1
|
Vital A, Siman-Tov M, Shlomai G, Davidov Y, Cohen-Hagai K, Shashar M, Askenasy E, Ghinea R, Mor E, Hod T. Assessing Health-Related Quality of Life in Non-Directed Versus Directed Kidney Donors: Implications for the Promotion of Non-Directed Donation. Transpl Int 2024; 37:12417. [PMID: 38283057 PMCID: PMC10811092 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2024.12417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2023] [Accepted: 01/02/2024] [Indexed: 01/30/2024]
Abstract
Living kidney donation has increased significantly, but little is known about the post-donation health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of non-directed donors (NDs) vs. directed donors (DDs). We thus examined the outcomes of 112 living kidney donors (82 NDs, 30 DDs). For the primary outcomes-namely, the mean physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) scores of the 12-item Short Form Survey (SF-12) questionnaire-scores were significantly higher for the NDs vs. the DDs (PCS: +2.69, MCS: +4.43). For secondary outcomes, NDs had shorter hospital stays (3.4 vs. 4.4 days), returned to physical activity earlier (45 vs. 60 days), exercised more before and after donation, and continued physical activity post-donation. Regression analyses revealed that donor type and white blood cell count were predictive of the PCS-12 score, and donor type was predictive of the MCS-12 score. Non-directed donation was predictive of a shorter hospital stay (by 0.78 days, p < 0.001) and the odds of having PCS-12 and MCS-12 scores above 50 were almost 10 and 16 times higher for NDs, respectively (p < 0.05). These findings indicate the safety and potential benefits of promoting non-directed donation. However, careful selection processes must be maintained to prevent harm and exploitation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Assaf Vital
- Arrow Program for Medical Research Education, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel
- Adelson School of Medicine, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel
| | - Maya Siman-Tov
- Department of Emergency and Disaster Management, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Gadi Shlomai
- Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
- Department of Internal Medicine D and Hypertension Unit, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel
| | - Yana Davidov
- Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
- Liver Disease Center, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Keren Cohen-Hagai
- Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Meir Medical Center, Kfar Saba, Israel
| | - Moshe Shashar
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Laniado Hospital, Netanya, Israel
| | - Enosh Askenasy
- Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
- Renal Transplant Center, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel
| | - Ronen Ghinea
- Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
- Renal Transplant Center, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel
| | - Eytan Mor
- Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
- Renal Transplant Center, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel
| | - Tammy Hod
- Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
- Renal Transplant Center, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zuchowski M, Mamode N, Draper H, Gogalniceanu P, Norton S, Chilcot J, Auburn T, Clarke A, Williams L, Burnapp L, McCrone P, Maple H. Exploring Staff Attitudes Towards Unspecified Kidney Donors in the United Kingdom: Results From the BOUnD Study. Transpl Int 2023; 36:11258. [PMID: 37359823 PMCID: PMC10285071 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2023.11258] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2023] [Accepted: 05/23/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023]
Abstract
Unspecified kidney donation (UKD) has made substantial contributions to the UK living donor programme. Nevertheless, some transplant professionals are uncomfortable with these individuals undergoing surgery. This study aimed to qualitatively explore the attitudes of UK healthcare professionals towards UKD. An opportunistic sample was recruited through the Barriers and Outcomes in Unspecified Donation (BOUnD) study covering six UK transplant centres: three high volume and three low volume centres. Interview transcripts were analysed using inductive thematic analysis. The study provided comprehensive coverage of the UK transplant community, involving 59 transplant professionals. We identified five themes: staff's conception of the ethics of UKD; presence of the known recipient in the donor-recipient dyad; need for better management of patient expectations; managing visceral reactions about the "typical" unspecified kidney donor; complex attitudes toward a promising new practice. This is the first in-depth qualitative study of attitudes of transplant professionals towards UKD. The data uncovered findings with strong clinical implications for the UKD programme, including the need for a uniform approach towards younger candidates that is adhered to by all transplant centres, the need to equally extend the rigorous assessment to both specified and unspecified donors, and a new approach to managing donor expectations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mira Zuchowski
- Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Transplantation, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nizam Mamode
- Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Heather Draper
- Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
| | - Peter Gogalniceanu
- Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sam Norton
- Department of Transplantation, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Joseph Chilcot
- Department of Transplantation, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Timothy Auburn
- School of Psychology, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, United Kingdom
| | - Alexis Clarke
- School of Psychology, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, United Kingdom
| | - Lynsey Williams
- School of Psychology, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, United Kingdom
| | - Lisa Burnapp
- Directorate of Organ and Tissue Donation and Transplantation, NHS Blood and Transplant, Watford, United Kingdom
| | - Paul McCrone
- Institute for Lifecourse Development, University of Greenwich, London, United Kingdom
| | - Hannah Maple
- Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Karydis N, Maroulis I. Changing landscape in living kidney donation in Greece. World J Transplant 2023; 13:28-35. [PMID: 36908308 PMCID: PMC9993187 DOI: 10.5500/wjt.v13.i2.28] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2022] [Revised: 01/05/2023] [Accepted: 02/08/2023] [Indexed: 02/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Patients with end-stage renal disease in Greece are facing long waiting times to receive a kidney transplant from a deceased donor. Living kidney donation offers a valuable alternative that provides optimal outcomes and significantly expands the donor pool but still remains relatively underutilised. Developments around the world in the field of kidney transplantation mandate a change in current practice to include additional options for living donation through paired exchange, antibody-incompatible transplantation and other strategies, following careful consideration of the cultural and ethical factors involved in these complex clinical decisions. An increase in living donation rates may be achieved in several ways, including targeted campaigning to overcome potential barriers. Educating clinicians on transplantation will prove as equally important as informing patients and prospective donors but requires training and resources. Adoption of established practices and implementation of new strategies must be tailored to the needs of the Greek donor and recipient population. Local beliefs about donation, perception of associated risk and other social characteristics must be considered in the design of future strategies. Facilitating living donation in a safe environment with appropriate donor and recipient education will form the solid foundation of a new era of kidney transplantation in Greece.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikolaos Karydis
- Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, University of Patras, Patras 26504, Greece
| | - Ioannis Maroulis
- Department of General Surgery, University of Patras, Patras 26504, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Courtney AE, Moorlock G, Van Assche K, Burnapp L, Mamode N, Lennerling A, Dor FJMF. Living Donor Kidney Transplantation in Older Individuals: An Ethical Legal and Psychological Aspects of Transplantation (ELPAT) View. Transpl Int 2023; 36:11139. [PMID: 37152615 PMCID: PMC10161899 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2023.11139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2022] [Accepted: 04/12/2023] [Indexed: 05/09/2023]
Abstract
Living donor transplantation is the optimal treatment for suitable patients with end-stage kidney disease. There are particular advantages for older individuals in terms of elective surgery, timely transplantation, and early graft function. Yet, despite the superiority of living donor transplantation especially for this cohort, older patients are significantly less likely to access this treatment modality than younger age groups. However, given the changing population demographic in recent decades, there are increasing numbers of older but otherwise healthy individuals with kidney disease who could benefit from living donor transplantation. The complex reasons for this inequity of access are explored, including conscious and unconscious age-related bias by healthcare professionals, concerns relating to older living donors, ethical anxieties related to younger adults donating to aging patients, unwillingness of potential older recipients to consider living donation, and the relevant legislation. There is a legal and moral duty to consider the inequity of access to living donor transplantation, recognising both the potential disparity between chronological and physiological age in older patients, and benefits of this treatment for individuals as well as society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aisling E. Courtney
- Regional Nephrology and Transplant Unit, Belfast City Hospital, Belfast, United Kingdom
- *Correspondence: Aisling E. Courtney,
| | - Greg Moorlock
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
| | - Kristof Van Assche
- Research Group Personal Rights and Property Rights, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Lisa Burnapp
- NHS Blood and Transplant, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Nizam Mamode
- Department of Surgery, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Annette Lennerling
- The Transplant Centre, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Frank J. M. F. Dor
- Imperial College Renal and Transplant Centre, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Pronk MC, Zuidema WC, Weimar W, Van De Wetering J, Ismail SY, Massey EK. Twenty Years of Unspecified Kidney Donation: Unspecified Donors Looking Back on Their Donation Experiences. Transpl Int 2023; 36:10959. [PMID: 36925946 PMCID: PMC10011065 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2023.10959] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2022] [Accepted: 01/30/2023] [Indexed: 03/02/2023]
Abstract
The Netherlands was the first European country to implement unspecified kidney donation in 2000. This qualitative study aimed to evaluate the experiences of unspecified kidney donors (UKDs) in our transplant institute to improve the care for this valuable group of donors. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 106 UKDs who donated between 2000-2016 (response rate 84%). Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and independently coded by 2 researchers in NVivo using thematic analysis. The following 14 themes reflecting donor experiences were found: Satisfaction with donation; Support from social network; Interpersonal stress; Complaints about hospital care; Uncertainty about donor approval; Life on hold between approval and actual donation; Donation requires perseverance and commitment; Recovery took longer than expected; Normalization of the donation; Becoming an advocate for living kidney donation; Satisfaction with anonymity; Ongoing curiosity about outcome or recipient; Importance of anonymous communication; Anonymity is not watertight. The data reinforced that unspecified kidney donation is a positive experience for donors and that they were generally satisfied with the procedures. Most important complaints about the procedure concerned the length of the assessment procedure and the lack of acknowledgment for UKDs from both their recipients and health professionals. Suggestions are made to address the needs of UKDs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathilde C Pronk
- Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Willij C Zuidema
- Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Willem Weimar
- Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Jacqueline Van De Wetering
- Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Sohal Y Ismail
- Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Emma K Massey
- Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lim WH, Chan KE, Ng CH, Tan DJH, Tay PWL, Chin YH, Yong JN, Xiao J, Fu CE, Nah B, Tiong HY, Syn N, Devi K, Griva K, Mak LLY, Huang DQ, Fung J, Siddiqui MS, Muthiah M, Tan EXX. A qualitative systematic review of anonymous/unspecified living kidney and liver donors' perspectives. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0277792. [PMID: 36584032 PMCID: PMC9803135 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277792] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2022] [Accepted: 11/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES & BACKGROUND Anonymous live organ donors or unspecified donors are individuals willing to be organ donors for any transplant recipient with whom they have no biological or antecedent emotional relationship. Despite excellent recipient outcomes and the potential to help address organ scarcity, controversy surrounds the unconditional act of gifting one's organs to an unrelated recipient. This qualitative systematic review provides insights into the first-hand experiences, motivations, and challenges that unspecified donors face. METHODS A systematic search was conducted on Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Web of Science database for qualitative literature regarding unspecified living donors' motivations and experiences in liver and kidney transplantation. An inductive thematic analysis was conducted to generate themes and supportive subthemes. RESULTS 12 studies were included. The four major themes were (i) motivations, (ii) perception of risks, (iii) donor support, and (iv) benefits of donation. Unspecified donors demonstrated a deep sense of social responsibility but tended to underestimate health risks in favour of benefits for recipients. Despite the lack of emotional support from family and friends, the decision to donate was a resolute personal decision for donors. Majority benefitted emotionally and did not express regret. CONCLUSION This qualitative review bridges the gap in literature on unspecified living donor psychology and provides a comprehensive understanding of the decision-making matrix and experiences of donors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wen Hui Lim
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Kai En Chan
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Cheng Han Ng
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Darren Jun Hao Tan
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Phoebe Wen Lin Tay
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Yip Han Chin
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Jie Ning Yong
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Jieling Xiao
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Clarissa Elysia Fu
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Benjamin Nah
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Ho Yee Tiong
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- National University Centre for Organ Transplantation, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Urology, University Surgical Cluster, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Nicholas Syn
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Kamala Devi
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Konstadina Griva
- Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Loey Lung Yi Mak
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong
| | - Daniel Q. Huang
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
- National University Centre for Organ Transplantation, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| | - James Fung
- Division of Liver Transplantation, Department of Surgery at Queen Mary Hospital, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong
| | - Mohammad Shadab Siddiqui
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, United States of America
| | - Mark Muthiah
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
- National University Centre for Organ Transplantation, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Eunice X. X. Tan
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
- National University Centre for Organ Transplantation, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Frutos MÁ, Crespo M, Valentín MDLO, Alonso-Melgar Á, Alonso J, Fernández C, García-Erauzkin G, González E, González-Rinne AM, Guirado L, Gutiérrez-Dalmau A, Huguet J, Moral JLLD, Musquera M, Paredes D, Redondo D, Revuelta I, Hofstadt CJVD, Alcaraz A, Alonso-Hernández Á, Alonso M, Bernabeu P, Bernal G, Breda A, Cabello M, Caro-Oleas JL, Cid J, Diekmann F, Espinosa L, Facundo C, García M, Gil-Vernet S, Lozano M, Mahillo B, Martínez MJ, Miranda B, Oppenheimer F, Palou E, Pérez-Saez MJ, Peri L, Rodríguez O, Santiago C, Tabernero G, Hernández D, Domínguez-Gil B, Pascual J. Recommendations for living donor kidney transplantation. Nefrologia 2022; 42 Suppl 2:5-132. [PMID: 36503720 DOI: 10.1016/j.nefroe.2022.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2021] [Accepted: 10/26/2021] [Indexed: 06/17/2023] Open
Abstract
This Guide for Living Donor Kidney Transplantation (LDKT) has been prepared with the sponsorship of the Spanish Society of Nephrology (SEN), the Spanish Transplant Society (SET), and the Spanish National Transplant Organization (ONT). It updates evidence to offer the best chronic renal failure treatment when a potential living donor is available. The core aim of this Guide is to supply clinicians who evaluate living donors and transplant recipients with the best decision-making tools, to optimise their outcomes. Moreover, the role of living donors in the current KT context should recover the level of importance it had until recently. To this end the new forms of incompatible HLA and/or ABO donation, as well as the paired donation which is possible in several hospitals with experience in LDKT, offer additional ways to treat renal patients with an incompatible donor. Good results in terms of patient and graft survival have expanded the range of circumstances under which living renal donors are accepted. Older donors are now accepted, as are others with factors that affect the decision, such as a borderline clinical history or alterations, which when evaluated may lead to an additional number of transplantations. This Guide does not forget that LDKT may lead to risk for the donor. Pre-donation evaluation has to centre on the problems which may arise over the short or long-term, and these have to be described to the potential donor so that they are able take them into account. Experience over recent years has led to progress in risk analysis, to protect donors' health. This aspect always has to be taken into account by LDKT programmes when evaluating potential donors. Finally, this Guide has been designed to aid decision-making, with recommendations and suggestions when uncertainties arise in pre-donation studies. Its overarching aim is to ensure that informed consent is based on high quality studies and information supplied to donors and recipients, offering the strongest possible guarantees.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Marta Crespo
- Nephrology Department, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Juana Alonso
- Nephrology Department, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Spain
| | | | | | - Esther González
- Nephrology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 Octubre, Spain
| | | | - Lluis Guirado
- Nephrology Department, Fundacio Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Jorge Huguet
- RT Surgical Team, Fundació Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Mireia Musquera
- Urology Department, Hospital Clinic Universitari, Barcelona, Spain
| | - David Paredes
- Donation and Transplantation Coordination Department, Hospital Clinic Universitari, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Ignacio Revuelta
- Nephrology and RT Department, Hospital Clinic Universitari, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Antonio Alcaraz
- Urology Department, Hospital Clinic Universitari, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Manuel Alonso
- Regional Transplantation Coordination, Seville, Spain
| | | | - Gabriel Bernal
- Nephrology Department, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville, Spain
| | - Alberto Breda
- RT Surgical Team, Fundació Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mercedes Cabello
- Nephrology Department, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Spain
| | | | - Joan Cid
- Apheresis and Cell Therapy Unit, Haemotherapy and Haemostasis Department, Hospital Clinic Universitari, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Fritz Diekmann
- Nephrology and RT Department, Hospital Clinic Universitari, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Laura Espinosa
- Paediatric Nephrology Department, Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Carme Facundo
- Nephrology Department, Fundacio Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Miquel Lozano
- Apheresis and Cell Therapy Unit, Haemotherapy and Haemostasis Department, Hospital Clinic Universitari, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | - Eduard Palou
- Immunology Department, Hospital Clinic i Universitari, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Lluis Peri
- Urology Department, Hospital Clinic Universitari, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Domingo Hernández
- Nephrology Department, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Spain
| | | | - Julio Pascual
- Nephrology Department, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Morris T, Maple H, Norton S, Chilcot J, Burnapp L, Draper H, Mamode N, McCrone P. Challenges and Opportunities in the Supply of Living Kidney Donation in the UK National Health Service: An Economic Perspective. Transplantation 2022; 106:2137-2142. [PMID: 35675431 PMCID: PMC9592159 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2021] [Revised: 03/11/2022] [Accepted: 03/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
End-stage kidney disease is a significant burden on the healthcare systems of many countries, and this is likely to continue because of an increasingly aging and comorbid population. Multiple studies have demonstrated a significant clinical benefit in transplantation when compared with dialysis, however, there continues to be a shortage of donor kidneys available. This article provides an economic perspective on issues pertinent to living kidney donation and transplantation. Although ethics, equity, and cultural considerations often seem at odds with economic concepts around resource allocation, this article explains the situation around supply and demand for living kidneys and illustrates how this has been addressed in the economic literature. The article discusses different policy recommendations for resolving the imbalance between supply and demand in kidney donation, through policies under 3 main approaches: increasing supply, decreasing demand, and improving the allocation of kidney supply.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiyi Morris
- King’s Health Economics, Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Hannah Maple
- Department of Renal Transplantation, Guy’s and St. Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust/King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sam Norton
- Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Joseph Chilcot
- Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Lisa Burnapp
- Directorate of Organ and Tissue Donation and Transplantation, NHS Blood and Transplant, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Heather Draper
- Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
| | - Nizam Mamode
- Department of Renal Transplantation, Guy’s and St. Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust/King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Paul McCrone
- King’s Health Economics, Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
- Institute for Lifecourse Development, University of Greenwich, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Okidi O, Sharma V, Piscoran O, Biggins F, Singh R, Augustine T. The altruistic elderly, a valuable but unrecognised kidney donor group. A case report of an 85-year-old unspecified kidney donor. BMC Geriatr 2022; 22:826. [PMID: 36303107 PMCID: PMC9615365 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-022-03511-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2021] [Accepted: 10/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Kidney transplantation is the definitive treatment for end stage renal disease (ESRD), offering improved quality of life and survival benefit over remaining on dialysis. There is, however, a prevailing significant mismatch between patients awaiting transplantation and available donor kidneys. Over time, initial stringent donor criteria have broadened and organs from extended criteria donors (ECDs) and older donors are now being accepted for transplantation. The spectrum of living donors has also undergone a change from close family members to an increasingly non-related, non-directed altruistic donors, newly classified as ‘unspecified’ donors. Unspecified elderly donors could be a potential untapped resource to expanding the kidney donor pool globally. Case Presentation We present a case of an 85 year and 8 months old individual, who donated to an unrelated non-directed matched recipient in the national deceased donor transplant waiting list with excellent donor and recipient outcomes at 7 years. Conclusion To our knowledge she is one of the oldest reported unspecified living kidney donors in the world to date. This case illustrates that elderly donors in good health can come forward to donate, knowing that it is safe and valuable. Once the immediate perioperative challenges after kidney donation are managed, elderly donors rarely encounter long term sequelae. We therefore report this case to increase awareness and refocus attention of transplant teams on elderly donors as a potential untapped group to help address the organ shortage problem in renal transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Okechukwu Okidi
- The Manchester Centre for Transplantation, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK. .,Abdominal Organ Transplantation, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| | - Videha Sharma
- The Manchester Centre for Transplantation, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK
| | - Oana Piscoran
- The Manchester Centre for Transplantation, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK
| | - Fiona Biggins
- Department of Renal Medicine, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK
| | - Rajinder Singh
- The Manchester Centre for Transplantation, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK
| | - Titus Augustine
- The Manchester Centre for Transplantation, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK.,Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, Biology and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kurleto P, Tomaszek L, Milaniak I, Bramstedt KA. Polish attitudes towards unspecified kidney donation: a cross-sectional study. BMC Nephrol 2022; 23:142. [PMID: 35418039 PMCID: PMC9006497 DOI: 10.1186/s12882-022-02767-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2021] [Accepted: 03/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic kidney disease effects about 4.2 million people in Poland, yet Polish organ donation research is rare. In addition, compared to other countries in the world, Poland has a relatively low living donation rate. Still, little is known about how Poles would react to the possibility of living kidney donation to strangers. A study was conducted to examine public opinion about living kidney donation, as well as their knowledge about it, willingness to donate to a stranger, and support for a possible expansion of existing Polish organ donation legislation to include living donation to strangers. METHODS A self-report questionnaire, which included a socio-demographic datasheet (9 questions), 16 questions about attitudes towards living donation, and 1 question about knowledge concerning transplantation law was sent to the respondents from December 2020 - February 2021. Logistic regression was used to assess factors affecting the support of the legalization of unspecified kidney donation amongst the participants. RESULTS More than sixty percent (62.1) of respondents supported legalization of unspecified living kidney donation. Such legalization would be accepted by people who accept a choice of a family member to donate a kidney to a stranger (OR = 3.50; Cl 95%: 1.49 to 4.85), who think bone-marrow transplant is safe (OR = 2.65; Cl 95%: 1.80 to 3.91), recognize the benefit of carrying out tests before donating a kidney (OR = 2.56; Cl 95%: 1.79 to 3.69), would agree to receive a kidney from another person (OR = 2.24; Cl 95%: 2.53 to 3.13), or would agree to donate organs after death (OR = 2.06; Cl 95%: 1.45 to 2.95). However, support for unspecified living kidney donation would not be given by respondents fearing the risk of organ trafficking (OR = 0.54; Cl 95%: 0.38 to 0.79). CONCLUSIONS In Poland there is strong support for legalization of unspecified living kidney donation. It is vital that future legislation define organ trafficking as a crime with serious punishment so that legal unspecified living kidney donation is not hindered. TRIAL REGISTRATION The study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT04789122 ) on 08/03/2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paulina Kurleto
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski University, ul. Gustawa Herlinga-Grudzińskiego 1, 30-705, Krakow, Poland.
| | - Lucyna Tomaszek
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski University, ul. Gustawa Herlinga-Grudzińskiego 1, 30-705, Krakow, Poland
| | - Irena Milaniak
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski University, ul. Gustawa Herlinga-Grudzińskiego 1, 30-705, Krakow, Poland.,John Paul II Hospital, Cracow, Poland
| | - Katrina A Bramstedt
- Faculty of Health Sciences & Medicine, Bond University, 14 University Drive Gold Coast, Gold Coast, QLD, 4226, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Recomendaciones para el trasplante renal de donante vivo. Nefrologia 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.nefro.2021.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
|
12
|
Pronk MC, Burnapp L, Reinders MEJ, Massey EK. Relinquishing Anonymity in Living Donor Kidney Transplantation: Lessons Learned From the UK Policy for Anonymous Donors. Transpl Int 2022; 35:10091. [PMID: 35185377 PMCID: PMC8842267 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2022.10091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2021] [Accepted: 01/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Anonymous living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) is performed in many countries and policies on anonymity differ. The UK is the only European country with a conditional policy, allowing pairs to break anonymity post-transplant. There is little evidence on how contact after anonymous LDKT is experienced. In this cross-sectional study participants who donated or received a kidney through non-directed altruistic kidney donation or within the UK living kidney sharing scheme completed a questionnaire on their experiences with and attitudes towards anonymity. Non-parametric statistics were used to analyse the data. 207 recipients and 354 donors participated. Anonymity was relinquished among 11% of recipients and 8% of donors. Non-anonymous participants were generally content with non-anonymity. They reported positive experiences with contact/meeting the other party. Participants who remained anonymous were content with anonymity, however, 38% would have liked to meet post-transplant. If the other party would like to meet, this number increased to 64%. Although participants agreed with anonymity before surgery, they believe that, if desired, a meeting should be allowed after surgery. UK donors and recipients were satisfied with conditional anonymity and experiences with breaking anonymity were positive. These results support the expansion of conditional anonymity to other countries that allow anonymous LDKT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathilde C. Pronk
- Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
- *Correspondence: Mathilde C. Pronk,
| | - Lisa Burnapp
- Department of Transplantation and Nephrology, Guy’s & St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Marlies E. J. Reinders
- Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Emma K. Massey
- Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Thomas R, Consolo H, Oniscu GC. Have we reached the limits in altruistic kidney donation? Transpl Int 2021; 34:1187-1197. [PMID: 34008872 DOI: 10.1111/tri.13921] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2021] [Revised: 05/11/2021] [Accepted: 05/12/2021] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Altruistic donation (unspecified donation) is an important aspect of living donor kidney transplantation. Although donation to a stranger is lawful and supported in many countries, it remains uncommon and not actively promoted. Herein, we ask the question if we have reached the limit in altruistic donation. In doing so, we examine important ethical questions that define the limits of unspecified donation, such as the appropriate balance between autonomous decision-making and paternalistic protection of the donor, the extent of outcome uncertainty and risk-benefit analyses that donors should be allowed to accept. We also consider the scrutiny and acceptance of donor motives, the potential for commercialization, donation to particular categories of recipients (including those encountered through social media) and the ethical boundaries of active promotion of unspecified kidney donation. We conclude that there is scope to increase the number of living donation kidney transplants further by optimizing existing practices to support and promote unspecified donation. A number of strategies including optimization of the assessment process, innovative approaches to reach potential donors together with reimbursement of expenses and a more specific recognition of unspecified donation are likely to lead to a meaningful increase in this type of donation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Thomas
- Edinburgh Transplant Centre, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | - Gabriel C Oniscu
- Edinburgh Transplant Centre, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, UK.,Department of Clinical Surgery, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Zuchowski M, Mamode N, Draper H, Gogalniceanu P, Norton S, Chilcot J, Clarke A, Williams L, Auburn T, Maple H. Experiences of completed and withdrawn unspecified kidney donor candidates in the United Kingdom: An inductive thematic analysis from the BOUnD study. Br J Health Psychol 2021; 26:958-976. [DOI: 10.1111/bjhp.12514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2020] [Revised: 12/23/2020] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Mira Zuchowski
- Department of Psychology Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience King's College London London UK
| | - Nizam Mamode
- Department of Transplantation Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust London UK
| | - Heather Draper
- Health Sciences Warwick Medical School University of Warwick Coventry UK
| | - Peter Gogalniceanu
- Department of Transplantation Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust London UK
| | - Sam Norton
- Department of Psychology Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience King's College London London UK
| | - Joseph Chilcot
- Department of Psychology Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience King's College London London UK
| | - Alexis Clarke
- School of Psychology University of Plymouth Plymouth UK
| | | | | | - Hannah Maple
- Department of Transplantation Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust London UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ceuppens S, Kimenai HJAN, Klop KWJ, Zuidema WC, Betjes MGH, Weimar W, IJzermans JNM, Dor FJMF, Minnee RC. Unspecified live kidney donation by urological patients. World J Transplant 2020; 10:215-222. [PMID: 32850289 PMCID: PMC7416359 DOI: 10.5500/wjt.v10.i8.215] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2020] [Revised: 06/29/2020] [Accepted: 07/01/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Individuals with benign kidney disorders undergoing nephrectomy have three possibilities: Autotransplantation, with a certain risk of complications, but without a clear benefit; discarding the kidney; or living kidney donation.
AIM To investigate whether patients with benign kidney disorders and a medical indication for nephrectomy are suitable as unspecified live kidney donors.
METHODS We searched all clinical data from 1994-2019 for unspecified donors and their transplant recipients (n = 160). Nine of these 160 donors had pre-existing kidney disorders necessitating nephrectomy and had decided to donate their kidney anonymously after discussing the possibility of kidney donation. We studied the clinical course of these nine donating patients and their transplant recipients.
RESULTS Seven of nine donating patients indicated unbearable loin pain as the main complaint, one donating patient refused ureterocutaneostomy and one had two aneurysms of the renal artery. Postoperatively, seven donating patients described absence of pain and one a significant reduction after the nephrectomy. The average 1-year creatinine level in the donating patients was 88 µmol/L and after a median of 6.9 years the average creatinine level was 86.6 µmol/L. In the transplant recipients, one major complication occurred which led to death and in one transplant recipient graft function failed to normalize at first but has been stable for nine years now. Currently, all transplant recipients are off dialysis.
CONCLUSION Our data show that patients undergoing nephrectomy as part of treatment in selected kidney disorders can function as live kidney donors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastiaan Ceuppens
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam 3015GD, Netherlands
| | - Hendrikus J A N Kimenai
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam 3015GD, Netherlands
| | - Karel W J Klop
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam 3015GD, Netherlands
| | - Willij C Zuidema
- Department of Internal Medicine, Nephrology and Kidney Transplant Unit, Rotterdam 3000CA, Netherlands
| | - Michiel G H Betjes
- Department of Internal Medicine, Nephrology and Kidney Transplant Unit, Rotterdam 3000CA, Netherlands
| | - Willem Weimar
- Department of Internal Medicine, Nephrology and Kidney Transplant Unit, Rotterdam 3000CA, Netherlands
| | - Jan N M IJzermans
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam 3015GD, Netherlands
| | - Frank J M F Dor
- Imperial College Renal and Transplant Unit, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London W12 0HS, United Kingdom
| | - Robert C Minnee
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam 3015GD, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Waterman AD, Wood EH, Ranasinghe ON, Faye Lipsey A, Anderson C, Balliet W, Holland-Carter L, Maurer S, Aurora Posadas Salas M. A Digital Library for Increasing Awareness About Living Donor Kidney Transplants: Formative Study. JMIR Form Res 2020; 4:e17441. [PMID: 32480362 PMCID: PMC7404010 DOI: 10.2196/17441] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2019] [Revised: 05/08/2020] [Accepted: 05/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background It is not common for people to come across a living kidney donor, let alone consider whether they would ever donate a kidney themselves while they are alive. Narrative storytelling, the sharing of first-person narratives based on lived experience, may be an important way to improve education about living donor kidney transplants (LDKTs). Developing ways to easily standardize and disseminate diverse living donor stories using digital technology could inspire more people to consider becoming living donors and reduce the kidney shortage nationally. Objective This paper aimed to describe the development of the Living Donation Storytelling Project, a web-based digital library of living donation narratives from multiple audiences using video capture technology. Specifically, we aimed to describe the theoretical foundation and development of the library, a protocol to capture diverse storytellers, the characteristics and experiences of participating storytellers, and the frequency with which any ethical concerns about the content being shared emerged. Methods This study invited kidney transplant recipients who had received LDKTs, living donors, family members, and patients seeking LDKTs to record personal stories using video capture technology by answering a series of guided prompts on their computer or smartphone and answering questions about their filming experience. The digital software automatically spliced responses to open-ended prompts, creating a seamless story available for uploading to a web-based library and posting to social media. Each story was reviewed by a transplant professional for the disclosure of protected health information (PHI), pressuring others to donate, and medical inaccuracies. Disclosures were edited. Results This study recruited diverse storytellers through social media, support groups, churches, and transplant programs. Of the 137 storytellers who completed the postsurvey, 105/137 (76.6%) were white and 99/137 (72.2%) were female. They spent 62.5 min, on average, recording their story, with a final median story length of 10 min (00:46 seconds to 32:16 min). A total of 94.8% (130/137) of storytellers were motivated by a desire to educate the public; 78.1% (107/137) were motivated to help more people become living donors; and 75.9% (104/137) were motivated to dispel myths. The ease of using the technology and telling their story varied, with the fear of being on film, emotional difficulty talking about their experiences, and some technological barriers being reported. PHI, most commonly surnames and transplant center names, was present in 62.9% (85/135) of stories and was edited out. Conclusions With appropriate sensitivity to ensure diverse recruitment, ethical review of content, and support for storytellers, web-based storytelling platforms may be a cost-effective and convenient way to further engage patients and increase the curiosity of the public in learning more about the possibility of becoming living donors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy D Waterman
- Division of Nephrology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.,Terasaki Research Institute, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Emily H Wood
- Division of Nephrology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Omesh N Ranasinghe
- Division of Nephrology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | | | - Crystal Anderson
- Division of Nephrology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Wendy Balliet
- Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | | | - Stacey Maurer
- Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|