Deep Remission With Vedolizumab in Patients With Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis: A GEMINI 1 post hoc Analysis

Emergency colectomy for massive rectal bleeding in a patient with well-controlled ulcerative colitis receiving Vedolizumab

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory condition, with a relapsing-remitting course. The case presented poses some valid questions regarding short-term and long-term management of patients with UC, and if the outcome (colectomy) could have been delayed or even prevented. Rectal bleeding is a cardinal symptom in patients with UC and it occurs among all patients during active disease. Massive rectal bleeding is an uncommon, but serious, complication of UC accounting for 0.1-1.4% of admissions. It is, nonetheless, noteworthy that instances of acute significant lower gastrointestinal bleeding accompanied by hemodynamic instability are infrequent. The rate of colectomy appears to be positively impacted by biological treatment. However, a refractory condition is still the primary reason for surgery, indicating a pressing need for new treatment approaches. Here we present the case of a young male patient who developed massive rectal bleeding and underwent emergent colectomy with ileostomy while having clinical and biological remission (normal calprotectin levels) at week 10 of Vedolizumab treatment.

Clinical profiles and outcomes in patients with ulcerative colitis receiving standard and higher-than-standard doses of vedolizumab: findings from a real-world study in Europe

OBJECTIVE

Vedolizumab is an antibody targeting α4β7 integrin used in the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). Patients are commonly prescribed higher-than-standard doses if treatment response is inadequate, but little is known about the drivers and impact of increased dosing. Our objective was to use real-world data to describe vedolizumab dosages in current clinical practice, patient characteristics, physicians' reasons for prescribing vedolizumab, and physician treatment satisfaction.

METHODS

Data were derived from the Adelphi Real World UC vedolizumab Chart Review, a cross-sectional survey of gastroenterologists and their UC patients, conducted in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom between December 2022 and March 2023. Gastroenterologists provided data on patient demographics, clinical characteristics, treatment and vedolizumab dosage history, reasons for dose choice, and treatment satisfaction.

RESULTS

Data were returned on 448 patients by 112 gastroenterologists. Overall, 83.5% of patients were on a standard vedolizumab dose and 10.3% were on a higher-than-standard dose. The worsening of symptoms was the most cited reason for higher doses. Most reported symptoms at survey were fatigue, abdominal distention or pain, diarrhea, and bowel urgency, with the latter particularly in higher-than-standard dose patients. Patients on higher-than-standard dose had high rates of mild (37.0%) or moderate (26.1%) disease, and low rates of remission (33.8%). Physicians were dissatisfied with treatment control for 2.7% of standard and 26.1% of higher-than-standard dose patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Over 10% of patients were receiving a higher-than-standard dose of vedolizumab, but despite this were found to have suboptimal clinical outcomes and low physician satisfaction.

The Role of IL-23 in the Pathogenesis and Therapy of Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Interleukin-23 (IL-23) is a proinflammatory cytokine produced mainly by macrophages and antigen-presenting cells (APCs) after antigenic stimulation. IL-23 plays a significant role as a mediator of tissue damage. Indeed, the irregularities in IL-23 and its receptor signaling have been implicated in inflammatory bowel disease. IL-23 interacts with both the innate and adaptive immune systems, and IL-23/Th17 appears to be involved in the development of chronic intestinal inflammation. The IL-23/Th17 axis may be a critical driver of this chronic inflammation. This review summarizes the main aspects of IL-23's biological function, cytokines that control cytokine production, effectors of the IL-23 response, and the molecular mechanisms associated with IBD pathogenesis. Although IL-23 modulates and impacts the development, course, and recurrence of the inflammatory response, the etiology and pathophysiology of IBD are not completely understood, but mechanism research shows huge potential for clinical applications as therapeutic targets in IBD treatment.

Single-cell atlas of the human neonatal small intestine affected by necrotizing enterocolitis

Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is a gastrointestinal complication of premature infants with high rates of morbidity and mortality. A comprehensive view of the cellular changes and aberrant interactions that underlie NEC is lacking. This study aimed at filling in this gap. We combine single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq), T-cell receptor beta (TCRβ) analysis, bulk transcriptomics, and imaging to characterize cell identities, interactions, and zonal changes in NEC. We find an abundance of proinflammatory macrophages, fibroblasts, endothelial cells as well as T cells that exhibit increased TCRβ clonal expansion. Villus tip epithelial cells are reduced in NEC and the remaining epithelial cells up-regulate proinflammatory genes. We establish a detailed map of aberrant epithelial-mesenchymal-immune interactions that are associated with inflammation in NEC mucosa. Our analyses highlight the cellular dysregulations of NEC-associated intestinal tissue and identify potential targets for biomarker discovery and therapeutics.

Early Clinical Remission Is a Predictor of Long-Term Remission with the Use of Vedolizumab for Ulcerative Colitis

Vedolizumab (VDZ) is an α4β7 integrin-antibody used to manage refractory ulcerative colitis (UC). This retrospective multicenter study aimed to identify predictors of efficacy or the time points when evaluation of VDZ therapy for UC would be most useful. We compiled data on 87 patients with moderate to severe active UC that was treated with VDZ. Overall clinical remission (CR) rates at 6 weeks and 52 weeks after VDZ administration were 44.4% (bio-naïve 44.2%, bio-failure 44.8%) and 52.8% (bio-naïve 53.5%, bio-failure 51.7%) respectively. Also, 83.3% (bio-naïve 81.3%, bio-failure 85.7%) of patients achieved mucosal healing at week 52. Among patients with a CR at week 52, 73.3% had a CR at week 6. In contrast, of patients who discontinued VDZ, 82.4% had not reached a CR at week 6. Our study demonstrated that VDZ was effective in a large percentage of UC patients, with a high mucosal healing rate even after prior biological exposures. This suggests that VDZ can be a treatment option even in bio-failure cases. Additionally, it was considered that early CR can predict long-term remission and that week 6 can be a helpful evaluation point for treatment decisions when using VDZ for UC.

(Re)Appraising Remission in Ulcerative Colitis

As the therapeutic targets in ulcerative colitis (UC) shift from control of symptoms to mucosal healing and prevention of disease complications like disability, colectomy, and cancer, the definition of remission has evolved. The current definition of clinical remission is variable and is determined by the clinical context in which it is being used. This results in skepticism and uncertainty about the true meaning of the term "clinical remission." In this review, the authors reexamine the definition of clinical remission and propose a novel approach to define remission in UC.

Translating Results from VARSITY to Real World: Adalimumab vs Vedolizumab as First-line Biological in Moderate to Severe IBD

BACKGROUND

Selecting a first-line therapy remains challenging in IBD. Adalimumab (ADM) and vedolizumab (VDZ) effectively lead to endoscopic remission in moderate to severe IBD. The VARSITY trial showed superiority of VDZ over ADM in ulcerative colitis (UC) regarding clinical remission and endoscopic improvement at week 52. We explored these results in a real-world setting of UC and Crohn's disease (CD).

METHODS

This retrospective study followed a cohort of biologic-naïve patients starting ADM or VDZ from 2015-2019. Patients had moderate to severe disease (endoscopic Mayo score ≥2 for UC, presence of ulcerations for CD) prior to therapy initiation. For UC, endoscopic remission (endoscopic Mayo score 0) and improvement (endoscopic Mayo score ≤1) at week 52 were assessed. For CD, endoscopic remission (absence of ulcerations) and improvement (markedly better endoscopy despite ulcerations) at weeks 26-52 were studied. Treatment persistence was also evaluated.

RESULTS

In total, 195 biologic-naïve patients (109 UC; 86 CD) were included. In UC, VDZ was superior to ADM regarding endoscopic remission (29% vs 11%, P = .03), endoscopic improvement (51% vs 26%, P = .01) at week 52, and treatment persistence (P = .04). In CD, no differences in endoscopic remission (VDZ 48% vs ADM 60%; P=0.37), improvement (VDZ 76% vs ADM 77%; P = 1.00), or treatment persistence (P=0.43) at weeks 26-52 were seen. Safety profiles were similar in UC and CD.

CONCLUSIONS

This real-world cohort study of biologic-naïve IBD patients found VDZ to be superior to ADM as first-line treatment for patients with UC-but not CD-regarding endoscopic remission at week 52 and treatment persistence.

Comparative efficacy and safety of infliximab and vedolizumab therapy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background and aims

There are limited comparative data for infliximab and vedolizumab in inflammatory bowel disease patients.

Methods

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of infliximab and vedolizumab in adult patients with moderate-to-severe Crohn’s disease or ulcerative colitis.

Results

We identified six eligible Crohn’s disease and seven eligible ulcerative colitis trials that randomised over 1900 participants per disease cohort to infliximab or vedolizumab. In the Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis cohorts, infliximab yielded better efficacy than vedolizumab for all analysed outcomes (CDAI-70, CDAI-100 responses, and clinical remission for Crohn’s disease and clinical response and clinical remission for ulcerative colitis) during the induction phase, with non-overlapping 95% confidence intervals. In the maintenance phase, similar proportions of infliximab- or vedolizumab-treated patients achieved clinical response, clinical remission, or mucosal healing in both Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis. For the safety outcomes, rates of adverse events, serious adverse events, and discontinuations due to adverse events were similar in infliximab- and vedolizumab-treated patients in both diseases. The infection rate was higher in infliximab for Crohn’s disease and higher in vedolizumab when treating patients with ulcerative colitis. There was no difference between the treatments in the proportions of patients who reported serious infections in both indications.

Conclusions

Indirect comparison of infliximab and vedolizumab trials in adult patients with moderate-to severe Crohn’s disease or ulcerative colitis demonstrated that infliximab has better efficacy in the induction phase and comparable efficacy during the maintenance phase and overall safety profile compared to vedolizumab.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12876-022-02347-1.

Recent advancements in clearance monitoring of monoclonal antibodies in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases

INTRODUCTION

Less than 50% of patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) receiving monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapy achieve endoscopic remission. Poor outcomes may indicate a need for dose optimization. During therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), drug concentrations are measured, and when found too low, dosage regimen escalations are performed. To date, benefits of TDM of mAbs in patients with IBD are uncertain.

AREAS COVERED

This review presents an overview of what clearance monitoring is, how it can be performed, and why and when it may be valuable in treating patients with IBD. Virtual patients were used for illustration. A literature search was performed to summarize current evidence for clearance monitoring in IBD and other disease settings.

EXPERT OPINION

During clearance monitoring, mAb clearance is calculated and monitored over time. Higher mAb clearance in patients with IBD has been associated with higher target load (target-mediated drug disposition), protein-losing enteropathy (fecal drug loss), and immunogenicity. Although not prospectively confirmed, clearance monitoring might facilitate identification of (yet) asymptomatic disease flares or presence of (yet) undetectable anti-drug antibodies. Furthermore, clearance monitoring may be used to predict treatment outcomes. Whether dosage regimen adjustments can modify the clearance time course and the treatment outcome is to be determined.

Proactive versus Reactive Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: Why, When, and How?

BACKGROUND

Up to a third of inflammatory bowel disease) patients show primary nonresponse to antitumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) biological therapy, and of those who respond, up to 40% develop secondary loss of response (LOR). Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) plays a crucial role in assessing patients with LOR to guide therapy by giving more of the drug or switching to a different biological agent. Although reactive TDM is suggested or recommended by the majority of gastroenterology associations, proactive TDM seems to be more controversial.

SUMMARY

In this article, we discuss the updated guidelines on TDM and will also discuss the available data supporting proactive and reactive TDM in patients with Crohn's disease and those with ulcerative colitis using the different available biological agents.

KEY MESSAGES

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is a valuable tool to aid in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) therapy optimization. Reactive TDM is widely accepted in IBD patients with suspected loss of response, especially in those receiving antitumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agents. Proactive TDM is emerging as a reasonable approach to patients initiated on anti-TNF therapy, specifically infliximab and, to some extent, adalimumab, particularly for patients with severe ulcerative colitis and fistulizing Crohn's disease. Similarly, TDM may play a role in patients considering de-escalation from combination therapy. To date, proactive TDM is not widely applied to ustekinumab and vedolizumab and more data are required before this becomes part of clinical practice.

The endoscopic diagnosis of mucosal healing and deep remission in inflammatory bowel disease

The therapeutic goal in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients has shifted from controlling the clinical activity alone to managing other associated problems. The concept of mucosal healing (MH) and deep remission (DR) are advocated and regarded as new therapeutic goals in IBD. However, the definition of MH still remains controversial. It is unclear whether or not the histological structures or functional factors should be included in the definition of DR in addition to clinical remission and MH. The classifications of white-light imaging (e.g. Mayo endoscopic subscore, UCEIS, CD Endoscopic Index of Severity, simple Endoscopic Score-CD) have been proposed and are now widely used to assess the severity as well as the MH of inflammation in IBD. In ulcerative colitis, magnifying chromoendoscopy has been shown to be useful to assess the MH of inflammation while other types of image-enhanced endoscopy, such as narrow-band imaging, have not. Endocytoscopy and confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) are also applied to assess the activity in IBD. These endoscopic procedures can estimate MH with more precision through observing the details of superficial structures, such as crypt openings. In addition, CLE can partially assess the mucosal function by detecting fluorescence leakage. Molecular imaging can possibly detect the molecules associated with inflammation, intestinal regeneration and differentiation, and various functions including the intestinal barrier and mucus secretion. These novel procedures may improve the diagnosis strategy of DR through the assessment of DR-associated factors such as the histological structures and functional factors in the near future.

Efficacy and Safety of Vedolizumab in Management of Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis: A Systematic Review

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is an inflammatory bowel disease and causes inflammation and ulcer of the colon. Vedolizumab is a newer biological agent with an inhibitory effect on α4β7 integrin approved for moderate to severe UC patients. Our study reviewed the clinical response, clinical remission, and mucosal healing of vedolizumab in moderate to severe UC management. Using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we conducted a literature search in PubMed, Google Scholar, and Science Direct, and nine studies were included in the systematic review. At week six, vedolizumab showed a significant clinical response. At week 52, vedolizumab showed significant mucosal healing and clinical remission. The most commonly associated adverse effects are nasopharyngitis, oropharyngeal infection, and gastrointestinal infection. However, additional clinical trials and observational studies with longer follow-ups are required to study the efficacy and safety of the drug.

Dose optimisation for Loss of Response to Vedolizumab- Pharmacokinetics and Immune Mechanisms

BACKGROUND

Real life data regarding pharmacokinetics of vedolizumab in patients needing dose optimisation are scarce. We set to examine whether pre-optimisation vedolizumab levels associate with therapy outcomes and which mechanisms explain the associations.

METHODS

A multicentre observational study assessed the outcome of dose increase in association with pre-escalation levels in vedolizumab-treated patients. SubsequentIy, α4β7 occupancy on peripheral blood [PB] and intestinal lamina propria [LP] tissues was investigated on various cellular subsets in patients undergoing lower endoscopy on infusion day. Cellular localisation of vedolizumab-bound α4β7 and effects on M1 and M2 macrophages were also explored.

RESULTS

A total of 161 inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] patients were included. Among 129/161 patients intensified during maintenance [Week 14 onward], pre-intensification trough levels were comparable or higher among those subsequently attaining post-optimisation clinical, biomarker, and endoscopic remission, compared with non-remitting patients [p = 0.09, 0.25, 0.04, respectively]. Similar results were demonstrated for those dose-optimised during induction [Week 6, n = 32]. In the immune sub-study [n = 43], free α4β7 receptors at trough were similarly low among patients with/without mucosal healing, on PB T cells [p = 0.15], LP T cells [p = 0.88], and on PB eosinophils [p = 0.08]. Integrin receptors on M1 and M2 macrophages were also saturated by low levels of vedolizumab and anti-inflammatory cytokine secretion was not increased. Co-localisation and dissociation experiments demonstrated membranal α4β7 receptors of two origins: non-internalised and newly generated α4β7, but re-binding was still complete at very low concentrations.

CONCLUSIONS

These results do not support pharmacokinetics as the mechanism responsible for loss of response to vedolizumab, nor do they support a need for higher drug concentration to enhance vedolizumab's immune effects. Higher pre-escalation levels may indicate less clearance [less severe disease] and higher likelihood of subsequent re-gained response, regardless of therapy escalation.

Faecal Calprotectin in Assessment of Mucosal Healing in Adults with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Meta-Analysis

Achieving mucosal healing in patients with inflammatory bowel disease is related to a higher incidence of sustained clinical remission and it translates to lower rates of hospitalisation and surgery. The assessment methods of disease activity and response to therapy are limited and mainly rely on colonoscopy. This meta-analysis reviews the effectiveness of using faecal calprotectin as a marker for mucosal healing in inflammatory bowel disease. Two meta-analyses were conducted in parallel. The analysis on the use of faecal calprotectin in monitoring mucosal healing in colonic Crohn’s disease is based on 16 publications (17 studies). The data set for diagnostic values of faecal calprotectin in ulcerative colitis is composed of 35 original publications (total 49 studies). The DOR for the use of faecal calprotectin in Crohn’s disease is estimated to be 11.20 and the area under the sROCis 0.829. In cases of ulcerative colitis, the DOR is 14.48, while the AUC sROC is 0.858. Heterogeneity of the studies was moderatetosubstantial. Collected data show overall good sensitivity and specificity of the faecal calprotectin test, as well as a good DOR. Thus, monitoring of mucosal healing with a non-invasive faecal calprotectin test may represent an attractive option for physicians and patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

Biologic Therapy for Ulcerative Colitis

Five biologics are approved for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC): infliximab, adalimumab, golimumab, vedolizumab, and ustekinumab. These drugs have varying levels of efficacy and are recommended as first-line treatment of moderate to severe UC. There has been only 1 head-to-head trial comparing the efficacy of the biologics, adalimumab and vedolizumab, which has important implications for management. Therapeutic drug monitoring of biologics, especially anti-TNF alpha agents, may improve the long-term efficacy of these agents. The future of treatment may include personalization of medications, based on patient-specific and disease-specific characteristics as well as biomarkers, along with appropriate therapeutic drug monitoring.

Development and Validation of Clinical Scoring Tool to Predict Outcomes of Treatment With Vedolizumab in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

We created and validated a clinical decision support tool (CDST) to predict outcomes of vedolizumab therapy for ulcerative colitis (UC).

METHODS

We performed logistic regression analyses of data from the GEMINI 1 trial, from 620 patients with UC who received vedolizumab induction and maintenance therapy (derivation cohort), to identify factors associated with corticosteroid-free remission (full Mayo score of 2 or less, no subscore above 1). We used these factors to develop a model to predict outcomes of treatment, which we called the vedolizumab CDST. We evaluated the correlation between exposure and efficacy. We validated the CDST in using data from 199 patients treated with vedolizumab in routine practice in the United States from May 2014 through December 2017.

RESULTS

Absence of exposure to a tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonist (+3 points), disease duration of 2 y or more (+3 points), baseline endoscopic activity (moderate vs severe) (+2 points), and baseline albumin concentration (+0.65 points per 1 g/L) were independently associated with corticosteroid-free remission during vedolizumab therapy. Patients in the derivation and validation cohorts were assigned to groups of low (CDST score, 26 points or less), intermediate (CDST score, 27-32 points), or high (CDST score, 33 points or more) probability of vedolizumab response. We observed a statistically significant linear relationship between probability group and efficacy (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.65), as well as drug exposure (P < .001) in the derivation cohort. In the validation cohort, a cutoff value of 26 points identified patients who did not respond to vedolizumab with high sensitivity (93%); only the low and intermediate probability groups benefited from reducing intervals of vedolizumab administration due to lack of response (P = .02). The vedolizumab CDST did not identify patients with corticosteroid-free remission during TNF antagonist therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

We used data from a trial of patients with UC to develop a scoring system, called the CDST, which identified patients most likely to enter corticosteroid-free remission during vedolizumab therapy, but not anti-TNF therapy. We validated the vedolizumab CDST in a separate cohort of patients in clinical practice. The CDST identified patients most likely to benefited from reducing intervals of vedolizumab administration due to lack of initial response. ClinicalTrials.gov no: NCT00783718.

Circulating α4β7+ Memory T Cells in Pediatric IBD Patients Express a Polyclonal T Cell Receptor Repertoire

Background

The integrin α4β7 is highly expressed on activated T cells and is thought to direct homing of lymphocytes to the intestine. Since ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD) are characterized by mucosal oligoclonal T cells' expansion, we aimed to assess whether similar repertoire features are identified in circulating gut-specific memory T cells.

Methods

Memory CD3⁺ T cells were isolated from blood samples of control subjects and patients with active UC or CD and then FACS-sorted into α4β7⁺ and α4β7^- populations. DNA was extracted from each subset and subjected to next-generation sequencing of the TCRβ. Different repertoire characteristics were compared between α4β7⁺ and α4β7^- subsets for each subject, and between groups.

Results

The percentages of memory T cells and α4β7⁺ cells were comparable between groups. α4β7⁺ memory T cells displayed a polyclonal distribution, in control subjects and in UC or CD patients, with similar indices of diversity. Strikingly, the clonal overlap between α4β7⁺ and α4β7^- T cells for each subject in all three groups was high, ranging between 20%-50%. We were unable to identify shared T cell clones that were specific to one of the groups.

Conclusion

α4β7⁺ memory T cells exhibited a polyclonal repertoire in both control subjects and patients with active inflammatory bowel disease, with high rates of overlap with α4β7^- memory T cells. Our study, along with additional recent reports, may suggest that the suppression of intestinal inflammation by vedolizumab is independent of the drug's effect on T cell migration to the gut.

Positioning Biologic Therapies in the Management of Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease

The incidence and prevalence of pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are rising worldwide, with a steep increase in children under 5 years of age. Compared to adult IBD, pediatric IBD presents with a more severe, aggressive phenotype and unique complications, notably growth impairment. Treatment goals include achieving intestinal healing, reaching growth potential, and optimizing quality of life, all while limiting drug toxicities. In the last 2 decades, the advent of anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) α agents has significantly increased the potential to reach these goals. However, nonresponse or loss of response to anti- TNFα agents is still encountered in approximately one-third of patients. Although the development of novel biologic therapies has offered new alternatives in recent years, the use of these therapies in the pediatric setting has been limited due to delayed approval. This article summarizes the key evidence for biologic agents currently used in the treatment of pediatric IBD and discusses challenges and barriers unique to pediatric drug development.

Vedolizumab and etrolizumab for ulcerative colitis: twins or simple cousins?

Introduction: Vedolizumab is a monoclonal antibody that selectively blocks α4β7 integrin and has already been approved for use in patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis both as first and second line. Etrolizumab is a monoclonal antibody still being tested, which acts with a dual mechanism by selectively inhibiting both α4β7 and αEβ7 integrins.Areas covered: This review provides an overview of the literature data of vedolizumab and etrolizumab, in order to define their role in the treatment of patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis.Expert opinion: Etrolizumab and vedolizumab block the α4β7 integrin with a similar action mechanism. However, the inhibition of αEβ7 integrin by etrolizumab distinguishes the two anti-integrins making them 'cousin' drugs. Phase 3 clinical trials are needed to confirm the promising etrolizumab's efficacy data and to resolve any doubts about its safety, allowing a clearer comparison with vedolizumab.

Long-term deep remission during maintenance therapy with biological agents in inflammatory bowel diseases

Background and aims: A multicentre, retrospective, non-interventional, patient chart review study was conducted to investigate deep (DR) and histological remission rates during maintenance therapy with biological agents in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).Methods: We reviewed clinical, endoscopic, and histological findings, and laboratory markers such as C-reactive protein (CRP) and faecal calprotectin (FC) on average of nine years after the initiation of anti-TNF-therapy. DR was defined as no clinical symptoms (The physicians' global assessment scores; PGA = 0) with endoscopic remission (the Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease [SES-CD] ≤ 2 or Mayo endoscopic subscore ≤1). Histological activity was defined as normal if only architectural alterations without cellularity changes occurred.Results: Of 117 IBD patients on maintenance therapy, 72 (62%; CD n = 55 [56%], UC n = 17 [85%]) patients were in DR. Of patients in DR, 76% were also in histological remission. 77% of patients remained on initiated biological treatment. UC patients achieved DR significantly more often than CD patients (p = .016). Both median CRP and FC levels were significantly lower in patients with DR.Conclusion: Reassuringly, almost two thirds of the IBD patients on maintenance therapy with biological agents maintained DR in the long-term, and more than two thirds of patients in DR achieved also histological remission. CD patients in DR had fewer surgical operations due to CD than patients not achieving DR.

Achieving Mucosal Healing in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: Which Drug Concentrations Need to Be Targeted?

Biologicals introduced a major shift in the treatment of patients suffering from inflammatory bowel diseases. Despite providing a tight disease control for many patients, a considerable proportion of patients will fail to respond favorably to treatment or will lose response over time. Therapeutic drug monitoring emerged as a valuable tool to guide clinical decision making as serum drug concentrations have been linked to outcomes. Focusing on mucosal healing as the ultimate treatment goal, different drug concentration thresholds to achieve this outcome have been identified in the literature and are summarized in this review. For therapeutic drug monitoring to be successful in guiding clinical decision making, the used assay, the sampling time point, and the outcome that is aimed for should be taken into account when interpreting drug concentration thresholds. Awareness of these essential aspects among clinicians will improve the implementation of therapeutic drug monitoring and aid in making an evidence‐based decision.

Therapeutic drug monitoring in inflammatory bowel disease: for every patient and every drug?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The current review provides an updated overview on the role of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of biological therapies in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We examine the data behind TDM for the antitumor necrosis factor agents, vedolizumab and ustekinumab, in patients with IBD. In addition, we discuss reactive vs. proactive TDM.

RECENT FINDINGS

There is a positive correlation between biologic drug concentrations and favorable therapeutic outcomes in IBD, although the majority of data refer to antitumor necrosis factor therapy. Reactive TDM has rationalized the management of patients with IBD with loss of response to biological therapy. Moreover, reactive TDM of infliximab has been proven to be more cost-effective when compared with empiric dose optimization. Preliminary data suggest that proactive TDM of infliximab and adalimumab applied in patients with clinical response/remission is associated with better therapeutic outcomes compared with standard of care (empiric treatment and/or reactive TDM).

SUMMARY

For all biologics in IBD, there is a positive correlation between drug concentrations and favorable therapeutic outcomes. Reactive TDM is the new standard of care for optimizing biologic therapies in IBD, whereas recent data suggest an important role of proactive TDM for optimizing antitumor necrosis factor therapy in IBD.

Mucosal healing in inflammatory bowel disease: Expanding horizon

Management of inflammatory bowel diseases has witnessed paradigm shift from 5-aminosalicylic acid and glucocorticoids to various immunosuppressant and biological agents. Targets of therapy have also been changed drastically from symptomatic improvement to mucosal, histological healing, and recently transmural healing. Mucosal healing is associated with reduced need of steroid therapy, hospitalization, and surgery. However, whether mucosal healing alters the natural history of disease remains to be proven. Though assessment of mucosal healing is traditionally done by endoscopic examination, newer tests like fecal calprotectin, capsule endoscopy, and magnetic resonance enterography have also shown promising results. Various immunosuppressants and biologicals are the main therapy being used to achieve mucosal healing. This review focuses on the need for achieving mucosal healing, its long-term benefits, various methods and algorithm for diagnosis, and achievement of mucosal healing.

Vedolizumab for the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases: from symptomatic control to mucosal healing

Anti-TNF-α have revolutionized the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease, but a significant proportion of patients do not respond or lose response over time after treatment with these drugs. Therefore, the development of drugs that act with a different mechanism of action is strongly needed. Vedolizumab is a selective blocker of intestinal integrin α4β7, which inhibits lymphocyte trafficking and blocks the inflammatory mechanism underlying the bowel damage of Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. Clinical trials have shown that vedolizumab is effective and safe for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease and these data have led to the approval of vedolizumab. However, it remains unclear what therapeutic algorithm to use and which drug to choose as first-line option for patients with moderate-severe disease not responsive to conventional therapies.