Trends in Iodine Status Among U.S. Children and Adults: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Data from 2001-2004 to 2017-2020

Impact of iodine supply in infancy and childhood

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To assess the most relevant articles on the impact of iodine supply in at-risk populations, namely infants and young children, pregnant and lactating women.

RECENT FINDINGS

The 2022 Iodine Global Network Annual Report confirmed the dramatic decrease of severe iodine deficiency over the last 30 years, thanks to universal iodine iodization. However, mild to moderate deficiency is still present in many countries, where recent data showed a decrease of iodine intake and an impairment of iodine status. Unfortunately, there is yet no validated biomarker to classify the iodine status at the individual level. Available data show that there is no clear evidence to link mild-to-moderate iodine deficiency to adverse health outcomes in pregnant and lactating women as well as in infants and children. The description of a negative impact of maternal iodine excess on neurodevelopment of infants is of concern.

SUMMARY

Optimization of salt iodization (e.g. careful increase in iodine concentration in salt, use by food industry in processed foods) combined with targeted, personalized supplementation under medical supervision if needed (e.g. low intake of iodine rich foods, vegan diet) seems currently preferable to blanket supplementation.

Iodine Intake Trends in United States Girls and Women between 2011 and 2020

BACKGROUND

Usual intakes of iodine in United States girls and women, including pregnant and lactating women have not been adequately studied. Adequate intake of iodine is critical for neurodevelopment of girls, thyroid functions, and reproductive health of women.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to examine the adequacy and trends of iodine intake of United States girls and women between 2011 and 2020.

METHODS

We mapped the sources of United States girls and women's iodine intake from the 29 food groups between 2011 and 2020 using United States Department of Agriculture's iodine data release 2. The total food intakes from 2 d of dietary recall of the United States National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey and estimated iodine concentrations of the food groups were used to calculate the usual iodine intakes of female participants. Trends of usual intakes, urinary iodine concentrations (UIC), and estimated intake adequacy were calculated.

RESULTS

Median usual intakes of iodine estimated from diet and supplements and UIC of United States girls and nonpregnant, nonlactating women declined between 2011 and 2020 in all 3 age groups: ≤14 y, 15-49 y old, and ≥50 y. Median usual intakes of iodine for pregnant and lactating United States women declined as well. Inadequacy levels of usual iodine intake were 9.9% for nonpregnant, nonlactating women of reproductive age 15-49 y old, 40.3% for lactating, and 10.2% for pregnant women in the 2017-2020 period. Intake insufficiencies estimated from UIC were 48.8%, 63.2%, and 31.3% for nonpregnant, nonlactating women of reproductive age 15-49 y old, pregnant and lactating women, respectively, in the 2017-2020 period. A significant decline in milk consumption might be one of the major contributors to the dietary iodine decline in United States women.

CONCLUSIONS

Iodine intake of United States girls and women were on the decline between 2011 and 2020 and the increased inadequacy of iodine intake deserves public health attention.

Trends in Prevalence of Thyroid Dysfunction and its Associations With Mortality Among US Participants, 1988-2012

CONTEXT

Various dynamic factors could influence the prevalence and distribution of thyroid dysfunction.

OBJECTIVE

To provide national estimates and temporal trends in prevalence of thyroid dysfunction over the past 3 decades in United States and determine the impact of thyroid dysfunction on mortality in US adults.

METHODS

A cross-sectional analysis of data from 33 117 participants aged 12 years or older in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III (1988-1994), 1999-2002, and 2007-2012.

RESULTS

The weighted mean age was 41.6 years, and 48.3% were men. In 2007 through 2012, the prevalence of subclinical and overt hypothyroidism, subclinical and overt hyperthyroidism was 4.3%, 0.33%, 3.2%, and 0.2% respectively. Eighty percent of individuals with thyroid dysfunction were previously undiagnosed. The prevalence of subclinical hypothyroidism and hyperthyroidism was stable, whereas overt hypothyroidism (0.54% [95% CI, 0.35-0.8] vs 0.33% [95% CI, 0.23-0.48]) and hyperthyroidism (0.8% [95% CI, 0.58-1.1] vs 0.2% [95% CI, 0.12-0.33]) were less prevalent in 2007-2012 compared to 1988-1994. Older age, White Americans, obesity, and positivity for thyroid peroxidase antibody and thyroglobulin antibody were risk factors for hypothyroidism, whereas older age, women, and Black Americans were risk factors for hyperthyroidism. Over a median follow-up of 17.2 years, no significant association was observed between any type of thyroid dysfunction with the risk of total or cardiovascular mortality. However, among individuals aged 65 years or older, subclinical hypothyroidism was associated with a higher risk of total mortality (hazard ratio, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.00-1.37; P = .05) and cardiovascular mortality (HR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.04-1.62; P = .02).

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of subclinical thyroid dysfunction remained relatively unchanged, whereas that of overt thyroid dysfunction decreased. Subclinical hypothyroidism was associated with a higher mortality among individuals aged 65 years or older.

Association study of urinary iodine concentrations and coronary artery disease among adults in the USA: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2003-2018

Iodine is a vital trace element in the human body and is associated with several important coronary artery disease (CAD) risk factors. We aimed to explore the correlation between urinary iodine concentration (UIC) and CAD. Data from 15 793 US adults in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2003-2018) were analysed. We conducted multivariable logistic regression models and fitted smoothing curves to study the correlation between UIC and CAD. Furthermore, we performed subgroup analysis to investigate possible effect modifiers between them. We found a J-shaped association between UIC and CAD, with an inflection point at Lg UIC = 2·65 μg/l. This result indicated a neutral association (OR 0·89; 95 % CI 0·68, 1·16) between UIC and CAD as Lg UIC < 2·65 μg/l, but the per natural Lg [UIC] increment was OR 2·29; 95 % CI 1·53, 3·43 as Lg UIC ≥ 2·65 μg/l. An interaction between diabetes and UIC might exist. The increase in UIC results in an increase in CAD prevalence (OR 1·84, 95 % CI 1·32, 2·58) in diabetes but results in little to no difference in non-diabetes (OR 0·98, 95 % CI 0·77, 1·25). The J-shaped correlation between UIC and CAD and the interaction between diabetes and UIC should be confirmed in a prospective study with a series of UIC measurements. If excessive iodine precedes CAD, then this new finding could guide clinical practice and prevent iodine deficiency from being overcorrected.

Large Iodine Variability in Retail Cows' Milk in the U.S.: A Follow-Up Study among Different Retail Outlets

In a previous study, large variability in iodine content was found among samples of store brand retail milk at a single time point in a sampling taken from 24 nationwide U.S. locations for the USDA FoodData Central database, but the sampling plan was not designed to detect differences among locations. This follow-up study was carried out to evaluate iodine levels in retail milk across the U.S. over time. Milk samples (2% fat) were collected bimonthly in fourteen locations for one year and analyzed in duplicate. Control materials were used to support accuracy of results and ensure precision across analytical batches. The overall mean and standard error (SE) for iodine concentration were 82.5 (7.0) µg/240 mL serving, which was comparable to the previous national mean [85.0 (5.5) µg/240 mL]. A similar wide range among individual samples was detected (27.9-282 µg/240 mL). For some locations, the mean iodine concentration differed significantly from others, and differed from the national average by amounts ranging from -47 µg to +37 µg per serving. The between-sample range within location was large for some (up to 229 µg/serving) and minimal for others (as little as 13.2 µg/serving). These findings suggest iodine intake from some retail milk supplies could be over- or underestimated relative to the national average, even if the national average is suitable for population-wide intake estimates.