Cetuximab and bevacizumab: preclinical data and phase II trial in recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

Harmine hydrochloride induces G0/G1 cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in oral squamous carcinoma cells

Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) represents the most frequently occurring form of oral cancer. However, despite the availability of advanced treatment modalities, the global 5-year survival rate for patients with advanced OSCC remains at ~50-60%. Devising alternative therapeutic strategies for oral cancer has therefore become an urgent need. Harmine, a β-carboline alkaloid, has recently been shown to exhibit anticancer activity. Compared with harmine, harmine hydrochloride (HH), a derivative of harmine, has improved water solubility and stability, so can absorb into tissues more readily. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the anticancer activity of HH in OSCC cells. A Cell Counting Kit-8 assay was performed to assess the cytotoxic effects of HH on the OSCC cell lines, SCC-4 and SCC-25. Flow cytometric analysis was subsequently employed to examine both the cell cycle profile and the extent of apoptosis. Western blotting was used to assess the expression levels of the regulatory proteins involved in these biological activities, and treatment with a pan-caspase inhibitor (Z-VAD-FMK) confirmed the involvement of the apoptotic pathway. Furthermore, western blotting was used to investigate which signaling pathways were affected in the HH-treated cells. Taken together, the findings of the present study demonstrated that HH was cytotoxic in OSCC cells. HH treatment induced G0/G1 phase cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. Additionally, the MAPK pathway was shown to be involved in HH-induced apoptosis in SCC-4 cells. Therefore, HH exhibited anticancer activity, and may be a putative therapeutic agent for the treatment of OSCC in the future.

Metastatic Head and Neck Cancer: Immunotherapy and Beyond

Head and neck cancer is estimated to result in 71,000 new cancer diagnoses and 16,000 deaths in 2024. Of these cases, approximately 14% will be metastatic. Recent changes in treatment paradigms have established immunotherapy as a cornerstone of treatment in the metastatic and recurrent setting. While immunotherapy has undoubtedly improved outcomes and can lead to long term durable responses in select patients, overall response rates remain suboptimal, with approximately 13%-20% of patients responding to immunotherapy in most studies. This review aims to provide an overview of the current treatment landscape of immunotherapies in head and neck malignancies. Additionally, we aim to discuss the future of immunotherapy, as well as novel targets and therapeutic platforms that may continue to change the treatment paradigm in this disease.

Efficacy and safety of molecular targeted therapies in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is one of the most common head and neck cancers worldwide. The majority of the new cases were from Asia and are the leading cause of cancer in China. The main treatment is surgery and radiotherapy with chemotherapy for advanced cases. With the advancement of targeted therapies, the objective of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of targeted therapies in NPC.

METHODS

Databases were searched from inception to Aug 2023, comparing molecular targeted therapies (MTT) with conventional chemotherapy, chemotherapy or surgery. Study screening, data extraction, and data analysis were conducted independently by two investigators. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 1.0 was used for the quality of the studies.

RESULTS

There was a total of ten eligible studies with 471 participants in the treatment arm and 469 participants in the control arm. Most studies had an unclear risk of bias assessment. Upon network meta-analysis, cetuximab was found to be the most effective regimen for complete response (CR), bevacizumab was found to be the most effective regimen for partial response (PR), nimotuzumab was found to be the most effective regimen for overall survival rate (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Pairwise meta-analysis showed that MTT had a significantly better response than conventional therapies in complete response. GRADE analysis reported low certainty of evidence for CR and very low certainty of evidence for other efficacy outcomes. There was a higher chance of bleeding with MTT and was statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

It was observed that targeted therapies were found to be a promising strategy for NPC especially recurrent and/or metastatic NPC, but the most appropriate therapy still needs to be evaluated.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was registered with the International Platform of Registered Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols (INPLASY) with a registration number of INPLASY202380024.

Extracellular vesicle-bound VEGF in oral squamous cell carcinoma and its role in resistance to Bevacizumab Therapy

BACKGROUND

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is an important proangiogenic factor and has been considered as a key target of antiangiogenetic therapy in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). However, clinical application of bevacizumab, a specific VEGF antibody, didn't improve the survival rate of OSCC patients. One possible explanation is that VEGF gene expresses diverse isoforms, which associate with extracellular vesicles (EVs), and EVs potentially contribute to VEGF resistance to bevacizumab. However, clear solution is lacking in addressing this issue.

METHODS

Expression of VEGF isoforms in OSCC cells was confirmed by reverse transcription and polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and western blot. EVs isolated from OSCC cell's conditioned medium (CM) were characterized by western blot, transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA). Flow cytometry, immunogold labeling and western blot were applied to study the VEGF on EVs. Tube formation assay and Matrigel plug angiogenesis assay were used for analyzing the angiogenesis capacity of EV-VEGF.

RESULTS

The most popular isoforms expressed by VEGF gene are VEGF121, VEGF165 and VEGF189. In this study, we demonstrated that all three isoforms of mRNA could be detected at varying levels in OSCC cells, while only VEGF165 and VEGF189 proteins were found. CM derived from OSCC cells, both soluble and non-soluble forms of VEGF could be detected. We further confirmed the presence of VGEF189 bound to EVs as a non-soluble form. EV-bound VEGF189 presented angiogenic activity, which could not be neutralized by bevacizumab. It was found that VEGF189 bound to EVs by heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPG). In addition, the angiogenic effect of EV-VEGF could be reversed by surfen, a kind of HSPG antagonist both in vitro and in vivo.

CONCLUSION

Antagonists targeting HSPG might potentially overcome the resistance of EV-VEGF to bevacizumab and serve as an alternative for anti-VEGF therapy in OSCC.

Apatinib potentiates the therapeutic effect of anti-PD-1 in locally advanced head and neck cancers

OBJECTIVES

Antiangiogenic inhibitors have been shown to synergize with immune checkpoint blockade, but the underlying mechanisms of the synergistic response are not fully understood.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We investigate the impact of VEGFR2 inhibition on tumor-infiltrating immune cells in vivo and the activity of the combination of apatinib and anti-PD-1 in synergistic mouse model of HNSCC. A patient with squamous cell carcinoma of the left tongue with cervical lymph node were received with combined induction treatment of camrelizumab and apatinib to validate the efficacy of neoadjuvant immunotherapy before surgery.

RESULTS

We found that apatinib increased the infiltration of CD8+T cells and decreased the population of Tregs in a preclinical syngeneic mouse model. The proportions of CD8+PD1+T cells were significantly increased in apatinib-treated tumors. The combined treatment of apatinib and anti-PD-1 demonstrated better therapeutic benefit than each treatment alone. The patient with squamous cell carcinoma of the left tongue with cervical lymph node achieved major pathologic response (MPR) after two cycles of combined induction treatment.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrated that apatinib therapy synergized with an anti-PD-1 antibody in preclinical cancer models and in patient with advanced HNSCC. These results provide a new rationale for advancing this neoadjuvant immunotherapy in large scale of clinical trials of HNSCC.

Molecular pathways and targeted therapies in head and neck cancers pathogenesis

The substantial heterogeneity exhibited by head and neck cancer (HNC), encompassing diverse cellular origins, anatomical locations, and etiological contributors, combined with the prevalent late-stage diagnosis, poses significant challenges for clinical management. Genomic sequencing endeavors have revealed extensive alterations in key signaling pathways that regulate cellular proliferation and survival. Initiatives to engineer therapies targeting these dysregulated pathways are underway, with several candidate molecules progressing to clinical evaluation phases, including FDA approval for agents like the EGFR-targeting monoclonal antibody cetuximab for K-RAS wild-type, EGFR-mutant HNSCC treatment. Non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs), owing to their enhanced stability in biological fluids and their important roles in intracellular and intercellular signaling within HNC contexts, are now recognized as potent biomarkers for disease management, catalyzing further refined diagnostic and therapeutic strategies, edging closer to the personalized medicine desideratum. Enhanced comprehension of the genomic and immunological landscapes characteristic of HNC is anticipated to facilitate a more rigorous assessment of targeted therapies benefits and limitations, optimize their clinical deployment, and foster innovative advancements in treatment approaches. This review presents an update on the molecular mechanisms and mutational spectrum of HNC driving the oncogenesis of head and neck malignancies and explores their implications for advancing diagnostic methodologies and precision therapeutics.

The Role of Inflammation-Associated Factors in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), which originates in the head or neck tissues, is characterized by high rates of recurrence and metastasis. Inflammation is important in HNSCC prognosis. Inflammatory cells and their secreted factors contribute to the various stages of HNSCC development through multiple mechanisms. In this review, the mechanisms through which inflammatory factors, signaling pathways, and cells contribute to the initiation and progression of HNSCC have been discussed in detail. Furthermore, the diagnostic and therapeutic potential of targeting inflammation in HNSCC has been discussed to gain new insights into improving patient prognosis.

Advantages of the Combinatorial Molecular Targeted Therapy of Head and Neck Cancer-A Step before Anakoinosis-Based Personalized Treatment

The molecular initiators of Head and Heck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC) are complex. Human Papillomavirus (HPV) infection is linked to an increasing number of HNSCC cases, but HPV-positive tumors generally have a good prognosis. External factors that promote the development of HPV-negative HNSCC include tobacco use, excessive alcohol consumption, and proinflammatory poor oral hygiene. On a molecular level, several events, including the well-known overexpression of epidermal growth factor receptors (EGFR) and related downstream signaling pathways, contribute to the development of HNSCC. Conventional chemotherapy is insufficient for many patients. Thus, molecular-based therapy for HNSCC offers patients a better chance at a cure. The first molecular target for therapy of HNSCC was EGFR, inhibited by monoclonal antibody cetuximab, but its use in monotherapy is insufficient and induces resistance. This article describes attempts at combinatorial molecular targeted therapy of HNSCC based on several molecular targets and exemplary drugs/drug candidates. The new concept of anakoinosis-based therapy, which means treatment that targets the intercellular and intracellular communication of cancer cells, is thought to be the way to improve the clinical outcome for HNSCC patients. The identification of a link between molecular targeted therapy and anakoinosis raises the potential for further progress in HPV-negative HNSCC therapy.

Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Therapeutic Role for Angiogenesis Markers in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Narrative Review

Despite refinements to diagnostic and therapeutic approaches over the last two decades, the outcome of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) has not shown substantial improvements, especially regarding those with advanced-stage disease. Angiogenesis is believed to be a turning point in the development of solid tumors, being a premise for mass growth and potential distant dissemination. Cancer-induced angiogenesis is a result of increased expression of angiogenic factors, decreased expression of anti-angiogenic factors, or a combination of both. The assessment of angiogenesis has also emerged as a potentially useful biological prognostic and predictive factor in HNSCC. The aim of this review is to assess the level of current knowledge on the neo-angiogenesis markers involved in the biology, behavior, and prognosis of HNSCC. A search (between 1 January 2012 and 10 October 2022) was run in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science electronic databases. After full-text screening and application of inclusion/exclusion criteria, 84 articles are included. The current knowledge and debate on angiogenesis in HNSCC presented in the eligible articles are stratified as follows: (i) diagnostic markers; (ii) prognostic markers; (iii) predictive markers; and (iv) markers with a potential therapeutic role. Angiogenesis is a biological and pathological indicator of malignancies progression and has negative implications in prognosis of some solid tumors; several signals capable of tripping the "angiogenic switch" have also been identified in HNSCC. Although several studies suggested that antiangiogenic agents might be a valuable adjunct to conventional chemo-radiation of HNSCC, their long-term therapeutic value remains uncertain. Further investigations are required on combinations of antiangiogenic agents with conventional chemotherapeutic ones, immunotherapeutic and molecularly targeted agents in HNSCC. Additional data are necessary to pinpoint which patients could benefit most from these treatments.

Combination Therapy as a Promising Way to Fight Oral Cancer

Oral cancer is a highly aggressive tumor with invasive properties that can lead to metastasis and high mortality rates. Conventional treatment strategies, such as surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy, alone or in combination, are associated with significant side effects. Currently, combination therapy has become the standard practice for the treatment of locally advanced oral cancer, emerging as an effective approach in improving outcomes. In this review, we present an in-depth analysis of the current advancements in combination therapies for oral cancer. The review explores the current therapeutic options and highlights the limitations of monotherapy approaches. It then focuses on combinatorial approaches that target microtubules, as well as various signaling pathway components implicated in oral cancer progression, namely, DNA repair players, the epidermal growth factor receptor, cyclin-dependent kinases, epigenetic readers, and immune checkpoint proteins. The review discusses the rationale behind combining different agents and examines the preclinical and clinical evidence supporting the effectiveness of these combinations, emphasizing their ability to enhance treatment response and overcome drug resistance. Challenges and limitations associated with combination therapy are discussed, including potential toxicity and the need for personalized treatment approaches. A future perspective is also provided to highlight the existing challenges and possible resolutions toward the clinical translation of current oral cancer therapies.

PELI1 and EGFR cooperate to promote breast cancer metastasis

Pellino-1 (PELI1) is an E3 ubiquitin ligase acting as a key regulator for the inflammation and autoimmunity via the ubiquitination of the substrate proteins. There is increasing evidence to support that PELI1 functions as an oncoprotein in tumorigenesis and metastasis. However, the molecular mechanism underlying the high expression and oncogenic roles of PELI1 in cancers remains limited. Herein, we revealed a novel regulation mechanism by which PELI1 and EGFR cooperate to promote breast cancer metastasis. EGFR is positively correlated with PELI1 expression in breast cancers, and its activation led to the phosphorylation of PELI1 at Tyr154 and Thr264, which subsequently activated its E3 ubiquitin ligase. Simultaneously, PELI1 physically interacted with and enhanced the stability of EGFR via the K63-linked polyubiquitination in reverse. The co-inhibition of the PELI1-EGFR showed synergetic effect to repress breast cancer metastasis. Furthermore, we identified a compound S62 as a small molecule disruptor of PELI1/EGFR that effectively repressed breast cancer metastasis. Our study not only uncovered the emerging roles of PELI1/EGFR interaction in the progression of breast cancer, but also provided an effective strategy for the inhibition of metastasis in breast cancer.

Therapeutic Cancer Vaccines for the Management of Recurrent and Metastatic Head and Neck Cancer: A Review

Importance

Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC) is prevalent globally and in the US. Management, particularly after disease recurrence, can be challenging, and exploring additional treatment modalities, such as therapeutic cancer vaccines, may offer an opportunity to improve outcomes in this setting.

Observations

This review provides an overview of the clinical efficacy of different treatment modalities that are currently available for the treatment of recurrent and metastatic HNSCC, including checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies, with a detailed summary of the numerous T-cell vaccines that have been studied in the setting of HNSCC, as well as a detailed summary of B-cell therapeutic vaccines being investigated for various malignant tumors.

Conclusions and Relevance

The findings of this review suggest that several therapeutic T-cell and B-cell vaccines, which have been recently developed and evaluated in a clinical setting, offer a promising treatment modality with the potential to improve outcomes for patients with recurrent and metastatic HNSCC.

Targeted therapy for head and neck cancer: signaling pathways and clinical studies

Head and neck cancer (HNC) is malignant, genetically complex and difficult to treat and is the sixth most frequent cancer, with tobacco, alcohol and human papillomavirus being major risk factors. Based on epigenetic data, HNC is remarkably heterogeneous, and treatment remains challenging. There is a lack of significant improvement in survival and quality of life in patients with HNC. Over half of HNC patients experience locoregional recurrence or distal metastasis despite the current multiple traditional therapeutic strategies and immunotherapy. In addition, resistance to chemotherapy, radiotherapy and some targeted therapies is common. Therefore, it is urgent to explore more effective and tolerable targeted therapies to improve the clinical outcomes of HNC patients. Recent targeted therapy studies have focused on identifying promising biomarkers and developing more effective targeted therapies. A well understanding of the pathogenesis of HNC contributes to learning more about its inner association, which provides novel insight into the development of small molecule inhibitors. In this review, we summarized the vital signaling pathways and discussed the current potential therapeutic targets against critical molecules in HNC, as well as presenting preclinical animal models and ongoing or completed clinical studies about targeted therapy, which may contribute to a more favorable prognosis of HNC. Targeted therapy in combination with other therapies and its limitations were also discussed.

A review of efficacy and safety of cetuximab and bevacizumab-based monoclonal antibodies in head and neck cancer

A combination of monoclonal antibodies prescribed along with the conventional standard of care has a potential to provide significant improvement in patients suffering from head and neck cancer. This combination has also shown a significant decrease in toxicities and improved overall quality of life. Cetuximab acts by inhibiting the human epidermal growth factors as its overexpression in head and neck tumours that are responsible for treatment failure, resistance, and metastasis. Whereas, bevacizumab acts by inhibiting the vascular endothelial growth factor since its overexpression leads to induction of tumour angiogenesis. Current research has not shown any remarkable beneficial effect in disease outcomes. Thus, the addition of these monoclonal antibodies to the standard regimen for head and neck cancer can be considered a prospect that might be beneficial. Cetuximab has already been included as an option under special recommendations in recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer by NCCN in a platinum-based regimen as well as in combination with radiation therapy. This review outlines the applicability of cetuximab and bevacizumab in the treatment of head and neck cancer as well as the clinical trials performed that give an idea about the efficacy and safety of these monoclonal antibodies. Based upon the literature reviewed, it can be deduced that immunotherapy is to be adopted and different targets are to be explored in it in order to combat head and neck cancer. Currently, immunotherapeutic drugs of two major targets have been discussed. These agents are even effective in combination with other therapeutic modalities that are not being able to achieve desirable outcomes due to issues such as resistance and toxicities. Thus, newer targets as well as newer agents acting on established targets are to be explored in order to improve disease outcomes.

Therapeutic approaches for the treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma-An update on clinical trials

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is the sixth most common non-skin cancer with a tobacco consumption and infection with high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) being major risk factors. Despite advances in numerous therapy modalities, survival rates for HNSCC have not improved considerably; a vast number of clinical outcomes have demonstrated that a combination strategy (the most well-known docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil) is the most effective treatment choice. Immunotherapy that targets immunological checkpoints is being tested in a number of clinical trials, either alone or in conjunction with chemotherapeutic or targeted therapeutic drugs. Various monoclonal antibodies, such as cetuximab and bevacizumab, which target the EGFR and VEGFR, respectively, as well as other signaling pathway inhibitors, such as temsirolimus and rapamycin, are also being studied for the treatment of HNSCC. We have reviewed the primary targets in active clinical studies in this study, with a particular focus on the medications and drug targets used.

Targeting Angiogenesis in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: Opportunities in the Immunotherapy Era

Simple Summary

Therapies for squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck (SCCHN) have been rapidly evolving, initially with the inclusion of immunotherapy, but more recently with the consideration of anti-angiogenic therapies. Recent preclinical and clinical data reveal a strong correlation between vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and the progression of SCCHN, with nearly 90% of these malignancies expressing VEGF. Our review article not only elaborates on the utility of anti-VEGF therapies on SCCHN but also its interaction with the immune environment. Furthermore, we detailed the current data on immunotherapies targeting SCCHN and how this could be coupled with anti-angiogenics therapies.

Abstract

Despite the lack of approved anti-angiogenic therapies in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN), preclinical and more recent clinical evidence support the role of targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in this disease. Targeting VEGF has gained even greater interest following the recent evidence supporting the role of immunotherapy in the management of advanced SCCHN. Preclinical evidence strongly suggests that VEGF plays a role in promoting the growth and progression of SCCHN, and clinical evidence exists as to the value of combining this strategy with immunotherapeutic agents. Close to 90% of SCCHNs express VEGF, which has been correlated with a worse clinical prognosis and an increased resistance to chemotherapeutic agents. As immunotherapy is currently at the forefront of the management of advanced SCCHN, revisiting the rationale for targeting angiogenesis in this disease has become an even more attractive proposition.

Current and Emerging Molecular Therapies for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Head and neck cancer affects nearly 750,000 patients, with more than 300,000 deaths annually. Advances in first line surgical treatment have improved survival rates marginally particularly in developed countries, however survival rates for aggressive locally advanced head and neck cancer are still poor. Recurrent and metastatic disease remains a significant problem for patients and the health system. As our knowledge of the genomic landscape of the head and neck cancers continues to expand, there are promising developments occurring in molecular therapies available for advanced or recalcitrant disease. The concept of precision medicine is underpinned by our ability to accurately sequence tumour samples to best understand individual patient genomic variations and to tailor targeted therapy for them based on such molecular profiling. Not only is their purported response to therapy a factor of their genomic variation, but so is their inclusion in biomarker-driven personalised medicine therapeutic trials. With the ever-expanding number of molecular druggable targets explored through advances in next generation sequencing, the number of clinical trials assessing these targets has significantly increased over recent years. Although some trials are focussed on first-line therapeutic approaches, a greater majority are focussed on locally advanced, recurrent or metastatic disease. Similarly, although single agent monotherapy has been found effective in some cases, it is the combination of drugs targeting different signalling pathways that seem to be more beneficial to patients. This paper outlines current and emerging molecular therapies for head and neck cancer, and updates readers on outcomes of the most pertinent clinical trials in this area while also summarising ongoing efforts to bring more molecular therapies into clinical practice.

Pre-Therapeutic VEGF Level in Plasma Is a Prognostic Bio-Marker in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC)

Simple Summary

In the context of a growing variety in treatment strategies for patients with cancer, especially approaches based on antiangiogenetic pathways, we aimed to identify a useful biomarker for patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Our experimental results detected vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in patients’ pre-therapeutic plasma, and not serum, which serves as a suitable biomarker for outcome prognostication. Results were validated in an independent cohort, confirming VEGF as an independent predictor (Pi) of outcomes in HNSCC patients. Therefore, pre-therapeutic VEGF in plasma may be an attractive biomarker in future HNSCC studies.

Abstract

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is centrally involved in cancer angiogenesis. We hypothesized that pre-therapeutic VEGF levels in serum and plasma differ in their potential as biomarkers for outcomes in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients. As prospectively defined in the study protocols of TRANSCAN-DietINT and NICEI-CIH, we measured VEGF in pretreatment serum and plasma of 75 HNSCC test cohort (TC) patients. We analyzed the prognostic value of VEGF concentrations in serum (VEGF_Serum) and plasma (VEGF_Plasma) for event-free survival (EFS) utilizing receiver-operating characteristics (ROC). Mean VEGF concentrations in plasma (34.6, 95% CI 26.0–43.3 ng/L) were significantly lower (p = 3.35 × 10⁻¹⁸) than in serum (214.8, 95% CI 179.6–250.0 ng/L) but, based on ROC (area under the curve, AUC_Plasma = 0.707, 95% CI 0.573–0.840; p = 0.006 versus AUC_Serum = 0.665, 95% CI 0.528–0.801; p = 0.030), superiorly correlated with event-free survival (EFS) of TC patients. Youden indices revealed optimum binary classification with VEGF_Plasma 26 ng/L and VEGF_Serum 264 ng/L. Kaplan–Meier plots demonstrated superiority of VEGF_Plasma in discriminating patients regarding outcome. Patients with VEGF_Plasma < 26 ng/L had superior nodal (NC), local (LC) and loco-regional control (LRC) leading to significant prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and EFS. We successfully validated VEGF_Plasma according the cut-off <26 ng/L as predictive for superior outcome in an independent validation cohort (iVC) of 104 HNSCC patients from the studies DeLOS-II and LIFE and found better outcomes including prolonged tumor-specific (TSS) and overall survival (OS). Outcomes in TC and iVC combined again was related to VEGF_Plasma, and multivariate Cox regression revealed that VEGF_Plasma was an independent outcome predictor. In HNSCC, pre-therapeutic VEGF_Plasma is prognostic for outcomes.

Angiogenesis Inhibitors for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Treatment: Is There Still Hope?

Background

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) carries poor survival outcomes despite recent progress in cancer treatment in general. Angiogenesis is crucial for tumour survival and progression. Therefore, several agents targeting the pathways that mediate angiogenesis have been developed. We conducted a systematic review to summarise the current clinical trial data examining angiogenesis inhibitors in HNSCC.

Methods

We carried out a literature search on three angiogenesis inhibitor categories—bevacizumab, tyrosine kinase inhibitors and endostatin—from Ovid MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Scopus and ClinicalTrials.gov database.

Results

Here, we analysed 38 clinical trials, total of 1670 patients, investigating 12 angiogenesis inhibitors. All trials were in phase I or II, except one study in phase III on bevacizumab. Angiogenesis inhibitors were used as mono- and combination therapies together with radio-, chemo-, targeted- or immunotherapy. Among 12 angiogenesis inhibitors, bevacizumab was the most studied drug, included in 13 trials. Although bevacizumab appeared effective in various combinations, it associated with high toxicity levels. Endostatin and lenvatinib were well-tolerated and their anticancer effects appeared promising.

Conclusions

Most studies did not show benefit of angiogenesis inhibitors in HNSCC treatment. Additionally, angiogenesis inhibitors were associated with considerable toxicity. However, some results appear encouraging, suggesting that further investigations of angiogenesis inhibitors, particularly in combination therapies, for HNSCC patients are warranted.

Systematic Review Registration

PROSPERO (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/), identifier CRD42020157144.

Cetuximab, docetaxel, and cisplatin versus platinum, fluorouracil, and cetuximab as first-line treatment in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma (GORTEC 2014-01 TPExtreme): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

Results from a phase 2 trial of the TPEx chemotherapy regimen (docetaxel-platinum-cetuximab) showed promising results, with a median overall survival of 14·0 months in first-line recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma (HNSCC). We therefore aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of the TPEx regimen with the standard of care EXTREME regimen (platinum-fluorouracil-cetuximab) in this setting.

METHODS

This was a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial, done in 68 centres (cancer centres, university and general hospitals, and private clinics) in France, Spain, and Germany. Eligible patients were aged 18-70 years with histologically confirmed recurrent or metastatic HNSCC unsuitable for curative treatment; had at least one measurable lesion according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1; and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 1 or less. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) using the TenAlea website by investigators or delegated clinical research associates to the TPEx regimen or the EXTREME regimen, with minimisation by ECOG performance status, type of disease evolution, previous cetuximab treatment, and country. The TPEx regimen consisted of docetaxel 75 mg/m² and cisplatin 75 mg/m², both intravenously on day 1, and cetuximab on days 1, 8, and 15 (intravenously 400 mg/m² on day 1 of cycle 1 and 250 mg/m² weekly subsequently). Four cycles were repeated every 21 days with systematic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) support at each cycle. In case of disease control after four cycles, intravenous cetuximab 500 mg/m² was continued every 2 weeks as maintenance therapy until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The EXTREME regimen consisted of fluorouracil 4000 mg/m² on day 1-4, cisplatin 100 mg/m² on day 1, and cetuximab on days 1, 8, and 15 (400 mg/m² on day 1 of cycle 1 and 250 mg/m² weekly subsequently) all delivered intravenously. Six cycles were delivered every 21 days followed by weekly 250 mg/m² cetuximab as maintenance therapy in case of disease control. G-CSF support was not mandatory per the protocol in the EXTREME regimen. The primary endpoint was overall survival in the intention-to-treat population; safety was analysed in all patients who received at least one dose of chemotherapy or cetuximab. Enrolment is closed and this is the final analysis. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02268695.

FINDINGS

Between Oct 10, 2014, and Nov 29, 2017, 541 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to the two treatment regimens (271 to TPEx, 270 to EXTREME). Two patients in the TPEx group had major deviations in consent forms and were not included in the final analysis. Median follow-up was 34·4 months (IQR 26·6-44·8) in the TPEx group and 30·2 months (25·5-45·3) in the EXTREME group. At data cutoff, 209 patients had died in the TPEx group and 218 had died in the EXTREME group. Overall survival did not differ significantly between the groups (median 14·5 months [95% CI 12·5-15·7] in the TPEx group and 13·4 months [12·2-15·4] in the EXTREME group; hazard ratio 0·89 [95% CI 0·74-1·08]; p=0·23). 214 (81%) of 263 patients in the TPEx group versus 246 (93%) of 265 patients in the EXTREME group had grade 3 or worse adverse events during chemotherapy (p<0·0001). In the TPEx group, 118 (45%) of 263 patients had at least one serious adverse event versus 143 (54%) of 265 patients in the EXTREME group. 16 patients in the TPEx group and 21 in the EXTREME group died in association with adverse events, including seven patients in each group who had fatal infections (including febrile neutropenia). Eight deaths in the TPEx group and 11 deaths in the EXTREME group were assessed as treatment related, most frequently sepsis or septic shock (four in each treatment group).

INTERPRETATION

Although the trial did not meet its primary endpoint, with no significant improvement in overall survival with TPEx versus EXTREME, the TPEx regimen had a favourable safety profile. The TPEx regimen could provide an alternative to standard of care with the EXTREME regimen in the first-line treatment of patients with recurrent or metastatic HNSCC, especially for those who might not be good candidates for up-front pembrolizumab treatment.

FUNDING

Merck Santé and Chugai Pharma.

Precision Medicine Approaches to Overcome Resistance to Therapy in Head and Neck Cancers

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is the sixth most incident cancer worldwide. More than half of HNSCC patients experience locoregional or distant relapse to treatment despite aggressive multimodal therapeutic approaches that include surgical resection, radiation therapy, and adjuvant chemotherapy. Before the arrival of immunotherapy, systemic chemotherapy was previously employed as the standard first-line protocol with an association of cisplatin or carboplatin plus 5-fluorouracil plus cetuximab (anti-EFGR antibody). Unfortunately, acquisition of therapy resistance is common in patients with HNSCC and often results in local and distant failure. Despite our better understanding of HNSCC biology, no other molecular-targeted agent has been approved for HNSCC. In this review, we outline the mechanisms of resistance to the therapeutic strategies currently used in HNSCC, discuss combination treatment strategies to overcome them, and summarize the therapeutic regimens that are presently being evaluated in early- and late-phase clinical trials.

Trial Watch: Tumor-targeting monoclonal antibodies in cancer therapy

In 1997, for the first time in history, a monoclonal antibody (mAb), i.e., the chimeric anti-CD20 molecule rituximab, was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for use in cancer patients. Since then, the panel of mAbs that are approved by international regulatory agencies for the treatment of hematopoietic and solid malignancies has not stopped to expand, nowadays encompassing a stunning amount of 15 distinct molecules. This therapeutic armamentarium includes mAbs that target tumor-associated antigens, as well as molecules that interfere with tumor-stroma interactions or exert direct immunostimulatory effects. These three classes of mAbs exert antineoplastic activity via distinct mechanisms, which may or may not involve immune effectors other than the mAbs themselves. In previous issues of OncoImmunology, we provided a brief scientific background to the use of mAbs, all types confounded, in cancer therapy, and discussed the results of recent clinical trials investigating the safety and efficacy of this approach. Here, we focus on mAbs that primarily target malignant cells or their interactions with stromal components, as opposed to mAbs that mediate antineoplastic effects by activating the immune system. In particular, we discuss relevant clinical findings that have been published during the last 13 months as well as clinical trials that have been launched in the same period to investigate the therapeutic profile of hitherto investigational tumor-targeting mAbs.

Evolving multidisciplinary treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck in India✰

In this article, we highlight the evolution of a multimodal approach in the overall management of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) in India; present advances in technology (newer surgical techniques), novel medical and radiotherapy (RT) approaches; review their roles for an integrated approach for treating SCCHN and discuss the current role of immunotherapy in SCCHN. For locally advanced (LA) SCCHN, the multidisciplinary approach includes surgery followed by RT, with or without chemotherapy (CT) or concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Improved surgical techniques of reconstruction and voice-preservation are being implemented. Advanced forms of high-precision conformal techniques like intensity-modulated radiotherapy are used to deliver highly conformal doses to tumors, sparing the surrounding normal tissue. Compared with RT alone, novel CT regimens and targeted therapeutic agents have the potential to improve locoregional control and survival and reduce treatment-induced toxicities. Several clinical trials have demonstrated efficacy, safety, and quality of life benefits of adding cetuximab to RT regimens in LASCCHN. Studies have also suggested a cetuximab-related laryngeal preservation benefit. At progression, platinum-based CT combined with cetuximab (a monoclonal anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibody) is the only validated option available as the first-line therapy. Thus, an integrated multidisciplinary approach plays a key role in maximizing patient outcomes, reduction in treatment related morbidities that consequently impact quality of life of survivors.

An update on angiogenesis targeting in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

Angiogenesis is an integral aspect of the growth and proliferation of solid tumors, including head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), and has potential implications in prognosis and treatment of both localized and recurrent/metastatic HNSCC. Therefore, there has been a significant interest in utilizing anti-angiogenic agents either alone or in combination with currently approved and emerging therapies. A phase III randomized trial (E1305) of chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab in the first-line treatment of recurrent/metastatic HNSCC showed an increased response rate and longer progression-free survival but fell short in demonstrating a statistically significant improved survival with bevacizumab. Moreover, toxicity, especially bleeding, was increased. Nevertheless, the study of other anti-angiogenic agents and novel combinations with other therapies, including immunotherapy, remains of interest. Several clinical trials are currently underway.

EPHB2 carried on small extracellular vesicles induces tumor angiogenesis via activation of ephrin reverse signaling

Angiogenesis is a key process that allows nutrient uptake and cellular trafficking and is coopted in cancer to enable tumor growth and metastasis. Recently, extracellular vesicles (EVs) have been shown to promote angiogenesis; however, it is unclear what unique features EVs contribute to the process. Here, we studied the role of EVs derived from head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) in driving tumor angiogenesis. Small EVs (SEVs), in the size range of exosomes (50-150 nm), induced angiogenesis both in vitro and in vivo. Proteomic analysis of HNSCC SEVs revealed the cell-to-cell signaling receptor ephrin type B receptor 2 (EPHB2) as a promising candidate cargo to promote angiogenesis. Analysis of patient data further identified EPHB2 overexpression in HNSCC tumors to be associated with poor patient prognosis and tumor angiogenesis, especially in the context of overexpression of the exosome secretion regulator cortactin. Functional experiments revealed that EPHB2 expression in SEVs regulated angiogenesis both in vitro and in vivo and that EPHB2 carried by SEVs stimulates ephrin-B reverse signaling, inducing STAT3 phosphorylation. A STAT3 inhibitor greatly reduced SEV-induced angiogenesis. These data suggest a model in which EVs uniquely promote angiogenesis by transporting Eph transmembrane receptors to nonadjacent endothelial cells to induce ephrin reverse signaling.

Phase III Randomized Trial of Chemotherapy With or Without Bevacizumab in Patients With Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Cancer

PURPOSE

We evaluated the addition of bevacizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody that targets vascular endothelial growth factor, to platinum-based chemotherapy in recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with chemotherapy-naïve (or with prior platinum as part of multimodal therapy completed ≥ 4 months earlier) recurrent or metastatic SCCHN were randomly assigned to receive a platinum-based chemotherapy doublet with or without bevacizumab 15 mg/kg given intravenously every 3 weeks until disease progression. Chemotherapy could be discontinued after six cycles if a maximum response was achieved.

RESULTS

The study randomly assigned 403 patients. Median overall survival (OS) was 12.6 months with bevacizumab plus chemotherapy (BC) and 11.0 months with chemotherapy alone (hazard ratio, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.70 to 1.09; P = .22). At 2, 3, and 4 years, the OS rates were 25.2% v 18.1%, 16.4% v 10.0%, and 11.8% v 6.4% for BC versus chemotherapy, respectively. In an analysis of 365 eligible patients who started treatment, the hazard ratio was 0.82 (95% CI, 0.65 to 1.04; P = .10), with a median OS of 14.2 months on BC v 11.1 months on chemotherapy. Median progression-free survival with BC was 6.0 months v 4.3 months with chemotherapy (P = .0014). Overall response rates were 35.5% with BC and 24.5% with chemotherapy (P = .016). There was increased toxicity, including a higher rate of treatment-related grade 3 to 5 bleeding events (6.7% v 0.5%; P < .001) and treatment-related deaths (9.3% v 3.5%; P = .022) with BC versus chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

The addition of bevacizumab to chemotherapy did not improve OS but improved the response rate and progression-free survival with increased toxicities. These results encourage biomarker-driven studies of angiogenesis inhibitors with better toxicity profiles in select patients with SCCHN.

Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound in evaluating of angiogenesis and tumor staging of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in nude mice

OBJECTIVE

To explore the use of Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in evaluating angiogenesis in a xenograft nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) model in nude mice and the evolution of CEUS parameters according to the growth of NPC.

METHODS

Nude mice were divided into three groups according to experiments conducted at various times from tumor implantation (8 mice/group; group A: 4 weeks from implantation; group B:6 weeks from implantation; group C:8 weeks from implantation). CNE-2 cells were transplanted in 24 nude mice and CEUS evaluations of the tumors were performed at 4, 6 or 8 weeks from implantation. CEUS parametric perfusion images and pathological findings were recorded. R version 3.4.4 software was used to analyze the CEUS parameters and pathological findings.

RESULTS

One-way anova analysis indicated statistically significant differences among the three groups with the parameters of peak intensity (PI) (p<0.001), area wash in (AWI) (p<0.001), area wash out (AWO) (p<0.001) and tumor volumes (p<0.001).Pearson correlation coefficient analysis indicated that microvessel density (MVD) was correlated with tumor volume (r = 0.644, p = 0.001), PI (r = 0.904, p<0.0001), AWI (r = 0.547, p = 0.008) and AWO (r = 0.744, P<0.0001). Tumor volume was correlated with MVD (r = 0.644, p = 0.001), PI (r = 0.625, p = 0.002), AWI (r = 0.528, p = 0.012) and AWO (r = 0.784, p<0.001). The percentage of necrosis in histological sections was correlated with the percentage of CEUS unperfused area (r = 0.446,p = 0.038). Spearman rank correlation coefficient analysis indicated that vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) was correlated with PI (r = 0.462, P = 0.032). Welch t test indicated PI, AWI and AWO parameters were significantly lower than that of kidneys (p<0.001, p = 0.009, p = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

The CEUS parameters PI, AWI and AWO indirectly reflect the MVD and the tumor volume in our model of subcutaneous transplanted NPC in nude mice, providing precious information on angiogenesis and tumor growth. VEGF may play a role in promoting angiogenesis of NPC.

Targeted therapies for non-HPV-related head and neck cancer: challenges and opportunities in the context of predictive, preventive, and personalized medicine

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) develops in the mucosal lining of the upper aerodigestive tract, principally as a result of exposure to carcinogens present in tobacco products and alcohol, with oncogenic papillomaviruses also being recognized as etiological agents in a limited proportion of cases. As such, there is considerable scope for prevention of disease development and progression. However, despite multimodal approaches to treatment, tumor recurrence and metastatic disease are common problems, and clinical outcome is unsatisfactory. As our understanding of the genetics and biochemical aberrations in HNSCC has improved, so the development and use of molecularly targeted drugs to combat the disease have come to the fore. In this article, we review molecular mechanisms that alter signal transduction downstream of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) as well as those that perturb orderly cell cycle progression, such as p53 mutation, cyclin overexpression, and loss of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor function. We outline some of the tactics that have been employed to combat the altered biochemistry. These include blockade of the EGFR using humanized monoclonal antibodies such as cetuximab and small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) such as erlotinib/gefitinib and subsequent generations of TKIs, restoration of p53 function using MIRA compounds, and inhibition of cyclin-dependent kinase and aurora kinase activity using drugs such as palbociclib and alisertib. Knowledge of the underlying molecular mechanisms may be utilizable in order to predict disease behavior and tailor therapeutic interventions in a more personalized approach to improve clinical response. Use of liquid biopsy, omics platforms, and salivary diagnostics hold promise in this regard.

Adaptive Responses to Monotherapy in Head and Neck Cancer: Interventions for Rationale-Based Therapeutic Combinations

Most Phase II and III clinical trials in head and neck cancer (HNC) combine two or more treatment modalities, which are based, in part, on knowledge of the molecular mechanisms of innate and acquired resistance to monotherapy. In this review, we describe the range of tumor-cell autonomously derived (intrinsic) and tumor-microenvironment-derived (extrinsic) acquired-resistance mechanisms to various FDA-approved monotherapies for HNC. Specifically, we describe how tumor cells and the tumor microenvironment (TME) respond to radiation, chemotherapy, targeted therapy (cetuximab), and immunotherapies [programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) inhibitors] and adapt to the selective pressure of these monotherapies. Due to the diversity of adaptive responses to monotherapy, monitoring the response to treatment in patients is critical to understand the path that leads to resistance and to guide the optimal therapeutic drug combinations in the clinical setting. We envisage that applying such a rationale-based therapeutic strategy will improve treatment efficacy in HNC patients.

Cetuximab-Containing Combinations in Locally Advanced and Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Cetuximab remains to date the only targeted therapy approved for the treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). The EGFR pathway plays a key role in the tumorigenesis and progression of this disease as well as in the resistance to radiotherapy (RT). While several anti-EGFR agents have been tested in HNSCC, cetuximab, an IgG1 subclass monoclonal antibody against EGFR, is the only drug with proven efficacy for the treatment of both locoregionally-advanced (LA) and recurrent/metastatic (R/M) disease. The addition of cetuximab to radiotherapy is a validated treatment option in LA-HNSCC. However, its use has been limited to patients who are considered unfit for standard of care chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with single agent cisplatin given the lack of direct comparison of these two regimens in randomized phase III trials and the inferiority suggested by metanalysis and phase II studies. The current use of cetuximab in HNSCC is about to change given the recent results from randomized prospective clinical trials in both the LA and R/M setting. Two phase III studies evaluating RT-cetuximab vs. CRT in Human Papillomavirus (HPV)-positive LA oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (De-ESCALaTE and RTOG 1016) showed inferior overall survival and progression-free survival for RT-cetuximab combination, and therefore CRT with cisplatin remains the standard of care in this disease. In the R/M HNSCC, the EXTREME regimen has been the standard of care as first-line treatment for the past 10 years. However, the results from the KEYNOTE-048 study will likely position the anti-PD-1 agent pembrolizumab as the new first line treatment either alone or in combination with chemotherapy in this setting based on PD-L1 status. Interestingly, cetuximab-mediated immunogenicity through antibody dependent cell cytotoxicity (ADCC) has encouraged the evaluation of combined approaches with immune-checkpoint inhibitors in both LA and R/M-HNSCC settings. This article reviews the accumulated evidence on the role of cetuximab in HNSCC in the past decade, offering an overview of its current impact in the treatment of LA and R/M-HNSCC disease and its potential use in the era of immunotherapy.

Target therapies in recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer: state of the art and novel perspectives. A systematic review

Recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous-cell carcinomas (R/M HNSCC) are a group of cancers with a very poor prognosis. Many clinical trials testing novel target therapies in this setting are currently ongoing. We performed a systematic review focusing our attention on all clinical trials, ongoing or already published, concerning the use of novel drugs for treatment of R/M HNSCC. We found that the research of novel molecules effective in treatment of R/M HNSCC has been intense during last decade, and nowadays it is still very active. Unfortunately, the results in this setting have been, overall, disappointing: until now, only cetuximab and, recently, nivolumab and pembrolizumab received authorization for treatment of R/M HNSCC. Nevertheless, the promising results showed by some novel drugs may lead to continue the research in this field, with the aim of producing more evidence and finding new therapeutic indication.

Cetuximab pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamics relationships in advanced head and neck carcinoma patients

AIMS

Cetuximab associated with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil is used to treat patients with inoperable or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC) up until disease progression or unacceptable toxicities. To date, no biomarkers of efficacy are available to select patients who will benefit from treatment.

METHODS

An ancillary pharmacokinetics (PK) exploration was performed in the context of a prospective study investigating circulating-tumour cells vs progression-free survival (PFS). Cetuximab plasma concentrations were analysed according to a population PK model. Individual exposure parameters were confronted with soluble epidermal growth factor receptor (sEGFR) concentrations, tumour response and PFS.

RESULTS

PK data (28 patients, 203 observations) were best described by a two-compartment model with linear elimination. Performance status (PS) significantly correlated to both cetuximab clearance and central volume of distribution with both parameters increasing by 33.3% (95% CI 1-65.6) for each 1-point increase of PS compared to PS = 0. Univariate analysis showed that patients with higher trough cetuximab concentrations at Day 7 (C_min,D7 ) had better tumour response (P = 0.03) and longer PFS (P = 0.035). However, multivariate analysis revealed that only PS and tumour size at baseline remained significantly associated with PFS. Levels of sEGFR increased during cetuximab treatment but were not associated with PFS in the multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study prospectively indicates that PS is likely a confounding factor in the relationship between cetuximab PK and PFS, patients with a poor PS having lower cetuximab plasma exposure and lower PFS.

Targeted Therapies and Immune-Checkpoint Inhibition in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Where Do We Stand Today and Where to Go?

With an increased understanding of the tumor biology of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN), targeted therapies have found their way into the clinical treatment routines against this entity. Nevertheless, to date platinum-based cytostatic agents remain the first line choice and targeting the epidermal growth factor-receptor (EGFR) with combined cetuximab and radiation therapy remains the only targeted therapy approved in the curative setting. Investigation of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), such as antibodies targeting programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and its ligand PD-L1, resulted in a change of paradigms in oncology and in the first approval of new drugs for treating SCCHN. Nivolumab and pembrolizumab, two anti-PD-1 antibodies, were the first agents shown to improve overall survival for patients with metastatic/recurrent tumors in recent years. Currently, several clinical trials investigate the role of ICI in different therapeutic settings. A robust set of biomarkers will be an inevitable tool for future individualized treatment approaches including radiation dose de-escalation and escalation strategies. This review aims to summarize achieved goals, the current status and future perspectives regarding targeted therapies and ICI in the management of SCCHN.

The Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Microenvironment as a Potential Target for Cancer Therapy

Similarly to other types of malignant tumours, the incidence of head and neck cancer is increasing globally. It is frequently associated with smoking and alcohol abuse, and in a broader sense also with prolonged exposure to these factors during ageing. A higher incidence of tumours observed in younger populations without a history of alcohol and tobacco abuse may be due to HPV infection. Malignant tumours form an intricate ecosystem of cancer cells, fibroblasts, blood/lymphatic capillaries and infiltrating immune cells. This dynamic system, the tumour microenvironment, has a significant impact on the biological properties of cancer cells. The microenvironment participates in the control of local aggressiveness of cancer cells, their growth, and their consequent migration to lymph nodes and distant organs during metastatic spread. In cancers originating from squamous epithelium, a similarity was demonstrated between the cancer microenvironment and healing wounds. In this review, we focus on the specificity of the microenvironment of head and neck cancer with emphasis on the mechanism of intercellular crosstalk manipulation for potential therapeutic application.

Beyond EGFR Targeting in SCCHN: Angiogenesis, PI3K, and Other Molecular Targets

Although the molecular landscape of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) has been largely deciphered, only one targeted therapy has been approved to date without any molecular selection, namely cetuximab. Cetuximab is a monoclonal antibody targeting EGFR. It has been shown to improve overall survival in the locally advanced setting in combination with radiotherapy and the recurrent and/or metastatic setting in combination with a platinum compound and 5FU. Beside EGFR targeting agents, antiangiogenic agents have been shown to produce antitumor activity but were associated with substantial toxicity. Buparlisib that targets PI3K was also shown to improve survival in combination with paclitaxel in an unselected patient population. Several other targeted therapies have been developed in SCCHN, most of time in all comers, potentially explaining the limited efficacy reported with them. The recent emergence of clinical trials of targeted therapies in enriched patient populations and precision medicine trials such as umbrella trials might boost the clinical development of targeted therapy in SCCHN.

An update: emerging drugs to treat squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck

Introduction: Subsequent to the 2006 FDA approval of cetuximab, a variety of molecular targeting agents have been evaluated in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). The treatment outcomes of recurrent and/or metastatic (R/M) HNSCC, in particular, remain dismal. The 2016 FDA approval of PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitors has expanded the treatment options for R/M HNSCC and highlights the potential for immune-based therapies. Areas covered: We will review the clinical application of EGFR-targeted agents, alone and in combination with other drugs. Molecular targeting agents directed against the IL6/PI3K/STAT3 signaling pathway will be covered. In addition, evaluation of immune checkpoint inhibitors in HNSCC, along with ongoing combination trials incorporating these agents, will be discussed. The expanded indications of emerging drugs and the potential clinical benefit of new drugs and treatment combinations will be summarized. Expert opinion: In recent years, there has been a major shift toward immunotherapy-based approaches for the treatment of HNSCC, leading to significant improvements in outcomes for a subset of patients. Leveraging the increased understanding of the genetic alterations that characterize individual HNSCC tumors will facilitate precision medicine approaches using targeted agents, immunotherapies, as well as standard chemotherapy and radiation.

Clinical immunotherapeutic approaches for the treatment of head and neck cancer

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is the sixth most common malignancy worldwide, accounting for more than 550,000 cases and 380,000 deaths annually. The primary risk factors associated with HNSCC are tobacco use and alcohol consumption; nevertheless genetic predisposition and oncogenic viruses also play important roles in the development of these malignancies. The current treatments for HNSCC patients include surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and cetuximab, and combinations of these. However, these treatments are associated with significant toxicity, and many patients are either refractory to the treatment or relapse after a short period. Despite improvements in the treatment of patients with HNSCC, the clinical outcomes of those who have been treated with standard therapies have remained unchanged for over three decades and the 5-year overall survival rate in these patients remains around 40-50%. Therefore, more specific and less toxic therapies are needed in order to improve patient outcomes. The tumour microenvironment of HNSCC is immunosuppressive; therefore immunotherapy strategies that can overcome the immunosuppressive environment and produce long-term tumour immunosurveillance will have a significant therapeutic impact in these patients. This review focuses on the current immunological treatment options under investigation or available for clinical use in patients with HNSCC.

Phase 1b Study of Trebananib Plus Paclitaxel and Trastuzumab in Patients With HER2-Positive Locally Recurrent or Metastatic Breast Cancer

INTRODUCTION

Trebananib, a peptide-Fc fusion protein, blocks angiogenesis by inhibiting binding of angiopoietin-1/2 to the receptor tyrosine kinase Tie2. Trebananib plus trastuzumab and paclitaxel was evaluated in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer in an open-label phase 1b clinical study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Women with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer received weekly paclitaxel (80 mg/m²), trastuzumab (8 mg/m² then 6 mg/kg every 3 weeks), and intravenous trebananib (10 mg/kg or 30 mg/kg weekly) beginning week 2. The primary end point was the incidence of dose-limiting toxicities. Secondary end points included incidence of adverse events (AEs), pharmacokinetics, and tumor response (objective response and duration of response).

RESULTS

Forty women were enrolled; 2 experienced dose-limiting toxicities (grade 3 ocular transient ischemic attack [10 mg/kg cohort] and grade 3 elevation in γ-glutamyl transferase [30 mg/kg cohort]). The most common treatment-emergent AEs were peripheral edema (n = 28), diarrhea (n = 27), alopecia (n = 26), fatigue (n = 24), and nausea (n = 24). Maximum observed concentration and area under the concentration-time curve increased proportionally with the trebananib dose. Objective response was confirmed in 31 patients. In the 10 mg/kg cohort, 16 patients (80%) experienced partial response, and none experienced complete response. In the 30 mg/kg cohort, 12 patients (71%) experienced partial response and 3 (18%) experienced complete response. Median (95% confidence interval) duration of response in the 10 and 30 mg/kg cohorts was 12.6 (4.3-20.2) and 16.6 (8.2-not estimable) months, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This phase 1b study showed that trebananib was tolerated with manageable AEs at a dose up to 30 mg/kg weekly. Trebananib demonstrated anticancer activity, as indicated by objective response and duration of response.

Optimizing treatments for recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

The majority of patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) will recur. The treatment of patients with recurrent/metastatic (R/M HNSCC) is rapidly evolving. Areas covered: This article will comprehensively review the current systemic treatment of R/M HNSCC. Expert commentary: For the time being, the EXTREME regimen (cetuximab in combination with platinum and 5-fluorouracil) still remains standard of care in previously untreated R/M HNSCC patients who are candidates for combination chemotherapy. Single agents with well documented activity in HNSCC include methotrexate, cisplatin, 5-FU, docetaxel, and paclitaxel. The anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody nivolumab can be considered the current standard of care in patients with R/M HNSCC progressing after platinum-based therapy based on the results of CheckMate 141 showing a survival benefit over standard of care drugs, such as single agent weekly cetuximab, methotrexate, or docetaxel. Multiple randomized phase III trials comparing anti-PD(L)-antibodies either as single agent or in combination with chemotherapy or an anti-CTLA-4 with the EXTREME as fist line treatment are ongoing or planned. The outcome of these trials might change the current treatment paradigm in previously untreated R/M HNSCC. Immunotherapeutic agents under active investigation include Toll-like receptor 8 agonists and inhibitors of IDO1.

Pazopanib plus cetuximab in recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: an open-label, phase 1b and expansion study

BACKGROUND

Angiogenesis is a hallmark of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), and a mechanism of resistance to EGFR inhibition. We investigated the safety and potential activity of pazopanib, an angiogenesis inhibitor, plus cetuximab, an EGFR inhibitor, in patients with recurrent or metastatic HNSCC.

METHODS

We did an open-label, single-centre, dose-escalation phase 1b trial using a standard 3 + 3 design, followed by an expansion cohort phase. Eligible participants were patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed recurrent or metastatic HNSCC, aged at least 18 years, had measurable disease as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1. During dose escalation, pazopanib oral suspension was administered daily in 8-week cycles at doses of 200 mg/day, 400 mg/day, 600 mg/day, or 800 mg/day, with cetuximab given intravenously once per week (400 mg/m² first dose and 250 mg/m² in consecutive cycles). The primary endpoint was to determine the maximum tolerated dose or recommended phase 2 dose of pazopanib in combination with cetuximab. Analyses were done per protocol. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01716416, and it is ongoing but closed to accrual.

FINDINGS

Between June 5, 2013, and April 4, 2017, we enrolled 22 patients into the phase 1b, dose-escalation phase of the trial. A maximum tolerated dose of pazopanib in combination with cetuximab was not reached. Single dose-limiting toxic events (all grade 3) during dose escalation occurred with pazopanib 400 mg/day (neutropenia with infection), 600 mg/day (proteinuria), and 800 mg/day (fatigue). The established recommended phase 2 dose for the combination was 800 mg/day of pazopanib during cycles of 8 weeks each, plus cetuximab 400 mg/m² on day 1 of cycle 1, then cetuximab 250 mg/m² weekly. A further nine patients were enrolled into the expansion cohort and treated with the established recommended phase 2 dose. The most common (grade 3-4) adverse events for all patients were hypertension (ten [32%] of 31), lymphocyte count decrease (seven [23%]), and dysphagia (seven [23%]). There were no treatment-related deaths. 11 (35%; 95% CI 19·2-54·6) of 31 patients achieved an overall response, as assessed by the investigator; two (6%) had a complete response and nine (29%) a partial response. Tumour responses were also observed in six (55%) of 11 patients with platinum-naive and cetuximab-naive disease, three (25%) of 12 patients with cetuximab-resistant disease, and five (28%) of 18 patients with platinum-resistant disease.

INTERPRETATION

Pazopanib oral suspension at a dose of 800 mg/day was feasible to administer in combination with standard weekly cetuximab for patients with recurrent or metastatic HNSCC. Encouraging preliminary antitumour activity was observed with this combination therapy and warrants further validation in randomised trials.

FUNDING

GlaxoSmithKline and Novartis.

Bevacizumab Inhibits Angiogenic Cytokines in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: From Gene to the Protein

Background: Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is one most prevalent cancers among worldwide. Aim of this study was to evaluate possible effect of bevacizumab, a vascular endothelial growth (VEGF) factor monoclonal antibody on HNSCC cells in vitro to evaluate angiogenic profile changes. Materials and Methods: HNSCC cells were grown and after that different concentrations of bevacizumab were added in order to evaluate cytotoxic concentration using MTT assay. Then after, the cultured cells in presence of different concentration of bevacizumab were evaluated for gene expression of VEGF, matrix metalloprotease-2 (MMP-2) and MMP-9 using real time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Moreover, the VEGF expression was evaluated by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Results: The concentration at which half cells died (IC59) was calculated 1779 µg/mL and at this concentration, VEGF protein secretion was decreased by over one fold. RT-PCR results showed that MMP2, MMP9 and VEGF decreased by 1, 0.6 and 1.1 folds, respectively. Conclusion: It seems that bevacizumab could be considered as a side therapy for patients with HNSCC due to its potential for inhibition of angiogenic related factors, but further complementary studies are necessary.

Application of molecular targeted therapies in the treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

Despite the development of standard therapies, including surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy, survival rates for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) have not changed significantly over the past three decades. Complete recovery is achieved in <50% of patients. The treatment of advanced HNSCC frequently requires multimodality therapy and involves significant toxicity. The promising, novel treatment option for patients with HNSCC is molecular-targeted therapies. The best known targeted therapies include: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibodies (cetuximab, panitumumab, zalutumumab and nimotuzumab), EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (gefitinib, erlotinib, lapatinib, afatinib and dacomitinib), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitor (bevacizumab) or vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) inhibitors (sorafenib, sunitinib and vandetanib) and inhibitors of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/serine/threonine-specific protein kinase/mammalian target of rapamycin. There are also various inhibitors of other pathways and targets, which are promising and require evaluation in further studies.

Chemotherapy and immunotherapy for recurrent and metastatic head and neck cancer: a systematic review

Head and neck cancer (HNC) is a fatal malignancy with an overall long-term survival of about 50% for all stages. The diagnosis is not rarely delayed, and the majority of patients present with loco-regionally advanced disease. The rate of second primary tumors after a diagnosis of HNC is about 3-7% per year, the highest rate among solid tumors. Currently, a single-modality or a combination of surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy (CHT), is the standard treatment for stage III-IV HNC. For the recurrent/metastatic setting, in the last 40 years great efforts have been made in order to develop a more effective CHT regimen, from the use of methotrexate alone, to the combination of cisplatin (CDDP) and 5-fluorouracile (5FU) or paclitaxel. Recently, the introduction of cetuximab, an anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody, to the CDDP-5FU doublet (EXTREME regimen) has improved the overall response rate, the progression-free survival and the overall survival (OS) compared to CHT alone. Nowadays, the EXTREME regimen is the standard of care for the first-line treatment of recurrent/metastatic head and neck carcinoma (RMHNC). In the last years, new promising therapies for RMHNC such as immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), which have demonstrated favorable results in second-line clinical trials, gained special interest. Nivolumab and pembrolizumab are the first two ICIs able to prolong OS in the second-, later-line and platinum-refractory setting, with tolerable toxicities. This review summarizes the current state of the art in RMHNC treatment options.

Advanced malignancies treated with a combination of the VEGF inhibitor bevacizumab, anti-EGFR antibody cetuximab, and the mTOR inhibitor temsirolimus

BACKGROUND

Bevacizumab and temsirolimus are active agents in advanced solid tumors. Temsirolimus inhibits mTOR in the PI3 kinase/AKT/mTOR pathway as well as CYP2A, which may be a resistance mechanism for cetuximab. In addition, temsirolimus attenuates upregulation of HIF-1α levels, which may be a resistance mechanism for bevacizumab.

RESULTS

The median age of patients was 60 years (range, 23-80 years). The median number of prior systemic therapies was 3 (range, 1-6). The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was determined to be bevacizumab 10 mg/kg biweekly, temsirolimus 5 mg weekly and cetuximab 100/75 mg/m2 weekly. Grade 3 or 4 toxicities were seen in 52% of patients with the highest prevalence being hyperglycemia (14%) and hypophosphatemia (14%). Eighteen of the 21 patients were evaluable for response. Three patients were taken off the study before restaging for toxicities. Partial response (PR) was observed in 2/18 patients (11%) and stable disease (SD) lasting ≥ 6 months was observed in 4/18 patients (22%) (total = 6/18 (33%)). In 8 evaluable patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC) there were partial responses in 2/8 (25%) patients and SD ≥ 6 months in 1/8 (13%) patients (total = 3/8, (38%)).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We analyzed safety and responses in 21 patients with advanced solid tumors treated with bevacizumab, cetuximab, and temsirolimus.

CONCLUSION

The combination of bevacizumab, cetuximab, and temsirolimus showed activity in HNSCC; however, there were numerous toxicities reported, which will require careful management for future clinical development.

Prognostic analysis of patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma following intensity modulated radiation therapy

The present study retrospectively analyzed the prognostic factors of 135 patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) who received intensity modulated radiation therapy between August 2008 and January 2012 at Xiangya Hospital of Central South University. Patients were staged from III-IVA according to the 7th American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system. Using Statistical Analysis System 9.3 software, the present study demonstrated that, among these 135 patients, the 5-year overall survival, the 5-year local relapse-free survival, and the 5-year disease metastasis-free survival were 84, 82, and 78%, respectively. Multivariate Cox regression analysis identified that targeted treatment [hazard ratio (95% confidence interval), 2.642 (1.001, 6.972); P=0.0497] served as an independent negative prognostic factor in locally advanced NPC. The results of immunostaining revealed that the staining intensity of the radiation-resistant group was increased compared with that of the radiation-sensitive group. These results demonstrate that a high expression of EGFR may be associated with radiation resistance, and targeted treatment may not be effective in patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma with low expression of EGFR.

3q26-29 Amplification in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a review of established and prospective oncogenes

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is significantly underrepresented in worldwide cancer research, yet survival rates for the disease have remained static for over 50 years. Distant metastasis is often present at the time of diagnosis, and is the primary cause of death in cancer patients. In the absence of routine effective targeted therapies, the standard of care treatment remains chemoradiation in combination with (often disfiguring) surgery. A defining characteristic of HNSCC is the amplification of a region of chromosome 3 (3q26-29), which is consistently associated with poorer patient outcome. This review provides an overview of the role the 3q26-29 region plays in HNSCC, in terms of both known and as yet undiscovered processes, which may have potential clinical relevance.

Targeting the Tumor Environment in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck

OPINION STATEMENT

The survival rate for patients with advanced stages of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) remains poor despite multimodal treatment options. Cetuximab, an anti-EGFR inhibitor, is the only FDA-approved targeted agent for this disease. Recent findings have implicated modifications of the microenvironment and, consequently, phenotypical modifications of the cancer cell, in treatment resistance mechanisms. For many years, cancer research has focused mainly on targetable sites on or inside the cancer cell. Nowadays, in preclinical and clinical studies, a greater emphasis is being placed on drugs that target the tumor microenvironment. Potential targets relate to tumor vascularization, immunology, extracellular matrix components, or cancer-associated fibroblasts. The combination of these new agents with standard treatment options is of particular interest to overcome resistance mechanisms and/or to increase treatment efficacy. Whereas antiangiogenic agents show poor clinical activity, immunotherapy seems to be a more promising tool with an objective response rate (ORR) of 20 % in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma (R/M SCC). Other targets, located inside the extracellular matrix or on cancer associated fibroblasts, are under preclinical investigation. These new agents all need to be tested in clinical trials alone, or in combination with standard treatment modalities, based on preclinical data. To increase our knowledge of the complex network between the cancer cell and its environment, preclinical studies should consider co-culture models, and clinical studies should incorporate a translational research objective.

Dramatic response of CTNNB1 and VEGFR-2 mutant temporal bone squamous cell carcinoma to bevacizumab in combination with pemetrexed

High recurrence rates and poor survival rates for late stage/advanced temporal bone squamous cell carcinoma with the standard treatments continues to be a significant challenge to otolaryngologists. Targeted therapy for temporal bone squamous cell carcinoma after relapse has not been reported. Here we present a 58-year-old man who was diagnosed with recurrent temporal bone squamous cell carcinoma and treated with a regimen developed using whole exome sequencing. Somatic mutations in genes encoding catenin beta 1 and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 were identified in the patient’s tumor sample compared to the normal tissue. The patient was then treated with Bevacizumab in combination with pemetrexed. After two weeks of treatment, tumor volume was reduced by 95% measured by MRI, and the Visual Analogue Scale headache scores went down from 10/10 to 2/10. Our results reveal novel gene mutations of temporal bone squamous cell carcinoma and demonstrate, for the first time, an effective targeted therapy for temporal bone squamous cell carcinoma. The successful treatment regimen of bevacizumab and pemetrexed may provide a new treatment option for treating recurrent temporal bone squamous cell carcinoma that fails to respond to conventional tumor resection, radiotherapy, and/or chemotherapy.