1
|
Bryan AF, Reich AJ, Norton AC, Campbell ML, Schwartzstein RM, Cooper Z, White DB, Mitchell SL, Fehnel CR. Process of Withdrawal of Mechanical Ventilation at End of Life in the ICU: Clinician Perceptions. CHEST CRITICAL CARE 2024; 2:100051. [PMID: 38957855 PMCID: PMC11218830 DOI: 10.1016/j.chstcc.2024.100051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/04/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nearly one-quarter of all Americans die in the ICU. Many of their deaths are anticipated and occur following the withdrawal of mechanical ventilation (WMV). However, there are few data on which to base best practices for interdisciplinary ICU teams to conduct WMV. RESEARCH QUESTION What are the perceptions of current WMV practices among ICU clinicians, and what are their opinions of processes that might improve the practice of WMV at end of life in the ICU? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS This prospective two-center observational study conducted in Boston, Massachusetts, the Observational Study of the Withdrawal of Mechanical Ventilation (OBSERVE-WMV) was designed to better understand the perspectives of clinicians and experience of patients undergoing WMV. This report focuses on analyses of qualitative data obtained from in-person surveys administered to the ICU clinicians (nurses, respiratory therapists, and physicians) caring for these patients. Surveys assessed a broad range of clinician perspectives on planning, as well as the key processes required for WMV. This analysis used independent open, inductive coding of responses to open-ended questions. Initial codes were reconciled iteratively and then organized and interpreted using a thematic analysis approach. Opinions were assessed on how WMV could be improved for individual patients and the ICU as a whole. RESULTS Among 456 eligible clinicians, 312 in-person surveys were completed by clinicians caring for 152 patients who underwent WMV. Qualitative analyses identified two main themes characterizing high-quality WMV processes: (1) good communication (eg, mutual understanding of family preferences) between the ICU team and family; and (2) medical management (eg, planning, availability of ICU team) that minimizes patient distress. Team member support was identified as an essential process component in both themes. INTERPRETATION Clinician perceptions of the appropriateness or success of WMV prioritize the quality of team and family communication and patient symptom management. Both are modifiable targets of interventions aimed at optimizing overall WMV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ava Ferguson Bryan
- Department of Surgery (A. F. B.), The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham & Women's Hospital (A. F. B. and A. J. R.), Boston, MA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/Harvard Medical School (A. C. N., R. M. S., S. L. M., and C. R. F.), Boston, MA; Wayne State University (M. L. C.), Detroit, MI; Brigham and Women's Hospital/Harvard Medical School (Z. C.), Boston, MA; University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine (D. B. W.), Pittsburgh, PA; and the Marcus Institute for Aging Research (S. L. M. and C. R. F.), Hebrew Senior Life, Boston, MA
| | - Amanda J Reich
- Department of Surgery (A. F. B.), The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham & Women's Hospital (A. F. B. and A. J. R.), Boston, MA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/Harvard Medical School (A. C. N., R. M. S., S. L. M., and C. R. F.), Boston, MA; Wayne State University (M. L. C.), Detroit, MI; Brigham and Women's Hospital/Harvard Medical School (Z. C.), Boston, MA; University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine (D. B. W.), Pittsburgh, PA; and the Marcus Institute for Aging Research (S. L. M. and C. R. F.), Hebrew Senior Life, Boston, MA
| | - Andrea C Norton
- Department of Surgery (A. F. B.), The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham & Women's Hospital (A. F. B. and A. J. R.), Boston, MA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/Harvard Medical School (A. C. N., R. M. S., S. L. M., and C. R. F.), Boston, MA; Wayne State University (M. L. C.), Detroit, MI; Brigham and Women's Hospital/Harvard Medical School (Z. C.), Boston, MA; University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine (D. B. W.), Pittsburgh, PA; and the Marcus Institute for Aging Research (S. L. M. and C. R. F.), Hebrew Senior Life, Boston, MA
| | - Margaret L Campbell
- Department of Surgery (A. F. B.), The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham & Women's Hospital (A. F. B. and A. J. R.), Boston, MA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/Harvard Medical School (A. C. N., R. M. S., S. L. M., and C. R. F.), Boston, MA; Wayne State University (M. L. C.), Detroit, MI; Brigham and Women's Hospital/Harvard Medical School (Z. C.), Boston, MA; University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine (D. B. W.), Pittsburgh, PA; and the Marcus Institute for Aging Research (S. L. M. and C. R. F.), Hebrew Senior Life, Boston, MA
| | - Richard M Schwartzstein
- Department of Surgery (A. F. B.), The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham & Women's Hospital (A. F. B. and A. J. R.), Boston, MA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/Harvard Medical School (A. C. N., R. M. S., S. L. M., and C. R. F.), Boston, MA; Wayne State University (M. L. C.), Detroit, MI; Brigham and Women's Hospital/Harvard Medical School (Z. C.), Boston, MA; University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine (D. B. W.), Pittsburgh, PA; and the Marcus Institute for Aging Research (S. L. M. and C. R. F.), Hebrew Senior Life, Boston, MA
| | - Zara Cooper
- Department of Surgery (A. F. B.), The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham & Women's Hospital (A. F. B. and A. J. R.), Boston, MA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/Harvard Medical School (A. C. N., R. M. S., S. L. M., and C. R. F.), Boston, MA; Wayne State University (M. L. C.), Detroit, MI; Brigham and Women's Hospital/Harvard Medical School (Z. C.), Boston, MA; University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine (D. B. W.), Pittsburgh, PA; and the Marcus Institute for Aging Research (S. L. M. and C. R. F.), Hebrew Senior Life, Boston, MA
| | - Douglas B White
- Department of Surgery (A. F. B.), The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham & Women's Hospital (A. F. B. and A. J. R.), Boston, MA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/Harvard Medical School (A. C. N., R. M. S., S. L. M., and C. R. F.), Boston, MA; Wayne State University (M. L. C.), Detroit, MI; Brigham and Women's Hospital/Harvard Medical School (Z. C.), Boston, MA; University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine (D. B. W.), Pittsburgh, PA; and the Marcus Institute for Aging Research (S. L. M. and C. R. F.), Hebrew Senior Life, Boston, MA
| | - Susan L Mitchell
- Department of Surgery (A. F. B.), The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham & Women's Hospital (A. F. B. and A. J. R.), Boston, MA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/Harvard Medical School (A. C. N., R. M. S., S. L. M., and C. R. F.), Boston, MA; Wayne State University (M. L. C.), Detroit, MI; Brigham and Women's Hospital/Harvard Medical School (Z. C.), Boston, MA; University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine (D. B. W.), Pittsburgh, PA; and the Marcus Institute for Aging Research (S. L. M. and C. R. F.), Hebrew Senior Life, Boston, MA
| | - Corey R Fehnel
- Department of Surgery (A. F. B.), The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham & Women's Hospital (A. F. B. and A. J. R.), Boston, MA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/Harvard Medical School (A. C. N., R. M. S., S. L. M., and C. R. F.), Boston, MA; Wayne State University (M. L. C.), Detroit, MI; Brigham and Women's Hospital/Harvard Medical School (Z. C.), Boston, MA; University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine (D. B. W.), Pittsburgh, PA; and the Marcus Institute for Aging Research (S. L. M. and C. R. F.), Hebrew Senior Life, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chen PJ, Ho CH, Lin YJ, Chang MH, Liao KM. Characteristics of "do not resuscitate" orders among elderly patients receiving mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit in Taiwan. Front Med (Lausanne) 2024; 11:1373726. [PMID: 38846140 PMCID: PMC11153661 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1373726] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2024] [Accepted: 04/30/2024] [Indexed: 06/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective As patient life expectancy has increased and people are living longer than before, the rate of mechanical ventilation among elderly patients in the intensive care unit has increased. Older patients who receive mechanical ventilation and have multiple comorbidities are more likely to have a do not resuscitate order than are younger patients with fewer comorbidities. The aim of our study was to describe the patient characteristics and predictive factors of do not resuscitate orders during hospitalization among elderly patients who received ventilation in the intensive care unit. Methods This was a retrospective review of the electronic medical records of patients in the intensive care unit of a teaching hospital in southern Taiwan. We enrolled patients admitted to the general intensive care unit from January 1, 2018, to September 31, 2020, and patients older than 80 years who experienced respiratory failure, were intubated and received mechanical ventilation. We analyzed patient demographics, disease severity during hospitalization and comorbidities. If a patient had multiple admissions to the intensive care unit, only the first admission was recorded. Results Of the 305 patients over 80 years of age with respiratory failure who were intubated and placed on a ventilator, 66 were excluded because of incomplete data, and 13 were excluded because they had already signed a do not resuscitate order prior to admission to the hospital. Ultimately, 226 patients were included in this study. A higher acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II score (>30) was also associated with an increased likelihood of a do not resuscitate order (odds ratio (OR) = 3.85, 95% CI = 1.09-13.62, p = 0.0362). Patients who had acute kidney injury or cerebrovascular accident were more likely to have a do not resuscitate order (OR = 2.74, 95% CI = 1.03-7.28, p = 0.0428 and OR = 7.32, 95% CI = 2.02-26.49, p = 0.0024, respectively). Conclusion Our study showed that older age, greater disease severity, and certain critical interventions were associated with a greater propensity for do not resuscitate orders, which is crucial for understanding patient preferences and guiding end-of-life care discussions. These findings highlight the importance of clinical severity and specific health events in predicting end-of-life care preferences in older patient groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pei-Jun Chen
- Department of Nursing, Nantou Hospital, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Nantou, Taiwan
| | - Chung-Han Ho
- Department of Medical Research, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan
- Department of Information Management, Southern Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Tainan, Taiwan
- Cancer Center, Taipei Municipal Wanfang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ying-Jia Lin
- Department of Medical Research, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Ming-Hung Chang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chi Mei Medical Center, Chiali, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Kuang-Ming Liao
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chi Mei Medical Center, Chiali, Tainan, Taiwan
- Department of Nursing, Min-Hwei Junior College of Health Care Management, Tainan, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Salins N, Rao A, Dhyani VS, Prasad A, Mathew M, Damani A, Rao K, Nair S, Shanbhag V, Rao S, Iyer S, Gursahani R, Mani RK, Simha S. Palliative and end-of-life care practices for critically ill patients and their families in a peri-intensive care setting: A protocol for an umbrella review. Palliat Support Care 2024:1-8. [PMID: 38420705 DOI: 10.1017/s1478951524000130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This umbrella review will summarize palliative and end-of-life care practices in peri-intensive care settings by reviewing systematic reviews in intensive care unit (ICU) settings. Evidence suggests that integrating palliative care into ICU management, initiating conversations about care goals, and providing psychological and emotional support can significantly enhance patient and family outcomes. METHODS The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology for umbrella reviews will be followed. The search will be carried out from inception until 30 September 2023 in the following databases: Cochrane Library, SCOPUS, Web of Science, CINAHL Complete, Medline, EMBASE, and PsycINFO. Two reviewers will independently conduct screening, data extraction, and quality assessment, and to resolve conflicts, adding a third reviewer will facilitate the consensus-building process. The quality assessment will be carried out using the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist. The review findings will be reported per the guidelines outlined in the Preferred Reporting Items for Overviews of Reviews statement. RESULTS This umbrella review seeks to inform future research and practice in critical care medicine, helping to ensure that end-of-life care interventions are optimized to meet the needs of critically ill patients and their families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naveen Salins
- Department of Palliative Medicine and Supportive Care, Kasturba Medical College Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India
| | - Arathi Rao
- Department of Health Policy, Prasanna School of Public Health, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India
| | - Vijay Shree Dhyani
- Evidence Synthesis Specialist, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Karnataka, India
| | - Ashmitha Prasad
- Department of Pallitaive Medicine, Karunashraya Bangalore Hospice Trust, Bangalore, India
| | - Mebin Mathew
- Department of Pallitaive Medicine, Karunashraya Bangalore Hospice Trust, Bangalore, India
| | - Anuja Damani
- Department of Palliative Medicine and Supportive Care, Kasturba Medical College Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India
| | - Krithika Rao
- Department of Palliative Medicine and Supportive Care, Kasturba Medical College Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India
| | - Shreya Nair
- Department of Palliative Medicine and Supportive Care, Kasturba Medical College Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India
| | - Vishal Shanbhag
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Kasturba Medical College Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India
| | - Shwethapriya Rao
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Kasturba Medical College Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India
| | - Shivakumar Iyer
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Bharati Vidyapeeth University Medical College, Pune, India
| | - Roop Gursahani
- Department of Neurology, P D Hinduja Hospital, Mahim, Mumbai, India
| | - R K Mani
- Department of Critical care, Yashoda Super Speciality Hospitals, Ghaziabad, India
| | - Srinagesh Simha
- Department of Pallitaive Medicine, Karunashraya Bangalore Hospice Trust, Bangalore, India
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Curtis JR, Lee RY, Brumback LC, Kross EK, Downey L, Torrence J, LeDuc N, Mallon Andrews K, Im J, Heywood J, Brown CE, Sibley J, Lober WB, Cohen T, Weiner BJ, Khandelwal N, Abedini NC, Engelberg RA. Intervention to Promote Communication About Goals of Care for Hospitalized Patients With Serious Illness: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2023; 329:2028-2037. [PMID: 37210665 PMCID: PMC10201405 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2023.8812] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2023] [Accepted: 05/05/2023] [Indexed: 05/22/2023]
Abstract
Importance Discussions about goals of care are important for high-quality palliative care yet are often lacking for hospitalized older patients with serious illness. Objective To evaluate a communication-priming intervention to promote goals-of-care discussions between clinicians and hospitalized older patients with serious illness. Design, Setting, and Participants A pragmatic, randomized clinical trial of a clinician-facing communication-priming intervention vs usual care was conducted at 3 US hospitals within 1 health care system, including a university, county, and community hospital. Eligible hospitalized patients were aged 55 years or older with any of the chronic illnesses used by the Dartmouth Atlas project to study end-of-life care or were aged 80 years or older. Patients with documented goals-of-care discussions or a palliative care consultation between hospital admission and eligibility screening were excluded. Randomization occurred between April 2020 and March 2021 and was stratified by study site and history of dementia. Intervention Physicians and advance practice clinicians who were treating the patients randomized to the intervention received a 1-page, patient-specific intervention (Jumpstart Guide) to prompt and guide goals-of-care discussions. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with electronic health record-documented goals-of-care discussions within 30 days. There was also an evaluation of whether the effect of the intervention varied by age, sex, history of dementia, minoritized race or ethnicity, or study site. Results Of 3918 patients screened, 2512 were enrolled (mean age, 71.7 [SD, 10.8] years and 42% were women) and randomized (1255 to the intervention group and 1257 to the usual care group). The patients were American Indian or Alaska Native (1.8%), Asian (12%), Black (13%), Hispanic (6%), Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander (0.5%), non-Hispanic (93%), and White (70%). The proportion of patients with electronic health record-documented goals-of-care discussions within 30 days was 34.5% (433 of 1255 patients) in the intervention group vs 30.4% (382 of 1257 patients) in the usual care group (hospital- and dementia-adjusted difference, 4.1% [95% CI, 0.4% to 7.8%]). The analyses of the treatment effect modifiers suggested that the intervention had a larger effect size among patients with minoritized race or ethnicity. Among 803 patients with minoritized race or ethnicity, the hospital- and dementia-adjusted proportion with goals-of-care discussions was 10.2% (95% CI, 4.0% to 16.5%) higher in the intervention group than in the usual care group. Among 1641 non-Hispanic White patients, the adjusted proportion with goals-of-care discussions was 1.6% (95% CI, -3.0% to 6.2%) higher in the intervention group than in the usual care group. There was no evidence of differential treatment effects of the intervention on the primary outcome by age, sex, history of dementia, or study site. Conclusions and Relevance Among hospitalized older adults with serious illness, a pragmatic clinician-facing communication-priming intervention significantly improved documentation of goals-of-care discussions in the electronic health record, with a greater effect size in racially or ethnically minoritized patients. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04281784.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J. Randall Curtis
- Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence at UW Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Robert Y. Lee
- Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence at UW Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
| | | | - Erin K. Kross
- Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence at UW Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Lois Downey
- Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence at UW Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Janaki Torrence
- Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence at UW Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Nicole LeDuc
- Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence at UW Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Kasey Mallon Andrews
- Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence at UW Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Jennifer Im
- Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence at UW Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
- Department of Health Systems and Population Health, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Joanna Heywood
- Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence at UW Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Crystal E. Brown
- Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence at UW Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - James Sibley
- Department of Biobehavioral Nursing and Health Informatics, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - William B. Lober
- Department of Biobehavioral Nursing and Health Informatics, University of Washington, Seattle
- Department of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Trevor Cohen
- Department of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Bryan J. Weiner
- Department of Health Systems and Population Health, University of Washington, Seattle
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Nita Khandelwal
- Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence at UW Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Nauzley C. Abedini
- Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence at UW Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
- Division of Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Ruth A. Engelberg
- Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence at UW Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Critical Issues in the Management of Agitation, Aggression, and End-of-Life in Delusional Disorder: A Mini-Review. Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 11:healthcare11040458. [PMID: 36832992 PMCID: PMC9956049 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11040458] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2022] [Revised: 01/15/2023] [Accepted: 02/02/2023] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Compared to other psychotic disorders, there is little information about staging care in delusional disorder (DD). Unlike schizophrenia, this is a disorder that begins in middle age, a time at which chronic medical comorbidities have already begun to impact global functioning. With age, the combination of psychological and somatic conditions leads to new behaviours, e.g., agitation, aggression, and behaviours that require specific preventive and interventive measures. With further age, knowledgeable end-of-life care becomes necessary for this population. Aim: The aim of this article was to review existing evidence on the management of these successive phases. Methods: We conducted a narrative review using PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov and searched for the following terms: (agitation OR aggressivity OR aggression OR palliative OR "end-of-life") AND ("delusional disorder"). Results: We found that the literature was sparse. Existing evidence suggests that medical causes are frequently at the root of agitation and aggression. With respect to management, de-escalation strategies are generally preferred over pharmacotherapy. Specific delusional syndromes, e.g., de Clérambault, Othello, Capgras, Fregoli, as well as folie à deux, are associated with aggression. The somatic subtype of DD is the one most often requiring palliative care at the end of life. Conclusions: We conclude that insufficient attention has been given to the care needs of the accelerated aging process in DD.
Collapse
|
6
|
Sullivan DR, Iyer AS, Enguidanos S, Cox CE, Farquhar M, Janssen DJA, Lindell KO, Mularski RA, Smallwood N, Turnbull AE, Wilkinson AM, Courtright KR, Maddocks M, McPherson ML, Thornton JD, Campbell ML, Fasolino TK, Fogelman PM, Gershon L, Gershon T, Hartog C, Luther J, Meier DE, Nelson JE, Rabinowitz E, Rushton CH, Sloan DH, Kross EK, Reinke LF. Palliative Care Early in the Care Continuum among Patients with Serious Respiratory Illness: An Official ATS/AAHPM/HPNA/SWHPN Policy Statement. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2022; 206:e44-e69. [PMID: 36112774 PMCID: PMC9799127 DOI: 10.1164/rccm.202207-1262st] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Patients with serious respiratory illness and their caregivers suffer considerable burdens, and palliative care is a fundamental right for anyone who needs it. However, the overwhelming majority of patients do not receive timely palliative care before the end of life, despite robust evidence for improved outcomes. Goals: This policy statement by the American Thoracic Society (ATS) and partnering societies advocates for improved integration of high-quality palliative care early in the care continuum for patients with serious respiratory illness and their caregivers and provides clinicians and policymakers with a framework to accomplish this. Methods: An international and interprofessional expert committee, including patients and caregivers, achieved consensus across a diverse working group representing pulmonary-critical care, palliative care, bioethics, health law and policy, geriatrics, nursing, physiotherapy, social work, pharmacy, patient advocacy, psychology, and sociology. Results: The committee developed fundamental values, principles, and policy recommendations for integrating palliative care in serious respiratory illness care across seven domains: 1) delivery models, 2) comprehensive symptom assessment and management, 3) advance care planning and goals of care discussions, 4) caregiver support, 5) health disparities, 6) mass casualty events and emergency preparedness, and 7) research priorities. The recommendations encourage timely integration of palliative care, promote innovative primary and secondary or specialist palliative care delivery models, and advocate for research and policy initiatives to improve the availability and quality of palliative care for patients and their caregivers. Conclusions: This multisociety policy statement establishes a framework for early palliative care in serious respiratory illness and provides guidance for pulmonary-critical care clinicians and policymakers for its proactive integration.
Collapse
|
7
|
Curtis JR, Lee RY, Brumback LC, Kross EK, Downey L, Torrence J, Heywood J, LeDuc N, Mallon Andrews K, Im J, Weiner BJ, Khandelwal N, Abedini NC, Engelberg RA. Improving communication about goals of care for hospitalized patients with serious illness: Study protocol for two complementary randomized trials. Contemp Clin Trials 2022; 120:106879. [PMID: 35963531 PMCID: PMC10042145 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106879] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2022] [Revised: 07/26/2022] [Accepted: 08/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although goals-of-care discussions are important for high-quality palliative care, this communication is often lacking for hospitalized older patients with serious illness. Electronic health records (EHR) provide an opportunity to identify patients who might benefit from these discussions and promote their occurrence, yet prior interventions using the EHR for this purpose are limited. We designed two complementary yet independent randomized trials to examine effectiveness of a communication-priming intervention (Jumpstart) for hospitalized older adults with serious illness. METHODS We report the protocol for these 2 randomized trials. Trial 1 has two arms, usual care and a clinician-facing Jumpstart, and is a pragmatic trial assessing outcomes with the EHR only (n = 2000). Trial 2 has three arms: usual care, clinician-facing Jumpstart, and clinician- and patient-facing (bi-directional) Jumpstart (n = 600). We hypothesize the clinician-facing Jumpstart will improve outcomes over usual care and the bi-directional Jumpstart will improve outcomes over the clinician-facing Jumpstart and usual care. We use a hybrid effectiveness-implementation design to examine implementation barriers and facilitators. OUTCOMES For both trials, the primary outcome is EHR documentation of a goals-of-care discussion within 30 days of randomization; additional outcomes include intensity of end-of-life care. Trial 2 also examines patient- or family-reported outcomes assessed by surveys targeting 3-5 days and 4-8 weeks after randomization including quality of goals-of-care communication, receipt of goal-concordant care, and psychological symptoms. CONCLUSIONS This novel study incorporates two complementary randomized trials and a hybrid effectiveness-implementation approach to improve the quality and value of care for hospitalized older adults with serious illness. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION STUDY00007031-A and STUDY00007031-B.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Randall Curtis
- Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence at UW Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America; Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
| | - Robert Y Lee
- Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence at UW Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America; Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America
| | - Lyndia C Brumback
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America
| | - Erin K Kross
- Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence at UW Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America; Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America
| | - Lois Downey
- Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence at UW Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America; Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America
| | - Janaki Torrence
- Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence at UW Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America; Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America
| | - Joanna Heywood
- Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence at UW Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America; Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America
| | - Nicole LeDuc
- Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence at UW Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America; Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America
| | - Kasey Mallon Andrews
- Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence at UW Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America; Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America
| | - Jennifer Im
- Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence at UW Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America; Department of Health Systems and Population Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America
| | - Bryan J Weiner
- Department of Health Systems and Population Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America; Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America
| | - Nita Khandelwal
- Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence at UW Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America
| | - Nauzley C Abedini
- Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence at UW Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America; Division of Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America
| | - Ruth A Engelberg
- Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence at UW Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America; Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Andersen SK, Vincent G, Butler RA, Brown EHP, Maloney D, Khalid S, Oanesa R, Yun J, Pidro C, Davis VN, Resick J, Richardson A, Rak K, Barnes J, Bezak KB, Thurston A, Reitschuler-Cross E, King LA, Barbash I, Al-Khafaji A, Brant E, Bishop J, McComb J, Chang CCH, Seaman J, Temel JS, Angus DC, Arnold R, Schenker Y, White DB. ProPACC: Protocol for a Trial of Integrated Specialty Palliative Care for Critically Ill Older Adults. J Pain Symptom Manage 2022; 63:e601-e610. [PMID: 35595373 PMCID: PMC9299559 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2022.02.344] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2022] [Revised: 02/23/2022] [Accepted: 02/24/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Each year, approximately one million older adults die in American intensive care units (ICUs) or survive with significant functional impairment. Inadequate symptom management, surrogates' psychological distress and inappropriate healthcare use are major concerns. Pioneering work by Dr. J. Randall Curtis paved the way for integrating palliative care (PC) specialists to address these needs, but convincing proof of efficacy has not yet been demonstrated. DESIGN We will conduct a multicenter patient-randomized efficacy trial of integrated specialty PC (SPC) vs. usual care for 500 high-risk ICU patients over age 60 and their surrogate decision-makers from five hospitals in Pennsylvania. INTERVENTION The intervention will follow recommended best practices for inpatient PC consultation. Patients will receive care from a multidisciplinary SPC team within 24 hours of enrollment that continues until hospital discharge or death. SPC clinicians will meet with patients, families, and the ICU team every weekday. SPC and ICU clinicians will jointly participate in proactive family meetings according to a predefined schedule. Patients in the control arm will receive routine ICU care. OUTCOMES Our primary outcome is patient-centeredness of care, measured using the modified Patient Perceived Patient-Centeredness of Care scale. Secondary outcomes include surrogates' psychological symptom burden and health resource utilization. Other outcomes include patient survival, as well as interprofessional collaboration. We will also conduct prespecified subgroup analyses using variables such as PC needs, measured by the Needs of Social Nature, Existential Concerns, Symptoms, and Therapeutic Interaction scale. CONCLUSIONS This trial will provide robust evidence about the impact of integrating SPC with critical care on patient, family, and health system outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah K Andersen
- Program on Ethics and Decision Making, The Clinical Research, Investigation, and Systems Modeling of Acute Illness (CRISMA) Center, Department of Critical Care Medicine (S.K.A., G.V., R.A.B., E.H.P.B., D.M., S.K., R.O., J.S., D.B.W.), University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Grace Vincent
- Program on Ethics and Decision Making, The Clinical Research, Investigation, and Systems Modeling of Acute Illness (CRISMA) Center, Department of Critical Care Medicine (S.K.A., G.V., R.A.B., E.H.P.B., D.M., S.K., R.O., J.S., D.B.W.), University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Rachel A Butler
- Program on Ethics and Decision Making, The Clinical Research, Investigation, and Systems Modeling of Acute Illness (CRISMA) Center, Department of Critical Care Medicine (S.K.A., G.V., R.A.B., E.H.P.B., D.M., S.K., R.O., J.S., D.B.W.), University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA; Palliative Research Center (PaRC) (R.A.B., J.R., K.B.B., A.T., L.A.K., J.S., R.A., Y.S., D.B.W.), University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Elke H P Brown
- Program on Ethics and Decision Making, The Clinical Research, Investigation, and Systems Modeling of Acute Illness (CRISMA) Center, Department of Critical Care Medicine (S.K.A., G.V., R.A.B., E.H.P.B., D.M., S.K., R.O., J.S., D.B.W.), University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Dave Maloney
- Program on Ethics and Decision Making, The Clinical Research, Investigation, and Systems Modeling of Acute Illness (CRISMA) Center, Department of Critical Care Medicine (S.K.A., G.V., R.A.B., E.H.P.B., D.M., S.K., R.O., J.S., D.B.W.), University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Sana Khalid
- Program on Ethics and Decision Making, The Clinical Research, Investigation, and Systems Modeling of Acute Illness (CRISMA) Center, Department of Critical Care Medicine (S.K.A., G.V., R.A.B., E.H.P.B., D.M., S.K., R.O., J.S., D.B.W.), University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Rae Oanesa
- Program on Ethics and Decision Making, The Clinical Research, Investigation, and Systems Modeling of Acute Illness (CRISMA) Center, Department of Critical Care Medicine (S.K.A., G.V., R.A.B., E.H.P.B., D.M., S.K., R.O., J.S., D.B.W.), University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - James Yun
- The CRISMA Center, Department of Critical Care Medicine (I.B., C.-C.H.C.), University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Carrie Pidro
- The CRISMA Center, Department of Critical Care Medicine (I.B., C.-C.H.C.), University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Valerie N Davis
- The CRISMA Center, Department of Critical Care Medicine (I.B., C.-C.H.C.), University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Judith Resick
- Palliative Research Center (PaRC) (R.A.B., J.R., K.B.B., A.T., L.A.K., J.S., R.A., Y.S., D.B.W.), University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA; Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Section of Palliative Care and Medical Ethics (J.R., K.B.B., R.A., Y.S.), University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Aaron Richardson
- The CRISMA Center, Department of Critical Care Medicine (I.B., C.-C.H.C.), University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Kimberly Rak
- The CRISMA Center, Department of Critical Care Medicine (I.B., C.-C.H.C.), University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jackie Barnes
- The CRISMA Center, Department of Critical Care Medicine (I.B., C.-C.H.C.), University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Karl B Bezak
- Palliative Research Center (PaRC) (R.A.B., J.R., K.B.B., A.T., L.A.K., J.S., R.A., Y.S., D.B.W.), University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA; Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Section of Palliative Care and Medical Ethics (J.R., K.B.B., R.A., Y.S.), University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Andrew Thurston
- Palliative Research Center (PaRC) (R.A.B., J.R., K.B.B., A.T., L.A.K., J.S., R.A., Y.S., D.B.W.), University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Eva Reitschuler-Cross
- Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine (E.R.-C., C.-C.H.C.), University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Linda A King
- Palliative Research Center (PaRC) (R.A.B., J.R., K.B.B., A.T., L.A.K., J.S., R.A., Y.S., D.B.W.), University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Ian Barbash
- Department of Critical Care Medicine (I.B., A.-K., E.B., J.B.), University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA; Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care (I.B., J.M.), University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA; The CRISMA Center, Department of Critical Care Medicine (I.B., C.-C.H.C.), University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Ali Al-Khafaji
- Department of Critical Care Medicine (I.B., A.-K., E.B., J.B.), University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Emily Brant
- Department of Critical Care Medicine (I.B., A.-K., E.B., J.B.), University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jonathan Bishop
- Department of Critical Care Medicine (I.B., A.-K., E.B., J.B.), University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jennifer McComb
- Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care (I.B., J.M.), University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Chung-Chou H Chang
- Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine (E.R.-C., C.-C.H.C.), University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA; The CRISMA Center, Department of Critical Care Medicine (I.B., C.-C.H.C.), University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jennifer Seaman
- Program on Ethics and Decision Making, The Clinical Research, Investigation, and Systems Modeling of Acute Illness (CRISMA) Center, Department of Critical Care Medicine (S.K.A., G.V., R.A.B., E.H.P.B., D.M., S.K., R.O., J.S., D.B.W.), University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA; Palliative Research Center (PaRC) (R.A.B., J.R., K.B.B., A.T., L.A.K., J.S., R.A., Y.S., D.B.W.), University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA; Department of Acute and Tertiary Care (J.S.), University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jennifer S Temel
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston (J.S.T.), Massachusetts, USA
| | - Derek C Angus
- The CRISMA Center, Department of Critical Care Medicine (I.B., C.-C.H.C.), University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Robert Arnold
- Palliative Research Center (PaRC) (R.A.B., J.R., K.B.B., A.T., L.A.K., J.S., R.A., Y.S., D.B.W.), University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA; The CRISMA Center, Department of Critical Care Medicine (I.B., C.-C.H.C.), University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Yael Schenker
- Palliative Research Center (PaRC) (R.A.B., J.R., K.B.B., A.T., L.A.K., J.S., R.A., Y.S., D.B.W.), University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA; Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Section of Palliative Care and Medical Ethics (J.R., K.B.B., R.A., Y.S.), University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Douglas B White
- Program on Ethics and Decision Making, The Clinical Research, Investigation, and Systems Modeling of Acute Illness (CRISMA) Center, Department of Critical Care Medicine (S.K.A., G.V., R.A.B., E.H.P.B., D.M., S.K., R.O., J.S., D.B.W.), University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA; Palliative Research Center (PaRC) (R.A.B., J.R., K.B.B., A.T., L.A.K., J.S., R.A., Y.S., D.B.W.), University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Chapman AC, Lin JA, Cobert J, Marks A, Lin J, O'Riordan DL, Pantilat SZ. Utilization and Delivery of Specialty Palliative Care in the ICU: Insights from the Palliative Care Quality Network. J Pain Symptom Manage 2022; 63:e611-e619. [PMID: 35595374 PMCID: PMC9303815 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2022.03.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2021] [Revised: 03/11/2022] [Accepted: 03/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Palliative care (PC) benefits critically ill patients but remains underutilized. Important to developing interventions to overcome barriers to PC in the ICU and address PC needs of ICU patients is to understand how, when, and for which patients PC is provided in the ICU. OBJECTIVES Compare characteristics of specialty PC consultations in the ICU to those on medical-surgical wards. METHODS Retrospective analysis of national Palliative Care Quality Network data for hospitalized patients receiving specialty PC consultation January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2019 in ICU or medical-surgical setting. 98 inpatient PC teams in 16 states contributed data. Measures and outcomes included patient characteristics, consultation features, process metrics and patient outcomes. Mixed effects multivariable logistic regression was used to compare ICU and medical-surgical units. RESULTS Of 102,597 patients 63,082 were in medical-surgical units and 39,515 ICU. ICU patients were younger and more likely to have non-cancer diagnoses (all P < 0.001). While fewer ICU patients were able to report symptoms, most patients in both groups reported improved symptoms. ICU patients were more likely to have consultation requests for GOC, comfort care, and withdrawal of interventions and less likely for pain and/or symptoms (OR-all P < 0.001). ICU patients were less often discharged alive. CONCLUSION ICU patients receiving PC consultation are more likely to have non-cancer diagnoses and less likely able to communicate. Although symptom management and GOC are standard parts of ICU care, specialty PC in the ICU is often engaged for these issues and results in improved symptoms, suggesting routine interventions and consultation targeting these needs could improve care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allyson Cook Chapman
- Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine (A.C.C., J.A.L., J.L., D.L.O.R., S.Z.P.), University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California; Department of Surgery (A.C.C., J.A.L.), University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California; Critical Care Medicine, Department of Anesthesia (A.C.C., J.C.), University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
| | - Joseph A Lin
- Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine (A.C.C., J.A.L., J.L., D.L.O.R., S.Z.P.), University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California; Department of Surgery (A.C.C., J.A.L.), University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Julien Cobert
- Anesthesia Service (J.C.), San Francisco VA Health Care System, San Francisco, California; Critical Care Medicine, Department of Anesthesia (A.C.C., J.C.), University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Angela Marks
- Department of Medicine (A.M.), University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Jessica Lin
- Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine (A.C.C., J.A.L., J.L., D.L.O.R., S.Z.P.), University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - David L O'Riordan
- Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine (A.C.C., J.A.L., J.L., D.L.O.R., S.Z.P.), University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Steven Z Pantilat
- Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine (A.C.C., J.A.L., J.L., D.L.O.R., S.Z.P.), University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Hua M, Wunsch H, Aslakson RA. Transformational Leaders Transcend Specialities. J Pain Symptom Manage 2022; 63:e647-e648. [PMID: 35595380 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2022.02.339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2022] [Accepted: 02/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- May Hua
- Department of Anesthesiology (M.H., H.W.), Columbia University, New York, USA; Department of Epidemiology (M.H.), Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, USA
| | - Hannah Wunsch
- Department of Anesthesiology (M.H., H.W.), Columbia University, New York, USA; Department of Critical Care Medicine (H.W.), Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine (H.W.), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rebecca A Aslakson
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative & Pain Medicine (R.A.A.), Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA; Division of Primary Care and Population Health (R.A.A.), Department of Medicine, Palliative Care Section, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ito K, George N, Wilson J, Bowman J, Aaronson E, Ouchi K. Primary palliative care recommendations for critical care clinicians. J Intensive Care 2022; 10:20. [PMID: 35428371 PMCID: PMC9013119 DOI: 10.1186/s40560-022-00612-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2022] [Accepted: 04/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Palliative care is an interdisciplinary care to optimize physical, psychosocial, and spiritual symptoms of patients and their families whose quality of life is impaired by serious, life-limiting illness. In 2021, the importance of providing palliative care in the intensive care unit (ICU) is well recognized by various studies to alleviate physical symptoms due to invasive treatments, to set patient-centered goals of care, and to provide end-of-life care. This paper summarizes the evidence known to date on primary palliative care delivered in the ICU settings. We will then discuss the potential benefits and harms of primary palliative care so that critical care clinicians are better equipped to decide what services might best improve the palliative care needs in their ICUs.
Collapse
|
12
|
Wells RD, Guastaferro K, Azuero A, Rini C, Hendricks BA, Dosse C, Taylor R, Williams GR, Engler S, Smith C, Sudore R, Rosenberg AR, Bakitas MA, Dionne-Odom JN. Applying the Multiphase Optimization Strategy for the Development of Optimized Interventions in Palliative Care. J Pain Symptom Manage 2021; 62:174-182. [PMID: 33253787 PMCID: PMC8274323 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.11.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2020] [Revised: 11/09/2020] [Accepted: 11/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses have reported positive benefit of multicomponent "bundled" palliative care interventions for patients and family caregivers while highlighting limitations in determining key elements and mechanisms of improvement. Traditional research approaches, such as the randomized controlled trial (RCT), typically treat interventions as "bundled" treatment packages, making it difficult to assess definitively which aspects of an intervention can be reduced or replaced or whether there are synergistic or antagonistic interactions between intervention components. Progressing toward palliative care interventions that are effective, efficient, and scalable will require new strategies and novel approaches. One such approach is the Multiphase Optimization Strategy (MOST), a framework informed by engineering principles, that uses a systematic process to empirically identify an intervention comprised of components that positively contribute to desired outcomes under real-life constraints. This article provides a brief overview and application of MOST and factorial trial design in palliative care research, including our insights from conducting a pilot factorial trial of an early palliative care intervention to enhance the decision support skills of advanced cancer family caregivers (Project CASCADE).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel D Wells
- School of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
| | - Kate Guastaferro
- Methodology Center, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Andres Azuero
- School of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Christine Rini
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine and Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Bailey A Hendricks
- School of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Chinara Dosse
- School of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Richard Taylor
- School of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Grant R Williams
- School of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Sally Engler
- School of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Charis Smith
- School of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Rebecca Sudore
- School of Medicine, Division of Geriatrics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Abby R Rosenberg
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA; Palliative Care and Resilience Lab, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Marie A Bakitas
- School of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA; Center for Palliative and Supportive Care, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - J Nicholas Dionne-Odom
- School of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA; Center for Palliative and Supportive Care, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Facilitating communication for critically ill patients and their family members: Study protocol for two randomized trials implemented in the U.S. and France. Contemp Clin Trials 2021; 107:106465. [PMID: 34091062 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2021] [Revised: 05/14/2021] [Accepted: 05/31/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Critically-ill patients and their families suffer a high burden of psychological symptoms due, in part, to many transitions among clinicians and settings during and after critical illness, resulting in fragmented care. Communication facilitators may help. DESIGN AND INTERVENTION We are conducting two cluster-randomized trials, one in the U.S. and one in France, with the goal of evaluating a nurse facilitator trained to support, model, and teach communication strategies enabling patients and families to secure care consistent with patients' goals, beginning in ICU and continuing for 3 months. PARTICIPANTS We will randomize 376 critically-ill patients in the US and 400 in France to intervention or usual care. Eligible patients have a risk of hospital mortality of greater than15% or a chronic illness with a median survival of approximately 2 years or less. OUTCOMES We assess effectiveness with patient- and family-centered outcomes, including symptoms of depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress, as well as assessments of goal-concordant care, at 1-, 3-, and 6-months post-randomization. The primary outcome is family symptoms of depression over 6 months. We also evaluate whether the intervention improves value by reducing utilization while improving outcomes. Finally, we use mixed methods to explore implementation factors associated with implementation outcomes (acceptability, fidelity, acceptability, penetration) to inform dissemination. Conducting the trial in U.S. and France will provide insights into differences and similarities between countries. CONCLUSIONS We describe the design of two randomized trials of a communication facilitator for improving outcomes for critically ill patients and their families in two countries.
Collapse
|
14
|
Morbidity and Mortality in Critically Ill Children. II. A Qualitative Patient-Level Analysis of Pathophysiologies and Potential Therapeutic Solutions. Crit Care Med 2021; 48:799-807. [PMID: 32301845 DOI: 10.1097/ccm.0000000000004332] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To describe at the individual patient level the pathophysiologic processes contributing to morbidity and mortality in PICUs and therapeutic additions and advances that could potentially prevent or reduce morbidity and mortality. DESIGN Qualitative content analysis of intensivists' conclusions on pathophysiologic processes and needed therapeutic advances formulated by structured medical record review. SETTING Eight children's hospitals affiliated with the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Collaborative Pediatric Critical Care Research Network. PATIENTS A randomly selected cohort of critically ill children with a new functional morbidity or mortality at hospital discharge. New morbidity was assessed using the Functional Status Scale and defined as worsening by two or more points in a single domain from preillness baseline. INTERVENTIONS None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Of 292 children, 175 (59.9%) had a new morbidity and 117 (40.1%) died. The most common pathophysiology was impaired substrate delivery (n = 158, 54.1%) manifesting as global or regional hypoxia or ischemia due to low cardiac output or cardiac arrest. Other frequent pathophysiologies were inflammation (n = 104, 35.6%) related to sepsis, respiratory failure, acute respiratory distress syndrome, or multiple organ dysfunction; and direct tissue injury (n = 64, 21.9%) including brain and spinal cord trauma. Chronic conditions were often noted (n = 156, 53.4%) as contributing to adverse outcomes. Drug therapies (n = 149, 51.0%) including chemotherapy, inotropes, vasoactive agents, and sedatives were the most frequently proposed needed therapeutic advances. Other frequently proposed therapies included cell regeneration (n = 115, 39.4%) mainly for treatment of neuronal injury, and improved immune and inflammatory modulation (n = 79, 27.1%). CONCLUSIONS Low cardiac output and cardiac arrest, inflammation-related organ failures, and CNS trauma were the most common pathophysiologies leading to morbidity and mortality in PICUs. A research agenda focused on better understanding and treatment of these conditions may have high potential to directly impact patient outcomes.
Collapse
|
15
|
Khater WA, Akhu-Zaheya LM, Al-Nabulsi HW, Shattnawi KK, Shamieh O, Joseph R. Barriers to implementing palliative care in intensive care units: perceptions of physicians and nurses in Jordan. Int J Palliat Nurs 2021; 27:98-106. [PMID: 33886360 DOI: 10.12968/ijpn.2021.27.2.98] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Palliative care (PC) aims to relieve a person's suffering and provide the best possible quality of life (QoL) to people with chronic illnesses. Despite the significant impact of PC services on the QoL of patients, barriers exist that prevent healthcare providers from facilitating PC in intensive care units (ICUs). AIM The purpose of this study was to explore the perceived barriers to implementing PC in ICUs. METHODS A qualitative approach was used to conduct 17 semi-structured interviews with clinicians across two ICUs (urban and suburban) in Jordan. Thematic analysis was used for the transcribed interviews. RESULTS Five main themes emerged: the ICU is a demanding and complex care environment; lack of preparation to implement PC; PC is a nicety, not a necessity; healthcare system-related barriers; and lack of cultural acceptance of PC. Lack of knowledge and training was identified as a major barrier for the effective implementation of PC by both physicians and nurses. CONCLUSION Equipping healthcare providers with the knowledge and expertise to provide PC is essential to dispel myths related to PC and facilitate PC provision. Developing an interdisciplinary care team will support the effective implementation of PC services in any setting. Establishing national PC policies will foster the ethical and legal practice of PC in Jordan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wejdan A Khater
- Associate Professor/Adult Health Nursing Department, Faculty of Nursing, Jordan University of Science and Technology
| | - Laila M Akhu-Zaheya
- Professor/Vice Dean, Adult Health Department Jordan University of Science and Technology
| | | | - Khulood K Shattnawi
- Associate Professor/Maternal and Child Health Nursing Department, Faculty of Nursing, Jordan University of Science and Technology
| | - Omar Shamieh
- Consultant Hospice and Palliative Medicine, Chairman, Department of Palliative Care, King Hussein Cancer Centre
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Bayuo J, Bristowe K, Harding R, Agbeko AE, Wong FKY, Agyei FB, Allotey G, Baffour PK, Agbenorku P, Hoyte-Williams PE, Agambire R. "Hanging in a balance": A qualitative study exploring clinicians' experiences of providing care at the end of life in the burn unit. Palliat Med 2021; 35:417-425. [PMID: 33198576 DOI: 10.1177/0269216320972289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although the culture in burns/critical care units is gradually evolving to support the delivery of palliative/end of life care, how clinicians experience the end of life phase in the burn unit remains minimally explored with a general lack of guidelines to support them. AIM To explore the end of life care experiences of burn care staff and ascertain how their experiences can facilitate the development of clinical guidelines. DESIGN Interpretive-descriptive qualitative approach with a sequential two phased multiple data collection strategies was employed (face to face semi-structured in-depth interviews and follow-up consultative meeting). Thematic analysis was used to analyze the data. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS The study was undertaken in a large teaching hospital in Ghana. Twenty burn care staff who had a minimum of 6 months working experience completed the interviews and 22 practitioners participated in the consultative meeting. RESULTS Experiences of burn care staff are complex with four themes emerging: (1) evaluating injury severity and prognostication, (2) nature of existing system of care, (3) perceived patient needs, and (4) considerations for palliative care in burns. Guidelines in this regard should focus on facilitating communication between the patient and family and staff, holistic symptom management at the end of life, and post-bereavement support for family members and burn care practitioners. CONCLUSIONS The end of life period in the burn unit is poorly defined coupled with prognostic uncertainty. Collaborative model of practice and further training are required to support the integration of palliative care in the burn unit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Bayuo
- Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Presbyterian University College, Abetifi, Eastern, Ghana.,School of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong
| | - Katherine Bristowe
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, Cicely Saunders Institute, Kings College, London, UK
| | - Richard Harding
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, Cicely Saunders Institute, Kings College, London, UK
| | | | | | - Frank Bediako Agyei
- Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Presbyterian University College, Abetifi, Eastern, Ghana
| | - Gabriel Allotey
- Burns Intensive Care Unit, Plastics and Reconstructive Surgical Unit, Directorate of Surgery, Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital, Kumasi, Ashanti, Ghana
| | - Prince Kyei Baffour
- Burns Intensive Care Unit, Plastics and Reconstructive Surgical Unit, Directorate of Surgery, Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital, Kumasi, Ashanti, Ghana
| | - Pius Agbenorku
- Plastics, Burns and Reconstructive Surgical Division, Directorate of Surgery, Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital, Kumasi, Ashanti, Ghana.,School of Medical Sciences, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ashanti, Ghana
| | - Paa Ekow Hoyte-Williams
- Plastics, Burns and Reconstructive Surgical Division, Directorate of Surgery, Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital, Kumasi, Ashanti, Ghana
| | - Ramatu Agambire
- Department of Nursing, Garden City University College, Kumasi, Ghana
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Spiker M, Paulsen K, Mehta AK. Primary Palliative Care Education in U.S. Residencies and Fellowships: A Systematic Review of Program Leadership Perspectives. J Palliat Med 2020; 23:1392-1399. [DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2020.0331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Spiker
- Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, VA Greater Los Angeles, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Kate Paulsen
- David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Ambereen K. Mehta
- Palliative Care Program, Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles Medical Center, Santa Monica, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Cox CE, Olsen MK, Casarett D, Haines K, Al-Hegelan M, Bartz RR, Katz JN, Naglee C, Ashana D, Gilstrap D, Gu J, Parish A, Frear A, Krishnamaneni D, Corcoran A, Docherty SL. Operationalizing needs-focused palliative care for older adults in intensive care units: Design of and rationale for the PCplanner randomized clinical trial. Contemp Clin Trials 2020; 98:106163. [PMID: 33007442 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2020.106163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2020] [Revised: 09/25/2020] [Accepted: 09/27/2020] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The number of older adults who receive life support in an intensive care unit (ICU), now 2 million per year, is increasing while survival remains unchanged. Because the quality of ICU-based palliative care is highly variable, we developed a mobile app intervention that integrates into the electronic health records (EHR) system called PCplanner (Palliative Care planner) with the goal of improving collaborative primary and specialist palliative care delivery in ICU settings. OBJECTIVE To describe the methods of a randomized clinical trial (RCT) being conducted to compare PCplanner vs. usual care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The goal of this two-arm, parallel group mixed methods RCT is to determine the clinical impact of the PCplanner intervention on outcomes of interest to patients, family members, clinicians, and policymakers over a 3-month follow up period. The primary outcome is change in unmet palliative care needs measured by the NEST instrument between baseline and 1 week post-randomization. Secondary outcomes include goal concordance of care, patient-centeredness of care, and quality of communication at 1 week post-randomization; length of stay; as well as symptoms of depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder at 3 months post-randomization. We will use general linear models for repeated measures to compare outcomes across the main effects and interactions of the factors. We hypothesize that compared to usual care, PCplanner will have a greater impact on the quality of ICU-based palliative care delivery across domains of core palliative care needs, psychological distress, patient-centeredness, and healthcare resource utilization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher E Cox
- Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine and the Program to Support People and Enhance Recovery (ProSPER), Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America.
| | - Maren K Olsen
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America; Durham Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC, United States of America.
| | - David Casarett
- Department of Medicine, Section of Palliative Care and Hospice Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America.
| | - Krista Haines
- Department of Surgery, Division of Trauma and Critical Care and Acute Care Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North, Carolina;, United States of America.
| | - Mashael Al-Hegelan
- Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine and the Program to Support People and Enhance Recovery (ProSPER), Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America.
| | - Raquel R Bartz
- Department of Anesthesia, Division of Critical Care Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America.
| | - Jason N Katz
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America.
| | - Colleen Naglee
- Department of Anesthesia, Division of Neurology, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Deepshikha Ashana
- Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine and the Program to Support People and Enhance Recovery (ProSPER), Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America.
| | - Daniel Gilstrap
- Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine and the Program to Support People and Enhance Recovery (ProSPER), Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America.
| | - Jessie Gu
- Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine and the Program to Support People and Enhance Recovery (ProSPER), Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America.
| | - Alice Parish
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America.
| | - Allie Frear
- Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine and the Program to Support People and Enhance Recovery (ProSPER), Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America.
| | - Deepthi Krishnamaneni
- Duke Health Technology Solutions, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America.
| | - Andrew Corcoran
- Office of Academic Solutions and Information Systems, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America.
| | - Sharron L Docherty
- School of Nursing, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Mehta AK, Patel R, Patel D, Davis MP. Trends in Published Palliative Care Research: A 15-Year Review. Am J Hosp Palliat Care 2020; 38:489-493. [PMID: 32705878 DOI: 10.1177/1049909120944863] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There has been a call for palliative care (PC) published research to support the impact and need for more specialty PC services. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to characterize research in PC over a 15-year period in 3 PC journals published in the United States. DESIGN The authors reviewed every issue of the Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, Journal of Palliative Medicine, and American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine from 2004 through 2018. Studies included were original articles and brief reports. Study type (qualitative, quantitative), author (first and last), gender, and professional degree of the author (first and last) were recorded. RESULTS A total of 4881 articles were included in this study. The proportion of quantitative papers significantly increased across 3 time points from 63% to 67% to 78%. The proportion of women first authors increased across all 3 time points (54%, 2004-2008; 57%, 2009-2013; 60%, 2014-2018), and the proportion of women last authors increased across all time points (38%, 2004-2008; 44%, 2009-2013; 46%, 2014-2018). More than 40% of authors were physicians. CONCLUSIONS Published PC studies are increasingly quantitative in design. Gender authorship is female dominant for the first authors and increasingly equal across genders for the last authors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ambereen K Mehta
- Palliative Care Program, 8783 University of California, Los Angeles Medical Center, CA, USA
| | - Rishi Patel
- Palliative Care Program, 8783 University of California, Los Angeles Medical Center, CA, USA.,Comprehensive Blood & Cancer Center, Bakersfield, CA, USA
| | - Dheer Patel
- 1259University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Mellar P Davis
- Department of Palliative Care, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Fehnel CR, Armengol de la Hoz M, Celi LA, Campbell ML, Hanafy K, Nozari A, White DB, Mitchell SL. Incidence and Risk Model Development for Severe Tachypnea Following Terminal Extubation. Chest 2020; 158:1456-1463. [PMID: 32360728 DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.04.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2019] [Revised: 04/03/2020] [Accepted: 04/20/2020] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Palliative ventilator withdrawal (PVW) in the ICU is a common occurrence. RESEARCH QUESTION The goal of this study was to measure the rate of severe tachypnea as a proxy for dyspnea and to identify characteristics associated with episodes of tachypnea. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS This study assessed a retrospective cohort of ICU patients from 2008 to 2012 mechanically ventilated at a single academic medical center who underwent PVW. The primary outcome of at least one episode of severe tachypnea (respiratory rate > 30 breaths/min) within 6 h after PVW was measured by using detailed physiologic and medical record data. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the association between patient and treatment characteristics with the occurrence of a severe episode of tachypnea post extubation. RESULTS Among 822 patients undergoing PVW, 19% and 30% had an episode of severe tachypnea during the 1-h and 6-h postextubation period, respectively. Within 1 h postextubation, patients with the following characteristics were more likely to experience tachypnea: no pre-extubation opiates (adjusted OR [aOR], 2.08; 95% CI, 1.03-4.19), lung injury (aOR, 3.33; 95% CI, 2.19-5.04), Glasgow Coma Scale score > 8 (aOR, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.30-3.77), and no postextubation opiates (aOR, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.19-3.00). INTERPRETATION Up to one-third of ICU patients undergoing PVW experience severe tachypnea. Administration of pre-extubation opiates (anticipatory dosing) represents a key modifiable factor that may reduce poor symptom control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Corey R Fehnel
- Hebrew SeniorLife Hinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research, Boston, MA; Department of Neurology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
| | - Miguel Armengol de la Hoz
- Division of Clinical Informatics, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Laboratory for Computational Physiology, Institute for Medical Engineering and Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA; Biomedical Engineering and Telemedicine Group, Biomedical Technology Centre CTB, ETSI Telecomunicación, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Leo A Celi
- Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
| | | | - Khalid Hanafy
- Department of Neurology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Ala Nozari
- Department of Medicine, Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Douglas B White
- Department of Critical Care, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Susan L Mitchell
- Hebrew SeniorLife Hinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research, Boston, MA; Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Kross EK, Rosenberg AR, Engelberg RA, Curtis JR. Postdoctoral Research Training in Palliative Care: Lessons Learned From a T32 Program. J Pain Symptom Manage 2020; 59:750-760.e8. [PMID: 31775020 PMCID: PMC7029795 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.11.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2019] [Revised: 11/08/2019] [Accepted: 11/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Our aging population and advances in chronic disease management that prolong the time that patients live with a chronic illness have combined to create an enormous need for improved palliative care research across diverse diseases. In this article, we describe the structure and processes of a National Institutes of Health-funded T32 postdoctoral research fellowship at the University of Washington and our experiences in developing and implementing the program. We recognize a broad definition of palliative care research, including research focused on improving quality of life, minimizing symptoms, providing psychological and spiritual support, and improving communication about patients' values and goals of care, all in the context of a serious illness. We describe our four core principles for postdoctoral training in palliative care research, each with a number of specific approaches: 1) mastering a set of essential content and research skills; 2) structured mentoring and academic career development; 3) creating and supporting early success; and 4) interdisciplinary training and team science. In addition, we also describe our framework for the essential competencies necessary for a palliative care research training program, our methods for identification and selection of applicants, our outcomes to date, and our processes of continuous quality assessment and improvement. Our goal is to describe our successful postdoctoral research training program in palliative care to promote development of new programs and share information between programs to continue to build the field of collaborative and interdisciplinary palliative care research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin K Kross
- Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA; Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Abby R Rosenberg
- Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA; Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Ruth A Engelberg
- Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA; Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - J Randall Curtis
- Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA; Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Janssen K, Rosielle D, Wang Q, Kim HJ. The impact of palliative care on quality of life, anxiety, and depression in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a randomized controlled pilot study. Respir Res 2020; 21:2. [PMID: 31900187 PMCID: PMC6942318 DOI: 10.1186/s12931-019-1266-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2019] [Accepted: 12/19/2019] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a fatal disease that results in poor quality of life due to progressive respiratory symptoms, anxiety, and depression. Palliative care improves quality of life and survival in other progressive diseases. No randomized controlled trials have investigated the impact of palliative care on quality of life, anxiety, or depression in IPF. Methods We conducted a randomized, controlled, pilot study to assess the feasibility of measuring the effect of a palliative care clinic referral on quality of life, anxiety, and depression in IPF. Patients were randomized to usual care (UC) or usual care + palliative care (UC + PC) with routine pulmonary follow up at 3 and 6 months. The UC + PC group received a minimum of one PC clinic visit. Primary outcome was change from baseline in quality of life, anxiety, and depression as measured by the St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Index (HADS), and the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) at 6 months. Results Twenty-two patients were randomized between September 2017 through July 2018; 11 to UC and 11 to UC + PC. There was no difference in the change in SGRQ score at 3 months or 6 months, however, the symptom score trended towards a significant worsening for UC + PC at both 3 and 6 months (mean change at 3 months for UC and UC + PC was − 7.8 and + 10.7, respectively, p = 0.066; mean change at 6 months for UC and UC + PC was − 6.0 and + 4.6, respectively, p = 0.055). There was no difference in the change in HADS anxiety or depression scores. There was a significant transient worsening in PHQ-9 scores for UC + PC at 3 months (UC: -1.6, UC + PC: + 0.9, p = 0.008); this effect did not persist at 6 months. Conclusion This pilot study demonstrated that a randomized controlled trial of palliative care in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis patients is feasible. Receiving palliative care did not lead to improved quality of life, anxiety, or depression compared to usual care after 6 months. Patients in the UC + PC group trended towards worsening symptoms and a small but statistically significant transient worsening in depression. These findings should be interpreted with caution, and need to be evaluated in adequately powered clinical trials. NCT03981406, June 10, 2019, retrospectively registered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine Janssen
- University of Minnesota Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, MMC 276, 420 Delaware Street SE, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
| | - Drew Rosielle
- University of Minnesota Palliative Care, MMC 603 Mayo, 8603A, 420 Delaware Street SE, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA
| | - Qi Wang
- University of Minnesota Biostatistical Design and Support Center, Clinical Translational Science Institute, Room 223, 1932D, 717 Delaware St SE, Minneapolis, MN, 55414, USA
| | - Hyun Joo Kim
- University of Minnesota Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, MMC 276, 420 Delaware Street SE, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Ribeiro AF, Martins Pereira S, Gomes B, Nunes R. Do patients, families, and healthcare teams benefit from the integration of palliative care in burn intensive care units? Results from a systematic review with narrative synthesis. Palliat Med 2019; 33:1241-1254. [PMID: 31296110 DOI: 10.1177/0269216319862160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Burn units are intensive care facilities specialized in the treatment of patients with severe burns. As burn injuries have a major impact in physical, psychosocial, and spiritual health, palliative care can be a strengthening component of integrated care. AIM To review and appraise the existing evidence about the integration of palliative care in burn intensive care units with respect to (1) the concept, model and design and (2) the benefits and outcomes of this integration. DESIGN A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Protocol registered with PROSPERO (CRD42018111676). DATA SOURCES Five electronic databases were searched (PubMed/NLM, Web of Science, MEDLINE/TR, Ovid, and CINAHL/EBSCO) until May 2019. A narrative synthesis of the findings was constructed. Hawker et al.'s tool was used for quality appraisal. RESULTS A total of 299 articles were identified, of which five were included for analysis involving a total of 7353 individuals. Findings suggest that there may be benefits from integrating palliative care in burn units, specifically in terms of patients' comfort, decision-making processes, and family care. Multidisciplinary teams may experience lower levels of burden as result of integrating palliative care in burn units. CONCLUSION This review reflects the challenging setting of burn intensive care units. Evidence from these articles suggests that the integration of palliative care in burn intensive care units improves patients' comfort, decision-making process, and family care. Further research is needed to better understand how the integration of palliative care in burn intensive care units may be fostered and to identify the outcomes of this integration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sandra Martins Pereira
- Instituto de Bioética, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Porto, Portugal.,UNESCO Chair in Bioethics, Instituto de Bioética, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Porto, Portugal.,Centro de Estudos em Gestão e Economia (CEGE), Porto Católica Business School, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Porto, Portugal
| | - Barbara Gomes
- Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.,Cicely Saunders Institute, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Rui Nunes
- Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.,International Network UNESCO Chair in Bioethics
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Aslakson RA, Ast K. Introduction to a New Special Series for the Journal of Pain and Symptom Management-Science in Action: Evidence and Opportunities for Palliative Care Across Diverse Populations and Care Settings. J Pain Symptom Manage 2019; 58:134-136. [PMID: 30763601 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2019] [Accepted: 02/05/2019] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Practices to optimize palliative care delivery and new opportunities in which to integrate palliative care vary across populations and care settings. Systematic reviews are an efficient and methodologically rigorous approach to summarize existing research to identify both evidence-based best practices and new areas for future research and clinical practice. This is the introduction to a special series of articles in which members of the American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine Research Committee report the results of circumscribed systematic reviews, which in a specific population or care setting seek to 1) summarize existing evidence for optimal palliative care practices or 2) identify opportunities where better palliative care delivery could improve patient and/or family outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca A Aslakson
- Department of Medicine and Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Section of Palliative Care, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA; Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
| | - Katherine Ast
- Director of Quality and Research, American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine (AAHPM), Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Palliative Care Planner: A Pilot Study to Evaluate Acceptability and Usability of an Electronic Health Records System-integrated, Needs-targeted App Platform. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2019; 15:59-68. [PMID: 29121480 DOI: 10.1513/annalsats.201706-500oc] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
RATIONALE The quality and patient-centeredness of intensive care unit (ICU)-based palliative care delivery is highly variable. OBJECTIVE To develop and pilot an app platform for clinicians and ICU patients and their family members that enhances the delivery of needs-targeted palliative care. METHODS In the development phase of the study, we developed an electronic health record (EHR) system-integrated mobile web app system prototype, PCplanner (Palliative Care Planner). PCplanner screens the EHR for ICU patients meeting any of five prompts (triggers) for palliative care consultation, allows families to report their unmet palliative care needs, and alerts clinicians to these needs. The evaluation phase included a prospective before/after study conducted at a large academic medical center. Two control populations were enrolled in the before period to serve as context for the intervention. First, 25 ICU patients who received palliative care consults served as patient-level controls. Second, 49 family members of ICU patients who received mechanical ventilation for at least 48 hours served as family-level controls. Afterward, 14 patients, 18 family members, and 10 clinicians participated in the intervention evaluation period. Family member outcomes measured at baseline and 4 days later included acceptability (Client Satisfaction Questionnaire [CSQ]), usability (Systems Usability Scale [SUS]), and palliative care needs, assessed with the adapted needs of social nature, existential concerns, symptoms, and therapeutic interaction (NEST) scale; the Patient-Centeredness of Care Scale (PCCS); and the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS). Patient outcomes included frequency of goal concordant treatment, hospital length of stay, and discharge disposition. RESULTS Family members reported high PCplanner acceptability (mean CSQ, 14.1 [SD, 1.4]) and usability (mean SUS, 21.1 [SD, 1.7]). PCplanner family member recipients experienced a 12.7-unit reduction in NEST score compared with a 3.4-unit increase among controls (P = 0.002), as well as improved mean scores on the PCCS (6.6 [SD, 5.8]) and the PSS (-0.8 [SD, 1.9]). The frequency of goal-concordant treatment increased over the course of the intervention (n = 14 [SD, 79%] vs. n = 18 [SD, 100%]). Compared with palliative care controls, intervention patients received palliative care consultation sooner (3.9 [SD, 2.7] vs. 6.9 [SD, 7.1] mean days), had a shorter mean hospital length of stay (20.5 [SD, 9.1] vs. 22.3 [SD, 16.0] patient number), and received hospice care more frequently (5 [36%] vs. 5 [20%]), although these differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS PCplanner represents an acceptable, usable, and clinically promising systems-based approach to delivering EHR-triggered, needs-targeted ICU-based palliative care within a standard clinical workflow. A clinical trial in a larger population is needed to evaluate its efficacy.
Collapse
|
26
|
Hua M, Ma X, Morrison RS, Li G, Wunsch H. Association between the Availability of Hospital-based Palliative Care and Treatment Intensity for Critically Ill Patients. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2018; 15:1067-1074. [PMID: 29812967 PMCID: PMC6137683 DOI: 10.1513/annalsats.201711-872oc] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2017] [Accepted: 05/29/2018] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
RATIONALE In the intensive care unit (ICU), studies involving specialized palliative care services have shown decreases in the use of nonbeneficial life-sustaining therapies and ICU length of stay for patients. However, whether widespread availability of hospital-based palliative care is associated with less frequent use of high intensity care is unknown. OBJECTIVES To determine whether availability of hospital-based palliative care is associated with decreased markers of treatment intensity for ICU patients. METHODS Retrospective cohort study of adult ICU patients in New York State hospitals, 2008-2014. Multilevel regression was used to assess the relationship between availability of hospital-based palliative care during the year of admission and hospital length of stay, use of mechanical ventilation, dialysis and artificial nutrition, placement of a tracheostomy or gastrostomy tube, days in ICU and discharge to hospice. RESULTS Of 1,025,503 ICU patients in 151 hospitals, 814,794 (79.5%) received care in a hospital with a palliative care program. Hospital length of stay was similar for patients in hospitals with and without palliative care programs (6 d [interquartile range, 3-12] vs. 6 d [interquartile range, 3-11]; adjusted rate ratio, 1.04 [95% confidence interval 1.03-1.05]; P < 0.001), as were other healthcare use outcomes. However, patients in hospitals with palliative care programs were 46% more likely to be discharged to hospice than those in hospitals without palliative care programs (1.7% vs. 1.4%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.46 [95% confidence interval 1.30-1.64]; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS The availability of hospital-based palliative care was not associated with differences in in-hospital treatment intensity, but it was associated with significantly increased hospice use for ICU patients. Currently, the measurable benefit of palliative care programs for critically ill patients may be the increased use of hospice facilities, as opposed to decreased healthcare use during an ICU-associated hospitalization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- May Hua
- Department of Anesthesiology and
| | - Xiaoyue Ma
- Department of Anesthesiology and
- Center for Health Policy and Outcomes in Anesthesia and Critical Care, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York
| | | | - Guohua Li
- Department of Anesthesiology and
- Center for Health Policy and Outcomes in Anesthesia and Critical Care, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York
- Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, New York
| | - Hannah Wunsch
- Department of Anesthesiology and
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; and
- Department of Anesthesia and
- Interdisciplinary Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Morrison RS, Aldridge MD, Block J, Chiu L, Maroney C, Morrison CA, Meier DE. The National Palliative Care Research Center: Ten Years of Promoting and Developing Research in Palliative Care. J Palliat Med 2018; 21:1548-1557. [PMID: 30136886 DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2018.0204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The evidence base to support high-quality clinical care and number of scientists available to develop this evidence base are inadequate. OBJECTIVE To describe the first 10 years of the National Palliative Care Research Center's (NPCRC) programs and their outcomes. DESIGN Established in 2005, NPCRC was created in direct response to the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine. Specifically, NPCRC was created to expand the palliative care evidence-based needed for both health policy and clinical practice by supporting research scientists, stimulating research and innovation, and creating a community of researchers focused on the needs of persons with serious illness and their families. MEASUREMENTS Subsequent grant funding following NPCRC investment (web searches of NIH Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools [RePORT], Veterans Administration and Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute [PCORI] grant databases, grantee on-line surveys, and grantee annual reports) promotions (grantee on-line surveys and annual reports), publications (PubMed searches), and NPCRC participant satisfaction (grantee questionnaires). RESULTS As of July 2017, NPCRC has funded 47 junior investigators representing over 10 disciplines. These investigators have leveraged NPCRC's $7.8 million investment into 52 federal grants totaling $74.8 million dollars and 69 foundation grants totaling $16 million. Thirty-five grants ($5.8 million) have been awarded to experienced investigators, resulting in additional grant funding of $104.5 million dollars ($78.5 million federal, $26 million nonfederal). Satisfaction with NPCRC's program has been uniformly high and policy efforts have resulted in enhanced federal funding opportunities in palliative care research. CONCLUSIONS NPCRC's focus on people and infrastructure in conjunction with a top-down bottom-up strategy has been critical in improving the palliative care evidence base.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Sean Morrison
- 1 National Palliative Care Research Center of the Brookdale Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine , Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Melissa D Aldridge
- 1 National Palliative Care Research Center of the Brookdale Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine , Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - James Block
- 1 National Palliative Care Research Center of the Brookdale Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine , Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.,2 Center to Advance Palliative Care of the Brookdale Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine , Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Lily Chiu
- 1 National Palliative Care Research Center of the Brookdale Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine , Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Catherine Maroney
- 1 National Palliative Care Research Center of the Brookdale Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine , Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Corey A Morrison
- 1 National Palliative Care Research Center of the Brookdale Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine , Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.,3 Brown University School of Public Health , Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Diane E Meier
- 2 Center to Advance Palliative Care of the Brookdale Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine , Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Mercadante S, Gregoretti C, Cortegiani A. Palliative care in intensive care units: why, where, what, who, when, how. BMC Anesthesiol 2018; 18:106. [PMID: 30111299 PMCID: PMC6094470 DOI: 10.1186/s12871-018-0574-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 81] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2018] [Accepted: 08/03/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Palliative care is patient and family-centered care that optimizes quality of life by anticipating, preventing, and treating suffering when “curative” therapies are futile. In the Intensive Care Unit (ICU), critically ill patients receive life-sustaining therapies with the goal of restoring or maintaining organ function. Palliative Care in the ICU is a widely discussed topic and it is increasingly applied in clinics. It encompasses symptoms control and end-of-life management, communication with relatives and setting goals of care ensuring dignity in death and decision-making power. However, effective application of Palliative Care in ICU presupposes specific knowledge and training which anesthesiologists and critical care physicians may lack. Moreover, logistic issues such protocols for patients’ selection, application models and triggers for consultation of external experts are still matter of debate. The aim of this review is to provide the anesthesiologists and intensivists an overview of the aims, current evidence and practical advices about the application of palliative care in ICU.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastiano Mercadante
- Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit and Pain Relief and Supportive-Palliative Care Unit, La Maddalena Cancer Center, Via san Lorenzo 312, 90145, Palermo, Italy
| | - Cesare Gregoretti
- Department of Biopathology and Medical Biotechnologies (DIBIMED). Section of Anestesia, Analgesia, Intensive Care and Emergency. Policlinico Paolo Giaccone, University of Palermo, Via del vespro 129, 90127, Palermo, Italy
| | - Andrea Cortegiani
- Department of Biopathology and Medical Biotechnologies (DIBIMED). Section of Anestesia, Analgesia, Intensive Care and Emergency. Policlinico Paolo Giaccone, University of Palermo, Via del vespro 129, 90127, Palermo, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Hobler MR, Engelberg RA, Curtis JR, Ramos KJ, Zander MI, Howard SS, Goss CH, Aitken ML. Exploring Opportunities for Primary Outpatient Palliative Care for Adults with Cystic Fibrosis: A Mixed-Methods Study of Patients' Needs. J Palliat Med 2018; 21:513-521. [PMID: 29298400 DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2017.0259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Persons with cystic fibrosis (CF) experience high morbidity and mortality, yet little is known about their palliative care needs and how clinicians may address these needs. OBJECTIVES (1) To identify palliative care and advance care planning needs of patients with CF and their families; and (2) to identify clinicians' potential roles in meeting these needs. METHODS A mixed-methods study of adult patients (age ≥18 years) with moderate-to-severe CF [forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) <65% predicted] were recruited from a CF Center. Semi-structured interviews (30-60 minutes) and questionnaires were administered in person or by phone. Grounded theory was used to analyze the interviews. Questionnaires were analyzed descriptively. RESULTS Forty-nine patients (FEV1 % range = 19%-63%) participated; the participation rate was 80% for eligible patients. Three main domains of palliative care needs were identified: (1) to be listened to, feel heard, and be "seen"; (2) understanding the context around CF and its trajectory, with the goal of preparing for the future; and (3) information about, and potential solutions to, practical and current circumstances that cause stress. In questionnaires, few patients (4.3%) reported talking with their clinician about their wishes for care if they were to become sicker, but mixed-methods data demonstrated that more than half of participants were willing to receive palliative care services provided those services were adapted to CF. CONCLUSION Patients expressed a need for and openness to palliative care services, as well as some reluctance. They appreciated clinician communication that was open, forthcoming, and attuned to individualized concerns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mara R Hobler
- 1 Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence, University of Washington , Seattle, Washington.,2 Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, University of Washington , Seattle, Washington
| | - Ruth A Engelberg
- 1 Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence, University of Washington , Seattle, Washington.,2 Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, University of Washington , Seattle, Washington
| | - J Randall Curtis
- 1 Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence, University of Washington , Seattle, Washington.,2 Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, University of Washington , Seattle, Washington
| | - Kathleen J Ramos
- 2 Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, University of Washington , Seattle, Washington
| | - Miriam I Zander
- 3 Touro College of Osteopathic Medicine , New York, New York
| | - Shacole S Howard
- 4 Sports Medicine Center, University of Washington Medical Center , Seattle, Washington
| | - Christopher H Goss
- 2 Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, University of Washington , Seattle, Washington.,5 Seattle Children's Hospital , Seattle, Washington.,6 Pediatric Pulmonology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington , Seattle, Washington
| | - Moira L Aitken
- 2 Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, University of Washington , Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Ali MS, Sorathia L. Palliative Care and Interventional Pulmonology. Clin Chest Med 2017; 39:57-64. [PMID: 29433725 DOI: 10.1016/j.ccm.2017.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Since pulmonary pathologies, such as lung cancer and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), are some of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality around the world, pulmonologists are likely to encounter patients with unmet palliative care needs. This article focuses on the symptoms and complications encountered by patients with terminal pulmonary conditions, briefly describes the non-interventional palliative strategies, and then discusses more advanced therapies available in the realm of interventional pulmonology. Most of the literature discussed here is derived from patients with lung cancer and COPD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammad Sajawal Ali
- Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, 9200 W. Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA.
| | - Lubna Sorathia
- Department of Medicine, Division of Geriatrics and Gerontology, Medical College of Wisconsin, 9200 W. Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA
| |
Collapse
|