Retreatment With Sofosbuvir Plus Grazoprevir/Elbasvir Plus Ribavirin of Patients With Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 1 or 4 Who Previously Failed an NS5A- or NS3-Containing Regimen: The ANRS HC34 REVENGE Study

Hepatitis C Virus Antiviral Drug Resistance and Salvage Therapy Outcomes Across Australia

Background

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection can now be cured with well-tolerated direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy. However, a potential barrier to HCV elimination is the emergence of resistance-associated substitutions (RASs) that reduce the efficacy of antiviral drugs, but real-world studies assessing the clinical impact of RASs are limited. Here, an analysis of the impact of RASs on retreatment outcomes for different salvage regimens in patients nationally who failed first-line DAA therapy is reported.

Methods

We collected data from 363 Australian patients who failed first-line DAA therapy, including: age, sex, fibrosis stage, HCV genotype, NS3/NS5A/NS5B RASs, details of failed first-line regimen, subsequent salvage regimens, and treatment outcome.

Results

Of 240 patients who were initially retreated as per protocol, 210 (87.5%) achieved sustained virologic response (SVR) and 30 (12.5%) relapsed or did not respond. The SVR rate for salvage regimens that included sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir was 94.3% (n = 140), sofosbuvir/velpatasvir 75.0% (n = 52), elbasvir/grazoprevir 81.6% (n = 38), and glecaprevir/pibrentasvir 84.6% (n = 13). NS5A RASs were present in 71.0% (n = 210) of patients who achieved SVR and in 66.7% (n = 30) of patients who subsequently relapsed. NS3 RASs were detected in 20 patients (20%) in the SVR group and 1 patient in the relapse group. NS5B RASs were observed in only 3 patients. Cirrhosis was a predictor of relapse after retreatment, as was previous treatment with sofosbuvir/velpatasvir.

Conclusions

In our cohort, the SVR rate for sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir was higher than with other salvage regimens. The presence of NS5A, NS5B, or NS3 RASs did not appear to negatively influence retreatment outcomes.

HLA-E*01:01 allele is associated with better response to anti-HCV therapy while homozygous status for HLA-E*01:03 allele increases the resistance to anti-HCV treatments in frequently transfused thalassemia patients

BACKGROUND

HLA-E binding to NKG2A/CD94 induces inhibitory signals that modulate NK cells cytotoxicity against infected targets. HCV-derived peptides stabilize HLA-E molecule that favours its higher expression. However, HLA-E stability and expression vary in different genotypes where the presence of HLA-E*01:03 allele is associated with higher HLA-E expression on targets that enhances NK cells inhibition and increases the chance of virus to escape from innate immune system. Here, we aimed to investigate whether HLA-E polymorphism affects HCV infection status or its treatment in major thalassemia patients who are more vulnerable to hepatitis C.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Study included 89 cases of major thalassemia positive for HCV-antibody; of those 17 patients were negative for HCV-PCR (spontaneously cleared) and 72 patients were HCV-PCR positive (persistent hepatitis under different anti-viral treatment). 16 major thalassemia patients without hepatitis, negative for HCV-antibody were also considered as patients control group. Genomic DNAs extracted from whole bloods were genotyped for HLA-E locus using a sequence specific primer-PCR strategy.

RESULTS

In thalassemia patients, HLA-E*01:03 allele increased susceptibility to HCV infection [p = 0.02; 4.74(1.418-15.85)]. In addition, HLA-E*01:03/*01:03 genotype predicted more resistance to HCV treatment compared to other genotypes [p = 0.037; 3.5(1.1-11.4)]. In other words, we found that the presence of HLA-E*01:01 allele favors better response to anti-HCV therapy [p = 0.037; 3.5(1.1-11.4)].

CONCLUSION

From a mechanistic point of view, the associations between HLA-E polymorphisms and susceptibility to HCV infection or its therapeutic resistance in thalassemia patients may suggest potential roles for the innate and adaptive immune responses to this infection, which are manifested by the acts of HLA-E - NKG2A/CD94 axis in the modulation of NK cell inhibitory function as well as HLA-E associated CD8+ T cell cytolytic activity against HCV, respectively. Notably, from a clinical point of view, paying attention to these associations may not only be useful in increasing the effectiveness of current anti-HCV regimens comprising direct acting antivirals (DAAs) in more complicated patients, but may also suggest antiviral prophylaxis for patients more vulnerable to HCV infection.

The Role of RASs /RVs in the Current Management of HCV

The approval of combination therapies with direct-acting antiviral (DAA) regimens has led to significant progress in the field of hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment. Although most patients treated with these agents achieve a virological cure, resistance to DAAs is a major issue. The rapid emergence of resistance-associated substitutions (RASs), in particular in the context of incomplete drug pressure, has an impact on sustained virological response (SVR) rates. Several RASs in NS3, NS5A and NS5B have been linked with reduced susceptibility to DAAs. RAS vary based on HCV characteristics and the different drug classes. DAA-resistant HCV variant haplotypes (RVs) are dominant in cases of virological failure. Viruses with resistance to NS3-4A protease inhibitors are only detected in the peripheral blood in a time frame ranging from weeks to months following completion of treatment, whereas NS5A inhibitor-resistant viruses may persist for years. Novel agents have been developed that demonstrate promising results in DAA-experienced patients. The recent approval of broad-spectrum drug combinations with a high genetic barrier to resistance and antiviral potency may overcome the problem of resistance.

A Retrospective Cohort Study: Safety and Effectiveness of Elbasvir/Grazoprevir ± Ribavirin Compared With Ombitasvir/Paritaprevir/Ritonavir/Dasabuvir ± Ribavirin in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C Genotype 1 Infection

Background: The direct-acting antiviral (DAA) agents are widely used to treat hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype (GT) 1 infection, while it may cause severe liver damage. The objectives of the study were to evaluate the incidence of drug-induced liver injury (DILI), sustained virologic response at post-treatment week 12 (SVR12), and recurrence rates in HCV GT 1 infection. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study that included patients diagnosed with HCV GT 1 infection, who had received intervention and treatment with elbasvir/grazoprevir (EBR/GZR) ± ribavirin (RBV) versus ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir (OBV/PTV/r) + dasabuvir ± RBV (as control group) for 12 or 24 weeks at a regional hospital in southern Taiwan between April 2016 and August 2018. The primary outcome of the study was to compare the incidence rate ratio (IRR) of DILI via Poisson regression, and the secondary outcome was to evaluate the effectiveness of two treatment regimens expressed as a percentage. Results: The study included 149 patients in the control group and 105 patients in the intervention group of which 99.33 and 98.1% patients, respectively, achieved SVR12. In the control group, one patient experienced relapse, whereas in the intervention group, two patients relapsed. Furthermore, in the control group, a total of nine patients developed DILI as determined during follow-up care. Of these patients, three were 55-84 years old. In the intervention group, six patients developed DILI. The IRR of DILI caused by EBR/GZR treatment was 2.84 times higher than that caused by the OBV/PTV/r treatment regimen. Conclusion: There was no significant difference between the studied DAA regimens regarding the incidence of DILI and effectiveness during the treatment. DILI occurrence during therapy did not affect the cure rate of medication. The present study results can provide reference data for drug selection among patients with HCV. Trial registration: The study was approved by DMF-CYCH (CYCH IRB No: 2018067).

Treatment failure with DAA therapy: Importance of resistance

Viral resistance is a major reason for virological failure in patients being treated with direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) for chronic HCV infection. However, the importance of viral resistance mainly depends on the DAA regimen and HCV genotype. For first-line therapy with glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (G/P) or velpatasvir/sofosbuvir (VEL/SOF) no general baseline resistance analysis is required because of the high antiviral activity and high barrier to resistance. If available, resistance testing may help to optimise therapy in certain subgroups of patients with HCV genotype 3 and other rare HCV geno/subtypes. Voxilaprevir/velpatasvir/sofosbuvir (VOX/VEL/SOF) is the first choice for the second-line treatment of patients following a previous DAA failure, with rates of viral eradication above 90% irrespective of the presence of resistance-associated substitutions (RASs). However, in resource-limited settings, only first-generation DAAs may be available for second-line therapy. Here, RASs selected during initial antiviral therapy should be considered if testing is available and rescue treatment should include a switch to a regimen with a new DAA class to optimise treatment response. Patients with HCV genotype 3 are overrepresented in the group who experience DAA treatment failure. Limited data are available for third-line therapies, but promising results have been achieved with G/P plus SOF or VOX/VEL/SOF with or without ribavirin for 12 to 24 weeks; these regimens should be administered irrespective of a patient's RAS profile.

Liver cT1 decreases following direct-acting antiviral therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus

PURPOSE

Direct-acting antiviral therapies (DAAs) for treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) have excellent rates of viral eradication, but their effect on regression of liver fibrosis is unclear. The primary aim was to use magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and spectroscopy (MRS) to evaluate changes in liver fibrosis, liver fat and liver iron content (LIC) in patients with chronic HCV following treatment with DAAs.

METHODS

In this prospective study, 15 patients with chronic HCV due to start treatment with DAAs and with transient elastography (TE) > 8 kPa were recruited consecutively. Patients underwent MRI and MRS at baseline (before treatment), and at 24 weeks and 48 weeks after the end of treatment (EoT) for the measurement of liver cT1 (fibroinflammation), liver fat and T2* (LIC).

RESULTS

All patients achieved a sustained virological response. Liver cT1 showed significant decreases from baseline to 24 weeks post EoT (876 vs 806 ms, p = 0.002, n = 15), baseline to 48 weeks post EoT (876 vs 788 ms, p = 0.0002, n = 13) and 24 weeks post EoT to 48 weeks post EoT (806 vs 788 ms, p = 0.016, n = 13). Between baseline and 48 weeks EoT significant reduction in liver fat (5.17% vs 2.65%, p = 0.027) and an increase in reported LIC (0.913 vs 0.950 mg/g, p = 0.021) was observed.

CONCLUSION

Liver cT1 decreases in patients with chronic HCV undergoing successful DAA treatment. The relatively fast reduction in cT1 suggests a reduction in inflammation rather than regression of fibrosis.

Elbasvir and grazoprevir for the treatment of hepatitis C

Introduction: Hepatitis C is one of the leading causes of chronic liver disease. The direct-acting-antivirals has revolutionized the chronic hepatitis C treatment. DAAs can achieve a sustained virological response rate >95% in different populations.Area covered: This review summarizes the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, efficacy, and safety of Elbasvir/Grazoprevir (EBR/GZR).Expert opinion: EBR/GZR is a combination of NS5A and NS3/4A inhibitors. The performance in the EBR/GZR combination's safety and tolerability is appreciated in clinical treatment. EBR/GZR also has a higher barrier to resistance-associated substitutions. Based on clinical trials and real-world experience, elbasvir/grazoprevir is effective in the HCV GT1, 4 infections.

Efficacy of Retreatment After Failed Direct-acting Antiviral Therapy in Patients With HCV Genotype 1-3 Infections

Hepatitis C virus infection is causing chronic liver disease, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma. By combining direct-acting antivirals (DAAs), high sustained virologic response rates (SVRs) can be achieved. Resistance-associated substitutions (RASs) are commonly observed after DAA failure, and especially nonstructural protein 5A (NS5A) RASs may impact retreatment options.^1-3 Data on retreatment of DAA failure patients using first-generation DAAs are limited.^4-7 Recently, a second-generation protease- and NS5A-inhibitor plus sofosbuvir (voxilaprevir/velpatasvir/sofosbuvir [VOX/VEL/SOF]) was approved for retreatment after DAA failure.⁸ However, this and other second-generation regimens are not available in many resource-limited countries or are not reimbursed by regular insurance, and recommendations regarding the selection of retreatment regimens using first-generation DAAs are very important. This study aimed to analyze patients who were re-treated with first-generation DAAs after failure of a DAA combination therapy.

Patients with HCV genotype-1 who have failed a direct-acting antiviral regimen: virological characteristics and efficacy of retreatment

BACKGROUND

This real-world clinical setting study characterized the virological patterns in genotype-1 patients failing interferon (IFN)-free regimens and evaluated the efficacy of re-treatment.

METHODS

A total of 73 consecutive patients failing IFN-free regimens were enrolled (17 genotype-1a and 56 -1b). At failure Sanger sequencing of NS3, NS5A and NS5B regions was performed by home-made protocols.

RESULTS

In patients having failed an NS3 inhibitor, the prevalence of NS3-RASs was higher in the 10 with genotype-1a than in the 24 with genotype-1b (80% versus 41.6%). In patients treated with an NS5A inhibitor, the prevalence of NS5A-RASs was very high in the 14 with genotype-1a and the 27 with genotype-1b (78.6% and 92.5%, respectively). In patients having failed sofosbuvir, the prevalence of NS5B-RASs was more frequently identified in the 45 with genotype-1b than in the 10 with genotype-1a (37.7% versus 10%). The prevalence of NS5B-RASs in patients having failed dasabuvir was high in both genotypes, 66.6% in the 6 with genotype-1a and 45.5% in the 11 with genotype-1b. The 6 patients re-treated with genotype-1a less frequently (50%) showed sustained virological response (SVR) than the 18 with genotype-1b (88.8%; P=0.07). SVR was more frequent in the 21 patients with an effective second-line direct-acting antiviral (DAA) regimen than the 3 without (90.4% versus 0%; P<0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of RASs was high in our real-world population. NS3, NS5A and NS5B sequencing seems mandatory in the choice of DAA re-treatment.

Resistance-associated substitutions in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 4 infection

Data on the prevalence of resistance-associated substitutions (RASs) and their implications for treatment with direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) are sparse in European patients with HCV genotype 4. This study investigated RASs before and after DAA failure in different genotype 4 subtypes and evaluated retreatment efficacies. Samples of 195 genotype 4-infected patients were collected in the European Resistance Database and investigated for NS3, NS5A and NS5B RASs. Retreatment efficacies in DAA failure patients were analysed retrospectively. After NS5A inhibitor (NS5Ai) failure, subtype 4r was frequent (30%) compared to DAA-naïve patients (5%) and the number of NS5A RASs was significantly higher in subtype 4r compared to 4a or 4d (median three RASs vs no or one RAS, respectively, P < .0001). RASsL28V, L30R and M31L pre-existed in subtype 4r and were maintained after NS5Ai failure. Typical subtype 4r RASs were located in subdomain 1a of NS5A, close to membrane interaction and protein-protein interaction sites that are responsible for multimerization and hence viral replication. Retreatment of 37 DAA failure patients was highly effective with 100% SVR in prior SOF/RBV, PI/SOF and PI/NS5Ai failures. Secondary virologic failures were rare (n = 2; subtype 4d and 4r) and only observed in prior NS5Ai/SOF failures (SVR 90%). In conclusion, subtype 4r harboured considerably more RASs compared to other subtypes. A resistance-tailored retreatment using first- and second-generation DAAs was highly effective with SVR rates ≥90% across all subtypes and first-line treatment regimens.

Unmet needs of chronic hepatitis C in the era of direct-acting antiviral therapy

The treatment of chronic hepatitis C (CHC) has been revolutionized in an era of all-oral direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) since 2014. Satisfactory treatment efficacy and tolerability can be provided by novel DAAs. Nevertheless, there are still some unmet needs and emerging issues in the treatment of CHC in the DAA era. Certain hard-to-cure populations are prone to have inferior treatment responses, including patients with severe liver decompensation, active hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 3 (HCV-3) infection and those who experience multiple DAA treatment failures. Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation during and after DAA treatment has raised concern regarding the use of prophylactic antivirals against HBV throughout DAA treatment. However, the standard strategy for the use of prophylactic antivirals is not uniform across regional guidelines. In the post-sustained virological response (SVR) period, HCC still occurs in a substantial proportion of patients. Due to the relatively short follow-up period, the net benefit of the achievement of an SVR by DAAs in the reduction of extrahepatic manifestations has not yet been determined. Attention must also be paid to HCV reinfection, particularly in high-risk populations. The most critical and unmet need for HCV elimination is the large gap in the HCV care cascade at the population level. To accomplish the World Health Organization (WHO)'s goal for HCV elimination by 2030, the expansion of access to HCV care requires a continuous effort to overcome practical and political challenges.

2020 Taiwan consensus statement on the management of hepatitis C: Part (II) special populations

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a silent killer that leads to rapid progression of liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). High prevalence of HCV infection has been reported in Taiwan, especially in high-risk populations including people who inject drugs (PWID) and patients requiring dialysis. Besides, certain populations merit special considerations due to suboptimal outcome, potential drug-drug interaction, or possible side effect. Therefore, in the second part of this 2-part consensus, the Taiwan Association for the Study of the Liver (TASL) proposes the treatment recommendations for the special population in order to serve as guidance to optimizing the outcome in the direct-acting antiviral (DAA) era. Special populations include patients with acute or recent HCV infection, previous DAA failure, chronic kidney disease, decompensated cirrhosis, HCC, liver and other solid organ transplantations, receiving an HCV viremic organ, hepatitis B virus (HBV) and HCV dual infection, HCV and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) coinfection, active tuberculosis infection, PWID, bleeding disorders and hemoglobinopathies, children and adolescents, and pregnancy. Moreover, future perspectives regarding the management of hepatitis C are also discussed and summarized in this consensus statement.

Hepatitis C genotype 4: A report on resistance-associated substitutions in NS3, NS5A, and NS5B genes

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTION

FN performed the literature review and wrote the manuscript; STZ coauthored, edited, and reviewed the manuscript.

ABSTRACT

Treatment response in Hepatitis C virus (HCV) has generated varied effects in patients. Recently, nonresponsive and relapse patients related to host and genotype variabilities have been reported in clinical trials. However, these trials included minimal sample sizes of patients with genotype 4, the most prevalent genotype in Egypt and the Middle East, compared with genotypes 1 and 2. The genetic variabilities that have been detected within the HCV genes, especially the ones associated with genotype 4, and are linked to treatment response, will be the focus of this review with emphasis on direct acting antiviral agents. In addition, the major studies and clinical trials performed globally and their inclusivity of genotype 4 are reported. This review also delineates future study areas and missing data that need further investigation when it comes to genotype 4.

Prevalence of HCV resistance-associated substitutions among treatment-failure patients receiving direct-acting antiviral agents

Direct-acting antiviral (DAA) failure, which is mainly associated with the selection of resistance-associated substitutions (RASs), is not rare in HCV treatment. RAS data collected from published literature and RAS prevalence were integrated using meta-analysis. DAA-failure-associated RASs were identified by comparing their prevalence between DAA-failure and DAA-naïve patients. Prevalences of emerging RASs that occurred during treatment were also estimated. A total of 2932 DAA-naïve patients and 1466 DAA-failure patients were included. Significant differences in the prevalence of RASs were found in 76 scenarios that involved 34 RASs (11 in NS3, 18 in NS5A and 5 in NS5B), 4 genotypes (GTs) (GT1a, GT1b and GT3-4) and 14 DAAs (6 NS3 protease inhibitors [PIs], 6 NS5A inhibitors and 2 NS5B inhibitors). For NS3, the DAA-failure-associated RASs included V36L, Y56H, Q80K/R, R155K, A156T and D168A/E/L/T/V/Y. Substitutions at R155 and D168 were dominant for most NS3 PIs. For NS5A, DAA-failure-associated RASs included K24R, Q30R, L31M, and P32L in GT1a; R30Q/H, L31F/I/M/V, P58S, and Y93H in GT1b; A30K, L31M and Y93H in GT3; and M31V and Y93H in GT4. Y93H was the most prevalent RAS for NS5A inhibitors. DAA-failure-associated RASs were found at only five positions in NS5B. The majority of DAA-failure patients relapsed. A significant difference was detected for only four RAS sites between relapse patients and nonresponse/breakthrough patients. The RAS prevalence in DAA-failure patients varied among the HCV GTs and DAA regimens. The identified treatment-selected resistance patterns for broadly used DAA regimens will enable the selection of optimized retreatment options.

Treatment and re-treatment results of HCV patients in the DAA era

Background

Re-treatment in patients with a chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and a previous failure to direct-acting antiviral (DAA) treatment remains a challenge. Therefore, we investigated the success rate of treatment and re-treatment regimens used at our center from October 2011 to March 2018.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of DAA-based HCV therapies of 1096 patients was conducted. Factors associated with a virological relapse were identified by univariable and multivariable logistic regression, treatment success of the re-treatment regimens was evaluated by an analysis of sustained virological response (SVR) rates in patients with a documented follow-up 12 weeks after the end of treatment.

Results

Of 1096 patients treated with DAA-based regimens, 91 patients (8%) were lost to follow-up, 892 of the remaining 1005 patients (89%) achieved an SVR12. Most patients (65/113, 58%) who experienced a virological relapse received an interferon-based DAA regimen. SVR rates were comparable in special cohorts like liver transplant recipients (53/61, 87%) and people with a human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) coinfection (41/45, 91%). On multivariable analysis, interferon-based DAA therapy was associated with treatment failure (odds ratio 0.111, 95%-confidence interval 0.054–0.218) among others. One hundred seventeen patients with multiple DAA treatment courses were identified, of which 97 patients (83%) experienced a single relapse, but further relapses after two (18/117, 15%) or even three (2/117, 2%) treatment courses were also observed. Eighty-two of 96 (85%) re-treatment attempts with all-oral DAA regimens were successful after an initial treatment failure.

Conclusion

Overall, DAA re-treatments were highly effective in this real-world cohort and only a minority of patients failed more than two treatment courses. Switching to–or addition of–a new drug class seem to be valid options for the re-treatment of patients especially after failure of an interferon-based regimen.

Salvage therapy in cancer patients with hepatitis C without sustained virologic response after direct-acting antivirals-A prospective study

Background and Aim

No information exists regarding direct‐acting antivirals (DAAs) salvage therapy for Hepatitis C (HCV)‐infected patients with any type of cancer. We prospectively evaluated the safety and efficacy (SVR12) of salvage therapy in these patients.

Methods

Patients who failed initial DAAs (01/2015–01/2018) were analyzed. Resistance‐associated substitutions to NS5A and NS3 were investigated by population sequencing.

Results

Of 164 patients enrolled, 16 (10%) experienced treatment failure. Of these, 11 patients received salvage therapy. The majority (91%) were men; 55% had genotype 1a, 45% had cirrhosis, and 45% had hepatocellular carcinoma. Four patients failed the first salvage therapy, and two of them required a second salvage therapy. Overall, 9 of 11 (82%) patients achieved SVR12. All four patients treated with sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir (+/− ribavirin) achieved SVR12. The presence of resistance‐associated substitutions did not impact response. Seven patients developed grade 1/2 adverse events. No patient had grade 3/4 adverse events. No patient required interruption of DAA therapy because of clinical or laboratory abnormalities.

Conclusions

This is the first prospective study in HCV‐infected cancer patients failing DAAs. The efficacy of salvage therapy in this group appears to be lower than previously reported in non‐cancer patients, but better response rates are observed with newer regimens. Salvage therapy is associated with minimal toxicity.

Retreatment with elbasvir, grazoprevir, sofosbuvir ± ribavirin is effective for GT3 and GT1/4/6 HCV infection after relapse

INTRODUCTION

Despite highly effective direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapies for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, some patients experience virological relapse. Salvage regimens should include multiple agents to suppress emergence of resistance-associated substitutions (RAS) and minimise treatment failure. The combination of sofosbuvir (SOF) and elbasvir/grazoprevir (ELB/GZR) ±ribavirin (RBV) is an effective retreatment strategy for HCV genotype (GT)1 and 4 infection. We hypothesised that SOF and ELB/GZR (±RBV) would also be an effective salvage regimen for DAA-experienced GT3 patients.

METHODS

We evaluated the efficacy and safety of SOF/ELB/GZR ± RBV in DAA-experienced participants with chronic HCV infection who had prior relapse. Participants were treated at four hospitals between December 2016 and March 2018 for either 12- or 16-weeks. The primary endpoint was sustained virological response at week 12 post-treatment (SVR12) using intention-to-treat analysis.

RESULTS

There were 40 participants included in the analysis. The mean age was 53 years, 53% had GT3, 33% had GT1 infection and 63% had cirrhosis. Fifty-eight percent were treated for 12 weeks, 42% were treated for 16 weeks and 90% received RBV. The SVR12 rate was 98% overall, 100% in non-GT3 participants and 95% in GT3 participants. One GT3 cirrhotic participant relapsed. ELB/GZR was stopped at week 6 in one GT3 cirrhotic participant who switched to SOF/velpatasvir/RBV for a further 12 weeks and achieved SVR12. RBV dose reduction was required in two participants. Treatment was otherwise well tolerated.

DISCUSSION

The combination of SOF/ELB/GZR ± RBV is effective and safe for difficult-to-cure patients who relapse after first-line DAA, including those with cirrhosis and GT3 infection.

Consensus recommendations for resistance testing in the management of chronic hepatitis C virus infection: Public Health England HCV Resistance Group

The treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection has been revolutionised by the advent of oral, well-tolerated, direct acting antiviral therapies (DAA), with high cure rates. However, in some scenarios, HCV resistance to antiviral therapies may have an impact on treatment success. Public Health England's HCV Resistance Group was established to support clinicians treating people with HCV, where the issue of resistance may be a factor in clinical decision-making, and this review includes the Group's current recommendations on the use of HCV resistance testing. The authors describe the principles behind and approach to HCV resistance testing and consider evidence from in vitro studies, clinical trials and real world cohorts on the impact of HCV resistance on treatment outcomes for particular DAA regimens. Five scenarios are identified in the UK and similar settings, where, in the Group's opinion, resistance testing should be performed.

Viral Hepatitis C Therapy: Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Considerations: A 2019 Update

It has been estimated by the World Health Organization (WHO) that over 71 million people were infected with the hepatitis C virus (HCV) in 2015. Since then, a number of highly effective direct-acting antiviral (DAA) regimens have been licensed for the treatment of chronic HCV infection: sofosbuvir/daclatasvir, sofosbuvir/ledipasvir, elbasvir/grazoprevir, sofosbuvir/velpatasvir, glecaprevir/pibrentasvir, and sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir. With these treatment regimens, almost all chronic HCV-infected patients, even including prior DAA failures, can be treated effectively and safely. It is therefore likely that further development of DAAs will be limited. In this descriptive review we provide an overview of the clinical pharmacokinetic characteristics of currently available DAAs by describing their absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion. Potential drug-drug interactions with the DAAs are briefly discussed. Furthermore, we summarize what is known about the pharmacodynamics of the DAAs in terms of efficacy and safety. We briefly discuss the relationship between the pharmacokinetics of the DAAs and efficacy or toxicity in special populations, such as hard to cure patients and patients with liver cirrhosis, liver transplantation, renal impairment, hepatitis B virus or HIV co-infection, bleeding disorders, and children. The aim of this overview is to educate/update prescribers and pharmacists so that they are able to safely and effectively treat HCV-infected patients even in the presence of underlying co-infections or co-morbidities.

Treatment optimisation for hepatitis C in the era of combination direct-acting antiviral therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: Prior to direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy, personalised medicine played an important role in the treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV). Whilst simplified treatment strategies are central to treatment scale-up, some patients will benefit from treatment optimisation. This systematic review and meta-analysis explores treatment optimisation strategies in the DAA era. Methods: We systematically searched Medline, Embase, and Web of Science for studies that adopted a stratified or personalised strategy using a licensed combination DAA regimen, alone or with additional agents. We performed a thematic analysis to classify optimisation strategies and a meta-analysis of sustained virologic response rates (SVR), exploring heterogeneity with subgroup analyses and meta-regression. Results: We included 64 studies (9450 participants). Thematic analysis found evidence of three approaches: duration, combination, and/or dose optimisation. We separated strategies into those aiming to maintain SVR in the absence of predictors of failure, and those aiming to improve SVR in the presence of predictors of failure. Shortened duration regimens achieve pooled SVR rates of 94.2% (92.3-95.9%) for 8 weeks, 81.1% (75.1-86.6%) for 6 weeks, and 63.1% (39.9-83.7%) for ≤4 weeks. Personalised strategies (100% vs 87.6%; p<0.001) and therapy shortened according to ≥3 host/viral factors (92.9% vs 81.4% or 87.2% for 1 or 2 host/viral factors, respectively; p=0.008) offer higher SVR rates when shortening therapy. Hard-to-treat HCV genotype 3 patients suffer lower SVR rates despite treatment optimisation (92.6% vs 98.2%; p=0.001). Conclusions: Treatment optimisation for individuals with multiple predictors of treatment failure can offer high SVR rates. More evidence is needed to identify with confidence those individuals in whom SVR can be achieved with shortened duration treatment.

Process of selecting and educating HCV-uninfected kidney waiting-list candidates for HCV-infected kidney transplantation

Long waiting times for kidney transplant (KT) and the high risk of mortality on dialysis have prompted investigation into strategies to utilize hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected organs to decrease discard rates of potentially viable kidneys. Due the opioid epidemic, the number of HCV-infected donors has increased significantly. With the development of direct-acting antiviral therapies for HCV infection, now more than 95% of patients who received treatment are cured. Experimental trials have used direct-acting antiviral therapy to treat HCV infection in HCV-uninfected transplant recipients of kidneys from HCV-viremic donors. To date, HCV has been eradicated in all cases. Though these strategies will potentially increase the donor pool of available kidneys, shorten waitlist times, and ultimately decrease mortality in patients waiting for KT, identifying the ideal candidates and educating them about a protocol to utilize direct-acting antiviral therapy to cure HCV after it is transmitted is essential. We present our approach to patient selection and education for a clinical trial in transplantation of HCV viremic kidneys into uninfected recipients.

Balancing the risk and rewards of utilizing organs from hepatitis C viremic donors

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Owing to long waitlist times and high waitlist morbidity and mortality, strategies to increase utilization of hepatitis C viremic-deceased donor organs are under investigation in kidney, liver, heart, and lung transplantation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Direct-acting antiviral medications for hepatitis C virus infection have high cure rates and are well tolerated. Small, single-center trials in kidney and heart transplant recipients have demonstrated that with early posttransplant direct-acting antiviral therapy, 100% of uninfected recipients of hepatitis C viremic organs have been cured of infection after transplantation.

SUMMARY

In this manuscript, we review the risks and rewards of utilizing hepatitis C viremic organs for transplantation.

Ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir and dasabuvir with or without sofosbuvir for patients with hepatitis C virus genotype 1 infection who failed a prior course of direct-acting antiviral therapy

INTRODUCTION

Despite high efficacy of current direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) in treating chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, a small portion of patients fail treatment. QUARTZ-I was a phase 2, open-label, multicenter, two-part study that assessed the safety and efficacy of ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir (OBV/PTV/r) with dasabuvir (DSV) with or without the addition of sofosbuvir (SOF) and/or ribavirin (RBV) in DAA treatment-experienced adults with chronic HCV GT1 infection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Genotype 1 HCV-infected patients with or without compensated cirrhosis had prior treatment failure to any DAA (part 1) or ledipasvir/SOF (part 2). Patients received OBV/PTV/r + DSV ± SOF with or without RBV for 12 or 24 weeks. The primary endpoint of this study is the percentage of patients achieving sustained virologic response at post-treatment week 12 (SVR12).

RESULTS

In part 1 of the study, 95.5% (21/22) of patients achieved SVR12, and in part 2, the SVR12 rate was 85.7% (6/7). Most adverse events (AEs) were mild and moderate in severity. Two serious AEs occurred and were assessed as not being related to study drug, of which one resulted in study drug discontinuation. Two patients experienced grade 3 elevations of serum alanine aminotransferase, and no other grade ≥3 laboratory abnormalities were observed.

CONCLUSION

The multi-targeted regimen of OBV/PTV/r + DSV ± SOF with or without RBV was effective in the treatment of patients who failed previous DAA regimens including NS3/4A protease and NS5A and NS5B polymerase inhibitors. These results provide a promising outcome for patients that traditionally had limited treatment options.

Status of Direct-Acting Antiviral Therapy for Hepatitis C Virus Infection and Remaining Challenges

Chronic infection with hepatitis C virus is a major cause of liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma worldwide. After the discovery of hepatitis C virus 3 decades ago, the identification of the structure of the viral proteins, combined with high-throughput replicon models, enabled the discovery and development of direct-acting antivirals. These agents have revolutionized patient care, with cure rates of more than 90%. We review the status of direct-acting antiviral therapies for hepatitis C virus infection and discuss remaining challenges. We highlight licensed compounds, discuss the potential to shorten therapy even further, and review different options for treatment failure and resistance. We also provide an overview of clinical experience with generic agents and evidence for their efficacy. Finally, we discuss the need for new drugs and outline promising targets for future therapies.

Hepatitis C virus therapy: No one will be left behind

The advent of oral direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) has dramatically improved the hepatitis C treatment landscape in the last 4 years, providing cure rates over 95% with shorter duration of treatment and a very good safety profile. This gave access to treatment to almost all Hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected patients. The launch of two pangenotypic fixed-dose combinations (FDCs) in 2017 was a step forward in hepatitis C treatment, by slightly increasing efficacy and more importantly allowing the treatment of patients without HCV genotyping, and in some cases without fibrosis assessment. New triple regimens have solved the issue of retreatment of the few patients who present failure to DAAs therapy. In the present review we describe the current HCV landscape that allows almost all HCV-infected patients to be cured.

Sofosbuvir, velpatasvir and voxilaprevir: a new triple combination for hepatitis C virus treatment. One pill fits all? Is it the end of the road?

The advent of oral direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) has dramatically improved the hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment landscape in the last 4 years, providing cure rates over 95% with a shorter duration of treatment and a very good safety profile. This has enabled access to treatment in nearly all HCV infected patients. The launch of two pangenotypic fixed dose combinations (FDCs) in 2017 made a new step forward in HCV treatment by slightly increasing efficacy and more importantly allowing the treatment of patients without HCV genotyping, and in some cases without fibrosis assessment. However, retreatment of the few DAA failure patients was still an issue for some HCV genotypes. The launch of the triple regimen FDC, sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir, solves this issue by providing a cure rate over 96% regardless of HCV genotype. In this review, we describe the current HCV treatment landscape and focus on the development of this triple FDC either in treatment-naïve or treatment-experienced patients with previous failure on a DAA regimen.

Viral resistance in HCV infection

The introduction of new multi-genotypic direct acting antivirals (DAA) in clinical practice has revolutionized HCV treatment, permitting the achievement of >95% rates of sustained virological response in many patients. However, virological failures can occur particularly if the treatments are sub optimal and/or with too short duration. Failure is often associated with development of resistance. The wide genetic variability in terms of different genotypes and subtypes, together with the natural presence and/or easy development of resistance during treatment, are intrinsic characteristics of HCV that may affect the treatment outcome and the chances of achieving a virological cure. This review explores in detail the aspects of HCV innate and treatment-induced resistance to new interferon-free DAA regimens.

Managing hepatitis C therapy failures and chronic kidney disease

INTRODUCTION

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection leads to important morbidity and mortality through liver disease and extra-hepatic manifestations. Recent evidence suggests the role of HCV in developing chronic kidney disease (CKD); also, HCV adversely affects cardiovascular (CV) disease both in the general population and in patients with CKD. Areas covered: All-oral, interferon-free direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) are currently available; anti-HCV regimens based on DAAs are provided with high efficacy and safety and short treatment duration. However, some difficult-to-treat populations still exist including patients with CKD and those who failed previous DAA regimen. Expert commentary: Two DAAs regimens (elbasvir/grazoprevir and glecaprevir/pibrentasvir) are now recommended for the treatment of HCV in patients with advanced CKD, these combinations have shown great efficacy, according to two multicenter phase-3 trials (C-SURFER and EXPEDITION-4). These trials reported a minimal impact of baseline resistance-associated substitutions (RASs) on treatment outcomes. The sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxaliprevir combination has been recommended as the first-line option for DAAs failures, on the basis of the results given by two randomized clinical trials involving patients who had been previously received DAA-containing regimens (POLARIS 1-4 studies). It has been suggested that clinicians should consider RASs upon the introduction of DAA-based antiviral therapy.

Hepatitis C resistance to NS5A inhibitors: Is it going to be a problem?

Treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection has evolved greatly through the recent decade. The availability of direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) targeting the functional proteins of HCV has resulted in the introduction of DAA-based combination therapies, providing an optimal rate of treatment success. Among the DAAs, NS5A inhibitors are used in most of the introduced and approved HCV antiviral regimens. Resistance-associated substitutions (RASs) are amino acid substitutions in HCV protein sequences that result in decreased antiviral efficacy of the HCV DAAs. Among the HCV RASs, the NS5A RASs were found to effectively modify and decrease treatment response to NS5A inhibitor-containing regimens. As a baseline predictor of treatment response, NS5A RAS draws attention for pretreatment testing in targeted patient groups. Given NS5A RASs are either naturally-occurring or DAA-selected, the application of NS5A RAS testing can be considered in two settings of NS5A inhibitor-naïve patients and NS5A inhibitor-experienced patients. Less than 5% of NS5A inhibitor-naïve patients harbor naturally-occurring NS5A RAS with high resistance level (> 100X resistance fold-change). In NS5A inhibitor-naïve patients, NS5A RAS testing accompanied by treatment optimization cannot increase treatment response more than 2%-3%, while in NS5A inhibitor-experienced patients, > 75% are found to have NS5A RASs > 100X and NS5A RAS testing in this group of patients seems to be reasonable. This editorial will address the debate on the application of NS5A RAS testing and will discuss if the NS5A RAS testing has any role in clinical management of hepatitis C.

Deferred treatment with sofosbuvir-velpatasvir-voxilaprevir for patients with chronic hepatitis C virus who were previously treated with an NS5A inhibitor: an open-label substudy of POLARIS-1

BACKGROUND

Direct-acting antiviral regimens containing NS5A inhibitors are highly effective treatments for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, but are not always successful. In the POLARIS-1 phase 3 study, sofosbuvir-velpatasvir-voxilaprevir for 12 weeks was highly effective in the treatment of chronic HCV infection in patients previously treated with a direct-acting antiviral regimen containing an NS5A inhibitor. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of sofosbuvir-velpatasvir-voxilaprevir in patients from the deferred treatment group of POLARIS-1, who were initially assigned to masked placebo treatment.

METHODS

This open-label, deferred treatment substudy was done at 73 clinical sites (hospitals and clinics) in the USA, France, Canada, the UK, Germany, Australia, and New Zealand. Patients who received placebo in the primary study and who did not have a new clinically significant illness at the post-treatment week 4 assessment were eligible to enter this substudy. Participants received a combination tablet of sofosbuvir (400 mg), velpatasvir (100 mg), and voxilaprevir (100 mg) once daily for 12 weeks. The primary efficacy outcome was achievement of sustained virological response (defined as HCV RNA concentration below the lower limit of quantification) 12 weeks after the end of treatment (SVR12). The primary safety outcome was the proportion of patients who discontinued treatment due to adverse events. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02607735, and the EU Clinical Trials Register, number 2015-003455-21.

FINDINGS

152 patients received placebo in the primary study and were potentially eligible for participation in the open-label substudy, of whom 147 were enrolled from March 30, 2016, to Oct 12, 2016. All 147 patients completed treatment, and 143 (97%; 95% CI 93-99) achieved SVR12. Four (3%) patients had virological relapse; all had HCV genotype 1a infection and one also had compensated cirrhosis. The most common adverse events were fatigue (31 [21%]), headache (29 [20%]), diarrhoea (28 [19%]), and nausea (21 [14%]). No deaths, treatment discontinuations, or treatment-related serious adverse events occurred.

INTERPRETATION

Supporting the results from the blinded portion of the phase 3 primary study, the single-tablet regimen of sofosbuvir-velpatasvir-voxilaprevir for 12 weeks was safe, well tolerated, and highly effective in patients with chronic HCV infection who had previous treatment failure with NS5A inhibitor-containing regimens. A salvage regimen for this population represents an important advance for patients with limited retreatment options.

FUNDING

Gilead Sciences.

Successful retreatment with grazoprevir and elbasvir for patients infected with hepatitis C virus genotype 1b, who discontinued prior treatment with NS5A inhibitor-including regimens due to adverse events

Background

Sustained virologic response (SVR) by interferon and interferon-free treatment can results in the reduction of advanced liver fibrosis and the occurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV). Recent interferon-free treatment for HCV shortens the duration of treatment and leads to higher SVR rates, without any serious adverse events. However, it is important to retreat patients who have had treatment-failure with HCV non-structural protein 5A (NS5A) inhibitor-including regimens. Combination of sofosbuvir and ledipasvir only leads to approximately 100% SVR rates in HCV genotype (GT1b), NS5A inhibitor-naïve patients in Japan. This combination is not an indication for severe renal disease or heart disease, and these patients should be treated or retreated with a different regimen.

Case summary

Retreatment with HCV non-structural protein 3/4A inhibitor, grazoprevir, and HCV NS5A inhibitor, elbasvir, successfully eradicated HCV RNA in three patients with HCV genotype 1b infection who discontinued prior interferon-free treatments including HCV NS5A inhibitors due to adverse events within 2 weeks.

Conclusion

Retreatment with the 12-week combination regimen of grazoprevir and elbasvir is effective for HCV GT1b patients who discontinue the HCV NS5A inhibitor-including regimens within 2 weeks. The treatment response may be related to the short duration of initial treatment, which did not produce treatment-emergent RASs.

Direct-acting antiviral therapy for hepatitis C virus infection in the kidney transplant recipient

Hepatitis C virus infection (HCV) is a common comorbidity in patients who have undergone kidney transplantation and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality compared with recipients who do not have chronic HCV infection. Because interferon-α-based therapies can precipitate acute rejection, they are relatively contraindicated after kidney transplantation. Thus, the majority of kidney transplant recipients with HCV remain untreated. There are now all-oral, interferon-free direct-acting antiviral therapies for HCV infection that are extremely effective and well tolerated in the general population. Recent reports in the literature demonstrate that direct-acting antiviral therapies effectively cured HCV in 406 of 418 kidney transplant recipients (97%); the majority were treated with sofosbuvir-based regimens. Smaller numbers of kidney transplant recipients have been treated with paritaprevir-ritonavir, ombitasvir and dasabuvir, elbasvir-grazoprevir, or glecaprevir-pibrentasvir with excellent success. Direct-acting antiviral therapies were well tolerated and did not increase the rate of acute rejection. The latest advances include approval of regimens that can treat patients with advanced allograft dysfunction (eGFR < 30 ml/min per 1.73 m²) and "pan-genotypic" regimens that have activity against all 6 major genotypes of HCV. This review summarizes what is known about the epidemiology of HCV infection in kidney transplant recipients, and presents the landscape of direct-acting antiviral therapies and areas in need of further investigation.

Grazoprevir, ruzasvir, and uprifosbuvir for hepatitis C virus after NS5A treatment failure

People with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection who have failed treatment with an all-oral regimen represent a challenging treatment population. The present studies evaluated the safety and efficacy of grazoprevir, ruzasvir, and uprifosbuvir, with or without ribavirin, in participants who had failed an NS5A inhibitor-containing regimen. C-SURGE (PN-3682-021) and C-CREST Part C (PN-3682-011 and -012) were open-label, multicenter studies. Participants who had previously relapsed following an NS5A inhibitor-containing all-oral regimen were retreated with grazoprevir 100 mg, ruzasvir 60 mg, and uprifosbuvir 450 mg alone for 24 weeks or with ribavirin for 16 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was sustained virologic response (HCV RNA below the limit of quantitation [<15 IU/mL]) 12 weeks after treatment completion (SVR12). In C-SURGE, SVR12 was achieved by 49/49 (100%) and 43/44 (98%) genotype (GT)1 participants in the 24-week no ribavirin arm and the 16-week plus ribavirin arm (lost to follow-up, n = 1), respectively. In C-CREST Part C, SVR12 was achieved by 23/24 (96%) participants treated for 16 weeks with ribavirin (GT1, 2/2 [100%]; GT2, 13/14 [93%]; GT3, 8/8 [100%]). One participant with GT2 infection discontinued study medication after a single dose of grazoprevir, ruzasvir, and uprifosbuvir plus ribavirin due to serious adverse events of vomiting and tachycardia. The presence of baseline resistance-associated substitutions had no impact on SVR12. No participant who completed treatment in either study experienced virologic failure.

CONCLUSION

Grazoprevir, ruzasvir, and uprifosbuvir, with or without ribavirin, for 16 or 24 weeks was safe and highly effective in participants with HCV infection who had previously failed NS5A inhibitor-containing therapy. (Hepatology 2017;66:1794-1804).