1
|
Khalil M, Woldesenbet S, Munir MM, Khan MMM, Rashid Z, Altaf A, Katayama E, Endo Y, Dillhoff M, Tsai S, Pawlik TM. Long-term Health Outcomes of New Persistent Opioid Use After Gastrointestinal Cancer Surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:5283-5292. [PMID: 38762641 PMCID: PMC11236845 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15435-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2024] [Accepted: 04/24/2024] [Indexed: 05/20/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND New persistent opioid use (NPOU) after surgery has been identified as a common complication. This study sought to assess the long-term health outcomes among patients who experienced NPOU after gastrointestinal (GI) cancer surgery. METHODS Patients who underwent surgery for hepato-pancreato-biliary and colorectal cancer between 2007 and 2019 were identified using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare-linked database. Mixed-effect multivariable logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate the risk of mortality and hospital visits related to falls, respiratory events, or pain symptoms. RESULTS Among 15,456 patients who underwent GI cancer surgery, 967(6.6%) experienced NPOU. Notably, the patients at risk for the development of NPOU were those with a history of substance abuse (odds ratio [OR], 1.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.14-1.84), moderate social vulnerability (OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.06-1.50), an advanced disease stage (OR, 4.42; 95% CI, 3.51-5.82), or perioperative opioid use (OR, 3.07; 95% CI, 2.59-3.63. After control for competing risk factors, patients who experienced NPOU were more likely to visit a hospital for falls, respiratory events, or pain symptoms (OR, 1.45, 95% CI 1.18-1.78). Moreover, patients who experienced NPOU had a greater risk of death at 1 year (hazard ratio [HR], 2.15; 95% CI, 1.74-2.66). CONCLUSION Approximately 1 in 15 patients experienced NPOU after GI cancer surgery. NPOU was associated with an increased risk of subsequent hospital visits and higher mortality. Targeted interventions for individuals at higher risk for NPOU after surgery should be used to help mitigate the harmful effects of NPOU.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mujtaba Khalil
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Selamawit Woldesenbet
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Muhammad Musaab Munir
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Muhammad Muntazir Mehdi Khan
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Zayed Rashid
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Abdullah Altaf
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Erryk Katayama
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Yutaka Endo
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Mary Dillhoff
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Susan Tsai
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Timothy M Pawlik
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shiraishi M, Sowa Y, Inafuku N, Sunaga A, Yoshimura K, Okazaki M. Chronic Pain Following Breast Reconstruction: A Scoping Review. Ann Plast Surg 2024; 93:261-267. [PMID: 38980915 DOI: 10.1097/sap.0000000000003986] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/11/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast cancer survival rates have increased significantly, underscoring the importance of enhancing long-term health-related quality of life. Breast reconstruction following mastectomy has emerged as a common approach that contributes to improved health-related quality of life. Nonetheless, chronic pain following breast reconstruction is a prevalent issue that has a negative impact on overall well-being. METHODS To examine recent findings on chronic pain after breast reconstruction and progress in pain management, we performed a review of the literature through independent searches using the MEDLINE database within NIH National Library of Medicine PubMed. RESULTS The review suggested that autologous reconstruction causes chronic postsurgical pain, especially at specific donor sites, whereas implant-based reconstruction does not seem to increase the risk of chronic pain. Moreover, certain operational and patient factors are also associated with chronic pain. Appropriate pain management can reduce chronic pain and prevent the transition from acute to chronic pain. CONCLUSION This scoping review evaluated the characteristics of long-term chronic pain after breast reconstruction. The findings provide patients with important treatment information and will assist with their decision on their preferred treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Makoto Shiraishi
- From the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Sowa
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Naoki Inafuku
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Ataru Sunaga
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Kotaro Yoshimura
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Mutsumi Okazaki
- From the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gosgnach M, Chasserant P, Raux M. Opioid free analgesia after return home in ambulatory colonic surgery patients: a single-center observational study. BMC Anesthesiol 2024; 24:260. [PMID: 39075360 PMCID: PMC11285406 DOI: 10.1186/s12871-024-02651-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2024] [Accepted: 07/22/2024] [Indexed: 07/31/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Because of the adverse effects of morphine and its derivatives, non-opioid analgesia procedures are proposed after outpatient surgery. Without opioids, the ability to provide quality analgesia after the patient returns home may be questioned. We examined whether an opioid-free strategy could ensure satisfactory analgesia after ambulatory laparoscopic colectomy. METHODS We performed a retrospective observational single-center study (of prospective collected database) including all patients eligible for scheduled outpatient colectomy. Postoperative analgesia was provided by paracetamol and nefopam. Postoperative follow-up included pain at mobilization (assessed by a numerical rating scale, NRS), hemodynamic variables, temperature, resumption of transit and biological markers of postoperative inflammation. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with moderate to severe pain (NRS > 4) the day after surgery. RESULTS Data from 144 patients were analyzed. The majority were men aged 59 ± 12 years with a mean BMI of 27 [25-30] kg/m2. ASA scores were 1 for 14%, 2 for 59% and 3 for 27% of patients. Forty-seven patients (33%) underwent surgery for cancer, 94 for sigmoiditis (65%) and 3 (2%) for another colonic pathology. Postoperative pain was affected by time since surgery (Q3 = 52.4,p < 0.001) and decreased significantly from day to day. The incidence of moderate to severe pain at mobilization (NRS > 4) on the first day after surgery was (0.19; 95% CI, 0.13-0.27). CONCLUSION Non-opioid analgesia after ambulatory laparoscopic colectomy seems efficient to ensure adequate analgesia. This therapeutic strategy makes it possible to avoid the adverse effects of opioids. TRIAL REGISTRATION The study was retrospectively registered and approved by the relevant institutional review board (CERAR) reference IRB 00010254-2018 - 188). All patients gave written informed consent for analysis of their data. The anonymous database was declared to the French Data Protection Authority (CNIL) (reference 221 2976 v0 of April 12, 2019).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marilyn Gosgnach
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Hôpital Privé de l'Estuaire, 505 rue Irene Joliot Curie, Le Havre, 76620, France.
- Département d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Fréjus Saint-Raphaël, 240 Avenue de Saint Lambert, Fréjus, 83600, France.
| | - Philippe Chasserant
- Digestive Surgery Department, Hôpital Privé de l'Estuaire, 505 rue Irene Joliot Curie, Le Havre, 76620, France.
- Surgery Department, Centre Hospitalier Albertville-Moutiers, Albertville, 73200, France.
| | - Mathieu Raux
- UMRS 1158 Experimental and Clinical Respiratory Neurophysiology, Faculté de Médecine, INSERM, Sorbonne Université, 91Bd de l'Hôpital, Paris, 75013, France
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, APHP-Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Pitié- Salpêtrière, 47-83 Bd de l'Hôpital, Paris, 75013, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hwang WJ, Koo JM, Yang AR, Park YH, Chae MS. Comparison of analgesic effectiveness between nefopam and propacetamol in living kidney donors following rectus sheath block after hand-assisted living donor nephrectomy: a prospective, randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol 2024; 24:219. [PMID: 38956473 PMCID: PMC11218207 DOI: 10.1186/s12871-024-02607-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2024] [Accepted: 06/26/2024] [Indexed: 07/04/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nefopam and propacetamol are the most commonly used analgesics in postoperative multimodal analgesic regimens. Distinct mechanisms are involved in each drug's anti-nociceptive effects. No studies have compared pain relief efficacy between the two drugs in patients undergoing transplantation surgery. Here, we investigated whether the administration of nefopam or propacetamol to healthy living kidney donors who underwent rectus sheath block (RSB) for parietal pain could reduce the subsequent opioid dose necessary to produce adequate analgesia. METHODS This prospective, randomized controlled trial included 72 donors undergoing elective hand-assisted living donor nephrectomy into two groups: propacetamol (n = 36) and nefopam (n = 36). Intraoperative RSB was performed in all enrolled donors. The primary outcome was the total volume of intravenous opioid-based patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) used on postoperative day 1 (POD 1). Additionally, the Numeric Rating Scale scores for flank (visceral) and umbilicus (parietal) pain at rest and during coughing were compared, and the Korean adaptation of the Quality of Recovery-15 Questionnaire (QoR-15 K) was evaluated on POD 1. RESULTS Both groups had similar preoperative and intraoperative characteristics. On POD 1, the total amount of PCA infusion was significantly lower in the nefopam group than in the propacetamol group (44.5 ± 19.3 mL vs. 70.2 ± 29.0 mL; p < 0.001). This group also reported lower pain scores at the flank and umbilical sites and required fewer rescue doses of fentanyl in the post-anesthesia care unit. However, pain scores and fentanyl consumption in the ward were comparable between groups. The QoR-15 K scores were similar between groups; there were substantial improvements in breathing, pain severity, and anxiety/depression levels in the nefopam group. The incidences of postoperative complications, including sweating and tachycardia, were similar between groups. CONCLUSION Compared with propacetamol, nefopam provides a greater analgesic effect for visceral pain and enhances the effects of blocks that reduce the opioid requirement in living kidney donors with parietal pain managed by RSB. TRIAL REGISTRATION The trial was registered prior to patient enrollment in the clinical trial database using the Clinical Research Information Service (registration no. KCT0007351 , Date of registration 03/06/2022).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Won-Jung Hwang
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222, Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul, 06591, Republic of Korea
| | - Jung Min Koo
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222, Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul, 06591, Republic of Korea
| | - A Rim Yang
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Yong Hyun Park
- Department of Urology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Min Suk Chae
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222, Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul, 06591, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lee HJ, Choi S, Yoon S, Yoon S, Bahk JH. Effect of an intravenous acetaminophen/ibuprofen fixed-dose combination on postoperative opioid consumption and pain after video-assisted thoracic surgery: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 2024; 38:3061-3069. [PMID: 38609589 PMCID: PMC11133211 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-10821-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2023] [Accepted: 03/22/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) often induces significant postoperative pain, potentially leading to chronic pain and decreased quality of life. This study aimed to evaluate the acetaminophen/ibuprofen combination effectiveness in reducing analgesic requirements and pain intensity in patients undergoing VATS. STUDY DESIGN This is a double-blinded randomized controlled trial. METHODS Adult patients scheduled for elective VATS for lung resection were randomized to receive either intravenous acetaminophen and ibuprofen (intervention group) or 100 mL normal saline (control group). Treatments were administered post-anesthesia induction and every 6 h for three cycles. The primary outcome was total analgesic consumption at 24 h postoperatively. Secondary outcomes were cumulative analgesic consumption at 2 and 48 h; analgesic-related side effects at 2, 24, and 48 h; quality of recovery at 24 h and 48 h postoperatively; pain intensity at rest and during coughing; and rescue analgesics use. Chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) was assessed through telephone interviews 3 months postoperatively. RESULTS The study included 96 participants. The intervention group showed significantly lower analgesic consumption at 24 h and 48 h postoperatively (24 h: median difference: - 100 µg equivalent intravenous fentanyl [95% confidence interval (CI) - 200 to - 5 μg], P = 0.037; 48 h: median difference: - 140 μg [95% CI - 320 to - 20 μg], P = 0.035). Compared to the controls, the intervention group exhibited a significantly lower quality of recovery 24 h post-surgery, with no significant difference at 48 h. All pain scores except for coughing at 48 h post-surgery were significantly lower in the intervention group compared to the controls. No significant differences were observed between the groups in postoperative nausea and vomiting occurrence, hospital stay length, and CPSP. CONCLUSION Perioperative administration of acetaminophen/ibuprofen significantly decreased analgesic needs in patients undergoing VATS, providing an effective postoperative pain management strategy, and potentially minimizing the need for stronger analgesics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ho-Jin Lee
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea
| | - Seungeun Choi
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea
| | - Soohyuk Yoon
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea
| | - Susie Yoon
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.
| | - Jae-Hyon Bahk
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mitchell J, Forget P. Pain management in victims of disasters. Minerva Anestesiol 2024; 90:573-580. [PMID: 38270922 DOI: 10.23736/s0375-9393.23.17818-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2024]
Abstract
Pain is widely studied and is considered a major clinical, social, and economic problem worldwide, although it remains poorly understood. For disaster victims, the complex picture, biologically, psychologically, and socially, only makes the situation even more complicated. This narrative review aims to describe specific aspects of pain and pain management in disaster victims. We reviewed relevant literature, both on pain management and selected specific data related to conflict victims. We discuss the complexity of the picture, its different aspects, and mechanisms. We discuss the limitations of current approaches and propose a simple strategy, including mitigation plans, all illustrated by a case study based on a personal experience in the Gaza Strip in 2022. The vulnerability factors are well known, as well as the tangle of intense acute pain and the persistence of pain in the subacute and chronic phase. However, the management of acute pain is, in a disaster context, more constrained than chosen. Empirical evidence suggests a focus on modifiable risk factors as well as the evaluation of strategies guiding future management. This management may depend on obstacles and barriers, linked to the context of the disaster, the availability of medicines, techniques, skills as well as linguistic and cultural barriers. Our proposal includes systematic assessment and, in a later phase, tailored and personalized treatment. In the chronic phase of rehabilitation and follow-ups, the essential place for management of psychological and social aspects become predominant. In disaster areas, including during and after conflict, the management, and recommendations for the management of acute and chronic pain are complex, distinct but interdependent. Acute pain must be systematically assessed and treated while personalized care pathways are desirable at a later stage. Psychological and social considerations are essential. Data collection should be systematically considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Mitchell
- Department of Anesthesiology, Catholic University of Louvain, University Hospital CHU UCL Namur, Mont-Godinne, Belgium
- Medecins Sans Frontieres (MSF) - Operational Centre Brussels (OCB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Patrice Forget
- Group of Epidemiology, School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK -
- Department of Anaesthesia, NHS Grampian, Aberdeen, UK
- Pain and Opioids After Surgery (PANDOS) European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (ESAIC) Research Group, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Forget P, Van de Velde M, Pogatzki-Zahn E. Opioid-free or opioid-sparing anaesthesia: Let us be patient-centred first. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2024; 41:320-321. [PMID: 38426255 DOI: 10.1097/eja.0000000000001915] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Patrice Forget
- From the Institute of Applied Health Sciences, Epidemiology Group, School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, University of Aberdeen (PF); Department of Anaesthesia, NHS Grampian, Aberdeen, UK (PF), Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, KULeuven and Department of Anaesthesiology, UZLeuven, Leuven, Belgium (VdV), University Hospital of Muenster, Muenster, Germany (EP-Z), and Pain AND Opioids After Surgery (PANDOS) European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (ESAIC) Research Group, Brussels, Belgium (PF, VdV and EP-Z)
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Steiness J, Hägi-Pedersen D, Lunn TH, Overgaard S, Brorson S, Graungaard BK, Lindberg-Larsen M, Varnum C, Lundstrøm LH, Beck T, Skettrup M, Pedersen NA, Bieder MJ, von Cappeln AG, Pleckaitiene L, Lindholm P, Bukhari SSH, Derby CB, Nielsen MG, Exsteen OW, Vinstrup LØ, Thybo KH, Gasbjerg KS, Nørskov AK, Jakobsen JC, Mathiesen O. Non-opioid analgesic combinations following total hip arthroplasty (RECIPE): a randomised, placebo-controlled, blinded, multicentre trial. THE LANCET. RHEUMATOLOGY 2024; 6:e205-e215. [PMID: 38458208 DOI: 10.1016/s2665-9913(24)00020-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2023] [Revised: 01/15/2024] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 03/10/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multimodal postoperative analgesia following total hip arthroplasty is recommended, but the optimal combination of drugs remains uncertain. The aim of the RECIPE trial was to investigate the relative benefit and harm of the different combinations of paracetamol, ibuprofen, and the analgesic adjuvant dexamethasone for treatment of postoperative pain following total hip arthroplasty. METHODS The RECIPE trial was a randomised, blinded, placebo-controlled trial conducted at nine Danish hospitals. Adults scheduled for total hip arthroplasty were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) using a computer-generated list with stratification by site to receive combinations of oral paracetamol 1000 mg every 6 h, oral ibuprofen 400 mg every 6 h, or a single-dose of intravenous dexamethasone 24 mg in the following groups: paracetamol plus ibuprofen, ibuprofen plus dexamethasone, paracetamol plus dexamethasone, and paracetamol plus ibuprofen plus dexamethasone. The primary outcome was 24 h intravenous morphine consumption, analysed in a modified intention-to-treat population, defined as all randomly assigned participants who underwent total hip arthroplasty. The predefined minimal important difference was 8 mg. Safety outcomes included serious and non-serious adverse events within 90 days and 24 h. The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04123873. FINDINGS Between March 5, 2020, and Nov 15, 2022, we randomly assigned 1060 participants, of whom 1043 (589 [56%] women and 454 [44%] men) were included in the modified intention-to-treat population. 261 were assigned to paracetamol plus ibuprofen, 262 to ibuprofen plus dexamethasone, 262 to paracetamol plus dexamethasone, and 258 to paracetamol plus ibuprofen plus dexamethasone. Median 24 h morphine consumption was 24 mg (IQR 12-38) in the paracetamol plus ibuprofen group, 20 mg (12-32) in the paracetamol plus dexamethasone group, 16 mg (10-30) in the ibuprofen plus dexamethasone group, and 15 mg (8-26) in the paracetamol plus ibuprofen plus dexamethasone group. The paracetamol plus ibuprofen plus dexamethasone group had a significantly reduced 24 h morphine consumption compared with paracetamol plus ibuprofen (Hodges-Lehmann median difference -6 mg [99% CI -10 to -3]; p<0·0001) and paracetamol plus dexamethasone (-4 mg [-8 to -1]; p=0·0013), however, none of the comparisons showed differences reaching the minimal important threshold of 8 mg. 91 (35%) of 258 participants in the paracetamol plus ibuprofen plus dexamethasone group had one or more adverse events, compared with 99 (38%) of 262 in the ibuprofen plus dexamethasone group, 103 (39%) of 262 in the paracetamol plus dexamethasone group, and 165 (63%) of 261 in the paracetamol plus ibuprofen group. INTERPRETATION In adults undergoing total hip arthroplasty, a combination of paracetamol, ibuprofen, and dexamethasone had the lowest morphine consumption within 24 h following surgery and the most favourable adverse event profile, with a lower incidence of serious and non-serious adverse events (primarily driven by differences in nausea, vomiting, and dizziness) compared with paracetamol plus ibuprofen. FUNDING The Novo Nordisk Foundation and Næstved-Slagelse-Ringsted Hospitals' Research Fund.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joakim Steiness
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark.
| | - Daniel Hägi-Pedersen
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Næstved-Slagelse-Ringsted Hospitals, Næstved, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Troels Haxholdt Lunn
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Søren Overgaard
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Stig Brorson
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ben Kristian Graungaard
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Martin Lindberg-Larsen
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Svendborg, Denmark; Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Claus Varnum
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Lillebælt Hospital, Vejle, Denmark; Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Lars Hyldborg Lundstrøm
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - North Zealand, Hillerød, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Torben Beck
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Michael Skettrup
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital, Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Manuel Josef Bieder
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Næstved-Slagelse-Ringsted Hospitals, Næstved, Denmark
| | | | | | - Peter Lindholm
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | | | | | - Maria Gantzel Nielsen
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Oskar Wilborg Exsteen
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - North Zealand, Hillerød, Denmark
| | - Louise Ørts Vinstrup
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Kasper Højgaard Thybo
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Næstved-Slagelse-Ringsted Hospitals, Næstved, Denmark
| | - Kasper Smidt Gasbjerg
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Anders Kehlet Nørskov
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - North Zealand, Hillerød, Denmark
| | - Janus Christian Jakobsen
- Copenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Ole Mathiesen
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Verret M, Lam NH, Lalu M, Nicholls SG, Turgeon AF, McIsaac DI, Hamtiaux M, Bao Phuc Le J, Gilron I, Yang L, Kaimkhani M, Assi A, El-Adem D, Timm M, Tai P, Amir J, Srichandramohan S, Al-Mazidi A, Fergusson NA, Hutton B, Zivkovic F, Graham M, Lê M, Geist A, Bérubé M, Poulin P, Shorr R, Daudt H, Martel G, McVicar J, Moloo H, Fergusson DA. Intraoperative pharmacologic opioid minimisation strategies and patient-centred outcomes after surgery: a scoping review. Br J Anaesth 2024; 132:758-770. [PMID: 38331658 PMCID: PMC10925893 DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2024.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2023] [Revised: 12/08/2023] [Accepted: 01/02/2024] [Indexed: 02/10/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postoperative patient-centred outcome measures are essential to capture the patient's experience after surgery. Although a large number of pharmacologic opioid minimisation strategies (i.e. opioid alternatives) are used for patients undergoing surgery, it remains unclear which strategies are most promising in terms of patient-centred outcome improvements. This scoping review had two main objectives: (1) to map and describe evidence from clinical trials assessing the patient-centred effectiveness of pharmacologic intraoperative opioid minimisation strategies in adult surgical patients, and (2) to identify promising pharmacologic opioid minimisation strategies. METHODS We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and CINAHL databases from inception to February 2023. We included trials investigating the use of opioid minimisation strategies in adult surgical patients and reporting at least one patient-centred outcome. Study screening and data extraction were conducted independently by at least two reviewers. RESULTS Of 24,842 citations screened for eligibility, 2803 trials assessed the effectiveness of intraoperative opioid minimisation strategies. Of these, 457 trials (67,060 participants) met eligibility criteria, reporting at least one patient-centred outcome. In the 107 trials that included a patient-centred primary outcome, patient wellbeing was the most frequently used domain (55 trials). Based on aggregate findings, dexmedetomidine, systemic lidocaine, and COX-2 inhibitors were promising strategies, while paracetamol, ketamine, and gabapentinoids were less promising. Almost half of the trials (253 trials) did not report a protocol or registration number. CONCLUSIONS Researchers should prioritise and include patient-centred outcomes in the assessment of opioid minimisation strategy effectiveness. We identified three potentially promising pharmacologic intraoperative opioid minimisation strategies that should be further assessed through systematic reviews and multicentre trials. Findings from our scoping review may be influenced by selective outcome reporting bias. STUDY REGISTRATION OSF - https://osf.io/7kea3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Verret
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Ottawa, Civic Campus, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada; Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Québec City, QC, Canada.
| | - Nhat H Lam
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Manoj Lalu
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Ottawa, Civic Campus, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada; Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Stuart G Nicholls
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Ottawa Methods Centre, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Alexis F Turgeon
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Québec City, QC, Canada; Population Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Unit (Trauma - Emergency - Critical Care Medicine), Centre de Recherche du CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Université Laval, Québec City, QC, Canada
| | - Daniel I McIsaac
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Ottawa, Civic Campus, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada; Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Myriam Hamtiaux
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - John Bao Phuc Le
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Ian Gilron
- Department of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine, Biomedical & Molecular Sciences, Centre for Neuroscience Studies and School of Policy Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Lucy Yang
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | | | - Alexandre Assi
- School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - David El-Adem
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Makenna Timm
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Peter Tai
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Joelle Amir
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Sriyathavan Srichandramohan
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Abdulaziz Al-Mazidi
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Nicholas A Fergusson
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative & Pain Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Brian Hutton
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Fiona Zivkovic
- Patient partner, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Megan Graham
- Patient partner, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Maxime Lê
- Patient partner, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Allison Geist
- Patient partner, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Mélanie Bérubé
- Population Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Unit (Trauma - Emergency - Critical Care Medicine), Centre de Recherche du CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Université Laval, Québec City, QC, Canada; Faculty of Nursing, Université Laval, Québec City, QC, Canada; Quebec Pain Research Network, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | - Patricia Poulin
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Risa Shorr
- Library Services, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | | | - Guillaume Martel
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jason McVicar
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Ottawa, Civic Campus, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Husein Moloo
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Dean A Fergusson
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Freys JC, Bigalke SM, Mertes M, Lobo DN, Pogatzki-Zahn EM, Freys SM. Perioperative pain management for appendicectomy: A systematic review and Procedure-specific Postoperative Pain Management recommendations. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2024; 41:174-187. [PMID: 38214556 DOI: 10.1097/eja.0000000000001953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite being a commonly performed surgical procedure, pain management for appendicectomy is often neglected because of insufficient evidence on the most effective treatment options. OBJECTIVE To provide evidence-based recommendations by assessing the available literature for optimal pain management after appendicectomy. DESIGN AND DATA SOURCES This systematic review-based guideline was conducted according to the PROSPECT methodology. Relevant randomised controlled trials, systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the English language from January 1999 to October 2022 were retrieved from MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Databases using PRISMA search protocols. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA We included studies on adults and children. If articles reported combined data from different surgeries, they had to include specific information about appendicectomies. Studies needed to measure pain intensity using a visual analogue scale (VAS) or a numerical rating scale (NRS). Studies that did not report the precise appendicectomy technique were excluded. RESULTS Out of 1388 studies, 94 met the inclusion criteria. Based on evidence and consensus, the PROSPECT members agreed that basic analgesics [paracetamol and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)] should be administered perioperatively for open and laparoscopic appendicectomies. A laparoscopic approach is preferred because of lower pain scores. Additional recommendations for laparoscopic appendicectomies include a three-port laparoscopic approach and the instillation of intraperitoneal local anaesthetic. For open appendicectomy, a preoperative unilateral transverse abdominis plane (TAP) block is recommended. If not possible, preincisional infiltration with local anaesthetics is an alternative. Opioids should only be used as rescue analgesia. Limited evidence exists for TAP block in laparoscopic appendicectomy, analgesic adjuvants for TAP block, continuous wound infiltration after open appendicectomy and preoperative ketamine and dexamethasone. Recommendations apply to children and adults. CONCLUSION This review identified an optimal analgesic regimen for open and laparoscopic appendicectomy. Further randomised controlled trials should evaluate the use of regional analgesia and wound infiltrations with adequate baseline analgesia, especially during the recommended conventional three-port approach. REGISTRATION The protocol for this study was registered with the PROSPERO database (Registration No. CRD42023387994).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob C Freys
- From the Department of Surgery, Agaplesion Bethesda Krankenhaus Hamburg (JCF), Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany (EMP-Z, MM), Gastrointestinal Surgery, Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre and National Institute for Health Research Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Nottingham (DNL), MRC Versus Arthritis Centre for Musculoskeletal Ageing Research, School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, United Kingdom (DNL), Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive and Pain Medicine, Ruhr-University Bochum, BG-University Hospital Bergmannsheil gGmbH, Bochum (SMB) and Department of Surgery, DIAKO Ev. Diakonie-Krankenhaus, Bremen, Germany (SMF)
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kurteva S, Pook M, Fiore JF, Tamblyn R. Rates and risk factors for persistent opioid use after cardiothoracic surgery: A cohort study. Surgery 2024; 175:271-279. [PMID: 38008605 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.10.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2023] [Revised: 09/25/2023] [Accepted: 10/25/2023] [Indexed: 11/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study's aim was to estimate potential risk factors for persistent opioid use after cardiothoracic surgery. METHODS This study included participants in the McGill University Health Centre clinical trial (2014 to 2016). Provincial medical services, prescription claims, and medical charts data were linked. Persistent opioid use was defined as an initial peri-operative opioid dispensation followed by an opioid dispensation between 91 and 180 days postdischarge. Multivariable Cox Proportional Hazards models were used to assess factors associated with persistent opioid use. RESULTS A cohort of 815 patients (mean age: 68.9 [standard deviation = 8.9]) was assembled, of which 8.2% became persistent opioid users. Factors such as higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (adjusted hazard ratio: 3.4, 95% confidence interval: 1.1-10.6), history of diabetes (adjusted hazard ratio: 2.1, 95% confidence interval: 1.3-3.4), substance and alcohol abuse (adjusted hazard ratio: 16.3, 95% confidence interval: 5.3-49.5), and radiotherapy (adjusted hazard ratio: 2.4, 95% confidence interval: 1.5-4.1) were associated with a higher hazard of persistent opioid use. Previous opioid use (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.7, 95% CI: 1.0-2.8), daily peri-operative opioid dose (adjusted hazard ratio: 2.3, 95% confidence interval: 1.5-3.7), having an opioid dispensation 30 days pre-admission (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.7, 95% confidence interval: 1.0-2.8), and pre-admission analgesic use (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.7, 95% confidence interval: 1.0-2.8), were also associated with an increased hazard of persistent use. Being prescribed multimodal analgesia at discharge (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.54, 95% confidence interval: 0.32-0.92) was associated with a 46% decreased hazard of developing persistent opioid use. CONCLUSION Multiple patient- and medication-related characteristics were associated with an increased hazard of persistent opioid use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siyana Kurteva
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McGill University, Montreal, Canada; Clinical and Health Informatics Research Group, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
| | - Makena Pook
- Division of Experimental Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Julio Flavio Fiore
- Division of Experimental Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Canada; Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (CORE), Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada; Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Robyn Tamblyn
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McGill University, Montreal, Canada; Clinical and Health Informatics Research Group, McGill University, Montreal, Canada; Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Canada; Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Coppens S, Somville A, Hoogma DF, Dewinter G, Neyrinck A, Desmet M, Vandebroek A, D'Hoore A, Wolthuis A, Bislenghi G, Fieuws S, Rex S. The effect of anterior quadratus lumborum block on morphine consumption in minimally invasive colorectal surgery: a multicentre, double-blind, prospective randomised placebo-controlled trial. Anaesthesia 2024; 79:54-62. [PMID: 37970976 DOI: 10.1111/anae.16177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/13/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
We investigated the efficacy and safety of a bilateral anterior quadratus lumborum block in patients undergoing minimally invasive colorectal surgery. This was a two-centre, double-blind, prospective, randomised, placebo-controlled trial including 150 patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery (left- or right hemicolectomy, sigmoidectomy) who were enrolled in the institutional abdominal enhanced recovery programme. Before induction of anaesthesia, patients received a bilateral anterior quadratus lumborum block in the left and right lateral decubitus position under ultrasound guidance and were allocated randomly to receive 30 ml of ropivacaine 0.375% (n = 75) or placebo (saline 0.9%) (n = 75) bilaterally. Postoperatively, all patients received multimodal intravenous analgesia including paracetamol, ketorolac and patient-controlled analgesia with morphine. The primary outcome was morphine consumption during the first 24 h after tracheal extubation. Secondary outcomes included severity of pain; presence and extent of sensory block; incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting; and hospital duration of stay. We also investigated the need for, and dose of, rescue analgesia. Safety outcomes included the incidence of adverse events. Mean (SD) 24-hour morphine consumption was no different between patients allocated to ropivacaine and placebo (28.6 (22.3) mg vs. 28.4 (22.5) mg, p = 0.966, respectively). While a sensory block could be detected in significantly more patients allocated to the ropivacaine group, no differences were detected in pain scores or other secondary or safety endpoints. Patient satisfaction scores were high in both groups. In laparoscopic colorectal surgery, adding a bilateral anterior quadratus lumborum block to a standard multimodal analgesia regimen did not reduce opioid consumption or improve pain scores.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Coppens
- Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospitals of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Biomedical Sciences Group, Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - A Somville
- Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospitals of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - D F Hoogma
- Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospitals of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Biomedical Sciences Group, Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - G Dewinter
- Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospitals of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Biomedical Sciences Group, Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - A Neyrinck
- Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospitals of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Biomedical Sciences Group, Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - M Desmet
- Department of Anesthesiology, AZ Groeninge Kortrijk, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - A Vandebroek
- Department of Anesthesiology, AZ Groeninge Kortrijk, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - A D'Hoore
- Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospitals of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, University Hospitals of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - A Wolthuis
- Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospitals of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, University Hospitals of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - G Bislenghi
- Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospitals of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, University Hospitals of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - S Fieuws
- Biomedical Sciences Group, Leuven Biostatistics and Statistical Bioinformatics Centre, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - S Rex
- Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospitals of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Biomedical Sciences Group, Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Liu Z, Bi C, Li X, Song R. The efficacy and safety of opioid-free anesthesia combined with ultrasound-guided intermediate cervical plexus block vs. opioid-based anesthesia in thyroid surgery-a randomized controlled trial. J Anesth 2023; 37:914-922. [PMID: 37740124 PMCID: PMC10654206 DOI: 10.1007/s00540-023-03254-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2023] [Accepted: 08/31/2023] [Indexed: 09/24/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE In the context of the current comfort medicine and enhanced recovery after surgery, there is a demand for a new anesthesia method to reduce adverse reactions and accelerate recovery after surgery. This randomized controlled trial aimed to compare the efficacy and safety between opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) combined with ultrasound-guided intermediate cervical plexus block (ICPB) and opioid-based anesthesia in patients after thyroid surgery. METHODS In this study, 75 patients scheduled for thyroid surgery under general anesthesia were randomly allocated into two groups. The primary outcome included the incidence of nausea within 24 h after surgery. The main secondary outcomes included the incidence of vomiting and the visual analog score (VAS) scores within 24 h after surgery as well as the quality of recovery 40 questionnaires (QoR-40) scores 24 h after surgery. RESULTS In the OFA group, the incidence of postoperative nausea was 6.1%, compared to 39.4% in the control group (p = 0.001). No patient presented with postoperative vomiting in the OFA group, while 15.2% of patients suffered from postoperative vomiting in the control group (p = 0.063). The VAS scores of patients in the postanesthetic care unit (PACU) and 2 h, 4 h, and 6 h after surgery were lower in the OFA group, and the difference is statistically significant. Besides, the VAS scores of patients at rest (p = 1.000) and during swallowing (p = 1.000) 24 h after surgery were comparable. CONCLUSION Compared with opioid-based anesthesia, the OFA combined with the ultrasound-guided ICPB can better improve patients' postoperative recovery, reduce nausea, and decrease pain scores. TRIAL REGISTRATION Chinese Clinical Trial Regisrty, ChiCTR2200056344, https://www.chictr.org.cn.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhi Liu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Dalian Municipal Central Hospital, Dalian, Liaoning, China
- China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Congjie Bi
- Department of Anesthesiology, Dalian Municipal Central Hospital, Dalian, Liaoning, China.
| | - Xingguo Li
- Department of Anesthesiology, Dalian Municipal Central Hospital, Dalian, Liaoning, China
| | - Ruonan Song
- Department of Anesthesiology, Dalian Municipal Central Hospital, Dalian, Liaoning, China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Tornøe AS, Pind AH, Laursen CCW, Andersen C, Maagaard M, Mathiesen O. Ketamine for postoperative pain treatment in spinal surgery: Systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2023; 67:1306-1321. [PMID: 37468443 DOI: 10.1111/aas.14307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2023] [Revised: 06/22/2023] [Accepted: 06/23/2023] [Indexed: 07/21/2023]
Abstract
AIM We aimed to assess the beneficial and harmful effects of perioperative pain treatment with ketamine in patients undergoing spinal surgery. METHODS We searched Medline, Embase, and CENTRAL from inception until 15 February 2023 for randomised clinical trials comparing ketamine with placebo or no intervention in patients undergoing spinal surgery. The primary outcomes were cumulative opioid consumption at 24 h postoperatively and serious adverse events. We adhered to recommendations of the Cochrane Collaboration and performed meta-analysis, Trial Sequential Analysis (TSA) to assess the risks of random errors, risk of bias assessment to evaluate the risks of systematic errors, and used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). RESULTS We included a total of 28 randomised clinical trials enrolling 2110 participants providing data for our pre-defined outcomes. Twenty-three trials enrolled adult participants and 5 trials enrolled paediatric participants. Three trials were at low risk of bias. Meta-analysis and TSA of trials including adults showed that ketamine versus placebo or no intervention seemed to reduce the cumulative 24-h opioid consumption (mean difference -17.57 mg; TSA-adjusted 95% confidence interval, -24.22 to -10.92; p < .01; low certainty of evidence), and there was no evidence of a difference of ketamine versus placebo or no intervention on the risk of serious adverse events (risk ratio 2.16; 96.7% confidence interval, 0.35 to 13.17; p = .36; very low certainty of evidence). CONCLUSION In adults undergoing spinal surgery, ketamine may reduce cumulative 24-h opioid consumption. Ketamine may increase the occurrence of serious adverse events, but the evidence was very uncertain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anders Schou Tornøe
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Centre for Anaesthesiological Research, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark
| | - Alison Holten Pind
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Centre for Anaesthesiological Research, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark
| | | | - Cheme Andersen
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Centre for Anaesthesiological Research, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark
| | - Mathias Maagaard
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Centre for Anaesthesiological Research, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark
| | - Ole Mathiesen
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Centre for Anaesthesiological Research, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ju JW, Lee HJ, Kim MJ, Ryoo SB, Kim WH, Jeong SY, Park KJ, Park JW. Postoperative NSAIDs use and the risk of anastomotic leakage after restorative resection for colorectal cancer. Asian J Surg 2023; 46:4749-4754. [PMID: 37105812 DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2023.04.061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2023] [Revised: 04/06/2023] [Accepted: 04/14/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are useful options for multimodal opioid-sparing analgesia, their effect on anastomotic leakage (AL) after colorectal surgery remains unclear. We aimed to investigate the association between early postoperative NSAID use and AL occurrence in patients who underwent colorectal cancer surgery at a high-volume tertiary care center. METHODS This retrospective observational study included all adult patients who underwent elective colorectal cancer resection surgery during 2011-2021 at a tertiary teaching hospital. Based on NSAID use within five postoperative days, patients were classified into either NSAID or no NSAID groups. We performed multivariable logistic regression analysis for the primary outcome, AL, within the first 30 postoperative days, before and after propensity score analysis using stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (sIPTW). RESULTS Among the 7928 patients analyzed, 0.6% experienced AL after surgery. The occurrence rates of AL were 1.7% (12/714) and 0.5% (37/7214) in the NSAID and no NSAID groups, respectively. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that early postoperative NSAID use was significantly associated with AL [odds ratio (OR), 3.41; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.76-6.60; P < 0.001]. Significance was maintained after sIPTW (OR, 3.65; 95% CI, 1.86-6.72; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION Early postoperative NSAID use was significantly associated with AL in patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery at a high-volume tertiary care center. Further prospective studies are required to investigate NSAIDs' clinically meaningful unfavorable effects following colorectal cancer surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jae-Woo Ju
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ho-Jin Lee
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| | - Min Jung Kim
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital and Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Seung-Bum Ryoo
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital and Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Won Ho Kim
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Seung-Yong Jeong
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital and Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Kyu Joo Park
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital and Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Ji Won Park
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital and Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ivascu R, Dutu M, Stanca A, Negutu M, Morlova D, Dutu C, Corneci D. Pain in Colorectal Surgery: How Does It Occur and What Tools Do We Have for Treatment? J Clin Med 2023; 12:6771. [PMID: 37959235 PMCID: PMC10648968 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12216771] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2023] [Revised: 10/09/2023] [Accepted: 10/24/2023] [Indexed: 11/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Pain is a complex entity with deleterious effects on the entire organism. Poorly controlled postoperative pain impacts the patient outcome, being associated with increased morbidity, inadequate quality of life and functional recovery. In the current surgical environment with less invasive surgical procedures increasingly being used and a trend towards rapid discharge home after surgery, we need to continuously re-evaluate analgesic strategies. We have performed a narrative review consisting of a description of the acute surgical pain anatomic pathways and the connection between pain and the surgical stress response followed by reviewing methods of multimodal analgesia in colorectal surgery found in recent literature data. We have described various regional analgesia techniques and drugs effective in pain treatment, emphasizing their advantages and concerns. We have also tried to identify present knowledge gaps requiring future research. Our review concludes that surgical pain has peculiarities that make its management complex, implying a consistent, multimodal approach aiming to block both peripheral and central pain pathways.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Ivascu
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, ‘Carol Davila’ University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania; (R.I.); (D.C.)
- Central Military Emergency University Hospital “Dr. Carol Davila”, 010825 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Madalina Dutu
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, ‘Carol Davila’ University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania; (R.I.); (D.C.)
- Central Military Emergency University Hospital “Dr. Carol Davila”, 010825 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Alina Stanca
- Elias University Emergency Hospital, 011461 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Mihai Negutu
- Elias University Emergency Hospital, 011461 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Darius Morlova
- Bagdasar Arseni Clinical Emergency Hospital, 041915 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Costin Dutu
- Central Military Emergency University Hospital “Dr. Carol Davila”, 010825 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Dan Corneci
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, ‘Carol Davila’ University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania; (R.I.); (D.C.)
- Central Military Emergency University Hospital “Dr. Carol Davila”, 010825 Bucharest, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Van De Sijpe G, Hublou W, Declercq P, Metsemakers WJ, Sermon A, Casteels M, Foulon V, Quintens C, Spriet I. Bedside check of medication appropriateness (BED-CMA) as a risk-based tool for bedside clinical pharmacy services: A proof-of-concept study at the trauma surgery ward. Comput Struct Biotechnol J 2023; 22:58-65. [PMID: 38022766 PMCID: PMC10656193 DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2023.10.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2023] [Revised: 10/10/2023] [Accepted: 10/10/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Bedside clinical pharmacy prevents drug-related problems, but is not feasible in many countries due to limited resources. Hence, clinical rules using structural information in the electronic health record can help identifying potentially inappropriate prescriptions (PIPs). We aimed to develop and implement a risk-based clinical pharmacy service and evaluate its impact on prescribing at the trauma surgery ward. Methods The proportion of residual PIPs per day, i.e. the number of PIPs that persisted up to 24 h after pharmacist intervention divided by the number of PIPs at T0, was evaluated before and after implementation of the intervention in an interrupted time series analysis. The pre-intervention cohort received usual pharmacy services, i.e. a 0.3 FTE clinical pharmacist trainee. Fifteen clinical rules, targeting antimicrobial, anticoagulant and analgesic therapy were implemented in the post-intervention period. The pre-intervention period was compared to two post-intervention scenarios: A) clinical rule alerts reviewed by a 0.3 FTE clinical pharmacist trainee; and B) clinical rule alerts reviewed daily for approximately 1 h by a clinical pharmacist trainee. Results Pre-intervention, a median proportion of 67% (range 0%-100%) residual PIPs per day was observed. Scenario A showed an immediate relative reduction of 14% (p = 0.72) and scenario B a significant immediate relative reduction of 85% (p = 0.0015) in residual PIPs per day. In scenario A, recommendations were provided for 19% of clinical rule alerts, of which 67% was accepted by the surgeon within 24 h. In scenario B, recommendations were given for 56% of alerts, of which 84% was accepted. Conclusions Using clinical rules is an effective approach to organize bedside clinical pharmacy services and improves prescribing at the trauma surgery ward. Advanced training and daily follow-up of the clinical rules are two requirements to be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Greet Van De Sijpe
- Pharmacy Department, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Wencke Hublou
- Pharmacy Department, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Peter Declercq
- Pharmacy Department, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - An Sermon
- Department of Trauma Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Minne Casteels
- Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Veerle Foulon
- Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Charlotte Quintens
- Pharmacy Department, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Isabel Spriet
- Pharmacy Department, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Lee DJ, Brenna CTA, Lee JM. Reply to Letter to the Editor regarding "The benefits and risks of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for postoperative analgesia in sinonasal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis". Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2023; 13:1841-1843. [PMID: 37401129 DOI: 10.1002/alr.23229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2023] [Accepted: 06/29/2023] [Indexed: 07/05/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel J Lee
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Connor T A Brenna
- Department of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - John M Lee
- Division of Rhinology, Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Lee DJ, Grose E, Brenna CTA, Philteos J, Lightfoot D, Kirubalingam K, Chan Y, Palmer JN, Adappa ND, Lee JM. The benefits and risks of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for postoperative analgesia in sinonasal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2023; 13:1738-1757. [PMID: 36762711 DOI: 10.1002/alr.23140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2022] [Revised: 01/26/2023] [Accepted: 02/06/2023] [Indexed: 02/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have emerged as an alternative to opioids for optimal postoperative pain management. However, the adoption of NSAIDs in sinonasal surgery has been impeded by a theoretical concern for postoperative bleeding. Our objective is to systematically review the efficacy and safety of NSAIDs for patients undergoing sinonasal surgery. METHODS MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL, and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform were searched from inception to January 27, 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and comparative observational studies in any language were considered. Screening, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were performed in duplicate. Our outcomes were postoperative pain scores, requirement for rescue analgesia, and postoperative adverse events (epistaxis, nausea/vomiting). RESULTS Out of 4661 records, 15 RCTs (enrolling 1210 patients) and two observational studies were included. Following endoscopic sinus surgery, there was no difference in pain scores between NSAIDs and non-NSAIDs groups (standardized mean differences [SMD] 0.44 units better, 95% CI -0.18 to 1.05). Following septorhinoplasty, NSAIDs decreased pain scores compared to non-NSAID regimens (SMD 1.14 units better, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.67 units better). Overall, NSAIDs reduced the need for rescue medication with a relative risk (RR) of 0.45 (95% CI 0.24 to 0.84). In addition, NSAIDs decreased the risk of nausea with an RR of 0.62 (95% CI 0.42 to 0.91) and did not increase the risk of epistaxis (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.23-2.22). CONCLUSION Among patients undergoing sinonasal surgery, NSAIDs are beneficial in postoperative pain management and avoidance of postoperative nausea without increasing the risk of postoperative epistaxis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel J Lee
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Elysia Grose
- Division of Rhinology, Department of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Connor T A Brenna
- Department of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Justine Philteos
- Division of Rhinology, Department of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - David Lightfoot
- St. Michael's Hospital Health Sciences Library, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Yvonne Chan
- Division of Rhinology, Department of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - James N Palmer
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Nithin D Adappa
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - John M Lee
- Division of Rhinology, Department of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
McCorquodale CL, Greening R, Tulloch R, Forget P. Opioid prescribing for acute postoperative pain: an overview of systematic reviews related to two consensus statements relevant at patient, prescriber, system and public health levels. BMC Anesthesiol 2023; 23:294. [PMID: 37648969 PMCID: PMC10468854 DOI: 10.1186/s12871-023-02243-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2023] [Accepted: 08/16/2023] [Indexed: 09/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND National guidelines for rational opioid prescribing for acute postoperative pain are needed to optimise postoperative pain control and function whilst minimising opioid-related harm. OBJECTIVES This overview of systematic reviews aims to summarise and critically assess the quality of systematic reviews related to the 20 recommendations from two previously published consensus guideline papers (ten relevant at patient and prescriber levels and ten at a system / Public Health level). It also aims to identify gaps in research that require further efforts to fill these in order to augment the evidence behind creating national guidelines for rational opioid prescribing for acute postoperative pain. METHODS A systematic database search using PubMed/MEDLINE and Cochrane was conducted in November 2022. Furthermore, reference lists were reviewed. All identified systematic reviews were assessed for eligibility. Data from each study was extracted using a pre-standardised data extraction form. The methodological quality of the included reviews was assessed by two independent reviewers using the AMSTAR 2 checklist. Descriptive synthesis of the results was performed. RESULTS A total of 12 papers were eligible for analysis. Only eight out of the total 20 prioritised recommendations had systematic reviews that provided evidence related to them. These systematic reviews were most commonly of critically low quality. CONCLUSION The consensus papers provide guidance and recommendations based on the consensus of expert opinion that is based on the best available evidence. However, there is a lack of evidence supporting many of these consensus statements. Efforts to further analyse interventions that aim to reduce the rates of opioid prescribing and their adverse effects should therefore continue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C L McCorquodale
- University of Aberdeen School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, Aberdeen, Scotland, UK.
| | - R Greening
- NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, Scotland, UK
| | - R Tulloch
- University of Aberdeen School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, Aberdeen, Scotland, UK
| | - P Forget
- University of Aberdeen School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, Aberdeen, Scotland, UK
- Department of Anaesthetics, NHS Grampian, Aberdeen, Scotland, UK
- Pain AND Opioid After Surgery (PANDOS) European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (ESAIC) Research Group, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Silva F, Costa G, Veiga F, Cardoso C, Paiva-Santos AC. Parenteral Ready-to-Use Fixed-Dose Combinations Including NSAIDs with Paracetamol or Metamizole for Multimodal Analgesia-Approved Products and Challenges. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2023; 16:1084. [PMID: 37630999 PMCID: PMC10459253 DOI: 10.3390/ph16081084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2023] [Revised: 07/11/2023] [Accepted: 07/25/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023] Open
Abstract
The combination of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) with non-opioid analgesics is common in clinical practice for the treatment of acute painful conditions like post-operative and post-traumatic pain. Despite the satisfactory results achieved by oral analgesics, parenteral analgesia remains a key tool in the treatment of painful conditions when the enteral routes of administration are inconvenient. Parenteral ready-to-use fixed-dose combinations of non-opioid analgesics combinations, including NSAIDs and paracetamol or metamizole, could play a central role in the treatment of painful conditions by combining the advantages of multimodal and parenteral analgesia in a single formulation. Surprisingly, only in 2020, a parenteral ready-to-use fixed-dose combination of ibuprofen/paracetamol was launched to the market. This review aims to investigate the current availability of combinations of NSAIDs with paracetamol or metamizole in both European and American markets, and how the combination of such drugs could play a central role in a multimodal analgesia strategy. Also, we explored how the parenteral formulations of NSAIDs, paracetamol, and metamizole could serve as starting elements for the development of new parenteral ready-to-use fixed-dose combinations. We concluded that, despite the well-recognized utility of combining NSAIDs with paracetamol or metamizole, several randomized clinical trial studies demonstrate no clear advantages concerning their efficacy and safety. Future clinical trials specifically designed to assess the efficacy and safety of pre-formulated fixed-dose combinations are required to generate solid evidence about their clinical advantages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fernando Silva
- Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Coimbra, 3000-548 Coimbra, Portugal
- REQUIMTE/LAQV, Group of Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Coimbra, 3000-548 Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Gustavo Costa
- Coimbra Institute for Clinical and Biomedical Research (iCBR), Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, 3000-548 Coimbra, Portugal
- Center for Innovative Biomedicine and Biotechnology (CIBB), Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, 3000-548 Coimbra, Portugal
- Laboratory of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Coimbra, Azinhaga de Santa Comba, Pólo das Ciências da Saúde, 3000-548 Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Francisco Veiga
- Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Coimbra, 3000-548 Coimbra, Portugal
- REQUIMTE/LAQV, Group of Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Coimbra, 3000-548 Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Catarina Cardoso
- Laboratórios Basi, Parque Industrial Manuel Lourenço Ferreira, Lote 15, 3450-232 Mortágua, Portugal
| | - Ana Cláudia Paiva-Santos
- Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Coimbra, 3000-548 Coimbra, Portugal
- REQUIMTE/LAQV, Group of Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Coimbra, 3000-548 Coimbra, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Erlenwein J, Leister N, Castello R, Wirz S. [Principles of acute pain therapy-An overview taking special features in the patient collective of ophthalmology into consideration]. DIE OPHTHALMOLOGIE 2023; 120:701-710. [PMID: 37340245 DOI: 10.1007/s00347-023-01888-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/02/2023] [Indexed: 06/22/2023]
Abstract
For many years the quality of perioperative pain management in general has been repeatedly reported as inadequate and there is significant evidence to indicate that this is also true after surgical procedures in ophthalmology. The patient population in ophthalmology is quite challenging due to numerous comorbidities and a high average age resulting in numerous contraindications and organ dysfunctions and requiring special knowledge to ensure high quality acute pain management. The following overview covers basic knowledge of acute pain management, with a particular focus on analgesic approaches and the specifics of the patient population and the associated limitations in terms of analgesic and co-analgesic pharmacological options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joachim Erlenwein
- Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37085, Göttingen, Deutschland.
| | - Nicolas Leister
- Klinik für Anästhesiologie und Operative Intensivmedizin, Medizinische Fakultät und Universitätsklinikum Köln, Universität zu Köln, Köln, Deutschland
| | - Roberto Castello
- Interdisziplinärer Arbeitskreis Ophthalmoanästhesie, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin e. V., Nürnberg, Deutschland
| | - Stefan Wirz
- Abteilung für Anästhesie, Interdisziplinäre Intensivmedizin, Schmerzmedizin/Palliativmedizin - Zentrum für Schmerzmedizin, Weaningzentrum, Cura Krankenhaus der GFO Kliniken Bonn, Bad Honnef, Deutschland
- Klinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinik Bonn, Bonn, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Stormholt ER, Steiness J, Derby CB, Larsen ME, Maagaard M, Mathiesen O. Glucocorticoids added to paracetamol and NSAIDs for post-operative pain: A systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2023; 67:688-702. [PMID: 36919281 DOI: 10.1111/aas.14237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2022] [Revised: 02/27/2023] [Accepted: 03/05/2023] [Indexed: 03/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Paracetamol and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are recommended as the basic pain treatment regimen for most surgeries. Glucocorticoids have well-known anti-inflammatory and anti-emetic properties and may also demonstrate analgesic effects. We assessed benefit and harm of adding glucocorticoids to a combination of paracetamol and NSAIDs for post-operative pain management. METHODS We searched Embase, Medline and CENTRAL for randomised clinical trials investigating the addition of glucocorticoids versus placebo/no intervention to paracetamol and an NSAID in adults undergoing any type of surgery. We assessed three primary outcomes: cumulative opioid consumption at 24 h postoperatively, serious adverse events and pain at rest at 24 h postoperatively. We performed meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis (TSA), assessed risk of bias using the Risk of Bias 2 tool and used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach to evaluate the certainty of the evidence. RESULTS We identified 12 relevant trials of which nine trials randomising 804 participants were included in quantitative analysis. When added to paracetamol and NSAIDs, we found no evidence of a difference of glucocorticoids versus placebo/no intervention in cumulative opioid consumption at 24 h postoperatively (mean difference [MD] -0.28, TSA-adjusted 95% confidence interval [CI] -1.90 to 1.33, p = .68, moderate certainty of evidence), serious adverse events (risk ratio (RR) 0.99, TSA-adjusted 95% CI 0.27-3.63, p = .93, very low certainty of evidence) or pain on the Numeric Rating Scale at 24 h postoperatively (MD -0.39, TSA-adjusted 95% CI -0.84 to 0.17, p = .10, moderate certainty of evidence). All outcomes were assessed to be at high risk of bias and TSA showed that we had insufficient information for most outcomes. CONCLUSION Glucocorticoids added to a baseline therapy of paracetamol and an NSAID likely result in little to no difference in cumulative opioid consumption and pain at rest at 24 h postoperatively. In addition, the evidence is very uncertain about the effect on serious adverse events. For most outcomes we did not have sufficient information to draw firm conclusions and the certainty of the evidence varied from moderate to very low. EDITORIAL COMMENT Multimodal approaches for post-operative analgesia are favoured, including paracetamol and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. In this meta-analysis, pooled results from clinical trials are assessed to describe possible benefit of addition of glucocorticoid treatment for analgesia. The findings did not identify additional benefit, though the certainty of the evidence was not high.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Ritsmer Stormholt
- Centre for Anaesthesiological Research, Department of Anaesthesiology, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark
| | - Joakim Steiness
- Centre for Anaesthesiological Research, Department of Anaesthesiology, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Naestved Hospital, Naestved, Denmark
| | - Cecilie Bauer Derby
- Centre for Anaesthesiological Research, Department of Anaesthesiology, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark
| | - Mia Esta Larsen
- Centre for Anaesthesiological Research, Department of Anaesthesiology, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark
- Department of Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Mathias Maagaard
- Centre for Anaesthesiological Research, Department of Anaesthesiology, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark
| | - Ole Mathiesen
- Centre for Anaesthesiological Research, Department of Anaesthesiology, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Ioannidis O, Ramirez JM, Ubieto JM, Feo CV, Arroyo A, Kocián P, Sánchez-Guillén L, Bellosta AP, Whitley A, Enguita AB, Teresa M, Anestiadou E. The EUPEMEN (EUropean PErioperative MEdical Networking) Protocol for Bowel Obstruction: Recommendations for Perioperative Care. J Clin Med 2023; 12:4185. [PMID: 37445224 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12134185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2023] [Revised: 06/05/2023] [Accepted: 06/06/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Mechanical bowel obstruction is a common symptom for admission to emergency services, diagnosed annually in more than 300,000 patients in the States, from whom 51% will undergo emergency laparotomy. This condition is associated with serious morbidity and mortality, but it also causes a high financial burden due to long hospital stay. The EUPEMEN project aims to incorporate the expertise and clinical experience of national clinical specialists into development of perioperative rehabilitation protocols. Providing special recommendations for all aspects of patient perioperative care and the participation of diverse specialists, the EUPEMEN protocol for bowel obstruction, as presented in the current paper, aims to provide faster postoperative recovery and reduce length of hospital stay, postoperative morbidity and mortality rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Orestis Ioannidis
- Fourth Department of Surgery, Medical School, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, General Hospital "George Papanikolaou", 57010 Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Jose M Ramirez
- Institute for Health Research Aragón, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Zaragoza, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Javier Martínez Ubieto
- Institute for Health Research Aragón, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
- Department of Anesthesia, Resuscitation and Pain Therapy, Miguel Servet University Hospital, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Carlo V Feo
- Department of Surgery, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale Ferrara-University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy
| | - Antonio Arroyo
- Department of Surgery, Universidad Miguel Hernández Elche, Hospital General Universitario Elche, 03203 Elche, Spain
| | - Petr Kocián
- Department of Surgery, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, 150 06 Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Luis Sánchez-Guillén
- Department of Surgery, Universidad Miguel Hernández Elche, Hospital General Universitario Elche, 03203 Elche, Spain
| | - Ana Pascual Bellosta
- Institute for Health Research Aragón, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
- Department of Anesthesia, Resuscitation and Pain Therapy, Miguel Servet University Hospital, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Adam Whitley
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, 100 34 Prague, Czech Republic
| | | | - Marta Teresa
- Institute for Health Research Aragón, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Elissavet Anestiadou
- Fourth Department of Surgery, Medical School, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, General Hospital "George Papanikolaou", 57010 Thessaloniki, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Maury T, Elnar A, Marchionni S, Frisoni R, Goetz C, Bécret A. Effect of rectus sheath anaesthesia versus thoracic epidural analgesia on postoperative recovery quality after elective open abdominal surgery in a French regional hospital: the study protocol of a randomised controlled QoR-RECT-CATH trial. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e069736. [PMID: 37221022 PMCID: PMC10410969 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069736] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2022] [Accepted: 04/20/2023] [Indexed: 05/25/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols increase patient well-being while significantly reducing mortality, costs and length-of-stay after surgery. A key component is multimodal analgesia that prevents postoperative pain and facilitates early refeeding and mobilisation. Thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) was long the gold standard for locoregional anaesthesia in anterior abdominal wall surgery. However, newer wall-block techniques such as rectus-sheath block (RSB) may be preferable because they are less invasive and may provide equivalent analgesia with fewer side effects. Since the evidence base remains limited, the Quality Of Recovery enhanced by REctus sheat CATHeter (QoR-RECT-CATH) randomised controlled trial (RCT) was designed to assess whether RSB elicits better postoperative rehabilitation than TEA after laparotomy. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This open-label parallel-arm 1:1-allocated RCT will determine whether RSB is superior to TEA in 110 patients undergoing scheduled midline laparotomy in terms of postoperative rehabilitation quality. The setting is a regional French hospital that provides opioid-free anaesthesia for all laparotomies within an ERAS programme. Recruited patients will be ≥18 years, scheduled to undergo laparotomy, have American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score 1-4 and lack contraindications to ropivacaine/TEA. TEA-allocated patients will receive an epidural catheter before surgery while RSB-allocated patients will receive rectus sheath catheters after surgery. All other pre/peri/postoperative procedures will be identical, including multimodal postoperative analgesia provided according to our standard of care. Primary objective is a change in total Quality-of-Recovery-15 French-language (QoR-15F) score on postoperative day (POD) 2 relative to baseline. QoR-15F is a patient-reported outcome measure that is commonly used to measure ERAS outcomes. The 15 secondary objectives include postoperative pain scores, opioid consumption, functional recovery measures and adverse events. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The French Ethics Committee (Sud-Ouest et Outre-Mer I Ethical Committee) gave approval. Subjects are recruited after providing written consent after receiving the information provided by the investigator. The results of this study will be made public through peer-reviewed publication and, if possible, conference publications. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT04985695.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Maury
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Regional Hospital Centre Metz-Thionville, Metz Cedex 03, France
- Faculty of Medicine, Université de Lorraine-Site de Nancy, Vandoeuvre lès Nancy, France
| | - Arpiné Elnar
- Clinical Research Support Unit, Regional Hospital Centre Metz-Thionville, Metz, France
| | - Sandra Marchionni
- Clinical Research Support Unit, Regional Hospital Centre Metz-Thionville, Metz, France
| | - Romain Frisoni
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Regional Hospital Centre Metz-Thionville, Metz, France
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Private Hospital Jeanne d'Arc, Lunéville, France
| | - Christophe Goetz
- Clinical Research Support Unit, Regional Hospital Centre Metz-Thionville, Metz, France
| | - Antoine Bécret
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Regional Hospital Centre Metz-Thionville, Metz Cedex 03, France
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Doleman B, Mathiesen O, Sutton AJ, Cooper NJ, Lund JN, Williams JP. Non-opioid analgesics for the prevention of chronic postsurgical pain: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth 2023; 130:719-728. [PMID: 37059625 DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2023.02.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2022] [Revised: 01/27/2023] [Accepted: 02/19/2023] [Indexed: 04/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic postsurgical pain is common after surgery. Identification of non-opioid analgesics with potential for preventing chronic postsurgical pain is important, although trials are often underpowered. Network meta-analysis offers an opportunity to improve power and to identify the most promising therapy for clinical use and future studies. METHODS We conducted a PRISMA-NMA-compliant systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of non-opioid analgesics for chronic postsurgical pain. Outcomes included incidence and severity of chronic postsurgical pain, serious adverse events, and chronic opioid use. RESULTS We included 132 randomised controlled trials with 23 902 participants. In order of efficacy, i.v. lidocaine (odds ratio [OR] 0.32; 95% credible interval [CrI] 0.17-0.58), ketamine (OR 0.64; 95% CrI 0.44-0.92), gabapentinoids (OR 0.67; 95% CrI 0.47-0.92), and possibly dexmedetomidine (OR 0.36; 95% CrI 0.12-1.00) reduced the incidence of chronic postsurgical pain at ≤6 months. There was little available evidence for chronic postsurgical pain at >6 months, combinations agents, chronic opioid use, and serious adverse events. Variable baseline risk was identified as a potential violation to the network meta-analysis transitivity assumption, so results are reported from a fixed value of this, with analgesics more effective at higher baseline risk. The confidence in these findings was low because of problems with risk of bias and imprecision. CONCLUSIONS Lidocaine (most effective), ketamine, and gabapentinoids could be effective in reducing chronic postsurgical pain ≤6 months although confidence is low. Moreover, variable baseline risk might violate transitivity in network meta-analysis of analgesics; this recommends use of our methods in future network meta-analyses. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW PROTOCOL PROSPERO CRD42021269642.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brett Doleman
- Department of Anaesthesia and Surgery, Graduate Entry Medicine, University of Nottingham, Royal Derby Hospital, Nottingham, UK.
| | - Ole Mathiesen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Anaesthesia, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark
| | - Alex J Sutton
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Nicola J Cooper
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Jon N Lund
- Department of Anaesthesia and Surgery, Graduate Entry Medicine, University of Nottingham, Royal Derby Hospital, Nottingham, UK
| | - John P Williams
- Department of Anaesthesia and Surgery, Graduate Entry Medicine, University of Nottingham, Royal Derby Hospital, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Adams TJ, Aljohani DM, Forget P. Perioperative opioids: a narrative review contextualising new avenues to improve prescribing. Br J Anaesth 2023; 130:709-718. [PMID: 37059626 DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2023.02.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2022] [Revised: 02/17/2023] [Accepted: 02/28/2023] [Indexed: 04/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Opioids have dominated the management of perioperative pain in recent decades with higher doses than ever before used in some circumstances. Through the expanding use of opioids, growing research has highlighted their associated side-effects and the intertwined phenomena of acute withdrawal syndrome, opioid tolerance, and opioid-induced hyperalgesia. With multiple clinical guidelines now endorsing multimodal analgesia, a diverse array of opioid-sparing agents emerges and has been studied to variable degrees, including techniques of opioid-free anaesthesia. It remains unclear to what extent such methods should be adopted, yet current evidence does suggest dependence on opioids as the primary perioperative analgesic might not meet the principles of 'rational prescribing' as described by Maxwell. In this narrative review we describe how, using current evidence, a patient-centred rational-prescribing approach can be applied to opioids in the perioperative period. To contextualise this approach, we discuss the historical adoption of opioids in anaesthesia, our growing understanding of associated side-effects and emerging strategies of opioid-sparing and opioid-free anaesthesia. We discuss avenues and challenges for improving opioid prescribing to limit persistent postoperative opioid use and how these may be incorporated into a rational-prescribing approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tobias J Adams
- Department of Anaesthesia, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, NHS Grampian, Aberdeen, UK; Pain AND Opioids after Surgery (PANDOS) European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (ESAIC) Research Group, Aberdeen, UK.
| | - Dalia Mohammed Aljohani
- Pain AND Opioids after Surgery (PANDOS) European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (ESAIC) Research Group, Aberdeen, UK; Epidemiology Group, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Health Sciences Building, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, UK; Department of Anesthesia Technology, Prince Sultan Military College of Health Sciences, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia
| | - Patrice Forget
- Department of Anaesthesia, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, NHS Grampian, Aberdeen, UK; Pain AND Opioids after Surgery (PANDOS) European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (ESAIC) Research Group, Aberdeen, UK; Epidemiology Group, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Health Sciences Building, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, UK
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Systemic glucocorticoids as an adjunct to treatment of postoperative pain after total hip and knee arthroplasty: A systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. Ugeskr Laeger 2023; 40:155-170. [PMID: 36325886 DOI: 10.1097/eja.0000000000001768] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postoperative analgesic effects of systemic glucocorticoids given as an adjunct to treatment are largely undetermined in alloplastic procedures. OBJECTIVES To investigate the beneficial and harmful effects of peri-operative systemic glucocorticoid treatment for pain after total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA). DESIGN A systematic review of randomised clinical trials (RCTs) with meta-analyses, trial sequential analyses and GRADE. Primary outcome was 24 h intravenous (i.v.) morphine (or equivalent) consumption with a predefined minimal important difference (MID) of 5 mg. Secondary outcomes included pain at rest and during mobilisation (MID, VAS 10 mm), adverse and serious adverse events (SAEs). DATA SOURCES We searched EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, PubMed and Google Scholar up to October 2021. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA RCTs investigating peri-operative systemic glucocorticoid versus placebo or no intervention, for analgesic pain management of patients at least 18 years undergoing planned THA or TKA, irrespective of publication date and language. RESULTS We included 32 RCTs with 3521 patients. Nine trials were at a low risk of bias. Meta-analyses showed evidence of a reduction in 24 h cumulative morphine consumption with glucocorticoids by 5.0 mg (95% CI 2.2 to 7.7; P = 0.0004). Pain at rest was reduced at 6 h by 7.8 mm (95% CI 5.5 to 10.2; P < 0.00001), and at 24 h by 6.3 mm (95% CI 3.8 to 8.8; P < 0.00001). Pain during mobilisation was reduced at 6 h by 9.8 mm (95% CI 6.9 to 12.8; P < 0.00001), and at 24 h by 9.0 mm (95% CI 5.5 to 12.4, P < 0.00001). Incidence of adverse events was generally lower in the glucocorticoid treatment group. SAEs were rarely reported. The GRADE rated quality of evidence was low to very low. CONCLUSION Peri-operative systemic glucocorticoid treatment reduced postoperative morphine consumption to an individually relevant level following hip and knee arthroplasty. Pain levels were reduced but were below the predefined MID. The quality of evidence was generally low. REGISTRATION PROSPERO ID: CRD42019135034.
Collapse
|
29
|
Hassan ME, Mahran E. Effect of magnesium sulfate with ketamine infusions on intraoperative and postoperative analgesia in cancer breast surgeries: a randomized double-blind trial. BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY (ELSEVIER) 2023; 73:165-170. [PMID: 34332956 PMCID: PMC10068526 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjane.2021.07.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2020] [Revised: 07/12/2021] [Accepted: 07/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Opioids are the cornerstone in managing postoperative pain; however, they have many side effects. Ketamine and Magnesium (Mg) are NMDA receptor antagonists used as adjuvant analgesics to decrease postoperative opioid consumption. OBJECTIVE We assumed that adding Mg to ketamine infusion can improve the intraoperative and postoperative analgesic efficacy of ketamine infusion alone in cancer breast surgeries. METHODS Ninety patients aged between 18 and 65 years and undergoing elective cancer breast surgery were included in this prospective randomized, double-blind study. Group K received ketamine 0.5.ßmg.kg...1 bolus then 0.12.ßmg.kg...1.h...1 infusion for the first 24.ßhours postoperatively. Group KM: received ketamine 0.5.ßmg.kg...1 and Mg sulfate 50.ßmg.kg...1, then ketamine 0.12.ßmg.kg...1.h...1 and Mg sulfate 8.ßmg.kg...1.h...1 infusions for the first 24.ßhours postoperative. The primary outcome was the morphine consumption in the first 24.ßhours postoperative, while the secondary outcomes were: intraoperative fentanyl consumption, NRS, side effects, and chronic postoperative pain. RESULTS Group KM had less postoperative opioid consumption (14.12.ß...ß5.11.ßmg) than Group K (19.43.ß...ß6.8.ßmg). Also, Group KM had less intraoperative fentanyl consumption. Both groups were similar in postoperative NRS scores, the incidence of side effects related to opioids, and chronic neuropathic pain. CONCLUSION Adding Mg to ketamine infusion can safely improve intraoperative and postoperative analgesia with opioid-sparing effect in cancer breast surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Essam Mahran
- Cairo University, National Cancer Institute, Cairo, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Rugg CM, Ginder JH, Bharadwaj A, Vomer R, Dale GA, Ketterly J, Zarzour H, Amendola A, Lau BC. Perioperative Management in the Collegiate Athlete: An Integrated Approach. Sports Med Int Open 2023; 7:E1-E8. [PMID: 37101550 PMCID: PMC10125641 DOI: 10.1055/a-2051-7756] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2022] [Accepted: 01/26/2023] [Indexed: 04/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Collegiate athletes face rigorous physical, academic, and emotional demands. While significant attention has been paid to injury prevention among young athletes in the past two decades, orthopedic injury rates remain high among collegiate athletes, and a significant number will undergo surgical management for injuries each year. In this narrative review, we describe techniques for perioperative management of pain and stress after surgery in collegiate athletes. In particular, we outline pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic management of surgical pain, with a goal of minimizing opiate consumption. We emphasize a multi-disciplinary approach to optimizing post-operative recovery in collegiate athletes help minimize reliance on opiate pain medication. Additionally, we recommend that institutional resources should be harnessed to support athletes in their well-being, from a nutritional, psychological and sleep standpoint. Critical to success in perioperative pain management is the communication among the athletic medicine team members and with the athlete and family to address pain and stress management and encourage timely, safe return to play.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Rock Vomer
- Orthopedics, Division of Sports Medicine, Duke University, Durham,
United States
- Correspondence Dr. Rock Vomer Duke
UniversityOrthopedics, Division of Sports
Medicine3475 Erwin
Road27708–0187
DurhamUnited States919 668n
1400
| | | | | | - Hap Zarzour
- Athletics, Duke University, Durham, United States
| | | | - Brian C. Lau
- Orthopedics, Duke University, Durham, United States
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Semyonov M, Bartulovic A, Cohen N, Berzon B, Fedorina E, Lerman S, Semionov A, Friger M, Acker A, Geftler A, Zlotnik A, Brotfain E. The effect of timing of intravenous paracetamol on perioperative pain and cytokine levels following laparoscopic bariatric surgery, a randomized controlled trial. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2022; 30:2185-2193. [PMID: 36161276 DOI: 10.1002/oby.23545] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2022] [Revised: 06/13/2022] [Accepted: 06/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Bariatric surgeries involve manipulation of the viscera and are associated with significant postoperative pain. Paracetamol is a nonopioid analgesic with a rapid onset, and it is effective and safe. The study compared the effects of pre- and postincisional intravenous paracetamol administration for optimal postoperative pain management in patients undergoing bariatric surgeries. METHODS This is a prospective, double-blinded, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial of adult patients, admitted electively for laparoscopic bariatric surgery. The patients were randomly divided into two groups. One group of patients was given paracetamol at the beginning of the operation, prior to the surgical incision, the other group of patients received the same treatment at the end of the operation. RESULTS Patients who were given preincisional intravenous paracetamol presented significantly lower visual analog scale (VAS) scores following the surgery compared with patients who were given intravenous paracetamol in the last 30 minutes of the operation (VAS, median [IQR] = 2 [2-3] vs. 5 [3-6]; p < 0.001). They also required fewer postoperative opioids and tramadol (in milligrams, respectively, 1 [0-5] vs. 7.5 [5-10] and 300 [100-400] vs. 400 [200-500]) compared with later analgesia administration (p < 0.001 and p = 0.03). The levels of inflammatory markers measured at fixed intervals from paracetamol administration were not statistically different between the study groups. CONCLUSION Early analgesia with intravenous paracetamol, given before the surgical incision, may result in lower VAS scores postoperatively compared with the same treatment administered toward the end of the operation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Semyonov
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, General Intensive Care Unit, Soroka Medical Center, Faculty of Health Science, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel
| | - Anastasiya Bartulovic
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, General Intensive Care Unit, Soroka Medical Center, Faculty of Health Science, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel
| | - Nir Cohen
- Department of General Surgery B, Soroka Medical Center, Faculty of Health Science, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel
| | - Baruch Berzon
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Shamir Assaf Harofeh, Tzrifin, Israel
| | - Ekaterina Fedorina
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, General Intensive Care Unit, Soroka Medical Center, Faculty of Health Science, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel
| | - Sofia Lerman
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, General Intensive Care Unit, Soroka Medical Center, Faculty of Health Science, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel
| | - Anastasia Semionov
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, General Intensive Care Unit, Soroka Medical Center, Faculty of Health Science, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel
| | - Michael Friger
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Science, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel
| | - Asaf Acker
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Soroka Medical Center, Faculty of Health Science, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel
| | - Alexander Geftler
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Soroka Medical Center, Faculty of Health Science, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel
| | - Alexander Zlotnik
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, General Intensive Care Unit, Soroka Medical Center, Faculty of Health Science, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel
| | - Evgeni Brotfain
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, General Intensive Care Unit, Soroka Medical Center, Faculty of Health Science, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Leth MF, Bukhari S, Laursen CCW, Larsen ME, Tornøe AS, Jakobsen JC, Maagaard M, Mathiesen O. Risk of serious adverse events associated with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in orthopaedic surgery. A protocol for a systematic review. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2022; 66:1257-1265. [PMID: 35986625 PMCID: PMC9826397 DOI: 10.1111/aas.14140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2022] [Accepted: 08/17/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postoperative pain is a common condition following orthopaedic surgeries and causes prolonged hospitalisation, delayed rehabilitation and hamper the quality of life. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are effective analgesics and anti-inflammatory mediators in the treatment of postoperative pain. The association of NSAIDs with serious adverse events may however keep some clinicians and clinical decision makers from using NSAIDs perioperatively. The evidence regarding the risks of serious adverse events following perioperative use of NSAIDs in orthopaedic surgery is sparse and needs to be assessed in a systematic review. This is a protocol for a systematic review that aims to identify the risks of serious adverse events from perioperative use of NSAIDs in orthopaedic patients. METHODS Our methodology is based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols and the eight-step assessment procedure suggested by Jakobsen and colleagues. We wish to assess if NSAIDs versus placebo, usual care or no intervention, will influence the risks of serious adverse events in patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery. We will include all randomised trials assessing the use of NSAIDs perioperatively. To identify trials we will search the Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online, Excerpta Medica database, Cochrane Central Register, Science Citation Index Expanded on Web of Science and BIOSIS. Two authors will screen the literature and extract data. We will use the 'Risk of Bias 2 tool' to assess trials. Extracted data will be analysed using RStudio and Trial Sequential Analysis. We will create a 'Summary of Findings' table in which we will present our primary and secondary outcomes. We will assess the quality of evidence using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). DISCUSSION This systematic review can potentially aid clinicians and clinical decision makers in the use of NSAIDs for treatment of postoperative pain following orthopaedic surgeries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Morten Fiil Leth
- Centre for Anaesthesiological Research, Department of AnaesthesiologyZealand University HospitalKøgeDenmark
| | - Shaheer Bukhari
- Centre for Anaesthesiological Research, Department of AnaesthesiologyZealand University HospitalKøgeDenmark
| | | | - Mia Esta Larsen
- Department of AnaesthesiologyJuliane Marie Centre ‐ RigshospitaletCopenhagenDenmark
| | | | - Janus Christian Jakobsen
- Copenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Department 7812Copenhagen University Hospital – RigshospitaletCopenhagenDenmark,Department of Regional Health Research, Faculty of Health SciencesUniversity of Southern DenmarkOdenseDenmark
| | - Mathias Maagaard
- Centre for Anaesthesiological Research, Department of AnaesthesiologyZealand University HospitalKøgeDenmark
| | - Ole Mathiesen
- Centre for Anaesthesiological Research, Department of AnaesthesiologyZealand University HospitalKøgeDenmark,Department of Clinical MedicineCopenhagen UniversityCopenhagenDenmark
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
LOHSIRIWAT V. Opioid-free analgesia: is it achievable in open colorectal surgery without neuraxial block? Minerva Surg 2022; 77:573-581. [DOI: 10.23736/s2724-5691.22.09678-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
34
|
Raksakietisak M, Rushatamukayanunt P, Wilaiwan K, Homprasert C, Nitising A, Sawasdiwipachai P, Pantubtim C. Postoperative analgesia of intraoperative nefopam in patients undergoing anterior cervical spine surgery: A prospective randomized controlled trial. Medicine (Baltimore) 2022; 101:e31296. [PMID: 36316913 PMCID: PMC9622578 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000031296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nefopam is a non-opioid, non-nonsteroidal anti-imflammatory drug, analgesic drug that inhibits the reuptake of serotonin, norepinephrine, and dopamine. It is widely used as an adjuvant for pain. This study investigated whether the intraoperative, intravenous infusion of nefopam (20 mg) reduces postoperative morphine consumption, pain scores, and alleviates neuropathic pain in patients undergoing cervical spine surgery. METHODS A prospective, paralleled design, randomized study was conducted on 50 patients (aged 18-75 years) in a university-based hospital. The patients were assigned to an intervention or a control group (25 patients in each). The intervention group received a 1-hour infusion of nefopam (20 mg) before the end of surgery. The control group received normal saline (NSS). The outcome measures were morphine consumption during the first 24 postoperative hours, numerical rating scale (NRS) pain scores, and scores for the Thai version of the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI-T) in patients with neuropathic pain and adverse drug reactions. The NPSI-T scores were assessed on the preoperative day, postoperative day 1, 3, 15, and 30. The outcome assessors were blinded to group allocation. RESULTS Fifty patients were analyzed. During the first 24 postoperative hours, morphine consumption was 8 mg (nefopam) and 12 mg (NSS; P = .130). The intervention and control groups demonstrated no significant differences in the median NRS scores or total NPSI-T scores or adverse drug reactions. CONCLUSIONS A single, intraoperative infusion of 20 mg of nefopam did not significantly reduce postoperative (24 hours) morphine consumption in patients undergoing anterior cervical spine surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manee Raksakietisak
- Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Pranee Rushatamukayanunt
- Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
- *Correspondence: Pranee Rushatamukayanunt, Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10700, Thailand (e-mail: )
| | - Kulanong Wilaiwan
- Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Chakkarin Homprasert
- Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Akkapong Nitising
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Prasert Sawasdiwipachai
- Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Chanitda Pantubtim
- Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Abstract
Perioperative pain management is one of the domains in which Anesthesiologists are intricately involved, and which is immensely important. Adequate postoperative analgesia is central to avoid both the acute as well as chronic complications of uncontrolled postoperative pain. Preventive analgesia has been identified as an approach to mitigate the phenomenon of central sensitization, which plays an important role in the development of chronic pain after surgery. As an over-reliance on opioids for peri- and postoperative pain control is associated with opioid dependence and hyperalgesia, multimodal analgesia has taken center stage. Multimodal analgesia, in theory, will optimize perioperative pain control, reduce the chance of central sensitization, and avoid the detrimental effects of opioid overuse. Multiple classes of systemic analgesic medications have been used to accomplish these tasks, and the aim of this article is to outline these medications, their mechanisms of action, as well as the evidence behind their individual roles in multimodal analgesia. Regional anesthesia has also been embraced as a key component of multimodal analgesia in orthopedic surgery; however, over the past several years, local infiltration analgesia (LIA) emerged as a viable alternative, particularly in total knee arthroplasty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Archana O'Neill
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Philipp Lirk
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Abstract
Opioid-free anesthesia is a multimodal anesthesia aimed at avoiding the negative impact of intraoperative opioid on patient's postoperative outcomes. It is based on the physiology of pathways involved in intraoperative nociception. It has been shown to be feasible but the literature is still scarce on the clinically meaningful benefits as well as on the side effects and/or complications that might be associated with it. Moreover, most studies involved abdominal and/or bariatric surgery. Procedure-specific studies are lacking, especially in orthopedics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helene Beloeil
- Anesthesia and Intensive Care Department, Univ Rennes, Inserm CIC 1414, COSS 1242, CHU Rennes, Rennes Cedex 35000, France.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Steiness J, Hägi-Pedersen D, Lunn TH, Lindberg-Larsen M, Graungaard BK, Lundstrom LH, Lindholm P, Brorson S, Bieder MJ, Beck T, Skettrup M, von Cappeln AG, Thybo KH, Gasbjerg KS, Overgaard S, Jakobsen JC, Mathiesen O. Paracetamol, ibuprofen and dexamethasone for pain treatment after total hip arthroplasty: protocol for the randomised, placebo-controlled, parallel 4-group, blinded, multicentre RECIPE trial. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e058965. [PMID: 36190737 PMCID: PMC9438203 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058965] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Multimodal analgesia with paracetamol, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug and glucocorticoid is recommended for hip arthroplasty, but with uncertain effects of the different combinations. We aim to investigate benefit and harm of different combinations of paracetamol, ibuprofen and dexamethasone following total hip arthroplasty. METHODS AND ANALYSIS RECIPE is a randomised, placebo-controlled, parallel 4-group, blinded trial with 90-day and 1-year follow-up performed at nine Danish hospitals. Interventions are initiated preoperatively and continued for 24 hours postoperatively. Eligible participants undergoing total hip arthroplasty are randomised to:group A: oral paracetamol 1000 mg × 4+oral ibuprofen 400 mg × 4+intravenous placebo; group B: oral paracetamol 1000 mg × 4+intravenous dexamethasone 24 mg+oral placebo; group C: oral ibuprofen 400 mg × 4+intravenous dexamethasone 24 mg+oral placebo; group D: oral paracetamol 1000 mg × 4+oral ibuprofen 400 mg × 4+intravenous dexamethasone 24 mg.Primary outcome is cumulative opioid consumption at 0-24 hours. Secondary outcomes are pain at rest, during mobilisation and during a 5 m walk and adverse events. Follow-up includes serious adverse events and patient reported outcome measures at 90 days and 1 year. A total of 1060 participants are needed to demonstrate a difference of 8 mg in 24-hour morphine consumption assuming an SD of 24.5 mg, a risk of type I errors of 0.0083 and a risk of type 2 errors of 0.2. Primary analysis will be a modified intention-to-treat analysis.With this trial we aim to verify recommendations for pain treatment after total hip arthroplasty, and investigate the role of dexamethasone as an analgesic adjuvant to paracetamol and ibuprofen. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This trial is approved by the Region Zealand Committee on Health Research Ethics (SJ-799). Plans for dissemination include publication in peer-reviewed journals and presentation at scientific meetings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT04123873.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joakim Steiness
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Zealand University Hospital Koge Centre for Anaesthesiological Research, Koege, Denmark
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Nastved Hospital, Naestved, Denmark
| | - Daniel Hägi-Pedersen
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Slagelse Hospital, Slagelse, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Troels Haxholdt Lunn
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Martin Lindberg-Larsen
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark Faculty of Health Sciences, Odense, Denmark
| | | | | | - Peter Lindholm
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Stig Brorson
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Zealand University Hospital Koge, Koege, Denmark
| | | | - Torben Beck
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Michael Skettrup
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Gentofte Hospital, Hellerup, Denmark
| | | | - Kasper Højgaard Thybo
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Zealand University Hospital Koge Centre for Anaesthesiological Research, Koege, Denmark
| | | | - Søren Overgaard
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Janus Christian Jakobsen
- Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark Faculty of Health Sciences, Odense, Denmark
- Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Rigshospitalet Copenhagen Trial Unit, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ole Mathiesen
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Zealand University Hospital Koge Centre for Anaesthesiological Research, Koege, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Lavand'homme PM, Kehlet H, Rawal N, Joshi GP. Pain management after total knee arthroplasty: PROcedure SPEcific Postoperative Pain ManagemenT recommendations. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2022; 39:743-757. [PMID: 35852550 PMCID: PMC9891300 DOI: 10.1097/eja.0000000000001691] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The PROSPECT (PROcedure SPEcific Postoperative Pain ManagemenT) Working Group is a global collaboration of surgeons and anaesthesiologists formulating procedure-specific recommendations for pain management after common operations. Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is associated with significant postoperative pain that is difficult to treat. Nevertheless, pain control is essential for rehabilitation and to enhance recovery. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the available literature and develop recommendations for optimal pain management after unilateral primary TKA. DESIGN A narrative review based on published systematic reviews, using modified PROSPECT methodology. DATA SOURCES A literature search was performed in EMBASE, MEDLINE, PubMed and Cochrane Databases, between January 2014 and December 2020, for systematic reviews and meta-analyses evaluating analgesic interventions for pain management in patients undergoing TKA. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Each randomised controlled trial (RCT) included in the selected systematic reviews was critically evaluated and included only if met the PROSPECT requirements. Included studies were evaluated for clinically relevant differences in pain scores, use of nonopioid analgesics, such as paracetamol and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and current clinical relevance. RESULTS A total of 151 systematic reviews were analysed, 106 RCTs met PROSPECT criteria. Paracetamol and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory or cyclo-oxygenase-2-specific inhibitors are recommended. This should be combined with a single shot adductor canal block and peri-articular local infiltration analgesia together with a single intra-operative dose of intravenous dexamethasone. Intrathecal morphine (100 μg) may be considered in hospitalised patients only in rare situations when both adductor canal block and local infiltration analgesia are not possible. Opioids should be reserved as rescue analgesics in the postoperative period. Analgesic interventions that could not be recommended were also identified. CONCLUSION The present review identified an optimal analgesic regimen for unilateral primary TKA. Future studies to evaluate enhanced recovery programs and specific challenging patient groups are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patricia M Lavand'homme
- From the Department of Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Pain Service, Cliniques Universitaires St Luc, University Catholic of Louvain (UCL), Brussels, Belgium (PML), Section of Surgical Pathophysiology 7621, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark (HK), Department of Anaesthesiology, Orebro University, Orebro, Sweden (NR) and Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, United States (GPJ)
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Zaslansky R. Status quo of pain-related patient reported outcomes and perioperative pain management in 10 415 patients from 10 countries: analysis of registry data. Eur J Pain 2022; 26:2120-2140. [PMID: 35996995 DOI: 10.1002/ejp.2024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2022] [Revised: 08/08/2022] [Accepted: 08/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postoperative pain is common at the global level, despite considerable attempts for improvement, reflecting the complexity of offering effective pain relief. In this study, clinicians from Mexico, China, and eight European countries evaluated perioperative pain practices and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in their hospitals as a basis for carrying out quality improvement (QI) projects in each country. METHODS PAIN OUT, an international perioperative pain registry, provided standardized methodology for assessing management and multi-dimensional PROs on the first postoperative day, in patients undergoing orthopedic, general surgery, obstetric & gynecology or urological procedures. RESULTS Between 2017-2019, data obtained from 10,415 adult patients in 105 wards, qualified for analysis. At the ward level: 50% (median) of patients reported worst pain intensities ≥7/10 NRS, 25% spent ≥50% of the time in severe pain and 20-34% reported severe ratings for pain-related functional and emotional interference. Demographic variables, country and surgical discipline explained a small proportion of the variation in the PROs, leaving about 88% unexplained. Most treatment processes varied considerably between wards. Ward effects accounted for about 7% and 32% of variation in PROs and treatment processes, respectively. CONCLUSIONS This comprehensive evaluation demonstrates that many patients in this international cohort reported poor pain-related PROs on the first postoperative day. PROs and treatments varied greatly. Most of the variance of the PROs could not be explained. The findings served as a basis for devising and implementing QI programs in participating hospitals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruth Zaslansky
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Yurutkina A, Klaschik S, Kowark P, Gass A, Link C, Randau TM, Jiménez-Cruz J, Coburn M, Hilbert T. Pain levels and patient comfort after lower limb arthroplasty comparing i.v. patient-controlled analgesia, continuous peripheral nerve block and neuraxial analgesia: a retrospective cohort analysis of clinical routine data. J Orthop Surg Res 2022; 17:381. [PMID: 35962409 PMCID: PMC9373442 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-022-03277-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2022] [Accepted: 08/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Insufficient pain control after lower limb arthroplasty results in delayed recovery and increased risk for pain chronicization. The ideal kind of analgesia is still discussed controversially. We conducted a retrospective analysis of single-center routine data from a German university hospital, including patients receiving either total hip (THA) or knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS All patients received general anesthesia. Patients undergoing THA received either continuous epidural ropivacaine infusion (0.133%, Epi) or patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with the Wurzburg Pain Drip (tramadol, metamizole and droperidol, WPD) or with piritramide (Pir). After TKA, patients received either continuous femoral nerve block (ropivacaine 0.2%, PNB) or Pir. RESULTS The analyzed cohort comprised 769 cases. Use of WPD after THA (n = 333) resulted in significantly reduced Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) values at rest, compared to Epi (n = 48) and Pir (n = 72) (.75 [IQR 1.14] vs. 1.17 [1.5], p = .02 vs. 1.47 [1.33], p < .0001) as well as maximum NRS scores (2.4 [1.7] vs. 3.29 [1.94], p < .001 vs. 3.32 [1.76], p < .0001). Positive feedback during follow-up visits was significantly increased in patients with a WPD PCA (p < .0001), while negative feedback (senso-motoric weakness/technical problems/nausea/dizziness/constipation) was particularly increased in Epi patients and lowest in those with WPD (p < .0001). After TKA, Pir (n = 131) resulted in significantly reduced NRS values at rest, compared to PNB (n = 185) (1.4 [1.4] vs. 1.6 [1.68], p = .02). Positive feedback was increased in patients with a Pir PCA in comparison with PNB (p = .04), while negative feedback was increased in PNB patients (p = .04). Overall, WPD presented with the lowest rate of any complications (8.7%), followed by Pir (20.2%), PNB (27.6%) and Epi (31.3%) (p < .001). CONCLUSIONS In the assessed population, the use of a WPD PCA after THA offered better pain control and patient comfort in comparison with continuous epidural or piritramide-based analgesia. After TKA, the use of a Pir PCA provided superior analgesia and a lower complication rate compared to continuous PNB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alina Yurutkina
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Sven Klaschik
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Pascal Kowark
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Annette Gass
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Carolina Link
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Thomas Martin Randau
- Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Jorge Jiménez-Cruz
- Department of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Mark Coburn
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Tobias Hilbert
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Optimizing Nonopioid Analgesia and Different Pain Management Options following Abdominoplasty: A Systematic Literature Review. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY - GLOBAL OPEN 2022; 10:e4441. [PMID: 35924003 PMCID: PMC9307297 DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000004441] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2022] [Accepted: 05/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: Postoperative pain remains a significant challenge with the growing number of abdominoplasties every year. Opioids are currently considered the mainstay modality for controlling postoperative pain. However, opioid-related side effects raise the need for a safer and more effective approach. In this study, we aimed to investigate these alternative evidence-based postoperative pain relief modalities following abdominoplasty. Methods: This systematic review was designed and conducted using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The literature was systematically searched in December 2021 using the following databases: MEDLINE, Cochrane, and EMBASE. The MeSH terms used to aid the search were the following: abdominoplasty, postoperative pain management, postoperative analgesia, pain control, analgesia, and pain. Results: Reviewing the literature resulted in a total of 851 publications. After implementing our criteria, only 13 articles were included in this study, with 990 patients. A continuous infusion pump was the most commonly used method of analgesia (n = 3), followed by a transversus abdominis plane block (n = 2). The postoperative pain assessment scale was mentioned in nine out of the 13. Compared to controls, all interventions resulted in considerably lower pain levels in all the patients. Patient satisfaction was reported in three studies, and all studies reported higher satisfaction rates than the control groups. Conclusions: The authors performed a systematic review of the existing database of high-quality research on pain management after cosmetic abdominoplasty to determine the best pain management options currently available. However, future studies are recommended to assess the optimum dosing and administration methods.
Collapse
|
42
|
Polanco-García M, Granero R, Gallart L, García-Lopez J, Montes A. Finding the vulnerable postoperative population: A two-step cluster analysis of the PAIN-OUT registry. Eur J Pain 2022; 26:1732-1745. [PMID: 35762292 DOI: 10.1002/ejp.1997] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2022] [Revised: 06/08/2022] [Accepted: 06/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Identifying predictors of poor postoperative outcomes is crucial for planning personalized pain treatments. The aim of this study was to examine pain outcomes using cluster analysis in N=2,678 patients from the PAIN-OUT registry at first postoperative day. METHODS Indicator variables of the clustering analysis assessed multiple domains, such as clinical and surgical conditions, analgesic-anesthetic variables, desire for more pain treatment and outcome variables of the International Pain Outcome Questionnaire (IPO) summarized as factor scores. RESULTS Two-step cluster identified the three-cluster solution as the optimal. Two empirical groups (C1 and C2) included patients with good postoperative outcomes discriminated by peripheral nerve block use, while the other cluster (C3) grouped patients with the worst outcomes, where all patients desired more pain treatment. C3 comprised about 20% of the participants, mostly lower limb, abdominal and spine procedures. The best predictors of belonging to C3 included younger age, being male, preoperative opioid use, bone and fracture reduction procedures, institution, number of comorbidities and morphine equivalents in the recovery room. CONCLUSIONS IPO factor scores can be used to select pain outcomes phenotypes in large clinical databases. Most of the predictors were present before the recovery period so perioperative planning should focus in the preoperative and intraoperative periods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mauricio Polanco-García
- Department of Anesthesiology, Consorci Sanitari Integral, Hospital Sant Joan Despí Moisès Broggi and Hospital General de l'Hospitalet, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Roser Granero
- Ciber Fisiopatología Obesidad y Nutrición (CIBERobn), Instituto Salud Carlos III, Spain.,Department of Psychobiology and Methodology of Health Science, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain
| | - Lluís Gallart
- Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital del Mar. IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute). Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jaume García-Lopez
- Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital del Mar. IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute). Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain
| | - Antonio Montes
- Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital del Mar. IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute). Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Anaesthetic Approach to Enhanced Recovery after Surgery for Kidney Transplantation: A Narrative Review. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11123435. [PMID: 35743505 PMCID: PMC9225521 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11123435] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2022] [Revised: 06/09/2022] [Accepted: 06/12/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols are designed to reduce medical complications, the length of hospital stays (LoS), and healthcare costs. ERAS is considered safe and effective for kidney transplant (KTx) surgery. KTx recipients are often frail with multiple comorbidities. As these patients follow an extensive diagnostic pathway preoperatively, the ERAS protocol can ideally be implemented at this stage. Small singular changes in a long perioperative pathway can result in significant positive outcomes. We have investigated the current evidence for an ERAS pathway related to anaesthetic considerations in renal transplant surgery for adult recipients.
Collapse
|
44
|
Hamilton C, Alfille P, Mountjoy J, Bao X. Regional anesthesia and acute perioperative pain management in thoracic surgery: a narrative review. J Thorac Dis 2022; 14:2276-2296. [PMID: 35813725 PMCID: PMC9264080 DOI: 10.21037/jtd-21-1740] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2021] [Accepted: 03/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Background and Objective Thoracic surgery causes significant pain which can negatively affect pulmonary function and increase risk of postoperative complications. Effective analgesia is important to reduce splinting and atelectasis. Systemic opioids and thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) have been used for decades and are effective at treating acute post-thoracotomy pain, although both have risks and adverse effects. The advancement of thoracoscopic surgery, a focus on multimodal and opioid-sparing analgesics, and the development of ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia techniques have greatly expanded the options for acute pain management after thoracic surgery. Despite the expansion of surgical techniques and analgesic approaches, there is no clear optimal approach to pain management. This review aims to summarize the body of literature regarding systemic and regional anesthetic techniques for thoracic surgery in both thoracotomy and minimally invasive approaches, with a goal of providing a foundation for providers to make individualized decisions for patients depending on surgical approach and patient factors, and to discuss avenues for future research. Methods We searched PubMed and Google Scholar databases from inception to May 2021 using the terms “thoracic surgery”, “thoracic surgery AND pain management”, “thoracic surgery AND analgesia”, “thoracic surgery AND regional anesthesia”, “thoracic surgery AND epidural”. We considered articles written in English and available to the reader. Key Content and Findings There is a wide variety of strategies for treating acute pain after thoracic surgery, including multimodal opioid and non-opioid systemic analgesics, regional anesthesia including TEA and paravertebral blocks (PVB), and a recent expansion in the use of novel fascial plane blocks especially for thoracoscopy. The body of literature on the effectiveness of different approaches for thoracotomy and thoracoscopy is a rapidly expanding field and area of active debate. Conclusions The optimal analgesic approach for thoracic surgery may depend on patient factors, surgical factors, and institutional factors. Although TEA may provide optimal analgesia after thoracotomy, PVB and emerging fascial plane blocks may offer effective alternatives. A tailored approach using multimodal systemic therapies and regional anesthesia is important, and future studies comparing techniques are necessary to further investigate the optimal approach to improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Casey Hamilton
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Paul Alfille
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jeremi Mountjoy
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Xiaodong Bao
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Sherazee EA, Chen SA, Li D, Li D, Frank P, Kiaii B. Pain Management Strategies for Minimally Invasive Cardiothoracic Surgery. INNOVATIONS-TECHNOLOGY AND TECHNIQUES IN CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR SURGERY 2022; 17:167-176. [PMID: 35521910 DOI: 10.1177/15569845221091779] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Elan A Sherazee
- Department of Surgery, 8789UC Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Sarah A Chen
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, 8789UC Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - David Li
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, 8789UC Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - David Li
- Department of Pharmacy Services, 8789UC Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Paul Frank
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, 8789UC Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Bob Kiaii
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, 8789UC Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Sohi G, Lao N, Caraceni A, Moulin DE, Zimmermann C, Herx L, Gilron I. Nonopioid drug combinations for cancer pain: a systematic review. Pain Rep 2022; 7:e995. [PMID: 35261931 PMCID: PMC8893303 DOI: 10.1097/pr9.0000000000000995] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2021] [Revised: 12/29/2021] [Accepted: 02/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Pain is highly prevalent in patients with cancer-nearly 40% report moderate-severe pain, which is commonly treated with opioids. Increasing cancer survivorship, opioid epidemics in some regions of the world, and limited opioid access in other regions have focused attention on nonopioid treatments. Given the limitations of monotherapy, combining nonopioids-such as antiepileptics and antidepressants-have shown promise in noncancer pain. This review seeks to evaluate efficacy of nonopioid combinations for cancer-related pain. Systematic searches of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL were conducted for double-blind, randomized, controlled trials comparing a nonopioid combination with at least one of its components and/or placebo. This search yielded 4 randomized controlled trials, published between 1998 and 2019 involving studies of (1) imipramine + diclofenac; (2) mitoxantrone + prednisone + clodronate; (3) pentoxifylline + tocopherol + clodronate; and (4) duloxetine + pregabalin + opioid. In the first 3 of these trials, trends favouring combination efficacy failed to reach statistical significance. However, in the fourth trial, duloxetine + pregabalin + opioid was superior to pregabalin + opioid. This review illustrates recognition for the need to evaluate nonopioid drug combinations in cancer pain, although few trials have been published to date. Given the growing practice of prescribing more than 1 nonopioid for cancer pain and the need to expand the evidence base for rational combination therapy, more high-quality trials in this area are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gursharan Sohi
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Nicholas Lao
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Augusto Caraceni
- Pain Therapy and Palliative Care Unit, Fondazione IRCCS, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
- Department of Clinical and Community SciencesUniversità degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Dwight E. Moulin
- Departments of Clinical Neurological Sciences and Oncology, Western University, London, Canada
| | - Camilla Zimmermann
- Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Leonie Herx
- Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Ian Gilron
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
- Department of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
- Centre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
- School of Policy Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Wilson SH, Wilson PR, Bridges KH, Bell LH, Clark CA. Nonopioid Analgesics for the Perioperative Geriatric Patient: A Narrative Review. Anesth Analg 2022; 135:290-306. [PMID: 35202007 DOI: 10.1213/ane.0000000000005944] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Management of acute perioperative pain in the geriatric patient can be challenging as the physiologic and pharmacokinetic changes associated with aging may predispose older patients to opioid-related side effects. Furthermore, elderly adults are more susceptible to postoperative delirium and postoperative cognitive dysfunction, which may be exacerbated by both poorly controlled postoperative pain and commonly used pain medications. This narrative review summarizes the literature published in the past 10 years for several nonopioid analgesics commonly prescribed to the geriatric patient in the perioperative period. Nonopioid analgesics are broken down as follows: medications prescribed throughout the perioperative period (acetaminophen and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs), medications limited to the acute perioperative setting (N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists, dexmedetomidine, dexamethasone, and local anesthetics), and medications to be used with caution in the geriatric patient population (gabapentinoids and muscle relaxants). Our search identified 1757 citations, but only 33 specifically focused on geriatric analgesia. Of these, only 21 were randomized clinical trials' and 1 was a systematic review. While guidance in tailoring pain regimens that focus on the use of nonopioid medications in the geriatric patient is lacking, we summarize the current literature and highlight that some nonopioid medications may extend benefits to the geriatric patient beyond analgesia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sylvia H Wilson
- From the Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Yeh CY, Chang WK, Wu HL, Chau GY, Tai YH, Chang KY. Associations of Multimodal Analgesia With Postoperative Pain Trajectories and Morphine Consumption After Hepatic Cancer Surgery. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 8:777369. [PMID: 35155466 PMCID: PMC8831718 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.777369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2021] [Accepted: 12/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background This study aimed to investigate the influential factors of postoperative pain trajectories and morphine consumption after hepatic cancer surgery with a particular interest in multimodal analgesia. Methods Patients receiving hepatic cancer surgery at a tertiary medical center were enrolled between 2011 and 2016. Postoperative pain scores and potentially influential factors like patient characteristics and the analgesic used were collected. Latent curve analysis was conducted to investigate predictors of postoperative pain trajectories and a linear regression model was used to explore factors associated with postoperative morphine consumption. Results 450 patients were collected, the daily pain scores during the first postoperative week ranged from 2.0 to 3.0 on average. Male and higher body weight were associated with more morphine consumption (both P < 0.001) but reduced morphine demand was noted in the elderly (P < 0.001) and standing acetaminophen users (P = 0.003). Longer anesthesia time was associated with higher baseline pain levels (P < 0.001). In contrast, male gender (P < 0.001) and standing non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) use (P = 0.012) were associated with faster pain resolution over time. Conclusions Multimodal analgesia with standing acetaminophen and NSAIDs had benefits of opioid-sparing and faster pain resolution, respectively, to patients receiving hepatic cancer surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chia-Yi Yeh
- Department of Anesthesiology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Wen-Kuei Chang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hsiang-Ling Wu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Gar-Yang Chau
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ying-Hsuan Tai
- Department of Anesthesiology, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Kuang-Yi Chang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
- *Correspondence: Kuang-Yi Chang
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Gasbjerg KS, Hägi-Pedersen D, Lunn TH, Laursen CC, Holmqvist M, Vinstrup LØ, Ammitzboell M, Jakobsen K, Jensen MS, Pallesen MJ, Bagger J, Lindholm P, Pedersen NA, Schrøder HM, Lindberg-Larsen M, Nørskov AK, Thybo KH, Brorson S, Overgaard S, Jakobsen JC, Mathiesen O. Effect of dexamethasone as an analgesic adjuvant to multimodal pain treatment after total knee arthroplasty: randomised clinical trial. BMJ 2022; 376:e067325. [PMID: 34983775 PMCID: PMC8724786 DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2021-067325] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the effects of one and two doses of intravenous dexamethasone in patients after total knee arthroplasty. DESIGN Randomised, blinded, placebo controlled trial with follow-up at 90 days. SETTING Five Danish hospitals, September 2018 to March 2020. PARTICIPANTS 485 adult participants undergoing total knee arthroplasty. INTERVENTION A computer generated randomised sequence stratified for site was used to allocate participants to one of three groups: DX1 (dexamethasone (24 mg)+placebo); DX2 (dexamethasone (24 mg)+dexamethasone (24 mg)); or placebo (placebo+placebo). The intervention was given preoperatively and after 24 hours. Participants, investigators, and outcome assessors were blinded. All participants received paracetamol, ibuprofen, and local infiltration analgesia. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was total intravenous morphine consumption 0 to 48 hours postoperatively. Multiplicity adjusted threshold for statistical significance was P<0.017 and minimal important difference was 10 mg morphine. Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain. RESULTS 485 participants were randomised: 161 to DX1, 162 to DX2, and 162 to placebo. Data from 472 participants (97.3%) were included in the primary outcome analysis. The median (interquartile range) morphine consumptions at 0-48 hours were: DX1 37.9 mg (20.7 to 56.7); DX2 35.0 mg (20.6 to 52.0); and placebo 43.0 mg (28.7 to 64.0). Hodges-Lehmann median differences between groups were: -2.7 mg (98.3% confidence interval -9.3 to 3.7), P=0.30 between DX1 and DX2; 7.8 mg (0.7 to 14.7), P=0.008 between DX1 and placebo; and 10.7 mg (4.0 to 17.3), P<0.001 between DX2 and placebo. Postoperative pain was reduced at 24 hours with one dose, and at 48 hours with two doses, of dexamethasone. CONCLUSION Two doses of dexamethasone reduced morphine consumption during 48 hours after total knee arthroplasty and reduced postoperative pain. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03506789.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kasper Smidt Gasbjerg
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Næstved, Slagelse and Ringsted Hospitals, Næstved, Denmark
| | - Daniel Hägi-Pedersen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Regional Health Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Næstved, Slagelse and Ringsted Hospitals, Slagelse, Denmark
| | - Troels Haxholdt Lunn
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Christina Cleveland Laursen
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Copenhagen Centre for Translational Research, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Majken Holmqvist
- Centre for Anaesthesiological Research, Department of Anaesthesiology, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark
| | - Louise Ørts Vinstrup
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Copenhagen Centre for Translational Research, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Mette Ammitzboell
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Karina Jakobsen
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Næstved, Slagelse and Ringsted Hospitals, Næstved, Denmark
| | - Mette Skov Jensen
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Næstved, Slagelse and Ringsted Hospitals, Næstved, Denmark
| | - Marie Jøhnk Pallesen
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jens Bagger
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Peter Lindholm
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | | | | | - Martin Lindberg-Larsen
- Orthopaedic Research Unit, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Anders Kehlet Nørskov
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Nordsjællands University Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark Anders
- Copenhagen Trial Unit Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Capital Region of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Kasper Højgaard Thybo
- Centre for Anaesthesiological Research, Department of Anaesthesiology, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark
| | - Stig Brorson
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark
| | - Søren Overgaard
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Orthopaedic Research Unit, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Janus Christian Jakobsen
- Department of Regional Health Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Copenhagen Trial Unit Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Capital Region of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ole Mathiesen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Centre for Anaesthesiological Research, Department of Anaesthesiology, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Jafra A, Ghai B, Bhatia N, Chanana N, Bansal D, Mehta V. Opioid sparing strategies for perioperative pain management other than regional anaesthesia: A narrative review. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2022; 38:3-10. [PMID: 35706649 PMCID: PMC9191794 DOI: 10.4103/joacp.joacp_362_19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2019] [Revised: 03/14/2020] [Accepted: 10/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Opioids play a crucial role in pain management in spite of causing increased hospital morbidity and related costs. It may also cause significant risks such as postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), sedation, sleep disturbances, urinary retention and respiratory depression (commonly referred to as opioid related adverse effects) in postoperative patients. In order to evade these opioid related side effects and also improve pain management, multimodal analgesia i.e., combination of different analgesics, was introduced more than a decade ago. Both pharmacological and non-pharmacological techniques are available as opioid sparing analgesia. Research from around the world have proved pharmacological techniques ranging from acetaminophen, NSAIDs (non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs), N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists (NDMA), alpha-2 agonists, anticonvulsants such as gamma aminobutyric acid analogues, beta-blockers, capsaicin, lignocaine infusion to glucocorticoids to be effective. On the other hand, non-pharmacological methods include techniques such as cognitive behavioral therapy, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), electroanalgesia, acupuncture and hypnosis. However, research regarding the effect of these non-pharmacological techniques on pain management is still needed.
Collapse
|