Effect of butorphanol tartrate on food and water consumption in humans

Opioid antagonism mitigates antipsychotic-associated weight gain: focus on olanzapine

BACKGROUND

The endogenous opioid system affects metabolism, including weight regulation. Evidence from preclinical and clinical studies provides a rationale for targeting this system to mitigate weight-related side effects of antipsychotics. This review describes the role of the opioid system in regulating weight and metabolism, examines the effects of opioid receptor antagonism on those functions, and explores the use of opioid antagonists to mitigate antipsychotic-associated weight gain and/or metabolic effects.

METHODS

A PubMed literature search was conducted to identify representative opioid antagonists and associated preclinical and clinical studies examining their potential for the regulation of weight and metabolism.

RESULTS

The mu opioid receptor (MOR), delta opioid receptor (DOR), and kappa opioid receptor (KOR) types have overlapping but distinct patterns of central and peripheral expression, and each contributes to the regulation of body weight and metabolism. Three representative opioid antagonists (eg, naltrexone, samidorphan, and LY255582) were identified for illustration. These opioid antagonists differed in their receptor binding and pharmacokinetic profiles, including oral bioavailability, systemic clearance, and half-life, and were associated with varying effects on food intake, energy utilization, and metabolic dysregulation.

CONCLUSIONS

Preclinical and clinical data suggest that antagonism of the endogenous opioid system is a mechanism to address antipsychotic-associated weight gain and metabolic dysregulation. However, evidence suggests that the differing roles of MOR, DOR, and KOR in metabolism, together with the differences in receptor binding, pharmacokinetic, and functional activity profiles of the opioid receptor antagonists discussed in this review, likely contribute to their differential pharmacodynamic effects and clinical outcomes observed regarding antipsychotic-associated weight gain.

Sweet taste pleasantness is modulated by morphine and naltrexone

BACKGROUND

Rodent models highlight the key role of μ-opioid receptor (MOR) signaling in palatable food consumption. In humans, however, the effects of MOR stimulation on eating and food liking remain unclear.

OBJECTIVES

Here, we tested sweet pleasantness experience in humans following MOR drug manipulations. We hypothesized that behaviors regulated by the endogenous MOR system would be enhanced by MOR agonism and decreased by antagonism. In line with rodent findings, we expected the strongest drug effects for the sweetest (high-calorie) sucrose stimuli. As very sweet stimuli are considered aversive by many people (called sweet dislikers), we also assessed whether MOR manipulations affect pleasantness ratings of sucrose-water stimuli differently depending on subjective and objective value.

METHODS

In a bidirectional psychopharmacological cross-over study, 49 healthy men underwent a sweet taste paradigm following double-blind administration of the MOR agonist morphine, placebo, and the opioid antagonist naltrexone.

RESULTS

As hypothesized, MOR stimulation with morphine increased pleasantness of the sweetest of five sucrose solutions, without enhancing pleasantness of the lower-sucrose solutions. For opioid antagonism, an opposite pattern was observed for the sweetest drink only. The observed drug effects on pleasantness of the sweetest drink did not differ between sweet likers and dislikers.

CONCLUSIONS

The bidirectional effect of agonist and antagonist treatment aligns with rodent findings showing that MOR manipulations most strongly affect the highest-calorie foods. We speculate that the MOR system promotes survival in part by increasing concordance between the objective (caloric) and subjective (hedonic) value of food stimuli, so that feeding behavior becomes more focused on the richest food available.

Effects of butorphanol on feeding and neuropeptide Y in the rat

Butorphanol ([BT] an opioid receptor agonist/antagonist) is different from other opioid agonists in that a single dose of BT can elicit up to 12 g of chow intake in a satiated rat whereas most opioid agonists induce a mild feeding response (2-3 g). Here, we first examined whether the effectiveness of BT to elicit feeding was affected by dose, method of infusion and possible tachyphylaxis following administration. Secondly, we examined whether BT administration influenced hypothalamic NPY gene expression and peptide levels. A single dose administration of BT (4 mg/kg) significantly increased food intake at 2, 3 and 6 h after administration. However following repeated injections of BT at 4 mg/kg, the cumulative long-term intake of BT-treated rats did not differ from that of controls, indicating that the animals compensate for the increased feeding following BT injection by decreased feeding at a later time. An ascending dose schedule of repeated BT injections resulted in additional feeding. NPY gene expression in the ARC was influenced by how much food had been consumed, but not by BT. The amount of food consumed and the level of NPY mRNA were inversely correlated. This is consistent with NPY's role in normal feeding. BT treatment did not affect either NPY or leptin RIA levels. We conclude that the feeding produced by BT is sensitive to dose and dosing paradigm. Further, its mechanism of action does not appear to be mediated by NPY or leptin pathways.

Naltrexone for the treatment of obesity: review and update

Since their discovery in the brain and gastrointestinal tract nearly 40 years ago, endogenous opioid peptides have been progressively shown to play a role in the regulation of food intake. Animal and human studies regarding opioid peptides and ingestive behavior are reviewed. While the opioid receptor antagonist naltrexone is associated with minimal weight loss as monotherapy, it does have potential utility in the treatment of obesity when combined with the pro-opiomelanocortin activator bupropion.

Role of endogenous opioids in the control of gastric sensorimotor function

Endogenous opioids have been implicated not only in the process of feeding but also in the control of gastric sensitivity and gastric motor responses, and impairment of antinociceptive opioid pathways has been hypothesized to contribute to the pathogenesis of functional dyspepsia. Our aim was to study the effect of suppression of endogenous opioid action by naloxone on gastric sensorimotor function in healthy volunteers. During intravenous administration of saline or naloxone (0.4 mg intravenous bolus followed by continuous infusion 20 microg kg(-1) h(-1)), sensitivity to gastric distension, gastric accommodation and fundic phasic contractility were evaluated by barostat in 15 subjects. Nutrient tolerance and meal-related symptoms were assessed using a satiety drinking test (n = 13), and solid and liquid gastric emptying were evaluated by breath test (n = 14). Naloxone did not influence gastric compliance and sensitivity. No effect on preprandial gastric tone was found but meal-induced accommodation was significantly inhibited by naloxone (P = 0.031). Subjects receiving naloxone demonstrated a higher motility index before (20.8 +/- 2.4 vs 28.0 +/- 1.9 mL s(-1), P = 0.007) and after (15.2 +/- 2.0 vs 22.7 +/- 1.5 mL s(-1), P = 0.0006) the meal. Naloxone significantly decreased the amount of food ingested at maximum satiety (715.4 +/- 77.7 vs 617.3 +/- 61.3 mL, P = 0.03). No effect of naloxone on gastric emptying was observed and intensity of postprandial symptoms was unchanged. These observations suggest that endogenous opioids are involved in the control of gastric accommodation and phasic contractility but not in the control of sensitivity to gastric distension or gastric emptying in healthy volunteers.

Endogenous opioids and feeding behavior: a 30-year historical perspective

This invited review, based on the receipt of the Third Gayle A. Olson and Richard D. Olson Prize for the publication of the outstanding behavioral article published in the journal Peptides in 2002, examines the 30-year historical perspective of the role of the endogenous opioid system in feeding behavior. The review focuses on the advances that this field has made over the past 30 years as a result of the timely discoveries that were made concerning this important neuropeptide system, and how these discoveries were quickly applied to the analysis of feeding behavior and attendant homeostatic processes. The discoveries of the opioid receptors and opioid peptides, and the establishment of their relevance to feeding behavior were pivotal in studies performed in the 1970s. The 1980s were characterized by the establishment of opioid receptor subtype agonists and antagonists and their relevance to the modulation of feeding behavior as well as by the use of general opioid antagonists in demonstrating the wide array of ingestive situations and paradigms involving the endogenous opioid system. The more recent work from the 1990s to the present, utilizes the advantages created by the cloning of the opioid receptor genes, the development of knockout and knockdown techniques, the systematic utilization of a systems neuroscience approach, and establishment of the reciprocity of how manipulations of opioid peptides and receptors affect feeding behavior with how feeding states affect levels of opioid peptides and receptors. The role of G-protein effector systems in opioid-mediated feeding responses, which was the subject of the prize-winning article, is then reviewed.

Opioid peptides and the control of human ingestive behaviour

A variety of evidence suggests that endogenous opioid peptides play a role in the short-term control of eating. More recently, opioid receptor antagonists like naltrexone have been approved as a treatment for alcohol dependence. Here we review the evidence for a role of opioid peptides in both normal and abnormal eating and drinking behaviours and in particular try to identify the nature of the role of opioids in these behaviours. Particular attention is paid to the idea that opioid reward processes may be involved both in the short-term control of eating and hedonic aspects of alcohol consumption, and parallels are drawn between the effects of opiate antagonists on food pleasantness and the experience of drinking alcohol. The review also explores the extent to which data from studies using opiate antagonists and agonists provide evidence for a direct role of endogenous opioids in the control of ingestive behaviour, or alternatively whether these data may be better explained through non-specific effects such as the nausea commonly reported following administration of opiate antagonists. The review concludes that the present data suggests a single opioid mechanism is unlikely to explain all aspects of ingestive behaviour, but also concludes that opioid-mediated reward mechanisms play an important control in hedonic aspects of ingestion. The review also highlights the need for further empirical work in order to elucidate further the role of opioid peptides in human ingestive behaviour.

Identification of central sites involved in butorphanol-induced feeding in rats

Butorphanol (BT), a mixed kappa- and mu-opioid receptor agonist, induces vigorous food intake in rats. Peripheral injection of BT seems to increase food intake more effectively than intracerebroventricular administration. To further elucidate the nature of BT's influence on consummatory behavior, we examined which feeding-related brain areas exhibit increased c-Fos immunoreactivity (IR) following subcutaneous injection of 4 mg/kg body weight BT, a dose known to induce a maximal orexigenic response. We also evaluated whether direct administration of BT into the forebrain regions activated by peripheral BT injection affects food intake. Peripheral BT administration induced c-Fos-IR in the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus (PVN), central nucleus of the amygdala (CeA), and nucleus of the solitary tract (NTS). However, 0.1-30 microg BT infused into the CeA, failed to increase food intake 1, 2, and 4 h after injection. Only the highest dose of BT (30 microg) injected into the PVN increased feeding. These results suggest that the PVN, CeA, and NTS mediate the effects of peripherally-injected BT. The PVN or CeA are probably not the main target sites of immediate BT action.

Reward deficiency syndrome: a biogenetic model for the diagnosis and treatment of impulsive, addictive, and compulsive behaviors

The dopaminergic system, and in particular the dopamine D2 receptor, has been implicated in reward mechanisms. The net effect of neurotransmitter interaction at the mesolimbic brain region induces "reward" when dopamine (DA) is released from the neuron at the nucleus accumbens and interacts with a dopamine D2 receptor. "The reward cascade" involves the release of serotonin, which in turn at the hypothalmus stimulates enkephalin, which in turn inhibits GABA at the substania nigra, which in turn fine tunes the amount of DA released at the nucleus accumbens or "reward site." It is well known that under normal conditions in the reward site DA works to maintain our normal drives. In fact, DA has become to be known as the "pleasure molecule" and/or the "antistress molecule." When DA is released into the synapse, it stimulates a number a DA receptors (D1-D5) which results in increased feelings of well-being and stress reduction. A consensus of the literature suggests that when there is a dysfunction in the brain reward cascade, which could be caused by certain genetic variants (polygenic), especially in the DA system causing a hypodopaminergic trait, the brain of that person requires a DA fix to feel good. This trait leads to multiple drug-seeking behavior. This is so because alcohol, cocaine, heroin, marijuana, nicotine, and glucose all cause activation and neuronal release of brain DA, which could heal the abnormal cravings. Certainly after ten years of study we could say with confidence that carriers of the DAD2 receptor A1 allele have compromised D2 receptors. Therefore lack of D2 receptors causes individuals to have a high risk for multiple addictive, impulsive and compulsive behavioral propensities, such as severe alcoholism, cocaine, heroin, marijuana and nicotine use, glucose bingeing, pathological gambling, sex addiction, ADHD, Tourette's Syndrome, autism, chronic violence, posttraumatic stress disorder, schizoid/avoidant cluster, conduct disorder and antisocial behavior. In order to explain the breakdown of the reward cascade due to both multiple genes and environmental stimuli (pleiotropism) and resultant aberrant behaviors, Blum united this hypodopaminergic trait under the rubric of a reward deficiency syndrome.

Metabolic determinants of binge eating

Binge-eating behavior is often thought to be the consequence of energy restriction and dietary restraint. However, evidence is accumulating that recurrent eating binges may be one behavioral mechanism in the expression of familial obesity, and may therefore precede the onset of dieting. The profile of patients with the DSM-IV binge-eating disorder resembles that of patients with familial obesity. There is further evidence for the involvement of the endogenous opiate peptide system. Binge-type foods are often rich in fat, sugar, or both. The opiate antagonist naloxone reduced the consumption of sweet high-fat foods in obese and lean female binge-eaters, though not in nonbinging controls. In contrast, obese as opposed to lean subjects were not differentially affected by naloxone. These data provide a psychobiological validation of the DSM-IV binge eating disorder and suggest that binge eating may be triggered by physiological events. As opposed to being the outcome of dieting, binge-eating episodes should be considered as its possible cause.

Food deprivation history and cocaine self-administration: an animal model of binge eating

In this two-part study, an animal model of binge eating was first produced, then the rate of acquisition of cocaine self-administration was assessed. Initially, 16 female weanling rats were food deprived (DEPR) at 25, 95, and 143 days of age. Another group of 16 age-matched controls was allowed ad lib access to food. Each time the DEPR group was food deprived, they were allowed to recover to normal weight. They were then injected with butorphanol tartrate (BUTR), an opioid that stimulates feeding, and food intake was measured for 4 h. All rats given BUTR consumed significantly more food than those given saline. Animals with DEPR history consumed food over a longer period of time, and at h 4 after BUTR injection, they consumed significantly more food than controls. In the second part of the experiment, an autoshaping procedure was used to quantitatively evaluate the rate of acquisition of cocaine self-administration. By day 30, 86% of the DEPR and 69% of the control groups had acquired cocaine self-administration.

Failure of naltrexone to affect the pleasantness or intake of food

Two separate studies were conducted to investigate the effects of oral naltrexone on the pleasantness ratings of foods and food intake. In both studies, normal-weight, nondieting males rated hunger, fullness, mood and the pleasantness of the taste of a variety of foods before and after double-blind administration of 50 mg of naltrexone or placebo. All subjects received a test meal, in a counterbalanced, repeated measures design. In the first study, 12 subjects were given a self-selection test meal after overnight deprivation. In the second study 14 subjects were given an ice cream test meal with no deprivation. In both experiments the pleasantness of the taste of the foods, sensory-specific satiety, hunger ratings and overall energy intake were not differentially influenced by naltrexone administration. In Experiment 2, intake of the ice cream was greater after active drug administration because subjects who received active drug on the first session ate less ice cream in the placebo session. In conclusion, in the short term, naltrexone had no impact on hunger, sensory-specific satiety or food intake.

Oral administration of proteinase inhibitor II from potatoes reduces energy intake in man

The effect of a proteinase inhibitor extracted from potatoes (POT II) which increases CCK release, on food intake was examined in 11 lean subjects. They received 1.5 g POT II in a high-protein soup vehicle (70 kcal), the soup vehicle alone, or a no-soup control five minutes before being presented with a lunchtime test meal, according to a double-blind, within-subjects design. Consuming the soup alone led to a nonsignificant 3% reduction in energy intake. The addition of 1.5 g POT II to the soup significantly reduced energy intake by a further 17.5%. Premeal ratings of motivation to eat and food preferences did not predict the reduction in energy intake by the proteinase inhibitor. These findings suggest that endogenous CCK may be important in the control of food intake and that proteinase inhibition may have therapeutic potential for reducing food intake.