Risk factors associated with post-kidney transplant malignancies: an article from the Cancer-Kidney International Network

Cytomegalovirus Disease in Renal Allograft Recipients in the Current Immunosuppression Era

The high prevalence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) after kidney transplantation, along with its significant morbidity, mortality, and financial burden, makes it a serious infectious complication. This retrospective observational study aimed to determine the incidence of CMV infection and recurrence in renal transplant recipients during the era of immunosuppression (IS), and to identify modifiable predictors of CMV infection. A total of 233 patients were screened for CMV disease incidence and predictors and were prospectively followed. The incidence of CMV disease was found to be 14.6% (95% CI, 11.7%-18%), with no recurrence observed. Multivariate analysis revealed that factors such as CMV serostatus and a positive B-cell crossmatch at transplantation were associated with an increased risk of CMV. Specifically, patients with a positive B-cell crossmatch had a threefold higher risk of developing CMV compared to those with a negative crossmatch (p = 0.025). This association is a novel finding and should be considered when assessing risks and complications in patients. There was a lower incidence of CMV infection among kidney transplant recipients within the first 2-5 years after transplantation. A positive B-cell crossmatch at the time of transplantation was strongly associated with an increased risk of developing CMV disease.

Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy for Multiple Allograft Renal Cell Carcinomas: A Case Report

BACKGROUND

Partial nephrectomy (PN) is strongly recommended as nephron-sparing surgery for T1 renal tumors. Although there have been some reports of robot-assisted PN (RAPN) for solitary allograft renal tumors, only a few cases of RAPN for multifocal allograft renal tumors have been reported. Herein, we report a case of a patient who underwent RAPN for multifocal allograft renal cell carcinoma (RCCs).

CASE PRESENTATION

A 77-year-old male was diagnosed with 24- and 15-mm lesions in the middle portion of a right iliac fossa renal allograft. RAPN was performed using a transperitoneal approach 22 years after the kidney transplantation. The allograft renal artery was clamped, and the tumors were resected. Pathological examination revealed clear-cell RCC with negative surgical margins. There were no perioperative complications, and kidney function did not significantly change during surgery.

CONCLUSION

RAPN is a feasible and effective treatment option for multiple allograft RCCs. The successful preservation of renal function coupled with minimal perioperative complications underscores the potential of RAPN. Our observations suggest that RAPN can be safely implemented in similar high-risk cases, offering a nephron-sparing alternative that might extend quality of life and reduce the need for dialysis in transplant recipients.

Acute Allograft Rejection in Kidney Transplant Recipients Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: An Educational Case Report

Rationale

Kidney transplant (KT) recipients have an increased risk of malignancy due to chronic immunosuppression. The emerging use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has been a promising development for the treatment of malignancy, but their use adds to the complexity of immunosuppression management for KT recipients. This case report describes 2 cases of acute rejection in KT recipients following ICI initiation and discusses the balance of malignancy treatment with adequate immunosuppression.

Presenting Concerns of Patients

The first patient is a 44-year-old male KT recipient with a diagnosis of metastatic renal cell carcinoma presenting with acute kidney injury 6 days following initiation of an ICI. The second patient is a 73-year-old male KT recipient with a diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma presenting with acute kidney injury 2 weeks following initiation of an ICI.

Diagnoses

Both patients were diagnosed with acute rejection in the setting of reduced immunosuppression and initiation of an ICI.

Interventions

Both cases received an increased dose of steroid without improvement of graft function. The first patient subsequently underwent a delayed graft nephrectomy due to complications of acute rejection, whereas the second patient did not undergo nephrectomy.

Outcomes

The first patient experienced complications including perioperative bleeding requiring multiple operations, but ultimately stabilized on hemodialysis and showed a durable response to ICI. The second patient remained dialysis-dependent post-ICI treatment and was readmitted with allograft complications leading to his eventual death.

Teaching Points

This study underscores the complexity of managing KT recipients diagnosed with malignancy and receiving ICIs. The balance between immunosuppression reduction to treat malignancy and preventing allograft rejection presents a significant challenge. Key considerations include the risk of acute allograft rejection and patient-centered decision-making. These cases highlight the need for further research to develop evidence-based guidelines for managing this patient population. In addition, the patient perspective in this study highlights the importance of careful risk-benefit analysis and the impact of treatment decisions on patient-focused outcomes.

Predicting kidney allograft survival with explainable machine learning

INTRODUCTION

Despite significant progress over the last decades in the survival of kidney allografts, several risk factors remain contributing to worsening kidney function or even loss of transplants. We aimed to evaluate a new machine learning method to identify these variables which may predict the early graft loss in kidney transplant patients and to assess their usefulness for improving clinical decisions.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was carried out with 627 kidney transplant patients followed at least three months. All these data were pre-processed, and their selected features were used to develop an automatically working a machine learning algorithm; this algorithm was then applied for training and parameterization of the model; and finally, the tested model was then used for the analysis of patients' features that were the most impactful for the prediction of clinical outcomes. Our models were evaluated using the Area Under the Curve (AUC), and the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) algorithm was used to interpret its predictions.

RESULTS

The final selected model achieved a precision of 0.81, a sensitivity of 0.61, a specificity of 0.89, and an AUC value of 0.84. In our model, serum creatinine levels of kidney transplant patients, evaluated at the hospital discharge, proved to be the most important factor in the decision-making for the allograft loss. Patients with a weight equivalent to a BMI closer to the normal range prior to a kidney transplant are less likely to experience graft loss compared to patients with a BMI below the normal range. The age of patients at transplantation and Polyomavirus (BKPyV) infection had significant impact on clinical outcomes in our model.

CONCLUSIONS

Our algorithm suggests that the main characteristics that impacted early allograft loss were serum creatinine levels at the hospital discharge, as well as the pre-transplant values such as body weight, age of patients, and their BKPyV infection. We propose that machine learning tools can be developed to effectively assist medical decision-making in kidney transplantation.

Glycolysis Changes in Alloreactive Memory B Cells in Highly Sensitized Kidney Transplant Recipients Undergoing Desensitization Therapy

Despite the growing use of desensitization strategies, hyperimmune patients remain at high risk of antibody-mediated rejection suggesting that, even when donor-specific antibodies (DSA) are effectively depleted, anti-donor specific B cells persist. We included 10 highly sensitized recipients that underwent desensitization with plasmapheresis and B cell depletion prior to kidney transplantation. We quantified changes in DSA (luminex), total B-cell subsets (flow cytometry), anti-donor HLA B cells (fluorospot), and single-cell metabolism in serially collected samples before desensitization, at the time of transplant, and at 6 and 12 months thereafter. Desensitization was associated with a decrease in DSA and total memory B cell and naive B cell percentage, while plasma cells and memory anti-donor HLA circulating B cells persisted up to 12 months after transplant. At 12-month post-transplantation, memory B cells increased their glycolytic capacity, while proliferative KI67+ plasma cells modified their metabolism by increasing fatty acid and amino acid oxidation capacity and decreasing their glucose dependence. Despite effective DSA depletion, anti-donor B cells persist in kidney transplant recipients. Due to the reliance of these cells on glycolysis, glycolysis-targeting therapies might represent a valuable treatment strategy.

Immunosuppression and cancer risk in kidney transplant recipients: A retrospective cohort study

We assessed whether contemporary immunosuppression agents were associated with cancer among kidney transplant recipients (KTR), and if this association varied by age and sex. We studied a retrospective province-wide cohort of primary KTR (1997-2016). Employing multivariable Cox models, we estimated associations of cumulative doses of prednisone, mycophenolate and tacrolimus administered over the past 10 years, lagged by 2 years, with the incidence of primary malignant neoplasms (PMN). We assessed interactions with age and sex. To assess the impact of exposure recency, we used weighted cumulative exposure (WCE) modeling. Among 1064 KTR, 108 (10.2%) developed PMN over median follow-up of 73 months (interquartile range: 32-120). Adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of 0.96 (0.64-1.43), 1.34 (0.96-1.86), and 1.06 (0.88-1.29) were estimated for cumulative daily doses of prednisone (5 mg), mycophenolate (1000 mg), and tacrolimus (2 mg) administered continuously over the past 10 years, respectively. PMN risk associated with cumulative tacrolimus exposure was modified by age (interaction p = .035) and was more pronounced in 15-year and 30-year-old KTR (aHRs of 1.57 [1.08-2.28] and 1.31 [1.03-1.66], respectively) in comparison to older KTR. PMN risk increase associated with higher cumulative mycophenolate dose was more pronounced in females (aHR = 1.86 [1.15-3.00]) than in males (aHR = 1.16 [0.74-1.81]; interaction p = .131). WCE analyses suggested increased PMN risk the higher the mycophenolate doses taken 5-10 years ago. A trend toward increased PMN risk with long-term mycophenolate exposure, particularly in females, and more pronounced risk with long-term tacrolimus exposure in younger KTR, identify opportunities for tailored immunosuppression to mitigate cancer risk.

Incidence and risk factors for cancer in people with type 1 diabetes, stratified by stages of diabetic kidney disease: a nationwide Finnish cohort study

Background

Individuals with type 1 diabetes (T1D) have been reported to have increased overall risk of cancer. In addition, individuals with a kidney transplant/transplantation (KT) have markedly increased cancer risk due to chronic use of immunosuppressive agents. However, it has not been elucidated whether the observed excess cancer risk is related to KT or whether diabetic kidney disease (DKD) per se is a risk factor for cancer in individuals with T1D.

Methods

The study included 5035 individuals from the Finnish Diabetic Nephropathy Study (FinnDiane) and 14,061 control individuals without diabetes. We assessed the standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) for cancers in individuals with T1D compared to controls according to DKD status. Cox regression analyses were used to identify potential risk factors for cancer in individuals with type 1 diabetes.

Findings

The SIR for overall cancer for all participants was 1.14 (1.05-1.24), for participants without KT 0.92 (0.83-1.01) and for participants with KT 4.78 (4.02-5.64). Participants without KT had in fact a reduced risk of prostate cancer with a SIR of 0.54 (0.37-0.76), cancer of urinary organs 0.41 (0.21-0.73) and respiratory and intrathoracic organs, 0.62 (0.38-0.97). Participants with KT had on the contrary an increased risk of non-melanoma skin cancer, SIR 14.50 (10.99-18.86), cancer in the lymphoid and hematopoietic tissue 5.38 (2.99-8.96), mouth or pharynx 5.13 (2.08-10.66), melanoma 5.12 [2.38-9.72]) and respiratory and intrathoracic organs 2.77 (1.21-5.49). The risk of thyroid cancer was increased both in participants without KT, SIR 2.14 (1.39-3.16) and with KT 5.30 (1.68-12.78).

Interpretation

The excess overall cancer risk in individuals with type 1 diabetes is only seen in KT recipients and in thyroid cancer. The individuals without KT seem to have a decreased risk of some forms of cancer.

Funding

Folkhälsan Research Foundation, Academy of Finland [316664], Wilhelm and Else Stockmann Foundation, Liv och Hälsa Society, Novo Nordisk Foundation [NNF OC0013659], Finnish Foundation for Cardiovascular Research, Finnish Diabetes Research Foundation, Medical Society of Finland, Sigrid Jusélius Foundation, and Helsinki University Hospital Research Funds [TYH2018207 and TYH 2020305].

Fine-tuning tumor- and allo-immunity: advances in the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in kidney transplant recipients

Cancer is a common complication after kidney transplantation. Kidney transplant recipients (KTR) have a 2- to 4-fold higher risk of developing cancer compared to the general population and post-transplant malignancy is the third most common cause of death in KTR. Moreover, it is well known that certain cancer types are overrepresented after transplantation, especially non-melanoma skin cancer. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have revolutionized the treatment of cancer, with remarkable survival benefit in a subgroup of patients. ICI are monoclonal antibodies that block the binding of specific co-inhibitory signaling molecules. Cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4), programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), and its ligand programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) are the main targets of ICI. Solid organ transplant recipients (SOTR) have been excluded from clinical trials owing to concerns about tumor response, allo-immunity, and risk of transplant rejection. Indeed, graft rejection has been estimated as high as 48% and represents an emerging problem. The underlying mechanisms of organ rejection in the context of treatment with ICI are poorly understood. The search for restricted antitumoral responses without graft rejection is of paramount importance. This review summarizes the current knowledge of the use of ICI in KTR, the potential mechanisms involved in kidney graft rejection during ICI treatment, potential biomarkers of rejection, and how to deal with rejection in clinical practice.

Impact of Immunosenescence in Older Kidney Transplant Recipients: Associated Clinical Outcomes and Possible Risk Stratification for Immunosuppression Reduction

The number of older individuals receiving a kidney transplant as replacement therapy has significantly increased in the past decades and this increase is expected to continue. Older patients have a lower rate of acute rejection but an increased incidence of death with a functioning graft. Several factors, including an increased incidence of infections, post-transplant malignancy and cardiovascular comorbidity and mortality, contribute to this increased risk. Notwithstanding, kidney transplantation is still the best form of kidney replacement therapy in all patients with chronic kidney disease, including in older individuals. The best form of immunosuppression and the optimal dose of these medications in older recipients remains a topic of discussion. Pharmacological studies have usually excluded older patients and when included, patients were highly selected and their numbers insignificant to draw a reasonable conclusion. The reduced incidence of acute rejection in older recipients has largely been attributed to immunosenescence. Immunosenescence refers to the aging of the innate and adaptive immunity, accumulating in phenotypic and functional changes. These changes influences the response of the immune system to new challenges. In older individuals, immunosenescence is associated with increased susceptibility to infectious pathogens, a decreased response after vaccinations, increased risk of malignancies and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Chronic kidney disease is associated with premature immunosenescent changes, and these are independent of aging. The immunosenescent state is associated with low-grade sterile inflammation termed inflammaging. This chronic low-grade inflammation triggers a compensatory immunosuppressive state to avoid further tissue damage, leaving older individuals with chronic kidney disease in an immune-impaired state before kidney transplantation. Immunosuppression after transplantation may further enhance progression of this immunosenescent state. This review covers the role of immunosenescence in older kidney transplant recipients and it details present knowledge of the changes in chronic kidney disease and after transplantation. The impact of immunosuppression on the progression and complications of an immunosenescent state are discussed, and the future direction of a possible clinical implementation of immunosenescence to individualize/reduce immunosuppression in older recipients is laid out.

Incidence of De Novo Post-Transplant Malignancies in Thai Adult Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Single-Center, Population-Controlled, Retrospective Cohort Study at the Highest Volume Kidney Transplant Center in Thailand

Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) are at increased risk of developing de novo post-transplant malignancies (PTMs), with regional differences in types with excess risk compared to the general population. A single-center, population-controlled, retrospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary care center in Thailand among all adults who underwent their first kidney transplant from 1986 to 2018. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) of malignancy by age, sex, and place of residence were obtained using data from the National Cancer Registry of Thailand as population control. There were 2,024 KTRs [mean age, 42.4 years (SD 11.4); female patients, 38.6%] during 16,495 person-years at risk. Of these, 125 patients (6.2%) developed 133 de novo PTMs. The SIR for all PTMs was 3.85 (95% CI 3.22, 4.56), and for pooled solid and hematologic PTMs, it was 3.32 (95% CI 2.73, 3.99). Urothelial malignancies had the largest excess risk, especially in women [female SIR 114.7 (95% CI 66.8, 183.6); male SIR 17.5 (95% CI 8.72, 31.2)]. The next two most common cancers were non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and skin cancer [SIR 20.3 (95% CI 13.6, 29.1) and 24.7 (95% CI 15.3-37.8), respectively]. Future studies are needed to identify the risk factors and assess the need for systematic screening among PTMs with excess risk in KTRs.

Inferring the diagnostic potential of 18F-FDG-PET/CT in post-renal transplantation from a unique case harboring multiple rare complications

Renal transplantation is undoubtedly an effective treatment for patients with end-stage renal disease, but it is certainly not a cure. Patients require lifelong immunosuppression to maintain optimal allograft function, and post-operative risk complications such as cancer in the transplant recipient cannot be ignored. Besides, infection is a silent complication that follows transplantation. Relatedly, herein, we present a report of a 40-year-old patient who underwent renal transplantation and promptly developed a diffuse large B-cell tumor in the liver and Aspergillus infection in the trachea. In addition, an inflammatory necrotizing granuloma was also observed in the muscles. Of importance, we also described the potential of 18F-FDG-PET/CT, which was instrumental in monitoring and evaluating these relevant post-operative complications in this rare case.

Recurrent Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleed Due to Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma of the Duodenum in a Renal Transplant Patient: A Case Report and Literature Review

A patient status post (s/p) renal transplantation in 2014 presented with an upper gastrointestinal bleed (UGIB). The source of the bleed was found to be a large mass in the duodenum with histopathology from biopsies obtained during esophagogastroduodenoscopy revealing diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) of the duodenum. His mycophenolate was stopped, and the tacrolimus dose was reduced due to active malignancy. He was discharged and completed one cycle of R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) before presenting back to ED with hemorrhagic shock from a large upper GI bleed requiring admission to the medical intensive care unit. Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders such as DBLCL can present 10 years from the transplant date. These malignancies are at high risk for bleed, especially after treatment with chemotherapy is initiated.

Current Trends and Future Directions of Malignancy After kidney Transplantation: A 1970-2022 Bibliometric Analysis

BACKGROUND Malignancy after kidney transplantation (MKT) remains a leading cause of death in transplant recipients and over the past few decades there have been many reports on this topic. However, the task of extracting crucial information from intricate events poses a significant challenge in guiding clinical work. Hence, bibliometrics was employed to summarize and predict the future in this study. MATERIAL AND METHODS Reviews and articles on MKT were extracted from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) and were analyzed by the software VOSviewer, CiteSpace, Scimago Graphica, and R package Bibliometrix for bibliometric analysis. RESULTS The analysis considered 5700 publications from 28 647 authors and 4924 institutions across 100 countries, spanning the years 1970-2022. Reference co-citation analysis showed that "renal cell carcinoma", "skin cancer", "post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder" and "COVID-19 vaccine" were research hotspots. Keywords that co-occurred early were "immunosuppressant", "cancer", "Epstein-Barr virus", "squamous cell carcinoma", and "infection", etc., while "impact","risk factor", "outcomes", "mortality", "management" frequently co-occurred later. From 2020 to 2022, newly emerging keywords such as "SARS-CoV-2" and "COVID-19", together with citation bursts for "immune checkpoint inhibitors" and "ipilimumab," were observed. CONCLUSIONS The focus of MKT-related studies has evolved from exploring the spectrum, risk factors, and outcomes of MKT, to examining the pathogenesis, individualized screening, prevention, and treatment, including appropriate use of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Reports of renal transplant recipients infected with SARS-CoV-2 or COVID-19 have also gained attention since 2019. These suggest that individualized management remains a frontier for research and a future direction in MKT topics.

Access to Cancer Care: Prevention and Screening for Females Post Kidney Transplantation Around the World

Kidney transplantation offers recipients superior outcomes and improved quality of life compared with dialysis. However, the need for ongoing immunosuppression places recipients at increased risk of certain forms of cancer. Screening and early detection of precancerous lesions are one of the few proven ways to lower the risk of cancer morbidity and mortality in the transplant population. Women have additional barriers to cancer screening services globally, especially in low- and middle-income countries as well as within certain disadvantaged groups in high-income countries. There is a dearth of published data on screening guidelines and policies on post-transplant malignancy in female recipients. It is vital that health care providers and patients are educated regarding the risks of cancer at all post-transplant stages and that the recommended screening policies are adhered to in order to reduce associated morbidity and mortality in this at-risk group.

Post-transplant malignancy: Focusing on virus-associated etiologies, pathogenesis, evidence-based management algorithms, present status of adoptive immunotherapy and future directions

Modern immunosuppression has led to a decrease in rejection rates and improved survival rates after solid organ transplantation. Increasing the potency of immunosuppression promotes post-transplant viral infections and associated cancers by impairing immune response against viruses and cancer immunoediting. This review reflects the magnitude, etiology and immunological characteristics of various virus-related post-transplant malignancies, emphasizing the need for future research. A multidisciplinary and strategic approach may serve best but overall literature evidence targeting it is sparse. However, the authors attempted to provide a more detailed update of the literature consensus for the prevention, diagnosis, management and surveillance of post-transplant viral infections and associated malignancies, with a focus on the current role of adoptive immunotherapy and the way forward. In order to achieve long-term patient and graft survival as well as superior post-transplant outcomes, collaborative research on holistic care of organ recipients is imperative.

Prevention of Oncogenic Gammaherpesvirinae (EBV and HHV8) Associated Disease in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients

Long-term risk for malignancy is higher among solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients compared to the general population. Four non-hepatitis viruses have been recognized as oncogenic in SOT recipients-EBV, cause of EBV-associated lymphoproliferative diseases; human herpes virus 8 (HHV8), cause of Kaposi sarcoma, primary effusion lymphoma and multicentric Castleman disease; human papilloma virus, cause of squamous cell skin cancers, and Merkel cell polyomavirus, cause of Merkel cell carcinoma. Two of these viruses (EBV and HHV8) belong to the human herpes virus family. In this review, we will discuss key aspects regarding the clinical presentation, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of diseases in SOT recipients associated with the two herpesviruses.

Ipsilateral synchronous papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity and urothelial carcinoma in a renal transplant recipient: a rare case report with molecular analysis and literature review

BACKGROUND

Renal transplant recipients (RTRs) have a 3- to 5-fold higher risk of developing malignant tumors than the general population, with new malignant tumors after transplantation considered to be the leading cause of death in RTRs. In pathological practice, it is rare for neoplasms with different histology to be located in the same organ. We report the first case of a synchronous papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity (PRNRP) and urothelial carcinoma (UC) in the ipsilateral kidney in an RTR. Molecular detection was conducted by next-generation sequencing.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 68-year-old female suffered from uremia 19 years ago and underwent renal transplantation (RT) after receiving dialysis for 6 months. Hematuria occurred one month ago and an enhanced CT showed that there were two abnormal density foci in the middle and lower parts of the autologous left kidney. A laparoscopic left nephrectomy and ureterectomy were performed. Gross examination revealed a mass (I) in the left renal parenchyma, 2*1.8*1.5 cm in size, that protruded from the renal capsule, and a cauliflower-like mass (II), 5*2.5*2 cm in size, adjacent to the mass (I). Microscopic findings revealed these lesions were PRNRP and UC, respectively. PCR analysis revealed a KRAS gene mutation (G12D in exon 2) in the PRNRP, while NGS analysis revealed FGFR3 (S249C in exon 7) and KDM6A (Q271Ter in exon 10 and A782Lfs in exon 17) mutations in the UC.

CONCLUSIONS

We report here for the first time an extraordinarily rare case of synchronous renal tumors of a PRNRP and UC in the ipsilateral kidney of an RTR. We identified simultaneous KRAS, FGFR3, and KDM6A mutations in two different renal masses in the ipsilateral kidney. Pathologic assessment with comparative molecular analysis of mutational profiles facilitates tumor studies after RT and may be of great value in clinical management strategies.

Chapter 4: CKD treatment in cancer survivors, from Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Kidney Injury During Anticancer Drug Therapy 2022

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is one of the most disabling disorders with significant comorbidity and mortality. Incidence and prevalence of CKD in cancer survivors are remarkably high in both adults and pediatric patients. The reasons for this high incidence/prevalence are multifold but kidney damage by cancer itself and cancer treatment (pharmacotherapy/surgery/radiation) are the main reasons. Since cancer survivors commonly have significant comorbidities, risk of cancer recurrence, limited physical function or life expectancy, special attentions should be paid when considering the treatment of CKD and its complications. Especially, shared decision-making should be considered when selecting the renal replacement therapies with as much information/facts/evidence as possible.

Renal Transplantation: Immediate and Late Complications

Kidney grafts are the most common transplanted solid organ. To optimize graft survival, radiologists should be familiar with the anatomy and potential complications unique to transplanted kidneys. In addition to being able to recognize the imaging characteristics to diagnose etiologies of kidney graft dysfunction, an understanding of the pathophysiology is a key to narrowing the differential diagnosis. This article provides a summary of the most common complications based on broad categories of type of complication and posttransplant timing.

Neoplastic Progression of Barrett's Esophagus Among Organ Transplant Recipients: a Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Several small studies reported high risk of progression to high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) in Barrett's esophagus (BE) patients who undergo solid organ transplantation (SOT) and implied that this may be due to immunosuppressant use. However, the major shortcoming of these studies was the lack of a control population. Therefore, we aimed to determine the rates of neoplastic progression in BE patients who underwent SOT and compare to that in controls and identify the predictors of progression.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of BE patients seen in Cleveland Clinic and affiliated hospitals between January 2000 and August 2022. Demographics, endoscopic and histological findings, history of SOT and fundoplication, immunosuppressant use, and follow-up were abstracted.

RESULTS

The study population consisted of 3466 patients with BE, of which 115 had SOT (lung 35, liver 34, kidney 32, heart 14, and pancreas 2) and 704 patients on chronic immunosuppressants but no history of SOT. During a median follow-up of 5.1 years, there was no difference in the annual risk of progression between the three groups (SOT=0.61%, no SOT but on immunosuppressants= 0.82%, and no SOT/no immunosuppressants= 0.94%, p=0.72). On multivariate analysis, immunosuppressant use (odds ratio (OR) 1.38, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04-1.82, p=0.025) but not SOT (OR 0.39, 95%CI 0.15-1.01, p=0.053) was associated with neoplastic progression in BE patients.

CONCLUSION

Immunosuppression is a risk factor for progression of BE to HGD/EAC. Therefore, close surveillance of BE patients on chronic immunosuppressants needs to be considered.

Local blockade of tacrolimus promotes T-cell-mediated tumor regression in systemically immunosuppressed hosts

BACKGROUND

Immunosuppressive drugs such as tacrolimus have revolutionized our ability to transplant organs between individuals. Tacrolimus acts systemically to suppress the activity of T-cells within and around transplanted organs. However, tacrolimus also suppresses T-cell function in the skin, contributing to a high incidence of skin cancer and associated mortality and morbidity in solid organ transplant recipients. Here, we aimed to identify a compound capable of re-establishing antitumor T-cell control in the skin despite the presence of tacrolimus.

METHODS

In this study, we performed time-resolved fluorescence resonance energy transfer to identify molecules capable of antagonizing the interaction between tacrolimus and FKBP12. The capacity of these molecules to rescue mouse and human T-cell function in the presence of tacrolimus was determined in vitro, and the antitumor effect of the lead compound, Q-2361, was assessed in "regressor" models of skin cancer in immunosuppressed mice. Systemic CD8 T-cell depletion and analyses of intratumoral T-cell activation markers and effector molecule production were performed to determine the mechanism of tumor rejection. Pharmacokinetic studies of topically applied Q-2361 were performed to assess skin and systemic drug exposure.

RESULTS

Q-2361 potently blocked the interaction between tacrolimus and FKBP12 and reversed the inhibition of the nuclear factor of activated T cells activation by tacrolimus following T-cell receptor engagement in human Jurkat cells. Q-2361 rescued T-cell function in the presence of tacrolimus, rapamycin, and everolimus. Intratumoral injection of Q-2361-induced tumor regression in mice systemically immune suppressed with tacrolimus. Mechanistically, Q-2361 treatment permitted T-cell activation, proliferation, and effector function within tumors. When CD8 T cells were depleted, Q-2361 could not induce tumor regression. A simple solution-based Q-2361 topical formulation achieved high and sustained residence in the skin with negligible drug in the blood.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings demonstrate that the local application of Q-2361 permits T-cells to become activated driving tumor rejection in the presence of tacrolimus. The data presented here suggests that topically applied Q-2361 has great potential for the reactivation of T-cells in the skin but not systemically, and therefore represents a promising strategy to prevent or treat skin malignancies in immunosuppressed organ transplant recipients.

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma presenting as an ileocaecal mass in a post-transplant patient

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common type of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Extranodal involvement, including the gastrointestinal tract, occurs frequently. However, colorectal involvement is extremely rare. We present a case of a man in his 20s with prior renal transplantation on immunosuppression for 10 years who developed symptoms of gas and bloating associated with unintentional weight loss. Colonoscopy revealed a large fungating mass at the ileocaecal valve, and a biopsy of this lesion confirmed stage IV DLBCL. Endoscopy should be considered for early workup of vague gastrointestinal symptoms, even in younger patients, if they have been on long-standing immunosuppression.

Cancer Risk Following HLA-Incompatible Living Donor Kidney Transplantation

Incompatible living donor kidney transplant recipients (ILDKTr) require desensitization to facilitate transplantation, and this substantial upfront immunosuppression may result in serious complications, including cancer.

Methods

To characterize cancer risk in ILDKTr, we evaluated 858 ILDKTr and 12 239 compatible living donor kidney transplant recipients (CLDKTr) from a multicenter cohort with linkage to the US transplant registry and 33 cancer registries (1997-2016). Cancer incidence was compared using weighted Cox regression.

Results

Among ILDKTr, the median follow-up time was 6.7 y (maximum 16.1 y) for invasive cancers (ascertained via cancer registry linkage) and 5.0 y (maximum 16.1 y) for basal and squamous cell carcinomas (ascertained via the transplant registry and censored for transplant center loss to follow-up). Invasive cancers occurred in 53 ILDKTr (6.2%) and 811 CLDKTr (6.6%; weighted hazard ratio [wHR] 1.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76-1.35). Basal and squamous cell carcinomas occurred in 41 ILDKTr (4.8%) and 737 CLDKTr (6.0%) (wHR 0.99; 95% CI, 0.69-1.40). Cancer risk did not vary according to donor-specific antibody strength, and in an exploratory analysis, was similar between CLDKTr and ILDKTr for most cancer types and according to cancer stage, except ILDKTr had a suggestively increased risk of colorectal cancer (wHR 3.27; 95% CI, 1.23-8.71); however, this elevation was not significant after correction for multiple comparisons.

Conclusions

These findings indicate that the risk of cancer is not increased for ILDKTr compared with CLDKTr. The possible elevation in colorectal cancer risk is unexplained and might suggest a need for tailored screening or prevention.

Multicenter analysis of immunosuppressive medications on the risk of malignancy following adult solid organ transplantation

Objective

This study aimed to assess the risk of maintenance immunosuppression on the post-transplant risk of malignancy across all solid organ transplant types.

Methods

This is a retrospective cohort study from a multicenter hospital system in the United States. The electronic health record was queried from 2000 to 2021 for cases of solid organ transplant, immunosuppressive medications, and post-transplant malignancy.

Results

A total of 5,591 patients, 6,142 transplanted organs, and 517 post-transplant malignancies were identified. Skin cancer was the most common type of malignancy at 52.8%, whereas liver cancer was the first malignancy to present at a median time of 351 days post-transplant. Heart and lung transplant recipients had the highest rate of malignancy, but this finding was not significant upon adjusting for immunosuppressive medications (heart HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.72 - 1.3, p = 0.88; lung HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.77 - 1.33, p = 0.94). Random forest variable importance calculations and time-dependent multivariate cox proportional hazard analysis identified an increased risk of cancer in patients receiving immunosuppressive therapy with sirolimus (HR 1.41, 95% CI 1.05 - 1.9, p = 0.04), azathioprine (HR 2.1, 95% CI 1.58 - 2.79, p < 0.001), and cyclosporine (HR 1.59, 95% CI 1.17 - 2.17, p = 0.007), while tacrolimus (HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.44 - 0.81, p < 0.001) was associated with low rates of post-transplant neoplasia.

Conclusion

Our results show varying risks of immunosuppressive medications associated with the development of post-transplant malignancy, demonstrating the importance of cancer detection and surveillance strategies in solid organ transplant recipients.

Use of Systemic Therapies for Treatment of Psoriasis in Patients with a History of Treated Solid Tumours: Inference-Based Guidance from a Multidisciplinary Expert Panel

BACKGROUND

Patients with treated solid tumours (TSTs) are a highly heterogeneous population at an increased risk for malignancy compared with the general population. When treating psoriasis in patients with a history of TSTs, clinicians are concerned about the immunosuppressive nature of psoriasis therapies, the possibility of augmenting cancer recurrence/progression, and infectious complications. No direct, high-level evidence exists to address these concerns.

OBJECTIVES

We aim to provide a structured framework supporting healthcare professional and patient discussions on the risks and benefits of systemic psoriasis therapy in patients with previously TSTs. Our goal was to address the clinically important question, "In patients with TSTs, does therapy with systemic agents used for psoriasis increase the risk of malignancy or malignancy recurrence?"

METHODS

We implemented an inference-based approach relying on indirect evidence when direct clinical trial and real-world data were absent. We reviewed indirect evidence supporting inferences on the status of immune function in patients with TSTs. Recommendations on systemic psoriasis therapies in patients with TSTs were derived using an inferential heuristic.

RESULTS

We identified five indirect indicators of iatrogenic immunosuppression informed by largely independent bodies of evidence: (1) overall survival, (2) rate of malignancies with psoriasis and systemic psoriasis therapies, (3) rate of infections with psoriasis and systemic psoriasis therapies, (4) common disease biochemical pathways for solid tumours and systemic psoriasis therapies, and (5) solid organ transplant outcomes. On the basis of review of the totality of this data, we provided inference-based conclusions and ascribed level of support for each statement.

CONCLUSIONS

Prior to considering new therapies for psoriasis, an understanding of cancer prognosis should be addressed. Patients with TSTs and a good cancer prognosis will have similar outcomes to non-TST patients when treated with systemic psoriasis therapies. For patients with TSTs and a poor cancer prognosis, the quality-of-life benefits of treating psoriasis may outweigh the theoretical risks.

Risk of Prostate Cancer in Chronic Kidney Disease Patient: A Meta-Analysis using Observational Studies

Background

Both clinical and experimental findings demonstrated a rise in prostate cancer in chronic renal illness. However, the clinical data associated with CKD was not looked at the context of prostate cancer. The study aims to investigate prostate cancer risk in CKD patients using clinical data via systemic review and meta-analysis.

Materials and Methods

Using pertinent pairing keywords, I carried out a thorough exploration of PubMed/MEDLINE and Web of Science. The pooled HR with 95% CI of the considered clinical findings was estimated involving the general inverse variance outcome type. With RevMan 5.3, the total pooled estimate meta-analysis was evaluated utilizing the random effects model.

Results

Total of six findings were considered for this analysis, with a total of 2,430,246 participants. The age and mean follow-up of the included patients and studies ranged from 55 to 67.4 years and 10.1 to 12 years, respectively. The meta-analysis showed no significant risk of prostate cancer among CKD patients (HR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.60-1.41; P = 0.70). The results from subgroup analysis based on eGFR levels ranged ≥30-59 ml/min per 1.73 m2 and also found no significant risk of prostate cancer among CKD patients (HR: 1.04; 95% CI: 0.92-1.18; P = 0.52). Here I did not report statistical heterogeneity found (Q = 0.56, I2 = 0%, P = 0.87). As per the Newcastle-Ottawa scale, the included studies suggested good quality.

Conclusion

The results suggest no significant risk of developing prostate cancer among CKD patients. Therefore, well-designed prospective cohort studies with stages of CKD and clear predefined prior history and causative factors are needed to support the present evidence strongly.

The strategy of diminishing age gap effect on different donor-recipient combinations in living donor kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

The disparity between kidney donation and the number of uremic patients on the waiting list has increased the demand for older live-donor kidneys (OLK). However, the donor-recipient age gap may have an impact on the recipient's outcome.

METHODS

Patients who underwent living donor kidney transplantation at our institute between 2005 and 2019 were enrolled and categorized into four donor-recipient groups according to age (≥50 years and <50 years). The Estimated Post-Transplant Survival (EPTS) score was used to quantify the recipient's condition. Adjusted models analyzed recipient outcomes and related risks among the four groups.

RESULTS

Of the 154 pairs of live donors and recipients, OLK did not influence overall or death-censored graft survival. The four donor-recipient combinations had similar recipient outcomes, except it slightly worsened in the "old donor to young recipient" group. The EPTS score (adjusted HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01-1.04; p = 0.014) and rejection (adjusted HR, 4.26; 95% CI, 1.36-13.37; p = 0.013) were significant risk factors for overall and death-censored graft survival, respectively. Recipients with pretransplant diabetes or prior solid organ transplantation could have amplified risk effects. The main causes of graft loss were death in older recipients and chronic rejection in younger recipients.

CONCLUSION

OLK is safe for young recipients. Nevertheless, adequate immunosuppression should be maintained to prevent rejection and subsequent graft loss, especially for those receiving second kidney transplantation. In contrast, older recipients should avoid overt immunosuppression and control their comorbidities, such as diabetes-related complications to improve their long-term outcomes.

Recent innovations in renal replacement technology and potential applications to transplantation and dialysis patients: a review of current methods

The current standard of care for patients with end-stage renal disease (ERSD) is a kidney transplant or dialysis when a donor organ isnot available. The growing gap between patients who require a kidney transplant and the availability of donor organs as well as thenegative effects of long-term dialysis, such as infection, limited mobility, and risk of cancer development, drive the impetus to developalternative renal replacement technology. The goal of this review is to assess the potential of two of the most recent innovations inkidney transplant technology-the implantable bioartificial kidney (BAK) and kidney regeneration technology-in addressing the aforementionedproblems related to kidney replacement for patients with ERSD. Both innovations are fully implantable, autologous, personalizedwith patient cells, and can replace all aspects of kidney function. Not only do these new innovations have the potential toimprove the possibility of transplantation for more patients, they also have potential to improve the outcome of transplantation or dialysis-related renal cancer diagnosis. A major limitation of the current technology is that both implantable BAK and kidney regenerationtechnology are still in preclinical stages, and thus their potential effects cannot be comprehensively generalized to human patients.

Post‐kidney transplant cancers: Racial and ethnic differences in sun‐exposed skin versus non‐sun‐exposed anogenital skin

BACKGROUND

Transplant recipients have a 2- to 4-fold increased risk of developing malignancies over the general population. Cancer is the second most common cause of death for recipients. The magnitude of the risk depends on the cancer type and increases in viral-related malignancies. Skin cancer is the most common. However, data in most cancer registries is limited to cutaneous melanomas, thereby limiting the epidemiologic examination of cancer risk in non-melanoma skin cancer. Our goal was to evaluate post-kidney transplant cancer cases and sites in our population to guide screening recommendations.

METHODS

Between 2009 and 2015, a retrospective study of adult kidney recipients transplanted at East Carolina University was conducted. The first cancer diagnosis after transplant through February 18, 2020, was captured and analyzed. Patient demographics, cancer sites, and histological diagnoses were analyzed and compared. p16 immunohistochemistry was used as a surrogate marker for high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) infection.

RESULTS

Retrospectively, kidney transplant recipients were analyzed (N = 439), the majority were non-Hispanic Black (NHB) individuals, 312 (71.1%), and 127 (28.9%) were non-Hispanic White (NHW) individuals. Of these, 59 (13.4%) developed a posttransplant malignancy, with the majority on sun-exposed skin found in NHW. NHB had all anogenital/mucosa skin cancers on non-sun-exposed skin. Of these detected in NHB, all were squamous cell carcinomas, with five out of six (83.3%) being positive for p16.

CONCLUSIONS

Posttransplant malignancy differed significantly by race, site, and potential source of etiology. The majority of malignancies are likely explained by acceleration of precursor lesions from prior exposure to ultraviolet rays or HPV.

Alteraciones neoplásicas en el paciente trasplantado renal. Una revisión sistemática

Introducción: El trasplante renal se ha destacado como la mejor terapia renal sustitutiva para la enfermedad renal crónica terminal, aunque conlleva una serie de riesgos entre los que el cáncer se destaca cada vez más, por lo que parece importante determinar el impacto que tiene en esta población.Objetivo: Conocer y sintetizar la evidencia científica acerca de la incidencia de neoplasias en pacientes trasplantados renales, así como las variables relacionadas con las mismas.Metodología: Se realizó una revisión sistemática en la que se incluyeron 14 artículos procedentes de las bases de Pubmed, Scopus, Scielo, WOS y Google Académico. Como términos MeSH se utilizaron: neoplasias (neoplasms), trasplante de riñón (kidney transplantation), incidencia (incidence), riesgo (risk), factores de riesgo (risk factors). Se incluyeron artículos originales en inglés y español, en población trasplantada adulta.Resultados: Se incluyeron 14 artículos de diseño observacional. De la revisión emergieron como principales variables: incidencia general, datos demográficos y tratamientos previos, otras características asociadas, tumores más frecuentes y medidas preventivas.Conclusiones: La incidencia de neoplasias en el paciente trasplantado es alta, sobre todo en la edad avanzada y pacientes con tratamiento inmunosupresor con ciclosporina y azatioprina siendo este último, junto al trasplante procedente de cadáver, los principales factores de riesgo encontrados. Los cánceres de piel no melanoma son los más prevalentes y como medidas de prevención se destaca llevar a cabo un cribado rutinario, fomento de una vida saludable, y promoción y potenciación de la vacunación de la hepatitis B.

Malignancies in adult kidney transplant candidates and recipients: current status

Posttransplant malignancies, particularly recurrent and de novo, in solid organs including kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) are a significant complication associated with substantial mortality, largely attributed to long-term immunosuppression necessary to maintain allograft tolerance. Older age at transplantation and oncogenic virus infection along with pretransplant malignancies are among the main factors contributing to the risk of cancer in this population. As the mean age of transplant candidates rises, the rate of transplant recipients with pretransplant malignancies also increases. The eligibility criteria for transplantation in patients with prior cancer have recently changed. The overall risk of posttransplant malignancies is at least double after transplantation including KTRs relative to the general population, most pronounced for skin cancers associated with UV radiation and virally-mediated tumors. The risk of renal cell carcinoma is specifically increased in the kidney transplant population. The therapy of cancer in transplant patients is associated with risk of higher toxicity, and graft rejection and/or impairment, which poses a unique challenge in the management. Reduction of immunosuppression and the use of mTOR inhibitors are common after cancer diagnosis, although optimal immunosuppression for transplant recipients with cancer remains undefined. Suboptimal cancer treatment contributing to a worse prognosis has been reported for malignancies in this population. In this article, we focus on the prevalence and outcomes of posttransplant malignancies, cancer therapy including a short overview of immunotherapy, cancer screening and prevention strategies, and immunosuppression as a cancer risk factor. The 2020/2021 recommendations of the Kidney Diseases Improving Global Outcome (KDIGO) and American Society of Transplantation (AST) for transplant candidates with a history of cancer are presented.

Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in an Adult After Renal Transplantation

Solid organ transplant patients are at an increased risk of developing various types of malignancies including hematological ones. The mechanisms behind these malignant changes are multifactorial. These include immunosuppressive agents, pre-transplantation cancer recurrence in the recipient, and de novo cancer development. Acute lymphoblastic leukemia is a rare malignancy in renal transplant recipients. Here, we describe the case of an adult male patient who underwent renal transplantation for end-stage renal disease due to diabetes and hypertension. He developed high hyper-diploid acute lymphoblastic leukemia four months after transplantation. This case is unique due to the presence of the high hyper-diploid cytogenetics of the B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) occurrence in an adult renal transplant recipient.

The Viral Origin of Human Breast Cancer: From the Mouse Mammary Tumor Virus (MMTV) to the Human Betaretrovirus (HBRV)

A Human Betaretrovirus (HBRV) has been identified in humans, dating as far back as about 4500 years ago, with a high probability of it being acquired by our species around 10,000 years ago, following a species jump from mice to humans. HBRV is the human homolog of the MMTV (mouse mammary tumor virus), which is the etiological agent of murine mammary tumors. The hypothesis of a HMTV (human mammary tumor virus) was proposed about 50 years ago, and has acquired a solid scientific basis during the last 30 years, with the demonstration of a robust link with breast cancer and with PBC, primary biliary cholangitis. This article summarizes most of what is known about MMTV/HMTV/HBRV since the discovery of MMTV at the beginning of last century, to make evident both the quantity and the quality of the research supporting the existence of HBRV and its pathogenic role. Here, it is sufficient to mention that scientific evidence includes that viral sequences have been identified in breast-cancer samples in a worldwide distribution, that the complete proviral genome has been cloned from breast cancer and patients with PBC, and that saliva contains HBRV, as a possible route of inter-human infection. Controversies that have arisen concerning results obtained from human tissues, many of them outdated by new scientific evidence, are critically discussed and confuted.

The Impact of Human Microbiotas in Hematopoietic Stem Cell and Organ Transplantation

The human microbiota heavily influences most vital aspects of human physiology including organ transplantation outcomes and transplant rejection risk. A variety of organ transplantation scenarios such as lung and heart transplantation as well as hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is heavily influenced by the human microbiotas. The human microbiota refers to a rich, diverse, and complex ecosystem of bacteria, fungi, archaea, helminths, protozoans, parasites, and viruses. Research accumulating over the past decade has established the existence of complex cross-species, cross-kingdom interactions between the residents of the various human microbiotas and the human body. Since the gut microbiota is the densest, most popular, and most studied human microbiota, the impact of other human microbiotas such as the oral, lung, urinary, and genital microbiotas is often overshadowed. However, these microbiotas also provide critical and unique insights pertaining to transplantation success, rejection risk, and overall host health, across multiple different transplantation scenarios. Organ transplantation as well as the pre-, peri-, and post-transplant pharmacological regimens patients undergo is known to adversely impact the microbiotas, thereby increasing the risk of adverse patient outcomes. Over the past decade, holistic approaches to post-transplant patient care such as the administration of clinical and dietary interventions aiming at restoring deranged microbiota community structures have been gaining momentum. Examples of these include prebiotic and probiotic administration, fecal microbial transplantation, and bacteriophage-mediated multidrug-resistant bacterial decolonization. This review will discuss these perspectives and explore the role of different human microbiotas in the context of various transplantation scenarios.

Malignancy Diseases in Kidney Transplantation, Clinical Outcomes, Patient, and Allograft Survival: A Case-Control Study

BACKGROUND

Malignancy is a well-known complication in patients after kidney transplantation (KT), but its effect on posttransplant outcomes, allograft, and patient survival remains unexplored. The aim of this study is to report the impact of the comorbidity on clinical outcome, function, and failure of an allograft kidney.

METHODS

This case-control study included 101 KT patients. Twenty-six patients who developed cancer (CA) were assigned to the case group and 75 to the control group. Statistical analysis was performed using logistic regression models, and graft survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier curve.

RESULTS

Non-melanoma skin CA was the most common malignancy, accounting for almost 60% of cases, followed by stomach CA, prostate CA, and lymphoproliferative diseases (7.70% each). Difference in graft and patient survival was not significant between the two groups (P > .05). A tumor in nonfunctioning in the first nonfunctioning KT was identified in 1 KT patient with a second allograft and by anatomopathological was detect Fuhrman grade II renal cell carcinoma. This KT patient was in good clinical condition with serum creatinine level of 1.5 mg/dL.

CONCLUSIONS

No association was observed between CA development and risk factors, including family history and smoking habit, and no differences in allograft and patient survival were found. Nevertheless, in our data, CA in KT patients occurred early after transplantation. Renal cell carcinoma in allograft failure was identified in a patient; that suggested that nephrectomy of kidney failure must be performed to avoid patient allosensitization and neoplasia. Thus, we suggest continuous screening of malignancy diseases for KT patients.

The incidence of cancer recurrence and new cancer following commencement of dialysis in patients with prior cancers

Background

Patients with kidney failure have a higher cancer risk compared with the age-matched general population. However, the outcomes of incident dialysis patients with a prior cancer history are unknown.

Methods

Using Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry data (2000–2019), the outcomes and survival probabilities of incident dialysis patients with prior cancers and having experienced a cancer recurrence or having developed a new cancer after dialysis commencement were described.

Results

Of 4912 patients with prior cancers before dialysis commencement, 323 (7%) and 343 (7%) patients experienced cancer recurrence or developed new cancers after dialysis initiation, respectively. The median time from dialysis commencement to cancer recurrence was 1.2 years [interquartile range (IQR) 0.5–2.8] and was 2.0 years (IQR 0.7–4.0) for new cancer occurrence. Of those with cancer recurrence, 80% presented with metastatic disease and one in two patients died from cancer, with a median time from cancer recurrence to death of 0.5 years (IQR 0.2–1.7). Of those who developed new cancer, urinary tract and respiratory cancers were the most frequent cancer types, with a median time from new cancer diagnosis to death of 1.3 years (IQR 0.4–3.1). The 3-year survival probabilities on dialysis following cancer recurrence and new cancer were 19% [95% confidence interval (CI) 15–24] and 41% (35–47), respectively.

Conclusion

Among incident dialysis patients with a prior cancer history, 14% experienced cancer recurrence or developed a new cancer. Patients who experienced cancer recurrence or developed new cancer have poor outcomes, with ˂50% surviving beyond 3 years. These findings suggest the need to have a greater understanding of the characteristics, cancer screening, treatment responses and reasons for commencing dialysis in patients with kidney failure and prior cancer history, which may help in the shared clinical decision-making process when considering dialysis for these patients.

Cancer among kidney transplant recipients >20 years after transplantation: post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder remains the most common cancer type in the ultra long-term

Background

Cancer risk is increased by 2- to 4-fold in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) compared with the general population. Little attention, however, has been given to KTRs with ultra long-term survival >20 years.

Methods

We studied 293 of 1241 KTRs (23.6%), transplanted between 1981 and 1999, who showed kidney allograft survival >20 years. These long-term survivors were analysed for cancer development, cancer type, cancer-associated risk factors and patient and allograft outcomes.

Results

By 10, 20 and 30 years post-transplantation, these long-term KTRs showed a cancer rate of 4.4%, 14.6% and 33.2%, and a non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) rate of 10.3%, 33.5% and 76.8%, respectively. By recipients' ages of 40, 60 and 80 years, KTRs showed a cancer rate of 3.4%, 14.5% 55.2%, and a NMSC rate of 1.7%, 31.6% and 85.2%, respectively. By 30 years post-transplantation, post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) showed the highest incidence of 8.5%, followed by renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with 5.1%. Risk factors associated with the development of cancer were only recipient age (P = 0.016). Smoking history was associated with the risk of lung cancer (P = 0.018). Risk factors related to the development of NMSC included recipient age (P = 0.001) and thiazide diuretics (P = 0.001). Cancer increased the risk of death by 2.4-fold (P = 0.002), and PTLD increased the risk of kidney allograft loss by 6.5-fold (P = 0.001). No differences were observed concerning the development of donor-specific antibodies (P > 0.05).

Conclusions

In long-term KTRs, cancer is a leading cause of death. PTLD remains the most common cancer type followed by RCC. These results emphasize the need for focused long-term cancer surveillance protocols.

Outcomes of Kidney Transplantation in Patients with Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease: Our Experience Based on 35-Years Follow-Up

Background and objectives: For patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), the best replacement therapy is renal transplant (RTx) to ensure life with good quality. Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is a genetic disorder and a common cause of ESRD. Different from ESRD of other causes, ADPKD patients need careful pre-RTx evaluations like detecting the presence of intracranial aneurisms, cardiac manifestations, and complications of liver and renal cysts. Materials: We retrieved a total of 1327 RTx patients receiving 1382 times RTx (two recipients with three times, 48 recipients with two times) over the last 35 years. Only 41 of these patients were diagnosed with ADPKD. Results: At the first RTx, patients’ ages were 42.9 ± 12.6 (mean ± SD) years. Ages of the ADPKD group (52.5 ± 10.1 years) were older than the non-ADPKD group (42.7 ± 12.7 years, p = 0.001). We found more cell mediated and antibody mediated rejection (29.3% vs. 26.0%, and 22.0% vs. 7.0%; both p < 0.001), new onset diabetes after transplant (NODAT) (21, 51.2% vs. 326, 25.3%; p = 0.005), and worse graft survival (p < 0.001) in the ADPKD group, and with the development of more malignancies (18; 43.9% vs. 360; 28.0%; p = 0.041). The long-term patient survivals were poorer in the ADPKD group (38.9% vs. 70.3%; p = 0.018). ADPKD was found as an independent risk factor for long-term patient survival (HR = 2.64, 95% CI 1.03−6.76, p = 0.04). Conclusions: Patients with ADPKD-related ESRD developed more NODAT, and also more malignancies if not aggressively surveyed before surgery. Due to poor long-term graft and patient survivals, regular careful examinations for NODAT and malignancies, even in the absence of related symptoms and signs, are highly recommended in the follow-ups.

OUP accepted manuscript

The year 2021 was the last full year of Alberto Ortiz’s editorship at Clinical Kidney Journal (CKJ). On May 2022, Maria José Soler will start her term as the Editor-in-Chief. Over these years, CKJ obtained its first journal impact factor and has consolidated its position among the top journals in the field, consistently ranking among the top 25% (first quartile) journals in Urology and Nephrology. The 2020 journal impact factor rose to 4.45, becoming the top open access journal in Nephrology and the ninth ranked Nephrology journal overall. We now review the recent history of the journal and the most highly cited topics which include the epidemiology of kidney disease, chronic kidney disease topics, such as the assessment and treatment of chronic kidney disease, onconephrology, cardionephrology, glomerular disease, transplantation and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).

A Combination therapy using an mTOR inhibitor and Honokiol effectively induces autophagy through the modulation of AXL and Rubicon in renal cancer cells and restricts renal tumor growth following organ transplantation

Development of cancer, including renal cancer, is a major problem in immunosuppressed patients. The mTOR inhibitor Rapamycin (RAPA) is used as an immunosuppressive agent in patients with organ transplants and other immunological disorders; and it also has antitumorigenic potential. However, long-term use of RAPA causes reactivation of Akt, and ultimately leads to enhanced tumor growth. Honokiol (HNK) is a natural compound, which possesses both anti-inflammatory and antitumorigenic properties. In this study, we investigated the effect of a novel combination therapy using RAPA + HNK on allograft survival and post-transplantation renal tumor growth. We observed that it effectively modulated the expression of some key regulatory molecules (like Carabin, an endogenous Ras inhibitor; and Rubicon, a negative regulator of autophagy) that play important roles in tumor cell growth and survival. This combination induced toxic autophagy and apoptosis to promote cancer cell death; and was associated with a reduced expression of the tumor-promoting receptor tyrosine kinase AXL. Finally, we utilized a novel murine model to examine the effect of RAPA + HNK on post-transplantation renal tumor growth. The combination treatment prolonged the allograft survival and significantly inhibited post-transplantation tumor growth. It was associated with reduced tumor expression of Rubicon and the cytoprotective/antioxidant heme oxygenase-1 to overcome therapeutic resistance. It also downregulated the coinhibitory programmed death-1 ligand, which plays major role(s) in the immune escape of tumor cells. Together, this combination treatment has a great potential to restrict renal tumor growth in transplant recipients as well as other immunosuppressed patients.

Management of the Failing Kidney Transplant: Challenges and Solutions

The kidneys are the most transplanted organs, and the number of failed kidney transplants that require reinstitution of renal replacement therapy in patients is on the increase. Increased mortality has been noted in patients with failed grafts compared with transplant- naïve patients with chronic kidney disease who are treated with dialysis. Issues such as management of immunosuppression, the need for transplant nephrectomy, addressing the increased risk of cardiovascular events, malignancies, and infections are debatable and often based on individual or hospital practices. The optimal timing and modality of renal replacement therapy to be reinitiated are sometimes blurred, with considerable variations among physician practices. Guidelines are therefore needed to appropriately manage this special population of patients with the aim of improving outcomes. Here, our objective was to review the current practices in managing patients with failing kidney transplants so that recommendations can be made based on the available evidence.

Malignancies after pediatric solid organ transplantation

As life expectancy among pediatric solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) improves, the risk of comorbid conditions such as malignancy post-transplantation has also increased. SOTRs are at elevated risks of post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLDs), and skin and solid cancers. PTLDs typically occur early following transplantation, while skin and solid cancers frequently arise in young adulthood (25-40 years). By 30 years following transplantation, 26-41% of pediatric SOTRs have developed cancer. Different risk factors exist for PTLD, and skin and solid cancers, which are modified by cumulative immunosuppression, infections, transplanted organ, and the underlying disease process associated with initial organ failure (e.g., kidney failure). Optimal cancer treatment strategies depend on the specific cancer type, stage, and patient comorbidities. Immunosuppression reduction may be beneficial for certain cancers but must be considered against the risks of acute and chronic rejection and allograft loss. Lifestyle counseling regarding smoking avoidance and sun protection, as well as human papillomavirus vaccination, is an important aspect of cancer prevention. Currently, no cancer screening guidelines exist specifically for pediatric SOTRs. Adult population screening guidelines have not been validated in transplant populations. Therefore, an individualized approach should be taken to cancer screening for pediatric SOTRs, accounting for other cancer risk factors.

Everolimus-facilitated calcineurin inhibitor reduction in Asian de novo kidney transplant recipients: Two-year results from the subgroup analysis of the TRANSFORM study

Objective

We analyzed the efficacy and safety of an everolimus with reduced‐exposure calcineurin inhibitor (EVR+rCNI) versus mycophenolic acid with standard‐exposure CNI (MPA+sCNI) regimen in Asian patients from the TRANSFORM study.

Methods

In this 24‐month, open‐label study, de novo kidney transplant recipients (KTxRs) were randomized (1:1) to receive EVR+rCNI or MPA+sCNI, along with induction therapy and corticosteroids.

Results

Of the 2037 patients randomized in the TRANSFORM study, 293 were Asian (EVR+rCNI, N = 136; MPA+sCNI, N = 157). At month 24, EVR+rCNI was noninferior to MPA+sCNI for the binary endpoint of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 50 ml/min/1.73 m² or treated biopsy‐proven acute rejection (27.0% vs. 29.2%, P = .011 for a noninferiority margin of 10%). Graft loss and death were reported for one patient each in both arms. Mean eGFR was higher in EVR+rCNI versus MPA+sCNI (72.2 vs. 66.3 ml/min/1.73 m², P = .0414) even after adjusting for donor type and donor age (64.3 vs. 59.3 ml/min/1.73 m², P = .0582). Overall incidence of adverse events was comparable. BK virus (4.4% vs. 12.1%) and cytomegalovirus (4.4% vs. 13.4%) infections were significantly lower in the EVR+rCNI arm.

Conclusion

This subgroup analysis in Asian de novo KTxRs demonstrated that the EVR+rCNI versus MPA+sCNI regimen provides comparable antirejection efficacy, better renal function, and reduced viral infections (NCT01950819).

Urothelial carcinoma of the graft kidney with molecular analyses: a rare case report

Background

Malignancy after transplantation is a leading cause of death among kidney transplant recipients. However, donor-derived malignancies are rare. We report a case of a high grade papillary urothelial carcinoma arising in a transplanted kidney.

Case presentation

A 62-year-old female who received a kidney transplantation more than 30 years ago presented with urinary tract infection, acute renal failure, and hydronephrosis of the transplant kidney. Anterograde nephrostogram showed a large filling defect in the lower pole of the transplant kidney and in the proximal 3–4 cm of the ureter. A biopsy from the renal pelvic mass showed a high grade urothelial carcinoma. She underwent an anterior exenteration, resection of both transplant and native kidneys and bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection. Pathologic examination showed a high grade papillary urothelial carcinoma which appeared to arise in the pelvis of the graft kidney, involve the graft ureter and native urinary bladder. The tumor had metastasized to one left obturator lymph node but spared the two native kidneys and ureters. Short tandem repeat (STR) analysis confirmed the tumor to be of donor origin. Next-generation sequencing identified amplification of TERT and loss of CDKN2A/CDKN2B in the primary tumor.

Conclusion

While it is known that transplant recipients have an increased risk of urothelial carcinoma compared to the general population, the lack of the well-documented risk factors, such as older age at transplantation, BK polyomavirus infection, and prolonged post-transplantation history and dissemination of the tumor in this case shed light on the de novo tumorigenesis of the graft kidney within the host microenvironment. Amplification of Telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) and loss of cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor 2A/2B (CDKN2A/CDKN2B) detected in the tumor by next gene sequencing suggests that they may play an important role in this case.

Sex differences in cancer risk and outcomes after kidney transplantation

Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) experience a two- to four-fold increased risk of developing and dying from cancer compared with the general population. High cancer risk results from the interaction of both modifiable and non-modifiable factors. This mapping review explores the impact of sex disparity on cancer's increased incidence and mortality after kidney transplantation (KT). In terms of age, population-based studies indicate that younger recipients of both sexes experience a higher risk of cancer, but this is more pronounced in young women. On the contrary, older men are more likely to be diagnosed with cancer, although their increased risk is not statistically significant compared with the general population. Regarding cancer type, studies show an increased risk of Kaposi sarcoma, gynecologic and lung cancer in women, and bladder and kidney cancer in men. Immune-related cancers such as pos-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders and melanoma are increased in both sexes. Mortality also shows differences between sexes. Although cancer is the second cause of death in both male and female KTRs, studies show higher overall mortality in men and elderly recipients. However, the relative risk of cancer mortality compared with the general population is higher at a younger age, with disparate results regarding sex. Female KTRs appear to die at a younger age than males when compared with the general population. Differences in cancer rates by sex after renal transplantation need further studies. A better understanding of sex-specific differences in cancer epidemiology after KT could help nephrologists to better address pre-transplant counseling, to establish early surveillance programs, and to plan modifiable risk factors such as immunosuppression.

Post renal-transplant malignancy surveillance

It is well recognised that kidney transplant recipients have an increased risk of cancers compared with the age and gender matched general population. Malignancy is one of the commonest causes of death among this cohort after cardiovascular disease. This increased risk is largely attributable to the effect of immunosuppression, which impairs T cell function, immunosurveillance and the immunological control of oncogenic viral infections. Cancer related mortality rates are also higher in solid organ transplant recipients compared with the general population. While early diagnosis may improve outcomes in these patients, cancer screening is debatable given the lack of randomised controlled trials in this cohort, and treatment is often challenging. This article reviews the epidemiology and risk factors for the development of malignancy in the post-transplant setting, as well as screening guidelines for specific malignancies of which patients are at particular risk.