Defining Baseline Mechanisms of Cefiderocol Resistance in the Enterobacterales

In vitro antimicrobial activity of six novel β-lactam and β-lactamase inhibitor combinations and cefiderocol against NDM-producing Enterobacterales in China

INTRODUCTION

To date, the global prevalence of New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase (NDM) in carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) has been of concern, which is not inhibited by classical β-lactamase inhibitors (BLIs). In this study, we investigated the newly developed antimicrobial agents or inhibitors against NDM-producing Enterobacterales (NPEs).

METHODS

The in vitro activities of cefiderocol, cefepime/taniborbactam, meropenem/taniborbactam, cefepime/zidebactam, meropenem/nacubactam, aztreonam/nacubactam and aztreonam/avibactam were analyzed in 204 NPE strains collected in China. The potential resistance mechanisms were identified by whole genome sequencing.

RESULTS

Of 204 NPE strains, 18.1% (37/204) were resistant to cefiderocol, in which cirA deleterious alteration, PBP3 insertion and NDM production were taken as potential resistance mechanisms; 28.9% (59/204) were resistant to cefepime/zidebactam, involving K. pneumoniae with ompK35 deleterious alteration; 22.5% (46/204) were resistant to cefepime/taniborbactam, in which YRIN or YRIK inserted in PBP3 and altered ompC are more frequently detected in the resistant E. coli isolates; 27.9% (57/204) were resistant to meropenem/taniborbactam. Aztreonam/avibactam and aztreonam/nacubactam exhibited excellent activity against NPE. However, meropenem/nacubactam had the lowest activity, with only 49.0% (100/204) of all isolates having MICs of <4/4 mg/L.

CONCLUSIONS

Aztreonam/avibactam and aztreonam/nacubactam showed the highest activity against NPE. The potential resistance mechanisms of novel antimicrobial agents against NPE should be under active surveillance.

Resistance profiles of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales in a large centre in England: are we already losing cefiderocol?

BACKGROUND

Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) pose difficult therapeutic challenges. We aimed to characterize antimicrobial resistance profiles of CPE in our centre.

METHODS

All non-duplicate CPE isolates between 1 August 2020 and 31 August 2023 in a large teaching trust in England were retrospectively studied. Cefiderocol antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) was performed using disc diffusion, ceftazidime/avibactam using disc diffusion and gradient diffusion, and ceftazidime/avibactam aztreonam synergy using the double disc diffusion method. EUCAST version 14.0 breakpoints were used.

RESULTS

A total of 158 CPE from 136 patients were isolated. Most patients were colonized with CPE, but only 16.9% had active infections. Thirty-day all-cause mortality was 10.3%, increasing to 13% for patients with infections and to 18.2% for bacteraemias. OXA-48 was the most prevalent carbapenemase (48.1%), followed by NDM (38%). All isolates exhibited MDR profiles, with high levels of resistance to meropenem (41.1%). Resistance to cefiderocol was found in 69.7% of NDM-producing isolates, with a further 18.2% in the area of technical uncertainty. Ceftazidime/avibactam and aztreonam synergy was seen in 87.5% of isolates, whereas colistin and fosfomycin susceptibility remained high (98.1% and 97.2%, respectively). All OXA-48-producing isolates were susceptible to ceftazidime/avibactam, and 15.3% were resistant to cefiderocol. No patients had been exposed to cefiderocol beforehand, whereas three had been exposed to ceftazidime/avibactam. The most common risk factor for CPE isolation was travel and receiving healthcare abroad, especially in Asia.

CONCLUSIONS

We found high rates of resistance to cefiderocol in CPE isolates without prior cefiderocol exposure. Our results prohibit empirical use of cefiderocol for the treatment of CPE infections in our setting.

Efficacy of Cefiderocol Against Endophthalmitis Isolates

Background/Objectives: Endophthalmitis is an intraocular microbial infection that can lead to permanent blindness, even with prompt anti-microbial therapy. Multi-drug-resistant organisms are on the rise, potentially limiting the efficacy of current empiric antibiotic therapies of intravitreal ceftazidime and vancomycin. Cefiderocol is a recent FDA- and EMA-approved antibiotic for multi-drug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. Methods: To better understand its potential utility in the treatment of ocular infections, the MIC of cefiderocol was compared to ceftazidime and amikacin in endophthalmitis bacterial isolates using Epsilometer testing. Because vancomycin is commonly given concomitantly as part of empiric endophthalmitis treatment, possible synergistic and antagonistic effects of concomitant vancomycin and cefiderocol were also evaluated. Results: Cefiderocol was found to have lower MIC values compared to ceftazidime for Pseudomonadales or Enterobacterales species. When comparing the MICs of cefiderocol and vancomycin, there appeared to be no antagonism between the two antibiotics. Conclusions: This is the first report exploring the use of cefiderocol in endophthalmitis strains. The results of this study show this is a promising antibiotic for multi-drug-resistant Gram-negative organisms but further research is needed to investigate its intraocular safety profile.

Updates on the Activity, Efficacy and Emerging Mechanisms of Resistance to Cefiderocol

In recent years, novel antimicrobials have been developed to counter the emergence of antimicrobial resistance and provide effective therapeutic options against multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacilli (GNB). Cefiderocol, a siderophore cephalosporin, represents a novel valuable antimicrobial drug for the treatment of infections caused by MDR-GNB. The mechanism of cefiderocol to penetrate through the outer membrane of bacterial cells, termed "Trojan horse", makes this antimicrobial drug unique and immune to the various resistance strategies adopted by GNB. Its broad spectrum of action, potent antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetics properties, safety, and tolerability make cefiderocol a key drug for the treatment of infections due to MDR strains. Although this novel antimicrobial molecule contributed to revolutionizing the therapeutic armamentarium against MDR-GNB, the recent emergence of cefiderocol-resistant strains has redefined its role in clinical practice and required new strategies to preserve its antibacterial activity. In this review, we provide an updated discussion regarding the mechanism of action, emerging mechanisms of resistance, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) properties, and efficacy data of cefiderocol against the major Gram-negative bacteria and future prospects.

Cefiderocol in Combating Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: Action and Resistance

Acinetobacter baumannii (A. baumannii) has emerged as a prominent multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogen, significantly complicating treatment strategies due to its formidable resistance mechanisms, particularly against carbapenems. Reduced membrane permeability, active antibiotic efflux, and enzymatic hydrolysis via different β-lactamases are the main resistance mechanisms displayed by A. baumannii, and they are all effective against successful treatment approaches. This means that alternate treatment approaches, such as combination therapy that incorporates beta-lactams, β-lactamase inhibitors, and novel antibiotics like cefiderocol, must be investigated immediately. Cefiderocol, a new catechol-substituted siderophore cephalosporin, improves antibacterial activity by allowing for better bacterial membrane penetration. Due to its unique structure, cefiderocol can more efficiently target and destroy resistant bacteria by using iron transport systems. Through its inhibition of peptidoglycan formation through binding to penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs), cefiderocol avoids conventional resistance pathways and induces bacterial cell lysis. The possibility of resistance development due to β-lactamase synthesis and mutations in PBPs, however, emphasizes the need for continued investigation into cefiderocol's efficacy in combination treatment regimes. Cefiderocol's siderophore mimic mechanism is especially important in iron-limited conditions because it can use ferric-siderophore transporters to enter cells. Additionally, its passive diffusion through bacterial porins increases its intracellular concentrations, making it a good option for treating carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii, especially in cases of severe infections and ventilator-associated diseases (IVACs). Cefiderocol may reduce MDR infection morbidity and mortality when combined with customized antimicrobial treatments, but further investigation is needed to improve patient outcomes and address A. baumannii resistance issues.

Survival of infection with TEM β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli with Pan-β-lactam resistance

BACKGROUND

Antimicrobial resistance is a critical global health issue, significantly contributing to patient mortality. Recent antibiotic developments have aimed to counteract carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales; however, the impact of their use on the emergence of antibiotic resistance is unknown. This study investigates the first case of a non-carbapenemase-producing, pan-β-lactam-resistant Escherichia coli strain from a patient previously treated with ceftolozane-tazobactam and cefiderocol.

METHODS

This study describes the clinical progression of a 39-year-old ICU patient who developed multiple infections, culminating in the isolation of a pan-β-lactam-resistant E. coli strain (EC554). The resistance profile was characterised through MIC determination, whole-genome sequencing, the use of the β-lactam inactivation method, RT-qPCR, efflux pump inhibition assays, outer membrane protein analysis, and blaTEM transformation.

FINDINGS

The EC554 isolate displayed resistance to all tested β-lactams and β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor combinations. Whole-genome sequencing revealed four plasmids in EC554, with the only β-lactamase gene being blaTEM-252 on the pEC554-PBR-X1-X1 plasmid. We found that the extremely resistant phenotype was attributable to a combination of different mechanisms: a high expression of TEM-252, efflux pump activity, porin loss, and PBP3 mutations.

INTERPRETATION

The findings illustrate the complex interplay of multiple resistance mechanisms in E. coli, highlighting the potential for high-level resistance even without carbapenemase production. This study underscores the importance of comprehensively characterising resistance mechanisms in order to inform effective treatment strategies and mitigate the spread of resistant strains.

In vitro resistance development gives insights into molecular resistance mechanisms against cefiderocol

Cefiderocol, a novel siderophore cephalosporin, demonstrates promising in vitro activity against multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria, including carbapenemase-producing strains. Nonetheless, only a few reports are available regarding the acquisition of resistance in clinical settings, primarily due to its recent usage. This study aimed to investigate cefiderocol resistance using an in vitro resistance development model to gain insights into the underlying molecular resistance mechanisms. Cefiderocol susceptible reference strains (Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa) and a clinical Acinetobacter baumannii complex isolate were exposed to increasing cefiderocol concentrations using a high-throughput resistance development model. Cefiderocol susceptibility testing was performed using broth microdilution. Whole-genome sequencing was employed to identify newly acquired resistance mutations. Our in vitro resistance development model led to several clones of strains exhibiting cefiderocol resistance, with MIC values 8-fold to 512-fold higher than initial levels. In total, we found 42 different mutations in 26 genes, of which 35 could be described for the first time. Putative loss-of-function mutations were detected in the envZ, tonB, and cirA genes in 13 out of 17 isolates, leading to a decrease in cefiderocol influx. Other potential resistance mechanisms included multidrug efflux pumps (baeS, czcS, nalC), antibiotic-inactivating enzymes (ampR, dacB), and target mutations in penicillin-binding-protein genes (mrcB). This study reveals new insights into underlying molecular resistance mechanisms against cefiderocol. While mutations leading to reduced influx via iron transporters was the most frequent resistance mechanism, we also detected several other novel resistance mutations causing cefiderocol resistance.

Successful Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Meningitis With Sulbactam-Durlobactam

BACKGROUND

The treatment of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii/calcoaceticus complex (CRAB) presents significant treatment challenges.

METHODS

We report the case of a 42-year-old woman with CRAB meningitis who experienced persistently positive cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cultures for 13 days despite treatment with high-dose ampicillin-sulbactam and cefiderocol. On day 13, she was transitioned to sulbactam-durlobactam and meropenem; 4 subsequent CSF cultures remained negative. After 14 days of sulbactam-durlobactam, she was cured of infection. Whole genome sequencing investigations identified putative mechanisms that contributed to the reduced cefiderocol susceptibility observed during cefiderocol therapy. Blood and CSF samples were collected pre-dose and 3-hours post initiation of a sulbactam-durlobactam infusion.

RESULTS

The CRAB isolate belonged to sequence type 2. An acquired blaOXA-23 and an intrinsic blaOXA-51-like (ie, blaOXA-66) carbapenemase gene were identified. The paradoxical effect (ie, no growth at lower cefiderocol dilutions but growth at higher dilutions) was observed by broth microdilution after 8 days of cefiderocol exposure but not by disk diffusion. Potential markers of resistance to cefiderocol included mutations in the start codon of piuA and piuC iron transport genes and an A515V substitution in PBP3, the primary target of cefiderocol. Sulbactam and durlobactam were detected in CSF at both timepoints, indicating CSF penetration.

CONCLUSIONS

This case describes successful treatment of refractory CRAB meningitis with the administration of sulbactam-durlobactam and meropenem and highlights the need to be cognizant of the paradoxical effect that can be observed with broth microdilution testing of CRAB isolates with cefiderocol.

MultiRapid ATB NP test for detecting concomitant susceptibility and resistance of last-resort novel antibiotics available to treat multidrug-resistant Enterobacterales infections

BACKGROUND

Recently developed therapeutics against Gram-negative bacteria include the β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor combinations ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA), meropenem-vaborbactam (MEV), and imipenem-relebatam (IPR), and the siderophore cephalosporin cefiderocol (FDC). The aim of this study was to develop a test for rapid identification of susceptibility/resistance to CZA, MEV, IPR, and FDC for Enterobacterales in a single test for rapid clinical decision making.

METHODS

The MultiRapid ATB NP test is based on the detection of glucose metabolism occurring after bacterial growth in the presence of defined concentrations of CZA, MEV, IPR, and FDC, followed by visual detection of colour change of the pH indicator red phenol (red to yellow) generated by the acidification of the medium upon bacterial growth. This test is performed in 96-well microplates. The MultiRapid ATB NP test was evaluated using 78 Enterobacterales isolates and compared to the reference method broth microdilution.

RESULTS

The MultiRapid ATB NP test displayed 97.0% (confidence interval [CI] 92.6-98.8) sensitivity, 97.7% (CI 94.3-99.1) specificity, and 97.4% (CI 95.0-98.7) accuracy. The results were obtained after 3 h of incubation at 35 °C ± 2 °C, representing at least a 15-h gain-of-time compared with currently used antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods.

CONCLUSION

The MultiRapid ATB NP test provided accurate results for the concomitant detection of susceptibility/resistance to CZA, MEV, IPR, and FDC in Enterobacterales, independent of the resistance mechanism. This test may be suitable for implementation in any microbiology routine laboratory.

Evolution of ceftazidime-avibactam and cefiderocol resistance in ST131-H30R1-Escherichia coli isolates with KPC-3 mutants and application of FTIR biotyping

Ceftazidime-avibactam and cefiderocol represent two of the few alternatives for infections by KPC-producing Enterobacterales. We reported the emergence of resistance to both ceftazidime-avibactam and cefiderocol in a KPC-producing ST131-Escherichia coli (KPC-ST131-Ec) clinical isolate. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing, Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, whole-genome sequencing, and cloning experiments were performed. A KPC-49-Ec isolate resistant to ceftazidime-avibactam (MICCZA > 16/4 mg/L) and susceptible to cefiderocol (MICFDC: 2 mg/L) was recovered in a blood sample from an oncologic patient hospitalized in the medical ICU (June 2019) during ceftazidime-avibactam treatment. After 44 days, a KPC-31-Ec resistant to both ceftazidime-avibactam and cefiderocol (MICCZA > 16/4 mg/L, MICFDC: 8 mg/L) was found in a rectal sample during a second cycle of ceftazidime-avibactam treatment. Both KPC-49 (R163S) and KPC-31 (D179Y) were detected in the epidemic ST131-H30R1-Ec high-risk clone and showed a phenotype resembling that of ESBL producers. FTIR spectroscopy managed to differentiate cefiderocol-susceptible and resistant ST131-Ec isolates, and these from others belonging to different clones. After cloning and transformation experiments, KPC-49 and KPC-31 were responsible for ceftazidime-avibactam resistance (MICCZA > 16/4 mg/L) and decreased carbapenem MICs (MICMER ≤ 0.12 mg/L, MICIMI ≤ 1 mg/L). KPC-31 was also shown to be associated with increased MICs of cefiderocol (twofold and threefold dilutions over KPC-3 and KPC-49, respectively). However, mutations in proteins participating in outer membrane stability and integrity, such as TolR, could have a more relevant role in cefiderocol resistance. The effects of ceftazidime-avibactam and cefiderocol co-resistance in clinical isolates of Enterobacterales producing KPC mutants make their identification challenging for clinical laboratories.IMPORTANCEThroughout four admissions in our hospital of a single patient, different KPC-3 variants (KPC-3, KPC-49, and KPC-31) were found in surveillance and clinical ST131-Escherichia coli isolates, after prolonged therapies with meropenem and ceftazidime-avibactam. Different patterns of resistance to cefiderocol and ceftazidime-avibactam emerged, accompanied by restored carbapenem susceptibility. The inability to detect these variants with some phenotypic methods, especially KPC-31 by immunochromatography, and the expression of a phenotype similar to that of ESBL producers, posed challenge to identify these variants in the clinical microbiology laboratory. Molecular methods and whole-genome sequencing are necessary and new techniques able to cluster or differentiate related isolates could also be helpful; this is the case of Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy, which managed in our study to discriminate isolates by cefiderocol susceptibility within ST131, and those from the non-ST131 ones.

Cefiderocol: early clinical experience for multi-drug resistant gram-negative infections

Multi-drug resistant gram-negative bacteria present a significant global health threat. Cefiderocol (CFDC), a siderophore cephalosporin, has shown potential in combating this threat, but with the currently available data, its role in therapy remains poorly defined. This multi-center, retrospective cohort study evaluated the real-world application of CFDC across six U.S. medical centers from January 2018 to May 2023. Patients aged ≥18 years and who had received ≥72 hours of CFDC were included. The primary outcome was a composite of clinical success: survival at 30 days, absence of symptomatic microbiologic recurrence at 30 days following CFDC treatment initiation, and resolution of signs and symptoms. Secondary outcomes included time to CFDC therapy and on-treatment non-susceptibility to CFDC. A total of 112 patients were included, with median (interquartile range [IQR]) APACHE II scores of 15 (19-18). Clinical success was observed in 68.8% of patients, with a mortality rate of 16.1% and comparable success rates across patients infected with carbapenem-resistant gram-negative infections. The most common isolated organisms were Pseudomonas aeruginosa (61/112, 54.5%, of which 55/61 were carbapenem-resistant) and carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (32/112, 28.6%). Median (IQR) time to CFDC therapy was 77 (14-141) hours. Two patients experienced a non-anaphylactic rash as an adverse drug reaction. On-treatment non-susceptibility to CFDC was found in six patients, notably due to P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii.IMPORTANCECFDC was safe and clinically effective as a monotherapy or in combination in treating a variety of carbapenem-resistant gram-negative infections. Further prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings.

Cefiderocol: Clinical application and emergence of resistance

Antibacterial drug resistance of gram-negative bacteria (GNB) results in high morbidity and mortality of GNB infection, seriously threaten human health globally. Developing new antibiotics has become the critical need for dealing with drug-resistant bacterial infections. Cefiderocol is an iron carrier cephalosporin that achieves drug accumulation through a unique "Trojan horse" strategy into the bacterial periplasm. It shows high antibacterial activity against multidrug-resistant (MDR) Enterobacteriaceae and MDR non-fermentative bacteria. The application of cefiderocol offers new hope for treating clinical drug-resistant bacterial infections. However, limited clinical data and uncertainties about its resistance mechanisms constrain the choice of its therapeutic use. This review aimed to summarize the clinical applications, drug resistance mechanisms, and co-administration of cefiderocol.

Functional features of KPC-109, a novel 270-loop KPC-3 mutant mediating resistance to avibactam-based β-lactamase inhibitor combinations and cefiderocol

OBJECTIVES

To investigate a ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA)-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (NE368), isolated from a patient exposed to CZA, expressing a novel K. pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-3 variant (KPC-109).

METHODS

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed by reference broth microdilution. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) analysis of NE368 was performed combining a short- and long-reads approach (Illumina and Oxford Nanopore Technologies). Functional characterization of KPC-109 was performed to investigate the impact of KPC-109 production on the β-lactam resistance phenotype of various Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae strains, including derivatives of K. pneumoniae with OmpK35 and OmpK36 porin alterations. Horizontal transfer of the KPC-109-encoding plasmid was investigated by conjugation and transformation experiments.

RESULTS

K. pneumoniae NE368 was isolated from a patient after repeated CZA exposure, and showed resistance to CZA, fluoroquinolones, piperacillin/tazobactam, expanded-spectrum cephalosporins, amikacin, carbapenems and cefiderocol. WGS revealed the presence of a large chimeric plasmid of original structure (pKPN-NE368), encoding a novel 270-loop mutated KPC-3 variant (KPC-109; ins_270_KYNKDD). KPC-109 production mediated resistance/decreased susceptibility to avibactam-based combinations (with ceftazidime, cefepime and aztreonam) and cefiderocol, with a trade-off on carbapenem resistance. However, in the presence of porin alterations commonly encountered in high-risk clonal lineages of K. pneumoniae, KPC-109 was also able to confer clinical-level resistance to carbapenems. Resistance of NE368 to cefiderocol was likely contributed by KPC-109 production acting in concert with a mutated EnvZ sensor kinase. The KPC-109-encoding plasmid did not appear to be conjugative.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings expand current knowledge about the diversity of emerging KPC enzyme variants with 270-loop alterations that can be encountered in the clinical setting.

In Vitro Activity of Cefiderocol Against Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa

The objective of this study was to assess the susceptibility of cefiderocol against multidrug-resistant carbapenemase-producing and nonproducing bacteria. The panel comprised 182 isolates of the order Enterobacterales, and 40 strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing has been performed using broth microdilution method according to the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing recommendations. Mass spectrometry matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry and carbapenemase-producing test were used to verify the presence of carbapenemases in clinical isolates. The genetic expression of single carbapenemases (blaKPC, blaOXA-48, blaNDM, blaVIM, blaIMP, blaGES) was determined by real-time polymerase chain reaction. Cefiderocol exhibited a good activity against the majority of strains tested in this study. Altogether, growth of 81.9% (n = 149) strains of the order Enterobacterales and 77.5% (n = 31) of P. aeruginosa isolates were inhibited at minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) ≤2 mg/L. Values MIC50/MIC90 were 0.5/8 mg/L for enterobacteria, and 1/8 mg/L for P. aeruginosa. One isolate (Klebsiella pneumoniae) harboring two carbapenemases (blaOXA-48, blaNDM) had cefiderocol MIC 0.5 mg/L. In enterobacteria resistant to cefiderocol, blaNDM carbapenemase prevailed (43.3%, n = 29), followed by blaOXA-48 (31.3%, n = 21) and blaKPC (4.5%, n = 3). blaIMP (n = 8) and blaVIM (n = 1) metallo-β-lactamases dominated in cefiderocol-resistant P. aeruginosa (n = 9) isolates. Very good susceptibility (100%) to this drug showed blaGES-positive strains of P. aeruginosa (n = 8) and isolates resistant to meropenem without confirmed carbapenemase gene (n = 10). In this study, cefiderocol demonstrated potent activity against important nosocomial pathogens, therefore, therapeutic options of this drug against multidrug-resistant bacteria should be considered.

Induced Heteroresistance in Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) via Exposure to Human Pleural Fluid (HPF) and Its Impact on Cefiderocol Susceptibility

Infections caused by Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) isolates, such as hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP), bacteremia, and skin and soft tissue infections, among others, are particularly challenging to treat. Cefiderocol, a chlorocatechol-substituted siderophore antibiotic, was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2019 and prescribed for the treatment of CRAB infections. Despite the initial positive treatment outcomes with this antimicrobial, recent studies reported a higher-than-average all-cause mortality rate in patients treated with cefiderocol compared to the best available therapy. The cause(s) behind these outcomes remains unconfirmed. A plausible hypothesis is heteroresistance, a phenotype characterized by the survival of a small proportion of cells in a population that is seemingly isogenic. Recent results have demonstrated that the addition of human fluids to CRAB cultures leads to cefiderocol heteroresistance. Here, we describe the molecular and phenotypic analyses of CRAB heteroresistant bacterial subpopulations to better understand the nature of the less-than-expected successful outcomes after cefiderocol treatment. Isolation of heteroresistant variants of the CRAB strain AMA40 was carried out in cultures supplemented with cefiderocol and human pleural fluid (HPF). Two AMA40 variants, AMA40 IHC1 and IHC2, were resistant to cefiderocol. To identify mutations and gene expression changes associated with cefiderocol heteroresistance, we subjected these variants to whole genome sequencing and global transcriptional analysis. We then assessed the impact of these mutations on the pharmacodynamic activity of cefiderocol via susceptibility testing, EDTA and boronic acid inhibition analysis, biofilm formation, and static time-kill assays. Heteroresistant variants AMA40 IHC1 and AMA40 IHC2 have 53 chromosomal mutations, of which 40 are common to both strains. None of the mutations occurred in genes associated with high affinity iron-uptake systems or β-lactam resistance. However, transcriptional analyses demonstrated significant modifications in levels of expression of genes associated with iron-uptake systems or β-lactam resistance. The blaNDM-1 and blaADC-2, as well as various iron-uptake system genes, were expressed at higher levels than the parental strain. On the other hand, the carO and ompA genes' expression was reduced. One of the mutations common to both heteroresistant strains was mapped within ppiA, a gene associated with iron homeostasis in other species. Static time-kill assays demonstrated that supplementing cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth with human serum albumin (HAS), the main protein component of HPF, considerably reduced cefiderocol killing activity for all three strains tested. Notably, collateral resistance to amikacin was observed in both variants. We conclude that exposing CRAB to fluids with high HSA concentrations facilitates the rise of heteroresistance associated with point mutations and transcriptional upregulation of genes coding for β-lactamases and biofilm formation. The findings from this study hold significant implications for understanding the emergence of CRAB resistance mechanisms against cefiderocol treatment. This understanding is vital for the development of treatment guidelines that can effectively address the challenges posed by CRAB infections.

A Selective Culture Medium for Screening Cefiderocol Resistance in Enterobacterales, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii

Cefiderocol (FDC) is a siderophore cephalosporin with a broad spectrum of activity against many multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. Acquired resistance to FDC has been already reported among Gram-negative isolates, thus highlighting the need for rapid and accurate identification of such resistant pathogens, in order to control their spread. Therefore, the SuperFDC medium was developed to screen FDC-resistant Enterobacterales, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii. After testing several culture conditions, a selective medium was set up by supplementing an iron-depleted agar medium with 8 μg/mL of FDC and evaluated with a collection of 68 FDC-susceptible and 33 FDC-resistant Gram-negative isolates exhibiting a variety of β-lactam resistance mechanisms. The sensitivity and specificity of detection of this medium were evaluated at 97% and 100%, respectively. In comparison with the reference broth microdilution method, only 3% very major errors were found. In addition, excellent detection performances were obtained by testing spiked stools with a lower limit of detection ranging between 100 and 103 CFU/mL. The SuperFDC medium allows detection of FDC-resistant Gram-negative isolates regardless of their corresponding resistance mechanisms.

Cefiderocol Treatment for Patients with Multidrug- and Carbapenem-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections in the Compassionate Use Program

Cefiderocol is an option for infections caused by multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa, but its in vitro activity against these isolates and its clinical effectiveness for isolates with MICs of >1 μg/mL is unclear. We investigated the in vitro activity of cefiderocol against P. aeruginosa isolates collected from patients treated with cefiderocol through the compassionate use program and assessed physician-reported clinical response and 28-day all-cause mortality by cefiderocol MIC values. P. aeruginosa isolates underwent susceptibility testing to cefiderocol and comparator agents by using reference broth microdilution. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA; susceptible, ≤1 μg/mL) and Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI; susceptible, ≤4 μg/mL) cefiderocol breakpoints were applied. Additionally, molecular characterization of β-lactamase genes was performed. Clinical response and vital status were reported by treating physicians. Forty-six patients with P. aeruginosa infections were evaluated. Twenty-nine (63%) and 42 (91%) isolates were susceptible to cefiderocol using FDA and CLSI breakpoints, respectively. Thirty-seven (80%) and 32 (70%) isolates were not susceptible to ceftolozane-tazobactam and ceftazidime-avibactam, respectively. The clinical response rate was 69% (20/29) with a cefiderocol MIC of ≤1 μg/mL, 69% (9/13) with a cefiderocol MIC of 2 to 4 μg/mL, and 100% (4/4) with an MIC of ≥8 μg/mL, while day 28 all-cause mortality rates were 23% (6/26; MIC ≤ 1 μg/mL), 33% (4/12; MIC, 2 to 4 μg/mL), and 0% (0/4; MIC ≥8 μg/mL), respectively. Cefiderocol was active in vitro against most P. aeruginosa isolated from patients with limited or no alternative therapies. Patients with cefiderocol MICs of 2 to 4 μg/mL did not have significantly worse outcomes than those with MICs of ≤1 μg/mL.

An NDM-Producing Escherichia coli Clinical Isolate Exhibiting Resistance to Cefiderocol and the Combination of Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Aztreonam: Another Step Toward Pan-β-Lactam Resistance

Background

Cefiderocol and ceftazidime-avibactam plus aztreonam (CZA-ATM) are preferred treatment regimens for New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase (NDM)-producing infections.

Methods

We report the case of a US patient who traveled to India to receive a renal transplant. He subsequently experienced pyelonephritis by an NDM-producing Escherichia coli. Broth microdilution and the broth disk elution method indicated resistance to all β-lactams, including cefiderocol and CZA-ATM. Whole-genome sequencing investigations were undertaken to identify resistance mechanisms.

Results

An E. coli isolate belonging to sequence type (ST) 167 containing a bla_NDM-5 gene was identified on a plasmid of the IncFIA/IncFIB/IncFIC replicon groups. When compared with the genome of another ST167 E. coli clinical isolate containing bla_NDM-5 and exhibiting susceptibility to cefiderocol and CZA-ATM, a 12-base pair insertion in ftsI, translating to a 4-amino acid duplication in PBP3, was identified. Moreover, a bla_CMY-59 gene was harbored on an IncI-γ replicon type, and frameshift mutations were identified in the cirA iron transport gene.

Conclusions

This is the first clinical case of a US patient harboring an NDM-producing isolate exhibiting resistance to all available β-lactam agents. The isolate's unexpected resistance to cefiderocol and CZA-ATM was likely due to a combination of (1) a modified PBP3 (increased MICs to both regimens), (2) truncated iron-binding protein (increased cefiderocol MIC), and (3) a bla_CMY gene (reduced CZA-ATM activity). E. coli ST167 clinical isolates harboring bla_NDM-5 genes are a recognized international high-risk clone. When coupled with the additional mechanisms identified in our patient's isolate, which is not uncommon for this high-risk clone, pan-β-lactam resistance may occur.

An Overview of Cefiderocol's Therapeutic Potential and Underlying Resistance Mechanisms

Antimicrobial resistance continues to increase globally and treatment of difficult-to-treat (DTT) infections, mostly associated with carbapenem-resistant (CR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa, CR Acinetobacter baumannii, and CR- and third-generation-cephalosporins-resistant Enterobacterales remains a challenge for the clinician. The recent approval of cefiderocol has broaden the armamentarium for the treatment of patients with DTT infections. Cefiderocol is a siderophore cephalosporin that has shown excellent antibacterial activity, in part due to its innovative way of cell permeation. It is relatively stable compared to most commonly found carbapenamases. However, some resistant mechanisms to cefiderocol have already been identified and reduced susceptibility has developed during patient treatment, highlighting that the clinical use of cefiderocol must be rational. In this review, we summarize the current available treatments against the former resistant bacteria, and we revise and discuss the mechanism of action of cefiderocol, underlying the biological function of siderophores, the therapeutic potential of cefiderocol, and the mechanisms of resistance reported so far.

Treatment of critically ill patients with cefiderocol for infections caused by multidrug-resistant pathogens: review of the evidence

Appropriate antibiotic treatment for critically ill patients with serious Gram-negative infections in the intensive care unit is crucial to minimize morbidity and mortality. Several new antibiotics have shown in vitro activity against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) and difficult-to-treat resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Cefiderocol is the first approved siderophore beta-lactam antibiotic with potent activity against multidrug-resistant, carbapenem-resistant, difficult-to-treat or extensively drug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens, which have limited treatment options. The spectrum of activity of cefiderocol includes drug-resistant strains of Acinetobacter baumannii, P. aeruginosa, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Achromobacter spp. and Burkholderia spp. and CRE that produce serine- and/or metallo-carbapenemases. Phase 1 studies established that cefiderocol achieves adequate concentration in the epithelial lining fluid in the lung and requires dosing adjustment for renal function, including patients with augmented renal clearance and continuous renal-replacement therapy (CRRT); no clinically significant drug-drug interactions are expected. The non-inferiority of cefiderocol versus high-dose, extended-infusion meropenem in all-cause mortality (ACM) rates at day 14 was demonstrated in the randomized, double-blind APEKS-NP Phase 3 clinical study in patients with nosocomial pneumonia caused by suspected or confirmed Gram-negative bacteria. Furthermore, the efficacy of cefiderocol was investigated in the randomized, open-label, pathogen-focused, descriptive CREDIBLE-CR Phase 3 clinical study in its target patient population with serious carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative infections, including hospitalized patients with nosocomial pneumonia, bloodstream infection/sepsis, or complicated urinary tract infections. However, a numerically greater ACM rate with cefiderocol compared with BAT led to the inclusion of a warning in US and European prescribing information. Cefiderocol susceptibility results obtained with commercial tests should be carefully evaluated due to current issues regarding their accuracy and reliability. Since its approval, real-world evidence in patients with multidrug-resistant and carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections suggests that cefiderocol can be efficacious in certain critically ill patient groups, such as those requiring mechanical ventilation for COVID-19 pneumonia with subsequently acquired Gram-negative bacterial superinfection, and patients with CRRT and/or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. In this article, we review the microbiological spectrum, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, efficacy and safety profiles and real-world evidence for cefiderocol, and look at future considerations for its role in the treatment of critically ill patients with challenging Gram-negative bacterial infections.

In Vitro Activity of Cefiderocol on Multiresistant Bacterial Strains and Genomic Analysis of Two Cefiderocol Resistant Strains

Cefiderocol is a new siderophore cephalosporin that is effective against multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria, including carbapenem-resistant strains. The aim of this study was to evaluate the activity of this new antimicrobial agent against a collection of pathogens using broth microdilution assays and to analyze the possible mechanism of cefiderocol resistance in two resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates. One hundred and ten isolates were tested, comprising 67 Enterobacterales, two Acinetobacter baumannii, one Achromobacter xylosoxidans, 33 Pseudomonas aeruginosa and seven Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Cefiderocol showed good in vitro activity, with an MIC < 2 μg/mL, and was able to inhibit 94% of the tested isolates. We observed a resistance rate of 6%. The resistant isolates consisted of six Klebsiella pneumoniae and one Escherichia coli, leading to a resistance rate of 10.4% among the Enterobacterales. Whole-genome sequencing analysis was performed on two cefiderocol-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates to investigate the possible mutations responsible for the observed resistance. Both strains belonged to ST383 and harbored different resistant and virulence genes. The analysis of genes involved in iron uptake and transport showed the presence of different mutations located in fhuA, fepA, iutA, cirA, sitC, apbC, fepG, fepC, fetB, yicI, yicJ, and yicL. Furthermore, for the first time, to the best of our knowledge, we described two Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates that synthesize a truncated fecA protein due to the transition from G to A, leading to a premature stop codon in the amino acid position 569, and a TonB protein carrying a 4-amino acid insertion (PKPK) after Lysine 103. In conclusion, our data show that cefiderocol is an effective drug against multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. However, the higher resistance rate observed in Enterobacterales underlines the need for active surveillance to limit the spread of these pathogens and to avoid the risks associated with the emergence of resistance to new drugs.

Novel Antimicrobial Agents for Gram-Negative Pathogens

Gram-negative bacterial resistance to antimicrobials has had an exponential increase at a global level during the last decades and represent an everyday challenge, especially for the hospital practice of our era. Concerted efforts from the researchers and the industry have recently provided several novel promising antimicrobials, resilient to various bacterial resistance mechanisms. There are new antimicrobials that became commercially available during the last five years, namely, cefiderocol, imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam, eravacycline, omadacycline, and plazomicin. Furthermore, other agents are in advanced development, having reached phase 3 clinical trials, namely, aztreonam-avibactam, cefepime-enmetazobactam, cefepime-taniborbactam, cefepime-zidebactam, sulopenem, tebipenem, and benapenem. In this present review, we critically discuss the characteristics of the above-mentioned antimicrobials, their pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic properties and the current clinical data.

Cefiderocol, a Siderophore Cephalosporin, as a Treatment Option for Infections Caused by Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) remain a significant public health threat, and, despite recent approvals, new antibiotics are needed. Severe infections caused by CRE, such as nosocomial pneumonia and bloodstream infections, are associated with a relatively high risk of morbidity and mortality. The recent approval of ceftazidime-avibactam, imipenem-relebactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, plazomicin, eravacycline and cefiderocol has broadened the armamentarium for the treatment of patients with CRE infections. Cefiderocol is a siderophore cephalosporin with overall potent in vitro activity against CRE. It is taken up via iron transport channels through active transport, with some entry into bacteria through traditional porin channels. Cefiderocol is relatively stable against hydrolysis by most serine- and metallo-beta-lactamases, including KPC, NDM, VIM, IMP and OXA carbapenemases-the most frequent carbapenemases detected in CRE. The efficacy and safety of cefiderocol has been demonstrated in three randomised, prospective, parallel group or controlled clinical studies in patients at risk of being infected by multidrug-resistant or carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. This paper reviews the in vitro activity, emergence of resistance, preclinical effectiveness, and clinical experience for cefiderocol, and its role in the management of patients with CRE infections.

In vitro activity of cefiderocol against clinically important carbapenem non-susceptible Gram-negative bacteria from Saudi Arabia

OBJECTIVES

Cefiderocol is a novel catechol-substituted siderophore cephalosporin with broad-spectrum activity against Gram-negative pathogens. However, variation of its activity among carbapenemase producers from various regions and countries has been reported. Here, we checked the in vitro activity against Gram-negative carbapenem non-susceptible bacteria collected in Saudi Arabia.

METHODS

Cefiderocol MICs were determined using the iron-depleted cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth and interpreted according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines. Isolates (n = 288) included carbapenemase-producing Escherichia coli (n = 46), Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 98), Acinetobacter baumannii (n = 65), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 79) clinical isolates.

RESULTS

Cefiderocol inhibited 73.26% (211/288) of the isolates studied at concentrations of ≤ 4 mg/L. Cefiderocol inhibited all carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii isolates (65/65, 100%) producing OXA-23-like, OXA-24-like, and NDM, and nearly all P. aeruginosa isolates (75/79, 94.94%), including those producing VIM and NDM. In contrast, the carbapenemase-producing isolates from the Enterobacterales group demonstrated significantly higher MICs with only 53.06% (52/98) of K. pneumoniae and 41.3% (19/46) of E. coli isolates exhibiting MICs of ≤4 mg/L. Isolates showing elevated MICs (73/144, 50.69%) included NDM (20/29, 68.97%), NDM/OXA-48-like (34/59, 57.63%), OXA-48-like (18/52, 34.62%), and KPC (1/4, 25%) producers, thus showing no clear association with the production of serine-type or metallo-type carbapenemases. However, high cefiderocol MICs (≥ 32mg/L) were associated with isolates producing NDM, and in particular, among those coproducing the OXA-232-type enzyme.

CONCLUSIONS

Cefiderocol had excellent activity against multi-drug resistant non-fermenting Gram-negative pathogens. Reasons behind the high cefiderocol MICs in certain Enterobacterales isolates need further investigation.

Rapid cefiderocol NP test for detection of cefiderocol susceptibility/resistance in Enterobacterales

BACKGROUND

Cefiderocol is among the latest generation of commercialized antibiotics against a large variety of MDR Gram-negative bacteria including carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales and non-fermenters such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii. Cefiderocol susceptibility testing, a key element for implementing rapidly a cefiderocol-based treatment, might be still challenging.

OBJECTIVES

To develop a rapid culture-based test, Rapid Cefiderocol NP test, for the identification of cefiderocol resistance among MDR Enterobacterales.

METHODS

The Rapid Cefiderocol NP test is based on glucose metabolization when bacterial growth occurs and the detection of bacterial growth in the presence of cefiderocol at 64 mg/L using iron-depleted CAMHB. Bacterial growth is visually detectable by a red-to-yellow colour change of red phenol, a pH indicator. A total of 74 clinical enterobacterial isolates from various clinical sources and of worldwide origin, among which 42 isolates were cefiderocol resistant, were used to evaluate the test performance.

RESULTS

The sensitivity and specificity of the test were found to be 98% and 91%, respectively, by comparison with the reference broth microdilution (BMD) method. All positive results were obtained within 3 h after incubation at 35°C ± 2°C, that is a gain of time of ca. 18 h (1 day) compared with currently used techniques for susceptibility testing (BMD method).

CONCLUSIONS

This novel test is rapid, highly sensitive, specific, easily interpretable, and easy to implement in routine microbiology laboratories. Such a test may rapidly and accurately provide the information needed for the implementation of adequate cefiderocol-based treatment.

Genomic Characterization of an Extensively Drug-Resistant Extra-Intestinal Pathogenic (ExPEC) Escherichia coli Clinical Isolate Co-Producing Two Carbapenemases and a 16S rRNA Methylase

An extensively drug-resistant Escherichia coli clinical isolate (N1606) belonging to Sequence Type 361 was recovered from the urine of a patient hospitalized in Switzerland. The strain showed resistance to virtually all β-lactams including the latest generation antibiotics cefiderocol and aztreonam-avibactam. Whole genome sequencing revealed that it possessed two carbapenemase-encoding genes, namely bla_NDM-5 and bla_KPC-3, and a series of additional β-lactamase genes, including bla_CTX-M-15 and bla_SHV-11 encoding extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs), bla_CMY-145 encoding an AmpC-type cephalosporinase, and bla_OXA-1 encoding a narrow-spectrum class D ß-lactamase. Most of these resistance genes were located on plasmids (IncFII-FIA, IncX3, IncIγ, IncFII). That strain exhibited also a four amino-acid insertion in its penicillin-binding protein 3 (PBP3) sequence, namely corresponding to YRIN. Complete genome analysis revealed that this E. coli isolate carried virulence factors (sitA, gad, hra, terC, traT, and cia) and many other non-β-lactam resistance determinants including rmtB, tet(A), dfrA17 (two copies), aadA1, aadA5 (two copies), sul1 (two copies), qacE (two copies), qepA, mdf(A), catA1, erm(B), mph(A), and qnrS1, being susceptible only to tigecycline, colistin and fosfomycin. In conclusion, we described here the phenotypic and genome characteristics of an extensively drug-resistant (XDR) E. coli ST361 being recognized as an emerging clone worldwide.

Nosocomial outbreak by NDM-1-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae highly resistant to cefiderocol, Florence, Italy, August 2021 to June 2022

A nosocomial outbreak by cefiderocol (FDC)-resistant NDM-1-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (NDM-Kp) occurred in a large tertiary care hospital from August 2021-June 2022 in Florence, Italy, an area where NDM-Kp strains have become endemic. Retrospective analysis of NDM-Kp from cases observed in January 2021-June 2022 revealed that 21/52 were FDC-resistant. The outbreak was mostly sustained by clonal expansion of a mutant with inactivated cirA siderophore receptor gene, which exhibited high-level resistance to FDC (MIC ≥ 32 mg/L) and spread independently of FDC exposure.

Antibacterial spectrum of cefiderocol

Cefiderocol, a siderophore catechol cephalosporin, recently introduced in the market has been developed to enhance the in vitro activity of extended spectrum cephalosporins and to avoid resistance mechanisms affecting cephalosporins and carbapenems. The in vitro study of cefiderocol in the laboratory requires iron depleted media when MIC values are determined by broth microdilution. Disk diffusion presents good correlation with MIC values. In surveillance studies and in clinical trials it has been demonstrated excellent activity against Gram-negatives, including carbapenemase producers and non-fermenters such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Few cefiderocol resistant isolates have been found in surveillance studies. Resistance mechanisms are not directly associated with porin deficiency and or efflux pumps. On the contrary, they are related with gene mutations affecting iron transporters, AmpC mutations in the omega loop and with certain beta-lactamases such us KPC-variants determining also ceftazidime-avibactam resistance, certain infrequent extended-spectrum betalactamases (PER, BEL) and metallo-beta-lactamases (certain NDM variants and SPM enzyme).

Safety and efficacy of cefiderocol for off-label treatment indications: A systematic review

PURPOSE

Cefiderocol is a siderophore cephalosporin recently approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of hospital- and ventilator-acquired bacterial pneumonia and complicated urinary tract infections. However, there is potential for cefiderocol utility for a variety of other infections. The purpose of this systematic review was to identify literature examining the safety and efficacy of cefiderocol for off-label indications.

METHODS

The PRISMA guidelines were utilized for reporting. Databases searched included PubMed, Scopus, and Embase, from inception to September 2021. Manuscripts describing cefiderocol off-label use in clinical settings were included. Exclusion criteria were studies focused on labeled indications, animal studies, pharmacodynamic/pharmacokinetic studies, in vitro or laboratory studies, and manuscripts in languages other than English or Arabic. Each stage of review utilized two independent investigators, with conflicts resolved and critical appraisal performed. Data regarding presentation, clinical course, and infection characteristics were extracted and descriptively analyzed.

RESULTS

The search identified a total of 985 records, narrowed to a final set of 27 studies. Among studies included were 18 (66.7%) case reports, 8 (29.6%) case series, and 1 (3.7%) phase 3 clinical trial. Cefiderocol was most frequently used off-label for bacteremia/sepsis with or without an identified source in 51 (67.1%) out of a total of 76 included patients. Among case series/reports with available data, 43 of 53 patients (81.1%) received combination antibiotic therapy. The most common pathogens identified included multi/extensively drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and/or Acinetobacter baumannii. Various clinical end points were reported, while microbiological end points were reported in 18 (66.7%) studies. Cefiderocol-related side effects were uncommon and rarely use-limiting.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review depicts relative clinical effectiveness of off-label cefiderocol, most commonly for P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii infections as combination antibiotic therapy. Further study is needed to elucidate the safety and efficacy of cefiderocol across an expanded set of patients and indications.

Cefiderocol: Systematic Review of Mechanisms of Resistance, Heteroresistance and In Vivo Emergence of Resistance

Cefiderocol appears promising, as it can overcome most β-lactam resistance mechanisms (including β-lactamases, porin mutations, and efflux pumps). Resistance is uncommon according to large multinational cohorts, including against isolates resistant to carbapenems, ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam, and colistin. However, alarming proportions of resistance have been reported in some recent cohorts (up to 50%). A systematic review was conducted in PubMed and Scopus from inception to May 2022 to review mechanisms of resistance, prevalence of heteroresistance, and in vivo emergence of resistance to cefiderocol during treatment. A variety of mechanisms, typically acting in concert, have been reported to confer resistance to cefiderocol: β-lactamases (especially NDM, KPC and AmpC variants conferring resistance to ceftazidime/avibactam, OXA-427, and PER- and SHV-type ESBLs), porin mutations, and mutations affecting siderophore receptors, efflux pumps, and target (PBP-3) modifications. Coexpression of multiple β-lactamases, often in combination with permeability defects, appears to be the main mechanism of resistance. Heteroresistance is highly prevalent (especially in A. baumannii), but its clinical impact is unclear, considering that in vivo emergence of resistance appears to be low in clinical studies. Nevertheless, cases of in vivo emerging cefiderocol resistance are increasingly being reported. Continued surveillance of cefiderocol’s activity is important as this agent is introduced in clinical practice.

Infectious Diseases Society of America 2022 Guidance on the Treatment of Extended-Spectrum β-lactamase Producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E), Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa with Difficult-to-Treat Resistance (DTR-P. aeruginosa)

BACKGROUND

The Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) is committed to providing up-to-date guidance on the treatment of antimicrobial-resistant infections. The initial guidance document on infections caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E), carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa with difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR-P. aeruginosa) was published on 17 September 2020. Over the past year, there have been a number of important publications furthering our understanding of the management of ESBL-E, CRE, and DTR-P. aeruginosa infections, prompting a rereview of the literature and this updated guidance document.

METHODS

A panel of 6 infectious diseases specialists with expertise in managing antimicrobial-resistant infections reviewed, updated, and expanded previously developed questions and recommendations about the treatment of ESBL-E, CRE, and DTR-P. aeruginosa infections. Because of differences in the epidemiology of resistance and availability of specific anti-infectives internationally, this document focuses on the treatment of infections in the United States.

RESULTS

Preferred and alternative treatment recommendations are provided with accompanying rationales, assuming the causative organism has been identified and antibiotic susceptibility results are known. Approaches to empiric treatment, duration of therapy, and other management considerations are also discussed briefly. Recommendations apply for both adult and pediatric populations.

CONCLUSIONS

The field of antimicrobial resistance is highly dynamic. Consultation with an infectious diseases specialist is recommended for the treatment of antimicrobial-resistant infections. This document is current as of 24 October 2021. The most current versions of IDSA documents, including dates of publication, are available at www.idsociety.org/practice-guideline/amr-guidance/.

Human Serum Proteins and Susceptibility of Acinetobacter baumannii to Cefiderocol: Role of Iron Transport

Cefiderocol, a recently introduced antibiotic, has a chemical structure that includes a cephalosporin that targets cell wall synthesis and a chlorocatechol siderophore moiety that facilitates cell penetration by active iron transporters. Analysis of the effect that human serum, human serum albumin, and human pleural fluid had on growing Acinetobacter baumannii showed that genes related to iron uptake were down-regulated. At the same time, β-lactamase genes were expressed at higher levels. The minimum inhibitory concentrations of this antimicrobial in A. baumannii cells growing in the presence of human serum, human serum albumin, or human pleural fluid were higher than those measured when these fluids were absent from the culture medium. These results correlate with increased expression levels of β-lactamase genes and the down-regulation of iron uptake-related genes in cultures containing human serum, human serum albumin, or human pleural fluid. These modifications in gene expression could explain the less-than-ideal clinical response observed in patients with pulmonary or bloodstream A. baumannii infections. The exposure of the infecting cells to the host's fluids could cause reduced cefiderocol transport capabilities and increased resistance to β-lactams. The regulation of genes that could impact the A. baumannii susceptibility to cefiderocol, or other antibacterials, is an understudied phenomenon that merits further investigation.

New Delhi Metallo-Beta-Lactamase Facilitates the Emergence of Cefiderocol Resistance in Enterobacter cloacae

Cefiderocol is a promising novel siderophore cephalosporin for the treatment of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli and with stability against degradation by metallo-β-lactamases. Nonetheless, the emergence of cefiderocol in metallo-β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales during therapy has been reported on more than one occasion. To understand the underlying mechanisms and factors facilitating the resistance development, we conducted an in vitro evolution experiment using clinical E. cloacae isolates via serial passaging under cefiderocol pressure. In this study, we showed that the presence of the New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase (NDM) facilitates the emergence of resistance via nonsynonymous mutations of the CirA catecholate siderophore receptor. Inhibition of metallo-β-lactamase activity using dipicolinic acid prevented the emergence of cefiderocol-resistant mutants successfully. This finding implies that caution should be taken when using cefiderocol for the treatment of infections caused by metallo-β-lactamase-producing bacteria.