Final overall survival results from a randomised, phase III study of erlotinib versus chemotherapy as first-line treatment of EGFR mutation-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (OPTIMAL, CTONG-0802)

Prevalence and clinical factors associated with survival in patients with EGFR-mutated lung cancer in Argentina

Introduction

Lung cancer remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Detecting mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is crucial for treatment selection due to the response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in these patients.

Objective

Describe the prevalence and identify factors associated with survival in stage IV lung cancer patients harboring EGFR mutations in a real-world setting.

Materials and methods

A retrospective cohort study was conducted to identify factors associated with progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and response rate in stage IV lung cancer patients with EGFR mutations.

Results

Data from 771 patients diagnosed with lung cancer between 2017 and 2021 at the Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires were analysed. The prevalence of EGFR mutations was 18% (139), with a median follow-up of 30 months. Of these, 118 were treated with EGFR TKIs, with a higher objective response rate observed with osimertinib compared to first or second-generation TKIs. Adverse prognostic factors included an ECOG performance status greater than 1, uncommon mutations, high disease burden and the presence of brain or hepatic metastases. Osimertinib was associated with a reduced risk of progression or death, even after adjusting for these prognostic factors. The median PFS was 13 months, with a significant OS difference between patients treated with osimertinib versus first or second-generation inhibitors.

Conclusion

This study underscores the importance of EGFR mutation detection in stage IV lung cancer patients and supports the need for personalised therapeutic approaches to improve outcomes in this patient population.

Characteristics of Long-Term Survivors With EGFR-Mutant Metastatic NSCLC

Introduction

Characteristics of long-term survivors in EGFR-mutant (EGFRm) NSCLC are not fully understood. This retrospective analysis evaluated a multi-institution cohort of patients with EGFRm NSCLC treated in the pre-osimertinib era and sought to describe characteristics of long-term survivors.

Methods

Clinical characteristics and outcomes were abstracted from the electronic medical records of patients with EGFRm metastatic NSCLC who started first-line therapy before 2015. Demographics and comutations were compared between greater than or equal to 5-year survivors and less than 5-year survivors. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard and logistic regression models were used to evaluate factors associated with survival and the odds of death within 5 years, respectively.

Results

Overall, 133 patients were greater than or equal to 5-year survivors; 127 were less than 5-year survivors. Burden of pathogenic comutations including TP53 and PIK3CA was similar between greater than or equal to 5-year survivors and less than 5-year survivors. Receipt of first-line chemotherapy rather than EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor was similar between the groups (22% of <5-y versus 31% of ≥5-y). Baseline brain metastasis and history of smoking were associated with higher odds of death within 5 years (odds ratio = 2.16, p = 0.029 and odds ratio = 1.90, p = 0.046, respectively). Among patients without baseline brain metastases, cumulative incidence of brain metastases at 5 years was 42.3%. Both baseline and post-baseline brain metastasis were associated with worse overall survival compared with no brain metastasis (hazard ratio = 3.26, p < 0.001 and hazard ratio = 4.99, p < 0.001, respectively).

Conclusions

Within patients treated for EGFRm metastatic NSCLC before 2015, absence of brain metastasis and nonsmoking status were predictive of 5-year survival. Our findings help to define a subset of patients with EGFRm NSCLC with excellent survival outcomes who may not require intensification of initial therapy.

Efficacy and safety of EGFR-TKIs for non-small cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials

BACKGROUND

We conducted this meta-analysis based on updated literature and research to compare the efficacy and safety of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) as treatments for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

A literature search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, Medline and Web of Science databases to perform a systematic literature search based on random control trials. In these articles, EGFR-TKIs were compared with placebos, chemotherapy, or whole-brain irradiation as treatments for NSCLC. In this research, a meta-analysis of the literature was performed to produce a combined risk ratio (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) for progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events. The data were synthesized with Review Manager 5.3 software, which was used to manage the process.

RESULTS

There were 15 random control trials included in the study, involving 4249 patients in total. There was evidence that EGFR-TKIs can significantly prolong OS (RR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.75-1) and PFS (RR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.66-0.86) in NSCLC patients. There was an increase in the incidence of adverse events after treatment with EGFR-TKI, including diarrhea (RR: 0.18, 95% CI: 0.10-0.26), infection (RR: 0.09, 95% CI: 0.02-0.16), and rash (RR: 0.37, 95% CI: 0.22-0.51).

CONCLUSIONS

It has been shown that EGFR-TKIs prolong OS and PFS in patients with NSCLC. NSCLC patients may benefit from EGFR-TKIs as an important treatment option in order to prolong their survival.

Predicting Lung Cancer Survival to the Future: Population-Based Cancer Survival Modeling Study

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortality globally, with late diagnoses often resulting in poor prognosis. In response, the Lung Ambition Alliance aims to double the 5-year survival rate by 2025.

OBJECTIVE

Using the Taiwan Cancer Registry, this study uses the survivorship-period-cohort model to assess the feasibility of achieving this goal by predicting future survival rates of patients with lung cancer in Taiwan.

METHODS

This retrospective study analyzed data from 205,104 patients with lung cancer registered between 1997 and 2018. Survival rates were calculated using the survivorship-period-cohort model, focusing on 1-year interval survival rates and extrapolating to predict 5-year outcomes for diagnoses up to 2020, as viewed from 2025. Model validation involved comparing predicted rates with actual data using symmetric mean absolute percentage error.

RESULTS

The study identified notable improvements in survival rates beginning in 2004, with the predicted 5-year survival rate for 2020 reaching 38.7%, marking a considerable increase from the most recent available data of 23.8% for patients diagnosed in 2013. Subgroup analysis revealed varied survival improvements across different demographics and histological types. Predictions based on current trends indicate that achieving the Lung Ambition Alliance's goal could be within reach.

CONCLUSIONS

The analysis demonstrates notable improvements in lung cancer survival rates in Taiwan, driven by the adoption of low-dose computed tomography screening, alongside advances in diagnostic technologies and treatment strategies. While the ambitious target set by the Lung Ambition Alliance appears achievable, ongoing advancements in medical technology and health policies will be crucial. The study underscores the potential impact of continued enhancements in lung cancer management and the importance of strategic health interventions to further improve survival outcomes.

Prolonged Response to Afatinib and Crizotinib in a Rare Case of EGFR-, HER2-, MET- and ROS1-Alterated Lung Adenocarcinoma

We present the case of a 70-year-old never-smoking female patient with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) p.L858R-mutated metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). After three months of first-line treatment with erlotinib, progression occurred and platinum/pemetrexed was initiated, followed by a response for more than two years. After the progression, the molecular testing of a vertebral metastasis revealed a ROS proto-oncogene 1 (ROS1) translocation and a human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) p.S310F mutation, in addition to the known EGFR p.L858R mutation. Crizotinib then led to a durable response of 17 months. The molecular retesting of the tumour cells obtained from the recurrent pleural effusion revealed the absence of the ROS1 translocation, whereas the EGFR and HER2 mutations were still present. Afatinib was added to the crizotinib, and the combination treatment resulted in another durable response of more than two years. The patient died more than 7 years after the initial diagnosis of metastatic NSCLC. This case demonstrates that the repeated molecular testing of metastatic NSCLC may identify new druggable genomic alterations that can impact the patient management and improve the patient outcome.

The predictive value of serum tumor markers for EGFR mutation in non-small cell lung cancer patients with non-stage IA

Objective

The predictive value of serum tumor markers (STMs) in assessing epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations among patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), particularly those with non-stage IA, remains poorly understood. The objective of this study is to construct a predictive model comprising STMs and additional clinical characteristics, aiming to achieve precise prediction of EGFR mutations through noninvasive means.

Materials and methods

We retrospectively collected 6711 NSCLC patients who underwent EGFR gene testing. Ultimately, 3221 stage IA patients and 1442 non-stage IA patients were analyzed to evaluate the potential predictive value of several clinical characteristics and STMs for EGFR mutations.

Results

EGFR mutations were detected in 3866 patients (57.9 %) of all NSCLC patients. None of the STMs emerged as significant predictor for predicting EGFR mutations in stage IA patients. Patients with non-stage IA were divided into the study group (n = 1043) and validation group (n = 399). In the study group, univariate analysis revealed significant associations between EGFR mutations and the STMs (carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC), and cytokeratin-19 fragment (CYFRA21-1)). The nomogram incorporating CEA, CYFRA 21-1, pathology, gender, and smoking history for predicting EGFR mutations with non-stage IA was constructed using the results of multivariate analysis. The area under the curve (AUC = 0.780) and decision curve analysis demonstrated favorable predictive performance and clinical utility of nomogram. Additionally, the Random Forest model also demonstrated the highest average C-index of 0.793 among the eight machine learning algorithms, showcasing superior predictive efficiency.

Conclusion

CYFRA21-1 and CEA have been identified as crucial factors for predicting EGFR mutations in non-stage IA NSCLC patients. The nomogram and 8 machine learning models that combined STMs with other clinical factors could effectively predict the probability of EGFR mutations.

Hippo pathway in non-small cell lung cancer: mechanisms, potential targets, and biomarkers

Lung cancer is the primary contributor to cancer-related deaths globally, and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) constitutes around 85% of all lung cancer cases. Recently, the emergence of targeted therapy and immunotherapy revolutionized the treatment of NSCLC and greatly improved patients' survival. However, drug resistance is inevitable, and extensive research has demonstrated that the Hippo pathway plays a crucial role in the development of drug resistance in NSCLC. The Hippo pathway is a highly conserved signaling pathway that is essential for various biological processes, including organ development, maintenance of epithelial balance, tissue regeneration, wound healing, and immune regulation. This pathway exerts its effects through two key transcription factors, namely Yes-associated protein (YAP) and transcriptional co-activator PDZ-binding motif (TAZ). They regulate gene expression by interacting with the transcriptional-enhanced associate domain (TEAD) family. In recent years, this pathway has been extensively studied in NSCLC. The review summarizes a comprehensive overview of the involvement of this pathway in NSCLC, and discusses the mechanisms of drug resistance, potential targets, and biomarkers associated with this pathway in NSCLC.

New Treatment Options for Patients With Oncogene-Addicted Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Focusing on EGFR-Mutant Tumors

Druggable oncogene-driven non-small cell lung cancer has led to innovative systemic treatment options, improving patients' outcome. This benefit is not only achieved in the metastatic setting but also in the postsurgical setting, such as in lung cancers harboring a common sensitizing EGFR mutation or ALK-rearrangement. To enhance the outcome of these patients, we need to understand the mechanisms of acquired resistance and evaluate the role of new drugs with novel mechanisms of action in the treatment landscape. In this chapter, we review treatment strategies of EGFR-mutant tumors in all stages, the mechanisms of acquired strategies, and novel therapies in this subset.

Brief Report: Risk of Recurrent Interstitial Lung Disease From Osimertinib Versus Erlotinib Rechallenge After Symptomatic Osimertinib-Induced Interstitial Lung Disease

Introduction

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is the most frequent cause of drug-related mortality from EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Yet, for patients with symptomatic osimertinib-induced ILD, the risk of recurrent ILD associated with EGFR TKI rechallenge, either with osimertinib or another TKI, such as erlotinib, is unclear.

Methods

Retrospective study of 913 patients who received osimertinib treatment for EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC. Clinical characteristics, ILD treatment history, and subsequent anticancer therapy of patients with symptomatic osimertinib-induced ILD were collated. The primary end point was to compare the incidence of recurrent ILD with osimertinib versus erlotinib rechallenge.

Results

Of 913 patients, 35 (3.8%) had symptomatic osimertinib-induced ILD, of which 12 (34%), 15 (43%), and eight (23%) had grade 2, 3 to 4, and 5 ILD, respectively. On ILD recovery, 17 patients had EGFR TKI rechallenge with eight received osimertinib and nine received erlotinib. The risk of recurrent ILD was higher with osimertinib rechallenge than erlotinib (p = 0.0498). Of eight, five (63%) developed recurrent ILD on osimertinib rechallenge, including three patients with fatal outcomes. In contrast, only one of nine patients (11%) treated with erlotinib had recurrent ILD. Median time to second ILD occurrence was 4.7 (range 0.7-12) weeks. Median time-to-treatment failure of patients with erlotinib rechallenge was 13.2 months (95% confidence interval: 8.6-15.0).

Conclusions

The risk of recurrent ILD was considerably higher with osimertinib rechallenge than erlotinib. Osimertinib rechallenge should be avoided, whereas erlotinib may be considered in patients with symptomatic osimertinib-induced ILD.

QALY-type preference and willingness-to-pay among end-of-life patients with cancer treatments: a pilot study using discrete choice experiment

PURPOSE

Quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) is a dominant measurement of health gain in economic evaluations for pricing drugs. However, end-of-life (EoL) patients' preference for QALY gains in life expectancy (LE) and quality of life (QoL) during different disease stages remains unknown and is seldom involved in decision-making. This study aims to measure preferences and willingness-to-pay (WTP) towards different types of QALY gain among EoL cancer patients.

METHODS

We attributed QALY gain to four types, gain in LE and QoL, respectively, and during both progression-free survival (PFS) and post-progression survival (PPS). A discrete choice experiment including five attributes (the four QALY attributes and one cost attribute) with three levels each was developed and conducted with 85 Chinese advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients in 2022. All levels were set with QALY gain/cost synthesised from research on anti-lung cancer drugs recently listed by Chinese National Healthcare Security Administration. Each respondent answered six choice tasks in a face-to-face interview. The data were analysed using mixed logit models.

RESULTS

Patients valued LE-related QALY gain in PFS most, with a relative importance of 81.8% and a WTP of $43,160 [95% CI 26,751 ~ 59,569] per QALY gain. Respondents consistently preferred LE-related to QoL-related QALY gain regardless of disease stage. Patients with higher income or lower education levels tended to pay more for QoL-related QALY gain.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest a prioritised resource allocation to EoL-prolonging health technologies. Given the small sample size and large individual heterogeneity, a full-scale study is needed to provide more robust results.

ELK1/MTOR/S6K1 Pathway Contributes to Acquired Resistance to Gefitinib in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

The development of acquired resistance to small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) targeting epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling has hindered their efficacy in treating non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Our previous study showed that constitutive activation of the 70 kDa ribosomal protein S6 kinase 1 (S6K1) contributes to the acquired resistance to EGFR-TKIs in NSCLC cell lines and xenograft tumors in nude mice. However, the regulatory mechanisms underlying S6K1 constitutive activation in TKI-resistant cancer cells have not yet been explored. In this study, we recapitulated this finding by taking advantage of a gefitinib-resistant patient-derived xenograft (PDX) model established through a number of passages in mice treated with increasing doses of gefitinib. The dissociated primary cells from the resistant PDX tumors (PDX-R) displayed higher levels of phosphor-S6K1 expression and were resistant to gefitinib compared to cells from passage-matched parental PDX tumors (PDX-P). Both genetic and pharmacological inhibition of S6K1 increased sensitivity to gefitinib in PDX-R cells. In addition, both total and phosphorylated mechanistic target of rapamycin kinase (MTOR) levels were upregulated in PDX-R and gefitinib-resistant PC9G cells. Knockdown of MTOR by siRNA decreased the expression levels of total and phosphor-S6K1 and increased sensitivity to gefitinib in PDX-R and PC9G cells. Moreover, a transcription factor ELK1, which has multiple predicted binding sites on the MTOR promoter, was also upregulated in PDX-R and PC9G cells, while the knockdown of ELK1 led to decreased expression of MTOR and S6K1. The chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP)-PCR assay showed the direct binding between ELK1 and the MTOR promoter, and the luciferase reporter assay further indicated that ELK1 could upregulate MTOR expression through tuning up its transcription. Silencing ELK1 via siRNA transfection improved the efficacy of gefitinib in PDX-R and PC9G cells. These results support the notion that activation of ELK1/MTOR/S6K1 signaling contributes to acquired resistance to gefitinib in NSCLC. The findings in this study shed new light on the mechanism for acquired EGFR-TKI resistance and provide potential novel strategies by targeting the ELK1/MTOR/S6K1 pathway.

The prognosis of TP53 and EGFR co-mutation in patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma and intracranial metastasis treated with EGFR-TKIs

Background

TP53 mutation is a poor factor for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), while the effect of TP53 on prognosis in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) with brain metastasis remains elusive and needs further exploration.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 236 patients and tested for TP53- and EGFR-mutant status in metastasis LUAD patients who had received first-line EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment. Survival rates were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Furthermore, univariate and multivariate Cox analyses were performed to identify the independent prognostic factors.

Results

There were 114 patients with confirmed non-brain metastasis (NBM), 74 patients with preliminary diagnosis early brain metastasis (EBM), and 48 patients with late brain metastasis (LBM). TP53 and EGFR co-mutations were found in 35/236 patients (14.8%). The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in the EGFR mutation and TP53 wild-type group were significantly longer than those in the EGFR and TP53 co-mutation group in all advanced LUAD or NBM. Concurrently, PFS and OS were found to be not significant in EBM and LBM patients. Subgroup analysis revealed longer median PFS and OS in the TP53 wild-type group compared to the TP53 mutant group in L858R patients and not significant in EGFR Exon 19 deletion patients. In LBM patients, the time to brain metastasis in the EGFR mutation and TP53 wild-type group was longer than that in the EGFR and TP53 co-mutation group, and TP53 mutant status was an independent prognostic factor for brain metastasis. The TP53 wild-type group exhibited a higher objective remission rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) than the TP53 mutant group in NBM, EBM, and LBM patients, irrespective of primary lung and brain metastatic lesions.

Conclusion

TP53/EGFR co-mutation patients receiving first-line EGFR-TKI treatment had poor prognoses in advanced LUAD, especially with L858R mutation. Moreover, TP53/EGFR co-mutation patients treated with EGFR-TKIs may more easy developed intracranial metastasis.

Effectiveness and safety of the bevacizumab and erlotinib combination versus erlotinib alone in EGFR mutant metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The EGFR gene encodes a protein that stimulates molecular pathways that allow the growth and development of the tumor microenvironment. The current preferred tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) for the first-line treatment of EGFRm metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is osimertinib. However, the combination of angiogenesis inhibitors and TKI has produced discordant results. We aimed to assess the effects of the bevacizumab and erlotinib combination in EGFRm metastatic NSCLC.

Methods

Using eligibility criteria focused on patients with EGFRm metastatic NSCLC treated with bevacizumab and erlotinib, we searched databases including clinical trial randomized studies and reviews published until April 15, 2023 in Medline (PubMed), Scopus, and Embase. Eight clinical trials (1,052 patients) were selected from 1,343 articles for quantitative and qualitative assessment. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Data were synthesized through random-effects meta-analysis.

Results

The bevacizumab and erlotinib combination significantly improved the progression-free survival (PFS) (log(HR) = 0.63; 95% CI: 0.54-0.73, p < 0.001) and overall response ratio (ORR) (RR = 0.79; 95% CI, 0.64-0.97, p = 0.03). However, it did not improve the overall survival (log(HR) = 0.93; 95% CI, 0.78-1.10, p = 0.38) and was associated with higher serious adverse events (SAEs) (OR = 3.48; 95% CI, 1.76-6.88, p = 0.005). A subgroup analysis suggested similar benefits in different mutation subtypes and brain metastasis condition. The evidence is limited by a moderate risk of bias across studies and heterogeneity in the reporting of SAEs.

Conclusions

The bevacizumab and erlotinib combination significantly improved PFS and ORR in EGFRm metastatic NSCLC but were also associated with higher-grade (≥3) adverse events. These results suggest that while the combination therapy may enhance progression-free survival and overall response, it does not improve the overall survival and is associated with higher toxicity. Thus, the treatment should be personalized based on individual patient comorbidities. Further prospective trials are needed to validate these results.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/#searchadvanced, identifier CDR 42022364692.

Compromised Outcomes in Stage IV Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer With Actionable Mutations Initially Treated Without Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: A Retrospective Analysis of Real-World Data

PURPOSE

Identification and targeting of actionable oncogenic drivers (AODs) in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has dramatically improved outcomes. However, genomic testing uptake is variable and hampered by factors including slow turnaround time, frequently resulting in initial non-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment. We investigate how this behavior affects outcomes.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis of real-world, deidentified data from the Integra Connect Database included adults with stage IV NSCLC newly diagnosed from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2020, with mutations of EGFR, ALK, ROS1, BRAF, MET, RET, ERBB2, or NTRK. Outcomes were reported as time to next treatment or death (TTNT) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Five hundred ten patients harboring AODs were identified and grouped as follows: group A (n = 379) were treated after the AOD was reported and served as the comparator. One hundred thirty-one patients treated before their AOD report were divided into group B (n = 47) who were initially started on chemotherapy and/or checkpoint inhibitor but switched to appropriate TKI within 35 days and group C (n = 84) who were also started empirically on non-TKI and did not switch within 35 days. Survival (OS) was significantly superior in group A compared with group C; TTNT was significantly superior in group A compared with groups B and C.

CONCLUSION

For patients harboring AODs in advanced NSCLC, initial treatment before receipt of genomic test results yields significantly inferior outcomes and should be avoided. Molecular profiling panels with rapid turnaround times are essential to optimize patient outcomes and should be standard of care.

Targeted Inhibitors of EGFR: Structure, Biology, Biomarkers, and Clinical Applications

Members of the EGFR family of tyrosine kinase receptors are major regulators of cellular proliferation, differentiation, and survival. In humans, abnormal activation of EGFR is associated with the development and progression of many cancer types, which makes it an attractive target for molecular-guided therapy. Two classes of EGFR-targeted cancer therapeutics include monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), which bind to the extracellular domain of EGFR, and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), which mostly target the intracellular part of EGFR and inhibit its activity in molecular signaling. While EGFR-specific mAbs and three generations of TKIs have demonstrated clinical efficacy in various settings, molecular evolution of tumors leads to apparent and sometimes inevitable resistance to current therapeutics, which highlights the need for deeper research in this field. Here, we tried to provide a comprehensive and systematic overview of the rationale, molecular mechanisms, and clinical significance of the current EGFR-targeting drugs, highlighting potential candidate molecules in development. We summarized the underlying mechanisms of resistance and available personalized predictive approaches that may lead to improved efficacy of EGFR-targeted therapies. We also discuss recent developments and the use of specific therapeutic strategies, such as multi-targeting agents and combination therapies, for overcoming cancer resistance to EGFR-specific drugs.

Treatment of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Atypical EGFR Mutations

OPINION STATEMENT

EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) should always be considered when treating advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with atypical EGFR mutations. The first choice of TKI depends on the specific mutation(s) present and its effect on structure and function of the EGFR protein. Afatinib is the only EGFR TKI currently FDA approved for atypical EGFR mutations and has the strongest data to support its use in PACC mutations, a subgroup of atypical EGFR mutations which includes G719X and S7681. Dacomitinib may also be an option for these mutations given similar efficacy to afatinib. In contrast, for classical-like mutations such as L861Q, osimertinib should be considered the first choice given that their behavior mimics that of the classical mutations exon 19 deletion and L858R. Osimertinib should also be utilized in the setting of a concurrent T790M mutation. Superior CNS penetrance and well managed toxicity profile may also be reasons to consider osimertinib. Given that the choice of TKI may depend on the specific mutation, it is crucial that every patient diagnosed with NSCLC undergo comprehensive sequencing to identify these mutations.

Non-small cell lung cancer with bone metastasis and pneumocystis pneumonia in a pregnant woman: a case report and literature review

BACKGROUND

Cancer case during pregnancy is rare, but it is the second leading cause of maternal mortality.

CASE PRESENTATION

A-32-year old pregnant woman with a gestational age of 37 weeks was admitted to the hospital due to repeated coughing for 5 months. She received Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (V-V ECMO) treatment for severe hypoxemia after delivery. She was diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with bone metastasis and pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP). She subsequently received anti-tumor therapy and anti-infective therapy. After treatment, her condition improved and she was weaned from ECMO. Two weeks after weaning ECMO, her condition worsened again. Her family chose palliative treatment, and she ultimately died.

CONCLUSIONS

NSCLC is rare during pregnancy. At present, there is still a lack of standardized methods to manage these cases. For theses cases, the clinician should be wary of opportunistic infections, such as pneumocystis jirovecii (P. jirovecii) and Elizabethkingia spp. Specialized medical teams with abundant experience and multidisciplinary discussions from the perspectives of the patient's clinical characteristics as well as preferences are crucial for developing individualized and the best approach.

Resistance of Lung Cancer to EGFR-Specific Kinase Inhibitors: Activation of Bypass Pathways and Endogenous Mutators

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-specific tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have changed the landscape of lung cancer therapy. For patients who are treated with the new TKIs, the current median survival exceeds 3 years, substantially better than the average 20 month survival rate only a decade ago. Unfortunately, despite initial efficacy, nearly all treated patients evolve drug resistance due to the emergence of either new mutations or rewired signaling pathways that engage other receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), such as MET, HER3 and AXL. Apparently, the emergence of mutations is preceded by a phase of epigenetic alterations that finely regulate the cell cycle, bias a mesenchymal phenotype and activate antioxidants. Concomitantly, cells that evade TKI-induced apoptosis (i.e., drug-tolerant persister cells) activate an intrinsic mutagenic program reminiscent of the SOS system deployed when bacteria are exposed to antibiotics. This mammalian system imbalances the purine-to-pyrimidine ratio, inhibits DNA repair and boosts expression of mutation-prone DNA polymerases. Thus, the net outcome of the SOS response is a greater probability to evolve new mutations. Deeper understanding of the persister-to-resister transformation, along with the development of next-generation TKIs, EGFR-specific proteolysis targeting chimeras (PROTACs), as well as bispecific antibodies, will permit delaying the onset of relapses and prolonging survival of patients with EGFR+ lung cancer.

Sequential treatment in advanced epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated lung adenocarcinoma patients receiving first-line bevacizumab combined with 1st/2nd-generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors

Introduction

The clinical outcomes of sequential treatment of advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with first-line bevacizumab combined with 1st/2nd-generation EGFR-TKIs are unclear. Thus, we aimed to analyze the outcomes of these patients.

Methods

Between January 2015 and December 2020, data for 102 advanced EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma patients receiving first-line bevacizumab combined with erlotinib or afatinib followed by treatments at multiple institutions were retrospectively analyzed. All patients with progressive disease (PD) after first-line therapy underwent secondary T790M mutation detection.

Results

The secondary T790M mutation positive rate of all study patients was 57.9%. First-line erlotinib use and progression-free survival (PFS) after first-line therapy > 12 months were positively associated with the T790M mutation (P <0.05). The response rates (RRs) to second-line treatments were 51.7% and 22.7% for the osimertinib and nonosimertinib groups, respectively (P = 0.001). The median PFS associated with second-line osimertinib and nonosimertinib therapy was 13.7 and 7.1 months, respectively (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.38; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.23-0.63; P< 0.001). Patients with a secondary T790M mutation receiving second-line osimertinib treatment had a median overall survival (OS) of 54.3 months, and the median OS was 31.9 months for non-T790M-mutated patients receiving second-line nonosimertinib treatments (HR = 0.36; CI: 0.21-0.62, P < 0.001).

Conclusion

The majority of acquired resistance to first-line bevacizumab combined with 1st/2nd-generation EGFR-TKIs is associated with the T790M mutation. Sequential osimertinib treatment in patients with positive secondary T790M mutation is associated with better outcomes among these patients.

Predictors of response in EGFR-mutant metastatic non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors

BACKGROUND

The goal of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant metastatic non-small cell cancer and to determine the factors that predict objective response.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In the study, data from metastatic non-small cell lung cancer patients with EGFR mutations treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors were retrospectively reviewed. Factors predicting objective response were evaluated with logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

The study evaluated the data of 105 patients. The most common EGFR mutations detected in patients were exon 19 (56.2%) and exon 21 (23.8%). The median progression-free survival (PFS) associated with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors was 20.1 (95% confidence interval [CI], 13.4-26.7) months. The median overall survival (OS) in the post-metastasis period was found to be 30.8 (95% CI, 20.2-41.4) months. Five- and seven-year OS was determined as 28.7% and 22.9%, respectively. Factors predicting the objective response were analyzed. Presence of drug-related toxicity (P = 0.02), histopathologic type (P = 0.01), metastasis burden (P = 0.03), and EGFR mutation type (P = 0.04) were found to be statistically significant in multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, we found that EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors are effective and safe. Better response to EGFR inhibitors was observed in the presence of drug-induced toxicity, adenocarcinoma histology, low metastasis burden, and exon 19 mutation.

Concordance of Abundance for Mutational EGFR and Co-Mutational TP53 with Efficacy of EGFR-TKI Treatment in Metastatic Patients with Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

The present study aimed to investigate the influence of the mutation abundance of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and its co-mutation with TP53 on the therapeutic efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment in patients with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). In total, 130 patients (January 2018-September 2022) with metastatic LUAD from the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University were included. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to measure the duration of drug application (DDA) and the log-rank test was used to compare differences. Univariate and multivariate analyses of Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to evaluate the association between the relevant clinicopathological factors and DDA. Hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals were also calculated. Among the 130 patients who were treated with first-generation EGFR-TKIs, 86 showed high-EGFR mutation abundance (>22.0%) and 44 showed low-EGFR mutation abundance (≤22.0%). Patients in the high-EGFR group had a greater DDA than those in the low-EGFR group (p < 0.05). The results of the subgroup analysis were consistent with those of the total mutation population (exon19: >18.5% vs. ≤18.5%, 14 months vs. 10 months, p = 0.049; exon21: >22.0% vs. ≤22.0%, 15 months vs. 9 months, p = 0.005). In addition, the mutation abundance of TP53 was negatively correlated with the DDA (p < 0.05). Patients in the combination group had a better DDA than those in the monotherapy group (p < 0.05). Subgroup analysis showed that, among the low mutation abundance of the EGFR exon 21 or 19 cohort, the combination group had a better DDA than the monotherapy group (p < 0.05). An EGFR mutation abundance greater than 22.0% was a positive predictor of DDA in patients with metastatic LUAD. However, a TP53 mutation abundance higher than 32.5% could reverse this situation. Finally, first-line treatment with EGFR-TKIs plus chemotherapy is a potential treatment strategy for patients with low-abundance EGFR mutations.

Successful neoadjuvant treatment of EGFR exon 19 deletion combined with TP53 mutation in non-small cell lung cancer using aumolertinib after osimertinib-induced myocardial damage: a case report and literature review

The development of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) represents a paradigm shift in the treatment of lung cancer with EGFR mutations. Aumolertinib has been shown to be a safe agent in the registry study. However, successful rechallenge with aumolertinib following osimertinib-induced myocardial damage has not been reported. In this article, a case of neoadjuvant therapy for lung adenocarcinoma is retrospectively analyzed, and the relevant literature is reviewed. The patient was diagnosed with stage IIIA lung adenocarcinoma, and genetic testing revealed EGFR exon 19 deletion mutation combined with Tumor Protein p53 (TP53) mutation. The mutation abundance is 33.5 and 14%, respectively. One month after osimertinib treatment, the patient developed myocardial damage, and abnormal indicators such as myocardial enzyme spectrum showed abnormalities and cardiac insufficiency, followed by pulmonary hypertension and pulmonary edema. Aumolertinib was subsequently used for treatment, following which the myocardial enzyme spectrum returned to normal, and the symptoms of bilateral interstitial edema disappeared. In addition to the disappearance of adverse reactions, the therapeutic effect was excellent; the lung lesions and mediastinal lymph nodes were significantly reduced, and the operation was successfully conducted. This is the first report of successful neoadjuvant treatment of EGFR exon 19 deletion combined with TP53 mutation in NSCLC using aumolertinib after osimertinib-induced myocardial damage. The results suggested that aumolertinib had fewer adverse reactions in patients with EGFR exon 19 deletion combined with TP53 mutation, and aumolertinib may be a potential neoadjuvant therapy for stage IIIA lung cancer.

Multi-state network meta-analysis of progression and survival data

Multiple randomized controlled trials, each comparing a subset of competing interventions, can be synthesized by means of a network meta-analysis to estimate relative treatment effects between all interventions in the evidence base. Here we focus on estimating relative treatment effects for time-to-event outcomes. Cancer treatment effectiveness is frequently quantified by analyzing overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). We introduce a method for the joint network meta-analysis of PFS and OS that is based on a time-inhomogeneous tri-state (stable, progression, and death) Markov model where time-varying transition rates and relative treatment effects are modeled with parametric survival functions or fractional polynomials. The data needed to run these analyses can be extracted directly from published survival curves. We demonstrate use by applying the methodology to a network of trials for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer. The proposed approach allows the joint synthesis of OS and PFS, relaxes the proportional hazards assumption, extends to a network of more than two treatments, and simplifies the parameterization of decision and cost-effectiveness analyses.

Neoadjuvant Afatinib for stage III EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer: a phase II study

Afatinib, an irreversible ErbB-family blocker, could improve the survival of advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small cell lung cancer patients (NSCLCm+). This phase II trial (NCT04201756) aimed to assess the feasibility of neoadjuvant Afatinib treatment for stage III NSCLCm+. Forty-seven patients received neoadjuvant Afatinib treatment (40 mg daily). The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included pathological complete response (pCR) rate, pathological downstaging rate, margin-free resection (R0) rate, event-free survival, disease-free survival, progression-free survival, overall survival, treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). The ORR was 70.2% (95% CI: 56.5% to 84.0%), meeting the pre-specified endpoint. The major pathological response (MPR), pCR, pathological downstaging, and R0 rates were 9.1%, 3.0%, 57.6%, and 87.9%, respectively. The median survivals were not reached. The most common TRAEs were diarrhea (78.7%) and rash (78.7%). Only three patients experienced grade 3/4 TRAEs. Biomarker analysis and tumor microenvironment dynamics by bulk RNA sequencing were included as predefined exploratory endpoints. CISH expression was a promising marker for Afatinib response (AUC = 0.918). In responders, compared to baseline samples, increasing T-cell- and B-cell-related features were observed in post-treatment tumor and lymph-node samples, respectively. Neoadjuvant Afatinib is feasible for stage III NSCLC+ patients and leads to dynamic changes in the tumor microenvironment.

Optimizing the Treatment for Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer with Mutated Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor in Low-Income Countries: A Review

Introduction

Osimertinib is the treatment of choice for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Because of its high price, many low-income countries, such as Syria, cannot provide osimertinib, which makes it difficult to choose the appropriate treatment for these patients. This study aimed to review articles that assessed tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for advanced NSCLC and developed an appropriate treatment plan for Syrian patients.

Methods

An electronic literature search was conducted of published phase II and III studies that assessed the efficacy of EGFR-TKIs for advanced NSCLC between January 2003 and May 2022.

Results

Seventeen articles were reviewed. The results were similar when erlotinib or icotinib was compared with gefitinib. Progression-free survival and overall survival for afatinib and dacomitinib were longer than for gefitinib, with small significant differences. Osimertinib was the only TKI that showed efficacy against the T790M mutation, which showed an improvement over the first- and second-generation TKIs. Osimertinib as a first-line therapy is not cost-effective compared with first- and second-generation TKIs.

Conclusion

Osimertinib is the preferred first-line treatment in patients with advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC. First- and second-generation TKIs are still considered good options, especially in low-income countries that cannot cover the costs of osimertinib.

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of first-line treatments for of advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer in Asian populations: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Background: According to the 2023 guidelines for treating non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), first-line treatment and recently developed agents for the treatment of epidermal growth factor (EGFR) mutation-positive locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC were compared in this meta-analysis. Treatment regimens involved in the included studies included first, second, and third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), TKIs plus chemotherapy, TKIs plus angiogenesis inhibitors, and platinum-containing doublet chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab. Considering the varying efficacy and safety of drugs in people of different ethnic origins, the optimal regimen should be determined, and the safety of first-line treatments should be assessed in the Asian population specifically. Methods: PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) were systematically searched to retrieve reports on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with research data published from inception to 1 February 2023. Adopting Asian patient populations as the target (including studies in which Asian patients accounted for more than 50% of the sample), a network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted for comparison of treatment regimens and treatments were ranked based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). Results: A total of 19 RCTs involving 5,824 patients and covering 14 treatment regimens were included. The primary outcome measure examined in this study was progression-free survival (PFS); other outcome measures examined were overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR), objective response rate (ORR), occurrence of any adverse events (AE), occurrence of adverse events of grade 3 or above (≥3AE), and occurrence of serious adverse events (SAE). In terms of PFS, all regimens including TKIs (as a monotherapy or in combination with other therapies), as well as bevacizumab (Bev) plus chemotherapy (Ch) were found to be significantly superior to basic chemotherapy (HRs: 0.09-0.61, p < 0.05 in all cases compared with Ch alone). The highest-ranking therapies were erlotinib (Erl) plus Bev (SUCRA: 0.94) and Erl plus ramucirumab (Ram) (SUCRA: 0.93). Regarding OS, no significant differences was observed between first-line treatment strategies; the top four treatments based on SUCRA, in rank order, were Bev + Ch (0.87), gefitinib (Gef) plus Ch (0.81), dacomitinib (Dac) (0.79), and osimertinib (Osi) (0.69). Additionally, there were no significant differences between first-line treatment strategies in terms of DCR. Regarding ORR, the top three treatments based on SUCRA were Erl + Bev (0.85), Erl + Ram (0.76), and Gef + Ch (0.74). No significant difference between first-line treatment strategies was observed in terms of the risk of AE. However, based on SUCRA, Erl ranked highest on avoidance of ≥ 3AE (0.97), and Osi ranked highest on avoidance of SAE (0.91). Conclusion: Based on these analyses of survival benefits, tumor burden response, and safety, furmonertinib (Fur), Osi, and aumolertinib (Aum) may represent the best treatment regimen options for Asian patients, significantly prolonging survival (as measured by median PFS/OS), eliciting a greater tumor burden response, and exposing patients to a lower risk of adverse events. Although Erl + Bev and Erl + Ram are associated with the best survival benefits in terms of PFS, further clinical studies are still needed to identify ways to reduce the risk of adverse events. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php? ID=CRD42023407994, identifier CRD42023407994.

Molecular epidemiology and clinical characteristics of epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in NSCLC: A single-center experience from India

Background

The genetic profiling of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has contributed to the discovery of actionable targetable mutations, which have significantly improved outcomes in disease with poor prognosis. Molecular epidemiological data of driver mutations in Indian populations have not been extensively elaborated compared to western and eastern Asian NSCLC populations. This study assessed the prevalence and clinical outcomes of EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor) mutations among the Indian NSCLC cohort in South India.

Patients and Methods

Retrospective analysis of 2,003 NSCLC patients who had undergone EGFR mutational analysis from 2013 to 2020 was performed. Clinical analysis was performed for 141 patients from 2013 to 2017 using Kaplan-Meier and Chi-square methods. Descriptive and survival statistics were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 23.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.

Results

EGFR-sensitizing mutations were detected in 41.6% (834/2003) in the study cohort with compound mutations detected in 7.55% (63/834) of EGFR-positive cases. A significant relationship with regard to female gender and EGFR mutation status (P <.001) was observed. Exon 18 G719X (8.7%) mutations and exon 20 T790M point mutation (3.1%) were the most frequently isolated uncommon EGFR mutations. In the clinical cohort, EGFR mutations were detected at a significantly higher prevalence in females (P =0.002) and never-smokers (P < 0.001). EGFR mutation demonstrated a significant relationship with regard to brain metastasis (P = 0.011). EGFR mutated individuals had significantly longer median overall survival compared to EGFR wild type (26 months vs. 12 months, P = 0.044).

Conclusion

We reports the highest number of EGFR mutation analysis performed from India and mutational analysis indicated a loco-regional variation in India with regard to EGFR mutation frequency and its subtypes.

Recent advance of next-generation sequencing in patients with lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

Precision medicine based on the driver genes mutation status is the current systemic therapeutic paradigm in patients with lung cancer. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) has emerged as a powerful platform for molecular diagnosis by virtue of high-throughput and massively parallel sequencing. Liquid biopsy also enabled the dynamic monitoring and comprehensive profiling of lung cancer in a noninvasive manner. However, challenges remain in the field of technology and clinical applications, especially in the era of immunotherapy.

AREAS COVERED

Here, we update the role of NGS in the context of lung cancer screening, molecular diagnosis, predictive and prognostic biomarkers, and guiding personalized treatment.

EXPERT OPINION

The NGS application for actable genomic alternation has greatly changed the therapeutic landscape in patients with lung cancer including perioperative setting and advanced stage. Meanwhile, emerging evidence has shown the potential of other applications such as early screening and detection, and MRD. However, challenges remain such as the lack of standardized protocols across different platforms and bioinformatics analysis pipelines, and the complexity of interpreting and leveraging numerous genomic mutation messages for therapy selection. Future research is needed to overcome these challenges and expand the applications of NGS to other aspects such as immunotherapy.

The Resistance to EGFR-TKIs in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: From Molecular Mechanisms to Clinical Application of New Therapeutic Strategies

Almost 17% of Western patients affected by non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have an activating epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene mutation. Del19 and L858R are the most-common ones; they are positive predictive factors for EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Currently, osimertinib, a third-generation TKI, is the standard first-line therapy for advanced NSCLC patients with common EGFR mutations. This drug is also administered as a second-line treatment for those patients with the T790M EGFR mutation and previously treated with first- (erlotinib, gefitinib) or second- (afatinib) generation TKIs. However, despite the high clinical efficacy, the prognosis remains severe due to intrinsic or acquired resistance to EGRF-TKIs. Various mechanisms of resistance have been reported including the activation of other signalling pathways, the development of secondary mutations, the alteration of the downstream pathways, and phenotypic transformation. However, further data are needed to achieve the goal of overcoming resistance to EGFR-TKIs, hence the necessity of discovering novel genetic targets and developing new-generation drugs. This review aimed to deepen the knowledge of intrinsic and acquired molecular mechanisms of resistance to EGFR-TKIs and the development of new therapeutic strategies to overcome TKIs' resistance.

Impact of minocycline on outcomes of EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with EGFR-TKIs

Minocycline is often administered prophylactically or therapeutically to non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients receiving epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) for skin rash as an adverse event. We examined the effects of minocycline on the outcomes of EGFR-mutant NSCLC treated with first-line EGFR-TKIs based on a single-center retrospective analysis. In this retrospective cohort study, data were collected on NSCLC patients treated with first-line EGFR-TKIs between January 2010 and June 2021. The treatment efficacy of first-line EGFR-TKIs was compared between patients who received minocycline and those who did not. Median progression-free survival (PFS) with first-line EGFR-TKIs was significantly longer in the minocycline group (N = 32) than in the control group (N = 106); 714 (95% confidence interval CI 411-1247) days vs. 420 (95% CI 343-626) days, p = 0.019. A multivariate analysis including skin rash as a variable confirmed that the administration of minocycline for 30 days or longer correlated with good PFS and overall survival (OS) with first-line EGFR-TKIs (HR 0.44 [95% CI 0.27-0.73], p = 0.0014 and HR 0.50 [95% CI 0.27-0.92], p = 0.027, respectively). The administration of minocycline influenced good treatment efficacy with first-line EGFR-TKIs independently of skin rash.

Trends in antineoplastic drug use, cost and prescribing patterns among patients with lung cancer in nine major cities of China, 2016-2020: a retrospective observational study based on inpatient and outpatient hospital data

OBJECTIVES

It is unclear whether the use of antineoplastic drugs for patients with lung cancer in China has changed after the implementation of the national drug price negotiation in 2016 and continual update of clinical guidelines. This study aims to evaluate the trends in antineoplastic drug use, cost and prescribing patterns among patients with lung cancer in major cities of China.

DESIGN

We conducted a retrospective observational study using data from January 2016 to December 2020.

SETTING

This study used prescription records based on inpatient and outpatient hospital data from 97 hospitals in 9 major cities of China.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 218 325 antineoplastic drug prescriptions in patients with lung cancer were retrospectively collected from the Hospital Prescription Analysis Cooperative Project during the study period.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Trends in antineoplastic drug use, cost and prescribing patterns among patients with lung cancer.

RESULTS

The yearly antineoplastic prescriptions increased by 85.6% from 28 594 in 2016 to 53 063 in 2020 (Z=1.71, p=0.086). Significant increases were seen in the prescriptions for protein kinase inhibitors (PKIs) and monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), whereas significant decreases were observed in antimetabolites, plant alkaloids and platinum compounds. The yearly cost increased progressively by 145.0% from ¥113.6 million in 2016 to ¥278.3 million in 2020 (Z=2.20, p=0.027). The top three anticancer drug classes in terms of total cost were PKIs, antimetabolites and mAbs. In prescribing patterns of antineoplastic agents for lung cancer, monotherapy, and triple or more drug combinations gradually increased, while dual combinations decreased significantly from 30.8% to 19.6%.

CONCLUSIONS

Prescription practices among patients with lung cancer in China underwent major changes during the study period. The observed trends can aid in understanding the present medication use status of patients with lung cancer in China and provide information for future drug management.

Only EBUS-Guided Mediastinal Lymph Node Cryobiopsy Enabled Immunotherapy in a Patient with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Personalized treatment of metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) requires detailed molecular characterization of the tumour including detection of predictive driver mutations and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. Complete detection is influenced by the amount of tumour cells sampled as well as their quality. Different sampling techniques may be necessary to provide sufficient tumour material for comprehensive molecular characterization. Missing the detection of targetable molecular genetic aberrations would have a serious impact on the quality of life and prognosis of a patient. This case report highlights the importance of biopsy technique in a patient with NSCLC. Several procedures—pleural puncture, transthoracic lung biopsy and endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA)—could not provide sufficient tumour material for precise tumour characterization. Only the addition of EBUS-guided transbronchial lymph node cryobiopsy (EBUS-TBLNC) enabled complete immunohistochemical and genetic tumour characterization, demonstrating PD-L1 expression in 100% of the tumour cells in the absence of actionable genetic alterations. Based on these results, immunotherapy was initiated.

The effect of EGFR-TKIs on survival in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with EGFR mutations: A real-world study

BACKGROUND

Few large-scale studies have been published using real-world data related to overall survival (OS) improvements in advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant lung cancer patients; therefore, little is known regarding the characteristics of patients who could benefit most from EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Our study aimed to assess whether EGFR-TKI treatment confers survival benefits among advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring EGFR mutations in the Chinese population.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 6451 advanced NSCLC patients were diagnosed between January 1, 2013 and June 30, 2019 in Zhejiang Cancer Hospital. Ultimately, 2864 patients with a confirmed EGFR mutation genotype were enrolled in our study. OS was measured from the time of diagnosis of advanced NSCLC until death or last follow-up.

RESULTS

Median follow-up for OS of advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients was 28.33 months in our study. Patients who received EGFR-TKIs demonstrated better survival compared to those without EGFR-TKI treatment (mOS: 29.77 vs. 22.97 months, p < 0.0001). A total of 451 patients switched to third-generation EGFR-TKI treatment and obtained a significantly better survival than those who adopted first-line third-generation EGFR-TKIs or those who did not receive third-generation EGFR-TKIs after disease progression with first- or second-generation EGFR-TKI treatment (mOS: 38.0 vs. 32.5 vs. 28.3 months, p < 0.0001). As for EGFR genotypes, patients with exon 19 deletion showed better OS, followed by those with L858R mutation (32.4 vs. 24.83 months, p = 0.0013). NGS versus PCR testing showed no statistical differences with respect to survival outcomes (mOS: 27.5 vs. 27.47 months, p = 0.6745).

CONCLUSION

Advanced EGFR-mutant patients treated with EGFR-TKIs obtained absolute superior survival in the Chinese population.

Rare mutation-dominant compound EGFR-positive NSCLC is associated with enriched kinase domain-resided variants of uncertain significance and poor clinical outcomes

BACKGROUND

Compound epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations are less responsive to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) than single EGFR mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the detailed clinical characteristics and prognosis of various compound EGFR mutations remain to be elucidated.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied the next-generation sequencing (NGS) data of treatment-naïve tumors from 1025 NSCLC patients with compound EGFR mutations, which were sub-categorized into different combinations of common mutations (19-Del and EGFR exon 21 p.L858R), rare mutations, and variants of uncertain significance (VUSs). Prognosis and drug resistance to first-line TKIs were analyzed in 174 and 95 patients, respectively.

RESULTS

Compound EGFR mutations were enriched with EGFR exon 21 p.L858R and rare mutations, but not 19-Del (P < 0.001). The common + rare and rare + rare subtypes had fewer concurrent mutations in the PI3K pathway (P = 0.032), while the rare + rare and common + VUSs subtypes showed increased association with smoking- and temozolomide-related mutational signatures, respectively (P < 0.001). The rare mutation-dominant subtypes (rare + VUSs and rare + rare) had the worst clinical outcomes to first-line TKIs (P < 0.001), which was further confirmed using an external cohort (P = 0.0066). VUSs in the rare + VUSs subtype selectively reside in the EGFR kinase domain (P < 0.001), implying these tumors might select additional mutations to disrupt the regulation/function of the kinase domain.

CONCLUSIONS

Different subtypes of compound EGFR mutations displayed distinct clinical features and genetic architectures, and rare mutation-dominant compound EGFR mutations were associated with enriched kinase domain-resided VUSs and poor clinical outcomes. Our findings help better understand the oncogenesis of compound EGFR mutations and forecast prognostic outcomes of personalized treatments.

Afatinib in Untreated Stage IIIB/IV Lung Adenocarcinoma with Major Uncommon Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Mutations (G719X/L861Q/S768I): A Multicenter Observational Study in Taiwan

BACKGROUND

Real-world clinical experience with afatinib as a treatment for advanced lung adenocarcinoma harboring uncommon epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations (G719X, L861Q and S768I) has rarely been reported.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to perform a retrospective multicenter study to analyze afatinib therapy in untreated advanced lung adenocarcinoma harboring uncommon EGFR mutations.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between May 2014 and June 2021, the data of 90 stage IIIB/IV lung adenocarcinoma patients with uncommon EGFR mutations (G719X/L861Q/S768I) treated with first-line afatinib from the cancer center database of Linkou, Tucheng, and Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospitals were retrospectively retrieved and analyzed.

RESULTS

Afatinib had an objective response rate (ORR) of 63.3% and a disease control rate (DCR) of 86.7%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) with first-line afatinib therapy was 17.3 months (95% confidence interval (CI), 12.07-22.53), and the median overall survival (OS) was 28.5 months (95% CI, 20.22-36.77) in all study patients. In the multivariate analysis, poor performance (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) ≥ 2) and brain and liver metastases were independent predictors of unfavorable PFS. The G719X mutation (alone+compound) was an independent predictor of favorable PFS (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.578; 95% CI, 0.355-0.941; P = 0.027). Most afatinib-related adverse events (AEs) were limited to grades 1 and 2 and were manageable.

CONCLUSIONS

First-line afatinib therapy is effective and safe for advanced lung adenocarcinoma harboring uncommon EGFR mutations. The G719X mutation was an independent factor associated with a favorable outcome. Poor performance (ECOG PS ≥ 2), brain metastasis, and liver metastasis were predictive factors of shorter PFS with first-line afatinib therapy.

Persistent response of furmonertinib plus anlotinib in a lung adenocarcinoma patient with an EGFR exon 20 insertion mutation: A case report

Insertions in exon 20 represent the third most common type of EGFR mutation following in-frame deletions in exon 19 and the point mutation L858R in exon 21. They are generally associated with primary resistance to EGFR-TKIs. Although mobocertinib and amivantamab were approved for adult patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations, the efficacy of these two agents was rather moderate. Therefore, other more potent targeted agents are urgently needed. Here, we report a patient with advanced lung adenocarcinoma harboring an EGFR exon 20 insertion mutation (NM_005228: exon 20: c.2316_2321dup: p.773_774dup). After experiencing platinum-based chemotherapy, this patient received a combination of furmonertinib and anlotinib and achieved lasting stable disease (SD). The treatment was well tolerated, and only mild hand-foot syndrome was reported from the patient. To the best of our knowledge, this case firstly reported the encouraging efficacy of combined furmonertinib and anlotinib in an advanced lung adenocarcinoma patient with an EGFR exon 20 insertion mutation who was previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. In addition, we summarize the recent literature on therapies against NSCLC with EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations. This case might provide an alternative approach for clinical oncologists.

Long-Term Responders to Erlotinib for Pulmonary Adenocarcinoma With Wild-Type Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor: Two Case Reports and a Single-Institutional Retrospective Study

Erlotinib is an oral and reversible epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor and is now used exclusively to non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) harboring mutated EGFR. However, there was historically a transient period when erlotinib was widely used regardless of EGFR mutation status. We report two cases with adenocarcinoma and wild-type EGFR status, which responded to erlotinib for unusual long time. We also retrospectively analyzed patients with adenocarcinoma and wild-type EGFR mutation status who had received erlotinib-containing regimen in our hospital. A 60-year-old woman received the second-line and tri-weekly regimen of pemetrexed (500 mg/m² on day 1) and intermittent erlotinib (150 mg on days 2 - 16). Pemetexed was discontinued 18 months after the initiation of this regimen, but erlotinib was continued for more than 11 years. This chemotherapy successfully reduced her brain metastasis and prevented recurrence. A 58-year-old man received erlotinib monotherapy as the third-line regimen, by which multiple brain metastases disappeared. Although we tried stopping erlotinib 9 years after the initiation of erlotinib, a solitary metastasis appeared in the brain 3 months after the discontinuation of erlotinib. Between December 2007 and October 2015, 39 patients with wild-type EGFR status initiated erlotinib-containing regimens at our hospital. The response rate, progression-free survival and overall survival were 17.9% (95% confidence interval (CI): 7.5-33.5%), 2.7 months (95% CI: 1.8 - 5.0 months) and 10.3 months (95% CI: 5.0 - 15.7 months), respectively. We reported two long-term responders and survivors to erlotinib for more than 9 years, which was much longer than patients with adenocarcinoma and wild-type EGFR mutation status who had received erlotinib-containing regimen in our hospital.

Advances in the management of non-small-cell lung cancer harbouring EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation is one of the key oncogenic mutations in non-small-cell lung cancer with adenocarcinoma histology. Exon 19 deletions and exon 21 L858R substitutions account for 90%, while EGFR exon 20 insertions constitute 4-10% of EGFR mutations and are the third most prevalent activating EGFR mutations. EGFR exon 20 insertions are associated with decreased sensitivity to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors and, until recently, effective targeted therapy against these tumours remained an unmet clinical need and chemotherapy was the only treatment of choice available. The approval of amivantamab and mobocertinib for patients who have progressed after chemotherapy represents an important step forward in the management of these patients. Here in this review, we summarize the epidemiology, structure and the tumour microenvironment of EGFR exon 20 insertion and also review the systemic treatments, including targeted therapies and ongoing clinical trials in EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations, as well as detection methods for EGFR exon 20 insertion. Lastly, resistant mechanisms and future directions are addressed.

Mechanisms of Acquired Resistance and Tolerance to EGFR Targeted Therapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) harboring activating mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) are treated with specific tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) of this receptor, resulting in clinically responses that can generally last several months. Unfortunately, EGFR-targeted therapy also favors the emergence of drug tolerant or resistant cells, ultimately resulting in tumor relapse. Recently, cellular barcoding strategies have arisen as a powerful tool to investigate the clonal evolution of these subpopulations in response to anti-cancer drugs. In this review, we provide an overview of the currently available treatment options for NSCLC, focusing on EGFR targeted therapy, and discuss the common mechanisms of resistance to EGFR-TKIs. We also review the characteristics of drug-tolerant persister (DTP) cells and the mechanistic basis of drug tolerance in EGFR-mutant NSCLC. Lastly, we address how cellular barcoding can be applied to investigate the response and the behavior of DTP cells upon EGFR-TKI treatment.

Overall survival analysis of patients enrolled in a randomized phase III trial comparing gefitinib and erlotinib for previously treated advanced lung adenocarcinoma (WJOG5108LFS)

BACKGROUND

Since the overall survival (OS) of patients enrolled in the first clinical phase III trial (WJOG5108L) was not recorded owing to time constraints, the present study (WJOG5108LFS) with a longer follow-up (66.6 months) aimed to compare OS of those treated with erlotinib (ER) and gefitinib (GE) for lung adenocarcinoma with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation.

METHODS

Among 536 enrolled patients, 362 (67.5%) were EGFR mutation-positive, including 182 in the ER arm and 180 in the GE arm. Median survival time (MST) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated using Kaplan-Meier survival curves. OS and PFS were determined for patients with EGFR mutation.

RESULTS

MSTs of ER (n = 182) and GE arms (n = 180) were 31.97 and 27.98 months, respectively (P = 0.3573, hazard ratio = 1.116). MSTs of exon 19 mutation patients in ER (n = 99) and GE arms (n = 89) were 37.49 and 28.91 months, respectively (P = 0.3791). MSTs of L858 mutation patients in ER (n = 82) and GE arms (n = 89) were 22.98 and 27.79 months, respectively (P = 0.7836). In patients with brain metastasis harboring mutation, response rates were 32.8% and 22.2% (P = 0.160), MSTs were 23.46 and 23.89 months (P = 0.7410), and PFS were 9.49 and 6.98 months (P = 0.1481) in the ER (n = 67) and GE arms (n = 72), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

No significant differences in OS were observed between the ER and GE arms in all patients with EGFR mutation and those with brain metastasis harboring EGFR mutation.

Considerations for the Utility of Real-World Evidence Beyond Trial Data in Advanced NSCLC: The Case of Frontline Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

Background

To extend the discussion on the use of real-world evidence (RWE) in conveying the clinical value of treatment beyond trial data, the primary objective of this study was to assess if efficacy gains in progression-free survival (PFS) observed in randomized controlled trials (RCT) correlate with efficacy gains in the real-world setting. For this, we assessed the treatment benefit of three tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in aNSCLC.

Methods

Using matched cohorts identified in the Flatiron Health database (2011-2020), we mimicked the following cohorts of TKI versus platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC) from the following trials: (1) erlotinib, EURTAC; (2) afatinib, LUX-Lung 3; and (3) crizotinib, PROFILE 1014. Time to treatment discontinuation (TTD) hazard ratio (HR) was used as a proxy for PFS HR, the primary endpoint in the selected RCTs. HRs were calculated via Cox proportional hazard models.

Results

Overall, 1,118 patients were included across the three RWE cohorts. Frontline TKI regimens had statistically significantly better real-world TTD than their matched PBC comparator group (HR 0.37, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.30-0.44 for erlotinib; HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.32-0.55 for afatinib; HR 0.37, 95% CI 0.26-0.53 for crizotinib). The benefit in real-world OS was not different between TKIs and PBC patients, attributed to a high proportion of switching to subsequent therapy. Study findings of relative treatment benefit (HR) for real-world TTD and OS were deemed similar to those for PFS and OS from the pivotal RCTs.

Conclusion

The relative treatment effect, measured as real-world TTD HR over the long term, was similar to trial-based PFS HR, implying that the clinical benefit of aNSCLC treatments conveyed in trials translated into the clinical setting. This is important, given that OS data interpretation is limited, even with longer follow-up. Additionally, our RWE analysis endorses TTD as a relevant endpoint to measure clinical benefit.

The mechanism of action of different generations of EGFR-inhibitors in malignant lung tumors. Literature review and data synthesis

Knowledge of the molecular characteristics of the progression of non-small cell lung tumors currently provides the patient with the best treatment options. One of the most well-known and studied genetic abnormalities is a mutation in the EGFR gene, which makes the tumor sensitive to therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors. In the conditions of the existence of several therapeutic options at once, it is required to know not only the results of clinical trials, but also the fundamental features of the mechanisms of action of a particular drug. The article contains a literature review, presenting the features of the functioning of EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor), the mechanisms of action of EGFR inhibitors of different generations (erlotinib, gefitinib, afatinib, osimertinib), generalization and analysis of the main differences between them.

New Strategies and Novel Combinations in EGFR TKI-Resistant Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

OPINION STATEMENT

Osimertinib is the current standard-of-care for the first-line treatment of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Progression after osimertinib ineluctably occurs, and standard of care treatment options beyond progression have mainly included next-line platinum doublet chemotherapy. With better understanding of the varied molecular mechanisms of resistance to osimertinib, several opportunities for the use of targeted agents are emerging that include MET amplification, observed in 15% of patients, and resistant EGFR mutations, including C797S in 7% of patients. Evidence for the use of targeted therapies in such situations is mostly based on case reports, but clinical trials are being conducted with MET inhibitors, such as amivantamab, an EGFR-MET bispecific antibody, or next-generation EGFR inhibitors, such as patritumab-deruxtecan, a HER3 antibody drug conjugate. In this review, we outline our proposed approach to current clinical practice for patients with EGFR mutant, osimertinib-resistant NSCLC which includes the following potential strategies: - Continuation of osimertinib beyond progression following local ablative treatment of oligoprogressive disease, - Tissue rebiopsy of progressive site and possibly concurrent liquid biopsy to evaluate for mechanism of resistance utilizing comprehensive genomic profiling, -Discussion at a molecular tumor board for assessment for enrollment in clinical trials/expanded access program if available with innovative drugs or possible off-label use of available targeted agents, based on the results of molecular profiling, -If no mechanism of resistance identified, administration of platinum-based chemotherapy with antiangiogenic agents. The role of immunotherapy will also be addressed given the uncertain benefit.

cyy-287, a novel pyrimidine-2,4-diamine derivative, inhibits tumor growth of EGFR-driven non-small cell lung cancer via the ERK pathway

In recent decades, EGFR-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been proven to be an effective therapy for EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, resistance to EGFR-TKIs limits their clinical application. In the present study, we investigate the antitumor effect and underlying mechanism of a novel pyrimidine-2,4-diamine derivative, cyy-287, in NSCLC. We find that cyy-287 has a high affinity for lung tissue and inhibits the proliferation of NSCLC cells. Interestingly, the significant suppression of migration and induction of apoptosis by cyy-287 are only observed in EGFR-driven but not in EGFR-wild-type (wt) cells. According to the RNA sequencing and KEGG enrichment analysis results, cyy-287 markedly inhibits the MAPK pathway in EGFR-driven PC9 cells, and western blot analysis results further indicate that cyy-287 selectively blocks the ERK pathway in EGFR-driven cells. Meanwhile, apoptosis induced by cyy-287 could be partially reversed by ERK pathway inhibition. Further experiment indicates that cyy-287 inhibits the EGFR pathway in both EGFR-driven and EGFR-overexpressing cells. Interestingly, it only induces apoptosis in EGFR-driven cells, not in EGFR-overexpressing cells. The growth of EGFR-driven cells is suppressed by cyy-287 in vivo, with fewer side effects. Our results suggest that cyy-287 may be a potential therapeutic drug with promising antitumor effects against NSCLC.

Biomarker-Targeted Therapies in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Current Status and Perspectives

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is one of the most common malignancies and the leading causes of cancer-related death worldwide. Despite many therapeutic advances in the past decade, NSCLC remains an incurable disease for the majority of patients. Molecular targeted therapies and immunotherapies have significantly improved the prognosis of NSCLC. However, the vast majority of advanced NSCLC develop resistance to current therapies and eventually progress. In this review, we discuss current and potential therapies for NSCLC, focusing on targeted therapies and immunotherapies. We highlight the future role of metabolic therapies and combination therapies in NSCLC.

Engaging innate immunity for targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor: Therapeutic options leveraging innate immunity versus adaptive immunity versus inhibition of signaling

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is a key player in the normal tissue physiology and the pathology of cancer. Therapeutic approaches have now been developed to target oncogenic genetic aberrations of EGFR, found in a subset of tumors, and to take advantage of overexpression of EGFR in tumors. The development of small-molecule inhibitors and anti-EGFR antibodies targeting EGFR activation have resulted in effective but limited treatment options for patients with mutated or wild-type EGFR-expressing cancers, while therapeutic approaches that deploy effectors of the adaptive or innate immune system are still undergoing development. This review discusses EGFR-targeting therapies acting through distinct molecular mechanisms to destroy EGFR-expressing cancer cells. The focus is on the successes and limitations of therapies targeting the activation of EGFR versus those that exploit the cytotoxic T cells and innate immune cells to target EGFR-expressing cancer cells. Moreover, we discuss alternative approaches that may have the potential to overcome limitations of current therapies; in particular the innate cell engagers are discussed. Furthermore, this review highlights the potential to combine innate cell engagers with immunotherapies, to maximize their effectiveness, or with unspecific cell therapies, to convert them into tumor-specific agents.

Liquid Biopsy Analysis as a Tool for TKI-Based Treatment in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

The treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has recently evolved with the introduction of targeted therapy based on the use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in patients with certain gene alterations, including EGFR, ALK, ROS1, BRAF, and MET genes. Molecular targeted therapy based on TKIs has improved clinical outcomes in a large number of NSCLC patients with advanced disease, enabling significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS). Liquid biopsy is an increasingly popular diagnostic tool for treating TKI-based NSCLC. The studies presented in this article show that detection and analysis based on liquid biopsy elements such as circulating tumor cells (CTCs), cell-free DNA (cfDNA), exosomes, and/or tumor-educated platelets (TEPs) can contribute to the appropriate selection and monitoring of targeted therapy in NSCLC patients as complementary to invasive tissue biopsy. The detection of these elements, combined with their molecular analysis (using, e.g., digital PCR (dPCR), next generation sequencing (NGS), shallow whole genome sequencing (sWGS)), enables the detection of mutations, which are required for the TKI treatment. Despite such promising results obtained by many research teams, it is still necessary to carry out prospective studies on a larger group of patients in order to validate these methods before their application in clinical practice.

EGFR-mutant NSCLC: monitoring the molecular evolution of tumors in 2022

INTRODUCTION

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) activating mutations define a subset of advanced, metastatic non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs), that was historically identified along with the clinical development of specific EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), opening the era of precision medicine in thoracic oncology.

AREAS COVERED

Progression after EGFR TKIs is a major challenge for patients, as it occurs ineluctably along with disease evolution. Osimertinib is the current standard-of-care for the first-line treatment of EGFR-mutant NSCLC. Mechanisms of resistance to osimertinib are challenging to identify, and are dominated by MET pathway activation, and acquired EGFR mutations.

EXPERT OPINION

The current vision for clinical practice in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC developing disease progression after osimertinib includes the following 5 steps:- continuation of osimertinib beyond progression, and local treatment of oligoprogressive disease, - comprehensive genomic profiling based on tissue rebiopsy of progressing sites, - access to new treatment agents through clinical trials, - molecular tumor board to discuss the off-label use of targeted agents, depending on the availability of drugs and/or expanded access programs - chemotherapy may be the best choice, based on combination of platinum-based regimen and antiangiogenic agents and possibly immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Updated Analysis of NEJ009: Gefitinib-Alone Versus Gefitinib Plus Chemotherapy for Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer With Mutated EGFR

Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned coprimary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported.

In a randomized, open-label, phase III NEJ009 study, gefitinib plus chemotherapy significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with gefitinib-alone in patients with untreated non–small-cell lung cancer harboring mutations in epidermal growth factor receptor. Herein, we report the updated survival outcome and long-term tolerability. Patients were randomly assigned to gefitinib (gefitinib 250 mg orally, once daily) and gefitinib combined with carboplatin plus pemetrexed (GCP in a 3-week cycle for six cycles followed by concurrent gefitinib and pemetrexed maintenance) groups. At the data cutoff (May 22, 2020), GCP demonstrated significantly better PFS2 (hazard ratio, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.62 to 0.97; P = .027) than gefitinib. However, the updated median OS was 38.5 months (95% CI, 31.1 to 47.1) and 49.0 months (95% CI, 41.8 to 56.7) in the gefitinib and GCP groups, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.64 to 1.06; P = .127). The OS in both groups was similar for the overall patient population. No severe adverse events occurred since the first report. This updated analysis revealed that the GCP regimen improved PFS and PFS2 with an acceptable safety profile compared with gefitinib-alone. GCP is more efficient than gefitinib monotherapy as a first-line treatment for non–small-cell lung cancer with epidermal growth factor receptor mutations.

Erlotinib with or without bevacizumab as a first-line therapy for patients with advanced nonsquamous epidermal growth factor receptor-positive non-small cell lung cancer: Exploratory subgroup analyses from the phase II JO25567 study

BACKGROUND

In the phase II JO25567 study (JapicCTI-111390), erlotinib plus bevacizumab demonstrated a significant clinical benefit in Japanese patients with epidermal growth factor receptor mutation-positive (EGFR+) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here, we present an exploratory analysis investigating the impact of baseline pleural/pericardial effusion (PPE) on patient outcomes.

METHODS

Patients with stage IIIB/IV or postoperative recurrent EGFR+ NSCLC were randomized 1:1 to receive erlotinib (150 mg/day) plus bevacizumab (15 mg/kg every 3 weeks) or erlotinib monotherapy. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety were evaluated according to the presence or absence of baseline PPE.

RESULTS

The population comprised 152 patients, 66 with baseline PPE and 86 without. Median PFS was longer with erlotinib plus bevacizumab than with erlotinib alone, with (hazard ratio [HR] 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.25-0.82) or without (HR 0.62; 95% CI: 0.37-1.04) baseline PPE. Median OS was also prolonged with erlotinib plus bevacizumab relative to erlotinib regardless of the presence (HR 0.82; 95% CI: 0.46-1.47) or absence (HR 0.84; 95% CI: 0.46-1.55) of baseline PPE. ORR was higher with erlotinib plus bevacizumab (70.0%) than with erlotinib (55.6%) in patients with baseline PPE, but similar (68.9% vs. 70.7%) in patients without. Most common grade ≥3 adverse events were hypertension and rash in the erlotinib plus bevacizumab arm, and rash in the erlotinib arm, regardless of baseline PPE status.

CONCLUSIONS

Erlotinib plus bevacizumab may be a beneficial treatment strategy in patients with EGFR+ NSCLC, especially for those with baseline PPE.