higher levels of p21 and Bax mRNA, which resulted in higher percentages of G(1) cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis. The higher efficiencies of adenoviral gene transfer in the drug-resistant cell lines were confirmed by X-gal staining after infection with Ad-CMV-beta-gal. In conclusion, adenovirus-mediated wt p53 gene therapy was more effective in the drug-resistant bladder-cancer cell lines than in the drug-sensitive bladder-cancer cell line.

Gene therapy for prostate cancer: current status and future prospects

PURPOSE

Locally advanced, relapsed and metastatic prostate cancer has a dismal prognosis with conventional therapies offering no more than palliation. In recent years advances achieved in understanding the molecular biology of cancer have afforded clinicians and scientists the opportunity to develop a range of novel genetic therapies for this disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a detailed review of published reports of gene therapy for prostate cancer. Particular emphasis was placed on recent developments in the arena of nonviral (plasmid DNA, DNA coated gold particles, liposomes and polymer DNA complexes) and viral (adenovirus, retrovirus, adeno-associated virus, herpes virus and pox virus) vectors. Therapeutic strategies were categorized as corrective, cytoreductive and immunomodulatory gene therapy for the purpose of data analysis and comparison.

RESULTS

Locoregional administration of nonviral and viral vectors can yield impressive local gene expression and therapeutic effects but to our knowledge no efficient systemically delivered vector is available to date. Corrective gene therapy to restore normal patterns of tumor suppressor gene (p53, Rb, p21 and p16) expression or negate the effect of mutated tumor promoting oncogenes (ras, myc, erbB2 and bcl-2) have efficacy in animal models but this approach suffers from the fact that each cancer cell must be targeted. A wide variety of cytoreductive strategies are under development, including suicide, anti-angiogenic, radioisotopic and pro-apoptotic gene therapies. Each approach has strengths and weaknesses, and may best be suited for use in combination. Immunomodulatory gene therapy seeks to generate an effective local immune response that translates to systemic antitumor activity. Currently most studies involve immunostimulatory cytokine genes, such as granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, or interleukin-2 or 12.

CONCLUSIONS

Various therapeutic genes have proved activity against prostate cancer in vitro and in vivo. However, the chief challenge facing clinical gene therapy strategies is the lack of efficient gene delivery by local and systemic routes. For the foreseeable future vector development may remain a major focus of ongoing research. Despite this caveat it is anticipated that gene therapy approaches may significantly contribute to the management of prostate cancer in the future.

Gene therapy for prostate cancer

Basic research continues to unravel the molecular complexity of normal and abnormal biologic processes. The development of means to affect the expression level of genes that promote or contribute to cellular transformation, invasion, and metastasis has spawned the concept of gene therapy. This relatively new field seeks to reverse or suspend the pathologic progression of a variety of diseases including the malignant transformation of prostatic epithelial cells. Initial clinical trials for prostate cancer have thus far shown gene therapy to be relatively safe, although definitive evidence of durable therapeutic efficacy remains to be demonstrated. In this article, recent preclinical research, current therapeutic strategies, and recent results of gene therapy clinical trials for the treatment of prostate cancer are reviewed.

Gene therapy for prostate cancer

Basic research continues to unravel the molecular complexity of normal and abnormal biologic processes. The development of means to affect the expression level of genes that promote or contribute to cellular transformation, invasion, and metastasis has spawned the concept of gene therapy. This relatively new field seeks to reverse or suspend the pathologic progression of a variety of diseases including the malignant transformation of prostatic epithelial cells. Initial clinical trials for prostate cancer have thus far shown gene therapy to be relatively safe, although definitive evidence of durable therapeutic efficacy remains to be demonstrated. In this article, recent preclinical research, current therapeutic strategies, and recent results of gene therapy clinical trials for the treatment of prostate cancer are reviewed.

Prostate cancer gene therapy

Cancer-specific gene therapy is still in its infancy. Although the first gene therapy trials were initiated in the late 1980s, it was only more recently that the first successful treatment of a genetic disease was reported.3 The current problems with low efficiency of gene transfer coupled with the immunologic difficulties with certain vectors indicate that more effort needs to be directed at the basic science of gene transfer. Ultimately, successful cancer-specific gene therapy will require combinations of the lessons learned from the ex vivo and in vivo paradigms. The next generation of gene therapy trials likely will focus on combination therapy with conventional chemotherapeutic agents, differentiating agents, or radiation therapy. The obstacles to the development of gene-based human therapeutics (i.e., molecular medicine) are formidable, but the benefits are so great that eventually the technical issues of gene transfer methodology will be worked out, and ultimately this will become the standard of care, not only for inborn errors of metabolism, but also for cancer.

Preclinical safety evaluation of G207, a replication-competent herpes simplex virus type 1, inoculated intraprostatically in mice and nonhuman primates

G207, a replication-competent herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) virus, has been previously shown to be effective against human prostate cancer xenografts in mice. This study assesses its safety in the prostate of two animal models known for their sensitivity to HSV-1. BALB/c mice were injected intraprostatically with either HSV-1 G207 or strain F and observed for 5 months. None of the G207-injected animals exhibited any clinical signs of disease or died. However, 50% of strain F-injected mice displayed sluggish, hunched behavior and died by day 13. Histopathologically, the G207-injected prostates were normal whereas strain F-injected prostates showed epithelial flattening, sloughing, and stromal edema. Four Aotus nancymae monkeys were also injected with G207 intraprostatically and observed short term (up to 21 days) and long term (56 days). Safety was assessed on the basis of clinical observations, viral biodistribution, virus shedding, and histopathology. None of the injected monkeys displayed evidence of clinical disease, shedding of infectious virus, or spread of the virus into other organs. Except for minor histological changes unrelated to the study, no significant abnormalities were observed. These results demonstrate that G207 can be safely inoculated into the prostate and should be considered for human trials for the treatment of prostate cancer.

Adenovirus-mediated p53 gene transfer to rat testis impairs spermatogenesis

The tumor suppressor protein p53 participates in normal cell differentiation as well as induction of programmed cell death. The authors investigated the effect of p53 overexpression on spermatogenesis by transferring p53 gene into the rat testes. Replication-deficient recombinant adenovirus vectors were constructed to include cytomegalovirus (CMV) promoter driving wild-type p53 (Ad-CMV-p53) or beta-galactosidase (Ad-CMV-beta-gal). Virus was delivered to cells of the tubules by slow retrograde injection through the rete testis. At 0, 4, 7, and 14 days, testes were removed, weighed, and analyzed histopathologically, including immunohistochemistry for p53, Bcl-2, Bax, and interleukin-1beta converting enzyme (ICE). Testicular weight was decreased in Ad-CMV-p53 group at 14 days after injection, while no change occurred in phosphate-buffered saline-injected controls or Ad-CMV-beta-gal-infected testes. Beyond 4 days, cell degradation in tubules interfered with immunohistochemical observation in the Ad-CMV-p53 group. At 4 days, p53 was expressed mostly in spermatocytes. Bax showed greater expression in the p53 group than in the control or Ad-CMV-beta-gal group. ICE, expressed mostly in spermatids, was more abundant in the p53 group than in controls. Overall, p53 overexpression in the testis impaired spermatogenesis.