Maribavir for Refractory or Resistant Cytomegalovirus Infections in Hematopoietic-cell or Solid-organ Transplant Recipients: A Randomized, Dose-ranging, Double-blind, Phase 2 Study

Efficacy of antimicrobials in preventing resistance in solid organ transplant recipients: A systematic review of clinical trials

BACKGROUND

In the absence of effective antimicrobials, transplant surgery is not viable, and antirejection immunosuppressants cannot be administered, as resistant infections compromise the life-saving goal of organ transplantation.

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy of antimicrobials in preventing resistance in solid organ transplant recipients.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted using a search methodology consistent with the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. This review included randomized clinical trials that evaluated the efficacy of antimicrobial agents (prophylactic or therapeutic) aimed at preventing antimicrobial resistance. The search strategy involved analyzing multiple databases, including PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, and SciELO, as well as examining gray literature sources on Google Scholar. A comprehensive electronic database search was conducted from the databases’ inception until May 2024, with no language restrictions.

RESULTS

After the final phase of the eligibility assessment, this systematic review ultimately included 7 articles. A total of 2318 patients were studied. The most studied microorganisms were cytomegalovirus, although vancomycin-resistant enterococci, Clostridioides difficile, and multidrug-resistant Enterobacterales were also analyzed. The antimicrobials used in the interventions were mainly maribavir, valganciclovir, ganciclovir, and colistin-neomycin. Of concern, all clinical trials showed significant proportions of resistant microorganisms after the interventions, with no statistically significant differences between the groups (mean resistance 13.47% vs 14.39%), except for two studies that demonstrated greater efficacy of maribavir and valganciclovir (mean resistance 22.2% vs 41.1% in the control group; P < 0.05). The total reported deaths in three clinical trials were 75, and there were 24 graft rejections in two studies.

CONCLUSION

All clinical trials reported significant proportions of antimicrobial-resistant microorganisms following interventions. More high-quality randomized clinical trials are needed to corroborate these results.

Real-world safety of maribavir: a retrospective study based on signal detection in the FDA adverse event reporting system

BACKGROUND

Maribavir is a novel antiviral agent targeting cytomegalovirus through inhibition of the UL97 protein kinase, exhibiting a distinct mechanism of action. However, limited data are available on its safety profile post-marketing.

AIM

This study aimed to evaluate the adverse events (AEs) associated with maribavir using the Food and Drug Administration's Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), providing insights to inform clinical practice.

METHOD

We conducted a retrospective analysis of maribavir-related adverse event reports from the FAERS database, spanning the fourth quarter of 2021 to the second quarter of 2024. Signal detection was performed using four statistical methods: the proportional reporting ratio, reporting odds ratio, Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN), and multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker.

RESULTS

A total of 1372 reports associated with maribavir were identified. Seven significant signals emerged at the system organ class level. At the preferred term level, 76 adverse events (AEs) demonstrated positive signals, including novel events such as pleural effusion, hypersomnia, and anosmia, alongside signals related to ear disorders. The majority of AEs were reported within the first month of maribavir use.

CONCLUSION

This study identified several new adverse event signals for maribavir, offering healthcare professionals a deeper understanding of its safety profile, which may guide safer clinical usage.

A Phase 1, Open-Label, Randomized, Two-Part Study in Healthy Adult Volunteers to Evaluate the Bioavailability of the Maribavir Powder for Oral Suspension, as Well as Food Effect and Impact of Rabeprazole

The relative bioavailability and impact of food and the proton pump inhibitor rabeprazole on the pharmacokinetics of a maribavir powder-for-oral-suspension formulation was investigated in a Phase 1 open-label study in healthy adult volunteers. A single 200-mg maribavir dose was administered as the commercial tablet (Treatment A), powder formulation (Treatment B), or powder formulation with a high-fat/high-calorie meal (Treatment C) in Part 1, and as the powder formulation alone (Treatment D) or following administration of rabeprazole 20 mg once daily for 5 days (Treatment E) in Part 2. Maribavir maximum plasma concentration following Treatment B was 18% lower versus Treatment A, whereas the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) from time 0 to the last quantifiable concentration or infinity were similar. Maribavir maximum plasma concentration, AUC from time 0 to the last quantifiable concentration, and AUC from time 0 to infinity were reduced by 42%, 18%, and 18% (Treatment C vs Treatment B), and by 51%, 30%, and 11% (Treatment E vs Treatment D), respectively. A clinically significant reduction in maribavir exposure is not expected when maribavir powder formulation is taken with food or proton pump inhibitors. Participants assessed the powder for oral suspension as easy to swallow and having an acceptable taste/texture. Safety profiles for maribavir formulations in this study were consistent with those previously published.

Management of cytomegalovirus in adult solid organ transplant patients: GESITRA-IC-SEIMC, CIBERINFEC, and SET recommendations update

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection remains a significant challenge in solid organ transplantation (SOT). The last international consensus guidelines on the management of CMV in SOT were published in 2018, highlighting the need for revision to incorporate recent advances, notably in cell-mediated immunity monitoring, which could alter the current standard of care. A working group including members from the Group for the Study of Infection in Transplantation and the Immunocompromised Host (GESITRA-IC) of the Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (SEIMC) and the Spanish Society of Transplantation (SET), developed consensus-based recommendations for managing CMV infection in SOT recipients. Recommendations were classified based on evidence strength and quality using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. The final recommendations were endorsed through a consensus meeting and approved by the expert panel.

The emergence of letermovir and maribavir drug-resistant mutations: from clinical trials to real-world studies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is associated with severe clinical disease and high morbidity in immunocompromised hosts. Letermovir and maribavir, are two recently developed antiviral drugs used in the prevention and treatment of resistant and refractory CMV. Following the publication of landmark randomized trials and increased use, both clinical trial data and real-world experience has reported the development of antiviral drug resistance. The aim of this review was to comprehensively review the published literature on letermovir and maribavir drug resistance and to describe the clinical scenarios in which they may emerge.

RECENT FINDINGS

For letermovir, the most frequently detected resistance mutations occur in the UL56 gene (C325Y/W/F) and confer total resistance. Maribavir resistance mutations most often occur in the UL97 gene and resistance-associated variants (RAVs) T409M, H411Y, C480F have all been detected. The clinical context in which letermovir and maribavir resistance occurs include high viral loads at initiation, intensified immunosuppression, subtherapeutic drug exposure because of poor adherence, drug interactions, and inadequate central nervous system (CNS) penetration. Emergence of resistance mutations generally occurs within the first 3 months of initiation.

SUMMARY

The detection of letermovir and maribavir resistance mutations highlights an ongoing clinical challenge in the management of CMV.

Population pharmacokinetics and exposure-response relationships of maribavir in transplant recipients with cytomegalovirus infection

Maribavir is approved for management of post-transplant cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections refractory and/or resistant to CMV therapies at a dose of 400 mg twice daily (BID). Population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) and exposure-response analyses were conducted to support the appropriateness of 400 mg BID dosing. A PopPK model was developed using non-linear mixed-effects modeling with pooled maribavir plasma concentration-time data from phase 1 and 2 studies (from 100 mg up to 1200 mg as single or repeated doses) and the phase 3 SOLSTICE study (400 mg BID). Exposure-response analyses were performed for efficacy, safety, and viral resistance based on data collected in the SOLSTICE study. Maribavir PK after oral administration was adequately described by a two-compartment model with first-order elimination, first-order absorption, and an absorption lag-time. There was no evidence that maribavir PK was affected by age, sex, race, diarrhea, vomiting, disease characteristics, or concomitant use of histamine H2 blockers, or proton pump inhibitors. In the SOLSTICE study, higher maribavir exposure was not associated with increased probability of achieving CMV DNA viremia clearance, nor with reduced probability of treatment-emergent maribavir-resistant CMV mutations. A statistically significant association with maribavir exposure was identified for taste disturbance, fatigue, and treatment-emergent serious adverse events, while transplant type, enrollment region, CMV DNA level at baseline, and/or CMV resistance at baseline were identified as additional risk factors for these safety outcomes. In conclusion, the findings of these PopPK and exposure-response analyses provide further support for the recommended maribavir dose of 400 mg BID.

Maribavir treatment for resistant cytomegalovirus disseminated disease in kidney transplant recipients: A case-based scoping review of real life data in literature

The treatment of refractory CMV is often associated with high toxicity. Maribavir (MBV) is a novel oral antiviral, known for its favourable safety profile in fragile patients. We describe a case of CMV disease with end organ damage following kidney transplantation at high risk, for recipient-donor serological mismatch. A 54-year-old female with history of obesity, hypertension, and chronic kidney disease, on prednisone and tacrolimus after kidney transplantation in November 2022, soon after developed primary CMV infection, treated with Valganciclovir and CMV Ig. In January 2023 the patient presented with fever and dyspnea. Pulmonary miliary opacities and right-upper lobe consolidation were found at CT-scan along with CMV-DNA positivity on BAL and serum. Lung biopsy confirmed CMV infection. Antiviral was switched to Ganciclovir. Despite initial benefit, fever and respiratory failure happened 8 days later, leading to intubation at day 15. Due to slow decrease serum CMV-DNA and detection of UL97 mutation, conferring resistance to valganciclovir and ganciclovir, the patient was started on foscarnet and letermovir. She was extubated after a gradual respiratory improvement and discharged from ICU to rehabilitation department with HFNC; reduction in serum CMV-DNA, but persistently elevated CMV-DNA on BAL were documented. At week 8, MBV was started and letermovir continued, for a 8 weeks course, without notable adverse effects. Respiratory function improved but soon after septic shock occurred. A bone marrow biopsy resulted in lymphoma, without indications for treatment: the patient developed coma and died 6 months after admission. MBV has recently been approved in Europe for treatment of R/R CMV in HSCT and SOT recipients. MBV showed superior rates of viraemia clearance after 8 weeks compared to SOC, demonstrating also a favourable safety profile with fewer patients discontinuing treatment and being affected by nephrotoxicity and neutropenia. Its main side effects are taste impairment, gastro-intestinal symptoms and asthenia. Based on actual promising perspectives regarding antiviral stewardship, more data are required to corroborate benefit of MBV in terms of toxicity and impact on mortality in highly fragile populations as SOT recipients. MBV received approval for the treatment of refractory or resistant CMV infections to other antiviral agents. Nevertheless, real-life data on efficacy and safety of MBV are still lacking. We conducted a narrative review of the current literature on MBV as treatment for CMV infection in kidney transplant recipients to understand clinical characteristics, safety and outcomes of MBV in this population. A search was run on the main scientific databases. 194 papers were identified, of which 188 were excluded by title and abstract evaluation. Subsequently, 6 papers were included. We performed descriptive statistics on the entire study population. The studies included in our analysis showed a higher prevalence of male subjects. The median age was 57 year. CKD was the most frequently reported comorbidity. Seven patients reported a donor/recipient mismatch (D+/R-). The case report and the cohort of patients collected from the literature show that MBV was used as an option in R/R CMV, notably for the presence or suspicion of CMV resistance to previous treatment. The clinical presentation of CMV in kidney SOT was heterogenous and varied from isolated reactivation of CMV-DNAemia, isolated fever or gastrointestinal involvement. For mild to moderate CMV disease, as with the cases reported in our review, or for proven ganciclovir, foscarnet or cidofovir resistance, MBV could be a valuable option. Outcomes of the patients treated with MBV were not reported in all the studies; however, where reported, 45.4% of the cases developed virological failure during MBV treatment with the development of specific resistance to MBV. MBV was generally well-tolerated, with low rates of toxicity, normally reversible. The introduction of new oral antivirals, such as MBV, could improve treatment, prophylaxis and preemptive treatment strategies, especially in anti-CMV treatment experienced patients.

Maribavir for refractory cytomegalovirus infection (with or without resistance) in solid organ transplant recipients: subgroup analysis of the phase 3 randomized SOLSTICE study

BACKGROUND

In the phase 3 SOLSTICE study (NCT02931539), maribavir was superior to investigator-assigned therapy (IAT) for confirmed cytomegalovirus viremia clearance at study week 8 in hematopoietic cell/solid organ transplant (HCT/SOT) recipients. We report additional efficacy and safety analyses from the SOT subgroup.

METHODS

Eligible solid organ transplant recipients (n=211) received maribavir 400 mg twice daily (n=142) or IAT (n=69) for 8 weeks (12 weeks' follow-up). Cytomegalovirus viremia clearance at week 8 (primary endpoint) and cytomegalovirus viremia clearance plus symptom control at the end of week 8 maintained through week 16 (key secondary endpoint) were assessed. Graft outcomes and treatment-emergent adverse events were analyzed.

RESULTS

A higher proportion maribavir-treated patients achieved the primary endpoint than with IAT across transplant organ types, including kidney (maribavir: 59.5%, IAT: 34.4%), lung (47.5%, 13.6%), and heart (42.9%, 11.1%). Similar proportions of patients achieved the key secondary endpoint in both arms (13.4% versus 11.6%; adjusted difference: 2.4%; 95% CI: -7.05, 11.83%; p=0.620). Rates of treatment-emergent adverse events were: maribavir (96.5%), IAT (88.4%). Maribavir (3.5%) had fewer treatment discontinuations due to treatment-emergent adverse events than IAT (23.2%). There were no graft losses; patients in both arms experienced acute rejection (maribavir: 9 [6.3%]; IAT: 4 [5.8%]). Treatment-emergent maribavir mutations occurred in 28.2% of patients; 19/33 patients achieved viremia clearance with subsequent alternative treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Consistent with findings in the overall SOLSTICE population, this subgroup analysis of SOT recipients demonstrated greater effectiveness of maribavir for cytomegalovirus viremia clearance and fewer discontinuations due to treatment-emergent adverse events than IAT.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT02931539 DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT: The datasets, including the redacted study protocol, redacted statistical analysis plan, and individual participants data supporting the results reported in this article, will be made available within three months from initial request, to researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal. The data will be provided after its deidentification, in compliance with applicable privacy laws, data protection and requirements for consent and anonymization.

Use of Specific T Lymphocytes in Treating Cytomegalovirus Infection in Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Recipients: A Systematic Review

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) poses a significant threat to post-hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Control strategies include letermovir prophylaxis or ganciclovir pre-emptive therapy (PET). Without prophylaxis, 65-90% of seropositive recipients develop a clinically significant CMV infection. Due to PET drawbacks, letermovir prophylaxis is preferable, as it reduces CMV-related events and improves overall survival. However, refractory or resistant CMV-CS remains a challenge, with maribavir showing limited efficacy. This systematic review followed the Cochrane Manual and PRISMA guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO. Searches were conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science. Out of 1895 identified records, 614 duplicates were removed, and subsequent screening excluded 1153 studies. Eleven included studies (2012-2024) involved 255 HCT recipients receiving adoptive immunotherapy (AI), primarily CMV-specific T-cell therapy. GvHD occurred in 1.82% of cases. Adverse events occurred in 4.4% of cases, while mild CRS was observed in 1.3% of patients. Efficacy, evaluated in 299 patients across eleven studies, showed an average response rate of 78.2%. CMV-CS recurrence was observed in 24.4% of 213 patients, and death due to CMV was reported in 9.7% of 307 patients across nine studies. Adoptive hCMV-specific T-cell immunotherapy appears to be a safe, effective alternative for refractory CMV-CS in HCT.

Preclinical and clinical studies in the drug development process of European Medicines Agency-approved non-HIV antiviral agents: a narrative review

BACKGROUND

Viral diseases represent a substantial global health challenge, necessitating the urgent development of effective antiviral medications.

OBJECTIVES

This review aims to present a thorough examination of systemic antiviral drugs approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) since its founding, excluding those targeting HIV, with a focus on preclinical and clinical studies in the drug development process.

SOURCES

Data was extracted from the European Public Assessment Reports and Summary of Product Characteristics issued by the EMA.

CONTENT

In total, 21 currently approved agents were analysed with a focus on preclinical and clinical studies. The majority of substances have been approved for hepatitis C (38%) and B (19%) followed by influenza and SARS-CoV-2 (14% and 10%, respectively). A smaller subset obtained approval for the indications of hepatitis D, cytomegalovirus, and pox viruses. As for preclinical studies, heterogeneity in the methods used for efficacy studies was observed, which is at least partly explained by the diverse nature of viruses and their hosts and the lack of general guidelines for antiviral pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics studies by the EMA. Clinical studies varied in sample sizes, ranging from a few hundred to several thousand patients. Many antiviral agents have a high potential for cytochrome P450 (CYP) and other enzyme interactions, resulting in the need for a high number of drug-drug interaction studies. Special market authorizations are available, including conditional approval for urgently required drugs such as nirmatrelvir/ritonavir for the treatment of COVID-19, and authorization under exceptional circumstances when comprehensive data cannot be provided, as seen with tecovirimat for pox viruses.

IMPLICATIONS

Streamlining the drug development process of antiviral substances and providing more guidelines would be crucial given the ongoing demand for effective treatment options for existing and new viral diseases.

Management of resistant and refractory cytomegalovirus infections after transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a classic opportunistic infection in transplant recipients. Treatment-refractory CMV infections are of concern, with growing identification of strains that have developed genetic mutations which confer resistance to standard antiviral therapy. Resistant and refractory CMV infections are associated with worse patient outcomes, prolonged hospitalization, and increased healthcare costs.

AREAS COVERED

This article provides a comprehensive practical overview of resistant and refractory CMV infections in transplant recipients. We review the updated definitions for these infections, antiviral pharmacology, mechanisms of drug resistance, diagnostic workup, management strategies, and host-related factors including immune optimization.

EXPERT OPINION

Resistant and refractory CMV infections are a significant contributor to post-transplant morbidity and mortality. This is likely the result of a combination of prolonged antiviral exposure and active viral replication in the setting of intensive pharmacologic immunosuppression. Successful control of resistant and refractory infections in transplant recipients requires a combination of immunomodulatory optimization and appropriate antiviral drug choice with sufficient treatment duration.

Cytomegalovirus Retinitis: Clinical Manifestations, Diagnosis and Treatment

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinitis is the most common eye disease associated with CMV infection in immunocompromised individuals. The CMVR may initially be asymptomatic; however, relatively mild vitreous inflammation at the onset may be an important differential point from other diseases in HIV patients. Fundus photography, CD4 T-cell count, and telemedicine could be used to screen and monitor the high-risk population, particularly in resource-limited regions. Retinitis generally starts in the peripheral retina and advances toward the posterior pole, which could develop to the characteristic "pizza pie" appearance marked by central retinal necrosis and intraretinal hemorrhage. CMVR causes vision loss if left untreated, and early antiviral therapy significantly reduces the risk of vision loss. Alongside traditional antiviral treatments, immunotherapies including CMV-specific adoptive T-cell therapy and CMV immunoglobulin (CMVIG) are emerging as promising treatment options due to their favorable tolerability and reduced mortality. This review comprehensively examines CMV retinitis, encompassing the clinical features, differential diagnosis, laboratory tests, and updated treatment strategies to inform clinical management.

Current Perspectives on Letermovir and Maribavir for the Management of Cytomegalovirus Infection in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is arguably the most important infectious complication that negatively affects the outcome of solid organ transplantation. For decades, CMV management after transplantation has relied on antiviral drugs that inhibit viral DNA polymerase (ganciclovir, foscarnet, and cidofovir). However, their use has been complicated by myelosuppression, nephrotoxicity, and selection of drug-resistant viruses. During the past few years, the therapeutic armamentarium for the management of CMV in solid organ transplant recipients has expanded with the approval of letermovir for CMV prophylaxis in high-risk CMV D+/R- kidney recipients, and maribavir for the treatment of refractory and resistant CMV infection. Both drugs offer significant improvement when compared to standard anti-CMV therapies; letermovir was as efficacious for CMV prevention, whereas maribavir was more effective in treating refractory and resistant CMV infections. Both letermovir and maribavir have favorable safety profiles compared to CMV DNA polymerase inhibitors, without the risk of neutropenia and leukopenia associated with ganciclovir and renal toxicities associated with foscarnet and cidofovir. Moreover, letermovir and maribavir are orally bioavailable, which allows convenient outpatient treatment. However, letermovir and maribavir have a significant drug interaction potential in solid organ transplant recipients, resulting in higher levels of calcineurin inhibitors (cyclosporine and tacrolimus) and mTOR inhibitors (sirolimus and everolimus). Both letermovir and maribavir are CMV-specific and do not have clinical efficacy against other herpes viruses. Thus, there is a need for additional antiviral drugs to prevent herpes simplex and other herpes viruses when clinically indicated. This article provides a comprehensive review of the clinical data supporting the use of letermovir and maribavir in clinical practice. The author provides perspectives on the role of these newly approved drugs in the current management landscape of CMV infection in solid organ transplantation.

Understanding the Cytomegalovirus Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Ortholog pUL97 as a Multifaceted Regulator and an Antiviral Drug Target

Herpesviral protein kinases, such as the therapy-relevant pUL97 of human cytomegalovirus (HCMV), are important for viral replication efficiency as well as pathogenesis, and represent key antiviral drug targets. HCMV pUL97 is a viral cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) ortholog, as it shares functional and structural properties with human CDKs. Recently, the formation of vCDK/pUL97-cyclin complexes and the phosphorylation of a variety of viral and cellular substrate proteins has been demonstrated. Genetic mapping and structural modeling approaches helped to define two pUL97 interfaces, IF1 and IF2, responsible for cyclin binding. In particular, the regulatory importance of interactions between vCDK/pUL97 and host cyclins as well as CDKs has been highlighted, both as determinants of virus replication and as a novel drug-targeting option. This aspect was substantiated by the finding that virus replication was impaired upon cyclin type H knock-down, and that such host-directed interference also affected viruses resistant to existing therapies. Beyond the formation of binary interactive complexes, a ternary pUL97-cyclin H-CDK7 complex has also been described, and in light of this, an experimental trans-stimulation of CDK7 activity by pUL97 appeared crucial for virus-host coregulation. In accordance with this understanding, several novel antiviral targeting options have emerged. These include kinase inhibitors directed to pUL97, to host CDKs, and to the pUL97-cyclin H interactive complexes. Importantly, a statistically significant drug synergy has recently been reported for antiviral treatment schemes using combinations of pharmacologically relevant CDK7 and vCDK/pUL97 inhibitors, including maribavir. Combined, such findings provide increased options for anti-HCMV control. This review focuses on regulatory interactions of vCDK/pUL97 with the host cyclin-CDK apparatus, and it addresses the functional relevance of these key effector complexes for viral replication and pathogenesis. On this basis, novel strategies of antiviral drug targeting are defined.

Antiviral Agents for Preventing Cytomegalovirus Disease in Recipients of Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

This systematic review discusses the use of prophylaxis to prevent cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in recipients who have undergone hematopoietic cell transplantation. It highlights the need for new approaches to control and prevent CMV infection. The approval of the anti-CMV drug letermovir has made antiviral prophylaxis more popular. CMV-specific T cell-mediated immunity tests are effective in identifying patients who have undergone immune reconstitution and predicting disease progression. Maribavir (MBV) has been approved for the treatment of post-transplant CMV infection/disease in adolescents. Adoptive T-cell therapy and the PepVax CMV vaccine show promise in tackling refractory and resistant CMV. However, the effectiveness of PepVax in reducing CMV viremia/disease was not demonstrated in a phase II trial. Cell-mediated immunity assays are valuable for personalized management plans, but more interventional studies are needed. MBV and adoptive T-cell therapy are promising treatments, and trials for CMV vaccines are ongoing.

Designing multi-epitope vaccine against human cytomegalovirus integrating pan-genome and reverse vaccinology pipelines

Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) is accountable for high morbidity in neonates and immunosuppressed individuals. Due to the high genetic variability of HCMV, current prophylactic measures are insufficient. In this study, we employed a pan-genome and reverse vaccinology approach to screen the target for efficient vaccine candidates. Four proteins, envelope glycoprotein M, UL41A, US23, and US28, were shortlisted based on cellular localization, high solubility, antigenicity, and immunogenicity. A total of 29 B-cell and 44 T-cell highly immunogenic and antigenic epitopes with high global population coverage were finalized using immunoinformatics tools and algorithms. Further, the epitopes that were overlapping among the finalized B-cell and T-cell epitopes were linked with suitable linkers to form various combinations of multi-epitopic vaccine constructs. Among 16 vaccine constructs, Vc12 was selected based on physicochemical and structural properties. The docking and molecular simulations of VC12 were performed, which showed its high binding affinity (-23.35 kcal/mol) towards TLR4 due to intermolecular hydrogen bonds, salt bridges, and hydrophobic interactions, and there were only minimal fluctuations. Furthermore, Vc12 eliciting a good response was checked for its expression in Escherichia coli through in silico cloning and codon optimization, suggesting it to be a potent vaccine candidate.

Refractory/Resistant Cytomegalovirus Infection in Transplant Recipients: An Update

Despite the significant progress made, CMV infection is one of the most frequent infectious complications in transplant recipients. CMV infections that become refractory or resistant (R/R) to the available antiviral drugs constitute a clinical challenge and are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Novel anti-CMV therapies have been recently developed and introduced in clinical practice, which may improve the treatment of these infections. In this review, we summarize the treatment options for R/R CMV infections in adult hematopoietic cell transplant and solid organ transplant recipients, with a special focus on newly available antiviral agents with anti-CMV activity, including maribavir and letermovir.

Efficacy and safety of adoptive T-cell therapy in treating cytomegalovirus infections post-haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection poses significant risks in allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT) recipients. Despite advances in antiviral therapies, issues such as drug resistance, side effects, and inadequate immune reconstitution remain. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of adoptive cell therapy (ATC) in managing CMV infections in allo-HSCT recipients. Adhering to preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines, we conducted a comprehensive database search through July 2023. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted on studies involving HSCT patients with CMV infections treated with ATC. The primary outcome was the response rate to ATC, and secondary outcomes included adverse events associated with ATC. The Freeman-Tukey transformation was applied for analysis. In the meta-analysis of 40 studies involving 953 participants, ATC achieved an overall integrated response rate of 90.16%, with a complete response of 82.59% and a partial response of 22.95%. ATC source, HLA matching, steroid intake, and age group markedly influenced response rates. Donor-derived T-cell treatments exhibited a higher response rate (93.66%) compared to third-party sources (88.94%). HLA-matched patients demonstrated a response rate of 92.90%, while mismatched patients had a lower rate. Children showed a response rate of 83.40%, while adults had a notably higher rate of 98.46%. Adverse events were minimal, with graft-versus-host disease occurring in 24.32% of patients. ATC shows promising response rates in treating CMV infections post-HSCT, with an acceptable safety profile. However, to establish its efficacy conclusively and compare it with other antiviral treatments, randomised controlled trials are essential. Further research should prioritise such trials over observational and one-arm studies to provide robust evidence for clinical decision-making.

Real-World Experience With Maribavir for Treatment of Cytomegalovirus Infection in High-Risk Solid Organ Transplant Recipients

We evaluated use of maribavir (MBV) for treatment of 15 episodes of refractory/resistant cytomegalovirus infection in 13 solid organ transplant recipients. Treatment failure due to treatment-emergent MBV resistance or early virological recurrence after MBV discontinuation occurred in 7 (47%) episodes. Sustained viral clearance was achieved in 6 (40%) episodes.

Innate and adaptive effector immune drivers of cytomegalovirus disease in lung transplantation: a double-edged sword

Up to 90% of the global population has been infected with cytomegalovirus (CMV), a herpesvirus that remains latent for the lifetime of the host and drives immune dysregulation. CMV is a critical risk factor for poor outcomes after solid organ transplant, though lung transplant recipients (LTR) carry the highest risk of CMV infection, and CMV-associated comorbidities compared to recipients of other solid organ transplants. Despite potent antivirals, CMV remains a significant driver of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD), re-transplantation, and death. Moreover, the extended utilization of CMV antiviral prophylaxis is not without adverse effects, often necessitating treatment discontinuation. Thus, there is a critical need to understand the immune response to CMV after lung transplantation. This review identifies key elements of each arm of the CMV immune response and highlights implications for lung allograft tolerance and injury. Specific attention is paid to cellular subsets of adaptive and innate immune cells that are important in the lung during CMV infection and reactivation. The concept of heterologous immune responses is reviewed in depth, including how they form and how they may drive tissue- and allograft-specific immunity. Other important objectives of this review are to detail the emerging role of NK cells in CMV-related outcomes, in addition to discussing perturbations in CMV immune function stemming from pre-existing lung disease. Finally, this review identifies potential mechanisms whereby CMV-directed treatments may alter the cellular immune response within the allograft.

Engineered HCMV-infected APCs enable the identification of new immunodominant HLA-restricted epitopes of anti-HCMV T-cell immunity

Complications due to HCMV infection or reactivation remain a challenging clinical problem in immunocompromised patients, mainly due to insufficient or absent T-cell functionality. Knowledge of viral targets is crucial to improve monitoring of high-risk patients and optimise antiviral T-cell therapy. To expand the epitope spectrum, genetically-engineered dendritic cells (DCs) and fibroblasts were designed to secrete soluble (s)HLA-A*11:01 and infected with an HCMV mutant lacking immune evasion molecules (US2-6 + 11). More than 700 HLA-A*11:01-restricted epitopes, including more than 50 epitopes derived from a broad range of HCMV open-reading-frames (ORFs) were identified by mass spectrometry and screened for HLA-A*11:01-binding using established prediction tools. The immunogenicity of the 24 highest scoring new candidates was evaluated in vitro in healthy HLA-A*11:01+/HCMV+ donors. Thus, four subdominant epitopes and one immunodominant epitope, derived from the anti-apoptotic protein UL36 and ORFL101C (A11SAL), were identified. Their HLA-A*11:01 complex stability was verified in vitro. In depth analyses revealed highly proliferative and cytotoxic memory T-cell responses against A11SAL, with T-cell responses comparable to the immunodominant HLA-A*02:01-restricted HCMVpp65NLV epitope. A11SAL-specific T cells were also detectable in vivo in immunosuppressed transplant patients and shown to be effective in an in vitro HCMV-infection model, suggesting their crucial role in inhibiting viral replication and improvement of patient's outcome. The developed in vitro pipeline is the first to utilise genetically-engineered DCs to identify naturally presented immunodominant HCMV-derived epitopes. It therefore offers advantages over in silico predictions, is transferable to other HLA alleles, and will significantly expand the repertoire of viral targets to improve therapeutic options.

Effect of Food, Crushing of Tablets, and Antacid Coadministration on Maribavir Pharmacokinetics in Healthy Adult Participants: Results From 2 Phase 1, Open-Label, Randomized, Crossover Studies

The effect of food composition, tablet crushing, and antacid coadministration on maribavir pharmacokinetics was assessed in 2 Phase 1 studies in healthy adults. In the first, a single maribavir 400-mg dose was administered under fasting conditions, with a low-fat/low-calorie or a high-fat/high-calorie meal. In the second, a single maribavir 100-mg dose was administered under fasting conditions, as a crushed tablet, or as a whole tablet alone or with an antacid. The 90% confidence intervals of the geometric mean ratios were within 80%-125% for area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), but not for maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) for low-fat/low-calorie and high-fat/high-calorie meals versus fasting or for whole tablet with antacid versus whole tablet alone. The 90% confidence intervals of the geometric mean ratios for AUC and Cmax were within 80%-125% for crushed versus whole tablet. Maribavir median time to Cmax value in plasma under fed conditions was delayed versus fasting conditions, but there was no statistical difference for crushed versus whole tablet or with versus without antacid. As the antiviral efficacy of maribavir is driven by AUC but not Cmax, findings suggest that maribavir can be administered with food or antacids or as a crushed tablet.

Case Report: Approaches for managing resistant cytomegalovirus in pediatric allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation recipients

The instructional case is a pediatric haploidentical TCRαβ+/CD19+ depleted allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation recipient who developed early onset CMV infection, which was complicated by resistant CMV (both UL97 and UL54) and successfully managed with maribavir and haploidentical CMV-specific T lymphocytes. Novel approaches to resistant CMV infection are reviewed and effective utilization of recent advances in diagnosis and management of resistant CMV in pediatric HCT are highlighted.

Antiviral medications for preventing cytomegalovirus disease in solid organ transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

The risk of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in solid organ transplant recipients has resulted in the frequent use of prophylaxis to prevent the clinical syndrome associated with CMV infection. This is an update of a review first published in 2005 and updated in 2008 and 2013.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the benefits and harms of antiviral medications to prevent CMV disease and all-cause death in solid organ transplant recipients.

SEARCH METHODS

We contacted the information specialist and searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 5 February 2024 using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) Search Portal, and ClinicalTrials.gov.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs comparing antiviral medications with placebo or no treatment, comparing different antiviral medications or different regimens of the same antiviral medications for CMV prophylaxis in recipients of any solid organ transplant. Studies examining pre-emptive therapy for CMV infection are studied in a separate review and were excluded from this review.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed study eligibility, risk of bias and extracted data. Summary estimates of effect were obtained using a random-effects model, and results were expressed as risk ratios (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) for dichotomous outcomes and mean difference (MD) and 95% CI for continuous outcomes. Confidence in the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

MAIN RESULTS

This 2024 update found four new studies, bringing the total number of included studies to 41 (5054 participants). The risk of bias was high or unclear across most studies, with a low risk of bias for sequence generation (12), allocation concealment (12), blinding (11) and selective outcome reporting (9) in fewer studies. There is high-certainty evidence that prophylaxis with aciclovir, ganciclovir or valaciclovir compared with placebo or no treatment is more effective in preventing CMV disease (19 studies: RR 0.42, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.52), all-cause death (17 studies: RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.92), and CMV infection (17 studies: RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.77). There is moderate-certainty evidence that prophylaxis probably reduces death from CMV disease (7 studies: RR 0.26, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.78). Prophylaxis reduces the risk of herpes simplex and herpes zoster disease, bacterial and protozoal infections but probably makes little to no difference to fungal infection, acute rejection or graft loss. No apparent differences in adverse events with aciclovir, ganciclovir or valaciclovir compared with placebo or no treatment were found. There is high certainty evidence that ganciclovir, when compared with aciclovir, is more effective in preventing CMV disease (7 studies: RR 0.37, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.60). There may be little to no difference in any outcome between valganciclovir and IV ganciclovir compared with oral ganciclovir (low certainty evidence). The efficacy and adverse effects of valganciclovir or ganciclovir were probably no different to valaciclovir in three studies (moderate certainty evidence). There is moderate certainty evidence that extended duration prophylaxis probably reduces the risk of CMV disease compared with three months of therapy (2 studies: RR 0.20, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.35), with probably little to no difference in rates of adverse events. Low certainty evidence suggests that 450 mg/day valganciclovir compared with 900 mg/day valganciclovir results in little to no difference in all-cause death, CMV infection, acute rejection, and graft loss (no information on adverse events). Maribavir may increase CMV infection compared with ganciclovir (1 study: RR 1.34, 95% CI: 1.10 to 1.65; moderate certainty evidence); however, little to no difference between the two treatments were found for CMV disease, all-cause death, acute rejection, and adverse events at six months (low certainty evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Prophylaxis with antiviral medications reduces CMV disease and CMV-associated death, compared with placebo or no treatment, in solid organ transplant recipients. These data support the continued routine use of antiviral prophylaxis in CMV-positive recipients and CMV-negative recipients of CMV-positive organ transplants.

Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling for Maribavir to Inform Dosing in Drug-Drug Interaction Scenarios with CYP3A4 Inducers and Inhibitors

Maribavir, an orally available antiviral agent, has been approved in multiple countries for the treatment of patients with refractory post-transplant cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and/or disease. Maribavir is primarily metabolized by CYP3A4; coadministration with CYP3A4 inducers and inhibitors may significantly alter maribavir exposure, thereby affecting its efficacy and safety. The effect of CYP3A4 inducers and inhibitors on maribavir exposure was evaluated based on a drug-drug interaction (DDI) study and physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling. The effect of rifampin (a strong inducer of CYP3A4 and moderate inducer of CYP1A2), administered at a 600 mg dose once daily, on maribavir pharmacokinetics was assessed in a clinical phase 1 DDI study in healthy participants. A full PBPK model for maribavir was developed and verified using in vitro and clinical pharmacokinetic data from phase 1 studies. The verified PBPK model was then used to simulate maribavir DDI interactions with various CYP3A4 inducers and inhibitors. The DDI study results showed that coadministration with rifampin decreased the maribavir maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC), and trough concentration (Ctrough) by 39%, 60%, and 82%, respectively. Based on the results from the clinical DDI study, the coadministration of maribavir with rifampin is not recommended. The PBPK model did not predict a clinically significant effect of CYP3A4 inhibitors on maribavir exposure; however, it predicted that strong or moderate CYP3A4 inducers, including carbamazepine, efavirenz, phenobarbital, and phenytoin, may reduce maribavir exposure to a clinically significant extent, and may prompt the consideration of a maribavir dosing increase, in accordance with local approved labels and/or regulations.

Approaches and Challenges in the Current Management of Cytomegalovirus in Transplant Recipients: Highlighting the Role of Advanced Practice Providers (Nurse Practitioners and Physician Assistants)

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) and solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients, with traditional anti-CMV therapies limited by their associated toxicities and the development of resistance. Clinical providers are often faced with challenging and complicated CMV infections that require multiple courses of antiviral therapies. Increasingly, advanced practice providers (APPs) are playing an important role in the day-to-day management of transplant recipients with CMV infection, including resistant/refractory CMV and other complex CMV syndromes. Here, we provide an overview of current preventative and treatment strategies for CMV infection in HCT and SOT recipients, highlighting the challenging aspects of current management and the potential utility of newer antiviral agents. This article also focuses on how a multidisciplinary team, orchestrated by APPs, can improve CMV-associated patient outcomes. Protocols using antiviral agents for the prevention or treatment of CMV infections require carefully designed and meticulously implemented strategies to ensure the best clinical outcomes for patients. APPs, who have increasingly become the frontline providers of outpatient care for transplant recipients, are ideally positioned to design and carry out these protocols.

Recent advances in cytomegalovirus infection management in solid organ transplant recipients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Human cytomegalovirus (CMV) continues to be the most important infectious complication following solid organ transplantation (SOT).

RECENT FINDINGS

Universal prophylaxis and preemptive therapy are the most adopted strategies for prevention of CMV disease globally. Prophylaxis with valganciclovir is the most widely used approach to CMV prevention, however leukopenia and late onset CMV disease after discontinuation of prophylaxis requires new strategies to prevent this complication. The use of assays detecting CMV-specific T cell-mediated immunity may individualize the duration of antiviral prophylaxis after transplantation. Letermovir has been recently approved for prophylaxis in kidney transplant recipients. CMV-RNAemia used together with CMV-DNAemia in the viral surveillance of CMV infection provides accurate information on viral load kinetics, mostly in patients receiving letermovir prophylaxis/therapy. The development of refractory and resistant CMV infection remains a major challenge and a new treatment with maribavir is currently available. In the present paper we will review the most recent advances in prevention and treatment of CMV diseases in SOT recipients.

SUMMARY

Recent findings, summarized in the present paper, may be useful to optimize prevention and treatment of CMV infection in SOT.

What's New: Updates on Cytomegalovirus in Solid Organ Transplantation

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is one of the most common infections occurring after solid organ transplantation. This high burden of disease, which incurs sizeable morbidity, may be worsening with the proportion of high-risk D+/R- solid organ transplantation recipients increasing in some regions globally. Cohort studies continue to support either universal prophylaxis or preemptive therapy as effective prevention strategies. Letermovir prophylaxis was noninferior to valganciclovir in adult high-risk D+/R- kidney transplant recipients with fewer drug-related adverse events in a recent clinical trial and has now been approved for such use in some regions. Maribavir preemptive therapy failed to demonstrate noninferiority when compared with valganciclovir in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients but looked promising for safety. Donor matching could be useful in prevention CMV disease with a survival advantage demonstrated in seronegative recipients waiting up to 30 mo for a seronegative kidney. Immune-guided prophylaxis resulted in fewer CMV infection episodes in lung transplant recipients when compared with fixed-duration prophylaxis in a recent clinical trial. For treatment of refractory or resistant CMV infection, maribavir was more efficacious and better tolerated when compared with investigator-initiated therapy in its registration trial for this condition. Further research regarding best treatment and prophylaxis of resistant or refractory CMV infection is needed to reflect best clinical practice choices. Optimal use of immune globulin or CMV-specific T cells for prevention or treatment of CMV disease remains undefined. Standardized definitions for the design of CMV clinical trials have been developed. In this review, we highlight recent updates in the field from data published since 2018.

Use of Maribavir for Multidrug Resistant Cytomegaloviremia in a Pediatric Oncology Patient

Resistant and refractory cytomegalovirus (CMV) viremia can limit the provision of chemotherapy due to myelosuppression and end-organ dysfunction. Few therapies are available for children with clinically significant CMV viremia. We successfully used maribavir for a 4-year-old patient with lymphoma to complete his chemotherapy course. Resistance to maribavir did result after many months of therapy.

Advances in pharmacotherapies for cytomegalovirus infection: what is the current state of play?

INTRODUCTION

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) remains a serious opportunistic infection in hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) and solid-organ transplant (SOT) recipients. Traditional anti-CMV drugs are limited by toxicities and the development of resistance. Letermovir and maribavir are newly approved antivirals for the prevention and treatment of CMV.

AREAS COVERED

Prior reviews have discussed use of letermovir for prevention of CMV after HCT and maribavir for resistant or refractory (R/R) CMV post HCT or SOT. Subsequent data have expanded their use including letermovir for primary CMV prophylaxis in high-risk renal transplant recipients and new recommendations for extending prophylaxis through day + 200 in certain HCT patients. Data on the use of maribavir for first asymptomatic CMV infection post-HCT has also been published. This review compares the pharmacology of anti-CMV agents and discusses the updated literature of these new drugs in the prevention and treatment of CMV.

EXPERT OPINION

Letermovir and maribavir are much needed tools that spare toxicities of ganciclovir, foscarnet, and cidofovir. High cost is a challenge preventing their integration into clinical practice in resource-limited countries. Transplant centers need to exercise restraint in overuse to avoid resistance, particularly in the setting of high viral loads.

Treatment for First Cytomegalovirus Infection Post-Hematopoietic Cell Transplant in the AURORA Trial: A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Phase 3 Trial Comparing Maribavir With Valganciclovir

BACKGROUND

Neutropenia may limit the use of valganciclovir treatment for cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection following hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT). A phase 2 study indicated efficacy of maribavir with fewer treatment-limiting toxicities than valganciclovir.

METHODS

In this multicenter, double-blind, phase 3 study, patients with first asymptomatic CMV infection post-HCT were stratified and randomized 1:1 to maribavir 400 mg twice daily or valganciclovir (dose-adjusted for renal clearance) for 8 weeks with 12 weeks of follow-up. The primary endpoint was confirmed CMV viremia clearance at week 8 (primary hypothesis of noninferiority margin of 7.0%). The key secondary endpoint was a composite of the primary endpoint with no findings of CMV tissue-invasive disease at week 8 through week 16. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were assessed.

RESULTS

Among patients treated (273 maribavir; 274 valganciclovir), the primary endpoint of noninferiority of maribavir was not met (maribavir, 69.6%; valganciclovir, 77.4%; adjusted difference: -7.7%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -14.98, -.36; lower limit of 95% CI of treatment difference exceeded -7.0%). At week 16, 52.7% and 48.5% of patients treated (maribavir and valganciclovir, respectively) maintained CMV viremia clearance without tissue-invasive disease (adjusted difference: 4.4%; 95% CI: -3.91, 12.76). With maribavir (vs valganciclovir), fewer patients experienced neutropenia (16.1% and 52.9%) or discontinued due to TEAEs (27.8% and 41.2%). Discontinuations were mostly due to neutropenia (maribavir, 4.0%; valganciclovir, 17.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

Although noninferiority of maribavir to valganciclovir for the primary endpoint was not achieved based on the prespecified noninferiority margin, maribavir demonstrated comparable CMV viremia clearance during post-treatment follow-up, with fewer discontinuations due to neutropenia. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT02927067 [AURORA].

Opportunistic Infections Post-Lung Transplantation: Viral, Fungal, and Mycobacterial

Opportunistic infections are a leading cause of lung transplant recipient morbidity and mortality. Risk factors for infection include continuous exposure of the lung allograft to the external environment, high levels of immunosuppression, impaired mucociliary clearance and decreased cough reflex, and impact of the native lung microbiome in single lung transplant recipients. Infection risk is mitigated through careful pretransplant screening of recipients and donors, implementation of antimicrobial prophylaxis strategies, and routine surveillance posttransplant. This review describes common viral, fungal, and mycobacterial infectious after lung transplant and provides recommendations on prevention and treatment.

Current and Emerging Antiviral Agents in the Prevention and Treatment of Cytomegalovirus in Pediatric Transplant Recipients

Despite current prophylaxis regimens, cytomegalovirus (CMV) is common in hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) and solid organ transplantation (SOT) and remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. Newer antiviral medications are reshaping the landscape for prevention and treatment of CMV DNAemia, infection, and disease. Letermovir is approved for CMV prevention in adult HCT patients and is attractive due to the absence of marrow suppression seen with ganciclovir/valganciclovir. Letermovir should not be routinely used for CMV treatment due to its low threshold for resistance. Maribavir is approved for the treatment of refractory or resistant CMV disease in HCT and SOT recipients ≥12 years of age, though it has no current role in CMV prevention. More research is needed to fully elucidate the roles, efficacy, and safety of these newer agents in prevention and treatment of CMV in pediatric transplant recipients.

Human Cytomegalovirus (HCMV) Genetic Diversity, Drug Resistance Testing and Prevalence of the Resistance Mutations: A Literature Review

Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) is a pathogen with high prevalence in the general population that is responsible for high morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised individuals and newborns, while remaining mainly asymptomatic in healthy individuals. The HCMV genome is 236,000 nucleotides long and encodes approximately 200 genes in more than 170 open reading frames, with the highest rate of genetic polymorphisms occurring in the envelope glycoproteins. HCMV infection is treated with antiviral drugs such as ganciclovir, valganciclovir, cidofovir, foscarnet, letermovir and maribavir targeting viral enzymes, DNA polymerase, kinase and the terminase complex. One of the obstacles to successful therapy is the emergence of drug resistance, which can be tested phenotypically or by genotyping using Sanger sequencing, which is a widely available but less sensitive method, or next-generation sequencing performed in samples with a lower viral load to detect minority variants, those representing approximately 1% of the population. The prevalence of drug resistance depends on the population tested, as well as the drug, and ranges from no mutations detected to up to almost 50%. A high prevalence of resistance emphasizes the importance of testing the patient whenever resistance is suspected, which requires the development of more sensitive and rapid tests while also highlighting the need for alternative therapeutic targets, strategies and the development of an effective vaccine.

Drug Resistance Assessed in a Phase 3 Clinical Trial of Maribavir Therapy for Refractory or Resistant Cytomegalovirus Infection in Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

This drug resistance analysis of a randomized trial includes 234 patients receiving maribavir and 116 receiving investigator-assigned standard therapy (IAT), where 56% and 24%, respectively, cleared cytomegalovirus DNA at week 8 (treatment responders).

METHODS

Baseline and posttreatment plasma samples were tested for mutations conferring drug resistance in viral genes UL97, UL54, and UL27.

RESULTS

At baseline, genotypic testing revealed resistance to ganciclovir, foscarnet, or cidofovir in 56% of patients receiving maribavir and 68% receiving IAT, including 9 newly phenotyped mutations. Among them, 63% (maribavir) and 21% (IAT) were treatment responders. Detected baseline maribavir resistance mutations were UL27 L193F (n = 1) and UL97 F342Y (n = 3). Posttreatment, emergent maribavir resistance mutations were detected in 60 (26%) of those randomized to maribavir, including 49 (48%) of 103 nonresponders and 25 (86%) of the 29 nonresponders where viral DNA initially cleared then rebounded while on maribavir. The most common maribavir resistance mutations were UL97 T409M (n = 34), H411Y (n = 26), and C480F (n = 21), first detected 26 to 130 (median 56) days after starting maribavir.

CONCLUSIONS

Baseline maribavir resistance was rare. Drug resistance to standard cytomegalovirus antivirals did not preclude treatment response to maribavir. Rebound in plasma cytomegalovirus DNA while on maribavir strongly suggests emerging drug resistance.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

NCT02931539.

Slaying the "Troll of Transplantation"-new frontiers in cytomegalovirus management: A report from the CMV International Symposium 2023

The 2023 International CMV Symposium took place in Barcelona in May 2023. During the 2-day meeting, delegates and faculty discussed the ongoing challenge of managing the risk of cytomegalovirus infection (the Troll of Transplantation) after solid organ or hematopoietic cell transplantation. Opportunities to improve outcomes of transplant recipients by applying advances in antiviral prophylaxis or pre-emptive therapy, immunotherapy, and monitoring of cell-mediated immunity to routine clinical practice were debated and relevant educational clinical cases presented. This review summarizes the presentations, cases, and discussions from the meeting and describes how further advances are needed before the Troll of Transplantation is slain.

Management of Cytomegalovirus Infections in the Era of the Novel Antiviral Players, Letermovir and Maribavir

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections may increase morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised patients. Until recently, standard antiviral drugs against CMV were limited to viral DNA polymerase inhibitors (val)ganciclovir, foscarnet and cidofovir with a risk for cross-resistance. These drugs may also cause serious side effects. This narrative review provides an update on new antiviral agents that were approved for the prevention and treatment of CMV infections in transplant recipients. Letermovir was approved in 2017 for CMV prophylaxis in CMV-seropositive adults who received an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Maribavir followed four years later, with an indication in the treatment of adult and pediatric transplant patients with refractory/resistant CMV disease. The target of letermovir is the CMV terminase complex (constituted of pUL56, pUL89 and pUL51 subunits). Letermovir prevents the cleavage of viral DNA and its packaging into capsids. Maribavir is a pUL97 kinase inhibitor, which interferes with the assembly of capsids and the egress of virions from the nucleus. Both drugs have activity against most CMV strains resistant to standard drugs and exhibit favorable safety profiles. However, high-level resistance mutations may arise more rapidly in the UL56 gene under letermovir than low-grade resistance mutations. Some mutations emerging in the UL97 gene under maribavir can be cross-resistant with ganciclovir. Thus, letermovir and maribavir now extend the drug arsenal available for the management of CMV infections and their respective niches are currently defined.

Unlocking the Pharmacological Potential of Benzimidazole Derivatives: A Pathway to Drug Development

Heterocyclic molecules have fascinated a massive interest in medicinal chemistry. They are heterocyclic compounds that have gained significance due to their diverse variety of pharmacological activities. Benzimidazole is a heterocyclic compound consisting of benzene and imidazole rings. The ease of synthesis and the structural versatility of benzimidazole make it a promising scaffold for drug development. Many biological actions of benzimidazole derivatives have been well documented, including antibacterial, antiviral, anticancer, anti-inflammatory, antitubercular, and anthelmintic properties. The mechanism of action of benzimidazole derivatives varies with their chemical structure and target enzyme. This review has explored numerous methods for producing benzimidazole derivatives as well as a broad range of pharmacological activities. SAR investigations are also discussed in this review as they provide crucial details regarding the essential structural qualities that benzimidazole derivatives must have in order to be biologically active, which could aid in the rational design of new drug candidates. Benzimidazole scaffold is an exclusive structure in drug design and discovery. Many new pharmaceutical drugs containing benzimidazole are anticipated to be available within the next ten years as a result of the extensive therapeutic applications of benzimidazole and its derivatives. This review inspired many researchers to develop more biologically active compounds bearing benzimidazole, expanding the scope of finding a remedy for other diseases. From this study, we concluded that 2-substituted benzimidazole was considered more extensively by researchers.

Maribavir: Mechanism of action, clinical, and translational science

Maribavir is an oral benzimidazole riboside for treatment of post-transplant cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection/disease that is refractory to prior antiviral treatment (with or without resistance). Through competitive inhibition of adenosine triphosphate, maribavir prevents the phosphorylation actions of UL97 to inhibit CMV DNA replication, encapsidation, and nuclear egress. Maribavir is active against CMV strains with viral DNA polymerase mutations that confer resistance to other CMV antivirals. After oral administration, maribavir is rapidly and highly absorbed (fraction absorbed >90%). The approved dose of 400 mg twice daily (b.i.d.) achieves a steady-state area under the curve per dosing interval of 128 h*μg/mL and trough concentration of 4.90 μg/mL (13.0 μM). Maribavir is highly bound to human plasma proteins (98%) with a small apparent volume of distribution of 27.3 L. Maribavir is primarily cleared by hepatic CYP3A4 metabolism; its major metabolite, VP44669 (pharmacologically inactive), is excreted in the urine and feces. There is no clinically relevant impact on maribavir pharmacokinetics by age, sex, race/ethnicity, body weight, transplant type, or hepatic/renal impairment status. In phase II dose-ranging studies, maribavir showed similar rates of CMV viral clearance across 400, 800, or 1200 mg b.i.d. groups, ranging from 62.5-70% in study 202 (NCT01611974) and 74-83% in study 203 (EudraCT 2010-024247-32). In the phase III SOLSTICE trial (NCT02931539), maribavir 400 mg b.i.d. demonstrated superior CMV viremia clearance at week 8 versus investigator-assigned treatments, with lower treatment discontinuation rates. Dysgeusia, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea were commonly experienced adverse events among patients treated with maribavir in clinical trials.

Refractory cytomegalovirus infections in Chinese patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: a review of the literature

In the absence of prophylactic therapy, cytomegalovirus (CMV) viremia is a common complication following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) and represents a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. Approximately 25% of allo-HCT happen in China, where the development and refinement of the 'Beijing protocol' has enabled frequent and increasing use of haploidentical donors. However, refractory CMV infection (an increase by >1 log10 in blood or serum CMV DNA levels after at least 2 weeks of an appropriately dosed anti-CMV medication) is more common among patients with haploidentical donors than with other donor types and has no established standard of care. Here, we review the literature regarding refractory CMV infection following allo-HCT in China.

Anti-CMV therapy, what next? A systematic review

Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) is one of the main causes of serious complications in immunocompromised patients and after congenital infection. There are currently drugs available to treat HCMV infection, targeting viral polymerase, whose use is complicated by toxicity and the emergence of resistance. Maribavir and letermovir are the latest antivirals to have been developed with other targets. The approval of letermovir represents an important innovation for CMV prevention in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients, whereas maribavir allowed improving the management of refractory or resistant infections in transplant recipients. However, in case of multidrug resistance or for the prevention and treatment of congenital CMV infection, finding new antivirals or molecules able to inhibit CMV replication with the lowest toxicity remains a critical need. This review presents a range of molecules known to be effective against HCMV. Molecules with a direct action against HCMV include brincidofovir, cyclopropavir and anti-terminase benzimidazole analogs. Artemisinin derivatives, quercetin and baicalein, and anti-cyclooxygenase-2 are derived from natural molecules and are generally used for different indications. Although they have demonstrated indirect anti-CMV activity, few clinical studies were performed with these compounds. Immunomodulating molecules such as leflunomide and everolimus have also demonstrated indirect antiviral activity against HCMV and could be an interesting complement to antiviral therapy. The efficacy of anti-CMV immunoglobulins are discussed in CMV congenital infection and in association with direct antiviral therapy in heart transplanted patients. All molecules are described, with their mode of action against HCMV, preclinical tests, clinical studies and possible resistance. All these molecules have shown anti-HCMV potential as monotherapy or in combination with others. These new approaches could be interesting to validate in clinical trials.

Antimicrobials in patients with hematologic malignancies and recipients of hematopoietic cell transplantation and other cellular therapies

BACKGROUND

Appropriate use of antimicrobials for hematologic malignancy, hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients, and other cellular therapies is vital, with infection causing significant morbidity and mortality in this unique population of immunocompromised hosts. However, often in this population the choice and management of antimicrobial therapy is complex. When selecting an antimicrobial agent, key considerations include the need for dose adjustments due to renal or hepatic impairment, managing drug interactions, the potential for additive drug toxicity among those receiving polypharmacy and therapeutic drug monitoring. Other factors include leveraging pharmacodynamic principles to enable optimization of directed therapy against challenging pathogens, as well as judicious use of antimicrobials to limit drug resistance and adverse drug reactions.

SUMMARY

This review summarizes the clinical considerations for commonly used antimicrobials in this setting, including antibacterial, antiviral, and antifungal agents.

New Treatment Options for Refractory/Resistant CMV Infection

Despite advances in monitoring and treatment, cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections remain one of the most common complications after solid organ transplantation (SOT). CMV infection may fail to respond to standard first- and second-line antiviral therapies with or without the presence of antiviral resistance to these therapies. This failure to respond after 14 days of appropriate treatment is referred to as "resistant/refractory CMV." Limited data on refractory CMV without antiviral resistance are available. Reported rates of resistant CMV are up to 18% in SOT recipients treated for CMV. Therapeutic options for treating these infections are limited due to the toxicity of the agent used or transplant-related complications. This is often the challenge with conventional agents such as ganciclovir, foscarnet and cidofovir. Recent introduction of new CMV agents including maribavir and letermovir as well as the use of adoptive T cell therapy may improve the outcome of these difficult-to-treat infections in SOT recipients. In this expert review, we focus on new treatment options for resistant/refractory CMV infection and disease in SOT recipients, with an emphasis on maribavir, letermovir, and adoptive T cell therapy.

Safety and efficacy of weight-based ganciclovir dosing strategies in overweight/obese patients

BACKGROUND

The management of cytomegalovirus (CMV) is particularly challenging as both CMV and its usual first-line treatment, ganciclovir, are associated with neutropenia. Ganciclovir dosing is weight-based, most commonly utilizing total body weight (TBW). The subsequent high doses of ganciclovir in overweight/obese patients may increase the risk of toxicity. Utilizing adjusted body weight (AdjBW) dosing may help mitigate this risk. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the difference in toxicity and efficacy between TBW and AdjBW ganciclovir dosing strategies in overweight/obese patients.

METHODS

This retrospective study conducted safety and efficacy analyses of ganciclovir courses (≥72 h) used as CMV treatment. The primary safety outcome was the incidence of neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count <1000 cells/μL), and the primary efficacy outcome was a 2-log decrease in CMV polymerase chain reaction within 4 weeks following ganciclovir initiation. In both analyses, courses were excluded in which ganciclovir was dosed outside of specified renal dosing parameters for >20% of the course.

RESULTS

Among the 253 courses in the safety cohort, there was no difference in the incidence of neutropenia (17.4% vs. 13.5%, p = .50) in AdjBW compared to TBW dosing. In the 62 courses evaluating efficacy, there was no statistical difference between AdjBW and TBW dosing (60.0% vs. 45.2%, p = .28). No subgroups were identified in which AdjBW dosing was advantageous.

CONCLUSION

Utilization of AdjBW ganciclovir dosing did not result in decreased neutropenia or treatment efficacy as compared to TBW dosing. Further studies with larger patient populations would be beneficial to confirm these findings.

Oral antiviral drugs for treatment of cytomegalovirus in transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is an opportunistic pathogen responsible for substantial morbidity after solid organ transplantation and haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Treatment of CMV disease involves a two-pronged approach with antiviral drug treatment coupled with strategies to minimize the intensity of immune suppression.

OBJECTIVES

This narrative review examines the evidence for the current treatment of CMV disease in transplant recipients, including the use of oral antiviral drugs.

SOURCES

Literature search was performed on PubMed with keywords cytomegalovirus, transplantation, ganciclovir, valganciclovir, maribavir, letermovir, cidofovir, and foscarnet.

CONTENT

Intravenous and oral valganciclovir are the standard first-line treatment of cytomegalovirus disease after transplantation. Oral maribavir has demonstrated superior efficacy and safety over CMV DNA polymerase inhibitors for the treatment of refractory or resistant CMV infection. Transplant patients with severe and life-threatening CMV disease, those with very high viral load, and patients with impaired gastrointestinal absorption should still be treated initially with intravenous antiviral drugs, including ganciclovir and foscarnet. Criteria for the safe transition from intravenous therapies to oral antiviral drugs include achieving clinical improvement and satisfactory decline in viral load. Recurrence of CMV viremia and disease is common, particularly among transplant patients who are lymphopenic and have impaired CMV-specific immunity.

IMPLICATIONS

Oral antiviral drugs for the treatment of CMV infection and disease in transplant recipients have improved the CMV landscape, because they reduce the cost and mitigate the inconvenience and risks related to prolonged hospitalization and the need for long-term intravascular access. However, their antiviral efficacy should be complemented by an intentional strategy of reducing the degree of immune suppression to allow for immunologic recovery that ensures durable control of CMV infection.