Clinical manifestations and management of left ventricular assist device-associated infections

The utility of sepsis scores for predicting blood stream infections in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

INTRODUCTION

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is an increasingly used modality of life support with high risk for nosocomial infections. The accuracy of sepsis prediction tools in identifying blood stream infections (BSI) in this population is unknown as measurement of multiple variables commonly associated with infection are altered by the circuit.

METHODS

This study compares all blood stream infections for patients receiving ECMO between January 2012 and December 2020 to timepoints when blood cultures were negative using the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA), Logistic Organ Dysfunction Score (LODS), American Burn Association Sepsis Criteria (ABA), Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) scores.

RESULTS

Of the 220 patients who received ECMO during the study period, 40 (18%) had 51 blood stream infections and were included in this study. Gram-positive infections composed 57% (n = 29) of infections with E. faecalis (n = 12, 24%) being the most common organism isolated. There were no significant differences in sepsis prediction scores at the time of infection compared to infection-free time points for SOFA (median (IQR) 7 (5-9) vs. 6 (5-8), p = 0.22), LODS (median (IQR) 12 (10-14) vs. 12 (10-13), p = 0.28), ABA (median (IQR) 2 (1-3) vs. 2 (1-3) p = 0.75), or SIRS (median (IQR) 3 (2-3) vs. 3 (2-3), p = 0.20).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data shows that previously published sepsis scores are elevated throughout a patient's ECMO course, and do not correlate with bacteremia. Better predictive tools are needed to determine the appropriate timing for blood cultures in this population.

Outcomes of treatment for deep left ventricular assist device infection

OBJECTIVE

Among left ventricular assist device patients, the most commonly infected component is the drive line, which can be managed with antibiotics and local debridement. Infection of intrathoracic device components is less common but more difficult to manage. Herein we describe the incidence of deep device infection (DDI) at our center as well as management and outcomes.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 658 patients who underwent implantable left ventricular assist device insertion with HeartMate 2 (Abbott) or HeartMate 3 (Abbott) devices between January 2004 and June 2021. DDI was defined according to radiographic and clinical criteria. Cumulative incidence was calculated using a Fine-Gray subdistribution model; survival analysis was performed using the method of Kaplan and Meier.

RESULTS

There were 32 (4.8%) DDIs during this study period. Drive line infection and re-exploration for bleeding were associated with development of DDI. Cumulative incidence of DDI increased over time, affecting 11% (7%-18%) at 5 years. The dominant microbes involved in DDI were Pseudomonas aeruginosa (19%) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (13%). Nineteen patients (59%) with device infection underwent device exchange, 6 (19%) underwent initial transplant, and 7 (22%) were treated solely with debridement and antibiotics. Of those who underwent device exchange, 12 (63%) developed reinfection of their new device and 6 underwent subsequent heart transplant. Patients who underwent transplantation for management of device infection had improved 5-year survival (80% vs 11%; P = .01) but 3 patients (25%) developed deep sternal wound infection after transplant.

CONCLUSIONS

DDI is a rare but challenging complication in this destination era. Heart transplantation is the preferred management strategy for eligible patients but infectious complication is common.

Left ventricular assist device-associated driveline infections as a specific form of complicated skin and soft tissue infection/acute bacterial skin and skin structure infection - issues and therapeutic options

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review comments on the current guidelines for the treatment of wound infections under definition of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI). However, wound infections around a catheter, such as driveline infections of a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) are not specifically listed under this definition in any of the existing guidelines.

RECENT FINDINGS

Definitions and classification of LVAD infections may vary across countries, and the existing guidelines and recommendations may not be equally interpreted among physicians, making it unclear if these infections can be considered as ABSSSI. Consequently, the use of certain antibiotics that are approved for ABSSSI may be considered as 'off-label' for LVAD infections, leading to rejection of reimbursement applications in some countries, affecting treatment strategies, and hence, patients' outcomes. However, we believe driveline exit site infections related to LVAD can be included within the ABSSSI definition.

SUMMARY

We argue that driveline infections meet the criteria for ABSSSI which would enlarge the 'on-label' antibiotic armamentarium for treating these severe infections, thereby improving the patients' quality of life.

Epidemiology and Risk Factors for Nosocomial Infections in Left Ventricular Assist Device Recipients

Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) have been increasingly used as a valid option to improve the prognosis and reduce the symptoms of end-stage heart failure. However, long-term complications, mostly infections and coagulation disorders, are frequent. We described the epidemiology and risk factors for nosocomial infections (NIs) in a cohort of adult patients who underwent continuous-flow LVAD implant between January 2010 and December 2017 in Turin, Italy. Secondary outcomes were the prevalence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria and mortality. Results: Overall, 64 LVADs were implanted. A total of 32 (50%) patients experienced at least one episode of NI, with a total of 46 infectious events. VAD-related infections occurred in 22 patients (68.8%). Non VAD-related NIs occurred in 12 patients (37.5%), mainly low respiratory tract infections. Length of intensive care unit admission was a risk factor for NI (OR 1.224, 95%CI; 1.049, 1.429). Gram-negative bacilli were responsible for 58.8% of VAD-related infections and 79.5% of non-VAD related infections. In sixteen patients (50%), at least one episode of infection was related to an MDR strain. INTERMACS class and length of MV were independent risk factors for NIs by MDR strains (respectively, OR 2.12, 95%CI: 1.08, 6.80; p = 0.02 and OR 1.46, 95%CI: 1.07, 5.52, p = 0.047). In-hospital mortality was 6.3%. No differences in mortality were observed between infected and non-infected patients (p = 0.61) even when caused by MDR strains (p = 0.143). Conclusion: the rate of nosocomial infections in LVAD patients is associated with the length of ICU admission, and the etiology of nosocomial infection after LVAD implant is mainly due to GNB, including a high rate of MDR strains, especially KPC-KP and MDR PA.

Clinical Outcomes of Left Ventricular Assist Device Pump Infection

Few studies have focused on the clinical outcomes and risk factors of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) pump infection, and no standard treatment for LVAD pump infection has been established. Therefore, we used a therapeutic flowchart to manage LVAD pump infections. We retrospectively evaluated 220 patients who underwent continuous-flow LVAD implantation between January 2005 and March 2021 at Osaka University, Japan. First, we performed wound debridement, negative-pressure wound therapy, antibiotic treatment, and omental flap transposition. Subsequently, we administered conservative treatment, scheduled implantable LVAD exchange, or emergent removal of the implantable LVAD and exchange for extracorporeal LVAD or percutaneous LVAD (IMPELLA). Pump infections occurred in 32 patients. The survival rates of patients with pump infections during LVAD support were 93%, 74%, and 61% at 180 days, 1 year, and 2 years after LVAD pump infection, respectively. Fifteen patients underwent successful heart transplantation. Bridge-to-bridge surgery, preoperative use of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or percutaneous LVAD, high lactate dehydrogenase levels, and driveline infection were significantly associated with pump infection. Our study reveals that poor preoperative condition and driveline infection were significant risk factors for LVAD pump infection.

Dynamics of bacterial pathogens at the driveline exit site in patients with ventricular assist devices: A prospective, observational, single-center cohort study

BACKGROUND

Driveline infections (DLIs) at the exit site are frequent in patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs). The dynamics from colonization to infection are yet to be investigated. We combined systematic swabbing at the driveline exit site and genomic analyses to study the dynamics of bacterial pathogens and get insights into DLIs pathogenesis.

METHODS

A prospective, observational, single-center cohort study at the University Hospital of Bern, Switzerland was performed. Patients with LVAD were systematically swabbed at the driveline exit site between June 2019 and December 2021, irrespective of signs and symptoms of DLI. Bacterial isolates were identified and a subset was whole-genome sequenced.

RESULTS

Fifty-three patients were screened, of which 45 (84.9%) were included in the final population. Bacterial colonization at the driveline exit site without manifestation of DLI was frequent and observed in 17 patients (37.8%). Twenty-two patients (48.9%) developed at least one DLI episode over the study period. Incidence of DLIs reached 2.3 cases per 1000 LVAD days. The majority of the organisms cultivated from exit sites were Staphylococcus species. Genome analysis revealed that bacteria persisted at the driveline exit site over time. In four patients, transition from colonization to clinical DLI was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study is the first to address bacterial colonization in the LVAD-DLI setting. We observed that bacterial colonization at the driveline exit site was a frequent phenomenon, and in a few cases, it preceded clinically relevant infections. We also provided acquisition of hospital-acquired multidrug-resistant bacteria and the transmission of pathogens between patients.

Mortality following durable left ventricular assist device implantation by timing and type of first infection

OBJECTIVE

Although infections are common after left ventricular assist device implantation, the relationship between timing and type of first infection with regard to mortality is less well understood.

METHODS

The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support patients receiving a primary left ventricular assist device from April 2012 to May 2017 were included. The primary exposure was defined 3 ways: any infection, timing of first infection (early: ≤90 days; intermediate: 91-180 days; late: >180 days), and type (ventricular assist device specific, ventricular assist device related, non-ventricular assist device). The association between first infection and all-cause mortality was estimated using Cox regression.

RESULTS

The cohort included 12,957 patients at 166 centers (destination therapy: 47.4%, bridge-to-transplant: 41.2%). First infections were most often non-ventricular assist device (54.2%). Rates of first infection were highest in the early interval (10.7/100 person-months). Patients with any infection had a significantly higher adjusted hazard of death (hazard ratio, 2.63; 2.46-2.86). First infection in the intermediate interval was associated with the largest increase in adjusted hazard of death (hazard ratio, 3.26; 2.82-3.78), followed by late (hazard ratio, 3.13; 2.77-3.53) and early intervals (hazard ratio, 2.37; 2.16-2.60). Ventricular assist device-related infections were associated with the largest increase in hazard of death (hazard ratio, 3.02; 2.69-3.40), followed by ventricular assist device specific (hazard ratio, 2.92; 2.57-3.32) and non-ventricular assist device (hazard ratio, 2.42; 2.20-2.65).

CONCLUSIONS

Relative to those without infection, patients with any postimplantation infection had an increased risk of death. Ventricular assist device-related infections and infections occurring in the intermediate interval were associated with the largest increase in risk of death. After left ventricular assist device implantation, infection prevention strategies should target non-ventricular assist device infections in the first 90 days, then shift to surveillance/prevention of driveline infections after 90 days.

Infections in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices: Current State and Future Perspectives

Mechanical circulatory support is increasingly being used as bridge-to-transplant and destination therapy in patients with advanced heart failure. Technologic improvements have led to increased patient survival and quality of life, but infection remains one of the leading adverse events following ventricular assist device (VAD) implantation. Infections can be classified as VAD-specific, VAD-related, and non-VAD infections. Risk of VAD-specific infections, such as driveline, pump pocket, and pump infections, remains for the duration of implantation. While adverse events are typically most common early (within 90 days of implantation), device-specific infection (primarily driveline) is a notable exception. No diminishment over time is seen, with event rates of 0.16 events per patient-year in both the early and late periods postimplantation. Management of VAD-specific infections requires aggressive treatment and chronic suppressive antimicrobial therapy is indicated when there is concern for seeding of the device. While surgical intervention/hardware removal is often necessary in prosthesis-related infections, this is not so easily accomplished with VADs. This review outlines the current state of infections in patients supported with VAD therapy and discusses future directions, including possibilities with fully implantable devices and novel approaches to treatment.

Daptomycin Pharmacokinetics in Blood and Wound Fluid in Critical Ill Patients with Left Ventricle Assist Devices

Daptomycin is a cyclic lipopeptide antibiotic with bactericidal effects against multidrug-resistant Gram-positive bacteria, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis (VRE). For critically ill patients, especially in the presence of implants, daptomycin is an important therapeutic option. Left ventricle assist devices (LVADs) can be utilized for intensive care patients with end-stage heart failure as a bridge to transplant. We conducted a single-center prospective trial with critically ill adults with LVAD who received prophylactic anti-infective therapy with daptomycin. Our study aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of daptomycin in the blood serum and wound fluids after LVAD implantation. Daptomycin concentration were assessed over three days using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). We detected a high correlation between blood serum and wound fluid daptomycin concentration at 12 h (IC95%: 0.64 to 0.95; r = 0.86; p < 0.001) and 24 h (IC95%: -0.38 to 0.92; r = 0.76; p < 0.001) after antibiotic administration. Our pilot clinical study provides new insights into the pharmacokinetics of daptomycin from the blood into wound fluids of critically ill patients with LVADs.

Treatment and outcome of gram-positive bacteremia in patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

BACKGROUND

While guidance exists for management of blood stream infections with various invasive devices, there are currently limited data to guide antibiotic selection and duration for bacteremia in patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO).

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the treatment and outcomes of thirty-six patients with Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus bacteremia on ECMO support.

METHODS

Blood culture data was retrospectively analyzed from patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) or Enterococcus bacteremia who underwent ECMO support between March 2012 and September 2021 at Brooke Army Medical Center.

RESULTS

Of the 282 patients who received ECMO during this study period, there 25 (9%) patients developed Enterococcus bacteremia and 16 (6%) developed SAB. SAB occurred earlier in ECMO as compared to Enterococcus (median day 2 IQR (1-5) vs. 22 (12-51), p = 0.01). The most common duration of antibiotics was 28 days after clearance for SAB and 14 days after clearance for Enterococcus. 2 (5%) patients underwent cannula exchange with primary bacteremia, and 7 (17%) underwent circuit exchange. 1/3 (33%) patients with SAB and 3/10 (30%) patients with Enterococcus bacteremia who remained cannulated after completion of antibiotics had a second episode of SAB or Enterococcus bacteremia.

CONCLUSION

This single center case series is the first to describe the specific treatment and outcomes of patients receiving ECMO complicated by SAB and Enterococcus bacteremia. For patients who remain on ECMO after completion of antibiotics, there is a risk of a second episode of Enterococcus bacteremia or SAB.

Prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy is not effective for preventing driveline infection following left ventricular assist device implantation

BACKGROUND

Driveline infection (DLI) following left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation remains an unresolved problem. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) promotes wound healing by applying negative pressure on the surface of the wound. Recently, the prophylactic application of NPWT to closed surgical incisions has decreased surgical site infections in various postsurgical settings. Therefore, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of prophylactic NPWT for preventing DLI in patients with LVAD implantation.

METHODS

Prophylactic NPWT was provided to 50 patients who received continuous-flow LVADs as bridge-to-transplant therapy at our institution between May 2018 and October 2020 (NPWT group). The negative pressure dressing was applied immediately after surgery and retained on the driveline exit site for 7 days with a continuous application of -125 mm Hg negative pressure. The primary outcome was DLI within 1 year of LVAD implantation. We compared the rate of DLI incidence in the NPWT group with that in the historical control cohort (50 patients) treated with the standard dressing (SD) who received LVAD implantation between July 2015 and April 2018 (SD group).

RESULTS

No severe complications were associated with the NPWT. During the follow-up period, DLI was diagnosed in 16 participants (32%) in the NPWT group and 21 participants (42%) in the SD group. The rates of DLI incidence and freedom from DLI did not differ between groups (p = 0.30 and p = 0.63).

CONCLUSIONS

Prophylactic NPWT at the driveline exit site was safe following LVAD implantation. However, it did not significantly reduce the risk of DLI.

Pressure sore incidence and treatment in left ventricular assist device (LVAD)-equipped patients: Insights from a prospective series

INTRODUCTION

A left ventricular assistance device (LVAD) is indicated in patients with end-stage heart failure. Due to the non-physiologic blood flow, a LVAD may favor pressure sores with a devastating risk of infection. This work shows the prevalence and treatment of pressure sores in LVAD patients, to optimize their management.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We retrospectively investigated all LVAD implantations at the Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) from 2015 to 2019. We detected patients who developed a pressure sore and evaluated the timeline, management, and outcomes.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients benefited from LVAD, among whom 5 (12%) developed a stage III/IV pressure sore, within a mean time of 25 days. Due to their poor overall condition, 4/5 patients were treated surgically and 1/5 conservatively. Half of the patients treated with surgery had major complications requiring reoperation. After flap coverage, the mean time to healing for patients was 6 weeks.

DISCUSSION

The rapid development of deep pressure sores seen in 12% of patients may be a manifestation of the maladaptive blood flow induced by LVADs, combined with their bedridden condition. Initial signs of pressure sores should be considered seriously, as they are rapidly evolving and needing an aggressive surgical treatment whenever possible (80%). Complication rate was similar compared to standard pressure sore flap treatment. All patients benefiting from flap surgery achieved effective coverage after a mean follow-up of 24 months. No patient developed a LVAD infection.

CONCLUSION

Surgery must be considered early in this population to prevent potential device infection.

Molecular Imaging of Valvular Diseases and Cardiac Device Infection

The use of positron emission tomography imaging with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose in the diagnostic workup of patients with suspected prosthetic valve endocarditis and cardiac device infection (implantable electronic device and left ventricular assist device) is gaining momentum in clinical practice. However, in the absence of prospective randomized trials, guideline recommendations about 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in this setting are currently largely based on expert opinion. Measurement of aortic valve microcalcification occurring as a healing response to valvular inflammation using 18F-sodium fluoride positron emission tomography represents another promising clinical approach, which is associated with both the risk of native valve stenosis progression and bioprosthetic valve degeneration in research trials. In this review, we consider the role of molecular imaging in cardiac valvular diseases, including aortic stenosis and valvular endocarditis, as well as cardiac device infections.

Driveline Infection in Left Ventricular Assist Device Patients: Effect of Standardized Protocols, Pathogen Type, and Treatment Strategy

Driveline infection (DLI) is common after left ventricular assist device (LVAD). Limited data exist on DLI prevention and management. We investigated the impact of standardized driveline care initiatives, specific pathogens, and chronic antibiotic suppression (CAS) on DLI outcomes. 591 LVAD patients were retrospectively categorized based on driveline care initiatives implemented at our institution (2009-2019). Era (E)1: nonstandardized care; E2: standardized driveline care protocol; E3: addition of marking driveline exit site; E4: addition of "no shower" policy. 87(15%) patients developed DLI at a median (IQR) of 403(520) days. S. aureus and P. aeruginosa were the most common pathogens. 31 (36%) of DLI patients required incision and drainage (I&D) and 5 (5.7%) device exchange. P. aeruginosa significantly increased risk for initial I&D (HR 2.7, 95% CI, 1.1-6.3) and recurrent I&D or death (HR 4.2, 95% CI, 1.4-12.5). Initial I&D was associated with a significant increased risk of death (HR 2.92 (1.33-6.44); P = 0.008) when compared to patients who did not develop DLI. Implementation of standardized driveline care protocol (E2) was associated with increased 2-year freedom from DLI compared to nonstandardized care (HR 0.36, 95% CI, 0.2-0.6, P < 0.01). Additional preventive strategies (E3&E4) showed no further reduction in DLI rates. 57(65%) DLI patients received CAS, 44% of them required escalation to intravenous antibiotics and/or I&D. Presence of P. aeruginosa DLI markedly increased risk for I&D or death. Conditional survival of patients progressing to I&D is diminished. Standardized driveline care protocol was associated with a significant reduction in DLI, while additional preventive strategies require further testing.

New Wound Management of Driveline Infections with Cold Atmospheric Plasma

The use of ventricular assist devices as a bridge to transplant or as destination therapy has increased. Wound complications increase morbidity in this cohort. Cold atmospheric plasma is a source of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species and can reduce the microbial load in skin wounds without negative effects on the surrounding tissue. We evaluated our cold atmospheric plasma treatment for LVAD driveline infections in a retrospective single-center study for peri- and postintervention outcome analysis. Between April 2019 and September 2019, 15 male patients were included (5 HVAD, 10 HeartMate III). The wounds were treated for a mean of 368.5 s with a reduction of bacterial load in treated wounds in 60% of patients, regardless of the pathogen. The most common pathogen was staphylococcus aureus (n = 8 patients). There was a significant reduction of the wound scale (scale 2.80 vs. 1.18; p < 0.001) plus a significant reduction in size (16.08 vs. 1.90 cm3; p = 0.047). Seven patients (46.6%) were free from any signs of local or systemic infection during 1-year follow-up. Five patients (33%) received a heart transplantation. Cold atmospheric plasma treatment is a potent, safe, and painless adjuvant technique for treating driveline infection without the need for repeating surgical interventions.

Local Treatment of Driveline Infection with Bacteriophages

Drive line infections (DLI) are common infectious complications after left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) implantation. In case of severe or persistent infections, when conservative management fails, the exchange of the total LVAD may become necessary. We present a case of successful treatment of DL infection with a combination of antibiotics, debridement and local bacteriophage treatment.

Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Infections Associated With Left Ventricular Assist Devices in 3 Patients

Durable left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) provide circulatory support in patients with end-stage heart failure; however, complications include infection of the driveline exit site. Nontuberculous mycobacterial infections are rare in patients with LVADs, but they should be considered in those who have undergone device exchanges and have bacterial infections with driveline exit-site discharge but no fever or leukocytosis. We reviewed the charts of patients who had an LVAD implanted at our institution from January 2009 through December 2019, to identify those with a device-related nontuberculous mycobacterial infection. Collected data included patient demographics, premorbid conditions, infection type, previous device complications, treatment, and outcomes. We identified infections in 3 patients (mean age, 41 yr): Mycobacterium abscessus in 2 and M. chimaera in 1. All had a HeartMate II device and had undergone device exchanges for pump thrombosis or for driveline fault or infections. All presented with driveline exit-site discharge without fever or leukocytosis. The mean time between initial device implantation and diagnosis of a nontuberculous mycobacterial infection was 55 months. All 3 patients were treated with antibiotics and underwent localized surgical débridement; one underwent an additional device exchange. The M. abscessus infections disseminated, and both patients died; the patient with M. chimaera infection continued to take suppressive antibiotics. Nontuberculous mycobacterial infections are associated with high morbidity and mortality rates, warranting prompt diagnosis and treatment.

Single-Center Experience With Protocolized Treatment of Left Ventricular Assist Device Infections

Purpose

Because of the current lack of evidence-based antimicrobial treatment guidelines, Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD) infections are often treated according to local insights. Here, we propose a flowchart for protocolized treatment, in order to improve outcome.

Methods

The flowchart was composed based on literature, consensus and expert opinion statements. It includes choice, dosage and duration of antibiotics, and indications for suppressive therapy, with particular focus on Staphylococcus aureus (SA) (Figure 1). The preliminary treatment results of 28 patients (2 from start cephalexin suppressive therapy) after implementation in July 2018 are described.

Results

Cumulative incidence for first episode of infection in a 3-year time period was 27% (26 of 96 patients with an LVAD). Twenty-one of 23 (91%) first episodes of driveline infection (10 superficial and 13 deep; nine of 13 caused by SA) were successfully treated with antibiotics according to flowchart with complete resolution of clinical signs and symptoms. For two patients with deep driveline infections, surgery was needed in addition. There were no relapses of deep driveline infections, and only 2 SA deep driveline re-infections after 6 months. Nine patients received cephalexin of whom four patients (44%) developed a breakthrough infection with cephalexin-resistant gram-negative bacteria.

Conclusions

The first results of this protocolized treatment approach of LVAD infections are promising. Yet, initiation of cephalexin suppressive therapy should be carefully considered given the occurrence of infections with resistant micro-organisms. The long-term outcome of this approach needs to be established in a larger number of patients, preferably in a multi-center setting.

Characteristics and Outcomes of Candidemia in Patients with Durable Left Ventricular Assist Device Support

There are limited data on the characteristics and clinical course of fungal infections in patients on durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support. We sought to further characterize the epidemiology and outcomes of LVAD patients with fungemia. We performed a retrospective review of patients receiving LVAD support from January 2012 through June 2020 at a large academic institution. Among 336 patients on LVAD support, five (1.4%) were diagnosed with fungemia during the study period. Three patients had diabetes with mean hemoglobin A1c 7.1% (R 6.6, 7.4). Fever and leukocytosis (mean white blood count 17.0 thousand/µL [R 12.5, 29.9]) were the most common symptoms. Fungemia was diagnosed early after LVAD implantation (mean 14.4 support days [R 2, 19]). All patients were infected with Candida species, and four isolates were susceptible to fluconazole. Central nervous system outcomes included an ischemic stroke, subarachnoid hemorrhage, and malignant hemorrhagic stroke. Two patients were successfully transplanted, and two patients on destination therapy remain on suppressive fluconazole. In conclusion, fungemia is a rare and severe complication in LVAD patients occurring early postimplant.

Colonization with Multidrug-resistant Organisms in Patients with Ventricular Assist Devices

Infection is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with ventricular assist devices (VAD). The impact of colonization with multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO) on outcomes in this cohort is unknown. Patients on VAD support from July 2008 to September 2018 at a single site were evaluated for MDRO colonization after implantation. MDROs included methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus species, and extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producing gram-negative bacteria. 378 patients with 433 VADs were included. 42.6% (n = 161) of patients were colonized with an MDRO throughout the duration of VAD support. Eighty-two VAD infections occurred, 74.4% (n = 61) of whom were MDRO colonized before infection. MDRO colonization was associated with an increased risk of a subsequent VAD infection (hazard ratio 3.704, p < 0.001). MDRO colonization is common after VAD implantation and is associated with future VAD infections. Further study is needed to determine best management strategies for VAD recipients with MDRO colonization given this increased risk.

Successful Use of Arteriovenous Graft for Hemodialysis Access After Left Ventricular Assist Device Placement

Kidney replacement therapy is required in up to one-third of patients after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) placement. A subset of these patients requires long-term maintenance hemodialysis and therefore needs durable vascular access but the ideal access in such patients has not been established. We present a series of 3 patients in whom arteriovenous grafts (AVGs) were successfully used for long-term kidney replacement therapy after LVAD placement. The maximum time from AVG placement to first successful AVG use was 40 days, and the longest AVG use duration was more than 2 years. 2 patients required AVG excision due to infection but both had successful placement of a second AVG. Total time on kidney replacement therapy was 993, 1,055, and 956 days for the 3 cases, of which dialysis catheter use was required for only 23%, 6.5%, and 27%, respectively. These cases suggest that AVG placement is a viable option for dialysis access in patients with LVADs.

Identifying Causative Microorganisms in Left Ventricular Assist Device Infections as a Guide for Developing Bacteriophage Therapy

BACKGROUND

As more left ventricular-assist devices (LVADs) are implanted, multidrug-resistant LVAD infections are becoming increasingly common, partly due to bacterial biofilm production. To aid in developing bacteriophage therapy for LVAD infections, we have identified the most common bacterial pathogens that cause LVAD driveline infections (DLIs) in our heart transplant referral center.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We studied a retrospective cohort of patients who received LVADs from November 2003 to August 2017 to identify the common causative organisms of LVAD infection. We also studied a prospective cohort of patients diagnosed with DLIs from October 2018 to May 2019 to collect bacterial strains from DLIs for developing bacteriophages to lyse causative pathogens. LVAD infections were classified as DLI, bacteremia, and pump/device infections in the retrospective cohort.

RESULTS

In the retrospective cohort of 582 patients, 186 (32.0%) developed an LVAD infection, with 372 microbial isolates identified. In the prospective cohort, 96 bacterial strains were isolated from 54 DLIs. The microorganisms causing DLIs were similar in the two cohorts; the most common isolate was Staphylococcus aureus. We identified 6 prospective S. aureus strains capable of biofilm formation. We developed 3 bacteriophages that were able to lyse 5 of 6 of the biofilm-forming S. aureus strains.

CONCLUSIONS

Similar pathogens caused LVAD DLIs in our retrospective and prospective cohorts, indicating our bacterial strain bank will be representative of future DLIs. Our banked bacterial strains will be useful in developing phage cocktails that can lyse ≥80% of the bacteria causing LVAD infections at our institution.

Impact of Ventricular Assist Device-Specific Infections on Post-Heart Transplant Infections: A Retrospective Single-Center Study

BACKGROUND

Patients with a ventricular assist device (VAD) who are awaiting heart transplant (HTx) are susceptible to infections. Such infections, especially at the site of the VAD, may increase the risk of severe post-transplant infections and mortality. Information on the characteristics of VAD-specific infections and outcomes in HTx recipients after prolonged periods of LVAD therapy is scarce.

PURPOSE

We aimed to assess the impact of active VAD-specific infections on the incidence of early post-transplant infections and patient survival.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of adult HTx cases at our center between April 2011 and October 2020. Informed consent was waived due to study design. A total of 86 patients were included in this study, among whom 94.2% (n = 81) were bridged with a VAD, and the median VAD support period was 1089 days.

RESULTS

Patients with active VAD-specific infections were significantly more likely to develop severe acute mediastinitis [odds ratio (OR) 14.8, 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.83-45.4, P < .01]. Active VAD infections were significantly related to increased length of intensive care unit stay (22.1 days vs 13.0 days, P = .016) and longer mechanical ventilation periods (324.7 hours vs 113.2 hours, P = .03). The 30-day survival rates for patients with and without post-transplant infections were 100% and 97.1%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Compared to other risk factors, the presence of active VAD-specific infections increases the risk of early post-heart transplant infections and morbidity, without affecting mortality.

Non-patient factors associated with infections in LVAD recipients: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

Infections are the most common complication in recipients of durable left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) and are associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and expenditures. The existing literature examining factors associated with infection in LVAD recipients is limited and principally comprises single-center studies. This scoping review synthesizes all available evidence related to identifying modifiable, non-patient factors associated with infections among LVAD recipients.

METHODS

Published studies were identified through searching 5 bibliographic databases: PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Web of Science Core Collection. Inclusion criteria required examination of factors associated with infections among recipients of contemporary, implantable, continuous flow LVADs. Key study characteristics were extracted by 4 independent reviewers and current literature described narratively. The Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) model was used to develop a taxonomy for non-patient related factors (e.g., tasks, tools, technologies, organization, and environment) associated with infections following LVAD implantation. All analyses took place between February 2019 and May 2021.

FINDINGS

A total of 43 studies met inclusion criteria. The majority of included studies were observational (n = 37), single-center (n = 29), from the U.S. (n = 38), and focused on driveline infections (n = 40). Among the 22 evaluated sub-domains of non-patient related factors, only two: increasing center experience and establishing a silicone-skin interface at the driveline exit site, were identified as consistently being associated with a lower risk of infection.

CONCLUSION

This review identified 43 studies that described non-patient related factors associated with infection in LVAD recipients. Only two factors were consistently associated with lower infection risk in LVAD recipients: increasing experience and establishing a silicone-skin interface at driveline exit site. The large variability in reporting across multiple studied interventions limited the ability to discern their effectiveness.

Cefazolin plus ertapenem and heart transplantation as salvage therapy for refractory LVAD infection due to methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus: A case series

The use of left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) is increasingly more common as the availability of donor organs in relation to failing hearts is outstandingly limited. Infections are the most common complications in LVAD recipients, particularly those caused by Staphylococcus spp. Refractory LVAD-related infections are not uncommon as achieving adequate source control is often not feasible before heart transplantation. Evidence suggest that cefazolin plus ertapenem is effective in refractory methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) bacteremia, but this approach has not been described in LVAD recipients. In this article, we report two cases of refractory MSSA bacteremia in LVAD recipients that were successfully treated with salvage therapy with cefazolin plus ertapenem and subsequent heart transplantation. This treatment strategy should be considered in patients with refractory LVAD-associated infection due to MSSA that are not responding to standard treatment.

Treatment of HeartMate III-LVAD driveline infection by negative pressure wound therapy: Result of our case series

Driveline infection is one of the most frequent complications following left ventricular assist device (LVAD) treatment and there is no consensus for its management. The standard approach to treat foreign-body infection is complete device ablation, which is not always feasible and therefore not an elected method for LVAD driveline infections. Here we share the results from a series of cases successfully treated for driveline infection by negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) therapy. Between 2016 and 2020, five male patients were hospitalized in our unit with a driveline infection of HeartMate III-LVAD^®. Ultrasonography and/or thoraco-abdominal CT confirmed the diagnosis, infection localization, and abscess formation. Following an antibiotic treatment, an urgent surgical abscess drainage and debridement of the infected tissues were performed. At the end of the procedure, NPWT was applied. NPWT re-dressing and debridement of wound was performed every 3-4 days. The wound was closed surgically after obtaining negative culture results and good healing. The patients were discharged in good condition, without signs of infection. Two patients underwent successful heart transplantation after 1 and 13 months. Other patients did not show any residual or recurrent infection during the follow-up within 25 months. Driveline infection following LVAD implantation is a significant complication and a challenging in terms of management for both; the surgical team and the patient. These results from our case series report a successful and less invasive approach by using NPWT for the treatment of LVAD driveline infections.

Ventricular Assist Device Driveline Infections: A Systematic Review

Infection is the most common complication in patients undergoing ventricular assist device (VAD) implantation. Driveline exit site (DLES) infection is the most frequent VAD infection and is a significant cause of adverse events in VAD patients, contributing to morbidity, even mortality, and repetitive hospital readmissions. There are many risk factors for driveline infection (DLI) including younger age, smaller constitution of patients, obesity, exposed velour at the DLES, longer duration of device support, lower cardiac index, higher heart failure score, DLES trauma, and comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, and depression. The incidence of DLI depends also on the device type. Numerous measures to prevent DLI currently exist. Some of them are proven, whereas the others remain controversial. Current recommendations on DLES care and DLI management are predominantly based on expert consensus and clinical experience of the certain centers. However, careful and uniform DLES care including obligatory driveline immobilization, previously prepared sterile dressing change kits, and continuous patient education are probably crucial for prevention of DLI. Diagnosis and treatment of DLI are often challenging because of certain immunological alterations in VAD patients and microbial biofilm formation on the driveline surface areas. Although there are many conservative and surgical methods described in the DLI treatment, the only possible permanent solution for DLI resolution in VAD patients is heart transplantation. This systematic review brings a comprehensive synthesis of recent data on the prevention, diagnostic workup, and conservative and surgical management of DLI in VAD patients.

The role of chronic suppressive antibiotics therapy in superficial drive line infection relapse of left ventricular assist devices: A retrospective cohort from a tertiary care center

INTRODUCTION

Drive line infections (DLIs) are common complications of left ventricular assist devices (LVADs). Data on use of suppression antibiotic therapy are limited.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of 451 patients who underwent LVAD placement from January 2009 to May 2015. First superficial DLIs were included for analysis. We examined factors associated with the use of chronic suppressive antibiotics (CSAs) therapy. Cox proportional hazards models were performed to identify factors associated with DLI relapse with the same organism as the initial DLI.

RESULTS

A total of 69 patients developed a superficial DLI within a median of 195 (interquartile range [IQR] 98-348) days of LVAD insertion. The median age was 57 years, 87% were males, and 74% were White. Gram positive bacteria caused 61% of infections, with Staphylococcus aureus being the most common (35%). Forty-three (62%) patients received suppressive antibiotic therapy. Relapse DLI occurred in 29 (42%) patients. Independent risk factors for relapse infection in multivariable analysis were sepsis (aHR 5.94 [CI 1.42-24.92]), and MRSA DLI (aHR 4.19 [CI 1.37-12.79]). There was no difference in the proportion of patients with relapse among those who were treated with antibiotic suppression therapy versus not (44% vs. 38%, p = 0.64), although relapse occurred at a later time in those who received suppression (185 vs. 69 days, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

CSA therapy was associated with delayed time to DLI relapse but no significant difference in the proportion of patients with relapse. A prospective study is needed to examine the effect of suppression on relapse rates.

The evolution of long-term pediatric ventricular assistance devices: a critical review

Introduction: The gap between the number of heart failure patients and the number of potential heart donors has never been larger than today, especially among the pediatric population. The use of mechanical circulatory support is seen as a potential alternative for clinicians to treat more patients. This treatment has proven its efficiency on short-term use. However, in order to replace heart transplant, the techniques should be used over longer periods of time.Areas covered: This review aims at furnishing an engineering vision of the evolution of ventricular assistance devices used in pediatrics. A critical analysis of the clinical complications related to devices generation is made to give an overview of the design improvements made since their inception.Expert opinion: The long-term use of a foreign device in the body is not without consequences, especially among fragile pediatric patients. Moreover, the size of their body parts increases the technical difficulties of such procedure. The balance between the living cells of the body is disturbed by the devices, mostly by the shear stress generated. To provide a safe mechanical circulatory support for long-term use, the devices should be more hemocompatible, preserving blood cells, adapted to the patient's systemic grid and miniaturized for pediatric use.

Impact of antimicrobial selection for prophylaxis of left ventricular assist device surgical infections

BACKGROUND

Surgical site infections (SSIs) after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation are associated with high mortality, while surgical prophylaxis is variable.

METHODS

This retrospective study included adult patients who underwent LVAD implantation at a single center. We compared outcomes in patients who received narrow antimicrobial prophylaxis (cefazolin, vancomycin, or both) to those who received broad antimicrobial prophylaxis (any antimicrobial combination targeting gram-positive and gram-negative organisms not included in the narrow group) at 30-day and 1-year postimplantation. Cox-proportional hazards models and log-rank tests were used for survival analysis.

RESULTS

Among the 39 and 65 patients comprising narrow and broad groups respectively, there was no difference in rate of SSI at 30 days (6.2% vs. 12.8%, p = .290) and 1 year (16.9% vs. 25.6%, p = .435). Comparing narrow to broad prophylaxis, the risk of mortality (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.44, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.15-1.35, logrank p = .14), and composite of mortality and infection was reduced (HR = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.45-1.88, logrank p = .83), but did not reach statistical significance. Most culture positive infections were due to gram-positive bacteria (70%) and the most common organisms were the Staphylococcus spp (47%). There were no significant differences in the rate of SSI at 1-year (p = 1.00) and mortality (p = .33) by device type.

CONCLUSIONS

The rates of infection and all-cause mortality were not different between patients who received narrow or broad prophylaxis. This highlights an opportunity for institutions to narrow their surgical infection prophylaxis protocols to primarily cover gram-positive organisms.

Contemporary Management Strategies in VAD Infection

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The use of durable ventricular assist devices (VAD) to manage end-stage heart failure is increasing, but infection remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among patients with VAD. In this review, we synthesize recent data pertaining to the epidemiology, diagnosis, management, and prevention of VAD infections, discuss transplant considerations in patients with VAD infections, and highlight remaining knowledge gaps. We also present a conceptual framework for treating clinicians to approach these infections that draws on the same principles that guide the treatment of analogous infections that occur in patients without VAD.

RECENT FINDINGS

Despite advances in device design, surgical techniques, and preventative interventions, more than a third of VAD recipients still experience infection as an adverse outcome. Positron emission tomography has emerged as a promising modality for identifying and characterizing VAD infections. High-quality data to support many of the routine therapeutic strategies currently used for VAD infections-including suppressive antibiotic therapy, surgical debridement/device exchange, and novel antimicrobials for emerging multidrug-resistant organisms-remain limited. Although pre-transplant VAD infection may impact some early transplant outcomes, transplantation remains a viable option for patients with most types of VAD infection. Standardized definitions of VAD infection applied to large registry datasets have yielded key insights into the epidemiology of infectious complications among VAD recipients, but more prospective studies are needed to evaluate the effectiveness of existing and novel diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.

Epidemiology of Left Ventricular Assist Device Infections: Findings From a Large Nonregistry Cohort

BACKGROUND

Infection is a major complication during circulatory support with a left ventricular assist device (VAD). Changes in device characteristics and treatment practices in the last decade can affect the epidemiology of infection. The International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) has published recommendations on the prevention and management of VAD infections, but data to support these recommendations remain sparse.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of 455 patients who underwent VAD placement from 2009 to 2015. Infection episodes were defined using ISHLT criteria and were also grouped as endovascular or local. Analysis included descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

There were 174 patients (38.6%) with a VAD infection. Infection incidence was 36.9 cases per 100 person-years of VAD support. The driveline was the most common infection site (67.2%). Systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria were not satisfied in 29.2% of patients with endovascular infections, and computed tomography (CT) examinations were normal in 37.7% of cases. Gram-positive bacteria caused 65.6% of infections in patients with an available culture. Antimicrobial suppression was used in 72.3% of patients who survived treatment. Median survival after infection was 35 months for patients with VAD-related infections versus 14 months for patients with VAD-specific infections.

CONCLUSIONS

VAD infections continue to be a major complication after implantation. Clinical criteria alone were not predictive of serious infections, and many patients with confirmed infection had normal CTs. Patients with VAD-specific infections had lower median survival than patients with VAD-related infections.

Ventricular Assist Device-Specific Infections

Ventricular assist device (VAD)-specific infections, in particular, driveline infections, are a concerning complication of VAD implantation that often results in significant morbidity and even mortality. The presence of a percutaneous driveline at the skin exit-site and in the subcutaneous tunnel allows biofilm formation and migration by many bacterial and fungal pathogens. Biofilm formation is an important microbial strategy, providing a shield against antimicrobial treatment and human immune responses; biofilm migration facilitates the extension of infection to deeper tissues such as the pump pocket and the bloodstream. Despite the introduction of multiple preventative strategies, driveline infections still occur with a high prevalence of ~10-20% per year and their treatment outcomes are frequently unsatisfactory. Clinical diagnosis, prevention and management of driveline infections are being targeted to specific microbial pathogens grown as biofilms at the driveline exit-site or in the driveline tunnel. The purpose of this review is to improve the understanding of VAD-specific infections, from basic "bench" knowledge to clinical "bedside" experience, with a specific focus on the role of biofilms in driveline infections.

HFSA/SAEM/ISHLT clinical expert consensus document on the emergency management of patients with ventricular assist devices

Mechanical circulatory support is now widely accepted as a viable long-term treatment option for patients with end-stage heart failure (HF). As the range of indications for the implantation of ventricular assist devices grows, so does the number of patients living in the community with durable support. Because of their underlying disease and comorbidities, in addition to the presence of mechanical support, these patients are at a high risk for medical urgencies and emergencies (Table 1). Thus, it is the responsibility of clinicians to understand the basics of their emergency care. This consensus document represents a collaborative effort by the Heart Failure Society of America, the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, and the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) to educate practicing clinicians about the emergency management of patients with ventricular assist devices. The target audience includes HF specialists and emergency medicine physicians, as well as general cardiologists and community-based providers.

Diagnosis and Image-guided Therapy of Cardiac Left Ventricular Assist Device Infections

Due to limited availability of donor hearts, more and more end stage heart failure patients are dependent on left ventricular assist device (LVAD) as their destination therapy rather than the original intended use as a bridge for heart transplantation. While LVADs improve life expectancy in these patients, infection emerges as one of the major adverse events. Early and accurate localization of LVAD infection is critical, as it can significantly influence clinical management decisions and ultimately impact patient outcome. Although the International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation has defined 3 categories for LVAD infection: (1) LVAD-specific infection, (2) LVAD-related infection, and (3) non-LVAD infection, there is still lack of standardized criteria for diagnosing these 3 types of LVAD infections. Morphologically based imaging tools such as transesophageal echocardiogram and cardiac computed tomography (CT) or CT angiogram have limited roles in diagnosing LVAD infections due to their nonspecific findings, often affected by significant streaking and beam hardening artifacts from the metal device. In contrast, ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) Positron Emission Tomography (PET)/CT has repeatedly shown a high sensitivity and specificity for LVAD infection diagnosis, albeit in small number of subjects. Beyond its accuracy for detecting infection, FDG PET/CT can predict clinical outcome based on the location of LVAD infection. As a functional imaging tool, FDG PET/CT can demonstrate the extent and severity of LVAD infection, as well as infectious embolism and potential extra-cardiac source of infection, which are all critical for providing optimal patient care, justifying its judicious and precise use in the workup of LVAD infection.

Management of Bloodstream Infections in Left Ventricular Assist Device Recipients: To Suppress, or Not to Suppress?

Background

Ascertaining involvement of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) in a patient presenting with bloodstream infection (BSI) can be challenging, frequently leading to use of chronic antimicrobial suppressive (CAS) therapy. We aimed to assess the efficacy of CAS therapy to prevent relapse of BSI from LVAD and non-LVAD sources.

Methods

We retrospectively screened adults receiving LVAD support from 2010 through 2018, to identify cases of BSI. Bloodstream infection events were classified into LVAD-related, LVAD-associated, and non-LVAD BSIs.

Results

A total of 121 episodes of BSI were identified in 80 patients. Of these, 35 cases in the LVAD-related, 14 in the LVAD-associated, and 46 in the non-LVAD BSI groups completed the recommended initial course of therapy and were evaluated for CAS therapy. Chronic antimicrobial suppressive therapy was prescribed in most of the LVAD-related BSI cases (32 of 35, 91.4%) and 12 (37.5%) experienced relapse. Chronic antimicrobial suppressive therapy was not prescribed in a majority of non-LVAD BSI cases (33, 58.9%), and most (31, 93.9%) did not experience relapse. Chronic antimicrobial suppressive therapy was prescribed in 9 of 14 (64.2%) cases of LVAD-associated BSI and none experienced relapse. Of the 5 cases in this group that were managed without CAS, 2 had relapse.

Conclusions

Patients presenting with LVAD-related BSI are at high risk of relapse. Consequently, CAS therapy may be a reasonable approach in the management of these cases. In contrast, routine use of CAS therapy may be unnecessary for non-LVAD BSIs.

Gallium-67 Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography Affects Management of Infections of Left Ventricular Assist Devices

Our institution employs gallium-67 single-photon emission computed tomography low-dose CT (Ga-SPECT-CT) to determine the presence and extent of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) infections. We present a retrospective single-center study of 41 LVAD recipients who underwent Ga-SPECT-CT from January 2011 to June 2018 to determine whether Ga-SPECT-CT led to changes in antimicrobial therapy, LVAD revision or exchange, or application for 1A exception. The average age was 56.6 years, predominantly male (80.5%) and diabetic (68.3%), divided between ischemic (48.8%) and nonischemic (51.2%) cardiomyopathy. The majority had HeartMate II devices (82.9%). Device-related infections were classified as possible (12.2%), probable (36.6%), proven (36.6%), or rejected (14.6%). Sensitivity was 68.6% and specificity was 100%. Most VAD-specific infections were percutaneous deep driveline infections (DRIs) (34.1%), and VAD-related infections were primarily bloodstream infections (31.7%). Staphylococcus aureus was the major pathogen isolated. Gallium-67 single-photon emission computed tomography low-dose CT resulted in changes in management in more than half (53.7%) of patients: starting (24.4%) or stopping (17.1%) antimicrobial therapy, LVAD revision (22.0%) or exchange (12.2%), and the application for 1A exception for transplant listing (17.1%). We conclude that Ga-SPECT-CT is an effective modality for determining the presence and extent of LVAD DRIs, and contributed to a change in management in more than half of cases.

An unusual case of Scedosporium apiospermum fungaemia in an immunocompetent patient with a left ventricular assist device and an implantable cardiac device

Left ventricular assist device (LVAD)-related infections are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality, with fungal infections being particularly difficult to manage. We report a case of an immunocompetent 39-year-old male with an LVAD and an implantable cardiac device (ICD) who developed fatal Scedosporium apiospermum fungaemia. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported case of LVAD-related S. apiospermum fungaemia.

Left Ventricular Assist Device as Destination Therapy: a State of the Science and Art of Long-Term Mechanical Circulatory Support

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to synthesize and summarize recent developments in the care of patients with end-stage heart failure being managed with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) as destination therapy.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although the survival of patients treated with LVAD continues to improve, the rates of LVAD-associated complication, such as right ventricular failure, bleeding complications, and major infection, remain high, and management of these patients remains challenging. The durability and hemocompatibility of LVAD support have greatly increased in recent years as a result of new technologies and novel management strategies. Challenges remain in the comprehensive care of patients with destination therapy LVADs, including management of comorbidities and optimizing patient function and quality of life.

Management and Outcome of Left Ventricular Assist Device Infections in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Transplantation

Background

Postoperative management of patients undergoing cardiac transplantation with an infected left ventricular assist device (LVAD) is unclear.

Methods

We retrospectively screened all adults with an LVAD who underwent cardiac transplantation at our institution from 2010 through 2018. We selected all cases of LVAD-specific and LVAD-related infections who were receiving antimicrobial therapy as initial treatment course or chronic suppression at the time of cardiac transplantation. Non-LVAD infections, superficial driveline-infection, or concurrent use of right ventricular assist device or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation device were excluded.

Results

A total of 54 cases met study criteria with 18 of 54 (33.6%) classified as LVAD- specific or related infections and 36 of 54 (66.6%) as noninfected. cases of lvad infection had a higher median charlson comorbidity Index score at the time of transplantation compared with noninfected cases (P = .005). Of the 18 cases of infection, 13 of 18 (72.2%) were classified as LVAD-specific and 5 of 18 (27.8%) were classified as LVAD-related. Nine of 13 (69.2%) cases had proven LVAD-specific infections. Antimicrobial therapy was extended posttransplant to treat preceding LVAD-specific infection in all 9 cases (9 of 13, 69.2%) with a median duration of 14 days (interquartile range, 14–28). After LVAD removal, antimicrobial treatment was not continued for preceding LVAD-related infections.

Conclusions

Patients with an LVAD-specific infection were treated with 2 weeks of pathogen-directed therapy postheart transplant without any relapses. For those without LVAD-specific infection or uncomplicated LVAD-related bacteremia who had completed antimicrobial therapy pretransplant, antibiotics were discontinued after standard perioperative prophylaxis and no relapses were observed.

Surgical infection prophylaxis prior to left ventricular assist device implantation: A survey of clinical practice

BACKGROUND

Short duration, antimicrobial prophylaxis that includes antistaphylococcal activity is recommended at the time of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation to reduce infection-related complications. There continues to be wide variability in surgical infection prophylaxis (SIP) regimens among implantation centers. The aim of this study is to characterize current SIP regimens at different LVAD centers.

METHODS

A survey study was conducted from 26 September 2017 to 25 October 2017. Surveys were distributed electronically to LVAD coordinators and infectious diseases specialists at 75 US medical centers identified as having an LVAD program. Data collection included information about antimicrobial selection, duration, Staphylococcus aureus screening, and decolonization procedures.

RESULTS

We received 29 survey responses. The majority of surveys were completed by infectious diseases physicians (72.4% [21 out of 29]). Most responding centers reported LVAD programs established for greater than 10 years (20 out of 29 [69%]). Cardiac transplantation was performed in 28 out of 29 (96%) centers. Of centers reporting a defined SIP regimen for non-penicillin allergic patients (96% [28 out of 29]), 17.9% (5 out of 28) reported a four-drug regimen, 35.7% (10 out of 28) reported a three-drug regimen, and 46.4% (13 out of 28) reported a two-drug regimen, while no centers reported a single-drug regimen. Empiric fluconazole was common (50% [14 out of 28]) and 96.4% (27 out of 28) of regimens included vancomycin. Duration of antimicrobial prophylaxis (24 hours to 5 days), S. aureus screening, decolonization procedures, and alterations due to drug allergies varied across participating centers.

CONCLUSIONS

Our survey results indicate wide variation in SIP regimens among participating LVAD centers. These results highlight the need for studies evaluating the implications of SIP regimens, and whether clinical factors that prolong antimicrobial duration impact postoperative infection rates.

Absorbable antibiotic beads as an adjuvant therapy in treating ventricular assist devices driveline infection: A case report

BACKGROUND

Ventricular assist devices driveline infections are common, recalcitrant, and carry high morbidity and mortality. Herein, we reported a patient with driveline infection that was successfully treated with a combination of systemic antibiotics, surgical debridement, and instillation of absorbable antibiotic beads to the wound bed.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A 39-year-old man with nonischemic cardiomyopathy underwent insertion of a continuous flow left ventricular assist device. Four years postoperatively, the patient presented with clinical, laboratory, and radiologic signs of driveline tract infection. He underwent extensive surgical debridement, installation of absorbable antibiotic beads that consisted of calcium sulfate, vancomycin, and tobramycin, into the wound bed, and systemic antibiotics. The patient was free of infection 9 month postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

Absorbable calcium sulfate antibiotic beads may serve as a beneficial adjunct to surgical debridement and systemic antibiotics for the treatment of ventricular assist device driveline infection, and merit further investigation.

Efficacy and safety of chronic antimicrobial suppression therapy for left ventricular assist device driveline infections: A single-center descriptive experience

BACKGROUND

Driveline infection (DLI) is the most common left ventricular assist device (LVAD) infectious complication. Short-term antimicrobial therapy and local debridement are the cornerstones of management for these infections, but the use of chronic antimicrobial suppression (CAS) therapy is not well characterized.

METHODS

To better characterize the efficacy of CAS therapy, we performed a retrospective review of all patients (N = 219) receiving care at our tertiary transplant center with continuous-flow LVADs placed between August 2007 and July 2019.

RESULTS

A total of 24 patients were identified as having received CAS therapy as treatment for DLIs. The mean age was 56 years, 50% were female, and chronic kidney disease affected 63% of patients. Staphylococcus aureus accounted for half of all initial DLIs, and the mean length of CAS therapy was 486 days (range 48-2287 days). All patients received per os regimens as suppression therapy. Adverse events impacted 5 of 24 patients (0.43 events per 1000 days). Overall, the use of CAS therapy led to successful outcomes in 50% of patients and 29% experienced treatment failures. The remaining patients experienced stable symptoms. Relapses were the most common cause of treatment failure, and three patients experienced reinfections while on CAS therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that CAS therapy for DLIs can be well tolerated, and future studies are needed to determine which patients merit suppression.

An Emergency Medicine-focused Summary of the HFSA/SAEM/ISHLT Clinical Consensus Document on the Emergency Management of Patients With Ventricular Assist Devices

Mechanical circulatory support is increasingly used as a long-term treatment option for patients with end-stage heart failure. Patients with implanted ventricular assist devices are at high risk for a range of diverse medical urgencies and emergencies. Given the increasing prevalence of mechanical circulatory support devices, this expert clinical consensus document seeks to help inform emergency medicine and prehospital providers regarding the approach to acute medical and surgical conditions encountered in these complex patients.