New classifications of B-cell neoplasms: a comparison of 5th WHO and International Consensus classifications

In 2024, the World Health Organization (WHO) launched a new classification of lymphoid neoplasms, a revision of the previously used Revised 4th Edition of their classification (WHO-4R). However, this means that two classifications are now in simultaneous use: the 5th Edition of the WHO classification (WHO-5) and the International Consensus Classification (ICC). Instead of a comprehensive review of each disease entity, as already described elsewhere, this review focuses on revisions made in both the WHO-5 and ICC from WHO-4R and discrepancies between them regarding B-cell neoplasms. Similarities include cutaneous marginal zone lymphoma, cold agglutinin disease, non-primary effusion lymphoma-type effusion-based lymphoma, and gray zone lymphoma. Differences include plasma cell neoplasms, high-grade B-cell lymphoma (double hit lymphoma), follicular lymphoma, LPD with immune deficiency and dysregulation, extranodal large B-cell lymphoma, transformations of indolent B-cell lymphomas, and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified. Understanding the similarities and differences between the two latest classifications will aid daily diagnostic practice and future research on lymphoid neoplasms.

Cancer Biomarkers V: Update on B-Cell Lymphoma Biomarkers

CONTEXT

Pathologists play an increasingly critical role in optimizing testing on scant specimens to ensure patients not only receive a correct and timely diagnosis, but also that the appropriate evaluation of biologic markers, or "biomarkers," is performed to inform prognosis and best guide therapeutic options. Advances in biomarkers have been particularly impactful in the field of hematopathology, where the identification of cytogenetic abnormalities, specific mutations, morphologic features, and/or protein expression may help guide clinical decision-making, including type and intensity of therapy and eligibility for clinical trials.

OBJECTIVE

To stay up to date with advances in relevant biomarkers for diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy. The Cancer Biomarkers Conference (CBC) has been developed as a highly focused meeting to provide key biomarker updates across medical fields with the inclusion of industry partners, to reach a broader audience, and cross-pollinate emerging areas for biomarker application and future discovery. The objective of this article is to raise awareness of the potential utility of such meetings for improving patient care and facilitating collaboration.

DATA SOURCES

Recently released guidelines related to B-cell lymphoma diagnosis from the World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification and associated manuscripts are reviewed. Material presented at the CBC conference is summarized.

CONCLUSIONS

This article covers highlights of the updates presented on B-cell lymphoma biomarkers at the most recent Cancer Biomarkers Conference in Flowood, Mississippi, in September 2022.

Analyzing the risk factors for disease progression within 2 years and histological transformation in patients treated with rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone as first-line treatment: A 15-year follow-up of patients with advanced follicular lymphoma in JCOG0203

Follicular lymphoma (FL) is an indolent lymphoma that becomes aggressive due to histological transformation (HT), leading to reduced survival. Patients with FL have different clinical courses and various treatment options. Some patients exhibit shorter survival and experience disease progression within 24 months of diagnosis/treatment (POD24); the optimal treatment remains an unmet needs. Thus, identifying factors that predict shorter survival is essential to stratify treatment and prolong the survival of patients with FL. To analyze risk factors for POD24 and HT in patients treated with rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) as first-line treatment, we performed this post-hoc analysis of patients with advanced indolent B-cell lymphoma in a randomized clinical trial wherein six cycles of R-CHOP were administered every 2-3 weeks. The primary analysis showed no differences in outcomes, which enabled the analysis of 248 patients with FL, assigned to two arms. All histopathological specimens from the 300 enrolled patients were reviewed by three expert hematopathologists. Multivariable analysis implicated Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI) intermediate (odds ratio [OR] 2.531, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.676-9.466) and high- (OR 2.236, 95% CI 0.160-31.226) risks, B symptoms (OR 2.091, 95% CI 0.747-5.851), and grade 3A (G3A) (OR 1.833, 95% CI 0.634-5.299) as risk factors for POD24. Furthermore, multivariable analysis through a median follow-up of 15.9 years implicated G3A (OR 2.628, 95% CI 0.806-8.575) and high-risk FLIPI (OR 4.401, 95% CI 0.186-104.377) as risk factors for HT. However, an analysis limited to the first 10 years revealed that the prognostic factors elucidated from the longer-term analysis had a greater impact on HT. G3A and high-risk FLIPI may independently predict POD24 and HT, thereby informing treatment stratification of patients with untreated advanced-stage FL in future trials, particularly to address the unmet needs of patients with POD24.

CD19-directed CAR T cells as first salvage therapy for large B-cell lymphoma: towards a rational approach

The approval of CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies for the second-line treatment of high-risk large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) has greatly affected salvage algorithms for this condition, and such therapies could have the potential to improve the course of relapsed or refractory LBCL. In this Review, we provide guidance for a rational management approach to the use of commercial CD19-directed CAR T cells in the second-line treatment of LBCL, addressing crucial questions regarding eligible histologies; age, comorbidity, and tumour biology restrictions; the handling of very aggressive tumour behaviour; and holding and bridging therapies. The guidance was developed in a structured manner and, for each question, consists of a description of the clinical issue, a summary of the evidence, the rationale for a practical management approach, and recommendations. These recommendations could help to decide on the optimal management of patients with relapsed or refractory LBCL who are considered for second-line CAR T-cell treatment.

T-cell phenotype including CD57+ T follicular helper cells in the tumor microenvironment correlate with a poor outcome in follicular lymphoma

T-lymphocytes are prevalent in the tumor microenvironment of follicular lymphoma (FL). However, the phenotype of T-cells may vary, and the prevalence of certain T-cell subsets may influence tumor biology and patient survival. We therefore analyzed a cohort of 82 FL patients using CyTOF to determine whether specific T-cell phenotypes were associated with distinct tumor microenvironments and patient outcome. We identified four immune subgroups with differing T-cell phenotypes and the prevalence of certain T-cell subsets was associated with patient survival. Patients with increased T cells with early differentiation stage tended to have a significantly better survival than patients with increased T-cells of late differentiation stage. Specifically, CD57+ TFH cells, with a late-stage differentiation phenotype, were significantly more abundant in FL patients who had early disease progression and therefore correlated with an inferior survival. Single cell analysis (CITE-seq) revealed that CD57+ TFH cells exhibited a substantially different transcriptome from CD57- TFH cells with upregulation of inflammatory pathways, evidence of immune exhaustion and susceptibility to apoptosis. Taken together, our results show that different tumor microenvironments among FL patients are associated with variable T-cell phenotypes and an increased prevalence of CD57+ TFH cells is associated with poor patient survival.

Navigating the Heterogeneity of Follicular Lymphoma and its Many Variants: An Updated Approach to Diagnosis and Classification

Follicular lymphoma (FL) is a lymphoid neoplasm composed of follicle center (germinal center) B cells, with varying proportions of centrocytes and centroblasts, that usually has a predominantly follicular architectural pattern. Over the past decade, our understanding of FL has evolved significantly, with new recognition of several recently defined FL variants characterized by distinct clinical presentations, behaviors, genetic alterations, and biology. This manuscript aims to review the heterogeneity of FL and its variants, to provide an updated guide on their diagnosis and classification, and to describe how approaches to the histologic subclassification of classic FL have evolved in current classification schemes.

[Classification of indolent B-cell lymphomas : Novelties and open questions]

The 5th edition of the WHO classification (WHO-HAEM5) and the International Consensus Classification (ICC) have considerable overlap but also some distinct differences in categorizing indolent B‑cell lymphomas. Most differences with the expected impact on the daily diagnostic routine relate to follicular lymphoma (FL). Grading of FL remains mandatory only in the ICC; a diffuse growth pattern in an FL with > 15 blasts per high-power field (FL grade 3A) is not automatically classified as DLBCL according to WHO-HAEM5, and an FL subtype with unusual morphology (blastoid or large centrocyte) and biology is recognized as an entity only in the WHO-HAEM5. With the exception of B‑prolymphocytic leukemia, which is no longer acknowledged in WHO-HAEM5, there are only minor differences between both classifications and include updated names of entities, improved diagnostic criteria, and upgrades from provisional to definite entities.

Differences in clinical characteristics and outcomes between patients with grade 3a and grades 1-2 follicular lymphoma: a real-world multicenter study

BACKGROUND

The difference between clinical characteristics and outcomes between follicular lymphoma grade 1-2 (FL1-2) and FL3a defined pathologically remains unclear, resulting in uncertainty how to treat FL3a. However, it may be crucial for clinicians to discriminate grade 3a and grade 1-2 for predicting prognosis and thus making treatment decisions.

METHODS

We compared 1403 patients with FL1-2 and 765 patients with FL3a diagnosed between January 2000 and December 2020 from fifteen centers nationwide in China to describe differences in clinical characteristics and outcomes.

RESULTS

Compared with FL1-2 patients, FL3a subgroup had a higher percentage of elderly patients (P = 0.003), and relatively more FL3a patients presented with increased levels of LDH (P < 0.0001) and higher Ki-67 indexs greater than 30% (P < 0.001). More FL3a patients were treated with CHOP ± R (P < 0.0001), and fewer were treated with the watchful-waiting approach (P < 0.0001). The results showed a higher incidence of relapse among FL3a patients, in which more patients underwent histological transformation (HT) when compared to FL1-2 (P = 0.003). 1470 (76.2%) patients of the entire cohort received R-CHOP therapy; survival analysis revealed that FL3a patients had a worse progression-free survival (PFS) rate than FL1-2 patients. Survival of FL3a patients with respect to FLIPI showed an inferior PFS in the intermediate and high-risk groups than FL1-2 patients. FL3a patients had a much worse prognosis than FL1-2 with or without progression of disease within 24 months (POD24). FL3a patients had higher likelihood of lymphoma-related death (LRD, P < 0.05), whereas the rates for non-LRD were comparable.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, this study demonstrates a marked difference in clinical features and outcomes in FL3a patients compared with FL1-2 patients. The results highlight the need for applying therapeutic approaches distinct from FL1-2 when treating FL3a patients.

Follicular Lymphoma in the 5th Edition of the WHO-Classification of Haematolymphoid Neoplasms-Updated Classification and New Biological Data

The conceptual description of Follicular lymphoma (FL) in the 5th edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of haematolymphoid tumors (WHO-HAEM5) has undergone significant revision. The vast majority of FL (85%) with a follicular growth pattern are composed of centrocytes and centroblasts, harbor the t(14;18)(q32;q21) translocation and are now termed classic FL (cFL). They are set apart from three related subtypes, FL with predominantly follicular growth pattern, FL with unusual cytological features (uFL) and follicular large B-cell lymphoma (FLBCL). In contrast to the revised 4th edition of the WHO classification of haematolymphoid tumors (WHO-HAEM4R), grading of cFL is no longer mandatory. FL with a predominantly diffuse growth pattern had been previously recognized in WHO-HAEM4R. It frequently occurs as a large tumor in the inguinal region and is associated with CD23 expression. An absence of the IGH::BCL2 fusion and frequent STAT6 mutations along with 1p36 deletion or TNFRSF14 mutation is typical. The newly introduced subtype of uFL includes two subsets that significantly diverge from cFL: one with "blastoid" and one with "large centrocyte" variant cytological features. uFL more frequently displays variant immunophenotypic and genotypic features. FLBCL is largely identical to WHO-HAEM4R FL grade 3B and renaming was done for reasons of consistency throughout the classification. In-situ follicular B-cell neoplasm, pediatric-type FL, duodenal-type FL and primary cutaneous follicle center lymphoma are categorized as discrete entities. In addition, novel findings concerning underlying biological mechanisms in the pathogenesis of early and systemic follicular lymphoma will be presented.

Follicular lymphoma and marginal zone lymphoma: how many diseases?

Follicular lymphoma (FL) and marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) are indolent mature B-cell neoplasms with variable clinical presentation and distinct histopathologic features. Recent advances in the biology and molecular characteristics of these lymphomas have further expanded our understanding of the heterogeneous nature of these lymphomas, with increasing recognition of specific disease entities within the broader categories of FL and MZL. Here, we discuss the conclusions of the 2022 International Consensus Classification of Mature Lymphoid Neoplasms (2022 ICC) dealing with FL, and review differences with the proposed WHO 5th Edition classification. We review issues related to grading and alternative forms of FL especially those lacking the genetic hallmark of FL, the t(14;18) chromosomal alteration. Among them, t(14;18)-negative CD23⁺ follicle center lymphoma has been proposed by the 2022 ICC as a provisional entity. Other follicle center-derived lymphomas such as pediatric-type follicular lymphoma, testicular follicular lymphoma, primary cutaneous follicle center lymphoma, and large B-cell lymphoma with IRF4 rearrangement are considered distinct entities separate from conventional FL. Importantly, large B-cell lymphoma with IRF4 rearrangement introduced as a provisional entity in the WHO 2017 is upgraded to a definite entity in the 2022 ICC. We also discuss diagnostic strategies for recognition of MZLs including splenic MZL, extranodal MZL (MALT lymphoma), and primary nodal MZL. The importance of molecular studies in the distinction among marginal zone lymphoma subtypes is emphasized, as well as their value in the differential diagnosis with other B-cell lymphomas.

Clinical characteristics and prognosis of patients with co-existing follicular lymphoma and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma components in rituximab era

PURPOSE

This single-centre study aimed to determine the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis for patients with co-existing FL and DLBCL components (FL/DLBCL).

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed the clinical characteristics and prognosis of patients diagnosed with FL/DLBCL (n = 56) and with pure FL (n = 260) or de novo DLBCL (n = 812) (controls) between January 2013 and December 2021.

RESULTS

The median age of patients with FL/DLBCL was 52 years. The amount of the DLBCL component ranged from 5 to 95%. Among the 56 FL/DLBCL cases analysed, 67.9% were of germinal centre B-cell (GCB) origin, 26.8% non-GCB origin, and 5.3% were unclassified. The clinical features of patients with FL/DLBCL were intermediate, falling between those of FL and DLBCL. Propensity-score matching was performed for patients with similar baseline characteristics who were receiving the rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin or epirubicin, vindesine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) regimen. Patients with FL/DLBCL showed inferior outcomes compared to those with FL, with a lower complete remission (CR) rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Bone marrow involvement and B symptoms were identified as independent adverse prognostic factors for PFS among patients with FL/DLBCL. Patients with FL/DLBCL presented a lower CR rate and PFS but similar OS to those with DLBCL when receiving the R-CHOP regimen.

CONCLUSION

Patients with FL/DLBCL showed inferior treatment response and survival than those with pure FL and had a lower CR rate and PFS, but similar OS to those with DLBCL in the rituximab era.

Genetics of Transformed Follicular Lymphoma

Histological transformation (HT) to a more aggressive disease–mostly diffuse large B-cell lymphoma–is considered one of the most dismal events in the clinical course of follicular lymphoma (FL). Current knowledge has not found a single biological event specific for HT, although different studies have highlighted common genetic alterations, such as TP53 and CDKN2A/B loss, and MYC translocations, among others. Together, they increase genomic complexity and mutational burden at HT. A better knowledge of HT pathogenesis would presumably help to find diagnostic biomarkers allowing the identification of patients at high-risk of transformation, as well as the discrimination from patients with FL recurrence, and those who remain in remission. This would also help to identify new drug targets and the design of clinical trials for the treatment of transformation. In the present review we provide a comprehensive overview of the genetic events frequently identified in transformed FL contributing to the switch towards aggressive behaviour, and we will discuss current open questions in the field of HT.

The International Consensus Classification of Mature Lymphoid Neoplasms: a report from the Clinical Advisory Committee

Since the publication of the Revised European-American Classification of Lymphoid Neoplasms in 1994, subsequent updates of the classification of lymphoid neoplasms have been generated through iterative international efforts to achieve broad consensus among hematopathologists, geneticists, molecular scientists, and clinicians. Significant progress has recently been made in the characterization of malignancies of the immune system, with many new insights provided by genomic studies. They have led to this proposal. We have followed the same process that was successfully used for the third and fourth editions of the World Health Organization Classification of Hematologic Neoplasms. The definition, recommended studies, and criteria for the diagnosis of many entities have been extensively refined. Some categories considered provisional have now been upgraded to definite entities. Terminology for some diseases has been revised to adapt nomenclature to the current knowledge of their biology, but these modifications have been restricted to well-justified situations. Major findings from recent genomic studies have impacted the conceptual framework and diagnostic criteria for many disease entities. These changes will have an impact on optimal clinical management. The conclusions of this work are summarized in this report as the proposed International Consensus Classification of mature lymphoid, histiocytic, and dendritic cell tumors.

Prediction of prognosis and pathologic grade in follicular lymphoma using 18F-FDG PET/CT

Purpose

We investigated the utility of a new baseline PET parameter expressing lesion dissemination and metabolic parameters for predicting progression-free survival (PFS) and pathologic grade in follicular lymphoma (FL).

Methods

The baseline ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT images of 126 patients with grade 1–3A FL were retrospectively analyzed. A novel PET/CT parameter characterizing lesion dissemination, the distance between two lesions that were furthest apart (D_max), was calculated. The total metabolic tumor volume and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) were computed by using 41% of the maximum standardized uptake value (SUV_max) thresholding method.

Results

The 5-year PFS rate was 51.9% for all patients. In the multivariate analysis, high D_max [P = 0.046; hazard ratio (HR) = 2.877], high TLG (P = 0.004; HR = 3.612), and elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase (P = 0.041; HR = 2.287) were independent predictors of PFS. A scoring system for prognostic stratification was established based on these three adverse factors, and the patients were classified into three risk categories: low risk (zero to one factor, n = 75), intermediate risk (two adverse factors, n = 29), and high risk (three adverse factors, n = 22). Patients in the high-risk group had a shorter 3-year PFS (21.7%) than those in the low- and intermediate-risk groups (90.6 and 44.6%, respectively) (P < 0.001). The C-index of our scoring system for PFS (0.785) was superior to the predictive capability of the Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI), FLIPI2, and PRIMA-Prognostic Index (C-index: 0.628–0.701). The receiver operating characteristic curves and decision curve analysis demonstrated that the scoring system had better differentiation and clinical utility than these existing indices. In addition, the median SUV_max was significantly higher in grade 3A (36 cases) than in grades 1 and 2 FL (90 cases) (median: 13.63 vs. 11.45, P = 0.013), but a substantial overlap existed (range: 2.25–39.62 vs. 3.17–39.80).

Conclusion

TLG and D_max represent two complementary aspects of the disease, capturing the tumor burden and lesion dissemination. TLG and D_max are promising metrics for identifying patients at a high risk of progression or relapse. Additionally, SUV_max seems to have some value for distinguishing grade 3A from low-grade FL but cannot substitute for biopsy.

The 5th edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Haematolymphoid Tumours: Lymphoid Neoplasms

We herein present an overview of the upcoming 5^th edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Haematolymphoid Tumours focussing on lymphoid neoplasms. Myeloid and histiocytic neoplasms will be presented in a separate accompanying article. Besides listing the entities of the classification, we highlight and explain changes from the revised 4^th edition. These include reorganization of entities by a hierarchical system as is adopted throughout the 5^th edition of the WHO classification of tumours of all organ systems, modification of nomenclature for some entities, revision of diagnostic criteria or subtypes, deletion of certain entities, and introduction of new entities, as well as inclusion of tumour-like lesions, mesenchymal lesions specific to lymph node and spleen, and germline predisposition syndromes associated with the lymphoid neoplasms.

Clinicopathological analysis of follicular lymphoma with BCL2, BCL6, and MYC rearrangements

Most follicular lymphomas (FL) show t(14;18)/IGH-BCL2 translocation, but rearrangement (R) negative cases exist. A series of 140 FL patients with a BCL2, BCL6, and MYC gene status examined by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) were classified into five groups: (a) BCL2-R group (BCL2-R/BCL6-G/MYC-G) (G, germline), 77 cases; (b) BCL2/BCL6 double-R group (BCL2-R/BCL6-R/MYC-G), 16 cases; (c) BCL6-R group (BCL2-G/BCL6-R/MYC-G), 16 cases; (d) MYC-R group (BCL2-R or G/BCL6-R or G/MYC-R), three cases; (e) Triple-G group (BCL2-G/BCL6-G/MYC-G), 28 cases. The BCL6-R group had different clinicopathological characteristics. It showed lower rates of an advanced clinical stage and bone marrow invasion, less disease progression (p = 0.036), and a 'trend' toward a favorable progression-free survival (PFS) (p = 0.06). It also showed higher rates of grade 3A and MUM1-expression, and when analyzing the interfollicular spread pattern of CD20-positive cells, had fewer cases showing the IF3+ pattern (high interfollicular spread). Moreover, cases with BCL6-R and/or BCL6 gain (with cases of BCL2 rearrangement and/or of copy number gain excluded) correlated with favorable PFS (p = 0.014) and less IF3+ pattern (p = 0.007). We demonstrated that BCL6-R FLs showed unique clinicopathological findings, and FISH of BCL2, BCL6, and MYC is useful for FL diagnosis and clinical management.

High-grade Follicular Lymphomas Exhibit Clinicopathologic, Cytogenetic, and Molecular Diversity Extending Beyond Grades 3A and 3B

Although follicular lymphoma (FL) is usually graded as FL1-2, FL3A, and FL3B, some borderline cases can be observed and led us to investigate the clinicopathologic diversity of grade 3 FL (FL3). Among 2449 FL patients enrolled in Lymphoma Study Association (LYSA) trials, 1921 cases with sufficient material underwent a central pathologic review. The resulting diagnoses comprised 89.6% FL1-2 (n=1723), 7.2% FL3A (n=138), and 0.5% purely follicular FL3B (n=9). The remaining 51 unclassifiable cases (2.7%) exhibited high-grade features but did not meet WHO criteria for either FL3A or FL3B; and were considered as "unconventional" high-grade FL (FL3U). FL3U morphological pattern consisted of nodular proliferation of large cleaved cells or small-sized to medium-sized blast cells. Compared with FL3A, FL3U exhibited higher MUM1 and Ki67 expression, less BCL2 breaks and more BCL6 rearrangements, together with a higher number of cases without any BCL2, BCL6 or MYC rearrangement. FL3U harbored less frequent mutations in BCL2, KMT2D, KMT2B, and CREBBP than FL3A. MYC and BCL2 were less frequently mutated in FL3U than FL3B. Rituximab cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone treated FL3U patients had a worse survival than FL1-2 patients with similar follicular lymphoma international prognostic index and treatment. These results suggest that high-grade FLs encompass a heterogeneous spectrum of tumors with variable morphology and genomic alterations, including FL3U cases that do not strictly fit WHO criteria for either FL3A or FL3B, and display a worse outcome than FL1-2. The distinction of FL3U may be useful to allow a better comprehension of high-grade FLs and to design clinical trials.

The diagnostic and therapeutic challenges of Grade 3B follicular lymphoma

Grade 3B follicular lymphoma (G3B FL) is rare, accounting for only 5-10% of FLs. Not only has it been routinely excluded from clinical trials, but data published on diagnosis, outcomes, choice of therapies and role of imaging are conflicting. With the advent of increasingly diverse treatment options for low-grade (G1-3A) FL, and the molecular subcategorisation of high-grade B-cell lymphomas, characterisation and treatment of G3B FL is ever more important as extrapolation of data becomes more difficult. New data have emerged exploring unique genetic characteristics, specific features on positron emission tomography imaging, choice of therapy, and outcomes of G3B FL in the current era. The present review will summarise and appraise these new data, and offer recommendations based on current evidence.

How do I sequence therapy for follicular lymphoma?

In the past decade, many new agents have been introduced for the management of follicular lymphoma, and therapeutic strategies have evolved over time. The clinical benefits of the different treatments vary and, at the time of progression, are influenced by patient and disease characteristics, the duration of the interval from last treatment, and the nature of the treatments previously administered. Altogether, this results in a marked heterogeneity of clinical situations encountered during the treatment of these patients. Despite numerous trials performed in the field, there is no single standard of care for patients undergoing second-line treatment or beyond. Furthermore, patients recruited in these studies have characteristics that rarely represent the full spectrum of possible clinical presentations. Therefore, to optimally individualize treatment, all of the risks (short- and long-term) and benefits of the available options should be well known. Discussing the goals of therapy with the patient at each intervention is also critical in providing an optimal sequence of therapy.

Prognostic significance of histologic grade and Ki-67 proliferation index in follicular lymphoma

The prognostic value of histologic grading and the Ki-67 proliferation index in follicular lymphoma (FL) is controversial. This study investigated the clinical usefulness of these two factors in Asian FL patients. Four hundred and thirty-three patients diagnosed with FL were retrospectively reviewed with a median follow-up time of 47.0 months (range, 24.0-168.0). The 10-year overall survival (OS) rate and progression-free survival (PFS) rate were 91.0% and 47.1%, respectively. Grade 3B and grade 3B with diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) showed a better PFS than grade 1-3A (P < 0.001), and similar findings were noted in patients who received rituximab-containing regimens (P = 0.002). In contrast, no significant differences in terms of OS or PFS were observed between grades 1-2 and 3A. In addition, patients with Ki-67 ≥ 30% had a significantly better PFS than patients with Ki-67 < 30% (P = 0.014), although the difference was eliminated in the multivariate analysis. Both grade and Ki-67 index had no impact on prognosis in patients who did not receive rituximab treatment. In conclusion, grade 3A is closely related to grade 1-2, as reflected by a similar indolent clinical course and a lower PFS rate than grade 3B/3B + DLBCL. In addition, a higher Ki-67 index seems to have a positive effect on PFS in FL patients.

Precision medicine in follicular lymphoma: Focus on predictive biomarkers

Current care for patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) offers most of them long-term survival. Improving it further will require careful patient selection. This review focuses on predictive biomarkers (ie, those whose outcome correlations depend on the treatment strategy) in FL, because awareness of what patient subsets benefit most or least from each therapy will help in this task. The first part of this review aims to summarize what biomarkers are predictive in FL, the magnitude of the effect and the quality of the evidence. We find predictive biomarkers in the setting of (a) indication of active treatment, (b) front-line induction (use of anthracyline-based regimens, CHOP vs bendamustine, addition of rituximab), (c) post-(front-line)induction (rituximab maintenance, radioimmunotherapy), and (d) relapse (hematopoietic stem cell transplant) and targeted agents. The second part of this review discusses the challenges of precision medicine in FL, including (a) cost, (b) clinical relevance considerations, and (c) difficulties over the broad implementation of biomarkers. We then provide our view on what biomarkers may become used in the next few years. We conclude by underscoring the importance of assessing the potential predictiveness of available biomarkers to improve patient care but also that there is a long road ahead before reaching their broad implementation due to remaining scientific, technological, and economic hurdles.

The Biological Basis of Histologic Transformation

Histologic transformation of follicular lymphoma remains the leading cause of follicular lymphoma-related mortality in the rituximab era. Both the diverse timing of transformation and heterogeneity in associated genomic events suggest that histologic transformation may itself comprise distinct disease entities. Successive indolent and transformation episodes occur by divergent clonal evolution from an inferred common progenitor cell, representing a potential therapeutic target. Existing biological knowledge largely pre-dates anti-CD20 therapy, and further prospective validation is essential. Inclusion of transformation cases in clinical trials incorporating biomarker discovery, and an integrated understanding of the genetic and microenvironmental factors underpinning transformation, may unearth renewed clinical opportunities.

First-line treatment with R-CHOP or rituximab-bendamustine in patients with follicular lymphoma grade 3A-results of a retrospective analysis

Based on centroblast frequency, follicular lymphoma (FL) is subdivided into grades 1-2, 3A, and 3B. Grade FL3A frequently coexists with FL1-2 (FL1-2-3A). Based on clinical trials, FL1-2 is treated with rituximab (R) or obinutuzumab plus bendamustine (B) or CHOP, while FL3B is treated with R-CHOP. In contrast, there are little data guiding therapy in FL3A. We present a retrospective, multicenter analysis of 95 FL3A or FL1-2-3A and 203 FL1-2 patients treated with R-CHOP or R-B first-line. R-CHOP facilitated a higher response rate (95% versus 76%) and longer overall survival (OS) (3-year OS 89% versus 73%, P = 0.008) in FL3A or FL1-2-3A, whereas the difference in progression-free survival (PFS) did not reach statistical significance. While transformation rates into aggressive lymphoma were similar between both groups, there were more additional malignancies after R-B compared with R-CHOP (6 versus 2 cases). In FL1-2, R-B achieved a higher 3-year PFS (79% versus 47%, P < 0.01), while there was no significant difference regarding OS or transformation. With the limitations of a retrospective analysis, these results suggest a benefit for R-CHOP over R-B in FL3A or FL1-2-3A. Confirmatory data from prospective clinical trials are needed.

The broad landscape of follicular lymphoma: Part II

Follicular lymphoma is a neoplasm derived from follicle center B cells, typically both centrocytes and centroblasts, in variable proportions according to the lymphoma grading. The pattern of growth may be entirely follicular, follicular and diffuse and rarely completely diffuse. It represents the second most common non-Hodgkin lymphoma, after diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and it is the most common low-grade mature B-cell lymphoma in Western countries. In the majority of cases, follicular lymphoma is a nodal tumor, occurring in adults and is frequently associated with the translocation t(14;18)(q32;q21)/IGH-BCL2. However, in recent years the spectrum of follicular lymphoma has expanded and small subsets of follicular lymphoma, which differ from common follicular lymphoma, have been identified and included in the current 2017 WHO classification. The aim of our review is to describe the broad spectrum of follicular lymphoma, pointing out that the identification of distinct clinicopathological variants of follicular lymphoma is relevant for the patient outcomes and treatment.

Long-term outcome comparing histological grades of follicular lymphoma patients treated with immunochemotherapy as first-line therapy: A retrospective analysis from two institutions

OBJECTIVES

To clarify the impact of histological grades in follicular lymphoma.

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed 250 patients diagnosed with FL treated with chemoimmunotherapy: 188 patients were grades 1-2 and 62 grade 3A.

RESULTS

In our series, grade 3A FL patients were older, higher proportion of localised disease and lower bone marrow infiltration at diagnosis comparing grades 1-2 FL patients. Estimated six-year progression-free survival and time to progression showed no differences between both groups [grade 3A: 56% (95%CI: 39%-73%) and 51% (95%CI: 41%-61%) vs grades 1-2:55% (95%CI: 46%-63%) and 57% (95%CI: 49%-65%), P = .782 and P = .521, respectively]. Estimated six-year overall survival was lower, 76% (95%CI: 64%-88%) for the grade 3A group than grades 1-2 83% (95%CI: 77%-89%); P = .044. In addition to that, cumulative incidence curves of death not related to lymphoma at 10 years between groups were as follows: [0.26 (95%CI: 0.25-0.27) and 0.05 (95%CI: 0.04-0.06) for G3AFL and G1-2FL, respectively], P = .010. Grade 3A FL showed in PFS curve no relapses after 6 years. These results were absolutely reproduced in 199 patients receiving R-CHOP regimen as induction.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate similar long-term outcomes in terms of progression-free survival and time to progression in grades 1-2 and 3A. No relapses were observed in G3AFL group after 6 years.

Evaluating Novel PET-CT Functional Parameters TLG and TMTV in Differentiating Low-grade Versus Grade 3A Follicular Lymphoma

BACKGROUND

Follicular lymphoma (FL) grading, low-grade 1-2 (LG) versus grade 3A (3A), informs management. However, accurate grading is challenging owing to disease heterogeneity and inter-reader variability. The [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) parameter maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) has utility in differentiating LG from 3A FL, but the utility of novel parameters total lesion glycolysis (TLG) and total metabolic tumor volume (TMTV) is unknown.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Retrospective review of diagnostic pre-treatment PET-CTs of patients aged > 18 years with FL grades 1-3A from 2009-2017 was performed. PET-CT parameters SUVmax, TLG, and TMTV values were generated using manual (MW) and semi-automated workflows (SW). Poisson regression and receiver operating characteristic curves were used to compare PET-CT parameters between LG and 3A.

RESULTS

A total of 49 patients with FL were identified: 38 LG and 11 3A. PET-CT parameters were significantly higher in 3A as compared with LG in both workflows. The cutoff values, sensitivities, and specificities were as follows: SUVmax: 10.4, 64%, and 74% in MW and 11.9, 73%, and 76% in SW; TLG: 543, 82%, and 74% in MW and 371, 73%, and 74% in SW; and TMTV: 141, 73%, and 76% in MW and 93, 64%, and 76% in SW. SUVmax had identical cutoff, sensitivity, and specificity across all 3 SWs, whereas TLG and TMTV had considerable variance across all 3 SWs.

CONCLUSIONS

TLG and TMTV are comparable to SUVmax in differentiating LG versus 3A FL. Cutoffs, sensitivities, and specificities varied in MW versus SW. Novel PET-CT parameters serve as reproducible adjuncts but not replacements for biopsy in differentiating grades of FL.

Limited stage grade 3 follicular lymphoma patients can experience favorable outcomes with combined modality therapy

Controversy exists regarding the optimal management of limited stage grade 3 follicular lymphoma (FL3). We assessed the treatment outcomes of 190 consecutive patients with stage I-II FL. Fifty two patients had FL3 disease, in whom the median age was 55 years. At a median follow-up of 65 months, 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 76.6% and 87.6%, respectively. Patients receiving systemic therapy followed by radiation therapy (RT) had a significantly better PFS (p=.003) than those treated with RT alone, but similar OS (p = .476). Patients treated with RT had 100% local control. Compared to 132 patients with grade 1-2 FL, those with FL3 had similar PFS (p = .493) and OS (p  =  .330). Patients with FL3 can experience favorable outcomes when treated with a combination of systemic therapy and RT, comparable to low grade FL.

Six versus eight doses of rituximab in patients with aggressive B cell lymphoma receiving six cycles of CHOP: results from the "Positron Emission Tomography-Guided Therapy of Aggressive Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas" (PETAL) trial

Standard first-line treatment of aggressive B cell lymphoma comprises six or eight cycles of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) plus eight doses of rituximab (R). Whether adding two doses of rituximab to six cycles of R-CHOP is of therapeutic benefit has not been systematically investigated. The Positron Emission Tomography-Guided Therapy of Aggressive Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas (PETAL) trial investigated the ability of [¹⁸F]-fluorodesoxyglucose PET scanning to guide treatment in aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphomas. Patients with B cell lymphomas and a negative interim scan received six cycles of R-CHOP with or without two extra doses of rituximab. For reasons related to trial design, only about a third underwent randomization between the two options. Combining randomized and non-randomized patients enabled subgroup analyses for diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL; n = 544), primary mediastinal B cell lymphoma (PMBCL; n = 37), and follicular lymphoma (FL) grade 3 (n = 35). With a median follow-up of 52 months, increasing the number of rituximab administrations failed to improve outcome. A non-significant trend for improved event-free survival was seen in DLBCL high-risk patients, as defined by the International Prognostic Index, while inferior survival was observed in female patients below the age of 60 years. Long-term outcome in PMBCL was excellent. Differences between FL grade 3a and FL grade 3b were not apparent. The results were confirmed in a Cox proportional hazard regression model and a propensity score matching analysis. In conclusion, adding two doses of rituximab to six cycles of R-CHOP did not improve outcome in patients with aggressive B cell lymphomas and a fast metabolic treatment response.

Chemotherapy-Free Initial Treatment of Advanced Indolent Lymphoma Has Durable Effect With Low Toxicity: Results From Two Nordic Lymphoma Group Trials With More Than 10 Years of Follow-Up

PURPOSE

For indolent lymphoma, the optimal timing, sequence, and choice of therapeutic regimens remain a matter of debate. In two Nordic Lymphoma Group randomized trials, symptomatic or clearly progressing patients were treated first line with a rituximab-containing regimen without chemotherapy. The purpose of this study was to assess long-term survival, risk of transformation, and need of new therapies.

METHODS

Data were collected at cross-sectional follow-up for 321 patients with indolent lymphoma (84% with follicular lymphomas [FL]) included in one of two Nordic Lymphoma Group trials (accrual 1998 to 1999 and 2002 to 2008). All patients received first-line therapy with one or two cycles of four weekly infusions of rituximab 375 mg/m2, and 148 were randomly allocated to the addition of interferon alfa-2a. Follow-up data were retrieved from initial trial databases and medical records on repeated clinical evaluations.

RESULTS

At the end of follow-up, 73% of patients were alive, with a median follow-up after random assignment of 10.6 years. Among all, 36% (38% with FL) had never needed chemotherapy. For patients with FL who required new therapy within 24 months because of early disease progression, the 10-year survival rate was 59% versus 81% for those with longer remission. Interferon was not shown to improve long-term outcome. Transformation was diagnosed in 20% of all patients (2.4% per person-year) and in 18% with FL. An additional malignancy was found in 12%.

CONCLUSION

Approximately one third of patients with symptomatic indolent lymphoma (30% with FL, 23% without FL) did not need new therapy in the long term after first-line rituximab without chemotherapy. In the entire cohort, 10-year survival was excellent with no major safety issues, which suggests that chemotherapy can be delayed safely in the majority of patients.

[Clinical characteristics and survival analysis of de novo grade 3 or transformed follicular lymphoma patients]

Objective: To evaluate the clinical characteristics and survival outcomes of patients with de novo grade 3 or transformed follicular lymphoma (FL). Methods: Fifty-two patients treated at Peking University Cancer Hospital between January 2009 and September 2017 were assessed, including 28 patients with FL 3A grade, 13 patients with FL 3B grade, 11 patients with transformed FL. Baseline characteristics, survival and prognostic factors were analyzed. Results: ① Twenty-six male and 26 female patients were enrolled, including 28 patients with FL 3A grade, 13 patients with FL 3B grade, 11 patients with transformed FL. ②The 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for the entire cohort were 56.0% and 80.6%, respectively. Patients with international prognostic index (IPI) score 0-1 demonstrated significantly better 3-year PFS (80.3% vs 20.1%; t=18.902, P<0.001) and OS (95.7% vs 57.0%; t=10.406, P<0.001) than patients with IPI score 2-3. Three-year PFS (94.1% vs 37.2% vs 25.2%; P=0.002) and OS (100.0% vs 76.0% vs 59.8%; P=0.020) were also significantly different among patients with FLIPI 1 score 0-1, 2, ≥3. FLIPI 2 score was also identified as a prognostic factor for 3-year PFS (68.4%, 0, 0; P=0.001) and OS(87.5%, 76.2%, 0; P=0.003). ③Multivariate analysis indicated a significant association of PFS (HR=3.536, P=0.015) and OS (HR=15.713, P=0.015) with IPI. FLIPI 2 was associated with OS (score 0-1, HR=0.078, P=0.007; score 2, HR=0.080, P=0.022). Conclusion: De novo grade 3 or transformed FL might be a group of curable disease with current treatment strategies. IPI is still a prognostic tool in this scenario.

Gene expression profiling reveals a close relationship between follicular lymphoma grade 3A and 3B, but distinct profiles of follicular lymphoma grade 1 and 2

A linear progression model of follicular lymphomas (FL) FL1, FL2 and FL3A has been favored, since FL3A often co-exist with an FL1/2 component. FL3B, in contrast, is thought to be more closely related to diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), and both are often simultaneously present in one tumor (DLBCL/FL3B). To obtain more detailed insights into follicular lymphoma progression, a comprehensive analysis of a well-defined set of FL1/2 (n=22), FL3A (n=16), FL3B (n=6), DLBCL/FL3B (n=9), and germinal center B-cell-type diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (n=45) was undertaken using gene expression profiling, immunohistochemical stainings and genetic analyses by fluorescence in situ hybridization. While immunohistochemical (CD10, IRF4/MUM1, Ki67, BCL2, BCL6) and genetic profiles (translocations of BCL2, BCL6 and MYC) delineate FL1-3A from FL3B and DLBCL/FL3B, significant differences were observed between FL1/2 and FL3A upon gene expression profiling. Interestingly, FL3B turned out to be closely related to FL3A, not categorizing within a separate gene expression cluster, and both FL3A and FL3B showed overlapping profiles in between FL1/2 and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Finally, based upon their gene expression pattern, DLBCL/FL3B represent a composite form of FL3B and DLBCL, with the majority of samples more closely resembling the latter. The fact that gene expression profiling clearly separated FL1/2 from both FL3A and FL3B suggests a closer biological relationship between the latter. This notion, however, is in contrast to immunohistochemical and genetic profiles of the different histological FL subtypes that point to a closer relationship between FL1/2 and FL3A, and separates them from FL3B.

Management of untreated advanced stage follicular lymphoma: Role of patient discernment

Follicular lymphoma is the most common indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Advanced stage disease is common at diagnosis. The timing of treatment for follicular lymphoma is best approached by considering the combination of presence or absence of symptoms along with estimation of tumor burden. Upfront treatment strategies should take into initial presentation variables, pace of disease progression and goals of care after discussion with the patient. Treatment approaches remain diverse and patient discernment is paramount.

Risk stratification in follicular lymphoma

Advances in the understanding of FL biology, molecular characteristics and clinical risk factors are further highlighting the heterogeneity of this disease. Historically used prognostic factors were broadly based on clinical and laboratory features at the time of diagnosis. However novel prognostic factors are emerging that can be studied at the time of diagnosis, and relapse, and use a variety of tools including gene alterations and diagnostic imaging. These novel discoveries are being implemented into daily practice with the ultimate goal of providing a precise, individualized approach to every patient with FL.

Transformed follicular lymphoma

Follicular Lymphoma (FL) is the second most common type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma and is considered to be the prototype of indolent lymphomas. Histologic transformation into an aggressive lymphoma, which is expected to occur at a rate of 2 to 3% each year, is associated with rapid progression, treatment resistance, and poor prognosis. Recent modifications to the physiopathologic mechanism of transformed follicular lymphoma (t-FL) have been proposed, including genetic and epigenetic mechanisms as well as a role for the microenvironment. Although t-FL is considered a devastating complication, as it is associated with treatment-refractory disease and a dismal outcome, recent data in the rituximab era have suggested that not only is the prognosis less severe than reported in the previous literature but the risk of transformation is also lower. Thus, this study aimed to review the most recent research on t-FL in an attempt to better understand the clinical meaning of transformation from FL to diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and the impact of current treatment strategies on the curability of this intriguing subentity of lymphoma.

Current prognostic and predictive factors in follicular lymphoma

Follicular lymphoma (FL) is generally considered an indolent disorder. With modern day treatments, long remissions are often achieved both in the front-line and relapsed setting. However, a subset of patients has a more aggressive course and a worse outcome. Their identification is the main purpose of modern day prognostic tools. In this review, we attempt to summarize the evidence concerning prognostic and predictive factors in FL, including (1) pre-treatment factors, from baseline clinical characteristics and imaging tests to histological grade, the microenvironment and genomic abnormalities; (2) post-treatment factors, i.e., depth of response, measured both by imaging tests and minimal residual disease; (3) factors at relapse and duration of response; and (4) prognostic factors in histological transformation. We conclude that, despite the existence of numerous tools, the availability of some of them is still limited; they generally suffer from notable downsides, and most have unproven predictive value, thus having scarce bearing on the choice of regimen at present. However, with the technological and scientific developments of the last few years, the potential for these prognostic factors is promising, particularly in combination, which will probably, in time, help guide therapeutic decisions.

[Recovery of paraffin blocks and central archiving : Experiences of the Kiel lymph node registry and the German study group for Hodgkin lymphoma]

BACKGROUND

Central collection of tissue blocks for pathological and translational research is particularly important in rare diseases. Transfer of tissue blocks from primary to central pathology is of crucial importance.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to answer the following questions: Has the transfer of tissue blocks sent for consultation or within clinical trials changed over the last 20 years? What are the reasons for reclaiming tissue blocks by the primary pathology and what actions would convince primary pathologists to leave the blocks in the reference pathology?

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The first 100 biopsies of each year between 1995 and 2015 (n = 2100), as well as all tissue transfers within therapeutic studies (n = 1405, German Hodgkin Study Group, GHSG) between 1998 and 2015, were analyzed separately for block reclaims using the Department of Pathology database. A questionnaire evaluated the reasons for block reclaiming by the peripheral pathologists.

RESULTS

There is a significant increase in block reclaims during the period analyzed among submissions for consultation as well as in clinical trials (linear regression, p = 0.0195 and p = 0.0107). The percentage of block reclaims does not differ between consultations and cases submitted upon request within clinical trials (p = 0.2404, t-test). A survey among pathologies that reclaim the block showed that their willingness to leave the block at the reference center would increase if the compatibility with accreditation guidelines (39.3%), a positive statement from professional associations (25%), or a formal confirmation of availability (53.6%) is provided.

DISCUSSION

In particular, to improve research on rare diseases, it is desirable to point out the compatibility of central archiving in a designated center with accreditation guidelines.

When to treat patients with relapsed follicular lymphoma

INTRODUCTION

Follicular lymphoma is the most common indolent lymphoma and remains incurable for the majority of patients despite recent major advances. The disease is typically initially chemosensitive, however relapse is inevitable. In contrast to the frontline setting, studies addressing the optimal timing of initiating second line therapy have not been performed and subsequently practice varies considerably. Areas covered: In the review, we consider the available literature regarding timing of therapy in patients with follicular lymphoma and consider key insights from FL biology to provide guidance on when to treat patients with relapsed disease. Expert commentary: We recommend re-biopsy at time of relapse, immediate treatment of patients with histologic transformation. Treatment for those with recurrent follicular lymphoma may be safely delayed in the absence of bulk, compressive or constitutional symptoms, cytopenias related to lymphoma or steady progression. Patients with localized relapse may be considered for radiotherapy if the involved field would result in minimal toxicity.

Systemic Front Line Therapy of Follicular Lymphoma: When, to Whom and How

The natural history of follicular lymphoma is usually characterized by an indolent course with a high response rate to the first line therapy followed by recurrent relapses, with a time to next treatment becoming shorter after each subsequent treatment line. More than 80% of patients have advanced stage disease at diagnosis. The time of initiation and the nature of the treatment is mainly conditioned by symptoms, tumor burden, lymphoma grading, co-morbidities and patients preference. A number of clinical and biological factors have been determined to be prognostic in this disease, but the majority of them could not show to be predictive of response to treatment, and therefore can’t be used to guide the treatment choice. CD20 expression is the only predictive factor recognized in the treatment of FL and justifies the use of “naked” or “conjugated” anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies as a single agent or in combination with chemo- or targeted therapy. Nevertheless, as this marker is almost universally found in FL, it has little role in the choice of treatment. The outcome of patients with FL improved significantly in the last years, mainly due to the widespread use of rituximab, autologous and allogeneic transplantation in young and fit relapsed patients, the introduction of new drugs and the improvement in diagnostic accuracy and management of side effects. Agents as new monoclonal antibodies, immuno-modulating drugs, and target therapy have recently been developed and approved for the relapsed setting, while studies to evaluate their role in first line treatment are still ongoing. Here we report our considerations on first line treatment approach and on the potential factors which could help in the choice of therapy.