Surgical stress: the role of pain and analgesia

Surgery for primary ventral hernias and risk of postoperative pain, nausea: a population-based register study

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate risk factors for postoperative pain and nausea after open repair for primary ventral hernias.

METHOD

A population-based registry study was conducted based on data assembled from the Swedish national ventral hernia repair register between January 2016 and December 2021and cross-matched with the Swedish perioperative register.

RESULTS

Altogether 2064 open ventral hernia repairs were registered, including 816 (39.5%) performed on women. Of these, 91 (4.4%) were registered to suffer postoperative nausea or vomiting (PONV) and 403 (19.5%) postoperative pain (PP). In both univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses, significant predictors of postoperative nausea and pain included male gender, which was associated with lower odds of both postoperative nausea (multivariable OR: 0.30, 95% CI: 0.18-0.49, P < 0.001) and postoperative pain (multivariable OR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.44-0.83, P = 0.002). Additional predictors of postoperative nausea included emergency surgery (multivariable OR: 4.08, 95% CI: 1.10-15.08, P = 0.035), operative time > 40 min (multivariable OR: 4.15, 95% CI: 2.24-7.69, P < 0.001). Conversely total intravenous anesthesia was associated with lower incidence of PONV (multivariable OR: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.22-0.74, P = 0.003). Other factors, such as age, BMI, smoking status, ASA classification, hernia size, surgery type, operative time, and anesthesia type, were not significantly associated with postoperative pain after adjusting for other variables.

CONCLUSION

Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) are significantly reduced with total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) compared to inhalation anesthesia, with no notable difference in postoperative pain between the two methods.

Serum Cortisol and Blood Glucose Concentrations in Anesthetized Dogs Administered Levobupivacaine and Low-Dose Dexmedetomidine for Regional Anesthesia of the Oral Cavity

The effects on the stress response, postanesthetic sedation, and altered behavior were evaluated following regional anesthesia and dental treatment in 40 dogs. Serum cortisol and blood glucose concentrations were measured following the administration of levobupivacaine (LBUP) 0.5% and dexmedetomidine (DEX) (0.5 µg/kg) or a placebo. The dogs were randomly assigned to 4 groups of 10 dogs each. All dogs received a regional nerve block using LBUP 0.5%. Group 1 (LBUP + DEX IV) also received DEX intravenously (IV); group 2 (LBUP + PLC IV) also received a placebo IV; group 3 (LBUP + DEX IO) also received DEX in one infraorbital (IO) block; and group 4 (LBUP + DEX IA) also received DEX in one inferior alveolar (IA) block. Serum cortisol and blood glucose concentrations were determined before the administration of oral blocks and at the end of the procedure. Sedation and behavior scores were assessed before premedication and hourly for 6 h after the end of anesthesia. Cortisol concentration did not change in any group at either evaluation time. The glucose concentration was higher (P < .05) only in the LBUP + DEX IA group at the end of the procedure. The sedation score was higher until the end of the observation period only in the LBUP + DEX IV and LBUP + PLC IV groups. No change in behavior score was observed in any of the groups. The reduction of perioperative stress response in all groups was due to the use of LBUP and not DEX.

Influence of laparoscopic surgery on the outcomes of radical cystectomy within a multimodal rehabilitation protocol

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE

The implementation of Enhanced Recover After Surgery (ERAS) multimodal rehabilitation protocols in radical cystectomy has shown to improve outcomes in hospital stay and complications. The aim of this analysis is to evaluate the impact of laparoscopic surgery on radical cystectomy within a multimodal rehabilitation program.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study was carried out in a third level center between 2011 and 2020 including patients with bladder cancer submitted to radical cystectomy according to an ERAS (Enhanced Recovery After Surgery) protocol and the Spanish Multimodal Rehabilitation Group (GERM) with 20 items to be fulfilled.

RESULTS

A total of 250 radical cystectomies were performed throughout the study period, 42.8% by open surgery (OS) and 57.2% by laparoscopic surgery (LS). The groups are comparable in demographic and clinical variables (p > 0.05). Operative time was longer in the LS group (248.4 ± 55.0 vs. 286.2 ± 51.9 min; p < 0.001). However, bleeding was significantly lower in the LS group (417.5 ± 365.7 vs. 877.9 ± 529.7 cc; p < 0.001), as was the need for blood transfusion (33.6% vs. 58.9%; p < 0.001). Postoperative length of stay (11.5 ± 10.5 vs. 20.1 ± 17.2 days; p < 0.001), total and major complications were also significantly lower in this group (LS). The readmission rate was lower in the LS group but not significantly (36.4% vs. 29.4%; p = 0.237). The difference between 90-day mortality in both groups was not statistically significant (2.8% LS vs. 4.3% OS; p = 0.546). The differences were maintained in the multivariate models.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic surgery within a multimodal rehabilitation program increases operative time but significantly decreases intraoperative bleeding, transfusion requirements, postoperative length of stay, and complications.

Assessment of the Safety and Efficiency of a Preperitoneal Continuous Infusion Using Bupivacaine after Abdominal Laparotomy in Digestive Carcinology

The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of continuous preperitoneal wound infiltration using bupivacaine after abdominal laparotomy in relation to plasma bupivacaine concentration and visual analog scale. Our study was performed on 60 adult patients with digestive cancer, operated at laparotomy, and randomized into two groups: bupivacaine and saline groups. The wound infiltration was through a multiperforated catheter along the scar. For the bupivacaine group, 0.25% bupivacaine was used; however, for the saline group, only saline (0.9%) was infiltrated. The pain was assessed by using the visual analog scale (VAS) in both groups. Plasma bupivacaine concentration was measured by high-performance liquid chromatography. The bupivacaine group had significantly lower postoperative morphine consumption and lower postoperative pain than the saline group (P < 0.0001). The majority of patients in the bupivacaine group had significant relief with the VAS scores of less than 3/10 cm at rest and 6/10 cm on mobilization. However, for the saline group, the VAS scores were higher than 6/10 cm either at rest or with mobilization. There was no clinical sign of toxicity and no technical complications for the bupivacaine group. Only eleven patients required morphine in this group, but the majority of patients received morphine at different doses in the saline group. Plasma bupivacaine was at very low concentrations. Overall, the current study has confirmed that continuous preperitoneal wound infiltration as postoperative analgesia is a simple, effective, and safe technique. It allows decreasing of morphine consumption and subsequently canceling their side effects.

Comparison of spinal versus general anesthesia on the perioperative blood glucose levels in patients undergoing lower abdominal and pelvic surgery: a prospective cohort study, Ethiopia

Surgery is linked with fear and stress that disrupt metabolic and neuroendocrine activities, which impair normal maintained glucose metabolism that leads to stress hyperglycaemia. This study aimed to compare the effect of general and spinal anaesthesia on perioperative blood glucose levels in patients undergoing lower abdominal and pelvic surgery.

Methods

This prospective observational cohort study recruits 70 adult patients who underwent lower abdominal and pelvic surgery under general and spinal anaesthesia; 35 in each group. A systematic random sampling technique was used to select study participants. Capillary blood glucose was measured at four perioperative times. An independent t-test, dependent t-test, and Manny-Whitney U test were used for statistical analysis, as appropriate. P values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

No statistically significant difference was observed in mean blood glucose levels at baseline and 5 min after induction of general anaesthesia and complete blocks of spinal anaesthesia. But at the end of surgery and 60 min after the end of surgery the mean blood glucose levels were statistically significantly higher in the general anaesthesia group compared with the spinal anaesthesia group (P<0.05). And the blood glucose level was significantly increased from baseline compared with the different time intervals in the general anaesthesia group.

Conclusion

The mean blood glucose levels were lower in patients undergoing surgery under spinal anaesthesia compared with general anaesthesia. The authors recommend spinal over general anaesthesia whenever possible for patients undergoing lower abdominal and pelvic surgery.

Efficacy of Transversus Abdominis Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Different Lower Abdominal Surgeries in a Tertiary Care Hospital-Chengalpattu District

Background

Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is one of the novel approaches and an effective method for providing postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing lower abdominal surgeries.

Objectives

To evaluate the efficacy and routine usage of TAP block for postoperative analgesia in different lower abdominal surgeries.

Methods

It is a randomized, double-blind trial. Sixty patients undergoing lower abdominal surgeries in sub-arachnoid block with bupivicaine 0.5% were randomized to undergo TAP block (n = 30) using ropivacaine 0.375% as the study group. In the control group (n = 30), only the standard analgesic regimen (paracetamol 1 gm IV and tramadol 50 mg IV) was given. Postoperative pain was assessed using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at 30 min and 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 hrs. First analgesic request after TAP block was compared with a subsequent number of analgesics given postoperatively. Rescue analgesia given postoperatively at request after TAP block was paracetamol 1 gm IV and tramadol 50 mg IV.

Results

Patients who received TAP block had a significant reduction in postoperative pain scores at 30 min - 0 (0 - 1), 4 hrs - 0 (0 - 4), 8 hrs - 4 (3 - 5), 12 hrs - 1 (0 - 4), 16 hrs - 1 (1 - 2), 20 hrs -1 (0 - 2), 24 hrs -1 (0 - 1) with P-value < 0.05 in the first 24 hrs. TAP block also delayed the first rescue analgesic request (265 ± 24 min Vs. 66 ± 15 min with P-value < 0.005) and reduction in subsequent analgesic requirements in the first 24 hrs (1.04 ± 0.26 Vs. 2.3 ± 0.48 with P-value < 0.05).

Conclusions

TAP block holds a considerable part in postoperative analgesia. Highly effective for the first 24 hrs in patients undergoing different lower abdominal surgeries, it delays the first rescue analgesic request, decreases the subsequent analgesic requirement, and augments early mobilization, discharge, and cost-effectiveness.

Evaluation of continuous wound infusion with local analgesics in postoperative renal transplantation patients: A retrospective study

Objectives

The objective is to evaluate the efficacy of the continuous wound infusion (CWI) with Ropivacaine (naropeine 2 mg/ml) on postoperative pain, analgesics consumption, and bowel function in renal transplantation patients.

Materials and Methods

A retrospective study trial including 79 patients who underwent renal transplantation. Patients were separated into two groups (catheter or without catheter). We identified 52 (65.8%) patients who received catheter wound infusion during the first 48 h postoperatively. On the other hand, 27 (34.1%) patients received standard without catheter anesthetic technique. Catheter wound infusion was achieved through a 12 cm catheter, inserted subcutaneously after abdominal closure. The catheter was placed above the external oblique aponeurosis. All postoperative data were examined to evaluate the first postoperative 48 h. This study aims to assess three variables: postoperative pain analysis through a visual analog scale, analgesics consumption, and bowel function.

Results

The overall score of the three variables was studied. Regarding pain assessment, we have determined that the group of patients with catheter scored better than patients without catheter with borderline significance (66.3 vs. 61.2 consecutively; P = 0.0843). An early bowel function was noted in patients with catheters on the 2nd postoperative day (P = 0.0209). Moreover, patients without catheter consumed more painkillers with nonsignificant difference (P = 0.2499).

Conclusion

Patients with catheter showed earlier bowel function than the noncatheter group on the 2nd postoperative day. The catheter group had better pain evaluation.

Effect of oral pre-emptive analgesia on pain management after total knee arthroplasty: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is currently regarded as an effective treatment for knee osteoarthritis, relieving patients' pain and significantly enhancing their quality of life and activity levels, allowing them to return to work and daily life after surgery. However, some TKA patients suffer from varying degrees of postoperative residual pain and opioid abuse, which negatively impacts their recovery and quality of life. It has been reported that preoperative treatment with multimodal analgesics improves postoperative pain and reduces opioid consumption. However, there is no conclusive evidence that pre-emptive analgesia provides the same benefits in TKA. In order to inform future research, this protocol focuses on the efficacy and safety of oral analgesics used in TKA pre-emptive analgesia.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We will search the literature on the involvement of pre-emptive analgesia in the management of pain in TKA from the PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, from their inception to 1 February 2023. Additionally, clinical registry platforms will be investigated to collect data for ongoing studies. Using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool, the quality assessment will be conducted. RevMan V.5.4 will be used for the meta-analysis. The statistic I 2 will be used to measure the percentage of total variability due to heterogeneity between studies. Where appropriate, subgroup and sensitivity analyses, assessment of evidence quality and publication bias will be conducted.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

No ethical approval and consent is required for this systematic review. Moreover, the results of this systematic review will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42022380782.

Opioid-free total intravenous anesthesia for thyroid and parathyroid surgery: Protocol for a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial

Background

Opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) may improve postoperative outcomes by reducing opioid-related adverse effects. This study aims to evaluate the effects of OFA on postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), postoperative pain, and 30-day outcomes after thyroid and parathyroid surgery.

Methods

This two-center, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial will include 400 adult patients scheduled for thyroid and parathyroid surgery. Patients will be randomly assigned, 1:1 and stratified by sex and site, to an OFA group (esketamine, lidocaine, and dexmedetomidine) or a control group (opioid-based anesthesia with sufentanil). All patients will receive propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia and PONV prophylaxis with dexamethasone and ondansetron. The primary outcome is the incidence of PONV (defined as experiencing any event of nausea, retching, or vomiting) during the first 48 h postoperatively. The secondary outcomes include the severity of PONV, antiemetic rescue therapy, pain scores at rest and while coughing, need for rescue analgesia, perioperative adverse effects related to anesthetics or analgesics (hypotension, bradycardia, hypertension, tachycardia, desaturation, dizziness, headache, hallucination, and nightmare), time to extubation, length of post-anesthesia care unit stay, length of postoperative hospital stay, patient satisfaction, and a composite of 30-day major adverse events (myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest, cerebrovascular accident, coma, acute renal failure, pulmonary embolism, sepsis, septic shock, deep neck space infection, reintubation, reoperation, blood transfusion, failure to wean off ventilator, and death). Analyses will be performed in the modified intention-to-treat population.

Discussion

We hypothesize that our OFA regimen reduces PONV after thyroid and parathyroid surgery. We will also investigate whether OFA leads to improvements in postoperative pain and major adverse events. Our results will offer evidence for optimizing anesthesia regimens in patients who undergo thyroid and parathyroid surgical procedures.

Clinical trial registration

http://www.chictr.org.cn, identifier: ChiCTR2200059656.

Respiratory response to finger clamping in dogs under general anesthesia: A descriptive pilot study

Aim of the study

The aim of this study was to assess the effects of a nociceptive stimulus on respiratory variables in anesthetized dogs.

Material and method

Eleven dogs received acepromazine administered intramuscularly (IM) at a dose of 0.04 mg kg−1 45 mins before induction of anesthesia. Loss of consciousness was obtained with midazolam at 0.2 mg kg−1 and propofol administered at a dose of 2 mg kg−1 intravenously (IV). Orotracheal intubation was performed and anesthesia was maintained with isoflurane in 100% oxygen. Inspired (VTi) and expired (VTe) tidal volume (VT), minute volume (VM), inspiratory and expiratory time (Ti; Te) were measured and recorded twice a second by a spirometer. The Drive (VT/Ti) and Timing [Ti/(Ti+ Te)] were calculated.

After stabilizing the depth of anesthesia the variables measured by the spirometer were recorded for 5 mins [T0−5-T0]. Then (T0) interdigital clamping of the hind leg was performed until a withdrawal movement was observed. If no reaction occurred, the clamp was left in place for 60s. After removal of the clamp, respiratory variables were measured continuously for another 5 mins [T0-T0+5]. At T0+5 morphine (0.2 mg kg−1 IV) was administered. Five minutes later (T0+10), a second clamp test was performed, using the same procedure. At T0+15 the data recording was stopped.

Result

The results showed a large variation in the individual values of Drive and Timing and are presented in a descriptive manner. The observation of Drive values over time showed variations following nociceptive stimuli. Drive appears to have increased only for those dogs that did not move during the stimulus, and were therefore pinched for a full 60 s. In contrast, the study of the Timing values revealed no difference between the data before and after nociceptive stimulation. However Timing seems to increase after morphine administration.

Conclusion

Drive remains a parameter that needs to be studied in depth to determine its sensitivity and precocity to monitor acute nociception.

Assessment and Management of Pain in Patients Sustaining Burns at Emergency Department Kenyatta National Hospital, Kenya: A Descriptive Study

Background: Poorly managed burn pain affects the victim by delayed healing, psychological disturbances, and chronic pain. Burn injuries are the fourth leading cause of injuries worldwide. The incidence of thermal burns in Kenya is 3%. Pain assessment and control are integral parts of management that a burn victim should be offered. We lack data on pain management in burn patients during setup. Methods: A descriptive study was carried out at the emergency department (ED) of Kenyatta National Hospital. We enrolled patients who sustained thermal burns until a sample 138 patients was reached. Enrollment of patients was done from February to August 2015. The pain level was assessed using a visual analogue scale, and the Lund and Browder chart was used to record the depth and extent of the burn. Data on the type of analgesia prescribed and its route of administration was collected. Data was analyzed using STATA v.11. Results: The median age of the sample was 28 years with a male to female ratio 1.8:1. The majority of the victims (38%) sustained flame burns. The median total body surface area was 19.5%. Pain assessment was done in 2% with a visual analogue scale and face pain recognition scale. Mean Visual Analogue score was 7. Analgesia was offered to 96% of participants, and it was unimodal in the majority, 76.7%, and the preferred drug of choice was morphine. The majority of all burn patients had sustained moderate to major burns. The tools used to assess pain in this hospital were Face Pain Recognition Scale and Visual Analogue Scale; however, pain assessment was done on a meagre 2% of the sample. Conclusions: A minority of the patients had any sort of pain assessment done at the emergency department. As a result, burn pain was inappropriately managed. There is a need to improve the assessment of burn pain and improve its management by encouraging training of ED burn care providers by burn surgeons and pain therapists.

The efficacy of laparoscopic transversus abdominis plane block on reducing postoperative narcotic usage in patients undergoing minimally invasive adrenalectomy

BACKGROUND

Post-operative pain relief after abdominal operations is critical for patient satisfaction and rapid recovery. Narcotics have been a traditional part of postoperative analgesia, with transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block introduced recently. The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of laparoscopic TAP block on postoperative pain control in patients undergoing minimally invasive adrenalectomy.

METHODS

This was an institutional review board-approved retrospective study. Parameters related to postoperative pain control were compared between patients who underwent robotic transabdominal lateral adrenalectomy with (after December 2018) or without laparoscopic TAP block (control group) (before December 2018) by one surgeon. Statistics were performed using Mann Whitney U and Chi-square tests.

RESULTS

There were 86 patients in the TAP and 83 patients in the control group. Groups were similar regarding demographic and clinical parameters. Despite the availability of intravenous acetaminophen to a higher percentage of patients in the control (31.3%) versus the TAP group (8.1%), 0-24 h lowest postoperative pain scores were significantly lower in the TAP group (P < 0.0001). In TAP versus control group, percentage of patients requiring narcotics and amount of narcotics used was lower (P = 0.04 vs P = 0.0004, respectively). Mainly due to less pain-related over-stay, percentage of patients requiring more than a day of hospital stay was less in the TAP (12%) versus control group (18%) (P = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, the utility of TAP block in patients undergoing minimally invasive adrenalectomy has not been reported in the past. This study shows that there may be benefits of laparoscopic TAP block in reducing post-operative narcotic usage while improving pain control in these patients.

Perioperative Opioid Administration

Opioids form an important component of general anesthesia and perioperative analgesia. Discharge opioid prescriptions are identified as a contributor for persistent opioid use and diversion. In parallel, there is increased enthusiasm to advocate opioid-free strategies, which include a combination of known analgesics and adjuvants, many of which are in the form of continuous infusions. This article critically reviews perioperative opioid use, especially in view of opioid-sparing versus opioid-free strategies. The data indicate that opioid-free strategies, however noble in their cause, do not fully acknowledge the limitations and gaps within the existing evidence and clinical practice considerations. Moreover, they do not allow analgesic titration based on patient needs; are unclear about optimal components and their role in different surgical settings and perioperative phases; and do not serve to decrease the risk of persistent opioid use, thereby distracting us from optimizing pain and minimizing realistic long-term harms.

Optimal Methods of Documenting Analgesic Efficacy in Neonatal Piglets Undergoing Castration

Analgesic products for piglet castration are critically needed. This requires extensive animal experimentation such as to meet regulatory-required proof of efficacy. At present, there are no validated methods of assessing pain in neonatal piglets. This poses challenges for investigators to optimize trial design and to meet ethical obligations to minimize the number of animals needed. Pain in neonatal piglets may be subtle, transient, and/or variably expressed and, in the absence of validated methods, investigators must rely on using a range of biochemical, physiological and behavioural variables, many of which appear to have very low (or unknown) sensitivity or specificity for documenting pain, or pain-relieving effects. A previous systematic review of this subject was hampered by the high degree of variability in the literature base both in terms of methods used to assess pain and pain mitigation, as well as in outcomes reported. In this setting we provide a narrative review to assist in determining the optimal methods currently available to detect piglet pain during castration and methods to mitigate castration-induced pain. In overview, the optimal outcome variables identified are nociceptive motor and vocal response scores during castration and quantitative sensory-threshold response testing and pain-associated behaviour scores following castration.

The Safety and Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Bilateral Dual Transversus Abdominis Plane (BD-TAP) Block in ERAS Program of Laparoscopic Hepatectomy: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Blinded, Clinical Study

Purpose

Postoperative pain management for patients undergoing hepatic resection is still a challenge due to the risk of perioperative liver dysfunction. The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is a promising regional analgesic technique. However, the correct guidelines regarding the dose and regimen of local anesthetics in patients undergoing hepatic resection have yet to be established completely. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ultrasound-guided BD-TAP block with a large dose of ropivacaine in laparoscopic hepatectomy.

Patients and Methods

This prospective, blinded, randomized, controlled study was conducted with 50 patients who were scheduled for selective laparoscopic hepatectomy. Patients who received a BD-TAP block (3 mg/kg of ropivacaine diluted to 60 mL) with general anesthesia were categorized into the BD-TAP block group (n = 25), and those who received general anesthesia were categorized into the control group (n = 25). The primary outcomes were consumption of sufentanil within 48 hours post-operation and plasma ropivacaine concentration. The secondary outcomes were the severity of pain (at rest and upon coughing), nausea and/or vomiting, and quality of recovery.

Results

Compared with the control group, the patients in BD-TAP block group had a significant reduction of postoperative sufentanil consumption at 2 hours (P = 0.019), 24 hours (P = 0.001), and 48 hours (P = 0.001), and the visual analog scale (VAS) scores on coughing were significantly lower at postoperative 2 hours (P = 0.004). There were no statistically significant differences in postoperative nausea and/or vomiting, flatus, catheter removal, off-bed activity, liver function, or postoperative hospital stay. The mean peak total ropivacaine concentration was 1,067.85 ng/mL, which occurred 1 hour after administering the block, and mean free ropivacaine concentration was 52.32 ng/mL. The highest individual peak plasma concentration was 2,360.90 ng/mL at 45 min postinjection, and the free ropivacaine concentration was 139.29 ng/mL.

Conclusion

Ultrasound-guided BD-TAP block provides effective postoperative analgesia after laparoscopic hepatectomy. This study also confirms that ultrasound-guided BD-TAP blocks with 3 mg/kg ropivacaine during laparoscopic hepatectomy almost never results in the plasma ropivacaine concentrations associated with neurotoxicity.

Erector Spinae Plane Block in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy, Is There a Difference? A Randomized Controlled Trial

Background

The ultrasound (US)-guided erector spinae plane (ESP) block and oblique subcostal transversus abdominis plane (OSTAP) block are used to decrease postoperative pain and subsequently opioids consumption.

Aim

The aim was to test the hypothesis that US-guided ESP blocks can produce more reduction in opioid usage during the first 24 h after laparoscopic cholecystectomy when compared to OSTAP block.

Settings and Design

Seventy adult patients (20-60 years old) who were planned to undergo elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were allocated in three groups in randomized controlled trial.

Materials and Methods

The three groups received either port site infiltration, US-guided bilateral ESP block (ESP group), or OSTAP (OSTAP group) with bupivacaine hydrochloride 0.25%.

Statistical Analysis

Postoperative 24 h Morphine consumption, visual analogue scale (VAS), the intraoperative fentanyl (μg) and equivalent morphine dose in the recovery unit were recorded and analyzed using one-way analysis of variance.

Results

The mean 24-h morphine consumption was statistically significant between groups (P < 0.001), but it was insignificant between ESP and OSTAP (P = 0.173). Median (range) and interquartile range of intraoperatively consumed fentanyl showed significance between the three groups (P < 0.001). There was insignificance between ESP block Group II and OSTAP block Group III (P = 0.95) by post hoc analysis. The mean values of VAS at both rest and movement of the control group were significantly higher than the ESP block group at 6 and 12 h postoperative.

Conclusion

Bilateral US-guided ESP block was found to be as effective as bilateral US OSTAP block. There was more decrease in intraoperative rescue fentanyl, PACU morphine analgesia, 24-h morphine, and pain assessment score in both groups than the control port-site infiltration group.Clinical trial registration number: NCT03398564.

Nociception monitoring tools using autonomic tone changes for intraoperative analgesic guidance in pediatric patients

Nociception monitoring devices using changes in autonomic nervous system activity have been developed in numerous ways. Although there have been few studies conducted on children, compared to the relatively higher number of studies on adults, most of the nociception monitors in children, as in adults, appear to be more useful than the standard clinical practice that uses hemodynamic parameters in the evaluation and treatment of intraoperative nociception (pain) during general anesthesia. Particularly, when monitoring the surgical pleth index (SPI) in anesthetized children, the application of a new target range of SPI values (≤ 40) to the SPI monitoring criteria seems to be necessary for providing a more proper intraoperative analgesia. The analgesia nociception index (ANI) shows promising results in anesthetized adults, and recently, positive results along with cardiorespiratory coherence have been reported in pediatric patients. Newborn infant parasympathetic evaluation (NIPE) could be useful for providing adequate analgesia in newborns, infants, and children under 2 years of age in anesthetized or awake states. In cases of skin conductance and pupillometry, further studies are needed. Understanding the pros, cons, and limitations of these nociception monitoring tools will provide more effective and safe intraoperative analgesia to pediatric patients undergoing general anesthesia, and it may also help to plan and conduct promising research on the use of perioperative nociception monitoring in pediatric patients in the future.

Opioid free onco-anesthesia: Is it time to convict opioids? A systematic review of literature

The epidemic of opioid crisis started getting recognised as a public health emergency in view of increasing opioid-related deaths occurring due to undetected respiratory depression. Prescribing opioids at discharge has become an independent risk factor for chronic opioid use, following which, prescription practices have undergone a radical change. A call to action has been voiced recently to end the opioid epidemic although with the pain practitioners still struggling to make opioids readily available. American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) has called for reducing patient exposure to opioids in the surgical setting. Opioid sparing strategies have emerged embracing loco-regional techniques and non-opioid based multimodal pain management whereas opioid free anesthesia is the combination of various opioid sparing strategies culminating in complete elimination of opioid usage. The movement away from opioid usage perioperatively is a massive but necessary shift in anesthesia which has rationalised perioperative opioid usage. Ideal way moving forward would be to adapt selective low opioid effective dosing which is both procedure and patient specific while reserving it as rescue analgesia, postoperatively. Many unknowns persist in the domain of immunologic effects of opioids, as complex interplay of factors gets associated during real time surgery towards outcome. At present it would be too premature to conclude upon opioid-induced immunosuppression from the existing evidence. Till evidence is established, there are no recommendations to change current clinical practice. At the same time, consideration for multimodal opioid sparing strategies should be initiated in each patient undergoing surgery.

Distal acupoint stimulation versus peri-incisional stimulation for postoperative pain in open abdominal surgery: a systematic review and implications for clinical practice

BACKGROUND

Acute postoperative pain remains a major clinical problem that affects patient recovery. Distal acupoint and peri-incisional stimulation are both used for relieving acute postoperative pain in hospital. Our objective was to assess and compare the effects of distal and peri-incisional stimulation on postoperative pain in open abdominal surgery.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Chinese databases CNKI and Wanfangdata were searched to identify eligible randomized controlled trials. Intensity of postoperative pain, opioid consumption and related data were extracted and analyzed using a random effects model. Risk of bias was assessed. Subgroup analyses were conducted when data were enough.

RESULTS

Thirty-five trials were included, in which 17 trials studied distal stimulation, another 17 trials studied peri-incisional stimulation and one studied the combination of the two approaches. No studies that directly compared the two approaches were identified. Subgroup analysis showed that both distal and peri-incisional stimulation significantly alleviated postoperative resting and movement pain from 4 h to 48 h after surgery by 6 to 25 mm on a 100 mm visual analogue scale. Peri-incisional stimulation showed a better reduction in postoperative opioid consumption. No studies compared the effects of the combined peri-incisional and distal stimulation with either mode alone. Overall the quality of evidence was moderate due to a lack of blinding in some studies, and unclear risk of allocation concealment.

CONCLUSION

Both distal and peri-incisional modes of stimulation were effective in reducing postoperative pain. Whether a combined peri-incisional stimulation and distal acupuncture has superior results requires further studies.

Perioperative C-reactive protein is associated with pain outcomes after major laparoscopic abdominal surgery: a retrospective analysis

Purpose: This study is aimed to investigate an association between perioperative C-reactive protein (CRP) levels and both opioid consumption and postoperative pain scores in postoperative days (PODs) in patients who underwent laparoscopic major abdominal surgery. We hypothesized that postoperative opioid requirements and numeric rating scale (NRS) pain scores would be positively associated with perioperative CRP levels.

Patients and method: Medical records from 4,653 patients who underwent a laparoscopic major abdominal surgery from January 2010 to December 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Generalized linear regression analysis was used to identify the association of preoperative and postoperative CRP levels, and increase in CRP level (postoperative CRP level – preoperative CRP level) with postoperative pain outcomes during POD 0–3.

Results: An increase of 1 mg dL⁻¹ of postoperative CRP level was significantly associated with 1.4% increase morphine equivalent consumption [exponentiated regression (Exp) coefficient: 0.014, 95% CI (0.011, 0.016), P<0.001], whereas preoperative CRP levels were not significantly associated with morphine equivalent consumption on POD 0–3 (P=0.450). A 1 mg dL⁻¹ of increase in CRP level was significantly associated with 1% increase of morphine equivalent consumption [Exp coefficient: 0.010, 95% CI (0.008, 0.012), P<0.001]. Postoperative CRP levels were positively associated with NRS pain scores on POD 1, POD 2, and POD 3 (P<0.001). Increases of CRP levels were also positively associated with NRS pain scores on POD 0, POD 1, POD2, and POD3 (P<0.05).

Conclusion: These results suggest postoperative CRP levels and increases in CRP levels are positively associated with opioid consumption and higher pain scores after major laparoscopic abdominal surgery.

Effectiveness of 3-in-1 Continuous Femoral Block of Differing Concentrations Compared to Patient Controlled Intravenous Morphine for Post Total Knee Arthroplasty Analgesia and Knee Rehabilitation

We assessed the effectiveness of the 3-in-l continuous femoral block as a form of postoperative pain relief for unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Sixty patients undergoing elective unilateral TKA under subarachnoid block were randomized into three groups. Postoperative analgesia was provided with a continuous 3-in-l femoral nerve catheter with 0.15% ropivacaine in group A, a continuous 3-in-l femoral nerve catheter with 0.2% ropivacaine in group B, or patient controlled intravenous morphine in group C (control group). Groups A and B received patient controlled intravenous morphine pumps for rescue analgesia. Patients in each group were followed for 72 hours postoperatively. Five patients were excluded after randomization. In the remaining 55 patients there was no statistical difference in pain score between the groups. Total morphine use was highest in group C (P< 0.05). No appreciable difference could be found with sensorimotor blockade, morphine usage and satisfaction scores when comparing groups A and B. Femoral catheter dislodgement rate was 7.9%. There was no statistical difference between the groups when comparing the day of first ambulation and the time to discharge from the hospital. Satisfaction scores were higher in group A (P = 0.028) and group B (P = 0.002) compared to group C. We conclude that a continuous 3-in-l femoral nerve block with ropivacaine 0.15% or 0.2% for elective unilateral TKA has an opioid-sparing effect.

Comparison of Subcostal Transversus Abdominis Block with Intraperitoneal Instillation of Levobupivacaine for Pain Relief after Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Prospective Study

Background

There are several methods employed in the management of postoperative pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy such as conventional systemic analgesics, including paracetamol, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, systemic opioids, and thoracic epidural analgesia with all having its limitations and side effects.

Aims

The present study aims to compare ultrasound-guided subcostal transversus abdominis (STA) block with intraperitoneal instillation of levobupivacaine in reducing postoperative pain, total analgesic consumption, nausea and vomiting, and recovery time in patients after elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Settings and Design

A prospective study was conducted between January 2017 and December 2017 in 80 patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy after approval of the Institutional Ethical Committee (Reference No: SGRR/IEC/05/16).

Materials and Methods

Patients were randomly divided into two equal-sized (n = 40) study groups. Group 1 patients received ultrasonography-guided STA block with 0.25% levobupivacaine both sides and Group 2 patients received 0.25% levobupivacaine through intraperitoneal route.

Statistical Analysis

Quantitative data were expressed in mean and standard deviation. Qualitative data were expressed in proportion and percentages. Independent t-test was applied to compare the means of quantitative data and the Chi-square test was used to compare categorical data. P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Survival curve was drawn using the log-rank test for comparing two groups.

Results

Patient characteristics regarding age, gender, and weight were comparable in the two groups. The mean Numerical Rating Scale scores were less in Group 1 than in Group 2 in the first 6 h, which was found to be statistically significant. There was no significant difference noted in pain scores after 6 h up to 24 h in postoperative area among the two groups. Pain scores for shoulder tip pain were lower in Group 2 as compared to Group 1 in the first 24 h, which was not significant statistically.

Conclusion

STA block is a better modality for analgesia compared to intraperitoneal instillation in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

The relationship between neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and postoperative pain in total knee and hip arthroplasty

Background and objectives

Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio is a simple, cost-effective and easily applicable inflammation indicator that is being used frequently in mortality, morbidity and prognosis studies in the recent years. We evaluated the relationship between neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and postoperative pain in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty.

Material and methods

We included 101 patients who preferred spinal anesthesia and intravenous patient-controlled analgesia in accordance and divided them into two groups, total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty. We recorded demographic information, duration of operation, length of hospital stay, analgesics consumption, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio results and postoperative pain using Visual Analog Scale.

Results

The morphine consumption of the patients was as follows in group total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty: at the 4th hour: 7.38 mg, 7.80 mg; 8th hour: 12.19 mg, 13.29 mg; 12th hour: 16.94 mg, 19.18 mg; 24th hour: 25.97 mg, 27.98 mg; 48th hour: 36.38 mg, 39.59 mg. The Visual Analog Scale scores of the patients was as follows in group total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty: at the 4th hour: 4.10, 4.51; 8th hour: 3.02, 3.43; 12th hour: 2.29, 2.55; 24th hour: 1.90, 1.87; 48th hour: 1.08, 1.13. In group total hip arthroplasty, we found a statistically significant association between postoperative neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and the Visual Analog Scale values on the 48th hour in a positive direction (r = 0.311; P = 0.031; P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio can be accepted as a relatively objective method for the diagnosis of postoperative pain.

The effects of dexamethasone, light anesthesia, and tight glucose control on postoperative fatigue and quality of life after major noncardiac surgery: A randomized trial

STUDY OBJECTIVES

The postoperative period is associated with an inflammatory response that may contribute to a number of complications including postoperative fatigue (POF) that impair patients' quality of life (QoL). We studied the impact of three potentially anti-inflammatory interventions (steroid administration, tight intraoperative glucose control, and light anesthesia) on POF and QoL in patients having major noncardiac surgery.

DESIGN

A randomized Trial.

SETTING

Operating room and postoperative recovery area/ICU/hospital floors.

PATIENTS

Patients undergoing major noncardiac surgery.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomized to perioperative IV dexamethasone (a total of 14 mg tapered over 3 days) versus placebo, intensive versus conventional glucose control (target 80-110 vs. 180-200 mg·dL^-1), and light versus deep anesthesia (Bispectral Index target of 55 vs. 35) in a 3-way factorial design.

MEASUREMENTS

In this planned sub-analysis, QoL was measured using SF-12 preoperatively and on postoperative day (POD) 30. POF was measured using Christensen VAS, pre-operatively, POD 1, and POD 3. We assessed the effect of each intervention on POF and on the physical and mental components of SF-12 summary scores with repeated-measures linear regression models.

MAIN RESULTS

326 patients with complete data were included in the SF-12 analysis and 306 were included in the QoL analysis. No difference was found between any of the intervention groups on fatigue or mean 30-day physical and mental components of SF-12 scores, after adjusting for preoperative score and imbalanced baseline variables (all P-value >0.07 for POF and >0.40 for QoL).

CONCLUSIONS

Steroid administration, tight intraoperative glucose control, and light anesthesia do not improve quality of life or postoperative fatigue after major surgery.

[The relationship between neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and postoperative pain in total knee and hip arthroplasty]

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio is a simple, cost-effective and easily applicable inflammation indicator that is being used frequently in mortality, morbidity and prognosis studies in the recent years. We evaluated the relationship between neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and postoperative pain in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We included 101 patients who preferred spinal anesthesia and intravenous patient-controlled analgesia in accordance and divided them into two groups, total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty. We recorded demographic information, duration of operation, length of hospital stay, analgesics consumption, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio results and postoperative pain using Visual Analog Scale.

RESULTS

The morphine consumption of the patients was as follows in group total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty: at the 4th hour: 7.38mg, 7.80mg; 8th hour: 12.19mg, 13.29mg; 12th hour: 16.94mg, 19.18mg; 24th hour: 25.97mg, 27.98mg; 48th hour: 36.38mg, 39.59mg. The Visual Analog Scale scores of the patients was as follows in group total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty: at the 4th hour: 4.10, 4.51; 8th hour: 3.02, 3.43; 12th hour: 2.29, 2.55; 24th hour: 1.90, 1.87; 48th hour: 1.08, 1.13. In group total hip arthroplasty, we found a statistically significant association between postoperative neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and the Visual Analog Scale values on the 48th hour in a positive direction (r=0.311; P=0.031; P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio can be accepted as a relatively objective method for the diagnosis of postoperative pain.

Enhanced Recovery in Surgical Intensive Care: A Review

Patients are admitted to the surgical intensive care (SICU) unit after emergency and elective surgery. After elective surgery, for further support, or to manage coexisting comorbidities. The implementation of the ERAS (Enhanced recovery after surgery) protocols in surgery should decrease the need for ICU beds, but there will always be unpredicted complications after surgery. These will require individual management. What we can do for our surgical patients in ICU to further enhance their recovery? To promote early enhanced recovery in surgical intensive care—SICU, three areas need to be addressed, sedation, analgesia, and delirium. Tools for measurement and protocols for management in these three areas should be developed to ensure best practice in each SICU. The fourth important area is Nutrition. Preoperative screening and post-operative measurement of the state of nutrition also need to be developed in the SICU. The fifth important area is early mobilization. ERAS protocols encourage early mobilization of the critically ill patients, even if on mechanical ventilation. Early mobilization is possible and should be implemented by special multidisciplinary ICU team. All team members must be familiar with protocols to be able to implement them in their field of expertise. Personal and professional attitudes are critical for implementation. In the core of all our efforts should be the patient and his well-being.

Painful Recall in Elective Electrical Cardioversion with Propofol and the Need for Additional Analgesia

Introduction

Electrical cardioversion (ECV) is a short but painful procedure for treating cardiac dysrhythmias. There is a wide variation regarding the medication strategy to facilitate this procedure. Many different sedative techniques for ECV are described. Currently, the optimal medication strategy to prevent pain in ECV has yet to be established. The role for additional analgesic agents to prevent pain during the procedure remains controversial, and evidence is limited.

Methods

We conducted a prospective multicenter study to determine the incidence of painful recall in ECV with propofol as a sole agent for sedation, in order to assess the indication for additional opioids. In all patients, sedation was induced with propofol titrated till loss of eyelash reflex and nonresponsiveness to stimuli, corresponding to Ramsay Sedation Score level 5-6. ECV was performed with extracardiac biphasic electrical shocks. The primary outcome was painful recall of the procedure, defined as numeric pain rating scale (NRS) ≥ 1. NRS ≥ 4 is considered inadequately treated pain. Secondary outcome parameters were pain at the side of the defipads and muscle pain after ECV.

Results

A total of 232 patients were enrolled in this study. Six patients were excluded due to missing data or violation of study protocol. Three patients reported recall of the procedure, and one patient (0.4%) reported recall of severe pain during the procedure with NRS 7. Two patients (0.9%) reported recall of mild pain with NRS 1-3. Complete amnesia was observed in 223 patients (98.7%), with NRS 0. The mean of the total dose of propofol was 1.1 mg/kg. Fifteen patients (6.6%) experienced pain at the side of the defipads, and six patients (2.7%) complained of muscle pain after the procedure.

Conclusions

In this prospective multicenter study, propofol as a sole agent provided good conditions for ECV with a low incidence of recall. Effective sedation and complete amnesia was achieved in 98.7% of the patients, 0.4% of patients reported recall of severe pain during the procedure, and 0.9% of patients experienced mild pain during the ECV.

Evaluation of thoracic epidural analgesia in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery - a prospective randomized trial

INTRODUCTION

Most recent studies tend to confirm the beneficial effect of thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) in cardiac surgery.

AIM

To assess whether intensive care unit TEA has an influence on the perioperative course following low-risk coronary artery surgery.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This prospective, randomized trial was performed in patients scheduled for low-risk coronary artery surgery. Eighty patients undergoing off-pump or on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery were prospectively randomized to receive either combined general and epidural anesthesia or general anesthesia only. Time of postoperative ventilations and intensive care unit stay was compared between the groups. For all comparisons (p < 0.05) was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

The addition of TEA to general anesthesia significantly attenuated the stress response expressed by intraoperative heart rate, systolic blood pressure and cumulative doses of opioids. Time to the return of spontaneous respiration, time to extubation and time of stay in the postoperative care unit were all shorter in the study group, with no difference in hospital stay. Patients with TEA required midazolam less frequently (12.8% vs. 53.8%, p < 0.001). The percentage of patients given morphine in the study group was lower (46.2% vs. 89.7%, p < 0.001) and the mean dose given in patients receiving morphine was also lower (9.3 ±5.3 mg vs. 18.2 ±9.1 mg, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Addition of TEA to general anesthesia shortens the return of respiratory function, duration of mechanical ventilation and ICU stay in the postoperative period after coronary artery surgery, providing comparable hemodynamic stability to general anesthesia alone.

Prevalence and risk factors for postoperative stress-related cardiomyopathy in adults

Stress-related cardiomyopathy can develop during the postoperative period due to surgery-related stress factors. However, the prevalence and risk factors for this condition are not yet known. During a retrospective, observational study, patients older than 19 years who underwent procedures from January 2011 to December 2015 at a tertiary hospital were included. The main aim was to identify the prevalence and related risk factors for postoperative stress-related cardiomyopathy. To estimate the incidence per risk factor, univariate and multivariate Poisson regression analyses were performed. During the 5-year period, 95,840 patients older than 19 years underwent 125,314 procedures, and the prevalence of postoperative stress-related cardiomyopathy was 17.74 per 100,000 (95% confidence interval, 9.31–26.17), with an in-hospital mortality of 23.5%. As a result, three risk factors were significantly associated: preoperative American Society of Anesthesiologists classification (incidence rate ratio, 5.901 for American Society of Anesthesiologists class 1–2 [ref] versus 3–6; 95% confidence interval,1.289–27.002; P = 0.022); preoperative body mass index (incidence rate ratio, 1.247 for increases of 18.5 [ref] to 30; 95% confidence interval, 1.067–1.458; P = 0.006); and preoperative serum sodium (incidence rate ratio, 0.830 for each increase of 10 mmol/L from 130; 95% confidence interval, 0.731–0.942; P = 0.004). The incidence rate ratio for age for each increase of 10 years from 50 years was 1.057, but it was not statistically significant (P = 0.064). Our study found that the prevalence of postoperative stress-related cardiomyopathy was 17.74 patients per 100,000 adult patients over the course of 5 years, with four cases of in-hospital mortality. Factors that increased the risk of postoperative stress-related cardiomyopathy included higher American Society of Anesthesiologists class (≥3), preoperative hyponatremia, and higher preoperative body mass index.

Comparison of Analgesic Efficacy of Laparoscope-Assisted and Ultrasound-Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Block after Laparoscopic Colorectal Operation: A Randomized, Single-Blind, Non-Inferiority Trial

BACKGROUND

Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block has been used as a component of multimodal analgesia after abdominal operation. We introduced a new laparoscope-assisted TAP (LTAP) block technique using intraperitoneal injection and compared its analgesic effect with that of an ultrasound-guided TAP (UTAP) block in terms of postoperative pain control.

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective, randomized, single-blinded non-inferiority clinical trial was conducted with patients undergoing elective laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer. Eighty patients were randomly assigned (1:1 ratio) to the UTAP and LTAP groups. At the end of the operation, opioid consumption and numeric rating scores (NRS; 0 [no pain] to 10 [worst pain]) of pain were recorded at 2, 6, 24, and 48 hours postoperatively and were compared between the groups. The primary end point was pain NRS during rest at 24 hours after operation.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients in the LTAP group and 35 patients in the UTAP group completed the study protocol. We found no significant difference in mean ± SD pain NRS during rest at 24 hours between the LTAP group (3.90 ± 1.7) and the UTAP group (4.5 ± 1.9). The mean difference in pain NRS during rest at 24 hours was 0.57 (95% CI -0.26 to 1.41). Because the lower boundary of a 95% CI for the differences in pain NRS was > -1, non-inferiority was established. There was no significant difference between the groups in NRS pain during rest, NRS pain on movement, and postoperative morphine consumption during the 48 hours after operation.

CONCLUSIONS

These results show our new LTAP block technique was non-inferior to the ultrasound-guided technique in providing a TAP block after laparoscopic colorectal operation.

Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block versus thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) in laparoscopic colon surgery in the ERAS program

AIM

The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway and laparoscopic approach had been proven beneficial for patients and should now be considered as a standard of care in colorectal surgery. Multimodal analgesia is the gold standard in the ERAS program with the use of thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA). Few data are available on Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks in laparoscopic colorectal surgery and ERAS pathway. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of TAP block compared to TEA in the management of postoperative pain and the impact on the recurrence of postoperative nausea, vomiting and ileus in laparoscopic colorectal surgery in the ERAS program.

METHOD

From October 2014 to October 2016, 182 patients underwent elective colon surgical interventions in enhanced recovery after surgery pathway. The patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 (n = 92) and Group 2 (n = 91) who received TEA and TAP block, respectively, with a standardized postoperative analgesic regimen consisting of regular 1 g of paracetamol every 8 h and a rescue dose with intravenous non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs infusion for both groups.

RESULTS

No differences were observed in baseline patient characteristics, clinical variables and surgical procedures between the two groups, as well as in the postoperative complications rate (p = 0.515) in accordance with Clavien-Dindo classification, 90-day mortality (p = 0.319), hospital stay (p = 0.469) and 30-day readmission rate (p = 0.711). Patients in the TAP block group showed lower postoperative nausea and vomiting rates (p = 0.025), as well as lower ileus (p = 0.031) and paraesthesia rates (p = 0.024). No differences were found in urinary retention (p = 0.157). Despite the "opioid-free" analgesia protocol in the TAP block group, pain intensity was comparable between the two groups (p = 0.651).

CONCLUSION

TAP block combined with an opioid-sparing analgesia in the setting of the laparoscopic colorectal surgery and ERAS program is feasible and effective in postoperative pain control.

No benefit of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane blocks over wound infiltration with local anaesthetic in elective laparoscopic colonic surgery: results of a double-blind randomized controlled trial

AIM

Advances in laparoscopic techniques combined with enhanced recovery pathways have led to faster recuperation and discharge after colorectal surgery. Peripheral nerve blockade using transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks reduce opioid requirements and provide better analgesia for laparoscopic colectomies than do inactive controls. This double-blind randomized study was performed to compare TAP blocks using bupivacaine with standardized wound infiltration with local anaesthetic (LA).

METHOD

Seventy-one patients were randomized to receive either TAP block or wound infiltration. The TAP blocks were performed by experienced anaesthetists who used ultrasound guidance to deliver 40 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine post-induction into the transverse abdominis plane. In the control group, 40 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine was injected around the trocar and the extraction site by the surgeon. Both groups received patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with intravenous morphine. Patients and nursing staff assessed pain scores 6, 12, 24 and 48 h after surgery. The primary outcome was overall morphine use in the first 48 h.

RESULTS

Of the 71 patients, 20 underwent a right hemicolectomy and 51 a high anterior resection. The modified intention-to-treat analysis showed no significant differences in overall morphine use [47.3 (36.2-58.5) mg vs 46.7 (36.2-57.3) mg; mean (95% CI), P = 0.8663] in the first 48 h. Pain scores were similar at 6, 12, 24 and 48 h. No differences were found regarding time to mobilization, resumption of diet and length of hospital stay.

CONCLUSION

In elective laparoscopic colectomies, standardized wound infiltration with LA has the same analgesic effect as TAP blocks post-induction using bupivacaine at 48 h.

Comparison of analgaesia with lumbar epidurals and lumbar plexus nerve blocks in patients receiving multimodal analgaesics following primary total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective analysis

PURPOSE

Significant post-operative pain occurs after hip arthroplasty. In a prior study, lumbar plexus nerve blocks provided comparable analgaesia to lumbar epidurals; however, multimodal analgaesics were not used consistently.

METHODS

This study assessed a randomly selected cohort of 48 patients undergoing primary hip arthroplasty who received a regional anaesthesia technique for post-operative pain. Twenty-four patients with lumbar epidurals and 24 with single-injection lumbar plexus nerve blocks were reviewed using electronic medical records. Post-operative opiate consumption was the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints were participation in physical therapy, side effects, and time to discharge. Descriptive statistics were calculated to describe patients in the different groups. Opiate consumption was compared using linear mixed models. Multivariable models were examined for both primary and secondary endpoints.

RESULTS

In comparison with patients receiving lumbar epidural catheters, patients with lumbar plexus blocks consumed less opiates post-operatively at 24-36 and 36-48 hours (P = 0.037 and 0.002, respectively); it did not differ at zero to 12 hours or 12-24 hours post-operatively. Patients with lumbar plexus blocks had earlier times to first ambulation (28.5 ± 3.29 vs 21.9 ± 1.76 h; P = 0.043). However, differences by block type were not observed for ambulation distance, level of assistance to ambulate or time of discharge orders.

CONCLUSIONS

Following primary total hip arthroplasty, lumbar plexus nerve blocks provide effective post-operative analgaesia with decreased opiate consumption compared with lumbar epidural catheters. Lumbar plexus blocks also promote earlier post-operative ambulation and are compatible with post-operative prophylactic anticoagulants.

Local infiltration analgesia with ropivacaine in acute fracture of thoracolumbar junction surgery

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

INTRODUCTION

Local infiltration analgesia is effective in many surgeries as knee arthroplasty, but the analgesic efficacy of local infiltration analgesia with ropivacaine in trauma spine surgery in T10 to L2 has not been clarified. We conducted a trial to assess the analgesic efficacy of intraoperative local infiltration analgesia (LIA) with ropivacaine.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to clarify the effect of intraoperative local infiltration analgesia with ropivacaine on postoperative pain for patients undergoing thoracolumbar junction fracture surgery.

METHODS

In a retrospective study, in 76 patients undergoing spine surgery for thoracolumbar junction fracture, 20ml of ropivacaine 7.5% (n R group=38) was infiltrated using a systematic technique, or no infiltration was realized (n M group=38). We assessed postoperative pain with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and morphine consumption in the 24 first hours.

RESULTS

VAS pain score upon awakening and at 2hours postoperatively were significantly lower in the ropivacaine group (P=0.01 and P=0.002). Rescue opioid requirement during the 24 first hours were about 50% lower in the ropivacaine group (P=0.01). No local or systemic side effects were observed.

CONCLUSION

Intraoperative LIA with ropivacaine in thoracolumbar junction fracture surgery may have an analgesic effect in postoperative pain control (24hours) with a reduction of VAS and morphine consumption.

Preemptive Caudal Ropivacaine: An Effective Analgesic during Degenerative Lumbar Spine Surgery

Study Design

This was a prospective, randomized, controlled trial comprising 60 patients undergoing lumbosacral spine (noninstrumentation/nonfusion) surgery.

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of 0.2% ropivacaine (20 mL) administered alone as a single, preoperative, caudal epidural block injection versus that of intravenous analgesics in providing effective postoperative analgesia to patients undergoing lumbosacral spine surgery.

Overview of Literature

Various studies have shown the effectiveness of a caudal epidural injection (bupivacaine or ropivacaine) in providing postoperative analgesia in combination with steroids or other analgesics. This study uniquely analyzed the efficacy of a single injection of caudal epidural ropivacaine in providing postoperative pain relief.

Methods

Sixty patients who were scheduled to undergo surgery for degenerative lumbar spine disease (noninstrumentation/nonfusion) were consecutively divided into two groups, group R (Study) and group I (Control). 30 group R patients received a caudal epidural block with 20 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine after the administration of general anesthesia. 30 group I patients received no preoperative analgesia. Intravenous analgesics were administered during the postoperative period after a complaint of pain. Various parameters indicating analgesic effect were recorded.

Results

There was a significant delay in the average time to the first demand for rescue analgesia in the study group, suggesting significantly better postoperative pain relief than that in the control group. In comparison with the control group, the study group also showed earlier ambulation with minimal adverse effects. The requirement for intraoperative fentanyl was higher in the control group than that in the study group.

Conclusions

Preemptive analgesia with a single epidural injection of ropivacaine is a safe, simple, and effective approach, providing better postoperative pain relief, facilitating early mobilization, and decreasing the intraoperative requirement for opioid administration.

Comparison of Lumbar Epidurals and Lumbar Plexus Nerve Blocks for Analgesia Following Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Analysis

BACKGROUND

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is associated with significant postoperative pain. Both lumbar epidurals and lumbar plexus nerve blocks have been described for postoperative pain control, but it is unclear if one technique is more beneficial.

METHODS

Using electronic medical records, a randomly selected, cohort of 58 patients with lumbar epidurals were compared with 58 patients with lumbar plexus nerve blocks following primary THA. The primary end point was 48-hour postoperative opiate consumption. Secondary end points included time of first ambulation, distance ambulated, level of assistance with ambulation, presence of side effects, and time to discharge. Descriptive statistics were calculated to characterize subjects in the different block-type groups. Comparisons in morphine consumption were conducted using linear mixed models. Primary and secondary end points were examined in multivariable models.

RESULTS

Patients with lumbar plexus blocks consumed less opiates at 24, 36, and 48 hours relative to patients that received lumbar epidural catheters (P = .047, .002, and .002, respectively). Patients with lumbar plexus blocks ambulated earlier (24.6 ± 2.01 hours vs 31.7 ± 3.01 hours) and farther relative to patients with epidurals (P < .001 for both) and had discharge orders written earlier (58.2 ± 6.68 hours vs 73.6 ± 6.35 hours).

CONCLUSION

In comparison to lumbar epidural catheters, lumbar plexus nerve blocks are an effective pathway for postoperative pain control following primary THA. Furthermore, this clinical pathway expedites physical rehabilitation and is more compatible with postoperative prophylactic anticoagulants.

No Difference in Early Analgesia Between Liposomal Bupivacaine Injection and Intrathecal Morphine After TKA

BACKGROUND

Opioid analgesics have been a standard modality for postoperative pain management after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) but are also associated with increased risk of nausea, pruritus, vomiting, respiratory depression, prolonged ileus, and cognitive dysfunction. There is still a need for a method of anesthesia that can deliver effective long-term postoperative pain relief without incurring the high cost and health burden of opioids and nerve blocks.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) Is liposomal bupivacaine-based periarticular injection (PAI) more effective than morphine-based spinal anesthesia or ropivacaine-based PAI in controlling postoperative pain after TKA? (2) Do patients treated with liposomal bupivacaine-based PAI experience fewer opioid-related adverse events compared with patients treated with morphine-based spinal anesthesia or ropivacaine-based PAI in controlling postoperative pain after TKA?

METHODS

This multicenter, blind trial randomized 119 patients undergoing TKA with spinal anesthesia to receive spinal anesthesia plus periarticular injection with liposomal bupivacaine (40 patients), spinal anesthesia with bupivacaine plus intrathecal morphine (41 patients) but no liposomal bupivacaine injection, or spinal anesthesia with bupivacaine (38 patients) and no liposomal bupivacaine injection. The two groups that did not receive periarticular liposomal bupivacaine did receive periarticular injection with ropivacaine, and all three groups had ketorolac (30 mg) plus epinephrine (1:1000) in the periarticular injections. Patients in all three groups received identical perioperative multimodal analgesic and antiemetic drugs. All patients were analyzed in the group to which they were randomized and no patients were lost to followup. The primary study endpoints were visual analog score (VAS) for pain and narcotic use during postoperative day 1. Secondary endpoints included side effects associated with narcotic administration during the hospital stay.

RESULTS

Mean VAS pain in the liposomal bupivacaine PAI group was lower than that for the ropivacaine PAI group at 6 hours (1.8 ± 2.1 versus 3.3 ± 2.3, p = 0.005, mean difference: 1.5, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.5-2.5) and 12 hours (1.5 ± 2.0 versus 3.3 ± 2.4, p < 0.001, mean difference: 1.8, 95% CI, 0.8-2.8) after surgery. The morphine spinal group had lower pain compared with the liposomal bupivacaine PAI group at 6 hours (0.9 ± 1.8 versus 1.8 ± 2.1, p = 0.035, mean difference: 1.0, 95% CI, 0.1-1.8), but there was no difference at 12 hours (0.8 ± 1.5 versus 1.5 ± 2.0, p = 0.086, mean difference: 0.7, 95% CI, -0.1 to 1.5). The magnitude of the differences at 6 and 12 hours are near the lower end of minimal clinically important differences reported in the literature, and thus the improvement shown in this study may only represent a small clinical improvement. Both the liposomal bupivacaine group (13% [five of 40]) and the ropivacaine group (5% [two of 38]) had fewer incidents of itching (pruritus) than the spinal morphine group (38% [15 of 41]) (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This prospective multicenter three-arm blind randomized controlled trial showed potentially improved pain control at 6 and 12 hours in the liposomal bupivacaine and intrathecal morphine groups compared with the ropivacaine group at the cost of much higher incidences of pruritus (itching) in the intrathecal morphine group. Based on these results, we prefer the use of PAI with liposomal bupivacaine as an alternative to spinal anesthesia with intrathecal morphine as a result of similar postoperative pain control and the potential for reducing adverse events.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, therapeutic study.

How Do Demographic, Surgical, Patient, and Cultural Factors Affect Pain Control After Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty? A Multivariable Regression Analysis

BACKGROUND

Controlling pain after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is essential for improving patient satisfaction, minimizing complications, and early rehabilitation. There is little literature available evaluating the effect of both treatment and patient characteristics on in-hospital pain after UKA. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of patient and treatment characteristics on in-hospital pain after UKA. This study also evaluated the role of analgesic cocktail (traditional periarticular injection cocktail "[PAI]" vs cocktail including liposomal bupivacaine "[LBUP]").

METHODS

The study sample included 442 consecutive UKA cases performed between December 2011 and August 2013. The primary outcome measures were the average Visual Analog Scale pain score and the percent of pain scores during hospitalization that were 0, that is, "no pain." Multivariable regression analyses were implemented to investigate associations between patient demographics and analgesic group with the outcomes. For the analgesic groups, the "PAI" group received injections of a cocktail including Marcaine, ketorolac, and morphine, the "LBUP" group received injections of LBUP.

RESULTS

Postoperative pain was higher in females (P < .001) and younger patients (P = .002). The patient group treated with LBUP injection technique had similar overall average Visual Analog Scale pain scores to patients in the PAI group (P = .729); however, there was also a significant improvement in pain scores over time (as the study progressed) for patients in the LBUP group relative to the PAI group (P = .003), potentially indicating better outcomes with more experience with the injection technique. When compared individually by day, the LBUP group had lower pain scores from day 1 to 3 (P < .024).

CONCLUSION

The results showed that in patients undergoing UKA, postoperative pain was lower in males, older patients, patients with lower body mass index, and those treated with LBUP over the study period. Understanding these associations is necessary to effectively manage pain and encourage earlier ambulation and physiotherapy after UKA.